Judge halts OPM data sharing with DOGE amid privacy concerns

A federal judge in New York ordered the US Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to stop sharing sensitive personal data with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) agents.

The preliminary injunction, issued on 6 June by Judge Denise Cote, cited a strong likelihood that OPM and DOGE violated both the Privacy Act of 1974 and the Administrative Procedures Act.

The lawsuit, led by the Electronic Frontier Foundation and several advocacy groups, alleges that OPM unlawfully disclosed information from one of the largest federal employee databases to DOGE, a controversial initiative reportedly linked to billionaire Elon Musk.

The database includes names, social security numbers, health and financial data, union affiliations, and background check records for millions of federal employees, applicants, and retirees.

Union representatives and privacy advocates called the ruling a significant win for data protection and government accountability. AFGE President Everett Kelley criticised the involvement of ‘Musk’s DOGE cronies’, arguing that unelected individuals should not have access to such sensitive material.

The legal action also seeks to delete any data handed over to DOGE. The case comes amid ongoing concerns about federal data security following OPM’s 2015 breach, which compromised information on more than 22 million people.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Europe’s new digital diplomacy: From principles to power

In a decisive geopolitical shift, the European Union has unveiled its 2025 International Digital Strategy, signalling a turn from a values-first diplomacy to a focus on security and competitiveness. As Jovan Kurbalija explains in his blog post titled ‘EU Digital Diplomacy: Geopolitical shift from focus on values to economic security‘, the EU is no longer simply exporting its regulatory ideals — often referred to as the ‘Brussels effect’ — but is now positioning digital technology as central to its economic and geopolitical resilience.

The strategy places special emphasis on building secure digital infrastructure, such as submarine cables and AI factories, and deepening digital partnerships across continents. Unlike the 2023 Council Conclusions, which promoted a human-centric, rights-based approach to digital transformation, the 2025 Strategy prioritises tech sovereignty, resilient supply chains, and strategic defence-linked innovations.

Human rights, privacy, and inclusivity still appear, but mainly in supporting roles to broader goals of power and resilience. The EU’s new path reflects a realpolitik understanding that its survival in the global tech race depends on alliances, capability-building, and a nimble response to the rapid evolution of AI and cyber threats.

In practice, this means more digital engagement with key partners like India, Japan, and South Korea and coordinated global investments through the ‘Tech Team Europe’ initiative. The strategy introduces new structures like a Digital Partnership Network while downplaying once-central instruments like the AI Act.

With China largely sidelined and relations with the US in ‘wait and see’ mode, the EU seems intent on building an independent but interconnected digital path, reaching out to the Global South with a pragmatic offer of secure digital infrastructure and public-private investments.

Why does it matter?

Yet, major questions linger: how will these ambitious plans be implemented, who will lead them, and can the EU maintain coherence between its internal democratic values and this outward-facing strategic assertiveness? As Kurbalija notes, the success of this new digital doctrine will hinge on whether the EU can fuse its soft power legacy with the hard power realities of a turbulent tech-driven world.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

AI in higher education: A mixed blessing for students and institutions

AI rapidly reshapes university life, offering students new tools to boost creativity, structure assignments, and develop ideas more efficiently. At institutions like Oxford Brookes University, students like 22-year-old Sunjaya Phillips have found that AI enhances confidence and productivity when used responsibly, with faculty guidance.

She describes AI as a ‘study buddy’ that transformed her academic experience, especially during creative blocks, where AI-generated prompts saved valuable time. However, the rise of AI in academia also raises important concerns.

A global student survey revealed that while many embrace AI in their studies, a majority fear its long-term implications on employment. Some admit to misusing the technology for dishonest purposes, highlighting the ethical challenges it presents.

Experts like Dr Charlie Simpson from Oxford Brookes caution that relying too heavily on AI to ‘do the thinking’ undermines educational goals and may devalue the learning process.

Despite these concerns, many educators and institutions remain optimistic about AI’s potential—if used wisely. Professor Keiichi Nakata from Henley Business School stresses that AI is not a replacement but a powerful aid, likening its expected workplace relevance to today’s basic IT skills.

He and others argue that responsible AI use could elevate the capabilities of future graduates and reshape degree expectations accordingly. While some students worry about job displacement, others, like Phillips, view AI as a support system rather than a threat.

The consensus among academics is clear: success in the age of AI will depend not on avoiding the technology, but on mastering it with discernment, ethics, and adaptability.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU launches global digital strategy

The European Union has launched a sweeping international digital strategy to bolster its global tech leadership and secure a human-centric digital transformation. With the digital and AI revolution reshaping economies and societies worldwide, the EU is positioning itself as a reliable partner in building resilient, open, and secure digital ecosystems.

The strategy prioritises collaboration with international partners to scale digital infrastructure, strengthen cybersecurity, and support emerging technologies like AI, quantum computing, and semiconductors while promoting democratic values and human rights in digital governance. The EU will deepen and expand its global network of Digital Partnerships and Dialogues to remain competitive and secure in a fast-changing geopolitical landscape.

These collaborations focus on research, industrial innovation, regulatory cooperation, and secure supply chains, while engaging countries across Africa, Latin America, Asia, and the EU’s own neighbourhood. The strategy also leverages trade instruments and investment frameworks such as the Global Gateway to support secure 5G and 6G networks, submarine cables, and digital public infrastructure, helping partner countries improve connectivity, resilience, and sustainability.

To enhance global digital governance, the EU is pushing for international standards that uphold privacy, security, and openness, and opposing efforts to fragment the internet. It supports inclusive multilateralism, working through institutions like the UN, G7, and OECD to shape rules for the digital age.

With initiatives ranging from AI safety cooperation and e-signature mutual recognition to safeguarding children online and combating disinformation, the EU aims to set the benchmark for ethical and secure digital transformation. At the heart of this vision is the EU Tech Business Offer—a modular, cross-border platform combining technology, capacity-building, and financing.

Through Team Europe and partnerships with industry, the EU seeks to bridge the digital divide, export trusted digital solutions, and foster an interconnected world aligned with European democratic principles. The strategy underscores that in today’s interconnected world, the EU’s prosperity and security hinge on shaping a digital future that is competitive, inclusive, and values-driven.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

New AI food waste project aims to deliver 1.5 million meals

A major new initiative backed by Innovate UK is bringing together leading businesses and organisations to develop an AI-powered food redistribution platform designed to reduce edible food waste and support communities facing food insecurity.

The project is supported by a £1.9 million grant from the BridgeAI programme and is match-funded by participating partners.

Led by Sustainable Ventures, the collaboration includes Bristol Superlight, FareShare, FuturePlus, Google Cloud, Howard Tenens Logistics, Nestlé UK & Ireland, and Zest (formerly The Wonki Collective).

Together, they aim to pilot a platform capable of redistributing up to 700 tonnes of quality surplus food—equivalent to 1.5 million meals—while preventing an estimated 1,400 tonnes of CO₂ emissions and delivering up to £14 million in cost savings.

The system integrates Google Cloud’s BigQuery and Vertex AI platforms to match surplus food from manufacturers with logistics providers and charities.

Bristol Superlight’s logistics solution incorporates AI to track food quality during delivery, and early trials have shown promising results—an 87% reduction in food waste at a Nestlé factory over just two weeks.

The pilot marks a significant step forward in applying AI to address sustainability challenges. The consortium believes the technology could eventually scale across the food supply chain, helping to create a more efficient, transparent, and environmentally responsible system.

Leaders from Nestlé, FareShare, and Zest all emphasised the importance of cross-sector collaboration in tackling rising food waste and food poverty.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Melania Trump’s AI audiobook signals a new era in media creation

Melania Trump has released an audiobook version of her memoir, but the voice readers hear isn’t hers in the traditional sense. Instead, it’s an AI-generated replica, created under her guidance and produced using technology from ElevenLabs.

Announcing the release as ‘The AI Audiobook,’ Trump declared this innovation as a step into the future of publishing, highlighting how AI is now entering mainstream media production. That move places AI-generated content into the public spotlight, especially as tech companies like Google and OpenAI are rolling out advanced tools to create audio, video, and even entire scenes with minimal human input.

While experts note that a complete replacement of voice actors and media professionals is unlikely in the immediate future, Trump’s audiobook represents a notable shift that aligns with rising interest from television and media companies looking to explore AI integration to compete with social media creators.

Industry observers suggest this trend could lead to a more interactive form of media. Imagine, for instance, engaging in a two-way conversation with a virtual Melania Trump about her book.

Though this level of interactivity isn’t here yet, it’s on the horizon as companies experiment with AI-generated personalities and digital avatars to enhance viewer engagement and create dynamic experiences. Still, the growth of generative AI sparks concern about job security in creative fields.

While some roles, like voiceover work, are vulnerable to automation, others—especially those requiring human insight and emotional intelligence, like investigative journalism—remain more resistant. Rather than eliminating jobs outright, AI may reshape media employment, demanding hybrid skills that combine traditional storytelling with technological proficiency.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Manhattan man accused of holding victim for Bitcoin credentials

A Manhattan-based crypto investor has been charged with kidnapping an Italian man. He allegedly tortured the victim in an attempt to gain access to his Bitcoin wallet.

John Woeltz, 37, was arrested on 24 May and later appeared in court, where he pleaded not guilty to four felony charges, including kidnapping for ransom.

Police said the 28-year-old victim was held inside a rented townhouse in Soho after arriving in the US on 6 May. He was allegedly beaten, electroshocked, and threatened with a firearm when he refused to give up his wallet credentials.

The man eventually escaped and contacted the authorities. Photographs found at the scene appeared to show signs of ongoing abuse.

A woman was also taken into custody, although no charges were filed against her. Investigators have not confirmed whether any cryptocurrency was taken or what the relationship between the parties may have been.

The case comes as more crypto executives and investors seek private security due to a rise in ransom threats. In France, authorities have introduced extra protections for those in the crypto industry.

These measures follow several kidnapping incidents, including the abduction of Ledger co-founder David Balland earlier this year.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

Rights groups condemn Jordan’s media crackdown

At least 12 independent news websites in Jordan have been blocked by the authorities without any formal legal justification or opportunity for appeal. Rights groups have condemned the move as a serious violation of constitutional and international protections for freedom of expression.

The Jordanian Media Commission issued the directive on 14 May 2025, citing vague claims such as ‘spreading media poison’ and ‘targeting national symbols’, without providing evidence or naming the sites publicly.

The timing of the ban suggests it was a retaliatory act against investigative reports alleging profiteering by state institutions in humanitarian aid efforts to Gaza. Affected outlets were subjected to intimidation, and the blocks were imposed without judicial oversight or a transparent legal process.

Observers warn this sets a dangerous precedent, reflecting a broader pattern of repression under Jordan’s Cybercrime Law No. 17 of 2023, which grants sweeping powers to restrict online speech.

Civil society organisations call for the immediate reversal of the ban, transparency over its legal basis, and access to judicial remedies for affected platforms.

They urge a comprehensive review of the cybercrime law to align it with international human rights standards. Press freedom, they argue, is a pillar of democratic society and must not be sacrificed under the guise of combating disinformation.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

The Vatican’s peace test

In his blog post ‘Can the Vatican mediate peace today?’, Jovan Kurbalija explores the renewed possibility of the Holy See stepping in as a mediator between Russia and Ukraine. The idea, sparked by a proposal from former US President Donald Trump after talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin, positions the Vatican, particularly Pope Leo XIV, as a neutral ground for ceasefire negotiations.

While no concrete agreement has emerged, the Vatican’s potential role draws on its historic reputation for diplomacy rooted not in power, but in moral persuasion and enduring principles. The Holy See’s legacy as a discreet but effective mediator is long established, from its influence during the Cuban Missile Crisis to its guiding hand in colonial negotiations in the 19th century.

Pope Leo XIV, who previously denounced Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, now demonstrates a core Vatican strength: the ability to uphold moral clarity while remaining open to dialogue. This nuanced approach, increasingly rare in today’s polarised geopolitics, embodies the Vatican’s distinctive role on the global stage.

Supporting this potential initiative is the Community of Sant’Egidio, a lay Catholic association known for mediating conflicts in Mozambique, Guatemala, and the Central African Republic. Their quiet, faith-rooted diplomacy has repeatedly succeeded where formal channels have failed, reinforcing the Church’s potential impact in resolving even deeply entrenched conflicts.

In an age dominated by digital noise and political posturing, the Vatican’s patient, values-driven approach may offer a much-needed alternative. If the talks move forward, they will test the relevance of religious diplomacy in the 21st century and challenge modern assumptions about where genuine peacebuilding can begin.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

The power of compromise

In a recent blog post titled ‘Compromise is not a dirty word – It’s the glue holding humanity together,’ Jovan Kurbalija reflects on the often misunderstood nature of compromise. Prompted by the sight of Lucid cars in Geneva, Switzerland, bearing the slogan ‘Compromise Nothing,’ he questions why compromise is so frequently seen as weakness when it is the foundation of human coexistence.

From families to international diplomacy, our ability to meet halfway allows us to survive and thrive together. Kurbalija reminds us that the word comes from the Latin for ‘promising together’—a mutual commitment rather than a concession.

In today’s world, however, standing firm is glorified while compromise is dismissed. Yet, he argues, true courage lies in embracing others’ needs without surrendering one’s principles and navigating the messy but necessary space between absolutes.

He contrasts this human necessity with how compromise is portrayed in marketing—as a flaw to be avoided—and in tech jargon, where being ‘compromised’ means a breach or failure. These modern distortions have led us to equate flexibility with defeat, instead of maturity. In truth, refusing to compromise risks far more than bending a little.

Ultimately, Kurbalija calls for a shift in mindset: rather than rejecting compromise altogether, we should learn to use it wisely, to preserve the greater good over rigid standoffs. In a world as interconnected and fragile as ours, compromise is not surrender; it’s survival.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!