A new poll by the Allensbach Institute reveals that Germans who rely on TikTok for news are less likely to view China as a dictatorship, criticise Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, or trust vaccines compared to consumers of traditional media. The findings suggest that the platform’s information ecosystem could contribute to scepticism about widely accepted narratives and amplify conspiracy theories. Among surveyed groups, TikTok users exhibited levels of distrust in line with users of X, formerly Twitter.
The study, commissioned by a foundation affiliated with Germany’s Free Democrats, comes amid ongoing US debates over the potential national security risks posed by the Chinese-owned app. The research highlights how young Germans, who make up TikTok’s largest user base, are more inclined to support the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, which has surged in popularity ahead of Germany’s upcoming election. By contrast, consumers of traditional media were significantly more supportive of Ukraine and critical of Russian aggression.
Concerns about misinformation on platforms like TikTok are echoed by researchers, who warn that foreign powers, particularly Russia, exploit social media to influence public opinion. The poll found that while 57% of newspaper readers believed China to be a dictatorship, only 28.1% of TikTok users shared the same view. Additionally, TikTok users were less likely to believe that China and Russia disseminate false information, while being more suspicious of their own government. Calls for action to address misinformation underscore the platform’s potential impact on younger, more impressionable audiences.
Meta Platforms, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, is once again under fire by the European Consumer Organisation (BEUC) over its ad-free subscription service. Introduced in 2023, the fee-based option offered European users the ability to opt out of personalised ads, with a subsequent price cut of 40% implemented later that year. However, BEUC claims these changes are merely superficial and fail to address deeper concerns about fairness and compliance with EU consumer and privacy laws.
BEUC’s Director General, Agustin Reyna, criticised Meta for not providing users with a fair choice, alleging that the company still pressures users into accepting its behavioural advertising system. Reyna called on consumer protection authorities and the European Commission to investigate Meta’s practices urgently, emphasising the need for decisive action to safeguard users’ rights. The consumer group also accused Meta of misleading practices, unclear terms, and failing to minimise data collection while restricting services for users who decline data processing.
In response, a Meta spokesperson defended the company’s approach, arguing that its November 2023 updates go beyond EU regulatory requirements. Despite these assurances, EU antitrust regulators have raised concerns, accusing Meta of breaching the Digital Markets Act. They claim the ad-free service forces users into a binary choice, sparking broader concerns about how the tech giant balances profit with consumer protection.
As pressure mounts, Meta faces growing scrutiny over its compliance with EU laws, with regulators weighing potential measures to address BEUC’s allegations and ensure fair treatment for European users.
President Donald Trump’s executive order delaying the enforcement of a US TikTok ban has created new legal uncertainties for the platform and its service providers, including Google and Apple. Signed on Monday, the order pauses for 75 days a law requiring TikTok’s Chinese parent company, ByteDance, to divest the app over national security concerns.
While the order directs the Justice Department to halt enforcement and assures app distributors of no liability during the review period, legal experts warn that the promise offers little protection. Courts do not consider executive orders binding, and Trump could alter or selectively enforce the policy at any time, potentially exposing companies to massive penalties.
The ban, passed by Congress and upheld by the Supreme Court days before Trump’s order, imposes steep fines of $5,000 per user for violations, making compliance a high-stakes gamble for service providers. Critics argue that the legal ambiguity could also open companies to shareholder lawsuits if they ignore the ban based solely on Trump’s directive.
Trump’s move has reignited tensions between the White House and lawmakers, who overwhelmingly supported the ban over fears of Chinese influence. The coming weeks may bring further legal battles and political manoeuvring as the future of TikTok in the US hangs in the balance.
Indonesia is on the verge of resolving a dispute with Apple that has banned iPhone 16 sales. The ban, implemented last year, arose after Apple failed to meet a requirement mandating that smartphones sold locally include at least 40% Indonesian-made components.
Rosan Roeslani, Indonesia’s investment minister, expressed optimism in an interview at Davos, predicting the issue could be resolved within weeks. A proposed investment plan from Apple appears to be the key to breaking the impasse, although the tech company has not commented on the developments.
Indonesia, home to 280 million people, represents a significant market for Apple. While the company has no manufacturing facilities in the country, it has operated application developer academies since 2018, fostering local tech talent.
The outcome of the negotiations could open the door for iPhone 16 sales in the region, signalling a potential end to the year-long ban.
US President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Monday aimed at safeguarding free speech and ending online censorship. The move comes amid allegations by Trump and Republican allies that the Biden administration suppressed speech on social media platforms. Critics argue, however, that many of these accusations centred on government actions against misinformation about vaccines and elections, which courts have upheld as lawful.
Despite his push for free speech protections, Trump’s history complicates the message. Over the years, he has threatened and sued critics, including journalists, political opponents, and media organisations. Most notably, his lawsuits against Hillary Clinton and several major media outlets have either been dismissed or remain unresolved. Additionally, Trump faced social media restrictions following the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack, which was fueled by false election claims.
Legal experts, such as David Kaye, have dismissed Trump’s order as symbolic. Kaye criticised the move as contradictory, pointing to Trump’s labelling of the press as the “enemy of the people” while claiming to champion free speech. He argued the federal government is already prohibited from interfering with First Amendment rights, rendering the order largely redundant.
Spanish Labour Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Yolanda Díaz announced her decision to leave Elon Musk’s social media platform X, citing concerns over its promotion of xenophobia and far-right ideologies. In a TV interview, Díaz criticised Musk’s behaviour during events linked to Donald Trump’s inauguration, as well as his recent speeches and gestures, which some interpreted as controversial.
Díaz’s departure follows backlash against Musk for raising his arm in a gesture at an inauguration-related event. While critics compared it to a Nazi salute, the Anti-Defamation League dismissed the claim, calling it an awkward moment of enthusiasm. Musk himself rejected the criticism as baseless.
The Spanish minister said her decision extends to personal and political posts and noted that members of her left-wing Sumar party would also leave the platform. This move aligns with other recent departures, including Germany’s Defence and Foreign Ministries, which cited dissatisfaction with X’s direction, joining universities in Germany and the UK in distancing themselves from the platform.
A new report from the European Court of Auditors (ECA) highlights progress in tackling unjustified geo-blocking in the EU but calls for stronger enforcement and expanded regulations. Geo-blocking, which restricts online access to goods and services based on nationality or location, was targeted by a 2018 regulation aimed at ensuring fairer treatment in the EU Single Market. However, the ECA found that inconsistent enforcement has left many consumers unprotected.
The report reveals significant disparities in penalties for non-compliance, ranging from minor fines of €26 in some countries to €5 million or even criminal liability in others. These gaps, combined with limited awareness among consumers and traders about available support, have undermined the regulation’s effectiveness. Key exemptions for sectors like audiovisual services—such as streaming platforms and TV distribution—are also causing frustration, with calls to broaden the regulation’s scope during its 2025 review.
Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz, the ECA member responsible for the audit, warned that geo-blocking continues to restrict consumer choices and fuel dissatisfaction. In response, the European Commission has welcomed the findings, signalling potential reforms, including stricter enforcement mechanisms and exploring ways to address challenges tied to copyright practices. The Commission has committed to factoring the report into its upcoming evaluation of the regulation.
A decision to allocate satellite spectrum administratively rather than through an auction aims to increase competition in India’s vast telecom market. Telecoms Minister Jyotiraditya Scindia emphasised the government’s commitment to providing consumers with greater choice, despite concerns from Mukesh Ambani’s Reliance Jio over losing ground to Elon Musk’s Starlink. Reliance had pushed for auctions, arguing they ensure a level playing field after the company invested $19 billion in airwave rights.
Analysts suggest administrative allocation aligns with global norms and reduces investment barriers for foreign companies. Scindia noted that current satellite technology is limited to outdoor use, which distinguishes it from indoor services offered by terrestrial networks. Applications from Starlink and Amazon Kuiper to enter India’s satellite broadband market, projected to reach $1.9 billion by 2030, are under review.
India’s competitive telecom sector, with 942 million users and low data costs, is attracting significant global interest. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL), a state-run operator with 99 million users, is expanding its 4G offerings to regain market share. Meanwhile, the government remains tight-lipped about plans to assist Vodafone Idea, which faces $24 billion in dues.
Musk’s disruptive approach, evident in markets like Kenya where Starlink’s pricing undercut local rivals, signals potential shifts in India’s broadband landscape. The new satellite policy could bring more innovation, fostering a dynamic environment for global and domestic players.
The UK government is exploring new AI tools to streamline public services and assist ministers and civil servants. Among these is Parlex, a tool that predicts how MPs may react to proposed policies, offering insights into potential support or opposition based on MPs’ previous parliamentary contributions. Described as a ‘parliamentary vibe check,’ the tool helps policy teams craft strategies before formally proposing new measures.
Part of the AI suite Humphrey—named after the Yes Minister character—Parlex and other tools aim to modernise government operations. These include Minute, which transcribes ministerial meetings, and Lex, which analyses the impact of laws. Another tool, Redbox, automates submission processing, while Consult is projected to save £80 million annually by improving public consultation processes. The Department for Work and Pensions has also utilised AI to analyse handwritten correspondence, accelerating responses to vulnerable individuals.
The broader government strategy, unveiled by Prime Minister Keir Starmer, emphasises integrating AI into public services while balancing privacy concerns. Plans include sharing anonymised NHS data for AI research under stringent safeguards. Ministers believe these innovations could address economic challenges and boost the UK’s economy by up to £470 billion over the next decade. However, past missteps, such as erroneous fraud accusations stemming from flawed algorithms, highlight the need for careful implementation.
The X account of Cuba’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has been locked following allegations of promoting and profiting from several Solana-based meme coins. The controversy began when the account appeared to promote a token called ‘CUBA,’ sparking speculation about potential government involvement in the recent meme coin frenzy.
The CUBA token reportedly surged to a $30 million market cap before collapsing, with additional tokens like “Cuba Coin 2.0” and ‘Justice for Cuba Coin’ failing within a day. Screenshots also surfaced of another token, “CUBA 4.0,” further raising questions about hacking or misuse of the account. Whilst the Ministry’s X account briefly addressed “difficulties” before being deleted, no official statement has been issued.
Adding to the confusion, an X Space titled ‘Sorry from $CUBA,’ hosted by the account, included an apology from a person claiming to represent the Cuban government. The host initially denied wrongdoing but later made an erratic statement about a “million MC” before the Space was removed.
As the Ministry’s X account remains disabled and no clarification has been provided, the situation continues to fuel debate over the Cuban government’s potential connection to the meme coin drama.
