Hackers use fake PayPal email to seize bank access

A man from Virginia fell victim to a sophisticated PayPal scam that allowed hackers to gain remote control of his computer and access his bank accounts.

After receiving a fake email about a laptop purchase, he called the number listed in the message, believing it to be legitimate. The person on the other end instructed him to enter a code into his browser, which unknowingly installed a program giving the scammer full access to his system.

Files were scanned, and money was transferred between his accounts—all while he was urged to stay on the line and visit the bank, without informing anyone.

The scam, known as a remote access attack, starts with a convincing email that appears to come from a trusted source. Instead of fixing any problem, the real aim is to deceive victims into granting hackers full control.

Once inside, scammers can steal personal data, access bank accounts, and install malware that remains even after the immediate threat ends. These attacks often unfold in minutes, using fear and urgency to manipulate targets into acting quickly and irrationally.

Quick action helped limit the damage in this case. The victim shut down his computer, contacted his bank and changed his passwords—steps that likely prevented more extensive losses. However, many people aren’t as fortunate.

Experts warn that scammers increasingly rely on psychological tricks instead of just technical ones, isolating their victims and urging secrecy during the attack.

To avoid falling for similar scams, it’s safer to verify emails by using official websites instead of clicking any embedded links or calling suspicious numbers.

Remote control should never be granted to unsolicited support calls, and all devices should have up-to-date antivirus protection and multifactor authentication enabled. Online safety now depends just as much on caution and awareness as it does on technology.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Android adds new scam protection for phone calls

Google is introducing new protections on Android devices to combat phone call scams, particularly those involving screen-sharing and app installations. Users will see warning messages if they attempt to change settings during a call and Android will also block the deactivation of Play Protect features.

The system will now block users from sideloading apps or granting accessibility permissions while on a call with unknown contacts.

The new tools are available on devices running Android 16 and select protections are also rolling out to older versions, starting with Android 11

A separate pilot in the UK will alert users trying to open banking apps during a screen-sharing call, prompting them to end the call or wait before proceeding.

These features expand Android’s broader efforts to prevent fraud, which already include AI-based scam detection for phone calls and messages.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

M&S breach linked to DragonForce hacking group

Marks & Spencer has confirmed that personal customer data was stolen in a recent cyberattack, including names, contact details, dates of birth, household information, and order histories. The company stressed that no useable payment details or account passwords were compromised.

The breach, which began over the Easter weekend, has disrupted online orders since April 25 and is reportedly costing M&S £43 million per week in lost sales.

Customers are being prompted to reset their passwords, and the retailer has warned users to be cautious of phishing emails or messages pretending to be from M&S.

The attack is linked to the DragonForce cybercrime group, known for double-extortion tactics—stealing and encrypting data while demanding ransom.

While no leaked M&S data has appeared online, experts say the risk of identity fraud remains high.

M&S has contacted website users, reported the breach to authorities, and is working with cybersecurity experts. The company has not disclosed how many of its 9.4 million online customers were affected.

Chief executive Stuart Machin said M&S is working ‘around the clock’ to restore services. Shares in the retailer have dropped 12% over the past month.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

M&S urges password reset after major cyber incident

Marks & Spencer has confirmed that hackers accessed personal customer information in a cyber-attack that began in late April. The retailer stated that no payment details or account passwords were compromised, and there is currently no evidence the stolen data has been shared.

Customers will be prompted to reset their passwords as a precaution. Chief executive Stuart Machin called the breach a result of a sophisticated attack and apologised for the disruption, which has impacted online orders, app functionality, and some in-store services.

Although stores remain open, the company has been unable to process online purchases since 25 April. A hacking group known as Scattered Spider is believed to be behind the incident.

M&S has contacted affected customers and provided guidance on online safety. The company said it is working ‘around the clock’ to resolve the issue and restore normal operations. Customers are thanked for their patience and continued support.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Masked cybercrime groups rise as attacks escalate worldwide

Cybercrime is thriving like never before, with hackers launching attacks ranging from absurd ransomware demands of $1 trillion to large-scale theft of personal data. Despite efforts from Microsoft, Google and even the FBI, these threat actors continue to outpace defences.

A new report by Group-IB has analysed over 1,500 cybercrime investigations to uncover the most active and dangerous hacker groups operating today.

Rather than fading away after arrests or infighting, many cybercriminal gangs are re-emerging stronger than before.

Group-IB’s May 2025 report highlights a troubling increase in key attack types across 2024 — phishing rose by 22%, ransomware leak sites by 10%, and APT (advanced persistent threat) attacks by 58%. The United States was the most affected country by ransomware activity.

At the top of the cybercriminal hierarchy now sits RansomHub, a ransomware-as-a-service group that emerged from the collapsed ALPHV group and has already overtaken long-established players in attack numbers.

Behind it is GoldFactory, which developed the first iOS banking trojan and exploited facial recognition data. Lazarus, a well-known North Korean state-linked group, also remains highly active under multiple aliases.

Meanwhile, politically driven hacktivist group NoName057(16) has been targeting European institutions using denial-of-service attacks.

With jurisdictional gaps allowing cybercriminals to flourish, these masked hackers remain a growing concern for global cybersecurity, especially as new threat actors emerge from the shadows instead of disappearing for good.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU prolongs sanctions for cyberattackers until 2026

The EU Council has extended its sanctions on cyberattacks until May 18, 2026, with the legal framework for enforcing these measures now lasting until 2028. The sanctions target individuals and institutions involved in cyberattacks that pose a significant threat to the EU and its members.

The extended measures will allow the EU to impose restrictions on those responsible for cyberattacks, including freezing assets and blocking access to financial resources.

These actions may also apply to attacks against third countries or international organisations, if necessary for EU foreign and security policy objectives.

At present, sanctions are in place against 17 individuals and four institutions. The EU’s decision highlights its ongoing commitment to safeguarding its digital infrastructure and maintaining its foreign policy goals through legal actions against cyber threats.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Jamie Lee Curtis calls out Zuckerberg over AI scam using her likeness

Jamie Lee Curtis has directly appealed to Mark Zuckerberg after discovering her likeness had been used without consent in an AI-generated advert.

Posting on Facebook, Curtis expressed her frustration with Meta’s lack of proper channels to report such abuse, stating she had exhausted all official avenues before resorting to a public plea.

The fake video reportedly manipulated footage from an emotional interview following the January wildfires in Los Angeles, inserting false statements under the guise of a product endorsement.

Instead of remaining silent, Curtis urged Zuckerberg to take action, saying the unauthorised content damaged her integrity and voice. Within hours of her public callout, Meta confirmed the video had been removed for breaching its policies, a rare example of a swift response.

‘It worked! Yay Internet! Shame has its value!’ she wrote in a follow-up, though she also highlighted the broader risks posed by deepfakes.

The actress joins a growing list of celebrities, including Taylor Swift and Scarlett Johansson, who’ve been targeted by AI misuse.

Swift was forced to publicly clarify her political stance after an AI video falsely endorsed Donald Trump, while Johansson criticised OpenAI for allegedly using a voice nearly identical to hers despite her refusal to participate in a project.

The issue has reignited concerns around consent, misinformation and the exploitation of public figures.

Instead of waiting for further harm, lawmakers in California have already begun pushing back. New legislation signed by Governor Gavin Newsom aims to protect performers from unauthorised digital replicas and deepfakes.

Meanwhile, in Washington, proposals like the No Fakes Act seek to hold tech platforms accountable, possibly fining them thousands per violation. As Curtis and others warn, without stronger protections, the misuse of AI could spiral further, threatening not just celebrities but the public as a whole.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Cyber attack disrupts Edinburgh school networks

Thousands of Edinburgh pupils were forced to attend school on Saturday after a phishing attack disrupted access to vital online learning resources.

The cyber incident, discovered on Friday, prompted officials to lock users out of the system as a precaution, just days before exams.

Approximately 2,500 students visited secondary schools to reset passwords and restore their access. Although the revision period was interrupted, the council confirmed that no personal data had been compromised.

Scottish Council staff acted swiftly to contain the threat, supported by national cyber security teams. Ongoing monitoring is in place, with authorities confident that exam schedules will continue unaffected.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Punycode scams steal crypto through lookalike URLs

Crypto holders are facing a growing threat from a sophisticated form of phishing that swaps letters in website addresses for nearly identical lookalikes, tricking users into handing over their digital assets.

Known as Punycode phishing, the tactic has led to significant losses—even for vigilant users—by mimicking legitimate cryptocurrency exchange sites with deceptive domain names.

Cybercriminals exploit the similarity between characters from different alphabets, such as replacing Latin letters with visually identical Cyrillic ones.

These fake websites are almost indistinguishable from real ones, making it extremely difficult to spot the fraud. Recent reports reveal that even browser recommendation systems, such as Google Chrome’s, have directed users to these deceptive domains.

In one widely cited case, a user was guided to a fraudulent site impersonating the crypto exchange ChangeNOW and subsequently lost over $20,000. The incident has raised questions about browser accountability and the urgency of protective measures against increasingly advanced phishing strategies.

US regulators, including the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA), and California’s Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI), have issued ongoing warnings about crypto scams.

While none have specifically addressed Punycode-based attacks, their advice—careful URL scrutiny, skepticism of unsolicited links, and immediate fraud reporting—remains critical.

As phishing methods evolve, users are urged to double-check domain names, avoid clicking unverified links, and consult tools like the DFPI Crypto Scam Tracker. Until browsers and platforms address the threat directly, user awareness remains the most effective defence.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Cybercriminals trick users with fake AI apps

Cybercriminals are tricking users into downloading a dangerous new malware called Noodlophile by disguising it as AI software. Rather than using typical phishing tactics, attackers create convincing fake platforms that appear to offer AI-powered tools for editing videos or images.

These are promoted through realistic-looking Facebook groups and viral social media posts, some of which have received over 62,000 views.

Users are lured with promises of AI-generated content and are directed to bogus sites, one of which pretends to be CapCut AI, offering video editing features. Once users upload prompts and attempt to download the content, they unknowingly receive a malicious ZIP file.

Inside, it is a disguised program that kicks off a chain of infections, eventually installing the Noodlophile malware. However, this software can steal browser credentials, crypto wallet details, and other sensitive data.

The malware is linked to a Vietnamese developer who identifies themselves as a ‘passionate Malware Developer’ on GitHub. Vietnam has a known history of cybercrime activity targeting social media platforms like Facebook.

In some cases, the Noodlophile Stealer has been bundled with remote access tools like XWorm, which allow attackers to maintain long-term control over victims’ systems.

This isn’t the first time attackers have used public interest in AI for malicious purposes. Meta removed over 1,000 dangerous links in 2023 that exploited ChatGPT’s popularity to spread malware.

Meanwhile, cybersecurity experts at CYFIRMA have reported another threat: a new, simple yet effective malware called PupkinStealer, which secretly sends stolen information to hackers using Telegram bots.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!