Human rights principles Archives | Digital Watch Observatory

UK ICO warns against unauthorised access to patient records

The UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has warned that unauthorised access to patient records is a serious breach of trust and an ongoing concern across the healthcare sector. In a new blog, the regulator said medical records contain some of the most sensitive personal information and must only be accessed for legitimate reasons.

The ICO said inappropriate access remains rare and does not reflect the behaviour of most healthcare professionals. However, recent high-profile incidents suggest the problem is not confined to isolated cases and requires a stronger organisational response.

According to the regulator, personal curiosity is never a legitimate basis for accessing patient records. Deliberate or reckless access to personal data without authorisation is unlawful and may result in disciplinary measures, loss of professional registration and, in some cases, criminal prosecution.

The ICO called on healthcare leaders to strengthen organisational culture through clear communication, role-specific data protection training and technical safeguards, including role-based access controls and audit logging. Protecting patient privacy is fundamental to maintaining trust in the healthcare system in the UK.

Why does it matter?

Healthcare records contain some of the most sensitive categories of personal information, including medical histories, diagnoses and treatment details. Even isolated cases of unauthorised access can undermine public trust in healthcare institutions and raise concerns about privacy, confidentiality and professional accountability.

The warning also highlights the growing importance of data governance in healthcare. As health systems become increasingly digital and interconnected, organisations must combine technical safeguards, staff training and strong organisational culture to ensure sensitive information is accessed only when necessary and for legitimate purposes. Maintaining patient trust remains essential to the effective delivery of healthcare services.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

UN Women cautions AI is reinforcing gender bias

UN Women has warned that AI systems continue to reinforce long-standing gender stereotypes, even as they become increasingly embedded in everyday life. The organisation says many AI models still associate women with domestic roles while linking men to leadership, business, and career success.

Recent studies highlighted the scale of the issue. Research examining 133 AI systems found that 44% displayed gender bias, while more than a quarter showed both gender and racial bias. According to UN Women, these outcomes reflect biases embedded in training data and broader social patterns rather than isolated technical flaws.

Concerns extend beyond stereotyping and representation. AI-generated content is contributing to the spread of online abuse, with women human rights defenders, activists, and journalists reporting experiences ranging from manipulated images to deepfake content. At the same time, women remain underrepresented in the AI sector, accounting for only around 30% of the global workforce.

Ahead of international discussions on AI governance in Geneva, UN Women is urging governments, technology companies, and developers to place gender equality at the centre of AI policymaking. The organisation argues that inclusive AI development can help ensure the technology expands opportunities and participation rather than reproducing existing inequalities.

Why does it matter?

As AI systems become increasingly influential in hiring, education, healthcare, public services and online platforms, biased outputs can amplify existing inequalities at scale. Gender stereotypes embedded in AI models may affect how people are represented, evaluated and treated, making fairness and inclusivity important considerations in AI development and deployment.

The issue also highlights the relationship between technical design and social outcomes. Diverse datasets, inclusive development teams and robust governance mechanisms are increasingly viewed as necessary to reduce harmful biases and improve trust in AI systems. As governments develop AI regulations and standards, questions of gender equality, representation and accountability are likely to play a growing role in shaping future AI governance frameworks.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

UNESCO backs new initiative against online hate speech

Organisations and experts in Kyrgyzstan have launched the country’s first multistakeholder coalition focused on online harmful content and content moderation, with support from UNESCO and the European Union.

The Aikyn Sanarip coalition was launched in Bishkek on 17 June, ahead of the UN International Day for Countering Hate Speech. It brings together civil society, media representatives, government bodies, academics, international organisations and bloggers.

UNESCO said the coalition will provide a platform for dialogue on freedom of expression, digital rights, online safety and greater accountability from digital platforms.

The launch also featured the first national study on freedom of expression and content moderation in Kyrgyzstan. The research examines how hate speech spreads across digital platforms, how content is moderated in Kyrgyz-language digital spaces, and where legal and institutional gaps remain.

UNESCO said users in Kyrgyzstan increasingly encounter hate speech, disinformation and online harassment. At the same time, the country lacks a clear legal definition of hate speech, and mechanisms for addressing harmful content remain fragmented.

The European Union supported the forum under UNESCO’s Social Media 4 Peace project, which promotes multistakeholder responses to harmful online content while protecting freedom of expression.

Why does it matter?

The launch shows how online hate speech and harmful content are becoming governance issues beyond major platform markets. Kyrgyzstan’s new coalition links digital rights, online safety and platform accountability, while also highlighting a difficult balance: tackling hate speech and disinformation without undermining freedom of expression. The initiative may offer a model for multistakeholder responses in countries where legal frameworks and platform moderation practices remain underdeveloped.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU court clarifies age verification rules for pornographic websites

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has clarified the conditions under which EU Member States may require age verification for users of pornographic websites and restrict the rebroadcasting of information about certain roadside checks.

The ruling concerns joined cases involving WebGroup Czech Republic, NKL Associates and Coyote System. The cases were referred by France’s Council of State and concerned French measures requiring pornographic websites to verify users’ ages and allowing restrictions on geolocation driving assistance services that rebroadcast information about certain roadside checks.

The companies argued that the measures breached the country-of-origin principle under the Directive on electronic commerce. Under that principle, information society services are generally governed by the laws of the Member State in which the provider is established.

The Court found that the contested measures, including age verification requirements, fall within the directive’s coordinated field and that applying them to providers established in other Member States constitutes a restriction on the free movement of the services concerned. However, it said the directive allows such restrictions under certain conditions.

The CJEU said Member States may impose measures on providers established elsewhere in the EU where necessary for recognised objectives such as public policy, public security, or public safety. According to the Court, protecting minors through age verification may constitute a public policy objective, while restrictions on rebroadcasting information about certain roadside checks may be justified on public security grounds.

The Court said such measures must be proportionate and targeted at specific information society services that actually prejudice those objectives. Except in urgent cases, the Member State taking the measure must first ask the provider’s Member State of establishment to act and must notify the European Commission and that Member State before adopting the measure.

The ruling means an EU Member State may require providers established in another Member State to introduce age verification systems to prevent minors from accessing pornographic websites, provided the directive’s conditions are met. The referring French court must determine whether the national age verification measures satisfy those conditions.

The Court also addressed liability for information stored and rebroadcast by online services. It said a provider cannot rely on the hosting liability exemption if it has knowledge of or control over the information. Control can exist when a provider uses an algorithm to determine the conditions, methods and priority according to which information is rebroadcast.

The decision therefore clarifies both the limits of the e-commerce country-of-origin principle and the circumstances in which algorithmic control over content distribution may affect platform liability.

Why does it matter?

The ruling provides important guidance on how EU Member States can pursue online safety objectives while respecting the Digital Single Market’s country-of-origin principle. In particular, it confirms that age verification requirements aimed at protecting minors may be applied to providers established in other Member States, provided procedural safeguards and proportionality requirements are met.

The judgement also has broader implications for platform governance and intermediary liability. By highlighting the relevance of algorithmic control in determining whether a provider can benefit from hosting liability exemptions, the Court contributes to ongoing debates about platform responsibility, content moderation and the legal consequences of algorithm-driven content distribution.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

UK deepens AI adoption in healthcare with new NHS funding

According to UKAuthority, the UK government is investing nearly £30 million to expand the use of AI-powered diagnostic technologies across England’s National Health Service (NHS). The funding aims to accelerate diagnoses and improve patient care for millions of people.

Under the programme, £20 million will be allocated to deploy AI-powered chest X-ray tools across every NHS trust in England by 2029. The technology is already used by around half of NHS trusts and has supported more than four million patients through faster lung cancer diagnosis or clearance.

A further £8.1 million from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) will support trials of six AI and digital technologies across 13 NHS sites. The technologies will assess scans and cardiac tests, prioritise urgent cases and provide digital therapies for a range of health conditions.

The investment forms part of the AI Diagnostic Fund under the Prime Minister’s AI Exemplars programme. Healthcare organisations and charities welcomed the initiative while noting that successful implementation will also depend on workforce capacity, digital infrastruture and operational readiness across the NHS.

Why does it matter?

The investment reflects the growing role of AI in healthcare, particularly in diagnostic imaging and clinical decision support. By helping clinicians identify urgent cases more quickly and process growing volumes of medical data, AI tools have the potential to improve efficiency and reduce delays in patient care.

The initiative also highlights a broader challenge facing health systems: scaling AI successfully requires more than access to technology. Workforce skills, digital infrastructure, clinical integration and governance frameworks will play a key role in determining whether AI delivers measurable improvements in healthcare outcomes.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

ILO adopts Decent Work in the Platform Economy Convention 2026 for digital workers

The International Labour Organization has adopted the Decent Work in the Platform Economy Convention 2026, creating the first global labour standard specifically focused on work performed through digital labour platforms.

The International Labour Conference adopted the Convention at its 114th session in Geneva. It addresses working conditions in the platform economy, including ride-hailing, delivery, online freelancing, data work and other forms of digitally mediated labour.

The new standard covers several long-standing concerns in platform work, including worker classification, fair remuneration, occupational safety and health, social protection, algorithmic management, data protection and protection against unfair account suspension or deactivation.

The Convention requires governments to take measures to ensure that platform workers are correctly classified according to the way their work is performed, rather than relying solely on contractual labels. It also includes protections linked to automated systems used to monitor, evaluate or make decisions about workers.

Workers should be informed about automated systems affecting their work and have access to explanations and human review of significant automated decisions, including those related to non-payment, suspension, or deactivation.

Labour organisations welcomed the adoption as a milestone for platform workers’ rights, while attention now turns to ratification and national implementation. The Convention will only translate into enforceable protections where governments incorporate its standards into domestic law and practice.

Why does it matter?

The Convention is a major development in global digital labour governance. Platform work has often grown faster than labour law, leaving workers exposed to income instability, opaque algorithmic management, sudden account deactivation and uncertain employment status. By setting an international baseline, the ILO standard gives governments, unions and regulators a reference point for bringing digital platform work within decent work protections. Its impact, however, will depend on ratification, enforcement and how countries translate the standard into national law.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

Humanists UK urges government to adopt human-centred AI principles

Humanists UK has urged the UK government to place human dignity, democratic oversight and human flourishing at the centre of AI governance.

The call followed a House of Lords debate on the impact of AI on human relationships and society, during which peers discussed the ethical, social and regulatory challenges raised by rapidly advancing AI systems.

Humanists UK pointed out to the government the Luxembourg Declaration on Artificial Intelligence and Human Values, adopted by Humanists International in 2025. The declaration argues that AI should support human judgement, the common good, democratic governance, transparency, autonomy and protection from harm.

Lord Michael Cashman, a patron of Humanists UK and member of the All-Party Parliamentary Humanist Group, urged the government not to ‘reinvent the wheel’ and said the declaration already sets out principles relevant to AI governance.

Liberal Democrat peer Lord Clement-Jones said the debate showed a convergence of values across different traditions, including the need for democratic oversight, transparency and safeguards to ensure AI serves human beings rather than replacing them.

Responding for the government, Digital Economy Minister Baroness Lloyd of Effra said AI is already changing the economy, public services and human relationships. She said the government’s responsibility is to ensure that the transformation strengthens rather than diminishes the fabric of society.

Humanists UK said it has written to Baroness Lloyd and shared a copy of the Luxembourg Declaration.

Why does it matter?

The story reflects the growing role of civil society, religious groups and ethical movements in AI governance debates. While it does not signal a new UK policy, it shows how discussions on AI safety are broadening beyond technical risk to include human dignity, democratic accountability, transparency, autonomy and the public interest. Such value-based frameworks may influence how governments frame future AI regulation, assurance and safeguards.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Population cap proposal rejected by Swiss voters

Swiss voters have rejected a proposal to prevent the country’s permanent resident population from exceeding 10 million people before 2050.

Provisional official results from the 14 June vote show that 54.79% of voters opposed the ‘No to a Switzerland with 10 million! (Sustainability Initiative) while 45.21% supported it. Turnout was 58.86%.

The initiative sought to introduce a population cap as Switzerland’s resident population reached around 9.1 million at the end of 2025. Supporters argued that population growth was increasing pressure on housing, infrastructure and public services.

If the permanent resident population had exceeded 9.5 million before 2050, the Federal Council and Parliament would have been required to take measures, particularly in areas such as asylum and family reunification. If the population had exceeded 10 million, Switzerland could have been required to terminate international agreements contributing to population growth, including the agreement with the EU on the free movement of persons.

Swiss federal authorities warned that ending the free movement agreement would also have affected other agreements under Bilateral Agreements I and could have called into question Switzerland’s participation in the Schengen and Dublin arrangements.

By rejecting the proposal, voters avoided a measure that could have placed major pressure on Switzerland’s labour market, its relations with the EU, and cross-border cooperation.

Why does it matter?

The vote matters beyond Swiss population policy because the initiative could have affected the country’s relationship with the EU. Switzerland relies on bilateral agreements for labour mobility, market access and cooperation on security and asylum. A population cap tied to termination of the free movement agreement would have created uncertainty for businesses, public services and sectors that depend on foreign workers, including healthcare.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

Latin American AI proposals draw on EU risk-based regulation

Latin American countries are increasingly looking to the EU’s risk-based approach as they develop AI governance frameworks, according to an International Bar Association analysis.

The IBA noted that Chile, Peru, Brazil and El Salvador have introduced or advanced AI-related legislation in recent years, with several initiatives focusing on risk classification, fundamental rights and accountability. Peru implemented an AI law in 2023 and updated it in 2025, while Brazil has considered similar draft legislation, and El Salvador enacted an AI law in 2025.

Chile has become one of the region’s most active AI policy actors. It helped launch Latam-GPT, an open-source language model trained on Latin American data, and is considering an AI bill that would classify systems according to risk. The proposal includes stricter obligations for high-risk uses, as well as regulatory sandboxes and measures intended to support innovation and smaller businesses.

Legal experts cited by the IBA said the EU model fits parts of Latin America’s existing regulatory culture, particularly in data protection and cybersecurity. However, they also warned that EU-style requirements on risk governance, technical documentation, testing and incident reporting could strain regulators and smaller companies with limited resources.

The analysis also points to regional challenges, including legal differences between countries, gaps in data governance and different economic priorities. While Europe’s AI focus often centres on highly regulated sectors, experts said Latin America may see greater value from AI applications in financial inclusion, payments, healthcare, agriculture, commerce and logistics.

Why does it matter?

Latin America’s approach to AI regulation could shape governance conditions for a region of more than 650 million people. If countries align closely with the EU model, transparency, accountability and fundamental rights may become central pillars of regional AI governance. However, the IBA analysis also shows the risk of importing complex compliance models without sufficient regulatory capacity, which could burden smaller firms and slow adoption in markets where AI could support financial inclusion, healthcare, agriculture and public services.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

Civil society groups warn EU Digital Networks Act could weaken net neutrality

A coalition of civil society organisations has raised concerns about the European Commission’s proposed Digital Networks Act, warning that it could weaken existing net neutrality protections. The signatories argue that the legislation could weaken net neutrality protections and alter the existing framework governing the open internet.

According to the coalition, the proposal would incorporate the Open Internet Regulation into the broader Digital Networks Act while removing many of its explanatory provisions. The groups argue that this could reduce legal certainty and make net neutrality protections more vulnerable to reinterpretation.

The signatories also oppose proposed provisions on IP interconnection, arguing that there is insufficient evidence of market failure to justify regulatory intervention. They warn that proposed cooperation and conciliation mechanisms could formalise commercial negotiations between network operators and content providers, potentially paving the way for network fees.

The coalition is urging EU lawmakers to remove Articles 191 to 193 from the proposal and keep the Open Internet Regulation as a separate legal instrument. The coalition argues that doing so would help preserve consumer protections, competition and the principle of an open internet across the EU.

Why does it matter?

Net neutrality has been a cornerstone of EU internet policy, requiring internet service providers to treat online traffic equally rather than favouring or disadvantaging particular services, platforms or content. Supporters argue that these rules help protect competition, innovation and consumer choice online.

The debate over the Digital Networks Act highlights broader tensions between telecom operators, digital platforms and civil society groups over the future governance of internet infrastructure. Proposed changes to interconnection rules and the legal framework for net neutrality could have implications for how internet services are delivered, regulated and financed across Europe.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!