T-Mobile‘s network was among those breached in a prolonged cyber-espionage campaign attributed to Chinese intelligence-linked hackers, according to a Wall Street Journal report. The attackers allegedly targeted multiple US and international telecom companies to monitor cellphone communications of high-value intelligence targets. T-Mobile confirmed it was aware of the industry-wide attack but stated there was no significant impact on its systems or evidence of customer data being compromised.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) recently disclosed that China-linked hackers intercepted surveillance data intended for American law enforcement by infiltrating telecom networks. Earlier reports revealed breaches into US broadband providers, including Verizon, AT&T, and Lumen Technologies, where hackers accessed systems used for court-authorised wiretapping.
China has consistently denied allegations of engaging in cyber espionage, rejecting claims by the US and its allies that it orchestrates such operations. The latest revelations highlight persistent vulnerabilities in critical communication networks targeted by state-backed hackers.
Elon Musk’s Starlink has received government approval to provide satellite internet in Chad, aiming to bridge the country’s significant connectivity gap. With only 12% of the population online as of 2022, the move is expected to bring internet access to remote regions lacking fiber-optic coverage. Communications Minister Boukar Michel confirmed the agreement, noting that better connectivity could spur public service digitalisation and tech start-up growth.
The satellite internet provider, a division of SpaceX, operates in several African nations, including Nigeria and Madagascar, though it has encountered regulatory hurdles elsewhere. In Chad, Starlink’s deployment is seen as a solution to the nation’s limited infrastructure. Elon Musk celebrated the expansion with an announcement on social media, declaring, ‘Starlink now available in Chad!’.
Despite its growing presence, Starlink has faced resistance from state-run telecom monopolies in some regions. In Cameroon, its equipment was seised earlier this year due to licensing issues. Meanwhile, local telecom operators in countries like Kenya are urging regulators to require partnerships between satellite services and national mobile providers.
The UK government has ordered China-registered Future Technology Devices International Holding Ltd to sell the majority stake—80.2%—in Scottish chipmaker FTDI, citing national security concerns. The government voiced concerns that UK-developed semiconductor technology and intellectual property could be misused if controlled by foreign interests that have been considered potentially harmful.
This directive requires FTDI’s Chinese parent company to follow a set procedure and timeline to complete the sale. The move highlights the UK’s efforts to protect sensitive technology sectors and its vigilance over foreign investments that may impact national security.
Increasingly, governments worldwide are scrutinising tech-related investments, especially in semiconductor industries, due to the strategic importance of chip technologies in national defence, infrastructure, and critical sectors.
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has announced its first International Strategic Plan for 2025-2026, underscoring a robust commitment to securing US critical infrastructure (CI) through global partnerships. Building on its previous 2023-2025 Strategic Plan, this new approach aligns with the National Security Memorandum on Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience, highlighting the essential role of international cooperation in protecting interconnected cyber and physical systems.
To achieve its mission, CISA has outlined three primary goals for international engagement:
Bolster the Resilience of Foreign Infrastructure on Which the US Depends: Collaborating with foreign partners, CISA aims to fortify international infrastructure, mitigating risks that could disrupt critical US operations.
Strengthen Integrated Cyber Defense: By sharing expertise, resources, and best practices, CISA and its allies can build a unified defence, equipping nations to address emerging threats to critical infrastructure better.
Unify Agency Coordination of International Activities: The agency’s “One CISA” approach seeks to streamline efforts and maximise the impact of global partnerships, reducing redundancy and fostering cohesive international collaboration.
China-linked hackers have reportedly breached telecommunications systems, targeting members of former President Donald Trump’s family and officials from the Biden administration, according to the New York Times. Individuals affected include Trump’s son Eric Trump, son-in-law Jared Kushner, and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.
Concerns surrounding this hacking group, known as “Salt Typhoon,” have intensified following media reports of their activities. Earlier this month, the Wall Street Journal reported that the group accessed broadband providers’ networks and gathered data from systems used by the federal government for court-authorised wiretapping.
No response was received from the State Department or Trump family representatives regarding Reuters’ requests for comments. The White House, National Security Agency, and Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency also did not reply immediately. Similarly, the Chinese Embassy in Washington did not respond, though Beijing usually denies involvement in cyberespionage activities.
The Open Source Initiative (OSI) has introduced version 1.0 of its Open Source AI Definition (OSAID), setting new standards for AI transparency and accessibility. Developed over the years in collaboration with academia and industry, the OSAID aims to establish clear criteria for what qualifies as open-source AI. The OSI says the definition will help align policymakers, developers, and industry leaders on a common understanding of ‘open source’ in the rapidly evolving field of AI.
According to OSI Executive Vice President Stefano Maffulli, the goal is to make sure AI models labelled as open source provide enough detail for others to recreate them and disclose essential information about training data, such as its origin and processing methods. The OSAID also emphasises that open source AI should grant users freedom to modify and build upon the models, without restrictive permissions. While OSI lacks enforcement power, it plans to advocate for its definition as the AI community’s reference point, aiming to combat “open source” claims that don’t meet OSAID standards.
The new definition comes as some companies, including Meta and Stability AI, use the open-source label without fully meeting transparency requirements. Meta, a financial supporter of the OSI, has voiced reservations about the OSAID, citing the need for protective restrictions around its Llama models. In contrast, OSI contends that AI models should be openly accessible to allow for a truly open-source AI ecosystem, rather than restricted by proprietary data and usage limitations.
Maffulli acknowledges the OSAID may need frequent updates as technology and regulations evolve. OSI has created a committee to monitor its application and adjust as necessary, with an eye on refining the open-source definition to address emerging issues like copyright and proprietary data.
San Francisco-based startup Untether has unveiled a new artificial intelligence chip, the 240 Slim, tailored for energy-efficient use in edge applications like autonomous vehicles and agricultural equipment. Unlike the large-scale data center chips produced by giants like Nvidia and AMD, Untether’s product is optimised to run pre-trained AI models, which means it focuses on inference, the process of applying existing AI models rather than training new ones.
As AI becomes more embedded in everyday technologies, demand for inference-focused chips is skyrocketing. Untether’s VP of product, Bob Beachler, anticipates the inference chip market to expand to $102B by 2027, far surpassing the training sector. The 240 Slim chip is built on the open-source RISC-V architecture, positioning it as a competitor to chips using Arm Holdings’ technology. Early tests by nonprofit MLCommons have shown promising performance results for Untether’s hardware.
Untether has already gained traction in the automotive sector; Mercedes-Benz plans to use Untether’s chips in its future autonomous vehicles. With these chips, the company aims to deliver cutting-edge performance with minimal power demands, a combination that could help drive innovation in autonomous tech, agriculture, and select data center applications.
Linux creator Linus Torvalds has expressed support for removing several Russian maintainers from the Linux kernel project. This decision, announced by prominent developer Greg Kroah-Hartman, has sparked debate within the Linux community. The removals affect 11 Russian developers, largely due to compliance with new sanctions, though specific details of the removals still need to be fully clarified.
Responding to the concerns, Torvalds stated, “If you haven’t heard of Russian sanctions yet, you should try reading the news sometime,” emphasising that the changes will not be reversed.
The Linux kernel, the operating system’s core, is managed by maintainers who oversee code submissions and updates. Kroah-Hartman noted that those removed may return if they provide documentation proving independence from sanctioned entities, especially organisations associated with the Russian government.
This action has stirred reactions among developers, with some accusing the decision-makers of acting contrary to Linux’s open-source principles. Others warned that the decision could lead to future uncertainties about the participation of maintainers in sanctioned regions.
Responding to criticism, Torvalds dismissed the objections as originating from “Russian troll factories” and reaffirmed his stance, citing his opposition to Russian aggression. The move follows broader trends in the tech industry, where major US companies, like Docker Hub and GitHub, have imposed restrictions on Russian users, reflecting the impact of international sanctions on open-source software projects.
The outcome of the US presidential election will not change the course of the tech conflict with China. Both Republican Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris are expected to intensify measures aimed at limiting China’s access to American technology and resources, although their strategies will differ.
Harris is likely to adopt a focused, multilateral approach, building on Biden’s tactics by working with allies to curb the flow of advanced technology to China. In contrast, Trump’s strategy could include sweeping measures, such as expanding tariffs and aggressively enforcing export controls, possibly escalating tensions with allies who resist the US lead.
Both candidates aim to curb China’s technological advancement and its military capabilities. Harris has pledged to ensure the US remains at the forefront of the global technology race, while Trump continues to advocate for higher tariffs and tough restrictions, including denying China access to essential components like AI chips.
China has already responded to recent US actions by imposing restrictions on exports of critical materials, such as graphite and rare earths. Experts warn that the US should exercise caution, as some industries remain reliant on Chinese resources. The tech war will likely see new fronts, including connected devices, as the conflict deepens under the next administration.
Georgia‘s secretary of state’s office recently thwarted a cyberattack aimed at crashing the website used by voters to request absentee ballots. The attack, believed to have originated from a foreign entity, involved hundreds of thousands of IP addresses flooding the system with fake traffic. Despite briefly slowing the site, the attack did not disrupt the ability of voters to request ballots, thanks in part to support from cybersecurity firm Cloudflare.
Officials have yet to confirm the foreign origin, though Gabe Sterling, an election official in Georgia, suggested the attack had “the hallmarks of a foreign power.” The FBI and the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency are involved in the investigation. This incident highlights ongoing attempts by hackers, including foreign-linked groups, to interfere with the democratic process as the US presidential election approaches.
Georgia has previously dealt with cyber threats, including a cyberattack in Coffee County earlier this year, underscoring the continuous risk to election infrastructure. However, no cyber activity has affected the actual casting or counting of votes so far.
