DW Weekly #181 – 11 October 2024

 Page, Text

Dear readers, 

The antitrust trial between Google and the US Department of Justice (DoJ) is shaping up to be a high-stakes digital David-versus-Goliath showdown for Google and the entire tech industry. In one corner stands Google, the modern-day titan of search engines, a company whose name has become a verb. On the other, the DoJ, brandishing antitrust laws sharpened to puncture monopolistic practices that allegedly stifle competition and innovation. What makes this case so significant is not just the scale of the accusations but the fact that it could redefine the legal boundaries of tech dominance in the 21st century.

At the core of the DoJ’s argument is the assertion that Google uses exclusionary contracts and arrangements to cement its near-total control over the search engine market, ensuring that it is the default choice on most browsers and devices. Critics argue that this practice creates a ‘walled garden’ where competitors are either shut out or significantly disadvantaged. This one and other measures, such as the breakup of essential Google assets like its Chrome browser and Android operating system or opening up Google’s vast search data, indexes, and AI models to rivals to prevent the company from monopolising AI-driven search technologies, seem to be excessive to someone who claims their dominance is the fruit of superior technology and innovation.

Ergo, the question over the trial is whether Google’s dominance is a product of superior technology and innovation or of calculated, anti-competitive strategies. For its part, Google maintains that its business practices merely reflect consumer preference and that switching search engines is just a click away. However, the DoJ’s legal team, seasoned from its work on the Microsoft antitrust case two decades ago, is not so quickly convinced.

 Plant, Outdoors, Nature, Animal, Canine, Dog, Husky, Mammal, Pet, Person, Antelope, Wildlife

The dispute is not just a legal slugfest; it is also a battle of narratives. Google paints itself as the quintessential American success story—an innovative disruptor democratising access to information. However, the DoJ seeks to reframe that story, portraying Google as a gatekeeper of the internet, hoarding the gates to the detriment of competition and consumer choice. The broader implications of this case stretch far beyond the courtroom, touching on how we navigate the digital landscape, how tech companies collect and monetise data, and how competitive markets should be regulated in a world increasingly shaped by algorithmic dominance.

Of course, lurking behind this high-profile litigation is the ghost of Big Tech’s broader regulatory challenges. If the DoJ succeeds, it could encourage calls for stricter regulations on Google and other tech giants such as Amazon, Meta, and Apple, whose sprawling ecosystems have been scrutinised for similar reasons. Silicon Valley is watching this case closely, with some companies quietly hoping for a Google defeat that might loosen its stranglehold on digital advertising and search markets. Others, however, fear that a successful antitrust case could lead to overregulation, hampering innovation, and growth in the long run.

In the end, this case will likely set a legal precedent for the tech industry at large. If Google emerges unscathed, it will validate its business model and cement its position as the uncontested king of search. But if the DoJ prevails, it will send shockwaves through Silicon Valley and worldwide, signalling a new era of scrutiny for Big Tech and setting the stage for even more aggressive antitrust enforcement in the years to come.

In other news…

AI is taking the stage at the Swedish Nobel Prize Academy

Two 2024 Nobel Prizes awarded this week highlighted AI’s transformative role in physics and chemistry. US physicist John Hopfield and British-Canadian AI pioneer Geoffrey Hinton were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics for their groundbreaking work in machine learning, with Hinton warning about the dual-edged nature of AI’s rapid advancements. Meanwhile, David Baker, John Jumper, and Demis Hassabis received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for their AI-driven breakthroughs in predicting protein structures, which have significant applications in drug development and tackling global challenges. Both awards underscore AI’s growing impact on science, from reconstructing complex data patterns to creating new proteins, reflecting the need for caution and innovation as these technologies reshape our world. 

Elon Musk’s social media platform, X, is returning to Brazil after months of legal clashes with the Supreme Court. Musk, who championed free speech, initially resisted blocking the accounts flagged for misinformation, resulting in a suspension by Justice Alexandre de Moraes.

More updates and other topics on our dig.watch portal!

Marko and the Digital Watch team


Highlights from the week of 4-11 October 2024

nobel

Hopfield and Hinton were recognised for their contribution to AI.

file CsAsKDDrEXjNFQyJtaIPcVA1

The Nobel Prize emphasises the growing role of AI in scientific innovation, with the laureates to receive their awards at a ceremony in Stockholm in December.

tiktok and the flag of the usa

States claim TikTok encourages social media addiction.

central bank digital currency european union

The initiative seeks to address fragmented financial systems and outdated regulations by enhancing financial integration and efficiency.

brazil bans twitter

After the company complies with legal rulings.

cybersecurity cybercrime internet scam anonymous hacker crypto currency investment digital network vpn technology computer virus attack risk protection

Forrester’s 2025 Predictions report highlights a looming $12 trillion cybercrime crisis, increased regulatory scrutiny, and the need for organisations to adopt proactive security measures, especially in light of new EU…

ai helping customer service in japan

AI systems in Japan are helping human workers by managing routine tasks, allowing staff to focus on more advanced roles.

discord image freepik

The tech company faces blockade by Roskomnadzor.

IMF6

The IMF is particularly concerned about transparency issues and the potential impact on the country’s fiscal stability.

bitcoin crypto currency diagram

The market has lost $200 billion in value, with Bitcoin briefly dipping below $60,000 before a slight recovery.



Reading corner

el salvador as a crypto heaven colorful
dig.watch

El Salvador’s integration of Bitcoin positions it as a pioneer in the shift towards cryptocurrency-driven economies.

Diplo BLOGS24 Insta Aldo Mateucci 9
www.diplomacy.edu

Markets excel at facilitating trade, but they fail to address the unintended consequences of consumerism like pollution. Aldo Matteucci provides ideas on how to approach these hidden costs.

Diplo BLOGS24 Insta Jovan Kurbalija 7
www.diplomacy.edu

Foreigners everywhere: Identity and estrangement in diplomacy As I wandered through the 2024 Biennale in Venice, captivated by the theme “Foreigners

Diplo BLOGS24 Insta Anita Lamprecht 11
www.diplomacy.edu

The AI Apprenticeship course has kicked off! Learn how participants are building their very own AI bots and why gaining independence from big tech is a game changer. Dr Anita Lamprecht writes.

Numéro 93 de la lettre d’information Digital Watch – octobre 2024

 Advertisement, Page, Text, Poster

Coup d’œil

Coup d’oeil : Les développements qui font des vagues

Gouvernance de l’IA

Le « Pacte pour le Futur », adopté lors du Sommet du Futur le 22 septembre 2024, définit un programme ambitieux pour faire face au changement climatique, à la transformation numérique et à la paix, tout en favorisant une gouvernance mondiale fluide.

Lors de la troisième journée de l’Assemblée générale des Nations Unies, les discussions ont porté sur les défis posés par les progrès technologiques rapides et leurs implications socioculturelles. L’accent a été mis sur la gestion de l’IA, la désinformation et la mésinformation, et plusieurs pays ont abordé leur impact négatif sur la stabilité démocratique.

L’organe consultatif des Nations Unies a publié son rapport final intitulé « Gouverner l’IA pour l’humanité », qui propose sept recommandations stratégiques pour une gouvernance mondiale de l’IA.

Israël façonne activement son paysage de l’IA en établissant un forum national d’experts sur la politique et la réglementation de l’IA. Dirigée par le ministère de l’Innovation, de la Science et de la Technologie, cette initiative témoigne de l’engagement du gouvernement à exploiter l’IA de manière responsable et à réunir des experts pour relever les défis et saisir les opportunités qu’elle offre.

Technologies 

Les modèles d’IA, tels que ChatGPT et Cohere, dépendaient autrefois de travailleurs peu coûteux pour la vérification de base des faits. Aujourd’hui, ces modèles nécessitent des formateurs humains possédant des connaissances spécialisées en médecine, en finance et en physique quantique.

La Chambre des représentants des États-Unis a récemment adopté un projet de loi visant à simplifier les procédures fédérales d’autorisation pour les projets de fabrication de semi-conducteurs, ce qui devrait profiter à des entreprises telles qu’Intel et TSMC. La législation cherche à répondre aux préoccupations selon lesquelles des examens environnementaux trop longs pourraient entraver la construction d’usines de puces sur le territoire américain, d’autant plus que les fabricants de puces ont promis des investissements importants à la suite de la loi Chips and Science Act de 2022.

Alors que les géants sud-coréens des mémoires Samsung Electronics et SK Hynix ont connu une augmentation significative de leurs ventes en Chine au cours du premier semestre de cette année, le rapport de l’Institut de recherche économique outre-mer de la Korea Eximbank indique que la dépendance de la Corée du Sud à l’égard de la Chine pour les matières premières essentielles aux semi-conducteurs s’accroît également.

Infrastructure

La FCC a pris une mesure décisive pour améliorer les services à large bande aux États-Unis en attribuant des fréquences supplémentaires dans la bande 17,3-17,7 GHz aux opérateurs de satellites non géostationnaires (NGSO), y compris à des fournisseurs importants comme Starlink.

La Chine et l’Afrique coopèrent pour améliorer l’infrastructure numérique, un aspect essentiel de leur partenariat économique. Les investissements chinois ont permis de constituer des cadres essentiels, notamment des câbles de fibre optique et des réseaux 5G, transformant les économies locales et développant le commerce électronique.

Cybersécurité

Les autorités américaines mettent en garde contre l’influence de l’IA étrangère à l’approche de l’élection présidentielle, la Russie menant la danse. Les efforts de Moscou se sont concentrés sur le soutien à Donald Trump et sur l’affaiblissement de Kamala Harris.

Le ministère chinois de la sécurité nationale a récemment affirmé qu’un groupe de pirates informatiques soutenu par Taïwan, Anonymous 64, avait attaqué des cibles en Chine, publiant même des photos d’individus qui, selon lui, font partie du groupe.

Le Federal Bureau of Investigation des États-Unis a mis hors d’état de nuire un autre grand groupe de pirates chinois, baptisé « Flax Typhoon » , qui avait compromis des milliers d’appareils dans le monde entier.

Après des mois de défi, la plateforme de médias sociaux d’Elon Musk, X, a déclaré à la Cour suprême du Brésil qu’elle s’était conformée aux ordonnances visant à freiner la diffusion de fausses informations et de contenus extrémistes.

Droits numériques

La Russie intensifie ses efforts pour contrôler l’internet en allouant près de 60 milliards de roubles (660 millions de dollars) au cours des cinq prochaines années afin de moderniser son système de censure du web, connu sous le nom de TSPU.

L’Australie se prépare à introduire des limites d’ âge pour l’utilisation des médias sociaux afin de protéger la santé mentale et physique des enfants.

Juridique

L’Australie a introduit le Privacy and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2024, qui marque une avancée décisive dans la prise en compte des préoccupations liées à la protection de la vie privée dans le paysage numérique.

Meta, le propriétaire de Facebook, a été condamné à une amende de 91 millions d’euros (101,5 millions de dollars) par le régulateur européen de la protection de la vie privée pour avoir mal géré les mots de passe des utilisateurs. La Commission irlandaise de protection des données (DPC), qui supervise la conformité au RGPD de nombreuses entreprises technologiques américaines opérant dans l’UE, a ouvert une enquête après que Meta a signalé l’incident.

Un consultant politique s’est vu infliger une amende de 7,7 millions de dollars par la Commission fédérale des communications (FCC) pour avoir utilisé l’intelligence artificielle afin de générer des appels téléphoniques robotisés imitant la voix du président Biden. Ces appels, destinés aux électeurs du New Hampshire, les invitaient à ne pas voter lors des primaires démocrates, ce qui a suscité une vive controverse.

Le gouverneur de Californie, Gavin Newsom, a signé deux nouveaux projets de loi visant à protéger les acteurs et les interprètes contre l’utilisation non autorisée de leur image numérique par l’IA. Les mesures suivantes ont été introduites en réponse à l’utilisation croissante de l’IA dans l’industrie du divertissement, qui a suscité des inquiétudes quant à la reproduction non autorisée des voix et des images des artistes.

Économie de l’internet

L’or a atteint un niveau record de 2 629 dollars l’once à la suite de la récente baisse des taux d’intérêt de la Réserve fédérale américaine.

Le conseil d’administration d’OpenAI envisage de rémunérer le PDG Sam Altman avec des actions, bien qu’aucune décision n’ait été prise, selon le président du conseil d’administration Bret Taylor.

Développement

Le groupe de travail 05 du G20 sur la transformation numérique a dévoilé un document d’orientation intitulé « Advocating an International Decade for Data under G20 Sponsorship (Plaidoyer pour une Décennie internationale des données sous le parrainage du G20)», qui souligne le rôle fondamental des données accessibles et réutilisées de manière responsable pour stimuler le développement social et économique, en particulier dans le contexte des technologies émergentes telles que l’IA.

Le projet d’intégration numérique régionale de l’Afrique de l’Est (EARDIP) est sur le point de transformer le paysage numérique en Afrique de l’Est en améliorant la connectivité et l’accessibilité.

Socioculturel

Le fondateur de Telegram, Pavel Durov, a annoncé que la plateforme de messagerie allait renforcer sa politique de modération des contenus à la suite des critiques concernant son utilisation pour des activités illégales. Cette décision intervient après que Pavel Durov a été placé sous enquête formelle en France pour des délits liés à la fraude, au blanchiment d’argent et au partage de contenus abusifs.

Le conseil de surveillance de Meta a conseillé à la société mère de Facebook de ne pas supprimer automatiquement la phrase « Du fleuve à la mer », qui est interprétée par certains comme une manifestation de solidarité avec les Palestiniens et par d’autres comme antisémite.

La plateforme de médias sociaux d’Elon Musk, X, a pris des mesures pour répondre aux exigences légales au Brésil en nommant une nouvelle représentante juridique, Rachel de Oliveira Conceicao.

En bref

L’AGNU79 et le Pacte mondial pour le Futur?

Le « Pacte pour le Futur » , adopté lors du Sommet du Futur le 22 septembre 2024, apparaît comme une déclaration d’intention pour franchir le pas vers des lendemains incertains mais ambitieux. Le Pacte, présenté devant un auditoire de dirigeants mondiaux et de représentants de la société civile, est à la fois une feuille de route et un phare : il s’agit de relever les défis du climat, de la transformation numérique et de la paix, tout en s’efforçant de mettre en place des structures suffisamment souples pour s’adapter aux rythmes imprévisibles de la modernité. Il s’agit d’une poignée de main mondiale entre les générations : une promesse que la sagesse du passé ne fera pas stagner le progrès, mais lui insufflera au contraire un caractère d’urgence. Le secrétaire général des Nations Unies a déclaré : « Nous ne pouvons pas créer un avenir digne de nos petits-enfants avec un système construit par nos grands-parents », un sentiment qui sous-tend le cœur thématique du pacte.

L’ encre du « Pacte pour le Futur » était à peine sèche que les premières répercussions se faisaient sentir, notamment dans les salles de la 79e session de l’Assemblée générale des Nations Unies. Avec le changement climatique d’un côté et la promesse de la révolution numérique de l’autre, les dirigeants mondiaux se sont réunis pendant la semaine de haut niveau pour réaffirmer leur engagement en faveur des objectifs de développement durable (ODD). Ce qui s’est passé est un kaléidoscope de voix, de discussions et d’engagements qui ont cherché à donner vie à ce qui a souvent été considéré comme des objectifs nobles et lointains. Le rythme était rapide, mais l’ambition semblait faire écho à des vérités plus lentes – l’augmentation fébrile de la température de la Terre, les inégalités persistantes et les écarts croissants dans l’accès à l’infrastructure numérique.

 UN Flag

Alors que le Sommet du Futur a ouvert un nouvel espace de discussion sur l’utilisation et la gouvernance de l’IA et l’inclusion numérique, l’AGNU79 s’est efforcée de faire en sorte que ces discussions ne soient pas de simples réflexions abstraites et éphémères. Ancré dans le Pacte, le Pacte mondial pour le numérique a occupé le devant de la scène, traçant des lignes nettes autour des questions de gouvernance des données, de l’accès à l’internet et de la supervision de l’IA. Ces initiatives sont un clin d’œil à la fracture numérique qui ne cesse de se creuser et où l’avenir de la démocratie et des droits de l’Homme pourrait bien être façonné par les bits et les octets du cyberespace autant que par les bulletins de vote déposés dans les urnes. Les dirigeants mondiaux, semble-t-il, ne s’engageaient pas seulement à ce que tout le monde reste connecté, mais aussi à ce que tout le monde soit protégé dans un monde en ligne de plus en plus délicat. Une promesse audacieuse, en effet, à une époque où le rythme des changements technologiques dépasse de loin la vitesse à laquelle les cadres de gouvernance sont mis en place.

 Advertisement, Poster, People, Person, Crowd, Text, Bow, Weapon

Puis vint la danse délicate de la paix et de la sécurité, où les vieux ennemis et les nouvelles technologies se sont heurtés à l’ordre du jour. Les discussions autour de la réforme du Conseil de sécurité des Nations unies – sans doute l’une des plus progressistes depuis le milieu du XXe siècle – se sont accompagnées de nouveaux engagements en faveur du désarmement nucléaire et de la gouvernance de l’espace extra-atmosphérique. L’espace et l’intelligence artificielle, qui ne relèvent plus de la science-fiction, ont été reconnus comme les nouvelles frontières du conflit et de la coopération. Pourtant, la sous-représentation de l’Afrique sur la scène mondiale pourrait s’avérer être le changement le plus sismique. Si la promesse du pacte de corriger ce déséquilibre historique se concrétise, l’architecture même de la gouvernance mondiale pourrait s’en trouver modifiée d’une manière inédite depuis les vagues de décolonisation du milieu du siècle dernier.

Tout au long du processus, la résonance des générations futures a été omniprésente. Pour la première fois, une déclaration officielle sur les générations futures a été signée, rappelant aux dirigeants actuels que leurs décisions – ou leurs indécisions – influenceraient la vie de ceux qui ne sont pas encore nés. Un représentant du futur, des jeunes responsabilisés et une société civile revigorée semblent faire écho à un courant sous-jacent plus profond : ce Pacte, ce Sommet et l’AGNU79 ne resteront peut-être pas dans les mémoires pour leurs seules paroles, mais pour les actions qui suivront (ou ne suivront pas) dans leur sillage.

Analyse

Infrastructure publique numérique : Un résultat innovant des dirigeants de l’Inde au G20

D’un concept latent à un consensus mondial

Il y a quelques années à peine, l’acronyme IPN (Infrastructure publique numérique) n’était qu’un terme latent. Mais aujourd’hui, il est devenu un « terme internationalement reconnu » et jouit d’une grande notoriété mondiale. Cela ne signifie pas que des efforts en ce sens n’ont pas été déployés plus tôt, mais un consensus mondial tangible sur l’incorporation formelle du terme n’a pas pu être atteint.

Le rapport met en évidence la complexité d’une telle impasse ou ambiguïté,  de longue date autour d’une validation potentielle de l’IPN fondée sur un consensus est mise en évidence dans le rapport récemment publié par le groupe de travail indien du G20 sur l’infrastructure publique numérique. Le rapport souligne clairement que,

alors que l’IPN était conçue et mise en place indépendamment par des institutions sélectionnées dans le monde entier depuis plus d’une décennie, il n’existait pas de mouvement mondial permettant d’identifier l’approche de conception commune qui conduisait au succès, ni de prise de conscience politique au plus haut niveau de l’impact de l’IPN sur l’accélération du développement. 

digital public infrastructure

Ce n’est qu’à l’occasion de la présidence indienne du G20 en septembre 2023 que le tout premier consensus multilatéral a été atteint pour reconnaître l’IPN comme un moteur « sûr, sécurisé, fiable, responsable et inclusif » du développement socio-économique dans le monde entier. La « Déclaration de New Delhi » a notamment cultivé une approche de l’IPN, visant à renforcer un écosystème numérique robuste, résilient, innovant et interopérable, piloté par une interaction cruciale entre la technologie, les entreprises, la gouvernance et la communauté.

L’approche de l’IPN offre de manière convaincante une voie médiane entre un volet purement public et un volet purement privé, en mettant l’accent sur la « diversité et le choix », en encourageant « l’innovation et la concurrence » et en garantissant « l’ouverture et la souveraineté ». 

Indian Flag

D’un point de vue ontologique, cela marque un changement perceptible de l’idée exclusive du technocratisme-fonctionnalisme vers l’adoption des concepts de multipartenariat et d’universalisme pluraliste. Ces conceptualisations ont de la substance dans le domaine de la quête de l’Inde pour démocratiser et diversifier le pouvoir d’innovation, sur la base de compromis délicats et d’une compréhension intersubjective transversale. Néanmoins, il faut également comprendre qu’une transition numérique omniprésente, de plus en plus ancrée dans l’approche internationale émergente de l’IPN, a été exceptionnellement tirée de l’expérience réussie de l’Inde en matière de cadre national de l’IPN, à savoir India Stack.

India Stack est avant tout une agglomération d’interfaces de programmation d’applications (API) ouvertes et de biens publics numériques, visant à renforcer un écosystème social, financier et technologique largement dynamique. Elle offre de multiples avantages et des services ingénieux, tels que des paiements numériques plus rapides grâce à l’UPI, le système de paiement basé sur l’Aadhaar (AEPS), des transferts directs de bénéfices, des prêts numériques, des mesures de santé numérique, l’éducation et la formation professionnelle, et le partage sécurisé des données. Le parcours remarquable de l’Inde en matière de progrès numérique et la mise en œuvre cohérente et réussie de l’IPN au cours de la dernière décennie ont incontestablement été mis en lumière lors des délibérations du G20.

Le rôle de l’Inde dans la promotion de l’IPN par le biais de l’engagement du G20 et de l’initiative stratégique

Le dynamisme procédural avec lequel des actions ont été entreprises pour mobiliser le concept et l’efficacité de l’IPN au cours de diverses réunions et conférences du G20 tenues en Inde semble tout à fait exemplaire. Surtout, les réunions et les négociations du groupe de travail sur l’économie numérique (GTEN) ont été organisées en collaboration avec tous les membres du G20, les pays invités et d’éminents partenaires du savoir, tels que l’UIT, l’OCDE, le PNUD, l’UNESCO et la Banque mondiale. Le document final de la réunion des ministres de l’économie numérique a été approuvé à l’unanimité par tous les membres du G20 et a présenté un agenda numérique mondial complet avec des nuances techniques et des stratégies de gestion des risques appropriées.

Outre le GTEN, l’agenda de l’IPN a également pris de l’importance dans d’autres groupes de travail du G20 sous la présidence de l’Inde. Il s’agit notamment du groupe de travail sur le partenariat mondial pour l’inclusion financière, du groupe de travail sur la santé, du groupe de travail sur l’agriculture, du groupe de travail sur le commerce et l’investissement et du groupe de travail sur l’éducation. 

India G20

Parallèlement à ces diverses réunions de groupe, les dirigeants indiens ont également mené des négociations bilatérales avec leurs principaux partenaires stratégiques et commerciaux du G20, à savoir les États-Unis, l’UE, la France, le Japon et l’Australie. Il est intéressant de noter que les déclarations conjointes officielles de toutes ces réunions bilatérales contenaient le mot d’ordre « IPN ». On peut évidemment se demander si le moment était venu ou si c’était la stratégie bien préparée de l’Inde qui avait fini par porter ses fruits. Toutefois, on ne peut nier qu’un processus de négociation parallèle bien pensé a certainement joué un rôle déterminant dans l’obtention d’un effet de levier pour l’approche de l’IPN. 

En outre, dans le prolongement de la déclaration de New Delhi de septembre 2023, le Premier ministre indien a annoncé le lancement de deux initiatives phares dirigées par l’Inde lors du sommet virtuel des dirigeants du G20 en novembre 2023. Ces deux initiatives, dénommées Global Digital Public Infrastructure Repository (GDPIR) et Social Impact Fund (SIF), visent principalement à faire progresser l’IPN dans les pays du Sud, notamment en offrant une assistance technico-financière en amont et une expertise fondée sur les connaissances. Ce type d’approche holistique tournée vers l’avenir renforce raisonnablement la voie vers un discours numérique mondial transformateur.

Poursuivre sur la lancée : Le rôle du Brésil dans la promotion de l’IPN

Depuis que l’Inde a passé le relais de la présidence du G20 au Brésil, on attend beaucoup de ce dernier pour qu’il poursuive sur sa lancée et veille à ce que les technologies numériques émergentes répondent effectivement aux besoins des pays du Sud. Il est encourageant de constater que le Brésil fait un pas en avant avec véhémence pour maintenir l’élan, en mettant davantage l’accent sur l’approfondissement de la discussion sur les éléments cruciaux du DPI tels que l’identification numérique, la gouvernance des données, l’infrastructure de partage des données et les garanties mondiales des données. Bien que le Brésil ait acquis une expérience impressionnante dans l’utilisation de l’infrastructure numérique pour promouvoir la réduction de la pauvreté et la croissance inclusive dans le pays, une grande partie du succès du prochain sommet du G20 reposera sur sa capacité à stimuler les engagements politiques et financiers pour une plus grande disponibilité de cette infrastructure.

Bien que des efforts concertés soient déployés pour stimuler l’interopérabilité, l’évolutivité et l’accessibilité des IPN, il devient impératif de garantir leur confidentialité et leur intégrité. Cela s’avère d’autant plus alarmant dans le sillage de l’augmentation des atteintes à la cybersécurité, des intrusions injustifiées dans la confidentialité des données et des risques potentiels liés aux technologies émergentes telles que l’IA. Par conséquent, à ce stade critique, il est essentiel d’encourager des efforts mondiaux plus raffinés, coordonnés et élargis, ou plus précisément, une coopération numérique mondiale efficace.

La désinformation à l’ère numérique

La communication est la pierre angulaire de l’interaction sociétale, elle entretient le système social. En modelant le cours de la communication, les agents peuvent influencer le développement de la société. Dans notre monde de plus en plus numérique, la diffusion de fausses informations et de désinformations constitue une menace importante pour la cohésion sociale, la démocratie et les droits de l’Homme.  

L’utilisation trompeuse de l’information ne date pas d’hier. On en trouve des exemples emblématiques dans l’Égypte ancienne, sous l’Empire romain et après l’invention de l’imprimerie, par exemple. Pendant la guerre froide, les États-Unis et l’Union soviétique ont eu recours à des campagnes de désinformation pour promouvoir leurs intérêts stratégiques respectifs. La complexité et l’ampleur de la pollution de l’information dans le monde numérique constituent toutefois un défi sans précédent. Les médias sociaux, en particulier, ont permis la diffusion d’informations à plus grande échelle. Si ce nouveau paysage informationnel a permis aux individus d’exprimer leurs opinions, il a aussi parfois entraîné la diffusion de fausses informations et de désinformation.

La vitesse de propagation est intimement liée à la dynamique des médias sociaux. Les individus ont de plus en plus recours aux médias sociaux pour s’informer au jour le jour, mais ils utilisent encore ces plateformes dans un esprit récréatif, ce qui diminue leur esprit critique et les rend plus vulnérables aux contenus qui suscitent une réaction émotionnelle, qui ont une composante visuelle puissante ou une narration forte, ou qui sont diffusés de manière répétée.

Au niveau mondial, les données de 2022 montrent que plus de 70 % des individus dans certains pays en développement utilisent les médias sociaux comme source d’information. Ce chiffre était supérieur à 60 % dans certains pays européens, tels que la Grèce, la Bulgarie et la Hongrie. Aux États-Unis, 50 % des adultes s’informent par le biais des médias sociaux. Dans 19 pays développés, 84 % des personnes interrogées par Pew Research pensent que l’accès à l’internet et aux médias sociaux a facilité la manipulation des gens avec de fausses informations et des rumeurs. En outre, 70 % des personnes interrogées considèrent la diffusion de fausses informations en ligne comme une menace majeure, juste après le changement climatique.

Le rôle de la technologie

L’un des principaux mécanismes à l’origine du phénomène des médias sociaux est la curation algorithmique du contenu. Les plateformes de médias sociaux utilisent des algorithmes sophistiqués, conçus pour maintenir l’intérêt des utilisateurs en leur montrant le contenu le plus susceptible de capter leur attention et de susciter une interaction. Par conséquent, les messages qui suscitent des réactions émotionnelles fortes, telles que la colère, la peur ou l’indignation, ont tendance à être privilégiés. La désinformation, souvent sensationnelle et incendiaire, s’inscrit parfaitement dans ce modèle, d’où sa diffusion à grande échelle.

Cet effet d’amplification est accentué par le phénomène des « chambres d’écho » et des « bulles de filtre ». Les algorithmes des médias sociaux ont tendance à renforcer les croyances existantes des utilisateurs en leur montrant des contenus qui correspondent à leurs points de vue tout en filtrant les perspectives opposées. Cela crée un environnement dans lequel les utilisateurs sont principalement exposés à des informations qui confirment leurs préjugés, ce qui les rend plus sensibles à la désinformation qui soutient leurs opinions préexistantes. Dans ces chambres d’écho, les faux récits peuvent rapidement gagner du terrain, car ils sont continuellement renforcés par des individus et des groupes partageant les mêmes idées.

La nature virale des médias sociaux ne fait qu’exacerber le problème. La désinformation peut se propager rapidement sur les réseaux et atteindre un large public. Cette rapidité de diffusion fait qu’il est difficile pour les vérificateurs de faits et autres contre-mesures de suivre, ce qui permet aux fausses informations de s’implanter avant d’être démenties. En outre, une fois que la désinformation a été largement diffusée, il peut être difficile de rectifier le tir, car les rétractations ou les corrections ne reçoivent souvent pas le même niveau d’attention que les faussetés initiales.

Parallèlement, des recherches supplémentaires sont nécessaires pour comprendre la propagation de la désinformation et la manière dont les algorithmes des médias sociaux interagissent avec la recherche active de contenu par les individus, en particulier dans les pays non occidentaux et non anglophones. Dans ce contexte, une politique et une réglementation demandant aux entreprises de partager les données et les informations sur les algorithmes avec les chercheurs et d’autres acteurs approuvés pourraient constituer une étape importante vers une compréhension plus approfondie du désordre de l’information.

L’émergence de la désinformation générée par l’intelligence artificielle introduit une complexité supplémentaire. Les défis concernent non seulement la désinformation alimentée par des erreurs factuelles ou des informations fabriquées fournies par l’IA (souvent appelées « hallucinations » de l’IA), mais aussi la désinformation délibérée générée par des acteurs malveillants avec l’aide de l’IA. La possibilité d’utiliser des modèles génératifs d’IA pour produire des « hypertrucages » – des médias audiovisuels synthétiques de visages, de corps ou de voix humains – améliore la qualité et le pouvoir de persuasion de la désinformation, menaçant ainsi les fonctions essentielles de la démocratie. Dans des pays aussi divers que le Burkina Faso, l’Inde, la Slovaquie, la Turquie et le Venezuela, les « hypertrucages » ont été utilisés pour influencer les électeurs et façonner l’opinion publique. En fin de compte, ils risquent d’ébranler la confiance dans les élections et les institutions démocratiques.

Diplo INSTA_GIZ Decoding Disinformation

Réponses politiques et réglementaires à la désinformation

Un nombre considérable de cadres juridiques nationaux et régionaux, ainsi que des initiatives privées, ont été mis en place pour lutter contre la désinformation. D’une part, ils cherchent à donner aux individus les moyens de participer à la lutte contre la diffusion de la désinformation par l’éducation aux médias. Par ailleurs, certaines initiatives mettent en place une réglementation des contenus visant à s’attaquer à l’écosystème de l’information, en réduisant l’exposition sociale à la désinformation afin de protéger la société, en mettant particulièrement l’accent sur les groupes vulnérables.

Dans les deux cas, les politiques et les cadres de lutte contre la désinformation doivent viser à défendre les droits de l’Homme, tels que le droit à la liberté d’expression et le droit de recevoir et de transmettre des informations. Le Conseil des droits de l’Homme a affirmé que les réponses à la diffusion de fausses informations et de désinformation doivent être conformes au droit international en matière de droits de l’Homme, notamment aux principes de légalité, de légitimité, de nécessité et de proportionnalité. Toute limitation imposée à la liberté d’expression doit être exceptionnelle et interprétée de manière restrictive. Les lois sur la désinformation qui sont vagues ou qui confèrent au gouvernement un pouvoir discrétionnaire excessif pour lutter contre la désinformation sont préoccupantes, car elles peuvent conduire à la censure.

Parallèlement, il convient de faire davantage pour réduire les incitations économiques à la désinformation. Les entreprises sont censées procéder à des évaluations des risques en matière de droits de l’Homme et faire preuve de diligence raisonnable, en veillant à ce que leurs modèles commerciaux et leurs opérations n’aient pas d’incidence négative sur les droits de l’Homme. Cela inclut le partage de données et d’informations sur les algorithmes, ce qui pourrait permettre d’évaluer la corrélation entre la propagation de la désinformation et les modèles d’affaires « ad tech ».

Trouver le bon équilibre entre protection et participation à la lutte contre la désinformation signifie recourir judicieusement à la fois à la réglementation et à l’engagement. Ce dernier doit être conçu en termes larges, englobant non seulement la participation active des individus, mais aussi celle d’autres segments tels que les éducateurs, les entreprises et les acteurs techniques. Cette approche globale permet de lutter contre la désinformation tout en respectant les droits de l’Homme.

Le rapport « Décoder la désinformation : Lessons from Case Studies », publié par Diplo, propose une analyse approfondie de la désinformation et de son interaction avec la politique numérique et les droits de l’Homme. La recherche a été soutenue par le projet « Info Trust Alliance », financé par le ministère fédéral allemand des affaires étrangères et mis en œuvre par la GIZ Moldavie.



Digital Watch newsletter – Issue 93 – October 2024

 Page, Text, Advertisement, Poster, Person

Snapshot: The developments that made waves

AI governance

The ‘Pact for the Future,’ adopted at the Summit of the Future on 22 September 2024, sets out an ambitious agenda to address climate change, digital transformation, and peace while fostering agile global governance. 

On Day 3 of the UN General Assembly, discussions surrounded the challenges of rapid technological advancements and their sociocultural implications. A significant focus was placed on governing AI, misinformation, and disinformation, with several countries addressing their detrimental impact on democratic stability. 

The UN advisory body has released its final report, Governing AI for Humanity, proposing seven strategic recommendations for global AI governance.

Israel is proactively shaping its AI landscape by establishing a national expert forum on AI policy and regulation. Led by the Ministry of Innovation, Science, and Technology, this initiative demonstrates the government’s commitment to responsibly harnessing AI and unites experts to address its challenges and opportunities.

Technologies

AI models, including ChatGPT and Cohere, once depended on low-cost workers for basic fact-checking. Today, these models require human trainers with specialised knowledge in medicine, finance, and quantum physics. 

The US House has recently passed a bill aimed at streamlining federal permitting for semiconductor manufacturing projects, a move anticipated to benefit companies like Intel and TSMC. The legislation seeks to address concerns that lengthy environmental reviews could hinder the construction of domestic chip plants especially as chipmakers have pledged significant investments following the 2022 Chips and Science Act.

While South Korean memory giants Samsung Electronics and SK hynix experienced a significant sales increase in China during the first half of this year, the report by the Korea Eximbank Overseas Economic Research Institute indicates that South Korea’s reliance on China for critical semiconductor raw materials is also growing.

Infrastructure

The FCC has made a pivotal move to enhance broadband services across the USA by allocating additional spectrum in the 17.3-17.7 GHz band to non-geostationary satellite operators (NGSO), including notable providers like Starlink.

China and Africa cooperate to enhance digital infrastructure, a key aspect of their economic partnership. Chinese investments have built essential frameworks, including fibre optic cables and 5G networks, transforming local economies and expanding e-commerce.

Cybersecurity

US officials warn of foreign AI influence as the presidential election draws near, with Russia leading the charge. Moscow’s efforts have focused on supporting Donald Trump and undermining Kamala Harris.

China’s national security ministry has recently alleged that a Taiwan-backed hacking group, Anonymous 64, has been attacking targets in China, even releasing photos of individuals it claims are part of the group.

The US Federal Bureau of Investigation has disrupted another major Chinese hacking group, dubbed ‘Flax Typhoon,’ which had compromised thousands of devices globally.

After months of defiance, Elon Musk’s social media platform, X, told Brazil’s Supreme Court that it had complied with orders to curb the spread of misinformation and extremist content.

Digital rights

Russia is ramping up its efforts to control the internet by allocating nearly RUB 60 billion ($660 million) over the next five years to upgrade its web censorship system, known as TSPU.

Australia is preparing to introduce age limits for social media use to protect children’s mental and physical health.

Legal

Australia has introduced the Privacy and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2024, marking a pivotal advancement in addressing privacy concerns within the digital landscape. 

Meta, Facebook’s owner, has been fined €91 million ($101.5 million) by the EU’s privacy regulator for mishandling user passwords. Ireland’s Data Protection Commission (DPC), which oversees GDPR compliance for many US tech firms operating in the EU, launched an investigation after Meta reported the incident.

A political consultant has been fined $7.7 million by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for using AI to generate robocalls mimicking President Biden’s voice. The calls, aimed at New Hampshire voters, urged them not to vote in the Democratic primary, sparking significant controversy.

California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed two new bills into law aimed at protecting actors and performers from unauthorised use of their digital likenesses through AI. The following measures have been introduced in response to the increasing use of AI in the entertainment industry, which has raised concerns about the unauthorised replication of artists’ voices and images.

Internet economy

Gold has soared to a record high of $2,629 per ounce following the US Federal Reserve’s recent interest rate cut.

OpenAI’s board is considering compensating CEO Sam Altman with equity, though no decision has been made, according to board chair Bret Taylor.

Development

The G20 Task Force 05 on Digital Transformation has unveiled a policy brief titled ‘Advocating an International Decade for Data under G20 Sponsorship’, highlighting the fundamental role of accessible and responsibly re-used data in driving social and economic development, particularly in the context of emerging technologies like AI.

The Eastern Africa Regional Digital Integration Project (EARDIP) is poised to transform the digital landscape across Eastern Africa by enhancing connectivity and accessibility.

Sociocultural

Telegram founder Pavel Durov has announced that the messaging platform will tighten its content moderation policies following criticism over its use for illegal activities. The decision comes after Durov was placed under formal investigation in France for crimes linked to fraud, money laundering, and sharing abusive content.

Meta’s Oversight Board has advised the Facebook parent company not to automatically remove the phrase ‘From the river to the sea’, which is interpreted by some as a show of solidarity with the Palestinians and by others as antisemitic.

Elon Musk’s social media platform, X, has moved to address legal requirements in Brazil by appointing a new legal representative, Rachel de Oliveira Conceicao.


UNGA79 and the ‘Pact for the Future’

The ‘Pact for the Future’, adopted at the Summit of the Future on 22 September 2024, emerges as a declaration of intent to leap from the past into an uncertain, but ambitious, tomorrow. The Pact, presented before an audience of world leaders and civil society representatives, encapsulates a roadmap and a lighthouse – navigating the challenges of climate, digital transformation, and peace while aiming to build structures agile enough for the unpredictable rhythms of modernity. It is a global handshake between generations: a promise that the wisdom of the past will not stagnate progress but rather infuse it with urgency. In the words of the UN Secretary-General: ‘We cannot create a future fit for our grandchildren with a system built by our grandparents’, we can hear a sentiment that underpins the thematic core of the Pact.

The ink on the Pact for the Future was barely dry when the first repercussions could be felt, especially within the UN General Assembly’s 79th session chambers. With climate change blazing on one side and the promise of digital revolution flickering on the other, world leaders convened during the high-level week to reassert their commitment to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). What unfolded was a kaleidoscope of voices, discussions, and pledges that sought to breathe life into what had often been seen as lofty, distant goals. The pace was fast, yet the ambition seemed to echo slower truths – the earth’s fevered rise in temperature, persistent inequality, and the widening gaps in access to digital infrastructure.

AD 4nXdAGMBsmu7Yo1Y7y9TuYEa5WV3KqxEs3FWR7DuZxHMULVMP6AGGMyDaNKGbG7owx9tOBwzlYvFyMgz4U5Cv6tg8RhAag hThcPj0ao6VuP9kO5KlvNQplsHmQX5bueD0UcHacIE Zg6vtRX7G2G

While the Summit of the Future carved out new space for discussions on the use and governance of AI and digital inclusion, the UNGA79 focused on ensuring these discussions weren’t mere fleeting abstractions. Anchored in the Pact, the Global Digital Compact took centre stage, drawing sharp lines around data governance issues, internet access, and AI oversight. These initiatives were a nod to the ever-growing digital divide, where the future of democracy and human rights may just be shaped by the bits and bytes of cyberspace as much as by the ballots cast at polls. Global leaders, it seemed, were not just pledging to keep everyone connected – they were promising to keep everyone protected in an increasingly tricky online world. A bold promise indeed, in a time when the pace of technological change far outstrips the speed at which governance frameworks are formed.

AD 4nXcwrD6xQLLmu PK5EzaQBksisc8bVGPTfuhJocJrZawiTT TA1NN2PmO4JMQxygep1R5AKQ5LHC 2tcFvjLFYa4qN6Q2F071YtjcRzGKj84lt0L

Then came the delicate dance of peace and security, where old enemies and new technologies collided on the agenda. Discussions surrounding the reform of the UN Security Council – arguably one of the most progressive since the Mid-20th century – were matched with fresh commitments to nuclear disarmament and the governance of outer space. No longer the stuff of science fiction, space and AI were recognised as the new frontiers of conflict and cooperation. Yet Africa’s under-representation on the global stage may prove to be the most seismic of shifts. If the Pact’s promise to redress this historical imbalance holds, it could alter the very architecture of global governance in ways not seen since the decolonisation waves of the mid-1900s.

Through it all, the resonance of the future generations loomed large. For the first time, a formal Declaration on Future Generations was signed, reminding current leaders that their decisions – or indecisions – would shape the lives of the not yet born. A future envoy, empowered youth, and re-energised civil society seem to echo a deeper undercurrent: that this Pact, this Summit, and the UNGA79 may not be remembered for its words alone, but for the actions that will (or won’t) follow in its wake.


Digital Public Infrastructure: An innovative outcome of India’s G20 leadership

From latent concept to global consensus
Not more than a couple of years back, this highly jingled acronym of the present time – DPI (Digital Public Infrastructure), was merely a latent term. However, today it has gained an ‘internationally agreed vocabulary’ with wide-ranging global recognition. This could not imply that efforts in this direction had not been laid earlier, yet a tangible global consensus over the formal incorporation of the term was unattainable. 

The complex dynamics of such a long-standing impasse or ambiguity over a potential consensus-based acknowledgement of DPI is prominently highlighted in the recently published report of ‘India’s G20 Task Force on Digital Public Infrastructure’. The report clearly underlines that, 

While DPI was being designed and built independently by selected institutions around the world for over a decade, there was an absence of a global movement that identified the common design approach that drove success, as well as low political awareness at the highest levels of the impacts of DPI on accelerating development. 

 City, Urban, Light, Architecture, Building

It was only at the helm of India’s G20 Presidency in September 2023 that the first-ever multilateral consensus was reached to recognise DPI as a ‘safe, secure, trusted, accountable, and inclusive’ driver of socioeconomic development across the globe. Notably, the ‘New Delhi Declaration’ has cultivated a DPI approach, intending to enhance a robust, resilient, innovative, and interoperable digital ecosystem steered by a crucial interplay of technology, business, governance, and community.

The DPI approach persuasively offers a middle way between a purely public and a purely private strand, with an emphasis on addressing ‘diversity and choice’, encouraging ‘innovation and competition’,  and ensuring ‘openness and sovereignty’. 

 Flag

Ontologically, this marks a perceptible shift from the exclusive idea of technocratic-functionalism to embracing the concepts of multistakeholderism and pluralistic universalism.  These conceptualisations hold substance in the realm of India’s greater quest to democratise and diversify the power of innovation, based on delicate tradeoffs and cross-sectional intersubjective understanding. Nevertheless, it is also to be construed that an all-pervasive digital transition increasingly entrenched into the burgeoning international DPI approach, has been exceptionally drawn from India’s own successful experience of the domestic DPI framework, namely India Stack.

India Stack is primarily an agglomeration of open Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) and digital public goods, aiming to enhance a broadly vibrant social, financial, and technological ecosystem. It offers multiple benefits and ingenious services, like faster digital payments through UPI, Aadhaar Enabled Payments System (AEPS), direct benefit transfers, digital lending, digital health measures, education and skilling, and secure data sharing. The remarkable journey of India’s digital progress and coherently successful implementation of DPI over the last decade indisputably came into focus during the G20 deliberations.

India’s role in advancing DPI through G20 engagement and strategic initiative
What seems quite exemplary is the procedural dynamism with which actions have been undertaken to mobilise the vocabulary and effectiveness of DPI during various G20 meetings and conferences held within India. Most importantly, the Digital Economy Working Group (DEWG) meetings and negotiations were organised in collaboration with all the G20 members, guest countries, and eminent knowledge partners, like ITU, OECD, UNDP, UNESCO and the World Bank. As an effect, the Outcome Document of the Digital Economy Ministers Meeting was unanimously agreed to by all the G20 members and presented a comprehensive global digital agenda with appropriate technical nuances and risk-management strategies. 

Along with gaining traction in the DEWG, the DPI agenda also gained prominence in other G20 working groups under India’s presidency. These include the Global Partnership for Financial Inclusion Working Group, the Health Working Group, the Agriculture Working Group, the Trade and Investment Working Group, and the Education Working Group. 

 Text, Advertisement

Commensurate to these diverse group meetings, the Indian leadership also held bilateral negotiations with its top G20 strategic and trading partners, namely the USA, the EU, France, Japan, and Australia. Interestingly, the official joint statements of all these bilateral meetings decisively entailed the catchword ‘DPI’. It could be obviously considered whether the time was ripe, or it was India’s well-laid-out strategy that ultimately paid off. Yet, it could not be repudiated that a well-thought-out parallel negotiation process had certainly played an instrumental role in providing leverage for the DPI approach.

Further, in follow-up to the New Delhi Declaration of September 2023, the Prime Minister of India announced the launch of two landmark India-led initiatives during the G20 Virtual Leaders’ Summit in November 2023. The two initiatives denominated as the Global Digital Public Infrastructure Repository (GDPIR) and the Social Impact Fund (SIF) are mainly inclined towards the advancement of DPI in the Global South, particularly by offering upstream technical-financial assistance and knowledge-based expertise. This kind of forward-looking holistic approach reasonably fortifies the path towards a transformative global digital discourse.

Building on momentum: Brazil’s role in advancing DPI
Ever since India passed the baton of the G20 presidency to Brazil, expectations have been pretty high from the latter to carry forward the momentum and ensure that emerging digital technologies effectively meet the requirements of the Global South. It is encouraging to witness that Brazil is vehemently making a step forward to maintain the drive, with a greater emphasis on deepening the discussion over crucial DPI components such as digital identification, data governance, data sharing infrastructure, and global data safeguards. Although Brazil has seized an impressive track record of using digital infrastructure to promote poverty alleviation and inclusive growth within the country, a considerable measure of success at the forthcoming G20 summit will be its efficacy in stimulating political and financial commitments for a broader availability of such infrastructure. 

Although concerted endeavours are being deployed to boost the interoperability, scalability and accessibility of DPIs, it becomes highly imperative to ensure their confidentiality and integrity. This turns out to be more alarming in the wake of increased cybersecurity breaches, unwarranted data privacy intrusions, and potential risks attached to emerging technologies like AI. Hence, at this critical juncture, it is quintessential to foster more refined, coordinated and scaled-up global efforts, or more precisely, an effective global digital cooperation.



Disinformation in the digital era

Communication is the cornerstone of societal interaction, holding together the fabric of the social system. By shaping the course of communication, agents may influence the development of society. In our increasingly digital world, the spread of misinformation and disinformation poses a significant threat to social cohesion, democracy, and human rights.  

The deceptive use of information has a long history. Emblematic examples can be found in Ancient Egypt, during the Roman Empire, and after the invention of the printing press, for example. During the Cold War, the United States and the Soviet Union used disinformation campaigns to help advance their respective strategic interests. The complexity and scale of information pollution in the digitally connected world, however, present an unprecedented challenge. In particular, social media has allowed information to be disseminated on a wider scale. While this new informational landscape has empowered individuals to express their opinions, it has also sometimes resulted in the spread of mis- and disinformation. 

The speed of propagation is intimately related to the dynamics of social media. Individuals increasingly resort to social media for day-to-day information but still use these platforms with a recreational mindset, which lowers critical thinking and makes them more vulnerable to content that evokes an emotional response, has a powerful visual component or a strong narrative, or is shown repeatedly. 

Globally, data from 2022 shows that over 70% of individuals in some developing countries use social media as a source of news. This figure was above 60% in some European countries, such as Greece, Bulgaria, and Hungary. In the United States, 50% of adults get their news from social media. In 19 developed countries, 84% of Pew Research respondents believe that access to the internet and social media has made it easier to manipulate people with false information and rumours. Moreover, 70% of those surveyed consider the spread of false information online to be a major threat, second only to climate change. 

The role of technology

One of the key mechanisms behind the social media phenomenon is algorithmic content curation. Social media platforms use sophisticated algorithms, designed to keep users engaged by showing them the content most likely to capture their attention and prompt interaction. As a result, posts that evoke strong emotional responses—such as anger, fear, or outrage—tend to be favoured. Disinformation, with its often sensational and inflammatory nature, fits perfectly into this model, leading to its widespread dissemination.

This amplification effect is compounded by the phenomenon of ‘echo chambers’ and ‘filter bubbles’. Social media algorithms tend to reinforce users’ existing beliefs by showing them content that aligns with their views while filtering out opposing perspectives. This creates an environment where users are primarily exposed to information that confirms their biases, making them more susceptible to disinformation that supports their pre-existing opinions. In these echo chambers, false narratives can quickly gain traction, as they are continually reinforced by like-minded individuals and groups.

The viral nature of social media further exacerbates the problem. Disinformation can spread rapidly across networks, reaching large audiences. This speed of dissemination makes it difficult for fact-checkers and other countermeasures to keep up, allowing false information to gain a foothold before it can be debunked. Moreover, once disinformation has been shared widely, it can be challenging to correct the record, as retractions or corrections often do not receive the same level of attention as the original falsehoods. 

In parallel, more research is necessary to understand the spread of disinformation and how social media algorithms interplay with individuals’ active search for content, especially in non-Western and non-English speaking countries. Against this backdrop, policy and regulation that requests companies to share data and information on algorithms with researchers and other vetted actors could be an important step towards a deeper understanding of information disorder. 

The emergence of artificial intelligence-generated mis- and disinformation introduces additional complexity. The challenges relate not only to misinformation fuelled by factual errors or fabricated information provided by AI (often called AI ‘hallucinations’) but also to deliberate disinformation generated by malicious actors with the assistance of AI. The possibility to use generative AI models to produce ‘deepfakes’ – synthetic audio-visual media of human faces, bodies, or voices – enhances the quality and persuasiveness of disinformation, threatening core functions of democracy. Countries as diverse as Burkina Faso, India, Slovakia, Türkiye, and Venezuela have seen deepfakes used to sway voters and shape public opinion. Ultimately, deepfakes may undermine trust in elections and democratic institutions.

 Advertisement, Text, Poster, Newspaper

Policy and regulatory responses to disinformation 

A considerable number of national and regional legal frameworks, as well as private-led initiatives have been introduced to combat mis- and disinformation. On the one hand, they seek to empower individuals to participate in fighting the spread of mis- and disinformation through media literacy. On the other hand, there are initiatives that put in place content regulation aiming to tackle the information ecosystem, reducing social exposure to disinformation to protect society, with particular emphasis on vulnerable groups. 

In both cases, policies and frameworks to fight disinformation should seek to uphold human rights, such as the right to freedom of expression and the right to receive and impart information. The Human Rights Council has affirmed that responses to the spread of mis- and disinformation must be aligned with international human rights law, including the principles of lawfulness, legitimacy, necessity, and proportionality. Any limitation imposed on freedom of expression must be exceptional and narrowly construed. Disinformation laws that are vague or that confer excessive government discretion to fight disinformation are concerning, since they may lead to censorship.

In parallel, more should be done to curb the economic incentives to disinformation. Companies are expected to conduct human rights risk assessments and due diligence, ensuring their business models and operations do not negatively impact human rights. This includes sharing data and information on algorithms, which could allow the correlation between the spread of disinformation and ‘ad tech’ business models to be assessed. 

Striking the right balance between protection and participation in combating disinformation means resorting wisely to both regulation and engagement. The latter should be conceived in broad terms, encompassing not only the active involvement of individuals, but also the involvement of other segments such as educators, companies, and technical actors. This inclusive approach provides a pathway to curb disinformation while respecting human rights.

The report ‘Decoding Disinformation: Lessons from Case Studies’, published by Diplo, offers an in-depth analysis of disinformation and its interplay with digital policy and human rights. The research was supported by the project ‘Info Trust Alliance’, funded by the German Federal Foreign Office and implemented by GIZ Moldova.


DW Weekly #180 – 4 October 2024

 Page, Text

Dear readers, 

The drafting of the EU’s Code of Practice for general-purpose AI (GPAI) signals a crucial moment in European AI regulation and a global benchmark for managing innovation and risk. Leading academics, including AI pioneer Yoshua Bengio, are at the centre of this initiative, tasked with weaving a framework that balances transparency, safety, and innovation. The cast of academics, from seasoned professors to PhD candidates, showcases the EU’s desire to root its AI regulation in deep technical and legal expertise. Yet, as polished as this effort appears, questions linger about its timing and inclusivity—critical voices from industry and civil society are already showing signs of divergence.

The EU AI Act, hinging significantly on this Code of Practice, will not see final standards before 2026. Thus, this interim period, overseen by academic chairpersons, holds immense weight. While the presence of global AI figures like Bengio underscores the Code’s gravitas, the timing of their appointment, just after Parliament’s intervention, leaves a slightly bitter aftertaste. The process could have benefited from earlier transparency, with the ‘pity’ expressed by digital policy advisors reflecting broader concerns about the bureaucratic backlog. But there is no doubt about the intellectual firepower gathered here: the mix of AI technical savants, legal minds, and governance experts is the EU’s bet on building a human-centered and safe AI future.

Yet, the road ahead is bumpy. The first plenary, attended by nearly 1,000 stakeholders, unveiled the deep fault lines between general-purpose AI providers—like ChatGPT’s creators—and other participants. The latter, which includes civil society and academia, overwhelmingly pushed for stringent transparency on training datasets, supporting the inclusion of licensed content, open data, and even web-scraped material. GPAI providers, however, were notably less enthusiastic, baulking at demands for greater data disclosure, mainly when it came to open datasets. Their preference for self-policed data transparency, rather than third-party audits, exposes a friction between innovation-driven autonomy and regulation-enforced accountability.

 People, Person, Book, Comics, Publication, Face, Head

While academia and civil society rally behind risk assessment and strict audit trails, providers shy away from measures they deem overly stringent. Perhaps this is the core tension of the GPAI Code: can a framework fuel cutting-edge AI development and satisfy the public’s call for ethical safeguards? The European Commission’s ongoing consultation shows the battle for compromise is still in its early stages. With over 430 responses already collected, there is a palpable risk that the sheer diversity of opinions could derail progress, a possibility echoed by those close to the drafting process.

Creating this Code of Practice feels like a high-stakes balancing act. On the one hand, there is pressure to protect against AI’s ‘black box’ nature, ensuring transparency and responsibility. Conversely, the EU must remain competitive in AI, not shackling its innovators with undue restrictions. The stakes could not be higher. As Bengio puts it, this Code will have to stand the test of time, and not just be watched closely by Europe.

In other news, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) token witnessed a staggering rise of over 33,000% in September before stabilising at approximately USD 0.02309. The surge was triggered by a playful comment from Elon Musk after a discussion with Donald Trump, who floated the idea of establishing a new government efficiency department, with Musk potentially at its helm if Trump wins the upcoming election. Amidst a closely contested race between Trump and Kamala Harris, meme coins, including politically themed tokens like DOGE, are seeing a resurgence, with trading volumes surging to over USD 10 million in 24 hours. 

For more insights on the intersection of digital economy, cybersecurity, and policy governance, visit dig.watch and stay updated on the latest developments through our daily updates on the specific topic of your interest.

Marko and the Digital Watch team


Highlights from the week of 27-4 October 2024

european parliament building in brussels 1

The first draft of the EU AI Code is expected by November, with finalisation planned for 2025.

UNGA 77

At the 79th UN General Assembly, 18 nations endorsed a joint statement emphasising the critical importance of securing undersea cable infrastructure, highlighting the need for policies that ensure its resilience,…

europe flag

The EU seeks to understand how these platforms’ algorithms could influence civic discourse, mental health, and child protection.

elon musk tesla dogecoin lawsuit

Analysts predict a new cryptocurrency supercycle, driven by the resurgence of meme coins and politically themed tokens like MAGA and ConstitutionDAO.

google 76517 1280

Russia’s digital ministry confirms Google’s account creation restrictions and warns users to back up data and consider alternative two-factor authentication methods.

washington monument in washington dc united states of america usa

Concurrently, the US is enhancing financial and technological support for allies like Israel, which raises ethical concerns amid ongoing regional conflicts.

man falls in love with ai

Companies offer advanced AI training, including quantum physics.

NTIA

The initiative aims to improve participation in the digital economy, telehealth, and distance learning, with grant applications open until 7 February 2025.

brazil fines twitter

X is likely to pay the fines but may challenge an additional $1.8 million penalty imposed by Brazil’s Supreme Court after a brief platform reappearance.

smart phone with 5g symbol hologram network worldwide connection 1

The project is expected to benefit local fishermen, tourism, shipping, and marine research, ultimately unlocking new economic opportunities for local communities.



Reading corner

FUTURE AI
dig.watch

Balancing innovation and ethics in AI.

Diplo BLOGS24 Insta Jovan Kurbalija 30 Sep 1080x1080px 1
www.diplomacy.edu

The conceptual and terminological confusion surrounding the use of “digital,” “cyber,” and “tech” diplomacy has practical consequences, as highlighted by a recent US Government Accountability Office report, which identifies this ambiguity as one of a major barrier to effective cyber and digital diplomacy. The key takeaway is that clarity in terminology is crucial, not only for clear communication but also for effective diplomatic action, underscoring the importance of understanding the context in which these terms are used.

UNGA79: AI-powered insights and human-curated analysis

 People, Person, Crowd, Indoors, Architecture, Building, Classroom, Room, School, Audience, Lecture

UNGA79: AI-powered insights and human-curated analysis

New York, 24 – 30 September 2024

This year marks Diplo’s 8th consecutive year reporting from the UN General Assembly (UNGA), and we’re excited to share our most comprehensive coverage yet. Combining human expertise and AI-driven tools, we’re offering our readers unparalleled access to insights, analysis, and real-time information on every session and speaker at UNGA79.

On our dedicated 79th Session of the UN General Assembly (UNGA 79) webpage, you will find a comprehensive overview of the General Debate.

You can access the UNGA79 knowledge through two main channels: interact with an AI assistant or navigate a structured data organisation. 


The AI assistant

The AI assistant, powered by DiploAI models, is designed to offer you a deeper understanding of the General Debate. You’ll be able to explore a trove of information through a dynamic, conversation-based interface.

 Page, Text, File, Webpage

Expert analysis

Our team of experts produced daily updates focused on AI and digital issues—topics that are increasingly central to global governance.

 Page, Text

Beyond daily updates, our team has gone back and thoroughly reviewed all the materials from the event, carefully extracting and synthesising highlights on AI and digital issues. This additional layer of analysis zeroes in on the most significant developments in AI and technology policy, offering you an overview of what is shaping the conversation.


Session reports, knowledge graphs, event statistics and more

You can also get more structured access to the General Debate knowledge via delivering session reports that go beyond simple summaries. Our reports provide a nuanced AI analysis of each session, each report includes detailed sections on speakers involved, and our knowledge graphs offer a visual representation of the connections between topics and participants. Additionally, we outline follow-up questions to guide further discussion.

You can also navigate the complex web of discussions, topics, and speakers with our interactive knowledge graph of the event. Finally, our event statistics feature gives you insight into numbers that matter.

 Text, Business Card, Paper



Digital on Day 6 of UNGA79

1200 280 max 1

Digital on Day 6 of UNGA79: Digital transformation and equitable AI access

On the last day of the General Debate of the 79th Session of the UN General Assembly, key discussions focused on the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and its role in guiding digital transformation. Participants emphasised the importance of equitable access to technology, particularly AI, and the need for capacity development to bridge the digital divide. The conversations also highlighted the dual nature of AI, addressing its potential for economic growth alongside the risks it poses, including the misuse of technology in conflict and the spread of misinformation.


Global Digital Compact: Charting digital transformation

The proposed Pact for the Future, Kiribati noted, is a roadmap for strengthening global cooperation on key issues, one of which is digital transformation. Rwanda echoed the Pact’s importance for empowering nations to rebuild sustainably with a renewed focus on digital transformation. Djibouti welcomed the adoption of the GDC annexed to the Pact, acknowledging that we live in an era of disruptive technological advances. Kiribati expressed support for the GDC as it will help bridge the digital divide and ensure that Small Island Developing States (SIDS) like Kiribati are not left behind. Ecuador stressed the importance of implementing the GDC.


Development: Equitable access to AI

The statements highlighted critical challenges and opportunities related to equitable access to technologies, focusing on AI, as well as the need for capacity development and financial support to bridge the digital divide.

Burundi stressed the urgent need for universal, affordable access to the internet, including AI, particularly in developing regions such as Africa, where connectivity remains low. This gap exacerbates inequalities, denying many in the Global South vital social and economic opportunities. The UAE advocated for increased international investment in advanced technologies to facilitate sustainable development, while Sri Lanka emphasised the importance of establishing accessible digital public infrastructure to promote equitable digital transformation and called for enhanced capacity building and technical assistance.

The necessity of capacity development and technology transfer was echoed by Kiribati and Djibouti. Djibouti’s focus on education systems aims to equip its youth with advanced technological skills, further enhancing their competitive advantage.

The potential of AI and digital technologies to drive sustainable development is acknowledged by several nations. The UAE and Sri Lanka both stressed the transformative impact of these technologies on addressing global challenges, aiming for sustained growth through innovation. The President of the General Assembly summarised the pressing global challenges, including persistent poverty and technological inequalities, calling for an effective international financial architecture to support the realisation of the SDGs.


AI: Balancing innovation and risks in global security

Countries have addressed both the potential and the risks associated with digital technologies, particularly AI. Algeria expressed optimism about Africa’s economic development through advancements in AI, digitisation, and renewable energy. The UAE called for global collaboration to create a prosperous and stable future, emphasising the need to harness technological advancements to develop innovative solutions for businesses, daily life, and government services.

Conversely, Syria condemned the misuse of modern technologies as instruments of death and destruction. Sri Lanka highlighted the weaponisation of new domains like outer space and cyberspace, warning that AI challenges international humanitarian law in conflict situations. Similarly, Ireland called for prompt action to prevent an arms race in autonomous weapons and expressed its support for the Secretary-General’s call to conclude a treaty on autonomous weapons systems by the end of 2026.

Djibouti expressed gratitude to the USA for leading efforts that resulted in the unanimous adoption of the first-ever resolution by the General Assembly to promote safe, secure, and trustworthy AI systems.


Sociocultural: From misinformation to violence

Sociocultural issues were addressed only briefly. Sri Lanka cautioned that developments in the digital realm could create fertile ground for the spread of disinformation and hate speech, which may lead to violence.


This summary was generated by humans and provides a comprehensive overview of how digital issues were tackled during the last day of discussions, which took place on 29 September 2024.

For real-time updates, follow our live coverage on the Digital Watch Observatory’s dedicated page through DiploAI reports, written by our AI reporting tool.

Digital on Days 4 and 5 of UNGA79

1200 280 max 1

Digital on Days 4 and 5 of UNGA79: Accelerating GDC implementation and bridging the digital divide

On Days 4 and 5 of the General Debate, discussions unfolded around AI governance, cybersecurity threats, and the need for robust digital infrastructure. As nations confront the dual challenges of innovation and risk, calls emerge for fostering international collaboration and multilateral efforts to build a secure and inclusive digital environment. Central to this dialogue was the call for implementing frameworks like the Global Digital Compact (GDC).


Global digital governance: Swift GDC implementation and inclusive digital governance

Pakistan, Barbados, Tuvalu, Jamaica, Cameroon, Zambia and Tunisia welcomed the adoption of the GDC.

Andorra highlighted the GDC’s role in promoting digital literacy to ensure an inclusive and secure virtual environment, particularly for small states, where technology can offer high-value resources. Samoa underscored the GDC’s focus on creating a robust governance framework for digital technologies and the internet. The Lao PDR stressed the GDC’s aim to leverage technology to accelerate SDGs. Thailand also noted that steps must be taken to close the digital divide through the GDC. 

The Philippines, Samoa, and Tuvalu highlighted the urgency of implementing the GDC. The Philippines emphasised the need for rapid action to establish governance mechanisms for new spheres of human activity such as AI and the internet, stressing that these frameworks must prioritise human dignity amid rapid technological advancements. Samoa called for a coordinated, multi-layered approach, advocating for the involvement of UN bodies and development partners to adapt GDC principles to both national and global contexts. Tuvalu echoed the necessity for strong political will and unwavering commitment to implementing the GDC’s principles.

Global cooperation is important to ensure no one is left behind and to build a cyberspace that reflects global standards, San Marino stated. The GDC has set the goals to eliminate all obstacles and facilitate digital cooperation at the international level, Lao PDR noted.  

Multilateralism has a crucial role to play in creating opportunities and at the same time it must guarantee accessibility and security in this new virtual space of globalisation, Andorra underlined. 

The adoption of the Pact for the Future, the Declaration on Future Generations and the GDC signals renewed hope in multilateralism, Jamaica underlined. Together, these agreements chart a path toward cooperation that is responsive to the challenges of today and the needs of future generations, Somalia stated.

The statements from Russia, Belarus, and China express concerns about fairness, inclusivity, and equity in global governance, especially regarding technology and international cooperation. Russia criticised what it called an undermining of the ‘sovereign equality of member states’ in addressing issues such as IG and AI, and argued that these topics, impacting all of humanity, should be addressed through universal negotiations involving all UN member states. The country claimed that the Pact for the Future was formulated without a single plenary round of negotiations.

Meanwhile, Belarus emphasised that UN law is universal and guarantees equal rights for all states to access benefits, technologies, and resources without discrimination. China expressed support for countries opposing technology blockades and supply chain restrictions.


AI: Global cooperation for ethical AI development and security

Countries shared their concerns about AI’s potential risks and stressed the importance of global governance and collaboration to ensure its ethical and beneficial use.

Bangladesh expressed enthusiasm for the potential of AI, especially among its youth, but emphasised the need to ensure that countries like Bangladesh benefit from AI developments without being left behind. The country called for a balance between AI innovation and the protection of human labour, warning of the existential risks posed by autonomous intelligence. The Holy See emphasised the need for careful reflection on AI, which presents both exciting possibilities and risks, especially amid societal divides. China advocated for a people-centred approach, supporting global AI governance through international cooperation and capacity development.

South Korea and Singapore highlighted both the opportunities and risks AI presents to human rights and dignity. South Korea emphasised the need for new governance norms, pledging to lead global discussions on AI regulation. The Seoul Declaration for Safe, Innovative, and Inclusive AI and the Blueprint for Action for military AI use were key milestones in developing responsible frameworks for AI governance, South Korea said.

AI’s use in peace and security was also brought up by some states. Namely, Cameroon emphasised that despite global challenges to peace and development, advancements in science, technology, and AI offer significant opportunities. Collective responsibility and solidarity are essential to overcoming these challenges, which no nation can address on its own. At the same time, Israel stated that peace with Saudi Arabia could make the two countries cooperate in many fields, including AI.

Kazakhstan warned of AI’s risks in warfare, data privacy, and disinformation, calling for ethical standards and a UN-led AI office. Norway highlighted AI’s potential for good, tied to peace, development, and human rights. San Marino, Japan, and The Holy See voiced their concerns about AI’s impact on security particularly in relation to cyberattacks and nuclear risks. 

The Holy See urged all states to engage in comprehensive ethical reflection on emerging technologies, particularly in military use and called for a binding ethical and regulatory framework. It stresses the need for a moratorium on lethal autonomous weapons due to significant ethical and humanitarian concerns. Japan highlighted the challenges posed by emerging technologies, particularly for disarmament and non-proliferation, and stressed the importance of international rule-making on lethal autonomous weapons systems (LAWS) with a balanced approach considering humanitarian and security perspectives. Japan also emphasised the need to address digital technologies in global governance to protect human dignity. It advocated for international cooperation on AI governance, aiming to maximise AI’s benefits while mitigating risks, and committed to contributing to global discussions on safe and secure AI development through initiatives like the Hiroshima AI Process.


Cybersecurity: Countries call for international cooperation to tackle cyber threats

As nations grapple with the pervasive impact of cyber threats, leaders from diverse regions have voiced their concerns about the challenges their countries face on a national and international level. Jamaica highlighted that cybercrime not only undermines citizen security but is also a formidable barrier to sustained economic development. Montenegro echoed this worry, stating that cyber threats contribute to an alarming global situation.

San Marino warned that emerging technologies, particularly AI, and the possibility of cyberattacks have increased the risk of nuclear weapon use to levels not seen since the Cold War. This precariousness is starkly exemplified by Albania’s experience, with a large-scale cyberattack on its public service infrastructure, which it attributed to Iran. 

As global challenges mount, nations are increasingly focused on international cooperation to pave the way for a more resilient global response to these pressing challenges. 

Uganda called for eliminating or reducing the incidence of conflicts caused by factors such as new technologies. Similarly, Tunisia called for fighting the criminal and illegal use of digital technologies. Thailand expressed its dedication to partnering with others to prevent drug trafficking and transnational crimes enabled by digital technology. 

South Korea emphasised its commitment to addressing cyber threats while promoting a free and safe cyberspace that respects human rights. It actively participates in global efforts to establish comprehensive norms, such as the UN Convention against Cybercrime and works within the UN Security Council to enhance cybersecurity responses. Jamaica emphasised the necessity of international cooperation in addressing cybercrime, noting its active participation in negotiations on the UN Convention on Cybercrime alongside its CARICOM partners. Jamaica looks forward to the convention’s adoption, which it views as a crucial framework for future engagements aimed at combating cyber threats.

Montenegro expressed hope that the New Agenda for Peace would bolster multilateral capacities to confront various challenges, including cyber risks.


Development: Advancing SDGs through technology and capacity building

Development once again took centre stage, with numerous countries highlighting issues related to the SDGs, equitable access to technology, technology transfer, financial support, and capacity building, especially for youth and e-government initiatives.

Many countries reaffirmed their commitment to SDGs, seeing digital as a catalyst. San Marino noted the paramount role played by digital technologies in the achievement of the 17 SDGs. Slovenia connected digital solutions to climate resilience, while Azerbaijan proposed initiatives linking climate action and the SDGs. Thailand underscored closing the digital divide to achieve the SDGs through cooperation and technology transfer.

The digital divide was a prevalent issue across many nations, with Kazakhstan, Tanzania, Malaysia and Uganda, emphasising the need for equitable access to technology to drive development and close the digital divide. One way to narrow the digital divide is through reforms in the global financial and technology regimes, which was advocated by Pakistan and Tunisia. Australia stressed the necessity of accessible technology that benefits all without censorship or exclusion, while Guinea called for universal access to technological innovations while ensuring that ethics remain at the heart of their use.

Another way to bridge the digital gap is through digital literacy and capacity building. To this end, Andorra highlighted the need for digital literacy for an open, safe and inclusive digital future, which was echoed by Thailand. Lao PDR and Timor-Leste noted the importance of technology transfer and capacity building to support their development goals. Similarly, Grenada and Kazakhstan stressed the need to equip young people with digital skills for future opportunities, while Tanzania, Belize and Uganda advocated for vocational training as a pathway for youth empowerment, aiming to close the digital divide. Cambodia noted it would prioritise building its human capital to meet the demands of the digital age and invest more in capacity development.

Singapore announced the renewal of its capacity-building programme for the Forum of Small States (FSE), now called ‘FSE for Good.’ This initiative will include digital-themed programmes focusing on leadership and governance in the context of digital technologies and AI, while South Korea emphasised its commitment to empowering Africa’s youth to promote sustainable development through initiatives such as Tech4Africa. Speaking on behalf of small states, Samoa called for support for Small Island Developing States (SIDS) to include capacity building, technical assistance, and enhanced digital infrastructure.

Countries like Andorra and Jamaica illustrate the transformative potential of digital access. Andorra has made significant strides, with 90% of homes connected to the internet, leveraging this connectivity to enhance economic diversification and ensure digital rights for all citizens. Jamaica, through its national broadband network, has increased internet penetration significantly, aiming to provide better online government services. Japan highlighted the importance of a rural perspective by leveraging the advanced technology of both established companies and start-ups in rural areas.

On the issue of climate change, Croatia stressed the importance of harnessing innovation for environmental protection amid current crises, while Eswatini presented a comprehensive SDG Recovery and Acceleration Plan focused on digital transformation and renewable energy to combat climate impacts. Similarly, Slovenia highlighted the need for practical solutions, developing a digital system linked to the UN’s ‘Early Warning for All’ Initiative to predict floods and droughts. Lao PDR and Madagascar called for international support to access technology and innovation for green growth, while Grenada sought global partnerships to fund resilience projects and share lessons learned with other nations facing similar challenges. Tonga shared its focus on improving climate-resilient healthcare and education infrastructure in the Blue Pacific, noting the importance of digital platforms to mitigate risks. 

Finally, a number of countries shared their progress towards enhancing governance and digital services. Croatia outlined its vision for 2030 supported by digital transformation, while emphasising the need for effective institutions to manage the risks of emerging technologies. Albania highlighted its successful transition to good governance, achieving over 95% paperless public services, which has curbed corruption and increased trust in institutions.


Infrastructure: Closing the digital divide

The need for robust digital infrastructure has never been more critical. As Australia emphasised, comprehensive digital infrastructure is necessary to prevent countries from being left behind in the global digital economy. It is actively promoting sustainable connectivity in the South-South regions, particularly in the Pacific, by developing infrastructure projects like submarine cables.

Ethiopia and the Solomon Islands shared their national examples of boosting digital infrastructure. Ethiopia outlined its broader strategy for economic and digital development, noting that it is implementing transformative changes to advance its digital infrastructure. The Solomon Islands highlighted its partnership with China, which is leading the installation of 161 communication towers nationwide. This initiative is already connecting more rural populations to the digital age.


Economic: Bolstering e-governance for digital economy

Moldova and Cambodia highlight their respective efforts to bolster economic resilience and promote digital transformation. Moldova is advancing digital transformation by implementing e-governance to better connect with citizens and businesses. Cambodia is focused on enhancing public service efficiency, inclusivity and access through e-government, digital economy and society initiatives. A key step is the central bank’s launch of Bakong, a Blockchain-based digital payment system that promotes financial inclusion.


Human rights: Technology and healthcare

In discussions about human rights, AI emerged as a primary concern, along with the need to use technology to enhance national healthcare systems. The Philippines stressed that governance must keep pace with the rapid development of technologies like AI, the internet, and outer space, with human dignity as the top priority. India emphasised using technology to empower people, offering replicable models like digital public infrastructure and accessible healthcare, showcasing how technology can enhance governance and public services. Bangladesh reaffirmed its commitment to protecting fundamental rights, including freedom of speech, assembly, voting, and press freedom, extending these principles to the digital realm.


Legal: Advocating for ethical technology

The necessity for ethical and moral usage of technologies emerged as a key argument for the implementation of effective laws. Croatia emphasised the importance of upholding international humanitarian law, ending impunity, enhancing women’s leadership, and addressing the climate emergency, while advocating for the ethical and responsible use of new technologies. Iceland highlighted that technology is reshaping human experiences, often developing without adequate governance. It warned that this moral and legal vacuum allows powerful algorithms to manipulate public attention and beliefs, potentially undermining peace, human rights, and the equality of nations.


Sociocultural: Addressing misinformation and building trust in digital services

The pressing issues of misinformation and trust in digital services were sociocultural topics discussed on days four and five. Barbados expressed concern over the impact of misinformation and digital chaos, highlighting the unsettling scenes of war and famine that emerge in a digitally connected world. Tunisia echoed this sentiment, calling for efforts to combat misinformation and the misuse of digital technologies that destabilise communities. 

India emphasised the importance of ensuring trusted digital services and promoting an open-source culture to democratise global production and build resilient supply chains, thereby fostering widespread prosperity.


This summary was generated by humans and provides a comprehensive overview of how digital issues were tackled during the fourth and fifth day of discussions, which took place on 27 and 28 September 2024.

For real-time updates, follow our live coverage on the Digital Watch Observatory’s dedicated page through DiploAI reports, written by our AI reporting tool.

DW Weekly #179 – 27 September 2024

 Page, Text

Dear readers, 

The ‘Pact for the Future’, adopted at the Summit of the Future on 22 September 2024, emerges as a declaration of intent to leap from the past into an uncertain, but ambitious, tomorrow. The Pact, presented before an audience of world leaders and civil society representatives, encapsulates a roadmap and a lighthouse – navigating the challenges of climate, digital transformation, and peace while aiming to build structures agile enough for the unpredictable rhythms of modernity. It is a global handshake between generations: a promise that the wisdom of the past will not stagnate progress but rather infuse it with urgency. In the words of the UN Secretary-General: ‘We cannot create a future fit for our grandchildren with a system built by our grandparents’, we can hear a sentiment that underpins the thematic core of the Pact.

The ink on the Pact for the Future was barely dry when the first repercussions could be felt, especially within the UN General Assembly’s 79th session chambers. With climate change blazing on one side and the promise of digital revolution flickering on the other, world leaders convened during the high-level week to reassert their commitment to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). What unfolded was a kaleidoscope of voices, discussions, and pledges that sought to breathe life into what had often been seen as lofty, distant goals. The pace was fast, yet the ambition seemed to echo slower truths – the earth’s fevered rise in temperature, persistent inequality, and the widening gaps in access to digital infrastructure.

 Advertisement, People, Person, Poster, Crowd, Bow, Weapon, Text

While the Summit of the Future carved out new space for discussions on the use and governance of AI and digital inclusion, the UNGA79 focused on ensuring these discussions weren’t mere fleeting abstractions. Anchored in the Pact, the Global Digital Compact took centre stage, drawing sharp lines around data governance issues, internet access, and AI oversight. These initiatives were a nod to the ever-growing digital divide, where the future of democracy and human rights may just be shaped by the bits and bytes of cyberspace as much as by the ballots cast at polls. Global leaders, it seemed, were not just pledging to keep everyone connected – they were promising to keep everyone protected in an increasingly tricky online world. A bold promise indeed, in a time when the pace of technological change far outstrips the speed at which governance frameworks are formed.

Then came the delicate dance of peace and security, where old enemies and new technologies collided on the agenda. Discussions surrounding the reform of the UN Security Council – arguably one of the most progressive since the Mid-20th century – were matched with fresh commitments to nuclear disarmament and the governance of outer space. No longer the stuff of science fiction, space and AI were recognised as the new frontiers of conflict and cooperation. Yet Africa’s under-representation on the global stage may prove to be the most seismic of shifts. If the Pact’s promise to redress this historical imbalance holds, it could alter the very architecture of global governance in ways not seen since the decolonisation waves of the mid-1900s.

Through it all, the resonance of the future generations loomed large. For the first time, a formal Declaration on Future Generations was signed, reminding current leaders that their decisions – or indecisions – would shape the lives of the not yet born. A future envoy, empowered youth, and re-energised civil society seem to echo a deeper undercurrent: that this Pact, this Summit, and the UNGA79 may not be remembered for its words alone, but for the actions that will (or won’t) follow in its wake.

If you want to take part in decoding disinformation and attending lessons from case studies, you can participate in the event ‘Decoding disinformation: Lessons from case studies’, which will take place online on 30 September from 13:00-14:00 UTC and 14:00-15:00 CEST. You will have the opportunity to study real cases on the matter from the expert panel who will host the session: Jovan Kurbalija, Shita Laksmi, Marília Maciel, Ana Revenco, and Cathleen Berger—other events in our ‘Upcoming’ section.

Marko and the Digital Watch team


Highlights from the week of 20-27 September 2024

X has begun to comply with orders for content removal to meet the court’s requirements.

flag of ukraine

Telegram’s founder denies sharing user data but Ukrainian officials stress the need for national security.

Pavel Durov

The policy shift follows the arrest of CEO Pavel Durov in France, where he faces charges related to child sexual abuse materials on the app.

most popular social media icons black cubes scaled 1

Politicians have also been criticised for using misinformation for political gain, undermining trust in reliable information and democratic institutions.

flag of the united nations

The initiative signifies an unwavering commitment to an international system capable of addressing contemporary challenges and shaping a sustainable, equitable future.

goldman sachs logo investments banking artificial intelligence

Goldman Sachs analysts predict that gold could reach $2,700 per ounce by early 2025.

Meta

Deputy Commissioner Graham Doyle underscored that storing passwords without encryption is widely unacceptable due to potential abuse.

5cCVPZJQ UNDP 2

The alliance focuses on promoting innovation and inclusivity within the digital realm, enhancing infrastructure and connectivity in developing regions, and advocating for robust digital governance.

openai logo

The company plans to restructure into a for-profit benefit corporation, potentially leading to a $150 billion valuation.

Screenshot 2023 08 01 142134 1024x575 1

The ban followed Musk’s resistance, which he framed as a fight against ‘censorship.’



Reading corner

Diplo BLOGS24 Insta Aldo Mateucci 25
www.diplomacy.edu

Diplomatic extraterritoriality isn’t absolute, but a tool shaped by political necessity. Examples from historic ambassadors to Assange show how its application is influenced by power dynamics. Aldo Matteucci analyses.


Upcoming

0AGWppgs DIPLO NEWS 500
www.diplomacy.edu

Celebrating 500 issues of DiploNews! Join us on 30 September at 11:00 CEST [9:00 UTC] for a special retrospective event celebrating 25 years of Diplo’s pioneering digital diplomacy research.

Diplo INSTA GIZ Decoding
www.diplomacy.edu

Decoding disinformation: Lessons from case studies on 30 September 13:00-14:00 UTC I 14:00-15:00 CEST, online

1NHX8bPa Tech Diplomacy publication
www.diplomacy.edu

Tech Diplomacy: Actors, Trends, and Controversies | Book launch on 1 October 2024, at 12:00 UTC | 14:00 CEST

Digital on Day 3 of UNGA79

1200 280 max 1

Digital on Day 3 of UNGA79: Addressing AI, misinformation, and the need for global cooperation

On Day 3 of the UN General Assembly, discussions surrounded the challenges of rapid technological advancements and their sociocultural implications. A significant focus was placed on governing AI, misinformation, and disinformation, with several countries addressing their detrimental impact on democratic stability. Greece emerged as a prominent voice, dedicating a substantial portion of its statement to the importance of digital governance and regulation, particularly in the context of AI. The debate emphasised the need for international cooperation to address these pressing issues and ensure that technological progress benefits all nations equitably.


Global digital governance: Competition and cooperation

The world is undergoing a turbulent transformation marked by significant geopolitical, economic, scientific, and technological shifts –  we are witnessing an unprecedented technological revolution in a short timeframe, North Macedonia and Mauritius underlined. As economies, demographics, technologies, and societies evolve, each generation of decision-makers faces new challenges, New Zealand highlighted.

UN member states compete, cooperate and conflict, but the area of new technologies, particularly in the era of AI, is skewed against the Global South, Malawi warned. Regulatory frameworks are being developed that favour certain nations over others, and there is a need to establish not only a rules-based system but also equitable rules that promote fair competition. This requires stronger governance institutions to ensure fair access to education, markets, technology, financing, and natural resources. Malawi emphasised that robust governance within the UN is crucial to equitably regulating international collaboration and competition.

However, many countries have spoken about the importance of digital cooperation. The Central African Republic noted that it is high time to accelerate the implementation of the SDGs in digital cooperation. Multiple delegations have expressed strong support for the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the Pact for the Future, both adopted at the Summit of the Future. 

Peru and the Central African Republic welcomed the adoption of the GDC, while Côte d’Ivoire welcomed the GDC as a means to better harness technological progress for all. 

Sweden, one of the co-facilitators of the compact, reminded that through the GDC, member states have committed to strengthening international cooperation to close digital divides between and within countries and to establish the governance required for a sustainable digital future, including AI. Costa Rica noted that the GDC puts the multilateral system in motion to address AI and is key for AI research and development. Portugal highlighted that the GDC can balance opportunities and risks of new technologies, such as AI. While New Zealand underlined that member states must demonstrate their determination to implement the GDC for the well-being of present and future generations, Greece stressed that for the GDC to have effect, states need to put the regulation and application of AI on a global footing.


AI: Global cooperation for effective AI governance

Several countries voiced their concerns and aspirations regarding the governance and impact of AI and the need for international cooperation. Namely, Comoros called for international cooperation to establish guidelines ensuring that AI development promotes global productivity and knowledge, ensuring equitable use and benefits for all. Mauritius emphasised that AI governance must be grounded in international law to ensure humanity benefits from its transformative power.

Côte d’Ivoire highlighted the technological revolution, for which many nations are unprepared. AI holds great promise but also poses risks, particularly due to the absence of international regulations governing its use. Unchecked AI could lead to widespread abuse and unintended consequences. Austria discussed broader existential issues, emphasising that humanity faces pressing challenges like climate change and AI’s rising influence.

Greece praised AI’s transformative potential, likening its impact to past technological milestones such as electricity and the internet, and stressed that AI could revolutionise science, medicine, and public services. Greece endorsed the ‘Governing AI for Humanity’ report by the UN’s High-Level Advisory Body on AI, emphasising its potential to create a flexible global AI governance framework. They highlighted the need for global regulation, possibly through a COP-style approach involving countries and tech companies, to manage AI’s benefits and risks. Greece also warned of the risks, such as AI being used for harm, including creating deepfakes and misinformation, and Peru stressed that such risks can destabilise democracies by manipulating public opinion.

The UK underscored the military applications of AI and raised concerns about the deployment of such technologies without agreed rules, advocating for clearer regulations in the cybersecurity and defence sectors. Costa Rica urged the creation of governance frameworks for AI for both civilian and military use. These frameworks must regulate autonomous systems, with the Global Digital Compact offering a multilateral platform to address AI research, development, and its applications.


Legal: Ethical data governance

The need for ethical governance of technological development, particularly AI and data, to prevent misuse, manipulation, and domination was among the main arguments. Namely, Portugal emphasised that technological development must be human-centred and guided by international law to ensure ethical progress. To ensure AI’s ethical progress, Comoros stressed the need for international cooperation.

The EU warned about the dangers of reducing individuals to data that can be manipulated and surveilled. While AI and digital innovation are drivers of progress and prosperity, the EU stressed that they must be used for the benefit of humanity and freedom. It highlighted the misuse of personal data, comparing it to past errors with natural resources, and called for a global regulatory framework to prevent AI and data from becoming tools of domination or conflict.


Cybersecurity: Grappling with rapid technological advances and protecting children online

Rapid technological advancements offer new opportunities but are progressing faster than our ability to manage them, Kenya and Haiti underlined. We are facing cyber threats we couldn’t have imagined years ago, the Netherlands underlined.

Kuwait warned that technological innovations, particularly AI and social media, are increasingly being used for incitement, terrorist recruitment, and spreading hate speech and disinformation, which exacerbates cybersecurity risks. 

The rapid proliferation of advanced technologies introduces complex new challenges for arms control and international regulations, as Kenya noted. Haiti also expressed the concern that the acceleration of AI development is undermining the stability of democracies worldwide.

More and more countries are developing offensive cyber programmes, which pose a growing threat to our critical infrastructure, our security, our earning capacity and our intellectual property, the Netherlands stated. Kenya also warned that cybersecurity breaches and sophisticated cyberattacks on critical infrastructure increasingly threaten national security and global stability, Kenya noted. Haiti echoed these concerns, noting that the proliferation of cyber attacks endangers the stability of democracies, while Lesotho highlighted cybercrime in particular as one of the obstacles towards sustainable peace.

Palau believes that joining INTERPOL and strengthening its cyber defence systems have improved its ability to safeguard national security. The Netherlands highlights progress made through the UN Pact for the Future, which has addressed critical areas like cybersecurity.

The issue of child safety online was brought up by Greece. The country drew a parallel between the prolonged struggle to mandate car seat belts and the current lack of regulation on children’s use of digital and social media platforms despite growing evidence of harm. Children are increasingly exposed to content that fosters loneliness, unrealistic beauty standards, and extremist ideologies, while online bullying and social media addiction are reshaping their development. Social media algorithms are constantly improved by AI to keep children online despite proof that heavy use of social media is linked to depression, feelings of isolation, sleep deprivation and addiction. Greece emphasised the urgency of action and commended Australia’s efforts to introduce age limits and enforceable age verification technologies to protect children from these negative impacts.


Development: Bridging gaps and harnessing technology for inclusive growth

In the area of development, several key issues were highlighted regarding affordable financing, financial inclusion, and the role of technology in achieving the SDGs. Kenya emphasised the need for affordable financing alongside transformative policies such as fair trade practices, market access, inclusive international tax cooperation, technology transfer, and capacity building. This aligns with the calls from Gambia and CAR for efforts to bridge the digital divide and enhance technology transfer to support development. The call for technology transfer was echoed by Nepal, stressing the need to harness advancements to avoid falling further behind.

Fiji noted that while technology has increased our connectivity, it has also widened the gaps between the rich and poor, as well as between developed and developing nations. The issue of digital connectivity was further underscored by Haiti’s concern that nearly 2.7 billion people still lack internet access, highlighting the urgency for support to overcome this challenge and enable participation in the global economy. North Macedonia raised questions about achieving social justice amidst increasing economic, educational, gender, and digital disparities, pointing to a growing divide between winners and losers in a globalised, digitalised world. Similarly, Côte d’Ivoire cautioned against allowing AI and other technologies to exacerbate inequalities, advocating for a technological revolution that benefits everyone.

Equatorial Guinea noted that African economies could significantly contribute to global supply chains by leveraging their vast resources and growing consumer markets, thereby necessitating targeted support for development. Portugal reiterated the importance of inclusivity in the 2030 Agenda, emphasising that no one should be left behind. Focusing on the positive impact of digital technology on development, the EU emphasised that technological competition must take place within a framework of fair competition to ensure equitable outcomes. Sweden added that the digital transition can drive new growth and improve livelihoods, further underscoring the importance of inclusivity.


Human rights: Human-centred laws for ethical technological development

Some countries stated that the common denominator for effective technological development was the need for clear regulatory frameworks that respect human rights. Portugal emphasised that technological development must be human-centred and grounded in international law. The EU warned against repeating past mistakes, stressing the importance of responsibly handling personal data, unlike the misuse of natural resources. Peru raised concerns about tech companies storing vast amounts of personal data, highlighting privacy risks and potential government mass surveillance.. 


Sociocultural: The impact of mis-/disinformation on democratic stability 

The vast majority of statements tackling sociocultural themes focus on the critical issues of mis-/disinformation and their impact on the stability of democracies. To this end, Kenya noted that misinformation and manipulation, facilitated by social media, undermine public trust and the integrity of democratic processes. Similarly, Haiti expressed concern that the proliferation of disinformation threatens democratic stability globally.

Kuwait pointed out that technological innovations, including AI and social media, are increasingly used for incitement, terrorist recruitment, and spreading hate speech and falsehoods. This issue disproportionately affects young people, highlighting the need for international cooperation to combat these negative practices. Peru added that the spread of misinformation and hate speech particularly affects women.

Germany emphasised that navigating the conflicting values of the Charter, especially balancing the right to self-defence with the duty to protect civilians, is increasingly challenging in today’s social media environment, where oversimplified narratives obscure complexity, nuance and sometimes even facts.

Another sociocultural topic was e-governance, mentioned by Iraq, which emphasised its importance as one of the strategies to promote good governance and reduce corruption.

This summary was generated by humans and provides a comprehensive overview of how digital issues were tackled during the third day of discussions, which took place on 26 September 2024.

For real-time updates, follow our live coverage on the Digital Watch Observatory’s dedicated page through DiploAI reports, written by our AI reporting tool.

Digital on Day 2 of UNGA79

1200 280 max 1

Digital on Day 2 of UNGA79: Spotlight on digital governance and development challenges

On Day 2 of the UN General Assembly, discussions remained focused on the pressing issues of digital global governance and the implications of digital technologies. However, AI received notably less attention than on the previous day. As in the previous day, discussions were predominantly centred on development, with digital technologies highlighted as crucial drivers for achieving sustainable development goals (SDGs). However, concerns about foreign interference and disinformation threatening democracy were echoed by several nations, alongside discussions on the transformative potential of technology in governance and the risks of misuse in the digital age.


Global digital governance: The need for digital cooperation

The recently adopted Global Digital Compact (GDC) received scant attention on Day 2:Only France, Mongolia and Congo made reference to the compact. 

France welcomed the work done and coordinated by the Secretary-General and the GDC. Mongolia acknowledged the rapid evolution of global interdependence due to technological progress and digital advancements. and highlighted the GDC as a crucial and timely initiative. Congo deemed it an essential pillar for a prosperous future, emphasising its central role in the Fourth Industrial Revolution, where digital technologies are now indispensable.

Bulgaria emphasises the necessity for effective digital governance systems that adopt a multistakeholder and inclusive approach, aiming for a human-centric digital transformation and a safe and open digital future. Zimbabwe called for the establishment of a global digital governance framework to mitigate the adverse effects of transformative technologies while maximising their benefits.

Slovakia advocates for increased attention to the technological and digital dimensions of life within UN discussions, arguing that these aspects are now as vital as physical identities. Slovakia proposed that regional actors should take charge of regulation, while the UN should leverage new technologies to level differences and promote gender equality. Zimbabwe expressed its commitment to actively participate in international discussions and negotiations aimed at fostering global cooperation.


Development: Digital tech as catalyst for SDGs

Development emerged once again as the most prominent digital issue on national agendas, with digital technologies serving as key catalysts for achieving the SDGs. Mongolia noted its alignment with the SDGs through initiatives like ‘Billion Trees’ and ‘Digital Mongolia,’ while Ghana highlighted how digitalisation significantly improved citizens’ lives and laid the groundwork for sustainable economic growth.

Romania emphasised that the digital transition offers a unique opportunity to meet the SDGs by 2030, particularly for least developed countries, but stressed that global reforms and adequate financing are essential to bridge the digital gap. Similarly, Finland warned that without tangible results to address climate challenges and the dual nature of technology, the world risks straying from the SDGs.

The digital divide remains a critical challenge. Small nations like Suriname stressed the need for support in digital transformation, highlighting financial inclusion, access to education, and government services. Slovakia called for a more equitable distribution of technological advancements to promote social progress and gender equality. Togo reported its commitment to inclusive development by addressing the digital divide, ensuring that all populations can benefit from technological innovations. Bolivia underscored the necessity of equitable global governance in technology deployment to ensure advancements serve the well-being of all and do not exacerbate existing inequalities.

Financial inclusion is vital for supporting digitalisation and fostering economic resilience. Uzbekistan noted that achieving the SDGs requires attracting investments and advanced technologies, advocating for access to technology as a fundamental right. The call for increased financial resources resonated across nations, emphasising that without adequate funding, the benefits of digitalisation cannot be fully realised.


Sociocultural: Defending societies and transforming public services

New technologies change the ways we interact, Bolivia noted. However, as Czechia warned, foreign interference and disinformation continue to present a challenge with a serious impact on democracy, security and the rules-based international order. Romania echoed these concerns, identifying disinformation, policy misuse and other hybrid tools as central challenges to national security, 

Czechia also stressed that global tech companies must play an active role in defending democratic resilience.

As Romania stressed, in the digital transition, technology is a global amplifier of trends and can contribute to more effective and accessible public services. Ghana noted that it has embraced the Fourth Industrial Revolution in full, revolutionising public service delivery by integrating technology into governance. The country highlighted two national examples: the introduction of the Ghana Card, which has streamlined identification and access to services, and the digitisation of the country’s land registry.

Zimbabwe also acknowledged the transformative power of ICT but warned against its misuse to commit crimes and destabilise societies.


AI: Supporting global coordination

Mongolia and Uzbekistan emphasised challenges from the uncontrolled use of AI and supported UN resolutions promoting safe AI use for sustainable development and stronger international cooperation. France stressed the urgency of coordinating global efforts on AI, aiming to foster innovation while ensuring it benefits all nations and does not exacerbate inequality. The development of AI should occur within a robust ethical and democratic framework, crafted by the global community rather than being dictated by a small number of private entities at the forefront of technological advancements, the country stressed. France also highlighted plans to host an AI Action Summit in February 2025 to advance this vision.


Cybersecurity: Collective efforts urged

Mongolia noted that non-traditional threats such as cybercrime gained increasing attention in the early years of the 21st century. Czechia also highlighted the escalating severity of cyber threats, emphasising that attacks on hospitals, media, and national infrastructure endanger democratic systems globally. 

Mongolia urged nations to strengthen collective efforts to combat cybercrime, while Cyprus noted that collective action is needed to address the changing nature of conflicts, including challenges from new technologies. Czechia advocated for adhering to an international framework of responsible state behaviour in cyberspace and committed to strengthening cyber resilience.

Czechia pledged continued support for partners in Africa, Asia, and South America to bolster collective cybersecurity efforts and protect citizens worldwide.


Human rights: Countering hate speech

The impact of emerging technologies on human rights and the use of social media to spread hate speech and incite terrorism were some of the issues addressed by the delegations. 

Czechia emphasised the need to protect human rights amid the rapid development of emerging technologies, such as AI, autonomous systems, biotech, and quantum computing. Czechia stressed that these innovations must align with ethical and human rights standards. It also highlighted a resolution, co-submitted with Mexico, the Maldives, the Netherlands, and South Africa on human rights in the context of digital technologies. 

Venezuela condemned the use of hate speech, especially through social media, to incite terrorism and fabricate psychological wars aimed at exploiting feelings of hatred and destruction. 


Infrastructure: Developing African connectivity

Issues around connectivity were the least represented in yesterday’s discussions on digital. That said, the Democratic Republic of the Congo highlighted its goal to attract investment for developing African connectivity. The country called for multilateral cooperation and knowledge transfer, emphasising that grid development and the Grant Inga hydroelectric project are vital for linking regions and meeting rising energy demands from connected devices.

This summary was generated by humans and provides a comprehensive overview of how digital issues were tackled during the second day’s discussions, which took place on 25 September 2024.

For real-time updates, follow our live coverage on the Digital Watch Observatory’s dedicated page through DiploAI reports, written by our AI reporting tool.