Global public goods


In a joint statement following the 16th United States (U.S.) and the European Union (EU) Information Society Dialogue (ISD), held on 23 May 2019 in Washington D.C., both sides reaffrimed commitment to enhancing global security and prosperity. Commitment to counter the use of Internet for terrorist activities was stressed. It also emphasises the importance of ‘mutual coordination on digital matters in international fora such as the G7, G20, the International Telecommunications Union, WTO, and Internet Governance Forum’. Thirdly, it mentions concerns about the use of ICTs for repression and social control. Underscored as relevant were further development of the fifth generation Internet (5G), as well as addressing issues and threats related to its use. Participants exchanged updates on their cybersecurity policies, discussed the EU Cybersecurity Act implications, as well as how to improve the trans-Atlantic trade. It was agreed for the next ISD to be organised by the EU in 2020, in Brussels.​

In collaboration with McKinsey and Company, the World Economic Forum (WEF) has published the ‘Data Collaboration for the Common Good: Enabling Trust and Innovation Through Public-Private Partnerships’ report. It identifies ‘systemic lack of trust’ among stakeholders as one of the main obstacles to ensuring inclusion and resilience as the global economy moves through the fourth industrial revolution. Therefore, the reports sets out to provide a governance framework focused on building trust among stakeholders and achieving ‘impact for a shared digital future’. Data innovation, stakeholder alignment, and economic sustainability and scalability, are some of the main instruments mentioned in the report. They are seen as crucial for achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The report concludes that advancing the collaborative public-private data life cycle will enable faster decision-making during humanitarian crises, better insights of SDGs indicators and help solve global health and poverty challenges.​

Microsoft Europe has published the Five Ideas for Five Years outline, aimed at supporting a 'strong digital Europe'. While applauding the EU for innovation and responsible use of technologies, the outline sets out to advance the debate around technologies and challenges such as climate change, curing diseases and public safety. The second chapter, Artificial Intelligence and Ethics, focuses on ethical issues arising from the increased use of artificial intelligence and cloud computing across the European industries. Discrimination issues related to the use of facial recognition systems are noted as the main challenge currently. According to Microsoft, the European Union decision-making should ensure development of ethical AI, based on the 'common principles such as fairness, reliability, safety, privacy, security, and inclusiveness, and underscored through transparency and accountability'.​


After the Russian State Duma adopted the law on stable operation of the Runet, it has been approved by the Federation Council which is the upper chamber and signed by President Putin on 1 May. The law is set to take effect on 1 November 2019 and should ensure what Kremlin refers to as a ’sustainable, secure, and fully functioning' Russian Internet in case it is disconnected from the global infrastructure of the world wide web. Critics have warned that it will expand governmental control over the Internet and lead to censorship and surveillance over wide parts of the network. Russian officials first submitted the new measures in December 2018 as a response to the United States cyber strategy following the 2016 presidential elections.​

The Global Commission on the Stability of Cyberspace (GCSC) - created to develop proposals for norms and policies to enhance international security and stability - released a “Call to Protect the Public Core of the Internet” after its Delhi meeting (20-21 December). The declaration urges state and non-state actors to avoid activity that would intentionally and substantially damage the general availability or integrity of the “public core” of the Internet. It proposes the adoption of the following norm by all stakeholders: “Without prejudice to their rights and obligations, state and non-state actors should not conduct or knowingly allow activity that intentionally and substantially damages the general availability or integrity of the public core of the Internet, and therefore the stability of cyberspace”.

White House advisor Steve Bannon believes that essential tech platforms such as Facebook and Google should be regulated as utilities. Speaking anonymously to The Intercept, three sources close to Brannon said that the advisor believes that Facebook and Google have become a necessity in contemporary life. Regulating them as utilities would mean that they are more tightly regulated in what the platforms are able to do and which prices they are able to charge. The plan is akin to the FCC’s order that already regulates Internet service providers as utilities - an order which the Trump administration is seeking to reverse.

The concept of global public goods can be linked to many aspects of Internet governance. The most direct connections are found in areas of access to the Internet infrastructure, protection of knowledge developed through Internet interaction, protection of public technical standards, and access to online education. Global public goods, combined with initiatives such as creative commons, could provide solutions that would both protect the current Internet creative environment and preserve Internet-generated knowledge for future generations.

One of the key features of the Internet is that through worldwide interaction of users, new knowledge and information are produced. Considerable knowledge has been generated through exchanges on mailing lists and forums, social networks, and blogs. With the exception of creative commons, there is no mechanism to facilitate the legal use of such knowledge. Left in a legal uncertainty, it is made available for modification and commercialisation. This common pool of knowledge, an important basis of creativity, is at risk of being depleted. The more Internet content is commercialised, the less spontaneous exchanges may become. This could lead towards reduced creative interaction.



When it comes to the Internet infrastructure, this area is predominantly run by private companies. One of the challenges is the harmonisation of the private ownership of the Internet infrastructure with the status of the Internet as a global public good. National laws provide the possibility of private ownership being restricted by certain public requirements, including providing equal rights to all potential users and not interfering with the transported content.

With regard to standardisation, almost continuous efforts are made to replace public standards with private and proprietary ones. This was the case with Microsoft (through browsers and ASP) and Sun Microsystems (through Java). The Internet standards (mainly TCP/IP) are open and public. The Internet governance regime should ensure protection of the main Internet standards as global public goods.

The balance between private and public interests

One of the underlying challenges of the future development of the Internet is to strike a balance between private and public interests. The question is how to provide the private sector with a proper commercial environment while ensuring the development of the Internet as a global public good. In many cases it is not a zero-sum game but a win-win situation. Many other Web 2.0 companies have tried to develop business models which both provide income and enable the creative development of the Internet.

Protecting the Internet as a global public good

Some solutions can be developed based on existing economic and legal concepts. For example, economic theory has a well-developed concept public goods, which was extended at international level to global public goods. A public good has two critical properties: non-rivalrous consumption and non-excludability. The former stipulates that the consumption of one individual does not detract from that of another; the latter, that it is difficult, if not impossible, to exclude an individual from enjoying the good. Access to Web-based materials and many other Internet services fulfils both criteria.

Other legal notions

The notion of global public goods is one of several other notions that can be linked to the Internet or Internet-related aspects. One other notion is that of common heritage of mankind, a concept which was adopted by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). In recent months, Malta – the small island state which was behind the introduction and adoption of the concept within UNCLOS – has been arguing in favour of the applying the concept of Common Heritage of Mankind to the critical infrastructure of the Internet.

Another notion is that of a global public resource, which has recently also been promoted – through several initiatives – as a possible solution for the protection of the Internet and its critical infrastructure.




UNESCO facilitates


UNESCO facilitates global advocacy and discussions on freedom of expression and relevant issues including privacy at the WSIS and the Internet Governance Forum. It further explores freedom of expression online in-depth through its flagship publication of Internet Freedom. UNESCO also defines key indicators to help stakeholders assess the local situation. Media development indicators are an analytic tool designed to assess the state of the media and measure the impact of media development programmes. Internet Universality Indicators aims to build a framework of indicators through which to assess levels of achievement, in individual countries and internationally, on four fundamental principles:  human rights, openness, accessibility and multistakeholderism.


In 2005, the UN General Assembly adopted the


In 2005, the UN General Assembly adopted the UN Convention of the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts. The Convention (entered into force in 2013) is aimed at facilitating the use of e-communications in international trade, and it contains, among others, provisions on the signing of electronic communications or contracts. It outlines criteria for the recognition of electronic signatures (irrespective of the technology used): an electronic communication is considered signed if the signing method (i.e. electronic signature) is capable of identifying the signatory and indicating the signatory’s intention in respect of the information contained in the electronic communication.


DiploFoundation works to strengthen the meaningful participation of small and developing states and mar


DiploFoundation works to strengthen the meaningful participation of small and developing states and marginalised groups in global policy processes, by offering several online courses targeting members from these states. Topics covered by the courses include data diplomacy, Internet governance and digital policy, e-diplomacy, e-commerce, cybersecurity, Internet technology and policy, etc. Diplo also offers customised Internet governance capacity development programmes, targeted at specific regions or thematic needs; these include online learning, in addition to policy research and policy immersion. A Master/Postgraduate Diploma in Contemporary Diplomacy with an Internet governance specialisation is also part of Diplo’s online learning portfolio.


In its Delhi Declaration for a Just and Equitable Internet, adopted in 2014, the Just Net Coalition stresses that ‘the Internet is a key social medium, and, in crucial respects, a global commons’. As such, the Internet must be maintained as a public space, and governed in the public interest. Internet basic functionalities and services (e-mail, web search, etc.) must be available to all people as public goods.  The declaration also underlines that ‘recognising the global commons nature of the Internet, all layers of the Internet’s architecture must be designed with a view to safeguard against concentration of power and centralised control’.


The Internet Society approaches net neutrality largely from a user-centric perspective, and its work in this a


The Internet Society approaches net neutrality largely from a user-centric perspective, and its work in this area focuses, among others, on: allowing freedom of expression, supporting user choice, and preventing discrimination. It also collaborates with businesses to develop solutions on issues such as network traffic management, pricing, and business models. Net neutrality also falls within the scope of the Internet Society’s research and capacity development activities. The organisation has produced several policy papers and other publications touching on aspects such as open inter-networking and zero rating. Its policy brief tutorial on net neutrality provides an overview of the key considerations, challenges, and guiding principles of net neutrality.



Internet Governance Acronym Glossary (2015)
An Introduction to Internet Governance (2014)


Click on the ( + ) sign to expand each day.

WSIS Forum 2019

OECD Summit 2019

13th IGF 2018

WSIS Forum 2018

12th IGF 2017

IGF 2016

WSIS Forum 2016


IGF 2015


The GIP Digital Watch observatory is provided by



and members of the GIP Steering Committee


GIP Digital Watch is operated by

Scroll to Top