Internet of things

Canadian ministers to discuss Safe Social Media Act

Canadian Heritage will hold an in-person roundtable in Winnipeg on Bill C-34, the Safe Social Media Act, as the government continues public discussion on its proposed online safety framework.

The event will bring together Marc Miller, Minister of Canadian Identity and Culture and Minister responsible for Official Languages, and Adam van Koeverden, Secretary of State for Sport. Media representatives have been invited to attend the conclusion of the discussion, followed by an informal media availability.

The Safe Social Media Act was introduced on 10 June 2026 and would create new duties for social media services, AI chatbot services and other regulated online services. The government says the bill is intended to make platforms more responsible for addressing harmful content and creating safer online spaces, especially for children and young people.

The bill would enact the Digital Safety Act and establish the Digital Safety Commission of Canada. The proposed framework focuses on platform accountability, child protection, transparency and the prevention of online harms before they occur.

The legislation comes amid growing international debate over children’s access to social media, age restrictions, harmful content, platform design and the role of AI chatbots in online safety.

The Winnipeg roundtable signals continued government engagement with stakeholders as Bill C-34 moves through the parliamentary process.

Why does it matter?

Canada’s Safe Social Media Act is part of a wider global shift towards stronger online safety rules focused on children and young people. By covering social media services and AI chatbots, the bill reflects growing concern that harmful content, platform design and AI-driven interactions can affect child safety, mental health and exposure to exploitation. The proposed Digital Safety Commission would also create a new federal oversight structure for platform accountability.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Meta launches new AI glasses with Muse Spark assistant

Meta has launched a new generation of AI glasses in partnership with EssilorLuxottica, expanding its push to make wearable AI a mainstream consumer technology.

The new Meta Glasses build on the company’s existing AI eyewear portfolio and will launch with 26 styles across different colours, lenses and frames.

Meta said the glasses include hands-free photo and video capture, open-ear audio, voice control, calls and messaging, live translation and access to Meta AI. The company also said the device offers more than eight hours of battery life, with a charging case providing up to 40 additional hours.

The glasses are the first in Meta’s AI eyewear line to launch with Meta AI powered by Muse Spark from day one. Meta said the model, developed by Meta Superintelligence Labs, gives the assistant stronger multimodal capabilities, including a better understanding of what users are seeing.

The company said the assistant can answer questions, suggest local recommendations, support daily tasks and help users manage schedules hands-free. Meta is also adding features such as dynamic photo capture, pedestrian navigation for displayless glasses and live translation support for 14 additional languages.

The launch reflects growing competition in AI wearables, as technology companies seek new interfaces beyond smartphones. By combining AI assistance with everyday eyewear, Meta is trying to position smart glasses as a practical gateway to always-available AI services.

Why does it matter?

AI glasses move digital assistants closer to the physical world, giving AI systems access to what users see, hear and do throughout the day. That could make AI more useful for translation, navigation, accessibility and hands-free computing, but it also raises questions over privacy, bystander consent, data collection and dependence on platform-controlled AI assistants.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

OECD examines young people’s social media use

The OECD has warned that young people are growing up in a social media age that offers opportunities for creativity and connection, but also creates risks for learning, well-being and online safety.

In a new Digital Economy Paper, ‘Growing up in the social media age’, the OECD reviews research on young people’s social media use and analyses data from the 2022 Programme for International Student Assessment. The paper focuses mainly on 15-year-olds and examines links between social media use, academic outcomes, creative thinking and policy responses.

The OECD says social media is almost universal among 15-year-olds. Around 95% report browsing social media daily, while 88% report communicating or sharing digital content on social platforms. On average, 15-year-olds across the OECD spend almost 35 hours a week on social media.

The paper says the evidence on social media and well-being remains complex. Excessive use is often associated with negative outcomes, but correlations do not prove that social media directly causes lower academic performance, poorer mental health or reduced well-being.

The OECD finds that moderate social media use is associated with stronger academic performance than either no use or heavy use. Mathematics performance is highest among students who use social media moderately, while performance tends to decline as time spent on social media exceeds 3 hours a day.

Creative thinking follows a similar pattern. Scores peak at moderate levels of browsing social media, usually one to three hours per day, but decline when students spend more than one hour communicating or sharing digital content.

The paper also notes that school mobile phone bans are becoming more common, but implementation remains difficult. Across the OECD, 29% of 15-year-olds in schools that ban mobile phones still reported using their phone at school several times a day.

The OECD says governments need balanced policies that help young people benefit from social media while protecting them from risks, and that safeguards should also respect freedom of expression, privacy, innovation and fair competition.

Why does it matter?

The OECD paper is useful because it pushes the debate beyond a simple ‘ban or allow’ framing. It shows that young people’s social media use is widespread and often excessive, yet moderate use can be associated with positive outcomes. For policymakers, the challenge is to design rules on school phone use, age limits and platform obligations that protect children without cutting them off from digital participation, creativity and social connection.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Meta expands AI-powered teen safety protections across its platforms

Meta has announced new teen safety updates across Instagram, Facebook, and Messenger, including expanded age-appropriate content settings, AI-powered age detection, and new parental notification tools.

Meta said the updates are designed to ensure teens receive appropriate protections by default, give parents greater visibility into online activity and strengthen safeguards that support young people’s well-being.

Meta said its 13+ default content setting, recently introduced in India, is now rolling out globally across Instagram, Facebook, and Messenger. The setting is designed to limit exposure to age-inappropriate content by default, drawing on established content-rating principles and parent feedback.

On Facebook, the 13+ default setting is intended to hide content considered inappropriate for teens in areas such as Feed and Reels. It also limits teens’ ability to interact with Profiles, Pages, Groups, and Events that primarily post inappropriate content.

On Messenger, the 13+ default setting limits teens’ ability to view links to inappropriate Facebook content or chat with accounts that primarily share it.

Meta is also expanding its use of AI-powered age estimation systems to identify accounts that may belong to underage users. The company said the system analyses profile context, including birthday celebrations, school-grade mentions, posts, comments, bios, and captions, to assess whether an account is likely to belong to someone underage.

The company said it is adding visual analysis as another detection technique. According to Meta, the technology analyses photos and videos for general indicators associated with age, such as physical characteristics, but does not identify individuals and does not use facial recognition.

Meta said combining visual signals with text and interaction analysis could increase the number of underage accounts it identifies and removes. The technology will be expanded across additional parts of its apps, including Instagram Reels, Instagram Live, and Facebook Groups.

Instagram will also notify supervising parents if a teen repeatedly searches for terms related to suicide or self-harm within a short period, subject to supervision settings. Meta said the feature has been rolled out to supervising parents in the EU, Brazil, and India, with parents and teens receiving notifications that the alerts are on the way.

Parents using supervision can now manage their teens’ activity through Meta’s Family Center across Instagram, Meta Horizon, Facebook, and Messenger. Meta said parents will also be able to see a more holistic view of teen activity across its apps in the coming months, including aggregated time spent.

Why does it matter?

The announcement reflects a broader shift towards age-appropriate design, where platforms increasingly rely on default protections and automated systems rather than expecting young users or parents to configure safety settings themselves. AI-based age detection is becoming a central tool in efforts to identify underage users and enforce platform safeguards at scale.

The update also highlights ongoing debates about the balance between child protection, privacy and platform accountability. While automated age-estimation technologies may help improve online safety, regulators and civil society groups continue to scrutinise their accuracy, transparency and potential impact on users’ rights. As governments around the world consider stricter child online safety requirements, platform approaches such as Meta’s may influence future regulatory expectations.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

UK plans major social media ban for under-16s

The UK government plans to introduce a social media ban for children under 16 as part of a wider package of online safety measures aimed at reducing children’s exposure to harmful content and risky online interactions.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the planned restrictions are intended to protect children from harmful material, excessive screen time and contact with unknown adults online. The measure is expected to apply to major social media platforms, while gaming and livestreaming services could face restrictions on features that allow children to interact with strangers.

The move follows a national consultation on children’s online safety, which examined possible age restrictions on social media and other online services, as well as limits on addictive design features and risky functionalities.

Further details are expected on implementation and enforcement, including how platforms would be required to verify users’ ages. The government has previously said that restrictions on children’s access to social media should be considered alongside broader protections for gaming platforms, AI chatbots and other online services used by young people.

The proposal would place the UK among a growing number of countries moving towards age-based restrictions on children’s access to social media. Australia has already adopted an under-16 social media ban, while other governments are considering similar approaches.

Supporters argue that age restrictions could reduce online harms and give parents clearer backing in setting boundaries for children’s technology use. Critics warn that enforcement may raise privacy concerns, increase reliance on age-verification systems and push children towards less regulated online spaces.

Why does it matter?

The proposal would move the UK closer to an age-based model of online safety regulation, where platforms may be expected to prevent under-16s from accessing certain services rather than only reduce harmful content after children join. That raises major governance questions around age assurance, privacy, platform design, parental responsibility and enforcement. The measure could also increase pressure on social media, gaming, livestreaming and AI chatbot services to redesign features that expose children to unknown adults, addictive interaction patterns or harmful content.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Singapore warns of Microsoft impersonation scams causing major losses

The Singapore Police Force (SPF) and the Cyber Security Agency of Singapore (CSA) have warned the public about technical support scams that impersonate Microsoft. Authorities said at least 10 cases had been reported since February 2026, with total losses exceeding S$1.7 million.

In this scam variant, victims typically encounter a pop-up alert in their web browser. The alert falsely appears to originate from Microsoft and claims that the user’s device has been hacked or compromised.

Victims are then instructed to contact a so-called technical support officer through an internet-based phone number. After making contact, victims may be transferred to another scammer posing as a police officer, who claims that their device has been used for criminal activities such as money laundering.

Authorities in Singapore said victims may be instructed to make bank transfers, provide banking credentials, or grant remote access to their devices. In some cases, scammers asked victims to download remote access applications or click links that allowed them to take control of bank accounts.

SPF and CSA advised members of the public to verify alerts through official software provider channels. They noted that Microsoft does not include phone numbers in error or warning messages, and that users should not call numbers displayed in suspicious pop-ups or click links or buttons within such alerts.

People who believe they have fallen victim to the scam are advised to disconnect their computer from the internet, contact their bank, remove applications installed under the scammer’s instructions, and run an anti-virus scan. They should also change passwords and banking credentials using a trusted device, remove unauthorised payees, and report the incident to the police and CSA’s SingCERT.

Why does it matter?

Technical support scams remain one of the most effective forms of cyber-enabled fraud because they combine social engineering, impersonation and remote access techniques. By exploiting trust in well-known brands such as Microsoft and creating a sense of urgency, scammers can persuade victims to hand over sensitive information or direct access to their devices.

The cases also highlight how cybersecurity and financial security are increasingly interconnected. Basic cyber hygiene practices, such as verifying security alerts through official channels, avoiding unsolicited remote access requests and reporting incidents quickly, can help prevent account compromise and reduce financial losses.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Starlink enters European ultra-low-cost flights through Wizz Air

Wizz Air has announced plans to roll out Starlink connectivity across its fleet from 2027, bringing low-Earth-orbit satellite internet to the European ultra-low-cost airline market.

The airline said it would become the first European ultra-low-cost carrier to offer Starlink’s in-flight internet technology to passengers. The service is expected to provide high-speed, low-latency connectivity during flights.

The move is significant because high-quality in-flight internet has often been treated as a premium service or a paid add-on, rather than a standard feature for low-cost travel. Wizz Air said passengers should not have to choose between affordable fares and reliable onboard connectivity.

The rollout would place Wizz Air among a growing group of airlines using Starlink to upgrade in-flight internet. Several full-service and hybrid carriers have already announced or begun Starlink deployments, but low-cost airlines have been more cautious because of installation, operating, weight and fuel-cost concerns.

Wizz Air’s decision suggests that satellite-based connectivity is moving beyond premium cabins and long-haul carriers into mass-market aviation. If implemented across the fleet, the service could change passenger expectations for affordable short- and medium-haul travel.

Ian Malin, Wizz Air’s Chief Commercial Officer, said ultra-low-cost travel has been about making opportunities accessible to more people and that the airline now wants to extend that approach to connectivity.

Starlink, operated by SpaceX, uses low-Earth orbit satellites to provide broadband connectivity with lower latency than traditional satellite internet systems. Its growing use in aviation reflects the wider expansion of satellite internet into transport, consumer connectivity and digital infrastructure markets.

Why does it matter?

The story matters because Starlink is helping shift in-flight connectivity from a premium airline feature towards a broader digital access expectation. If ultra-low-cost carriers can offer reliable satellite internet without undermining their fare model, connected air travel could become more common across short- and medium-haul routes. The move also shows how low-Earth-orbit satellite networks are expanding into mainstream transport infrastructure, not just for rural broadband or emergency connectivity.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU court annuls Meta Marketplace designation

The General Court of the European Union has annulled the European Commission’s decision designating Meta as a gatekeeper for Marketplace under the Digital Markets Act, while upholding the company’s designation for Messenger.

The case concerned the Commission’s 5 September 2023 decision designating Meta as a gatekeeper for several core platform services, including Facebook, Messenger, and Marketplace. Meta challenged the decision in part, contesting the classification of Messenger and Marketplace as important gateways under the DMA.

The General Court upheld the Commission’s assessment of Messenger, finding that the service is a number-independent interpersonal communications service distinct from Facebook. The court said Messenger is available through standalone applications, can be used independently of Facebook, and includes tools that allow businesses to engage with users.

The court also found that the Commission did not have to count only Messenger users who were not also Facebook users when assessing whether the quantitative threshold under the DMA was met. It also said the Commission was not required to open a market investigation in the absence of sufficiently substantiated arguments from Meta calling the DMA presumptions into question.

For Marketplace, the court found that the Commission erred in law by relying only on data from the three years preceding designation without taking account of changes made at the end of July 2023. Those changes limited the number of listings that could be published per user and led to the disappearance of the criterion used by the Commission to identify business users.

The court also found that the Commission had not provided sufficient reasoning for classifying Marketplace as an online intermediation service. It said the Commission failed to provide a concrete analysis of the July 2023 changes or to explain their effect on whether Marketplace-enabled business users could offer goods and services to consumers.

As a result, the decision was annulled only to the extent that it designated Meta as a gatekeeper for Marketplace. Meta’s Messenger designation remains in place.

Why does it matter?

The judgement is an important test of how the EU courts will review Digital Markets Act gatekeeper designations. It confirms that the Commission can rely on DMA presumptions where companies do not provide sufficiently substantiated counterarguments, as seen with Messenger. But it also shows that the Commission must properly assess relevant changes and provide sufficient reasoning when classifying a service as a core platform service, as the Marketplace annulment demonstrates.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Singapore and Japan launch mutual recognition of IoT cybersecurity labels

Singapore and Japan have launched mutual recognition of their cybersecurity labelling schemes for Internet of Things (IoT) under a Memorandum of Cooperation that entered into force on 1 June 2026. The arrangement covers Singapore’s Cybersecurity Labelling Scheme and Japan’s JC-STAR scheme.

The Memorandum of Cooperation was signed by Rahayu Mahzam, Singapore’s Minister of State for Digital Development and Information, and Ino Toshiro, Japan’s State Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry. The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore (CSA) and Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry agreed to recognise cybersecurity labels issued under either scheme.

IoT devices certified under either Japan’s JC-STAR scheme or Singapore’s Cybersecurity Labelling Scheme will be eligible for streamlined recognition in the other market. Covered products include smart home assistants, home automation and alarm systems, and IoT gateways and hubs that connect multiple devices.

Japan is the fifth country to establish such an arrangement with Singapore, following Finland, Germany, South Korea, and the United Kingdom. According to Singapore authorities, the arrangement is expected to support stronger cybersecurity practices for connected devices, reduce certification burdens for manufacturers, and increase consumer confidence in smart technologies.

The CSA launched the Cybersecurity Labelling Scheme in 2020. Since then, it has received applications for more than 1,000 products, including routers, smart lighting, and smart cameras.

Why does it matter?

Connected devices are increasingly used in homes, businesses, and critical services, making cybersecurity a growing concern for governments and consumers. Cybersecurity labelling schemes are designed to help buyers identify products that meet recognised security requirements while encouraging manufacturers to improve security practices.

By recognising each other’s certification schemes, Singapore and Japan are reducing regulatory barriers and promoting greater interoperability in cybersecurity standards. The agreement also reflects broader international efforts to strengthen trust and security in the rapidly expanding IoT ecosystem.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

European Commission’s proposal strengthens mobile satellite services rules

The European Commission has proposed a new EU-level authorisation system for mobile satellite services using the harmonised 2 GHz frequency band, following the expiry of current licences in 2027.

The proposal would establish a selection procedure for mobile satellite service providers authorised to use the 2 GHz band across all EU member states. According to the Commission, EU-level authorisation would support regulatory consistency and allow operators to develop and provide services across borders.

The 2 GHz mobile satellite services band is suited to direct-to-device services, including satellite and terrestrial connectivity directly to mobile devices. It can support high-speed internet and critical communications in areas without terrestrial coverage.

Under the proposal, one-third of the band would be reserved for governmental use, including critical communications, security, and military purposes. The services would be provided by an EU operator, which would be required to integrate with IRIS², the EU’s Secure Connectivity programme, and its current and future capabilities.

The remaining two-thirds would be allocated to commercial uses, including direct-to-device services, mobile coverage where terrestrial networks are unavailable, and internet of things applications such as fitness trackers, energy monitoring, and emergency response devices.

The commercial portion would be split equally between use by the EU operators entering the market and use by the EU and non-EU operators. The structure is intended to diversify suppliers and support the entry of the EU providers.

The proposed regulation would replace the 2008 decision that selected the current operators. The Commission said the proposal is consistent with the Digital Networks Act approach, under which satellite spectrum would be authorised at the EU level on a single set of conditions.

Why does it matter?

The proposal links satellite spectrum policy to Europe’s wider goals around connectivity, resilience, security, defence, and technological sovereignty. By moving towards EU-level authorisation for the 2 GHz band, the Commission is trying to reduce regulatory fragmentation while supporting direct-to-device services, critical communications, and future integration with IRIS².

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!