ai Archives | Page 4 of 401 | Digital Watch Observatory

Spain pushes for AI regulation to protect workers

Spain has called for stronger regulation of AI and algorithmic management in the workplace, arguing that digital technologies should strengthen workers’ rights rather than undermine them.

Speaking at the VI Ibero-American Ministerial Conference on Labour in Avilés, Spain’s Second Vice President and Minister of Labour, Yolanda Díaz, urged governments across the region to establish governance frameworks that ensure transparency, human oversight and the ethical use of AI in employment.

The conference focused on two priorities shaping the future of work. Ministers agreed on the need to professionalise, formalise and improve working conditions in the care sector, recognising its economic and social importance while addressing the precarious conditions faced by many workers, particularly women.

Delegations also examined the growing use of algorithmic management, stressing that governments should actively regulate AI to protect labour rights.

The meeting concluded with the adoption of the Avilés Ministerial Declaration and the Ibero-American Commitment on the Social and Solidarity Economy 2026–2030. Together, the documents establish shared principles on care work, algorithmic governance and labour rights while strengthening regional cooperation to promote inclusive economic development, quality employment and more resilient labour markets ahead of the XXX Ibero-American Summit in Madrid later this year.

At the same time, the commitment strengthens regional cooperation to promote inclusive economic development, quality employment and more resilient labour markets ahead of the XXX Ibero-American Summit scheduled to take place in Madrid later this year.

Why does it matter?

The conference reflects growing international concern that AI is reshaping the workplace faster than labour regulations are evolving. By calling for greater transparency, human oversight and accountability in algorithmic management, Spain is arguing that AI should improve working conditions without weakening workers’ rights or limiting human decision-making.

The adoption of shared regional principles also highlights how labour policy is becoming an increasingly important part of AI governance. As algorithmic systems play a larger role in hiring, scheduling, performance management and other employment decisions, governments are placing greater emphasis on ensuring that technological innovation remains aligned with fairness, inclusion and decent work.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

India backs ‘Human-led AI’ for digital government

India has reaffirmed its commitment to placing people at the centre of AI during the 29th National Conference on e-Governance, where Union Minister Dr Jitendra Singh said ‘Human-led Artificial Intelligence’ will guide the country’s journey towards Viksit Bharat 2047.

Speaking at the conference’s closing session in Jaipur, Singh said AI is no longer optional for governments, but argued that its success depends on responsible deployment that strengthens transparency, accountability and public service rather than replacing human judgement.

Held under the theme ‘Viksit Bharat 2047: AI-enabled, Data-driven and Secure Digital Governance’, the conference brought together policymakers, technology experts, researchers, industry representatives and public administrators to discuss the future of digital government.

The conference concluded with the adoption of the Jaipur Declaration, which sets out a strategic roadmap for AI-enabled, secure and citizen-centric governance. It also recognised 17 digital governance initiatives through the National e-Governance Awards 2026, highlighting innovation across ministries, states, local governments and research institutions.

Throughout the event, speakers presented AI as a tool to strengthen public administration while preserving democratic accountability. Singh stressed that AI should enhance institutional capacity rather than replace human responsibility.

He highlighted several flagship initiatives, including the Centralized Public Grievance Redress and Monitoring System, the multilingual AI chatbot SAMADHAN DIDI developed with BHASHINI, the National e-Governance Service Delivery Assessment, Mission Karmayogi and the IndiaAI Mission, all intended to improve efficiency, accessibility and citizen engagement.

Singh also said India’s long-term digital strategy extends beyond technology deployment. Capacity building for civil servants, administrative reform, secure Digital Public Infrastructure and responsible AI governance are all seen as essential to achieving the country’s 2047 development ambitions. According to Singh, AI should accelerate public service delivery while remaining grounded in ethics, constitutional values and human oversight.

According to Dr Singh, technology should accelerate governance while remaining firmly guided by ethics, constitutional values and human oversight.

Why does it matter?

India is positioning AI as a tool to strengthen public administration rather than replace human decision-making. By emphasising human oversight, ethics and citizen-centred services, the government is seeking to balance technological innovation with democratic accountability as AI becomes more deeply integrated into public institutions.

The Jaipur Declaration also signals that AI is becoming a long-term pillar of India’s digital governance strategy. Combined with investments in Digital Public Infrastructure, civil service capacity development and multilingual AI services, the approach could shape how other countries integrate AI into public administration while maintaining public trust.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Ireland introduces AI Bill to implement EU AI Act

Ireland’s government has introduced the Regulation of AI Bill 2026, with Digital Transformation Minister Niamh Smyth describing the legislation as essential to protecting citizens while supporting innovation during its Second Stage debate in the Dáil.

The Bill is intended to give full effect to the EU AI Act in Ireland by establishing the national institutions needed to supervise and enforce the regulation ahead of the EU implementation deadline of 2 August 2026.

A central element of the Bill is the establishment of the AI Office of Ireland as an independent statutory body. The office will act as Ireland’s national point of contact with the European Commission and other member states, oversee enforcement of the AI Act, promote AI literacy and innovation, and operate a regulatory sandbox for start-ups and small and medium-sized enterprises.

Smyth acknowledged both the opportunities and risks presented by AI, highlighting advances in areas such as healthcare and scientific research while warning that, without appropriate safeguards, the technology could reinforce discrimination, manipulate behaviour and exploit vulnerabilities. She emphasised that the Bill is an implementing measure and does not introduce obligations beyond those already established by the EU AI Act.

Smyth also said the legislation would strengthen Ireland’s position as an ‘EU centre of excellence and digital regulatory hub‘. She argued that a robust enforcement framework would provide businesses with the regulatory certainty needed to invest and innovate, with the government seeking passage of the Bill before the August deadline.

Why does it matter?

Ireland’s implementation of the EU AI Act carries particular significance because many of the world’s largest technology companies base their European operations there. The establishment of an independent AI Office with enforcement responsibilities and a regulatory sandbox positions Ireland as a key player in applying the EU’s AI rules in practice.

The legislation also illustrates the broader challenge facing EU member states as the AI Act enters into force. Governments must rapidly establish the institutions, expertise and enforcement mechanisms needed to supervise AI systems while providing businesses with regulatory certainty and supporting continued innovation.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Pax Silica expands with new AI partnership, supply chain initiatives, and workforce programme

The United States has announced a series of new initiatives under the Pax Silica partnership aimed at strengthening AI supply chain security, expanding international cooperation on AI, and supporting advanced manufacturing capabilities among participating economies.

The announcements were made following the 2026 Pax Silica Summit, the second meeting of the initiative launched by the US Department of State in December 2025. Pax Silica focuses on strengthening economic security and resilient supply chains across sectors, including semiconductors, critical minerals, advanced manufacturing, energy inputs, AI, and digital infrastructure, through cooperation among participating countries.

One of the summit’s principal outcomes was the signing of a Joint Statement on AI Opportunity by the United States and nearly three dozen partner economies. According to the US Department of State, the statement promotes a pro-innovation and pro-growth approach to AI governance while emphasising secure AI supply chains and support for startups, developers, and private-sector innovation. Signatories include countries from Europe, the Indo-Pacific, the Middle East, and Latin America, including Australia, Germany, India, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

The summit also expanded the Pax Silica partnership itself. Ten additional participants, including Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica, El Salvador, the European Union, Germany, Greece, Kazakhstan, the Netherlands, and Panama, joined the initiative, bringing the total number of signatories to 24. Taiwan continues to support the initiative’s principles through a separate joint statement on economic security cooperation with the United States.

Another announcement focused on strengthening the security and transparency of AI supply chains. The US Department of State plans to launch a competitive funding programme for a pilot AI Assistance Project in Panama to develop an AI supply chain credentialing and provenance platform. According to the Department, the proposed platform would integrate with customs authorities, ports, and logistics systems to help verify and facilitate shipments of semiconductors, AI infrastructure, critical minerals, and other strategic goods. If successfully implemented in Panama, the project could later be expanded to additional Pax Silica partners.

The summit also introduced Foundry School, a workforce development initiative established jointly by the US Department of State and Stanford University. The programme will begin with seminars at Stanford for entrepreneurs and industrial leaders and will be complemented by an advanced manufacturing curriculum that participating educational institutions across Pax Silica economies will be able to adopt. The initiative aims to strengthen expertise in advanced manufacturing, recognising its growing importance for both economic competitiveness and technological development.

Pax Silica reflects broader government efforts to strengthen resilience across AI-related supply chains as geopolitical competition increasingly intersects with technological development. In recent years, countries have introduced a range of policies covering semiconductor production, critical minerals, export controls, and trusted technology partnerships, while also seeking to balance innovation with economic and national security considerations.

The summit’s outcomes indicate that Pax Silica is evolving beyond a policy dialogue into a broader cooperation framework encompassing AI governance, supply chain security, industrial capacity, and workforce development. Whether the initiatives announced at the summit expand beyond their initial pilot phase will depend on implementation by participating governments and continued international cooperation among partner economies.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Altman proposes US-led international forum for AI safety standards

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has called for the creation of a US-led international forum to establish global safety standards for AI, arguing that no single country or company should dominate the governance of increasingly capable AI systems.

Writing in an opinion article published in the Financial Times, Altman proposed an international body bringing together governments, independent technical experts, and other stakeholders to develop accepted AI safety standards, provide impartial assessments of AI capabilities and risks, and make advanced AI technologies available to countries and organisations that participate in and comply with agreed rules.

According to Altman, such a forum could also serve as a governance mechanism for frontier AI developers, helping to reduce commercial pressures that may encourage companies to prioritise rapid deployment over safety. He argued that international cooperation has previously enabled countries to manage other strategically important technologies despite geopolitical competition.

To illustrate his proposal, Altman pointed to existing international governance mechanisms such as the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which oversees the peaceful use of nuclear technology, as well as global aviation safety frameworks and international financial standards. In his view, these models demonstrate that countries can establish common rules for technologies with significant cross-border implications while maintaining national interests.

Altman also argued that the benefits of AI should be shared more broadly, writing that ‘everyone on Earth should benefit from this technology and determine for themselves how best to use it.’ His proposal follows discussions at the recent Group of Seven (G7) summit in France, where executives from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google DeepMind met with political leaders to discuss international approaches to governing advanced AI models.

A key challenge for any international oversight mechanism, however, remains enforcement. Unlike nuclear facilities or aircraft, frontier AI models are developed within highly secured data centres, making independent verification considerably more difficult. The limited visibility into model training, testing, and deployment has led many experts to question how compliance with international AI standards could be monitored in practice.

Altman’s proposal is not the first call for stronger international oversight of advanced AI. OpenAI and Anthropic have previously supported the idea of international governance mechanisms for frontier AI systems. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has argued for a more prescriptive regulatory approach, drawing comparisons with the US Federal Aviation Administration and advocating stronger regulatory oversight for highly capable AI models.

The proposal also comes as governments continue to expand their involvement in AI governance. Alongside national regulatory initiatives, international discussions have accelerated through forums such as the G7, the Global Partnership on AI (GPAI), and the UN.

Earlier this week, the UN’s Independent International Scientific Panel on Artificial Intelligence published its first preliminary assessment of AI opportunities, risks, and governance challenges ahead of the inaugural Global Dialogue on AI Governance in Geneva, reflecting growing international efforts to establish evidence-based approaches to AI governance.

Whether Altman’s proposal develops into a formal international initiative will ultimately depend on governments rather than AI companies. Commenting on broader discussions around AI governance, analysts at the Brookings Institution argued that cooperation between governments and leading AI developers could help establish common standards, but stressed that any future international framework would need effective implementation and enforcement mechanisms rather than relying solely on voluntary commitments.

As governments, international organisations, and AI developers continue debating how to govern increasingly capable AI systems, Altman’s proposal adds to a growing conversation about whether existing institutions are sufficient or whether new international mechanisms will be needed to manage the opportunities and risks associated with frontier AI.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

University of Wisconsin launches College of Computing & AI

The University of Wisconsin-Madison has launched its College of Computing & Artificial Intelligence (CAI), the institution’s first new college in more than four decades.

The new college brings together the departments of Computer Sciences, Statistics and the Information School, building on the School of Computer, Data & Information Sciences established in 2019.

The college will focus on computing and AI education and research while promoting collaboration across fields including health, engineering, business, the social sciences, the arts and the humanities.

The university also plans to launch new academic programmes, recruit 50 faculty members over the coming years and expand partnerships with industry and government to strenthen research, education and innovation.

Why does it matter?

The creation of a dedicated College of Computing & Artificial Intelligence reflects the growing importance universities are placing on AI as a cross-disciplinary field rather than a specialised area within computer science. By bringing together expertise from multiple disciplines, the university aims to prepare students and researchers to address the technical, social and ethical challenges of AI.

The investment also highlights intensifying competition among higher education institutions to attract talent, research funding and industry partnerships in AI. Expanding faculty, academic programmes and collaboration with government and business positions the university to play a larger role in developing the next generation of AI research and workforce skills.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Europol Roblox game wins EU award for online child safety

Europol’s Cyber Defenders initiative has won the 2026 European Ombudsman Award for Good Administration.

The free educational game, built on Roblox, is designed to help children recognise online risks and develop safer behaviour in digital environments.

Cyber Defenders received the overall award, selected from 48 nominations submitted by the EU institutions, bodies and agencies. It also won the Excellence in Technological Innovation and the Use of AI category award.

The game teaches children about risks such as fraud, identity theft and online grooming through interactive missions rather than traditional awareness campaigns.

Europol says the project was developed to reach children in online gaming environments they already use, while making them more comfortable asking for help when they encounter risks.

The agency has also published supporting resources for teachers, parents and schools, including a game guide, lesson assessment, poster and letter to parents.

The award follows earlier recognition of Europol digital initiatives, including Trace An Object, which uses public participation to help identify victims of child sexual abuse.

Why does it matter?

Cyber Defenders shows how law enforcement agencies are experimenting with interactive tools to improve children’s digital safety skills. Game-based learning can make online safety more relevant for younger users, especially in gaming environments where risks such as grooming, scams and identity theft may appear. The award also reflects broader recognition that digital literacy and prevention are part of child online safety, alongside regulation, enforcement and platform accountability.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

WTO highlights AI opportunities for small businesses

The WTO’s Informal Working Group on Micro, Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (MSMEs) has highlighted AI as a key tool for helping small businesses compete in international trade.

During meetings on 29 and 30 June, WTO members explored how AI could strengthen supply chains, reduce trade barriers and help smaller firms navigate an increasingly uncertain global trading environment. The group also welcomed Ghana as its 106th member.

One of the highlights was the announcement of the 2026 Small Business Champions, recognising organisations using AI to support international trade.

Zambia’s Rinato Space was selected to apply satellite technology and AI to provide climate monitoring, early warning systems and capacity-building services for smallholder farmers, helping improve agricultural productivity and export opportunities.

France-based Koaloo.FI was also recognised for using generative AI to automate environmental, social and governance compliance, assess supply chain risks and improve access to financing for small suppliers.

The competition also recognised Colombia’s Cámara Colombiana de Informática y Telecomunicaciones and the Center for International Private Enterprise for developing an AI governance roadmap for Latin America that includes affordable AI tools for MSMEs.

Türkiye’s Globby was honoured for creating an AI-powered trade intelligence platform that helps small businesses identify international market opportunities and participate more effectively in global commerce.

WTO members acknowledged persistent barriers to AI adoption, including limited digital infrastructure, fragmented international standards, shortages of technical expertise, constrained access to finance and the need for supportive legal and regulatory frameworks.

WTO officials also presented ongoing initiatives, including preparations for the upcoming World Trade and Tech Day, alongside new AI-related learning tools and digital trade resources.

The meeting also focused on broader trade uncertainty affecting small businesses worldwide.

The meeting also addressed broader trade uncertainty affecting MSMEs. Representatives from organisations including World Intellectual Property Organization, the International Finance Corporation, the International Telecommunication Union, the Food and Agriculture Organization and the Pan African Alliance of Small and Medium Industries presented initiatives to improve market access, trade finance, intellectual property protection and digital trade participation.

Why does it matter?

The discussions reflect a growing recognition that AI is becoming an important enabler of international trade, particularly for smaller businesses that often lack the resources to compete with larger firms. By helping automate compliance, improve supply chain management and identify export opportunities, AI could reduce longstanding barriers to global market participation.

At the same time, the meeting highlighted that technology alone is not enough. Expanding the benefits of AI for MSMEs will depend on investment in digital infrastructure, skills, financing and interoperable regulatory frameworks, making international cooperation an increasingly important component of digital trade policy.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

UN scientific panel publishes first global AI assessment ahead of Geneva governance dialogue

The United Nations’ Independent International Scientific Panel on Artificial Intelligence has published its first preliminary report, providing an evidence-based assessment of AI’s opportunities, risks, and societal impacts ahead of next week’s inaugural Global Dialogue on AI Governance in Geneva. Rather than prescribing specific policies, the report aims to inform international discussions by providing an independent scientific foundation for AI governance decision-making.

Established by the UN General Assembly in August 2025 following commitments made in the Global Digital Compact, the panel brings together 40 independent experts from academia, civil society, the private sector, and the technical community. It is the first permanent UN scientific body dedicated exclusively to assessing the development and societal implications of AI. The report will serve as a key input to the Global Dialogue on AI Governance, which takes place on 6–7 July alongside the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) Forum and the AI for Good Global Summit in Geneva.

The preliminary report examines AI through four broad dimensions:

Scientific and technological developments;
Opportunities for sustainable development;
Emerging risks;
Approaches to international governance.

Instead of advocating a particular regulatory model, the panel seeks to establish a shared evidence base that can support future policymaking and international cooperation on AI.

Rather than focusing solely on risks, the report examines AI’s growing role across sectors, including healthcare, education, agriculture, scientific research, and public administration. It describes AI as a general-purpose technology with the potential to accelerate innovation, improve productivity, and expand access to knowledge and public services. At the same time, the panel notes that these benefits remain unevenly distributed across countries and regions, with significant disparities in access to computing infrastructure, technical expertise, and digital resources.

The report estimates that more than one billion people now use AI-powered services each week, while frontier AI capabilities remain concentrated among a relatively small number of companies and countries. According to the panel, this concentration extends beyond AI models themselves to include computing infrastructure, specialised hardware, large-scale datasets, and technical talent, raising broader questions about equitable access to AI and the distribution of its benefits.

The panel also highlights the challenges facing developing countries, warning that many risk becoming primarily consumers rather than producers of AI technologies if investment in local infrastructure, research ecosystems, digital skills, and governance capacity does not keep pace with global developments. It identifies multilingual AI, locally relevant datasets, and stronger scientific capabilities as important factors in ensuring that AI systems better reflect diverse societies and languages rather than reinforcing existing global disparities.

Alongside these opportunities, the report identifies a range of emerging risks associated with increasingly capable AI systems. These include the use of AI for cyberattacks, fraud, disinformation, election interference, and other malicious activities, as well as broader concerns related to market concentration, transparency, and the growing dependence of many countries on a limited number of AI providers. The panel also notes that many governments currently lack the technical capacity to evaluate the most advanced frontier AI models independently.

Beyond security-related concerns, the report identifies environmental sustainability as an increasingly important governance issue. It notes that the rapid expansion of AI requires increasing amounts of computing power, electricity, water, and specialised hardware, and argues that future AI development should balance technological progress with efficient resource use and broader sustainable development objectives.

Speaking at the report’s launch, UN Secretary-General António Guterres said that the pace of AI development requires stronger international cooperation grounded in scientific evidence and inclusive dialogue.

Panel co-chair Maria Ressa described the publication as an independent scientific assessment designed to inform, rather than replace, intergovernmental decision-making. The report itself states that ‘effective AI governance requires international cooperation,’ while recognising that governance approaches will continue to reflect different national circumstances and policy priorities.

The publication marks the first major output of the Independent International Scientific Panel on AI since its establishment under the Global Digital Compact. Future reports are expected to provide regular scientific assessments of AI capabilities, impacts, and governance challenges as the technology continues to evolve.

Why does it matter?

As governments, international organisations, researchers, and industry representatives gather in Geneva next week for the inaugural Global Dialogue on AI Governance, the preliminary report is expected to provide an important reference point for discussions on the future of AI. By combining scientific evidence with a broad assessment of opportunities, risks, and governance considerations, it seeks to support a more informed international conversation on how AI can contribute to sustainable development, human rights, and shared global prosperity.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

France and WHO call for stronger safeguards for children online

French President Emmanuel Macron and World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus have called for stronger governance of digital environments to protect children’s health and well-being.

In a joint statement, they argued that social media, gaming platforms, AI and other digital services are increasingly shaping children’s physical, mental and social development.

The authors said digital technologies can support education, healthcare access, creativity and social inclusion, especially for children in remote or disadvantaged communities. However, they argued that these benefits depend on how digital services are designed, regulated and governed.

The statement warns that excessive or poorly governed digital exposure can be linked to anxiety, depression, sleep disruption, sedentary behaviour, online exploitation, harmful content and misinformation amplified by recommendation systems.

Macron and Tedros also describe generative AI as a force multiplier for both opportunity and risk. They said AI could support education, accessibility and healthcare, but warned that its long-term effects on children’s emotional development, relationships and well-being remain uncertain.

The authors pointed to growing international momentum behind child online safety measures, including age restrictions, stronger age assurance and safety-by-design standards.

They called on governments, technology companies, researchers, educators and civil society to build healthier digital ecosystems through regulation, transparency, independent research and stronger safeguards for children.

Why does it matter?

The intervention places child online safety within the language of public health. That broadens the debate beyond content moderation and screen-time advice to include platform design, recommendation systems, business models, AI deployment and digital governance. It also reflects growing international pressure for age-appropriate design, stronger age assurance and safety-by-design rules, while leaving open difficult questions about privacy, enforcement and children’s access to beneficial digital services.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!