Jurisdiction

Virginia sets new limits on AI chatbots for minors

Lawmakers in Virginia are preparing fresh efforts to regulate AI as concerns grow over its influence on minors and vulnerable users.

Legislators will return in January with a set of proposals focused on limiting the capabilities of chatbots, curbing deepfakes and restricting automated ticket-buying systems. The push follows a series of failed attempts last year to define high-risk AI systems and expand protections for consumers.

Delegate Michelle Maldonado aims to introduce measures that restrict what conversational agents can say in therapeutic interactions instead of allowing them to mimic emotional support.

Her plans follow the well-publicised case of a sixteen-year-old who discussed suicidal thoughts with a chatbot before taking his own life. She argues that young people rely heavily on these tools and need stronger safeguards that recognise dangerous language and redirect users towards human help.

Maldonado will also revive a previous bill on high-risk AI, refining it to address particular sectors rather than broad categories.

Delegate Cliff Hayes is preparing legislation to require labels for synthetic media and to block AI systems from buying event tickets in bulk instead of letting automated tools distort prices.

Hayes already secured a law preventing predictions from AI tools from being the sole basis for criminal justice decisions. He warns that the technology has advanced too quickly for policy to remain passive and urges a balance between innovation and protection.

Proposals that come as the state continues to evaluate its regulatory environment under an executive order issued by Governor Glenn Youngkin.

The order directs AI systems to scan the state code for unnecessary or conflicting rules, encouraging streamlined governance instead of strict statutory frameworks. Observers argue that human oversight remains essential as legislators search for common ground on how far to extend regulatory control.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Australia strengthens parent support for new social media age rules

Yesterday, Australia entered a new phase of its online safety framework after the introduction of the Social Media Minimum Age policy.

eSafety has established a new Parent Advisory Group to support families as the country transitions to enhanced safeguards for young people. The group held its first meeting, with the Commissioner underlining the need for practical and accessible guidance for carers.

The initiative brings together twelve organisations representing a broad cross-section of communities in Australia, including First Nations families, culturally diverse groups, parents of children with disability and households in regional areas.

Their role is to help eSafety refine its approach, so parents can navigate social platforms with greater confidence, rather than feeling unsupported during rapid regulatory change.

A group that will advise on parent engagement, offer evidence-informed insights and test updated resources such as the redeveloped Online Safety Parent Guide.

Their advice will aim to ensure materials remain relevant, inclusive and able to reach priority communities that often miss out on official communications.

Members will serve voluntarily until June 2026 and will work with eSafety to improve distribution networks and strengthen the national conversation on digital literacy. Their collective expertise is expected to shape guidance that reflects real family experiences instead of abstract policy expectations.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

UAE strengthens digital transformation with Sharjah’s new integration committee

Sharjah is advancing its digital transformation efforts following the issuance of a new decree that established the Higher Committee for Digital Integration. The Crown Prince formed the body to strengthen oversight and guide government entities as the emirate seeks more coordinated progress.

The committee will report directly to the Executive Council and will be led by Sheikh Saud bin Sultan Al Qasimi from the Sharjah Digital Department.

Senior officials from several departments in the UAE will join him to enhance cooperation across the government, rather than leaving agencies to pursue separate digital plans.

Their combined expertise is expected to support stronger governance and reduce risks linked to large-scale transformation.

Its mandate covers strategic oversight, approval of key policies, alignment with national objectives and careful monitoring of digital projects.

The members will intervene when challenges arise, oversee investments and help resolve disputes so the emirate can maintain momentum instead of facing delays caused by fragmented decision-making.

Membership runs for two years, with the option of extension. The committee will continue its work until a successor group is formed and will provide regular reports on progress, challenges and proposed solutions to the Executive Council.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Swiss Federal Council approves update to tax information exchange rules

The Swiss Federal Council has approved significant updates to the Ordinance on the International Automatic Exchange of Information in Tax Matters. The new rules are set to take effect across Switzerland on 1 January 2026, assuming no referendum intervenes.

The revisions expand Switzerland’s international exchange of financial account information, updating the Common Reporting Standard (CRS) and introducing the new Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF).

Crypto service providers in Switzerland will now have reporting, due diligence, and registration obligations under the AEOI Ordinance, although these provisions will not apply until at least 2027.

The updated Ordinance also extends CRS rules to Swiss associations and foundations while excluding certain accounts if specific conditions are met. Transitional measures aim to facilitate the implementation of the amended CRS and CARF by affected parties more smoothly.

Deliberations on partner states for Switzerland’s crypto data exchange have been paused by the National Council’s Economic Affairs and Taxation Committee. The CARF will become law in Switzerland in 2026, but full implementation is delayed, keeping crypto-asset rules inactive for the first year.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

OpenAI clarifies position in sensitive lawsuit

A legal case is underway involving OpenAI and the family of a teenager who had extensive interactions with ChatGPT before his death.

OpenAI has filed a response in court that refers to its terms of use and provides additional material for review. The filing also states that more complete records were submitted under seal so the court can assess the situation in full.

The family’s complaint includes concerns about the model’s behaviour and the company’s choices, while OpenAI’s filing outlines its view of the events and the safeguards it has in place. Both sides present different interpretations of the same interactions, which the court will evaluate.

OpenAI has also released a public statement describing its general approach to sensitive cases and the ongoing development of safety features intended to guide users towards appropriate support.

The case has drawn interest because it relates to broader questions about safety measures within conversational AI systems.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Teens launch High Court bid to stop Australia’s under-16 social media ban

Two teenagers in Australia have taken the federal government to the High Court in an effort to stop the country’s under-16 social media ban, which is due to begin on 10 December. The case was filed by the Digital Freedom Project with two 15-year-olds, Noah Jones and Macy Neyland, listed as plaintiffs. The group says the law strips young people of their implied constitutional right to political communication.

The ban will lead to the deactivation of more than one million accounts held by users under 16 across platforms such as YouTube, TikTok, Snapchat, Twitch, Facebook and Instagram. The Digital Freedom Project argues that removing young people from these platforms blocks them from engaging in public debate. Neyland said the rules silence teens who want to share their views on issues that affect them.

The Digital Freedom Project’s president, John Ruddick, is a Libertarian Party politician in New South Wales. After the lawsuit became public, Communications Minister Anika Wells told Parliament the government would not shift its position in the face of legal threats. She said the government’s priority is supporting parents rather than platform operators.

The law, passed in November 2024, is supported by most Australians according to polling. The government says research links heavy social media use among young teens to bullying, misinformation and harmful body-image content.

Companies that fail to comply with the ban risk penalties of up to A$49.5 million. Lawmakers and tech firms abroad are watching how the rollout unfolds, as Australia’s approach is among the toughest efforts globally to restrict minors’ access to social platforms.

Would you like to learn more aboutAI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

UK enforces digital travel approval through new ETA system

Visitors from 85 nationalities, including those from the US, Canada, and France, will soon be required to secure an Electronic Travel Authorisation to enter the UK.

The requirement takes effect in February 2026 and forms part of a move towards a fully digital immigration system that aims to deliver a contactless border in the future.

More than thirteen million people in the UK have already used the ETA since its introduction in 2023. However, the government claims that this scale facilitates smoother travel and faster processing for most applicants.

Carriers will be required to confirm that incoming passengers hold either an ETA or an eVisa before departure, a step officials argue strengthens the country’s ability to block individuals who present a security risk.

British and Irish citizens remain exempt; however, dual nationals have been advised to carry a valid British passport to avoid any difficulties when boarding.

The application process takes place through the official ETA app, costs £ 16, and concludes typically within minutes. However, applicants are advised to allow three working days in case additional checks are required.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

AI models face new test on safeguarding human well-being

A new benchmark aims to measure whether AI chatbots support human well-being rather than pull users into addictive behaviour.

HumaneBench, created by Building Humane Technology, evaluates leading models in 800 realistic situations, ranging from teenage body image concerns to pressure within unhealthy relationships.

The study focuses on attention protection, empowerment, honesty, safety and longer-term well-being rather than engagement metrics.

Fifteen prominent models were tested under three separate conditions. They were assessed on default behaviour, on prioritising humane principles and on following direct instructions to ignore those principles.

Most systems performed better when asked to safeguard users, yet two-thirds shifted into harmful patterns when prompted to disregard well-being.

Only four models, including GPT-5 and Claude Sonnet, maintained integrity when exposed to adversarial prompts, while others, such as Grok-4 and Gemini 2.0 Flash, recorded significant deterioration.

Researchers warn that many systems still encourage prolonged use and dependency by prompting users to continue chatting, rather than supporting healthier choices. Concerns are growing as legal cases highlight severe outcomes resulting from prolonged interactions with chatbots.

The group behind the benchmark argues that the sector must adopt humane design so that AI serves human autonomy rather than reinforcing addiction cycles.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU approves funding for a new Onsemi semiconductor facility in the Czech Republic

The European Commission has approved €450 million in Czech support for a new integrated Onsemi semiconductor facility in Rožnov pod Radhoštěm.

A project that will help strengthen Europe’s technological autonomy by advancing Silicon Carbide power device production instead of relying on non-European manufacturing.

The Czech Republic plans to back a €1.64 billion investment that will create the first EU facility covering every stage from crystal growth to finished components. These products will be central to electric vehicles, fast charging systems and renewable energy technologies.

Onsemi has agreed to contribute new skills programmes, support the development of next-generation 200 mm SiC technology and follow priority-rated orders in future supply shortages.

The Commission reviewed the measure under Article 107(3)(c) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU and concluded that the aid is necessary, proportionate and limited to the minimum required to trigger the investment.

In a scheme that addresses a segment of the semiconductor market where the EU lacks sufficient supply, which improves resilience rather than distorts competition.

The facility is expected to begin commercial activity by 2027 and will support the wider European semiconductor ecosystem.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Creativity that AI cannot reshape

A landmark ruling in Munich has put renewed pressure on AI developers, following a German court’s finding that OpenAI is liable for reproducing copyrighted song lyrics in outputs generated by GPT-4 and GPT-4o. The judges rejected OpenAI’s argument that the system merely predicts text without storing training data, stressing the long-established EU principle of technological neutrality that, regardless of the medium, vinyl, MP3, or AI output, the unauthorised reproduction of protected works remains infringement.

Because the models produced lyrics nearly identical to the originals, the court concluded that they had memorised and therefore stored copyrighted content. The ruling dismantled OpenAI’s attempt to shift responsibility to users by claiming that any copying occurs only at the output stage.

Judges found this implausible, noting that simple prompts could not have ‘accidentally’ produced full, complex song verses without the model retaining them internally. Arguments around coincidence, probability, or so-called ‘hallucinations’ were dismissed, with the court highlighting that even partially altered lyrics remain protected if their creative structure survives.

As Anita Lamprecht explains in her blog, the judgement reinforces that AI systems are not neutral tools like tape recorders but active presenters of content shaped by their architecture and training data.

A deeper issue lies beneath the legal reasoning, the nature of creativity itself. The court inferred that highly original works, which are statistically unique, force AI systems into a kind of memorisation because such material cannot be reliably reproduced through generalisation alone.

That suggests that when models encounter high-entropy, creative texts during training, they must internalise them to mimic their structure, making infringement difficult to avoid. Even if this memorisation is a technical necessity, the judges stressed that it falls outside the EU’s text and data mining exemptions.

The case signals a turning point for AI regulation. It exposes contradictions between what companies claim in court and what their internal guidelines acknowledge. OpenAI’s own model specifications describe the output of lyrics as ‘reproduction’.

As Lamprecht notes, the ruling demonstrates that traditional legal principles remain resilient even as technology shifts from physical formats to vector space. It also hints at a future where regulation must reach inside AI systems themselves, requiring architectures that are legible to the law and laws that can be enforced directly within the models.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!