The European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) is reviewing the European Commission‘s response to a March ruling that its use of Microsoft 365 violated the bloc’s data protection laws. Monday marked the deadline for the Commission to address the EDPS order to halt unlawful data flows and renegotiate its contracts with Microsoft.
On Tuesday, EDPS Wojciech Wiewiórowski confirmed receipt of the Commission’s report, emphasising the complexity of the case and hinting that a detailed analysis will take time. Both the Commission and Microsoft are appealing the EDPS decision, with related cases set to progress through the courts in 2025.
The outcome could have significant implications for the Commission’s use of tech platforms and broader data privacy enforcement in the EU. For now, all parties remain tight-lipped, extending the uncertainty over the resolution of this high-profile dispute.
A federal court ruling on December 4 has bolstered the Justice Department’s (DOJ) position that algorithm-driven price-fixing constitutes a clear antitrust violation. Judge Robert S. Lasnik of the US District Court for the Western District of Washington ruled that claims against Yardi Systems Inc., a property management software firm, could proceed under the “per se” theory of antitrust law. This theory automatically deems certain actions, like price-fixing, illegal without requiring additional proof of harm.
The case alleges that Yardi’s RENTmaximizer tool facilitated collusion among property managers to inflate rents. The decision marks a significant departure from earlier rulings where similar claims involving pricing algorithms were dismissed. Experts see this as a pivotal moment for antitrust litigation, enabling plaintiffs to pursue cases by demonstrating that shared algorithm use facilitated price collusion.
This ruling aligns with the DOJ’s broader push against anticompetitive practices in algorithm-driven pricing, a growing area of concern across industries like home rentals and hospitality. While the decision strengthens the DOJ’s stance, legal experts anticipate continued debates over whether traditional antitrust principles can adapt to emerging technologies, signaling years of legal uncertainty ahead.
Apple Pay has faced its first real competition on iPhones, thanks to Norway’s mobile payment app, Vipps. Leveraging new EU regulations, Vipps now allows iPhone users to make tap-to-pay transactions, shop online, and even set it as their default payment app. This is a significant milestone as Apple, under pressure from EU regulators, has opened its NFC chip to third-party developers with the release of iOS 18.1.
For a decade, Apple Pay was the exclusive method for tap-to-pay functionality on iPhones. That changed after EU rulings deemed Apple’s practices anti-competitive, prompting the company to commit to a more open ecosystem. In addition to enabling NFC access, Apple has also introduced RCS messaging support and expanded app deletion options in response to regulatory pressure.
Vipps’ debut as Apple Pay’s first competitor signals a shift toward a more diverse iPhone experience. While this development could usher in innovative payment solutions, it also raises concerns about potential fragmentation in mobile payment systems. For now, Norway is leading the charge in this new era of digital payments.
European regulators are investigating a previously undisclosed advertising partnership between Google and Meta that targeted teenagers on YouTube and Instagram, the Financial Times reports. The now-cancelled initiative aimed at promoting Instagram to users aged 13 to 17 allegedly bypassed Google’s policies restricting ad personalisation for minors.
The partnership, initially launched in the US with plans for global expansion, has drawn the attention of the European Commission, which has requested extensive internal records from Google, including emails and presentations, to evaluate potential violations. Google, defending its practices, stated that its safeguards for minors remain industry-leading and emphasised recent internal training to reinforce policy compliance.
This inquiry comes amid heightened concerns about the impact of social media on young users. Earlier this year, Meta introduced enhanced privacy features for teenagers on Instagram, reflecting the growing demand for stricter online protections for minors. Neither Meta nor the European Commission has commented on the investigation so far.
OpenAI has launched its text-to-video AI model, Sora, to ChatGPT Plus and Pro users, signalling a broader push into multimodal AI technologies. Initially limited to safety testers, Sora is now available as Sora Turbo at no additional cost, allowing users to create videos up to 20 seconds long in various resolutions and aspect ratios.
The move positions OpenAI to compete with similar tools from Meta, Google, and Stability AI. While the model is accessible in most regions, it remains unavailable in EU countries, the UK, and Switzerland due to regulatory considerations. OpenAI plans to introduce tailored pricing options for Sora next year.
The company emphasised safeguards against misuse, such as blocking harmful content like child exploitation and deepfake abuse. It also plans to gradually expand features, including uploads of people, as it enhances protections. Sora marks another step in OpenAI’s efforts to innovate responsibly in the AI space.
China has launched an anti-monopoly investigation into US chipmaker Nvidia, citing possible violations linked to its acquisition of Mellanox Technologies in 2020. The move is widely seen as retaliation against recent US restrictions on China’s semiconductor sector, including curbs on advanced chip exports.
Nvidia, which dominates China’s AI chip market, is accused of breaching conditions tied to the Mellanox deal, such as fair trade requirements and restrictions on bundling products. The probe comes amid heightened trade tensions, with Beijing encouraging local companies to avoid US chips and Washington tightening export controls on critical semiconductor technologies.
Analysts suggest the investigation is unlikely to significantly impact Nvidia in the near term, as its most advanced chips are already restricted from sale in China. However, the company faces growing competition from domestic firms like Huawei. China accounted for 17% of Nvidia’s revenue last year, down from 26% two years prior, as US-China tech conflicts continue to reshape the global semiconductor landscape.
TikTok and its parent company, ByteDance, have filed an emergency motion with a federal appeals court to temporarily halt a US law that would force ByteDance to sell TikTok by 19 January or face a nationwide ban. The companies argue that without the delay, the popular app could shut down in the US, affecting 170 million monthly users and numerous businesses reliant on the platform.
The motion follows a decision by an appeals court panel upholding the divestment requirement. TikTok’s lawyers assert the Supreme Court should have time to review the case and highlight President-elect Donald Trump’s stated intention to prevent the ban. The incoming administration, they argue, could reconsider the law and render the case moot.
The law granting the US government authority to ban foreign-owned apps over data security concerns has faced criticism, with TikTok warning the decision could disrupt services globally. As the January deadline looms, ByteDance faces challenges in demonstrating sufficient progress toward a divestment to secure an extension, even as political and legal battles intensify.
Sens. Mike Lee (R-Utah) and Peter Welch (D-Vt.) are calling for an investigation into potential antitrust violations by FanDuel and DraftKings. In a joint letter to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the US Department of Justice, the lawmakers accused the two sports betting giants of collaborating to suppress competition in the online sports betting market. The issue centres around their 2016 merger attempt, which was blocked by the FTC due to concerns about market dominance.
Since the merger was scrapped, Lee and Welch argue that FanDuel and DraftKings have used their dominance in fantasy sports to stifle smaller competitors in the online betting space. They claim that the companies, through the Sports Betting Alliance trade group, have intimidated rivals, blocked access to technology, and undermined marketing opportunities, which could harm innovation and prevent new players from entering the market.
FanDuel and DraftKings have not publicly commented on the allegations, and the Justice Department has acknowledged receipt of the letter but has not provided further details. The news has caused a drop in DraftKings’ stock, with Sen. Lee highlighting the potential societal impacts of the companies’ actions.
The European Union is investigating Nvidia’s business practices, focusing on whether the AI chip leader ties its GPU products to other hardware like networking equipment. Nvidia, which dominates the GPU market with an 84% share, has faced increasing global scrutiny due to its role in the AI and accelerated computing sectors.
Regulators recently distributed questionnaires to Nvidia’s competitors and customers as part of their preliminary fact-finding process. If proven, antitrust violations could result in fines up to 10% of the company’s annual global turnover.
Nvidia has denied any wrongdoing, asserting its products compete on merit and support customer choice. The inquiry coincides with a separate investigation by France‘s antitrust authority, which may soon press charges.
Google has filed a lawsuit against the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) over its decision to place the company’s payment division under federal supervision. The legal dispute arises from the CFPB’s claims that Google’s handling of its payment products, including a discontinued peer-to-peer payment service, posed risks to consumers.
The lawsuit, lodged in the Washington, DC district court, argues that the CFPB’s actions constitute government overreach. Google asserts the decision was based on limited and unverified user complaints, stating that a discontinued product cannot pose consumer risks. The CFPB, however, maintains that its supervisory authority is essential to enforcing compliance with financial laws, even for defunct services.
Google spokesperson José Castañeda described the agency’s oversight as unnecessary, reiterating that the company’s payment products have always prioritised user safety. Google also claims the CFPB set an unreasonably low standard for determining consumer risks, leading to undue regulatory burdens.
The CFPB’s authority to oversee nonbank financial institutions, announced in 2022, allows it to conduct examinations and intervene against potential risks to consumers. Google contends that applying such measures to its payments division is unjustified and aims to challenge the agency’s approach in court.
