Intellectual property rights

US seizes more than 1,000 illegal World Cup streaming domains

The US Department of Justice has seized more than 1,000 domains used to illegally stream FIFA World Cup matches, following three enforcement operations carried out during the 2026 tournament.

The domains provided unauthorised real-time broadcasts of World Cup matches protected under US copyright law. Homeland Security Investigations said agents confirmed the sites were actively streaming matches without authorisation before obtaining seizure warrants.

The operation formed part of Operation Offsides, coordinated by the National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center. FIFA helped identify the domains, while broadcasters, sports organisations and anti-piracy groups provided additional intelligence.

Officials also warned that pirate streaming services frequently expose users to malware, payment fraud and other cybersecurity risks, while generating revenue for wider criminal networks and harming legitimate broadcasters and rights holders.

Enforcement also expanded across Latin America through Operation Red Card, with authorities blocking hundreds of piracy websites, including 309 in Brazil, 256 in the Dominican Republic and 1,140 in Colombia.

Colombian investigators also carried out search-and-seizure operations targeting counterfeit sports merchandise and arrested members of a cybercrime group accused of selling pirated streams using stolen credentials, VPNs and intercepted security codes.

The wider operation involved prosecutors, police and cybercrime specialists across Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru and the Dominican Republic, alongside cooperation with Europol.

The Justice Department said Operation Offsides will continue targeting domains used for illegal sports streaming, while international partners pursue related piracy, cybercrime and counterfeiting networks.

Why does it matter?

The operation illustrates how online piracy has evolved beyond copyright infringement into a broader cybersecurity and organised crime issue. Pirate streaming platforms often expose users to malware, credential theft and payment fraud while generating revenue for criminal networks.

The coordinated enforcement effort also demonstrates the increasingly international nature of digital copyright enforcement. As major sporting events become global targets for online piracy, cooperation between governments, law enforcement agencies, rights holders and technology companies is becoming essential to disrupting cross-border criminal operations.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Australia holds firm on AI copyright rules

Australia will retain its existing AI copyright rules, rejecting calls for a text and data mining exemption as the government seeks to attract AI investment without weakening protections for creators.

Industry and Innovation Minister Tim Ayres said existing copyright protections would remain in place while the government works towards a framework that provides greater certainty for both technology companies and rights holders. He said attracting AI investment should not come at the expense of creators’ rights.

The comments follow calls from AI companies for clearer access to copyrighted material for model training. Ayres acknowledged that technology firms and rights holders favour different approaches, while Attorney-General Michelle Rowland continues consultations aimed at reaching a compromise. Although no timetable has been announced, Ayres said the government wants to resolve the issue quickly without overriding creators’ control over their work.

Australia’s wider AI agenda also includes legislation establishing standards for large data centres, including requirements relating to electricity supply, grid stability and water security. Ayres said implementation would be coordinated by the Office of Artificial Intelligence, while the AI Safety Institute continues collaborating with international partners, security agencies and frontier AI developers.

Ayres described the reforms as a national economic and security priority, arguing that Australia should help shape AI rather than depend solely on technologies developed elsewhere. The government is also working with businesses and trade unions on workforce adaptation as AI transforms employment.

By maintaining its AI copyright rules while developing infrastructure and safety standards, Australia is seeking to balance investment, technological sovereignty, creators’ rights and public trust.

Why does it matter?

Australia’s approach illustrates the growing challenge governments face in balancing AI innovation with intellectual property protections. By rejecting a broad copyright exemption while continuing consultations, Canberra is signalling that attracting AI investment should not automatically come at the expense of creators’ rights.

The announcement also shows that AI governance is extending beyond model regulation to encompass copyright, infrastructure, energy security and workforce policy. Rather than treating these as separate issues, Australia is developing a broader national strategy that links AI competitiveness with economic resilience, public trust and technological sovereignty.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

South Korea strengthens investigations into AI and semiconductor technology leaks

South Korea has restructured its specialised intellectual property investigation system to strengthen efforts against leaks of advanced technologies, including semiconductors and AI, amid growing concerns over economic security.

The reforms establish new investigative and analytical divisions while expanding the technology police force from 27 to 61 officers.

A new Technology Divulgence Police Division will investigate trade secret theft and the leakage of advanced technologies. Its 21 investigators will include specialists in electrical, chemical and mechanical engineering alongside patent examiners, attorneys and other technical experts.

The government also plans to expand investigative authority to cover violations involving National Core Technologies and National High-Tech Strategic Technologies.

A separate Intellectual Property Protection Analysis Division will use patent data and other intelligence to identify technologies, companies and institutions at high risk of technology leakage.

It will also cooperate with businesses, research organisations and law enforcement agencies to detect warning signs, support intelligence-led investigations and strengthen security awareness, particularly among smaller companies.

The restructuring creates an Intellectual Property Protection Standards Division responsible for investigative procedures, oversight and human rights safeguards.

Planned reforms in South Korea include clearer rules for compulsory investigations, external review through a Criminal Investigation Review Committee, stronger access to legal counsel, wider use of video recording and regular updates for parties involved in investigations.

Why does it matter?

As geopolitical competition increasingly centres on semiconductors, AI and other strategic technologies, governments are treating intellectual property protection as a matter of economic and national security. South Korea’s reforms aim to strengthen its ability to detect, investigate and prevent technology leakage before commercially valuable innovations are transferred abroad.

The restructuring also reflects a broader trend towards combining specialised technical expertise with intelligence-led enforcement and stronger procedural safeguards. This approach seeks to improve both the effectiveness and accountability of investigations involving advanced technologies.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Japan reviews legal protection for AI voice imitation

Japan’s Justice Ministry has prepared a draft report on civil liability for the unauthorised use of people’s voices and images through generative AI.

The draft focuses on the protection of famous individuals, including celebrities, singers and voice actors, as AI tools make it easier to imitate real voices and appearances.

It was submitted to an expert committee on 13 July, with a final report expected as early as August.

The ministry said the report could serve as a reference in lawsuits and AI development, as Japanese courts have not yet issued clear rulings on rights related specifically to voice imitation.

One scenario examined in the draft involves AI-generated audio that could mislead the public into believing a voice actor had read obscene material online for profit.

The draft says such use could be illegal if it harms a person’s dignity, honour or peace of mind beyond a tolerable limit.

It also outlines criteria for assessing whether an AI-generated voice is similar to that of a famous person and whether it may infringe publicity rights.

At the same time, the draft suggests that parody, impersonation and artistic mimicry would generally not infringe publicity rights when they are presented as expressive acts based on resemblance.

The review comes amid growing concern in Japan over AI covers and the unauthorised use of singers’ and voice actors’ voices in synthetic performances.

Why does it matter?

Japan’s draft report shows how generative AI is forcing legal systems to revisit personality, publicity and dignity protections. Voice imitation is especially sensitive because it can affect reputation, commercial value and personal autonomy even when no copyrighted recording is copied. The Japanese approach could influence how courts and AI developers assess consent, similarity, commercial use and harm in cases involving synthetic voices, AI covers and celebrity likenesses.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

Music industry introduces labels for AI-generated songs

Major music industry organisations have announced a voluntary labelling system to help listeners understand when AI has been used in songs.

Groups including the RIAA, IFPI, the Recording Academy, SAG-AFTRA, IMPALA, WIN, A2IM and the Human Artistry Campaign back the initiative.

The labels will distinguish between ‘AI-generated’ and ‘AI-assisted’ music.

An ‘AI-generated’ label will apply when most or nearly all of the creative elements in a recording are artificial, such as an AI-generated lead vocal, instrumental performance or a song created from a prompt.

An ‘AI-assisted’ label will apply when humans mainly create a track but use AI for some expressive elements.

Industry leaders said the aim is to give fans clearer information about how music is made, while protecting human creativity, authorship and artistic intent.

The move comes as streaming platforms face rising volumes of AI-made content and low-quality uploads.

Deezer said in April that AI-generated tracks accounted for 44% of all new music uploaded to its platform each day.

Spotify also removed around 75 million spam tracks in 2025, as platforms increase efforts to identify low-quality, fraudulent or unauthorised content.

Why does it matter?

The labelling initiative shows how the music industry is trying to build transparency around AI use without waiting for formal regulation. Clear labels could help listeners distinguish fully synthetic music from human-led work that uses AI as a tool. They may also support copyright, attribution and platform-governance efforts as streaming services face growing volumes of AI-generated tracks, recycled content and spam uploads.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

X expands creator tools to reduce AI slop and recycled content

X has introduced new video editing and recording tools to encourage users to create original content directly on the platform.

The update includes multilingual caption overlays, customisable subtitles, trimming tools, and green-screen features that let creators to combine videos with photos from their devices or existing X posts.

X head of product Nikita Bier said the company wants to make it easier for users to create videos natively rather than relying on content first published elsewhere.

The update comes as X faces growing pressure over recycled posts, stolen videos and low-quality content that can be amplified through engagement and monetisation systems.

Bier said many high-performing accounts continue to repost videos that went viral years earlier, reducing incentives for original creators to publish directly on X.

Video now accounts for almost half of all impressions on the platform, making content quality and attribution increasingly important for X’s creator strategy.

The company has also taken steps to reduce rewards for accounts that reupload material from smaller creators to game its revenue-sharing programme.

The new tools are therefore part of a wider push to make original video creation easier while discouraging recycled and unattributed content.

Why does it matter?

X’s update shows how platform design and creator incentives are becoming part of the response to low-quality, recycled and synthetic content. Native editing tools can help users produce original material, but the harder governance problem is attribution and monetisation. As AI makes it cheaper to generate or repackage text, images and video at scale, platforms will need stronger systems to distinguish original human creativity, authorised reuse and automated content farming.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EPO reports record patent demand as AI and digital services boost innovation

The European Patent Office (EPO) has published its Annual Review 2025, revealing that European patent applications exceeded 200,000 for the first time in the organisation’s history.

The milestone reflects growing confidence in the European patent system, supported by continued investment in digital transformation, AI and more efficient patent examination processes under the Strategic Plan 2028.

The Office processed a record 418,868 patent dossiers during 2025, increasing productivity by 4% while maintaining high quality standards and improving the speed of patent searches, grants and opposition proceedings.

User satisfaction also remained high following the EPO’s largest-ever satisfaction survey, involving more than 8,000 participants. Innovation activity continued to grow across strategic sectors including digital technologies, healthcare, advanced materials and battery technologies.

AI played an increasingly important role throughout the patent granting process. The EPO expanded AI-powered tools for patent examiners, including a large language model-based enhancement to its PreSearch system, designed to improve prior art discovery while ensuring examiners retain full control over decision-making.

Additional AI-supported capabilities now assist with document analysis, advanced searches, file allocation and oral proceedings. At the same time, MyEPO continued evolving as the organisation’s central digital platform, while Online Filing 2.0 became the standard filing tool ahead of broader DOCX filing deployment.

The report also highlights the growing success of the Unitary Patent system, with SMEs, universities and public research organisations accounting for nearly half of all Unitary Patents granted to European innovators.

Alongside new innovation intelligence tools such as the Patent Standards Explorer, Digital Library and expanded Deep Tech Finder, the EPO says it is strengthening Europe’s innovation ecosystem through greater transparency, digital services and data-driven patent intelligence.

Why does it matter?

The Annual Review demonstrates how AI is becoming embedded within one of Europe’s most important innovation institutions. Rather than replacing patent examiners, AI is being deployed to improve search quality, accelerate administrative processes and strengthen decision-making while maintaining human oversight.

It also illustrates Europe’s broader strategy of combining AI adoption with digital public services, intellectual property protection and innovation policy.

Record patent demand, expanding use of the Unitary Patent and new digital tools suggest the EPO is positioning itself as a key pillar of Europe’s competitiveness in emerging technologies, particularly as global competition intensifies in AI, semiconductors, advanced manufacturing and deep tech.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Australian audit highlights governance gaps in public-sector AI

The Australian National Audit Office has found that IP Australia’s use of AI in the patent rights process is largely effective, while calling for stronger cybersecurity governance, monitoring and strategic oversight.

Auditor-General Report No. 43 of 2025–26 examined whether IP Australia has effective arrangements to support AI adoption in the patent rights process. IP Australia administers intellectual property rights, including patents, trade marks, design rights and plant breeders’ rights.

The agency deployed its first AI tool for patent examination in 2018 and now uses four AI tools in the process. The tools are designed to provide examiners with information to support better decisions, rather than to decide patent applications themselves.

The ANAO said IP Australia has been an early adopter of AI and has progressively improved its governance arrangements. The agency has introduced an AI governance policy, risk-scaled assessment mechanisms and clearer enterprise accountability roles.

However, the audit found that strategic oversight of AI implementation and related benefits is not yet fully established. It said IP Australia’s AI inventory, committee roles and use-case ownership remain works in progress.

Monitoring and reporting were assessed as only partly effective. The ANAO said benefits have been inconsistently defined and measured, making it harder to demonstrate the ongoing effectiveness of AI tools and manage emerging risks.

The ANAO made two recommendations, urging IP Australia to review cybersecurity governance controls for AI and establish clearer risk-based monitoring and reporting arrangements. IP Australia agreed to both recommendations.

The audit said public-sector agencies should regularly reassess AI governance frameworks as they move from experimentation to wider use.

Why does it matter?

The audit shows how AI is moving from experimentation into routine public-sector decision support. IP Australia’s experience points to the benefits of AI in improving efficiency and quality, but also shows that governance must evolve as tools become embedded in official processes. Cybersecurity, accountability, monitoring and measurable benefits are becoming central to responsible AI use in government.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Cate Blanchett unveils AI consent tool at European Parliament

Actor and producer Cate Blanchett has launched the Human Consent Registry, a free online tool that allows individuals to specify how AI systems may use their identity. Presented at the European Parliament, the registry enables users to permit or prohibit the use of their name, image, voice, likeness and movements by AI systems, either unconditionally or subject to specific terms.

The platform is available to individuals as well as representatives, such as agents and managers. Its developers say it will eventually expand to cover works of art, fictional characters and brands. It was developed by RSL Media, a nonprofit co-founded by Blanchett that focuses on building consent tools related to AI use, which launched in May to wide support from figures across the entertainment industry.

Blanchett has been a prominent advocate for stronger safeguards against unauthorised AI use. In March 2025, she joined more than 400 artists in signing an open letter urging the US administration to maintain copyright protections and reject proposals that would allow AI developers to train models on copyrighted works without permission or compensation.

The launch comes amid growing concern among artists over the unauthorised use of creative works and personal likenesses for AI training. Singer SZA recently said more than 200 of her songs had been used to train AI systems, while actor Matthew McConaughey has trademarked his image, voice and a well-known catchphrase.

The Human Consent Registry positions itself as a scalable and accessible alternative to such individual legal measures, offering a standardised mechanism that does not require significant resources to deploy. The tool is free to use and designed to be available to anyone, not only those with the means to pursue trademark or copyright protections independently.

The registry was launched during an event at the European Parliament hosted by Bulgarian MEP Eva Maydell of the European People’s Party. Director Steven Soderbergh also attended the event in Brussels.

Why does it matter?

The Human Consent Registry highlights a growing gap between existing intellectual property laws and the capabilities of generative AI. While copyright and trademark protections offer some legal remedies, they often do not provide individuals with a simple way to express or enforce consent over the use of their identity, voice or likeness by AI systems.

The initiative also reflects a broader shift towards consent-based AI governance. By launching the registry at the European Parliament, its creators are seeking to influence ongoing debates on AI regulation, copyright and personality rights, while promoting practical mechanisms that could complement future legal frameworks for the responsible use of AI-generated content.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot! 

Ireland expands Trusted Flagger network under the DSA

Ireland’s media regulator, Coimisiún na Meán, has granted Trusted Flagger status to three additional organisations under the EU Digital Services Act.

The Irish Internet Hotline, the Irish Music Rights Organisation and the Jewish Representative Council of Ireland will join the Central Bank of Ireland, which received Trusted Flagger status in 2025.

Each organisation will submit notices to online platforms within its area of expertise. The Irish Internet Hotline will report child sexual abuse material, non-consensual intimate image sharing, racism, xenophobia, financial scams and fraud. The Irish Music Rights Organisation will focus on copyright infringement, particularly music and lyrical copyright, while the Jewish Representative Council of Ireland will report illegal antisemitic material.

Under the Digital Services Act, Trusted Flaggers are recognised bodies that can notify platforms of illegal content. Platforms must give those notices priority and decide on them without undue delay, although the designation does not guarantee content removal.

Coimisiún na Meán said reports from Trusted Flaggers will also help identify online safety trends and support evidence-based supervision of online platforms.

To qualify, organisations must demonstrate expertise in detecting, identifying and notifying illegal content, operate independently from online platforms and carry out reporting activities diligently, accurately and objectively.

The three new accreditations will remain valid for 3 years and can be reviewed, revoked, or reassessed upon expiration of the accreditation period.

Why does it matter?

Trusted Flaggers are one of the practical enforcement mechanisms of the Digital Services Act. Ireland’s expansion of the network creates specialised reporting channels for different categories of illegal online content, including child sexual abuse material, non-consensual intimate images, scams, copyright infringement and antisemitic material. The model aims to improve the quality and speed of platform responses while keeping final moderation decisions with platforms under DSA procedures.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Diplo chatbot can make mistakes. Consider checking important information.