Why digital literacy is becoming a strategic necessity in the AI era

For many years, digital policy focused mainly on connectivity. Governments measured progress through broadband expansion, smartphone adoption, internet penetration, and device accessibility. Success was defined by how many people could connect to digital networks rather than by how effectively they could navigate increasingly complex digital environments.

However, AI, algorithmic recommendation systems, synthetic media, and platform-driven information ecosystems are now forcing policymakers to reconsider this approach. Access alone no longer guarantees empowerment. Citizens may be connected to the digital world while remaining vulnerable to manipulation, misinformation, cyber fraud, algorithmic bias, and AI-generated deception.

 Book, Publication, Advertisement, Text, Poster, Paper

Digital literacy is therefore evolving into something much broader than technical competence. It gradually includes media literacy, AI literacy, critical thinking, online safety awareness, privacy protection, and the ability to evaluate the credibility of information sources. In many countries, digital literacy is becoming directly linked to democratic resilience, social cohesion, economic competitiveness, and national security.

International organisations, regulators, and governments are beginning to frame digital literacy not merely as an educational issue but as a structural policy challenge. UNESCO initiatives, EU educational frameworks, online safety regulations, and national AI strategies all point to the same conclusion: societies are entering a phase where the ability to critically navigate digital systems may become as important as traditional literacy itself.

From digital access to digital judgement

The shift from access to judgement is becoming visible across multiple policy initiatives worldwide. Early digital inclusion strategies focused on closing infrastructure gaps and improving affordability. Current discussions increasingly focus on cognitive resilience and information integrity.

For example, UNESCO’s ‘Digital Citizens for Peace’ initiative in Pakistan offers a strong example of that transition. Pakistan has more than 205 million mobile subscribers and over 116 million internet users, yet UNESCO describes a growing ‘literacy-connectivity gap’. Digital access has expanded far faster than critical media literacy capabilities, leaving many users exposed to disinformation and online manipulation.

 Flag, Pakistan Flag

Rather than relying only on reactive fact-checking, UNESCO’s programme seeks to foster long-term digital judgement. Young journalists and content creators participate in media and information literacy camps that combine mentorship, role-playing exercises, ethical communication practices, and collaborative learning. Participants are encouraged not only to recognise misinformation but also to understand the broader social consequences of hate speech, manipulation, and digital polarisation.

Such programmes reflect an important evolution in policymaking. Digital literacy is no longer treated as a narrow technical skill associated with operating software or navigating websites. Increasingly, policymakers view it as a civic competence linked to democratic participation and responsible engagement in digital spaces.

That transition matters because modern information environments are no longer passive. Algorithms actively shape what users see, recommend emotionally engaging material, and amplify content capable of driving interaction. We, as citizens, therefore, need to understand not only the information itself, but also the systems that distribute it.

AI raises the stakes

AI dramatically intensifies these challenges. Generative AI systems can now produce realistic text, audio, images, and video at scale, often with minimal cost or expertise required. As we already know, deepfakes, synthetic media, AI-generated propaganda, and automated misinformation campaigns are becoming easier to deploy and harder to identify.

Such developments are forcing governments and educational institutions to rethink how societies prepare citizens for digital environments increasingly influenced by AI systems.

The Council of the European Union has recently called for a ‘human-centred approach’ to AI in education, stressing that teachers must remain central to the learning process even as AI tools expand across classrooms.

Furthermore, the Council has highlighted several major risks associated with AI integration, including misinformation, algorithmic bias, unequal access to digital resources, excessive technological dependence, and data protection concerns.

Importantly, the Council has not framed AI literacy as a purely technical matter. Instead, European policymakers have emphasised critical reflection, ethical understanding, and responsible digital citizenship. Teachers are described not merely as users of AI systems, but as guides capable of helping students understand limitations, biases, and broader societal implications.

That distinction is critical. AI literacy cannot simply mean learning how to use AI tools productively. Communities also need to understand how such systems influence perception, automate decisions, and shape public discourse. Without these skills, populations may struggle to distinguish authentic information from synthetic manipulation.

As such, digital literacy increasingly intersects with cyber resilience. Individuals and organisations need to understand the emerging threats connected to synthetic media, AI-driven fraud, deepfake impersonation, and automated social engineering techniques.

Education systems are the first line of defence

Schools and universities are gradually becoming central pillars of digital resilience strategies. Educational institutions are expected to prepare students not only for labour markets shaped by AI but also for digital societies susceptible to manipulation and polarisation.

That challenge places considerable pressure on teachers. Many education systems still struggle with uneven digital infrastructure, insufficient training, and outdated curricula. AI adoption risks widening those gaps if implementation occurs without adequate preparation.

UNESCO initiatives reflect similar priorities globally. In Tanzania, UNESCO supported ICT teacher training programmes involving 139 ICT master trainers across 20 regions. 15 online ICT modules were integrated into broader professional development systems, helping educators build long-term digital competencies rather than relying on isolated workshops.

Such efforts reveal an important reality often overlooked in AI discussions. Technology alone does not transform education. Institutional capacity, teacher confidence, curriculum design, and long-term support mechanisms remain equally important.

 Female, Girl, Person, Teen, Pen, Head, Computer, Electronics, Laptop, Pc, Face, Writing, Ylona Garcia

Education systems also face a delicate balancing act. AI tools may improve accessibility, personalise learning experiences, and reduce administrative burdens. At the same time, overreliance on automation could weaken concentration, analytical thinking, and independent problem-solving abilities among students.

Several governments are therefore attempting to preserve human oversight while embracing technological innovation. European frameworks increasingly stress ‘digital humanism’, ensuring that AI systems support rather than replace human agency and democratic values.

Misinformation and civic resilience

The relationship between digital literacy and democratic resilience is becoming increasingly direct. Misinformation campaigns no longer operate only through fringe websites or isolated propaganda channels. False narratives now spread through mainstream social platforms, encrypted messaging applications, short-form video systems, and AI-generated media.

UNESCO’s ‘Share Responsibly’ campaign in Lebanon illustrates how policymakers are attempting to address misinformation as a social behaviour problem, not just a technological issue. Rather than focusing exclusively on platforms, the campaign highlights everyday spaces such as taxis, shops, and public areas where digital misinformation circulates through ordinary conversations and social sharing practices.

UNESCO and Lebanon launch national campaign promoting media literacy and responsible information sharing.

This approach, among other national and institutional initiatives (EU, governments, etc), recognises an important reality: misinformation spreads because people trust familiar networks and emotionally engaging narratives. Digital literacy, therefore, requires behavioural and cultural dimensions alongside technical awareness.

AI further complicates this dynamic. Synthetic voices, realistic avatars, and automated content generation systems can manufacture the illusion of public consensus. Information operations become more scalable, more personalised, and potentially more persuasive.

Growing concerns around online radicalisation, conspiracy movements, and digital polarisation explain why many governments now frame digital literacy as part of broader societal resilience strategies. Citizens capable of critically assessing digital content are less vulnerable to manipulation, foreign influence operations, and emotionally driven misinformation ecosystems.

Platform design and user autonomy

Digital literacy alone cannot solve the structural problems embedded in digital platforms themselves. Society may develop stronger critical thinking skills while remaining exposed to systems intentionally designed to maximise engagement, emotional reaction, and behavioural influence.

Regulators are increasingly recognising that platform architecture matters as much as user education.

European regulators have intensified scrutiny of recommender systems, addictive platform features, and manipulative interface design. Investigations involving major technology firms increasingly focus on algorithmic amplification, dark patterns, and risks connected to minors’ online experiences.

The UK’s Ofcom has also strengthened its focus on online safety obligations involving children, illegal content, and algorithmic harms under the Online Safety Act. Such initiatives reflect a growing understanding that digital literacy must be paired with platform accountability.

UK child safety enforcement expands as Ofcom investigates adult sites over age-check compliance.

Individuals cannot realistically bear the full responsibility of navigating opaque recommendation systems, behavioural targeting mechanisms, and AI-driven engagement architectures alone. Effective digital governance requires a dual approach: empowering users while regulating platform behaviour.

That broader regulatory environment is reshaping the way policymakers think about digital citizenship. Instead of assuming neutral technological environments, governments increasingly recognise that digital systems actively influence behaviour, attention, and perception.

AI literacy and the future workforce

Digital literacy debates increasingly extend beyond democratic resilience into labour markets and economic competitiveness. AI systems are transforming workplaces across industries, forcing workers to adapt continuously to changing technological environments.

The World Economic Forum has argued that organisations succeeding with AI are redesigning workflows around human-machine collaboration rather than simply deploying technology. HR leaders are increasingly expected to oversee continuous learning systems, workforce adaptation, and AI-related reskilling strategies.

 Adult, Female, Person, Woman, Male, Man, Indoors, Plant, Executive, Computer Hardware, Electronics, Hardware, Monitor, Screen, Face, Head, Furniture, Mobile Phone, Phone, Computer, Laptop, Pc, Cup, Chair, Ray Caesar

Research by the International Labour Organization similarly highlights growing risks of inequality if lifelong learning systems fail to evolve quickly enough. Workers lacking digital and AI-related skills may face exclusion from emerging labour markets, while technological concentration could deepen economic disparities between regions and social groups.

Such developments demonstrate that digital literacy is no longer confined to classrooms. Governments increasingly view AI and digital competencies as long-term economic infrastructure linked to productivity, competitiveness, and social stability.

National frameworks and international governance

As highlighted previously, the growing strategic importance of digital literacy is visible across national and international governance frameworks. UNESCO, the EU, Canada, China, Australia, and multiple other jurisdictions are integrating AI literacy, ethical governance, and digital resilience into broader policy agendas.

China has recently launched pilot programmes for AI ethics review and governance services, focusing on risks such as algorithmic discrimination and emotional dependence. European institutions continue to expand AI education frameworks and digital rights protections.

Despite different political systems and regulatory philosophies, many governments are converging around similar concerns. AI systems simultaneously influence education, labour markets, information ecosystems, public trust, cybersecurity, and democratic participation.

That convergence explains why digital literacy is now being discussed alongside concepts such as strategic autonomy, societal resilience, and democratic stability.

Limitations and unresolved tensions

Digital literacy initiatives nevertheless face important limitations. Awareness campaigns alone cannot resolve structural inequalities, opaque algorithms, or concentrated technological power.

There is also a risk that governments and technology firms will frame digital literacy as an individual responsibility, avoiding deeper questions about platform incentives, surveillance-based business models, and algorithmic amplification.

Citizens cannot realistically detect every deepfake, evaluate every manipulated narrative, or fully understand every AI system they encounter. Excessive reliance on individual vigilance may therefore create unrealistic expectations.

Educational inequalities present another major challenge. Wealthier regions often have stronger infrastructure, better-trained educators, and greater institutional capacity to adapt curricula. Less developed areas may struggle to implement sophisticated AI literacy programmes, potentially widening global and domestic divides.

In conclusion, digital literacy is gradually evolving into one of the defining governance challenges of the AI era. Connectivity alone no longer guarantees meaningful participation in digital societies shaped by algorithms, synthetic media, and automated systems.

Governments, regulators, and international organisations are now recognising that societies require more than infrastructure and access. Citizens need the capacity to critically evaluate information, understand AI systems, recognise manipulation, and participate responsibly in digital environments.

The next phase of digital transformation will therefore not be defined solely by technological sophistication. It will instead depend on whether societies can develop individuals capable of understanding, questioning, and shaping ever more powerful digital systems rather than passively consuming them.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

UN experts raise concerns over online pornography platforms and digital intermediaries

UN human rights experts have raised concerns about the role of online pornography platforms, payment providers, and internet companies in enabling and monetising sexual exploitation and non-consensual content involving women and girls.

In a statement released in Geneva, the experts focused on Pornhub and its parent company Aylo Holdings, while also referencing broader concerns involving user-generated pornography platforms, payment networks, and search and technology companies linked to online distribution systems.

The experts said businesses involved in digital content ecosystems should not avoid responsibility where their services contribute to human rights violations. They called for stronger safeguards, including mandatory third-party age and consent verification systems for user-generated pornography platforms.

The statement urged the governments of the United States and Canada to pursue stronger regulatory and legal responses. According to experts, Canada acknowledged the need to modernise privacy legislation and to strengthen accountability requirements for digital platforms that host harmful content.

The experts also raised concerns about the burden placed on victims seeking the removal of non-consensual intimate content. They said victims are often required to repeatedly report abusive material that may continue circulating online even after complaints are filed.

The statement called for stronger moderation and monitoring systems, alongside obligations for platforms to remove violent, abusive, and non-consensual content involving both adults and children.

The experts acknowledged that Aylo has introduced changes to moderation and verification practices in recent years. However, they argued that these measures followed legal action, public pressure, and investigations linked to online exploitation and failures in content verification.

The statement referenced a deferred prosecution agreement reached in the United States in 2023 involving Aylo. Under the agreement, the company accepted financial penalties, compensation measures, and external monitoring arrangements. The experts expressed concern that the arrangement may not provide full corporate accountability for harms linked to the platform’s operations.

The communication also noted ongoing engagement with companies, including Mastercard, Visa, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, regarding their role in digital infrastructure, payment systems, and traffic distribution connected to online pornography platforms.

The statement was issued by Reem Alsalem, UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls, and Ana Brian Nougrères, UN Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy. The experts serve independently under the UN Human Rights Council’s Special Procedures framework.

Why does it matter?

The discussion reflects wider international debates over platform accountability, online safety, content moderation, digital payments infrastructure, and the role of technology companies in addressing harmful and non-consensual online content.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Pope Leo XIV to publish first encyclical on AI and human dignity

Pope Leo XIV’s first encyclical, Magnifica humanitas, focusing on the protection of the human person in the age of AI, will be released on 25 May, according to Vatican News.

The document, whose title roughly translates as ‘The greatness of humanity,’ addresses the relationship among AI, human dignity, and Catholic social teaching. It carries the Pope’s signature dated 15 May, marking the 135th anniversary of Rerum novarum, the landmark 1891 encyclical by Pope Leo XIII on labour and social issues during the industrial era.

The Vatican said the encyclical will be presented during an event at the Synod Hall in Vatican City on the day of publication. Pope Leo XIV is expected to attend, along with Church officials, theologians, and technology specialists.

Participants scheduled to speak include Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández, Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith; Cardinal Michael Czerny, Prefect of the Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development; Professor Anna Rowlands of Durham University; Christopher Olah, co-founder of AI company Anthropic and a researcher focused on AI interpretability; and Professor Leocadie Lushombo of Santa Clara University.

Cardinal Secretary of State Pietro Parolin is expected to deliver closing remarks before the Pope delivers an address and blesses.

The publication comes amid growing international debate over the societal impact of AI systems, including questions related to ethics, labour, governance, misinformation, and human oversight. The Vatican has increasingly engaged with discussions around digital technologies and AI in recent years, often emphasising human dignity, accountability, and the ethical use of emerging technologies.

By linking the new encyclical to the anniversary of Rerum novarum, the Vatican appears to place AI within a broader historical context of technological transformation and social change.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Council of Europe highlights role of democracy and AI governance in security

The Council of Europe has called for a legal and democratic framework for European security in its 2026 annual report, warning that the continent cannot separate security from democracy, human rights, and the rule of law.

Secretary General Alain Berset presented his 2026 annual report, titled ‘The New Democratic Pact for Europe in times of rupture’, to foreign ministers from the Council of Europe’s 46 member states during the Committee of Ministers session in Chişinău on 15 May.

The report states that Europe is increasing defence spending and argues that military measures alone cannot provide lasting security. Berset said democratic security depends on legal safeguards, resilient institutions, and public trust.

The report links Europe’s security challenges to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, foreign information manipulation, and declining trust in democratic systems. It also stresses that safeguards for human rights and democratic principles must keep pace with rapid technological change, including digital technology and AI.

Berset argues that social rights, health, education, and institutional trust have too often been treated as ‘soft security’. He said security depends on public trust in institutions and resilient democratic systems.

The report presents the state of play of the New Democratic Pact for Europe, launched in 2025 to identify integrated responses to democratic backsliding and renew democratic governance across the continent. Its first consultation phase runs until December 2026.

The annual report is structured around six areas: countering information manipulation and disinformation; promoting social rights; defending equal rights and inclusion; safeguarding elections and democratic processes; supporting civic space and fundamental freedoms; and promoting positive use of digital technology and AI, including action against cyber-enabled threats.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Vatican establishes commission on AI under Pope Leo XIV

The Vatican has established an Inter-Dicasterial Commission on Artificial Intelligence, approved by Pope Leo XIV, to coordinate work on the implications of rapidly advancing AI technologies.

The decision was formalised in a rescript dated 12 May and published by the Holy See Press Office on 16 May. The document refers to the acceleration of AI development and its widespread use, as well as its potential effects on human beings and humanity as a whole.

The rescript links the initiative to the Church’s concern for the dignity of every human being, especially in relation to integral human development. It says the commission was established by the Cardinal Prefect of the Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development, with the approval of Pope Leo XIV.

The commission will include representatives from the Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development, the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, the Dicastery for Culture and Education, the Dicastery for Communication, the Pontifical Academy for Life, the Pontifical Academy of Sciences and the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences.

Coordination will initially be entrusted to the Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development for one year, renewable if necessary. The coordinating institution will facilitate collaboration and information exchange among participating bodies on AI-related activities and projects, including policies on AI use within the Holy See.

Why does it matter?

The commission shows that the Vatican is treating AI as a cross-cutting institutional issue linked to human dignity, social responsibility and internal governance. By involving several dicasteries and pontifical academies, the Holy See is positioning AI not only as a technological matter, but as a question affecting doctrine, communication, education, science, life ethics and integral human development.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!  

Global experts gather for CPDP 2026

The CPDP Conference 2026 has released its detailed programme, outlining a multi-day agenda of panels, workshops and cultural sessions focused on AI, data protection and digital governance. The conference will run from 19 to 22 May 2026, bringing together global experts across policy, academia and industry.

Across the programme, a wide range of panels and debates will explore key themes including AI regulation, digital governance, workplace data rights and platform power. Alongside panels and discussions, there will also be short movies and workshops offering conference topics in different formats.

Workshops are scheduled throughout each day, with structured breaks including coffee sessions and lunch intervals offering networking moments for participants. Topics range from AI in healthcare and advertising to digital conflict, governance under pressure and privacy-preserving technologies.

The programme also includes specialised tracks and cultural sessions, such as film screenings and artistic discussions on algorithmic systems, alongside academic panels and policy debates. The event will conclude after a final series of workshops and sessions on 22 May in Brussels, Belgium.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

UN invites leaders for AI governance dialogue

The co-chairs of the first Global Dialogue on AI Governance have invited member states and stakeholders to express interest in co-chairing thematic discussions during the meeting, which will take place in Geneva on 6–7 July 2026 alongside the ITU AI for Good Global Summit under UN General Assembly resolution 79/325.

The discussions will be organised around four themes: the social, economic, ethical, cultural, linguistic, and technical implications of AI; bridging AI divides through capacity-building and digital access; safe, secure, and trustworthy AI, including interoperability between governance approaches; and human rights issues such as transparency, accountability, and human oversight.

Each thematic session will be jointly chaired by one member state and one stakeholder representative, with the aim of fostering multistakeholder exchanges on experiences, best practices, and policy cooperation. Governments are asked to nominate high-level representatives, while stakeholders are encouraged to nominate senior experts relevant to the selected theme.

Selected co-chairs will support dialogue design, facilitate exchanges, and contribute to inclusive and balanced participation.

According to the UN, the initiative aims to bring together diverse perspectives from governments, industry, academia and civil society. The process is intended to strengthen collaboration and inform future AI governance approaches.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

G7 working group advances cybersecurity approach for AI systems

The German Federal Office for Information Security published guidance developed by the G7 Cybersecurity Working Group outlining elements for a Software Bill of Materials for AI. The document aims to support both public and private sector stakeholders in improving transparency in AI systems.

The guidance builds on a shared G7 vision introduced in 2025 and focuses on strengthening cybersecurity throughout the AI supply chain. It sets out baseline components that should be included in an AI SBOM to better track and understand system dependencies.

The document outlines seven baseline building blocks that should form part of an AI Software Bill of Materials (SBOM for AI), designed to improve visibility into how AI systems are built and how their components interact across the supply chain.

At the foundation is a Metadata cluster, which records information about the SBOM itself, including who created it, which tools and formats were used, when it was generated, and how software dependencies relate to one another.

The framework then moves to System Level Properties, covering the AI system as a whole. This includes the system’s components, producers, data flows, intended application areas, and the processing of information between internal and external services.

A dedicated Models cluster focuses on the AI models embedded within the system, documenting details such as model identifiers, versions, architectures, training methods, limitations, licenses, and dependencies. The goal is to make the origins and characteristics of models easier to trace and assess.

The document also introduces a Dataset Properties cluster to improve transparency into the data used throughout the AI lifecycle. It captures dataset provenance, content, statistical properties, sensitivity levels, licensing, and the tools used to create or modify datasets.

Beyond software and data, the framework includes an Infrastructure cluster that maps the software and hardware dependencies required to run AI systems, including links to hardware bills of materials where relevant.

Cybersecurity considerations are grouped under Security Properties, which document implemented safeguards such as encryption, access controls, adversarial robustness measures, compliance frameworks, and vulnerability references.

Finally, the framework proposes a Key Performance Indicators cluster that includes metrics related to both security and operational performance, including robustness, uptime, latency, and incident response indicators.

According to the paper, the objective is to provide practical direction that organisations can adopt to enhance visibility and manage risks linked to AI technologies. The framework is intended to support more secure development and deployment practices.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

New South Wales criminalises AI sexual deepfakes

Australia’s New South Wales state has clarified that creating, sharing, or threatening to share sexually explicit images, videos, or audio of a person without consent is a criminal offence, including where the material has been digitally altered or generated using AI.

The state government strengthened protections in 2025 by amending the Crimes Act 1900 to cover digitally generated deepfakes. The law already applied to sexually explicit image material, but now also covers content created or altered by AI to place someone in a sexual situation they were never in.

The reforms mean that non-consensual sexual images or audio are covered regardless of how they were made. Threatening to create or share such material is also a criminal offence in New South Wales, with penalties of up to three years in prison, a fine of up to A$11,000, or both.

Courts can also order offenders to remove or delete the material. Failure to comply with such an order can result in up to 2 years’ imprisonment, a fine of up to A$5,500, or both.

The law operates alongside existing child abuse material offences. Under criminal law, any material depicting a person under 18 in a sexually explicit way can be treated as child abuse material, including AI-generated content.

Criminal proceedings against people under 16 can begin only with the approval of the Director of Public Prosecutions, which is intended to ensure that only the most serious matters involving young people enter the criminal justice system.

Limited exemptions apply for proper purposes, including genuine medical, scientific, law enforcement, or legal proceedings-related purposes. A review of the law will take place 12 months after it comes into effect to assess how it is working and whether changes are needed.

The changes are intended to address the misuse of AI and deepfake technology to harass, shame, or exploit people through fake digital content. New South Wales says its criminal law works alongside national online safety frameworks, including the work of Australia’s eSafety Commissioner, as It seeks to keep privacy and consent protections aligned with emerging technologies.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Texas lawsuit targets Netflix data practices

The Attorney General of Texas has filed a lawsuit against Netflix, alleging the company unlawfully collected user data without consent. The case claims the platform tracked extensive behavioural information from both adults and children while presenting itself as privacy-conscious.

According to the lawsuit, Netflix allegedly logged viewing habits, device usage and other interactions, turning user activity into monetised data. The lawsuit further claims that this data was shared with brokers and advertising technology firms to build detailed consumer profiles.

The Attorney General also argues that Netflix designed features to increase engagement, including autoplay, which allegedly encouraged prolonged viewing, particularly among younger users. These practices allegedly contradict the platform’s public messaging about being ad-free and family-friendly.

Texas’s complaint quoted a statement from Netflix co-founder and Chairman Reed Hastings, who allegedly said the company did not collect user data. He sought to distinguish Netflix’s approach from other major technology platforms with regard to data collection.

The Attorney General also claims that Netflix’s alleged surveillance violates the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act. The legal action seeks to halt the alleged data practices, introduce stricter controls, such as disabling autoplay for children, and impose penalties under consumer protection law, including civil fines of $ 10,000 per violation. The case highlights ongoing scrutiny of data practices by major technology platforms in the USA.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot