Privacy and data protection Archives | Page 259 of 328

The US clock strikes ‘ban or divest TikTok’

TikTok faces an uncertain future as the US government’s 19 January 2025 deadline approaches, demanding ByteDance divest its US operations or face a nationwide ban. The ultimatum, backed by the Supreme Court’s apparent readiness to uphold the decision, appears to be the culmination of years of scrutiny over the platform’s data practices and ties to China. Amid this mounting pressure, reports suggest Elon Musk, the owner of X (formerly Twitter), could acquire TikTok’s US operations, a proposal that has sparked debates about its feasibility and geopolitical implications.

Now, let’s see how it began..

How did the TikTok odyssey begin?

The story of TikTok began in 2014 with Musical.ly, a social media app enabling users to create and share lip-sync videos. Founded in Shanghai, it quickly gained traction among US and European teenagers. By 2017, Musical.ly had over 100 million users and caught the attention of ByteDance, a Chinese tech giant that acquired it for $1 billion. In 2018, ByteDance merged Musical.ly with its domestic app Douyin, launching TikTok for international audiences. Leveraging powerful machine-learning algorithms, TikTok’s ‘For You Page’ became its defining feature, captivating users with an endless stream of personalised content.

TikTok, Person, People, Computer Hardware, Electronics, Hardware, Art — The US clock strikes 'ban or divest TikTok' 4

By 2018, TikTok had become one of the most downloaded apps globally, surpassing giants like Facebook and Instagram. Its cultural influence exploded, reshaping how content was created and consumed. From viral dance challenges to comedic skits, TikTok carved out a unique space in the digital world, particularly among younger users. However, its meteoric rise also brought scrutiny. Concerns emerged over user data privacy and potential manipulation by its parent company ByteDance, which critics claimed had ties to the Chinese government.

The ‘ban or divest’ saga

The incipit of the current conflict can be traced back to 2020 when then-President Donald Trump attempted to ban TikTok and Chinese-owned WeChat, citing fears that Beijing could misuse US data or manipulate public discourse through the platforms. The courts blocked Trump’s effort, and in 2021, President Joe Biden revoked the Trump-era orders, but initiated its review of TikTok’s data practices, keeping the platform under scrutiny. Despite challenges, TikTok continued to grow, surpassing 1 billion active users by 2021. It implemented community guidelines and transparency measures to address content moderation and concerns about misinformation. It also planned to store US user data on Oracle-operated servers to mitigate fears of Chinese government access. However, bipartisan concerns over TikTok’s influence persisted, especially regarding its ties to the Chinese government and the potential data misuse. Lawmakers and US intelligence agencies have long raised alarms about the vast amount of data TikTok collects on its US users and the potential for Beijing to exploit this information for espionage or propaganda. Therefore, last year, Congress passed a bill with overwhelming support requiring ByteDance to divest its US assets, marking the strictest legal threat the platform has ever faced.

The 19 January 2025 deadline and the rumours about Elon Musk’s potential acquisition of TikTok

By 2024, TikTok was at the centre of a geopolitical storm. The US government’s demand for divestment or a ban by 19 January 2025 intensified the platform’s challenges. Amid these disputes, Elon Musk, owner of X (formerly Twitter), has emerged as a potential buyer for TikTok’s US operations. Musk’s ties to US and Chinese markets via Tesla’s Shanghai production hub position him as a unique figure in this debate. If Musk were to acquire TikTok, it could bolster X’s advertising reach and data capabilities, aligning with his broader ambitions in AI and technology. However, such a sale would involve overcoming numerous hurdles, including ByteDance’s valuation of TikTok at $40–50 billion and securing regulatory approvals from both Washington and Beijing. On the other hand, ByteDance, backed by Beijing, is resisting the sale, arguing that the conditioning violates free speech and poses significant logistical hurdles.

Person, Bulldozer, machine, Text — The US clock strikes 'ban or divest TikTok' 5

TikTok has attempted to safeguard its US user base of 170 million by planning to allow users to download their data in case the ban takes effect. It has also reassured its 7,000 US employees that their jobs and benefits are secure, even if operations are halted. While new downloads would be prohibited under the ban, existing users could retain access temporarily, although the platform’s functionality would degrade over time.

The looming deadline has sparked a surge in alternative platforms, such as RedNote (known in China as Xiaohongshu), which has seen a significant influx of US users in anticipation of TikTok’s potential exit.

TikTok’s cultural legacy and future

The fate of TikTok in the US hangs in the balance as President-elect Donald Trump considers an executive order to delay the enforcement of the ‘ban or divest’ law by up to 90 days. The potential extension, supported by figures from both political sides, including Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Trump’s incoming national security adviser Mike Waltz, aims to provide ByteDance, TikTok’s Chinese owner, additional time to divest its US operations and avoid a nationwide ban. With over 170 million American users and substantial ad revenue at risk, lawmakers are increasingly wary of the disruption a ban could cause, signalling bipartisan support to keep the app operational while addressing national security concerns. TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew’s attendance at Trump’s inauguration further hints at a shift in relations between the platform and the new administration. Meanwhile, the uncertainty has already driven US users to explore alternatives like RedNote as the clock ticks down to the Sunday deadline.

Either way, TikTok’s impact on culture and technology is undeniable. It has redefined digital content creation and inspired competitors like Instagram Reels and YouTube Shorts. Yet, its journey highlights the challenges of navigating geopolitical tensions and concerns over data privacy in a hyper-connected world. As the 19 January deadline looms, TikTok stands at a crossroads. Whether it becomes part of Musk’s tech empire, succumbs to a US ban, or finds another path, its legacy as a trailblazer in short-form video content remains secure. The platform’s next chapter, however, hangs in the balance, as these TikTok developments underscore the broader implications of its struggles, including the reshaping of the social media landscape and the role of government intervention in regulating digital platforms.

TikTok users react to looming US Shutdown

Disappointment and confusion swept across TikTok users in the United States as news broke that ByteDance, the app’s Chinese owner, plans to shut down the platform for its 170 million US users by Sunday. The move comes in response to a federal ban requiring ByteDance to sell TikTok’s US assets by January 19 due to national security concerns. While some users hold out hope for a last-minute reprieve, many are preparing for the worst.

Content creators, many of whom have built careers and followings on TikTok, expressed frustration and sadness. Some vowed to boycott rival platforms like Instagram, Facebook, and X, while others scrambled to save their content. True crime creator Amber Goode, from Colorado, criticised the government for “playing with us,” while other users shared instructions on migrating to alternative platforms, including China-based apps like RedNote.

TikTok has maintained that it does not and would never share US user data with China, arguing that the ban violates First Amendment rights. Unless the Supreme Court intervenes, users attempting to open the app on Sunday will be redirected to a shutdown information page. President-elect Donald Trump is reportedly exploring executive actions to delay the ban, but the outcome remains uncertain.

The shutdown has sparked mixed emotions globally, with some international users relieved that American social media issues may no longer dominate their feeds. However, for US creators like Ishpal Sidhu, who stands to lose her livelihood, the uncertainty has cast a shadow over what was once a thriving platform.

iGenius unveils new AI model for regulated industries

Italian startup iGenius has launched Colosseum 355B, a large language model built using the latest Nvidia technology, designed for industries with strict data protection and compliance needs. CEO Uljan Sharka highlighted the challenges that tight regulations pose for AI adoption in sectors like finance, heavy industry, and government, where data security is paramount.

Unlike major competitors like OpenAI, iGenius offers open-source AI models that allow companies to run the technology on their own infrastructure, ensuring that sensitive data remains in-house. The startup is already in talks with potential clients in the financial services and industrial sectors.

Sharka also traveled to Brussels to present the new model to the European Commission, aiming to gain regulatory approval and foster wider adoption in Europe’s heavily regulated markets.

Noyb challenges Chinese data practices in Europe

Austrian advocacy group Noyb has filed privacy complaints against six Chinese companies, including TikTok, Shein, and Xiaomi, alleging illegal transfers of European user data to China. The group, known for targeting US tech giants like Apple and Meta, said this is its first case against Chinese firms. Complaints have been filed in four EU countries, seeking fines of up to 4% of each company’s global revenue.

Noyb claims that companies such as Alibaba’s AliExpress and Tencent’s WeChat transfer EU citizens’ data either directly to China or undisclosed ‘third countries,’ which are likely China. Under EU data protection laws, such transfers are prohibited if the destination country fails to meet the bloc’s strict privacy standards. A Noyb lawyer emphasised that China’s status as a ‘surveillance state’ makes such transfers clearly unlawful.

The allegations add to mounting regulatory challenges for Chinese tech firms. TikTok, already under scrutiny in Europe for election interference concerns, faces a potential US ban starting Sunday over national security fears. Regulators in multiple regions continue to ramp up pressure on Chinese companies amid growing global concerns over data privacy and security.

TikTok prepares for possible US shutdown

T i kTok is preparing to shut down its US operations on Sunday unless a federal ban is averted at the last minute, according to sources. The ban, stemming from a law signed last April, requires TikTok’s Chinese parent company, ByteDance, to sell its US assets by January 19 or face nationwide restrictions. The Supreme Court is currently deliberating on whether to uphold or pause the ban, but no ruling has been made yet.

President-elect Donald Trump, set to take office the day after the ban would take effect, is reportedly considering a temporary suspension of the shutdown. However, legal uncertainty clouds the possibility of such action. Meanwhile, the Biden administration, in its final days, has signalled it will not block the ban without a credible divestment plan from ByteDance. TikTok has argued that the law violates First Amendment rights and warned that a prolonged ban could lead to significant user loss and global disruptions to its services.

If the ban proceeds, TikTok plans to display a pop-up message informing users of the shutdown and allow them to download their data. The app would become largely inoperable as US companies would no longer be permitted to provide critical services for its maintenance. TikTok has emphasised its ability to restore operations quickly if the ban is reversed but warned that the shutdown would impact not just American users but its global platform due to its reliance on US-based infrastructure.

The political and legal standoff has sparked widespread public and corporate reactions. Social media users have expressed disappointment at the impending ban, while TikTok’s US operations, employing over 7,000 workers, hang in the balance. Despite ongoing efforts to delay the enforcement, the platform faces an uncertain future as Sunday’s deadline looms.

ChatGPT enhanced with new Tasks feature by OpenAI

OpenAI has introduced a new beta feature called Tasks in ChatGPT, expanding into the virtual assistant market. Tasks will let users schedule future actions such as reminders for concert ticket sales or recurring updates like daily weather reports.

ChatGPT may also suggest tasks based on user conversations, with users retaining control to accept or decline them. The feature aims to compete with virtual assistants like Apple’s Siri and Amazon’s Alexa, both of which are being enhanced with AI capabilities.

The updated Alexa will include generative AI features for task automation, with Amazon CEO Andy Jassy announcing its launch in the coming months. Apple has also integrated ChatGPT into Siri under its ‘Apple Intelligence’ initiative, seeking user permission for queries sent to OpenAI’s service.

OpenAI will roll out the Tasks feature in beta to Plus, Team, and Pro users worldwide over the next few days, starting with the web version.

Brazil challenges Meta’s hate speech policy changes

Brazil’s government has expressed serious concerns over Meta’s recent changes to its hate speech policy, warning that the adjustments may not comply with national legislation. The social media giant, which owns Facebook, Instagram, and Threads, has eased restrictions on discussions around sensitive topics such as immigration and gender identity while also ending its fact-checking programme in the United States. President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva previously called the policy shift “extremely serious,” prompting officials to demand clarification from Meta.

Meta has responded by stating that fact-checking changes currently apply only in the United States and that adjustments to its community standards remain limited to hate speech policy. The company argues that the revisions aim to promote greater freedom of expression, but Brazil’s solicitor general’s office believes the changes are insufficient to protect fundamental rights. Government ministries have raised concerns that Meta’s updated terms of use may violate Brazilian law, particularly in relation to online discourse and misinformation.

A public hearing will be held later this week to discuss the potential impact of Meta’s policy changes. The government is engaging experts to assess whether the new rules align with Brazil’s legal framework and ensure that social media platforms uphold protections against hate speech. Authorities are monitoring how the changes affect digital content regulation as they consider further action to address concerns over online safety and misinformation.

China steps up fight against illegal data activities

China has announced plans to intensify measures against unauthorised data handling, targeting black and grey markets involved in illegal data sales and distribution. New regulations aim to improve governance over data circulation security while curbing systemic risks.

Authorities emphasised the need for stronger data security risk monitoring across critical industries to safeguard national security and maintain social stability. Measures will focus on preventing widespread misuse and addressing vulnerabilities in data handling practices.

Chinese courts also committed to enhancing market order by applying the rule of law. Legal actions will target activities disrupting the socialist economy, following a rise in economic crimes.

US dismantles China-backed malware infecting thousands of computers

The US Justice Department has removed malware from over 4,200 computers worldwide in an operation targeting a hacking group linked to the Chinese government. The malware, known as ‘PlugX,’ was used to steal information and compromise systems across the United States, Europe, and Asia. Investigators identified the cybercriminals behind the attack as ‘Mustang Panda’ and ‘Twill Typhoon,’ groups believed to have received financial support from China.

Court documents filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania allege that the Chinese government paid Mustang Panda to develop PlugX. The malware has been active since at least 2014 and was used not only to target governments and businesses but also Chinese political dissidents. Officials described the operation as a critical step in neutralising cyber threats backed by foreign states.

Authorities emphasised the growing risks posed by state-sponsored hacking groups and their ability to infiltrate global networks. The Justice Department remains committed to dismantling cyber threats and preventing adversaries from exploiting sensitive information. The scale of the attack highlights the persistent threat of cyber espionage and the need for international cooperation in addressing cybersecurity challenges.

US Supreme Court to hear challenge to Texas pornography age verification law

The US Supreme Court will hear a challenge on Wednesday regarding a Texas law that mandates adult websites verify the age of users before granting access to potentially harmful material. The law, which is part of a broader trend across Republican-led states, requires users to submit personal information proving they are at least 18 years old to access pornographic content. The case raises significant First Amendment concerns, as adult entertainment industry groups argue that the law unlawfully restricts free speech and exposes users to risks such as identity theft and data breaches.

The challengers, including the American Civil Liberties Union and the Free Speech Coalition, contend that alternative methods like content-filtering software could better protect minors without infringing on adults’ rights to access non-obscene material. Texas, however, defends the law, citing concerns over the ease with which minors can access explicit content online.

This case is significant because it will test the balance between state efforts to protect minors from explicit content and the constitutional rights of adults to access protected expression. If the Supreme Court upholds the law, it could set a precedent for similar age-verification measures across the US.