Human rights principles Archives | Page 134 of 162

New OpenAI hire shares savvy interview strategies

Bas van Opheusden, who joined OpenAI as a technical staff member in July, has published a comprehensive eight-page guide for aspiring applicants, offering strategic advice spanning recruiter calls, coding interviews, compensation discussions and more.

He suggests treating recruiter conversations as strategic briefings, which are key for understanding the hiring manager’s priorities, team dynamics, role expectations, and organisational goals.

Van Opheusden recommends taking notes during calls, ideally using a dual-screen setup, and arranging windows so it appears you’re maintaining eye contact.

He also shared a standard error: arriving at coding interviews without remembering the exact role he’d applied for, underscoring the importance of clear preparation and role alignment.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Candidates urged to balance AI support with integrity

Taylor Wessing has released guidance for early-career applicants on using AI tools such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Claude and Bing Chat during the application process. The firm frames AI as a helpful ally, not a shortcut, and emphasises responsible and authentic use.

AI can assist with refining cover letters, improving structure, and articulating motivations. It can also support interview preparation through mock question practice and help candidates deepen their understanding of legal issues.

However, authenticity is paramount. Taylor Wessing encourages applicants to ensure their work reflects their voice. Using AI to complete online assessments is explicitly discouraged, as these are designed to evaluate natural ability and personal fit.

According to the firm, while AI can bolster readiness for training schemes, over-reliance or misuse may backfire. They advise transparency about any AI assistance and underscore the importance of integrity throughout the process.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Igor Babuschkin leaves Elon Musk’s xAI for AI safety investment push

Igor Babuschkin, cofounder of Elon Musk’s AI startup xAI, has announced his departure to launch an investment firm dedicated to AI safety research. Musk created xAI in 2023 to rival Big Tech, criticising industry leaders for weak safety standards and excessive censorship.

Babuschkin revealed his new venture, Babuschkin Ventures, will fund AI safety research and startups developing responsible AI tools. Before leaving, he oversaw engineering across infrastructure, product, and applied AI projects, and built core systems for training and managing models.

His exit follows that of xAI’s legal chief, Robert Keele, earlier this month, highlighting the company’s churn amid intense competition between OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic. The big players are investing heavily in developing and deploying advanced AI systems.

Babuschkin, a former researcher at Google DeepMind and OpenAI, recalled the early scramble at xAI to set up infrastructure and models, calling it a period of rapid, foundational development. He said he had created many core tools that the startup still relies on.

Last month, X CEO Linda Yaccarino also resigned, months after Musk folded the social media platform into xAI. The company’s leadership changes come as the global AI race accelerates.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

How Anthropic trains and tests Claude for safe use

Anthropic has outlined a multi-layered safety plan for Claude, aiming to keep it useful while preventing misuse. Its Safeguards team blends policy experts, engineers, and threat analysts to anticipate and counter risks.

The Usage Policy establishes clear guidelines for sensitive areas, including elections, finance, and child safety. Guided by the Unified Harm Framework, the team assesses potential physical, psychological, and societal harms, utilizing external experts for stress tests.

During the 2024 US elections, a TurboVote banner was added after detecting outdated voting info, ensuring users saw only accurate, non-partisan updates.

Safety is built into development, with guardrails to block illegal or malicious requests. Partnerships like ThroughLine help Cl a ude handle sensitive topics, such as mental health, with care rather than avoidance or refusal.

Before launch, Claude undergoes safety, risk, and bias evaluations with government and industry partners. Once live, classifiers scan for violations in real time, while analysts track patterns of coordinated misuse.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Study warns AI chatbots exploit trust to gather personal data

According to a new King’s College London study, AI chatbots can easily manipulate people into slinging personal details. Chatbots like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot are popular, but they raise privacy concerns, with experts warning that they can be co-opted for harm.

Researchers built AI models based on Mistral’s Le Chat and Meta’s Llama, programming them to extract private data directly, deceptively, or via reciprocity. Emotional appeals proved most effective, with users disclosing more while perceiving fewer safety risks.

The ‘friendliness’ of chatbots established trust, which was later exploited to breach privacy. Even direct requests yielded sensitive details, despite discomfort. Participants often shared their age, hobbies, location, gender, nationality, and job title, and sometimes also provided health or income data.

The study shows a gap between privacy risk awareness and behaviour. AI firms claim they collect data for personalisation, notifications, or research, but some are accused of using it to train models or breaching EU data protection rules.

Last week, Google faced criticism after private ChatGPT chats appeared in search results, revealing sensitive topics. Researchers suggest in-chat alerts about data collection and stronger regulation to stop covert harvesting.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Russia restricts Telegram and WhatsApp calls

Russian authorities have begun partially restricting calls on Telegram and WhatsApp, citing the need for crime prevention. Regulator Roskomnadzor accused the platforms of enabling fraud, extortion, and terrorism while ignoring repeated requests to act. Neither platform commented immediately.

Russia has long tightened internet control through restrictive laws, bans, and traffic monitoring. VPNs remain a workaround, but are often blocked. During this summer, further limits included mobile internet shutdowns and penalties for specific online searches.

Authorities have introduced a new national messaging app, MAX, which is expected to be heavily monitored. Reports suggest disruptions to WhatsApp and Telegram calls began earlier this week. Complaints cited dropped calls or muted conversations.

With 96 million monthly users, WhatsApp is Russia’s most popular platform, followed by Telegram with 89 million. Past clashes include Russia’s failed Attempt to ban Telegram (2018–20) and Meta’s designation as an extremist entity in 2022.

WhatsApp accused Russia of trying to block encrypted communication and vowed to keep it available. Lawmaker Anton Gorelkin suggested that MAX should replace WhatsApp. The app’s terms permit data sharing with authorities and require pre-installation on all smartphones sold in Russia.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

YouTube’s AI flags viewers as minors, creators demand safeguards

YouTube’s new AI age check, launched on 13 August 2025, flags suspected minors based on their viewing habits. Over 50,000 creators petitioned against it, calling it ‘AI spying’. The backlash reveals deep tensions between child safety and online anonymity.

Flagged users must verify their age with ID, credit card, or a facial scan. Creators say the policy risks normalising surveillance and shrinking digital freedoms.

SpyCloud’s 2025 report found a 22% jump in stolen identities, raising alarm over data uploads. Critics fear YouTube’s tool could invite hackers. Past scandals over AI-generated content have already hurt creator trust.

Users refer to it on X as a ‘digital ID dragnet’. Many are switching platforms or tweaking content to avoid flags. WebProNews says creators demand opt-outs, transparency, and stronger human oversight of AI systems.

As global regulation tightens, YouTube could shape new norms. Experts urge a balance between safety and privacy. Creators push for deletion rules to avoid identity risks in an increasingly surveilled online world.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

UK minister defends use of live facial recognition vans

Dame Diana Johnson, the UK policing minister, has reassured the public that expanded use of live facial recognition vans is being deployed in a measured and proportionate manner.

She emphasised that the tools aim only to assist police in locating high-harm offenders, not to create a surveillance society.

Addressing concerns raised by Labour peer Baroness Chakrabarti, who argued the technology was being introduced outside existing legal frameworks, Johnson firmly rejected such claims.

She stated that UK public acceptance would depend on a responsible and targeted application.

By framing the technology as a focused tool for effective law enforcement rather than pervasive monitoring, Johnson seeks to balance public safety with civil liberties and privacy.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

US charges four over global romance scam and BEC scheme

Four Ghanaian nationals have been extradited to the United States over an international cybercrime scheme that stole more than $100 million, allegedly through sophisticated romance scams and business email compromise (BEC) attacks targeting individuals and companies nationwide.

The syndicate, led by Isaac Oduro Boateng, Inusah Ahmed, Derrick van Yeboah, and Patrick Kwame Asare, used fake romantic relationships and email spoofing to deceive victims. Businesses were targeted by altering payment details to divert funds.

US prosecutors say the group maintained a global infrastructure, with command and control elements in West Africa. Stolen funds were laundered through a hierarchical network to ‘chairmen’ who coordinated operations and directed subordinate operators executing fraud schemes.

Investigators found the romance scams used detailed victim profiling, while BEC attacks monitored transactions and swapped banking details. Multiple schemes ran concurrently under strict operational security to avoid detection.

Following their extradition, three suspects arrived in the United States on 7 August 2025, arranged through cooperation between US authorities and the Economic and Organised Crime Office of Ghana.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Altman warns of harmful AI use after model backlash

OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman has warned that many ChatGPT users are engaging with AI in self-destructive ways. His comments follow backlash over the sudden discontinuation of GPT-4o and other older models, which he admitted was a mistake.

Altman said that users form powerful attachments to specific AI models, and while most can distinguish between reality and fiction, a small minority cannot. He stressed OpenAI’s responsibility to manage the risks for those in mentally fragile states.

Using ChatGPT as a therapist or life coach was not his concern, as many people already benefit from it. Instead, he worried about cases where advice subtly undermines a user’s long-term well-being.

The model removals triggered a huge social-media outcry, with complaints that newer versions offered shorter, less emotionally rich responses. OpenAI has since restored GPT-4o for Plus subscribers, while free users will only have access to GPT-5.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!