More than 20 price comparison websites across Europe, including Germany’s Idealo and France‘s LeGuide, criticised Google’s proposed changes to its search results, claiming they fail to comply with EUDigital Markets Act (DMA) requirements. The Act prohibits companies from favouring their own products and services on their platforms.
Google’s latest proposal includes redesigned search results to balance comparison sites and supplier websites, alongside testing an older ‘ten blue links’ format in some countries. However, the websites argue Google has disregarded feedback from over a year of discussions.
The critics, in an open letter, called on the European Commission to take decisive action, including fines, to ensure compliance. Google referred to a November statement highlighting efforts to meet DMA requirements.
Serie A has partnered with Meta to combat illegal live streaming of football matches, aiming to protect its broadcasting rights. Under the agreement, Serie A will gain access to Meta’s tools for real-time detection and swift removal of unauthorised streams on Facebook and Instagram.
Broadcasting revenue remains vital for Serie A clubs, including Inter Milan and Juventus, with €4.5 billion secured through deals with DAZN and Sky until 2029. The league’s CEO urged other platforms to follow Meta’s lead in fighting piracy.
Italian authorities have ramped up anti-piracy measures, passing laws that enable swift takedowns of illegal streams. Earlier this month, police dismantled a network with 22 million users, highlighting the scale of the issue.
Global digital governance was the main topic in a key discussion led by moderator Timea Suto, gathering experts to tackle challenges in AI, data management, and internet governance. At the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, speakers emphasised balancing innovation with regulatory consistency while highlighting the need for inclusive frameworks that address societal biases and underrepresented voices.
Thomas Schneider of Ofcom Switzerland underscored the Council of Europe‘s AI convention as a promising standard for global interoperability. Meta’s Flavia Alves advocated for open-source AI to drive global collaboration and safer products. Meanwhile, Yoichi Iida from Japan‘s Ministry of Communications outlined the G7 Hiroshima AI code as an international step forward, while concerns about dataset biases were raised from the audience.
Data governance discussions focused on privacy and trust in cross-border flows. Maarit Palovirta of Connect Europe called for harmonised regulations to protect privacy while fostering innovation. Yoichi Iida highlighted OECD initiatives on trusted data sharing, with Amr Hashem of the GSMA stressing the need to develop infrastructure alongside governance, particularly in underserved regions.
The future of internet governance also featured prominently, with Irina Soeffky from Germany‘s Digital Ministry reinforcing the multi-stakeholder model amid calls to update WSIS structures. Audience member Bertrand de La Chapelle proposed reforming the Internet Governance Forum to reflect current challenges. Jacques Beglinger of EuroDIG stressed the importance of grassroots inclusion, while Desiree Milosevic-Evans highlighted gender representation gaps in governance.
Canada‘s Larisa Galadza framed the coming year as critical for advancing the Global Digital Compact, with priorities on AI governance under Canada’s G7 presidency. Maria Fernanda Garza of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) called for alignment in governance while maintaining flexibility for local needs amid ongoing multilateral challenges.
Speakers concluded that collaboration, inclusivity, and clear mandates are key to shaping effective digital governance. As technological change accelerates, the dialogue reinforces the need for adaptable, action-oriented strategies to ensure equity and innovation globally.
Nvidia has added around 200 employees in China this year, boosting its research capabilities and focusing on autonomous driving technologies, Bloomberg News reports. The company now employs nearly 600 people in Beijing, with a recently opened office in the Zhongguancun tech hub, according to sources familiar with the matter.
Despite its expansion, Nvidia faces headwinds in China, including an ongoing investigation into alleged violations of the country’s anti-monopoly laws. This probe is widely interpreted as a response to US restrictions on China’s chip sector. Nvidia declined to comment on the situation.
China contributed about 17% of Nvidia’s revenue in the year ending January, down from 26% two years earlier. Globally, Nvidia employs around 29,600 people across 36 countries, as detailed in its February 2024 filing.
BeReal, the selfie-sharing app acquired by French mobile games publisher Voodoo earlier this year, is under scrutiny for allegedly violating European data protection rules. A privacy complaint filed by Noyb, a European privacy rights organisation, accuses the app of using manipulative ‘dark patterns’ to coerce users into consenting to ad tracking, a tactic that may breach the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
The controversy centres on a consent banner introduced in July 2024, which appears to offer users a straightforward choice to accept or refuse tracking. However, Noyb argues that users who decline tracking face daily pop-ups when they try to post, while those who consent are spared further interruptions. This practice, Noyb asserts, pressures users into compliance, undermining the GDPR’s requirement that consent be ‘freely given.’
The complaint has been filed with France’s data protection authority, CNIL, and demands that BeReal revise its consent process to comply with GDPR. It also calls for any improperly obtained data to be deleted and suggests a fine for the alleged violations. BeReal’s parent company, Voodoo, has yet to comment on the complaint.
This case highlights growing concerns over dark patterns in social media apps, with regulators emphasising the need for fair and transparent consent mechanisms in line with user privacy rights.
Samsung has filed a legal challenge against India‘s Competition Commission (CCI), accusing the watchdog of unlawfully detaining employees and seizing data during a 2022 raid connected to an antitrust investigation involving Amazon and Walmart-owned Flipkart. The CCI claims Samsung colluded with the e-commerce giants to launch products exclusively online, a practice it argues violates competition laws.
In its filing with the northern city of Chandigarh’s High Court, Samsung alleged that confidential data was improperly taken from its employees during the raid and requested the return of the material. Samsung has secured an injunction to pause the CCI’s proceedings but seeks a broader ruling to prevent the use of the seized data. The CCI, in turn, has asked the Supreme Court to consolidate similar challenges by Samsung and 22 other parties, arguing that companies are attempting to derail the investigation.
The case stems from findings earlier this year that Amazon, Flipkart, and smartphone companies like Samsung engaged in anti-competitive practices by favouring select sellers and using exclusive product launches. While Amazon and Flipkart deny wrongdoing, brick-and-mortar retailers have long criticised their pricing and market strategies. Samsung, a major smartphone brand in India with a 14% market share, maintains it was wrongly implicated and cooperated only as a third party in the investigation.
Australia‘s Federal Court has fined Bit Trade, the local operator of cryptocurrency exchange Kraken, A$8 million ($5.1 million) for unlawfully offering credit facilities to over 1,100 customers. The ruling came after the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) filed civil proceedings against the company, accusing it of non-compliance with regulations for its margin trading product.
ASIC revealed that Bit Trade failed to assess whether its margin extensions—a form of credit repayable in digital assets like bitcoin or national currencies—were suitable for customers. This led to combined customer losses exceeding $5 million, while Bit Trade charged over $7 million in fees and interest. The court classified the margin extension product as a credit facility requiring a specific consumer suitability document, which the company had not provided.
In a statement, Kraken expressed disappointment, arguing the ruling could stifle economic growth in Australia. The exchange emphasised its willingness to work with regulators to shape the evolving cryptocurrency framework. The case marks a milestone for ASIC, as it is the first penalty imposed on a company for failing to provide a target market determination for a financial product.
The US Justice Department has urged a federal appeals court to reject TikTok‘s emergency request to delay a law requiring its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, to divest from the app by 19 January or face a nationwide ban. TikTok argued the law threatens to shut down one of America’s most popular social media platforms, which boasts over 170 million US users, while the Justice Department maintains that continued Chinese ownership poses a national security risk.
While the law would not immediately block users from accessing TikTok, the Justice Department admitted the lack of ongoing support would eventually render the app inoperable. A three-judge appeals court panel recently upheld the divestment requirement, and ByteDance has asked the US Supreme Court to review the case.
The controversy places TikTok’s future in the hands of the incoming presidential administration. President Joe Biden could grant a 90-day extension to the divestment deadline before President-elect Donald Trump, who has vowed to prevent a ban, takes office on January 20. Trump’s stance on TikTok has been consistent since his unsuccessful attempts to ban the app during his first term.
The law also strengthens the US government’s powers to ban other foreign-owned apps over data security concerns, following a broader trend initiated under Trump, including an earlier attempt to block Tencent-owned WeChat. As legal battles continue, TikTok’s operations in the US hang in the balance.
Synopsys has proposed remedies to address EU antitrust concerns over its $35 billion acquisition of engineering software company Ansys. The deal, which was announced in January, marks one of the most significant mergers in the technology sector since Broadcom’s $69 billion purchase of VMware in 2023.
The European Commission, tasked with reviewing the merger, has set a decision deadline for 10 January. Details of the proposed remedies remain undisclosed, but the Commission may consult industry rivals and customers before making a final determination. If concerns persist, the regulator could launch an in-depth investigation lasting up to four months.
As part of its plans, Synopsys announced in September the sale of its Optical Solutions Group to Keysight Technologies. This divestiture is conditional on the completion of the Ansys acquisition, suggesting efforts to address market competition issues raised by the deal.
Recent feedback sought by the Commission has centred on whether electronic design automation (EDA) tools offered by Synopsys and Ansys can operate seamlessly with competitors’ products. Concerns about bundling practices in EDA software, services, and hardware have also been highlighted, adding pressure on Synopsys to alleviate antitrust fears.
TikTok‘s Canadian branch has filed an emergency motion with the country’s Federal Court to review a government order requiring it to cease operations due to national security concerns. The company, owned by China’s ByteDance, is challenging the December 5 order and seeking either its annulment or a return to the government for further review. The motion argues that shutting down TikTok’s Canadian operations could result in significant job losses.
The legal challenge comes after Canada began investigating TikTok’s plans to expand its business in the country last year. The investigation led to last month’s order, which did not block Canadian access to the app but mandated the company’s exit from the Canadian market. TikTok emphasised the importance of maintaining a local presence for its platform in Canada, where it has over 14 million monthly users.
Under Canadian law, the government can assess foreign investments’ risks to national security, though details of the investigations are kept confidential. The case follows similar actions in the US, where the government has pressured ByteDance to sell TikTok’s US assets by January 2025 or face a ban. TikTok is currently seeking a temporary block on this US law as well.
