Content Policy

Policy hackathon shapes OpenAI proposals ahead of EU AI strategy

OpenAI has published 20 policy proposals to speed up AI adoption across the EU. Released shortly before the European Commission’s Apply AI Strategy, the report outlines practical steps for member states, businesses, and the public sector to bridge the gap between ambition and deployment.

The proposals originate from Hacktivate AI, a Brussels hackathon with 65 participants from EU institutions, governments, industry, and academia. They focus on workforce retraining, SME support, regulatory harmonisation, and public sector collaboration, highlighting OpenAI’s growing policy role in Europe.

Key ideas include Individual AI Learning Accounts to support workers, an AI Champions Network to mobilise SMEs, and a European GovAI Hub to share resources with public institutions. OpenAI’s Martin Signoux said the goal was to bridge the divide between strategy and action.

Europe already represents a major market for OpenAI tools, with widespread use among developers and enterprises, including Sanofi, Parloa, and Pigment. Yet adoption remains uneven, with IT and finance leading, manufacturing catching up, and other sectors lagging behind, exposing a widening digital divide.

The European Commission is expected to unveil its Apply AI Strategy within days. OpenAI’s proposals act as a direct contribution to the policy debate, complementing previous initiatives such as its EU Economic Blueprint and partnerships with governments in Germany and Greece.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

India’s competition watchdog urges AI self-audits to prevent market distortions

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has urged companies to self-audit their AI systems to prevent anti-competitive practices and ensure responsible autonomy.

A call came as part of the CCI’s market study on AI, emphasising the risks of opacity and algorithmic collusion while highlighting AI’s potential to enhance innovation and productivity.

The study warned that dominant firms could exploit their control over data, infrastructure, and proprietary models to reinforce market power, creating barriers to entry. It also noted that opaque AI systems in user sectors may lead to tacit algorithmic coordination in pricing and strategy, undermining fair competition.

The regulatory approach of India, the CCI said, aims to balance technological progress with accountability through a co-regulatory framework that promotes both competition and innovation.

Additionally, the Commission plans to strengthen its technical capacity, establish a digital markets think tank and host a conference on AI and regulatory challenges.

A report recommended a six-step self-audit framework for enterprises, requiring evaluation of AI systems against competition risks, senior management oversight and clear accountability in high-risk deployments.

It also highlighted AI’s pro-competitive effects, particularly for MSMEs, which benefit from improved efficiency and greater access to digital markets.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Italy passes Europe’s first national AI law

Italy has become the first EU country to pass a national AI law, introducing detailed rules to govern the development and use of AI technologies across key sectors such as health, work, and justice.

The law, approved by the Senate on 17 September and in effect on 10 October, defines new national authorities responsible for oversight, including the Agency for Digital Italy and the National Cybersecurity Agency. Both bodies will supervise compliance, security, and responsible use of AI systems.

In healthcare, the law simplifies data-sharing for scientific research by allowing the secondary use of anonymised or pseudonymised patient data. New rules also ensure transparency and consent when AI is used by minors under 14.

The law introduces criminal penalties for those who use AI-generated images or videos to cause harm or deception. The Italian approach combines regulation with innovation, seeking to protect citizens while promoting responsible growth in AI development.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot! 

OpenAI backs policy push for Europe’s AI uptake

OpenAI and Allied for Startups have released Hacktivate AI, a set of 20 ideas to speed up AI adoption across Europe ahead of the Commission’s Apply AI Strategy.

The report emerged from a Brussels policy hackathon with 65 participants from EU bodies, governments, enterprises and startups, proposing measures such as an Individual AI Learning Account, an AI Champions Network for SMEs, a European GovAI Hub and relentless harmonisation.

OpenAI highlights strong European demand and uneven workplace uptake, citing sector gaps and the need for targeted support, while pointing to initiatives like OpenAI Academy to widen skills.

Broader policy momentum is building, with the EU preparing an Apply AI Strategy to boost homegrown tools and cut dependencies, reinforcing the push for practical deployment across public services and industry.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot! 

Thousands affected by AI-linked data breach in New South Wales

A major data breach has affected the Northern Rivers Resilient Homes Program in New South Wales.

Authorities confirmed that personal information was exposed after a former contractor uploaded data to the AI platform ChatGPT between 12 and 15 March 2025.

The leaked file contained over 12,000 records, with details including names, addresses, contact information and health data. Up to 3,000 individuals may be impacted.

While there is no evidence yet that the information has been accessed by third parties, the NSW Reconstruction Authority (RA) and Cyber Security NSW have launched a forensic investigation.

Officials apologised for the breach and pledged to notify all affected individuals in the coming week. ID Support NSW is offering free advice and resources, while compensation will be provided for any costs linked to replacing compromised identity documents.

The RA has also strengthened its internal policies to prevent unauthorised use of AI platforms. An independent review of the incident is underway to determine how the breach occurred and why notification took several months.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Labour market stability persists despite the rise of AI

Public fears of AI rapidly displacing workers have not yet materialised in the US labour market.

A new study finds that the overall occupational mix has shifted only slightly since the launch of generative AI in November 2022, with changes resembling past technological transitions such as the rise of computers and the internet.

The pace of disruption is not significantly faster than historical benchmarks.

Industry-level data show some variation, particularly in information services, finance, and professional sectors, but trends were already underway before AI tools became widely available.

Similarly, younger workers have not seen a dramatic divergence in opportunities compared with older graduates, suggesting that AI’s impact on early careers remains modest and difficult to isolate.

Exposure, automation, and augmentation metrics offer little evidence of widespread displacement. OpenAI’s exposure data and Anthropic’s usage data suggest stability in the proportion of workers most affected by AI, including those unemployed.

Even in roles theoretically vulnerable to automation, there has been no measurable increase in job losses.

The study concludes that AI’s labour effects are gradual rather than immediate. Historical precedent suggests that large-scale workforce disruption unfolds over decades, not months. Researchers plan to monitor the data to track whether AI’s influence becomes more visible over time.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

What a Hollywood AI actor can teach CEOs about the future of work

Tilly Norwood, a fully AI-created actor, has become the centre of a heated debate in Hollywood after her creator revealed that talent agents were interested in representing her.

The actors’ union responded swiftly, warning that Tilly was trained on the work of countless performers without their consent or compensation. It also reminded producers that hiring her would involve dealing with the union.

The episode highlights two key lessons for business leaders in any industry. First, never assume a technology’s current limitations will remain its inherent limitations. Some commentators, including Whoopi Goldberg, have argued that AI actors pose little threat because their physical movements still appear noticeably artificial.

Yet history shows that early limitations often disappear over time. Once-dismissed technologies like machine translation and chess software have since far surpassed human abilities. Similarly, AI-generated performers may eventually become indistinguishable from human actors.

The second lesson concerns human behaviour. People are often irrational; their preferences can upend even the most carefully planned strategies. Producers avoided publicising actors’ names in Hollywood’s early years to maintain control.

Audiences, however, demanded to know everything about the stars they admired, forcing studios to adapt. This human attachment created the star system that shaped the industry. Whether audiences will embrace AI performers like Tilly remains uncertain, but cultural and emotional factors will play a decisive role.

Hollywood offers a high-profile glimpse of the challenges and opportunities of advanced AI. As other sectors face similar disruptions, business leaders may find that technology alone does not determine outcomes.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

AI platforms barred from cloning Asha Bhosle’s voice without consent

The Bombay High Court has granted ad-interim relief to Asha Bhosle, barring AI platforms and sellers from cloning her voice or likeness without consent. The 90-year-old playback singer, whose career spans eight decades, approached the court to protect her identity from unauthorised commercial use.

Bhosle filed the suit after discovering platforms offering AI-generated voice clones mimicking her singing. Her plea argued that such misuse damages her reputation and goodwill. Justice Arif S. Doctor found a strong prima facie case and stated that such actions would cause irreparable harm.

The order restrains defendants, including US-based Mayk Inc, from using machine learning, face-morphing, or generative AI to imitate her voice or likeness. Google, also named in the case, has agreed to take down specific URLs identified by Bhosle’s team.

Defendants are required to share subscriber information, IP logs, and payment details to assist in identifying infringers. The court emphasised that cloning the voices of cultural icons risks misleading the public and infringing on individuals’ rights to their identity.

The ruling builds on recent cases in India affirming personality rights and sets an important precedent in the age of generative AI. The matter is scheduled to return to court on 13 October 2025.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

FRA presents rights framework at EU Innovation Hub AI Cluster workshop in Tallinn

The EU Innovation Hub for Internal Security’s AI Cluster gathered in Tallinn on 25–26 September for a workshop focused on AI and its implications for security and rights.

The European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) played a central role, presenting its Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment framework under the AI Act and highlighting its ongoing project on assessing high-risk AI.

A workshop that also provided an opportunity for FRA to give an update on its internal and external work in the AI field, reflecting the growing need to balance technological innovation with rights-based safeguards.

AI-driven systems in security and policing are increasingly under scrutiny, with regulators and agencies seeking to ensure compliance with EU rules on privacy, transparency and accountability.

In collaboration with Europol, FRA also introduced plans for a panel discussion on ‘The right to explanation of AI-driven individual decision-making’. Scheduled for 19 November in Brussels, the session will form part of the Annual Event of the EU Innovation Hub for Internal Security.

It is expected to draw policymakers, law enforcement representatives and rights advocates into dialogue about transparency obligations in AI use for security contexts.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Mexico drafts law to regulate AI in dubbing and animation

The Mexican government is preparing a law to regulate the use of AI in dubbing, animation, and voiceovers to prevent unauthorised voice cloning and safeguard creative rights.

Working with the National Copyright Institute and more than 128 associations, it aims to reform copyright legislation before the end of the year.

The plan would strengthen protections for actors, voiceover artists, and creative workers, while addressing contract conditions and establishing a ‘Made in Mexico’ seal for cultural industries.

A bill that is expected to prohibit synthetic dubbing without consent, impose penalties for misuse, and recognise voice and image as biometric data.

Industry voices warn that AI has already disrupted work opportunities. Several dubbing firms in Los Angeles have closed, with their projects taken over by companies specialising in AI-driven dubbing.

Startups such as Deepdub and TrueSync have advanced the technology, dubbing films and television content across languages at scale.

Unions and creative groups argue that regulation is vital to protect both jobs and culture. While AI offers efficiency in translation and production, it cannot yet replicate the emotional depth of human performance.

The law is seen as the first attempt of Mexico to balance technological innovation with the rights of workers and creators.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!