Jurisdiction

US platforms signal political shift in DSA risk reports

Major online platforms have submitted their 2025 systemic risk assessments under the Digital Services Act as the European Commission moves towards issuing its first fine against a Very Large Online Platform.

The reports arrive amid mounting political friction between Brussels and Washington, placing platform compliance under heightened scrutiny on both regulatory and geopolitical fronts.

Several US-based companies adjusted how risks related to hate speech, misinformation and diversity are framed, reflecting political changes in the US while maintaining formal alignment with EU law.

Meta softened enforcement language, reclassified hate speech under broader categories and reduced visibility of civil rights structures, while continuing to emphasise freedom of expression as a guiding principle.

Google and YouTube similarly narrowed references to misinformation, replaced established terminology with less charged language and limited enforcement narratives to cases involving severe harm.

LinkedIn followed comparable patterns, removing references to earlier commitments on health misinformation, civic integrity and EU voluntary codes that have since been integrated into the DSA framework.

X largely retained its prior approach, although its report continues to reference cooperation with governments and civil society that contrasts with the platform’s public positioning.

TikTok diverged from other platforms by expanding disclosures on hate speech, election integrity and fact-checking, likely reflecting its vulnerability to regulatory action in both the EU and the US.

European regulators are expected to assess whether these shifts represent genuine risk mitigation or strategic alignment with US political priorities.

As systemic risk reports increasingly inform enforcement decisions, subtle changes in language, scope and emphasis may carry regulatory consequences well beyond their formal compliance function.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Russia considers restoring Roblox access after compliance talks

Roblox has signalled willingness to comply with Russian law, opening the possibility of the platform being unblocked in Russia following earlier access restrictions.

Roskomnadzor stated that cooperation could resume if Roblox demonstrates concrete steps instead of declarations towards meeting domestic legal requirements.

The regulator said Roblox acknowledged shortcomings in moderating game content and ensuring the safety of user chats, particularly involving minors.

Russian authorities stressed that compliance would require systematic measures to remove harmful material and prevent criminal communication rather than partial adjustments.

Access to Roblox was restricted in early December after officials cited the spread of content linked to extremist and terrorist activity.

Roskomnadzor indicated that continued engagement and demonstrable compliance could allow the platform to restore operations under the regulatory oversight of Russia.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

UNDP and UNESCO support AI training for judiciary

UNESCO and UNDP have partnered to enhance judicial capacity on the ethical use of AI. A three-day Bangkok training, supported by the Thailand Institute of Justice, brought together 27 judges from 13 Asia-Pacific countries to discuss the impact of AI on justice and safeguards for fairness.

Expert sessions highlighted the global use of AI in court administration, research, and case management, emphasising opportunities and risks. Participants explored ways to use AI ethically while protecting human rights and judicial integrity, warning that unsupervised tools could increase bias and undermine public trust.

Trainers emphasised that AI must be implemented with careful attention to bias, transparency, and structural inequalities.

Judges reflected on the growing complexity of verifying evidence in the age of generative AI and deepfakes, and acknowledged that responsible AI can improve access to justice, support case reviews, and free time for substantive decision-making.

The initiative concluded with a consensus that AI adoption in courts should be guided by governance, transparency, and ongoing dialogue. The UNDP will continue to collaborate in advancing ethical, human rights-focused AI in regional judiciaries.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot! 

EU approves €1.8 billion clean energy boost through Modernisation Fund

The European Commission and the European Investment Bank have approved €1.8 billion in new clean energy funding under the EU Modernisation Fund, supporting 45 projects across 12 member states.

Portugal receives funding for the first time after becoming eligible in 2024, while total support from the Fund since 2021 has now reached €20.7 billion across 294 investments.

Financed through revenues from the EU Emissions Trading System, the Fund targets high-impact projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions in energy, industry and transport, while improving energy efficiency and strengthening energy security.

In 2025 alone, total disbursements reached €5.46 billion, with significant allocations directed to Czechia, Poland, Romania and Hungary, alongside support for Greece, Portugal and Slovenia.

All projects approved during 2025 focus on renewable electricity generation, energy storage, grid modernisation and efficiency upgrades in public infrastructure and industry.

The Modernisation Fund plays a central role in supporting national climate plans, reducing dependence on fossil fuel imports and advancing the EU’s Fit for 55 and REPowerEU objectives, with further investment proposals scheduled for early 2026.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Denmark pushes digital identity beyond authentication

Digital identity has long focused on proving that the same person returns each time they log in. The function still matters, yet online representation increasingly happens through faces, voices and mannerisms embedded in media rather than credentials alone.

As synthetic media becomes easier to generate and remix, identity shifts from an access problem to a problem of media authenticity.

The ‘Own Your Face’ proposal by Denmark reflects the shift by treating personal likeness as something that should be controllable in the same way accounts are controlled.

Digital systems already verify who is requesting access, yet lack a trusted middle layer to manage what is being shown when media claims to represent a real person. The proxy model illustrates how an intermediary layer can bring structure, consistency and trust to otherwise unmanageable flows.

Efforts around content provenance point toward a practical path forward. By attaching machine-verifiable history to media at creation and preserving it as content moves, identity extends beyond login to representation.

Broad adoption would not eliminate deception, yet it would raise the baseline of trust by replacing visual guesswork with evidence, helping digital identity evolve for an era shaped by synthetic media.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

UK-EU cyber dialogue strengthens policy alignment

The third UK-EU Cyber Dialogue was held in Brussels on 9 and 10 December 2025, bringing together senior officials under the UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement to strengthen cooperation on cybersecurity and digital resilience.

The meeting was co-chaired by Andrew Whittaker from the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office and Irfan Hemani from the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, alongside EU representatives from the European External Action Service and the European Commission.

Officials from Europol and ENISA also participated, reinforcing operational and regulatory coordination rather than fragmented policy approaches.

Discussions covered cyber legislation, deterrence strategies, countering cybercrime, incident response and cyber capacity development, with an emphasis on maintaining strong security standards while reducing unnecessary compliance burdens on industry.

Both sides confirmed that the next UK-EU Cyber Dialogue will take place in London in 2026.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Russia rejects crypto as money but expands legal recognition

Russian lawmakers have reiterated that cryptocurrencies will not be recognised as money, maintaining a strict ban on their use for domestic payments while allowing limited application as investment assets.

Anatoly Aksakov, head of the State Duma Committee on the Financial Market, emphasised that all payments within Russia must be conducted in rubles, echoing the central bank’s long-standing stance against the use of cryptocurrencies in internal settlements.

At the same time, legislative proposals point to a more nuanced legal approach. A bill submitted by United Russia lawmaker Igor Antropenko seeks to recognise cryptocurrencies as marital property, classifying digital assets acquired during marriage as jointly owned in divorce proceedings.

The proposal reflects the growing adoption of cryptocurrency in Russia, where digital assets are increasingly used for investment and savings. It also aligns family law with broader regulatory shifts that permit the use of crypto in foreign trade under an experimental framework.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot! 

EU moves to tax low-value e-commerce parcels

The European Commission welcomed the decision by EU Member States to introduce a €3 customs duty on low-value e-commerce parcels arriving from third countries.

A measure, which enters into force in July 2026, that applies to items valued below €150 and aims to restore fair competition instead of allowing online imports to benefit from longstanding exemptions.

The move responds to the rapid growth of cross-border e-commerce shipments and will operate as a temporary solution until the EU Customs Data Hub becomes fully operational in 2028.

Until then, the Council and the Commission will coordinate legal changes and IT systems to ensure smooth implementation and effective customs supervision across the Union.

Once the Customs Data Hub is in place, a permanent customs duty regime will replace the temporary measure, offering authorities a comprehensive view of goods entering and leaving the EU.

The €3 duty applies only to parcels sent directly to consumers and remains separate from ongoing negotiations on a handling fee intended to offset the rising operational costs faced by customs authorities.

The reform builds on earlier Commission proposals to remove duty exemptions for low-value parcels and forms part of the most extensive overhaul of EU customs rules in decades.

European institutions argue that modernised customs controls are essential instead of relying on outdated frameworks, particularly as global e-commerce volumes continue to expand.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

UNODC and INTERPOL announce Global Fraud Summit in 2026

The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), in cooperation with the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), will convene the Global Fraud Summit 2026 at the Vienna International Centre, Austria, from 16 to 17 March 2026.

UNODC and INTERPOL invite applications for participation from private sector entities, civil society organisations, and academic institutions. Applications must be submitted by 12 December 2025.

The Summit will provide a platform for discussion on current trends, risks, and responses related to fraud, including its digital and cross-border dimensions. Discussions will address challenges associated with detection, investigation, prevention, and international cooperation in fraud-related cases.

The objectives of the Summit include:

  • Facilitating coordination among national and international stakeholders
  • Supporting information exchange across sectors and jurisdictions
  • Sharing policy, operational, and technical approaches to fraud prevention and response
  • Identifying areas for further cooperation and capacity-building

The ministerial-level meeting will bring together senior representatives from governments, international and regional organisations, law enforcement authorities, the private sector, academia, and civil society. Participating institutions are encouraged to nominate delegates at an appropriate senior level.

The Summit is supported by a financial contribution from the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Applications must be submitted through the application at the official website.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

International Criminal Court (ICC) issues policy on cyber-enabled crimes

The Office of the Prosecutor (OTP) of the International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued a Policy on Cyber-Enabled Crimes under the Rome Statute. The Policy sets out how the OTP interprets and applies the existing ICC legal framework to conduct that is committed or facilitated through digital and cyber means.

The Policy clarifies that the ICC’s jurisdiction remains limited to crimes defined in the Rome Statute: genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, the crime of aggression, and offences against the administration of justice. It does not extend to ordinary cybercrimes under domestic law, such as hacking, fraud, or identity theft, unless such conduct forms part of or facilitates one of the crimes within the Court’s jurisdiction.

According to the Policy, the Rome Statute is technology-neutral. This means that the legal assessment of conduct depends on whether the elements of a crime are met, rather than on the specific tools or technologies used.

As a result, cyber means may be relevant both to the commission of Rome Statute crimes and to the collection and assessment of evidence related to them.

The Policy outlines how cyber-enabled conduct may relate to each category of crimes under the Rome Statute. Examples include cyber operations affecting essential civilian services, the use of digital platforms to incite or coordinate violence, cyber activities causing indiscriminate effects in armed conflict, cyber operations linked to inter-State uses of force, and digital interference with evidence, witnesses, or judicial proceedings before the ICC.

The Policy was developed through consultations with internal and external legal and technical experts, including the OTP’s Special Adviser on Cyber-Enabled Crimes, Professor Marko Milanović. It does not modify or expand the ICC’s jurisdiction, which remains governed exclusively by the Rome Statute.

Currently, there are no publicly known ICC cases focused specifically on cyber-enabled crimes. However, the issuance of the Policy reflects the OTP’s assessment that digital conduct may increasingly be relevant to the commission, facilitation, and proof of crimes within the Court’s mandate.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!