Content Policy

Philippine House passes anti-disinformation bill on final reading

The House of Representatives of the Philippines has approved the proposed Digital Media Anti-False Information Act on its third and final reading.

According to the House’s Press and Public Affairs Bureau, the measure passed with 286 votes in favour, three against, and seven abstentions.

The bill seeks to address organised disinformation campaigns, troll farms, bot networks, fake account syndicates, and foreign-backed influence operations. It also covers AI-generated or manipulated content that is released without disclosure and intended to mislead the public.

Individuals found guilty of knowingly spreading false information that causes verifiable public harm or threatens national security could face six to 12 years in prison and fines ranging from PHP 500,000 to PHP 2 million.

The measure would require digital platforms operating in the country to maintain a legal presence and meet transparency standards.

The House said the bill includes protections for freedom of expression, including political opinions, criticism of government, journalism, satire, academic discourse, artistic expression, and whistleblowing.

It also calls for stronger media and digital literacy programmes through the Department of Education and the Commission on Higher Education.

Why does it matter?

The bill shows how governments are trying to address organised disinformation, bot networks, fake accounts, and AI-generated manipulation through platform rules and criminal penalties. The Philippines case is especially important because it combines anti-disinformation enforcement with explicit free-expression safeguards, but the severity of the penalties means implementation and interpretation will be closely watched

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot! 

New York passes child protection law targeting AI companion chatbots

New York State has approved legislation aimed at strengthening protections for minors interacting with AI chatbots, marking one of the first targeted regulatory efforts focused on AI companion technologies. The bill, known as S9051B, introduces restrictions on chatbot features that may encourage harmful emotional dependence or unsafe behaviour among young users.

The law prohibits AI systems from presenting themselves as real or fictional human beings in ways that could mislead minors and restricts outputs that encourage self-harm, disordered eating or other harmful behaviour. The legislation specifically targets design features that may foster emotional dependency between children and AI systems, reflecting growing concerns over their potential psychological effects.

Sponsored by Senator Kristen Gonzalez and Assemblymember Alex Bores, the legislation was developed in consultation with New York Attorney General Letitia James and child safety organisations, including Common Sense Media. Supporters of the bill argue that rapid advances in AI have outpaced existing safeguards, leaving young users vulnerable to emerging risks.

Supporters say the measure is part of a wider push for responsible AI governance in New York, focusing on transparency, accountability, and consumer protection. Advocacy groups involved in developing the legislation have pointed to real-world cases as evidence of the need for stronger oversight of emotionally interactive AI systems.

Why does it matter?

AI companion applications are becoming increasingly sophisticated and capable of sustaining long-term, emotionally engaging interactions with users. While these systems may provide entertainment, companionship or support, concerns have emerged about their potential influence on children and other vulnerable users.

By focusing on chatbot design features rather than solely on content moderation, New York’s legislation introduces a new approach to AI governance that could influence future regulatory efforts in the United States and beyond. The law also reflects growing attention to the psychological and social impacts of generative AI systems.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!  

UNICEF warns of AI risks to child online safety

UNICEF Vietnam has warned that rapid advances in AI are creating new risks for child online safety, including AI-generated child sexual abuse material and deepfakes.

The UNICEF Vietnam Representative, Silvia Danailov, issued a warning to mark International Children’s Day and Vietnam’s Month of Action for Children, which is held under the theme ‘Happy, safe and confident children in the digital world.’

Danailov said digital technologies can help children learn, connect, and develop future skills, but also create new forms of harm. She warned that generative AI can now be used to create highly realistic sexual images or videos of children without their knowledge or consent.

UNICEF, ECPAT, and INTERPOL research across 11 countries found that at least 1.2 million children reported that their images had been manipulated into sexually explicit deepfakes in the past year. Danailov said such harms can have lasting effects, even when images are digitally created, because children experience fear, shame, and loss of trust.

Nearly nine in ten children aged 12 to 17 in Vietnam are online, with many spending five to seven hours a day on the internet. Danailov said AI-driven risks add a new layer to existing challenges, such as cyberbullying and online exploitation, while also exposing inequalities between children who are supported online and those who are not.

Vietnam has strengthened its legal and policy framework, including a new government decree effective from 16 May 2026 that reinforces children’s right to privacy by prohibiting the disclosure of a child’s personal information without the child’s consent, when aged seven or older, and with the consent of their parents or caregivers.

The country has also approved the National Programme on Child Online Protection and Support for Development for 2026–2030, aimed at protecting children and empowering them as confident digital citizens through stronger legal frameworks, improved systems, education, and coordinated action.

UNICEF called for laws and enforcement to keep pace with technology, stronger child protection systems, safer platform design by technology companies, and better support for schools and families. Danailov also stressed that children must be heard and involved in creating safer digital environments.

Why does it matter?

The warning shows how generative AI is changing the landscape of child online safety. Children can now be harmed even without direct interaction with an offender, including through manipulated images and deepfake abuse. That makes child protection harder for families, schools, platforms, and regulators, and increases the need for safety-by-design, stronger reporting systems, legal safeguards, and trusted support channels for children.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Ireland launches fund for fact-checking and anti-disinformation training

Ireland’s media regulator, Coimisiún na Meán, has launched a funding call to support training in fact-checking, prebunking and debunking for journalists and media professionals during 2026.

The programme is aimed at graduate, early-career and mid-career professionals working in news and current affairs. Eligible activities include training courses, mentorship programmes, internships and collaborative projects designed to strengthen fact-checking and verification skills.

The fund forms part of the regulator’s Media Skills and Development Programme and supports objectives outlined in Ireland’s National Counter Disinformation Strategy. Applications are open to academic institutions, accredited bodies and representative organisations, including partnerships involving media organisations.

Minister for Culture, Communications and Sport Patrick O’Donovan said the initiative would help strengthen professional skills and support high-quality journalism. Applications are open until 2 July 2026, with all funded activities to be delivered in Ireland during 2026.

Why does it matter?

Fact-checking, verification and disinformation response skills are becoming increasingly important as journalists navigate rapidly evolving information environments shaped by social media, generative AI and coordinated influence campaigns.

By investing in professional training, Ireland aims to strengthen media resilience, support evidence-based reporting and enhance the capacity of news organisations to identify and counter misleading or false information.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot! 

UK regulator launches AI-assisted review of gambling advertising

The UK Gambling Commission has announced a new compliance initiative targeting gambling advertising, following an enforcement notice issued by the Committee of Advertising Practice (CAP). The measure aims to prevent gambling advertisements from having a strong appeal to people under 18.

From 11 June, CAP will conduct a monitoring exercise using its AI-powered Active Ad Monitoring System in collaboration with social media platforms. The review will assess whether gambling advertisements comply with rules intended to protect children and other vulnerable audiences.

Under the enforcement notice, businesses found to be in breach of the rules may be required to amend or remove advertisements without delay. Failure to comply could lead to sanctions, including referrals to hosting platforms or the Gambling Commission.

The Gambling Commission said operators must ensure that all advertising, including content published on social media, remains socially responsible and complies with CAP and Broadcast Committee of Advertising Practice (BCAP) requirements.

Why does it matter?

Regulators are increasingly using AI tools to monitor online advertising at scale, particularly in areas where consumer protection concerns are significant. Gambling advertising remains a sensitive issue because of its potential impact on children and other vulnerable groups.

The initiative signals a more proactive approach to enforcement, combining automated monitoring with platform cooperation to identify problematic content more quickly and strengthen compliance with advertising standards.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot! 

UNESCO promotes media literacy as response to online hate speech

UNESCO has announced a new issue brief examining how Media and Information Literacy (MIL) can help address the spread of hate speech, disinformation and other harmful content across digital platforms. The publication will be officially presented on 18 June, the International Day for Countering Hate Speech.

UNESCO argues that addressing online hate speech requires measures that extend beyond content moderation and regulation. According to UNESCO, strengthening critical thinking, ethical awareness and digital skills can help individuals better navigate information environments, assess online content and engage responsibly in digital spaces while respecting human rights and freedom of expression.

The brief presents Media and Information Literacy as a long-term educational approach to strengthening information integrity and building more resilient societies. UNESCO officials emphasise that sustainable solutions depend on combining governance measures with investments in education, digital citizenship and informed engagement with information.

The publication forms part of UNESCO’s wider efforts to promote information integrity and responsible digital governance. A related webinar will examine how digital platforms, AI and generative technologies can amplify harmful narratives and social polarisation, as well as strategies for fostering safer and more inclusive online environments.

Why does it matter?

The spread of hate speech, disinformation and other harmful content remains a major challenge for governments, platforms and civil society. While regulatory and moderation measures often focus on limiting harmful content, UNESCO argues that long-term resilience also depends on strengthening citizens’ ability to critically assess information and engage responsibly online.

The initiative reflects growing international interest in combining platform governance with education, digital literacy and information integrity efforts as societies adapt to the influence of AI-powered content creation and increasingly complex online information environments.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU court annuls Meta Marketplace designation

The General Court of the European Union has annulled the European Commission’s decision designating Meta as a gatekeeper for Marketplace under the Digital Markets Act, while upholding the company’s designation for Messenger.

The case concerned the Commission’s 5 September 2023 decision designating Meta as a gatekeeper for several core platform services, including Facebook, Messenger, and Marketplace. Meta challenged the decision in part, contesting the classification of Messenger and Marketplace as important gateways under the DMA.

The General Court upheld the Commission’s assessment of Messenger, finding that the service is a number-independent interpersonal communications service distinct from Facebook. The court said Messenger is available through standalone applications, can be used independently of Facebook, and includes tools that allow businesses to engage with users.

The court also found that the Commission did not have to count only Messenger users who were not also Facebook users when assessing whether the quantitative threshold under the DMA was met. It also said the Commission was not required to open a market investigation in the absence of sufficiently substantiated arguments from Meta calling the DMA presumptions into question.

For Marketplace, the court found that the Commission erred in law by relying only on data from the three years preceding designation without taking account of changes made at the end of July 2023. Those changes limited the number of listings that could be published per user and led to the disappearance of the criterion used by the Commission to identify business users.

The court also found that the Commission had not provided sufficient reasoning for classifying Marketplace as an online intermediation service. It said the Commission failed to provide a concrete analysis of the July 2023 changes or to explain their effect on whether Marketplace-enabled business users could offer goods and services to consumers.

As a result, the decision was annulled only to the extent that it designated Meta as a gatekeeper for Marketplace. Meta’s Messenger designation remains in place.

Why does it matter?

The judgement is an important test of how the EU courts will review Digital Markets Act gatekeeper designations. It confirms that the Commission can rely on DMA presumptions where companies do not provide sufficiently substantiated counterarguments, as seen with Messenger. But it also shows that the Commission must properly assess relevant changes and provide sufficient reasoning when classifying a service as a core platform service, as the Marketplace annulment demonstrates.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

OpenAI advocates for global action on youth AI safety

OpenAI has called for stronger international action on youth AI safety, including the creation of a dedicated institute to support common evidence, guidance, and safeguards for young users.

Ahead of the G7 Leaders’ Summit in Évian, France, the company said governments, researchers, civil society, and industry should work together to raise standards for safe and age-appropriate AI use by children and teenagers.

OpenAI said a dedicated youth AI safety institute could provide continuity beyond a single summit, helping stakeholders share evidence, develop guidance, and keep standards aligned with fast-moving AI systems. The company said such a body could take the form of a new international institute or an existing or newly created national AI institute with a global mandate.

The principles outlined by OpenAI include privacy-preserving age estimation, default safeguards when a user’s age is uncertain, annual youth safety risk assessments, accessible parental controls, clearer transparency about youth protections, and stronger protocols for serious safety situations involving self-harm, exploitation, grooming, sexually exploitative content, and other high-risk interactions.

The company also called for stronger protection of minors’ personal information, including prohibitions on privacy-invasive targeted advertising to young people and the sale of their personal information. It also said youth safety frameworks should promote AI literacy, learning, creativity, skill development, and future opportunities.

OpenAI said AI tools can help young people understand difficult concepts, practise languages, improve writing, learn to code, organise research, explore creative ideas, and prepare for changing labour markets. However, it argued that safeguards, family and educator guidance, and clear accountability mechanisms such as independent audits should support access.

The proposal builds on existing youth safety initiatives and education partnerships, including work with Common Sense Media, educators, and national education deployments in countries such as Estonia, Greece, and Singapore.

Why does it matter?

Youth AI safety is becoming a central policy issue as children and teenagers increasingly use AI tools for learning, creativity, social interaction, and everyday digital tasks. OpenAI’s proposal adds to pressure for international coordination on age-appropriate design, privacy, parental controls, safety protocols, and independent accountability. The G7 context also shows that youth AI safety is moving from product policy into broader debates over digital governance and education policy.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

UK publishers gain control over Google AI search content

Online publishers in the UK will be able to prevent their content from appearing in Google’s AI-generated search features without losing visibility in traditional search results, following new requirements introduced by the Competition and Markets Authority.

The measures are part of the CMA’s conduct requirements for Google’s search services under the UK’s digital markets competition regime. They are intended to give news organisations and other publishers greater control over how their content is used in AI-powered search products such as AI Overviews and AI Mode.

Publishers have argued that AI-generated summaries can reduce website traffic by providing users with key information directly in search results, limiting the need to visit original articles. Until now, opting out of Google’s AI features could also affect visibility in standard search results, creating a difficult choice for organisations that rely on search traffic to reach readers and generate revenue.

Under the new requirements, Google must give UK website owners more control over how their content and links appear in AI search features. Google will test new tools with selected UK sites before wider rollout, allowing publishers to opt out of AI-generated search features while remaining visible in traditional search results.

Google will also be required to provide clearer attribution and links to the publisher when publisher content appears in AI-generated results. The CMA said the measures are designed to improve transparency, support fairer dealing between publishers and Google, and help users understand where information in AI search results comes from.

The regulator described the measure as a world-first for Google’s search services. Further announcements concerning Google’s search business are expected from the CMA in the coming weeks.

Why does it matter?

The decision addresses one of the central tensions created by AI search: search engines can summarise publishers’ content while reducing users’ incentive to click through to the sources. By separating AI search opt-outs from traditional search visibility, the CMA aims to give publishers greater, more meaningful control without forcing them to sacrifice reach. The case could shape how other regulators approach attribution, content use, traffic diversion, and bargaining power between AI platforms and publishers.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!  

Diplo chatbot can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.