E-commerce and trade Archives | Page 4 of 205

US crypto usage rises to 10% in 2025, Fed reports

Crypto adoption in the United States rose to 10% of adults in 2025, up two percentage points from the previous year, according to the Federal Reserve’s latest report on the economic well-being of US households.

The figure marks a rebound from 7% in 2023 and 8% in 2024, though it remains below the 12% recorded in 2021, when the survey first asked about cryptocurrency. The Federal Reserve notes that its online survey may include respondents who are more technologically connected than the overall population.

The data shows that crypto is used far more commonly as an investment tool than as a payment method. Around 9% of adults bought or held cryptocurrency as an investment in 2025, while 2% used it to buy something or make a payment, and 1% used it to send money to friends or family.

Among adults who used cryptocurrency for financial transactions, the most common reason was that the recipient preferred cryptocurrency. Other reasons included faster transfers, privacy and lower cost.

Transactional crypto use remained more common among unbanked adults, with 6% using cryptocurrency for financial transactions compared with 2% of banked adults. The Fed also found higher transactional use among adults who used nonbank check cashing or money orders. However, it stressed that crypto use for transactions remained very low even among those groups.

Why does it matter?

The Fed’s data show that crypto use in the United States is rebounding, but it still primarily functions as an investment rather than a mainstream payment tool. Payment use remains limited, including among adults who are more likely to rely on nonbank financial services, suggesting that digital assets have not yet become a broad alternative to traditional payment systems.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

Myanmar proposes Anti-Online Fraud Bill targeting digital currency scams

Myanmar’s military-backed authorities have proposed a new Anti-Online Fraud Bill to tackle digital currency scams and online fraud networks operating in the country.

The draft legislation would introduce severe penalties for offences linked to online fraud and ‘digital currency fraud’. Reports citing the text say those convicted could face prison sentences ranging from 10 years to life imprisonment.

The bill also proposes the death penalty in the most serious cases involving online scam centres, particularly where people are unlawfully detained, violently coerced or forced into scam operations. AFP, cited by Malay Mail, reported that the proposed penalty would apply to those who detain or violently coerce victims into working in online scam centres.

The proposal reflects growing pressure on Myanmar over large scam compounds where trafficked people have reportedly been forced into online fraud schemes, including romance and cryptocurrency scams. International scrutiny has intensified as cyber-fraud networks across Southeast Asia continue to target victims globally.

Myanmar’s authorities have presented online fraud and online gambling as national security concerns. State media has previously reported crackdowns, deportations and plans for a national anti-scam centre, while also describing telecom fraud and online gambling as threats requiring stronger enforcement.

The bill comes amid wider regional action against transnational scam networks. China has pursued criminal cases linked to Myanmar-based fraud syndicates, while international organisations and law enforcement agencies have warned that online scam compounds combine cybercrime, financial fraud and human trafficking.

Why does it matter?

The proposed bill shows how governments are escalating responses to transnational online fraud networks, particularly where crypto scams overlap with human trafficking and forced labour in scam compounds. Myanmar’s approach would mark a shift towards extreme punitive measures, raising both enforcement and human rights concerns, while highlighting how digital fraud has become a cross-border security issue involving organised crime, financial losses and exploitation of vulnerable people.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

Deutsche Bank highlights shift towards digital forms of money

Deutsche Bank has highlighted a structural shift in the financial system towards digital, programmable, and always-on money. In a new white paper, the bank examines how real-time transaction infrastructure is reshaping payments and driving the adoption of new forms of digital currency.

The report identifies three core pillars of this transformation:

Stablecoins
Tokenised deposits
Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs)

Stablecoins have seen rapid growth in transaction volumes and are increasingly supported by formal regulatory frameworks in key jurisdictions, particularly for cross-border and business-to-business payments, the report describes.

Tokenised deposits are emerging as a competing model of programmable bank money, enabling 24/7 settlement within and between financial institutions. According to the report, adoption remains limited by interoperability challenges and the use of permissioned networks.

The report describes CBDCs as a public-sector approach to digital money innovation. China’s e-CNY system and the European Central Bank’s planned digital euro illustrate growing momentum, while Asian financial hubs continue to expand cross-border and institutional settlement pilots.

Why does it matter?

The shift outlined in the Deutsche Bank report signals a structural redesign of how money itself functions, moving from static, institution-bound systems to programmable, always-on digital infrastructure.

As stablecoins, tokenised deposits, and CBDCs develop in parallel, they collectively reshape how value is issued, transferred, and settled across borders, potentially reducing friction in global payments while increasing competition between public and private forms of money.

The evolution is not just about efficiency gains but about who controls monetary infrastructure, how regulatory frameworks adapt, and how financial sovereignty and interoperability are balanced in an increasingly tokenised global economy.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

Australia moves to tighten capital gains rules on crypto assets

Australia’s proposed capital gains tax reforms could affect crypto investment behaviour, according to industry participants. The ruling Labor Party has proposed changes, including a minimum 30% tax on capital gains and the removal of the 50% discount for assets held for more than 12 months.

Industry representatives said the changes may increase the tax burden for some crypto investors, particularly lower-income retail traders. Estimates suggest that smaller retail traders could see a substantial rise in liabilities under the new structure, reducing the appeal of ‘patient investing’ and long-term wealth-building strategies.

Some market participants said the policy shift could encourage more frequent trading in crypto markets. Industry participants also suggested that some investors may shift towards structured investment vehicles such as retirement funds.

The reforms still require approval from Australia’s Parliament and face political resistance. Critics said the measures could affect investment patterns and asset allocation decisions across financial markets.

Why does it matter?

The proposed tax changes remove incentives for long-term crypto holding and may shift investor behaviour towards shorter-term trading. By increasing tax burdens on gains held over time, the policy could reshape retail investment strategies and influence how capital flows within Australia’s digital asset market.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

CLARITY Act moves forward amid split over crypto market rules

The United States Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee has advanced the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act in a 15–9 vote, marking another step towards establishing a federal framework for digital asset markets.

Committee Chair Tim Scott said the bill is intended to establish clearer rules for digital assets, strengthen consumer protection, support innovation and keep digital asset activity within the United States. The committee said the legislation now moves to the Senate floor.

The vote followed months of negotiations and highlighted continuing political divisions over the scope of US crypto regulation. Supporters argue that the bill would provide long-awaited market structure rules, while critics remain concerned about consumer protection, enforcement powers, conflicts of interest and the treatment of decentralised finance.

A central issue in the revised text is how to regulate stablecoin-related activity. The bill seeks to prevent stablecoins from functioning like bank deposits by limiting passive yield on customer holdings, while still allowing certain rewards linked to user activity or platform use.

The bill also continues debate over decentralised finance, including how far regulation should extend to developers, protocols and infrastructure providers that do not directly custody user funds.

Ethics provisions were among the most contested issues during the markup process, with lawmakers divided over whether and how to restrict potential conflicts of interest involving public officials and cryptoasset activities.

Further hurdles remain before the legislation can become law. The bill will need to advance through the full Senate, be reconciled with other Senate work on digital asset regulation and secure agreement with the House of Representatives before reaching the President’s desk.

Why does it matter?

The vote moves the United States closer to a federal framework for digital asset markets, but the debate shows that key questions remain unresolved. Rules on stablecoin rewards, DeFi, developers and enforcement powers will shape how crypto firms operate in the US. However, the political split could affect how quickly Congress can deliver a stable regulatory regime.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

Supply chains move toward adaptive AI-driven networks

Supply chains are increasingly being redesigned to respond more dynamically to disruption, risk and changing market conditions, as companies explore AI-native systems that can support planning, decision-making and real-time adaptation.

Writing for the World Economic Forum, Avathon CEO Pervinder Johar argues that traditional supply-chain software is struggling to cope with a more volatile operating environment because many systems still rely on rigid rules, static configurations and manual workflows.

The article says the emerging model places greater emphasis on knowledge rather than raw data, combining context and reasoning across suppliers, logistics routes, energy markets and policy environments. AI-native systems are presented as a way to support continuous learning, improve disruption forecasting and help organisations assess alternative responses before problems escalate.

Physical AI is also described as part of the shift, embedding intelligence more directly into operational infrastructure. According to the article, this could allow logistics systems, equipment and connected assets to sense, compute and coordinate responses more quickly across supply-chain networks.

As automation expands, human roles are expected to move towards strategic oversight. Supply-chain professionals may spend less time managing dashboards and exceptions, and more time setting priorities, weighing trade-offs and guiding AI agents through intent expressed in natural language.

The broader argument is that supply-chain management is moving from reactive workflows towards more adaptive coordination, where systems can anticipate disruption, assess options and support decisions across organisations and partners.

Why does it matter?

Supply chains are facing persistent disruption from geopolitical tensions, climate risks, logistics bottlenecks and changing market conditions. If AI-enabled systems can improve forecasting, coordination and response, they could help companies build more resilient operations. However, the shift also raises governance questions around accountability, human oversight, data quality and reliance on automated decision-making across critical trade and logistics networks.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

Bhutan’s Gelephu city launches fast-track crypto licensing for global firms

Bhutan’s Gelephu Mindfulness City has launched an accelerated pathway for crypto and fintech firms already regulated in major financial hubs such as Singapore, Hong Kong and Abu Dhabi.

The system is intended to reduce duplication in compliance checks while allowing eligible companies to incorporate in Gelephu, seek local regulatory approval, and open corporate bank accounts through a coordinated process involving DK Bank, the city’s official banking partner. Standard Know Your Customer and Anti-Money Laundering checks will still apply.

Officials said foreign licences will not replace local supervision, but will instead help streamline due diligence. The framework also differs from passporting models used in regions such as the European Union, as each firm must still meet Gelephu’s own regulatory requirements.

Gelephu Mindfulness City also rejected speculation linking recent Bitcoin transfers flagged by analytics platforms to reserve sales. Officials said Bitcoin held under the country’s ‘Bitcoin Development Pledge’ remains part of strategic reserves allocated for the long-term development of the city.

Why does it matter?

The move shows how smaller jurisdictions are competing for digital asset and fintech firms by offering faster market entry while trying to preserve regulatory credibility. By recognising existing licences without replacing local supervision, Gelephu is positioning itself as a controlled gateway for firms seeking access to a new crypto and fintech jurisdiction.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

Stablecoin rules updated in revised US Senate proposal

The US Senate Banking Committee has released a revised 309-page draft of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act ahead of a markup vote, reopening debate on stablecoin rewards, DeFi protections and the regulation of digital asset markets.

The draft, proposed by Committee Chair Tim Scott, seeks to provide a federal framework for digital asset market structure, including provisions on securities innovation, illicit finance, decentralised finance, banking innovation, regulatory sandboxes, software developers and customer protection.

A key section addresses stablecoin rewards. The draft would prohibit digital asset service providers from paying interest or yield on payment stablecoin balances in a way that is economically or functionally equivalent to bank deposit interest. However, it would permit certain activity-based or transaction-based rewards and incentives, provided they are not equivalent to interest or yield on a bank deposit.

The text also includes provisions affecting decentralised finance. It covers rules on non-decentralised finance trading protocols, illicit finance obligations for distributed ledger messaging systems, temporary holds for certain digital asset transactions, voluntary cybersecurity programmes for DeFi trading protocols and studies on digital asset mixers, foreign intermediaries and financial stability risks.

Software developer protections are also included in the draft. The bill contains a dedicated title on protecting software developers and software innovation, including provisions on non-fungible tokens, self-custody and blockchain regulatory certainty.

The draft still faces further negotiation before any final vote. Lawmakers continue to debate the balance between consumer protection, illicit finance controls, innovation, stablecoin incentives and the treatment of decentralised finance. At the same time, the legislation needs to be aligned with other Senate work on digital asset market structure.

Why does it matter?

The revised Clarity Act is another step towards a federal framework for digital asset markets in the United States, with rules that could shape how crypto firms, stablecoin platforms and decentralised finance projects operate. Its provisions on stablecoin rewards, DeFi and software developers show lawmakers trying to balance innovation, consumer protection and oversight in one of the world’s most important financial markets.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

Dubai opens government payments to crypto users

Dubai residents will be able to pay government fees using virtual assets after Crypto.com’s UAE entity, Foris DAX Middle East FZE, received a Stored Value Facilities licence from the Central Bank of the UAE.

Crypto.com said the approval makes it the first Virtual Asset Service Provider in the UAE to receive the licence. It allows the company to activate its partnership with the Dubai Department of Finance, enabling virtual asset payments for government services.

Financial settlements will be conducted in UAE dirhams or Central Bank-approved dirham-backed stablecoins through the regulated Stored Value Facilities framework. Crypto.com said the arrangement supports the Dubai Cashless Strategy.

Users wishing to access the service will need to be onboarded through Crypto.com’s VARA-licensed platform. The company also said that, subject to further Central Bank approvals, the licence could support crypto payment integrations with Emirates and Dubai Duty Free.

Crypto.com executives described the approval as a step towards regulated digital asset adoption in the UAE, while linking it to the country’s wider push for compliant crypto infrastructure and digital payments innovation.

Why does it matter?

The development shows how Dubai is moving virtual asset payments closer to public-sector infrastructure, rather than treating them only as investment products or private-sector payment experiments. By routing payments through a regulated Stored Value Facilities framework and settling them in dirhams or approved dirham-backed stablecoins, the model links crypto access with conventional payment oversight, financial regulation and the emirate’s cashless economy strategy.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

European Central Bank moves forward with digital euro technical work

The European Central Bank is advancing technical work on the digital euro, a proposed electronic form of central bank money designed to complement cash in an increasingly digital payments landscape.

The project reflects Europe’s response to the rapid shift towards digital payments, where cards, apps and mobile wallets are increasingly used for everyday transactions. The ECB says a digital euro would provide a European payment option that could be used across the euro area, both online and offline.

Users would be able to store digital euro holdings in an account set up with a bank or public intermediary and use them for in-store, online and person-to-person payments. The ECB says the system would aim to combine the convenience of digital payments with features associated with cash, including offline functionality.

Policy objectives include strengthening Europe’s strategic autonomy in payments, supporting monetary sovereignty and ensuring access to public money in digital form. The ECB has also presented privacy as a central design feature, saying offline digital euro payments would offer cash-like privacy, with transaction details known only to the payer and the recipient.

The project remains conditional on the EU legislative process. The ECB aims to be technically ready for a potential first issuance of the digital euro in 2029, assuming the necessary EU legislation is adopted in 2026.

Supporters view the digital euro as a way to preserve the role of central bank money in digital payments and reduce reliance on non-European payment providers. Debate continues over how to balance innovation, privacy, financial inclusion, bank intermediation and public trust.

Why does it matter?

The digital euro would shape how public money functions in a digital economy increasingly dominated by private payment platforms and international card schemes. Its significance lies not only in creating a new payment tool, but in preserving access to central bank money, supporting European payment sovereignty and setting privacy expectations for public digital infrastructure.

Its success will depend on whether the final design can offer clear benefits over existing payment options while maintaining trust, usability and strong safeguards. The project also raises broader questions about how central banks remain relevant in everyday payments without crowding out private-sector innovation or weakening the role of commercial banks.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!