Intellectual property rights

Orson Welles lost film reconstructed with AI

More than 80 years after Orson Welles’ The Magnificent Ambersons was cut and lost, AI is being used to restore 43 missing minutes of the film.

Amazon-backed Showrunner, led by Edward Saatchi, is experimenting with AI technology to rebuild the destroyed sequences as part of a broader push to reimagine how Hollywood might use AI in storytelling.

The project is not intended for commercial release, since Showrunner has not secured rights from Warner Bros. or Concord, but instead aims to explore what could have been the director’s original vision.

The initiative marks a shift in the role of AI in filmmaking. Rather than serving only as a tool for effects, dubbing or storyboarding, it is being positioned as a foundation for long-form narrative creation.

Showrunner is developing AI models capable of sustaining complex plots, with the goal of eventually generating entire films. Saatchi envisions the platform as a type of ‘Netflix of AI,’ where audiences might one day interact with intellectual property and generate their own stories.

To reconstruct The Magnificent Ambersons, the company is combining traditional techniques with AI tools. New sequences will be shot with actors, while AI will be used for face and pose transfer to replicate the original cast.

Thousands of archival set photographs are being used to digitally recreate the film’s environments.

Filmmaker Brian Rose, who has rebuilt 30,000 missing frames over five years, has reconstructed set movements and timing to match the lost scenes, while VFX expert Tom Clive will assist in refining the likenesses of the original actors.

A project that underlines both the creative possibilities and ethical tensions surrounding AI in cinema. While the reconstructed footage will not be commercially exploited, it raises questions about the use of copyrighted material in training AI and the risk of replacing human creators.

For many, however, the experiment offers a glimpse of what Welles’ ambitious work might have looked like had it survived intact.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Trilateral quantum talks highlight innovation and security priorities

The United States, Japan, and South Korea held two Trilateral Quantum Cooperation meetings this week in Seoul and Tokyo. Officials and experts from government and industry gathered to discuss securing quantum ecosystems against cyber, physical, and intellectual property threats.

The US State Department stressed that joint efforts will ensure breakthroughs in quantum computing benefit citizens while safeguarding innovation. Officials said cooperation is essential as quantum technologies could reshape industries, global power balances, and economic prosperity.

The President of South Korea, Lee Jae Myung, described the partnership as entering a ‘golden era’, noting that Seoul, Washington, and Tokyo must work together both to address North Korea and to drive technological progress.

The talks come as Paul Dabbar, the former CEO of Bohr Quantum Technology, begins his role as US Deputy Secretary of Commerce. Dabbar brings experience in deploying emerging quantum network technologies to the new trilateral framework.

North Korea has also signalled interest in quantum computing for economic development. Analysts note that quantum’s lower energy demand compared to supercomputers could appeal to a country plagued by chronic power shortages.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Apple sued over use of pirated books in AI training

Apple is facing a new copyright lawsuit after two authors alleged the company used pirated copies of their books to train its OpenELM AI models. Filed in Northern California, the case claims Apple used the authors’ works without permission, payment, or credit.

The lawsuit seeks class-action status, adding Apple to a growing list of technology firms accused of misusing copyrighted works for AI training.

The action comes amid a wider legal storm engulfing AI companies. Anthropic recently agreed to a $1.5 billion settlement with authors who alleged its Claude chatbot was trained on their works without authorisation, in what lawyers called the most significant copyright recovery in history.

Microsoft, Meta, and OpenAI also face similar lawsuits over alleged reliance on unlicensed material in their datasets.

Analysts warn Apple could face heightened scrutiny given its reputation as a privacy-focused company. Any finding that its AI models were trained on pirated material could cause serious reputational harm alongside potential financial penalties.

The case also underscores the broader unresolved debate over whether AI training constitutes fair use or unlawful exploitation of creative works.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot! 

Anthropic settles $1.5 billion copyright case with authors

The AI startup, Anthropic, has agreed to pay $1.5 billion to settle a copyright lawsuit accusing the company of using pirated books to train its Claude AI chatbot.

The proposed deal, one of the largest of its kind, comes after a group of authors claimed the startup deliberately downloaded unlicensed copies of around 500,000 works.

According to reports, Anthropic will pay about $3,000 per book and add interest while agreeing to destroy datasets containing the material. A California judge will review the settlement terms on 8 September before finalising them.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs described the outcome as a landmark, warning that using pirated websites for AI training is unlawful.

The case reflects mounting legal pressure on the AI industry, with companies such as OpenAI and Microsoft also facing copyright disputes. The settlement followed a June ruling in which a judge said using the books to train Claude was ‘transformative’ and qualified as fair use.

Anthropic said the deal resolves legacy claims while affirming its commitment to safe AI development.

Despite the legal challenges, Anthropic continues to grow rapidly. Earlier in August, the company secured $13 billion in funding for a valuation of $183 billion, underlining its rise as one of the fastest-growing players in the global technology sector.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Google avoids breakup as court ruling fuels AI Mode expansion

A US district judge has declined to order a breakup of Google, softening the blow of a 2024 ruling that found the company had illegally monopolised online search.

The decision means Google can press ahead with its shift from a search engine into an answer engine, powered by generative AI.

Google’s AI Mode replaces traditional blue links with direct responses to queries, echoing the style of ChatGPT. While the feature is optional for now, it could become the default.

That alarms publishers, who depend on search traffic for advertising revenue. Studies suggest chatbots reduce referral clicks by more than 90 percent, leaving many sites at risk of collapse.

Google is also experimenting with inserting ads into AI Mode, though it remains unclear how much revenue will flow to content creators. Websites can block their data from being scraped, but doing so would also remove them from Google search entirely.

Despite these concerns, Google argues that competition from ChatGPT, Perplexity, and other AI tools shows that new rivals are reshaping the search landscape.

The judge even cited the emergence of generative AI as a factor that altered the case against Google, underlining how the rise of AI has become central to the future of the internet.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Hollywood’s Warner Bros. Discovery challenge an AI firm over copyright claims

Warner Bros. Discovery has filed a lawsuit against AI company Midjourney, accusing it of large-scale infringement of its intellectual property. The move follows similar actions by Disney and Universal, signalling growing pressure from major studios on AI image and video generators.

The filing includes examples of Midjourney-produced images featuring DC Comics, Looney Tunes and Rick and Morty characters. Warner Bros. Discovery argues that such output undermines its business model, which relies heavily on licensed images and merchandise.

The studio also claims Midjourney profits from copyright-protected works through its subscription services and the ‘Midjourney TV’ platform.

A central question in the case is whether AI-generated material reproducing copyrighted characters constitutes infringement under US law. The courts have not decided on this issue, making the outcome uncertain.

Warner Bros. Discovery is also challenging how Midjourney trains its models, pointing to past statements from company executives suggesting vast quantities of material were indiscriminately collected to build its systems.

With three major Hollywood studios now pursuing lawsuits, the outcome of these cases could establish a precedent for how courts treat AI-generated content.

Warner Bros. Discovery seeks damages that could reach $150,000 per infringed work, or Midjourney’s profits linked to the alleged violations.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Latvia launches open AI framework for Europe

Language technology company Tilde has released an open AI framework designed for all European languages.

The model, named ‘TildeOpen’, was developed with the support of the European Commission and trained on the Lumi supercomputer in Finland.

According to Tilde’s head Artūrs Vasiļevskis, the project addresses a key gap in US-based AI systems, which often underperform for smaller European languages such as Latvian. By focusing on European linguistic diversity, the framework aims to provide better accessibility across the continent.

Vasiļevskis also suggested that Latvia has the potential to become an exporter of AI solutions. However, he acknowledged that development is at an early stage and that current applications remain relatively simple. The framework and user guidelines are freely accessible online.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Google avoids forced breakup in search monopoly trial

A United States federal judge has ruled against a forced breakup of Google’s search business, instead opting for a series of behavioural changes to curb anticompetitive behaviour.

The ruling, from US District Court Judge Amit P. Mehta, bars Google from entering or maintaining exclusive deals that tie the distribution of its search products, such as Search, Chrome, and Gemini, to other apps or revenue agreements.

The tech giant will also have to share specific search data with rivals and offer search and search ad syndication services to competitors at standard rates.

The ruling comes a year after Judge Mehta found that Google had illegally maintained its monopoly in online search. The Department of Justice brought the case and pushed for stronger measures, including forcing Google to sell off its Chrome browser and Android operating system.

It also sought to end Google’s lucrative agreements with companies like Apple and Samsung, in which it pays billions to be the default search engine on their devices. The judge acknowledged during the trial that these default placements were ‘extremely valuable real estate’ that effectively locked out rivals.

A final judgement has not yet been issued, as Judge Mehta has given Google and the Department of Justice until 10 September to submit a revised plan. A technical committee will be established to help enforce the judgement, which will go into effect 60 days after entry and last for six years.

Experts say the ruling may influence a separate antitrust trial against Google’s advertising technology business, and that the search case itself is likely to face a lengthy appeals process, stretching into 2028.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

AI-generated media must now carry labels in China

China has introduced a sweeping new law that requires all AI-generated content online to carry labels. The measure, which came into effect on 1 September, aims to tackle misinformation, fraud and copyright infringement by ensuring greater transparency in digital media.

The law, first announced in March by the Cyberspace Administration of China, mandates that all AI-created text, images, video and audio must carry explicit and implicit markings.

These include visible labels and embedded metadata such as watermarks in files. Authorities argue that the rules will help safeguard users while reinforcing Beijing’s tightening grip over online spaces.

Major platforms such as WeChat, Douyin, Weibo and RedNote moved quickly to comply, rolling out new features and notifications for their users. The regulations also form part of the Qinglang campaign, a broader effort by Chinese authorities to clean up online activity with a strong focus on AI oversight.

While Google and other US companies are experimenting with content authentication tools, China has enacted legally binding rules nationwide.

Observers suggest that other governments may soon follow, as global concern about the risks of unlabelled AI-generated material grows.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

US appeals court reverses key findings in Sonos-Google patent case

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a reversed-in-part and affirmed-in-part a district court decision in the ongoing legal battle between Sonos and Google over smart speaker technologies. The court reversed the district court’s finding that Sonos’s ‘Zone Scene’ patents were unenforceable due to prosecution laches, a legal doctrine that can bar the enforcement of patents if the owner unreasonably delays in pursuing claims.

The district court had held that Sonos waited too long (13 years) to file specific claims following its 2006 provisional application, allegedly prejudicing Google, which had begun developing similar products by 2015.

However, the CAFC found that Google had failed to establish actual prejudice. It noted a lack of evidence that Google had meaningfully invested in the accused technology based on the assumption that Sonos had not already invented it. As a result, the court held that the lower court had abused its discretion in declaring the patents unenforceable.

The CAFC also reversed the district court’s invalidation of the Zone Scene patents for lack of written description, citing sufficient detail in Sonos’s 2019 patents. Google’s argument that the patents described only alternative embodiments was rejected, particularly as Google had presented no expert testimony to rebut Sonos’s claims.

Case background

Essentially, in 2020, Sonos filed a lawsuit against Google in the US, accusing it of infringing on key patents related to wireless multi-room speaker technology. Sonos claimed that after collaborating with Google years earlier, Google used its proprietary technology without permission in products like Google Home and Chromecast.

In 2022, the US International Trade Commission sided with Sonos, leading to a limited import ban on some Google products. In response, Google had to remove or change certain features, such as group volume control.

However, Google later challenged the validity of Sonos’s patents, and some were ruled invalid by a federal court. The legal battle has continued in various jurisdictions, reflecting broader conflicts over intellectual property rights and innovation in the tech world. Both companies have appealed different aspects of the rulings.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!