What the Cloudflare outage taught us: Tracing ones that shaped the internet of today

The internet has become part of almost everything we do. It helps us work, stay in touch with friends and family, buy things, plan trips, and handle tasks that would have felt impossible until recently. Most people cannot imagine getting through the day without it.

But there is a hidden cost to all this convenience. Most of the time, online services run smoothly, with countless systems working together in the background. But every now and then, though, a key cog slips out of place.

When that happens, the effects can spread fast, taking down apps, websites, and even entire industries within minutes. These moments remind us how much we rely on digital services, and how quickly everything can unravel when something goes wrong. It raises an uncomfortable question. Is digital dependence worth the convenience, or are we building a house of cards that could collapse, pulling us back into reality?

Warning shots of the dot-com Era and the infancy of Cloud services

In its early years, the internet saw several major malfunctions that disrupted key online services. Incidents like the Morris worm in 1988, which crashed about 10 percent of all internet-connected systems, and the 1996 AOL outage that left six million users offline, revealed how unprepared the early infrastructure was for growing digital demand.

A decade later, the weaknesses were still clear. In 2007, Skype, then with over 270 million users, went down for nearly two days after a surge in logins triggered by a Windows update overwhelmed its network. Since video calls were still in their early days, the impact was not as severe, and most users simply waited it out, postponing chats with friends and family until the issue was fixed.

As the dot-com era faded and the 2010s began, the shift to cloud computing introduced a new kind of fragility. When Amazon’s EC2 and EBS systems in the US-East region went down in 2011, the outage took down services like Reddit, Quora, and IMDb for days, exposing how quickly failures in shared infrastructure can cascade.

A year later, GoDaddy’s DNS failure took millions of websites offline, while large-scale Gmail disruptions affected users around the world, early signs that the cloud’s growing influence came with increasingly high stakes.

By the mid-2010s, it was clear that the internet had evolved from a patchwork of standalone services to a heavily interconnected ecosystem. When cloud or DNS providers stumbled, their failures rippled simultaneously across countless platforms. The move to centralised infrastructure made development faster and more accessible, but it also marked the beginning of an era where a single glitch could shake the entire web.

Centralised infrastructure and the age of cascading failures

The late 2000s and early 2010s saw a rapid rise in internet use, with nearly 2 billion people worldwide online. As access grew, more businesses moved into the digital space, offering e-commerce, social platforms, and new forms of online entertainment to a quickly expanding audience.

With so much activity shifting online, the foundation beneath these services became increasingly important, and increasingly centralised, setting the stage for outages that could ripple far beyond a single website or app.

The next major hit came in 2016, when a massive DDoS attack crippled major websites across the USA and Europe. Platforms like Netflix, Reddit, Twitter, and CNN were suddenly unreachable, not because they were directly targeted, but because Dyn, a major DNS provider, had been overwhelmed.

The attack used the Mirai botnet malware to hijack hundreds of thousands of insecure IoT devices and flood Dyn’s servers with traffic. It was one of the clearest demonstrations yet that knocking out a single infrastructure provider could take down major parts of the internet in one stroke.

In 2017, another major outage occurred, with Amazon at the centre once again. On 28 February, the company’s Simple Storage Service (S3) went down for about 4 hours, disrupting access across a large part of the US-EAST-1 region. While investigating a slowdown in the billing system, an Amazon engineer accidentally entered a typo in a command, taking more servers offline than intended.

That small error was enough to knock out services like Slack, Quora, Coursera, Expedia and countless other websites that relied on S3 for storage or media delivery. The financial impact was substantial; S&P 500 companies alone were estimated to have lost roughly 150 million dollars during the outage.

Amazon quickly published a clear explanation and apology, but transparency could not undo the economic damage nor (yet another) sudden reminder that a single mistake in a centralised system could ripple across the entire web.

Outages in the roaring 2020s

The S3 incident made one thing clear. Outages were no longer just about a single platform going dark. As more services leaned on shared infrastructure, even small missteps could take down enormous parts of the internet. And this fragility did not stop at cloud storage.

Over the next few years, attention shifted to another layer of the online ecosystem: content delivery networks and edge providers that most people had never heard of but that nearly every website depended on.

The 2020s opened with one of the most memorable outages to date. On 4 October 2021, Facebook and its sister platforms, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Messenger, vanished from the internet for nearly 7 hours after a faulty BGP configuration effectively removed the company’s services from the global routing table.

Millions of users flocked to other platforms to vent their frustration, overwhelming Twitter, Telegram, Discord, and Signal’s servers and causing performance issues across the board. It was a rare moment when a single company’s outage sent measurable shockwaves across the entire social media ecosystem.

But what happens when outages hit industries far more essential than social media? In 2023, the Federal Aviation Administration was forced to delay more than 10,000 flights, the first nationwide grounding of air traffic since the aftermath of September 11.

A corrupted database file brought the agency’s Notice to Air Missions (NOTAM) system to a standstill, leaving pilots without critical safety updates and forcing the entire aviation network to pause. The incident sent airline stocks dipping and dealt another blow to public confidence, showing just how disruptive a single technical failure can be when it strikes at the heart of critical infrastructure.

Outages that defined 2025

The year 2025 saw an unprecedented wave of outages, with server overloads, software glitches and coding errors disrupting services across the globe. The Microsoft 365 suite outage in January, the Southwest Airlines and FAA synchronisation failure in April, and the Meta messaging blackout in July all stood out for their scale and impact.

But the most disruptive failures were still to come. In October, Amazon Web Services suffered a major outage in its US-East-1 region, knocking out everything from social apps to banking services and reminding the world that a fault in a single cloud region can ripple across thousands of platforms.

Just weeks later, the Cloudflare November outage became the defining digital breakdown of the year. A logic bug inside its bot management system triggered a cascading collapse that took down social networks, AI tools, gaming platforms, transit systems and countless everyday websites in minutes. It was the clearest sign yet that when core infrastructure falters, the impact is immediate, global and largely unavoidable.

And yet, we continue to place more weight on these shared foundations, trusting they will hold because they usually do. Every outage, whether caused by a typo, a corrupted file, or a misconfigured update, exposes how quickly things can fall apart when one key piece gives way.

Going forward, resilience needs to matter as much as innovation. That means reducing single points of failure, improving transparency, and designing systems that can fail without dragging everything down. The more clearly we see the fragility of the digital ecosystem, the better equipped we are to strengthen it.

Outages will keep happening, and no amount of engineering can promise perfect uptime. But acknowledging the cracks is the first step toward reinforcing what we’ve built — and making sure the next slipped cog does not bring the whole machine to a stop.

The smoke and mirrors of the digital infrastructure

The internet is far from destined to collapse, but resilience can no longer be an afterthought. Redundancy, decentralisation and smarter oversight need to be part of the discussion, not just for engineers, but for policymakers as well.

Outages do not just interrupt our routines. They reveal the systems we have quietly built our lives around. Each failure shows how deeply intertwined our digital world has become, and how fast everything can stop when a single piece gives way.

Will we learn enough from each one to build a digital ecosystem that can absorb the next shock instead of amplifying it? Only time will tell.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

New ChatGPT layout blends audio, text and maps in one view

OpenAI has unveiled an updated ChatGPT interface that combines voice and text features in a single view. Users can speak naturally at any point in a chat and receive responses in text, audio, or images. The new layout also introduces real-time map displays.

The redesign adds a scrolling transcript within the chat window. It allows users to revisit earlier exchanges and move easily between reading and listening. OpenAI states that the goal is to support voice-led tasks without compromising clarity.

With the unified experience, conversations no longer require switching modes. ChatGPT can deliver audio, written, and visual replies simultaneously. Maps and images appear directly alongside the voice response.

Every spoken message is automatically transcribed. However, this helps users follow more extended discussions and keep a record for later reference. OpenAI says the feature supports both accessibility and everyday convenience.

The update is rolling out gradually across web and mobile platforms. Users who prefer the earlier voice-only layout can revert to it in settings. OpenAI says the unified mode will remain the default as development continues.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

India confronts rising deepfake abuse as AI tools spread

Deepfake abuse is accelerating across India as AI tools make it easy to fabricate convincing videos and images. Researchers warn that manipulated media now fuels fraud, political disinformation and targeted harassment. Public awareness often lags behind the pace of generative technology.

Recent cases involving Ranveer Singh and Aamir Khan showed how synthetic political endorsements can spread rapidly online. Investigators say cloned voices and fabricated footage circulated widely during election periods. Rights groups warn that such incidents undermine trust in media and public institutions.

Women face rising risks from non-consensual deepfakes used for harassment, blackmail and intimidation. Cases involving Rashmika Mandanna and Girija Oak intensified calls for stronger protections. Victims report significant emotional harm as edited images spread online.

Security analysts warn that deepfakes pose growing risks to privacy, dignity and personal safety. Users can watch for cues such as uneven lighting, distorted edges, or overly clean audio. Experts also advise limiting the sharing of media and using strong passwords and privacy controls.

Digital safety groups urge people to avoid engaging with manipulated content and to report suspected abuse promptly. Awareness and early detection remain critical as cases continue to rise. Policymakers are being encouraged to expand safeguards and invest in public education on emerging risks associated with AI.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Chen Deli warns that AGI progress could bring dangerous societal consequences

DeepSeek made a rare public appearance at the World Internet Conference in Wuzhen, where senior researcher Chen Deli restated the firm’s ambition to develop AGI. He joined other companies known as China’s ‘six little dragons’ of AI and acknowledged the potential risks of advanced systems.

Chen represented founder Liang Wenfeng, who has remained out of the public eye since meeting President Xi Jinping earlier this year. He said AI’s current limits create a short ‘honeymoon phase’ before automation reshapes employment and social stability.

The start-up, founded in 2023 as a High-Flyer spin-out, continues to focus on long-term AGI research rather than short-lived commercial trends. Chen said it was reasonable to consider the dangers of highly capable systems while still pursuing them.

His comments echoed an open letter calling for a pause on superintelligence work until strong public support and scientific consensus on safety emerge. Hundreds of experts and public figures backed the appeal for tighter oversight.

Chen argued that market incentives make slowing progress unrealistic and said widespread job replacement may ultimately define the AI revolution. Other firms from China, including Zhipu AI and Alibaba, outlined plans for more powerful infrastructure to meet rising compute demand.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Gemini boosts Google Maps with tips, EV forecasts and revamped Explore

Google Maps is rolling out new Gemini-powered features to streamline travel planning and reduce everyday friction. The update includes Insider Tips for venues, a refreshed Explore tab, predictions of EV-charger availability, and the option to review businesses under a nickname.

Insider Tips uses Gemini to analyse reviews and local data, offering practical guidance on parking details, dress codes, and lesser-known menu items. The feature is launching first in the United States on Android and iOS before expanding further.

The Explore tab has been redesigned with curated lists of trending restaurants, attractions, and activities. Google says the update will be available globally this month, helping users discover new places without having to sort through lengthy reviews.

EV drivers will gain predictive insights into charger availability, with Maps estimating how many ports are likely to be free when they arrive. The feature will begin rolling out next week on Android Auto and Google-built-in vehicles.

Users can also choose to leave business reviews under a nickname and profile picture instead of their real name, offering greater privacy without losing review protections. Google says the option will roll out across Android, iOS, and desktop.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

DPDP law takes effect as India tightens AI-era data protections

India has activated new Digital Personal Data Protection rules that sharply restrict how technology firms collect and use personal information. The framework limits data gathering to what is necessary for a declared purpose and requires clear explanations, opt-outs, and breach notifications for Indian users.

The rules apply across digital platforms, from social media and e-commerce to banks and public services. Companies must obtain parental consent for individuals under 18 and are prohibited from using children’s data for targeted advertising. Firms have 18 months to comply with the new safeguards.

Users can request access to their data, ask why it was collected, and demand corrections or updates. They may withdraw consent at any time and, in some cases, request deletion. Companies must respond within 90 days, and individuals can appoint someone to exercise these rights.

Civil society groups welcomed stronger user rights but warned that the rules may also expand state access to personal data. The Internet Freedom Foundation criticised limited oversight and said the provisions risk entrenching government control, reducing transparency for citizens.

India is preparing further digital regulations, including new requirements for AI and social media firms. With nearly a billion online users, the government has urged platforms to label AI-generated content amid rising concerns about deepfakes, online misinformation, and election integrity.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Chrome receives emergency update to fix high-severity zero-day flaw

Google has issued an emergency update to fix the seventh Chrome zero-day exploited in attacks this year. The flaw, tracked as CVE-2025-13223, is caused by a type confusion bug in the browser’s V8 JavaScript engine and was used in the wild before the patch was released.

The company says updates will roll out across the Stable Desktop channel in the coming weeks, though users can install the fix immediately by checking for updates in Chrome’s settings. Google is withholding technical details until most users have upgraded to avoid encouraging further exploitation.

The vulnerability was reported by a member of Google’s Threat Analysis Group and allowed attackers to trigger code execution or browser crashes through malicious HTML pages. It continues a pattern of high-severity zero-days discovered and patched throughout 2025.

Google stresses that prompt updates remain essential, as attackers often target unpatched systems. Automatic updates can help ensure that newly released fixes reach users quickly and reduce exposure to emerging threats.

Security experts also recommend enabling scheduled antivirus scans and using protective features, such as hardened browsers or VPNs. With multiple zero-days already patched this year, analysts say more are likely, and users should keep Chrome’s update settings enabled.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Web services recover after Cloudflare restores its network systems

Cloudflare has resolved a technical issue that briefly disrupted access to major platforms, including X, ChatGPT, and Letterboxd. Users had earlier reported internal server error messages linked to Cloudflare’s network, indicating that pages could not be displayed.

The disruption began around midday UK time, with some sites loading intermittently as the problem spread across the company’s infrastructure. Cloudflare confirmed it was investigating an incident affecting multiple customers and issued rolling updates as engineers worked to identify the fault.

Outage tracker Down Detector also experienced difficulties during the incident, later showing a sharp rise in reports once it came back online. The pattern pointed to a broad network-level failure rather than isolated platform issues.

Users saw repeated internal server error warnings asking them to try again, though services began recovering as Cloudflare isolated the cause. The company has not yet released full technical details, but said the fault has been fixed and that systems are stabilising.

Cloudflare provides routing, security, and reliability tools for a wide range of online services, making a single malfunction capable of cascading globally. The company said it would share further information on the incident and steps taken to prevent similar failures.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Misconfigured database triggered global Cloudflare failure, CEO says

Cloudflare says its global outage on 18 November was caused by an internal configuration error, not a cyberattack. CEO Matthew Prince apologised to users after a permissions update to a ClickHouse cluster generated a malformed feature file that caused systems worldwide to crash.

The oversized file exceeded a hard limit in Cloudflare’s routing software, triggering failures across its global edge. Intermittent recoveries during the first hours of the incident led engineers to suspect a possible attack, as the network randomly stabilised when a non-faulty file propagated.

Confusion intensified when Cloudflare’s externally hosted status page briefly became inaccessible, raising fears of coordinated targeting. The root cause was later traced to metadata duplication from an unexpected database source, which doubled the number of machine-learning features in the file.

The outage affected Cloudflare’s CDN, security layers, and ancillary services, including Turnstile, Workers KV, and Access. Some legacy proxies kept limited traffic moving, but bot scores and authentication systems malfunctioned, causing elevated latencies and blocked requests.

Engineers halted the propagation of the faulty file by mid-afternoon and restored a clean version before restarting affected systems. Prince called it Cloudflare’s most serious failure since 2019 and said lessons learned will guide major improvements to the company’s infrastructure resilience.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

The future of EU data protection under the Omnibus Package

Introduction and background information

The Commission claims that the Omnibus Package aims to simplify certain European Union legislation to strengthen the Union’s long-term competitiveness. A total of six omnibus packages have been announced in total.

The latest (no. 4) targets small mid-caps and digitalisation. Package no. 4 covers data legislation, cookies and tracking technologies (i.e. the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and ePrivacy Directive (ePD)), as well as cybersecurity incident reporting and adjustments to the Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA).

That ‘simplification’ is part of a broader agenda to appease business, industry and governments who argue that the EU has too much red tape. In her September 2025 speech to German economic and business associations, Ursula von der Leyen sided with industry and stated that simplification is ‘the only way to remain competitive’.

As for why these particular laws were selected, the rationale is unclear. One stated motivation for including the GDPR is its mention in Mario Draghi’s 2024 report on ‘The Future of European Competitiveness’.

Draghi, the former President of the European Central Bank, focused on innovation in advanced technologies, decarbonisation and competitiveness, as well as security. Yet, the report does not outline any concrete way in which the GDPR allegedly reduces competitiveness or requires revision.

The GDPR appears only twice in the report. First, as a brief reference to regulatory fragmentation affecting the reuse of sensitive health data across Member States (MS).

Second, in the concluding remarks, it is claimed that ‘the GDPR in particular has been implemented with a large degree of fragmentation which undermines the EU’s digital goals’. There is, however, no explanation of this ‘large fragmentation’, no supporting evidence, and no dedicated section on the GDPR as its first mention being buried in the R&I (research and innovation) context.

It is therefore unclear what legal or analytical basis the Commission relies on to justify including the GDPR in this simplification exercise.

The current debate

There are two main sides to this Omnibus, which are the privacy forward and the competitive/SME side. The two need not be mutually exclusive, but civil society warns that ‘simplification’ risks eroding privacy protection. Privacy advocates across civil society expressed strong concern and opposition to simplification in their responses to the European Commission’s recent call for evidence.

Industry positions vary in tone and ambition. For example, CrowdStrike calls for greater legal certainty under the Cybersecurity Act, such as making recital 55 binding rather than merely guiding and introducing a one-stop-shop mechanism for incident reporting.

Meta, by contrast, urges the Commission to go beyond ‘easing administrative burdens’, calling for a pause in AI Act enforcement and a sweeping reform of the EU data protection law. On the civil society side, Access Now argues that fundamental rights protections are at stake.

It warns that any reduction in consent prompts could allow tracking technologies to operate without users ever being given a real opportunity to refuse. A more balanced, yet cautious line can be found in the EDPB and EDPS joint opinion regarding easing records of processing activities for SMEs.

Similar to the industry, they support reducing administrative burdens, but with the caveat that amendments should not compromise the protection of fundamental rights, echoing key concerns of civil society.

Regarding Member State support, Estonia, France, Austria and Slovenia are firmly against any reopening of the GDPR. By contrast, the Czech Republic, Finland and Poland propose targeted amendments while Germany proposes a more systematic reopening of the GDPR.

Individual Members of the European Parliament have also come out in favour of reopening, notably Aura Salla, a Finnish centre-right MEP who previously headed Meta’s Brussels lobbying office.

Therefore, given the varied opinions, it cannot be said what the final version of the Omnibus would look like. Yet, a leaked draft document of the GDPR’s potential modifications suggests otherwise. Upon examination, it cannot be disputed that the views from less privacy-friendly entities have served as a strong guiding path.

Leaked draft document main changes

The leaked draft introduces several core changes.

Those changes include a new definition of personal and sensitive data, the use of legitimate interest (LI) for AI processing, an intertwining of the ePrivacy Directive (ePD) and GDPR, data breach reforms, a centralised data protection impact assessment (DPIA) whitelist/blacklist, and access rights being conditional on motive for use.

A new definition of personal data

The draft redefines personal data so that ‘information is not personal data for everyone merely because another entity can identify that natural person’. That directly contradicts established EU case law, which holds that if an entity can, with reasonable means, identify a natural person, then the information is personal data, regardless of who else can identify that person.

A new definition of sensitive data

Under current rules, inferred information can be sensitive personal data. If a political opinion is inferred from browsing history, that inference is protected.

The draft would narrow this by limiting sensitive data to information that ‘directly reveals’ special categories (political views, health, religion, sexual orientation, race/ethnicity, trade union membership). That would remove protection from data derived through profiling and inference.

Detected patterns, such as visits to a health clinic or political website, would no longer be treated as sensitive, and only explicit statements similar to ‘I support the EPP’ or ‘I am Muslim’ would remain covered.

Intertwining article 5(3) ePD and the GDPR

Article 5(3) ePD is effectively copied into the GDPR as a new Article 88a. Article 88a would allow the processing of personal data ‘on or from’ terminal equipment where necessary for transmission, service provision, creating aggregated information (e.g. statistics), or for security purposes, alongside the existing legal bases in Articles 6(1) and 9(2) of the GDPR.

That generates confusion about how these legal bases interact, especially when combined with AI processing under LI. Would this mean that personal data ‘on or from’ a terminal equipment may be allowed if it is done by AI?

The scope is widened. The original ePD covered ‘storing of information, or gaining access to information already stored, in the terminal equipment’. The draft instead regulates any processing of personal data ‘on or from’ terminal equipment. That significantly expands the ePD’s reach and would force controllers to reassess and potentially adapt a broad range of existing operations.

LI for AI personal data processing

A new Article 88c GDPR, ‘Processing in the context of the development and operation of AI’, would allow controllers to rely on LI to process personal data for AI processing. That move would largely sideline data subject control. Businesses could train AI systems on individuals’ images, voices or creations without obtaining consent.

A centralised data breach portal, deadline extension and change in threshold reporting

The draft introduces three main changes to data breach reporting.

  • Extending the notification deadline from 72 to 96 hours, giving privacy teams more time to investigate and report.
  • A single EU-level reporting portal, simplifying reporting for organisations active in multiple MS.
  • Raising the notification threshold when the rights and freedoms of data subjects are at ‘risk’ to ‘high risk’.

The first two changes are industry-friendly measures designed to streamline operations. The third is more contentious. While industry welcomes fewer reporting obligations, civil society warns that a ‘high-risk’ threshold could leave many incidents unreported. Taken together, these reforms simplify obligations, albeit at the potential cost of reducing transparency.

Centralised processing activity (PA) list requiring a DPIA

This is another welcome change as it would clarify which PAs would automatically require a DPIA and which would not. The list would be updated every 3 years.

What should be noted here is that some controllers may not see their PA on this list and assume or argue that a DPIA is not required. Therefore, the language on this should make it clear that it is not a closed list.

Access requests denials

Currently, a data subject may request a copy of their data regardless of the motive. Under the draft, if a data subject exploits the right of access by using that material against the controller, the controller may charge or refuse the request.

That is problematic for the protection of rights as it impacts informational self-determination and weakens an important enforcement tool for individuals.

For more information, an in depth analysis by noyb has been carried out which can be accessed here.

The Commission’s updated version

As of the 19th of November, the Commission has published its digital omnibus proposal. Most of the amendments in the leaked draft have remained. One of the measures dropped is the definition of sensitive data. This means that inferences could amount to sensitive data.

However, the final document keeps three key changes that erode fundamental rights protections:

  • Changing the definition of personal data to be a subjective and narrow one;
  • An intertwining of the ePD and the GDPR which also allows for processing based on aggregated and security purposes;
  • LI being relied upon as a legal basis for AI processing of personal data.

Still, positive changes remain:

  • A single-entry point for EU data breaches. This is a welcomed measure which streamlines reporting and appease some compliance obligations for EU businesses.
  • Another welcomed measure is the white/black-list of processing activities which would or would not require a DPIA. The same note remains with what the language of this text will look like.

Overall, these two measures are examples of simplification measures with concrete benefits.

Now, the European Parliament has the task to dissect this proposal and debate on what to keep and what to reject. Some experts have suggested that this may take minimum 1 year to accomplish given how many changes there are, but this is not certain.

We can also expect a revised version of the Commission’s proposal to be published due to the errors in language, numbering and article referencing that have been observed. This does not mean any content changes.

Final remarks

Simplification in itself is a good idea, and businesses need to have enough freedom to operate without being suffocated with red tape. However, changing a cornerstone of data protection law to such an extent that it threatens fundamental rights protections is just cause for concern.

Alarms have already been raised after the previous Omnibus package on green due diligence obligations was scrapped. We may now be witnessing a similar rollback, this time targeting digital rights.

As a result, all eyes are on 19 November, a date that could reshape not only the EU privacy standards but also global data protection norms.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!