European Commission panel recommends social media restrictions for under-13s

A special panel convened by the European Commission has recommended restricting access to social media and other high-risk digital services for children under 13, arguing that platforms should prove they are safe before minors are allowed to use them.

The report was prepared by the co-chairs of the Special Panel on Child Safety Online, Prof. Dr. Jörg M. Fegert and Dr. Maria Melchior, whom European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen appointed in March 2026 to advise on child safety online and possible age restrictions for social media.

The panel met three times between March and June 2026 to examine scientific evidence on the impact of social media and digital environments on minors, review existing EU and national rules, and develop recommendations to better protect and empower children online.

The report uses the term ‘social media+’ to describe social media and other digital services that expose minors to potentially harmful features, including addictive design, infinite scroll, autoplay, recommender systems, persistent notifications, AI companions, video games and video-sharing platforms.

The co-chairs argue that providers, not children or parents, should bear the burden of demonstrating that their services are safe by design and appropriate for young users. Until then, they recommend restricting access for children under 13, while allowing member states to introduce additional precautionary measures for older adolescents if needed.

The recommendations also call for proportionate age-assurance systems, stronger safety-by-design requirements, limits on addictive platform features, more effective complaints mechanisms for minors and stronger enforcement of existing EU legislation, including the Digital Services Act, GDPR and AI Act.

The report also urges the EU to close legislative gaps on child sexual abuse online by adopting permanent obligations requiring providers to prevent, detect, report and block abuse, including in interpersonal communications.

Beyond restrictions, the report emphasises digital empowerment through stronger media literacy for children, parents, teachers and caregivers, greater participation by young people in policymaking, improved parental guidance, increased support for civil society organisations and helplines, and more investment in offline activities such as sports, arts and youth spaces.

The report concludes that protecting children online requires an ecosystem-wide approach involving regulators, digital service providers, educators, parents, caregivers and children themselves. It argues that children’s rights should apply online just as they do offline, balancing protection with opportunities to learn, participate and communicate.

Why does it matter?

The report could significantly influence future EU policy on children’s access to digital services, platform design and online safety. By recommending a default restriction for children under 13 and placing responsibility on providers to demonstrate that their services are safe, it shifts the debate away from parental responsibility towards platform accountability.

Although the recommendations are not legally binding, they are likely to inform future discussions on the Digital Services Act, the AI Act and wider EU child protection policies. If adopted, they could reshape how online platforms design services for younger users across Europe.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

European Commission preliminarily finds Meta’s addictive platform design breaches the DSA

The European Commission has issued preliminary findings that Meta’s design of Instagram and Facebook breaches the Digital Services Act (DSA), arguing that features designed to maximise engagement may encourage compulsive use and fail to adequately protect children and other vulnerable users.

The investigation focuses on platform features including infinite scroll, autoplay, push notifications and highly personalised recommender systems.

According to the Commission’s preliminary assessment, Meta failed to properly evaluate the risks these features pose to users’ physical and mental well-being. Investigators found that personalised recommendations, continuous content feeds and engagement-driven formats such as Reels and Stories can encourage excessive use, particularly among younger users.

The Commission also said Meta failed to adequately consider evidence showing that children spend significant time on Instagram and Facebook during nighttime hours.

The Commission also concluded that Meta’s existing mitigation measures are insufficient. Screen time tools, including those enabled by default for teenagers, can easily be dismissed and do not meaningfully reduce usage.

Parental controls were also found to require considerable technical knowledge and active supervision, while educational resources available through Meta’s Safety Centre were considered inadequate to mitigate the risks associated with addictive platform design.

According to the Commission, Meta should redesign several core platform features, including disabling autoplay and infinite scroll by default, introducing more effective screen-time reminders and reducing the engagement-driven nature of its recommender systems.

The findings are preliminary, and Meta now has the opportunity to examine the Commission’s evidence and submit a formal response before a final decision is adopted. If the infringement is ultimately confirmed, the company could face fines of up to 6% of its global annual turnover under the Digital Services Act.

Why does it matter?

The case represents one of the EU’s most significant attempts to regulate platform design rather than online content. If confirmed, it would establish an important precedent for how very large online platforms design recommender systems, engagement mechanisms and user interfaces under the Digital Services Act, particularly where children and vulnerable users are concerned.

More broadly, the case signals that European regulators are increasingly willing to scrutinise the business models underpinning social media platforms, not just the content they host. That could influence how digital platforms design engagement features well beyond the EU.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Google adds labels to AI generated advertisements

Google has introduced a new transparency feature that lets users see whether advertisements on its platforms were created or modified using AI. The company will add a ‘created or edited with AI’ label to the ‘How this ad was made’ section of My Ad Center for ads shown on Google Search, Google Discover and YouTube.

The label will be applied automatically to advertisements generated with Google’s own AI advertising tools. Advertisers using third-party AI systems, however, will be responsible for disclosing AI involvement themselves. In some regions, the disclosure may also appear directly on advertisements to give users clearer information about how promotional content was produced.

The move follows a broader industry push for greater transparency around AI-generated content. Platforms such as Meta have introduced similar disclosure measures, while Google has expanded content authenticity initiatives including SynthID and C2PA support to help identify AI-generated or digitally altered media.

Why does it matter?

Generative AI is making it faster and cheaper to create advertising content, increasing the importance of disclosure mechanisms that help users understand how digital content is produced. AI labels can improve transparency without restricting advertisers’ ability to use AI-powered creative tools.

The initiative also reflects a broader shift towards digital trust and content provenance. As synthetic media becomes more common across advertising, social media and online publishing, consistent labelling and authenticity standards are likely to play an increasingly important role in platform governance, consumer protection and regulatory compliance.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

European Parliament advances child safety privacy balance

The European Parliament has adopted amendments to a temporary exemption from the EU’s ePrivacy rules, seeking to preserve voluntary detection of child sexual abuse material while strengthening protections for end-to-end encrypted communications.

MEPs voted to exclude communications protected by end-to-end encryption from the scope of the temporary derogation, reinforcing privacy protections while maintaining support for voluntary detection measures.

The amendments were adopted during Parliament’s second reading of the proposal. Although a simple majority initially voted to reject the Council’s position, the motion failed because it did not reach the required absolute majority of 360 votes. Parliament therefore proceeded to adopt amendments instead.

The amended text now returns to the Council, which has three months to approve or reject Parliament’s changes. If the Council does not accept all of the amendments, the proposal will move to conciliation negotiations.

The temporary derogation is intended to prevent a legal gap following the expiry of the previous exemption in April 2026. It allows electronic communications providers to continue voluntarily detecting, removing and reporting child sexual abuse material while EU institutions negotiate a permanent legal framework.

Earlier negotiations between the European Parliament and the Council failed to produce an agreement, allowing the previous temporary framework to expire before the proposal returned for a second reading.

At the same time, Parliament and the Council continue negotiations on a permanent legislative framework to combat child sexual abuse online. Most elements have already been agreed, with discussions continuing on issues such as the balance between child protection and fundamental rights, including privacy and secure communications.

Why does it matter?

The vote highlights the EU’s continuing effort to balance child protection with fundamental rights. By excluding end-to-end encrypted communications from the temporary derogation, Parliament is signalling that stronger safeguards against child sexual abuse should not come at the expense of weakening secure communications.

The decision also keeps voluntary detection measures in place while negotiations continue on a permanent framework. The outcome of those talks is likely to shape how the EU reconciles online safety, privacy and encryption in future digital regulation.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Ofcom fines adult platform over Online Safety Act age check failures

The UK communications regulator, Ofcom, has fined the operator of Fapello.com £630,000 for breaching the Online Safety Act, marking one of its most significant enforcement actions under the new regime.

The penalty includes £600,000 for failing to implement legally required age assurance measures to prevent children from accessing pornographic content, and a further £30,000 for failing to comply with a legally binding information request. Following Ofcom’s action, Fapello.com geoblocked users in the UK, although the regulator said it will continue monitoring compliance.

Ofcom also confirmed it has opened a new investigation into Bit Hive, operator of Eporner.com, to assess whether its age verification measures meet the Act’s requirement for ‘highly effective’ age assurance.

Separately, the regulator expanded its existing investigation into Kemono.cr to examine whether the platform failed to comply with statutory information requests.

Ofcom said robust age verification is a core requirement of the Online Safety Act and warned that providers failing to implement effective protections or cooperate with regulatory investigations should expect enforcement action, including substantial financial penalties.

The regulator added that it prioritises investigations according to user reach and will continue monitoring compliance across online pornography services.

Why does it matter?

The case demonstrates that the UK’s Online Safety Act has entered a new phase of active enforcement. Rather than focusing solely on guidance and compliance deadlines, Ofcom is now imposing financial penalties and investigating platforms that fail to implement effective child protection measures.

The decision also shows that enforcement extends beyond age verification itself. Companies that fail to cooperate with regulatory investigations or provide required information may face additional sanctions, reinforcing the regulator’s ability to oversee compliance across online platforms.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Google rolls out AI video editing in Google Photos

Google is rolling out Google Photos Video Remix for Google Photos, a new AI-powered editing feature that transforms videos using ready-made templates and generative effects.

Powered by Gemini Omni, Google’s multimodal AI model, the feature is designed to help users create stylised video clips without professional editing skills or dedicated video software.

Available through the Create tab in Google Photos, Video Remix lets users apply effects such as cinematic relighting, background changes and artistic styles including watercolour, raw sketchbook and oil painting.

Google says users can, for example, make a video appear as though it was filmed in a greenhouse, add a morning glow to a dark clip, or transform footage into a watercolour-style animation.

The launch forms part of Google’s broader effort to integrate generative AI across its consumer products. In Google Photos, the company has also introduced AI-powered editing tools and features that generate outfit ideas from photos of clothing.

Video Remix is rolling out to eligible Google AI Plus, Pro and Ultra subscribers in selected countries, including the United States, Argentina, Brazil, India, Japan, Mexico, South Korea and Türkiye.

Why does it matter?

Video Remix reflects how generative AI video editing is becoming a mainstream consumer feature rather than a specialist capability. By embedding AI-powered creative tools directly into Google Photos, Google is lowering the barrier to producing stylised video content while further integrating generative AI into everyday digital experiences.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Japan reviews AI search use of news content

Japan’s Fair Trade Commission has launched a review of how generative AI search services use news content, examining concerns over unauthorised use of articles and compensation for publishers. The survey will gather information from around 370 domestic news organisations, including newspapers, publishers, broadcasters and news agencies.

The review will also include discussions with major technology companies, including Google and LY Corp. Regulators want to understand how AI-powered search services access, display and potentially monetise news content produced by publishers.

A key focus is the growth of zero-click searches, where users receive AI-generated summaries without visiting the original publisher’s website. News organisations argue that the trend could reduce traffic, advertising revenue and incentives to invest in professional journalism.

The Commission will assess whether any practices breach Japan’s Antimonopoly Act, including through the abuse of a dominant market position. Its findings could shape future policies on AI content use, publisher compensation and competition in digital media markets.

Why does it matter?

Generative AI search is reshaping how people discover news by increasingly providing answers directly within search results. While this may improve convenience for users, it also raises concerns that publishers could lose traffic, advertising revenue and the economic incentives needed to sustain quality journalism.

Japan’s review reflects a broader international debate over how AI companies should use and compensate for news content. The outcome could influence future competition policy, licensing arrangements and the relationship between AI-powered search services and media organisations.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

Global groups call for stronger AI accountability rules

Global organisations have called for AI governance frameworks that prioritise trust, information integrity and child safety, backed by enforceable accountability from AI companies.

The European Broadcasting Union delivered the message alongside Fondation Abeona, the Global Trust Challenge and 5Rights Foundation at a side event of the UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance in Geneva.

The groups warned that AI companies are increasingly shaping how people access and evaluate information, while traditional markers of editorial accountability, such as bylines and editorial principles, may become less visible to audiences.

They also pointed to declining public trust in news and rising use of AI chatbots as information sources.

Child safety was another central concern. 5Rights Foundation warned that children are adopting generative AI faster than adults, while many AI systems are not designed with children’s rights and development in mind.

The organisations presented three recommendations to the UN Global Dialogue.

They called for public service media to be recognised as trust anchors in national AI governance frameworks.

They also urged stronger safeguards requiring AI systems that affect children to be demonstrably safe, accurate and effective before reaching the market.

A third recommendation called for open, interoperable standards and sandboxed environments, so that information infrastructure is not shaped solely by technology companies.

Why does it matter?

The side event links AI accountability to two sensitive areas: information integrity and child safety. As AI systems become gateways to news, search and everyday information, governance frameworks will need clearer rules on accuracy, sourcing, attribution and responsibility. The child-safety recommendation also establishes a stronger accountability standard: AI systems that affect children should be proven safe and effective before deployment, rather than relying on harm mitigation after problems emerge.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

Viber brings ChatGPT into its messaging app

Rakuten Viber has launched ChatGPT-powered tools inside its messaging app through a new partnership with OpenAI.

The integration allows users to ask questions in a dedicated ChatGPT chat or tab, mention @ChatGPT in supported private and group chats, summarise conversations and shared links, polish draft messages, translate messages and remix images.

Viber said most tools are available after users update the app, without requiring ChatGPT registration.

Image Remix requires users to log in to ChatGPT within Viber or create a free account. OpenAI says availability may vary by region, app version, account and chat type.

The privacy model depends on the feature used. Viber says its core messaging features remain protected by end-to-end encryption, while ChatGPT-powered tools are activated only when users choose to use them.

When a ChatGPT-powered feature is used, Viber sends OpenAI the information needed to process that request. Depending on the feature, that may include selected messages, drafts, images, prompts, link content, messages that mention @ChatGPT, timestamps, approximate location and a Viber-generated hashed user ID.

OpenAI says data sent from ChatGPT-powered features in Viber personal and group chats is not used to train its models, except for conversations in the ChatGPT tab.

If a user connects a ChatGPT account, activity may be associated with that account and handled under OpenAI’s standard retention and data settings.

Why does it matter?

The launch brings generative AI into everyday messaging, moving ChatGPT from a separate assistant into conversations, links, drafts, translations and images. That makes AI tools more accessible, but also creates a more complex privacy model. Users need to understand when messages remain inside an end-to-end encrypted chat and when selected content is sent to OpenAI for processing. For messaging platforms, the key governance challenge is adding useful AI features while preserving user control, clear consent and transparent data handling.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

X expands creator tools to reduce AI slop and recycled content

X has introduced new video editing and recording tools to encourage users to create original content directly on the platform.

The update includes multilingual caption overlays, customisable subtitles, trimming tools, and green-screen features that let creators to combine videos with photos from their devices or existing X posts.

X head of product Nikita Bier said the company wants to make it easier for users to create videos natively rather than relying on content first published elsewhere.

The update comes as X faces growing pressure over recycled posts, stolen videos and low-quality content that can be amplified through engagement and monetisation systems.

Bier said many high-performing accounts continue to repost videos that went viral years earlier, reducing incentives for original creators to publish directly on X.

Video now accounts for almost half of all impressions on the platform, making content quality and attribution increasingly important for X’s creator strategy.

The company has also taken steps to reduce rewards for accounts that reupload material from smaller creators to game its revenue-sharing programme.

The new tools are therefore part of a wider push to make original video creation easier while discouraging recycled and unattributed content.

Why does it matter?

X’s update shows how platform design and creator incentives are becoming part of the response to low-quality, recycled and synthetic content. Native editing tools can help users produce original material, but the harder governance problem is attribution and monetisation. As AI makes it cheaper to generate or repackage text, images and video at scale, platforms will need stronger systems to distinguish original human creativity, authorised reuse and automated content farming.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!