Future of work Archives | Digital Watch Observatory

Canada launches AI for All national strategy to accelerate adoption and digital sovereignty

Canada has launched AI for All, a new national AI strategy aimed at accelerating AI adoption, strengthening digital sovereignty, and positioning the country as a leading AI economy.

Announced by Prime Minister Mark Carney, the strategy combines proposed legislation, investments, and programmes intended to ensure AI is adopted responsibly and benefits businesses, workers, students, and communities across Canada.

The strategy targets an additional C$200 billion in economic growth, 250,000 new AI-related jobs over the next five years, and an increase in AI adoption from just over 12% today to 60% by 2034. The government also plans to provide up to 90,000 AI-related jobs and work placement opportunities for young Canadians.

The strategy is built around three principles: building trust, creating opportunities, and reinforcing Canadian sovereignty. To build trust, the government plans to modernise digital legislation, strengthen protections for personal information, address harms such as deepfakes and surveillance pricing, introduce an online safety regime, and expand the capabilities of the Canadian AI Safety Institute.

To create opportunities, the government will establish a National AI Literacy Initiative, provide access to trusted AI agents for post-secondary students, help small and medium-sized businesses adopt AI, support worker training, and launch an AI Missions Program with a flagship health mission focused on diagnostics, patient care, and system efficiency.

To reinforce sovereignty, Canada plans to build domestic AI foundations, including compute, cloud, connectivity, data, and talent. Measures include a world-leading public AI supercomputer, investments in sovereign compute and cloud infrastructure, better access to growth capital for Canadian AI companies, strategic public procurement, and expanded support for AI talent.

The government said the strategy is intended to ensure more AI value is created in Canada while strengthening privacy, data protection, public services, productivity, and economic security.

Why does it matter?

Canada’s AI for All strategy links AI adoption directly to economic growth, workforce development, public trust, and technological sovereignty. The strategy reflects a wider shift among governments: AI policy is no longer focused only on research excellence, but also on compute infrastructure, cloud sovereignty, data governance, safety institutions, business adoption, public procurement, and skills. Its success will depend on whether Canada can turn ambitious targets into measurable adoption across businesses, public services, and workers.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

ILO calls for stronger EU action on mental health, AI and climate risks at work

The International Labour Organization has called for occupational disease prevention, mental health risks, AI, and climate change to become central elements of the European Union’s future workplace health and safety agenda.

The intervention was delivered during a European Parliament hearing on the EU strategic framework on occupational safety and health after 2027.

The ILO stressed that while Europe has reduced fatal workplace accidents, occupational diseases now account for more than 98% of work-related deaths in the EU. Cancer, respiratory diseases, and circulatory diseases remain the leading causes, underscoring the need for stronger prevention, better labour inspection, and improved recognition of work-related illness.

The organisation also highlighted emerging risks linked to digitalisation and environmental change. AI-driven systems are reshaping working conditions through algorithmic management, surveillance, and automated decision-making, while psychosocial pressures and mental health risks are becoming a growing concern for workers.

Climate change was also identified as a major occupational safety and health challenge, with rising temperatures and extreme weather events increasing risks across European workplaces.

The ILO urged the EU policymakers to integrate these evolving risks into a renewed strategic framework, alongside stronger international cooperation and prevention-based approaches. It said Europe can help shape global workplace safety standards through coordinated regulation, effective prevention, and sustainable working conditions.

Why does it matter?

The ILO’s intervention shows how workplace safety policy is expanding beyond traditional accident prevention. AI systems, algorithmic management, psychosocial risks, occupational disease, and climate-related hazards are becoming part of the same strategic debate. For the EU, the post-2027 framework will be a test of whether workplace regulation can adapt to technology-driven work organisation, demographic pressures, and climate volatility.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

Australia issues guidance for government use of agentic AI

Australia’s Digital Transformation Agency (DTA) has issued an agentic AI addendum to its AI Technical Standard, providing guidance for government agencies exploring, developing or deploying agentic AI systems. The document provides best-practice guidance for agencies exploring, developing, or using agentic AI and states that existing requirements in the AI technical standard remain applicable.

The addendum says agentic AI systems may autonomously plan tasks, coordinate work, and trigger actions in real-world contexts. The addendum notes that agentic AI could improve the responsiveness, efficiency and consistency of public services, particularly in high-volume administrative environments, while also introducing new risks related to oversight, control and system behaviour.

The guidance defines agentic AI as systems capable of perceiving and interpreting their environment, maintaining an internal state, reasoning about objectives and autonomously executing actions within defined permissions and constraints. Agencies are advised to implement human oversight, operational safeguards, continuous evaluation processes and mechanisms that allow systems to be rolled back when necessary.

The addendum sets out guidance across the AI lifecycle, including governance and safeguards, memory management, workflow design, secure data exchange, technology selection, evaluation, tool integration, monitoring, and decommissioning. It also calls for clear human accountability, human-in-the-loop or human-on-the-loop oversight, auditable decision records, and orchestration layers.

The guidance recommends ongoing monitoring of agent behaviour, tool usage, memory functions, operational costs, latency, authorisations and changes in the operating environment. The addendum also recommends centralised oversight mechanisms, referred to as ‘control towers’, and calls for the secure decommissioning of agentic AI resources, including agents, associated data, memory stores, tools and system logs.

Why does it matter?

Agentic AI represents a shift from AI systems that generate outputs in response to prompts to systems capable of planning, coordinating tasks and taking actions with limited human intervention. While these capabilities could improve efficiency and service delivery, they also create new governance, accountability and security challenges.

Australia’s guidance reflects growing international efforts to establish safeguards for increasingly autonomous AI systems. The emphasis on human oversight, auditability and lifecycle governance highlights concerns that public-sector AI deployments must remain transparent, controllable and accountable as the technology evolves.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

OpenAI advocates for global action on youth AI safety

OpenAI has called for stronger international action on youth AI safety, including the creation of a dedicated institute to support common evidence, guidance, and safeguards for young users.

Ahead of the G7 Leaders’ Summit in Évian, France, the company said governments, researchers, civil society, and industry should work together to raise standards for safe and age-appropriate AI use by children and teenagers.

OpenAI said a dedicated youth AI safety institute could provide continuity beyond a single summit, helping stakeholders share evidence, develop guidance, and keep standards aligned with fast-moving AI systems. The company said such a body could take the form of a new international institute or an existing or newly created national AI institute with a global mandate.

The principles outlined by OpenAI include privacy-preserving age estimation, default safeguards when a user’s age is uncertain, annual youth safety risk assessments, accessible parental controls, clearer transparency about youth protections, and stronger protocols for serious safety situations involving self-harm, exploitation, grooming, sexually exploitative content, and other high-risk interactions.

The company also called for stronger protection of minors’ personal information, including prohibitions on privacy-invasive targeted advertising to young people and the sale of their personal information. It also said youth safety frameworks should promote AI literacy, learning, creativity, skill development, and future opportunities.

OpenAI said AI tools can help young people understand difficult concepts, practise languages, improve writing, learn to code, organise research, explore creative ideas, and prepare for changing labour markets. However, it argued that safeguards, family and educator guidance, and clear accountability mechanisms such as independent audits should support access.

The proposal builds on existing youth safety initiatives and education partnerships, including work with Common Sense Media, educators, and national education deployments in countries such as Estonia, Greece, and Singapore.

Why does it matter?

Youth AI safety is becoming a central policy issue as children and teenagers increasingly use AI tools for learning, creativity, social interaction, and everyday digital tasks. OpenAI’s proposal adds to pressure for international coordination on age-appropriate design, privacy, parental controls, safety protocols, and independent accountability. The G7 context also shows that youth AI safety is moving from product policy into broader debates over digital governance and education policy.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

ILO chief calls for human-centred AI governance at labour conference

International Labour Organization (ILO) Director-General Gilbert F. Houngbo has called for a human-centred approach to AI at the opening of the 114th International Labour Conference in Geneva. He said the future of work would depend not only on technological advances, but also on the policies, institutions and social dialogue shaping their impact on people’s lives.

Drawing on his report ‘A Moment of Choice: Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Decent Work‘, Houngbo outlined an agenda focused on rights, employment and skills, social protection, and social dialogue. He argued that productivity gains generated by AI should be shared through higher wages, stronger labour protections and more inclusive economic growth.

Houngbo warned that decisions taken today would determine whether AI expands opportunity and shared prosperity or contributes to greater inequality and insecurity. He also situated AI governance within a broader context of economic uncertainty, citing ILO estimates that a prolonged oil-price shock could reduce global working hours by the equivalent of millions of full-time jobs and lead to significant labour income losses by 2027.

Delegates will also hold a second discussion on decent work in the platform economy, with the aim of developing new international labour standards. The draft Convention and Recommendation cover employment promotion, protections for digital platform workers, and provisions relating to automated systems used by digital labour platforms.

Delegates from governments, employers, and workers will also address gender equality, social dialogue, tripartism, and the application of labour standards. The conference, which brings together representatives from the ILO’s 187 Member States, will run until 12 June.

Why does it matter?

As AI becomes increasingly integrated into workplaces, governments, employers and workers are debating how productivity gains, skills requirements and labour protections should evolve. The ILO’s focus on human-centred AI reflects growing international efforts to ensure that technological change supports decent work rather than exacerbating inequality.

The discussions are also significant because they could influence future international labour standards for platform work and the use of automated systems in employment, helping shape how AI affects workers worldwide.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

OECD examines national security limits in competition enforcement

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development has published a policy paper examining how national security considerations are increasingly influencing competition enforcement across a growing range of sectors.

The report highlights the impact of geopolitical developments, technological change, and stronger attention to economic security, resilience, and technological capability. National security issues are increasingly intersecting with competition policy in areas such as energy, telecommunications, and advanced technologies.

The paper explores how competition authorities should address these concerns while maintaining their established legal and analytical responsibilities. It argues that security concerns should be assessed by competition authorities only where they can be expressed as competition-relevant effects under established competition law tools.

Concerns that fall outside the analytical remit of competition authorities should instead be assessed by governments or specialised bodies, according to the OECD.

The paper proposes an analytical framework to distinguish between national security concerns that can be examined through competition law and those that require separate institutional assessment.

Drawing on cross-jurisdictional experience, the OECD examines how national security considerations can arise in assessments of competitive constraints, merger control, coordinated conduct, unilateral conduct, and remedy design.

The paper concludes that preserving clear institutional roles, legal predictability, analytical boundaries, and effective enforcement will become increasingly important as national security considerations continue to shape economic policymaking.

Why does it matter?

The paper reflects a growing tension in competition policy: governments increasingly view sectors such as energy, telecommunications, and advanced technologies through a national security lens, but competition authorities still need clear legal boundaries. OECD’s framework aims to prevent competition enforcement from becoming a catch-all tool for broader security or industrial policy concerns, while still allowing authorities to consider security-related issues when they have measurable competition effects.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

OECD examines local conditions for trustworthy AI transition

The OECD is advancing work on AI and the local conditions needed for a trustworthy, ethical, and sustainable transition, focusing on how countries, regions, and cities can develop AI solutions adapted to local needs.

The project, ‘Seizing the full potential of AI: the local factor’, examines how AI is affecting business functions, public governance, jobs, labour markets, and regional economies. The OECD says generative AI has lowered some barriers to adoption by enabling the use of pre-trained models, but uptake remains uneven across places, people, and firms.

The organisation links stronger AI adoption to innovation-leading regions, especially global technology hubs connected to specialised knowledge networks and global value chains. Regions with weaker innovation performance appear to use AI less and adopt it more slowly, while workforce skills act as both an enabler and a barrier to adoption.

The OECD warns that uneven diffusion could affect competitiveness and territorial cohesion, particularly because technology gaps can be difficult to close once they widen. Businesses, regional governments, and cities also face challenges in integrating AI into legacy systems, adapting labour markets, revising skills and employment policies, financing the transition, and managing risks linked to employment, the environment, land use, and natural resources.

The project focuses on place-based AI strategies, local employment and skills needs, regional development policy, and smart and inclusive cities. Its work aims to help national and subnational policymakers assess AI readiness, strengthen stakeholder engagement, and build the policy capacity needed to support broader AI diffusion.

Why does it matter?

The OECD’s work highlights a key risk in AI adoption: technological divides may become territorial divides. If leading innovation hubs move faster while weaker regions lack skills, infrastructure, financing, or institutional capacity, AI could widen gaps in competitiveness, public service quality, and labour market outcomes. Place-based AI strategies can help policymakers tailor adoption, skills, and investment policies to local conditions rather than relying on one-size-fits-all national approaches.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Anthropic opens Milan office, highlights responsible AI development

The US AI company, Anthropic, has announced the opening of a new office in Milan, expanding its European presence alongside existing locations in London, Dublin, Paris, Zurich and Munich. The company says the Italian office will support enterprises, developers and researchers adopting Claude AI while contributing to broader discussions about the societal impact of AI.

The announcement comes shortly after the publication of Pope Leo XIV’s AI-focused encyclical ‘Magnifica Humanitas’. Anthropic highlighted the participation of co-founder Chris Olah in the Vatican presentation, where he discussed the ethical challenges associated with advanced AI and called for wider involvement from governments, academia, civil society and religious institutions in shaping AI’s future.

Anthropic says its technology has already been adopted by several major Italian organisations, including Generali Group, Unipol Group, Angelini Pharma, Bracco Group, Enel Group and Pirelli.

The company also highlighted partnerships with Italian technology firms. According to Anthropic, JAKALA deployed Claude across more than 3,000 users, while Satispay and Bending Spoons have integrated Claude into software development workflows to accelerate engineering and product development.

Anthropic says the Milan office will help support the AI ecosystem of Italy while encouraging broader debate about how advanced AI technologies should be developed and deployed responsibly.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

ITU puts AI and creativity in focus at Geneva summit

The International Telecommunication Union will place AI and digital creativity in the spotlight during the AI for Good Global Summit in Geneva, where artists, musicians, filmmakers, and technologists will discuss how AI is reshaping creative industries.

The summit’s AI Creativity and Culture track will explore questions around ownership, authenticity, copyright, and the growing role of generative AI in artistic production. Sessions will examine how AI tools are affecting media, music, publishing, design, fashion, entertainment, journalism, and creative labour.

High-profile participants include John Legend, who will discuss AI and music with Universal Music Group’s Michael Nash, and will.i.am, who will focus on skills, education, and AI. The programme will also feature AI-driven art installations, robotic musical performances, and screenings during the AI for Good Film Festival.

The festival, now in its second year, has received more than 1,200 contest submissions, with selected films to be shown during the summit. The programme will also include the third edition of Canvas of the Future, ITU’s AI-powered art contest, focused on how AI is shaping the future of education and work.

Organised by ITU with partners across the UN system and co-convened with Switzerland, AI for Good is intended to demonstrate AI solutions for people, planet, and prosperity. The 2026 creative programme reflects growing international attention to how AI is changing cultural production, intellectual property, and the economics of creative work.

Why does it matter?

The programme shows how AI governance debates are expanding beyond safety, productivity, and infrastructure into culture, copyright, ownership, and creative labour. By bringing together artists, entertainment companies, technologists, and UN actors in a single forum, AI for Good is treating AI creativity as both an economic opportunity and a policy challenge.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

US Census Bureau reports higher AI adoption among larger firms

The US Census Bureau has published new findings from its Business Trends and Outlook Survey, showing that AI use among US businesses remained between 17% and 20% from December 2025 to May 2026.

The survey also found that between 20% and 23% of businesses expected to use AI within the next six months. The data were collected between 14 December 2025 and 3 May 2026 and provide a biweekly, nationally representative view of AI implementation across US businesses.

AI adoption was higher among larger firms. Around 37% of businesses with at least 250 employees reported using AI in their operations, while 32% of firms with 100 to 249 employees reported AI use during the data collection period ending 3 May 2026.

The Census Bureau said AI use increased among firms with at least 20 employees between December 2025 and May 2026, but did not change significantly among firms with fewer than 20 employees. Less than 20% of firms with four or fewer employees reported using AI.

Sector-level findings showed that AI use remained above the national average in the Information and Finance and Insurance sectors. As of 3 May 2026, AI use reached 39.7% in Information and 33.9% in Finance and Insurance, compared with a national rate of 19.8%.

Retail Trade businesses reported lower adoption rates, with around 14% currently using AI and about 17% expecting to use it within six months.

The Census Bureau also noted that its updated AI supplement now measures AI use across 15 business functions, including finance, human resources, customer service, marketing, information technology, and research and development. The supplement also examines AI-related operational changes, including training, workflow adjustments, and technology investments.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!