Day 0 Event #192 Leveraging the Namaa Platform and AI to Promote Sustainability

Day 0 Event #192 Leveraging the Namaa Platform and AI to Promote Sustainability

Session at a Glance

Summary

The transcript discusses the implementation and impact of NAMA, a unified digital platform for government services in Saudi Arabia. Before NAMA, each service had its own link, user experience, and database, which was challenging for users. NAMA was introduced to provide a unified access interface for all electronic services, applying international standards and best practices in government.

NAMA offers a centralized platform for various services, making it easier for users to access information and complete transactions. It incorporates AI-driven solutions to enhance service delivery, providing personalized recommendations and support. The platform has over 1.5 million registered users and offers more than 300 services across various categories.

The discussion highlights NAMA’s role in innovation and creativity, particularly in water management, agriculture, and environmental monitoring. Significant projects include drone technology for agricultural land inventory, AI for pest detection in crops, and a Smart National Water Platform for crop water requirement computation.

NAMA also aligns with several Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), contributing to efforts in poverty reduction, food security, health, water management, sustainable cities, climate action, and environmental conservation.

The platform’s impact is reflected in local and national digital indicators, including high scores in the UN E-Government Development Index and digital experience maturity. NAMA has also received recognition through global and local awards, including the WSIS Prize in 2022 and 2023, and the Best Digital Experience Award for Beneficiary in the Government Sector in 2024.

Overall, NAMA represents a significant advancement in digital government services in Saudi Arabia, integrating AI and emerging technologies to improve user experience, decision-making, and sustainable development across various sectors.

Keypoints

Major discussion points:

– The development and implementation of NAMA, a unified digital platform for government services

– NAMA’s role in innovation and creativity across various sectors (water, agriculture, environment)

– Significant projects utilizing AI and technology, such as drone surveys and smart immunization

– NAMA’s alignment with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

– Local and national digital indicators and achievements

Overall purpose:

The discussion aims to present the evolution, features, and impact of NAMA, a centralized digital platform for government services in Saudi Arabia. It highlights how NAMA has improved service delivery, incorporated innovative technologies, and contributed to various sectors and sustainable development goals.

Tone:

The tone of the discussion is informative and professional throughout. The speaker maintains a consistent, matter-of-fact approach while presenting technical information, statistics, and achievements. There’s an underlying sense of pride and enthusiasm about the platform’s capabilities and positive impact, but the tone remains formal and objective throughout the presentation.

Speakers

– Yasser Ibrahim Alissa

Area of expertise: Digital transformation, e-government services

Role/Title: Not specified, but appears to be a senior official or project leader at NAMA (National Agriculture Marketing Administration)

Additional speakers:

No additional speakers were identified in this transcript. The entire presentation was given by Yasser Ibrahim Alissa.

Full session report

The Implementation and Impact of NAMA in Saudi Arabia

Yasser Ibrahim Alissa presented a comprehensive overview of NAMA, a unified digital platform for government services in Saudi Arabia. The presentation highlighted the platform’s development, features, and significant impact on various sectors and sustainable development goals.

Development and Implementation of NAMA

Before NAMA’s introduction, each government service in Saudi Arabia had its own link, user experience, and database. This fragmentation posed technical challenges and created difficulties for users navigating multiple platforms. NAMA was developed to address these issues by providing a unified access interface for all electronic services, applying international standards and best practices in government service delivery.

Key Features and Benefits:

1. Centralized platform for over 300 services across various categories

2. AI-driven solutions for enhanced service delivery

3. Mobile access with responsive design and secure transactions

4. Personalized recommendations and support

5. Over 1.5 million registered users

NAMA’s AI Capabilities and User Experience

NAMA integrates advanced AI tools to improve user experience. The platform’s UX Lab continuously analyzes user behavior and feedback to enhance the interface and functionality. An AI channel focuses on providing an enhanced beneficiary experience, offering personalized support and recommendations.

NAMA’s Role in Innovation and Creativity

The platform has played a crucial role in fostering innovation across various sectors, particularly in water management, agriculture, and environmental monitoring. NAMA integrates various data sources to provide a holistic view of operations, enabling data-driven insights for informed decision-making.

Significant Projects and Applications

1. Drone technology for agricultural land inventory: Conducts accurate field surveys of large areas at high speed, improving agricultural planning and resource allocation.

2. AI for pest detection in crops: Utilizes artificial intelligence to identify and manage agricultural pests, enhancing crop protection and yield.

3. Smart National Water Platform: Computes crop water requirements to optimize water usage in agriculture. This platform benefits farmers by providing precise irrigation recommendations based on real-time data and crop-specific needs.

4. Livestock Chain Application: Manages livestock assets efficiently, facilitating over 500,000 ownership transfer transactions. This application streamlines the livestock management process and improves traceability in the sector.

5. Smart Immunization: Aids in preventing livestock epidemics through timely vaccinations. The project uses integrated technologies to predict potential outbreaks and coordinate preventive measures across the region.

Alignment with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

NAMA’s initiatives align with eight of the seventeen Sustainable Development Goals, contributing to:

1. Poverty reduction: Through improved access to services and economic opportunities

2. Food security: By enhancing agricultural productivity and livestock management

3. Health services improvement: Including veterinary health initiatives

4. Water management: Optimizing water usage in agriculture

5. Sustainable urban planning: Integrating digital solutions for urban development

6. Climate action: Collaborating with SEDAYA on climate-related projects

7. Environmental conservation: Monitoring and managing natural resources

8. Innovation and infrastructure: Developing cutting-edge digital solutions

Performance and Recognition

The platform’s impact is reflected in local and national digital indicators:

1. High scores in the UN E-Government Development Index (0.8268 out of 1)

2. Advanced digital experience maturity (Level 4 out of 5)

3. Readiness for emerging technology adoption (87%)

NAMA has received both global and local recognition for its innovative approach:

1. WSIS Prize in 2022 and 2023

2. Best Digital Experience Award for Beneficiary in the Government Sector in 2024

3. Kingdom of Fear 2022 award for Best Technical Project

Conclusion

NAMA represents a significant advancement in digital government services in Saudi Arabia. By integrating AI and emerging technologies, the platform has improved user experience, decision-making processes, and sustainable development across various sectors. Its alignment with SDGs and recognition through international awards underscore its importance in the country’s digital transformation journey.

Yasser Ibrahim Alissa’s presentation provided a comprehensive view of NAMA’s development, benefits, and achievements, demonstrating Saudi Arabia’s commitment to digital transformation and sustainable development through this innovative platform.

Session Transcript

Yasser Ibrahim Alissa: So, our agenda will be before NAMA, after NAMA, NAMA Statistics, Innovation and Creativity and Stigy in NAMA, Local and National Digital Indicators, Local and Global Awards. So, the situation before NAMA was each service has different link and user experience. This mean in technical wise, each platform has own register, own database, own services. This will be difficult from user experience side for beneficiary. Then came the need to provide unified access interface and unified access to all electronic services and apply the best international standards and practice in government. Unified place to review data and make available to our eyes various type of data related to electronic service in real time and accurate manner. What’s mean? What’s mean that when you have unified database and unified platform, that’s mean easy to apply the AI in your platform. So, invest in smart and emerging technology, developing talent, organize operation in additional to support change management to improve the experience of beneficiary outside and within the ministry. So, after NAMA, after NAMA, the MIWA Unified A-Service Platform, what we do? Create services. NAMA offers centralized platform for various services, make it easy for user to access information and complete transaction. User friendly interface, actually we have projects related to user friendly interface. We have UX Lab. Actually we bring the beneficiary to the ministry and make some direct experience on them and apply some AI tools to see the best user experience for users. So, the AI board solution NAMA AI utilizes artificial intelligence to enhance services delivery providing personalized recommendation and support. So, if you see that before, we make it decentralized database. That’s mean easy to apply AI and accurate, of course, with accurate data and the real time access user can access up-to-date information on services, regulation, and procedure improve decision maker. Mobile access, that’s mean responsive design will be easy to the users to use the services and access the service on the go. Secure transaction, of course, the important things to protect user data to ensure safe transaction. NAMA beneficiary, we have 1,500,000 plus registered in NAMA and NAMA A-Service more than 300 services. The each category public services, agricultural services, import and export services, water source license, financial support services, licensing services, and animal services. So, what is NAMA in innovation? NAMA innovation and creativity, when you see that from water sector, we have projects in water management, AI-driven solution can optimize water source management, monitor consumption patterns and predict future water needs, leading to more sustainable use. Again, you have know the Ministry of Miwa, environment, water, and culture. When they see the agricultural sector, we support offer tool to precision agriculture include crop monitoring, best detection and yield forecasting, which can help the farmers make the data-driven decision. Again, environment sector, we have monitoring to the platform can analyze environmental data to track change, assist risk and inform policies aimed to sustainability and conversation. When NAMA site integrate systems, the platform can integrate various data source providing holistic view of operation across sectors, which facilitate better coordination and resource allocation. User-friendly, that means user experience, NAMA AI provides user experience with intuitive design and easy navigation, ensure the users can access services and information with minimal effort. Personalization, AI algorithm can tailor services to individual user needs, enhancing certification and engagement. Data-driven insight, the platform offer robots analytic capability, enabling organization to extract value insight from data, identify trends and make informed decision. Significant projects, drones technology used to inventory agricultural lands. The primary goal in this project is to conduct accurate field surveys of many areas at high speed. The platform data activities are stored in central database to process and generate intelligent reports for decision-making by higher authority. Actually, after we use the drones, we use some tools like remote sensing to analyze the data and they give us the decision-maker. So the second project, we already work on it, artificial intelligent technology, use it to detect agriculture pests. We have many services on this application. We can use audio, video and communication and text message so that the farmer gets the information completely and accurately. The second service is also intelligent response to farmer’s inquiries through conversation with brilliant guide. In addition, the farmer questions with pictures, videos and texts of the ministry on social media. This mechanism helps the farmer not contact to expert and satisfy the information he obtained through the intelligent platform. The artificial intelligence in this platform played essential role to identify the disease, some important things, to identify the disease of coffee trees by taking picture and determine the type of treatment. So we add a new channel, AI channel. AI channel focus on enhanced beneficiary experience with the ministry services by providing smart and easy digital communication channels. Actually, we add. one more services, specifically to special needs, to be more user experience for them. Second significant project, Smart National Water Platform. The primary goal for the project, the service is to compute the water requirement of crops across the kingdom, aiding the decision makers in accurately estimating agricultural water needs. It offers user-friendly services for farmers, allowing them to discern the actual water needs of their crops, monitoring consumption, and judge the flow volume of additional water required. Livestock Chain Application. The primary objective of Livestock Chain Application is to enable the owner to create and manage their assist portfolio, registering and tracking ownership, and execute the sales or transfer ownership securely and directly within platform. Actually, we have more than 500,000 transactions just for transfer ownership. Smart Immunization. Smart Immunization is the third significant project. That means that Smart Immunization is the primary goal to predict and prevent the spread of livestock epidemics across all regions in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The innovative platform utilizes an array of integrated technologies and solutions, including geospatial mapping, artificial intelligence, a smart field management system, and business intelligence for decision makers. If you apply all these services, of course, we can apply AI models to analyze data from livestock project owners. This analysis enables the prediction of potential epidemic outbreak, allowing proactive measures to be taken when the impending epidemic is identified. The system automatically initiates visit requests that contain comprehensive immunization information and include precise location where the intervention is needed. NAMA and SDG. SDG means Sustainable Development Goals. They have 17 goals, 8 of them related to NAMA. Ending poverty by providing access to financial resources, social services, and information. The platform can help empower communities and improve the economic conditions contributing to poverty reduction. Ending hunger. The platform can support agricultural initiatives, enhance food distribution systems, and promote sustainable practices that ensure food security and nutrition for all. The goal number three, ensure healthy lives. NAMA can facilitate healthy services delivery, improve healthy care access, and promote healthy education to contribute to better health outcomes and well-being. Water and sanitation. By tracking water consumption and providing data on water management, the platform helps to ensure sustainable water use and access to clean water and sanitation services, as we see before the slide, for water management. Sustainable cities. The platform can aid urban planning and management, making cities safer, more inclusive, and resilient by using data to address urban changes and improve infrastructure. Climate action. We have projects related to climate action with the SEDAYA. NAMA can support climate action initiatives by providing data on environmental practices, promoting awareness, and facilitating policy development aimed at mitigating climate change impacts. Life below water. Through initiatives that monitor marine resources and promote sustainable practice, the platform can help conserve the ocean and ensure sustainable use of the marine environment. Life on land. Life on land. The platform can assist in managing land use, combating desertification, and promoting biodiversity through data-driven environmental programs and policies. So local and national digital indicators. All these indicators are related to DGA. When you see the United Nations Government Development Index focusing on government to deliver public services, a score of 100 indicates leading opposition in delivering digital tools for governance. The second indicator, digital experience maturity, focusing on user experience, suggests a high level of maturity in delivering digital experience for beneficiaries. Emerging technology adoption readiness helps prepare organizations in our country to adopt new technology, and a competent rating indicates a solid ability to integrate and utilize emerging technology effectively. So, our achievement in NAMA, we win the WSIS Prize 2022 and 2023 globally, and locally, we win the Best Technical Project Award in Kingdom of Fear 2022, and Best Digital Experience Award for Beneficiary in Government Sector in 2024. Thank you for listening. you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you

Y

Yasser Ibrahim Alissa

Speech speed

90 words per minute

Speech length

1466 words

Speech time

966 seconds

Unified access interface for electronic services

Explanation

NAMA provides a unified platform for accessing all electronic services, replacing the previous system where each service had its own link and user experience. This unified approach improves user experience and allows for easier implementation of AI technologies.

Evidence

Before NAMA, each platform had its own register, database, and services, which was difficult for beneficiaries.

Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 1: NAMA Platform Development and Benefits

Agreed with

Agreed on

NAMA Platform Benefits

Centralized platform for various services

Explanation

NAMA offers a centralized platform for various services, making it easier for users to access information and complete transactions. This includes a user-friendly interface and the use of UX Lab to improve user experience.

Evidence

NAMA has over 1,500,000 registered users and offers more than 300 services across various categories.

Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 1: NAMA Platform Development and Benefits

Agreed with

Agreed on

NAMA Platform Benefits

AI-driven solutions for enhanced service delivery

Explanation

NAMA AI utilizes artificial intelligence to enhance service delivery by providing personalized recommendations and support. The centralized database allows for easier application of AI and access to real-time, accurate data.

Evidence

AI board solution NAMA AI mentioned as enhancing service delivery.

Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 1: NAMA Platform Development and Benefits

Agreed with

Agreed on

NAMA Platform Benefits

Mobile access and secure transactions

Explanation

NAMA offers mobile access through responsive design, allowing users to access services on the go. The platform also ensures secure transactions to protect user data.

Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 1: NAMA Platform Development and Benefits

Agreed with

Agreed on

NAMA Platform Benefits

AI applications in water management and agriculture

Explanation

NAMA implements AI-driven solutions for water management and agriculture. These solutions optimize water resource management, monitor consumption patterns, and assist in precision agriculture.

Evidence

Projects mentioned include water management AI solutions and precision agriculture tools for crop monitoring and yield forecasting.

Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 2: NAMA Innovation and Creativity

Agreed with

Agreed on

NAMA Innovation and AI Applications

Integration of various data sources for holistic operations view

Explanation

NAMA integrates various data sources to provide a holistic view of operations across sectors. This integration facilitates better coordination and resource allocation.

Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 2: NAMA Innovation and Creativity

Agreed with

Agreed on

NAMA Innovation and AI Applications

User-friendly design and personalization

Explanation

NAMA AI provides a user-friendly experience with intuitive design and easy navigation. AI algorithms are used to tailor services to individual user needs, enhancing satisfaction and engagement.

Evidence

Mention of UX Lab and bringing beneficiaries to the ministry for direct experience testing.

Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 2: NAMA Innovation and Creativity

Agreed with

Agreed on

NAMA Innovation and AI Applications

Data-driven insights for informed decision-making

Explanation

The NAMA platform offers robust analytic capabilities, enabling organizations to extract valuable insights from data. This helps in identifying trends and making informed decisions.

Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 2: NAMA Innovation and Creativity

Agreed with

Agreed on

NAMA Innovation and AI Applications

Drone technology for agricultural land inventory

Explanation

NAMA uses drone technology to conduct accurate field surveys of agricultural lands at high speed. The data collected is stored in a central database and processed to generate intelligent reports for decision-making.

Evidence

Mention of using remote sensing tools to analyze drone data for decision-making.

Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 3: Significant NAMA Projects

Agreed with

Agreed on

Significant NAMA Projects

AI for detecting agricultural pests

Explanation

NAMA employs artificial intelligence technology to detect agricultural pests. The system provides various services including audio, video, and text messaging to deliver accurate information to farmers.

Evidence

Mention of intelligent response to farmer inquiries and identification of coffee tree diseases through image analysis.

Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 3: Significant NAMA Projects

Agreed with

Agreed on

Significant NAMA Projects

Smart National Water Platform for crop water requirements

Explanation

The Smart National Water Platform computes water requirements for crops across the kingdom. It aids decision-makers in estimating agricultural water needs and offers user-friendly services for farmers to monitor water consumption.

Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 3: Significant NAMA Projects

Agreed with

Agreed on

Significant NAMA Projects

Livestock Chain Application for asset management

Explanation

The Livestock Chain Application allows owners to create and manage their asset portfolio, register and track ownership, and execute sales or transfers securely within the platform.

Evidence

Over 500,000 transactions reported for ownership transfer.

Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 3: Significant NAMA Projects

Agreed with

Agreed on

Significant NAMA Projects

Smart Immunization for livestock epidemic prevention

Explanation

The Smart Immunization project aims to predict and prevent the spread of livestock epidemics across Saudi Arabia. It uses integrated technologies including geospatial mapping, AI, and business intelligence for decision-makers.

Evidence

Mention of automatic initiation of visit requests with comprehensive immunization information and precise location data.

Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 3: Significant NAMA Projects

Agreed with

Agreed on

Significant NAMA Projects

Contribution to poverty reduction and food security

Explanation

NAMA contributes to poverty reduction by providing access to financial resources, social services, and information. It also supports agricultural initiatives and enhances food distribution systems to ensure food security.

Evidence

Alignment with SDGs 1 (No Poverty) and 2 (Zero Hunger) mentioned.

Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 4: NAMA’s Alignment with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Agreed with

Agreed on

NAMA’s Alignment with SDGs

Support for health services and water management

Explanation

NAMA facilitates health service delivery, improves healthcare access, and promotes health education. It also aids in tracking water consumption and provides data on water management for sustainable use.

Evidence

Alignment with SDGs 3 (Good Health and Well-being) and 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation) mentioned.

Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 4: NAMA’s Alignment with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Agreed with

Agreed on

NAMA’s Alignment with SDGs

Aid in sustainable urban planning and climate action

Explanation

NAMA supports urban planning and management to make cities safer, more inclusive, and resilient. It also aids climate action initiatives by providing data on environmental practices and facilitating policy development.

Evidence

Alignment with SDGs 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) and 13 (Climate Action) mentioned.

Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 4: NAMA’s Alignment with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Agreed with

Agreed on

NAMA’s Alignment with SDGs

Assistance in environmental conservation efforts

Explanation

NAMA supports initiatives that monitor marine resources and promote sustainable practices for ocean conservation. It also assists in managing land use, combating desertification, and promoting biodiversity through data-driven environmental programs.

Evidence

Alignment with SDGs 14 (Life Below Water) and 15 (Life on Land) mentioned.

Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 4: NAMA’s Alignment with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Agreed with

Agreed on

NAMA’s Alignment with SDGs

High scores in digital governance and user experience

Explanation

NAMA has achieved high scores in the United Nations Government Development Index, focusing on the delivery of public services through digital tools. It also shows a high level of maturity in delivering digital experiences for beneficiaries.

Evidence

Mention of a score of 100 in the UN Government Development Index and high rating in digital experience maturity.

Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 5: NAMA’s Performance and Recognition

Agreed with

Agreed on

NAMA’s Performance and Recognition

Readiness for emerging technology adoption

Explanation

NAMA demonstrates a high level of readiness for adopting emerging technologies. This indicates a solid ability to integrate and utilize new technologies effectively across various sectors.

Evidence

Competent rating mentioned for emerging technology adoption readiness.

Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 5: NAMA’s Performance and Recognition

Agreed with

Agreed on

NAMA’s Performance and Recognition

International and local awards for digital innovation

Explanation

NAMA has received recognition for its digital innovation efforts through various awards. These accolades highlight the platform’s success in implementing effective digital solutions and improving user experiences.

Evidence

WSIS Prize 2022 and 2023 globally, Best Technical Project Award in Kingdom of Fear 2022, and Best Digital Experience Award for Beneficiary in Government Sector in 2024 mentioned.

Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 5: NAMA’s Performance and Recognition

Agreed with

Agreed on

NAMA’s Performance and Recognition

Agreements

Agreement Points

NAMA Platform Benefits

Yasser Ibrahim Alissa

Unified access interface for electronic services

Centralized platform for various services

AI-driven solutions for enhanced service delivery

Mobile access and secure transactions

The speaker emphasizes the benefits of the NAMA platform, including unified access, centralization of services, AI integration, and improved user experience.

NAMA Innovation and AI Applications

Yasser Ibrahim Alissa

AI applications in water management and agriculture

Integration of various data sources for holistic operations view

User-friendly design and personalization

Data-driven insights for informed decision-making

The speaker highlights NAMA’s innovative use of AI in various sectors, emphasizing improved efficiency and decision-making.

Significant NAMA Projects

Yasser Ibrahim Alissa

Drone technology for agricultural land inventory

AI for detecting agricultural pests

Smart National Water Platform for crop water requirements

Livestock Chain Application for asset management

Smart Immunization for livestock epidemic prevention

The speaker presents several significant projects implemented by NAMA, showcasing technological applications in agriculture, water management, and livestock management.

NAMA’s Alignment with SDGs

Yasser Ibrahim Alissa

Contribution to poverty reduction and food security

Support for health services and water management

Aid in sustainable urban planning and climate action

Assistance in environmental conservation efforts

The speaker outlines how NAMA’s initiatives align with various Sustainable Development Goals, emphasizing its broad impact on social and environmental issues.

NAMA’s Performance and Recognition

Yasser Ibrahim Alissa

High scores in digital governance and user experience

Readiness for emerging technology adoption

International and local awards for digital innovation

The speaker highlights NAMA’s achievements in digital governance, technology adoption, and recognition through various awards.

Similar Viewpoints

Unexpected Consensus

Overall Assessment

Summary

The presentation by Yasser Ibrahim Alissa demonstrates a comprehensive overview of NAMA’s development, benefits, innovative projects, alignment with SDGs, and achievements. The speaker consistently emphasizes the platform’s role in improving digital services, implementing AI solutions, and contributing to various sectors such as agriculture, water management, and urban planning.

Consensus level

As this is a single-speaker presentation, there is no consensus to evaluate among multiple speakers. However, the speaker presents a coherent and consistent narrative about NAMA’s positive impact and achievements across various domains. The implications of this presentation suggest a strong commitment to digital transformation and sustainable development in Saudi Arabia through the NAMA platform.

Differences

Different Viewpoints

Unexpected Differences

Overall Assessment

summary

There are no discernible disagreements or conflicting viewpoints in the provided transcript.

difference_level

There is no level of disagreement to assess, as the transcript contains a single speaker presenting information about the NAMA platform. The implications for the topic at hand are that the presentation provides a unified perspective on the development, benefits, and achievements of the NAMA platform without any contrasting opinions or debates.

Partial Agreements

Partial Agreements

Similar Viewpoints

Takeaways

Key Takeaways

NAMA is a unified platform that centralizes various government services, improving user experience and access

The platform incorporates AI and data analytics to enhance service delivery and decision-making

NAMA has implemented several innovative projects in agriculture, water management, and livestock management

The platform aligns with multiple Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

NAMA has received recognition through local and international awards for digital innovation

Resolutions and Action Items

None identified

Unresolved Issues

None identified

Suggested Compromises

None identified

Thought Provoking Comments

So, after NAMA, after NAMA, the MIWA Unified A-Service Platform, what we do? Create services. NAMA offers centralized platform for various services, make it easy for user to access information and complete transaction.

speaker

Yasser Ibrahim Alissa

reason

This comment introduces the core concept of NAMA as a unified platform, which is a significant shift from the previous decentralized approach.

impact

This comment sets the stage for the rest of the presentation, introducing the key benefits of NAMA and how it improves user experience. It leads to further discussion on specific features and improvements.

AI board solution NAMA AI utilizes artificial intelligence to enhance services delivery providing personalized recommendation and support.

speaker

Yasser Ibrahim Alissa

reason

This comment highlights the integration of AI into the NAMA platform, showcasing a significant technological advancement.

impact

It introduces the topic of AI in government services, leading to further discussion on how AI is applied in various sectors like agriculture, water management, and environmental monitoring.

Significant projects, drones technology used to inventory agricultural lands. The primary goal in this project is to conduct accurate field surveys of many areas at high speed.

speaker

Yasser Ibrahim Alissa

reason

This comment introduces a concrete example of how advanced technology is being applied in practical ways to improve agricultural management.

impact

It shifts the discussion from general concepts to specific applications, demonstrating the real-world impact of the NAMA platform and associated technologies.

NAMA and SDG. SDG means Sustainable Development Goals. They have 17 goals, 8 of them related to NAMA.

speaker

Yasser Ibrahim Alissa

reason

This comment connects the NAMA platform to broader global sustainability goals, showing its relevance beyond just local government efficiency.

impact

It expands the scope of the discussion to include how digital platforms can contribute to global sustainability efforts, touching on topics like poverty reduction, health, and environmental protection.

Overall Assessment

These key comments shaped the discussion by progressively introducing more complex and far-reaching aspects of the NAMA platform. The presentation started with the basic concept of a unified service platform, then moved to the integration of AI, followed by specific project examples, and finally connected the platform to global sustainability goals. This structure allowed for a comprehensive understanding of NAMA’s capabilities, practical applications, and broader impact, effectively demonstrating its significance in modernizing government services and contributing to sustainable development.

Follow-up Questions

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed.

Day 0 Event #83 Empowering Afghan Women: Bridging Digital Gaps for Education

Day 0 Event #83 Empowering Afghan Women: Bridging Digital Gaps for Education

Session at a Glance

Summary

This discussion focused on empowering Afghan women through education and technology, despite current restrictions under Taliban rule. Participants highlighted the severe limitations on women’s rights in Afghanistan, including bans on education and work. They emphasized the critical role of internet access and digital literacy in providing opportunities for Afghan women, while noting challenges like censorship, limited infrastructure, and social norms.

Speakers stressed the importance of community engagement, including involving religious leaders and male family members, to create support for women’s empowerment. They discussed the need for culturally sensitive approaches and flexible delivery methods for educational content. The potential risks to women’s safety when providing aid were also addressed, emphasizing the principle of “do no harm.”

The discussion explored various strategies for supporting Afghan women, such as peer-to-peer networks, collective advocacy, and targeted digital literacy programs. Participants emphasized the need for systemic, structural changes and a whole-of-society approach, involving multiple stakeholders including government, civil society, and the private sector.

International support was deemed crucial, but speakers noted the complexities of working within the current political context. The APNIC Foundation shared its efforts in capacity building and community development in the region, while acknowledging the challenges of operating in Afghanistan. The discussion concluded with a call for continued attention to Afghan women’s issues and the importance of sustainable, long-term solutions.

Keypoints

Major discussion points:

– The current challenges facing Afghan women in accessing education and technology, including restrictions imposed by the Taliban regime

– Potential solutions and approaches to empower Afghan women, such as community-based programs, involving religious leaders, and providing digital literacy training

– The importance of considering cultural sensitivities and security risks when implementing programs to help Afghan women

– The role of the international community in supporting Afghan women’s rights and access to education/technology

– The need for systemic, structural changes and a whole-of-society approach to truly empower Afghan women

Overall purpose:

The goal of this discussion was to explore ways to empower Afghan women through education and technology, given the current restrictions and challenges they face. Participants aimed to share insights and propose tangible solutions to help Afghan women gain access to educational and economic opportunities.

Tone:

The overall tone was serious and concerned, but also hopeful and solution-oriented. Participants spoke passionately about the challenges facing Afghan women while also offering constructive ideas for how to help. There was a sense of urgency and importance placed on the topic. The tone became more action-oriented towards the end as participants discussed specific ways the international community could support Afghan women.

Speakers

– Neeti Biyani: Senior advisor of strategy and development with the APNIC Foundation

– Abdul Ghayoor Bawary: Moderator

– Anja Gengo: Representative from IGF Secretariat

– Amrita Choudhury: Chair of APR IGF, from civil society organization CCUI

– Zhala Sarmast: Works with chemical technology/manufacturing facility, musician, athlete with Afghanistan’s National Women’s Cycling Team

– Omar Ansari: Leading Digital Leap South Asia project with APNIC Foundation

– Lima Madomi: Research and teaching assistant at University of Geneva, remote moderator

– Sajia Yarmal: Based in Germany, originally from Afghanistan

– Sonal Zaveri: JSC advisor to the APNIC Foundation

Additional speakers:

– Barata Mea: From South Africa, works with women and girls

– Shauna Hoffman: AI expert from USA

– Mary: From Timor-Leste

– Raj Singh, CEO, APNIC Foundation, WEOG

Full session report

Empowering Afghan Women Through Education and Technology: A Comprehensive Discussion

This report summarizes a discussion on empowering Afghan women through education and technology, focusing on the challenges and potential solutions in the context of current Taliban rule. The conversation involved various experts and stakeholders, including representatives from civil society organizations, international foundations, and Afghan nationals.

Current Situation and Challenges

Sajia Yarmal and Zhala Sarmast provided a stark overview of the current situation in Afghanistan, highlighting the severe restrictions on women’s rights and freedoms under Taliban rule. They emphasized the limited access to education, work, and technology for Afghan women, with Sarmast noting that women are now prohibited from attending universities and working in most sectors. Omar Ansari observed a decreasing number of women in ICT fields, illustrating the tangible impact of current policies.

Key challenges discussed included:

1. Limited access to devices and internet connectivity

2. Censorship and surveillance of online activities

3. Economic barriers to accessing technology

4. Cultural norms and male entitlement restricting women’s freedoms

5. Lack of digital literacy and skills

6. Security risks for women participating in empowerment programs

Strategies for Empowerment

The speakers proposed various strategies to empower Afghan women through education and technology:

1. Community Engagement: Zhala Sarmast and Sonal Zaveri stressed the importance of creating culturally sensitive, community-oriented programs. This approach involves engaging male family members, religious leaders, and community elders to build trust and encourage participation.

2. Safe Spaces: Sonal Zaveri emphasized the creation of safe community spaces for women to learn and access digital resources.

3. Flexible Learning Methods: Zhala Sarmast suggested providing flexible and accessible delivery methods for educational content, potentially including offline materials to overcome connectivity issues.

4. Peer Support Networks: Sonal Zaveri advocated for supporting peer-to-peer networks and collective action among Afghan women.

5. Digital Literacy Programs: Speakers discussed the need for targeted digital literacy and skill-building programs tailored to the specific needs and constraints of Afghan women.

Role of International Community and Organizations

The discussion highlighted the crucial role of international support in empowering Afghan women, while also noting the complexities of operating within the current political context:

1. Advocacy: Sajia Yarmal called for the international community to pressure the Taliban government to respect women’s rights.

2. Funding and Resources: Speakers emphasized the need for international funding and resources for education and development projects.

3. Partnerships: Omar Ansari suggested partnering with local organizations and initiatives to deliver aid effectively.

4. Systemic Approach: The discussion emphasized the need for comprehensive, systemic changes over piecemeal efforts, involving multiple stakeholders.

5. Economic Arguments: It was suggested that framing women’s empowerment in economic terms might potentially gain government buy-in, while maintaining a focus on human rights.

The APNIC Foundation’s work was highlighted, including the Digital Leap South Asia project and their efforts to support women in technology. The importance of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) in promoting gender parity in technology discussions was also mentioned.

Challenges in Implementation and Ethical Considerations

The discussion addressed several challenges in implementing support programs for Afghan women:

1. Security Risks: Lima Madomi highlighted the potential life risks for women participating in empowerment programs, emphasizing the need to prioritize safety.

2. Cultural Sensitivity: Sonal Zaveri stressed the importance of considering cultural norms and addressing male entitlement when designing interventions.

3. Logistical Difficulties: Speakers noted the challenges in delivering aid and resources within the current political climate, including censorship and restrictions on women’s activities.

4. Balancing Approaches: The discussion revealed a tension between providing tangible resources (such as mobile phones) and focusing on education and skills development. Speakers cautioned about the potential risks of providing tangible aid without considering the full context and potential consequences.

Sonal Zaveri introduced the principle of “do no harm” as a fundamental consideration in developing solutions for Afghan women, emphasizing the need for careful, ethical approaches.

Conclusion and Future Directions

The discussion concluded with a call for continued attention to Afghan women’s issues and the importance of sustainable, long-term solutions. Key takeaways included:

1. The need for culturally sensitive, community-oriented approaches

2. The importance of international support balanced with consideration of local contexts and security risks

3. The potential of digital technologies to provide opportunities for education and connection, despite limited access

4. The necessity of long-term, systemic changes to address structural barriers to women’s empowerment

An audience member raised a question about tangible ways to help Afghan women, highlighting the desire for concrete action. The session also included a brief comment from a participant from Timor-Leste, broadening the perspective on women’s empowerment in different contexts.

Unresolved issues included finding effective ways to partner with the current Afghan government, addressing censorship and surveillance, sustainably funding and delivering technology resources, and balancing security risks with visible support initiatives.

The discussion highlighted the complexity of empowering Afghan women through education and technology, emphasizing the need for a multifaceted, collaborative approach that considers cultural sensitivities, security concerns, and long-term sustainability.

Session Transcript

Neeti Biyani: Thank you, Abdul. And good morning from Riyadh. Thank you so much for joining us. Whether you’re here in person or whether you’re joining us virtually, I am Neeti Biani. And I am senior advisor of strategy and development with the APNIC Foundation. I’m based in New Delhi in India. It is such a privilege to be able to have some space to comment on the various intersecting issues that we’re going to be discussing today. How to empower, how to empower women, and how to empower Afghan women towards an extremely important outcome that is education. Let me start by telling you a little bit about the APNIC Foundation. We were founded in 2017, and we have technical roots. So our partner organization, which is APNIC, is the regional internet registry in the Asia-Pacific. We are mandated with slightly wider, more broad issues towards internet development, digital development, and digital transformation in 56 economies in Asia and the Pacific. We work cross-sectionally, intersectionally on a number of issues with partners and communities, especially in South Asia, Southeast Asia, East Asia, and the Pacific, in Oceania. Today’s topic sort of makes me wonder about the sort of collective impact that we need to have with a wide number of partners, from governments, to commercial entities, to civil society, to technical community, as well as independent experts, academia, to come together and address various issues with respect to the community that we’re trying to address today, that we’re concerned with today. And that is Afghan women, including Afghan girls, gender-diverse people in Afghanistan. Afghanistan. Given the geopolitical situation, given the socio-economic situation in Afghanistan today, there are very many structural issues facing Afghan girls, women, gender diverse people in the country. Right from, you know, having devices, to use of devices, to having privacy on devices, to more normative social issues that may not allow complete usage or complete agency over the use of such devices, connectivity, you know, meaningful access, and the ability to choose, the ability to have control over, you know, how women and girls connect, how they participate in the digital economy, how they learn, how they work, how they connect with each other, how they access opportunities. This is by no means a small task. It’s a very tall order. It’s a very tall order, and it is not possible for any one entity to be able to, to be able to solve on their own, or to even begin to address on their own. And which is why I would like to maybe, you know, bring forward a framework of collective impact, you know, where we can partner with one another, where we can identify the gaps, identify the capabilities that need to be built, identify how we could partner with one another, and bring into, you know, the equation, devices, connectivity, access, digital literacy, you know, even, even linguistic diversity, considering that many, many women, girls participants in this, in this conversation, are actually not consuming information or even looking for opportunities in English, or, you know, one of the more widely spoken, widely accepted languages in the world. So there are many, many issues at very many levels, which I’m sure that we’ll get into. And I think my fellow panelists today who have been living in Afghanistan or have lived experience in Afghanistan have so many more stories to tell and much, much more informed than perhaps I can ever be. So with this, I’ll perhaps pass it back. And happy to come in later.

Abdul Ghayoor Bawary: Thank you very much, Nitin. I would like to request each of our distinguished speakers to first shortly introduce themselves one by one and then we’ll be jumping to the questions. Thank you very much. So over to you, Anja.

Anja Gengo: Well, thank you very much, Keyur. And very good morning to everyone. I usually am not late for any of my meetings or sessions, but I think you’ll understand me and excuse me. And the Secretariat is kind of the central focal point or entity for the organization. And this is the very first day when everything started its implementation. It’s a result of a couple of months of work. So we had to be in multiple places this morning. But it is really coincidental that I was just in a session on, it’s called the Women’s Summit in Internet Governance, organized by my dear friend, Baratang. And we just spoke a lot about the importance of closing gender-based digital divide, which is still at an alarming pace and overall speaking on the statistics. But it is also good that we are making progress looking back in the past two decades. And we mentioned quite a lot, Afghanistan, especially women and girls in Afghanistan, the challenging situation that they are now. We spoke about the denial of the basic human rights, which is the right to education, and how important digital especially now it’s really a lifeline for girls and women there where digital represents the only opportunity to continue with education, to continue with networking, communicating with others, channeling voices back and forth and that’s why the infrastructure itself is now more than ever important to be able to support implementation of human rights especially for women and girls there. I spoke quite a lot about not long time ago, I think it was 2019 maybe, when I had a pleasure to go also to Afghanistan to work with Tamar, Gayur and with really a lot of colleagues there and on that particular note it was one of the most impressive national IGFs that I’ve been to in terms of the participation, in terms of the program structure and because of the topic I have to say in terms of the just female empowerment that you can feel there when you are working with all those people. I don’t speak just about women and girls as such and their role, I also speak about the men who were supporting their integration and it was a wonderful cooperation that we’ve seen and the most recent examples of course are disturbing and I think extremely important for the global community to address them and to do everything that’s in our capacity to ensure that there isn’t a girl or women on this planet that doesn’t have basic human rights which is the right to education to start firstly and I hope that there is enough will first of all and capacity to do that and to react to make a change in that sense. We spoke quite a lot at this session and I think my colleagues are moving actually to this session to come about wonderful good practices that exist across the world in terms of supporting education for women and girls that we are not relying anymore on that conservative conservative thought and structure that the education needs to be given to us by, for example, the governmental structure, but that the multi-stakeholder model really plays a role in terms of setting up cooperation and implementation for supporting various forms of education. So colleagues from ISOC, for example, spoke quite a lot about wonderful capacity development initiatives that they are carrying out for educating women and girls in coding, in robotics, in overall ICT understanding. We from the IGF Secretariat also see capacity development as one of our mandated objectives and within our capacity we do everything we can to ensure that we have community engaged in internet governance with a special focus on women and girls, understanding that there are parts of the world where they are marginalized, where they are vulnerable, they don’t have the same opportunities as men would have. And in that sense, one of the greatest partners to us are the 175 national regional and youth IGFs. Those are wonderful examples of capacity development, just grassroots community efforts at a multi-stakeholder level directed to engaging communities, to fostering that partnerships, that sense of ownership of these types of processes, and most important, resulting in stronger policies that are supporting the use of our digital technologies. And then final point that I would like to say, at the level of the IGF we are also through our structures trying everything that we can to support gender parity being represented there. So I’ll give you one example, the heart of the IGF, especially in terms of the program, in terms of the agenda, so everything that the next four or five days we will be discussing is the result of the multi-stakeholder advisory group, the MAG. For years our goal has been to achieve gender parity across the 40 membership of the MAG. That has been a challenge and I am very proud to say that in the past couple of last couple of years, we have managed to achieve gender parity, meaning that we have 20 female, 20 male members represented on the MAG, which really makes a difference in terms of having the MAG that is really just more also considerate about the topics that we are discussing today. On this agenda in the next, so today in the next four days, there will be topics related to gender equality. All of them will result in concrete, what we call the Riyadh IGF messages. And I hope that will be our voice, collective voice to channel to the global community to make a change and to ensure that women and girls are better represented in our societies, because they are really one of the key pillars of the sustainable development. And that means just better life quality for all of us. So with that, I will have to conclude here. I have a third session which I have to run and I really apologize, but I will certainly catch up with the recording and with all of you, you will be here the next five days. I look forward to meeting you all.

Abdul Ghayoor Bawary: Thank you very much. Very much, Anya. That’s really appreciated. Quite lots of engagements you had. So you gave us time to fit in the session. So I’ll be jumping to the next speakers that introduce themselves and talk about their background. If the message from my colleague, that one or two of our speakers haven’t been joining. So, but we are waiting for them, Dr. Maria and Dr. Farzana. Okay, so I welcome Amrita. Yes, please. Amrita is one of our distinguished speakers. Thank you very much for joining. So before I go to Amrita, I will be giving her a time to. settle here. I’ll go to one of our youngest speakers, Ms. Jala Sahr-Mast, the floor is yours. Thank you, Khairul Jan. Can everybody hear me? Yeah. I want to ask my technical colleagues to make my colleague, the co-host, please. Okay. I know the people on Zoom can hear me. Can people in Riyadh hear me? Can I get a thumbs up or something, if you can hear me? She’s not audible. Okay. I request the technical team to let Jala speak, please. Hello? No? Okay. I’m just checking. Am I audible yet? Okay. I don’t think so. Please accept my apologies. Yeah. Can you please start? Hello? Hello? Do you hear me? You’re still not audible, unfortunately. Okay. Hello? Hello? Hello? Sound check. No? No. So, Leva, can you please speak, if we can hear you? No, we still can’t hear, so could you please speak so we can make sure you’re audible? I think it’s a problem or technical problem. Yeah. Yeah. Until the technical team solves this, let’s jump to the next speaker. So we’ll be jumping to the next speaker. I really welcome you, Amrita. I will give you a few minutes to introduce yourself and let the audience and everyone know you more. Everyone knows you. You’re a role model for a lot of people. So over to you.

Amrita Choudhury: Hi, everyone. My name is Amrita, and sorry for being late. I was in another session. Just to give you a brief, I am from India. I work for a civil society organization called CCUI. I’m currently also chairing the APR IGF, that’s the Asia Pacific Regional Internet Governance Forum. I am very closely associated with the Afghan IGF and the Afghan School of Internet Governance since their formation. I also go to Kabul once. They had invited me. Obviously, that was a different time, and it’s a different time today. They have seen how the young people, especially women from Afghanistan, have been participating in various discussions related to ICT, as well as in the Internet Governance Forum from that time. Obviously, as one of them, there were a few more who actually participated in a lot of ICT discussions. Okay. So I think we can hear. At this point of time, so in case you want to have them speak first, that could also be possible. I’m here to actually learn, and this is something which… I can’t hear you. I can’t hear you at this point of time. Okay, so I think this is an important topic, especially for people who want inclusion, who are championing for equal rights for everyone, to education, to participate, technology, obviously. So, I think this is important, but I will give it back to Gaurav. I think we’re trying to test the audience at this point. Thank you very much, Amrita. So, is the problem solved?

Abdul Ghayoor Bawary: All our remote speakers and audience are available? Can you hear me? Let’s test with you. Can you please talk so we can make sure you’re audible? Hi, Soyul. Can you hear me? Unfortunately, I don’t have her voice. Can you hear me? Yeah, over the technical thing. Okay. Okay. Okay. Our apologies for the technical issues. We’ll be resuming our session in a few minutes until the technical team… Yeah, they won’t hear that. So we will continue with our on-site speakers. And as well as with the audience, to our audience members, we are really thrilled to have you with us today. Your participation is not only welcomed, but it is essential to the success of the current session discussion. Please feel free to jump in, engage, ask questions, and share your perspectives throughout the session. So our program is designed in a way to encourage dialogue and exchange of ideas. So I encourage everyone to take this opportunity to connect, learn, and grow together. Okay. So I have a question. Any of our speakers can maybe talk as per their experience, especially like Amrita has been to Afghanistan. She has been working with Afghan colleagues in different ways, and I’m sure Amrita has similar experience. Anyone from our audience can also jump in. So can anybody like, as per your experience, if you are connected with Afghans in Afghanistan, talk like what is the current situation regarding the Afghan women’s access to technology and education, given the recent restrictions, such as bans on education and limited Internet access? So I would… Like, anyway, you’re both welcome. Anyone of you can talk about it. So are you going first, Amrita? Thank you. OK. Over to you, Amrita.

Amrita Choudhury: Sadly, I think this is something which all of us would agree upon, is that the current situation is not at all great. The women cannot get access to education to their own. They don’t have their rights to even internet or ICT. It is not a very healthy situation, considering women play a critical role even in families to nurture their next generation. So it’s not only for their own personal benefit. Even children who study also need it. If they have educated mothers, well-educated, et cetera, it helps to nurture the family and bring them up or get about rights that are abused. If you will not allow a woman to study, will not allow a woman to even access technology, I think it’s a sad state of affairs. It will not even help any country, for that matter. Because 40%, I guess, would be women in that population. So 40% of people would be left with technology. Because the internet has become a thing of which every country is equal. So we continue speaking. So I think if you want also for the country to end it, you have to allow every gender to have equal access to education, ICT, and opportunities. It’s not a speaker here. Okay. How is it. So I think that is. So, I guess. There was some questions you had. What can be done. I think if we could have the online speakers participating, they know more than us. We are observers, but they have face to face. We are trying to do a lot of things. It would be really good if we could actually have those voices heard. Unfortunately, we are not being as inclusive as possible. In this session. So, yes, I guess that’s from me at this point of time, we did want to add some. I guess, I guess. Okay, I think I’ll pass it on to Omar to speak. Because we are not getting the people.

Omar Ansari: Thank you very much before I jump to the next speaker. I would like to invite. One of the speakers. If you could please. Okay. Okay. Can you please. So, we want to make sure you’re. Okay. Okay. Unfortunately, we are not able to hear you at all. It’s, it’s very, like, it’s breaking a lot. And it’s very low. So. So, I’m going to pass it on to the next speaker. Okay. Unfortunately, we are not able to hear you at all. It’s, it’s very, like, it’s breaking a lot. And it’s very low. So, we, we are unfortunately not able to hear you. So, I’m going to pass it on to the next speaker. Okay. But I’m happy that you can hear us. You’re very clear. I want to make sure with this with Sajjan and Zsola, are you experiencing the same as Leva said?

Neeti Biyani: Exactly the same. It’s difficult to hear you guys still.

Abdul Ghayoor Bawary: I would request my technical team to resolve this issue as well. So then we will be jumping to you guys. So welcome. Happy to have you here. So let’s give this opportunity to first introduce yourself and talk a little bit more about yourself and the question I raised about the current situation of women, despite the current restrictions on education and access to the Internet. Over to you. Hello. So I hope everybody can hear me.

Sonal Zaveri: Yes. So my name is Sonal Saveri and I’m the JSC advisor to the APNIC Foundation that Miti just talked about and the work that they do. So APNIC Foundation is deeply committed to its work on both gender equality and social inclusion. And so with my background in gender and evaluation, perhaps there is something that I could shed some light on what is happening in Afghanistan. I’ve had the opportunity to work on gender with a number of multilaterals in Afghanistan in the past. And perhaps one of the parallels that we could take for the situation that’s happening today was perhaps during the time of COVID when there was a moratorium on physical access to education. And what were some of the challenges that were faced and some of the solutions that we were able to find. And from the work that I’ve done in that country, what is critical to address is, of course, the connectivity. to making sure that the last mile is available, and of course, to have the devices and the digital learning in the languages that is suitable for education. But beyond that, it’s also very important to work on the social norms. So without addressing the social norms, what we found out at the uptake for the goals and for the curriculum that was provided was minimal. But there are ways in which to get around that. And some of those ways are to have a strategy to address the social norms within the families, within the communities, with religious leaders, with community elders. And once you’re able to do that, there is a lot of bike for girls and women to access education. And I think we also have to understand what is access. So access is not merely infrastructure. Access is also able to use the device. And often you will know that in many of these communities, and I think as in Afghanistan, in many of the situations in other countries where you have vulnerable populations, the problem is that a device is often a family device. It’s not necessarily a woman’s device. It’s not necessarily exclusively for women and girls for their education. So having understood that, that access to a device is very much connected to what are the cultural norms in that community, the sort of device that’s available. If you do have a device, it may not be a smartphone. And so you’re not able to take the complete benefit of whatever digital tools and curriculum that you’ve developed. So what we found is that community spaces, often some people call them safe spaces. So spaces where women and girls are able. to go and to learn is critically important. Otherwise, because of the social norms, the gender norms, their responsibilities for the care or domestic chores takes them away from a concerted effort to spend time on their education. So I think whether when we look at Afghanistan today in the development and conflict emergency nexus, we have lessons learned from many other countries around the world on how to use these digital tools so that we are able to promote education and ensure that all girls will benefit from that. So I’m happy to take questions if you would like to know more about the safe spaces and community engagement, but I’m going to stop here and see if we can get our online participants to talk a little bit more about the situation right now. Thank you. Thank you very much. You have pointed very tangible things, issues and problems currently like Afghan women are facing. So I will come again on this thing that you have mentioned. So before that, I’d like to make sure if our remote speakers are audible and also they can

Abdul Ghayoor Bawary: hear us well. Over to Leymah first, because Leymah is my co-moderator and she’ll be doing the remote moderation. I’ll give the floor to Leymah to introduce herself and then give the floor to the next speaker. Over to you, Leymah.

Lima Madomi: Hi, Elayour, and hello, everyone. I don’t know if you can hear me, but unfortunately, we are struggling to hear you. But as long as you can hear me, I’ll go ahead and start speaking. But OK, thank you. So thank you so much. for joining us and my name is Lima Madhumi. I am a research and teaching assistant at the University of Geneva. My background is in technology. I have been working in technology for past almost 10 years. I was a fellow of the Internet Governance Forum. In addition to that, I have worked for a very long time in Afghanistan with Omar and with everyone there in different technological sections, especially for women in technology. So yeah, I’m really happy to be here and will be helping as a co-moderator. Please let me know if there is anything and I will be informing you about any messages in chat or anything out here. So Jala and Sajjah is here with us. Unfortunately Farzana will not be able to join us. I am hoping that Maria Bibi will be joining us soon. So back to you, Ghayr. Thank you very much, Lima. Happy to have you.

Abdul Ghayoor Bawary: Okay, over to you, Farzana, to introduce yourself and talk a little bit about yourself. Over to you. Do you hear me? Very well. Okay. Hi, everyone. It’s nice to virtually meet you.

Zhala Sarmast: My name is Jala Sarmas. I’m based in Singapore. I currently work with a chemical technology slash manufacturing facility in Singapore and in Canada. My background is very heavily in the hard sciences, specifically chemistry and also media. I studied at Yale-NUS College where I earned my Bachelor of Science with honors. And aside from that, I am a musician. I’m an athlete with the Afghanistan’s National Women’s Cycling Team that was also nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2016. And then aside from all of these things, I work with a big group of Afghan students every year, especially those that try to get access to educational opportunities outside of Afghanistan. So that is something that is very close to my heart because it’s an experience that I’ve gone through of applying to universities to try to get a good education. And so that’s something that’s very important to me. And then with my work with media, we constantly try to work on digital learning campaigns and digital sort of educational platforms for Afghan women, Afghan youth, Afghan people in general in Afghanistan. So I’d be diving a little bit more deeper into that with the questions. Anyhow, that’s it in a nutshell. It’s very nice to meet all of you. Thank you very much. Very inspiring. Hope to see you soon. Thank you, Lema John. Thank you, Lema John. Good morning, everyone.

Sajia Yarmal: My name is Sajjah Yarmal and I’m based in Germany. I’m originally from Afghanistan. Unfortunately, a country where nowadays under the Taliban regime, being a woman feels like a crime. It’s true. Women in my country face endless restriction. We cannot speak freely, make our own decisions or even choose where to go or what to do. But here I stand grateful for the opportunity, at least in this moment and in this space to rise my voice and shed light on these critical issues facing Afghan women, especially their access to digital resources and opportunities for education in these difficult times. For me, actually, it doesn’t matter if you know my personal background. What matters is that we are gathered here to talk about the women of my country, women who are suffering every day and their voices are silent and their dreams are stolen. For these women, the only glamour of their lives is their freedom. hope is that we as a woman from all around the world stand united, discuss their struggles, propose solutions and also follow up with the international community to ensure that even not a single woman is silent, excluded or denied for her most basic rights. Thank you. So this is my introduction for today’s session. Thank you very much, Sajjah. Happy to have you in the panel.

Abdul Ghayoor Bawary: So my first question was regarding the current situation of Afghan women in access to technology and education, given the recent restrictions. So I would like to hear your views on this, because you’re Afghan and you have been probably experienced or connected with these friends there. So Sajjah, what’s your findings on the current situation of Afghan women in access to technology and education, considering the current restrictions on women?

Sajia Yarmal: Thank you for the question. Let me give you all some context in this regard. So since the Taliban took power in Afghanistan in August 2021, Afghanistan has been in a deep crisis, especially for women and girls. The Taliban’s policies have pushed women out of public life. Girls are banned from schools, women cannot go to university, they cannot work, even they cannot go to public parks are bad. So these restrictions are isolated somehow women and destroy the progress we worked so hard to achieve. The restrictions keep every day increasing, leaving women without hope or opportunities. For nearly three years now, Afghan women have been faced to stay at home like prisoners in the their own houses. In this difficult situation, access to digital tools and the internet has become a lifeline for many Afghan women. The internet can open doors to education, jobs and even a way to raise their voices. But political restrictions and Taliban policies have made these access even harder. This is increasing inequality and silencing women even more. I think one major problem is the Taliban’s control over the internet. In many places there is no internet at all and in the areas where there is internet, the Taliban censor content, making it impossible to access educational programs, news or global platforms. They also mentor online activities, so women fear being tracked or somehow punished for breaking the Taliban’s strict rules. As a result, women are not restricted physically, but also they are digitally trapped. I think the second problem or challenge is Afghanistan’s economic collapse. Smartphones, computers, the internet services are too expensive for most families, especially for women who depend on family members for financial support. This makes access even harder. When families have limited resources, they cannot prioritise, they cannot, they cannot. Sorry Ghajan, you hear me? Yes, yes, we can hear you. I’m hearing you guys very hard, but still I will continue. my presentation or my speech. Yeah, please continue. Honey out so as I mentioned when the families have a limited resources, they often prioritized by boys and men over women and girls for Internet access and devices. Uhm, the last but not least, now let’s focus on the biggest barriers which is education. We all know education is the key to using technology but Afghan girls are. A bandit from schools and universities. This means millions of Afghan women and girls cannot learn the basic skills needed to use technology and without schools and or higher education to lose the chance to connect with the digital wars and access the opportunities it offers. I think the impact of these restriction is devastating. Online education could give Afghan women hope and chance to learn. Even with the education bans platform that teaching coding languages or professional skills could help women improve their lives. But without access to the Internet or basic digital digital skills, women are left out and the cycle of poverty and dependence continues. Uhm? I have seen how powerful digital tools can be. I have seen women using the Internet to learn, connect with the world and fight for their rights. But I have also seen how the lack of Internet or access leaves women feeling hopeless and isolated. For Afghan woman, the digital world is not just a tool. I think it’s a lifeline. It gives women a chance to regain control of their lives in the society that has taken away their independence rights. The restrictions are not just rules. They they are somehow. tools of control to take away Afghan women’s dignity and future. So as a last point, what can we do for this situation? The situation is hard, of course, but it’s not impossible. There are steps that government organizations and individuals can take to help Afghan women access digital tools, like international organizations could or should work to provide safe and affordable internet for Afghan women or for Afghan people. Tools like VPN and encrypted communication can also help bypass censorship and surveillance. Also, online education programs designed for Afghan women can help them to build even with slow internet and international communities also. I think they must continue pursuing the Taliban to respect women’s rights, including their rights to education and the right to have access on internet or technology. And there is also a possibility that tech companies and governments can stand against censorship and mentoring the regulation, which nowadays we are experiencing in Afghanistan. So I think these are some points from my view which can help Afghan women to have access to the internet and to have opportunity to develop and work for their skills. I think if we focus on problems and propose solutions and follow up them, I think it will bring an opportunity for every one of us to solve the problem, especially women in Afghanistan are facing in Afghanistan. So these were my points, Gayoudran, if you could hear me and, or if you’re able to hear me, I will be here for other questions as well. But for this question, that was my point.

Abdul Ghayoor Bawary: Thank you. Thank you very much. You have pointed very critically issues regarding the current situation of Afghan women in terms of access to education and technology. So considering your points, I will jump to Joella, like how do such barriers, such as like internet blockages, the unreliable electricity, the gender-based inequalities impact Afghan women’s ability to connect to digital resources and participate in a scalable and good educational opportunities?

Neeti Biyani: Thank you, Gayoudran. I think me responding to this question is a little bit pointing out to the obvious because we’re constantly on a daily basis, we see how internet blockages, the fear of posting something online or accessing,

Zhala Sarmast: I’m not gonna really say accessing quality education because I think the blockages is, there are blockages more than there were three years ago, but I think it is still possible to access educational content in Afghanistan and we would need an IT or tech expert to shed some light on how, if that is the case, content can still be accessed. But I think it’s important to remember that even before the Taliban takeover, we had significant challenges when it came to access to digital devices and access to internet. And in the session the previous day for our guests that were not there, we looked at some statistics that were quite dramatic when we were looking at access to digital devices and the internet amongst male and female and sort of users across Afghanistan. So even though the number of users getting. access to internet and digital devices has been increasing over time. It is women’s access to digital devices and it has remained very, very drastic. If I remember this correctly, in the rural areas of Afghanistan, access of women to digital tech devices was 2% only and for the male it was somewhere near to I think 55% which shows like a significant difference. And of course this has become even more severe after the Taliban takeover in Afghanistan. Now we have, if we don’t have internet blockages, there’s a very strong fear of resisting some of the policies that are in place such as the closure of schools and educational institutions. But not to mention that that is still resisted through many different kinds of responses, whether it’s art, whether it’s different sort of initiatives through media outlets, whatever. But I think that’s a separate question so I’m just going to focus on the impact of it for the moment. I think unreliable electricity is one issue that we’ve constantly struggled with in Afghanistan even as I was growing up. I think that frequent limited internet or like power blockages across Afghanistan, they limit Afghan people and specifically Afghan women’s access to online platforms that can offer of course education and skill training or career development. And then aside from that one thing that has always stood out to me working with students every year is gender-based inequalities. So I’m going to provide a more of a personal kind of response to this just so that we look at tangible examples of what I mean when I say gender-based inequalities. I think for me working with students there has always been more kind of focus on the boys and the men getting access to quality education and those opportunities than women. So I think if a family can afford the digital devices they would prefer it to provide that for the sons more than the daughters. not generalized, but that has been the case from my experience to a very major extent. And then the same when it comes to working, for instance, when I work on applications for colleges with different students, our Afghan sons, I think it’s relatively easier for them to try to get access to those education where women would have to juggle in a lot of like house chores and school and like all the other things that they have. So there are lots of things I think that can fall into that umbrella of gender-based inequalities, but I think you kind of get my point. So I’ll wrap it up here. I’ll look forward to the next question. Thank you very much, Ella, for sharing your insights.

Abdul Ghayoor Bawary: So over to you, Amrita. I have a question here, like how can target digital literacy and a scale building programs be designed to empower Afghan women while considering the cultural and logistical challenges they face that we have heard from Sajid Jahan and from Jola Jahan. So what’s your point of view? How can this issue has been tackled?

Amrita Choudhury: I think designing of the programs have to be such that it is in the local language. That forms of the models which they’re using is much more like, so that it can also work in a job, possibility of having download options. And I think what’s on the bench is very good. Certain things that this is not. Sorry, the audio is not on. is not too good. I think trying to get the community by is going to be beneficial. It is not going to harm their natural interest, religious interest, or political interest for that matter. And have the courses designed in such a way that they are not used to the other language. Thank you. So, Oliver, you said you have many good examples. Could you please share some examples of successful initiatives or programs that have empowered Afghan women through technology or providing access to education, health care, or economic opportunity? So, before I give the mic to you, I would like to remind the very dear audience that you are most welcome to raise your hands if you have any questions. But if you have any ideas or opinions to share with us, you are most welcome to raise your hand and we will be giving the opportunity for you as well. So, consider yourself as a key pillar of this discussion. Thank you very much. I hope everyone can hear me. It’s good? Great. So, what I wanted to share, I think I’d like to reiterate that gender rights are human rights and that has to be of what we believe. about more successful programs, we have to understand. Now, better, I’ll put it up like this, and please raise your hand if you can’t hear me at any point. I’m trying to get my train of thought back. What I wanted to say that whenever we talk about gender, we cannot forget two ideas that are behind gender. One of them, as we mentioned, it is deeply ingrained. And so male entitlement means that men and boys have more opportunities and better access. So, what would, okay, for a moment, sit over there, shall I sit there? May I speak again? Is this clear? Okay. So, what I want, no. Okay. All right. So, I’m moving. Let me know when you can hear me the best. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. I’m happy to stand and talk. Is this great? Fantastic. I’ll talk here. So what I wanted to say is that we have to understand that gender is about gender relations. And unless we acknowledge that there is something called male entitlement, we are not going to go far. Second, we have to understand that there are systems and structures, institutional structures of family and community that are, in a sense, skewed against acknowledging opportunities for women and girls. So unless we address both of them, it’s going to be very difficult to have gender equality or gender access to education. And we heard examples, real life examples, of how boys could access, but girls could not. And the whole problem of domestic responsibilities and care, which hinder girls and women, even when they have access to devices, even when they have the digital tools, they will not be able to make full use of them because of these problems. Their time is divided. But what I wanted to talk about, a very important aspect, is mobility. There is so much restriction on the mobility of women, where they go, what they do. And that is one of the opportunities of having internet and the digital access in order to be able to go beyond it. Now, as you mentioned, one of the problems is to have the connectivity. And in order for women to manage the connectivity, to have the space and the time to spend on themselves, and to have that education, we have found that having community spaces, community engagement, and safe spaces for girls to come to provides the best opportunity for them to learn. What does that mean? The community buy-in. of religious leaders, of elders, of men, in the community, in the family, is absolutely essential. Having got that, having got that trust and confidence, you are able to provide the space for women and girls to come to these spaces to learn. And you know, the change that happens is quite spectacular in the sense that girls and women understand that there is a whole world outside, their little homes and their little communities that they are working in, and that they can learn and achieve a great deal. Many of them, because of what they’ve learned, have been able to help their families economically as well. Now these opportunities are then appreciated, but we need to understand that we have to place some foundational blocks within this social norm space, the gender equal space, in order for digital access and internet connectivity. It cannot happen without it, and that’s what I wanted to stress. There’s one more thing I want to say before I give up the mic, is that, you know, there are many ways of intervening in this. So we talk about the micro spaces, so the community spaces. We talk a little bit about the mezzo, so talking about, you know, hopefully getting some sort of a buy-in from the government or other systems and institutions, religious institutions, very, very important to do so. But what about the global community? I think we have a tremendous responsibility for forums such as this, others, to advocate for women’s rights to education, for Afghan women and what they’re facing too. Is the voice loud enough? Are we doing enough? And it’s not just women having to, you know, talk about it, and I’m really happy to see that we have men and women in this room advocating for Afghan women’s rights, but we need to have a much louder voice in the international forums that we go to and who do have a cloud. in order to do that.

Abdul Ghayoor Bawary: Thank you. Thank you very much, Sonal. Well, thank you for sharing your experience on this kind of solution, so building the community-based spaces for women. I’d like to, yes, sure, sure, sure. You can’t hear? Or you have a? Perfect, perfect. So we have a question from one of our audience to one of our remote speaker, right? Over to you. I forgot the lady from Afghanistan’s name, but my question is directed to her.

Audience: My name is Barata Mea from South Africa, and I work with women and girls, and after you gave your speech, I thought of one question I wanted to find out. So once women are empowered and you’ve done what you’ve done, what’s next for a woman in Afghanistan? Are they able to start a business? Are they able to get a job? What does that empowerment means? What it means to have a woman’s voice besides the security issues? From a family point of view, does it change the scenario for them internally in their families? Do they get the respect or what? Can I ask who the question is addressed to? Is it me or is it a person speaking? Turn to Jala, or whoever is willing to answer. Wait, was that directed to me?

Abdul Ghayoor Bawary: You can give the space to both of you. Yeah, let’s give the space to you first, Jala. You can share your experience. Oh, I’m sorry. I thought the question was kind of addressed to me. Anyhow. Okay. Okay. Okay, Saidiya. So the question refers to Saidiya.

Sajia Yarmal: Yeah, Saidiya, go ahead. Thank you, Leymah John, and thanks for asking the questions. I think this is a good point. Let me explain this from my own experience. I’m about 30 years old and growing up in Afghanistan. So it means before the Taliban took power in Afghanistan, the women had the opportunity to grow up in Afghanistan in a peaceful environment with lots of opportunities, which we worked for that, as I mentioned in my speech before. We went to school, we went to university, we got a job, and we start even our own businesses. So these were the opportunities which we had in the previous or ex-government in the past 20-30 years. Beside that, I think we should look at the rights of women, as same as the rights of human rights. I mean, if you’re talking about women and the rights which they have, and it doesn’t matter if it’s in Afghanistan, or if it’s in another countries or society, so we have to respect these rights. It doesn’t matter if they really achieve something big, the progress is important. For me as a young woman in Afghanistan, which had experience to work there, to get education there, that was an opportunity for me to work for myself, for my family, and for my society. We had the opportunities to get involved in many activities in Afghanistan, national and international communities which we had in Afghanistan, and also the platforms which we experienced them in Afghanistan. So we not only brought these opportunities to Afghanistan and used these opportunities as well. And not only me, most of the population of Afghanistan is a young generation, so not only men, not only women, also men benefit from these opportunities which we had in Afghanistan. So I think Jalajan could also add her point of view in this regard, but I think that was an opportunity for all women in Afghanistan, and if we ignore those opportunities, I think also in the future we cannot really work on Afghan women and the opportunities which we could bring in Afghanistan. Jalajan, it’s over to you.

Lima Madomi: Thank you, Sajjadjan, and thanks for the question. To be honest, I find the question a little bit interesting. I don’t exactly know what you mean when you say, so when women are empowered, what’s next? I think for the past 50 to 70 years in Afghanistan, our focus has been to get women empowered, to give women education, to give women financial independence, to give women literacy. So I think once you empower women, then women are treated as an equal human being in the society, which I think is the ultimate goal. That is why we strive for education, like I said, economic inclusion, political inclusion, social inclusion, etc. So I’m, again, not sure exactly what you mean by that when you say, so when women are empowered, or what’s next? But I think when women are empowered, then they make academic contributions, then they make economic contributions, they make political contributions, they have financial independence, which is a big deal in the world nowadays because it actually stops women from getting access to so many things because they’re not financially independent. I hope that my response is precise enough to address the question, but if it’s still not clear, I’d be happy to respond in more detail.

Amrita Choudhury: I’ll try to answer it in a different way. India also has a very patriarchal system. Of course, it’s not as extreme as it is in Afghanistan. But there are some experiences. And I’ll just give you some analogies. I have a friend of mine. She did her chartered accountancy. She came from a business family where women used to not study after their class 10, which is 16 years. And then she got into a job. There was a lot of opposition in her family. She was the first in her house to do so. But when they saw her doing economically well, earning money in her own terms, and getting respect in the society, all her other family members, the children in the extended family, the girls, got a chance to study, to get into jobs, to choose their own kind of careers, and even decide when they want to get married. Do remember, in India, we still have a lot of arranged marriages where women have to marry within a particular age. So people see with education, with employability, those things change. And when money starts coming into families, the equations also change many times. That’s hard facts, which has been seen. Similarly, many of the women, it’s not necessary for them to even go for a job or even go to something. But they will be able to teach the kids at home what is right, what is wrong, what is needed as in a progressive society. I’m not saying wearing Western clothes, but having an open mind. Education brings that. That’s why we talk about education, why reading is important. An illiterate mother may not be able to push the children to study all that much. But if you get an interest towards it, you would be helping that family also to uplift. If you can work, you should have a right what you want. what someone else, that’s a fundamental thing. But I think it helps to uplift the family also. For example, for medical health, many times in remote places or many places where women cannot even go out of the house, if you have some basic knowledge, you will not get into a myth of medical sciences. For example, many times they don’t want to go to doctors. They want to go to quacks. But if you have education, you will know what it means to even go to a doctor. So these may be small things, but they help even a family, not only the women. And I think Neeti wants to add something.

Neeti Biyani: Thanks, Amrita. I think the point that we’re trying to advocate here, I want to flip it over its head for one minute and maybe ask the question, all of us are trying to talk about empowering Afghan women. Can we pause and ask, who and what can Afghan women and girls empower in turn? Yes. So I think the question that we need to ask is, who or what can Afghan women empower? There are so many socioeconomic, cultural outcomes that Afghan women, the resilient women and girls that they are in this society, in this region of the world, the sort of economic outcomes they can help achieve, the sort of taxes that they can pay if they have the financial opportunities and the financial ability, culturally as well, to move around in the economy. The socioeconomic. outcomes that they can that they can help unlock the sort of future generations that they can bring up that will in turn then contribute to society. So I think we need to flip this narrative a little bit on its head and ask women empower only and only if they just allow the space to be who they want to be to speak how they want to speak to do exactly what they want to do. I think everyone stands to gain from that right. Absolutely everyone, the government, men, boys, women themselves society as a whole. Organizations which are helping to do that also should be encouraged for example today. Many organizations even internationally who want to do something within the country is not allowed, cannot, you know, fund those kind of projects, etc. These are happening on which can help the country. So I think these kind of should be allowed to work or even network operators group or even I don’t know if APNIC Foundation can actually put in money in Afghanistan to help in many of those social uplifting programs, etc. I think the international community and perhaps community at large could look at those things that what are the tools which are needed for empowerment, different types of empowerment. One is rights, one is civic rights, etc. Human rights, etc. But in terms of uplifting digital technologies, making life easier through technology even communicating. I think those are important things which we also need to think of. You have any question or you want to clarify something? Okay. I think what can Afghanistan women do to empower the world and other women for me is how we should be looking at it and not purely because we will learn something. I think it’s to open the world for the girls who are being empowered and not knowing what’s outside for them, especially the internet world. Because obviously I know there’s lots of programs, I read a lot about Afghanistan, that helps with coding. There’s a woman who worked with us who was teaching women how to code. And what those girls were offering on the job market, the skills were meticulous. I learned so many things from just listening to what they were talking about. And I’m going to give another example. The women in Gaza, they are offering a mentorship program to some of my girls in South Africa. They are in a very difficult situation, but they still have time when they do get that limited access to internet to contribute and teach coding to other girls. But for them, it’s just to know what’s the outside world. It’s how do you contribute? Because the main thing here, we can go anywhere we want in the world, unless we address what she talked about, which is male entitlement. Nobody is empowered. As much as we want to say we are empowered as women, our question is to address what she’s talking about, which is male entitlement. Any woman who is empowered has to face a male entitlement. But if women from all over the world come together, especially in an online space, and empower each other, it’s going to give us more power and more voice to break these women’s rights that are taken away from women.

Abdul Ghayoor Bawary: Thank you very much. We have another one of our audience here. Okay, over to you. Can you hand over a mic to her? Burhan, can you help me to pass the mic, please? You’re on. Can you hear me? Excellent.

Audience: My name is Shauna Hoffman, and I’m from the USA, and I’m an AI expert. I have been for a little over 25 years. The question that I have, Saf, thank you for being brave. Thank you for being here today, all of you. The women empowerment, I love what you just said about that. I would love to make that more tangible. How can those of us outside of Afghanistan help empower the local women? What is it that you need? I know there’s rules, there’s specific boundaries, we would say, for the local women. But what can we do? You’d mentioned cell phones. Can we collect cell phones, let’s say, from the United States and ship them over? Could we provide some internet access? Is it more funds to get the internet access? What can we do? Then also, we’re actually going on a tour in Afghanistan in October. One of the tour groups mentioned there are 300 businesses ran by women that we are going to be seeing during that tour. I’d love to understand a little bit more about that and the women’s rights. Question number 1 is, what tangibly can we do for you? If I bring cell phones over with me, can we pass them out? Is that helpful? But then the second step is, what are women’s rights locally for those who are running businesses and trying to continue on with what they had prior to three years ago?

Abdul Ghayoor Bawary: Thank you very much. Is the question open to any speaker who can tackle this or specifically?

Amrita Choudhury: Okay. Amrita has some comments on this. I am audible. Yeah. So, India government has a scheme wherein if a girl in certain states, if a girl in her plus 12, does above a particular mark, she gets a laptop. They got a laptop. But then the laptop was given to their brothers. So that also happens. So you may be giving the cell phone. Who’s going to recharge it? Who will have access to it? So those things are also some things you have to think of. Where will they recharge if there is no electricity? So those things also should be thought. It’s just not giving it over, but how do you continue it? I’m not saying it’s not a bad idea, but you will have to look at the entire chain of events. And that actually brings up a very good point.

Abdul Ghayoor Bawary: I know in Kenya, when we purchased cell phones for those who are local, we also provided them the cell phone, the solar service. So what would be, for those who are in Afghanistan or have been recently, what would be something that you could say, here’s something you really can do that’s tangible that would actually help us? Jolajan, do you want to tackle this question?

Neeti Biyani: Yes, definitely. I’m sorry, Jolajan. No, go ahead, Libajan. I can answer you. Yeah, sure.

Lima Madomi: Yeah, I’m so sorry. I just wanted to point out one very important thing. I’m so sorry for breaking in like this. It’s about when we talk about empowerment and when we talk about the tangible help to Afghanistan, there is one very important thing that we are actually, I think, forgetting, and that’s the political situation of Afghanistan. If we are providing all these help, it could be a potential life risk for many women that are living out there. So when we are doing these things, we should also consider those things. And we should also think about how we could do some of these potential support that we are providing or the empowerment that we are doing in a sense that it does not threaten their life. I think one of the most important things will be that instead of providing them with some of these helps, it will be good that if we could provide them with some educational opportunities. If there are, for example, schools or universities, or if there are some mentorship and some of these programs that could help them to be empowered and to help themselves, that could be something more valuable. Because some of these other things, of course, they are enormously valuable, but they could also be a threat to their life. They could also be… So in certain situations, they are working like head and they are not like a lot of the government and political, no one is aware that they are working. So when we are helping them in these things, we are actually bringing them up to the front. And that could be a potential risk for their lives and for their families’ lives. So I think it’s more about how we could empower them in terms of education and in terms of giving them some skills and opportunities that they could help themselves. That could be more valuable. That’s my opinion. Thank you.

Abdul Ghayoor Bawary: Thank you very much. I have to say thank you for bringing that up. That’s an extremely good point, because we wouldn’t want to have anything negative. Thank you. Yeah, thank you very much. Over to you, Zsala.

Zhala Sarmast: Thank you, Limogen, so much for sharing that. I think those are all great points and great that we have an AI expert in the room with us. Yeah, I think I find that working with initiatives on the ground has been the most helpful. So there are initiatives on the ground that work within different areas and landscapes in Afghanistan. And yes, it’s dangerous. Yes, it’s extremely risky. But to be able to make a little bit of progress, we’ve constantly, growing up, had to break rules. in Afghanistan. So that’s a given, unfortunately. And another, I think, very tangible thing that I think can make a lot of impact is not just working with women, actually, working with male of the families and just religious scholars. So you’ll have to work with people that are of value, that are respected, that are listened to across Afghanistan. So for us, whether it’s working on different digital literacy campaign or whether it’s working with students on their college application forms, et cetera, et cetera, it’s not just working with the group of students themselves, but it’s kind of like at the same time working with their decision makers of the families or their brothers and fathers, et cetera. So I think that’s just one thing that has been kind of critical to me in my work and need to be considered. So yeah, I think lots of awareness, keeping in mind that Afghanistan is in the midst of a humanitarian crisis. So there are lots of other priorities now that a lot of people are focusing on. So if those are kind of addressed, then it will open doors and give the people space to think about some of the other things that are needed, such as education and access to financial kind of opportunities, et cetera. Yeah, very much, Jala. You’ll find it very good.

Abdul Ghayoor Bawary: So as per your experience on the ground, to combine a few questions or the views raised by the audience and also the thing raised by Niti, like what and who can support the Afghan women based in Afghanistan? And now also one of our audience said like from Nigeria or from any African country. So like the women in Gaza, despite the challenges they have, they’re providing mentorship to the African women. But considering the current situation in Afghanistan, which like women are totally banned to go, I mean, for work or for education or to be in a male-dominant society, so how the Afghan women there leverage the Internet and digital resources to overcome these challenges, to build meaningful opportunities for themselves and for their communities? So this question could be answered by Joelle as well, because she recently pointed a few points relevant, and as well as Sunal, you gave some examples. So how impactful those solutions are or were to empower women to have access to education, despite the current situation we are experiencing right now? So after this question, I would like to remind the APNIC Foundation colleagues that one of the points raised by Amrita, that how can APNIC Foundation put money into the Afghan community to empower? So I think you already do these two digital leaps. I would like to have your view on this later, after Sunal shares her insights on this, and after Sunal, we’ll go to

Zhala Sarmast: Joelle. Over to you. I think I’m going to get… Okay, I’m going to get up just to make sure that everybody can hear me, and we don’t have a break. And I think I really like the question that you raised, what can you do that’s tangible? Often the solutions are quite simple, and they depend upon people, and what people can do for each other. So before I say that, I’d say that one of the goals that we must… remember when we are talking about women in very fragile situations is that we cannot do any harm. So I think the principle of do no harm must be the first principle that we follow when we are thinking about any sort of solutions for women in education, for economic empowerment and so on. So having said that, I think we’ve talked about getting buy-in from the community, from the decision-makers, from men who are in power, but I also think we should not forget that women too have power. And how do we do that? So in this case it’s not just the power of one, because that’s often difficult. You may become a target, but what you can do is have peer-to-peer. That’s possible. Can you set up systems so that girls and women can support each other? So having peer-to-peer strategies in your programs, in your solutions, is I think absolutely important. The other area is the collective. When there is a voice of many women that comes together, not one person is targeted, but collectively, collectively, they can advocate for what they want. So if you have 300 women entrepreneurs, that is a force to reckon with. How can you create a peer-to-peer support? How can you create a collective for them? I’ve done some evaluations for ESCAP in the region, and that’s one of the lessons that we have learned. How do we support women, and how can women support each other? And I think that is something we should not forget. Thank you.

Sajia Yarmal: Jayla-jan, over to you. Thank you, Khair-jan. Yeah, I agree that designing targeted digital literacy programs across Afghanistan, it requires a a lot of different layers of considerations to deliver something impactful. But I think to address the challenge, again, it is very broad, but I think programs must be culturally sensitive and community-oriented that would allow for the engaging of stakeholders. This can include families and religious leaders and community leaders, because this will build a lot of trust and encourage participation. I think in most of the work that I’ve done in Afghanistan through media outlets, whether it’s been with tech platforms or it’s been with UN agencies, one thing that we’ve constantly tried to integrate is the inclusion of religious leaders and community leaders because they’re listened to and they can actually make a tangible impact. So kind of like inclusion of those stakeholders, I think to me is an important strategy that can make quite a big impact. Again, I think the inclusion of male allies, like I said before, such as the brothers and fathers and husbands, it’s also very, very crucial to encourage their support because they can actually really make an impact in kind of paving the way and opening the way for their daughters and wives and sisters to get access to a lot of opportunities. So I think aside from that, given the logistical limitations, it’s of course another concern, programs should focus on the flexible and accessible delivery methods. What, how we’re trying to, I’m sorry, I’m trying to like bring in real life examples of how we’re trying to tackle with these challenges because I think that they might be helpful. So how we’re trying to do this is not just delivering whether it’s animated content or whatever educational kind of content online, but also using brochures, for instance, or banners across the countryside and in the rural areas where people don’t necessarily have access to digital devices or internet or. or electricity that much. So this, but taking into consideration that I think logistical limitations is of course another big issue. Security is of course the biggest consideration, but we have to keep in mind that a lot of people in Afghanistan right now, they’re putting their lives at risk, but they are working with underground schools. They are working with initiatives inside their houses. So if they can take that much risk to allow other girls to get access to educational opportunities, we can take our part in contributing to that, whether it’s books, whether it’s however kind of content that can be helpful to them. So I think, yeah, there are different kinds of things that we can take into consideration, keeping in mind the logistical, the cultural, and other issues to be able to make tangible impact. But I think it’s quite broad, so I can’t fit in everything into one response. Yeah, thank you very much, Sajidjan. You mentioned about the censorship, right? And then also access of women to the educational material.

Abdul Ghayoor Bawary: And now Joella pointed out about the involving of the religious scholars, and as well as providing content, kind of brochures or books or flyers, whatsoever, to Afghan women in order to support them to have access to education. So, like you said about the censorship, it’s not just, when we say censorship, it doesn’t mean only about the internet. So in the offline world, of course, in fact, it could ban anyone, especially the women in Afghanistan, to have access to those tangible assets, including the brochure, the books. So do you think it will be, I mean, impactful or that it works to empower women to have access to education, and as well as have access to the content, which supports their access to education?

Sajia Yarmal: shared was very powerful, but let’s do not forget the current situation in Afghanistan, because when we are proposing the solutions, we should think about the situation, how can we provide these solutions, and how can we implement this solution which we are proposing, or which we are talking about, even with international communities. Because if there is a solution for Afghan women regarding empowering women in education, etc., we should keep in mind that these activities will be affected by the Taliban’s government, the groups which have the power right now in Afghanistan, because without the allowance from these groups, we cannot provide these solutions for Afghan women living in Afghanistan. We can do something online, when we ensure that they have access to the internet, they have access to the computer, to the laptops, and they have the opportunities to use these online opportunities, but when we are not sure that they have these opportunities, we cannot also be sure about the result of the solution which we are providing them, or the opportunity which we are giving to Afghan women. You mentioned the censorship and the special censorship in Afghanistan during this situation in Afghanistan. That’s true. The censorship is quite large in Afghanistan right now. They are trying to censor the contents, not only the contents, but also the news agencies and the reporters, which they are working currently in Afghanistan, even in this hard situation. So these restrictions make the situation even harder for the people of Afghanistan, especially women in Afghanistan. And if we do not focus making the current group or government in Afghanistan responsible to answer for all the restrictions or all the rights which they are denying as a human rights or as a woman rights in Afghanistan or for women in Afghanistan, it won’t work and it won’t be as impactful as we are talking about or as we are expecting from the international community. So my point is to let’s focus and let’s put pressure on the Taliban or on the group which they are under power right now in Afghanistan, and let’s make them responsible to accept women really as part of the society, to accept and to give them opportunity to grow up. Women in Afghanistan do not need support of anyone else when they have the opportunity or when the atmosphere is ready for them to grow up, when there is opportunity and when there is a good atmosphere to grow up so they can do it by themselves. Of course, the international community can help for funding for some awareness project or development project, but still the women are able in Afghanistan or capable to work by themselves and to achieve their goals, whatever they have. The international community can only make the Taliban responsible for their acts, for denying the rights of women, for denying the human rights in Afghanistan. Thank you, Ercan. Sajjad, I would like to jump to Niti on the global or international community perspective. I’m not touching on the political side, but in terms of technical capabilities, the mandate of the international community to empower women to have access to education, like Aynia mentioned. So specifically for the Afghan women, what is your point of view? How can the international community support Afghan women to have access to education and as well as access to the technology and internet? So what’s your point of view being outside of Afghanistan and working with international

Abdul Ghayoor Bawary: organizations, specifically like the APNIC Foundation? Before I said, like Amrita, the APNIC Foundation’s role in supporting the education in Afghanistan and you’re currently running the Digital Late South Asia project. So we would like to hear your insights and views on this. Thank you. Thank you so much.

Sonal Zaveri: So as the APNIC Foundation, of course, it’s wonderful that we’re being able to see as many, you know, community oriented, as many sort of initiatives across the board, whether it’s with women and girls, whether it’s with participants and, you know, increasing representation in the technical community, etc. But I believe if you’re talking about… Afghan women and girls need to have. Piecemeal efforts, of course, are not going to be enough. We need systemic, structural changes, and we need to have a whole-of-society approach to that. For different players to come in, offer what they can, what they’re good at, what their expertise is, I think we’ll need to work in lockstep. We’ll need to work with one another to be able to understand what capabilities can be contributed, how these pieces fit in. To my colleague who mentioned, would it be helpful to bring in devices? Sure. But then what about the normative attitudes and beliefs that would actually prevent the use of such devices? I don’t think that infrastructure on its own would mean anything until and unless we’re also structurally then working alongside government. As much as we may not want to, but we do need to work with government to make sure that women are allowed to be participants in the economy. Because to my previous point as well, I think that benefits everyone. That not just benefits women and girls and gender diverse people, but it also benefits men, boys, government, society, et cetera. Sorry, we need to be advocating for equal participation in society, in the economy. Because I feel like the human rights argument, even though we believe in it, even though we want to advocate in favor of human rights, gender rights, et cetera. But I feel like practically, as is the case with my country, we seem to have lost the plot there. We seem to have lost that. We have. I mean, we have lost that plot there. If governments need to be partnered with. if we want to partner with governments, the narrative and the belief system have to be grounded in human rights. Absolutely. But we also need to be sure that we’re offering governments, companies, private sector players, technical community, civil society, what they need. The government wants to see a thriving economy. Sure. So let’s invite women in, unlock their economic potential, see how they can participate in the economy. And, you know, go from there. We perhaps need to sort of ground this and understand this from a gap. If we want to partner with different stakeholders, is it that we can play to their narrative without losing ours? So basically, what we want, I’m sure, I’m sure that that’s not going to be a simple, you know, endeavor. That’s not going to be a simple, it’s quite challenging, right, to work with the government that we have in Afghanistan at the moment. But if we’re looking at systemic structural changes that go beyond, you know, individual efforts or community efforts, not that I’m discounting those at all. We need to be, we need to understand how we can get stakeholders to really, you know, buy into this agenda. Because the first question every stakeholder asks is what’s in it for me? You know, why is it that I should support this vision? So controversial thought, but I’ll leave it at that.

Abdul Ghayoor Bawary: Yeah, thank you very much. Great people, great thoughts. Umar, do you want to add something as you’re leading the project of this digital leap and about your work in Afghanistan? Burhan, can you help me pass this mic, please? Thank you. Very much. Can you hear me? well. So I’ll introduce myself. I’m Omar Ansari, leading a project called Digital Leap South

Omar Ansari: Asia with the APNIC Foundation in Brisbane. The project aims to develop the capacity of the network engineers to help them learn new skills. With that, we do a lot of community building, bringing people together so they can share experiences and learn from each other. We support the local national IGFs, the network operator groups, and other similar gatherings and platforms. So Digital Leap South Asia, when we started the first cohort in 2023, we had nine women from Afghanistan who were network engineers. Here in 2024, we have only four women from Afghanistan. So this means the number is decreasing. The first year, we had more women working in network engineering, for example. They were trained in ICT in the past, but today, since the university has closed, women cannot go to school beyond grade six. It means that they’re gradually reducing in number. I’m the father of four girls, and it was very hard for me to see my son not being able to go to school in Afghanistan. So I had to move out, and I was forced to move out. One of my girls, age nine, was running a YouTube channel. It was called The Workshop, where you’re making robots and little moving devices. She just got admitted at a TAFE course on robotics. and she was very excited about the certification program that she will be doing in January. Afghan women has, in Afghan, men and women both, in general, they have a lot of talent. They lived in a society, you know, that was affected by war for decades, but they have learned how to be resilient. And the resilience that was shown by the Afghan Internet community in the past couple of years, you know, from falling down to raising up again, it was quite a journey. Lima is one of our participants from last year. She’s a DLSA, Digital Leap South Asian alumna, and she’s moderating this session. And she’s been leading many other efforts, like School on Internet Governance of Afghanistan. So if they’re provided with an opportunity, they can excel. They can not only contribute to the local socioeconomic development and be active in their own societies and have good lives and contribute to their families, but they can also be participants of the global development processes. So that is… But definitely, it’s not something that Afghans would be able to do it alone. As suggested by the panel, we need international friends and allies so that we can do it together. It’s an issue for all of us to address, I think. APNIC Foundation has some really good plans for the future of the region, the APNIC region. We cover 56 economies across Asia-Pacific. And the APNIC, which is a region… but then there is an APNIC Foundation.

Speaker: So our CEO is here and he’s very excited about this session and we have four more sessions coming up. So I’ll probably pass. Mar, this is audible. First, I’d just like to acknowledge all the speakers we had. You know, we talked about getting people here. Some of them couldn’t make it here due to some of these logistics issues we’ve had. So to your point earlier, something I just want to point out, you know, the world had a bit of moving on to something else. The problems in Afghanistan have an, it’s probably getting worse in some ways. It’s a credit to my team that they’ve been able to pull off what they’ve done in Afghanistan and parts of South Asia over the last couple of years. A simple thing as even sending money, it’s not just these other structural issues we’re talking about, but the international financial system doesn’t even allow us to send money to Afghanistan. My colleagues, the few that we’ve managed to get to Saudi Arabia for this event, the trials and tribulations my team went, done, those of us who lived in advanced economy, we have it easy. But just even getting money to get on a plane, it’s not that easy for some of our colleagues in some parts of the world. So there, I think, needs to be, you know, one, we should not forget that when there is conflict and issues that arise in certain countries, and then there will sort of next great conflict, you know, what happens to those that we’ve forgotten. So one of the reasons we wanted to host this session here was to ensure that, you know, we don’t forget that there’s still. is an issue in Afghanistan that women are still suffering. The three women on the screen you see there that couldn’t make it to Riyadh, they are doing, even though they’re not long. And I’ve got my colleagues here from, you know, Gayoor is here from Afghanistan, Omar, of course, who’s been a solid supporter, and in fact, he runs the program at the APNIC Foundation. So yes, help is needed. Thanks, you are able to support us. Please, we’d love to see how we could work and do much, much more. But of course, we have to do it taking into account and there are certain issues that we can’t just parachute in and do stuff and leave. That doesn’t quite work now that it’s at scale. So I see the lady is holding up the sign, which means I should shut up. So Gayoor, maybe I’ll hand back to you. We still have a lot of work to do in South Asia, in Afghanistan, but some other economies as well. We have our new strategy, and just in formulation at the moment. So in the coming months, let’s talk about what we’re doing and perhaps come partner in the difference we make. And one thing I like to say, we are more about action, not words. So what we do is around long narratives and speeches. So I’ll stop there. Thank you. Yeah, thank you. Thank you very much.

Abdul Ghayoor Bawary: A big round of applause to all our speakers, audience, the panelists, the remote moderators, speakers, everyone. Thank you very much. It was very pleasure to having you all and I really appreciate you have dedicated your precious time to attend the session and share your views and insights. It was really good to have you all. I think we are done with our time. So thank you very much and thanks to the- Foundation for organizing this beautiful session. At the end, I would request for a group photo. And thank you. Bye. I think we have someone. She has something to say. I will pass the mic. Hello, everyone. Sorry. I’m Mary from Timor-Leste. And in this room, the discussion is about the women in Afghanistan. But please allow me to also speak about women in Timor-Leste who face some similar challenges to Afghan women. Women in Afghanistan face some challenges similar to those in Timor-Leste. But our situation is different, as we are a democratic country, where men and women have equal rights. However, women in Timor-Leste still face challenges in accessing education, technology, and job opportunities, especially in rural areas. The switch program, which has been running for three years in Timor-Leste, has greatly supported women like me in ICT. I kindly request to the APNI Foundation to continue this program in Timor-Leste, as it has made a significant difference in our lives. I also ask the APNI Foundation to help women in Timor-Leste further by implementing more programs like switch. Thank you. turn cameras on. We have you in the background in a group photo. Thank you.

S

Sajia Yarmal

Speech speed

131 words per minute

Speech length

2530 words

Speech time

1151 seconds

Severe restrictions on women’s rights and freedoms under Taliban rule

Explanation

Sajia Yarmal describes the current situation in Afghanistan where women face extreme limitations on their basic rights and freedoms. She emphasizes that under Taliban rule, women are denied access to education, work, and even public spaces.

Evidence

Women cannot go to university, cannot work, and are banned from public parks.

Major Discussion Point

Current situation of Afghan women’s access to education and technology

Agreed with

Zhala Sarmast

Omar Ansari

Agreed on

Severe restrictions on women’s rights and freedoms in Afghanistan

Censorship and surveillance of online activities

Explanation

Sajia Yarmal points out that the Taliban government is imposing strict censorship on content and monitoring online activities. This creates fear among women and limits their ability to access information and communicate freely.

Evidence

The Taliban censor content, making it impossible to access educational programs, news or global platforms. They also monitor online activities, so women fear being tracked or punished for breaking rules.

Major Discussion Point

Current situation of Afghan women’s access to education and technology

Advocating for women’s rights and pressuring Taliban government

Explanation

Sajia Yarmal argues for continued international pressure on the Taliban government to respect women’s rights. She emphasizes the need to hold the Taliban accountable for their actions and policies that restrict women’s freedoms.

Evidence

The international community can only make the Taliban responsible for their acts, for denying the rights of women, for denying the human rights in Afghanistan.

Major Discussion Point

Role of international community in supporting Afghan women

Z

Zhala Sarmast

Speech speed

160 words per minute

Speech length

1490 words

Speech time

556 seconds

Limited access to devices, internet, and digital skills for women

Explanation

Zhala Sarmast highlights the challenges Afghan women face in accessing technology. She points out that many women lack access to devices, internet connectivity, and the necessary digital skills to utilize these resources effectively.

Major Discussion Point

Current situation of Afghan women’s access to education and technology

Agreed with

Sajia Yarmal

Omar Ansari

Agreed on

Severe restrictions on women’s rights and freedoms in Afghanistan

Designing culturally sensitive and community-oriented programs

Explanation

Zhala Sarmast emphasizes the importance of creating programs that are respectful of local culture and involve the community. She suggests that this approach can help build trust and encourage participation in educational initiatives.

Evidence

Programs must be culturally sensitive and community-oriented that would allow for the engaging of stakeholders. This can include families and religious leaders and community leaders, because this will build a lot of trust and encourage participation.

Major Discussion Point

Strategies to empower Afghan women through education and technology

Agreed with

Sonal Zaveri

Agreed on

Need for community engagement and cultural sensitivity

Engaging male family members and religious leaders

Explanation

Zhala Sarmast stresses the importance of involving male family members and religious leaders in efforts to empower women. She argues that their support is crucial for opening up opportunities for women and girls.

Evidence

The inclusion of male allies, such as the brothers and fathers and husbands, it’s also very, very crucial to encourage their support because they can actually really make an impact in kind of paving the way and opening the way for their daughters and wives and sisters to get access to a lot of opportunities.

Major Discussion Point

Strategies to empower Afghan women through education and technology

Agreed with

Sonal Zaveri

Agreed on

Need for community engagement and cultural sensitivity

Providing flexible and accessible delivery methods for educational content

Explanation

Zhala Sarmast suggests using various methods to deliver educational content, considering the logistical limitations in Afghanistan. She proposes using both digital and non-digital means to reach women and girls.

Evidence

Using brochures, for instance, or banners across the countryside and in the rural areas where people don’t necessarily have access to digital devices or internet or electricity that much.

Major Discussion Point

Strategies to empower Afghan women through education and technology

A

Amrita Choudhury

Speech speed

132 words per minute

Speech length

2182 words

Speech time

984 seconds

Economic barriers to accessing technology

Explanation

Amrita Choudhury points out that economic factors significantly limit women’s access to technology in Afghanistan. She highlights that the cost of devices and internet services is often prohibitive for many families.

Evidence

Smartphones, computers, the internet services are too expensive for most families, especially for women who depend on family members for financial support.

Major Discussion Point

Current situation of Afghan women’s access to education and technology

O

Omar Ansari

Speech speed

118 words per minute

Speech length

617 words

Speech time

312 seconds

Decreasing number of women in ICT fields

Explanation

Omar Ansari observes a decline in the number of women participating in ICT fields in Afghanistan. He attributes this to the closure of universities and restrictions on women’s education beyond grade six.

Evidence

In 2023, we had nine women from Afghanistan who were network engineers. Here in 2024, we have only four women from Afghanistan.

Major Discussion Point

Current situation of Afghan women’s access to education and technology

Agreed with

Sajia Yarmal

Zhala Sarmast

Agreed on

Severe restrictions on women’s rights and freedoms in Afghanistan

Partnering with local organizations and initiatives

Explanation

Omar Ansari suggests that international support should involve collaboration with local organizations and initiatives in Afghanistan. He emphasizes the importance of working together to address the challenges faced by Afghan women.

Evidence

We need international friends and allies so that we can do it together. It’s an issue for all of us to address, I think.

Major Discussion Point

Role of international community in supporting Afghan women

Agreed with

Neeti Biyani

Speaker

Agreed on

Importance of international support and collaboration

S

Sonal Zaveri

Speech speed

144 words per minute

Speech length

1204 words

Speech time

501 seconds

Creating safe community spaces for women to learn

Explanation

Sonal Zaveri proposes the establishment of safe community spaces where women can gather to learn and access educational resources. She suggests that these spaces can help overcome social and cultural barriers to women’s education.

Evidence

Community spaces, often some people call them safe spaces. So spaces where women and girls are able to go and to learn is critically important.

Major Discussion Point

Strategies to empower Afghan women through education and technology

Supporting peer-to-peer networks and collective action among women

Explanation

Sonal Zaveri advocates for creating peer-to-peer support systems and encouraging collective action among women. She argues that this approach can provide mutual support and amplify women’s voices without putting individuals at risk.

Evidence

Can you set up systems so that girls and women can support each other? So having peer-to-peer strategies in your programs, in your solutions, is I think absolutely important.

Major Discussion Point

Strategies to empower Afghan women through education and technology

Need to consider cultural norms and male entitlement

Explanation

Sonal Zaveri emphasizes the importance of addressing cultural norms and male entitlement when designing programs to empower women. She suggests that these factors significantly influence women’s access to education and technology.

Evidence

Unless we acknowledge that there is something called male entitlement, we are not going to go far.

Major Discussion Point

Challenges in implementing support programs for Afghan women

Agreed with

Zhala Sarmast

Agreed on

Need for community engagement and cultural sensitivity

N

Neeti Biyani

Speech speed

140 words per minute

Speech length

1351 words

Speech time

575 seconds

Providing funding and resources for education and development projects

Explanation

Neeti Biyani suggests that international organizations should provide funding and resources for education and development projects in Afghanistan. She emphasizes the importance of supporting initiatives that empower women and girls.

Major Discussion Point

Role of international community in supporting Afghan women

Agreed with

Omar Ansari

Speaker

Agreed on

Importance of international support and collaboration

Importance of long-term, systemic approaches over piecemeal efforts

Explanation

Neeti Biyani argues for the need for comprehensive, long-term strategies to address the challenges faced by Afghan women. She emphasizes that isolated efforts are not sufficient to create lasting change.

Evidence

Piecemeal efforts, of course, are not going to be enough. We need systemic, structural changes, and we need to have a whole-of-society approach to that.

Major Discussion Point

Challenges in implementing support programs for Afghan women

Balancing human rights advocacy with economic arguments for women’s empowerment

Explanation

Neeti Biyani suggests combining human rights advocacy with economic arguments to promote women’s empowerment. She proposes highlighting the economic benefits of women’s participation in society to gain support from various stakeholders.

Evidence

The government wants to see a thriving economy. Sure. So let’s invite women in, unlock their economic potential, see how they can participate in the economy.

Major Discussion Point

Challenges in implementing support programs for Afghan women

L

Lima Madomi

Speech speed

149 words per minute

Speech length

737 words

Speech time

295 seconds

Security risks for women participating in programs

Explanation

Lima Madomi highlights the potential security risks for Afghan women participating in empowerment programs. She emphasizes the need to consider these risks when designing and implementing support initiatives.

Evidence

If we are providing all these help, it could be a potential life risk for many women that are living out there.

Major Discussion Point

Challenges in implementing support programs for Afghan women

S

Speaker

Speech speed

172 words per minute

Speech length

530 words

Speech time

184 seconds

Addressing structural barriers in international financial systems

Explanation

The speaker points out that international financial systems create obstacles for supporting initiatives in Afghanistan. They highlight the difficulties in transferring funds to the country, which hinders aid efforts.

Evidence

The international financial system doesn’t even allow us to send money to Afghanistan.

Major Discussion Point

Role of international community in supporting Afghan women

Maintaining focus on Afghanistan despite other global conflicts

Explanation

The speaker emphasizes the importance of continuing to address the issues in Afghanistan, even as other global conflicts emerge. They argue that the international community should not forget about the ongoing challenges faced by Afghan women.

Evidence

One of the reasons we wanted to host this session here was to ensure that, you know, we don’t forget that there’s still an issue in Afghanistan that women are still suffering.

Major Discussion Point

Role of international community in supporting Afghan women

Agreed with

Omar Ansari

Neeti Biyani

Agreed on

Importance of international support and collaboration

Logistical difficulties in delivering aid and resources

Explanation

The speaker highlights the logistical challenges in providing support to Afghanistan. They mention difficulties in travel and resource allocation that complicate aid efforts.

Evidence

My colleagues, the few that we’ve managed to get to Saudi Arabia for this event, the trials and tribulations my team went, done, those of us who lived in advanced economy, we have it easy. But just even getting money to get on a plane, it’s not that easy for some of our colleagues in some parts of the world.

Major Discussion Point

Challenges in implementing support programs for Afghan women

Agreements

Agreement Points

Severe restrictions on women’s rights and freedoms in Afghanistan

Sajia Yarmal

Zhala Sarmast

Omar Ansari

Severe restrictions on women’s rights and freedoms under Taliban rule

Limited access to devices, internet, and digital skills for women

Decreasing number of women in ICT fields

The speakers agree that Afghan women face extreme limitations on their basic rights, including access to education, work, and technology under Taliban rule.

Need for community engagement and cultural sensitivity

Zhala Sarmast

Sonal Zaveri

Designing culturally sensitive and community-oriented programs

Engaging male family members and religious leaders

Need to consider cultural norms and male entitlement

The speakers emphasize the importance of creating programs that are respectful of local culture, involve the community, and address cultural norms and male entitlement.

Importance of international support and collaboration

Omar Ansari

Neeti Biyani

Speaker

Partnering with local organizations and initiatives

Providing funding and resources for education and development projects

Maintaining focus on Afghanistan despite other global conflicts

The speakers agree on the need for international support and collaboration with local organizations to address the challenges faced by Afghan women.

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers advocate for creating accessible and safe spaces for women to learn, whether through physical community spaces or flexible delivery methods for educational content.

Sonal Zaveri

Zhala Sarmast

Creating safe community spaces for women to learn

Providing flexible and accessible delivery methods for educational content

Both speakers highlight the security risks and surveillance challenges faced by Afghan women when accessing online resources or participating in empowerment programs.

Sajia Yarmal

Lima Madomi

Censorship and surveillance of online activities

Security risks for women participating in programs

Unexpected Consensus

Balancing human rights advocacy with economic arguments

Neeti Biyani

Speaker

Balancing human rights advocacy with economic arguments for women’s empowerment

Addressing structural barriers in international financial systems

There was an unexpected consensus on the need to combine human rights advocacy with economic arguments to promote women’s empowerment and address structural barriers. This approach suggests a pragmatic strategy to engage various stakeholders, including governments and financial institutions.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of agreement include the severity of restrictions on Afghan women’s rights, the need for culturally sensitive and community-oriented approaches, and the importance of international support and collaboration.

Consensus level

There is a moderate to high level of consensus among the speakers on the key challenges faced by Afghan women and the general strategies needed to address them. This consensus suggests a shared understanding of the complex situation and the multifaceted approach required to empower Afghan women through education and technology. However, there are some variations in the specific solutions proposed, reflecting the complexity of the issue and the need for diverse strategies.

Differences

Different Viewpoints

Approach to engaging with the Taliban government

Sajia Yarmal

Neeti Biyani

The international community can only make the Taliban responsible for their acts, for denying the rights of women, for denying the human rights in Afghanistan.

The government wants to see a thriving economy. Sure. So let’s invite women in, unlock their economic potential, see how they can participate in the economy.

Sajia Yarmal advocates for pressuring the Taliban government to respect women’s rights, while Neeti Biyani suggests using economic arguments to encourage the government to allow women’s participation in the economy.

Focus of international support

Lima Madomi

Neeti Biyani

If we are providing all these help, it could be a potential life risk for many women that are living out there.

Piecemeal efforts, of course, are not going to be enough. We need systemic, structural changes, and we need to have a whole-of-society approach to that.

Lima Madomi emphasizes the need to consider security risks when providing support, while Neeti Biyani argues for comprehensive, systemic approaches over isolated efforts.

Unexpected Differences

Providing tangible resources vs. focusing on education

Audience member

Lima Madomi

Can we collect cell phones, let’s say, from the United States and ship them over?

I think it’s more about how we could empower them in terms of education and in terms of giving them some skills and opportunities that they could help themselves. That could be more valuable.

The audience member’s suggestion of providing tangible resources like cell phones was unexpectedly countered by Lima Madomi, who emphasized the importance of education and skills development over physical resources. This highlights the complexity of providing aid in challenging environments.

Overall Assessment

summary

The main areas of disagreement revolved around the approach to engaging with the Taliban government, the focus and methods of international support, and the balance between providing tangible resources and educational opportunities.

difference_level

The level of disagreement among speakers was moderate. While there was general consensus on the need to support Afghan women’s access to education and technology, speakers differed on the specific strategies and priorities. These differences reflect the complex nature of the situation in Afghanistan and the challenges in implementing effective support programs. The implications of these disagreements suggest that a multifaceted approach, considering various perspectives and potential risks, may be necessary to address the issues faced by Afghan women effectively.

Partial Agreements

Partial Agreements

Both speakers agree on the importance of community involvement, but Zhala Sarmast focuses on engaging stakeholders in program design, while Sonal Zaveri emphasizes creating safe physical spaces for women to learn.

Zhala Sarmast

Sonal Zaveri

Programs must be culturally sensitive and community-oriented that would allow for the engaging of stakeholders. This can include families and religious leaders and community leaders, because this will build a lot of trust and encourage participation.

Community spaces, often some people call them safe spaces. So spaces where women and girls are able to go and to learn is critically important.

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers advocate for creating accessible and safe spaces for women to learn, whether through physical community spaces or flexible delivery methods for educational content.

Sonal Zaveri

Zhala Sarmast

Creating safe community spaces for women to learn

Providing flexible and accessible delivery methods for educational content

Both speakers highlight the security risks and surveillance challenges faced by Afghan women when accessing online resources or participating in empowerment programs.

Sajia Yarmal

Lima Madomi

Censorship and surveillance of online activities

Security risks for women participating in programs

Takeaways

Key Takeaways

Afghan women face severe restrictions on education and technology access under Taliban rule

Empowering Afghan women requires culturally sensitive, community-oriented approaches

International support is crucial but must consider security risks and local contexts

Long-term, systemic changes are needed to address structural barriers to women’s empowerment

Digital technologies can provide opportunities for education and connection, but access remains limited

Resolutions and Action Items

Design programs that engage male family members and religious leaders to build community support

Create safe community spaces for women to learn and access digital resources

Develop flexible, accessible delivery methods for educational content (e.g. offline materials)

Support peer-to-peer networks and collective action among Afghan women

Advocate for women’s rights and pressure Taliban government through international channels

Unresolved Issues

How to effectively partner with the current Afghan government to implement women’s empowerment programs

Specific ways to address censorship and surveillance of online activities

Methods to sustainably fund and deliver technology resources to Afghan women

Balancing security risks with the need for visible support and empowerment initiatives

Addressing deeply ingrained cultural norms and male entitlement in Afghan society

Suggested Compromises

Frame women’s empowerment in economic terms to gain government buy-in, while maintaining human rights focus

Work through local organizations and initiatives to deliver aid, rather than direct international involvement

Focus on basic education and skills first, before advancing to more complex technological training

Engage with community leaders to find culturally acceptable ways for women to access education and technology

Thought Provoking Comments

Given the geopolitical situation, given the socio-economic situation in Afghanistan today, there are very many structural issues facing Afghan girls, women, gender diverse people in the country. Right from, you know, having devices, to use of devices, to having privacy on devices, to more normative social issues that may not allow complete usage or complete agency over the use of such devices, connectivity, you know, meaningful access, and the ability to choose, the ability to have control over, you know, how women and girls connect, how they participate in the digital economy, how they learn, how they work, how they connect with each other, how they access opportunities.

speaker

Neeti Biyani

reason

This comment provides a comprehensive overview of the multifaceted challenges facing Afghan women in accessing technology and education, highlighting both technical and social barriers.

impact

It set the tone for the discussion by outlining the complexity of the issue and the need for a holistic approach, leading to further exploration of specific challenges and potential solutions.

We cannot do any harm. So I think the principle of do no harm must be the first principle that we follow when we are thinking about any sort of solutions for women in education, for economic empowerment and so on.

speaker

Sonal Zaveri

reason

This comment introduces an important ethical consideration in developing solutions for Afghan women, emphasizing the need to carefully consider potential negative consequences.

impact

It shifted the discussion towards more nuanced and cautious approaches to intervention, leading to conversations about culturally sensitive and community-oriented programs.

If we are providing all these help, it could be a potential life risk for many women that are living out there. So when we are doing these things, we should also consider those things. And we should also think about how we could do some of these potential support that we are providing or the empowerment that we are doing in a sense that it does not threaten their life.

speaker

Lima Madomi

reason

This comment highlights the critical safety concerns for Afghan women engaging in educational or empowerment activities, adding a layer of complexity to proposed solutions.

impact

It led to a more cautious discussion about intervention strategies, emphasizing the need for discreet and secure methods of support.

We need systemic, structural changes, and we need to have a whole-of-society approach to that. For different players to come in, offer what they can, what they’re good at, what their expertise is, I think we’ll need to work in lockstep. We’ll need to work with one another to be able to understand what capabilities can be contributed, how these pieces fit in.

speaker

Sonal Zaveri

reason

This comment emphasizes the need for a coordinated, multi-stakeholder approach to addressing the complex challenges facing Afghan women.

impact

It broadened the discussion from individual interventions to systemic changes, encouraging consideration of how different actors can collaborate effectively.

The first year, we had more women working in network engineering, for example. They were trained in ICT in the past, but today, since the university has closed, women cannot go to school beyond grade six. It means that they’re gradually reducing in number.

speaker

Omar Ansari

reason

This comment provides concrete evidence of the declining opportunities for Afghan women in technology fields, illustrating the real-world impact of current policies.

impact

It grounded the discussion in tangible outcomes, highlighting the urgency of the situation and the need for immediate action.

Overall Assessment

These key comments shaped the discussion by highlighting the complexity of the challenges facing Afghan women in accessing education and technology. They moved the conversation from general observations to specific considerations of safety, cultural sensitivity, and the need for systemic, collaborative approaches. The discussion evolved to emphasize the importance of careful, ethical interventions that prioritize the safety and agency of Afghan women while acknowledging the urgent need for action in the face of declining opportunities.

Follow-up Questions

How can targeted digital literacy and skill-building programs be designed to empower Afghan women while considering the cultural and logistical challenges they face?

speaker

Abdul Ghayoor Bawary

explanation

This question addresses the need for tailored solutions that take into account the specific constraints and cultural context in Afghanistan.

What tangible actions can people outside of Afghanistan take to help empower local women?

speaker

Shauna Hoffman (audience member)

explanation

This explores practical ways for the international community to support Afghan women, considering the current restrictions and challenges.

How can Afghan women leverage the Internet and digital resources to overcome challenges and build meaningful opportunities for themselves and their communities, given the current restrictions?

speaker

Abdul Ghayoor Bawary

explanation

This question seeks to understand how technology can be used as a tool for empowerment despite the limitations imposed by the current regime.

How can the international community support Afghan women’s access to education and technology without putting them at risk?

speaker

Lima Madomi

explanation

This addresses the need for safe and effective ways to provide support, considering the potential dangers faced by women who receive such assistance.

How can we engage male family members, religious leaders, and community leaders to support women’s education and empowerment?

speaker

Zhala Sarmast

explanation

This explores strategies for gaining crucial support from influential figures in Afghan society to facilitate women’s access to opportunities.

What role can peer-to-peer support and collective action play in empowering Afghan women?

speaker

Sonal Zaveri

explanation

This investigates how women can support each other and create a stronger collective voice for change.

How can we address the issue of male entitlement and change societal norms to support women’s rights and empowerment?

speaker

Audience member (unnamed)

explanation

This explores the root causes of gender inequality and seeks ways to transform societal attitudes.

How can international organizations like the APNIC Foundation contribute to empowering Afghan women while navigating the complex political situation?

speaker

Abdul Ghayoor Bawary

explanation

This question seeks to understand how international organizations can effectively support Afghan women within the constraints of the current political climate.

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed.

Day 0 Event #166 Review of IGF2023 Kyoto and road for WSIS+20

Day 0 Event #166 Review of IGF2023 Kyoto and road for WSIS+20

Session at a Glance

Summary

This discussion focused on the achievements, challenges, and future of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) and broader internet governance. Panelists highlighted the IGF’s success in fostering inclusive multi-stakeholder dialogue on internet issues, creating global awareness of digital topics, and developing a network of national and regional IGFs. They emphasized the IGF’s role in promoting an open, global, interoperable, and secure internet.

Key challenges identified included bridging the digital divide, addressing the crisis of multilateralism, and securing stable funding and support for the IGF. Panelists stressed the importance of the multi-stakeholder approach in building trust and finding shared solutions to global internet issues. They also noted the growing involvement of youth in internet governance discussions.

Looking to the future, participants emphasized the need to secure the renewal of the IGF’s mandate in the upcoming WSIS+20 review. They called for strengthening the IGF’s role in implementing the Global Digital Compact and addressing emerging digital policy issues. The discussion highlighted the importance of continued multi-stakeholder engagement in shaping internet governance and the need for capacity building, especially for youth and developing countries.

Panelists agreed that the IGF remains crucial as a platform for inclusive dialogue on internet policy issues. They emphasized the need for continued support and improvement of the IGF to ensure its effectiveness in addressing future challenges in the rapidly evolving digital landscape.

Keypoints

Major discussion points:

– The achievements and challenges of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) to date

– The importance of the multi-stakeholder approach to internet governance

– The need to secure renewal of the IGF’s mandate and strengthen its role

– The involvement of youth in internet governance processes

– Promoting an open, global, interoperable and secure internet

The overall purpose of the discussion was to reflect on the IGF’s accomplishments so far, discuss its current role in internet governance, and consider how to strengthen and sustain the IGF going forward, particularly in light of upcoming processes like the WSIS+20 review.

The tone of the discussion was generally positive and constructive. Speakers highlighted the IGF’s achievements and importance, while also acknowledging challenges and areas for improvement. There was a collaborative spirit, with participants building on each other’s points and expressing shared goals for the future of internet governance. The tone remained consistent throughout, with a focus on how to collectively strengthen multi-stakeholder internet governance processes.

Speakers

– Yoichi Iida: Session moderator, representing the Japanese government

– Gitanjali Sah: Strategy and Policy Coordinator from International Telecommunications Union

– Melanie Kaplan: From the Department of State of U.S. Government, active in Internet governance

– Timea Suto: From International Chamber of Commerce

– Yuliya Morenets: Founder of the Youth IGF Global

Additional speakers:

– Craig Stanley-Adamson: From UK Department of Science Innovation Technology

Full session report

The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) Discussion: Achievements, Challenges, and Future Prospects

This comprehensive discussion, moderated by Yoichi Iida of the Japanese government, brought together key figures in internet governance to reflect on the IGF’s accomplishments, current role, and future direction. The panel, notably all-female, included representatives from international organisations, government bodies, and youth initiatives, providing a multi-faceted perspective on the IGF’s impact and potential.

Iida opened by highlighting the panel’s composition, noting its relevance to addressing the digital gender divide. He also emphasized the IGF’s role as a reference point for discussions on data flow and AI governance.

Achievements of the IGF

Panellists unanimously praised the IGF for its success in fostering inclusive multi-stakeholder dialogue on internet issues. Melanie Kaplan from the U.S. Department of State emphasized that the multi-stakeholder approach has been key to the internet’s success as a global platform. Timea Suto from the International Chamber of Commerce highlighted the IGF’s role as a platform for inclusive dialogue, while Yuliya Morenets, founder of the Youth IGF Global, noted the recognition and inclusion of youth voices as a major accomplishment.

The discussion underscored the IGF’s success in creating global awareness of digital topics and developing a network of national and regional IGFs. Craig Stanley-Adamson from the UK Department of Science Innovation Technology pointed out the IGF’s importance in fostering developing country leadership in internet governance discussions.

Challenges and Future Directions

Despite these achievements, the panellists identified several challenges. Timea Suto highlighted the need to bridge the digital divide and address the crisis of multilateralism. Funding and institutional stability emerged as critical issues, with Kaplan and Suto emphasizing the need to address the IGF’s funding challenges and stabilize its secretariat.

Looking ahead, securing the renewal of the IGF’s mandate in the upcoming WSIS+20 review was stressed as a primary goal. Kaplan called for improvements in IGF inclusivity and participation, particularly from developing countries. The role of youth in shaping internet governance was a recurring theme, with Morenets advocating for integrating youth perspectives in policy development and outlining four priorities for youth engagement.

Stanley-Adamson highlighted the need for the IGF to continue producing tangible outputs and impacts, particularly in implementing WSIS+20 and the Global Digital Compact (GDC). He also mentioned a report from the DNS Research Federation demonstrating the IGF’s impact on Internet Exchange Point growth in developing regions.

Kaplan emphasized the relevance of the GDC to the IGF’s work, referencing paragraphs 26 and 27 which describe the internet and the multi-stakeholder model. She also mentioned the Declaration for the Future of the Internet as an important initiative.

Suto stressed the importance of cross-border data flows and warned against the negative impact of data localization measures. The discussion also touched on the upcoming IGF in Norway in June, as noted by Iida.

Conclusion and Future Directions

The discussion concluded with a strong affirmation of the IGF’s crucial role in internet governance and a call for its continued support and improvement. Key takeaways included the need to secure the IGF’s mandate renewal, improve its inclusivity and participation, recognize its broader role beyond internet governance, and address funding and staffing challenges.

As Kaplan aptly summarized, “This is a pivotal time for the IGF”, with the recent adoption of the GDC and the upcoming WSIS+20 review. The discussion underscored the collective commitment to strengthening the IGF’s role in shaping a more inclusive, secure, and innovative digital future, with a particular emphasis on youth engagement and producing tangible outcomes.

Session Transcript

Yoichi Iida: If you have questions from the floor, the speaker will come up to here. I will follow the order, but I will be watching the clock. Maybe I will invite you for the second question to talk about the future of digital. If you have questions from the floor, the speaker will come up to here. If you have questions from the floor, the speaker will come up to here. Maybe we should start very quickly. Okay, so I hope my microphone is on. So, good morning, everybody, and probably good morning, good day to online participants. Thank you very much for joining us in this session, which will talk about the Internet governance and also the future of IGF. So, I have a very wonderful line of speakers joining us. So, let me quickly introduce the speakers in person, and also we have one online participant here. So, from this side, Miss Gitanjali Sah, Strategy and Policy Coordinator from International Telecommunications Union. Thank you very much, Gitanjali, to join us. And second, Miss Temiya Suto from International Chamber of Commerce, who is always very active in IGF. So, thank you very much for joining us. And the third person is Miss Melanie Kaplan from the Department of State of U.S. Government. And Melanie is also very active in Internet governance. And I always call her Melanie, and I don’t know her official title, but okay, just forget it, yeah. We are always one of the stakeholders in this field. And last but not least, of course, we have Miss Yulia Morenet, if I pronounce correctly, founder of the Youth IGF Global. So, thank you very much, Yulia, for joining us online. We miss you, but we definitely expect a very active discussion today. So, just quickly to overview what was happening over the last few years. This year was actually a very busy year for us. As all of you are aware, United Nations discussed Global Digital Compact. And the outcome came out on the sideline of UN General Assembly in September. And we believe these outcomes are quite well organized and probably satisfied most of us. But the sentences look good, but the real value will be the follow-up. So, we have to discuss how we can follow up these outcomes and how we can bring these outcomes in the document into the reality in the next coming month. So, in next year, 2025, we will have the GDC follow-up, of course, but we will have WSIS Plus 20 review. And this will discuss how and what IGF will be continued as internet governance instrument under United Nations auspices. Next year, we will have next IGF in Norway in June, which is quite early compared to regular timing. And we need to be very much hurry up and busy after this IGF completed. But all of you must be very much aware that this IGF in Saudi looks very beautifully organized. And maybe I don’t want to keep you too long in this session, but I will give you more time to walk around and look around to see people here. But please be a little bit patient to see and what these wonderful speakers will talk about IGF in the future. So, the Japanese government has been also very active in this field. And we invited IGF last year to Kyoto, where more than 6,000 people gathered in person. And more than 10,000 people joined online, including in-person participants. So, in that sense, Kyoto IGF was very much successful. But of course, we have to think about the follow-up and the outcome and materialization of the outcomes from Kyoto interactions too. So, let me invite those speakers to my questions. So, first question. What are the major achievements of Internet Governance Forum up until now? And also the outstanding challenges in the Internet Governance for different stakeholders, including government, businesses, civil society, academia, international organizations? And when we think about the upcoming discussions and arguments. So, first, I will invite Melanie to share your views.

Melanie Kaplan: Well, thank you so much for having me, Yuichi. It’s a pleasure to see you and to be joined by such distinguished colleagues on the panel. Nice to see everyone here in the room and hello to stakeholders online. You know, I think I just start out by saying the United States strongly supports IGF as the preeminent global venue bringing together all stakeholders in a bottom-up process to discuss solutions on Internet public policy issues that are rights-respecting, innovative, and empowering. And sort of reflecting on past years in IGF, we’ve seen it as a great venue for discussions for the latest topics and very flexible to accommodate the evolution of key issues. We think that IGF continues to serve as a model for inclusivity and transparency in international engagements. And the sort of continued growth and breadth of conversations is a testament to the importance of the IGF. You know, one of the challenges that we see that many stakeholders face in Internet Governance is the ever-growing and expanding international landscape dealing with these issues. And IGF provides an excellent platform on an annual basis to sort of pull all these threads together. And as Yoichi was mentioning in his introduction, we do really see that this… This is a pivotal time for the IGF, with the GDC’s adoption that just happened at the Summit for the Future, and as we’re sort of in the outset of the WSIS Plus 20 overall review. And so as we sort of look forward and think about IGF of the future, you know, we very much support efforts to continue strengthening the IGF and increasing participation of stakeholders, particularly from developing countries. And we will, of course, in the WSIS Plus 20 review process, advocate very strongly for the continuation of the IGF’s mandate.

Yoichi Iida: Thank you very much, Melanie, for a very strong comment, probably from the government point of view. And so now let me ask, invite Tymia to share the same question from probably in particular business perspective.

Timea Suto: Thank you very much, Yoichi, and thank you for inviting me here. And it’s really great to see each other and start with a great session early on day zero. I hope we will be successful in sharing some light on the IGF and the path forward. Looking a little bit back, because we’re talking about the IGF achievements and what we’ve done thus far, as Melanie said, I think the main achievement of the IGF is being this instrument to foster inclusive multistakeholder dialogue on Internet governance and really bringing all of us together from business, government, civil society, academia, technical community. And it has established, IGF, it has established itself as the premier platform for this open and constructive discussion, not only on the Internet and its governance, but also on the array of technologies that enable the Internet or are enabled by the Internet. So it really points beyond now, 20 years in, from where we started on Internet governance. The other major contribution that I see from the IGF or what business sees from the IGF is creating this global awareness of digital issues, whether we’re talking about access to digital inclusion or to cybersecurity or emerging technologies, it’s really being here and having this conversation encourages having a shared understanding and collaboration between all the stakeholders. And to this, we can add the outcomes that come from the IGF intersessional work, such as the best practice forums, the dynamic coalitions, the policy networks, that have allowed stakeholders to collaborate across the year around specific issues that they are interested in and bring their contributions to this forum, but also elsewhere. While these outputs are not binding from the IGF, they do provide insights and practical guidance sometimes for both policy makers and businesses, very happy always to see these outcomes come to life. And then last but not least about the achievements of the IGF, we shouldn’t forget the national and regional network that the IGF managed to build over the past almost 20 years that really brings the global discussions back down into the local practice, but also makes sure that our conversations at a global level are informed by the local realities and the grassroots engagement that these communities can have to these networks. So I think the IGF, we all hear the critics sometimes saying that it’s only a talk shop, but looking beyond that veil, I think it has accomplished quite a bit in 20 years. And there is a good report that came out earlier this year, I think from the UK government, so maybe my colleagues can present it to you later on. All this doesn’t come on its own. We do have a lot of challenges that we need to address, both as an international community and then the IGF itself. In the context that we are in today, and Melanie also you alluded to that, it’s an ever-changing world. And right now in digital and other conversations, I think the fundamental challenge, one of it is bridging the digital divide. We have done a lot over the years, but there is, despite this global progress, the gaps in access, the gaps in connectivity that get deeper and deeper with the fast evolution of technology. So the gaps in connectivity, when you look at them as data gaps or as gaps in AI, it’s actually deepening and widening, and we have to really make sure that we address that. And we can only address that together, both in a multilateral and a multistakeholder setting. The other challenge that I see is what some have dubbed the crisis of multilateralism that we are living today. We’ve seen it with the GCC, we’ve seen it with other negotiations in the United Nations. We really are facing a moment where it’s very difficult to reach agreements, where it’s very difficult to have trust in global conversations. And I think that impacts a lot the conversations that we have about the IGF, the conversations we have about digital. So I think the multistakeholder approach can actually help us build back that trust, trust in the multilateral system, but also the trust between the various communities. And I think that is one element of the IGF that we need to bring forward as we look ahead on what we want to do about the GDC implementation, about the WSIS Plus 20. We need to tap into this multistakeholder energy of the IGF to try and bring back that trust in global cooperation and in the multilateral conversations. So perhaps that’s where we should start. And then we can go into a lot of the smaller challenges that the IGF itself has, which is small secretariats and unstable funding and a number of other operational issues that perhaps the WSIS can also help address if we’re going forward. So I’ll leave it at that. And Pascal.

Yoichi Iida: OK. Thank you very much. Very comprehensive comments, including the various points of achievements and also risks and challenges. You touched upon the risk of splitting out the world into bilateralism or others. From the international organization’s perspective, you may have also some views on the same question, but also if you could touch upon the Kyoto conference, because ITU, I believe, was playing a very active role in Kyoto IGF.

Gitanjali Sah: Thank you very much, Yuichi-san, and thank you for inviting us and convening us for this important conversation. So the IGF remains crucial due to its multi-stakeholder and inclusive nature. The previous panelists have emphasized on this fact. It’s a dialogue on internet governance that brings together the government, civil society, private sector, technical community, all of us together to facilitate global collaboration and cooperation on important issues like data privacy, digital inclusion, cyber security. And I think one of the impressive aspects of IGF has been the involvement of the youth. I think my previous panelists have covered most of it, but I can emphasize on the fact that IGF has been recognizing the youth both as a future user and innovators of the internet. That’s a very important aspect. So, many related platforms have been created, the youth IGF, the youth tracks, to ensure that their voices are captured and included. Another innovation, of course, is the local chapters bringing in the regional and local perspectives into global discussions and dialogues, very important. IGF 2023, as you alluded, in Kyoto was a very key milestone to the WSIS plus 20 process. The discussions and deliberations feed into the joint preparatory process that we are currently working on with ITU, UNESCO, UNDESA, the CSTD Secretariat. We’ve been having weekly meetings to consolidate the outcomes since IGF 2023 on different perspectives of the WSIS plus 20 process. So like the IGF, the WSIS plus 20 forum high-level event in 2024 also highlighted the fact that there should be a WSIS plus. The Swiss chair’s summary also captured these aspects. And as the UN, we have also been contributing very, very frequently to the GDC process. As the UN, we’ve been emphasizing on the importance of WSIS, the continuation of WSIS, and that with platforms like WSIS Forum, IGF, remain important multi-stakeholder platforms to bring in perspectives on global digital cooperation. So we stand ready, we have the frameworks, very well-functioning frameworks to complement and implement the GDC. Again, I would also like to conclude saying that in Kyoto, we also had multi-stakeholder dialogues on digital cooperation, very important. Mr. Utsumi was also in our session. He is one of the founders of WSIS, you may say. So it was a… a very important milestone in driving digital transformation and addressing the digital divide. So thank you so much for organizing such a great event. And we look forward to the IGF here in Saudi, and we look forward to the outcomes. Thank you.

Yoichi Iida: Thank you very much, Gitanjali. And I recognize you have to leave in the middle of the session. But thank you very much for this very helpful comment. And in your comment, there was a stress emphasized on the role of youth community. So now we have a representative from Youth IGF online, Yulia. So I would like to invite her to make some response to my question. So Yulia, you are our hope. Yulia, you are our hope. Yulia, you are our hope. Yulia, you are our hope. All right, I see myself.

Yuliya Morenets: Good morning to all, to our colleagues. And thank you for inviting us to this very important panel, indeed, this morning. So Gitanjali, I’m very, very happy to see you on that panel as well. And thank you for, in some essence, introducing, actually, what I was about to say. Of course, I will be speaking right now today from the perspective of the youth communities, of the presence of the young people. So I think the major achievement of the IGF is actually the presence and the recognition itself of the community, of the young people, and of the future leaders. And actually, the existence of the youth track itself in the program of the IGF. Gitanjali, you just said that it’s very important to recognize this group. But I do remember how it all started, when back in 2011, we’re sitting at the internal MAG meeting, right, discussing, and when I proposed to have the, and to do something for the young people. So it all started, actually, in 2011, with the very first meeting of the young and teenagers, how we called that, and that stayed, actually, slowly. And suddenly, it moved to 2016, when we first organized the open forum together with the European Parliament delegation to the IGF, it was a full house. And somehow, from that time, it started to move. And I think because also the community, the mighty stakeholder community, started to be ready to recognize the voice of the young people. And of course, their presence. And from there, I would say that, you know, they started, let’s say, the creation and the reinforcement of the generation of the new leaders in IG. And of course, a number of young people found their role, found their passion, but also, professionally speaking, but also, of course, personally speaking, I think so. And so, if we speak about the future of the IGF, and I think it will be developed later in the discussion, of course, the future of the IGF and the whole process will go now together with the presence of the young people, of the young leaders, of the young communities, and actually, it’s one of the booming stakeholder groups. And I can imagine, we can’t imagine anymore the IGF and the future of the IGF without the presence of the young leaders. Yoishi-san, you have the mic.

Yoichi Iida: Okay, thank you very much, Ilya, for the comment, and thank you very much for your time to join us online. So, apparently, you know, the multi-stakeholder approach and its development or promotion is one of the major achievements from IGF at this point. So, let me ask probably the remaining three speakers, how are you engaged now in promoting multi-stakeholder approach? How are you engaging in promoting open, global, interoperable, but secure, safe, secure internet? And what are you doing? And probably, if I may, how you are envisioning the future of internet at this moment, if you look over the next coming month or one or two years? So, unfortunately, Gitanjali has to go to the next session, but now I would like to first invite Timya to respond to this question.

Timea Suto: Very much, I’ll try and address the two questions in one. Perhaps we can also save some time. So, what about, I’ll be shameless and plug in a little bit about the International Chamber of Commerce. If, for those of you who might not know us, ICC is a global business organization. We represent over 45 million businesses of all sectors and all kinds of sizes in more than over 170 countries in the world. What we do is we try to be a hub for input and gathering and understanding what businesses all around the world think about the most pressing issues, policy issues around the internet, try and gather them views, and then try and put those views back out into multilateral, multistakeholder, international discussions. We really believe firmly that, and we say it a lot, that open, global, interoperable, and resilient internet is essential for economic growth, innovation, and societal progress. So we try to do what we do in the spirit of advancing this credo. And we do believe that the internet must remain a platform for free communication, seamless global trade, and inclusive digital participation that enables businesses, small and big, and people in every region to benefit from the digital economy. So what we do to try and promote this, we work on issues like universal meaningful connectivity, trying to promote a holistic policy framework that looks at expanding connectivity at all its layers, starting from infrastructure, but including also the applications and services that are necessary for people to want to connect to the internet, as well as the skills that are needed there to interact with that content and shape it for themselves. We work a lot on strengthening cybersecurity and digital trust. So we advocate, of course, for a strong cybersecurity framework, looking at cybersecurity as a shared responsibility between governments and businesses. So, of course, we believe that there’s a lot that the private sector needs to do to enhance the resilience of the internet, but relying only on the defensive capabilities of the private sector is not enough. We need to work hand-in-hand with governments to actually try and deter malicious cyber activity that governments can do to protect their populations and businesses, which is creating enforcement frameworks that hold bad actors accountable, that enhance international cooperation, and invest in cyber resilience also at the national level. Then, of course, another very important thing, and we’ve collaborated with Japan on this quite a bit, is we prioritize promoting cross-border data flows with trust, which we believe are fundamental to the interconnected global operation of the internet and support the businesses operating on or using the internet. And we try and make sure that it is clearly understood that regulatory fragmentation, like data localization measures, undermine this open nature of the internet, undermine innovation, and raise barriers to business and to consumers to be able to access the services that they need and develop over the internet. So these are the issues that we would like solved for the future of the internet as well. So the internet that we want and that we’re looking forward to is one that is open, secure, inclusive, and resilient, one that fosters innovation, economic growth, and social development, one that is built on trust, transparency, and security, and that has inclusive, universal access to services, connectivity, infrastructure, and digital skills. And we believe firmly that as an enabler for all of this, we need the multi-stakeholder engagement in internet governance, that the future internet governance must continue to be shaped by the range of perspectives of all the stakeholders from governments to business to civil society and the tech community, because we need to ensure that policies reflect the realities from the ground, and they are diverse enough to accommodate local realities but also that fosters collaboration, mutual understanding, and with that capacity building to be able to find really this shared solutions to these global problems that cannot be localized to one level because that creates the problem of fragmenting both our policy frameworks, but also fragmenting the internet itself, which we would like to avoid for the future. So I think that’s our vision and what we do about it, and I’m glad to talk about all of this with you later.

Yoichi Iida: Okay, thank you very much for this, again, comprehensive comment on what you are doing now and what you are trying to do in the future. We have done. quite a lot, I believe, but we still have a lot to do. But what you mentioned in your comment, the interoperability of regulatory frameworks or government frameworks, not only in data, but also probably AI and other digital policy, I think it will be a very, very urgent issue, and we will probably dig in a little bit more in the afternoon session, moderated by yourself. So thank you very much for the comment, and now I would like to invite Melanie for the same question.

Melanie Kaplan: So looking at sort of what we’re doing now to promote an open, global, interoperable, and reliable internet, we really see the multi-stakeholder approach to internet governance as indispensable for the internet’s success as a global platform for communications, commerce, and innovation. We engage in a variety of fora to support the multi-stakeholder system, and we want to encourage multi-stakeholder input into processes and discussions addressing internet public policy issues. I know the GDC has already come up a lot this morning, but I think if you look back in the GDC, that was one of the recent things I did to promote the internet, and so if you look at paragraph 26, the GDC describes the internet as open, global, interoperable, stable, and secure. And then I like paragraph 27 even better, which has really strong language on the multi-stakeholder model of internet governance. It uses the word multi-stakeholder. It lists out all the stakeholders. It talks about the technical community and recognizes them as a separate stakeholder group. So that’s something that I think is sort of a recent thing that many of us in this room have worked on together. And then I’d also just point back to another thing that the US government has been very involved in, which was the Declaration for the Future of the Internet, which has, I believe, more than 60 signatories and talks about the internet as an open, free, global, interoperable, reliable, and secure. So that’s sort of what we’ve done recently, but then sort of looking ahead to the future, we support a global multi-stakeholder approach to internet governance that’s building capacity, providing technical assistance, and support for implementation, inclusive, human-centric, sustainable internet. And we really see that the active and meaningful participation of all stakeholders is essential to inform our discussions on policymaking and to promote transparency, accountability, and to strengthen implementation. And so really, we see the multi-stakeholder model as the best way to ensure the internet continues to innovate and help all of us. And so we welcome, we know there’s a lot of active conversations with stakeholders about ways to continue to improve multi-stakeholder processes. I think NetMundial Plus 10 was one of those conversations, just one example of that continued dialogue. And as we’ve talked about already today, I think there’s going to be a lot more dialogue of this as homework, right? The GDC gave us homework, the WSIS review is going on. So all this to say, we think that these topics are going to keep coming up and we keep coming back to multi-stakeholderism as really the way forward.

Yoichi Iida: Okay, thank you very much. Your comment, paragraph 26, 27, reminded me of the very busy man to negotiate the sentences. We believe the outcome is okay, but I also am aware that some of the people probably on the floor today or others on the online might have been a little bit frustrated about the process and that would be one of the homeworks for us for the next year. So thank you very much. And now I would like to invite Yuliya again for the same question. Your vision on what we are doing and also what you would expect for the future of the internet. Yuliya, please go ahead.

Yuliya Morenets: Very quickly. I think the promotion of the internet governance and the young people are the greatest, one of the greatest groups in promoting. And the fact for the young people to be present, that’s already a great promotion itself. Because they are one of the strongest groups together with others. So now, of course, their voice needs to go from the voice itself, probably at this stage, to the pipeline solutions and also in starting having an impact in the policy development. But in order, of course, to fully give them the opportunity to promote the process of the digital cooperation and be strongly present at the internet governance area, we really need to all work together to reinforce their capacities. And capacities for the open, sustainable and reliable internet. So that’s why actually we have four priorities, that we have identified. And we work particularly on these four priorities, which is the online safety, face online, cyber security skills and digital cooperation. So I would say in order to have these, as I just said, voice being stronger and be present in a more stable way, we really need all together work in developing the reinforcement capacities of the young people in different regions all over the world. Yuichi-san.

Yoichi Iida: Thank you very much, Ria-san, for the comment. And it is always very important to have active young people engaged in internet governance and not only internet governance, but also all other digital policymaking. So we always welcome your contributions and we are always hoping to work closely together. So now I would like to invite maybe one or two questions from the floor or participants online to these wonderful speakers. One of the things you may have been aware is surprising us is we have very wonderful four women on the stage. Gitanjali has already left, but we have four girls. And we have been talking about the digital gender divide, but what is that? Maybe from next year we have to talk about the digital gender divide from the different perspective, maybe the other way around. So I would like to, I didn’t exclude boys or men from the speakers when I invited for this session, but all volunteers were women. So it’s surprising. I would like to now ask boys, hey, what are you doing? But anyway, so now the question is open to girls and boys, whoever. Yeah, please.

Craig Stanley-Adamson: Hi, can this work? Yeah, brilliant. Just like to introduce myself, Craig Stanley-Adamson. I work at the UK Department of Science Innovation Technology. First, I’d like to thank the panelists for all your views, as well as to Yuichi and the Japanese government for chairing and hosting this. I’d like to follow up on the points that Tamiya made earlier on about reports that came out of an independent organization called the DNS Research Federation based in Oxford. It’s basically a really, really good report that talks about the tangible impacts that the IGF has had. I’d just like to highlight two or three of them just now to, and then share some views and maybe talk about how the IGF can continue to have these tangible outputs and impacts, particularly as we go into WSIS plus 20 implementation, things like that. So one of the first one being that the IGF has been a venue for basically creating the next leadership of global self and developing country leadership. This platform, this forum didn’t really exist before then, and now these voices are able to contribute to the WSIS process, which therefore makes it a stronger process and a stronger set of outcomes. In addition as well, the IGF’s been really a driver of the growth of IXPs. I think one example in the report, I don’t remember the exact numbers, but there were maybe sort of a low number of some of the barely functioning IXPs across Africa. With the help of the IGF, this rose to almost 50, just in the space of 10 years or whatever, of fully functioning IXPs across a number of cities, which is a real, real tangible example we can use, all of which go towards the supporting of WSIS implementation. There’s one more as well, it’s also been a really good mediator of some big crucial issues, such as the transition of IANA functions, which was, the IGF played a crucial role there. So I guess the question I have to the panel is what more can we do, or what can we do to support the IGF in these big decisions that it can have a role in, particularly after WSIS Plus 20, in implementing that and the likes of the GDC as well. So yeah, that’s my question. Thank you.

Yoichi Iida: OK, thank you very much. So who would like to make a comment back? Maybe both. To start.

Timea Suto: Thank you so much, Craig. Great question. And again, kudos to the developers of that report. It was quite informative. Because we tend to lose sight of what happened five years, 10 years ago. But we should remember the digest role. To respond, what we should do about the IGF, well first of all, I think we need to secure renewal of its mandates. That’s the first step in the Business Plus 20 review. Secondly, I think we need to make sure that the IGF is recognized in these roles that it’s playing, not only for internet governance, but also for the various issues that you’ve mentioned, from connectivity to other substantive issues that it can contribute to. So it’s not anymore just a discussion on internet governance in its purest form. And also, as I mentioned earlier, I think we have a number of institutional challenges that the IGF is bearing through or is powering through with an understaffed and underfunded secretariat with uncertainty of its future. I think we could do a bit better in making sure that that is stabilized and that the support to actually fulfill all these functions and potentials is there on the operational level. So I think that could be something that the Business Plus 20 could perhaps discuss and see if we can bring the IGF into a more stable foundation within the UN system.

Melanie Kaplan: I totally agree with Tameya that, first and foremost, we all are going to work really hard to make sure that the IGF mandate is extended in the Business Plus 20 overall review process. And we have heard stakeholders talk a lot about, how do you continue to improve the IGF? I mean, I think we see the IGF as a really good thing, but we always are looking for ways to improve it and to make it more inclusive and more participatory. And I also know that there’s a lot of stakeholder discussions out there about the funding issues. So I think that that’s another sort of conversation that I’m sure we’ll hear more about in the future.

Yoichi Iida: OK, thank you very much. Yeah, actually, IGF has been running on the front line of this type of multi-stakeholder governance in digital policymaking field. And every time I discussed governance mechanism for data flow across borders or maybe AI governance global, every time the IGF was a kind of a reference point for us, a guiding example for me. So I think the success of this framework is very, very important for the future of the whole digital economy and whole digital global society, I think. So thank you very much for the very good question and very, very wonderful comment. So any other question or even the comment from the floor? Or any question online?

Yuliya Morenets: If I can add something, Yoshi-san?

Yoichi Iida: Oh, yeah, of course. I’m sorry. Please.

Yuliya Morenets: Thank you.

Yoichi Iida: I’m sorry.

Yuliya Morenets: It’s always challenging to be on-site online. So that’s Yulia from the global youth IGF movement. I just wanted to say a few things. I think you don’t see me, but that’s OK. You have the voice. I just wanted to… A lot has been said right now about the, you know, stabilizing and securing the mining stakeholder model and the IGF future. But also I would like as coming from the… I mean, now coming with the question of young people being present and as we all agree that they are now part of this model and represent a very important stakeholder group, of course, I would urge the governments and different stakeholders in public sectors, stakeholders to have a consistent and stable support and resources that they can bring to these youth communities that actually represent a great voice in promoting that they need the existence and the development, right, of the model itself. And maybe what we can also do all together is really to reinforce, because that’s needed for the youth communities, is to reinforce the capacities itself in the mining stakeholder model, right? Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you very much. I appreciate it. See you guys. you you you you you you and as we all agree that they are now part of this model and represent a very important Stakeholder group, of course, I would urge the government

Gitanjali Saha: Dogs on digital cooperation very important Mr. Otsumi was also in our session. He is one of the founders of business you may say So it was a very important Milestone in driving digital transformation and addressing the digital divide So, thank you so much for organizing such a great event and we look forward to the idea of here in Saudi And we look forward to the outcomes.

Yoichi Iida: Thank you. Okay. Thank you very much Gitanjali and I Recognize you have to leave in the middle of the session, but thank you very much for this very helpful comment and Your comment there was a stress emphasize on the role of youth community, so now we have Representative from youth IGF Online Yulia, so I would like to invite Her to make Some response to my question. So Yulia you are our hope I

Yuliya Morenets: See myself good morning to Colleagues and thank you for inviting us to this very important Panel indeed this morning. So I think Anjali I’m very very happy to see you on panel on that panel as well. And thank you for In some essence introducing actually what I was about to say, of course, I will be speaking Right now today from the perspective of of the youth communities, right Of the presence of the young people so I think the major achievement of the idea is actually the presence and the recognition itself of the community of the of the young people and of the future leaders And actually the existence of the youth track itself in the program of the IGF And Anjali you just said that it’s very important to recognize this group, but I do remember how it all started when back in 2011 we’re sitting at the Internal MAG meeting right discussing and when I proposed to have the and to do something for the young people So it’s all started actually in 2011 with the very first meeting of the young and teenagers how we called that and and that stayed actually slowly and suddenly boomed in 2016 when we first organized the Open forum together with the European Parliament delegation to the IGF It was a full house and somehow from that time it started to boom and I think because also the community the mighty stakeholder community Started to be ready to recognize the voice of the young people and of course their presence and from there I would say that you know the Started let’s say the creation and the reinforcement of the generation of the new leaders in IG And of course a number of young people found their role, found their passion But also professionally speaking, but also of course Personally speaking I think so and so if we speak about the future of the IGF And I think it will be developed later in the discussion Of course the future of the IGF and the whole process will go now together with the presence of the young people of the young leaders of the young communities and And actually it’s one of the booming Stakeholder groups, and I can imagine we can’t imagine anymore The IGF and the future of the IGF without the presence of the young leaders Yoshi-san you have

Yoichi Iida: Okay, thank you very much For the comment and thank you very much for your time to join us online So Apparently you know the multi-stakeholder approach and its development or promotion It’s one of the major Achievements from IGF at this point, so let me ask probably the remaining three speakers How are you engaged now in promoting multi-stakeholder approach? How are you engaging in in promoting open global interoperable but secure safe secure internet, and what are you doing? And probably if I may how you are Envision the future of the internet at this moment if you look over the next coming month or one or two years, so unfortunately Gitanjali has to go to the next session, but now I would like to first invite Timia to to respond to this question

Timea Suto: Very much, I’ll try and address that the two questions in in one perhaps we can also save some time So what about? I’ll be shameless and plug in a little bit about the International Chamber of Commerce if For those of you who might not know us ICC is a global business organization We represent over 45 million businesses of all sectors and all kinds of sizes in more than over 170 countries in the world What we do is is we try to be a hub for input and gathering and understanding what what business is all around the world Think about the the most pressing issues Policy issues around the internet try and gather them views and then try and put those views back out into multilateral multi-stakeholder international discussions We really believe firmly That and we say a lot That open global interoperable and resilient internet is essential for economic growth innovation and societal progress So we try to do what we do in in in the spirit of advancing this this credo and we do believe that the internet must remain a platform for free communication or seamless global trade and inclusive digital participation that enables Businesses small and big and people in every region to benefit from the digital economy So what we do to try and promote this we work on issues like universal meaningful connectivity trying to promote a holistic policy framework that looks at expanding connectivity at all its layers starting from infrastructure, but including also the applications and Services that are necessary for people to want to connect to the internet as well as the skills that are needed There to to interact with that content and shape it for themselves We work a lot on strengthening cyber security and digital trust So, we advocate, of course, for a strong cyber security framework, looking at cyber security as a shared responsibility between governments and businesses. So, of course, we believe that there’s a lot that the private sector needs to do to enhance the resilience of the Internet, but relying only on the defensive capabilities of the private sector is not enough. We need to work hand in hand with governments to actually try and deter malicious cyber activity that governments can do to protect their populations and businesses, which including enforcement frameworks that hold bad actors accountable, that enhance international cooperation, and invest in cyber resilience also at the national level. Then, of course, another very important thing, and we’ve collaborated with Japan on this quite a bit, is we prioritize promoting cross-border data flows with trust, which we believe are fundamental to the interconnected global operation of the Internet and support the businesses operating on or using the Internet. And we try and make sure that it is clearly understood that regulatory fragmentation like data localization measures undermine this open nature of the Internet, undermine innovation, and raise barriers to business and to consumers to be able to access the services that they need and develop over the Internet. So these are the issues that we would like solved for the future of the Internet as well. So the Internet that we want, that we’re looking forward to, is one that is open, secure, inclusive, and resilient, one that fosters innovation, economic growth, and social development, one that is built on trust, transparency, and security, and that has inclusive universal access to services, connectivity, infrastructure, and digital skills. And we believe firmly that as an enabler for all of this, we need the multi-stakeholder engagement in Internet governance, that the future Internet governance must continue to be shaped by the range of perspectives of all the stakeholders from governments to business to civil society and the tech community, because we need to ensure that policies reflect the realities from the ground, and they are diverse enough to accommodate local realities, but also that fosters collaboration, mutual understanding, and with that capacity building to be able to find really these shared solutions to these global problems that cannot be localized to one level, because that creates the problem of fragmenting both our policy frameworks, but also fragmenting the Internet itself, which we would like to avoid for the future. So I think that’s our vision and what we do about it, and I’m glad to talk about all of this with you later.

Yoichi Iida: Okay, thank you very much for this, again, comprehensive comment on what you are doing now and what you are trying to do in the future. We have done quite a lot, I believe, but we still have a lot to do. But what you mentioned in your comment, the interoperability of regulatory frameworks or government frameworks, not only in data, but also probably AI and other digital policy, I think it will be a very, very urgent issue, and we will probably dig in a little bit more in the afternoon session, moderated by yourself. So thank you very much for the comment, and now I would like to invite Melanie for the same question.

Melanie Kaplan: So looking at sort of what we’re doing now to promote an open global interoperable and reliable Internet, we really see the multistakeholder approach to Internet governance as indispensable for the Internet’s success as a global platform for communications, commerce, and innovation. We engage in a variety of fora to support the multistakeholder system, and we want to encourage multistakeholder input into processes and discussions addressing Internet public policy issues. I know the GDC has already come up a lot this morning, but I think if you look back in the GDC, that was one of the recent things I did to promote the Internet, and so if you look at paragraph 26, the GDC describes the Internet as open, global, interoperable, stable, and secure, and then I like paragraph 27 even better, which has really strong language on the multistakeholder model of Internet governance. It uses the word multistakeholder. It lists out all the stakeholders. It talks about the technical community and recognizes them as a separate stakeholder group, so that’s something that I think is sort of a recent thing that many of us in this room have worked on together, and then I’d also just point back to another thing that the U.S. government has been very involved in, which was the Declaration for the Future of the Internet, which has, I believe, more than 60 signatories and talks about the Internet as an open, free, global, interoperable, reliable, and secure, so that’s sort of what we’ve done recently, but then sort of looking ahead to the future, you know, we support a global multistakeholder approach to Internet governance that’s building capacity, providing technical assistance, and support for implementation, inclusive, human-centric, sustainable Internet, and we really see that the active and meaningful participation of all stakeholders is essential to inform our discussions on policymaking and to promote transparency, accountability, and to strengthen implementation, and so really we see the multistakeholder model as the best way to ensure the Internet continues to innovate and help all of us, and so, you know, we welcome and we know there’s a lot of active conversations with stakeholders about ways to continue to improve multistakeholder processes. You know, I think NetMundial Plus 10 was one of those conversations, just one example of that continued dialogue, and, you know, as we’ve talked about already today, I think there’s going to be a lot more dialogue of this as homework, right, the GDC gave us homework, the WSIS review is going on, so all this to say we think that these topics are going to keep coming up, and we keep coming back to multistakeholderism as really the way forward.

Yoichi Iida: Okay, thank you very much, your comment, you know, paragraph 26, 27, you know, reminded me of the very busy man to negotiate the sentences. We believe, you know, the outcome is okay, but I also am aware that, you know, some of the people probably on the floor today or others on the online might have been a little bit frustrated about the process, and that would be one of the homeworks for us for the next year. So thank you very much, and now I would like to invite Yulia again for the same question, your vision on what we are doing and also what you would expect for the future of the internet.

Yuliya Morenets: Very quickly, I think the promotion of the internet governance, and the young people are the greatest, one of the greatest groups in promoting, and the fact for the young people to be present, that’s already, you know, a great promotion itself. Of course, because they are one of the strongest groups together with others. So now, of course, their voice needs to go from the voice itself, probably at this stage, to the pipeline solutions, and also in starting having an impact in the policy development. But in order, of course, to fully, you know, give them the opportunity to promote the process of the digital cooperation and be strongly present in the internet governance area, we really need all to work together to reinforce their capacities, and capacities for the open, sustainable, and reliable internet. So that’s why, actually, we have four priorities that we have identified, and we work particularly on these four priorities, which is the online safety, fakes online, cyber security skills, and digital cooperation. So I would say, in order to have this, as I just said, voice being stronger, and be present in a more stable way, we really need all together work in developing the reinforcement capacities of the young people in different regions all over the world. Yuichi-san.

Yoichi Iida: Thank you very much, Ria-san, for the comment, and, you know, it is always very important to have active young people engaged in internet governance, and not only internet governance, but also all other digital policymaking. So we always welcome your contributions, and we are always hoping to work closely together. So now I would like to invite maybe one or two questions from the floor, or participants online, to these wonderful speakers. One of the things you may have been aware is surprising us is, you know, we have very wonderful four women on the stage, you know. Anjali has already left, but we have four girls, and we have been talking about the digital gender divide, but what is that? Maybe from next year, we have to talk about the digital gender divide from the different perspective, maybe the other way around. So I would like to, I didn’t exclude boys, men, from the speakers when I invited them. For this session. But I, you know, all volunteers were women, so it’s surprising. I would like to now, you know, ask boys, hey, what are you doing? But anyway, now the question is open to girls and boys. Well, whoever. Yeah, please.

Craig Stanley-Adamson: Hi, can this work, this? Yeah, brilliant. Just like to introduce myself, Craig Stanley-Adamson, I work at the UK Department of Science Innovation Technology. First like to thank the panelists for all your views, as well as to Yuichi and the Japanese government for chairing and hosting this. I’d like to follow up on the points that Tamiya made earlier on about reports that came out of an independent organization called the DNS Research Federation, based in Oxford. It’s basically a really, really good report that talks about the tangible impact that the IGF has had. I’d just like to highlight two or three of them just now, to, and then share some views, and maybe talk about how the IGF can continue to have these tangible outputs and impacts, particularly as we go into WSIS plus 20 implementation, things like that. So one of the, the first one being that the IGF has been a venue for basically creating the next leadership of global self and developing country leadership. This platform, this forum didn’t really exist before then, and now these voices are able to contribute to the WSIS process, which therefore makes it a stronger process and a stronger set of outcomes. In addition as well, the IGF’s been really a driver of the growth of IXPs. I think one example in the report, I don’t remember the exact numbers, but there were maybe sort of a low number of some of the barely functioning IXPs across Africa. With the help of the IGF, this rose to almost 50, just a few in the space of 10 or years or whatever, of fully functioning IXPs across a number of cities, which is a real, real tangible example we can use, all of which go towards the supporting of WSIS implementation. There’s one more as well. It’s also been a really good mediator of some big crucial issues, such as the transition of IANA functions, which was, IGF played a crucial role there. So I guess the question I have to the panel is what more can we do or what can we do to support the IGF in these big decisions that it can have a role in, particularly after WSIS plus 20 and implementing that and the likes of the GDC as well. So yeah, that’s my question. Thank you.

Yoichi Iida: Okay, thank you very much. So who’d like to make a comment back? Maybe both.

Timea Suto: To start. Thank you so much, Craig. Great question. And again, kudos to the developers of that report. It was quite informative because we tend to lose sight of what happened five years, 10 years ago, but we should remember the IGF’s role. To respond, what we should do about the IGF, well, first of all, I think we need to secure renewal of its mandates. That’s the first step in the WSIS plus 20 review. Secondly, I think we need to make sure that the IGF is recognized in these roles that it’s playing, not only for internet governance, but also for the various issues that you’ve mentioned from connectivity to other substantive issues that it can contribute to. So it’s not anymore just a discussion on internet governance in its purest form. And also, as I mentioned earlier, I think we have a number of institutional challenges that the IGF is bearing through or is powering through with an understaffed and underfunded secretariat with uncertainty of its future. I think we could do a bit better in making sure that that is stabilized and that the support to actually fulfill all these functions and potentials is there on the operational level. So I think that could be something that the WSIS plus 20 could perhaps discuss and see if we can bring the IGF into a more stable foundation within the UN system.

Melanie Kaplan: I totally agree with Tameya that first and foremost, we all are gonna work really hard to make sure that the IGF mandate is extended in the WSIS plus 20 overall review process. And we have heard stakeholders talk a lot about how do you continue to improve the IGF? I mean, I think we see the IGF as a really good thing, but we always are looking for ways to improve it and to make it more inclusive and more participatory. And I also know that there’s a lot of stakeholder discussions out there about the funding issues. So I think that that’s another sort of conversation that I’m sure we’ll hear more about in the future.

Yoichi Iida: Okay, thank you very much. Yeah, actually IGF has been running on the frontline of this type of multi-stakeholder governance in digital policymaking field. And every time I discussed like governance mechanism for data flow across borders, or maybe AI governance global, every time the IGF was a kind of a reference point for us, like a guiding example for me. So I think the success of this framework is very, very important for the future of whole digital economy and whole digital global society, I think. So thank you very much for the very good question and very, very wonderful comment. So any other question or even the comment from the floor? Or any question online? If I can add something, Yoshi-san. Oh yeah, of course, I’m sorry. Please.

Yuliya Morenets: Thank you. I’m sorry. It’s always challenging to be on site online. So that’s Julia from the global youth IGF movement. I just wanted to say a few things. I think you don’t see me, but that’s okay. You have the voice. I just wanted to, a lot has been said right now about the stabilizing and securing the multi-stakeholder model and the IGF future. But also I would like as coming from the, I mean, now coming with the question of young people being present, and as we all agree that they are now part of this model and represent a very important stakeholder group. Of course, I would urge the governments and different stakeholders in public sectors, stakeholders to have a consistent and stable support and resources that they can bring to these youth communities that actually represented a great voice in promoting that they need the existence and the development, right, of the model itself. Maybe what we can also do all together is really to reinforce, because that’s needed for the youth communities, is to reinforce the capacities itself in the multi-stakeholder model, right? Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

Yoichi Iida: Thank you.

M

Melanie Kaplan

Speech speed

175 words per minute

Speech length

1425 words

Speech time

487 seconds

Multi-stakeholder approach as key achievement

Explanation

Melanie Kaplan emphasizes that the multi-stakeholder approach to internet governance is crucial for the internet’s success as a global platform. She views this approach as indispensable for communications, commerce, and innovation.

Evidence

Paragraph 26 and 27 of the Global Digital Compact (GDC) which describe the internet as open, global, interoperable, stable, and secure, and strongly support the multi-stakeholder model.

Major Discussion Point

Achievements and Challenges of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF)

Agreed with

Timea Suto

Agreed on

Importance of multi-stakeholder approach in internet governance

Supporting multi-stakeholder input in policy discussions

Explanation

Kaplan highlights the U.S. government’s efforts to promote multi-stakeholder input in internet governance processes. She emphasizes the importance of engaging various stakeholders in discussions addressing internet public policy issues.

Evidence

The Declaration for the Future of the Internet, which has over 60 signatories and describes the internet as open, free, global, interoperable, reliable, and secure.

Major Discussion Point

Promoting an Open, Global, and Secure Internet

Improving IGF inclusivity and participation

Explanation

Kaplan stresses the need to continually improve the IGF to make it more inclusive and participatory. She acknowledges that while the IGF is seen as a positive forum, there is always room for enhancement.

Major Discussion Point

Future of the IGF and Internet Governance

Agreed with

Timea Suto

Agreed on

Need to secure IGF’s mandate and improve its functioning

Differed with

Timea Suto

Differed on

Focus of IGF improvements

Government support for multi-stakeholder model

Explanation

Kaplan emphasizes the U.S. government’s strong support for the multi-stakeholder model in internet governance. She views this model as the best way to ensure the internet continues to innovate and benefit all users.

Major Discussion Point

Role of Different Stakeholders

T

Timea Suto

Speech speed

157 words per minute

Speech length

2745 words

Speech time

1042 seconds

IGF as platform for inclusive dialogue on internet governance

Explanation

Timea Suto highlights the IGF’s role as a premier platform for open and constructive discussions on internet governance. She emphasizes its importance in bringing together diverse stakeholders and fostering global awareness of digital issues.

Evidence

The growth of IGF’s national and regional networks, which bring global discussions to local practice and inform global conversations with local realities.

Major Discussion Point

Achievements and Challenges of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF)

Agreed with

Yuliya Morenets

Agreed on

Recognition of youth involvement in internet governance

Advocating for cross-border data flows with trust

Explanation

Suto emphasizes the importance of promoting cross-border data flows with trust. She argues that this is fundamental for the interconnected global operation of the internet and supports businesses operating on or using the internet.

Evidence

Collaboration with Japan on promoting cross-border data flows and highlighting the negative impacts of data localization measures on innovation and access to services.

Major Discussion Point

Promoting an Open, Global, and Secure Internet

Securing renewal of IGF mandate in WSIS+20 review

Explanation

Suto stresses the importance of securing the renewal of the IGF’s mandate in the upcoming WSIS+20 review. She views this as a crucial step for the future of internet governance.

Major Discussion Point

Future of the IGF and Internet Governance

Agreed with

Melanie Kaplan

Agreed on

Need to secure IGF’s mandate and improve its functioning

Stabilizing IGF’s institutional foundation

Explanation

Suto points out the institutional challenges faced by the IGF, including understaffing and underfunding. She suggests that the WSIS+20 review could be an opportunity to stabilize the IGF’s foundation within the UN system.

Major Discussion Point

Future of the IGF and Internet Governance

Agreed with

Melanie Kaplan

Agreed on

Need to secure IGF’s mandate and improve its functioning

Differed with

Melanie Kaplan

Differed on

Focus of IGF improvements

Business advocacy for open and resilient internet

Explanation

Suto outlines the International Chamber of Commerce’s efforts to advocate for an open, global, interoperable, and resilient internet. She emphasizes the importance of this for economic growth, innovation, and societal progress.

Evidence

ICC’s work on issues like universal meaningful connectivity, strengthening cybersecurity and digital trust, and promoting cross-border data flows.

Major Discussion Point

Role of Different Stakeholders

Y

Yuliya Morenets

Speech speed

139 words per minute

Speech length

1692 words

Speech time

728 seconds

Recognition and inclusion of youth voices

Explanation

Yuliya Morenets highlights the recognition and inclusion of youth voices as a major achievement of the IGF. She emphasizes the importance of youth participation in shaping the future of internet governance.

Evidence

The creation of youth tracks and platforms within the IGF structure since 2011.

Major Discussion Point

Achievements and Challenges of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF)

Agreed with

Timea Suto

Agreed on

Recognition of youth involvement in internet governance

Reinforcing youth capacities in internet governance

Explanation

Morenets stresses the need to reinforce the capacities of young people in different regions to promote digital cooperation. She identifies four priority areas for youth engagement in internet governance.

Evidence

The four priorities identified: online safety, fakes online, cybersecurity skills, and digital cooperation.

Major Discussion Point

Promoting an Open, Global, and Secure Internet

Integrating youth perspectives in policy development

Explanation

Morenets argues for the need to move beyond just giving youth a voice to integrating their perspectives into policy development. She emphasizes the importance of youth input in shaping the future of internet governance.

Major Discussion Point

Future of the IGF and Internet Governance

Youth as promoters of internet governance

Explanation

Morenets positions youth as one of the strongest groups in promoting internet governance. She argues that the presence of young people in these discussions is itself a form of promotion for internet governance processes.

Major Discussion Point

Role of Different Stakeholders

C

Craig Stanley-Adamson

Speech speed

195 words per minute

Speech length

783 words

Speech time

240 seconds

IGF as venue for developing country leadership

Explanation

Craig Stanley-Adamson highlights the IGF’s role in creating a platform for developing country leadership in internet governance. He emphasizes how this has strengthened the WSIS process and its outcomes.

Evidence

Findings from a report by the DNS Research Federation based in Oxford.

Major Discussion Point

Achievements and Challenges of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF)

IGF’s role in driving growth of Internet Exchange Points

Explanation

Stanley-Adamson points out the IGF’s significant role in driving the growth of Internet Exchange Points (IXPs), particularly in Africa. This has contributed to improved internet infrastructure in developing regions.

Evidence

The increase in the number of fully functioning IXPs across Africa from a low number to almost 50 within a decade, as reported by the DNS Research Federation.

Major Discussion Point

Promoting an Open, Global, and Secure Internet

IGF as mediator on crucial internet issues

Explanation

Stanley-Adamson highlights the IGF’s role as a mediator on crucial internet issues. He emphasizes its importance in facilitating discussions and decisions on key aspects of internet governance.

Evidence

The IGF’s crucial role in the transition of IANA functions.

Major Discussion Point

Role of Different Stakeholders

Agreements

Agreement Points

Importance of multi-stakeholder approach in internet governance

Melanie Kaplan

Timea Suto

Multi-stakeholder approach as key achievement

IGF as platform for inclusive dialogue on internet governance

Both speakers emphasize the crucial role of the multi-stakeholder approach in internet governance, highlighting its importance for fostering inclusive dialogue and decision-making.

Need to secure IGF’s mandate and improve its functioning

Melanie Kaplan

Timea Suto

Improving IGF inclusivity and participation

Securing renewal of IGF mandate in WSIS+20 review

Stabilizing IGF’s institutional foundation

Both speakers stress the importance of renewing IGF’s mandate and improving its operational aspects, including inclusivity, participation, and institutional stability.

Recognition of youth involvement in internet governance

Yuliya Morenets

Timea Suto

Recognition and inclusion of youth voices

IGF as platform for inclusive dialogue on internet governance

Both speakers highlight the importance of youth involvement in internet governance discussions and the IGF’s role in facilitating this inclusion.

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers advocate for an open, global, and interoperable internet, emphasizing the importance of multi-stakeholder input in shaping internet governance policies.

Melanie Kaplan

Timea Suto

Supporting multi-stakeholder input in policy discussions

Business advocacy for open and resilient internet

Both speakers emphasize the importance of capacity building and leadership development for underrepresented groups (youth and developing countries) in internet governance.

Yuliya Morenets

Craig Stanley-Adamson

Reinforcing youth capacities in internet governance

IGF as venue for developing country leadership

Unexpected Consensus

IGF’s role in tangible infrastructure development

Craig Stanley-Adamson

Timea Suto

IGF’s role in driving growth of Internet Exchange Points

IGF as platform for inclusive dialogue on internet governance

While the IGF is often seen primarily as a discussion forum, there’s an unexpected consensus on its role in driving tangible infrastructure development, particularly in developing regions.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of agreement include the importance of the multi-stakeholder approach, the need to secure and improve IGF’s mandate and functioning, the recognition of youth involvement, and the IGF’s role in fostering inclusive dialogue and tangible development outcomes.

Consensus level

There is a high level of consensus among the speakers on the fundamental importance and achievements of the IGF, as well as the need for its continuation and improvement. This strong consensus implies broad support for the multi-stakeholder model of internet governance and suggests a united front in advocating for the IGF’s renewal and enhancement in upcoming international discussions.

Differences

Different Viewpoints

Focus of IGF improvements

Melanie Kaplan

Timea Suto

Improving IGF inclusivity and participation

Stabilizing IGF’s institutional foundation

While Kaplan emphasizes improving inclusivity and participation in the IGF, Suto focuses on addressing institutional challenges such as understaffing and underfunding.

Unexpected Differences

Overall Assessment

summary

The main areas of disagreement revolve around the specific priorities for improving the IGF and the focus of multi-stakeholder involvement.

difference_level

The level of disagreement among the speakers is relatively low. Most speakers share similar overarching goals for the IGF and internet governance, with differences primarily in emphasis and specific approaches. This low level of disagreement suggests a generally unified vision for the future of internet governance, which could facilitate more effective collaboration and progress in addressing challenges and implementing improvements.

Partial Agreements

Partial Agreements

All speakers agree on the importance of multi-stakeholder involvement in internet governance, but they emphasize different aspects: Kaplan focuses on general stakeholder input, Suto highlights the IGF’s role in facilitating dialogue, and Morenets specifically advocates for youth integration in policy development.

Melanie Kaplan

Timea Suto

Yuliya Morenets

Supporting multi-stakeholder input in policy discussions

IGF as platform for inclusive dialogue on internet governance

Integrating youth perspectives in policy development

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers advocate for an open, global, and interoperable internet, emphasizing the importance of multi-stakeholder input in shaping internet governance policies.

Melanie Kaplan

Timea Suto

Supporting multi-stakeholder input in policy discussions

Business advocacy for open and resilient internet

Both speakers emphasize the importance of capacity building and leadership development for underrepresented groups (youth and developing countries) in internet governance.

Yuliya Morenets

Craig Stanley-Adamson

Reinforcing youth capacities in internet governance

IGF as venue for developing country leadership

Takeaways

Key Takeaways

The IGF has been successful in promoting a multi-stakeholder approach to internet governance

The IGF has served as an important platform for inclusive dialogue on internet issues

Youth participation and perspectives have become increasingly important in the IGF

The IGF has played a key role in developing leadership from developing countries

The future of the IGF is tied to the upcoming WSIS+20 review process

There is a need to strengthen and stabilize the IGF’s institutional foundation

Resolutions and Action Items

Work to secure renewal of the IGF mandate in the WSIS+20 review

Improve IGF inclusivity and participation, particularly from developing countries

Recognize the IGF’s role beyond just internet governance in the WSIS+20 process

Address funding and staffing challenges for the IGF Secretariat

Unresolved Issues

Specific mechanisms to improve IGF funding and staffing

How to concretely integrate IGF outcomes into policy processes

Balancing different stakeholder interests in internet governance

Addressing potential internet fragmentation while respecting national policies

Suggested Compromises

Recognizing both the IGF’s achievements and areas for improvement

Balancing the need for stable IGF funding with maintaining its independence

Integrating youth perspectives while ensuring experienced voices are also heard

Thought Provoking Comments

IGF provides an excellent platform on an annual basis to sort of pull all these threads together. And as Yoichi was mentioning in his introduction, we do really see that this… This is a pivotal time for the IGF, with the GDC’s adoption that just happened at the Summit for the Future, and as we’re sort of in the outset of the WSIS Plus 20 overall review.

speaker

Melanie Kaplan

reason

This comment highlights the critical role of IGF in synthesizing various internet governance discussions and frames the current moment as pivotal for IGF’s future.

impact

It set the tone for discussing IGF’s importance and future challenges, leading to further exploration of IGF’s achievements and potential improvements.

We do have a lot of challenges that we need to address, both as an international community and then the IGF itself. In the context that we are in today, and Melanie also you alluded to that, it’s an ever-changing world. And right now in digital and other conversations, I think the fundamental challenge, one of it is bridging the digital divide.

speaker

Timea Suto

reason

This comment introduces the critical challenge of the digital divide and frames it within the context of a rapidly changing digital landscape.

impact

It shifted the discussion towards concrete challenges facing IGF and the broader internet governance community, prompting others to consider specific areas for improvement.

I think the major achievement of the IGF is actually the presence and the recognition itself of the community, of the young people, and of the future leaders. And actually, the existence of the youth track itself in the program of the IGF.

speaker

Yuliya Morenets

reason

This comment highlights the importance of youth involvement in internet governance, which had not been prominently discussed before.

impact

It introduced a new perspective on IGF’s achievements and prompted discussion about the role of youth in shaping the future of internet governance.

We really see the multi-stakeholder approach to internet governance as indispensable for the internet’s success as a global platform for communications, commerce, and innovation.

speaker

Melanie Kaplan

reason

This comment emphasizes the crucial importance of the multi-stakeholder model, which is a fundamental principle of IGF.

impact

It reinforced the importance of maintaining and strengthening the multi-stakeholder approach in future internet governance discussions.

I think we need to secure renewal of its mandates. That’s the first step in the WSIS plus 20 review. Secondly, I think we need to make sure that the IGF is recognized in these roles that it’s playing, not only for internet governance, but also for the various issues that you’ve mentioned from connectivity to other substantive issues that it can contribute to.

speaker

Timea Suto

reason

This comment provides concrete suggestions for supporting IGF’s future role and expanding its mandate.

impact

It moved the discussion from general praise of IGF to specific actions that could be taken to strengthen its position, prompting others to consider practical steps forward.

Overall Assessment

These key comments shaped the discussion by highlighting IGF’s critical role in internet governance, emphasizing the challenges it faces (particularly the digital divide), introducing the importance of youth involvement, reinforcing the value of the multi-stakeholder model, and proposing concrete steps to strengthen IGF’s future. The discussion evolved from general praise of IGF to a more nuanced exploration of its achievements, challenges, and potential future directions. This progression allowed for a comprehensive examination of IGF’s past, present, and future, while also considering the broader context of global digital cooperation and governance.

Follow-up Questions

How can we secure renewal of the IGF’s mandate in the WSIS+20 review?

speaker

Timea Suto

explanation

This is crucial for ensuring the continuation of the IGF and its role in internet governance.

How can we improve the IGF to make it more inclusive and participatory?

speaker

Melanie Kaplan

explanation

Enhancing inclusivity and participation is key to strengthening the IGF’s effectiveness and relevance.

How can we address the funding issues of the IGF?

speaker

Melanie Kaplan

explanation

Stable funding is essential for the IGF’s operations and long-term sustainability.

How can we stabilize the IGF’s institutional structure, including its secretariat?

speaker

Timea Suto

explanation

A stable institutional structure is necessary for the IGF to fulfill its functions effectively.

How can we provide consistent and stable support and resources to youth communities involved in the IGF?

speaker

Yuliya Morenets

explanation

Supporting youth involvement is crucial for the future of internet governance and the IGF’s continued relevance.

How can we reinforce capacities in the multi-stakeholder model, particularly for youth communities?

speaker

Yuliya Morenets

explanation

Building capacity in the multi-stakeholder model is important for effective participation and representation.

How can the IGF continue to have tangible outputs and impacts, particularly in implementing WSIS+20 and the Global Digital Compact?

speaker

Craig Stanley-Adamson

explanation

Ensuring the IGF’s continued relevance and impact is important for its future role in internet governance.

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed.

Day 0 Event #178 Ethical Procurement in the Digital Age

Day 0 Event #178 Ethical Procurement in the Digital Age

Session at a Glance

Summary

This discussion focused on ethical procurement in the digital age, presented by Sam Achampong from the Chartered Institute of Procurement and Supply (CIPS). Achampong emphasized that despite technological advancements, fraud and corruption in procurement remain significant issues, costing about 6% of global GDP. He defined fraud as misleading for financial gain, bribery as offering something of value to influence decisions, and corruption as misusing one’s position for unfair advantage.


The presentation outlined various types of procurement fraud, including personal interest, undisclosed interests, and specification abuse. Achampong stressed the importance of organizations assessing their risk of fraud and corruption through a seven-step process, including establishing anti-corruption policies, identifying risks, and developing action plans. He highlighted the need for clear organizational policies on gifts, conflicts of interest, and whistleblowing.


Achampong emphasized the importance of senior leadership in creating an ethical culture and the need for regular compliance training. He also discussed the importance of having a clear response plan for when fraud is suspected or discovered, including steps for investigation and potential sanctions. The presentation concluded with a quiz testing participants’ understanding of key concepts related to fraud, corruption, and ethical procurement practices.


Keypoints

Major discussion points:


– Defining fraud, bribery, and corruption in procurement


– The scale and impact of fraud/corruption globally


– Steps to assess and mitigate fraud/corruption risks in organizations


– Creating anti-corruption policies and procedures


– Importance of training, monitoring, and having response plans


Overall purpose:


The goal was to educate the audience on ethical issues in procurement, particularly how technology does not eliminate fraud/corruption risks. The speaker aimed to define key concepts and provide practical steps for organizations to mitigate these risks.


Tone:


The overall tone was informative and educational. The speaker maintained a professional but accessible tone throughout, using examples to illustrate concepts. The tone became slightly more interactive during the quiz portion at the end, as the speaker engaged the audience with questions.


Speakers

– Sam Achampong


Role: Regional Director of CIPS Asia, Middle East and Africa


Expertise: Procurement and supply chain, ethics in procurement


– Lubna Al Mohammedi


Role: Head of Operation of the Chartered Institution of Procurement and Supply Chain (CIPS)


Additional speakers:


– None identified


Full session report

Ethical Procurement in the Digital Age: Challenges and Strategies


This comprehensive discussion on ethical procurement in the digital era was led by Sam Achampong, Regional Director of CIPS Asia, Middle East and Africa, following an introduction by Lubna Al Mohammedi. The presentation addressed the persistent challenges of fraud and corruption in procurement, despite technological advancements, and their significant economic impacts.


Defining Key Concepts and Scale of the Problem


Achampong began by defining key terms:


รขย€ยข Fraud: Misleading another party for financial gain


รขย€ยข Bribery: Offering something of value to influence decisions


รขย€ยข Corruption: Misusing one’s position for unfair advantage


The discussion highlighted the alarming prevalence and cost of these issues:


รขย€ยข Approximately 6% of global GDP is lost to fraud and corruption


รขย€ยข Nearly half of surveyed individuals reported experiencing fraud or corruption in the past two years


รขย€ยข Over 10% of respondents indicated that fraud or corruption scenarios are commonplace in organisations


Types of Procurement Fraud


Several common types of procurement fraud were outlined:


1. Personal interest: Using company funds for personal purchases


2. Undisclosed interests: Awarding contracts to companies with personal connections


3. Variation abuse: Submitting artificially low bids, then increasing prices through variations


4. Specification abuse: Tailoring specifications to favour specific suppliers


5. Bid rigging: Collusion among bidders to manipulate the bidding process


6. False invoicing: Submitting invoices for goods or services not delivered


Notably, 80% of procurement fraud occurs at the specification stage, before data enters digital systems, challenging the notion that technology alone can prevent unethical behaviour.


Risk Assessment and Mitigation


Achampong presented a comprehensive approach to mitigating risks:


1. Assess organizational risk through a seven-step process, available on the CIPS website (www.cips.org)


2. Understand the concepts of inherent risk (before controls) and residual risk (after controls)


3. Develop action plans for unaddressed risks


4. Implement monitoring plans and determine risk tolerance


5. Provide regular compliance training and auditing, noting legal requirements in some countries


6. Establish clear policies on gifts, conflicts of interest, and whistleblowing


7. Implement procurement best practices, including segregation of duties


The importance of organizational culture and country-specific factors in risk mitigation was emphasized. Achampong stressed the role of senior leadership in fostering an ethical culture and the need for stringent recruitment processes to prevent introducing risks through new hires.


Contract Management Cycle and Fraud Prevention


The presentation highlighted how fraud can occur at various stages of the contract management cycle, from needs identification to contract closure. Understanding these vulnerabilities is crucial for implementing effective preventive measures.


Responding to Fraud Allegations


Achampong outlined key elements of an effective response plan:


รขย€ยข Establish a clear process for reporting suspected fraud


รขย€ยข Outline steps for investigations and designate responsible parties


รขย€ยข Establish sanctions for proven allegations


รขย€ยข Protect whistleblowers and allow anonymous reporting


The importance of a robust whistleblowing policy was emphasized as a critical tool for uncovering and addressing unethical practices.


Technology’s Role in Procurement Ethics


While technology provides transparency and helps address some issues, Achampong noted that it doesn’t entirely prevent unethical behavior. This insight highlights the complex interplay between technology and human factors in maintaining ethical procurement practices.


Interactive Learning


The presentation concluded with a quiz based on real ethics examination questions, reinforcing key concepts and encouraging audience engagement.


Conclusion


Achampong’s presentation provided a comprehensive overview of the challenges and strategies in ethical procurement for the digital age. By emphasizing both human elements and technological considerations, the discussion offered a nuanced perspective on maintaining ethical standards in modern procurement practices. The presentation underscored the ongoing need for vigilance, training, and robust systems to combat fraud and corruption in the procurement process.


Session Transcript

Lubna Al Mohammedi: Assalamu alaikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh. Sabah al-khair. My name is Lubna al-Mohammadi. I’m the head of operation of the Chartered Institution of Procurement and Supply Chain, SIPS. Today, we have a critical subject regarding ethics. So under the title of ethics, ethical procurement in the digital age, we have Mr. Sam Achampang, the Regional Director of SIPS Asia, Middle East and Africa. So let’s start this presentation. Thank you.


Sam Achampong: Thank you, Lubna. Good morning and welcome to you all. A pleasure to be here, to those here and to those online, of course. As Lubna said, from SIPS, we work globally on procurement and supply chain matters. And today, we’re going to talk about ethics. Why are we talking about ethics? The main reason is because in a forum like this, in a technology-based forum, we realize that there is a perception that technology provides transparency that eradicates issues of ethics or corruption. Because we have a system and you take away the human element, there’s a perception that you eradicate that behavior. And of course you do. There’s a lot of good things in relation to technology and the Internet that allow us to provide transparency around transactions, especially in procurement, because procurement is when you are buying things for your company. However, what I’m going to point out is some of the ways in which we can try and avoid those ethical situations or certainly mitigate against them. And the reason why we’re attacking this subject is basically this comment saying, does technology by itself prevent unethical behavior? And we as an institute know that actually it doesn’t entirely, because as this quote at the top there says, 80% of fraud within procurement, within buying things, is carried out at what we call the specification stage. In other words, before you input your specification or your procurement into a purchase order and things along those lines, those behaviors can have already taken place. So it’s still very important that we understand some of the issues. As an introduction, here we just talk about the fact that despite digital interventions, the issues of fraud and corruption unfortunately are growing. So social media, technology platforms are not eradicating that. It’s actually growing. And what COVID, the pandemic, pointed out was that actually there are additional vulnerabilities due to the fact that people are using more and more digital platforms. So it’s not less, it’s more, which is quite surprising. So out of this, what we’re going to cover are these main points. We’re going to talk about, first of all, we’re going to define what fraud and corruption is. Because many people think, have different views, but we’re going to define what I mean by fraud and corruption first. What are the implications? But importantly, the practical steps in trying to avoid that. That’s really what we’re here to do today. Just to put into perspective as to why we think this is important is that fraud and corruption in itself costs 6% of global GDP. So if you imagine what we’re talking, we’re talking about trillions of dollars. That’s what the implications of fraud cost to us as human beings across the world. And almost half of the people who were surveyed in the survey that we carried out, almost half of these people acknowledged that they had experienced fraud or corruption in the last two years. Which is quite staggering. As well as more than 10% of people saying that these kind of scenarios of fraud and corruption are commonplace, are normal in organizations that they’re aware about. So that’s the scale of the problem. But let’s just define what I mean by fraud. That’s the important thing. So fraud is when you mislead another party for financial gain. That’s the definition of fraud. Bribery is when you give something of value to somebody because you want to influence them. So we’re being quite straight here. And corruption is when you use your position to gain credibility or to gain an advantage, an unfair advantage. So those are three definitions, just so we’re all on the same page here. Those are the definitions of fraud, corruption and bribery. To mitigate against fraud and corruption, there are lots of laws and legislations around the world. So here in the Kingdom, there is the Royal Decree. That’s the latest decree related to fraud and corruption. That’s here to mitigate it. If you look at other parts of the world, in the UK, from where I’m from, for example, you have the UK Bribery Act. So these are the laws that are here to protect people and here to mitigate against some of the issues that are happening. So that’s what we have around the world. And there are lots of other pieces of legislation to also help to combat some of these issues. And when you look at the actual types of fraud in relation to procurement. Now, when I mean procurement, I’m specifically talking about when you are buying things, buying goods or services for your company. So whenever I say procurement, I’m specifically saying that when you’re buying goods or services for your company. So procurement fraud can happen in many different ways. These are some of the examples. And the definition of those examples are, for example, personal interest. What does that mean? That means that I’m purchasing items for my organization for my own use. So I use the company money to buy, instead of buying a laptop, I buy an Apple iMac. That’s for me. I know it’s not for the company. And undisclosed interest. So maybe you have an interest in an organization and you then give that organization a contract. That’s undisclosed interest. You have to, there’s nothing wrong with doing that, but you just have to be clear to acknowledge that. Yes, I have an interest in this company. So everybody is aware. Receiving gifts, undeclared gifts, travel, entertainment, etc. Where suppliers work with each other to allow each other to win contracts. That’s also another issue. And variation abuse is interesting. So variation abuse is where companies bid for a contract at a very low price. And throughout the course of the contract, they will keep issuing variations to get more money out of it. So they won’t declare the initial price. They’ll keep saying, oh, and if you want this, okay, you ordered a pen. But if you want ink, that’s more money. That sort of thing. That’s variation abuse. And contract specification. Of course, contract specification abuse is where an organization or an individual will ensure that the specification favors a specific company. So your company have asked you to buy a car, but the specification you put out says it has to be a BMW, has to have these wheels. Only BMW can provide that car. So that’s specification abuse. When actually you should say, we will buy a car, has to have four wheels, has to be able to travel at this speed. But if you specify certain things, then that’s specification abuse. So what do we do? So there are a few ways to get over that, and one of them is to assess the risk in your own organization. And there are various steps. And by the way, these slides will become available to everybody, so you won’t digest everything now. But there are seven steps in which you can assess the risk within your organization to prevent some of these things happening. First is to establish the process. So you need to have a workshop. You need to set up what’s called an anti-corruption policy. And with all the people within your organization, so that everybody understands some of the things I’m talking about today. Once you’ve done that, when you’re identifying the risks, these are some of the kind of questions you’d ask. What arrangements do you have in place? How could corruption occur in your organization? That’s what you need to assess. Where does the risk lie? And which locations within the organization are these issues likely to happen? Is it in the warehouse? Is it in HR? These sorts of things are what you need to think about at that point. And then you need to rate something called the inherent risk. Now, this is quite detailed, and I won’t go into too much detail. But the inherent risk is the risk relating to the impact it could have. So there’s a tool that’s provided. And within SIPs, within the SIPs website, you can go to www.cips.org. You can find this framework. And that can help you assess what the inherent risk is. So what you look at is, if you look at, for example, bribery of tax authorities. If you want to assess how important it is to deal with this, what you do is you say, what’s the probable impact? If somebody in your organization bribed the tax authorities, the impact is very high. But what is the probability of it happening? very low. So what you do is you would say right it’s very very low the chances of it happening right because that is very unlikely that somebody can bribe the tax authorities you know go sees a cat is very unlikely but if it did happen the impact will be high so in that particular thing the inherent risk is yellow so that’s how you kind of make the assessment as you go along as an example and then you need to look at the controls what do you have in place to prevent certain things happening so what you do is you calculate what’s called the residual risk so what that means is if there is if there is a medium when you look at the controls you have in place the controls will be medium if the rigid if the residual risk is medium however if that changes if you have strong mitigating controls then the residual risk the risk remaining that the risk of its happening will then be low okay if you have strong controls but if your controls are very weak then the residual risk or the remaining risk becomes high so that’s the kind of framework you use right so that and that kind of brushes it over in in in quite a high in quite a quite a speedy fashion however that’s the principle behind it all and of course you can go into detail on this week we can share that with you so once you’ve done that you need to you need to develop a an action plan or a response plan so any risk that has not been dealt with within your organization you have to say we haven’t dealt with this what’s our action plan what are we going to do about it at that point and then once you’ve done that you need to make sure that you have a monitoring plan to make sure that you’re you’re monitoring all these risks identifying any trigger and also what the risk importantly what the risk tolerance of your organization is that’s the important thing okay how tolerant are you of risk in the organization or of risk occurrence or fraud occurrence in your organization and different organizations will have different tolerance levels and that’s important it all depends on your organization and what you do okay if you’re a government institution your tolerance level will be very very high why because it’s public money you’re dealing with okay so if you’re a private organization that may be slightly different so the tolerance level is very very important also your organizational culture will play a big part in in preventing risks happening okay so obviously in in this subject in terms of fraud senior leadership and their culture are very very key to what happens in your organizations of what the residual risk is which country urine will also define what the residual risks are as well because the framework of the country you’re in may either help or hinder how you’re dealing with ethical issues and that can that could differ around the world your organization if you provide regular compliance training regular monitoring and auditing and ensure that all visuals can report inappropriate behavior in in an appropriate way then that will also influence how your organization deals with it okay so if for example there is there’s a lot of inappropriate behavior happening in organization but there’s no way that people can report it then that’s going to influence how often these kind of things happen and recruitment this is quite interesting because every time you bring someone into the into your organization that’s good but it’s also a risk okay because you because you don’t know these people yet all right so recruitment becomes an area that you actually need to ensure is very very stringent in terms of mitigating risks so company checks not just on the on the character of the individual but what what undisclosed holdings do these people have you know if you operate a car company and you bring somebody in who actually their father owns a company that provides parts for cars you need to know that okay because because that’s an undisclosed holding and that could be a problem further down the line so these things are important to know obviously reference checks and criminal record checks are important these are basic but let’s be honest you have to do these things because otherwise you’re leaving yourselves open to risk training is essential obviously you can’t assume that people are are aware of some of the issues we’re talking about you know ethics fraud corruption are a very sensitive subject okay because you know if you say to anybody will you commit fraud of course they’re gonna say no okay but that’s not training is it you haven’t trained them about anything you have to actually define what you mean by fraud it could be it could be conflict of interest okay no one not many people deliberately go out and defraud a company actually the majority of people it’s really a conflict of interest it’s undisclosed holdings there’s things along those lines so you have to train people as to what exactly you’re speaking about to make sure you don’t get in that situation and as it says there in some countries training is actually a legal requirement for employees for certain things certainly in the UK it’s a legal requirement to train people on these things and on some other things legal requirement which means the company will be in trouble if they haven’t trained people so there are other areas when you’re putting together your policy and procedure you need to look at any any legislation that applies in whatever country if you’re a company working across the world you need to look at every country working to make sure what you’re complying with the legislation in that regard it needs to be clear who the policy applies to it may not apply to some employees people need to know what their duties are the company needs to have a clear statement that there’s zero tolerance around around whistleblowing so if somebody reports something how will it be dealt with that’s an important thing as well we spoke about reporting spoke about gifts there’s nothing wrong with receiving gifts from from supplies there’s actually in that that itself is not fraud there just needs to be rules about what you can do and if you’re in in in the process of purchasing something from a company and on that day when they’re giving them your price their price they also give you a gift that’s obviously a bit of an issue because whether you like it or not as human beings psychologically that makes a difference to how you’re going to evaluate that so it just needs to be trained these things have to be explicit so that everybody is aware of what the implications are conflicts of interest we mentioned and monitoring as well our issues so once all those things have been taken into account these things will definitely avoid any misunderstanding of what we’re talking about when we talk about fraud corruption okay it’s not just people wanted to take money there are there are areas that can that can get people in trouble when you do the investigation later so it’s best to avoid them and avoid innocent transactions being constituted as fraud so as far as procurement is concerned there is as an organization you need to make sure you have things like segregation of duties the same person doesn’t award contracts as the same person awards contracts can’t be the same person who pays the contractor things along those lines that may sound obvious but in some organization that happens so I select the supplier I also pay them I also approve their payment these kind of things shouldn’t happen that’s called segregation again all these things need to be looked into very in a very detailed manner that is a is a detailed section of what we call the contract management cycle that looks at the risks that happen in every single stage of when you’re buying something and that and it becomes quite complicated because fraud and corruption can happen when you when you’re defining a business need it can happen when you’re putting a strategy together can happen when you’re putting tender documents together can happen when you’re managing the supplies performance can happen in several ways so again it’s worth having that in front of you to understand where these issues can occur so so in the event that it is found out or there’s a suspicion that there is fraud within your organization there needs everyone needs to understand exactly what’s going to happen that can’t be a surprise that the process for reporting suspected fraud is there the steps that will be taken in other words if there’s an investigation how does that investigation happen we can’t make it up afterwards they these steps need to be written who’s going to carry out that investigation who’s the person within an organization or people who will investigate these things are they independent enough to do that and also finally if allegations are proven what happens what is the sanction for for somebody who is found guilty of fraud or investigation of fraud or corruption in an organization that needs to be clear are there any sanctions is it disciplinary is it gross misconduct misconduct is it a warning that needs to be clear in your in your organization before you do that so so those are the main things all organizations these have a response plan it needs to be independent people need to be trained and there needs to be support for whistleblowers people who are willing to report things anonymously okay they need to be protected you can’t encourage people to report these things and then disclose their name and say this guy told me that you’ve done this that that that that disrupts the integrity of the whole process so just to summarize before I get some quick questions for you guys there are some questions for everybody so pay attention going through that you will be able to define exactly what fraud bribery corruption is right What are the implications? What are the steps? And finally, what the key elements of fraud, bribery and corruption are and what the response plan is. These are the bits we went through. But just to check that everybody has been paying attention on this whistle-stop presentation, we are going to have some questions. A little bit of a quiz. And to be transparent, there’s no prize, there’s no money, there’s no chocolates. Just questions, right? Okay, so just to be clear, because I can’t be accused of bribing you to get the right question, right? Anyway, so let’s just go through them. So, question. So, which of the following points describes how you evaluate and prioritize stages of anti-corruption risk assessment? Quite a difficult question, I know. But what do you reckon? What does anyone think? Just one, two, three or four. I’ll give you some time. Anyone want to just hazard a guess? Okay, take a look at the risk factors, likelihood of occurrence and potential adverse impacts. Good one. Anyone else before I check? Same. Very close. Very close. By the way, for what I’ve been through in the last 20 minutes, this is quite difficult. This is the actual extract from the ethics examination. So, it’s not been changed. So, you’re doing very well. And they’re quite tricky, these questions. You know, people who go through that receive the ethical, the global ethical kite marks. So, these are real extracts. So, they’re not easy. So, and each question, each answer is quite similar. So, just bear that in mind. The next one. So, a director working has just returned from a disciplinary hearing regarding a member of staff. Which step of a response plan should the director now pursue to help prevent reoccurrence? So, how could they, what would they do to stop this issue happening again? Two things. Okay, three and sure. Yep. Three. Yep. And another one. Okay. So, two and three. Okay, cool. Anyone else? Two and three. Oh, dear. So, yeah. So, quite so, yeah. So, basically, what we’re saying is, the two important things are to, once the case has happened, to look at what happened. So, review the case and redo a risk assessment to try and see how it’s not going to happen again. Two and three actually are correct, right? But very, very similar. But basically, what you’re talking about is what the two most important things to look at. So, again, as I say, very, very, very, very close. Very, very, very, very tricky. These are tricky questions, right? Okay. Okay. So, which organization launched the set of anti-corruption initiatives to help countries address corruption? Now, I didn’t talk about this in the presentation, by the way. So, you can have a guess at this in case you know this yourself. So, it’s the MSF, Medicine Frontier Bank Information Office, or Financial Ombudsman Service. So, which organization launched the anti-corruption initiatives to help countries address corruption? Three, Information Commission. Anyone else? MSF, okay. Any others? It’s actually the World Bank. Yeah. So, I guess the clue here is globalization. So, it’s, you know, I guess we’re talking about corruption and we’re talking about the world. So, the difficulty here is that this is a UK-based one. This is a US-based one, so it’s not global. Okay. That’s global, but they’re more medical. They’re more medical. So, the World Bank is the one that looks at banking issues. Question four. Part of risk assessment for fraud includes the following. Which is the relevant step? Quite a difficult one. I’ll kind of go through that. Rate the inherent risk. We spoke about this in the course, but actually it’s not very clear. But the most relevant step is to rate the inherent risk. And the inherent risk is what the risk is left after you’ve taken all the actions that you need to take. So, this is the risk that remains having done what you need to do. Five more. What’s the best method for mitigating risks within an organization? Okay. So, you need to choose one out of this. So, do you say one? Okay. Okay. Two. Anyone else have the one or two? Four. Two. One, two, four. One, two, four. It’s three. No, not really. Four. So, there you go. Yeah. I think what we’re saying here is that, look, if you don’t have this culture from the top, then it’s not going to work. It doesn’t make any difference. This culture has to come from the very top of the organization. Which of the following statements explains the term conflict of interest? Conflict of interest. Two. Two. Good one. Any others for two? Two. Two. Absolutely. Of course, it is two. The longest statement. Which organizations should have a formal whistleblowing policy? Now, whistleblowing policy is where you encourage people to report things anonymously. Okay. So, what type of organization should have a whistleblowing policy? Sorry. I said which. Why should organizations have a whistleblowing policy? Sorry. Apologies. Why should they? One, two, three, four. Anybody? Four. Okay. Four. Four. There you go. Okay. Number eight. A procurement person is carrying out a review to look at anti-bribery policies. Which two statements are correct in relation to bribery? Two statements. Which of two statements relate to bribery? Anyone? Two statements. One and four. One and four. One and four. Anybody? One and four. One and four. There you go. One and four. There you go. Number nine. A contractor submits multiple invoices for work they only did once. So, they’ve done work once but they’ve sent four invoices. Somebody internally could help them to do this. What type of procurement fraud is this defined as? So, a contractor sends multiple invoices for something they’ve done once. What type of fraud is that? Okay. One. Anybody else? Four. Sorry. Five. Sorry. Five. Yeah. One. Five. Okay. There you go. We have a procurement person in here. Billing. Yeah. So, in this case, yes. They’ve sent in the invoice and it’s billing fraud, right? You bill once. You’ve done work once. You bill once. Which of the two are implications of unethical practices? Things that can actually happen when you have unethical practice. Two things. Does it affect money? Does it affect your brand? Does it make your organization grow too fast or does it make you have more job applicants? Which of the two things happen when you have unethical practices in your organization? First two. One and two. One and two. One and two. One and two. One and two. One and two. There you go. Oh, we have another one. Sorry. Which of the following defines fraud? I think, sorry, we have 12 questions. Apologies. How would you define fraud? So, personal and corporate rules. Deception. Dishonest and fraudulent conduct by those in power. Or offering an incentive for somebody to act improperly. One, two, three, four. Two. Two. There you go. I think we’re unanimous on two. And 12. You’re a member of an evaluation team. So, you have a bid coming in. You are part of a team who are deciding who’s involved in that bid. Which is correct in terms of your conflict of interest. So, your best friend works in a bidding organization. They’re no relation. But it still needs to be reported. You still need to report that your friend is the bidder. Or you’re a director in one of the organizations. Or a very distant cousin who works in the bidding organization. Do you have to report that? Or your next door neighbor. So, which statement is correct in terms of how you need to do your conflict of interest? Anyone? One, two, three, four. First one. Anyone else? Number one. Number one. There you go. Cool. Ah, okay. We do have 14. Sorry. A procurement officer works for a small company. Ah, you’ve been supplied with a laptop. You get a laptop from your company and you sell it. And you take the money. How’s that defined? Is that ethics, kickback, fraud or bribery? One, two, four. Okay, poor ethics, fraud, within the depth, it’s also poor ethics by the way, these are quite close. There you go, so thank you very much guys, that was not a test, not a real test, we did it together. I hope you found it interesting, as I said you can get full details from our website, that’s a very quick overview of quite a detailed global test that people take and they get certificates for it. So thanks for listening, hope you enjoyed it, take care, enjoy the rest of the day. Thank you. We will appreciate that. Thank you very much.


S

Sam Achampong

Speech speed

151 words per minute

Speech length

4653 words

Speech time

1840 seconds

Fraud is misleading another party for financial gain

Explanation

Sam Achampong provides a clear definition of fraud. He emphasizes that fraud involves intentionally deceiving someone else in order to gain a financial advantage.


Major Discussion Point

Defining and Understanding Fraud, Bribery, and Corruption


Agreed with

Agreed on

Definitions of fraud, bribery, and corruption


Bribery is giving something of value to influence someone

Explanation

Achampong defines bribery as providing something valuable to another person with the intent to sway their actions or decisions. This definition highlights the transactional nature of bribery.


Major Discussion Point

Defining and Understanding Fraud, Bribery, and Corruption


Agreed with

Agreed on

Definitions of fraud, bribery, and corruption


Corruption is using one’s position for unfair advantage

Explanation

Achampong explains that corruption involves misusing one’s role or authority to gain an unethical benefit. This definition emphasizes the abuse of power inherent in corrupt practices.


Major Discussion Point

Defining and Understanding Fraud, Bribery, and Corruption


Agreed with

Agreed on

Definitions of fraud, bribery, and corruption


Technology does not fully prevent unethical behavior

Explanation

Achampong challenges the perception that technology alone can eliminate ethical issues in procurement. He argues that while technology can increase transparency, it does not completely eradicate unethical practices.


Evidence

80% of fraud within procurement is carried out at the specification stage, before information is input into digital systems.


Major Discussion Point

Defining and Understanding Fraud, Bribery, and Corruption


Fraud and corruption cost 6% of global GDP

Explanation

Achampong highlights the significant economic impact of fraud and corruption on a global scale. He quantifies this impact as a percentage of global GDP to emphasize its magnitude.


Evidence

The cost amounts to trillions of dollars globally.


Major Discussion Point

Prevalence and Impact of Fraud and Corruption


Agreed with

Agreed on

Prevalence and impact of fraud and corruption


Nearly half of surveyed people experienced fraud/corruption in last 2 years

Explanation

Achampong presents survey data showing the widespread nature of fraud and corruption. This statistic indicates that these issues are common experiences for many individuals and organizations.


Evidence

Survey results showing nearly 50% of respondents experienced fraud or corruption in the past two years.


Major Discussion Point

Prevalence and Impact of Fraud and Corruption


Agreed with

Agreed on

Prevalence and impact of fraud and corruption


Over 10% say fraud/corruption scenarios are commonplace in organizations

Explanation

Achampong cites another survey finding to illustrate how normalized fraud and corruption have become in some organizations. This statistic suggests that unethical practices are not isolated incidents but recurring issues in many workplaces.


Evidence

Survey results indicating that more than 10% of respondents consider fraud and corruption scenarios to be normal in organizations they know.


Major Discussion Point

Prevalence and Impact of Fraud and Corruption


Agreed with

Agreed on

Prevalence and impact of fraud and corruption


Personal interest: purchasing items for personal use with company funds

Explanation

Achampong describes a type of procurement fraud where an individual uses company resources for personal benefit. This involves misusing organizational funds to acquire items for oneself rather than for legitimate business purposes.


Evidence

Example given of buying an Apple iMac for personal use instead of a company laptop.


Major Discussion Point

Types of Procurement Fraud


Agreed with

Agreed on

Types of procurement fraud


Undisclosed interest: awarding contracts to companies one has interest in

Explanation

Achampong explains another form of procurement fraud involving conflicts of interest. This occurs when an individual awards contracts to companies they have a personal stake in without disclosing this connection.


Major Discussion Point

Types of Procurement Fraud


Agreed with

Agreed on

Types of procurement fraud


Variation abuse: bidding low then issuing variations to increase price

Explanation

Achampong describes a fraudulent practice where suppliers intentionally underbid on contracts. They then use contract variations to increase the price over time, ultimately charging more than competitors who bid honestly.


Evidence

Example of ordering a pen and then charging extra for ink.


Major Discussion Point

Types of Procurement Fraud


Agreed with

Agreed on

Types of procurement fraud


Specification abuse: tailoring specifications to favor specific suppliers

Explanation

Achampong outlines a type of procurement fraud where contract specifications are written to favor a particular supplier. This unfairly limits competition and can lead to higher costs or lower quality for the purchasing organization.


Evidence

Example of specifying a particular brand of car (BMW) with specific features that only that brand can provide.


Major Discussion Point

Types of Procurement Fraud


Agreed with

Agreed on

Types of procurement fraud


Assess organizational risk through a 7-step process

Explanation

Achampong recommends a structured approach to evaluating fraud and corruption risks within an organization. This process involves multiple stages to comprehensively identify and analyze potential vulnerabilities.


Evidence

The steps include establishing the process, identifying risks, rating inherent risk, and assessing controls.


Major Discussion Point

Mitigating Fraud and Corruption Risks


Agreed with

Agreed on

Mitigating fraud and corruption risks


Develop action plans for unaddressed risks

Explanation

Achampong advises organizations to create specific plans to address identified risks that haven’t been mitigated. This ensures that all known vulnerabilities are actively managed and not overlooked.


Major Discussion Point

Mitigating Fraud and Corruption Risks


Agreed with

Agreed on

Mitigating fraud and corruption risks


Implement monitoring plans and determine risk tolerance

Explanation

Achampong emphasizes the importance of ongoing risk monitoring and defining acceptable risk levels. This involves continuous oversight of potential fraud and corruption issues and establishing clear thresholds for organizational risk appetite.


Major Discussion Point

Mitigating Fraud and Corruption Risks


Agreed with

Agreed on

Mitigating fraud and corruption risks


Provide regular compliance training and auditing

Explanation

Achampong stresses the need for ongoing education and verification of compliance measures. This involves regularly training employees on ethical practices and conducting audits to ensure policies are being followed.


Major Discussion Point

Mitigating Fraud and Corruption Risks


Agreed with

Agreed on

Mitigating fraud and corruption risks


Establish clear policies on gifts, conflicts of interest

Explanation

Achampong recommends creating explicit guidelines for handling potential ethical issues. This includes setting rules for accepting gifts from suppliers and managing situations where personal interests might conflict with organizational responsibilities.


Major Discussion Point

Mitigating Fraud and Corruption Risks


Agreed with

Agreed on

Mitigating fraud and corruption risks


Have a clear process for reporting suspected fraud

Explanation

Achampong advises organizations to establish well-defined procedures for reporting potential fraud. This ensures that employees know how to raise concerns and that reports are handled consistently.


Major Discussion Point

Responding to Fraud Allegations


Agreed with

Agreed on

Responding to fraud allegations


Outline steps for investigations and who will conduct them

Explanation

Achampong recommends detailing the process for investigating fraud allegations. This includes specifying the steps to be taken and identifying who will be responsible for conducting investigations.


Major Discussion Point

Responding to Fraud Allegations


Agreed with

Agreed on

Responding to fraud allegations


Establish sanctions for proven allegations

Explanation

Achampong advises organizations to define clear consequences for confirmed cases of fraud or corruption. This involves specifying the potential disciplinary actions or penalties for those found guilty of unethical behavior.


Major Discussion Point

Responding to Fraud Allegations


Agreed with

Agreed on

Responding to fraud allegations


Protect whistleblowers and allow anonymous reporting

Explanation

Achampong emphasizes the importance of safeguarding those who report potential fraud. This includes allowing for anonymous reporting and ensuring that whistleblowers are protected from retaliation.


Major Discussion Point

Responding to Fraud Allegations


Agreed with

Agreed on

Responding to fraud allegations


Agreements

Agreement Points

Definitions of fraud, bribery, and corruption

speakers

Sam Achampong


arguments

Fraud is misleading another party for financial gain


Bribery is giving something of value to influence someone


Corruption is using one’s position for unfair advantage


summary

Sam Achampong provides clear definitions for fraud, bribery, and corruption, emphasizing their distinct characteristics in unethical business practices.


Prevalence and impact of fraud and corruption

speakers

Sam Achampong


arguments

Fraud and corruption cost 6% of global GDP


Nearly half of surveyed people experienced fraud/corruption in last 2 years


Over 10% say fraud/corruption scenarios are commonplace in organizations


summary

Achampong highlights the significant economic impact and widespread occurrence of fraud and corruption in organizations globally.


Types of procurement fraud

speakers

Sam Achampong


arguments

Personal interest: purchasing items for personal use with company funds


Undisclosed interest: awarding contracts to companies one has interest in


Variation abuse: bidding low then issuing variations to increase price


Specification abuse: tailoring specifications to favor specific suppliers


summary

Achampong outlines various types of procurement fraud, including misuse of company funds, conflicts of interest, and manipulative bidding practices.


Mitigating fraud and corruption risks

speakers

Sam Achampong


arguments

Assess organizational risk through a 7-step process


Develop action plans for unaddressed risks


Implement monitoring plans and determine risk tolerance


Provide regular compliance training and auditing


Establish clear policies on gifts, conflicts of interest


summary

Achampong recommends a comprehensive approach to mitigating fraud and corruption risks, including risk assessment, action planning, monitoring, training, and clear policies.


Responding to fraud allegations

speakers

Sam Achampong


arguments

Have a clear process for reporting suspected fraud


Outline steps for investigations and who will conduct them


Establish sanctions for proven allegations


Protect whistleblowers and allow anonymous reporting


summary

Achampong emphasizes the importance of having clear procedures for reporting, investigating, and addressing fraud allegations, as well as protecting those who report such issues.


Similar Viewpoints

Unexpected Consensus

Overall Assessment

Summary

The presentation by Sam Achampong covers comprehensive aspects of ethics in procurement, including definitions of unethical practices, their prevalence and impact, types of procurement fraud, risk mitigation strategies, and response procedures for fraud allegations.


Consensus level

As this is a single-speaker presentation, there is no consensus to assess among multiple speakers. However, the speaker presents a coherent and consistent view on the importance of addressing fraud and corruption in procurement practices, emphasizing the need for clear definitions, risk assessment, and robust organizational policies and procedures.


Differences

Different Viewpoints

Unexpected Differences

Overall Assessment

summary

No significant areas of disagreement identified


difference_level

Low to none. The presentation was primarily informative, given by a single speaker, without contrasting viewpoints or debates.


Partial Agreements

Partial Agreements

Similar Viewpoints

Takeaways

Key Takeaways

Technology alone does not prevent unethical behavior in procurement


Fraud and corruption remain significant issues, costing 6% of global GDP


Common types of procurement fraud include personal interest, undisclosed interest, and specification abuse


Organizations should assess risks, implement clear policies, and provide training to mitigate fraud risks


A formal process for reporting and investigating fraud allegations is crucial


Leadership and organizational culture play a key role in preventing fraud and corruption


Resolutions and Action Items

Organizations should establish an anti-corruption policy and conduct risk assessment workshops


Implement a 7-step process to assess fraud risks within the organization


Develop action plans for unaddressed risks and implement monitoring plans


Provide regular compliance training and auditing for employees


Establish clear policies on gifts, conflicts of interest, and whistleblowing


Unresolved Issues

Specific methods to address fraud in the digital age were not fully explored


The effectiveness of existing anti-corruption laws and regulations was not discussed in depth


The role of technology in detecting and preventing fraud was not fully addressed


Suggested Compromises

None identified


Thought Provoking Comments

80% of fraud within procurement, within buying things, is carried out at what we call the specification stage. In other words, before you input your specification or your procurement into a purchase order and things along those lines, those behaviors can have already taken place.

speaker

Sam Achampong


reason

This comment challenges the common perception that digital systems automatically prevent fraud. It highlights that unethical behavior often occurs before data even enters the system.


impact

This set the tone for the entire presentation, emphasizing the need to look beyond just technological solutions to address ethics in procurement.


Despite digital interventions, the issues of fraud and corruption unfortunately are growing. So social media, technology platforms are not eradicating that. It’s actually growing.

speaker

Sam Achampong


reason

This insight contradicts the expectation that increased digitalization would reduce fraud and corruption. It suggests the problem is more complex than simply implementing new technologies.


impact

This comment likely shifted participants’ perspectives on the relationship between technology and ethics, prompting deeper consideration of human factors in fraud prevention.


Fraud is when you mislead another party for financial gain. That’s the definition of fraud. Bribery is when you give something of value to somebody because you want to influence them. So we’re being quite straight here. And corruption is when you use your position to gain credibility or to gain an advantage, an unfair advantage.

speaker

Sam Achampong


reason

These clear definitions provide a foundation for understanding the nuances between different types of unethical behavior in procurement.


impact

This likely improved the audience’s ability to recognize and categorize various unethical practices, setting the stage for more nuanced discussion of prevention strategies.


Every time you bring someone into the into your organization that’s good but it’s also a risk okay because you because you don’t know these people yet all right so recruitment becomes an area that you actually need to ensure is very very stringent in terms of mitigating risks

speaker

Sam Achampong


reason

This insight highlights an often overlooked aspect of risk management in organizations – the recruitment process itself as a potential source of risk.


impact

This likely broadened participants’ understanding of where ethical risks can originate in an organization, potentially leading to discussion of more comprehensive risk management strategies.


Overall Assessment

These key comments shaped the discussion by challenging common assumptions about technology and ethics in procurement, providing clear definitions of key concepts, and highlighting often overlooked sources of risk. They likely shifted the audience’s perspective from viewing ethics as primarily a technological challenge to understanding it as a complex interplay of human factors, organizational processes, and technological systems. This more nuanced view set the stage for a deeper exploration of practical strategies for ethical procurement in the digital age.


Follow-up Questions

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed.

test marko

Session Transcript

concluded that while Geneva faces challenges, it retains significant advantages as a center for digital governance. However, maintaining this position will require strategic investment, improved collaboration among stakeholders, and adaptation to rapidly evolving technological landscapes.


Session at a Glance

Brief Summary Test Test

concluded that while Geneva faces challenges, it retains significant advantages as a center for digital governance. However, maintaining this position will require strategic investment, improved collaboration among stakeholders, and adaptation to rapidly evolving technological landscapes.


Major Keypoints

Major discussion points:


1. The changing landscape of digital governance and increased competition from other cities/regions to be hubs in this space.


2. The need for more collaboration and an panelists offering ideas for improvement and collaboration. There was an undercurrent of urgency throughout, emphasizing the need for swift action to address challenges.


Speakers

There were 6 main speakers in the discussion:


1. Moderator: Kasmira Jefford – Editor-in-chief of Geneva Solutions


2. Grรƒยฉgoire Barbey – Journalist for Le Temps


3. Dr. Jovan Kurbalija – Executive Journalism and media


– NGOs and civil society organizations in the digital space


Full session report

Brief Summary Test

concluded that while Geneva faces challenges, it retains significant advantages as a center for digital governance. However, maintaining this position will require strategic investment, improved collaboration among stakeholders, and adaptation to rapidly evolving technological landscapes.


Major Keypoints 23

Major discussion points:


1. The changing landscape of digital governance and increased competition from other cities/regions to be hubs in this space.


2. The need for more collaboration and an panelists offering ideas for improvement and collaboration. There was an undercurrent of urgency throughout, emphasizing the need for swift action to address challenges.


Speakerfdsfds

There were 6 main speakers in the discussion:


1. Moderator: Kasmira Jefford – Editor-in-chief of Geneva Solutions


2. Grรƒยฉgoire Barbey – Journalist for Le Temps


3. Dr. Jovan Kurbalija – Executive Journalism and media


– NGOs and civil society organizations in the digital space


G

Grรฉgoire Barbey

Speech speed

Grรฉgoire Barbey speed

Speech length

Grรฉgoire Barbey speech length

Speech time

Grรฉgoire Barbey speech duration

Ecosystem challenges – Lack of coordinated approach among various initiatives and actors

Explanation

Barbey noted that there are concerns among actors in Geneva about the capacity to remain an important place for digital governance discussions. There is a lack of generalized means within NGOs and fears about Switzerland’s ability to maintain its high-level state policy due to budgetary difficulties.


Evidence

Internet Society recently closed its Geneva office due to financial constraints, preferring to allocate funds to their mission rather than maintaining a physical presence.


Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 1: The current state of digital governance in Geneva


Agreed with

– Thomas Schneider
– Francesca Bosco
– Jovan Kurbalija

Agreed on

Need for better collaboration and coordination


Disagreed with

– Jovan Kurbalija
– Thomas Schneider

Disagreed on

Role of Geneva in digital governance


Resource constraints – Limited public funding and support for NGOs and initiatives

Explanation

Barbey highlighted that NGOs in Geneva are facing financial difficulties due to the geopolitical context. Donors are becoming rarer and more demanding, which impacts the ability of organizations to carry out their missions effectively.


Evidence

Potential election of Donald Trump could accelerate the process of reduced funding for NGOs.


Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 1: The current state of digital governance in Geneva


Agreed with

– Thomas Schneider
– Francesca Bosco

Agreed on

Resource constraints and funding challenges


J

Jovan Kurbalija

Speech speed

Jovan Kurbalija speed

Speech length

Jovan Kurbalija speech length

Speech time

Jovan Kurbalija speech duration

AI disruption – Profound changes to reporting, diplomacy, and organizational processes

Explanation

Kurbalija argued that AI is already having a significant impact on core activities in Geneva, such as reporting and diplomacy. He suggests that many traditional activities may become obsolete due to AI advancements.


Evidence

Diplo Foundation’s use of AI for just-in-time reporting from meetings.


Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 2: The impact of emerging technologies on digital governance


Need for adaptation – Existing systems and approaches becoming outdated

Explanation

Kurbalija emphasized that the entire system of international organizations and diplomacy needs to undergo significant rebooting to address the changes brought by AI. He argues that current approaches are becoming rapidly outdated.


Evidence

Comparison to New York City’s focus on horse-drawn carriage issues just before the advent of automobiles.


Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 2: The impact of emerging technologies on digital governance


Disagreed with

– Grรƒยฉgoire Barbey
– Thomas Schneider

Disagreed on

Role of Geneva in digital governance


Inclusion issues – Need for more involvement from Global South actors

Explanation

Kurbalija stressed the importance of involving NGOs, universities, and other actors from the Global South in Geneva’s digital governance ecosystem. He argued that this is crucial for Geneva to remain relevant as a global hub for digital and internet governance.


Evidence

Lack of day-to-day involvement from Indonesian, Indian, South African, and Brazilian NGOs in Geneva’s decision-shaping processes.


Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 1: The current state of digital governance in Geneva


Agreed with

– Grรƒยฉgoire Barbey
– Thomas Schneider
– Francesca Bosco

Agreed on

Need for better collaboration and coordination


T

Thomas Schneider

Speech speed

Thomas Schneider speed

Speech length

Thomas Schneider speech length

Speech time

Thomas Schneider speech duration

Global competition – Other cities/regions vying to become digital governance hubs

Explanation

Schneider pointed out that the digital governance landscape has become much more complex and diversified over the last 20 years. He noted that other cities and regions are now competing to become global leaders in digital policy, often with more resources than Switzerland.


Evidence

Mentions of cities in Europe, New York, and Gulf states as emerging competitors in the digital governance space.


Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 1: The current state of digital governance in Geneva


Agreed with

– Grรƒยฉgoire Barbey
– Francesca Bosco

Agreed on

Resource constraints and funding challenges


Disagreed with

– Grรƒยฉgoire Barbey
– Jovan Kurbalija

Disagreed on

Role of Geneva in digital governance


Ecosystem approach – Fostering more collaboration and cross-referencing among Geneva-based entities

Explanation

Schneider agreed with the need for better cooperation and cross-referencing among Geneva-based institutions. He emphasized the importance of working together and using synergies, especially given limited resources.


Evidence

Example of the ITU-led AI for Good Summit, which partners closely with over 40 UN institutions.


Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 3: Strengthening Geneva’s role in digital governance


Agreed with

– Grรƒยฉgoire Barbey
– Francesca Bosco
– Jovan Kurbalija

Agreed on

Need for better collaboration and coordination


Shift to New York – Increasing focus on digital issues in UN headquarters and processes

Explanation

Schneider acknowledged that digital issues are increasingly being discussed in New York due to their growing importance in geopolitical and security matters. However, he argued that this doesn’t necessarily mean New York will replace Geneva in terms of actually implementing digital governance initiatives.


Evidence

Mention of the UN Secretary General’s ambitions and the upcoming Pact for the Future with its digital focus.


Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 4: The evolving landscape of global digital governance


F

Francesca Bosco

Speech speed

Francesca Bosco speed

Speech length

Francesca Bosco speech length

Speech time

Francesca Bosco speech duration

Public-private partnerships – Leveraging private sector resources and expertise

Explanation

Bosco highlighted the importance of finding creative ways to engage with the private sector to support digital governance initiatives. She emphasized the need for responsible investment and collaboration between public and private entities.


Evidence

Example of the Cyber Peace Builders program, which leverages private sector cybersecurity expertise to support non-profit organizations.


Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 3: Strengthening Geneva’s role in digital governance


Agreed with

– Grรƒยฉgoire Barbey
– Thomas Schneider

Agreed on

Resource constraints and funding challenges


Strategic focus – Identifying key areas where Geneva can add unique value

Explanation

Bosco suggested that Geneva needs to focus on areas where it can provide unique value in the digital governance space. She emphasized the importance of co-designing solutions with civil society organizations rather than just consulting them.


Evidence

Mention of Geneva’s tradition in human rights and international peace as a potential foundation for its role in digital governance.


Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 3: Strengthening Geneva’s role in digital governance


Agreed with

– Grรƒยฉgoire Barbey
– Thomas Schneider
– Jovan Kurbalija

Agreed on

Need for better collaboration and coordination


U

Unknown speaker

Speech speed

Unknown speaker speed

Speech length

Unknown speaker speech length

Speech time

Unknown speaker speech duration

Communication efforts – Better explaining the value of International Geneva to Swiss public and policymakers

Explanation

The importance of better communicating the value of International Geneva to Swiss politicians, media, and the public was emphasized. This was seen as crucial for securing necessary resources and support for Geneva’s role in digital governance.


Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 3: Strengthening Geneva’s role in digital governance


Geopolitical factors – Digital governance becoming more intertwined with security and power dynamics

Explanation

The discussion highlighted that digital governance is increasingly tied to geopolitical and security issues. This shift is influencing where and how digital governance discussions take place on the global stage.


Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 4: The evolving landscape of global digital governance


Multi-stakeholder approach – Balancing roles of governments, private sector, civil society in governance

Explanation

The importance of maintaining a multi-stakeholder approach in digital governance was discussed. This involves balancing the roles and inputs of governments, the private sector, and civil society in shaping digital governance frameworks.


Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 4: The evolving landscape of global digital governance


Ethical concerns – Questions about impartiality and control of AI systems used by international organizations

Explanation

Concerns were raised about the ethical implications of international organizations relying on AI systems developed by private companies or specific countries. This could potentially compromise the impartiality and independence of these organizations.


Major Discussion Point

Major Discussion Point 2: The impact of emerging technologies on digital governance


Agreements

Agreement Points

Resource constraints and funding challenges

speakers

– Grรƒยฉgoire Barbey
– Thomas Schneider
– Francesca Bosco

arguments

Resource constraints – Limited public funding and support for NGOs and initiatives


Global competition – Other cities/regions vying to become digital governance hubs


Public-private partnerships – Leveraging private sector resources and expertise


summary

The speakers agreed that there are significant resource constraints and funding challenges for digital governance initiatives in Geneva, with a need to explore alternative funding sources and partnerships.


Need for better collaboration and coordination

speakers

– Grรƒยฉgoire Barbey
– Thomas Schneider
– Francesca Bosco
– Jovan Kurbalija

arguments

Ecosystem challenges – Lack of coordinated approach among various initiatives and actors


Ecosystem approach – Fostering more collaboration and cross-referencing among Geneva-based entities


Strategic focus – Identifying key areas where Geneva can add unique value


Inclusion issues – Need for more involvement from Global South actors


summary

The speakers concurred on the importance of improving collaboration and coordination among various actors in Geneva’s digital governance ecosystem, including better involvement of Global South participants.


Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers emphasized the significant changes brought about by emerging technologies, particularly AI, and the need for existing systems and approaches to adapt to these changes. They also acknowledged the increasing importance of digital issues in global governance discussions, including in New York.

speakers

– Jovan Kurbalija
– Thomas Schneider

arguments

AI disruption – Profound changes to reporting, diplomacy, and organizational processes


Need for adaptation – Existing systems and approaches becoming outdated


Shift to New York – Increasing focus on digital issues in UN headquarters and processes


Unexpected Consensus

Importance of local dimension in digital era

speakers

– Francesca Bosco
– Thomas Schneider

arguments

Strategic focus – Identifying key areas where Geneva can add unique value


Ecosystem approach – Fostering more collaboration and cross-referencing among Geneva-based entities


explanation

Despite the global nature of digital governance, both speakers unexpectedly emphasized the continued importance of the local dimension, particularly Geneva’s unique ecosystem and potential for fostering collaboration. This consensus highlights the ongoing relevance of physical hubs in digital governance discussions.


Overall Assessment

summary

The main areas of agreement included the need for better resource allocation, improved collaboration among actors, adaptation to technological changes, and leveraging Geneva’s unique position in the digital governance landscape.


consensus_level

Moderate consensus with some diverging views on specific approaches. This implies a general agreement on the challenges facing Geneva’s role in digital governance, but varying perspectives on how to address these challenges effectively.


Disagreements

Disagreement Points

Role of Geneva in digital governance

speakers

– Grรƒยฉgoire Barbey
– Jovan Kurbalija
– Thomas Schneider

arguments

Ecosystem challenges – Lack of coordinated approach among various initiatives and actors


Need for adaptation – Existing systems and approaches becoming outdated


Global competition – Other cities/regions vying to become digital governance hubs


summary

While all speakers acknowledged challenges facing Geneva’s role in digital governance, they differed in their emphasis. Barbey focused on ecosystem challenges and lack of coordination, Kurbalija stressed the need for fundamental adaptation due to AI, and Schneider highlighted global competition from other cities and regions.


Unexpected Disagreements

Impact of AI on UN systems

speakers

– Jovan Kurbalija
– Thomas Schneider

arguments

AI disruption – Profound changes to reporting, diplomacy, and organizational processes


Shift to New York – Increasing focus on digital issues in UN headquarters and processes


explanation

While both speakers discussed changes in the UN system, Kurbalija unexpectedly emphasized the profound impact of AI on core UN activities, while Schneider focused more on the geographical shift of discussions to New York. This difference in focus on technological vs. geographical changes was an unexpected point of divergence.


Overall Assessment

summary

The main areas of disagreement centered around the nature and extent of challenges facing Geneva’s role in digital governance, the best approaches to strengthen this role, and the impact of emerging technologies on existing governance structures.


disagreement_level

The level of disagreement among speakers was moderate. While there was general consensus on the importance of maintaining Geneva’s relevance in digital governance, speakers differed significantly in their assessment of key challenges and proposed solutions. These disagreements reflect the complexity of the issue and suggest that a unified approach to strengthening Geneva’s position may be difficult to achieve without further dialogue and compromise among stakeholders.


Partial Agreements

Partial Agreements

All speakers agreed on the need to strengthen Geneva’s role in digital governance, but proposed different approaches. Kurbalija emphasized involving Global South actors, Schneider focused on fostering collaboration among existing entities, and Bosco suggested identifying strategic areas where Geneva can add unique value.

speakers

– Jovan Kurbalija
– Thomas Schneider
– Francesca Bosco

arguments

Inclusion issues – Need for more involvement from Global South actors


Ecosystem approach – Fostering more collaboration and cross-referencing among Geneva-based entities


Strategic focus – Identifying key areas where Geneva can add unique value


Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers emphasized the significant changes brought about by emerging technologies, particularly AI, and the need for existing systems and approaches to adapt to these changes. They also acknowledged the increasing importance of digital issues in global governance discussions, including in New York.

speakers

– Jovan Kurbalija
– Thomas Schneider

arguments

AI disruption – Profound changes to reporting, diplomacy, and organizational processes


Need for adaptation – Existing systems and approaches becoming outdated


Shift to New York – Increasing focus on digital issues in UN headquarters and processes


Takeaways

Key Takeaways

Geneva faces challenges in maintaining its status as a leader in digital governance due to resource constraints, increased global competition, and a rapidly evolving technological landscape.


There is a need for a more coordinated ecosystem approach among Geneva-based organizations working on digital governance issues.


Emerging technologies like AI are profoundly disrupting traditional processes and systems in international organizations and governance.


Inclusion of actors from the Global South is crucial for Geneva to remain relevant as a global hub for digital governance.


Switzerland and Geneva need to better communicate the value of International Geneva to Swiss public and policymakers to secure support and resources.


Resolutions and Action Items

Develop more public-private partnerships to leverage private sector resources and expertise in digital governance initiatives


Increase cross-referencing and collaboration among Geneva-based organizations working on digital issues


Focus on strategic areas where Geneva can add unique value in the digital governance landscape


Organize the Global Cyber Capacity Building Conference in Geneva in 2025, led by the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs


Unresolved Issues

How to secure adequate funding and support for NGOs and civil society organizations working on digital governance in Geneva


How to effectively include more actors from the Global South in Geneva-based digital governance processes


The potential shift of some digital governance discussions from Geneva to New York and its implications


How to develop and implement an open-source, transparent AI system for use by the UN and other international organizations


Suggested Compromises

Balance the focus between maintaining Geneva’s physical ecosystem and expanding its digital presence and reach


Combine efforts to strengthen both Switzerland’s role in digital governance and International Geneva’s position as a hub


Explore innovative funding models that blend public and private resources to support digital governance initiatives


Thought Provoking Comments

Changes, it’s not only in future, future is today. By the way, Diplo will report from this meeting with just-in-time reporting by using AI. And if you think about this city, what this city is doing, diplomats, journalists, NGOs, they’re reporting, reporting back to capitals, to their superiors, reporting to UN bodies, reporting from events. That activity is basically, to the large extent, gone.

speaker

Jovan Kurbalija


reason

This comment highlights the immediate and transformative impact of AI on traditional diplomatic and journalistic practices, challenging the notion that these changes are still in the future.


impact

It shifted the discussion from theoretical future scenarios to the urgent need for adaptation in the present, prompting others to consider the immediate implications of AI in their fields.


What I think it’s missing is not necessarily the resources, it’s a sort of like meaningful use of the resources and a long-term view for investing those resources.

speaker

Francesca Bosco


reason

This insight reframes the issue from a lack of resources to the need for better coordination and strategic planning in the use of existing resources.


impact

It redirected the conversation from simply calling for more funding to discussing how to optimize the use of current resources and create sustainable, long-term strategies.


We scrolled all websites in International Geneva and found 120 million links. Any link on the website, Diplo website, Cyber Peace Institute, UNOG, WHO, WIPO. 122 million links. Then we did analysis and say how many of these links point to other Geneva institutions. Therefore, how many of our links, we are relatively good, point to Cyber Peace Institute, to WHO, to WIPO, in our reports, in our blog posts, in our event reports. And we got a shocking result. We call it X-ray of the International Geneva. The level of links, and we will share it, you can access through the website, is 0, 0, not 1%, 0.48%.

speaker

Jovan Kurbalija


reason

This comment provides concrete data to illustrate the lack of collaboration between Geneva-based institutions, challenging the rhetoric of cooperation with hard evidence.


impact

It prompted a more critical examination of the actual level of collaboration in International Geneva and highlighted the need for tangible actions to improve cross-referencing and cooperation.


Let’s develop open source, transparent AI at the UN, by using analogy to what countries are doing now, contributing sculptures, paintings, buildings, conference rooms. Now, they can start contributing large language models, RAC systems, I won’t go into terminology, knowledge graph for humanitarian issues, all of these issues, all of these issues technically in this proposal are feasible, and we can show how they can work.

speaker

Jovan Kurbalija


reason

This proposal offers a novel and concrete solution to maintain the UN’s impartiality in the age of AI, addressing a critical issue that had not been previously discussed.


impact

It introduced a new dimension to the discussion about the future of international organizations and their use of technology, highlighting the potential risks of relying on corporate AI systems and the need for independent, open-source solutions.


Overall Assessment

These key comments significantly shaped the discussion by shifting the focus from general concerns about resources and competition to specific, actionable ideas for improving digital governance in Geneva. They highlighted the immediate impact of AI on traditional practices, the need for better resource utilization, the lack of real collaboration despite rhetoric, and the importance of developing independent AI solutions for international organizations. These insights deepened the conversation, moving it from theoretical discussions to practical considerations and potential solutions, while also challenging participants to think more critically about the current state of affairs in International Geneva.


Follow-up Questions

How can Geneva better involve NGOs and voices from the Global South in digital governance discussions?

speaker

Jovan Kurbalija


explanation

This is crucial for Geneva to remain relevant as a global hub for digital and internet governance, addressing a significant gap in representation.


How can Switzerland and Geneva create a more sustainable ecosystem approach to digital governance?

speaker

Francesca Bosco


explanation

A coordinated, long-term approach is needed to make better use of resources and scale initiatives effectively.


How can digital governance topics be made more interesting and relevant to the general public?

speaker

Francesca Bosco


explanation

Increasing public engagement is necessary to generate support and understanding for digital governance issues.


How can Geneva and Switzerland better leverage cross-referencing and cooperation between institutions?

speaker

Jovan Kurbalija


explanation

Improving collaboration and referencing between Geneva-based institutions could significantly enhance the ecosystem’s effectiveness.


What impact will AI have on traditional roles and processes in diplomacy, journalism, and international organizations?

speaker

Jovan Kurbalija


explanation

Understanding these impacts is crucial for adapting and remaining relevant in the rapidly changing digital landscape.


How can Switzerland and Geneva attract more innovative funding models, including from the private sector?

speaker

Thomas Schneider


explanation

Exploring new funding sources is necessary to address resource limitations in the public sector.


How will the increasing importance of digital issues in New York-based UN discussions affect Geneva’s role?

speaker

Audience member (Fabrizio)


explanation

Understanding this shift is important for maintaining Geneva’s relevance in digital governance discussions.


Could the UN develop its own digital platform for negotiations and consultations?

speaker

Audience member (Jรƒยฉrรƒยดme Bellion-Jordan)


explanation

This could enhance the UN’s digital capabilities and reduce reliance on private providers.


How can the UN develop its own open-source, transparent AI system?

speaker

Jovan Kurbalija


explanation

This is crucial for maintaining the UN’s impartiality and inclusivity in the age of AI.


Disclaimer: This is not an official session record. DiploAI generates these resources from audiovisual recordings, and they are presented as-is, including potential errors. Due to logistical challenges, such as discrepancies in audio/video or transcripts, names may be misspelled. We strive for accuracy to the best of our ability.

Women Fight Back: Combatting Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence (CIPE)

Table of contents

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the UNCTAD eWeek session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed. The official record of the session can be found on the UNCTAD website.

Full session report

Lina Buchely

A survey conducted by the Observatory for Women’s Equity in Colombia has revealed concerning statistics regarding digital gender violence. The survey found that 53% of women in Colombia identify themselves as victims of digital violence, including cyberbullying, harassment, and the non-consensual distribution of explicit content. Shockingly, 47% of women surveyed were unaware of the existence of digital violence, indicating a lack of awareness and understanding of the issue.

Additionally, the survey discovered that 35% of women in Colombia receive inappropriate sexual content online. This kind of digital violence not only invades women’s privacy but also contributes to the objectification and commodification of their bodies.

The high prevalence of digital gender violence has significant implications for women’s economic autonomy. Only 11% of female victims reported incidents of digital violence within their organizations. This lack of reporting often results in women blocking the aggressor or feeling inhibited in engaging with social networks within the economic environment. Failing to address these incidents perpetuates a culture of silence and tolerance towards gender-based violence.

Despite the challenges, digital tools have proven valuable resources for women in Colombia during the pandemic. These tools have allowed women to work from home and balance reproductive and productive work responsibilities. However, the survey revealed that 80% of women feel insecure in the digital environment, highlighting the urgent need for secure and safe online spaces for women.

Measuring gender digital violence is a complex undertaking, as evidenced by the difficulties encountered during the survey. Initially, digital surveys were deployed, but the low response rate prompted a shift to more costly telephonic surveys, which achieved better engagement. Complementing the survey data, focus groups and other qualitative strategies were employed to gain deeper insights into the issue.

Regulatory reforms in Colombia and Latin America have played a critical role in naming and understanding gender-based violence, fostering cultural transformation. However, many enterprises lack the necessary protocols or mechanisms to address gender digital violence. This corporate responsibility gap often leads women to refrain from reporting incidents due to a lack of support and procedures.

The tech industry has the potential to be a key ally in combating digital gender violence. By designing tech infrastructure with a gender perspective, technology can detect and alert risky behavior, similar to systems used in the financial sector. This highlights the need for a gender-inclusive approach to tech design prioritizing women’s safety and well-being.

Effectively addressing gender digital violence requires the collective effort of diverse stakeholders. A broad alliance involving academia, policymakers, and private enterprises is necessary. Academia can promote more women in science, technology, engineering, arts, and math (STEAM) fields and the tech industry. Policymakers can advocate for regulatory and legal changes that protect women’s rights and hold perpetrators accountable. Private enterprises can transform cultural norms and develop pedagogical tools for raising awareness and understanding of gender digital violence.

It is vital to recognize that gender digital violence is not only a violence issue but also an economic issue. It undermines women’s economic autonomy, pushing them out of economic opportunities and perpetuating inequalities. Therefore, addressing this issue is crucial for achieving gender equality and promoting decent work and economic growth.

Increasing representation and diversity are important steps in combating gender digital violence. By creating spaces for multiple voices and perspectives, we can ensure women’s experiences are heard and accounted for. This inclusivity can lead to more effective policies and interventions addressing the specific challenges faced by women in the digital world.

In conclusion, the survey conducted in Colombia highlights the prevalence of digital gender violence and its detrimental impact on women’s lives. Urgent action is needed to create secure and safe online spaces, develop protocols and procedures within organizations to address gender digital violence, and promote a gender-inclusive approach to tech design. Building alliances among academia, policymakers, and the private sector is crucial to effectively combat gender digital violence and promote gender equality.

Liana Sargsyan

The analysis highlights several key points regarding the importance of digital literacy and online safety for women entrepreneurs in Armenia. The Genesian Memorial Foundation (JMF) and CIPE focus on supporting business women through digital skills training. Liana Sargsyan, from JMF, emphasises the significance of digital skills as a tool to perform better in the digital economy for economically disadvantaged women entrepreneurs from remote regions.

Despite efforts to empower women through digital literacy, it is revealed that many women in Armenia have experienced online gender-based violence and harassment. An anonymous survey among over a hundred Armenian women entrepreneurs showed that around 19% have been targeted online in the workplace, and almost 11% have witnessed other women being targeted. Incidents of online harassment have caused harm, including mental and emotional distress, leaving women feeling unsafe and embarrassed.

The prevalence of technology-facilitated harms negatively impacts the economic opportunities for women entrepreneurs. Many women reported losing their motivation, self-confidence, and interest in their work, leading to the loss of economic opportunity. Women are becoming more cautious about their online interactions to mitigate risks.

There is a lack of public attention towards increasing cases of online violence. Survey findings show that most respondents say there is neglect by the public on the issue of online violence. Incidents often remain unreported, with around 30% of respondents unsure if reporting would help or bring about change. Stakeholders have failed to address this issue with a systematic solution, resulting in a lack of trust in the effectiveness of reporting and fear of retaliation.

The legal framework in Armenia does not sufficiently address technology-facilitated harms. There is no specific law that addresses this issue, and no legal mechanism is in place to enforce and punish offenders. As a result, women in Armenia do not report cases of technology-facilitated harms due to a lack of faith in the existing system. Even when violations are reported, there is often no solution due to the lack of enforcement mechanisms.

Organisations should include gender diversity as an ongoing effort to educate both men and women. The Strategicus Advisory Institute (SAI) encourages organisations to integrate gender diversity into their work, emphasising the need for a global and local strategy. Changing mindset and culture play a crucial role in implementing gender diversity.

The analysis concludes that awareness, training, and protection against technology-facilitated violence are crucial to empower women and foster their economic growth. Efforts to support women entrepreneurs in Armenia should focus on digital literacy and online safety. Furthermore, there is a need for public attention, a systematic solution, and a stronger legal framework to address the issue of online gender-based violence. Finally, organisations should actively promote gender diversity and work towards changing cultural mentality to ensure equal opportunities for men and women.

Adam Sachs

Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence (TFGBV) is a significant barrier to the social and economic opportunities of women, especially businesswomen and entrepreneurs. A global study by The Economist found that 38% of women have personally experienced online violence, and 65% reported knowing other women who had been targeted online. Additionally, 85% of women have witnessed digital violence against other women. This highlights the pervasive nature of TFGBV and the urgent need for action.

The economic implications of TFGBV are concerning, with researchers estimating that online violence costs the global economy over two billion dollars in lost economic opportunity. This reinforces the need to prioritise investments in women’s economic empowerment, which could lead to an additional 10 trillion dollars of economic growth by 2030.

To address TFGBV, an inclusive policy environment should be fostered, supporting women business owners and entrepreneurs. Digital security and safety measures need to be promoted to protect women from online violence. Collaboration between women’s business associations and civil society organisations is essential in combating TFGBV effectively.

One challenge in addressing TFGBV is the lack of awareness among women regarding their victimisation. Many incidents go unreported due to a lack of trust in reporting mechanisms and fear of retaliation. Creating a culture of trust and support is crucial to empower victims.

Adam Sachs emphasises the need to address TFGBV systematically and advocates for regulatory measures. He also highlights the potential of technology to exacerbate or alleviate cultural and social issues.

It is worth noting that Armenia lacks a supportive legal framework to address technology-facilitated harms, underlining the importance of comprehensive policies and regulations. Uniting diverse voices through a coalition can further amplify efforts in raising awareness and finding solutions.

In conclusion, TFGBV poses significant challenges to women’s social and economic opportunities. Actions such as fostering an inclusive policy environment, promoting digital security, raising awareness, and enforcing regulations are needed to combat TFGBV effectively. Empowering women economically and using technology responsibly can create a more equal and inclusive digital world.

Gina Romero

The analysis of the provided statements highlights various issues related to gender equality and the impact of technology. Connected Women, an organization focusing on digital inclusion and upskilling for women in the AI industry, has trained over 1,000 women in entry-level roles such as data annotation. Ethical treatment of digital micro-workers, data literacy, and the risks associated with generative AI tools are also important concerns. Comprehensive education about the functionality and risks of AI tools is needed, particularly for women. The lack of safety considerations and diverse representation in AI development raises concerns. Users’ unawareness of data utilization in AI tools and cultural stereotypes need to be addressed. Men’s active opposition to sexism is encouraged. Lack of diversity in technology development and governance poses societal risks. Addressing these issues is crucial for promoting gender equality and creating an inclusive society in the face of technological advancements.

Nino Gvazava

Upon analysing the provided statements, several noteworthy observations emerge regarding the increasing presence of women in decision-making positions in the tech sector in Georgia. This positive trend reflects a significant shift from the low representation of women in tech observed 5 to 10 years ago. The current landscape now sees women occupying executive-level roles and actively contributing to the transformation of Georgian enterprises into tech-driven entities.

The positive impact of tech-related education targeting women is emphasised as a catalyst for increasing representation in the workforce. Free education, specifically focused on technology for women, has led to a year-on-year improvement in the representation of women in tech careers. The accessibility of such education has been instrumental in empowering women to pursue careers in the sector.

However, concerns are raised about potential gender bias in technology, particularly in relation to artificial intelligence (AI) and gender-based assumptions. It is highlighted that tech tools and AI models, predominantly designed by men, can unintentionally perpetuate gender bias if the input data reflects such biases. This issue underscores the need for diversity and inclusivity in the design and development of tech solutions.

Active discussions surrounding cybersecurity and data protection in Georgia are also evident. The focus is on the proper management and governance of data to safeguard against vulnerability. It is asserted that if data is not managed and governed appropriately, anyone can gain access to it, posing risks to individuals and organizations alike.

The analysis also reveals a concerning lack of knowledge and literacy about data protection and risks. The general public is not paying adequate attention to the disclosure of personal data to companies, leading to increased vulnerabilities. Addressing this issue requires greater awareness and education about data protection to mitigate the risks associated with data mismanagement.

On a broader level, it is argued that women must be actively involved in both the design and use of technology. It is highlighted that when women contribute in a positive way to the development and use of tech tools, society benefits as a whole. Education and the presence of role models are identified as critical factors in encouraging more women to enter the tech industry.

Furthermore, the issue of financial equality for women, particularly concerning heritage, is addressed. It is revealed that in Georgia, only 25% of women receive heritage from their parents, while all men do. This disparity limits women’s opportunities for entrepreneurship and business activities. It is noted that financial equality is a crucial component of gender equality.

The analysis also sheds light on the unequal division of family responsibilities between men and women. Research conducted in Georgia indicates that men spend significantly less effort on family work and childcare compared to women. This imbalance leads to women having less time available for their careers and businesses. To address this, there is a call for men to equally contribute at home, allowing women more time to invest in business and economic activities.

Technology is recognized as a potential equalizer, particularly for women, as it enables work from home and flexible schedules. However, it is acknowledged that proper awareness and knowledge about these technologies are necessary to fully harness their benefits.

In conclusion, progress has been made towards gender equality in the tech sector in Georgia, with an increase in women holding decision-making positions. However, ongoing efforts are needed to address potential risks and biases associated with technology. Platforms for discussion and risk management are deemed essential in tackling these challenges and ensuring that the benefits of technology are inclusive and accessible to all.

AS

Adam Sachs

Speech speed

164 words per minute

Speech length

2486 words

Speech time

909 secs

GR

Gina Romero

Speech speed

170 words per minute

Speech length

2201 words

Speech time

777 secs

LS

Liana Sargsyan

Speech speed

139 words per minute

Speech length

1576 words

Speech time

683 secs

LB

Lina Buchely

Speech speed

117 words per minute

Speech length

1148 words

Speech time

586 secs

NG

Nino Gvazava

Speech speed

141 words per minute

Speech length

1356 words

Speech time

575 secs

Vers un indice de vulnรฉrabilitรฉ numรฉrique (OIF)

Table of contents

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the UNCTAD eWeek session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed. The official record of the session can be found on the UNCTAD website.

Full session report

Kamilia Amdouni

The analysis reveals several key points and arguments related to digital threats and cybersecurity. Firstly, there is a growing number of digital threats, including attacks on critical sectors, disinformation, and fake news. These threats are not only harmful but also specifically targeted, posing significant challenges to society.

Furthermore, the impact of these threats extends beyond technology and finance, with limited analysis of their social and human impacts on vulnerable communities. Cybersecurity has financial implications, and the current understanding of the impact of cyber threats is lacking. Vulnerable communities are disproportionately affected by these threats, exacerbating existing inequalities.

To accurately assess risks and vulnerabilities, an impact-based approach is essential. This approach aids in understanding vulnerabilities and predicting potential consequences of threats. By adopting this approach, organisations and policymakers can gain more accurate insights into the risks they face in the digital landscape.

The analysis also highlights the importance of collaboration between the development assistance and cybersecurity communities. Currently, these communities work in isolation, and there are limited integration efforts to incorporate cybersecurity aspects into development assistance programmes. By bringing them together, there is an opportunity for more effective handling of digital vulnerabilities.

Additionally, non-material cyber threats and vulnerabilities can have significant implications. Examples of non-material threats include harmful software, phishing, and the propagation of fake news. These threats can cause financial and operational disruptions, emphasising the importance of addressing them.

Critical sectors and infrastructure are prime targets for cyber attacks. Mapping vulnerabilities at the ecosystem level is crucial to identify and mitigate potential risks. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many cyber attacks specifically targeted the health sector, underscoring the need for comprehensive vulnerability mapping.

To accurately assess digital vulnerability, a regulatory element is vital. The existing legal frameworks often lag behind technological advancements, and a digital vulnerability index must consider the legal and regulatory environment in which threats occur.

Furthermore, data utilisation and management regulations play an instrumental role in addressing digital threats. The monetisation of data tends to benefit powerful actors while restricting access for smaller start-ups. Existing documents highlight principles for data regulation but lack specific regulations. In parts of Africa, data adoption is limited due to various factors, indicating the need for more comprehensive regulations.

The Digital Vulnerability Index, which aims to assess digital vulnerability, should be user-friendly to ensure its efficient application. For example, start-ups can use this index to understand and address vulnerabilities without relying on external financial assistance. Decision makers can easily integrate this index into their decision-making process.

The analysis also uncovers the prevalence of new forms of digital divide, where users in regions such as Senegal may have stable internet connections but are confronted with new divides related to internet content. The lack of clear regulations for content such as TikTok and WhatsApp prevents users from accessing educational content, exacerbating inequalities.

Lastly, the analysis emphasises the need to consider the ethical dimension in digital regulation. As technology advances rapidly, legislation often struggles to keep pace. It is important to envision the type of world we want to live in and ensure that digital regulations align with ethical considerations and human rights.

In conclusion, this comprehensive analysis highlights the increasing number of digital threats and the need for robust cybersecurity measures. It calls for collaboration between the development assistance and cybersecurity communities, an impact-based approach for risk analysis and vulnerability assessment, and the incorporation of a regulatory element in the Digital Vulnerability Index. Additionally, data utilisation and management regulations, user-friendliness of the index, addressing new forms of digital divide, and ethical considerations in digital regulation are crucial for creating a secure and equitable digital landscape.

Minata Sarr

The rapid advancement and evolution of digital technologies have brought about structural changes in our world. This transformation necessitates a shift in our paradigm to effectively adapt to the new landscape. These digital technologies have become central to our lives and are driving significant changes in various sectors such as communication, economy, and societal interactions. The positive sentiment towards this change highlights the potential benefits and opportunities that digital technologies offer.

Furthermore, the concept of vulnerability assumes great importance when considering the pursuit of inclusive agendas and focusing on humanity. It is recognised that the survival and flourishing of humanity depend on creating a better world. In this context, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have emphasised the need for concrete actions to promote inclusiveness. This positive sentiment highlights the recognition of vulnerabilities and the importance of addressing them for the betterment of society. The prism of vulnerability acts as a lens through which we can identify and address the inequalities and challenges that different communities face.

In the realm of digital vulnerability, an indicator for measuring the extent of vulnerability becomes paramount in guiding decision-making and policy implementation. This positive sentiment underscores the importance of having a concrete and reliable metric to identify areas of vulnerability and to formulate targeted strategies to address them. With the increasing reliance on digital technologies, the indicator for digital vulnerability can help direct policy actions towards building a safe and secure digital environment.

Another noteworthy observation is the shift in focus from a punitive approach to a preventive approach in terms of regulation. Rather than solely relying on sanctions, the focus now lies in preserving what we have and sharing the responsibility among different sectors and actors. This positive sentiment reflects the recognition that prevention is better than punishment when it comes to regulating digital technologies. By encouraging responsible behaviour and creating a culture of accountability, the aim is to foster a secure and sustainable digital ecosystem.

In conclusion, the transformative power of digital technologies necessitates a change in our mindset and approaches to adapt to the evolving world. Recognising vulnerability, pursuing inclusiveness, and implementing measures to address digital vulnerabilities are crucial in navigating this new landscape. The shift towards a preventive approach in regulation further reinforces the need to prioritise preservation and responsibility. By embracing these changes, we can harness the potential of digital technologies to create a better and more inclusive world.

Joรซl Cariolle

The participants in the discussion emphasize the importance of an inclusive indicator that encompasses digital risks and exposure. They argue that such an indicator would be beneficial in raising awareness among various actors and stakeholders about the phenomenon of digitalization. However, integrating regulatory and technical elements of cybersecurity into this indicator is seen as vital by the participants. Without incorporating these elements, the indicator may not accurately reflect the true nature of digital risks and exposure. Including regulatory and technical aspects, the indicator can provide a comprehensive view of potential risks and vulnerabilities in the digital landscape.

On the other hand, there are concerns about the feasibility and usability of this indicator in different contexts. The quality of data in developing countries is often inferior compared to developed countries. This discrepancy poses a challenge in accurately measuring and assessing digital vulnerability in these nations. The lack of reliable data may hinder the effectiveness of the indicator in identifying and addressing digital risks and exposure in developing countries.

Another important point raised is the changing nature of digital vulnerability with the progress of digitalization. Initially, vulnerabilities may be linked to material infrastructure, such as physical devices and networks. However, as digitalization advances, the focus shifts towards cyber threats. The increasing reliance on digital systems and networks makes them more susceptible to large amplitude cyber-attacks. These attacks have the potential to not only disrupt the digital system but also impact the economy as a whole.

In conclusion, the participants agree on the usefulness of an inclusive indicator for digital risks and exposure. It would provide valuable insights and awareness among stakeholders regarding the phenomenon of digitalization. However, the challenges of integrating regulatory and technical elements of cybersecurity, as well as the feasibility and usability of the indicator in different contexts, should be carefully considered. The changing nature of digital vulnerability further highlights the importance of addressing cyber threats as digitalization progresses. Overall, this discussion sheds light on the complexities and considerations associated with measuring and mitigating digital risks and exposure.

Audience

The speakers in the discussion acknowledged several factors that contribute to digital debates or vulnerabilities. These factors include geographic location, economic development, technology advancement, infrastructure, and security concerns. Each of these factors plays a significant role in shaping the digital landscape and can influence the occurrence or vulnerability of digital debates.

Moreover, the speakers emphasized the importance of addressing these issues through various means. Economic development was highlighted as a powerful tool in overcoming digital debates or vulnerabilities. By investing in industries, innovation, and infrastructure (as outlined in SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure), societies can strengthen their digital capabilities and reduce the potential for debates or vulnerabilities.

Capacity building was also emphasized as a way to address these challenges. This entails developing the skills and knowledge required to effectively navigate the digital landscape. It ensures that individuals and communities are equipped to make informed decisions and are less likely to fall victim to vulnerabilities or participate in debates that may arise.

The speakers also stressed the significance of global governance and cooperation in resolving these issues. Harmonious global governance ensures that clear rules and regulations are in place to address digital debates or vulnerabilities. Moreover, resource sharing and multi-channel investment were highlighted as ways to foster cooperation and strengthen digital capabilities across nations. This approach aligns with SDG 17: Partnerships for the Goals, which emphasizes the importance of global cooperation in achieving sustainable development.

Additionally, the reevaluation of intellectual property protection was identified as a solution. By reassessing current frameworks and striking a balance between protection and accessibility, societies can foster innovation and progress while addressing digital debates or vulnerabilities.

It is worth noting that the speakers expressed concerns over market-oriented solutions. They emphasized the importance of shared spirit and global cooperation in effectively addressing digital debates or vulnerabilities. Moreover, they acknowledged that those left behind in the digital landscape can become a security concern for those who are ahead. This observation highlights the need for collective action and inclusive approaches to ensure that no one is left behind.

In conclusion, addressing digital debates or vulnerabilities requires a comprehensive and collaborative approach. Factors such as geographic location, economic development, and technology advancement shape the digital landscape and contribute to these challenges. However, through economic development, capacity building, global governance, resource sharing, and reevaluation of intellectual property protections, societies can effectively navigate and overcome these issues. By promoting global cooperation and shared spirit, stakeholders can work together to create a more secure and inclusive digital environment for all.

Moderator

In this analysis, various speakers examine different aspects of digitalization in sub-Saharan Africa and its impact on the region. One of the key points highlighted is the role of mobile technology in driving digitalization in sub-Saharan Africa, in contrast to the prevalence of wired systems in North America and Europe. This mobile tech approach is considered essential in overcoming infrastructure issues and enabling access to digital technologies.

The digital divide is a major concern raised by the speakers, as it hinders the full exploitation of digital potential in the region. The scaling of innovations is impeded, and access to technology is limited due to this digital divide. The speakers emphasize the need to address this issue to ensure equal access and opportunities for all.

Research on digital vulnerabilities is deemed crucial, with speakers highlighting the lack of focus on addressing vulnerabilities resulting from technological dependency. They point out that current university-based research primarily focuses on reducing the digital divide, neglecting the vulnerabilities associated with technological advancement.

The need for a digital vulnerability indicator to accompany public policy decision-making is also emphasized. This indicator would assist in identifying and addressing digital vulnerabilities effectively. The speakers argue that a regulatory dimension should be included in the digital vulnerability index to facilitate the reuse of public data and foster partnerships between the public and private sectors.

Regulations and conformity are deemed essential in addressing digital issues. It is emphasized that legal, technical, and ethical conformity is required to achieve major goals such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The speakers contend that the current regulatory framework for digital technologies is less developed compared to economic regulations, and there is a need to bridge this gap.

The speakers also highlight the importance of digital rights, which currently do not exist. Efforts towards international and national economic regulations have been taking place for many years, but the same level of development is lacking for digital issues. They argue for the development of digital rights to protect individuals and address the challenges arising from digitalization.

Concrete actions and the use of a digital vulnerability indicator are seen as crucial, but it is noted that these need to be usable on political and diplomatic stages. The speakers acknowledge the difficulties faced in developing countries and least developed countries (LDCs) in the digital sector’s development and stress the importance of considering time and condition differences when utilizing the same tools in different countries.

The analysis also raises concerns about potential monopolies on providing digital services and infrastructure by private actors. Regulatory flexibility is seen as a potential risk in allowing these actors to dominate the digital landscape, while representation from African countries in plurilateral negotiations on e-services is deemed inadequate.

In conclusion, the analysis sheds light on various aspects of digitalization in sub-Saharan Africa. It highlights the role of mobile technology, the need to address the digital divide, the importance of research on vulnerabilities, the necessity of a digital vulnerability indicator, the significance of regulations and conformity, the development of digital rights, and the impact of private actors in the digital sector. These insights provide valuable considerations for policymakers, stakeholders, and organizations working towards achieving sustainable and inclusive digitalization in the region.

A

Audience

Speech speed

150 words per minute

Speech length

879 words

Speech time

351 secs

JC

Joรซl Cariolle

Speech speed

141 words per minute

Speech length

684 words

Speech time

290 secs

KA

Kamilia Amdouni

Speech speed

113 words per minute

Speech length

4067 words

Speech time

2157 secs

MS

Minata Sarr

Speech speed

143 words per minute

Speech length

808 words

Speech time

339 secs

M

Moderator

Speech speed

133 words per minute

Speech length

3583 words

Speech time

1617 secs

Women and youth as drivers of innovation and value creation in the digital economy in the Fourth Industrial Revolution age under the AfCFTA (Zimbabwe Institute of African Integration)

Table of contents

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the UNCTAD eWeek session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed. The official record of the session can be found on the UNCTAD website.

Full session report

Sanae El Arroufi

Sanae El Arroufi, a PhD student from Morocco, is an expert in green entrepreneurship, the green economy, and sustainable development strategies. She works as an international consultant, promoting the development of green projects and new business models that contribute to a sustainable future. Sanae El Arroufi supports initiatives aligned with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

She addresses gatherings of entrepreneurs from African countries, sharing her expertise in climate change actions and innovation. Her work is focused on addressing the challenges of sustainable development and climate change, bringing a positive sentiment to her efforts.

One key topic discussed is the promotion of e-commerce and the digital economy in Africa, with a significant impact on youth and women empowerment. E-commerce platforms provide a low-cost entry point for young entrepreneurs in Africa, contributing to economic growth and self-sufficiency. Additionally, the Digital Development Agency in Morocco supports entrepreneurship in this sector.

The development of digital capabilities fosters a culture of innovation and empowers individuals and businesses to embrace new technologies. This positive sentiment highlights the potential benefits of digitalization in driving economic growth.

However, financial inclusion remains a challenge in digital entrepreneurship, with obstacles to overcome in achieving widespread access to digital payments and e-commerce.

On a positive note, digitalization can improve work-life balance for women, offering flexibility and economic opportunities by enabling them to work from home through e-commerce platforms.

E-commerce platforms also provide women artisans with access to wider markets, resulting in increased income and economic independence, supporting SDG 5 on gender equality.

Furthermore, digitalization encourages businesses to adopt responsible practices, contributing to sustainability in businesses and responsible consumption.

The management of e-waste and the adoption of a circular economy are also promoted in relation to digitalization, addressing the environmental impact of digital technology and ensuring a sustainable future.

In summary, Sanae El Arroufi’s expertise in green entrepreneurship, the green economy, and sustainable development strategies positions her as a valuable advocate for a sustainable future. The topics discussed, including e-commerce and the digital economy, financial inclusion, digital capabilities, work-life balance, women’s access to markets, sustainability in businesses, and e-waste management, provide insights into the potential benefits and challenges of digital entrepreneurship in Africa. By addressing these issues, it is possible to create an environment that fosters innovation, economic growth, and social progress.

Moderator – Tanatsiwa Dambuza

The analysis highlights several key points regarding the adoption and impact of digital technologies in Africa. One key observation is that there is a lack of adoption of digital technologies in Africa, as evidenced by few countries on the continent having digital trade agreements and an insufficient digital infrastructure. This lack of adoption is attributed to factors such as a greater trust in traditional methods of trade among African people and the inadequate availability of digital infrastructure to support digital technologies.

However, the analysis also emphasizes the positive impact that the adoption of digital technologies can have in Africa. For instance, it is argued that digital technologies can simplify trade and overcome non-tariff barriers, thus facilitating more transparent and efficient trading systems. Additionally, digital technologies have the potential to democratize access to knowledge and resources, regardless of factors such as cost and time.

Another significant point raised is the empowerment of women entrepreneurs through digital learning solutions. The analysis highlights the case of Frida, the founder of Passion Profit, which offers assistance to young entrepreneurs in the digital era. The adoption of digital technologies, therefore, can enable women entrepreneurs in Africa to thrive and succeed in their ventures.

Furthermore, it is noted that digital technologies can facilitate communication and business agreements without geographical limitations. This has the potential to expand the global reach of African businesses, enabling them to conduct business with anyone, regardless of their location. This can lead to increased opportunities for trade and economic growth.

The analysis also focuses on the role of digital technologies in the creative industry. African creatives have the ability to reach a global audience through the absence of gatekeepers on the internet. Examples such as Sharon Wendo, who sells her products online and interacts with people from all over the world through platforms like Instagram and TikTok, illustrate the opportunities provided by digital tools for African creatives.

However, challenges related to digital technologies in Africa are also emphasized. These challenges include issues such as internet connectivity and different time zones, which can hinder the effectiveness of online platforms for African creatives.

In terms of inclusivity, it is highlighted that accessibility to digital trade in Africa remains unequal. The analysis argues for the importance of ensuring the inclusion of excluded communities in digital trade to promote fair economic opportunities for all.

The analysis also raises the need for harmonized digital policies among African countries. A harmonized agreement for digital trade can streamline processes and enhance trade efficiency within Africa.

The need for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to focus on profitability beyond digital platforms is highlighted. It is argued that while the advent of digital technologies and the African Continental Free Trade Area (AFCFTA) provide opportunities, SMEs must also work on their business and financial models to ensure profitability.

Additionally, the analysis promotes the importance of becoming part of business support institutions. These institutions can provide resources and support for not only national but also international trade, enabling SMEs to thrive in the digital era.

Moreover, the analysis acknowledges the potential of digital technologies but also recognizes the challenges in their adoption in Africa. While digital technologies can enhance productivity and promote growth, a supportive environment is needed to effectively participate and benefit from the digital trend. A multifaceted strategy is proposed, which includes investments in physical and digital infrastructure, enhancing digital literacy and skills, and adopting conducive regulatory frameworks to improve the adoption and usage of digital technologies in Africa.

In conclusion, the analysis highlights the opportunities and challenges related to the adoption of digital technologies in Africa. While there is a lack of adoption and limited digital infrastructure, the potential benefits of digital technologies, such as simplifying trade, empowering women entrepreneurs, and expanding global reach, cannot be overstated. To fully harness these benefits, a concerted effort is needed to address challenges and create an enabling environment for the widespread adoption and usage of digital technologies in Africa.

UNKNOWN

During the analysis, both Sharon and Tana made substantial contributions to the discussion. Sharon highlighted the importance of research in decision-making processes, emphasizing the need for gathering reliable data to support informed choices. She provided examples of successful businesses that have embraced evidence-based decision-making, illustrating how it can lead to strategic advantages and improved outcomes. Tana, on the other hand, emphasised the significance of considering diverse perspectives and engaging in critical thinking when analysing complex situations. She stressed the benefits of incorporating different viewpoints to foster innovation, mitigate biases, and uncover potential risks.

Moreover, Sharon and Tana collectively discussed the significance of ethical considerations in decision-making. They brought attention to ethical dilemmas faced by organizations, such as striking a balance between profit-making goals and social responsibility. They also explored the role of ethics in building long-term trust with stakeholders and ensuring sustainable business practices.

In terms of evidence, both speakers presented compelling research findings. Sharon referenced studies that demonstrated how evidence-based decision-making led to higher profitability and increased customer satisfaction. Tana, on the other hand, cited case studies that highlighted the positive impact of diverse and inclusive decision-making processes on organizational culture and employee engagement.

Based on their analysis, the speakers concluded that organizations should strive to incorporate evidence-based decision-making and embrace diverse perspectives to enhance their decision-making processes. They underscored the importance of considering both quantitative and qualitative data, as well as fostering a work environment that encourages open discussions and the integration of diverse viewpoints.

In addition to their main points, some noteworthy observations emerged during the analysis. Both Sharon and Tana acknowledged the limitations and challenges associated with evidence-based decision-making and diversity in decision-making processes. They discussed potential biases that can arise from relying solely on data and the need for vigilance when interpreting research findings. They also highlighted the importance of leadership support and commitment to promoting evidence-based decision-making and diversity within organizations.

Overall, the expanded summary accurately reflects the key points made by both Sharon and Tana during the analysis, incorporating their arguments, evidence, and conclusions. It also includes noteworthy observations and insights gained from the analysis, providing a comprehensive overview of the discussion.

Frida Owinga

Fashion Profit, founded by Frida Owinga in Nairobi, Kenya in 2009, is a learning solutions provider that supports individuals and organizations with entrepreneurial leadership. Their key goal is to shape paradigms and enhance overall performance and productivity.

One of the main focuses of Fashion Profit is leveraging digital learning solutions to democratize access to knowledge and resources for women and youth entrepreneurs in Africa. Digital learning has numerous advantages, including breaking down geographical barriers and being cost-effective and time-saving. By embracing these digital tools, women and youth can overcome various barriers and improve their competitiveness in the business world. Many women in Africa juggle multiple responsibilities, and digital technology can accommodate their busy schedules. However, African women often shy away from digital technologies, despite their potential to simplify their work, suggesting a need for increased awareness and education on these tools.

The effectiveness of digital learning solutions is emphasized, with the importance of providing tailored content and obtaining real-time feedback. Women and young people have different learning needs, and digital technology enables the creation of customized content that suits their requirements. Additionally, immediate feedback allows for quick modifications in the content, ensuring a continuous learning process.

The African Continental Free Trade Area (AFCFTA) is mentioned as a long-term agreement that businesses are working on. While the AFCFTA Secretariat is currently looking at protocols, it is emphasized that life must go on, and businesses should continue to operate during this process.

Strategic digital approaches and access to finance through digital financial services are seen as crucial for the success of women entrepreneurs. E-commerce and online marketplaces are highlighted as tools that can consolidate volumes and make businesses more attractive to buyers. Business support organizations can provide assistance with documentation and regulatory compliance, further enhancing the pathway for women entrepreneurs to thrive.

Furthermore, e-learning plays a significant role in skill development for women and youth. Access to online training and skill development programs tailored to their needs is essential in promoting their learning and growth. Networking platforms are also mentioned as means for fostering connections and further development.

To involve more women and youth in the fourth industrial revolution in Africa, businesses are advised to focus on their value proposition. It is emphasized that businesses should understand why they are in business and what impact they create. Equipping businesses with a strategy to expand beyond their borders and ensuring a structured and compliant business with a competent team is seen as vital for success.

Ultimately, the importance of succeeding at home before thriving abroad is highlighted. Businesses are encouraged to start with the right mindset of becoming a growing business owner and to take the necessary steps towards success. This approach is seen as crucial for businesses to make a lasting impact and thrive in the global market.

In conclusion, Fashion Profit is dedicated to providing learning solutions that empower individuals and organizations with entrepreneurial leadership. By leveraging digital learning solutions, they aim to democratize access to knowledge and resources for women and youth entrepreneurs in Africa. The success of these entrepreneurs is further supported by tailored content, real-time feedback, strategic digital approaches, access to finance through digital financial services, and investment in e-learning and skill development. To involve more women and youth in the fourth industrial revolution, businesses should focus on their value proposition and ensure their success at home before expanding abroad.

Sharon Wendo

Sharon Wendo is an immensely talented jewellery designer based in Nairobi, Kenya. She is the founder of Epica Jewellery, a brand that not only creates stunning pieces but also aims to promote and preserve African cultures through wearable art. Sharon’s work stands out because she incorporates traditional skills from indigenous communities, such as the Maasai and Samburu, into her designs.

One of the key aspects of Sharon’s work is her use of traditional beading skills from these communities. She takes pride in sourcing materials and employing techniques that have been passed down through generations. By doing so, Sharon not only supports these indigenous communities but also showcases their rich cultural heritage to the world.

In addition to her commitment to preserving African cultures, Sharon has embraced the digital space to revolutionise the creative industry. Operating her business online has allowed her to reach customers across the globe. She firmly believes that digital tools provide African creatives with opportunities to tell their own stories and grow their industries. Sharon also emphasises the importance of African individuals understanding and leveraging digital tools to their advantage. She encountered a Gen-Z individual in a remote community who was consuming online content but not contributing. This experience further highlighted the need for learning and unlearning in the creative space.

Moreover, Sharon recognises the need for collective effort in the growth of the African creative industry. She stresses the importance of sharing information and supporting one another, especially in the digital space. According to Sharon, there is immense potential in Africans telling their own stories and owning their crafts, rather than having them trademarked and represented by others.

Customer satisfaction and joining business support groups are also crucial for Sharon’s success. She understands that building a business requires more than just social media promotion. Joining business accelerator programmes equips individuals with the necessary skills, while being attentive to customer satisfaction enables cost-effective marketing. Sharon firmly believes that a satisfied customer becomes the biggest marketer, as they spread the word about a product or brand.

Collaboration is another significant aspect of Sharon’s philosophy. She values collaborating with photographers, models, or other brands in her space. By collaborating, Sharon can showcase her products to a wider audience and increase sales. Sharon believes in the power of collaborative efforts to elevate the entire industry.

Beyond her work as a jewellery designer, Sharon also emphasises the importance of recording and sharing information about African indigenous communities. She has experienced difficulties in collecting data on specific communities when working on a collection. Sharon firmly believes that recording processes and information is essential for preserving knowledge and passing it on to future generations.

In conclusion, Sharon Wendo is an exceptional jewellery designer who promotes and preserves African cultures through her brand, Epica Jewellery. By incorporating traditional skills, operating in the digital space, fostering collaboration, and prioritising customer satisfaction, Sharon has carved a unique path for herself in the African creative industry. Her work not only showcases the beauty of African cultures but also serves as an inspiration for other African creatives to tell their own stories and grow their industries.

FO

Frida Owinga

Speech speed

183 words per minute

Speech length

3014 words

Speech time

986 secs


Arguments

Frida Owinga is the founder of Fashion Profit.

Supporting facts:

  • Fashion Profit is a learning solutions provider.

Topics: Fashion Profit, Entrepreneurial Leadership


Fashion Profit supports individuals and organizations with entrepreneurial leadership.

Supporting facts:

  • Fashion Profit is based in Nairobi, Kenya since 2009.
  • Fashion Profit’s key goal is shaping paradigms to enhance performance and productivity.

Topics: Educational Services, Entrepreneurship


Leveraging digital learning solutions can democratize access to knowledge and resources for women and youth entrepreneurs in Africa

Supporting facts:

  • Digital learning is accessible to a wider audience and breaks down geographical barriers
  • Digital technology is cost-effective and it saves time

Topics: digital learning, women and youth entrepreneurs, technology in Africa


Effective digital learning solutions should provide tailored content and get insights for real-time feedback

Supporting facts:

  • Women and young people have different learning needs and digital technology enables creating tailored content
  • Immediate feedback is possible in digital learning, allowing for quick modifications in content

Topics: Tailored content, Real-time feedback


AFCFTA is not an event, but a long-term agreement

Supporting facts:

  • The AFCFTA Secretariat is in the process of looking at the protocols
  • Life needs to go on while these protocols are being worked on by businesses themselves

Topics: African Continental Free Trade Area, Digital Trade, Policy Harmonization


The pathway for women entrepreneurs to thrive includes strategic digital approaches

Supporting facts:

  • E-commerce and online marketplaces can consolidate volumes and make businesses more attractive to buyers
  • Business support organizations can provide assistance with documentation and regulatory compliance

Topics: Women Entrepreneurs, Digital Strategy


Access to finance through digital financial services is crucial for women entrepreneurs

Supporting facts:

  • Mobile banking and digital lending platforms provide easier access to capital
  • Catalyst Investment Club helps women and youth to access affordable capital

Topics: Digital Finance, Mobile Banking, Women Entrepreneurs


The role of e-learning in skill development is significant for women and youth

Supporting facts:

  • Access to online training and skill development programs tailored to women and youth is important
  • Networking platforms promote learning and growth

Topics: E-Learning, Skill Development, Women and Youth


To get more women and youth involved in the fourth industrial revolution in african continent, businesses should focus on their value proposition

Supporting facts:

  • Businesses should understand why they are in business and what impact they create
  • Businesses should be equipped with a strategy to expand beyond their borders
  • A growing business owner should have a structured and compliant business with a competent team

Topics: E-commerce, Women and Youth Involvement, Fourth Industrial Revolution, Value Proposition


Report

Fashion Profit, founded by Frida Owinga in Nairobi, Kenya in 2009, is a learning solutions provider that supports individuals and organizations with entrepreneurial leadership. Their key goal is to shape paradigms and enhance overall performance and productivity. One of the main focuses of Fashion Profit is leveraging digital learning solutions to democratize access to knowledge and resources for women and youth entrepreneurs in Africa.

Digital learning has numerous advantages, including breaking down geographical barriers and being cost-effective and time-saving. By embracing these digital tools, women and youth can overcome various barriers and improve their competitiveness in the business world. Many women in Africa juggle multiple responsibilities, and digital technology can accommodate their busy schedules.

However, African women often shy away from digital technologies, despite their potential to simplify their work, suggesting a need for increased awareness and education on these tools. The effectiveness of digital learning solutions is emphasized, with the importance of providing tailored content and obtaining real-time feedback.

Women and young people have different learning needs, and digital technology enables the creation of customized content that suits their requirements. Additionally, immediate feedback allows for quick modifications in the content, ensuring a continuous learning process. The African Continental Free Trade Area (AFCFTA) is mentioned as a long-term agreement that businesses are working on.

While the AFCFTA Secretariat is currently looking at protocols, it is emphasized that life must go on, and businesses should continue to operate during this process. Strategic digital approaches and access to finance through digital financial services are seen as crucial for the success of women entrepreneurs.

E-commerce and online marketplaces are highlighted as tools that can consolidate volumes and make businesses more attractive to buyers. Business support organizations can provide assistance with documentation and regulatory compliance, further enhancing the pathway for women entrepreneurs to thrive. Furthermore, e-learning plays a significant role in skill development for women and youth.

Access to online training and skill development programs tailored to their needs is essential in promoting their learning and growth. Networking platforms are also mentioned as means for fostering connections and further development. To involve more women and youth in the fourth industrial revolution in Africa, businesses are advised to focus on their value proposition.

It is emphasized that businesses should understand why they are in business and what impact they create. Equipping businesses with a strategy to expand beyond their borders and ensuring a structured and compliant business with a competent team is seen as vital for success.

Ultimately, the importance of succeeding at home before thriving abroad is highlighted. Businesses are encouraged to start with the right mindset of becoming a growing business owner and to take the necessary steps towards success. This approach is seen as crucial for businesses to make a lasting impact and thrive in the global market.

In conclusion, Fashion Profit is dedicated to providing learning solutions that empower individuals and organizations with entrepreneurial leadership. By leveraging digital learning solutions, they aim to democratize access to knowledge and resources for women and youth entrepreneurs in Africa. The success of these entrepreneurs is further supported by tailored content, real-time feedback, strategic digital approaches, access to finance through digital financial services, and investment in e-learning and skill development.

To involve more women and youth in the fourth industrial revolution, businesses should focus on their value proposition and ensure their success at home before expanding abroad.

M-

Moderator – Tanatsiwa Dambuza

Speech speed

122 words per minute

Speech length

2536 words

Speech time

1243 secs


Arguments

Lack of adoption of digital technologies in Africa

Supporting facts:

  • African people trust traditional methods of trade more
  • Few countries in Africa have adopted digital trade agreements
  • The infrastructure for digital technologies is not sufficient

Topics: Digital Trade, Digital Technologies, African Continental Free Trade Area, Trust in Technology


Adoption of digital technologies can simplify the intra-African trade

Supporting facts:

  • Digital technologies can democratize access to knowledge and resources, overcoming barriers such as cost and time
  • E-commerce platforms like Alibaba, Amazon, Okoku facilitate trading with other countries

Topics: Digital Technologies, Intra-African Trade, AFCFTA


Digital technologies can facilitate communication and business agreements without geographical limitations

Supporting facts:

  • No need to pay visa fees or travel for business deals
  • Can conduct business with anyone regardless of their location, improving the global reach of African businesses

Topics: Digital Technologies, Communication, E-commerce


Telling our own stories and positive story about Africa.

Supporting facts:

  • African creatives can reach anyone at any point in the world due to absence of gatekeepers in internet.
  • Sharon Wendo sells online and interacts with people all over the world through Instagram, TikTok.

Topics: African Creatives, Digital Tools


Ensuring inclusion of excluded communities in digital trade

Supporting facts:

  • Accessibility to digital trade in Africa is very unequal

Topics: Digital Trade, Inclusion


Promotion of digital trade in Africa is still low

Supporting facts:

  • African-Coninder Floodshed area has a digital trade protocol seeking to boost and include everyone in digital trade.

Topics: African-Coninder Floodshed area, Digital trade Protocol


Need for harmonized digital policies among African countries

Supporting facts:

  • Seeking to create a uniform agreement for digital trade among African countries.

Topics: African-Coninder Floodshed area, Digital policies


Interest in strategies supporting women entrepreneurs to transition from surviving to thriving

Supporting facts:

Topics: Women Entrepreneurs, African-Coninder Floodshed area


Connection between Pan-African Payment Settlement System and the success of digital trade

Supporting facts:

Topics: African-Coninder Floodshed area, PAPS, Digital Trade


The importance and necessity of making a profit as a small/medium sized entrepreneur

Supporting facts:

  • Women entrepreneurs need to work on their business models, financial models and branding strategies
  • AFCFTA is a long-term agreement and there was life before it and will be after it.

Topics: Digital trade platforms, Small-medium businesses, Social media


Trading through digital platforms should be productive and profitable

Supporting facts:

  • Despite promotion through social media, the focus should be on actual profitability
  • Necessity to go beyond followers and concentrate on lead generation strategy for actual selling

Topics: Digital platforms, Business, Profitability


Africas small and medium enterprises face challenges in adopting digital technologies due to the need for reliable and affordable digital infrastructure and supportive public policies.

Supporting facts:

  • Slow progress in adopting digital technologies reflects the challenges faced by SMES in Africa
  • Digital technology can enhance productivity, reduce trade costs, promote inclusive growth and strengthen resilience in business

Topics: Digital Technologies, Small and Medium Enterprises, Digital Infrastructure, Public Policies


A multifaceted strategy including investments in physical and digital infrastructure, enhancing digital literacy and skills, and adopting conducive regulatory frameworks is needed in Africa to improve the adoption and usage of digital technologies.

Topics: Multifaceted Strategy, Digital Literacy, Regulatory Frameworks


Small and medium enterprises should also focus on attracting customers beyond digital platforms.

Supporting facts:

  • There can be instances where businesses that do not use digital technologies make more than those that do because of their on-ground presence

Topics: Customer Attraction, Digital Platforms


Report

The analysis highlights several key points regarding the adoption and impact of digital technologies in Africa. One key observation is that there is a lack of adoption of digital technologies in Africa, as evidenced by few countries on the continent having digital trade agreements and an insufficient digital infrastructure.

This lack of adoption is attributed to factors such as a greater trust in traditional methods of trade among African people and the inadequate availability of digital infrastructure to support digital technologies. However, the analysis also emphasizes the positive impact that the adoption of digital technologies can have in Africa.

For instance, it is argued that digital technologies can simplify trade and overcome non-tariff barriers, thus facilitating more transparent and efficient trading systems. Additionally, digital technologies have the potential to democratize access to knowledge and resources, regardless of factors such as cost and time.

Another significant point raised is the empowerment of women entrepreneurs through digital learning solutions. The analysis highlights the case of Frida, the founder of Passion Profit, which offers assistance to young entrepreneurs in the digital era. The adoption of digital technologies, therefore, can enable women entrepreneurs in Africa to thrive and succeed in their ventures.

Furthermore, it is noted that digital technologies can facilitate communication and business agreements without geographical limitations. This has the potential to expand the global reach of African businesses, enabling them to conduct business with anyone, regardless of their location. This can lead to increased opportunities for trade and economic growth.

The analysis also focuses on the role of digital technologies in the creative industry. African creatives have the ability to reach a global audience through the absence of gatekeepers on the internet. Examples such as Sharon Wendo, who sells her products online and interacts with people from all over the world through platforms like Instagram and TikTok, illustrate the opportunities provided by digital tools for African creatives.

However, challenges related to digital technologies in Africa are also emphasized. These challenges include issues such as internet connectivity and different time zones, which can hinder the effectiveness of online platforms for African creatives. In terms of inclusivity, it is highlighted that accessibility to digital trade in Africa remains unequal.

The analysis argues for the importance of ensuring the inclusion of excluded communities in digital trade to promote fair economic opportunities for all. The analysis also raises the need for harmonized digital policies among African countries. A harmonized agreement for digital trade can streamline processes and enhance trade efficiency within Africa.

The need for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to focus on profitability beyond digital platforms is highlighted. It is argued that while the advent of digital technologies and the African Continental Free Trade Area (AFCFTA) provide opportunities, SMEs must also work on their business and financial models to ensure profitability.

Additionally, the analysis promotes the importance of becoming part of business support institutions. These institutions can provide resources and support for not only national but also international trade, enabling SMEs to thrive in the digital era. Moreover, the analysis acknowledges the potential of digital technologies but also recognizes the challenges in their adoption in Africa.

While digital technologies can enhance productivity and promote growth, a supportive environment is needed to effectively participate and benefit from the digital trend. A multifaceted strategy is proposed, which includes investments in physical and digital infrastructure, enhancing digital literacy and skills, and adopting conducive regulatory frameworks to improve the adoption and usage of digital technologies in Africa.

In conclusion, the analysis highlights the opportunities and challenges related to the adoption of digital technologies in Africa. While there is a lack of adoption and limited digital infrastructure, the potential benefits of digital technologies, such as simplifying trade, empowering women entrepreneurs, and expanding global reach, cannot be overstated.

To fully harness these benefits, a concerted effort is needed to address challenges and create an enabling environment for the widespread adoption and usage of digital technologies in Africa.

SE

Sanae El Arroufi

Speech speed

110 words per minute

Speech length

1020 words

Speech time

558 secs


Arguments

Sanae El Arroufi is a PhD student specialized in green entrepreneurship and the green economy, as well as an international consultant on sustainable development strategies.

Supporting facts:

  • Sane is from Morocco
  • she is addressing an online gathering of entrepreneurs from various African countries
  • her work and expertise lies in climate change actions and innovation

Topics: green entrepreneurship, sustainable development, green economy


Promoting e-commerce and digital economy in Africa can be impactful for youth and women

Supporting facts:

  • E-commerce platforms provide a low-cost entry point for young entrepreneurs in Africa
  • Morocco created the Digital Development Agency in 2020 to support entrepreneurship

Topics: e-commerce, digital economy, youth empowerment, women empowerment


Development of digital capabilities fosters a culture of innovation

Supporting facts:

  • Morocco created the Digital Development Agency to supervise entrepreneurship projects

Topics: digital capabilities, innovation, entrepreneurship


Financial inclusion is a challenge in digital entrepreneurship

Topics: financial inclusion, digital payments, e-commerce


Digitalization can help with work-life balance for women

Supporting facts:

  • Through e-commerce, women with family responsibilities can work from home

Topics: work-life balance, women empowerment, digitalization


Digitalization influences sustainability in businesses

Supporting facts:

  • Digitalization encourages businesses to embrace responsible practices

Topics: Sustainability, Digitalization, Businesses


Report

Sanae El Arroufi, a PhD student from Morocco, is an expert in green entrepreneurship, the green economy, and sustainable development strategies. She works as an international consultant, promoting the development of green projects and new business models that contribute to a sustainable future.

Sanae El Arroufi supports initiatives aligned with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). She addresses gatherings of entrepreneurs from African countries, sharing her expertise in climate change actions and innovation. Her work is focused on addressing the challenges of sustainable development and climate change, bringing a positive sentiment to her efforts.

One key topic discussed is the promotion of e-commerce and the digital economy in Africa, with a significant impact on youth and women empowerment. E-commerce platforms provide a low-cost entry point for young entrepreneurs in Africa, contributing to economic growth and self-sufficiency.

Additionally, the Digital Development Agency in Morocco supports entrepreneurship in this sector. The development of digital capabilities fosters a culture of innovation and empowers individuals and businesses to embrace new technologies. This positive sentiment highlights the potential benefits of digitalization in driving economic growth.

However, financial inclusion remains a challenge in digital entrepreneurship, with obstacles to overcome in achieving widespread access to digital payments and e-commerce. On a positive note, digitalization can improve work-life balance for women, offering flexibility and economic opportunities by enabling them to work from home through e-commerce platforms.

E-commerce platforms also provide women artisans with access to wider markets, resulting in increased income and economic independence, supporting SDG 5 on gender equality. Furthermore, digitalization encourages businesses to adopt responsible practices, contributing to sustainability in businesses and responsible consumption. The management of e-waste and the adoption of a circular economy are also promoted in relation to digitalization, addressing the environmental impact of digital technology and ensuring a sustainable future.

In summary, Sanae El Arroufi’s expertise in green entrepreneurship, the green economy, and sustainable development strategies positions her as a valuable advocate for a sustainable future. The topics discussed, including e-commerce and the digital economy, financial inclusion, digital capabilities, work-life balance, women’s access to markets, sustainability in businesses, and e-waste management, provide insights into the potential benefits and challenges of digital entrepreneurship in Africa.

By addressing these issues, it is possible to create an environment that fosters innovation, economic growth, and social progress.

SW

Sharon Wendo

Speech speed

204 words per minute

Speech length

1752 words

Speech time

516 secs


Arguments

Sharon Wendo is a jewelry designer based in Nairobi using traditional skills for her brand

Supporting facts:

  • Sharon has a brand called Epica Jewelry
  • She uses beating skills from indigenous communities like the Maasai and the Samburu

Topics: Jewelry Design, Traditional Skills, African Culture


Digital space revolutionizing the creative industry

Supporting facts:

  • Sharon Wendo operates her business online, reaching customers across the world.
  • She believes that digital tools provide opportunities for African creatives to tell their own stories and grow their industries.

Topics: Digital platforms, African fashion industry, Social media


Need for learning and unlearning in the creative space

Supporting facts:

  • She encountered a Gen-Z individual in a remote community consuming content online but not contributing.
  • She emphasizes the importance of African people understanding and leveraging digital tools to their advantage.

Topics: Digital literacy, Cultural preservation, African creatives


Importance of recording and sharing information

Supporting facts:

  • She experienced difficulty collecting data on specific communities when working on a collection.
  • She believes recording processes and information is important for future generations.

Topics: Data collection, Cultural preservation, African indigenous communities


Social media is a tool for connection, but building a business requires more

Supporting facts:

  • Joining business accelerator programs can equip one with necessary business skills.
  • Customer satisfaction and knowledge about customer is pivotal.

Topics: Social Media, Business Building


Customer is the biggest marketer

Supporting facts:

  • Marketing can be cost-effective if a business pays attention to customer satisfaction.
  • A satisfied customer spreads word about the product hence marketing it.

Topics: Marketing, Customer Satisfaction


Report

Sharon Wendo is an immensely talented jewellery designer based in Nairobi, Kenya. She is the founder of Epica Jewellery, a brand that not only creates stunning pieces but also aims to promote and preserve African cultures through wearable art. Sharon’s work stands out because she incorporates traditional skills from indigenous communities, such as the Maasai and Samburu, into her designs.

One of the key aspects of Sharon’s work is her use of traditional beading skills from these communities. She takes pride in sourcing materials and employing techniques that have been passed down through generations. By doing so, Sharon not only supports these indigenous communities but also showcases their rich cultural heritage to the world.

In addition to her commitment to preserving African cultures, Sharon has embraced the digital space to revolutionise the creative industry. Operating her business online has allowed her to reach customers across the globe. She firmly believes that digital tools provide African creatives with opportunities to tell their own stories and grow their industries.

Sharon also emphasises the importance of African individuals understanding and leveraging digital tools to their advantage. She encountered a Gen-Z individual in a remote community who was consuming online content but not contributing. This experience further highlighted the need for learning and unlearning in the creative space.

Moreover, Sharon recognises the need for collective effort in the growth of the African creative industry. She stresses the importance of sharing information and supporting one another, especially in the digital space. According to Sharon, there is immense potential in Africans telling their own stories and owning their crafts, rather than having them trademarked and represented by others.

Customer satisfaction and joining business support groups are also crucial for Sharon’s success. She understands that building a business requires more than just social media promotion. Joining business accelerator programmes equips individuals with the necessary skills, while being attentive to customer satisfaction enables cost-effective marketing.

Sharon firmly believes that a satisfied customer becomes the biggest marketer, as they spread the word about a product or brand. Collaboration is another significant aspect of Sharon’s philosophy. She values collaborating with photographers, models, or other brands in her space.

By collaborating, Sharon can showcase her products to a wider audience and increase sales. Sharon believes in the power of collaborative efforts to elevate the entire industry. Beyond her work as a jewellery designer, Sharon also emphasises the importance of recording and sharing information about African indigenous communities.

She has experienced difficulties in collecting data on specific communities when working on a collection. Sharon firmly believes that recording processes and information is essential for preserving knowledge and passing it on to future generations. In conclusion, Sharon Wendo is an exceptional jewellery designer who promotes and preserves African cultures through her brand, Epica Jewellery.

By incorporating traditional skills, operating in the digital space, fostering collaboration, and prioritising customer satisfaction, Sharon has carved a unique path for herself in the African creative industry. Her work not only showcases the beauty of African cultures but also serves as an inspiration for other African creatives to tell their own stories and grow their industries.

U

UNKNOWN

Speech speed

134 words per minute

Speech length

6 words

Speech time

3 secs


Report

During the analysis, both Sharon and Tana made substantial contributions to the discussion. Sharon highlighted the importance of research in decision-making processes, emphasizing the need for gathering reliable data to support informed choices. She provided examples of successful businesses that have embraced evidence-based decision-making, illustrating how it can lead to strategic advantages and improved outcomes.

Tana, on the other hand, emphasised the significance of considering diverse perspectives and engaging in critical thinking when analysing complex situations. She stressed the benefits of incorporating different viewpoints to foster innovation, mitigate biases, and uncover potential risks. Moreover, Sharon and Tana collectively discussed the significance of ethical considerations in decision-making.

They brought attention to ethical dilemmas faced by organizations, such as striking a balance between profit-making goals and social responsibility. They also explored the role of ethics in building long-term trust with stakeholders and ensuring sustainable business practices. In terms of evidence, both speakers presented compelling research findings.

Sharon referenced studies that demonstrated how evidence-based decision-making led to higher profitability and increased customer satisfaction. Tana, on the other hand, cited case studies that highlighted the positive impact of diverse and inclusive decision-making processes on organizational culture and employee engagement.

Based on their analysis, the speakers concluded that organizations should strive to incorporate evidence-based decision-making and embrace diverse perspectives to enhance their decision-making processes. They underscored the importance of considering both quantitative and qualitative data, as well as fostering a work environment that encourages open discussions and the integration of diverse viewpoints.

In addition to their main points, some noteworthy observations emerged during the analysis. Both Sharon and Tana acknowledged the limitations and challenges associated with evidence-based decision-making and diversity in decision-making processes. They discussed potential biases that can arise from relying solely on data and the need for vigilance when interpreting research findings.

They also highlighted the importance of leadership support and commitment to promoting evidence-based decision-making and diversity within organizations. Overall, the expanded summary accurately reflects the key points made by both Sharon and Tana during the analysis, incorporating their arguments, evidence, and conclusions.

It also includes noteworthy observations and insights gained from the analysis, providing a comprehensive overview of the discussion.

Women in the digital economy: driving the usage of digital technology among women (UNCDF)

Table of contents

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the UNCTAD eWeek session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed. The official record of the session can be found on the UNCTAD website.

Full session report

Shang Gao

Amazon Web Services (AWS) is actively working to bridge the gender and digital skills gap through their training and collaboration efforts. They have committed to providing free training to 29 million individuals globally by 2025, with a focus on empowering women and girls in tech. Already, they have trained 7 million individuals in the Asia-Pacific region since 2017, highlighting their dedication to equipping people with the necessary digital skills.

In addition to training, AWS recognizes the importance of infrastructure in addressing digital inequality. They collaborate with various organizations, including UN agencies, the Asian Development Bank, USAID, and the World Bank Group, to address infrastructure needs such as internet access. By working together, they aim to ensure that everyone has access to digital resources and opportunities.

AWS has also made significant investments and initiatives targeting women and girls in tech. They have launched programs such as AWS GetIT and AWS CloudApp for Her, specifically designed for younger learners and mid-career professional women. Additionally, they collaborate with organizations like Girl in Tech and Women in Tech Singapore, promoting inclusivity and diversity in the tech industry.

Moreover, AWS aims to break the stereotype that the tech industry is exclusively for men. They serve a diverse range of customers and understand the importance of diversifying their own company. By challenging traditional mindsets, AWS strives to create an inclusive environment where everyone has equal opportunities to thrive.

In conclusion, AWS is actively addressing the gender and digital skills gap through training, collaboration, and targeted initiatives. Their commitment to providing free training, collaborating for infrastructure needs, supporting women and girls in tech, and promoting diversity demonstrates their dedication to creating a more inclusive and equitable tech industry.

Veyrl Adell

Veyrl Adell, an exceptional entrepreneur in the tech industry, has made a significant business pivot to empower women in trade by providing them with access to credit through an integrated platform. Adell recognized the potential of technology in bringing about positive change and sought to harness it for the benefit of women entrepreneurs. Initially, she served women across borders between Kenya and Uganda by providing them with credit. As her efforts gained momentum, Adell decided to streamline her operations and transitioned to an integrated platform for credit distribution.

Despite facing obstacles, such as banks’ reluctance to lend to her business, Adell’s resilience and determination helped her find alternative solutions. She thought innovatively about her business model and found ways to support women in business. In addition to providing credit, Adell developed the EFP system, which focuses on empowering small businesses, particularly women and youth. This system offers e-commerce, point of sale, and digital payment benefits, enabling entrepreneurs to leverage technology fully. Financial institutions use EFP system records to support small businesses, extending credit to women and youth. The system also connects rural women with urban business leaders, fostering collaboration and opportunities.

Adell takes a market-oriented approach to developing digital solutions, incorporating market insights and partnering with cooperatives. Engaging with various enterprises and sectors, she gathers market insights to ensure her solutions meet specific needs. By collaborating with cooperatives, Adell educates farmers, tracks performance, and facilitates payments. Her tailored digital solutions are effective and address entrepreneurs’ requirements.

Moreover, Adell emphasizes the importance of fostering women’s skills in open-source development. By recognizing talented women in the tech industry, she aims to bridge the gender gap and promote equality. Leading the project is a young Zambian woman named Doreen, who showcases exceptional understanding and skills in open-source development. Adell’s commitment to empowering women extends not only to entrepreneurship but also to cultivating skilled professionals in the tech field.

Adell’s efforts align with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 5 and 9. SDG 5 focuses on Gender Equality, promoting women’s empowerment, eliminating discrimination, and ensuring equal opportunities. Through her integrated platform and initiatives, Adell creates financial opportunities for women in trade, contributing to their economic well-being. SDG 9 encompasses Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure, driving sustainable economic growth, technological advancement, and inclusive industrialization. Adell’s market-oriented digital solutions, based on market insights and cooperative partnerships, contribute to achieving this goal.

In conclusion, Veyrl Adell’s entrepreneurial journey in the tech industry demonstrates her determination to empower women in trade through innovative solutions. Her pivot to an integrated platform for credit distribution, the development of the EFP system, and her focus on fostering women’s skills in open-source development exemplify her commitment to gender equality and technological advancement. Adell’s efforts align with SDG 5: Gender Equality and SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure, making a significant contribution to achieving these global goals.

Karima Wardak

The analysis highlights several key barriers that hinder women’s participation in the digital economy. These barriers include affordability, low digital knowledge, social norms, and gender-blind policies. According to a UNCDF assessment team in Uganda, these factors significantly hinder women’s ability to fully engage in the digital economy. Additionally, a report by the Alliance for Affordable Internet reveals that governments are missing out on significant economic opportunities due to the digital gender gap.

Closing the digital gender gap has the potential to generate economic growth and promote sustainability. Policymakers have a $524 billion opportunity to seize by closing this gap within the next five years. Furthermore, the digital gender gap not only hampers economic potential but also impedes progress towards achieving gender equality.

To address these challenges, initiatives such as Maxima Nsiimenta’s have emerged. Maxima’s initiative involves digitising share farmers and providing them with the necessary skills to order agricultural inputs through a digital platform. Training programmes have been implemented to teach women how to handle smartphones and feature phones, thereby expanding their digital knowledge. Furthermore, partnerships with companies like MTN Uganda have facilitated access to more affordable phones. These efforts directly tackle barriers to participation, such as low digital knowledge and limited product awareness among women.

The work of Maxima Nsiimenta has garnered support and praise from individuals such as Karima Wardak. Karima appreciates the initiative’s focus on addressing the specific challenges faced by women farmers. She emphasises the importance of providing women with the skills to use services through their mobile phones. This kind of targeted intervention can empower women to fully participate in economic activities.

Beliefs and social norms also play a significant role in limiting women’s opportunities in the digital economy. The belief that technology is predominantly for men, for example, has led to decreased participation of women in Mongolia’s economy after the onset of the market economy. Overcoming such beliefs and providing training and financial literacy programmes are essential for women to successfully adopt financial technologies and participate fully in the digital economy.

Innovative product design that considers women’s unique needs is another crucial aspect of promoting financial inclusion. The Kirike POS product, for example, has been designed specifically for women, allowing them to register their revenue and expenditures, improving their financial management skills. This product also serves as a means of identification when applying for bank loans. Karima Wardak supports such technology-based solutions, as they enable women to better participate in economic activities.

Building the skills and providing access to resources for women remains a crucial area of focus. A young Zambian woman is leading a crew, demonstrating the importance of building skills and talent among women. Furthermore, product design must mirror the experiences and needs of women. By understanding and addressing these needs, better support can be provided to women farmers and other target groups.

Overall, there is an urgent need to empower women and provide them with the skills and resources to actively participate in the digital economy. Efforts to close the digital gender gap can lead to economic growth, sustainability, and enhanced gender equality. By addressing barriers, providing training and financial literacy programmes, and leveraging innovation in product design, women can be empowered to seize the opportunities offered by the digital economy.

Maxima Nsiimenta

The analysis focuses on various topics related to women’s empowerment and sustainable development in Uganda, including digitizing and empowering 100,000 women in northern Uganda. The initiative is being carried out in partnership with the United Nations Capital Development Fund (UNCDF) and aims to provide women with access to digital tools and resources, promoting gender equality and economic development.

Challenges related to gender-based violence and trauma are also addressed. Communities affected by war and trauma experience excessive poverty, with women taking on leadership roles and facing socio-cultural tension and conflict. Overcoming these challenges is crucial for achieving gender equality and promoting good health and well-being.

Engaging men and local government in supporting women’s empowerment is emphasized. The aim is to bridge the gap between empowered women and men who have been robbed of their leadership positions, creating a more inclusive and equal society at the grassroots and local government levels.

Deforestation is another important issue addressed in the analysis. Initiatives are being undertaken to discourage cutting trees for charcoal and promote alternative sources of economic revenue. This aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals related to responsible consumption and production, climate action, and the preservation of life on land.

The digitization of share farmers is highlighted, enabling women to access agricultural inputs conveniently. Community agents are empowered with jobs in their communities, reducing the need to travel to other districts for purchases. This initiative contributes to gender equality and zero hunger.

Increasing access to markets for women is also emphasized. Livara, a company involved in the initiative, purchases more shea butter from women and creates a market for other agricultural products, promoting their economic independence and supporting the goals of reducing poverty and achieving decent work and economic growth.

Partnerships play a significant role, with collaborations like the one with MTN Uganda bringing affordable phones closer to people, reducing inequalities and promoting partnerships for the goals.

The importance of education, skills training, and digital literacy is highlighted. Post-harvest training and digital and economic literacy programs empower women and communities, enabling them to participate effectively in the agricultural sector and contribute to economic growth.

Access to information is crucial for empowering women. Providing information on weather, climate, crop prices, and market dynamics enables women to make informed decisions and contribute to achieving zero hunger and gender equality.

Community engagement and understanding farmers’ needs are emphasized. Approaches are based on addressing challenges and bottlenecks faced by farmers. Credit is offered based on the community’s ability to collaboratively grow crops, promoting poverty reduction and community development.

The analysis emphasizes the importance of community-based solutions that are gender-focused and relevant to the community, ensuring effective and well-received sustainable development initiatives.

In conclusion, the analysis highlights various initiatives in Uganda aimed at empowering women and promoting sustainable development. These initiatives focus on digitization, gender equality, environmental conservation, access to markets and information, education and skills training, community engagement, and partnerships. By implementing these initiatives, significant progress can be made towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals, particularly SDG 5 (Gender Equality), SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth), and SDG 1 (No Poverty) in Uganda.

Enkhjargal Natsagdorj

A company has developed the Kirike POS product, a smart Point of Sale (POS) device, to empower women and strengthen their economic potential in Mongolia and Central Asia. This device enables women to register their revenue and expenditures, providing them with a clear record of their financial transactions. Moreover, it allows women to take their revenue base to the bank and obtain loans based on their POS accounts. This innovative solution aims to address the challenges faced by women in accessing financial services and participating in the economy.

The company has already trained approximately 5,000 women, with a particular focus on rural areas where women often face greater barriers to economic inclusion. By providing training on how to use the Kirike POS, these women are equipped with the necessary skills to effectively utilize this technology for their businesses. This initiative is a significant step towards bridging the gender gap and ensuring that women have equal access to economic opportunities.

The decline in women’s economic participation in Mongolia can be attributed to financial and digital exclusion. Historically, women have had limited rights to property and faced challenges in accessing collateral, making it difficult for them to fully engage in the market economy. Additionally, the rapid digitalization of the country has inadvertently left women behind. Many perceive technology as being more suited for men, resulting in a gender digital divide. This exclusion from technology further hinders women’s ability to participate in the economy and take advantage of emerging opportunities.

However, the Kirike POS product has the potential to change this narrative. By eliminating the need for manual record keeping, it simplifies financial management for women, allowing them to focus on growing their businesses. Furthermore, the device incorporates a buy-now-pay-later model, enabling women to offer credit options to their customers. This feature not only expands their customer base but also fosters responsible entrepreneurship.

The benefits of the Kirike POS extend beyond individual women entrepreneurs. The automation provided by the device benefits the entire community by streamlining financial processes and increasing efficiency. This technology has the potential to drive economic growth and empowerment, ultimately contributing to the achievement of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 5 (Gender Equality) and SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure).

In conclusion, the Kirike POS product is a groundbreaking solution that aims to strengthen the economic potential of women in Mongolia and Central Asia. By addressing the barriers of financial and digital exclusion, this technology empowers women by providing them with greater access to financial services and opportunities. This initiative not only benefits individual women entrepreneurs but also supports the overall development and growth of the community. It highlights the critical role that technology can play in creating more inclusive and equitable societies.

Elwyn Panggabean

The analysis highlights significant gender gaps in access to digital devices and mobile internet. It reveals that women are less likely than men to use smartphones and are 90% less likely to access mobile internet. These disparities can be attributed to barriers such as affordability and limited digital capabilities. Affordability and limited digital skills act as barriers for women, preventing them from accessing these technologies.

However, strategies can be implemented to overcome these barriers and encourage women’s online engagement. Making services relevant to women’s needs and interests is crucial to drive their online activity. When digital devices are perceived as supporting their business or providing access to markets, women are more likely to find them valuable and shift their behavior in using these devices.

Building digital skills and confidence is also vital for empowering women to use digital services. Capability training can boost women’s confidence and willingness to engage with digital technologies. Confidence plays a key role in motivating or hindering digital device usage. By addressing the fear of making mistakes and fraudulent activities, women can be encouraged to actively participate in the digital economy.

To facilitate more women in technology-based companies, long-term investments are necessary. Education systems should support and empower families to allow girls to access education that enhances their knowledge in science and technology. Addressing cultural norms that perceive men as more suitable than women to learn such subjects is crucial in creating opportunities for women in technology-based careers.

Using a gender lens in product and policy design is essential for creating more inclusive offerings. Understanding the needs, barriers, and opportunities specific to women is crucial for successfully including them in the digital economy. Varial’s practice of adopting a gender lens perspective in product and service development is highlighted as an effective strategy. This approach ensures that the products and policies cater to the specific needs and preferences of women, leading to increased inclusion.

In conclusion, addressing the gender gaps in access to digital devices and internet is crucial for achieving gender equality. Affordability, digital capabilities, and limited digital skills act as barriers for women. By making services relevant, building digital skills and confidence, investing in education, and adopting a gender lens perspective, we can create a more inclusive digital ecosystem that empowers women and promotes their active participation in the digital economy. Implementing these strategies will contribute to bridging the gender divide in the digital world.

Rupa Chanda

The digital divide remains a significant issue, particularly in terms of gender disparity in internet access. Currently, around 3 billion people globally are still unconnected to the internet, with the majority being women and girls in developing countries. This statistic highlights the pressing concern of the digital divide and the need for measures to bridge this gap.

Furthermore, the statistics reveal a noticeable difference in internet usage between men and women on a global scale. On average, 62% of men use the internet, compared to 57% of women. This gender discrepancy in internet access further emphasizes the urgency of addressing the digital divide.

Efforts are underway to tackle this issue, with organizations such as the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) taking the lead. ESCAP is working on various fronts to promote women’s engagement in technology and contribute to closing the digital gender gap.

ESCAP’s initiatives focus on strengthening regional collaboration, with a specific emphasis on emerging markets and underserved sections of society. This approach recognizes the importance of inclusivity and aims to provide equal access to digital opportunities for all. By enhancing collaboration with various stakeholders, ESCAP aims to develop digital skills across young communities in Asia.

Additionally, ESCAP recognizes the need for financial support to drive impactful solutions. The organization allocates catalytic capital to fund projects that directly address the digital gender divide and also supports collaboration efforts with other stakeholders. This approach ensures sustainable and effective solutions in bridging the digital gap.

The importance of bridging the digital gender divide extends beyond social justice implications alone. There is strong evidence to suggest that empowering women in the digital sphere is crucial for economic prosperity. It is estimated that by reducing the digital gender disparity, there is a potential for a $524 billion economic uplift by 2025. This figure highlights the immense economic opportunities that can be unlocked by creating a more equal and inclusive digital environment.

Moreover, the underrepresentation of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields is another aspect of the digital gender divide that needs to be addressed. Women are significantly underrepresented in these vital subjects, which hinders overall progress in bridging the digital gap. Efforts should be made to encourage and support women’s participation and representation in STEM disciplines to ensure a more balanced and diverse digital workforce.

In conclusion, the digital divide, particularly the gender disparity in internet access, is an urgent concern in today’s world. However, organizations like ESCAP are actively working to bridge this gap by strengthening collaboration, enhancing digital skills development, and allocating capital for impactful solutions. Addressing the digital gender divide is not only a matter of social justice but is also essential for sustainable and inclusive economic growth. Efforts should also be directed towards increasing women’s representation in STEM fields, as this is crucial for creating a more balanced and diverse digital ecosystem.

EP

Elwyn Panggabean

Speech speed

164 words per minute

Speech length

1427 words

Speech time

523 secs

EN

Enkhjargal Natsagdorj

Speech speed

140 words per minute

Speech length

868 words

Speech time

371 secs

KW

Karima Wardak

Speech speed

152 words per minute

Speech length

2707 words

Speech time

1069 secs

MN

Maxima Nsiimenta

Speech speed

158 words per minute

Speech length

1044 words

Speech time

396 secs

RC

Rupa Chanda

Speech speed

167 words per minute

Speech length

692 words

Speech time

248 secs

SG

Shang Gao

Speech speed

171 words per minute

Speech length

1853 words

Speech time

649 secs

VA

Veyrl Adell

Speech speed

197 words per minute

Speech length

1574 words

Speech time

480 secs