Children’s rights

Digital harms and child protection drive major Criminal Code reforms in Canada

Canada has enacted new criminal justice legislation aimed at strengthening protections for children, restoring mandatory minimum sentences for serious sexual offences and expanding legal tools to combat online exploitation and digital abuse. The Protecting Victims Act has been presented as a major update to the Criminal Code.

The law increases penalties for offences including sexual abuse, voyeurism, sextortion and the non-consensual sharing of intimate images, including AI-generated or digitally manipulated sexual deepfakes. Authorities have also been given enhanced powers to pursue offenders operating across borders.

Additional provisions extend investigative timeframes and require internet service providers to retain certain data for longer periods, improving access to evidence in cases involving online exploitation and abuse. The legislation also introduces a new criminal offence targeting the recruitment of minors into criminal activity.

Officials said the reforms are intended to strengthen enforcement capabilities and promote greater consistency in sentencing for serious offences, while preserving limited judicial discretion where mandatory penalties would be clearly disproportionate.

Why does it matter?

The reforms reflect how child protection laws are evolving to address increasingly digital forms of exploitation. Offences such as sextortion, non-consensual image sharing and AI-generated sexual deepfakes have created new challenges for law enforcement and courts, requiring legal frameworks that can respond to technology-enabled harms as effectively as traditional offences.

The legislation also highlights a broader policy trend towards stronger investigative powers and cross-border enforcement cooperation in cases involving online abuse. As criminal activity increasingly relies on digital platforms and international networks, governments are seeking new tools to obtain evidence, identify offenders and protect victims while balancing privacy, due process and judicial oversight.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

EU and OECD launch AI literacy framework for schools

The European Commission and the OECD have presented a new AI literacy framework for primary and secondary education, aimed at helping schools prepare learners for a world increasingly shaped by AI technologies.

The AI Literacy Framework was unveiled on 18 June during the European Digital Education Hub flagship event in Brussels. The event, titled ‘Collaborate for Impact: Advancing European Digital Education and Skills’, brought together policymakers, educators, experts, and stakeholders from across Europe.

Developed with support from international experts, including CodeAI, the framework provides a common reference point for integrating AI literacy across education systems. It is accompanied by practical classroom examples for primary and secondary levels to help educators translate AI literacy into learning experiences.

The framework defines AI literacy as the combination of technical knowledge, durable skills and future-ready attitudes needed to participate effectively in a world influenced by AI. It aims to help learners engage with, create with, manage, and shape AI while critically evaluating its benefits, risks, and ethical implications.

The European Commission said AI is reshaping how people learn, work, communicate, and make decisions. It said education systems need to prepare young people to navigate AI in daily life and use it responsibly.

The framework defines AI literacy as the combination of technical knowledge, durable skills and future-ready attitudes needed to participate effectively in a world influenced by AI.

According to the Commission, 68% of teenagers already use AI tools, yet many education systems still lack structured approaches for integrating AI into teaching and learning. Addressing these barriers could help learners use AI more creatively, ethically, and effectively.

The framework is intended for teachers, education leaders, policymakers, and learning designers. It offers guidance on curriculum integration, school-level AI literacy initiatives, policy development, and the design of educational content and teacher training materials.

The framework is structured around four dimensions that describe how learners engage with, create with, manage, and shape AI. It also includes 19 competences organised around knowledge, skills, and attitudes, along with learner expectations, learning scenarios, and classroom examples.

The Commission said the framework supports the EU’s ambition to deliver high-quality, inclusive, and future-oriented digital education. It also contributes to the Digital Education Action Plan and the Union of Skills by helping learners develop competences for a digital and AI-driven society.

The framework complements several European initiatives and policy priorities, including the PISA 2029 Media and AI Literacy assessment, the Digital Education Action Plan 2021-2027, updated ethical guidelines for educators on AI use, the AI Act, and the European Digital Competence Framework.

Why does it matter?

AI is rapidly becoming a foundational digital skill, comparable to information literacy or internet literacy. As AI tools become increasingly integrated into education, work and everyday life, schools face growing pressure to help students understand not only how to use these technologies, but also how to evaluate their outputs, recognise their limitations and engage with them responsibly.

The framework also represents an important step towards harmonising AI education across Europe. By providing common competences, classroom examples and guidance for educators, it creates a bridge between AI policy objectives and practical teaching. This could help ensure that future generations develop the skills needed to participate in an AI-driven society while supporting broader European goals related to digital skills, innovation and trustworthy AI.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Meta expands AI-powered teen safety protections across its platforms

Meta has announced new teen safety updates across Instagram, Facebook, and Messenger, including expanded age-appropriate content settings, AI-powered age detection, and new parental notification tools.

Meta said the updates are designed to ensure teens receive appropriate protections by default, give parents greater visibility into online activity and strengthen safeguards that support young people’s well-being.

Meta said its 13+ default content setting, recently introduced in India, is now rolling out globally across Instagram, Facebook, and Messenger. The setting is designed to limit exposure to age-inappropriate content by default, drawing on established content-rating principles and parent feedback.

On Facebook, the 13+ default setting is intended to hide content considered inappropriate for teens in areas such as Feed and Reels. It also limits teens’ ability to interact with Profiles, Pages, Groups, and Events that primarily post inappropriate content.

On Messenger, the 13+ default setting limits teens’ ability to view links to inappropriate Facebook content or chat with accounts that primarily share it.

Meta is also expanding its use of AI-powered age estimation systems to identify accounts that may belong to underage users. The company said the system analyses profile context, including birthday celebrations, school-grade mentions, posts, comments, bios, and captions, to assess whether an account is likely to belong to someone underage.

The company said it is adding visual analysis as another detection technique. According to Meta, the technology analyses photos and videos for general indicators associated with age, such as physical characteristics, but does not identify individuals and does not use facial recognition.

Meta said combining visual signals with text and interaction analysis could increase the number of underage accounts it identifies and removes. The technology will be expanded across additional parts of its apps, including Instagram Reels, Instagram Live, and Facebook Groups.

Instagram will also notify supervising parents if a teen repeatedly searches for terms related to suicide or self-harm within a short period, subject to supervision settings. Meta said the feature has been rolled out to supervising parents in the EU, Brazil, and India, with parents and teens receiving notifications that the alerts are on the way.

Parents using supervision can now manage their teens’ activity through Meta’s Family Center across Instagram, Meta Horizon, Facebook, and Messenger. Meta said parents will also be able to see a more holistic view of teen activity across its apps in the coming months, including aggregated time spent.

Why does it matter?

The announcement reflects a broader shift towards age-appropriate design, where platforms increasingly rely on default protections and automated systems rather than expecting young users or parents to configure safety settings themselves. AI-based age detection is becoming a central tool in efforts to identify underage users and enforce platform safeguards at scale.

The update also highlights ongoing debates about the balance between child protection, privacy and platform accountability. While automated age-estimation technologies may help improve online safety, regulators and civil society groups continue to scrutinise their accuracy, transparency and potential impact on users’ rights. As governments around the world consider stricter child online safety requirements, platform approaches such as Meta’s may influence future regulatory expectations.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

UNESCO backs new initiative against online hate speech

Organisations and experts in Kyrgyzstan have launched the country’s first multistakeholder coalition focused on online harmful content and content moderation, with support from UNESCO and the European Union.

The Aikyn Sanarip coalition was launched in Bishkek on 17 June, ahead of the UN International Day for Countering Hate Speech. It brings together civil society, media representatives, government bodies, academics, international organisations and bloggers.

UNESCO said the coalition will provide a platform for dialogue on freedom of expression, digital rights, online safety and greater accountability from digital platforms.

The launch also featured the first national study on freedom of expression and content moderation in Kyrgyzstan. The research examines how hate speech spreads across digital platforms, how content is moderated in Kyrgyz-language digital spaces, and where legal and institutional gaps remain.

UNESCO said users in Kyrgyzstan increasingly encounter hate speech, disinformation and online harassment. At the same time, the country lacks a clear legal definition of hate speech, and mechanisms for addressing harmful content remain fragmented.

The European Union supported the forum under UNESCO’s Social Media 4 Peace project, which promotes multistakeholder responses to harmful online content while protecting freedom of expression.

Why does it matter?

The launch shows how online hate speech and harmful content are becoming governance issues beyond major platform markets. Kyrgyzstan’s new coalition links digital rights, online safety and platform accountability, while also highlighting a difficult balance: tackling hate speech and disinformation without undermining freedom of expression. The initiative may offer a model for multistakeholder responses in countries where legal frameworks and platform moderation practices remain underdeveloped.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot! 

Spain’s data protection authority issues privacy guidance for video game industry

The Spanish Data Protection Agency (AEPD) has published a new guide outlining data protection recommendations for the video game industry, urging companies to embed privacy safeguards throughout the entire game lifecycle.

According to the AEPD, modern video games have evolved into complex digital ecosystems that collect, analyse and process significant volumes of personal data. This may include account information, gameplay activity, behavioural data and other user-generated information, creating potential privacy and security risks.

The guide notes that AI-enabled and online gaming services increasingly rely on data-driven business models, making compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) particularly important. The agency emphasised that privacy protections are especially important for children and other vulnerable groups, given their significant participation in online gaming environments.

The recommendations span the entire development process, from pre-production and design to post-launch operations, covering transparency obligations, data minimisation, profiling controls and cybersecurity measures. Privacy and responsible data practices should be integrated into games from design through to end-of-life in Spain.

Why does it matter?

The guidance reflects the growing importance of data protection in the gaming industry as video games increasingly function as connected digital platforms rather than standalone entertainment products. Online services, in-game economies, AI-powered features and behavioural analytics have expanded the volume and sensitivity of personal data processed by game developers and publishers.

The recommendations also highlight broader regulatory concerns around children’s privacy and responsible data use. As gaming platforms become more immersive and data-driven, regulators are placing greater emphasis on privacy-by-design principles, transparency and user control. The AEPD’s guidance signals that compliance with data protection rules is becoming an integral part of game development, not simply a legal requirement applied after products are launched.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot! 

EU court clarifies age verification rules for pornographic websites

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has clarified the conditions under which EU Member States may require age verification for users of pornographic websites and restrict the rebroadcasting of information about certain roadside checks.

The ruling concerns joined cases involving WebGroup Czech Republic, NKL Associates and Coyote System. The cases were referred by France’s Council of State and concerned French measures requiring pornographic websites to verify users’ ages and allowing restrictions on geolocation driving assistance services that rebroadcast information about certain roadside checks.

The companies argued that the measures breached the country-of-origin principle under the Directive on electronic commerce. Under that principle, information society services are generally governed by the laws of the Member State in which the provider is established.

The Court found that the contested measures, including age verification requirements, fall within the directive’s coordinated field and that applying them to providers established in other Member States constitutes a restriction on the free movement of the services concerned. However, it said the directive allows such restrictions under certain conditions.

The CJEU said Member States may impose measures on providers established elsewhere in the EU where necessary for recognised objectives such as public policy, public security, or public safety. According to the Court, protecting minors through age verification may constitute a public policy objective, while restrictions on rebroadcasting information about certain roadside checks may be justified on public security grounds.

The Court said such measures must be proportionate and targeted at specific information society services that actually prejudice those objectives. Except in urgent cases, the Member State taking the measure must first ask the provider’s Member State of establishment to act and must notify the European Commission and that Member State before adopting the measure.

The ruling means an EU Member State may require providers established in another Member State to introduce age verification systems to prevent minors from accessing pornographic websites, provided the directive’s conditions are met. The referring French court must determine whether the national age verification measures satisfy those conditions.

The Court also addressed liability for information stored and rebroadcast by online services. It said a provider cannot rely on the hosting liability exemption if it has knowledge of or control over the information. Control can exist when a provider uses an algorithm to determine the conditions, methods and priority according to which information is rebroadcast.

The decision therefore clarifies both the limits of the e-commerce country-of-origin principle and the circumstances in which algorithmic control over content distribution may affect platform liability.

Why does it matter?

The ruling provides important guidance on how EU Member States can pursue online safety objectives while respecting the Digital Single Market’s country-of-origin principle. In particular, it confirms that age verification requirements aimed at protecting minors may be applied to providers established in other Member States, provided procedural safeguards and proportionality requirements are met.

The judgement also has broader implications for platform governance and intermediary liability. By highlighting the relevance of algorithmic control in determining whether a provider can benefit from hosting liability exemptions, the Court contributes to ongoing debates about platform responsibility, content moderation and the legal consequences of algorithm-driven content distribution.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU child safety panel concludes work on online protections for minors

The European Union’s Special Panel on child safety online has concluded its final meeting, marking a key step towards developing new recommendations to strengthen protections for minors in the digital environment. Co-chairs are set to present their findings to the European Commission in July.

A newly published Eurobarometer survey highlights growing concerns about young people’s digital habits and online well-being. The survey found that adolescents across Europe spend an average of 4.5 hours online on school days and 6.1 hours at weekends, with 14% reporting more than 10 hours of screen time per day.

The findings also show a strong link between social media use and well-being. Nearly one in three young people reported feeling stressed, sad or excluded, while many also reported exposure to harmful content, including hate speech. EU officials, including Ursula von der Leyen, have stressed the urgency of strengthening online protections for children.

The final panel meeting brought together educators, legal experts, healthcare professionals, and child rights advocates to review best practices and discuss measures to support parents and guardians. Broader EU initiatives, including the Digital Services Act (DSA) and age-verification tools, also form part of the bloc’s wider regulatory response to online risks facing children.

Why does it matter? 

The findings underline a growing public health and policy challenge as children’s digital engagement becomes deeply embedded in daily life, while evidence increasingly links high screen time and social media exposure to emotional distress and reduced well-being.

For the EU, the issue goes beyond individual behaviour, pointing to structural questions around platform accountability, age-appropriate design, and the effectiveness of existing safeguards.

The panel’s recommendations are therefore likely to influence the next phase of EU digital regulation, shaping how online services balance innovation with stronger protections for minors across member states.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

G7 summit to address supply chains, technology and economic growth

Leaders of the G7 nations have gathered in Évian-les-Bains, France, for the 2026 summit, where discussions are expected to focus on economic stability, geopolitical tensions and international cooperation. The meeting comes as governments face growing concerns over global conflicts, economic imbalances and weakened multilateral institutions.

France has placed balanced economic growth and international solidarity at the centre of this year’s agenda. Discussions will examine ways to address macroeconomic imbalances, strengthen partnerships with developing countries and improve the effectiveness of international assistance programmes.

Brazil, Egypt, India, Kenya and South Korea have also been invited to participate in parts of the summit process.

Securing critical mineral supply chains has emerged as a key priority, reflecting growing demand for resources used in renewable energy technologies, semiconductors and digital infrastructure. Leaders are also expected to discuss child safety online, efforts to combat drug trafficking and new initiatives to support cancer research and treatment.

Geopolitical developments will remain a major focus throughout the summit. G7 leaders are expected to discuss continued support for Ukraine, regional security in Europe, and efforts to promote stability in the Middle East, including concerns related to freedom of navigation and broader regional tensions.

Why does it matter? 

The summit highlights how economic security, technology governance and geopolitical stability are becoming increasingly interconnected. Decisions made by the G7 can influence global policy priorities, international cooperation frameworks and supply chain strategies, shaping responses to some of the most significant economic and security challenges facing the world.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!  

Debate grows over UK’s proposed social media ban for under-16s

Amnesty International has challenged the British government’s decision to introduce a social media ban for under-16s, arguing that it targets children rather than the design choices made by digital platforms.

Responding to the announcement, Amnesty International UK chief executive Kerry Moscogiuri said the government had correctly identified the risks facing young people online but had chosen the wrong solution.

Amnesty argued that social media companies have developed products and business models that prioritise engagement and profit over children’s well-being, privacy and rights.

The organisation argues that social media platforms should be redesigned and regulated more effectively rather than restricting access for young users. The organisation argued that social media remains an important space where children and teenagers learn, communicate with friends, access support networks and participate in public life.

The human rights group is calling for stronger platform regulation, including restrictions on invasive profiling, hyper-personalised recommendation systems, autoplay features and infinite scrolling.

Amnesty also called for stronger protections for children’s privacy and personal data, arguing that responsibility for online safety should rest primarily with technology companies rather than young users.

Ofcom supports further assessment of child online safety measures

In a letter to Technology Secretary Liz Kendall, Ofcom chief executive Dame Melanie Dawes said the regulator had begun examining age-assurance options and would provide an assessment by the end of October 2026 to support parliamentary consideration of the proposals.

The regulator also pledged to continue prioritising enforcement of existing child protection measures under the Online Safety Act and confirmed it will publish reports on enforcement outcomes and evaluate the impact of the proposed ban within a year of implementation.

Why does it matter?

The debate highlights two competing approaches to child online safety. One approach focuses on restricting access to social media for younger users, while the other seeks to address the design features and business models that critics argue contribute to online harms.

The discussion also reflects broader questions about platform accountability, children’s rights and digital governance. As governments around the world consider age restrictions, age verification requirements and online safety measures, policymakers continue to grapple with how to balance child protection, privacy, freedom of expression and access to digital services.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Europol warns of rising online exploitation of minors

Europol has warned that criminal networks are increasingly using digital platforms to target, manipulate and recruit minors into criminal activity.

The agency said offenders exploit online environments, including dark web portals, social media networks, games and e-commerce platforms, which can offer anonymity, reach and operational efficiency. Europol and the EU member states have observed growing use of these digital tools to target and recruit minors.

According to Europol, young people are being drawn into offences including cyberattacks, drug distribution, online fraud and money laundering. In some cases, minors are also exposed to extremist ideologies, manipulation and pressure from online communities.

Europol said digital tools have made recruitment easier to scale and harder to detect. Minors may initially be approached as victims, but can later be pressured into carrying out further offences, increasing both the harm to the child and the reach of criminal networks.

The agency said it is working with the EU member states and international partners to strengthen intelligence sharing, operational support and the disruption of criminal groups. Prevention efforts also include awareness-raising and guidance for parents, educators and communities to help identify risks and support vulnerable minors.

Why does it matter?

The warning shows how child safety and organised crime are increasingly overlapping in online spaces. Social media, gaming environments, e-commerce platforms and dark web channels can be used not only to exploit minors, but also to recruit them into cybercrime, fraud, drug distribution or extremist networks. That creates a governance challenge for law enforcement, schools, parents and platforms, especially where manipulation, anonymity and cross-border digital services make early detection difficult.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!  

Diplo chatbot can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.