Children’s rights

US House of Representatives passes Kids Internet and Digital Safety Act

The US House of Representatives has passed the Kids Internet and Digital Safety Act in a bipartisan 267-117 vote, advancing a broad package that combines 14 online child safety proposals into a single piece of legislation.

The legislation includes provisions requiring AI chatbots to remind users they are not human, provide mental health resources, encourage regular breaks and avoid promoting potentially harmful topics. Lawmakers also removed the original Kids Online Safety Act’s proposed ‘duty of care’ provision after concerns it could lead to censorship, a decision criticised by several senators who co-authored the earlier bill.

Critics, including digital rights organisations and several lawmakers, argue the legislation weakens existing protections and does not go far enough in holding technology companies accountable. The Electronic Frontier Foundation warned that compliance could encourage widespread age verification, potentially requiring users to submit personal information and raising concerns about privacy and freedom of expression.

Supporters reject those criticisms, arguing that the bill does not explicitly require age verification but instead strengthens safeguards for minors and expands parental controls. The legislation now moves to the Senate, where it is expected to face further scrutiny.

Why does it matter?

The legislation represents one of the most comprehensive federal efforts to strengthen online child safety in the United States. Its inclusion of AI chatbot requirements reflects growing recognition that conversational AI introduces new risks for younger users that existing online safety frameworks were not designed to address.

At the same time, the bill highlights the continuing challenge of balancing child protection with privacy and freedom of expression. As it moves to the Senate, debate is likely to focus on whether stronger platform accountability can be achieved without expanding age verification requirements or creating incentives for broader online censorship.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot! 

France and WHO call for stronger safeguards for children online

French President Emmanuel Macron and World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus have called for stronger governance of digital environments to protect children’s health and well-being.

In a joint statement, they argued that social media, gaming platforms, AI and other digital services are increasingly shaping children’s physical, mental and social development.

The authors said digital technologies can support education, healthcare access, creativity and social inclusion, especially for children in remote or disadvantaged communities. However, they argued that these benefits depend on how digital services are designed, regulated and governed.

The statement warns that excessive or poorly governed digital exposure can be linked to anxiety, depression, sleep disruption, sedentary behaviour, online exploitation, harmful content and misinformation amplified by recommendation systems.

Macron and Tedros also describe generative AI as a force multiplier for both opportunity and risk. They said AI could support education, accessibility and healthcare, but warned that its long-term effects on children’s emotional development, relationships and well-being remain uncertain.

The authors pointed to growing international momentum behind child online safety measures, including age restrictions, stronger age assurance and safety-by-design standards.

They called on governments, technology companies, researchers, educators and civil society to build healthier digital ecosystems through regulation, transparency, independent research and stronger safeguards for children.

Why does it matter?

The intervention places child online safety within the language of public health. That broadens the debate beyond content moderation and screen-time advice to include platform design, recommendation systems, business models, AI deployment and digital governance. It also reflects growing international pressure for age-appropriate design, stronger age assurance and safety-by-design rules, while leaving open difficult questions about privacy, enforcement and children’s access to beneficial digital services.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!  

UNICEF warns millions of children rely on AI for advice and learning

Millions of children worldwide are already using AI for learning, problem-solving and personal guidance, according to UNICEF, which warns that safeguards are not keeping pace with adoption. Data collected across 10 countries suggests that at least 20 million children have used AI tools, with adoption rates significantly higher than among adults.

UNICEF estimates that around 13 million children use AI to support schoolwork, while approximately two million turn to it for advice on personal concerns. The organisation warns that AI is becoming embedded in children’s lives faster than safeguards and oversight mechanisms are being developed.

Young users also reported concerns about misinformation, scams and AI-generated deepfakes. UNICEF is calling on governments and technology companies to strengthen regulation, improve digital literacy and ensure AI systems are designed with children’s rights and safety in mind.

Why does it matter? 

The findings suggest that AI is already becoming part of children’s everyday lives, influencing how they learn, seek information and even look for personal support. As adoption accelerates, the gap between technological use and effective safeguards could expose young users to misinformation, manipulation, privacy risks and other online harms.

The report also highlights the growing importance of child-centred AI governance. Decisions made now on regulation, digital literacy and safety-by-design are likely to shape how future generations interact with AI, making children’s rights an increasingly important consideration in global AI policy.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

UNICEF urges child-focused AI governance

UNICEF has called for child rights to be placed at the centre of AI governance, warning that children are adopting AI technologies faster than adults while safeguards struggle to keep pace. Ahead of the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance, UNICEF said AI is already reshaping childhood worldwide, creating significant opportunities alongside new risks.

Based on data from 10 countries, UNICEF estimates that at least 20 million children have used AI, with adoption rates in many cases more than three times higher than among adults.

More than 2 million children, or one in 10, said they use AI for advice on things that worry them. An estimated 13 million children reported using AI to support learning and homework.

UNICEF warned that governance frameworks, including safeguards for children, are failing to keep pace with rapid AI adoption. The organisation said children are more exposed to AI systems, business models and data practices, while having less power to avoid or challenge them.

UNICEF said most AI governance frameworks do not adequately prioritise children’s interests, despite young people being among those most likely to experience the long-term consequences of today’s policy decisions. While AI can support learning, creativity and play, evidence on its effects on cognitive development, emotional well-being and exposure to harm is still emerging.

The organisation also highlighted children’s own concerns. Across the 10 countries surveyed, one-third worried about AI being used for scams or misinformation, while one-quarter feared their images or videos could be manipulated into sexually explicit deepfakes. UNICEF warned that too many AI systems are reaching children without adequate safeguards.

UNICEF called on governments, the private sector and partners to embed child rights in global AI governance, with a particular focus on safety and protection.

The organisation urged investment in research on AI’s impact on children’s development and wellbeing, stronger laws and corporate accountability to stop AI-enabled sexual exploitation and abuse, and AI systems designed with maximum safety and transparency.

UNICEF called on governments and technology companies to embed children’s rights into AI governance through stronger legal protections, corporate accountability and safety-by-design. It also urged greater investment in research, AI literacy for children and caregivers, and digital infrastructure to reduce inequalities in access. According to UNICEF, decisions made today will shape children’s safety, privacy, wellbeing and opportunities for decades to come.

Why does it matter?

Children are becoming some of the earliest and most frequent users of AI, yet governance frameworks, research and safety measures remain underdeveloped. As AI increasingly influences how children learn, communicate and seek information, gaps in protection could expose them to misinformation, exploitation, privacy risks and harmful content during critical stages of development.

The report also reinforces a broader shift in AI governance towards rights-based policymaking. By arguing that children’s interests should be considered from the design stage through deployment and regulation, UNICEF is framing child protection not as a niche issue but as a core principle for trustworthy AI.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

UK ATOC says social media ban is not enough

The UK Alliance Tackling Online Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse has welcomed the UK government’s plan to ban social media use by children under 16, while warning that the measure alone will not stop online child sexual abuse.

The alliance said age restrictions on mainstream social media platforms could reduce some risks. Still, children may move to less regulated digital spaces, including encrypted messaging services, gaming platforms and other online environments where grooming, sexual extortion and abuse can continue.

UK ATOC called for a broader, system-wide response focused on prevention, stronger platform accountability and safer-by-design digital services. It said governments, regulators, technology companies and online service providers share responsibility for reducing opportunities for abuse before harm occurs.

The alliance proposed a package of technical, legislative and regulatory measures. These include stronger safeguards in end-to-end encrypted environments, robust age-assurance systems, mandatory safer-by-design principles, stronger enforcement under the Online Safety Act and clearer regulation of AI chatbots and companion services.

It also called for device-level nudity detection, upload prevention for known child sexual abuse material and measures to address livestreamed abuse, grooming and sexual extortion.

UK ATOC welcomed the government’s plan to introduce nudity-detection tools on children’s devices, describing it as an important additional safeguard.

The statement reflects a wider concern that age bans may reduce children’s exposure to some mainstream platforms, but cannot replace a comprehensive child-safety framework across the broader digital ecosystem.

Why does it matter?

The UK debate shows the limits of age-based social media bans as a child-safety tool. Online child sexual exploitation and abuse can move across platforms, devices, encrypted services, gaming environments and AI-enabled systems. UK ATOC’s response therefore shifts the focus from access restrictions alone towards prevention, safer design, platform duties and technical safeguards that address how abuse actually happens across digital services.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!  

EU calls for stronger action against cyber violence targeting girls

The Council of the European Union has adopted conclusions calling for stronger action to protect girls and young women from cyber violence, urging member states and the European Commission to reinforce prevention, enforcement, and victim support.

Findings from the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) show that girls and young women are disproportionately affected by cyber violence, including online harassment, cyberstalking, non-consensual sharing of intimate images and sexist hate speech. Interviews with teenagers across the EU also suggest many believe existing prevention efforts are inadequate.

The Council called for improved access to mental health services, legal assistance and educational programmes covering digital consent, online safety and gender-responsive digital literacy. It also recommended providing parents and educators with practical guidance and training to help identify and respond to online abuse.

The Council also stressed the need for stronger enforcement of existing legislation, including the Digital Services Act and AI Act, while urging online platforms to take greater responsibility for user safety. It further called for increased investment in law enforcement resources, cross-border cooperation and research into the causes and impact of cyber violence.

Why does it matter? 

The Council’s conclusions recognise cyber violence as both an online safety challenge and a barrier to gender equality and digital inclusion. By combining prevention, victim support, stronger enforcement and platform accountability, the EU is signalling that tackling online abuse requires coordinated action across governments, technology companies and civil society.

The recommendations also reinforce the EU’s broader digital governance agenda. Linking cyber violence to legislation such as the Digital Services Act and AI Act demonstrates how existing regulatory frameworks are increasingly being used to address online harms alongside technological innovation.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

EU launches funding for youth-centred social media platforms

The European Commission has launched a €1.48 million call for proposals to support the development and testing of safer, more inclusive social media platforms designed for young people.

The initiative aims to involve young people from diverse backgrounds in designing digital services that prioritise privacy, well-being, accessibility and user safety.

Selected projects will develop or enhance protocol-based social media platforms aligned with EU values, while giving users greater control over their data, content moderation and overall online experience.

The programme also supports market analysis, platform development, adoption strategies and recommendations for the future of social media in the EU.

Why does it matter?

The initiative reflects the EU’s growing emphasis on promoting digital platforms that prioritise user wellbeing, privacy and safety rather than engagement-driven business models. By supporting protocol-based alternatives, the Commission is seeking to encourage a more open and user-centric social media ecosystem.

It also highlights a broader policy shift towards involving young people directly in the design of digital services. Giving users greater control over their data, online experience and content moderation aligns with the EU’s wider objectives on digital rights, platform accountability and safer online environments.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Indonesia reports 4.7 million under-16 accounts deactivated

TikTok and YouTube have deactivated about 4.7 million accounts belonging to children under 16 in Indonesia, according to the country’s Communications and Digital Affairs Minister Meutya Hafid.

TikTok deactivated around 4.1 million accounts, while YouTube removed about 600,000. The move follows a regulation introduced in March requiring platforms deemed high risk to deactivate accounts held by users under 16.

The rule applies to services including TikTok, YouTube, X, Instagram and Roblox. Hafid said the government expects other platforms to follow the same approach.

Indonesia says the measures are intended to reduce children’s exposure to online harms, including cyberbullying, harmful content and internet addiction. Hafid said the government is not only trying to delay children’s access to social media, but also to change platform behaviour.

The ministry is reviewing self-assessment reports submitted by digital platforms and has said there is no room for compromise on compliance.

Indonesia’s approach reflects a wider global shift towards stricter rules on children’s access to social media and high-risk online services. Australia’s under-16 social media ban took effect in December 2025, while other governments are considering stronger restrictions and age-assurance requirements.

Why does it matter?

Indonesia’s enforcement shows how child online safety regulation is moving from policy debate to platform-level action. Deactivating millions of accounts creates immediate compliance pressure on major services and raises wider questions about age assurance, children’s rights, privacy and access to online spaces. The case also shows that governments are increasingly asking platforms not only to remove underage users, but to redesign how they manage risks for minors.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot! 

Singapore launches Online Safety Commission for online harms

Singapore’s Online Safety Commission has begun operations, giving victims of online harms a dedicated channel to seek faster support and redress.

The commission was established to support the office of the Commissioner of Online Safety under the Online Safety (Relief and Accountability) Act 2025. Specified provisions on statutory torts under the Act also came into effect on 29 June 2026.

In its first phase, the commission will support victims affected by five categories of online harm: online harassment, including online sexual harassment, doxxing, online stalking, intimate image abuse and image-based child abuse.

Victims of online harassment and online stalking are generally expected to report harmful content to the relevant platform first. If the platform fails to respond promptly or provides an inadequate response within 24 hours, the platform may be reported to the commission. More serious harms, including doxxing and image-based abuse, can be reported directly.

Where there is reason to suspect that online harm has occurred, the Commissioner may issue directions to the person who posted the content, the administrator of the online space or the platform hosting it. These directions may require access to harmful content to be disabled or an account to be restricted. Non-compliance is a criminal offence.

Singapore is also introducing court-based remedies through statutory torts. Victims may bring civil claims against communicators, administrators, or platforms that fail to meet the duties set out in the law. For intimate image abuse and image-based child abuse, courts must award at least $5,000 for each image or recording if the claim succeeds.

The commission will also work with community partners that can provide counselling and practical support to victims and families.

Why does it matter?

Singapore’s Online Safety Commission provides victims of online harms with a dedicated institutional route for faster relief, rather than leaving them to rely solely on platform complaint systems or lengthy court processes. The model combines administrative directions, platform duties, community support and civil remedies. It is especially relevant for image-based abuse, doxxing and child safety, where rapid content restriction and victim support can be critical.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!  

Australia pushes more AI nudify services offline over child safety

Three more AI-powered ‘nudify’ services have withdrawn access for Australian users after enforcement action by Australia’s eSafety Commissioner under the country’s Age-Restricted Material codes.

The codes require AI services that allow users to access or generate age-restricted material, including sexually explicit material, to put appropriate age-assurance measures in place to prevent access by children under 18.

The latest action followed a formal Direction to Comply issued to one of the most widely used nudify services in Australia, requiring the provider to implement stronger protections within 14 days. Instead, the company disabled access for Australian users, while two associated services also withdrew.

eSafety said users in Australia will no longer be able to log in or use the service’s features, although landing pages may remain visible with content blurred.

The regulator said AI nudification tools pose serious risks because they can be used to create non-consensual sexually explicit deepfakes and child sexual exploitation material. It has also warned that such tools are increasingly being misused in school settings.

The action is part of eSafety’s broader enforcement focus on generative AI and nudify services now that Australia’s online safety codes and standards are in force. The regulator said seven of the most frequently accessed nudify services in Australia have either withdrawn from the market or introduced age-assurance measures following intervention.

Australia is also preparing further legislation to prohibit nudify services used to generate non-consensual sexually explicit material.

Why does it matter?

Australia’s approach shows how regulators can use age-assurance and online safety rules to restrict children’s access to high-risk generative AI tools before new AI-specific laws are fully in place. The case is also important because nudify services sit at the intersection of AI-generated abuse, child protection, image-based harm and platform accountability. By forcing services to either introduce safeguards or withdraw access, eSafety is creating a practical enforcement model that other jurisdictions may closely watch.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Diplo chatbot can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.