Starting Saturday, all small- and medium-sized portable electronic devices sold in the EU must use USB-C ports for charging, a move aimed at reducing waste and increasing convenience for consumers. Devices like smartphones, tablets, cameras, and headphones will now share a standardised charger, eliminating the need for multiple charging cables.
The new rule follows a 2022 vote by the European Parliament and member states to phase out alternative charging methods. Consumers can also choose to opt out of receiving a charger with new devices, further cutting down on waste. Laptop manufacturers will be required to comply with similar standards starting April 28, 2026.
Anna Cavazzini, chair of the European Parliament’s Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, hailed the change as a victory for sustainability and cost savings. The measure is expected to save EU households €250 million annually and significantly reduce the waste generated by discarded chargers. The Parliament has pledged to closely monitor manufacturers as they implement the new rules.
Ireland’s burgeoning data centre industry, dominated by global tech firms like Google and Amazon, is consuming over 20% of the nation’s electricity. Rising demand has led to restrictions on new developments near Dublin until 2028, as regulators address concerns over energy use, emissions, and household electricity costs.
Efforts to expand data centres into rural areas like County Offaly promise economic opportunities but raise environmental and cultural preservation debates. Residents remain divided over renewable energy projects linked to these facilities.
As Ireland navigates energy and climate goals, questions linger about balancing technological growth with sustainability.
Google contractors improving the Gemini AI model have been tasked with comparing its responses against those of Anthropic’s Claude, according to internal documents reviewed by TechCrunch. The evaluation process involves scoring responses on criteria such as truthfulness and verbosity, with contractors given up to 30 minutes per prompt to determine which model performs better. Notably, some outputs identify themselves as Claude, sparking questions about Google’s use of its competitor’s model.
Claude’s responses, known for emphasising safety, have sometimes refused to answer prompts deemed unsafe, unlike Gemini, which has faced criticism for safety violations. One such instance involved Gemini generating responses flagged for inappropriate content. Despite Google’s significant investment in Anthropic, Claude’s terms of service prohibit its use to train or build competing AI models without prior approval.
A spokesperson for Google DeepMind stated that while the company compares model outputs for evaluation purposes, it does not train Gemini using Anthropic models. Anthropic, however, declined to comment on whether Google had obtained permission to use Claude for these tests. Recent revelations also highlight contractor concerns over Gemini producing potentially inaccurate information on sensitive topics, including healthcare.
Generative AI, has begun to mimic an intriguing aspect of human perception, the blending of sensory experiences. Research shows that humans naturally associate colours, shapes, and even sounds with flavours a phenomenon known as cross-modal correspondence. For instance, red hues often evoke sweetness, while sharp shapes suggest bitterness. AI systems, trained on human data, appear to be trained to replicate these associations, offering new perspectives on how deeply such connections are embedded in our perception.
This revelation emerged through studies where AI was tasked with answering prompts about the relationships between sensory elements, such as the sweetness of certain shapes or colours. The results closely mirrored human responses, particularly when using advanced models like ChatGPT-4. Researchers believe this reflects the biases in the data the AI was trained on, highlighting how common and universal these sensory links might be.
The potential applications of this technology are vast. Marketing, for example, could use AI to design products and packaging that enhance sensory appeal. However, experts warn that AI’s insights should complement, not replace, human creativity. While AI offers inspiration, the nuances of human perception remain essential for creating designs that resonate deeply with people.
By understanding how AI interprets sensory input, researchers hope to not only enhance technology but also unlock more about the mysteries of the human brain. As AI continues to explore the sensory dimensions, it might pave the way for innovative approaches to art, marketing, and even neuroscience.
US President-elect Donald Trump announced on Sunday that Bo Hines, a former congressional candidate from North Carolina, will serve as executive director of the Presidential Council of Advisers for Digital Assets. The council, a newly formed body under Trump’s administration, will focus on shaping US policy on cryptocurrencies and digital assets. It will be chaired by David Sacks, a prominent venture capitalist and tech entrepreneur who has been dubbed the incoming administration’s ‘crypto czar.’
Hines, a political newcomer who gained attention during his congressional campaign, has been a vocal supporter of blockchain technology and its potential to revolutionise finance. In his new role, Hines will work closely with Sacks to advise the administration on regulatory frameworks, market opportunities, and the integration of digital assets into the broader economy. The appointment signals a potential shift in federal policy toward a more active and structured approach to managing the growing influence of cryptocurrencies.
David Sacks, known for his extensive experience in the tech sector and his advocacy for decentralised finance, is expected to play a leading role in the council’s direction. His appointment reflects the administration’s interest in fostering innovation while addressing concerns about security, fraud, and market stability. Together, Sacks and Hines will oversee a team of experts tasked with navigating the complexities of the digital asset landscape, aiming to position the United States as a global leader in the rapidly evolving sector.
Trump’s creation of the council underscores the importance of cryptocurrencies and blockchain in the modern economy. As the sector continues to expand, the administration’s policies could have far-reaching implications for innovation, financial regulation, and the global competitiveness of the US digital asset industry.
Italy’s antitrust authority has concluded its investigation into Booking.com, finding the travel giant’s proposed changes sufficient to resolve concerns about its dominance in the market. The probe, which began in March, scrutinised whether the company’s practices restricted competition and led to higher prices for consumers.
The Italian watchdog highlighted that Booking.com’s Preferred Partner Programme risked stifling competition by favouring certain hotels while reducing consumer choice. As part of its commitments, the platform agreed not to consider prices offered by hotels on other booking channels when managing or promoting participating properties.
These adjustments are intended to ensure fairer competition in the online travel sector, preventing practices that could inflate costs or limit options for users. By addressing these issues, Booking.com avoids further regulatory action and strengthens its position in Italy’s travel market.
Speakers at IGF 2024 highlighted digital innovation within the United Nations system, demonstrating how emerging technologies are enhancing services and operational efficiency. Representatives from UNHCR, UNICEF, the UN Pension Fund, and UNICC shared their organisations’ progress and collaborative efforts.
Michael Walton, Head of Digital Services at UNHCR, detailed initiatives supporting refugees through digital tools. These include mobile apps for services and efforts to counter misinformation. Walton stressed the importance of digital inclusion and innovation to bridge gaps in education and access for vulnerable groups.
Fui Meng Liew, Chief of Digital Center of Excellence at UNICEF, emphasised safeguarding children’s data rights through a comprehensive digital resilience framework. UNICEF’s work also involves developing digital public goods, with a focus on accessibility for children with disabilities and securing data privacy.
Dino Cataldo Dell’Accio from the UN Pension Fund presented a blockchain-powered proof-of-life system that uses biometrics and AI in support of e-Government for the aging population. This system ensures beneficiaries’ security and privacy while streamlining verification processes. Similarly, Sameer Chauhan of UNICC showcased digital solutions like AI chatbots and cybersecurity initiatives supporting UN agencies.
The session’s collaborative tone extended into discussions of the UN Digital ID project, which links multiple UN agencies. Audience members raised questions on accessibility, with Nancy Marango and Sary Qasim suggesting broader use of these solutions to support underrepresented communities globally.
Efforts across UN organisations reflect a shared commitment to ethical technology use and digital inclusion. The panellists urged collaboration and transparency as key to addressing challenges such as data protection and equitable access while maintaining focus on innovation.
At IGF 2024, panellists explored AI’s role in elections, its potential for both empowerment and disruption, and the challenges it poses to democratic processes. Moderator Tapani Tarvainen led the discussion with contributions from Ayobangira Safari Nshuti, Roxana Radu, Babu Ram Aryal, and other experts.
Speakers noted that AI had been primarily used for self-promotion in campaigns, helping smaller candidates compete with limited resources. Roxana Radu highlighted AI’s positive role in voter outreach in India but warned of risks such as disinformation and public opinion manipulation. Ayobangira Safari Nshuti pointed to algorithmic biases and transparency issues in platforms as critical concerns, emphasising a recent case in Romania where AI-enabled manipulation caused election disruption.
Accountability of social media platforms became a focal point. Platforms increasingly rely on AI for content moderation, but their effectiveness in languages with limited online presence remains inadequate. Babu Ram Aryal stressed the need for stronger oversight, particularly in multilingual nations, while Dennis Redeker underscored the challenges of balancing regulation with free speech.
Panellists called for holistic solutions to safeguard democracy. Suggestions included enhancing platform transparency, implementing robust digital literacy programmes, and addressing social factors like poverty that exacerbate misinformation. Nana, an AI ethics specialist, advocated for proactive governance to adapt electoral institutions to technological realities.
The session concluded with a recognition that AI’s role in elections will continue to evolve. Panellists urged collaborative efforts between governments, civil society, and technology companies to ensure election integrity and maintain public trust in democratic systems.
Major firms including Google, Stripe, and Shopify have pledged $80 million to support innovative carbon capture technologies, targeting emissions from paper mills and sewage plants in the US. This investment is part of the Frontier coalition’s strategy to develop cost-effective solutions for reducing atmospheric carbon.
Two start-ups, CO280 and CREW, will benefit from the funding. CO280 plans to deploy carbon capture technology adapted from the oil industry to trap emissions from paper mills. Meanwhile, CREW will enhance wastewater treatment processes with limestone to absorb carbon dioxide, leveraging rocks’ natural CO2-attracting properties.
The coalition’s aim is to drive down the cost of carbon removal to $100 per metric ton in the US, a significant reduction from current prices. Frontier’s head of deployment, Hannah Bebbington, highlighted the potential to integrate these technologies into older industries, paving the way for large-scale, affordable carbon removal in the near future.
A panel of international experts at the IGF 2024 gathered to discuss the growing importance of digital solidarity in global digital governance. Jennifer Bachus of the US State Department introduced the concept as a framework for fostering international cooperation centred on human rights and multi-stakeholder engagement. Nashilongo Gervasius, a public interest technology expert from Namibia, highlighted the need to close digital divides and promote inclusivity in global digital policymaking.
The discussion focused on balancing digital sovereignty with the need for international collaboration. Jason Pielemeier, Executive Director of the Global Network Initiative, stressed the critical role of data privacy and cybersecurity in advancing global digital rights. Robert Opp, Chief Digital Officer at the United Nations Development Programme, emphasised the importance of capacity building and enhancing digital infrastructure, particularly in developing nations.
Key global mechanisms like the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) and the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) processes featured prominently in the dialogue. Panellists, including Susan Mwape from Zambia, underscored the need to strengthen these platforms while ensuring they remain inclusive and respectful of human rights. The upcoming WSIS+20 review was recognised as an opportunity to revitalise international cooperation in the digital realm.
Challenges such as internet shutdowns, mass surveillance, and the misuse of cybercrime legislation were debated. Mwape voiced concerns about the potential for international forums to lose credibility if hosted by countries with poor human rights records. Audience member Barbara from Nepal called for greater accountability in digital governance practices, while Hala Rasheed from the Alnahda Society echoed the urgency of addressing inequalities in digital policy implementation.
Russian civil society representative Alexander Savnin brought attention to the impact of sanctions on international technical cooperation in cybersecurity. He argued for a more balanced approach that would allow global stakeholders to address shared security challenges effectively. Panellists agreed that fostering trust among diverse actors remains a critical hurdle to achieving digital solidarity.
The session concluded with a commitment to fostering continuous dialogue and collaboration. Panellists expressed hope that inclusive and rights-based approaches could transform digital solidarity into tangible solutions, helping to address the pressing challenges of the digital age.
