EU and Japan deepen AI cooperation under new digital pact

In May 2025, the European Union and Japan formally reaffirmed their long-standing EU‑Japan Digital Partnership during the third Digital Partnership Council in Tokyo. Delegations agreed to deepen collaboration in pivotal digital technologies, most notably artificial intelligence, quantum computing, 5G/6G networks, semiconductors, cloud, and cybersecurity.

A joint statement committed to signing an administrative agreement on AI, aligned with principles from the Hiroshima AI Process. Shared initiatives include a €4 million EU-supported quantum R&D project named Q‑NEKO and the 6G MIRAI‑HARMONY research effort.

Both parties pledge to enhance data governance, digital identity interoperability, regulatory coordination across platforms, and secure connectivity via submarine cables and Arctic routes. The accord builds on the Strategic Partnership Agreement activated in January 2025, reinforcing their mutual platform for rules-based, value-driven digital and innovation cooperation.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Italy challenges tech giants over VAT on user data

Meta, LinkedIn and X have filed appeals against a sweeping VAT claim by Italy, marking the first time the country has failed to settle such cases with major tech firms. Italy is demanding nearly €1 billion combined over the value of user data exchanged during free account registrations.

Italian authorities argue that providing platform access in exchange for personal data constitutes a taxable service, which if upheld, could have far-reaching implications across the EU. The case marks a significant legal shift as it challenges traditional definitions of taxable transactions in the digital economy.

Meta strongly disagreed with the concept, saying it should not be liable for VAT on free platform access. While LinkedIn offered no public comment, X did not respond to media inquiries.

Italy is now preparing to refer the issue to the EU Commission’s VAT Committee for advisory input. Though the committee’s opinion will not be binding, a rejection could derail Italy’s efforts and lead to a withdrawal of the tax claims.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Meta pushes back on EU AI framework

Meta has refused to endorse the European Union’s new voluntary Code of Practice for general-purpose AI, citing legal overreach and risks to innovation.

The company warns that the framework could slow development and deter investment by imposing expectations beyond upcoming AI laws.

In a LinkedIn post, Joel Kaplan, Meta’s chief global affairs officer, called the code confusing and burdensome, criticising its requirements for reporting, risk assessments and data transparency.

He argued that such rules could limit the open release of AI models and harm Europe’s competitiveness in the field.

The code, published by the European Commission, is intended to help companies prepare for the binding AI Act, set to take effect from August 2025. It encourages firms to adopt best practices on safety and ethics while building and deploying general-purpose AI systems.

While firms like Microsoft are expected to sign on, Meta’s refusal could influence other developers to resist what they view as Brussels overstepping. The move highlights ongoing friction between Big Tech and regulators as global efforts to govern AI rapidly evolve.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU helps Vietnam prepare for cyber emergencies

The European Union and Vietnam have conducted specialised cyber‑defence training to enhance the resilience of key infrastructure sectors such as power, transportation, telecoms and finance.

Participants, including government officials, network operators and technology experts, engaged in interactive threat-hunting exercises and incident simulation drills designed to equip teams with practical cyber‑response skills.

This effort builds on existing international partnerships, including collaboration with the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, to align Vietnam’s security posture with global standards.

Vietnam faces an alarming shortfall of more than 700,000 cyber professionals, with over half of organisations reporting at least one breach in recent years.

The training initiative addresses critical skills gaps and contributes to national digital security resilience.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

How cultural heritage can go green through digital preservation

A Europe-wide survey has exposed how cultural heritage institutions (CHIs) protect humanity’s legacy digitally while unintentionally harming the environment.

Instead of focusing only on efficiency, the Europeana Climate Action Community recommends a shift towards environmentally sustainable and regenerative digital preservation.

Led by the Environmental Sustainability Practice Task Force, the survey collected input from 108 organisations across 24 EU countries. While 80% of CHIs recognise environmental responsibility, just 42% follow formal environmental strategies and a mere 14% measure carbon footprints.

Many maintain redundant data backups without assessing the ecological cost, and most lack policies for retiring digital assets responsibly.

The report suggests CHIs develop community-powered archives, adopt hardware recycling and repair, and prioritise sufficiency instead of maximising digital volume. Interviews with institutions such as the National Library of Finland and the POLIN Museum revealed good practices alongside common challenges.

With digital preservation increasingly essential, the Europeana Initiative calls for immediate action. By moving from isolated efficiency efforts to collective regeneration strategies, CHIs can protect cultural memory while reducing environmental impact for future generations.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU confirms AI Act rollout and releases GPAI Code of Practice

The European Commission has confirmed it will move forward with the EU AI Act exactly as scheduled, instead of granting delays requested by tech giants and businesses.

On 10 July 2025, it published the final General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice alongside FAQs to guide organisations aiming to comply with the new law.

Rather than opting for a more flexible timetable, the Commission is standing firm on its regulatory goals. The GPAI Code of Practice, now in its final form, sets out voluntary but strongly recommended steps for companies that want reduced administrative burdens and clearer legal certainty under the AI Act.

The document covers transparency, copyright, and safety standards for advanced AI models, including a model documentation form for providers.

Key dates have already been set. From 2 August 2025, rules covering notifications, governance, and penalties will come into force. By February 2026, official guidelines on classifying high-risk AI systems are expected.

The remaining parts of the legislation will take effect by August 2026, instead of being postponed further.

With the publication of the GPAI Code of Practice, the EU takes another step towards building a unified ethical framework for AI development and deployment across Europe, focusing on transparency, accountability, and respect for fundamental rights.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Meta faces fresh EU backlash over Digital Markets Act non-compliance

Meta is again under EU scrutiny after failing to fully comply with the bloc’s Digital Markets Act (DMA), despite a €200 million fine earlier this year.

The European Commission says Meta’s current ‘pay or consent’ model still falls short and could trigger further penalties. A formal warning is expected, with recurring fines likely if the company does not adjust its approach.

The DMA imposes strict rules on major tech platforms to reduce market dominance and protect digital fairness. While Meta claims its model meets legal standards, the Commission says progress has been minimal.

Over the past year, Meta has faced nearly €1 billion in EU fines, including €798 million for linking Facebook Marketplace to its central platform. The new case adds to years of tension over data practices and user consent.

The ‘pay or consent’ model offers users a choice between paying for privacy or accepting targeted ads. Regulators argue this does not meet the threshold for genuine consent and mirrors Meta’s past GDPR tactics.

Privacy advocates have long criticised Meta’s approach, saying users are left with no meaningful alternatives. Internal documents show Meta lobbied against privacy reforms and warned governments about reduced investment.

The Commission now holds greater power under the DMA than it did with GDPR, allowing for faster, centralised enforcement and fines of up to 10% of global turnover.

Apple has already been fined €500 million, and Google is also under investigation. The EU’s rapid action signals a stricter stance on platform accountability. The message for Meta and other tech giants is clear: partial compliance is no longer enough to avoid serious regulatory consequences.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Apple accused of blocking real browser competition on iOS

Developers and open web advocates say Apple continues to restrict rival browser engines on iOS, despite obligations under the EU’s Digital Markets Act. While Apple claims to allow competition, groups like Open Web Advocacy argue that technical and logistical hurdles still block real implementation.

The controversy centres on Apple’s refusal to allow developers to release region-specific browser versions or test new engines outside the EU. Developers must abandon global apps or persuade users to switch manually to new EU-only versions, creating friction and reducing reach.

Apple insists it upholds security and privacy standards built over 18 years and claims its new framework enables third-party browsers. However, critics say those browsers cannot be tested or deployed realistically without access for developers outside the EU.

The EU held a DMA compliance workshop in Brussels in June, during which tensions surfaced between Apple’s legal team and advocates. Apple says it is still transitioning and working with firms like Mozilla and Google on limited testing updates, but has offered no timeline for broader changes.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

GPAI Code of Practice creates legal uncertainty for non-signatories

Lawyers at William Fry say the EU’s final Code of Practice for general-purpose AI (GPAI) models leaves key questions unanswered. GPAI systems include models such as OpenAI’s GPT-4, Google’s Gemini, Anthropic’s Claude, and Meta’s Llama, trained on vast datasets for broad applications.

The Code of Practice, released last week, addresses transparency, safety, security, and copyright, and is described by the European Commission as a voluntary tool. It was prepared by independent experts to help GPAI developers comply with upcoming legal obligations under the EU AI Act.

In a statement on the firm’s website, William Fry lawyers Barry Scannell and Leo Moore question how voluntary the code truly is. They note that signatories not in full compliance can still be seen as acting in good faith and will be supported rather than penalised.

A protected grace period runs until 2 August 2026, after which the AI Act could allow fines for non-compliance. The lawyers warn that this creates a two-tier system, shielding signatories while exposing non-signatories to immediate legal risk under the AI Act.

Developers who do not sign the code may face higher regulatory scrutiny, despite it being described as non-binding. William Fry also points out that detailed implementation guidelines and templates have not yet been published by the EU.

Additional guidance to clarify key GPAI concepts is expected later this month, but the current lack of detail creates uncertainty. The code’s copyright section, the lawyers argue, shows how the document has evolved into a quasi-regulatory framework.

An earlier draft required only reasonable efforts to avoid copyright-infringing sources. The final version demands the active exclusion of such sites. A proposed measure requiring developers to verify the source of copyrighted data acquired from third parties has been removed from the final draft.

The lawyers argue that this creates a practical blind spot, allowing unlawful content to slip into training data undetected. Rights holders still retain the ability to pursue action if they believe their content was misused, even if providers are signatories.

Meanwhile, the transparency chapter now outlines specific standards, rather than general principles. The safety and security section also sets enforceable expectations, increasing the operational burden on model developers.

William Fry warns that gaps between the code’s obligations and the missing technical documentation could have costly consequences. They conclude that, without the final training data template or implementation details, both developers and rights holders face compliance risks.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU bets on quantum to regain global influence

European policymakers are turning to quantum technology as a strategic solution to the continent’s growing economic and security challenges.

With the US and China surging ahead in AI, Europe sees quantum innovation as a last-mover advantage it cannot afford to miss.

Quantum computers, sensors, and encryption are already transforming military, industrial and cybersecurity capabilities.

From stealth detection to next-generation batteries, Europe hopes quantum breakthroughs will bolster its defences and revitalise its energy, automotive and pharmaceutical sectors.

Although EU institutions have heavily invested in quantum programmes and Europe trains more engineers than anywhere else, funding gaps persist.

Private investment remains limited, pushing some of the continent’s most promising start-ups abroad in search of capital and scale.

The EU must pair its technical excellence with bold policy reforms to avoid falling behind. Strategic protections, high-risk R&D support and new alliances will be essential to turning scientific strength into global leadership.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!