UNGA79: AI-powered insights and human-curated analysis

 People, Person, Crowd, Indoors, Architecture, Building, Classroom, Room, School, Audience, Lecture

UNGA79: AI-powered insights and human-curated analysis

New York, 24 – 30 September 2024

This year marks Diplo’s 8th consecutive year reporting from the UN General Assembly (UNGA), and we’re excited to share our most comprehensive coverage yet. Combining human expertise and AI-driven tools, we’re offering our readers unparalleled access to insights, analysis, and real-time information on every session and speaker at UNGA79.

On our dedicated 79th Session of the UN General Assembly (UNGA 79) webpage, you will find a comprehensive overview of the General Debate.

You can access the UNGA79 knowledge through two main channels: interact with an AI assistant or navigate a structured data organisation. 


The AI assistant

The AI assistant, powered by DiploAI models, is designed to offer you a deeper understanding of the General Debate. You’ll be able to explore a trove of information through a dynamic, conversation-based interface.

 Page, Text, File, Webpage

Expert analysis

Our team of experts produced daily updates focused on AI and digital issues—topics that are increasingly central to global governance.

 Page, Text

Beyond daily updates, our team has gone back and thoroughly reviewed all the materials from the event, carefully extracting and synthesising highlights on AI and digital issues. This additional layer of analysis zeroes in on the most significant developments in AI and technology policy, offering you an overview of what is shaping the conversation.


Session reports, knowledge graphs, event statistics and more

You can also get more structured access to the General Debate knowledge via delivering session reports that go beyond simple summaries. Our reports provide a nuanced AI analysis of each session, each report includes detailed sections on speakers involved, and our knowledge graphs offer a visual representation of the connections between topics and participants. Additionally, we outline follow-up questions to guide further discussion.

You can also navigate the complex web of discussions, topics, and speakers with our interactive knowledge graph of the event. Finally, our event statistics feature gives you insight into numbers that matter.

 Text, Business Card, Paper



Digital on Day 6 of UNGA79

1200 280 max 1

Digital on Day 6 of UNGA79: Digital transformation and equitable AI access

On the last day of the General Debate of the 79th Session of the UN General Assembly, key discussions focused on the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and its role in guiding digital transformation. Participants emphasised the importance of equitable access to technology, particularly AI, and the need for capacity development to bridge the digital divide. The conversations also highlighted the dual nature of AI, addressing its potential for economic growth alongside the risks it poses, including the misuse of technology in conflict and the spread of misinformation.


Global Digital Compact: Charting digital transformation

The proposed Pact for the Future, Kiribati noted, is a roadmap for strengthening global cooperation on key issues, one of which is digital transformation. Rwanda echoed the Pact’s importance for empowering nations to rebuild sustainably with a renewed focus on digital transformation. Djibouti welcomed the adoption of the GDC annexed to the Pact, acknowledging that we live in an era of disruptive technological advances. Kiribati expressed support for the GDC as it will help bridge the digital divide and ensure that Small Island Developing States (SIDS) like Kiribati are not left behind. Ecuador stressed the importance of implementing the GDC.


Development: Equitable access to AI

The statements highlighted critical challenges and opportunities related to equitable access to technologies, focusing on AI, as well as the need for capacity development and financial support to bridge the digital divide.

Burundi stressed the urgent need for universal, affordable access to the internet, including AI, particularly in developing regions such as Africa, where connectivity remains low. This gap exacerbates inequalities, denying many in the Global South vital social and economic opportunities. The UAE advocated for increased international investment in advanced technologies to facilitate sustainable development, while Sri Lanka emphasised the importance of establishing accessible digital public infrastructure to promote equitable digital transformation and called for enhanced capacity building and technical assistance.

The necessity of capacity development and technology transfer was echoed by Kiribati and Djibouti. Djibouti’s focus on education systems aims to equip its youth with advanced technological skills, further enhancing their competitive advantage.

The potential of AI and digital technologies to drive sustainable development is acknowledged by several nations. The UAE and Sri Lanka both stressed the transformative impact of these technologies on addressing global challenges, aiming for sustained growth through innovation. The President of the General Assembly summarised the pressing global challenges, including persistent poverty and technological inequalities, calling for an effective international financial architecture to support the realisation of the SDGs.


AI: Balancing innovation and risks in global security

Countries have addressed both the potential and the risks associated with digital technologies, particularly AI. Algeria expressed optimism about Africa’s economic development through advancements in AI, digitisation, and renewable energy. The UAE called for global collaboration to create a prosperous and stable future, emphasising the need to harness technological advancements to develop innovative solutions for businesses, daily life, and government services.

Conversely, Syria condemned the misuse of modern technologies as instruments of death and destruction. Sri Lanka highlighted the weaponisation of new domains like outer space and cyberspace, warning that AI challenges international humanitarian law in conflict situations. Similarly, Ireland called for prompt action to prevent an arms race in autonomous weapons and expressed its support for the Secretary-General’s call to conclude a treaty on autonomous weapons systems by the end of 2026.

Djibouti expressed gratitude to the USA for leading efforts that resulted in the unanimous adoption of the first-ever resolution by the General Assembly to promote safe, secure, and trustworthy AI systems.


Sociocultural: From misinformation to violence

Sociocultural issues were addressed only briefly. Sri Lanka cautioned that developments in the digital realm could create fertile ground for the spread of disinformation and hate speech, which may lead to violence.


This summary was generated by humans and provides a comprehensive overview of how digital issues were tackled during the last day of discussions, which took place on 29 September 2024.

For real-time updates, follow our live coverage on the Digital Watch Observatory’s dedicated page through DiploAI reports, written by our AI reporting tool.

Digital on Days 4 and 5 of UNGA79

1200 280 max 1

Digital on Days 4 and 5 of UNGA79: Accelerating GDC implementation and bridging the digital divide

On Days 4 and 5 of the General Debate, discussions unfolded around AI governance, cybersecurity threats, and the need for robust digital infrastructure. As nations confront the dual challenges of innovation and risk, calls emerge for fostering international collaboration and multilateral efforts to build a secure and inclusive digital environment. Central to this dialogue was the call for implementing frameworks like the Global Digital Compact (GDC).


Global digital governance: Swift GDC implementation and inclusive digital governance

Pakistan, Barbados, Tuvalu, Jamaica, Cameroon, Zambia and Tunisia welcomed the adoption of the GDC.

Andorra highlighted the GDC’s role in promoting digital literacy to ensure an inclusive and secure virtual environment, particularly for small states, where technology can offer high-value resources. Samoa underscored the GDC’s focus on creating a robust governance framework for digital technologies and the internet. The Lao PDR stressed the GDC’s aim to leverage technology to accelerate SDGs. Thailand also noted that steps must be taken to close the digital divide through the GDC. 

The Philippines, Samoa, and Tuvalu highlighted the urgency of implementing the GDC. The Philippines emphasised the need for rapid action to establish governance mechanisms for new spheres of human activity such as AI and the internet, stressing that these frameworks must prioritise human dignity amid rapid technological advancements. Samoa called for a coordinated, multi-layered approach, advocating for the involvement of UN bodies and development partners to adapt GDC principles to both national and global contexts. Tuvalu echoed the necessity for strong political will and unwavering commitment to implementing the GDC’s principles.

Global cooperation is important to ensure no one is left behind and to build a cyberspace that reflects global standards, San Marino stated. The GDC has set the goals to eliminate all obstacles and facilitate digital cooperation at the international level, Lao PDR noted.  

Multilateralism has a crucial role to play in creating opportunities and at the same time it must guarantee accessibility and security in this new virtual space of globalisation, Andorra underlined. 

The adoption of the Pact for the Future, the Declaration on Future Generations and the GDC signals renewed hope in multilateralism, Jamaica underlined. Together, these agreements chart a path toward cooperation that is responsive to the challenges of today and the needs of future generations, Somalia stated.

The statements from Russia, Belarus, and China express concerns about fairness, inclusivity, and equity in global governance, especially regarding technology and international cooperation. Russia criticised what it called an undermining of the ‘sovereign equality of member states’ in addressing issues such as IG and AI, and argued that these topics, impacting all of humanity, should be addressed through universal negotiations involving all UN member states. The country claimed that the Pact for the Future was formulated without a single plenary round of negotiations.

Meanwhile, Belarus emphasised that UN law is universal and guarantees equal rights for all states to access benefits, technologies, and resources without discrimination. China expressed support for countries opposing technology blockades and supply chain restrictions.


AI: Global cooperation for ethical AI development and security

Countries shared their concerns about AI’s potential risks and stressed the importance of global governance and collaboration to ensure its ethical and beneficial use.

Bangladesh expressed enthusiasm for the potential of AI, especially among its youth, but emphasised the need to ensure that countries like Bangladesh benefit from AI developments without being left behind. The country called for a balance between AI innovation and the protection of human labour, warning of the existential risks posed by autonomous intelligence. The Holy See emphasised the need for careful reflection on AI, which presents both exciting possibilities and risks, especially amid societal divides. China advocated for a people-centred approach, supporting global AI governance through international cooperation and capacity development.

South Korea and Singapore highlighted both the opportunities and risks AI presents to human rights and dignity. South Korea emphasised the need for new governance norms, pledging to lead global discussions on AI regulation. The Seoul Declaration for Safe, Innovative, and Inclusive AI and the Blueprint for Action for military AI use were key milestones in developing responsible frameworks for AI governance, South Korea said.

AI’s use in peace and security was also brought up by some states. Namely, Cameroon emphasised that despite global challenges to peace and development, advancements in science, technology, and AI offer significant opportunities. Collective responsibility and solidarity are essential to overcoming these challenges, which no nation can address on its own. At the same time, Israel stated that peace with Saudi Arabia could make the two countries cooperate in many fields, including AI.

Kazakhstan warned of AI’s risks in warfare, data privacy, and disinformation, calling for ethical standards and a UN-led AI office. Norway highlighted AI’s potential for good, tied to peace, development, and human rights. San Marino, Japan, and The Holy See voiced their concerns about AI’s impact on security particularly in relation to cyberattacks and nuclear risks. 

The Holy See urged all states to engage in comprehensive ethical reflection on emerging technologies, particularly in military use and called for a binding ethical and regulatory framework. It stresses the need for a moratorium on lethal autonomous weapons due to significant ethical and humanitarian concerns. Japan highlighted the challenges posed by emerging technologies, particularly for disarmament and non-proliferation, and stressed the importance of international rule-making on lethal autonomous weapons systems (LAWS) with a balanced approach considering humanitarian and security perspectives. Japan also emphasised the need to address digital technologies in global governance to protect human dignity. It advocated for international cooperation on AI governance, aiming to maximise AI’s benefits while mitigating risks, and committed to contributing to global discussions on safe and secure AI development through initiatives like the Hiroshima AI Process.


Cybersecurity: Countries call for international cooperation to tackle cyber threats

As nations grapple with the pervasive impact of cyber threats, leaders from diverse regions have voiced their concerns about the challenges their countries face on a national and international level. Jamaica highlighted that cybercrime not only undermines citizen security but is also a formidable barrier to sustained economic development. Montenegro echoed this worry, stating that cyber threats contribute to an alarming global situation.

San Marino warned that emerging technologies, particularly AI, and the possibility of cyberattacks have increased the risk of nuclear weapon use to levels not seen since the Cold War. This precariousness is starkly exemplified by Albania’s experience, with a large-scale cyberattack on its public service infrastructure, which it attributed to Iran. 

As global challenges mount, nations are increasingly focused on international cooperation to pave the way for a more resilient global response to these pressing challenges. 

Uganda called for eliminating or reducing the incidence of conflicts caused by factors such as new technologies. Similarly, Tunisia called for fighting the criminal and illegal use of digital technologies. Thailand expressed its dedication to partnering with others to prevent drug trafficking and transnational crimes enabled by digital technology. 

South Korea emphasised its commitment to addressing cyber threats while promoting a free and safe cyberspace that respects human rights. It actively participates in global efforts to establish comprehensive norms, such as the UN Convention against Cybercrime and works within the UN Security Council to enhance cybersecurity responses. Jamaica emphasised the necessity of international cooperation in addressing cybercrime, noting its active participation in negotiations on the UN Convention on Cybercrime alongside its CARICOM partners. Jamaica looks forward to the convention’s adoption, which it views as a crucial framework for future engagements aimed at combating cyber threats.

Montenegro expressed hope that the New Agenda for Peace would bolster multilateral capacities to confront various challenges, including cyber risks.


Development: Advancing SDGs through technology and capacity building

Development once again took centre stage, with numerous countries highlighting issues related to the SDGs, equitable access to technology, technology transfer, financial support, and capacity building, especially for youth and e-government initiatives.

Many countries reaffirmed their commitment to SDGs, seeing digital as a catalyst. San Marino noted the paramount role played by digital technologies in the achievement of the 17 SDGs. Slovenia connected digital solutions to climate resilience, while Azerbaijan proposed initiatives linking climate action and the SDGs. Thailand underscored closing the digital divide to achieve the SDGs through cooperation and technology transfer.

The digital divide was a prevalent issue across many nations, with Kazakhstan, Tanzania, Malaysia and Uganda, emphasising the need for equitable access to technology to drive development and close the digital divide. One way to narrow the digital divide is through reforms in the global financial and technology regimes, which was advocated by Pakistan and Tunisia. Australia stressed the necessity of accessible technology that benefits all without censorship or exclusion, while Guinea called for universal access to technological innovations while ensuring that ethics remain at the heart of their use.

Another way to bridge the digital gap is through digital literacy and capacity building. To this end, Andorra highlighted the need for digital literacy for an open, safe and inclusive digital future, which was echoed by Thailand. Lao PDR and Timor-Leste noted the importance of technology transfer and capacity building to support their development goals. Similarly, Grenada and Kazakhstan stressed the need to equip young people with digital skills for future opportunities, while Tanzania, Belize and Uganda advocated for vocational training as a pathway for youth empowerment, aiming to close the digital divide. Cambodia noted it would prioritise building its human capital to meet the demands of the digital age and invest more in capacity development.

Singapore announced the renewal of its capacity-building programme for the Forum of Small States (FSE), now called ‘FSE for Good.’ This initiative will include digital-themed programmes focusing on leadership and governance in the context of digital technologies and AI, while South Korea emphasised its commitment to empowering Africa’s youth to promote sustainable development through initiatives such as Tech4Africa. Speaking on behalf of small states, Samoa called for support for Small Island Developing States (SIDS) to include capacity building, technical assistance, and enhanced digital infrastructure.

Countries like Andorra and Jamaica illustrate the transformative potential of digital access. Andorra has made significant strides, with 90% of homes connected to the internet, leveraging this connectivity to enhance economic diversification and ensure digital rights for all citizens. Jamaica, through its national broadband network, has increased internet penetration significantly, aiming to provide better online government services. Japan highlighted the importance of a rural perspective by leveraging the advanced technology of both established companies and start-ups in rural areas.

On the issue of climate change, Croatia stressed the importance of harnessing innovation for environmental protection amid current crises, while Eswatini presented a comprehensive SDG Recovery and Acceleration Plan focused on digital transformation and renewable energy to combat climate impacts. Similarly, Slovenia highlighted the need for practical solutions, developing a digital system linked to the UN’s ‘Early Warning for All’ Initiative to predict floods and droughts. Lao PDR and Madagascar called for international support to access technology and innovation for green growth, while Grenada sought global partnerships to fund resilience projects and share lessons learned with other nations facing similar challenges. Tonga shared its focus on improving climate-resilient healthcare and education infrastructure in the Blue Pacific, noting the importance of digital platforms to mitigate risks. 

Finally, a number of countries shared their progress towards enhancing governance and digital services. Croatia outlined its vision for 2030 supported by digital transformation, while emphasising the need for effective institutions to manage the risks of emerging technologies. Albania highlighted its successful transition to good governance, achieving over 95% paperless public services, which has curbed corruption and increased trust in institutions.


Infrastructure: Closing the digital divide

The need for robust digital infrastructure has never been more critical. As Australia emphasised, comprehensive digital infrastructure is necessary to prevent countries from being left behind in the global digital economy. It is actively promoting sustainable connectivity in the South-South regions, particularly in the Pacific, by developing infrastructure projects like submarine cables.

Ethiopia and the Solomon Islands shared their national examples of boosting digital infrastructure. Ethiopia outlined its broader strategy for economic and digital development, noting that it is implementing transformative changes to advance its digital infrastructure. The Solomon Islands highlighted its partnership with China, which is leading the installation of 161 communication towers nationwide. This initiative is already connecting more rural populations to the digital age.


Economic: Bolstering e-governance for digital economy

Moldova and Cambodia highlight their respective efforts to bolster economic resilience and promote digital transformation. Moldova is advancing digital transformation by implementing e-governance to better connect with citizens and businesses. Cambodia is focused on enhancing public service efficiency, inclusivity and access through e-government, digital economy and society initiatives. A key step is the central bank’s launch of Bakong, a Blockchain-based digital payment system that promotes financial inclusion.


Human rights: Technology and healthcare

In discussions about human rights, AI emerged as a primary concern, along with the need to use technology to enhance national healthcare systems. The Philippines stressed that governance must keep pace with the rapid development of technologies like AI, the internet, and outer space, with human dignity as the top priority. India emphasised using technology to empower people, offering replicable models like digital public infrastructure and accessible healthcare, showcasing how technology can enhance governance and public services. Bangladesh reaffirmed its commitment to protecting fundamental rights, including freedom of speech, assembly, voting, and press freedom, extending these principles to the digital realm.


Legal: Advocating for ethical technology

The necessity for ethical and moral usage of technologies emerged as a key argument for the implementation of effective laws. Croatia emphasised the importance of upholding international humanitarian law, ending impunity, enhancing women’s leadership, and addressing the climate emergency, while advocating for the ethical and responsible use of new technologies. Iceland highlighted that technology is reshaping human experiences, often developing without adequate governance. It warned that this moral and legal vacuum allows powerful algorithms to manipulate public attention and beliefs, potentially undermining peace, human rights, and the equality of nations.


Sociocultural: Addressing misinformation and building trust in digital services

The pressing issues of misinformation and trust in digital services were sociocultural topics discussed on days four and five. Barbados expressed concern over the impact of misinformation and digital chaos, highlighting the unsettling scenes of war and famine that emerge in a digitally connected world. Tunisia echoed this sentiment, calling for efforts to combat misinformation and the misuse of digital technologies that destabilise communities. 

India emphasised the importance of ensuring trusted digital services and promoting an open-source culture to democratise global production and build resilient supply chains, thereby fostering widespread prosperity.


This summary was generated by humans and provides a comprehensive overview of how digital issues were tackled during the fourth and fifth day of discussions, which took place on 27 and 28 September 2024.

For real-time updates, follow our live coverage on the Digital Watch Observatory’s dedicated page through DiploAI reports, written by our AI reporting tool.

DW Weekly #179 – 27 September 2024

 Page, Text

Dear readers, 

The ‘Pact for the Future’, adopted at the Summit of the Future on 22 September 2024, emerges as a declaration of intent to leap from the past into an uncertain, but ambitious, tomorrow. The Pact, presented before an audience of world leaders and civil society representatives, encapsulates a roadmap and a lighthouse – navigating the challenges of climate, digital transformation, and peace while aiming to build structures agile enough for the unpredictable rhythms of modernity. It is a global handshake between generations: a promise that the wisdom of the past will not stagnate progress but rather infuse it with urgency. In the words of the UN Secretary-General: ‘We cannot create a future fit for our grandchildren with a system built by our grandparents’, we can hear a sentiment that underpins the thematic core of the Pact.

The ink on the Pact for the Future was barely dry when the first repercussions could be felt, especially within the UN General Assembly’s 79th session chambers. With climate change blazing on one side and the promise of digital revolution flickering on the other, world leaders convened during the high-level week to reassert their commitment to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). What unfolded was a kaleidoscope of voices, discussions, and pledges that sought to breathe life into what had often been seen as lofty, distant goals. The pace was fast, yet the ambition seemed to echo slower truths – the earth’s fevered rise in temperature, persistent inequality, and the widening gaps in access to digital infrastructure.

 Advertisement, People, Person, Poster, Crowd, Bow, Weapon, Text

While the Summit of the Future carved out new space for discussions on the use and governance of AI and digital inclusion, the UNGA79 focused on ensuring these discussions weren’t mere fleeting abstractions. Anchored in the Pact, the Global Digital Compact took centre stage, drawing sharp lines around data governance issues, internet access, and AI oversight. These initiatives were a nod to the ever-growing digital divide, where the future of democracy and human rights may just be shaped by the bits and bytes of cyberspace as much as by the ballots cast at polls. Global leaders, it seemed, were not just pledging to keep everyone connected – they were promising to keep everyone protected in an increasingly tricky online world. A bold promise indeed, in a time when the pace of technological change far outstrips the speed at which governance frameworks are formed.

Then came the delicate dance of peace and security, where old enemies and new technologies collided on the agenda. Discussions surrounding the reform of the UN Security Council – arguably one of the most progressive since the Mid-20th century – were matched with fresh commitments to nuclear disarmament and the governance of outer space. No longer the stuff of science fiction, space and AI were recognised as the new frontiers of conflict and cooperation. Yet Africa’s under-representation on the global stage may prove to be the most seismic of shifts. If the Pact’s promise to redress this historical imbalance holds, it could alter the very architecture of global governance in ways not seen since the decolonisation waves of the mid-1900s.

Through it all, the resonance of the future generations loomed large. For the first time, a formal Declaration on Future Generations was signed, reminding current leaders that their decisions – or indecisions – would shape the lives of the not yet born. A future envoy, empowered youth, and re-energised civil society seem to echo a deeper undercurrent: that this Pact, this Summit, and the UNGA79 may not be remembered for its words alone, but for the actions that will (or won’t) follow in its wake.

If you want to take part in decoding disinformation and attending lessons from case studies, you can participate in the event ‘Decoding disinformation: Lessons from case studies’, which will take place online on 30 September from 13:00-14:00 UTC and 14:00-15:00 CEST. You will have the opportunity to study real cases on the matter from the expert panel who will host the session: Jovan Kurbalija, Shita Laksmi, Marília Maciel, Ana Revenco, and Cathleen Berger—other events in our ‘Upcoming’ section.

Marko and the Digital Watch team


Highlights from the week of 20-27 September 2024

X has begun to comply with orders for content removal to meet the court’s requirements.

flag of ukraine

Telegram’s founder denies sharing user data but Ukrainian officials stress the need for national security.

Pavel Durov

The policy shift follows the arrest of CEO Pavel Durov in France, where he faces charges related to child sexual abuse materials on the app.

most popular social media icons black cubes scaled 1

Politicians have also been criticised for using misinformation for political gain, undermining trust in reliable information and democratic institutions.

flag of the united nations

The initiative signifies an unwavering commitment to an international system capable of addressing contemporary challenges and shaping a sustainable, equitable future.

goldman sachs logo investments banking artificial intelligence

Goldman Sachs analysts predict that gold could reach $2,700 per ounce by early 2025.

Meta

Deputy Commissioner Graham Doyle underscored that storing passwords without encryption is widely unacceptable due to potential abuse.

5cCVPZJQ UNDP 2

The alliance focuses on promoting innovation and inclusivity within the digital realm, enhancing infrastructure and connectivity in developing regions, and advocating for robust digital governance.

openai logo

The company plans to restructure into a for-profit benefit corporation, potentially leading to a $150 billion valuation.

Screenshot 2023 08 01 142134 1024x575 1

The ban followed Musk’s resistance, which he framed as a fight against ‘censorship.’



Reading corner

Diplo BLOGS24 Insta Aldo Mateucci 25
www.diplomacy.edu

Diplomatic extraterritoriality isn’t absolute, but a tool shaped by political necessity. Examples from historic ambassadors to Assange show how its application is influenced by power dynamics. Aldo Matteucci analyses.


Upcoming

0AGWppgs DIPLO NEWS 500
www.diplomacy.edu

Celebrating 500 issues of DiploNews! Join us on 30 September at 11:00 CEST [9:00 UTC] for a special retrospective event celebrating 25 years of Diplo’s pioneering digital diplomacy research.

Diplo INSTA GIZ Decoding
www.diplomacy.edu

Decoding disinformation: Lessons from case studies on 30 September 13:00-14:00 UTC I 14:00-15:00 CEST, online

1NHX8bPa Tech Diplomacy publication
www.diplomacy.edu

Tech Diplomacy: Actors, Trends, and Controversies | Book launch on 1 October 2024, at 12:00 UTC | 14:00 CEST

Digital on Day 3 of UNGA79

1200 280 max 1

Digital on Day 3 of UNGA79: Addressing AI, misinformation, and the need for global cooperation

On Day 3 of the UN General Assembly, discussions surrounded the challenges of rapid technological advancements and their sociocultural implications. A significant focus was placed on governing AI, misinformation, and disinformation, with several countries addressing their detrimental impact on democratic stability. Greece emerged as a prominent voice, dedicating a substantial portion of its statement to the importance of digital governance and regulation, particularly in the context of AI. The debate emphasised the need for international cooperation to address these pressing issues and ensure that technological progress benefits all nations equitably.


Global digital governance: Competition and cooperation

The world is undergoing a turbulent transformation marked by significant geopolitical, economic, scientific, and technological shifts –  we are witnessing an unprecedented technological revolution in a short timeframe, North Macedonia and Mauritius underlined. As economies, demographics, technologies, and societies evolve, each generation of decision-makers faces new challenges, New Zealand highlighted.

UN member states compete, cooperate and conflict, but the area of new technologies, particularly in the era of AI, is skewed against the Global South, Malawi warned. Regulatory frameworks are being developed that favour certain nations over others, and there is a need to establish not only a rules-based system but also equitable rules that promote fair competition. This requires stronger governance institutions to ensure fair access to education, markets, technology, financing, and natural resources. Malawi emphasised that robust governance within the UN is crucial to equitably regulating international collaboration and competition.

However, many countries have spoken about the importance of digital cooperation. The Central African Republic noted that it is high time to accelerate the implementation of the SDGs in digital cooperation. Multiple delegations have expressed strong support for the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the Pact for the Future, both adopted at the Summit of the Future. 

Peru and the Central African Republic welcomed the adoption of the GDC, while Côte d’Ivoire welcomed the GDC as a means to better harness technological progress for all. 

Sweden, one of the co-facilitators of the compact, reminded that through the GDC, member states have committed to strengthening international cooperation to close digital divides between and within countries and to establish the governance required for a sustainable digital future, including AI. Costa Rica noted that the GDC puts the multilateral system in motion to address AI and is key for AI research and development. Portugal highlighted that the GDC can balance opportunities and risks of new technologies, such as AI. While New Zealand underlined that member states must demonstrate their determination to implement the GDC for the well-being of present and future generations, Greece stressed that for the GDC to have effect, states need to put the regulation and application of AI on a global footing.


AI: Global cooperation for effective AI governance

Several countries voiced their concerns and aspirations regarding the governance and impact of AI and the need for international cooperation. Namely, Comoros called for international cooperation to establish guidelines ensuring that AI development promotes global productivity and knowledge, ensuring equitable use and benefits for all. Mauritius emphasised that AI governance must be grounded in international law to ensure humanity benefits from its transformative power.

Côte d’Ivoire highlighted the technological revolution, for which many nations are unprepared. AI holds great promise but also poses risks, particularly due to the absence of international regulations governing its use. Unchecked AI could lead to widespread abuse and unintended consequences. Austria discussed broader existential issues, emphasising that humanity faces pressing challenges like climate change and AI’s rising influence.

Greece praised AI’s transformative potential, likening its impact to past technological milestones such as electricity and the internet, and stressed that AI could revolutionise science, medicine, and public services. Greece endorsed the ‘Governing AI for Humanity’ report by the UN’s High-Level Advisory Body on AI, emphasising its potential to create a flexible global AI governance framework. They highlighted the need for global regulation, possibly through a COP-style approach involving countries and tech companies, to manage AI’s benefits and risks. Greece also warned of the risks, such as AI being used for harm, including creating deepfakes and misinformation, and Peru stressed that such risks can destabilise democracies by manipulating public opinion.

The UK underscored the military applications of AI and raised concerns about the deployment of such technologies without agreed rules, advocating for clearer regulations in the cybersecurity and defence sectors. Costa Rica urged the creation of governance frameworks for AI for both civilian and military use. These frameworks must regulate autonomous systems, with the Global Digital Compact offering a multilateral platform to address AI research, development, and its applications.


Legal: Ethical data governance

The need for ethical governance of technological development, particularly AI and data, to prevent misuse, manipulation, and domination was among the main arguments. Namely, Portugal emphasised that technological development must be human-centred and guided by international law to ensure ethical progress. To ensure AI’s ethical progress, Comoros stressed the need for international cooperation.

The EU warned about the dangers of reducing individuals to data that can be manipulated and surveilled. While AI and digital innovation are drivers of progress and prosperity, the EU stressed that they must be used for the benefit of humanity and freedom. It highlighted the misuse of personal data, comparing it to past errors with natural resources, and called for a global regulatory framework to prevent AI and data from becoming tools of domination or conflict.


Cybersecurity: Grappling with rapid technological advances and protecting children online

Rapid technological advancements offer new opportunities but are progressing faster than our ability to manage them, Kenya and Haiti underlined. We are facing cyber threats we couldn’t have imagined years ago, the Netherlands underlined.

Kuwait warned that technological innovations, particularly AI and social media, are increasingly being used for incitement, terrorist recruitment, and spreading hate speech and disinformation, which exacerbates cybersecurity risks. 

The rapid proliferation of advanced technologies introduces complex new challenges for arms control and international regulations, as Kenya noted. Haiti also expressed the concern that the acceleration of AI development is undermining the stability of democracies worldwide.

More and more countries are developing offensive cyber programmes, which pose a growing threat to our critical infrastructure, our security, our earning capacity and our intellectual property, the Netherlands stated. Kenya also warned that cybersecurity breaches and sophisticated cyberattacks on critical infrastructure increasingly threaten national security and global stability, Kenya noted. Haiti echoed these concerns, noting that the proliferation of cyber attacks endangers the stability of democracies, while Lesotho highlighted cybercrime in particular as one of the obstacles towards sustainable peace.

Palau believes that joining INTERPOL and strengthening its cyber defence systems have improved its ability to safeguard national security. The Netherlands highlights progress made through the UN Pact for the Future, which has addressed critical areas like cybersecurity.

The issue of child safety online was brought up by Greece. The country drew a parallel between the prolonged struggle to mandate car seat belts and the current lack of regulation on children’s use of digital and social media platforms despite growing evidence of harm. Children are increasingly exposed to content that fosters loneliness, unrealistic beauty standards, and extremist ideologies, while online bullying and social media addiction are reshaping their development. Social media algorithms are constantly improved by AI to keep children online despite proof that heavy use of social media is linked to depression, feelings of isolation, sleep deprivation and addiction. Greece emphasised the urgency of action and commended Australia’s efforts to introduce age limits and enforceable age verification technologies to protect children from these negative impacts.


Development: Bridging gaps and harnessing technology for inclusive growth

In the area of development, several key issues were highlighted regarding affordable financing, financial inclusion, and the role of technology in achieving the SDGs. Kenya emphasised the need for affordable financing alongside transformative policies such as fair trade practices, market access, inclusive international tax cooperation, technology transfer, and capacity building. This aligns with the calls from Gambia and CAR for efforts to bridge the digital divide and enhance technology transfer to support development. The call for technology transfer was echoed by Nepal, stressing the need to harness advancements to avoid falling further behind.

Fiji noted that while technology has increased our connectivity, it has also widened the gaps between the rich and poor, as well as between developed and developing nations. The issue of digital connectivity was further underscored by Haiti’s concern that nearly 2.7 billion people still lack internet access, highlighting the urgency for support to overcome this challenge and enable participation in the global economy. North Macedonia raised questions about achieving social justice amidst increasing economic, educational, gender, and digital disparities, pointing to a growing divide between winners and losers in a globalised, digitalised world. Similarly, Côte d’Ivoire cautioned against allowing AI and other technologies to exacerbate inequalities, advocating for a technological revolution that benefits everyone.

Equatorial Guinea noted that African economies could significantly contribute to global supply chains by leveraging their vast resources and growing consumer markets, thereby necessitating targeted support for development. Portugal reiterated the importance of inclusivity in the 2030 Agenda, emphasising that no one should be left behind. Focusing on the positive impact of digital technology on development, the EU emphasised that technological competition must take place within a framework of fair competition to ensure equitable outcomes. Sweden added that the digital transition can drive new growth and improve livelihoods, further underscoring the importance of inclusivity.


Human rights: Human-centred laws for ethical technological development

Some countries stated that the common denominator for effective technological development was the need for clear regulatory frameworks that respect human rights. Portugal emphasised that technological development must be human-centred and grounded in international law. The EU warned against repeating past mistakes, stressing the importance of responsibly handling personal data, unlike the misuse of natural resources. Peru raised concerns about tech companies storing vast amounts of personal data, highlighting privacy risks and potential government mass surveillance.. 


Sociocultural: The impact of mis-/disinformation on democratic stability 

The vast majority of statements tackling sociocultural themes focus on the critical issues of mis-/disinformation and their impact on the stability of democracies. To this end, Kenya noted that misinformation and manipulation, facilitated by social media, undermine public trust and the integrity of democratic processes. Similarly, Haiti expressed concern that the proliferation of disinformation threatens democratic stability globally.

Kuwait pointed out that technological innovations, including AI and social media, are increasingly used for incitement, terrorist recruitment, and spreading hate speech and falsehoods. This issue disproportionately affects young people, highlighting the need for international cooperation to combat these negative practices. Peru added that the spread of misinformation and hate speech particularly affects women.

Germany emphasised that navigating the conflicting values of the Charter, especially balancing the right to self-defence with the duty to protect civilians, is increasingly challenging in today’s social media environment, where oversimplified narratives obscure complexity, nuance and sometimes even facts.

Another sociocultural topic was e-governance, mentioned by Iraq, which emphasised its importance as one of the strategies to promote good governance and reduce corruption.

This summary was generated by humans and provides a comprehensive overview of how digital issues were tackled during the third day of discussions, which took place on 26 September 2024.

For real-time updates, follow our live coverage on the Digital Watch Observatory’s dedicated page through DiploAI reports, written by our AI reporting tool.

Digital on Day 2 of UNGA79

1200 280 max 1

Digital on Day 2 of UNGA79: Spotlight on digital governance and development challenges

On Day 2 of the UN General Assembly, discussions remained focused on the pressing issues of digital global governance and the implications of digital technologies. However, AI received notably less attention than on the previous day. As in the previous day, discussions were predominantly centred on development, with digital technologies highlighted as crucial drivers for achieving sustainable development goals (SDGs). However, concerns about foreign interference and disinformation threatening democracy were echoed by several nations, alongside discussions on the transformative potential of technology in governance and the risks of misuse in the digital age.


Global digital governance: The need for digital cooperation

The recently adopted Global Digital Compact (GDC) received scant attention on Day 2:Only France, Mongolia and Congo made reference to the compact. 

France welcomed the work done and coordinated by the Secretary-General and the GDC. Mongolia acknowledged the rapid evolution of global interdependence due to technological progress and digital advancements. and highlighted the GDC as a crucial and timely initiative. Congo deemed it an essential pillar for a prosperous future, emphasising its central role in the Fourth Industrial Revolution, where digital technologies are now indispensable.

Bulgaria emphasises the necessity for effective digital governance systems that adopt a multistakeholder and inclusive approach, aiming for a human-centric digital transformation and a safe and open digital future. Zimbabwe called for the establishment of a global digital governance framework to mitigate the adverse effects of transformative technologies while maximising their benefits.

Slovakia advocates for increased attention to the technological and digital dimensions of life within UN discussions, arguing that these aspects are now as vital as physical identities. Slovakia proposed that regional actors should take charge of regulation, while the UN should leverage new technologies to level differences and promote gender equality. Zimbabwe expressed its commitment to actively participate in international discussions and negotiations aimed at fostering global cooperation.


Development: Digital tech as catalyst for SDGs

Development emerged once again as the most prominent digital issue on national agendas, with digital technologies serving as key catalysts for achieving the SDGs. Mongolia noted its alignment with the SDGs through initiatives like ‘Billion Trees’ and ‘Digital Mongolia,’ while Ghana highlighted how digitalisation significantly improved citizens’ lives and laid the groundwork for sustainable economic growth.

Romania emphasised that the digital transition offers a unique opportunity to meet the SDGs by 2030, particularly for least developed countries, but stressed that global reforms and adequate financing are essential to bridge the digital gap. Similarly, Finland warned that without tangible results to address climate challenges and the dual nature of technology, the world risks straying from the SDGs.

The digital divide remains a critical challenge. Small nations like Suriname stressed the need for support in digital transformation, highlighting financial inclusion, access to education, and government services. Slovakia called for a more equitable distribution of technological advancements to promote social progress and gender equality. Togo reported its commitment to inclusive development by addressing the digital divide, ensuring that all populations can benefit from technological innovations. Bolivia underscored the necessity of equitable global governance in technology deployment to ensure advancements serve the well-being of all and do not exacerbate existing inequalities.

Financial inclusion is vital for supporting digitalisation and fostering economic resilience. Uzbekistan noted that achieving the SDGs requires attracting investments and advanced technologies, advocating for access to technology as a fundamental right. The call for increased financial resources resonated across nations, emphasising that without adequate funding, the benefits of digitalisation cannot be fully realised.


Sociocultural: Defending societies and transforming public services

New technologies change the ways we interact, Bolivia noted. However, as Czechia warned, foreign interference and disinformation continue to present a challenge with a serious impact on democracy, security and the rules-based international order. Romania echoed these concerns, identifying disinformation, policy misuse and other hybrid tools as central challenges to national security, 

Czechia also stressed that global tech companies must play an active role in defending democratic resilience.

As Romania stressed, in the digital transition, technology is a global amplifier of trends and can contribute to more effective and accessible public services. Ghana noted that it has embraced the Fourth Industrial Revolution in full, revolutionising public service delivery by integrating technology into governance. The country highlighted two national examples: the introduction of the Ghana Card, which has streamlined identification and access to services, and the digitisation of the country’s land registry.

Zimbabwe also acknowledged the transformative power of ICT but warned against its misuse to commit crimes and destabilise societies.


AI: Supporting global coordination

Mongolia and Uzbekistan emphasised challenges from the uncontrolled use of AI and supported UN resolutions promoting safe AI use for sustainable development and stronger international cooperation. France stressed the urgency of coordinating global efforts on AI, aiming to foster innovation while ensuring it benefits all nations and does not exacerbate inequality. The development of AI should occur within a robust ethical and democratic framework, crafted by the global community rather than being dictated by a small number of private entities at the forefront of technological advancements, the country stressed. France also highlighted plans to host an AI Action Summit in February 2025 to advance this vision.


Cybersecurity: Collective efforts urged

Mongolia noted that non-traditional threats such as cybercrime gained increasing attention in the early years of the 21st century. Czechia also highlighted the escalating severity of cyber threats, emphasising that attacks on hospitals, media, and national infrastructure endanger democratic systems globally. 

Mongolia urged nations to strengthen collective efforts to combat cybercrime, while Cyprus noted that collective action is needed to address the changing nature of conflicts, including challenges from new technologies. Czechia advocated for adhering to an international framework of responsible state behaviour in cyberspace and committed to strengthening cyber resilience.

Czechia pledged continued support for partners in Africa, Asia, and South America to bolster collective cybersecurity efforts and protect citizens worldwide.


Human rights: Countering hate speech

The impact of emerging technologies on human rights and the use of social media to spread hate speech and incite terrorism were some of the issues addressed by the delegations. 

Czechia emphasised the need to protect human rights amid the rapid development of emerging technologies, such as AI, autonomous systems, biotech, and quantum computing. Czechia stressed that these innovations must align with ethical and human rights standards. It also highlighted a resolution, co-submitted with Mexico, the Maldives, the Netherlands, and South Africa on human rights in the context of digital technologies. 

Venezuela condemned the use of hate speech, especially through social media, to incite terrorism and fabricate psychological wars aimed at exploiting feelings of hatred and destruction. 


Infrastructure: Developing African connectivity

Issues around connectivity were the least represented in yesterday’s discussions on digital. That said, the Democratic Republic of the Congo highlighted its goal to attract investment for developing African connectivity. The country called for multilateral cooperation and knowledge transfer, emphasising that grid development and the Grant Inga hydroelectric project are vital for linking regions and meeting rising energy demands from connected devices.

This summary was generated by humans and provides a comprehensive overview of how digital issues were tackled during the second day’s discussions, which took place on 25 September 2024.

For real-time updates, follow our live coverage on the Digital Watch Observatory’s dedicated page through DiploAI reports, written by our AI reporting tool.

Digital on Day 1 of UNGA79

1200 280 max 1

Digital on Day 1 of UNGA79: UN debates AI’s role amid urgent calls for responsible digital governance

Welcome to the first daily report from the General Debate of the 79th Session of the UN General Assembly, where global leaders converge to address pressing issues impacting humanity. This year’s discussions are particularly timely, as the world grapples with rapid technological advancements and their implications for society. Central to these debates is the topic of AI, which has been identified by Secretary-General António Guterres as an existential threat alongside the climate crisis. 

As nations share their perspectives, the emphasis on responsible governance and collective action resonates throughout the debate, highlighting the urgent need for frameworks that ensure emerging technologies are harnessed for the common good.


Setting the stage: AI as a central focus in the UN

The tone for each General Debate is set by the Secretary-General of the UN, and the current Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, has long had digital technologies – and AI in particular – in mind and on the agenda.

He once again dedicated a substantial portion of his speech to AI, identifying it as an existential threat alongside the climate crisis. He raised critical questions about AI’s future impact on freedom, sustainability, and information integrity, warning that a few companies currently hold significant power over its development without adequate oversight. Without a global management framework, AI risks creating deep divisions and a ‘Great Fracture’ with separate internets and economies.

The UN is uniquely positioned to facilitate dialogue and cooperation on AI based on international law and values. Guterres welcomed initial steps such as the Global Digital Compact and General Assembly resolutions as foundational for inclusive AI governance, urging collective action to ensure AI serves as a force for good.

Other countries followed suit. While the opportunities presented by AI have been acknowledged, national statements echoed a strong sense of urgency and collective responsibility, emphasising the critical need for responsible governance of artificial intelligence amid its rapid advancement and potential risks.

Brazil highlighted the dangers of knowledge oligopolies, advocating for an inclusive AI that promotes cultural diversity, human rights, and peace and called for global governance that includes all states. This was echoed by Colombia, which warned against a global oligarchy and urged the necessity of controlling AI through public power. Vietnam and Monaco also called for the establishment of global governance frameworks to maximise the benefits of emerging technologies while safeguarding against their misuse. 

The USA pointed to the dual nature of AI, along with Latvia, acknowledging its potential for scientific progress while also warning of profound risks, including misinformation and deepening inequalities. ‘AI must grow responsible to our collective needs and values’, the USA noted, urging the importance of ensuring that AI supports, rather than undermines, the core principles of humanity.


Development: A call for equal AI access

As in previous UN General Assembly debates, development was the most prominently discussed digital issue. Countries once again called for bridging the digital divide, with an increasing emphasis on ensuring equal access to AI.

To this end, Türkiye advocated for equal access to breakthroughs like AI, exemplified by hosting the UN Technology Bank for Least-Developed Countries to bridge gaps in access. The Maldives emphasised that a robust ICT infrastructure and education are vital for a digital future. By expanding AI access in essential services such as healthcare and education, they aim to empower the next generation with the necessary skills for a competitive global economy. Similarly, Paraguay emphasised that technology, alongside education, is crucial for development and social inclusion, and called for innovative regulatory frameworks, such as sandboxes and co-regulation, to ensure their responsible use and equitable application.

Speaking on the same issue, Chile warned that AI often perpetuates existing biases, raising concerns about whether we can trust technologies regulated solely by large companies. To protect the most vulnerable, the international community must demand greater transparency through traceable algorithms and data audits. 

Qatar and Sierra Leone expressed their commitment to fostering global governance aligned with the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Qatar endorsed the Pact for the Future to ensure coordinated efforts toward climate resilience and energy transition, while Sierra Leone pledged support to the Global Digital Compact (GDC), focusing on safe and trustworthy technologies to transform critical sectors like agriculture and infrastructure.

Moving to Central Asia, Tajikistan shared it was implementing a national strategy for digitalisation and proposed a UN resolution to highlight AI’s role in creating socioeconomic opportunities. Kyrgyzstan noted that it integrated the SDGs into its National Development Strategy, stressing the need for modern technology transfer to enable less developed countries to foster independent growth.

Vietnam called for equitable resource allocation, advocating targeted support for developing nations through technology transfer and investment facilitation. Poland highlighted the challenges to achieving the SDGs, underscoring the need for renewed commitment.

On climate change, Nauru urged developed nations to acknowledge their historical responsibility and fulfil commitments under the Paris Agreement by providing climate finance and technology transfer. Paraguay shared its approach towards building a green economy by leveraging its abundant natural resources and human capital. 


Sociocultural: Dis- and misinformation on the rise

In an era where information flows faster than ever before, dis- and misinformation and hate speech are reshaping our world in dramatic and often dangerous ways. Switzerland, Nigeria, Estonia and Latvia acknowledged these issues in their speeches. 

Switzerland expressed concern over the rise in disinformation, stating that private and state actors use it to deepen polarisation, sow discord and destabilise states. Nigeria also highlighted the harmful effects of unfiltered hate speech and fake news across social media, impacting both rich and poor nations alike.

However, as Nigeria noted, there is much more that we could and should do, together, to strengthen those guard rails that will help release the most progressive elements of the new technologies shaping our world.

Some solutions were proposed: Switzerland emphasised that debunking illegitimate influence, fostering open debate, and providing transparent information are key to addressing disinformation, while Latvia highlighted building resilience against disinformation and promoting media literacy. Estonia highlighted the importance of developing critical thinking and ensuring global access to education, stressing that UN resolutions must consider the new mechanisms used to undermine international peace and security.


Cybersecurity: Combatting cybercrime and cyberterrorism

Traditionally one of the most talked about topics, cybersecurity was not prominent on Day 1: Only two countries, Türkiye and Tajikistan made reference to cybersecurity issues. Tajikistan emphasised the need for the international community to collaborate effectively to combat cybercrime, while Türkiye highlighted the cyberterror attacks in Lebanon as an example of how deadly technologies can be when used as weapons.


Other issues

Nigeria stressed the importance of working towards common global standards to regulate cryptocurrency trading platforms, to provide confidence in these new markets and to limit the potential for instability. The country noted that in its own case, the trading of crypto-currency helped fuel speculation and undermined macroeconomic reforms. 

Nigeria also underlined that new technologies, when not properly regulated, can facilitate organised crime, violent extremism and human trafficking.

However, as Estonia noted, positive changes are possible: The country highlighted their digital, cyber-secure society where citizens feel that they themselves are the state. Freedom combined with proper technology and an innovation-oriented mindset are the best tools for finding long-term solutions, Estonia concluded.


This summary was generated by humans and provides a comprehensive overview of how digital issues were tackled during the first day’s discussions, which took place on 24 September 2024.

For real-time updates, follow our live coverage on the Digital Watch Observatory’s dedicated page through DiploAI reports, written by our AI reporting tool.

X-Ray of the Summit of the Future: themes, trends, and controversies

New York, 20 – 23 September 2024

This year, Diplo had the privilege of reporting from the Summit of the Future and Action Days, bringing you in-depth insights from the heart of these important discussions. Our team of experts, alongside DiploAI, closely analysed the statements and debates shaping the future of global governance.

On our dedicated Summit of the Future page, you will find a comprehensive overview, including detailed analysis, statistics, transcripts, and much more. This resource offers an unparalleled ‘x-ray’ into the critical debates and forward-looking ideas addressed at the Summit.

You have two main ways to access Summit’s knowledge: via interacting with an AI assistant or through navigating a structured organisation of data. 

The AI assistant


The AI assistant is built around DiploAI models and all debates at the Summit.

 Page, Text, File

Expert analysis

You can consult an expert analysis of AI and digital issues covered at the Summit of the Future.

 Page, Text, Advertisement, Poster

Session reports, speakers, main arguments

You can also get more structured access to the Summit knowledge via sessions, speakers, and main arguments…

 Page, Text, File, Webpage


DW Weekly #178 – 20 September 2024

 Page, Text

Dear readers,

Judging by a digital landscape where content governance is essential to navigating truth, lies, and influence, Meta’s recent decision to ban several Russian state media outlets represents more than a mere policy shift. It is a stark reminder of the tug of war in cyberspace between global superpowers, where platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp serve as modern battlefields. In other words, Meta’s enforcement against RT (Russia Today) and Rossiya Segodnya for covert influence operations underscores the West’s alleged growing unease with the East’s manipulation of online discourse.

Either way, the ban was not born in a vacuum. It follows allegations of Russian interference in the 2024 US elections, with charges against RT employees for money laundering related to influencing operations. These tactics, allegedly meant to shape the outcome of an election pivotal to global geopolitics, bring to light the intersection of data governance and cybersecurity. Once seen as neutral spaces, social media platforms have become fertile grounds for state actors to sow seeds of discord, all under the guise of free speech.

However, the battle does not end with one company’s sweeping policy. Cybercrime and cyberwarfare have evolved into more than just hacking attacks or espionage. They have grown into elaborate strategies to distort information, erode trust in institutions, and sway public opinion. The West, particularly the USA, has grown increasingly wary of Russia’s digital manoeuvres, framing them not as isolated acts of misinformation but as an orchestrated form of warfare. By banning Russian state media, Meta is sending a clear message: covert operations disguised as journalism will no longer be tolerated. Yet, this development is just one part of the broader puzzle of content regulation as global platforms grapple with defining the fine line between censorship and protection.

The implications of such decisions ripple far beyond the USA. As Meta extends its ban across all its apps, from Instagram to WhatsApp, it confronts an international community of users who may not see RT and Rossiya Segodnya as mere puppets of state propaganda. In many parts of the world, these outlets are viewed as alternative news sources, offering a counter-narrative to the Western media. 

The complex dance between freedom of expression and security measures now leaves platforms in the tricky position of balancing competing values on the global stage. Meta’s anticipation that Russian state media will attempt to evade the ban points to the ongoing cat-and-mouse game between tech companies and malign actors, all posing the same question: who controls the cyberspace narrative in a world where likes, shares, and comments are currency?

In other news, the UN advisory body released its final report, ‘Governing AI for Humanity,’ outlining seven strategic recommendations for responsible AI governance. Key proposals include the creation of an international scientific panel on AI to provide unbiased assessments, an AI standards exchange to align global values, and an AI capacity development network to address disparities in AI infrastructure. The report also advocates for a global AI data framework to ensure equitable data sharing, a global fund for AI to support under-resourced nations, and a policy dialogue to harmonise international regulations. To oversee these efforts, the UN recommends the establishment of a dedicated AI office to coordinate global actions and ensure that AI benefits are distributed fairly while mitigating risks.

Marko and the Digital Watch team


Highlights from the week of 13-20 September 2024

closeup shot of the waving flag of the united nations with interesting

The recommendations respond to the rapid spread of AI technologies and the varied global regulatory approaches.

march 16 2022 brazil this photo illustration woman holds smartphone with facebook logo displayed screen with meta platforms logo displayed background

Meta’s enforcement will roll out over the next few days across Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Threads

Pavel Durov 1

Durov is under investigation for ‘complicity in the administration of an online platform to allow an illicit transaction in an organised gang,’ facing a potential 10-year sentence and a €500,000…

Temu Shein

New rules for Chinese platforms like Shein, Temu.

instagram 5409107 1280

Teen Instagram users will now have app usage limits and a sleep mode feature to silence notifications overnight.

google 959059 1280

Initially issued in 2019, the fine accused Google of using its dominance to prevent websites from utilising advertising brokers other than its AdSense platform between 2006 and 2016.

RoboticArm

The US will host a global summit on AI safety, gathering experts from several countries to discuss safe AI development.

the flag of switzerland flying on a banner

The proposed platform from SIX would likely offer both spot crypto and derivatives trading, thus providing a comprehensive suite of services aimed at institutional players, including asset managers.

robber wearing black hoodie against digitally generated russian national flag

The Chinese Embassy in Washington has denied these claims, labelling them baseless.

eu ai act

The EU’s newly agreed AI Act marks the world’s first comprehensive AI regulations, but enforcement specifics remain unclear.



Reading corner

AIatUN 1
dig.watch

About the High-level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence The multi-stakeholder High-level Advisory Body on Artifcial Intelligence, initially proposed in 2020 as part of the United Nations Secretary-General’s Roadmap for Digital…

1080 1080
www.diplomacy.edu

Blindly believing in state rationality can lead to disaster. Historical mistakes, from Brest-Litovsk to unrestricted warfare, show the dangers of ignoring past lessons. Aldo Matteucci analyses.


Upcoming

Summit of the Future 2024
dig.watch

The Summit of the Future 2024 aims to create a new global consensus for a better future, emphasizing multilateral solutions. It will bring together diverse stakeholders to address institutional reforms,…

UNGA 78 logo
dig.watch

The general debate of the 79th session of the General Assembly will open on Tuesday, 24 September, continue through Saturday, 28 September, and conclude on Monday, 30 September 2024.

Numéro 92 de la lettre d’information Digital Watch – septembre 2024

 Advertisement, Poster, People, Person, Face, Head

Coup d’œil

Coup d’oeil : Les développements qui font des vagues

Gouvernance de l’IA

Deux commissions du Parlement européen ont formé un groupe de travail conjoint pour superviser la mise en œuvre de la loi sur l’IA. Celle-ci est officiellement entrée en vigueur le 1er août 2024. Elle sera pleinement applicable 24 mois après son introduction, à l’exception des interdictions relatives aux pratiques illégales qui s’appliqueront 6 mois après la date de début, des codes de pratique (9 mois plus tard), des règles générales en matière d’IA, y compris la gouvernance (12 mois), et des obligations pour les systèmes à haut risque (36 mois). 

Les principales autorités de la concurrence de l’UE, du Royaume-Uni et des États-Unis ont publié une déclaration commune soulignant l’importance de marchés équitables, ouverts et concurrentiels pour le développement et le déploiement de l’IA générative.

La Serbie a dévoilé une nouvelle stratégie de développement de l’IA 2024-2030, visant à favoriser un écosystème d’IA dynamique dans le pays. En Australie, les agences gouvernementales doivent divulguer leur utilisation de l’IA dans un délai de six mois en vertu d’une nouvelle politique qui entrera en vigueur le 1er septembre.

OpenAI et Anthropic ont accepté de collaborer avec l’Institut américain de sécurité de l’intelligence artificielle pour la recherche, les tests et l’évaluation de leurs modèles d’IA avancés. Elon Musk a réactivé son action en justice contre OpenAI et Sam Altman, alléguant que l’entreprise s’est détournée de l’objectif de faire progresser l’IA pour l’humanité au profit d’un gain commercial.

Technologies 

Des chercheurs de l’Université de Californie Davis Health ont mis au point une interface cerveau-ordinateur (BCI) extrêmement précise, capable de traduire les signaux cérébraux en paroles avec une précision de 97 %.

Neuralink, la société d’interface cerveau-ordinateur appartenant à Elon Musk, a implanté avec succès son BCI chez un deuxième patient. Neuralink a indiqué que le dispositif permettait au patient de contrôler des appareils numériques par la pensée, par exemple en jouant à des jeux vidéo et en utilisant des logiciels de conception assistée par ordinateur (CAO).

Infrastructure

Le parlement sri-lankais a modifié sa loi sur les télécommunications pour permettre à Starlink d’Elon Musk de démarrer ses activités dans le pays. Nokia et Telecom Egypt ont annoncé un nouveau partenariat pour introduire la technologie 5G en Égypte. La Commission nigériane des communications (NCC) a adopté une réglementation visant à améliorer la qualité des services de télécommunications au Nigeria, en fixant des indicateurs de performance clés (KPI) pour les réseaux 2G, 3G et 4G. 

Le secteur sud-africain des télécommunications intensifie ses efforts pour que les fournisseurs de contenu et de services numériques contribuent financièrement à l’expansion et à l’entretien de l’infrastructure de réseau du pays.

Cybersécurité

L’OTAN a annoncé la création du Centre intégré de cyberdéfense de l’OTAN (NICC), qui vise à renforcer les capacités de cyberdéfense de l’Alliance.

Le Royaume-Uni et la France vont lancer une consultation sur la prolifération et l’utilisation irresponsable des outils commerciaux de cyberintrusion.

Kaspersky Lab a fermé ses bureaux aux États-Unis à la suite d’une interdiction prononcée par le ministère américain du commerce, qui lui interdisait de vendre ses logiciels à des clients américains.

Une victime dont l’identité n’a pas été révélée a versé 75 millions de dollars au groupe de rançongiciel Dark Angels, établissant ainsi un record pour le plus gros paiement de ce genre.

Halliburton, une importante société américaine de services pétroliers, a été victime d’une cyberattaque le 21 août. L’entreprise a reconnu que des données avaient été consultées et supprimées, mais a déclaré que l’incident ne devrait pas avoir d’impact significatif sur ses activités.

Droits numériques

La Türkiye a rétabli l’accès à Instagram après une interdiction de neuf jours, qui avait été imposée au motif que la plateforme ne respectait pas les lois et les réglementations locales. La restriction a été levée après que Meta, la société mère d’Instagram, a accepté de coopérer avec les autorités turques.

Le Conseil suprême iranien du cyberespace a publié une directive approuvée par le guide suprême, l’ayatollah Ali Khamenei, qui interdit l’utilisation de réseaux privés virtuels (VPN) sans l’autorisation des autorités.

Juridique

Meta Platforms a accepté un règlement de 1,4 milliard de dollars américains (USD) avec l’État du Texas concernant des allégations d’utilisation illégale de la technologie de reconnaissance faciale pour collecter des données biométriques sans consentement. Le Nigeria a imposé une amende de 220 millions de dollars américains (USD) à Meta pour des violations « multiples et répétées » des lois locales sur la protection des données des consommateurs, dans le cadre d’une initiative visant à faire respecter la réglementation sur la confidentialité des données. Un juge fédéral brésilien a rendu une décision obligeant WhatsApp à limiter le partage de données avec d’autres entreprises du groupe Meta.

Une cour d’appel américaine a rétabli une action en justice contre Google, permettant ainsi aux utilisateurs de Chrome de poursuivre les plaintes selon lesquelles l’entreprise aurait collecté leurs données sans autorisation. L’affaire concerne des utilisateurs qui ont choisi de ne pas synchroniser leur navigateur Chrome avec leur compte Google, mais qui affirment que Google a tout de même recueilli leurs informations.

La Californie codifie dans la loi les protections des artistes-interprètes en matière d’IA : Le Sénat de l’État de Californie a adopté deux projets de loi: AB 2602, qui exige le consentement explicite des artistes-interprètes pour la création de répliques numériques sur divers supports, et AB 1836, qui exige le consentement des ayants droit des artistes-interprètes décédés pour des reproductions numériques similaires.

Économie de l’internet

Les autorités de régulation de la concurrence ont eu un été chargé. Un juge américain a estimé que Google avait violé la législation sur la concurrence en dépensant des milliards pour établir un monopole illégal en tant que moteur de recherche par défaut dans le monde. L’entreprise a perdu son procès contre Epic Games, et un juge américain a ordonné à Google de fournir aux utilisateurs d’Android davantage de moyens de télécharger des applications en dehors de son Play Store. Google s’apprête à faire face à un procès anticoncurrentiel majeur, le ministère américain de la justice s’attaquant aux pratiques publicitaires du géant technologique, l’accusant d’utiliser sa position dominante pour étouffer la compétitivité et nuire aux éditeurs d’informations. De l’autre côté de l’Atlantique, l’autorité de surveillance anticoncurrentielle du Royaume-Uni examine le partenariat entre Alphabet, la société mère de Google , et la startup d’intelligence artificielle Anthropic afin d’évaluer son impact sur la concurrence du marché.

Google n’est pas la seule entreprise dans le viseur des autorités de régulation de la concurrence. L’App Store d’Apple fait l’objet d’une enquête de l’autorité de régulation de la concurrence espagnole, la CNMC, qui l’accuse d’imposer des conditions commerciales inégales aux développeurs d’applications mobiles vendues par l’intermédiaire de sa plateforme. L’autorité française de la concurrence a officiellement ouvert une enquête sur le fabricant de puces Nvidia pour suspicion de comportement anticoncurrentiel.

La CNUCED a publié le Rapport sur l’économie numérique 2024, qui souligne la nécessité de stratégies de numérisation durables et inclusives. Il met en évidence l’impact environnemental croissant de l’économie numérique, notamment l’augmentation de la consommation d’énergie et des émissions de gaz à effet de serre. 

Développement

Le règlement de l ‘UE sur l’écoconception des produits durables (ESPR) est entré en vigueur le 18 juillet, imposant des passeports numériques de produits (DPP) pour la plupart des produits (à l’exception des aliments et des médicaments) d’ici à 2030.

Le groupe de travail 05 du G20 sur la transformation numérique a dévoilé un document d’orientation intitulé « Advocating an International Decade for Data under G20 Sponsorship », qui souligne le rôle fondamental des données accessibles et réutilisées de manière responsable pour stimuler le développement social et économique, en particulier dans le contexte des technologies émergentes telles que l’IA.

Socioculturel 

Une coalition de 21 États et de plus de 50 législateurs américains a soutenu le mandat du ministère américain de la justice exigeant que ByteDance vende les actifs américains de TikTok avant le 19 janvier 2025, sous peine d’interdiction. Le conseil de surveillance de Meta a pris une décision sur la manière de modérer les messages relatifs aux groupes armés au Venezuela, dans un contexte de violence et de manifestations. Le gouvernement malaisien va collaborer avec Worldcoin pour améliorer la vérification de l’identité numérique nationale.

En bref

La fin de l’illusion du cyberespace ?

Les PDG du secteur de la technologie découvrent à leurs dépens que, quelle que soit la puissance de leurs plateformes, il est impossible d’échapper à la loi.

L’affaire Durov. Fin août, Pavel Durov, le fondateur de Telegram, une application de messagerie connue pour son cryptage puissant et son engagement en faveur de la protection de la vie privée des utilisateurs, a été arrêté par les autorités françaises.

La liste des chefs d’accusation est longue: complicité d’exploitation d’une plateforme en ligne illégale, détention et diffusion de matériel pédopornographique, trafic de stupéfiants, escroquerie en bande organisée et association de malfaiteurs. D’autres chefs d’accusation concernent le blanchiment du produit d’activités criminelles et la délivrance non autorisée de services de cryptologie.

Durov a depuis été libéré sous caution, mais l’enquête se poursuit. Cette affaire pourrait répondre à la question suivante : Le propriétaire d’une plateforme est-il responsable de ce qui est publié sur son site ou son application ? L’issue de cette affaire pourrait avoir des conséquences importantes sur le respect par les plateformes de médias sociaux de diverses exigences réglementaires, ainsi que sur l’avenir de la communication numérique et de la liberté d’expression.

 Adult, Male, Man, Person, Face, Head, Body Part, Finger, Hand, Gun, Weapon, Pavel Durov

X interdit au Brésil. La liberté d’expression sur les médias sociaux est au cœur d’une autre affaire juridique dans laquelle un oligarque de la technologie se bat contre un pays. La querelle entre Musk et la Cour suprême du Brésil a commencé en avril dernier, lorsque le juge Alexandre de Moraes a ordonné à X de bloquer certains comptes accusés de diffuser des informations erronées et des discours haineux – des ordres que X a d’abord refusé de suivre, mais auxquels le média s’est plié par la suite 

Mi-août, X a annoncé cesser immédiatement ses activités au Brésil, affirmant que M. Moraes avait menacé d’arrêter le représentant légal de X dans le pays si X ne se conformait pas à l’ordre de retirer certains contenus de la plateforme. M. Moraes n’a fait aucun commentaire à ce sujet, mais il a donné à X 24 heures pour nommer un nouveau représentant local, la loi brésilienne exigeant que les entreprises aient une représentation dans le pays. Le délai s’est écoulé et la société X n’a pas nommé de représentant. Résultat : X est bloquée au Brésil.

L’interdiction durera jusqu’à ce que la société X se soumette à toutes les ordonnances du tribunal, nomme un représentant légal et paie toutes les amendes. Les comptes locaux de Starlink, une autre société détenue par Musk, sont également bloqués jusqu’à ce que X paie les amendes, une décision qui a été critiquée car Starlink n’a rien à voir avec l’affaire X. Pendant ce temps, les Brésiliens rejoignent Bluesky (lancé par Jack Dorsey, le fondateur de Twitter) en masse.

Elon musk flying on Twitter in the sky

Ces développements mettent en évidence la tension fondamentale entre le cyberespace et l’espace réel. Il fut un temps où l’on croyait que le monde virtuel – celui des bits et des octets et des flux de données sans fin – était en quelque sorte distinct du monde tangible dans lequel nous vivons. Au début de l’internet, le monde virtuel semblait être une vaste frontière inexplorée, un endroit où les règles du monde physique ne semblaient pas s’appliquer. 

Mais ce qu’on appelle le cyberespace n’a jamais été une réalité distincte; il s’agissait d’une augmentation, d’une couche différente du monde que nous connaissions déjà. Le concept de punition dans le monde numérique était, et reste, une réalité juridique. Les personnes accusées de cybercriminalité ou qui ne respectent pas les lois nationales ne sont pas envoyées dans une cellule de détention virtuelle ; elles sont confrontées à des systèmes judiciaires réels, à des tribunaux réels, à des amendes et à des prisons concrètes.

Analyse

Les Nations unies approuvent une convention historique sur la cybercriminalité

Après des années de négociations, les États membres des Nations unies réunis au sein du comité ad hoc ont adopté la “Convention des Nations unies contre la cybercriminalité”

L’adoption de la convention s’est faite malgré l’opposition significative de la société civile et des entreprises technologiques, qui se sont inquiétées des risques potentiels d’une surveillance accrue. Les parties prenantes ont souligné l’urgence d’un traité axé sur les infractions principales en matière de cybercriminalité et renforcé par des garanties solides. Il était également difficile d’imaginer que les États parviendraient à un consensus étant donné le nombre de questions sur lesquelles ils étaient en désaccord auparavant. Vous trouverez ci-dessous un aperçu des débats de la dernière session du CaH.

Débats sur le titre, le champ d’application et la terminologie de la convention. La majorité des délégations ont préconisé un titre succinct, suggérant par souci de clarté « Convention des Nations unies contre la cybercriminalité ». Toutefois, le terme « cybercriminalité » n’a pas fait l’objet d’un consensus entre tous les États dans l’utilisation des termes. Le titre « Projet de convention des Nations unies contre la cybercriminalité » a été adopté avec un sous-titre : « Renforcement de la coopération internationale pour la lutte contre certaines infractions commises au moyen des technologies de l’information et de la communication et pour l’échange de preuves sous forme électronique d’infractions graves ».

Les négociations sur le champ d’application de la convention ont abouti à l’adoption de l’article 4, qui stipule : 1. En donnant effet aux autres conventions et protocoles des Nations unies applicables auxquels ils sont parties, les États parties veillent à ce que les infractions pénales établies conformément à ces conventions et protocoles soient également considérées comme des infractions pénales en vertu du droit interne lorsqu’elles sont commises au moyen de systèmes de technologies de l’information et de la communication. 2. Aucune disposition du présent article ne doit être interprétée comme établissant des infractions pénales conformément à la présente Convention.

Protections et garanties en matière de droits de l’Homme. Les États ont eu des avis divergents sur la proposition du président concernant l’article 6.2, qui suggérait d’ajouter la phrase “et d’une manière compatible avec le droit international applicable en matière de droits de l’Homme” pour répondre aux préoccupations concernant les garanties en matière de droits de l’Homme. Les négociations ont abouti à l’adoption de l’article 6, qui stipule que : 1. Les États parties veillent à ce que la mise en œuvre des obligations qui leur incombent en vertu de la présente convention soit compatible avec les obligations qui leur incombent en vertu du droit international des droits de l’Homme. 2. Aucune disposition de la présente Convention ne peut être interprétée comme autorisant la suppression des droits de l’Homme ou des libertés fondamentales, y compris les droits liés à la liberté d’expression, de conscience, d’opinion, de religion ou de croyance, de réunion pacifique et d’association, conformément au droit international applicable en matière de droits de l’Homme.

Une partie importante de la session a été consacrée au débat sur les articles 14 et 16, respectivement relatifs au contenu de l’exploitation sexuelle des enfants et à la diffusion d’images intimes. Des inquiétudes ont été exprimées quant à l’expression « sans droit » figurant dans ces articles, qui, selon certains États membres, pourrait légitimer l’accès à ce type de contenu. Finalement, les deux articles ont été adoptés avec l’expression « sans droit ».

Ratification et étapes suivantes. Après avoir échangé différents points de vue, les États se sont mis d’accord sur le seuil de 40 ratifications. Ils ont également adopté l’article 61, qui stipule que la convention peut être complétée par un ou plusieurs protocoles. L’article 62 précise qu’au moins 60 parties signataires sont requises avant qu’un protocole additionnel ne soit examiné pour adoption par la Conférence des États parties. Si le consensus sur le protocole n’est pas atteint, le protocole peut tout de même être adopté s’il reçoit un vote à la majorité des deux tiers des États parties présents et votants lors de la réunion de la Conférence des États parties.

Réserves. Certains pays ont annoncé des réserves. Par exemple, la Russie a souligné qu’elle se dissociait du consensus sur le titre de la convention et qu’elle avait l’intention de faire une déclaration interprétative lorsqu’elle signera ou ratifiera cet accord. Le Nigeria s’est également dissocié de certaines dispositions, notamment celles de l’article 14, en faisant valoir qu’elles étaient incompatibles avec sa législation nationale et ses normes culturelles.

Explorez le contenu de la convention avec notre assistant IA et lisez notre analyse détaillée du dernier cycle de négociations.

L’OMC dévoile un accord majeur sur le commerce numérique

Les coorganisateurs de l’initiative conjointe (JI) de l’Organisation mondiale du commerce (OMC) sur le commerce électronique – l’Australie, le Japon et Singapour – ont publié un texte stabilisé d’un accord sur le commerce électronique, ce qui constitue une étape importante après près de sept ans de discussions et de négociations.

Pourquoi cet accord est-il important ? Jusqu’à présent, les réglementations relatives au commerce électronique et au commerce numérique ont été traitées principalement dans le cadre d’accords commerciaux préférentiels (ACPr) entre les pays. La création d’un accord spécifique de l’OMC sur le commerce électronique contribuerait à normaliser les règles du commerce électronique à l’échelle mondiale, ce qui faciliterait les affaires à l’ère numérique.

Que contient l’accord sur le commerce électronique ? Le texte contient des dispositions visant à :

  1. Promouvoir la facilitation du commerce numérique dans et entre les pays, notamment en encourageant l’adoption de signatures et de factures électroniques.
  2. Rendre le commerce numérique international plus fiable et plus abordable en travaillant conjointement sur les risques liés à la cybersécurité.
  3. Interdire les droits de douane sur le contenu numérique entre les pays participants.
  4. Protéger les consommateurs en ligne contre les activités trompeuses et frauduleuses.
  5. Protéger les données personnelles des consommateurs.
  6. Aider les consommateurs et les entreprises des pays en développement à participer au commerce numérique.
  7. Encourager la concurrence dans le secteur des télécommunications en garantissant l’indépendance des régulateurs, un meilleur accès aux infrastructures et des attributions de bandes de fréquences basées sur le marché.

Que manque-t-il au texte ? Les négociations sur des questions numériques fondamentales telles que les flux de données et le code source ont été bloquées lorsque les États-Unis ont retiré leur soutien afin de conserver une certaine flexibilité en matière de politique intérieure. Les coorganisateurs déclarent simplement que « les participants reconnaissent que certaines questions importantes pour le commerce numérique n’ont pas été abordées dans ce texte. Les participants discuteront de l’inclusion de ces questions dans les négociations futures».

Qui est absent de l’accord ? Le dernier projet de texte représente 82 des 91 membres de l’initiative commune. Toutefois, le Brésil, la Colombie, le Salvador, le Guatemala, l’Indonésie, le Paraguay, les territoires douaniers distincts de Taïwan, Penghu, Kinmen et Matsu, la Türkiye et les États-Unis examinent encore le texte au niveau national.

 Groupshot, Person, Adult, Female, Woman, Clothing, Formal Wear, Suit, Male, Man, Coat, Face, Head, Leon Lee
Négociateurs début 2024. Source : OMC.

Quelles sont les prochaines étapes ? Pour devenir le fondement des règles mondiales sur le commerce numérique entre les membres de l’OMC, le texte doit être intégré dans le cadre juridique de l’OMC. Cependant, toutes les initiatives conjointes de l’OMC se sont heurtées à l’opposition de plusieurs de ses membres qui soutiennent que les initiatives conjointes n’ont pas de statut juridique parce qu’elles n’ont pas été lancées sur la base d’un consensus.

De même, ces pays affirment que les résultats des initiatives conjointes ne sont pas fondés sur un consensus et ne constituent ni des accords multilatéraux ni des accords plurilatéraux au sens de l’article IV de l’accord qui a institué l’OMC, à savoir l’accord de Marrakech.

Si l’accord sur le commerce électronique entre en vigueur, il y aura beaucoup de travail à accomplir. Cinq changements dans le paysage mondial sont importants à prendre en compte dans sa mise en œuvre. Premièrement, l’inégalité numérique s’est accrue et il faudra s’y atteler. Deuxièmement, on observe un glissement vers l’Est de l’élaboration des règles du commerce numérique. Troisièmement, les accords sur l’économie numérique ( DEA ) sont de plus en plus importants, ce qui perpétue le patchwork normatif. Quatrièmement, les chaînes de valeur mondiales ont été restructurées en raison de la pandémie mondiale de COVID-19 et des considérations géopolitiques, entraînant des conséquences commerciales incertaines. Enfin, la nature systémique des défis posés au multilatéralisme a également été ressentie à l’OMC, mettant en péril les fonctions de négociation et de règlement des différends de l’organisation.

La mise à jour de CrowdStrike à l’origine d’une panne de 5 milliards de dollars, des poursuites judiciaires et un examen minutieux par le Congrès

Une mise à jour de routine a tourné à la catastrophe lorsque le pilote Falcon Sensor de CrowdStrike, conçu pour protéger les systèmes Windows, a déclenché une panne technique massive le 19 juillet. La perturbation s’est répercutée sur les industries du monde entier, affectant des secteurs tels que le transport aérien, les soins de santé, la finance et les médias.

Le problème a commencé lorsque CrowdStrike a publié une mise à jour de la configuration du contenu pour le capteur Windows afin de collecter des données télémétriques sur les nouvelles techniques de menace potentielles. Ces mises à jour sont un aspect régulier du système de protection dynamique de la plateforme Falcon, et se produisent parfois quotidiennement.

Cependant, cette mise à jour particulière contenait une erreur de programmation qui a entraîné un blocage du système, provoquant le fameux écran bleu de la mort (BSOD) sur 8,5 millions d’appareils Windows.

Blue screen of death for the Microsoft failure

Le problème a été attribué à un défaut dans le validateur de contenu de CrowdStrike, qui a permis à la mise à jour en question de passer la validation bien qu’elle contienne des données de contenu problématiques.

Les conséquences. Sur le plan financier, l’impact de cet incident est colossal. Selon le cyber-assureur Parametrix, la mise à jour défectueuse pourrait entraîner des pertes allant jusqu’à 5,4 milliards de dollars pour des entreprises comme Microsoft, de grandes compagnies aériennes, des banques et des prestataires de soins de santé.

Toutefois, les pertes couvertes par l’assurance suite à l’incident de CrowdStrike sont estimées entre 1,5 et 10 milliards de dollars américains(USD).

CrowdStrike a annoncé qu’elle offrirait à ses clients des crédits d’environ 60 millions de dollars américains (USD) pour qu’ils restent dans l’entreprise. À la fin du mois d’août, la société affichait un taux de fidélisation de 98 % après la panne.

Cependant, CrowdStrike n’est pas au bout de ses peines. Le 23 septembre, Adam Meyers, vice-président senior des opérations de contre-attaque chez CrowdStrike, témoignera devant la sous-commission de la cybersécurité de la Chambre des représentants des États-Unis. M. Meyers devra expliquer en détail comment cet incident s’est produit et les mesures de prévention prises par CrowdStrike.

L’entreprise est également confrontée à une avalanche de procès. Delta prévoit de poursuivre CrowdStrike et Microsoft pour un montant de 500 millions de dollars américain (USD) en raison des pertes importantes liées à la mise à jour. Le cabinet d’avocats Labaton Keller Sucharow a déposé un recours collectif au nom des actionnaires de CrowdStrike, alléguant qu’ils ont été induits en erreur au sujet des tests de logiciels. Le cabinet Gibbs Law Group envisage également une action collective pour les petites entreprises touchées par la panne.

Quelles leçons en tirer ? De nombreuses organisations sont trop dépendantes des solutions informatiques ponctuelles (single-point IT solutions). Les entreprises technologiques doivent-elles assumer la responsabilité des cyberrisques liés à leurs produits et services ?

Il est essentiel de définir la responsabilité (et l’obligation) des fournisseurs en matière de sécurité et de stabilité des produits numériques au moyen d’instruments juridiques afin de garantir la responsabilité et la sécurité. Cela inciterait les entreprises à investir davantage dans des mesures de sécurité fiables, des protocoles de test approfondis et des mécanismes de sécurité intégrée.

En outre, elle favoriserait une nouvelle approche de la responsabilité au sein de l’industrie technologique, dans laquelle les impacts potentiels des défaillances numériques, leurs solutions et leurs implications plus larges pour la société sont pris en compte avec toute l’attention qu’ils méritent.

Á venir

Les géants des médias sociaux obtiennent gaiLe sommet de l’avenir

Le prochain Sommet de l’avenir est considéré comme une « occasion unique dans une génération » de réaffirmer les principes fondamentaux et d’adapter les cadres multilatéraux pour relever les défis de demain.  

Prévu pour les 22 et 23 septembre 2024, cet événement de haut niveau des Nations unies réunira diverses parties prenantes autour du thème «Sommet de l’avenir : Des solutions multilatérales pour un avenir meilleur».

 Advertisement, Poster, Smoke Pipe

Le sommet sera précédé d’une réunion ministérielle préparatoire le 18 septembre et de journées d’action les 20 et 21 septembre.

Le volet « Un avenir numérique pour tous » des journées d’action vise à exploiter l’innovation, la science et les données pour promouvoir un monde numérique plus inclusif, plus sûr et plus durable. Les premières sessions se concentreront sur la manière dont les technologies numériques peuvent favoriser un avenir durable et responsable, tandis que les sessions ultérieures célébreront les engagements et exploreront les fondements nécessaires à un paysage numérique ouvert et sécurisé. Les parties prenantes discuteront également du Pacte mondial pour le numérique et des applications pratiques de l’IA.

Un dialogue interactif intitulé « Vers un avenir numérique commun : Renforcer l’innovation inclusive et la coopération pour combler les fractures numériques » se tiendra pendant le sommet.

Le résultat immédiat du sommet sera une version finale du Pacte pour l’avenir, du très attendu Pacte mondial pour le numérique ( PMN ) et de la Déclaration sur les générations futures, qui devraient tous être adoptés par les États membres au cours du sommet.

Nous avons longuement parlé du PMN. Il examine toute la gamme des développements numériques, technologiques et de l’IA, et est censé maximiser les avantages des nouvelles technologies et minimiser les risques. Il visera à (1) réduire la fracture numérique et accélérer la réalisation des objectifs du Millénaire pour le développement (ODD) ; (2) accroître l’inclusion dans l’économie numérique et les avantages qui en découlent pour tous ; (3) favoriser un espace numérique inclusif, ouvert, sûr et sécurisé ; (4) faire progresser la gouvernance des données ; et (5) renforcer la gouvernance des technologies émergentes, y compris l’IA, dans l’intérêt de l’humanité.

Le PMN fait l’objet d’une négociation distincte et sera annexé au pacte. Le document a fait l’objet de plusieurs révisions. Tout récemment, les co-facilitateurs ont partagé la quatrième révision du projet sous la règle du silence (consentement tacite) avec les États membres de l’ONU. Celui-ci  pouvait être rompu jusqu’au jeudi 29 août, signalant ainsi le mécontentement d’un ou de plusieurs États à l’égard du texte. Il semble qu’il ait été rompu cette fois-ci. Les discussions sur les prochaines étapes des négociations sont maintenant en cours.

Consultez l’analyse de Diplo et discutez avec nos assistants d’IA sur le Pacte pour l’avenir et le Pacte mondial pour le numérique. vous pourrez suivre en temps réel le Sommet de l’avenir des 22 et 23 septembre 2024