Canada introduces Safe Social Media Act targeting online harms and AI chatbots

Canada has introduced the Safe Social Media Act, legislation that would establish new online safety requirements for social media platforms and certain AI chatbot services. Bill C-34 aims to make regulated services more accountable for addressing online harms before they occur.

The Safe Social Media Act would create a new legislative and regulatory framework through the proposed Digital Safety Act. Regulated services would be required to identify, assess and mitigate risks on their platforms, implement safety-by-design features, make user guidelines easily accessible, provide tools such as blocking and reporting mechanisms, and publish Digital Safety Plans.

The bill would prohibit children under the age of 16 from holding social media accounts. Social media services could seek an exemption if they demonstrate that sufficient safeguards for children are in place.

The Safe Social Media Act is organised around three core duties: a Duty to Protect Children, a Duty to Act Responsibly and a Duty to Make Certain Content Inaccessible. Social media services would be required to assess and mitigate risks associated with seven categories of harmful content, including child sexual victimisation, content inducing a child to self-harm, cyberbullying, hatred, violence, terrorism or violent extremism, and intimate content shared without consent.

Regulated social media services would also be required to make certain content inaccessible to users in Canada, including content that sexually victimises a child or revictimises a survivor, and intimate content communicated without consent, including sexualised deepfakes. The government said these categories can cause substantial and lasting harm even when a single item is shared.

Under the proposed legislation, AI chatbot services would be subject to a tailored Duty to Act Responsibly. The proposed requirements include mitigating the risk that chatbots communicate harmful content, being transparent about reporting thresholds in crisis situations, and reducing the risk of harmful chatbot behaviour.

The legislation would establish an independent Digital Safety Commission of Canada responsible for enforcing the framework, assessing compliance, conducting audits and inspections, issuing compliance orders and imposing administrative monetary penalties. The Commission would also handle certain complaints, develop guidance and support research on online safety best practices.

Why does it matter?

The Safe Social Media Act reflects a growing international shift towards preventative online safety regulation. Rather than focusing solely on the removal of illegal content after it appears, the proposed framework would require platforms and AI services to assess risks proactively and implement measures designed to reduce harm before it occurs.

The inclusion of AI chatbot services is particularly notable, as governments worldwide are increasingly examining the safety implications of generative AI systems. If adopted, the legislation could position Canada among the first countries to apply a comprehensive online safety framework that combines platform accountability, child protection measures and AI-specific obligations under a single regulatory regime.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU publishes the final Code for labelling AI-generated content

The European Commission has published the final Code of Practice on marking and labelling AI-generated content, offering practical guidance for providers and deployers preparing to comply with transparency obligations under the EU AI Act.

The code is voluntary, but the underlying transparency obligations in Article 50 of the AI Act will apply from 2 August 2026. The Commission said the code is intended to help organisations implement those obligations in a consistent, practical and proportionate way.

The framework covers two main areas. Providers of generative AI systems are guided on marking and detecting AI-generated or manipulated audio, image, video and text content, including through machine-readable solutions where technically feasible. Deployers are guided on labelling deepfakes and AI-generated or manipulated text published to inform the public on matters of public interest.

Under the AI Act, users must also be informed when they are interacting with interactive AI systems, such as chatbots. The transparency requirements are intended to help people recognise when content has been generated or altered by AI and to reduce the risk of deception and manipulation.

The Commission has also published a set of the EU icons that deployers may use to label certain AI-generated content. The code does not replace the AI Act or future Commission guidelines on Article 50, which are expected before the transparency obligations begin to apply.

The Commission and the AI Board will now assess the code’s adequacy. If assessed positively, providers and deployers who sign the code may use its measures to help demonstrate compliance with the AI Act’s transparency rules.

Why does it matter?

The code is an important step in turning the AI Act’s transparency provisions into operational practice. Labelling and machine-readable marking rules could shape how platforms, AI providers, media organisations and other deployers handle synthetic text, images, audio and video. The measures are especially relevant for public-interest information, where undisclosed AI-generated or manipulated content can affect trust, elections, journalism and public debate.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Snapchat introduces friends-only content sharing for users under 16

Snapchat has begun rolling out new content-sharing protections for users aged 13 to 15, limiting the visibility of their Stories and Spotlight videos to mutually accepted friends.

Under the new experience, younger teens will have a dedicated profile where they can create, save and showcase content. Still, it will not be visible to one-sided followers or the wider Snapchat community. Snap said users in this age group will no longer be able to post Spotlight content that is visible to non-friend audiences.

The company said the change is intended to create a more private sharing environment for younger teenagers. Snapchat users under 16 will also no longer have engagement metrics such as favourite counts.

Snap said users aged 16 to 17 will have an optional introduction to public sharing, with additional safeguards, limited distribution and parental visibility. Users aged 18 and over will continue to have full access to public profiles and broader distribution tools.

The update forms part of Snapchat’s wider teen safety approach, which includes stricter default privacy settings, limits on unwanted contact, moderated public content and parental tools through Family Center.

Why does it matter?

The update reflects a broader shift towards age-appropriate design and privacy-by-default settings for younger users. By limiting public distribution for users aged 13 to 15, Snapchat is reducing minors’ exposure to unknown audiences and public engagement metrics. The change is relevant to ongoing regulatory debates on children’s online safety, platform design, algorithmic distribution and the mental health effects of public social media engagement.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

MIT study warns of AI reliance in news verification

A new MIT Media Lab study suggests that using AI to verify news can improve short-term accuracy but may not help users build lasting skills to detect misinformation.

The month-long study followed 67 participants as they assessed news headlines and image pairs. Participants were 21% more accurate at detecting false information when assisted by an AI chatbot during a session. However, their unassisted performance on new news items declined by 15 percentage points by the fourth week compared with before the study began.

Researchers linked the finding to the ‘AI dependency paradox’, in which tools that improve immediate performance can also encourage users to rely on automated guidance rather than develop their own judgement. The study found that some participants shifted from active analysis to passive acceptance of AI suggestions, even as some believed their own abilities were improving.

The researchers said the way AI systems interact with users matters. Tools that ask guided questions and encourage reasoning appear more likely to support long-term learning than systems that simply provide direct answers.

The findings point to the need for stronger AI literacy as chatbots become more common in news consumption, education and information verification. Researchers also noted limitations, including the small set of validated news items and a participant pool focused on the United States and the United Kingdom.

Why does it matter?

AI is increasingly becoming part of how people search for, verify and consume news. The study suggests that using AI as a shortcut for fact-checking may reduce users’ ability to evaluate information independently, while better-designed systems could support learning and critical reasoning. That distinction matters for educators, platforms and policymakers working on misinformation, media literacy and responsible AI use.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!  

New York moves to curb undisclosed news scraping by AI bots

New York lawmakers have passed legislation aimed at restricting ‘stealth crawlers’, automated bots that access and scrape content from news websites without identifying themselves. If signed by Governor Kathy Hochul, New York would become the first US state to impose such transparency requirements.

The bill would require companies operating such bots to identify themselves when accessing the websites of news organisations. It would also prohibit activity that damages, impairs or places undue burdens on news websites, or otherwise causes economic harm to publishers.

Supporters, including the New York State Broadcasters Association and the New York News Publishers Association, argue that undisclosed scraping allows technology companies to use journalistic content for AI and other automated services while reducing traffic and revenue opportunities for publishers.

The legislation would authorise the New York Attorney General’s office to take enforcement action against non-compliant companies, with civil penalties of up to $15,000 per day for violations. The measure was passed by lawmakers in New York and now awaits the governor’s decision.

Why does it matter?

The legislation reflects growing tensions between news publishers and technology companies over the use of online content for AI training, search services and other automated applications. Publishers increasingly argue that large-scale content scraping can generate commercial value for technology firms while undermining the business models that support journalism.

If enacted, the measure could establish one of the first state-level transparency frameworks governing automated content collection in the United States. It may also influence broader debates about AI training data, web scraping practices, publisher rights and the relationship between technology platforms and news organisations.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

UK to issue guidance on smartphone and screen use for children

The Department for Education and Department of Health and Social Care have announced plans to publish guidance on mobile device use for children aged 5 to 16. The guidance, due to be published this autumn, aims to provide parents with practical advice on issues including screen time, social media use, sleep and smartphone habits.

A three-week call for evidence has been launched to help shape the guidance, supported by an independent expert group co-chaired by Children’s Commissioner Dame Rachel de Souza and Professor Russell Viner. The review will also examine how children use screens in schools and at home.

The government said technology can support learning, creativity and inclusion, particularly for children with special educational needs and disabilities. It added that the guidance will focus on helping families make informed decisions about online safety rather than imposing blanket restrictions on technology use.

Alongside the guidance, the government plans additional measures relating to technology in education, including the possible introduction of safety certification for certain school technology products and the creation of an AI Youth Advisory Board.

Ministers are also considering measures such as app curfews, time limits and other tools aimed at improving children’s online safety. The announcement was made in the UK, where ministers said technology used in schools should be safe, effective and supported by evidence.

Why does it matter?

Governments around the world are increasingly examining the impact of smartphones, social media and digital platforms on children’s wellbeing, safety and development. While technology can provide educational and social benefits, concerns have grown over excessive screen time, online harms, sleep disruption and the effects of digital services on young people.

The UK’s approach reflects a broader policy trend towards evidence-based guidance and targeted safeguards rather than outright restrictions. The review may also influence future discussions on digital wellbeing, online safety, parental controls and the role of technology in education.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

Ofcom confirms platform crisis protocols under UK Online Safety Act

UK communications regulator Ofcom has set out new crisis response measures aimed at helping online platforms respond when illegal content and content harmful to children spreads rapidly during emergencies.

The measures will be added to Ofcom’s Illegal Content Codes of Practice and Protection of Children Codes of Practice under the UK’s Online Safety Act. However, they must still complete the parliamentary process before taking effect.

Ofcom said ordinary content moderation systems may not be sufficient during exceptional events, such as public disorder, terrorist attacks, or other crises that lead to a sudden increase in harmful or illegal online activity. The regulator pointed to the violent riots that followed the 2024 Southport murders and the risk of terrorist attacks being livestreamed as examples of crises where online content can threaten public safety.

Under the measures, service providers should prepare and apply crisis protocols to manage significant increases in relevant illegal content or content harmful to children. Ofcom expects providers to deploy temporary response teams as soon as possible during a crisis, record key decisions and conduct post-crisis reviews to assess whether their response was effective.

Large platforms should also maintain dedicated communication channels for law enforcement agencies to share crisis-related information. Ofcom said the measures are intended to support faster and more coordinated public safety efforts during exceptional events.

The regulator consulted on crisis response protocols in 2025 and said further decisions on additional online safety measures are expected in autumn 2026.

Why does it matter?

The measures show how online safety regulation is moving from general content moderation duties towards operational crisis governance. In emergencies, platforms may face sudden spikes in illegal content, livestreamed harm or coordinated activity that ordinary moderation systems cannot manage quickly enough. Ofcom’s approach also formalises closer crisis-time coordination between large platforms and law enforcement, raising important questions about public safety, platform accountability, due process and safeguards under the UK Online Safety Act.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Apple unveils next-generation Siri AI and expanded child safety features

Apple has unveiled the next generation of Apple Intelligence at WWDC26, introducing a significantly upgraded Siri designed to provide deeper personal context awareness, broader app integration and more advanced conversational capabilities.

The new assistant can search across messages, emails and photos, answer questions about on-screen content and access web information to provide more up-to-date responses while maintaining Apple’s privacy-focused approach.

Alongside its AI announcements, Apple announced major updates to parental controls and Screen Time features. Parents will be able to approve new contacts, manage app permissions more precisely and benefit from new safety features designed to respond when explicit or violent content is shared.

New screen time recommendations and scheduling tools are also intended to encourage healthier digital habits for children.

Software updates arriving later this year across Apple’s operating systems will also introduce a range of performance improvements.

Apple said app launches on iPhone and iPad are up to 30% faster, newly captured photos load up to 70% faster, and AirDrop transfers can be up to 80% quicker. Search functions across Spotlight, Photos, and Mail have also been redesigned to improve speed and accuracy.

Additional features include enhanced health tracking, expanded AirPods personalisation, improved Apple Watch functionality, cross-platform photo sharing through iCloud Shared Albums, and AI-powered upgrades to Apple Maps and Apple Vision Pro.

Public beta testing begins next month, with the full software release scheduled for autumn. Apple noted that some Apple Intelligence features will vary by device, language, and region, with regulatory requirements affecting availability in certain markets, including China and parts of the European Union.

Why does it matter?

Apple’s latest updates reflect a broader industry shift, especially towards embedding child safety and digital well-being features directly into operating systems, as governments and regulators worldwide increase scrutiny of how technology platforms protect young users online.

Enhanced parental controls, communication safeguards, and screen time management tools could help set new standards for online child protection, influencing future policies and product development across the technology sector.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

Ofcom warns platforms over online abuse ahead of FIFA World Cup 2026

Ofcom has urged online platforms to strengthen protections against illegal hate speech, abuse, threats and harassment ahead of the FIFA World Cup 2026. The UK regulator reminded technology companies that they have legal responsibilities under the Online Safety Act to reduce the risk of users encountering criminal content on their services.

The intervention follows concerns about abuse directed at players, coaches, officials and commentators during previous international tournaments. According to Ofcom, online attacks have frequently targeted individuals based on race, ethnicity, perceived sexual orientation and disability, causing significant personal and professional harm.

Under the UK’s Online Safety Act, platforms are required to operate effective reporting systems, maintain adequately resourced moderation teams and remove illegal content without undue delay. Ofcom stated that evidence of failures to meet these obligations during the tournament could be considered as part of its ongoing compliance assessments.

The regulator also highlighted a partnership established earlier this year with the UK Football Policing Unit, the Football Association, the Premier League, the English Football League, the Women’s Super League, the Professional Footballers’ Association and anti-discrimination organisation Kick It Out.

The initiative aims to strengthen information sharing and support preventative measures against online abuse targeting individuals across the football ecosystem.

Why does it matter?

Major sporting events often lead to spikes in online abuse, particularly against athletes, officials and other high-profile figures. The scale and visibility of these events can amplify harmful behaviour and place additional pressure on platforms to enforce their content moderation policies effectively.

Ofcom’s intervention highlights how online safety regulation is increasingly being tested during major public events. The regulator’s warning also signals that compliance with the Online Safety Act will be assessed not only through policies on paper but through how platforms respond to real-world surges in harmful content.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Philippine House passes anti-disinformation bill on final reading

The House of Representatives of the Philippines has approved the proposed Digital Media Anti-False Information Act on its third and final reading.

According to the House’s Press and Public Affairs Bureau, the measure passed with 286 votes in favour, three against, and seven abstentions.

The bill seeks to address organised disinformation campaigns, troll farms, bot networks, fake account syndicates, and foreign-backed influence operations. It also covers AI-generated or manipulated content that is released without disclosure and intended to mislead the public.

Individuals found guilty of knowingly spreading false information that causes verifiable public harm or threatens national security could face six to 12 years in prison and fines ranging from PHP 500,000 to PHP 2 million.

The measure would require digital platforms operating in the country to maintain a legal presence and meet transparency standards.

The House said the bill includes protections for freedom of expression, including political opinions, criticism of government, journalism, satire, academic discourse, artistic expression, and whistleblowing.

It also calls for stronger media and digital literacy programmes through the Department of Education and the Commission on Higher Education.

Why does it matter?

The bill shows how governments are trying to address organised disinformation, bot networks, fake accounts, and AI-generated manipulation through platform rules and criminal penalties. The Philippines case is especially important because it combines anti-disinformation enforcement with explicit free-expression safeguards, but the severity of the penalties means implementation and interpretation will be closely watched

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot