ai Archives | Page 3 of 392 | Digital Watch Observatory

South Korea selects site for AI defence robotics hub

South Chungcheong Province and the city of Nonsan have been selected to host a new AI defence robotics innovation cluster in South Korea.

The project was chosen under the Defense Acquisition Program Administration’s 2026 defence innovation cluster programme and will run for five years, from 2026 to 2030. It will receive a total of 49.9 billion won in national and local funding, including 24.5 billion won from the central government.

The cluster will be developed around Naedong and Yeonmu-eup in Nonsan and will focus on building an AI defence robotics ecosystem. The project is intended to support the full development cycle, from technology research and testing to demonstration and commercialisation.

Plans include a 45,190-square-metre testing and certification facility in Yeonmu-eup, designed to support research and development, test evaluation and demonstration activities in one location.

The initiative will involve Chungnam Techno Park, Konyang University, the Korea Testing Laboratory, the Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, the Korea Automotive Technology Institute and KAIST’s Mobility AX Research Institute.

Provincial officials said Nonsan’s existing defence infrastructure, including the Nonsan Defence National Industrial Complex, the headquarters of South Korea’s three armed services and Korea National Defense University, helped support the site’s selection.

Why does it matter?

The project shows how South Korea is linking AI, robotics and defence industrial policy through testing and certification infrastructure. For digital policy, the relevant signal is the institutionalisation of AI-enabled military robotics development, including facilities for experimentation, evaluation and commercialisation. It also reflects the growing importance of regional defence-tech clusters as governments seek to build domestic capacity in autonomous and unmanned systems.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Uruguay launches Latin America’s first national AI ethics business council

Uruguay has become the first country in Latin America to establish a national Business Council for the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, a UNESCO-backed initiative aimed at strengthening responsible AI governance.

Launched in Montevideo, the council will serve as a platform connecting businesses, academic institutions and public authorities to promote ethical, transparent and accountable AI development.

The initiative is aligned with UNESCO’s Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, adopted in 2021 as the first global normative framework dedicated to the ethical governance of AI. The council aims to ensure that AI deployment promotes human well-being, fundamental rights, transparency and non-discrimination while supporting innovation.

The Uruguayan Chamber of Information Technologies will lead the national chapter, supported by representatives from the technology and telecommunications sectors.

During 2026, the council plans to focus on integrating ethical AI practices into business operations, strengthening technical capabilities and promoting Uruguay as a regional reference point for AI governance.

UNESCO officials noted that ethical AI principles can strengthen innovation by fostering trust, accountability and long-term sustainability. Such an initiative by Uruguay is expected to contribute to broader regional discussions on AI governance and responsible digital transformation.

Why does it matter?

As AI adoption accelerates, governments and businesses are increasingly seeking governance mechanisms that balance innovation with accountability, transparency and respect for fundamental rights. While many AI governance initiatives have focused on regulation, Uruguay’s approach places particular emphasis on engaging the private sector in the implementation of ethical AI principles.

The initiative also reflects a broader international trend towards multi-stakeholder AI governance, bringing together government, industry and academia to address challenges such as bias, transparency and responsible deployment. As the first initiative of its kind in Latin America, the council could influence regional discussions on AI governance and digital transformation.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU publishes the final Code for labelling AI-generated content

The European Commission has published the final Code of Practice on marking and labelling AI-generated content, offering practical guidance for providers and deployers preparing to comply with transparency obligations under the EU AI Act.

The code is voluntary, but the underlying transparency obligations in Article 50 of the AI Act will apply from 2 August 2026. The Commission said the code is intended to help organisations implement those obligations in a consistent, practical and proportionate way.

The framework covers two main areas. Providers of generative AI systems are guided on marking and detecting AI-generated or manipulated audio, image, video and text content, including through machine-readable solutions where technically feasible. Deployers are guided on labelling deepfakes and AI-generated or manipulated text published to inform the public on matters of public interest.

Under the AI Act, users must also be informed when they are interacting with interactive AI systems, such as chatbots. The transparency requirements are intended to help people recognise when content has been generated or altered by AI and to reduce the risk of deception and manipulation.

The Commission has also published a set of the EU icons that deployers may use to label certain AI-generated content. The code does not replace the AI Act or future Commission guidelines on Article 50, which are expected before the transparency obligations begin to apply.

The Commission and the AI Board will now assess the code’s adequacy. If assessed positively, providers and deployers who sign the code may use its measures to help demonstrate compliance with the AI Act’s transparency rules.

Why does it matter?

The code is an important step in turning the AI Act’s transparency provisions into operational practice. Labelling and machine-readable marking rules could shape how platforms, AI providers, media organisations and other deployers handle synthetic text, images, audio and video. The measures are especially relevant for public-interest information, where undisclosed AI-generated or manipulated content can affect trust, elections, journalism and public debate.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

CISA updates vulnerability remediation rules

The US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency has issued a binding directive requiring federal civilian agencies to prioritise vulnerability remediation based on risk.

Binding Operational Directive 26-04 directs agencies to align their vulnerability management policies around four criteria: whether an affected asset is exposed, whether a vulnerability is listed in CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue, whether exploitation can be automated and the likely technical impact after exploitation.

CISA said the directive consolidates and updates earlier requirements for internet-accessible systems and known exploited vulnerabilities. The agency said the approach is intended to help federal civilian agencies focus remediation on the vulnerabilities most likely to cause serious harm.

The directive comes as threat actors continue to exploit unpatched vulnerabilities, with CISA warning that AI software services could help attackers identify and exploit weaknesses more quickly. The agency said AI-enabled exploitation may further reduce the time defenders have between a patch release and attempted compromise.

The directive also requires agencies to consider whether a system may already be compromised before applying a patch. CISA said applying a patch generally does not remove an attacker who already has access to a system, making compromise checks important for risk management.

CISA will monitor agency compliance and provide implementation support. Although the directive is binding only for federal civilian agencies, CISA encouraged other organisations to adopt similar risk-based vulnerability management practices.

Why does it matter?

The directive reflects a shift in federal cybersecurity from treating vulnerability remediation as a fixed checklist to prioritising flaws based on exploitation risk, exposure, and potential impact. That matters because attackers increasingly move quickly from disclosure to exploitation, and AI tools may further shorten that window. For governments and critical organisations, vulnerability management is becoming a continuous risk-management process rather than a periodic patching exercise.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

UK backs open-source AI developers with compute and mentoring

The UK government has announced new support for open-source AI developers, including computing resources, mentoring and a policy engagement channel for younger developers.

The measures were announced during London Tech Week by AI Minister Kanishka Narayan as part of a wider package covering open-source AI, data centre design and workplace robotics.

The new Open-Source AI Builder Fund will provide more than £500,000 worth of compute to selected projects from the Hack for Impact hackathon. The support will include 160,000 GPU-hours through the UK’s AI Research Resource, intended to help teams move from prototypes to operational AI tools.

The government also announced an Open-Source AI Builder Mentoring Scheme, which will pair hackathon winners with experts from the Incubator for Artificial Intelligence, the government’s in-house AI team. A new Open-Source AI Dev Board will give 10 UK-based developers under 30 a route to contribute to government discussions on how AI is used and developed.

The package also includes a government-backed Data Centre Design Challenge with the Royal Institute of British Architects, focused on improving the design, sustainability and local community value of data centres.

Separately, the Regulatory Innovation Office and the Health and Safety Executive will work with industry to develop guidance on the safe use of collaborative robots in workplaces.

Why does it matter?

The announcement shows how governments are trying to broaden participation in AI development beyond large commercial labs by supporting open-source builders with compute, mentoring and access to policy discussions. It also links AI policy to the physical and regulatory infrastructure around deployment, including data centres and workplace robotics. The package is not a major funding programme, but it signals the UK’s effort to shape domestic AI capacity through practical support and regulatory clarity.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

ILO and Singapore expand cooperation on AI and the future of work in ASEAN

The International Labour Organization and Singapore have renewed their partnership to support ASEAN countries in responding to labour market changes linked to AI, platform work and demographic shifts.

The new ‘Partnership Agreement for a Collaborative Programme on Labour and Decent Work’ will run from June 2026 to June 2028. It builds on more than 15 years of cooperation between the ILO and Singapore’s Ministry of Manpower.

Developed in consultation with Singapore’s tripartite partners, including the National Trades Union Congress and the Singapore National Employers Federation, the framework aims to strengthen the capacity of governments, employers and workers across ASEAN.

The renewed partnership adds new priority areas, including AI, platform work, non-standard employment, demographic transitions and older workers’ participation in the labour market. Existing areas of cooperation, such as occupational safety and health, skills development and social dialogue, will continue.

The agreement will support policy dialogue, knowledge-sharing activities and the exchange of good practices among ASEAN member states. Recent initiatives under the cooperation framework include the Leaders in Tripartism Programme in Singapore in April 2026 and the Global Dialogue on Digital Platform Work in September 2025, which brought together participants from more than 20 countries.

The renewed partnership reflects a broader focus on how ASEAN labour markets can adapt to technological change, ageing societies and new forms of work while maintaining decent work standards.

Why does it matter?

AI and platform work are reshaping labour markets faster than many policy frameworks can adapt. The ILO-Singapore partnership is not a binding regulatory measure, but it creates a regional cooperation channel for ASEAN governments, employers and workers to exchange approaches on skills, social dialogue, worker protection and decent work standards as employment models change.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

New York moves to curb undisclosed news scraping by AI bots

New York lawmakers have passed legislation aimed at restricting ‘stealth crawlers’, automated bots that access and scrape content from news websites without identifying themselves. If signed by Governor Kathy Hochul, New York would become the first US state to impose such transparency requirements.

The bill would require companies operating such bots to identify themselves when accessing the websites of news organisations. It would also prohibit activity that damages, impairs or places undue burdens on news websites, or otherwise causes economic harm to publishers.

Supporters, including the New York State Broadcasters Association and the New York News Publishers Association, argue that undisclosed scraping allows technology companies to use journalistic content for AI and other automated services while reducing traffic and revenue opportunities for publishers.

The legislation would authorise the New York Attorney General’s office to take enforcement action against non-compliant companies, with civil penalties of up to $15,000 per day for violations. The measure was passed by lawmakers in New York and now awaits the governor’s decision.

Why does it matter?

The legislation reflects growing tensions between news publishers and technology companies over the use of online content for AI training, search services and other automated applications. Publishers increasingly argue that large-scale content scraping can generate commercial value for technology firms while undermining the business models that support journalism.

If enacted, the measure could establish one of the first state-level transparency frameworks governing automated content collection in the United States. It may also influence broader debates about AI training data, web scraping practices, publisher rights and the relationship between technology platforms and news organisations.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

India’s human rights commission examines impact of digital arrest scams

The National Human Rights Commission of India (NHRC) held an open house discussion on safeguarding human rights against digital arrest scams, highlighting their growing impact on individual rights, dignity and personal security.

The NHRC Chairperson said cybersecurity-enabled fraud has caused significant financial losses and noted that digital arrest scams often exploit fear of law enforcement authorities to coerce victims into transferring money. Participants also highlighted the challenges victims face in recovering stolen funds and obtaining effective redress.

Speakers stressed the need for stronger protections for vulnerable groups, particularly older adults, alongside improved data protection, public awareness campaigns and faster support mechanisms for victims. Participants also reviewed existing government measures, AI-powered detection tools and industry initiatives aimed at preventing and detecting fraud.

Key recommendations included recognising digital arrest scams as a distinct criminal offence, strengthening measures against mule accounts and the fraudulent misuse of official identities, improving compensation and recovery mechanisms, and enhancing cooperation among government agencies, industry and other stakeholders in India.

Why does it matter?

Digital arrest scams have emerged as a growing form of cyber-enabled fraud, combining social engineering techniques with the impersonation of law enforcement and government authorities. By exploiting fear and urgency, such scams can cause significant financial losses and psychological harm, particularly among vulnerable groups.

The discussion highlights the increasing intersection between cybersecurity, consumer protection and human rights. As digital fraud becomes more sophisticated, policymakers are placing greater emphasis on prevention, victim support, data protection and coordinated responses involving government agencies, technology providers and financial institutions.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Poland signals progress on AI gigafactories and digital services tax

According to the Polish Press Agency, negotiations between the European Commission and EU member states on the development of AI gigafactories could conclude in June. The planned facilities are expected to be financed through the EU’s €20 billion InvestAI fund.

The initiative aims to establish five AI gigafactories across the EU to support the development of large-scale AI models and applications. Discussions intensified after revisions to the funding model required member states to commit financial support before the launch of a tender process limited to private companies and consortia.

Polish Deputy Minister of Digitisation Dariusz Standerski said Poland led a coalition of seven member states that opposed the revised framework and pushed for changes. He said negotiations are now close to a compromise that could strengthen the EU’s digital sovereignty and AI infrastructure ambitions.

Separately, Standerski said the Ministry of Digitisation is finalising proposals for a digital services tax of up to 3% on revenues generated by large technology companies operating in Poland. The draft legislation is expected to be published by early July in Poland.

Why does it matter?

The AI gigafactory initiative is a central component of the EU’s broader effort to strengthen its AI infrastructure and reduce dependence on non-European providers of computing capacity. Access to large-scale computing resources is increasingly viewed as a prerequisite for developing advanced AI models and competing in the global AI ecosystem.

The negotiations also highlight the governance challenges associated with large industrial policy initiatives. Questions around funding, public-private participation and member state involvement will shape how effectively the EU can translate its AI ambitions into operational infrastructure.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Canada warns of cyber threats targeting FIFA World Cup 2026

Canada’s Cyber Centre has warned that the FIFA World Cup 2026 will almost certainly attract cyber threat activity from cybercriminals, non-state actors and state-sponsored actors.

The tournament will run from 11 June to 19 July 2026 across Canada, the US and Mexico, with 104 matches in 16 cities. The Cyber Centre said the event’s global visibility, complex supporting infrastructure and broad ecosystem of suppliers and services create a large attack surface.

According to the bulletin, cybercriminals are expected to exploit public interest in the tournament through phishing, social engineering, ticket scams, fraudulent travel offers, fake livestreaming services, malicious apps and other forms of online fraud. The Cyber Centre cited research identifying more than 4,300 likely fraudulent domain registrations linked to the tournament as of August 2025.

Organisations connected to the event, including travel, hospitality, ticketing, broadcasting, telecommunications, utilities and transport providers, could also face ransomware, distributed denial-of-service attacks and website defacement. The Cyber Centre said attackers may target entities in the wider tournament ecosystem to maximise publicity, even when their targets are not part of the core World Cup infrastructure.

The bulletin also warned that threat actors are very likely to use the event for disinformation and influence activity, including campaigns involving AI-generated articles, images, videos and deepfakes. It found that there is roughly an even chance of disruptive state-sponsored cyber activity, depending on geopolitical tensions involving host nations or participating countries.

Canadian authorities urged fans, attendees, athletes, government officials and organisations linked to the tournament to strengthen cybersecurity practices and prepare for scams, disruptive attacks and information manipulation during the event.

Why does it matter?

The bulletin treats the World Cup as more than a sports event. It frames major tournaments as digitally dependent public safety environments involving ticketing systems, broadcasters, transport networks, hotels, mobile communications, local authorities and critical infrastructure. Cyber incidents during such events can cause financial loss, service disruption, data exposure, emergency communication risks and information manipulation, making cybersecurity part of event resilience and public trust.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!