EU Archives | Digital Watch Observatory

Data watchdogs seek safeguards in biotech law

The European Data Protection Board and the European Data Protection Supervisor have issued a joint opinion on the proposed European Biotech Act. Both bodies support efforts to streamline biotech regulation and modernise clinical trial rules.

Regulators welcome plans to harmonise the application of the Clinical Trials Regulation and create a single legal basis for processing personal data in trials. Greater legal clarity for sponsors and investigators is seen as a key benefit.

Strong safeguards are urged due to the sensitivity of health and genetic data. Recommendations include clearer definitions of data controller roles and limiting the proposed 25-year retention rule to essential trial files.

Further advice calls for defined purposes when reusing trial data, alignment with the AI Act, routine pseudonymisation, and lawful frameworks for regulatory sandboxes under the GDPR.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

AI-EFFECT builds EU testing facility for AI in critical energy infrastructure

As Europe moves towards its climate-neutrality goals, integrating AI into energy systems is being presented as a way to improve efficiency, resilience, and sustainability. The EU-funded AI-EFFECT project is developing a European testing and experimentation facility (TEF) to support the development and adoption of AI solutions for the energy industry while ensuring safety, reliability, and compliance with EU regulations.

The TEF is described as a virtual network linking existing laboratories and computing resources across several EU countries. It is designed to provide standardised testing environments, risk and certification workflows, and replicable methods for developing, testing, and validating AI applications for critical energy infrastructures under diverse, real-world conditions.

The facility operates through four national nodes in Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, and Portugal, each focused on a different set of energy challenges. In Denmark, the node led by the Technical University of Denmark is testing AI in virtual and physical multi-energy systems, including coordination between electric power grid operations and district heating systems in the Triangle Region in Jutland and on the island of Bornholm.

In the Netherlands, the node at Delft University of Technology is extending the university’s ‘control room of the future’ with AI capabilities to address grid congestion as renewable generation increases.

In Portugal, the node led by INESC TEC is developing a trusted local energy data space intended to address privacy concerns and connectivity gaps through secure, consent-based energy data sharing. The AI-EFFECT project says consumers and prosumers will be able to manage data rights and permissions in line with EU regulations while working with AI-driven service providers on co-creation and testing.

In Germany, the Fraunhofer-led node is focused on AI for power distribution systems and is developing a near-realistic cyber-physical model to benchmark AI performance in congestion management and distributed energy resource integration against traditional engineering approaches.

Alberto Dognini, project coordinator of EPRI Europe, Ireland, wrote in an Enlit news item: ‘Together, these four nodes form the backbone of AI-EFFECT’s mission to make AI a trusted partner in Europe’s energy transition.’ He added: ‘From optimising multi-energy systems to enabling secure data sharing and improving grid resilience, these nodes will accelerate innovation while reducing risk for operators and consumers alike.’

AI-EFFECT is also sharing its work through public-facing initiatives, including the EPRI Current Podcast. In the episode ‘Exploring the AI-EFFECT on Europe’s Energy Future’, participants discuss the architecture and building blocks supporting distributed nodes across multiple countries and examine how the TEF could shape the future of Europe’s energy systems.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU lawmakers call for faster enforcement of digital competition rules

Members of the European Parliament are calling for more rapid progress in implementing the bloc’s digital competition framework, with particular focus on the Digital Markets Act.

In a recent resolution, lawmakers urged the European Commission to ensure timely and effective enforcement of the rules designed to regulate large online platforms. The legislation aims to address concerns around market dominance and promote fair competition across the digital economy.

The discussions reflect ongoing concerns that delays in enforcement could undermine the framework’s effectiveness, particularly as major technology companies continue to expand their influence. Platforms such as Google, Apple and Meta are among those expected to comply with the new obligations.

At the same time, policymakers are balancing regulatory oversight with the need to maintain innovation and competitiveness. The debate forms part of a broader effort in the EU to strengthen digital governance and reinforce the region’s position in global technology markets.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU faces pressure to strengthen digital safeguards ahead of elections

Emmanuel Macron has called for stronger enforcement of the EU digital rules, urging Ursula von der Leyen to act against risks linked to foreign interference in elections. The request comes amid growing concern over attempts to influence democratic processes across Europe.

In a letter addressed to the Commission, Macron stressed the importance of safeguarding electoral integrity in a challenging geopolitical environment.

He wrote:

‘In a geopolitical context marked by a multiplication of hostile stances against the European model and its democratic values, it is crucial that the Union… ensure the integrity of civic discourse and electoral processes’.

The proposal focuses on stricter enforcement instead of new legislation, particularly regarding the Digital Services Act. European authorities are encouraged to ensure that online platforms properly assess and mitigate systemic risks, including the spread of manipulated content and coordinated disinformation.

Attention is also directed toward algorithmic amplification, AI-generated content labelling and the removal of fake accounts.

As multiple elections approach across the EU, policymakers are considering how to apply existing regulatory tools more effectively to protect democratic systems.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU digital wallet nears rollout

Interoperability tests for the European Digital Identity Wallet have marked a significant step towards deployment, following a major industry-wide exercise. Systems were tested under real conditions to ensure compatibility across providers.

The initiative forms part of the EU’s plan to provide citizens with a secure digital wallet for identification and online services. The system will allow users to store identity data and access services, including electronic signatures.

Results showed that most test scenarios were successfully completed, confirming that independent systems can work together effectively. The exercise also highlighted areas requiring further refinement ahead of wider implementation.

EU officials and industry leaders said the progress supports the development of a unified digital ecosystem. The wallet is expected to simplify everyday services while strengthening security and trust in digital identity solutions.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

TikTok disinformation study raises concerns over AI content and EU regulation

A new study by Science Feedback indicates that TikTok has a higher proportion of misleading content than other major platforms operating in the EU.

The analysis covered France, Poland, Slovakia and Spain, assessing content across multiple thematic areas including health, politics and climate.

Findings suggest that approximately one in four posts on TikTok contained misleading elements, placing the platform ahead of competitors such as Facebook, YouTube and X. Health-related narratives were the most prominent category, reflecting broader patterns observed across digital ecosystems.

Researchers describe disinformation as a persistent feature embedded within platform structures instead of an isolated occurrence.

The study also highlights a growing presence of AI-generated content, particularly in video formats, where synthetic material accounted for a significant share of misleading posts. Despite existing platform policies, most identified content lacked clear labelling.

The regulatory context remains under development.

While the Digital Services Act integrates voluntary commitments from the EU disinformation code, it does not impose mandatory requirements for identifying AI-generated material.

Ongoing debates therefore focus on transparency, accountability and the evolving responsibilities of digital platforms within the European information environment.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU scrutiny intensifies over Broadcom VMware licensing dispute

Broadcom is facing increased regulatory pressure in the EU following a formal antitrust complaint concerning changes to VMware licensing practices.

The complaint highlights growing tensions between large technology providers and European cloud infrastructure firms.

The filing, submitted by Cloud Infrastructure Services Providers in Europe, raises concerns that revised licensing models could significantly alter market dynamics.

European providers argue that the changes may limit flexibility, increase costs, and affect their ability to compete effectively in the cloud services sector.

At the centre of the dispute lies the broader issue of market concentration and control over critical digital infrastructure.

Industry stakeholders suggest that restrictive licensing conditions could reshape access to essential virtualisation technologies, which underpin a wide range of cloud and enterprise services across the EU.

Regulatory attention is expected to focus on whether such practices align with the EU competition rules, particularly regarding fair access and market neutrality.

The case emerges at a time when European policymakers are intensifying oversight of dominant technology firms and seeking to strengthen digital sovereignty across strategic sectors.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Meta data processing ruled unlawful in Germany

A Berlin court has ruled that Meta unlawfully processed personal data through its Facebook platform, including information belonging to non-users. Judges found the ‘Find Friends’ feature lacked a valid legal basis for handling third-party data.

The court determined that Meta acted as a data controller and could not rely on consent, contract or legitimate interests to justify the processing. Non-users had no reasonable expectation that their data would be collected or stored.

The German judges also ruled that personalised advertising based on platform data breached GDPR rules. The processing was not considered necessary for providing a social media service and lacked a lawful basis.

However, the court accepted that sensitive personal data entered by users could be processed with explicit consent under the GDPR. The ruling is under appeal and may shape future enforcement of the EU data protection law.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU advances AI simplification effort ahead of further negotiations

A committee within the European Parliament has approved a proposal to simplify aspects of AI regulation, marking a step forward in efforts to refine the implementation of the AI Act.

An initiative that seeks to adjust certain requirements to support clearer compliance, particularly for industry stakeholders.

The proposal focuses on technical and procedural elements linked to how AI rules are applied in practice.

Lawmakers aim to ensure that regulatory obligations remain proportionate while maintaining existing safeguards. Part of the discussion includes how specific categories of AI systems should be addressed within the broader framework.

Some elements of the proposal may require further discussion in upcoming negotiations with the Council of the European Union. Areas under consideration include the treatment of sensitive AI applications and the balance between regulatory clarity and enforcement effectiveness.

The development reflects ongoing efforts within the EU to refine its approach to AI governance. As discussions continue, policymakers are expected to assess how adjustments can support innovation while maintaining consistency with existing legal principles.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU child safety rules lapse amid ongoing debate over privacy and enforcement

The European Union has been unable to reach an agreement on extending temporary rules that allow online platforms to detect child sexual abuse material, leaving the current framework set to expire in April.

Discussions between the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union concluded without reaching a consensus on how to proceed with such measures.

The existing rules permit technology companies to voluntarily scan their services for harmful content, supporting efforts to identify and remove illegal material.

The European Commission had proposed a temporary extension while negotiations continue on a permanent framework under the Child Sexual Abuse Regulation, but differing views on scope and safeguards prevented agreement.

Stakeholders across sectors have highlighted the importance of maintaining effective tools to address online harms, while also emphasising the need to respect fundamental rights.

Previous periods of legal uncertainty have shown that detection capabilities may be affected when such frameworks are absent, although assessments of effectiveness remain subject to ongoing debate.

At the same time, concerns have been raised regarding the broader implications of monitoring digital communications. Some perspectives stress that any approach should carefully consider privacy protections, particularly in relation to secure and encrypted services.

Attention now turns to ongoing negotiations on a long-term regulatory solution.

The outcome will shape how the EU approaches the challenge of addressing harmful online content while safeguarding rights and ensuring proportional and transparent enforcement.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!