Nvidia has refuted social media claims suggesting it plans to limit chip supplies to China, categorically stating that these rumours are false. In a post on a popular Chinese platform, the company reaffirmed its dedication to providing top-quality products and services to Chinese customers, highlighting the importance of the region to its business.
The denial comes at a time of heightened scrutiny over global semiconductor trade, with geopolitical tensions influencing market dynamics. Nvidia’s statement emphasises its continued focus on meeting the needs of its Chinese clientele, despite speculation circulating online.
This clarification is expected to reassure stakeholders in one of Nvidia’s most significant markets, where demand for advanced chips continues to grow, particularly in artificial intelligence and high-performance computing sectors. The company’s swift dismissal of the claims underscores its commitment to maintaining strong ties with China.
The United Nations has established a dedicated body to safeguard submarine cables, which transmit over 99% of global data, including emails, video streams, and government communications. The initiative aims to address the vulnerability of this critical infrastructure to natural disasters, accidents, and suspected acts of sabotage. Around 200 cable failures are reported annually, with incidents such as a 2022 tsunami cutting off the Pacific island of Tonga for a month.
The new body, comprising 40 experts from public and private sectors, will focus on ensuring cables are built and maintained with greater resilience. While its mandate does not extend to investigating potential sabotage, it seeks to expedite repairs and minimise disruptions. ITU Deputy Secretary-General Tomas Lamanauskas emphasised the importance of this effort, citing the impact cable failures have on economies and societies worldwide.
As cable disruptions become increasingly common, experts believe the UN’s efforts will help stabilise a crucial global network. A follow-up summit in Nigeria is planned for February, continuing discussions on enhancing undersea cable resilience and safeguarding international data flow.
A senior US official revealed that a Chinese hacking group, known as ‘Salt Typhoon,’ has stolen vast amounts of Americans’ metadata in a broad cyberespionage effort targeting US telecommunications. While specific figures remain undisclosed, the hackers are said to have breached at least eight American telecom firms, including Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile.
Call record metadata — detailing who called whom, when, and where — was a key target, exposing sensitive personal and professional patterns. In some cases, telephone audio intercepts were also reportedly stolen. The campaign remains active, with the White House prioritising efforts to counter the intrusions.
Government agencies, including the FBI and the National Security Council, have briefed lawmakers and President Joe Biden on the matter, highlighting the severity of the breach. Efforts to secure the nation’s telecommunications infrastructure are ongoing.
With organisations facing an average of 1,300 cyberattacks per week, Axiado is stepping up with a novel defence: a specialised security chip designed to protect digital infrastructure. Founded in 2017, the Silicon Valley-based startup recently secured $60M in Series C funding led by Maverick Silicon, with participation from Samsung Catalyst Fund and other investors. This brings Axiado’s total funding to $140M.
Axiado’s chip defends against boot-level and runtime security threats, ensuring the integrity of devices from data centres to 5G base stations. It uses root-of-trust technology to prevent hardware tampering and leverages AI-powered analytics to detect malicious data patterns. The company’s chip is positioned as a complement to existing software-based cybersecurity measures, acting as a last line of defence against sophisticated attacks.
The new funds will support Axiado’s go-to-market efforts and help transition its products into mass production by 2025. CEO Gopi Sirineni highlights the growing need for hardware-based security solutions, particularly as the stakes rise in the fight against cybercrime. With partnerships like the one with Jabil to develop server cybersecurity solutions, Axiado is set to expand its reach while competing with industry heavyweights and open-source projects such as Google’s OpenTitan.
Meta Platforms has reported that generative AI had limited influence on misinformation campaigns across its platforms in 2023. According to Nick Clegg, Meta‘s president of global affairs, coordinated networks spreading propaganda struggled to gain traction on Facebook and Instagram, and AI-generated misinformation was promptly flagged or removed.
Clegg noted, however, that some of these operations have migrated to other platforms or standalone websites with fewer moderation systems. Meta dismantled around 20 covert influence campaigns this year. The company aims to refine content moderation while maintaining free expression.
Meta also reflected on its overly strict moderation during the COVID-19 pandemic, with CEO Mark Zuckerberg expressing regret over certain decisions influenced by external pressure. Looking forward, Zuckerberg intends to engage actively in policy debates on AI under President-elect Donald Trump‘s administration, underscoring AI’s critical role in US technological leadership.
US agencies have briefed senators on ‘Salt Typhoon,’ a Chinese cyber-espionage campaign allegedly targeting American telecommunications networks. Officials claim the hackers stole call metadata and other sensitive information, affecting at least eight US telecom firms and dozens of companies worldwide. The breaches have sparked bipartisan concern, with some senators pressing for stronger preventive measures and legislation.
Telecom giants like Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile acknowledged the incidents but downplayed the impact on customer data. Federal agencies, including the FBI and Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, emphasised the challenge of fully removing hackers from networks, while incoming FCC Chair Brendan Carr pledged to strengthen cybersecurity defences.
China has denied the allegations, calling them disinformation. Meanwhile, a Senate subcommittee hearing on December 11 will focus on the risks posed by such cyber threats and explore ways to protect US communications infrastructure.
The UK faces an escalating cyber threat from hostile states and criminal gangs, according to Richard Horne, head of the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC). In his first major speech, Horne warned that the severity of these risks is being underestimated, citing a significant rise in cyber incidents, particularly from Russia and China. He described Russia’s cyber activity as ‘aggressive and reckless’ while noting that China’s operations are highly sophisticated with growing global ambitions.
Over the past year, the NCSC responded to 430 cyber incidents, a marked increase from the previous year. Among them, 12 were deemed especially severe, a threefold rise from 2023. The agency highlighted the growing threats to critical infrastructure and supply chains, urging both public and private sectors to strengthen their cyber defences. The UK also faces a growing number of ransomware attacks, often originating from Russia, which target key organisations like the British Library and healthcare services.
Horne emphasised the human costs of cyber-attacks, citing how these incidents disrupt vital services like healthcare and education. The rise in ransomware, often linked to Russian criminal gangs, is a major concern, and the NCSC is working to address these challenges. The agency’s review also pointed to increasing cyber activity from China, Iran, and North Korea, with these states targeting the UK’s infrastructure and private sector.
Experts like Professor Alan Woodward of Surrey University echoed Horne’s concerns, urging the UK to step up its cybersecurity efforts to keep pace with evolving threats. With adversaries growing more sophisticated, the government and businesses must act swiftly to protect the country’s digital infrastructure.
The initiative, announced in October 2024, brings together the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), and the International Cable Protection Committee (ICPC) to address growing risks to submarine cables, facilitating over 99% of global data transmission.
The initiative follows high-profileincidents, including damage to undersea cables and will prioritise enhancing cable security, promoting global best practices, and expediting repairs. With around 150 to 200 cable damage incidents annually—mainly due to ship anchors, fishing activities, and natural disasters—the ICPC highlights the urgency of coordinated action.
Officials from Nigeria and Portugal will co-chair the 40-member advisory body. Scheduled to convene twice a year, the body’s first meeting will occur virtually in December, followed by an in-person session in Abuja, Nigeria, in February.
Submarine cable disruptions have significant consequences. Earlier this year, outages from cable cuts in Africa left 13 countries offline for days, while damage in the Red Sea caused widespread internet disruption in the Middle East.
The French government has initiated negotiations to acquire the advanced computing unit of IT firm Atos for €500M. This move seeks to safeguard critical technologies supporting the military and intelligence sectors. The agreement, which includes an initial payment of €150M, could rise to €625Mwith additional performance-based payouts. Atos’ advanced computing and cybersecurity operations generate €900M annually and employ 4,000 people.
Once a European tech leader, Atos has faced financial difficulties, with its survival hinging on an accelerated restructuring plan. The French state, emphasising national sovereignty, aims to maintain control over strategic assets. Finance Minister Antoine Armand stated that protecting key industrial activities is essential for ensuring the country’s security and independence.
The proposed deal reflects growing government interest in Atos’ assets, with nationalisation also being considered. Despite years of financial struggles, Atos shares surged 160% following the announcement, reflecting renewed investor optimism about its recovery and restructuring efforts.
Chinese big tech companies have emerged as some of the most influential players in the global technology landscape, driving innovation and shaping industries across the board. These companies are deeply entrenched in everyday life in China, offering a wide range of services and products that span e-commerce, social media, gaming, cloud computing, ΑΙ, and telecommunications. Their influence is not confined to China, they also play a significant role in global markets, often competing directly with US tech giants.
The rivalry between China and the US has become one of the defining geopolitical struggles of the 21st century. This competition oscillates between cooperation, fierce competition, and confrontation, influenced by regulatory policies, national security concerns, and shifting political priorities. The geopolitical pendulum of China-US tech firms, totally independent from the US election outcome, reflects the broader tensions between the two powers, with profound implications for global tech industries, innovation, and market dynamics.
The Golden Shield Project
In 2000, under Chairman Jiang Zemin’s leadership, China launched the Golden Shield Project to control media and information flow within the country. The initiative aimed to safeguard national security and restrict the influence of Western propaganda. As part of the Golden Shield, many American tech giants such as Google, Facebook, and Netflix were blocked by the Great Firewall for not complying with China’s data regulations, while companies like Microsoft and LinkedIn were allowed to operate.
At the same time, China’s internet user base grew dramatically, reaching 800 million netizens by 2018, with 98% using mobile devices. This rapid expansion provided a fertile ground for Chinese tech firms, which thrived without significant competition from foreign players. Among the earliest beneficiaries of this system were the BATX companies, which capitalised on China’s evolving internet landscape and rapidly established a dominant presence in the market.
The powerhouses of Chinese tech
The major Chinese tech companies, often referred to as the Big Tech of China, include Alibaba Group, Tencent, Baidu, ByteDance, Huawei, Xiaomi, JD.com, Meituan, Pinduoduo, and Didi Chuxing.
Alibaba Group is a global e-commerce and technology conglomerate, operating platforms such as Taobao and Tmall for e-commerce, AliExpress for international retail, and Alipay for digital payments. The company also has significant investments in cloud computing with Alibaba Cloud and logistics.
Tencent, a massive tech conglomerate, is known for its social media and entertainment services. It owns WeChat, a widely used messaging app that offers payment services, social media features, and more. Tencent also has investments in gaming, owning major stakes in Riot Games, Epic Games, and Activision Blizzard, as well as interests in financial services and cloud computing.
Baidu, often called China’s Google, is a leading search engine provider. In addition to its search services, Baidu has a strong presence in AI development, autonomous driving, and cloud computing, particularly focusing on natural language processing and autonomous vehicles.
ByteDance, the company behind TikTok, has made a name for itself in short-form video content and AI-driven platforms. It also operates Douyin, the Chinese version of TikTok, along with Toutiao, a popular news aggregation platform. ByteDance has expanded into gaming, e-commerce, and other AI technologies.
Huawei is a global leader in telecommunications equipment and consumer electronics, particularly smartphones and 5G infrastructure. The company is deeply involved in cloud computing and AI, despite facing significant geopolitical challenges.
Xiaomi is a leading smartphone manufacturer that also produces smart home devices, wearables, and a wide range of consumer electronics. The company is growing rapidly in the Internet of Things (IoT) space and AI-driven products.
JD.com, one of China’s largest e-commerce platforms, operates similarly to Alibaba, focusing on direct sales, logistics, and tech solutions. JD.com has also made significant strides in robotics, AI, and logistics technology.
Meituan is best known for its food delivery and local services platform, offering everything from restaurant reservations to hotel bookings. The company also operates in sectors like bike-sharing, travel, and ride-hailing.
Pinduoduo has rapidly grown in e-commerce by focusing on group buying and social commerce, particularly targeting lower-tier cities and rural markets in China. The platform offers discounted products to users who buy in groups.
Didi Chuxing is China’s dominant ride-hailing service, offering various transportation services such as ride-hailing, car rentals, and autonomous driving technology.
But what are the BATX companies we mentioned earlier?
BAXT
The term BATX refers to a group of the four dominant Chinese tech companies: Baidu, Alibaba, Tencent, and Xiaomi. These companies are central to China’s technology landscape and are often compared to the US “FAANG” group (Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Google) because of their major influence across a range of industries, including e-commerce, search engines, social media, gaming, ΑΙ and telecommunications. Together, BATX companies are key players in shaping China’s tech ecosystem and have a significant impact on global markets.
China’s strategy for tech growth
China’s technology development strategy has proven effective in propelling the country to the forefront of several high-tech industries. This ambitious approach, which involves broad investments across both large state-owned enterprises and smaller private startups, has fostered significant innovation and created a competitive business environment. As a result, it has the potential to serve as a model for other countries looking to stimulate tech growth.
A key driver of China’s success is its diverse investment strategy, supported by government-led initiatives like the “Made in China 2025” and the “Thousand Talents Plan“. These programs offer financial backing and attract top talent from around the globe. This inclusive approach has helped China rapidly emerge as a global leader in fields like AI, robotics, and semiconductors. However, critics argue that the strategy may be overly aggressive, potentially stifling competition and innovation.
Some have raised concerns that China’s government support unfairly favours domestic companies, providing subsidies and other advantages that foreign competitors do not receive. Yet, this type of protectionist approach is not unique to China; other countries have implemented similar strategies to foster the growth of their own industries.
Another critique is that China’s broad investment model may encourage risky ventures and the subsidising of failures, potentially leading to a market that is oversaturated with unprofitable businesses. While this criticism holds merit in some cases, the overall success of China’s strategy in cultivating a dynamic and competitive tech landscape remains evident.
Looking ahead, China’s technology development strategy is likely to continue evolving. As the country strengthens its position on the global stage, it may become more selective in its investments, focusing on firms with the potential for global leadership.
In any case, China’s strategy has shown it can drive innovation and foster growth. Other nations hoping to advance their technological sectors should take note of this model and consider implementing similar policies to enhance their own competitive and innovative business environments.
But under what regulatory framework does Chinese tech policy ultimately operate? How does it affect the whole project? Are there some negative effects of the tight state grip?
China’s regulatory pyramid: Balancing control and consequences
China’s regulatory approach to its booming tech sector is defined by a precarious balance of authority, enforcement, and market response. Angela Zhang, author of High Wire: How China Regulates Big Tech and Governs Its Economy, proposes a “dynamic pyramid model” to explain the system’s intricate dynamics. This model highlights three key features: hierarchy, volatility, and fragility.
The top-down structure of China’s regulatory system is a hallmark of its hierarchy. Regulatory agencies act based on directives from centralised leadership, creating a paradox. In the absence of clear signals, agencies exhibit inaction, allowing industries to flourish unchecked. Conversely, when leadership calls for stricter oversight, regulators often overreach. A prime example of this is the drastic shift in 2020 when China moved from years of leniency toward its tech giants to implementing sweeping crackdowns on firms like Alibaba and Tencent.
This erratic enforcement underscores the volatility of the system. Chinese tech regulation is characterised by cycles of lax oversight followed by abrupt crackdowns, driven by shifts in political priorities. The 2020 – 2022 crackdown, which involved antitrust investigations and record-breaking fines, sent shockwaves through markets, wiping out billions in market value. While the government eased its stance in 2022, the uncertainty created by such pendulum swings has left investors wary, with many viewing the Chinese market as unpredictable and risky.
Despite its intentions to address pressing issues like antitrust violations and data security, China’s heavy-handed regulatory approach often results in fragility. Rapid interventions can undermine confidence, stifle innovation, and damage the very sectors the government seeks to strengthen. Years of lax oversight exacerbate challenges, leaving regulators with steep issues to address and markets vulnerable to overcorrection.
This model offers a lens into the broader governance dynamics in China. The system’s centralised control and reactive policies aim to maintain stability but often generate unintended economic consequences. As Chinese tech firms look to expand overseas amid domestic challenges, the long-term impact of these regulatory cycles remains uncertain, potentially influencing China’s ability to compete on the global stage.
The battle for tech supremacy between the USA and China
The incoming US President Donald Trump is expected to adopt a more aggressive, unilateral approach to counter China’s technological growth, drawing on his history of quick, broad measures such as tariffs. Under his leadership, the USA is likely to expand export controls and impose tougher sanctions on Chinese tech firms. Trump’s advisors predict a significant push to add more companies to the US Entity List, which restricts US firms from selling to blacklisted companies. His administration might focus on using tariffs (potentially up to 60% on Chinese imports) and export controls to pressure China, even if it strains relations with international allies.
The escalating tensions have been further complicated by China’s retaliatory actions. In response to US export controls, China has targeted American companies like Micron Technology and imposed its own restrictions on essential materials for chipmaking and electric vehicle production. These moves highlight the interconnectedness of both economies, with the US still reliant on China for critical resources such as rare earth elements, which are vital for both technology and defence.
This intensifying technological conflict reflects broader concerns over data security, military dominance, and leadership in AI and semiconductors. As both nations aim to protect their strategic interests, the tech war is set to continue evolving, with major consequences for global supply chains, innovation, and the international balance of power in technology.
