AI-generated ads face new disclosure rules in South Korea

South Korea will require advertisers to label AI-generated or AI-assisted advertising from early 2026, marking a shift in how the country governs AI in online commerce and consumer protection.

The measure responds to a sharp rise in deceptive ads using synthetic imagery and deepfakes, particularly in healthcare and financial promotions. Regulators say transparency at the point of content delivery is intended to reduce manipulation and restore consumer trust.

Authorities in South Korea acknowledge that mandatory labelling alone may not deter malicious actors, who can bypass rules through offshore hosting or rapidly changing content. Detection challenges and uneven enforcement capacity across platforms remain open concerns.

South Korea’s industry groups warn that the policy could have uneven economic effects within the country’s advertising ecosystem. Large platforms and agencies are expected to adapt quickly, while smaller firms may face higher compliance costs that slow experimentation with generative tools.

Policymakers argue the framework aligns with South Korea’s broader AI governance strategy, positioning the country between innovation-led and precautionary regulatory models as synthetic media becomes more widespread.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Segment Anything adds audio as Meta unveils SAM Audio

Meta has introduced SAM Audio, a new AI model that uses intuitive prompts to isolate and segment sounds from complex audio recordings. The release extends the company’s Segment Anything collection beyond visuals into audio and video workflows.

SAM Audio allows users to separate sounds through text prompts, visual cues, or time-based selections. Creators can extract vocals or instruments, remove background noise, or isolate specific sound sources in recordings without specialised audio engineering tools.

Meta describes SAM Audio as a unified model designed around how people naturally think about sound. It supports combined text, visual, and time-based prompts, enabling flexible audio separation across music, podcasting, film, accessibility, and research.

Meta says the model achieves strong performance across diverse audio environments and is already being used internally to develop next-generation creative tools. The approach lowers technical barriers while expanding the range of possible audio editing applications.

SAM Audio is available through the Segment Anything Playground, where users can test the model with sample assets or upload their own files. Meta has also made the model available for download, signalling broader ambitions to make audio segmentation a core capability of its AI ecosystem.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

BioTechEU aims to close Europe’s biotech funding gap

The European Commission and the European Investment Bank Group have launched BioTechEU, a new initiative to mobilise €10 billion in investment for biotechnology and life sciences between 2026 and 2027.

The programme targets Europe’s biotech funding gap, seeking to strengthen global competitiveness by channelling public and private capital into health innovation, including gene therapies, mRNA treatments, personalised medicine and AI-enabled medical technologies.

BioTechEU will operate under the EIB Group’s TechEU framework and draw on instruments such as the InvestEU guarantee. The initiative aligns with broader EU efforts to retain strategic health innovation within Europe and reduce reliance on external markets.

European Health Commissioner Olivér Várhelyi said under-investment continues to constrain biotech startups, adding that the European Commission sees BioTechEU as a way to help promising treatments scale and reach patients more efficiently across the EU.

EIB President Nadia Calviño said Europe has strong scientific talent and ideas, but deeper capital markets are needed. She described BioTechEU as a catalyst for enabling EU-based biotech companies to grow and compete globally.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

UN member states adopt WSIS+20 outcome document

The WSIS+20 review process – dedicated to reviewing progress made in the implementation of outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society, 20 years after their adoption – finalised in New York, with the adoption of an outcome document at the end of a dedicated high-level meeting of the General Assembly. Following several months of consultations and negotiations, the document takes stock of progress made towards the WSIS vision of a people-centred, inclusive, and development-oriented information society, while identifying areas where further efforts and strengthened cooperation remain necessary.

The outcome document contains several provisions on the WSIS architecture, reaffirming existing mechanisms and introducing some adjustments aimed at strengthening implementation, coherence, and follow-up. One significant decision made as part of the WSIS+20 process concerns the Internet Governance Forum (IGF). Established in 2005 with a time-bound mandate that was renewed in 2010 and 2015, the IGF is now made a permanent forum of the United Nations. This decision reflects broad support among member states and was widely welcomed by non-governmental stakeholders as well.

In addition to making the IGF permanent, the outcome document introduces several measures intended to enhance its functioning and impact. The IGF is called upon to improve its work modalities and to broaden participation, particularly by governments and stakeholders from developing countries and underrepresented communities. It is invited to reinforce intersessional work, strengthen support for national and regional IGF initiatives, and apply innovative, inclusive, transparent, and agile collaboration methods.

The document also calls for the strengthening of the IGF Secretariat and requests the Secretary-General to submit a proposal to the General Assembly to ensure sustainable funding for the Forum. The IGF is further requested to report annually on progress to the Commission on Science and Technology for Development (CSTD) and to report its outcomes to relevant UN entities and processes, with a call for the UN Group on the Information Society (UNGIS), action line facilitators, the WSIS Forum, and other relevant bodies to take IGF outcomes into account in their work.

One interesting point negotiated among member states concerned the establishment of a governmental segment at the IGF. Some member states viewed this track as an important element towards fostering more dialogue among governments on digital governance issues (for some, it was also a response to the call for enhanced cooperation in the Tunis Agenda).

Others were concerned that such a segment would shift away from the IGF’s multistakeholder nature (despite the fact that the IGF, at the moment, has dedicated tracks for various groups such as parliamentarians). The final text is meant to be a compromise: The Forum is called upon to work on ‘establishing and facilitating a dialogue among Governments with the participation of all stakeholders’. 

Beyond the IGF, member states agreed that the WSIS Forum should continue to be held on an annual basis and invited the UNGIS to enhance its agility, efficiency, and effectiveness, as well as to expand its membership.

Additional provisions aim to strengthen coherence across UN digital processes. Action line facilitators are requested to develop targeted implementation roadmaps linking WSIS action lines with relevant Sustainable Development Goal targets and Global Digital Compact (GDC) commitments. Furthermore, UNGIS is requested to prepare a joint implementation roadmap to strengthen coherence between WSIS and the GDC, to be presented to CSTD in 2026. The Secretary-General is requested to submit a biennial report on WSIS implementation progress, to be considered by CSTD and ECOSOC, and the General Assembly is requested to convene a further high-level review of WSIS outcomes in 2035.

Throughout the WSIS+20 process, many discussions focused on the interplay between WSIS and GDC processes and the need to avoid duplication and enhance synergies. This is recognised in the outcome document, and several provisions – in particular those related to the implementation roadmaps, coupled with other elements describing roles for the UN Secretary-General, CSTD, the Economic and Social Council, and the General Assembly – offer important pathways in this regard. Moving forward, the key will be in how these provisions are implemented.

Substantively, the outcome document places the closure of digital divides at the core of the WSIS+20 agenda. It addresses multiple and intersecting dimensions of digital exclusion, including accessibility and equal access, inclusion of people in vulnerable situations and those in underserved, rural, and remote areas, affordability and quality of connectivity, multilingualism, cultural diversity, and the commitment to connect all schools to the Internet. The document emphasises that digital inclusion requires more than connectivity alone and must be supported by skills development, enabling environments, and respect for human rights.

The document also underscores the importance of fostering an open, fair, and non-discriminatory environment for digital development, including in the context of the digital economy. It highlights the need for predictable and transparent policy, legal, and regulatory frameworks, calls for technical assistance and technology transfer to developing countries on mutually agreed terms, and reiterates the call for states to refrain from unilateral economic measures not in line with international law. Environmental sustainability is also covered, with commitments to leverage digital technologies for sustainability while addressing energy use, critical mineral resources, e-waste management, and the development of international standards for sustainable digital products.

Human rights and ethical considerations are reaffirmed as foundational to the information society. The outcome document reiterates that the same rights apply online and offline, commits to safeguards to prevent and address adverse human rights impacts of digital technologies, and calls on the private sector to respect human rights throughout the technology lifecycle. It addresses concerns related to violence, hate speech, discrimination, misinformation and disinformation, cyberbullying, and child sexual exploitation and abuse, while emphasising information integrity, media freedom, privacy, freedom of expression, and the need to refrain from internet shutdowns and unlawful surveillance practices.

Capacity development and financing are treated as enablers of implementation. The document highlights the need to strengthen digital skills, policy and technical expertise, and institutional capacity, including in relation to emerging technologies such as AI. It invites the International Telecommunication Union – as Secretariat of UNGIS, and working with WSIS Action Line facilitators and other group members – to establish an internal task force to assess gaps and challenges in financial mechanisms for digital development and to report recommendations to CSTD in 2027.

It also calls on the Inter-Agency Working Group on Artificial Intelligence to map existing UN capacity-building initiatives, identify gaps, and address them, including through the establishment of an AI capacity-building fellowship for government officials and research programmes. These elements were subject to substantive discussions during the negotiations, with some members supporting them as important for building more capacities in AI, and others expressing concerns over potential duplication with existing work.

The outcome document reinforces the importance of monitoring and measurement, requesting a systematic review of existing ICT indicators and methodologies; the Partnership on Measuring ICT for Development is requested to conduct this review, in cooperation with action line facilitators and with the support of the Statistical Commission, and to report to CSTD in 2027. Finally, the document reaffirms the role of CSTD, ECOSOC, and the General Assembly in overall WSIS follow-up and review. 


Read more:

AI governance talks deepen as BRICS aligns national approaches

BRICS countries are working to harmonise their approaches to AI, though it remains too early to speak of a unified AI framework for the bloc, according to Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov.

Speaking as Russia’s BRICS sherpa, Ryabkov said discussions are focused on aligning national positions and shared principles rather than establishing binding standards, noting that no common BRICS AI rules have yet taken shape.

He highlighted the adoption of a standalone leaders’ declaration on global AI governance at the Rio de Janeiro summit, describing it as a milestone for the organisation and a first for the grouping.

BRICS members, including Russia, view cooperation on AI as a way to manage emerging risks, build capacity and help narrow the digital divide, particularly for developing countries.

Ryabkov added that the group supports a central coordinating role for the United Nations, with AI governance anchored in national legislation, respect for sovereignty, data protection and human rights.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

UN reviews global digital progress at WSIS+20

The UN General Assembly’s 66th plenary meeting marked the twentieth anniversary review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS), taking stock of global progress on digital transformation and the challenges that remain. Delegations highlighted how digital technologies have become central to development, governance, and economic growth, while warning that deep inequalities continue to limit who can benefit from them.

Speakers repeatedly pointed to stark connectivity gaps between and within countries. While internet access is nearly universal in high-income states, less than a quarter of people in low-income countries are connected, with persistent rural-urban and gender divides.

Representatives from the least developed countries and small island states emphasised that limited digital access has a direct impact on education, healthcare, economic opportunities, and effective public administration.

Internet governance was another focal point, with broad support for formally establishing the Internet Governance Forum as a permanent UN body. Many countries defended the multistakeholder model as essential to keeping the internet open and resilient, although some raised concerns about the need for stronger participation by developing countries and questioned whether the current framework provides states with sufficient influence.

AI emerged as a defining issue for the next phase of digital cooperation. While several countries outlined national and regional AI strategies, others warned that the concentration of computing power and infrastructure in a few countries could create new global divides. Calls grew for ethical, responsible, and inclusive AI governance, alongside stronger international dialogue and cooperation.

Human rights in the digital space featured prominently throughout the debate. Delegations reaffirmed that the rights people enjoy offline must be protected online, raising concerns about internet shutdowns, surveillance, online violence, and threats to journalists and civil society.

Cybersecurity was also framed as a development and trust issue, with warnings about cybercrime, attacks on critical infrastructure, and risks to children and young people online.

Looking ahead, speakers emphasised the need to align WSIS outcomes with the sustainable development goals and the Global Digital Compact while addressing financing, capacity development, and environmental sustainability. The review highlighted both the progress made in global digital development and to significant challenges that remain, as governments grapple with the rapid pace of technological change and the increasing political, social, and economic stakes of the digital future.

Diplo and the Geneva Internet Platform will provide just-in-time reporting from the high-level meeting. Bookmark this page.

For more details about WSIS and the 20-year review, consult our WSIS+20 process dedicated page.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

WSIS+20 highlights deep gaps in global digital access

Twenty years after the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) laid the foundations for global digital cooperation, UN member states gathered in New York to assess what has been achieved and what still lies out of reach. The WSIS+20 High-Level Meeting of the UN General Assembly highlighted how deeply digital technologies now shape everyday life, while also exposing the uneven distribution of their benefits across societies and regions.

Despite major progress in connectivity, speakers warned that the world faces not a digital ‘gap’ but a digital ‘canyon’. While most people live within reach of mobile broadband, more than two billion remain offline, predominantly in developing countries.

Delegations stressed that meaningful digital inclusion depends not only on networks, but also on affordability, skills, institutions, and the ability to participate fully in the digital economy and public life.

Gender inequality emerged as one of the most urgent concerns. Women remain significantly less likely to be online than men, and digital harms disproportionately affect them, from exclusion from economic opportunities to widespread gender-based abuse enabled by new technologies.

Participants underlined that closing the gender digital divide is not only a matter of rights and justice, but also a major economic opportunity with global benefits.

AI featured prominently, with broad agreement that AI must be governed in a human-centred and rights-based way. Several speakers warned of a growing ‘AI divide’, driven by unequal access to computing power, data, and linguistic representation. Concerns were raised that AI systems risk reinforcing existing inequalities unless global cooperation ensures that emerging technologies serve public interests rather than deepen exclusion.

Debates over internet governance revealed both strong consensus and sharp geopolitical tensions. Most countries reaffirmed support for the multistakeholder model and called for strengthening the Internet Governance Forum, including making it a permanent UN platform with sustainable funding.

At the same time, disagreements surfaced over state control, sovereignty, and the future institutional architecture of global digital governance.

Looking ahead, the meeting underscored that digital transformation is no longer just a technical issue but a deeply political one, tied to human rights, development, security, and power. While the original WSIS principles remain widely supported, participants agreed that renewed ambition, financing, and cooperation are essential to ensure that digital technologies, including AI, deliver tangible benefits for all, rather than widening the divides they were meant to close.

Diplo and the Geneva Internet Platform will provide just-in-time reporting from the high-level meeting. Bookmark this page.

For more details about WSIS and the 20-year review, consult our WSIS+20 process dedicated page.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

E-commerce transformation through blockchain technology

Understanding blockchain technology

Blockchain technology emerged from the 2008 Bitcoin white paper as a radical approach to storing and verifying information. A blockchain is a distributed ledger maintained across a decentralised network of computers.

Each participant holds a full or partial copy of the ledger, and each new record is grouped into a block that is linked to previous blocks through cryptographic hashing. The system ensures immutability because any alteration of a record demands the recalculation of every subsequent block.

That requirement becomes practically impossible when the ledger is distributed across thousands of nodes. Trust is achieved through consensus algorithms that validate transactions without a central authority.

The most widely used consensus mechanisms include Proof of Work and Proof of Stake. Both ensure agreement on transaction validity, although they differ significantly in computational intensity and energy consumption.

Encryption techniques and smart contracts provide additional features. Smart contracts operate as self-executing pieces of code recorded on a blockchain. Once agreed parameters are met, they automatically trigger actions such as payments or product releases.

Blockchain technology, therefore, functions not only as a secure ledger but as an autonomous execution environment for digital agreements.

The valuable property arises from decentralisation. Instead of relying on a single organisation to safeguard information, the system spreads responsibility and ownership across the network.

Fraud becomes more difficult, data availability improves, and censorship resistance increases. These characteristics attracted early adopters in finance, although interest soon expanded into supply chain management, healthcare, digital identity systems and electronic commerce.

The transparency, traceability and programmability of blockchain technology introduced new possibilities for verifying transactions, enforcing rules, and reducing dependencies on intermediaries. These properties made it appealing for online markets that require trust between large numbers of strangers.

Overview of major global e-commerce platforms

An e-commerce platform is a digital environment that enables businesses and individuals to buy and sell goods or services online. It provides essential functions such as product listings, payment processing, inventory management, customer support and logistics integration.

Instead of handling each function independently, sellers rely on the platform’s infrastructure to reach customers, manage transactions and ensure secure and reliable delivery.

E-commerce platforms have evolved rapidly over the last two decades and now operate as global digital ecosystems. Companies such as Amazon, Alibaba, eBay, Shopify, and Mercado Libre dominate much of the global market.

shopper using computer laptop input order with trolley credit card delivery truck online shopping ecommerce technology concept

Each platform has built its success on efficient logistics, secure payment systems, powerful search technologies, recommendation algorithms and extensive third-party seller networks. Yet each platform depends on centralised data systems that assign authority to the platform operator.

Amazon functions as an all-in-one marketplace, logistics provider, and cloud infrastructure supplier. Sellers rely on Amazon for product storage, fulfilment, payments, advertising and customer trust.

The centralised structure enables Amazon to deliver high service reliability and instant refunds, while granting Amazon significant control over pricing, competition and data.

Alibaba operates a two-tiered system with Alibaba.com serving business-to-business (B2B) trade and AliExpress catering to international consumers. Its platforms rely on Alipay for secure transactions and on vast networks of Chinese suppliers.

Alibaba uses an AI-driven tool to manage inventory, fraud detection and personalised recommendations. The centralised model allows for strong coordination across sellers and logistics partners, although concerns often arise around counterfeits and data visibility.

eBay uses an auction and fixed-price model that supports both personal resales and professional merchants. It depends heavily on reputation systems and buyer protection schemes.

Dispute resolution and payment management were traditionally run through PayPal, later reintegrated into eBay’s own system. Although decentralised in terms of sellers, eBay remains centralised in its enforcement and decision-making.

Shopify functions as an infrastructure provider rather than a marketplace. Merchants build their own shops using Shopify’s tools, integrate third-party apps and manage independent payment gateways through Shopify Payments.

Although more decentralised on the surface, Shopify still holds the core infrastructure and retains ultimate authority over store policies.

Across all major e-commerce platforms, centralisation creates efficiency, but it also produces trust bottlenecks. Buyers depend on the platform operator to verify sellers, protect funds and manage refunds. Sellers depend on the operator for traffic, transaction processing and dispute management.

Power inequalities emerge because the platform controls data flows and marketplace rules. That environment encourages exploration of blockchain-based alternatives that seek to distribute trust, reduce intermediaries and automate verification.

How blockchain technology intersects with e-commerce

The relationship between blockchain technology and e-commerce can be divided into several major areas that reflect attempts to solve persistent problems within online marketplaces. Each area demonstrates how decentralised technology is reshaping trust and coordination instead of relying on central authorities.

Let’s dive into some examples.

Payments and digital currencies

The earliest impact arose from blockchain-based digital currencies. Platforms such as Overstock and Shopify began accepting Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as alternative payment methods.

bitcoin keyboard

Acceptance was driven by lower transaction fees compared to credit card networks, the elimination of chargebacks and faster cross-border payments. Buyers gained autonomy by being able to transact without banks, while sellers reduced exposure to fraudulent chargebacks.

Stablecoins further extended the utility of blockchain payments by reducing volatility through pegs to traditional currencies. Platforms started experimenting with stablecoin settlements that allow rapid international payments without the delays or costs of traditional banking infrastructure.

For cross-border commerce, stablecoins offer a major advantage because buyers and sellers located in different financial systems can transact directly.

While integration remains limited across mainstream platforms, blockchain wallets and cryptocurrency gateways illustrate how decentralised finance can complement e-commerce rather than replacing it.

Major challenges include regulatory uncertainty, fluctuating exchange rates, tax complexity and limited consumer familiarity.

Supply chain transparency and product authenticity

Blockchain technology provides auditable and immutable records that improve supply chain transparency. Companies such as Walmart, Carrefour and Alibaba have introduced blockchain-based tracking systems to verify product origins.

For high-value items including luxury goods, pharmaceuticals or speciality foods, authenticity is critical. A blockchain tracker records each stage of production and logistics from raw materials to retail delivery. Consumers can verify product history by scanning a QR code that accesses the ledger.

E-commerce platforms benefit because trust increases. Sellers find it easier to demonstrate the legitimacy of products, and counterfeit goods become easier to identify. Instead of depending solely on platform reputation systems, transparency is shifted to verifiable data that cannot be easily altered.

E-commerce, therefore, gains an additional trust layer through blockchain-backed provenance.

Decentralised marketplaces

A newer development involves decentralised e-commerce marketplaces built directly on blockchain networks. Platforms such as OpenBazaar, Origin Protocol, Boson Protocol and various Web3 retail experiments allow for peer-to-peer trade without central operators.

Smart contracts automate escrow, dispute handling, and payments. Buyers acquire goods by locking funds in a smart contract, sellers ship items and final confirmation releases payment.

The model reduces fees because no central operator takes commissions. Governance becomes community-driven through token-based voting. Control over seller data, reputation, and transactions is shared across the network instead of being held by a corporation.

Although adoption remains small compared to conventional platforms, decentralised marketplaces demonstrate how blockchain could transform current power structures in e-commerce.

Significant obstacles remain. Users must manage digital wallets, transaction costs fluctuate with network activity, and the user experience often feels less polished than that of mainstream platforms.

sending money paying online online shopping buying online online banking digital wallet mobile

Without strong brand recognition, trust formation is slower. Nevertheless, the model indicates how blockchain could enable marketplaces that operate without dominant intermediaries.

Smart contracts and automated commerce

Smart contracts provide automated enforcement of agreements. Within e-commerce, they can manage warranties, subscriptions, service renewals, loyalty rewards and escrow arrangements.

Instead of relying on human moderators, refund conditions or service obligations can be encoded into smart contracts that release payment only when the conditions are met.

Automated commerce extends further when smart contracts interact with Internet of Things devices. A connected device could autonomously purchase replacement parts or consumables when necessary.

E-commerce platforms could integrate smart contract logic to handle inventory restocking, supplier payments or automated compliance checks.

The special nature of smart contracts improves reliability because actions cannot be arbitrarily reversed by a platform operator. However, coding errors and rigidity create risks because smart contracts cannot easily adapt once deployed.

Governance frameworks such as decentralised autonomous organisations attempt to manage contract upgrades and dispute processes, although they remain experimental.

Tokenisation and loyalty systems

Blockchain technology also enables the tokenisation of loyalty points, vouchers and digital assets. Instead of centralised reward programmes that limit transferability, tokenised loyalty points can be traded, exchanged or used across multiple platforms.

Sellers gain marketing flexibility while buyers gain value portability.

E-commerce platforms have explored non-fungible tokens (NFTs) as digital certificates for physical goods, especially within luxury fashion, collectables and art-related markets. Instead of simple receipts, NFTs act as verifiable proof of ownership that can be transferred independently of the platform.

5409268

Although the market has experienced volatility, the experiment highlighted how blockchain can merge physical and digital commerce.

Data ownership and privacy

Centralised e-commerce collects extensive customer data, including purchasing behaviour, preferences and browsing patterns. Blockchain technology introduces alternative models where users hold their own data and selectively grant access through cryptographic permissions.

Instead of businesses accumulating large datasets, consumers become the custodians of their personal information.

Self-sovereign identity solutions allow users to verify age, location or reputation without exposing full personal profiles. This approach could reduce data breaches and strengthen privacy protection.

E-commerce platforms could integrate verification without storing sensitive information. Adoption remains limited, although interest is growing as data protection regulations increase.

Assessment of combined impact

The combination of blockchain technology and e-commerce represents a gradual shift toward decentralised trust models. Traditional platforms depend on central authorities to enforce rules, settle disputes, and secure transactions.

Blockchain introduces alternatives that distribute these responsibilities across networks and algorithms. The synergy creates several potential impacts.

Traceability and transparency improve product trust. Automated contracts reduce operational complexity. Decentralised payments shorten cross-border settlement times. Tokenisation creates new commercial models where digital and physical goods are tied to verifiable ownership.

Data ownership frameworks give buyers greater control over information. Taken together, these features increase resilience and reduce reliance on single intermediaries.

However, integration also encounters notable challenges. User experience remains a critical barrier because decentralised systems often require technical understanding. Regulatory frameworks for cryptocurrency payments, smart contract disputes and decentralised marketplace governance remain uncertain.

Crypto jurisdiction

Energy consumption concerns affect public perception, although newer blockchains use far more efficient consensus mechanisms. Large platforms may resist decentralisation because it reduces their control and revenue streams.

The most realistic pathway is hybrid rather than fully decentralised commerce. Mainstream marketplaces can incorporate blockchain features such as supply chain tracking, tokenised loyalty, and optional crypto payments while retaining central management for dispute resolution and customer support.

A combination like this delivers benefits without sacrificing the convenience of familiar interfaces.

Future outlook and complementary technologies

Blockchain technology will continue to shape e-commerce, although it will evolve alongside other technologies rather than acting alone. Several developments appear likely to influence the next decade of online commerce.

AI will integrate with blockchain to enhance fraud detection, automate dispute processes, and analyse supply chain data. Instead of opaque AI systems, blockchain can record decision rules or training data in transparent ways that improve accountability.

Internet of Things networks will use blockchain for device-to-device payments and micro-transactions. Connected appliances could automatically reorder supplies or arrange maintenance using autonomous smart contracts. A model that expands e-commerce from human-initiated purchases to machine-driven commerce.

Decentralised identity solutions will simplify verification for both buyers and sellers. Instead of uploading documents to multiple platforms, individuals will maintain portable digital identities controlled by cryptographic keys.

E-commerce platforms will verify the necessary attributes without storing personal information. Such an approach aligns with privacy regulations and reduces fraud.

Quantum-resistant cryptography will become essential as quantum computing advances. Blockchain networks will need upgrades to maintain security. E-commerce platforms built on blockchain will therefore rely on next-generation cryptographic systems.

AR and VR will integrate with blockchain through tokenised digital goods that move between immersive environments and real-world marketplaces.

medium shot man wearing vr glasses

Luxury brands already experiment with digital twins of physical products. That trend will only deepen as consumers spend more time in virtual spaces.

The future of e-commerce will not depend on a single technology. Instead of blockchain replacing conventional systems, it will act as a foundational layer that strengthens transparency, trust, and automation.

E-commerce platforms will selectively adopt decentralised features that complement their existing operations while retaining user-friendly interfaces and established logistics networks.

In conclusion, blockchain has reshaped expectations of trust within digital environments. Its decentralised architecture, immutability, and programmability have introduced new opportunities for secure payments, supply chain verification, automated agreements and data sovereignty.

E-commerce platforms recognised the potential and began integrating blockchain features to improve authenticity, reduce fraud and expand payment options. The combination offers a powerful pathway toward more transparent and efficient commerce.

Yet challenges remain as user experience, regulation and scalability continue to influence adoption. The future of our transactions is to be hybrid, with blockchain supporting specific components of e-commerce rather than replacing established models.

Complementary technologies, including AI, IoT, decentralised identity and quantum-resistant security, will reinforce these developments. E-commerce will evolve toward ecosystems where automation, transparency and user empowerment become standard expectations.

Blockchain technology will play a central role in that transformation, although its greatest impact will emerge through careful integration rather than radical disruption.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

OpenAI’s GPT-5 shows a breakthrough in wet lab biology

New research has been published by OpenAI, examining whether advanced AI models can accelerate biological research within the wet lab, rather than just supporting theoretical science.

Working with biosecurity firm Red Queen Bio, researchers tested GPT-5 within a tightly controlled molecular cloning system designed to measure practical laboratory improvements.

Across multiple experimental rounds, GPT-5 independently proposed protocol modifications, analysed results and refined its approach using experimental feedback.

The model introduced a previously unexplored enzymatic mechanism that combines RecA and gp32 proteins, along with adjustments to reaction timing and temperature, resulting in a 79-fold increase in cloning efficiency compared to the baseline protocol.

OpenAI emphasises that all experiments were carried out under strict biosecurity safeguards and still relied on human scientists to execute laboratory work.

Even so, the findings suggest AI systems could work alongside researchers to reduce costs, accelerate experimentation and improve scientific productivity while informing future safety and governance frameworks.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Denmark pushes digital identity beyond authentication

Digital identity has long focused on proving that the same person returns each time they log in. The function still matters, yet online representation increasingly happens through faces, voices and mannerisms embedded in media rather than credentials alone.

As synthetic media becomes easier to generate and remix, identity shifts from an access problem to a problem of media authenticity.

The ‘Own Your Face’ proposal by Denmark reflects the shift by treating personal likeness as something that should be controllable in the same way accounts are controlled.

Digital systems already verify who is requesting access, yet lack a trusted middle layer to manage what is being shown when media claims to represent a real person. The proxy model illustrates how an intermediary layer can bring structure, consistency and trust to otherwise unmanageable flows.

Efforts around content provenance point toward a practical path forward. By attaching machine-verifiable history to media at creation and preserving it as content moves, identity extends beyond login to representation.

Broad adoption would not eliminate deception, yet it would raise the baseline of trust by replacing visual guesswork with evidence, helping digital identity evolve for an era shaped by synthetic media.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!