A Digital Future for All (afternoon sessions)

A Digital Future for All (afternoon sessions)

Session at a Glance

Summary

This discussion focused on the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in shaping a digital future that benefits humanity. The event brought together leaders from government, technology, civil society, and international organizations to explore how to harness digital technologies and AI for sustainable development while addressing potential risks.

Key themes included the importance of inclusivity, bridging the digital divide, and ensuring AI governance is rooted in human rights. Speakers emphasized the need for multi-stakeholder cooperation and global governance frameworks to guide AI development. The United Nations was highlighted as uniquely positioned to facilitate this process due to its global reach and legitimacy.

Participants discussed both the transformative potential of AI to accelerate progress on sustainable development goals and the need to mitigate risks like bias, privacy concerns, and potential misuse. The importance of building capacity, especially in developing countries, was stressed to prevent an “AI divide” from emerging.

Recommendations from the UN’s High-Level Advisory Body on AI were presented, including proposals for a global AI capacity network, an international scientific panel on AI, and mechanisms to foster inclusive AI development. Speakers noted the urgency of action, given AI’s rapid advancement.

The discussion concluded on an optimistic note, with participants expressing hope that early engagement on AI governance could help steer the technology towards benefiting humanity. However, they emphasized sustained effort and cooperation would be needed to realize this vision of an inclusive, sustainable digital future for all.

Keypoints

Major discussion points:

– The importance of developing AI and digital technologies in an inclusive, ethical way that benefits all of humanity

– The need for global cooperation and governance frameworks for AI, with the UN playing a key role

– Bridging the digital divide and ensuring developing countries can participate in and benefit from AI advancements

– Balancing the opportunities of AI with potential risks and challenges

– Implementing the Global Digital Compact and moving from principles to concrete actions

Overall purpose/goal:

The discussion aimed to highlight the transformative potential of AI and digital technologies while emphasizing the need for responsible development and governance to ensure these technologies benefit all of humanity. It sought to build momentum for global cooperation on AI governance through initiatives like the Global Digital Compact.

Tone:

The overall tone was optimistic and forward-looking, with speakers emphasizing the positive potential of AI while acknowledging challenges. There was a sense of urgency about the need to act quickly to shape AI’s development. The tone became more action-oriented towards the end, focusing on next steps and implementation.

Speakers

Moderators/Facilitators:

– Redi Thlabi – Journalist and TV Host Al Jazeera English

– Tumi Makgabo – In Africa World Wide Media

Speakers:

– Ian Bremmer – Political Scientist, President of Eurasia Group and GZERO Media

– Ebba Busch – Minister for Energy, Business and Industry and Deputy Prime Minister of Sweden

– Sundar Pichai – CEO, Google and Alphabet

– Felix Mutati – Minister of Technology and Science, Zambia

– Margrethe Vestager – Executive Vice President of the European Union

– Rebeca Grynspan – Secretary-General, United Nations Trade and Development (UNCTAD)

– Omar Al Olama – Minister of State for Artificial Intelligence, Digital Economy and Remote Work in the United Arab Emirates

– Josephine Teo – Minister for Digital Development and Information, Singapore

– Nnenna Nwakanma – Digital Policy, Advocacy and Cooperation Strategist

– Carme Artigas – Former Secretary of State for Digitalisation and AI of Spain and Co-Chair of the Secretary-General’s High-level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence

– James Manyika – Senior VP, Google-Alphabet and Co-Chair of the Secretary-General’s High-level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence

– Vilas Dhar – President and Trustee, Patrick J. McGovern Foundation

– Jian Wang – CTO and Founder, Alibaba Cloud

– Volker Türk, High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)

– Alondra Nelson – Harold F. Linder Professor, Institute for Advanced Study

– Mokgweetsi Masisi – President of Botswana

– Amandeep Singh Gill – UN Secretary-General’s Envoy on Technology

– Achim Steiner – Administrator of UNDP

– Doreen Bogdan-Martin – Secretary-General of the ITU

The speakers represent a diverse range of expertise including government leadership, technology industry executives, civil society representatives, academics, and leaders of international organizations. Their areas of focus include artificial intelligence, digital development, human rights, sustainable development, and global governance.

Full session report

The Global Digital Compact and AI Governance: Shaping a Digital Future for All

This high-level discussion brought together diverse leaders from government, technology, civil society, and international organizations to explore the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in shaping an inclusive digital future. The conversation centered on the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the need for responsible AI development and governance to benefit all of humanity.

Key Themes and Agreements

1. The Global Digital Compact as a Foundation for AI Governance

There was broad consensus on the importance of the Global Digital Compact as a starting point for global AI governance. Speakers like Carme Artigas and Omar Al Olama emphasized the unique position of the United Nations to lead this effort. James Manyika stressed the need for a multi-stakeholder approach, which was echoed by other participants. Volker Turk noted that the GDC builds on existing human rights frameworks, stating, “The Global Digital Compact is firmly anchored in human rights.”

2. AI’s Potential for Sustainable Development

Speakers agreed on AI’s transformative potential to accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goals. Felix Mutati highlighted AI’s ability to transform lives in rural areas, saying, “AI has the potential to leapfrog development.” However, many stressed the need to bridge the digital divide to prevent an AI divide, emphasizing the importance of building AI capacity in developing countries.

3. Balancing Innovation and Risk Mitigation

There was general agreement on the need for a balanced approach to AI governance that promotes innovation while mitigating risks. Margrethe Vestager emphasized the importance of enforceable AI regulation, while Carme Artigas highlighted the need to balance innovation and risk mitigation.

4. Human Rights and Community Engagement

Speakers like Volker Turk and Alondra Nelson emphasized the importance of grounding AI governance and development in existing human rights frameworks. Vilas Dhar highlighted the importance of community engagement in AI development, challenging the typical narrative of top-down control in governance.

5. Scientific Research and Understanding of AI

Multiple speakers, including James Manyika, Dr. Wang Jian, and Alondra Nelson, stressed the importance of scientific research to better understand AI systems and their impacts. Manyika proposed “a real-time scientific panel on AI developments,” while Nelson drew parallels to rapid scientific developments during the COVID-19 pandemic.

6. Role of the Private Sector

James Manyika and others discussed the crucial role of the private sector in AI governance. Manyika emphasized the need for collaboration, stating, “We need everybody at the table – governments, civil society, academia, and the private sector.”

7. Capacity Building and Infrastructure

Many speakers emphasized the importance of capacity building and infrastructure development for AI in developing countries. Nnenna Nwakanma’s statement, “Connect the schools. Connect the young people. Connect my children,” refocused the conversation on practical, human-centered outcomes of digital development.

Key Recommendations and Action Items

1. Recommendations from the UN High-Level Advisory Body on AI, as discussed by Ian Bremmer and panelists, including:

– Establishing a global fund for AI for sustainable development

– Creating an international scientific panel on AI

– Developing a global AI capacity-building program

2. Proposal to make an online platform available for public input on the Global Digital Compact after its adoption

3. Emphasis on building AI capacity and infrastructure in developing countries to prevent an AI divide

4. Focus on sustainable and ethical AI development practices, as highlighted by Alondra Nelson

5. Plan to potentially adopt the Global Digital Compact at the upcoming Summit of the Future

Thought-Provoking Insights

1. Vilas Dhar reframed governance as a collaborative process involving multiple stakeholders, not just governments and tech companies.

2. Mokgweetsi Masisi highlighted the interconnection between digital divides, global inequality, and gender disparities.

3. Alondra Nelson acknowledged the limitations of current knowledge about AI systems, emphasizing the need for ongoing research and understanding.

Unresolved Issues and Future Directions

Despite the productive discussion, several issues remain to be addressed:

1. Specific mechanisms for enforcing AI governance globally

2. Details on implementation of the proposed global fund on AI

3. How to effectively balance AI development with sustainability and climate concerns

4. Concrete steps to ensure AI benefits reach marginalized communities

In conclusion, the discussion demonstrated a high level of consensus on fundamental principles and goals for AI governance, providing a strong foundation for global cooperation. The conversation evolved from high-level policy talk to considering concrete actions and their impacts on diverse communities, particularly in the Global South. The Global Digital Compact emerges as a crucial starting point for global AI governance, with emphasis on multi-stakeholder involvement, scientific research, capacity building, and human rights-centered approaches. As Amandeep Singh Gill noted, “The Global Digital Compact is our chance to shape our digital future.” The stage is set for continued dialogue and action on shaping an inclusive, sustainable digital future for all.

Session Transcript

Redi Thlabi: I think the applause was loudest this side. You’re very generous. Thank you. Good afternoon. Honored delegates, ladies and gentlemen. My name is Redi Thlabi. I’m a broadcast journalist, a moderator, an MC from Johannesburg, South Africa, delighted to be a visitor in the United States. I noticed that when the lunch break was announced, many of you did not leave. That tells me that you were in this room this morning when the answer to why we are here was provided. In the morning, we saw the real impact of digital tools, of artificial intelligence enabling human flourishing. Who can forget Adit, a young lady who grew up in a refugee camp, but she was able to access learning. She was able to connect with other young people from other parts of the world because she had the technology to do so. Who can forget how we witnessed the ability to get mobility after an acute injury. The mobility that you and I take for granted, but when you lose it, you need technology, you need innovation to help you be a part of the global community. You were in this room when we saw how technological tools can be enabled to respond to the planetary crisis that we are all facing today. That’s what happened this morning. So what are we doing this afternoon? We are here to ensure that those case studies that we heard about in the morning are not just the exception, but they become the norm. We are here to renew our commitments, to find solutions to the crises that we face, to ensure that we create a global digital architecture, a compact that is human-centered, that is secure, that is efficient, that is accessible to all. Because if we don’t do this, we create other frontiers of inequality. I come from Africa, I’m a part of the Global South, and we see very much how often we feel as if the world is advancing without us, even though we have the expertise, the agency, the tools, the willingness. But without the investment, without being invited into the table as we find these digital solutions, then this inequality will deepen. And so we convene today at a very hopeful moment. In a few hours, the Global Digital Compact may just become a reality. You will hear a lot about it. It has several themes that resonate. It’s about collaboration, creating policy, bringing all the stakeholders together to ensure that the case studies that we heard about in the morning become a global norm so that we all become citizens of a world where technology and AI are accessible, they are free, they are secure, and they are rooted, they are rooted in human flourishing. That’s what today is all about. But to situate us in the moment, let’s watch this very short video about the Global Digital Compact just to get a sense of the process and how it unfolded.

Official Video: GDC has been a very optimistic and constructive process during the past 18 months with broad participation from multi-stakeholders. And with GDC, we see that every country and every member state of the United Nations will have better possibilities of implementing the SDG agenda. Co-facilitators of the Global Digital Compact are so excited that we’ve come to this moment where we can actually indulge the Global Digital Compact. We as co-facilitators have engaged with yourselves. over many many hours. Over hundreds, thousands of delegates have put in their work and now it’s time to really look at this document and adopt it. And so we’re very excited that we’ve really come to this point and welcome you to this event. Thank you very much. The Global Digital Compact provides an opportunity to close the digital divide. It also provides an opportunity for Africa to engage as well as civil society organizations to engage way better at the United Nations level. The Global Digital Compact should be implemented through a multi-stakeholder process so that everyone, everywhere, can thrive in the age of AI. Governments must protect and support the people who build and govern digital public goods, like Wikipedia, which is run by volunteers who share knowledge in over 300 languages. Thank you very much for this outstanding opportunity to share with all of you how private and public collaboration can help achieve the goals of the Global Digital Compact. We at TIGO, we build broadband networks across all the communities we operate in. We call them digital highways because they provide the highways that bring our communities to the digital economy and it takes the work of everyone involved, public, private sector, everyone, so that those digital highways get built for the betterment of our communities are for the inclusion of everyone in them into the digital economy of the 21st century. Let’s make it happen together. I’m delighted to welcome the Global Digital Compact and to see that children’s rights are at the heart of this declaration. Children’s charities across the world have collaborated closely with co-facilitators and the UN Tech Envoy for two years to shape this important compact. We welcome that it now underscores a unified commitment for children’s rights and safety. I hope all will live by its words and will move from words to action. States have made bold commitments. They must now translate them into concrete actions. Equally, tech companies must not be exempt and be held accountable for the services they deliver to children. The Global Digital Compact has been a crucial platform for diverse stakeholders like me to come together and shape the future of a digital world that benefits everyone. It has fostered a sense of shared responsibility and ownership. I believe that the GDC we contributed will play a vital role in shaping a digital world.

Redi Thlabi: Thank you very much. Thank you. You will have an opportunity to make your inputs to ensure that the Global Digital Compact becomes a reality. Once it’s been adopted by world leaders, the online platform will be available tomorrow and you can share your inputs. Ladies and gentlemen, please help me welcome the Deputy Prime Minister of Sweden, Ebba Busch.

Ebba Busch: Excellencies, distinguished colleagues, ladies and gentlemen. I was suggesting earlier here when we were waiting for things to start, soon someone has to get up on stage and start singing. I’m not gonna sing here today but we’re going to talk about the digital era that we have just entered fully on now. And we’re living in an era where digital and emerging technologies, where they’re really reshaping almost every single aspect of our lives. our lives. The digital transformation presents us with unprecedented opportunities to really accelerate our work towards the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals. To fulfil those opportunities, we need to cooperate across all levels, and certainly, of course, including the UN. Sweden has, together with Zambia, had the honour of facilitating the negotiations on the Global Digital Compact that we are soon going to adopt. The Compact outlines our collective commitment to a digital future that is inclusive, that is open, that is sustainable, fair, safe and secure. And it seeks to close those digital divides and accelerate progress across the Sustainable Development Goals. Sweden is my home country, and Sweden is also home to some of the most innovative companies in the world that are enabling and driving the global digital transition forward. To truly harness this power of digital technology for a better and more sustainable future, we need an approach that involves all stakeholders. It is only by bringing together the excellent researchers, innovative companies, efficient authorities and multilateral organisations that we can create a well-functioning innovation system that works for everyone. Artificial intelligence, AI, plays a central role in this context. It has the potential to revolutionise how we work, learn and connect with one another. Yet, we must also acknowledge the challenges and risks that come with it. Of course, like so many of the new emerging technologies, AI can be used for both good and for harm. This is why it is crucial that we work together to establish common norms and governance structures that guide the use of AI in such a way that it truly, truly benefits humanity. And at the same time, limit its proliferation into areas of use that may threaten our common security, development, and future. We need a global conversation to build a shared understanding of both the opportunities and the challenges of AI. And in this regards, I really like to emphasize the Compact’s initiative to launch a global dialogue on AI governance, which engages governments and stakeholders in developing standards that prioritizes human rights, that prioritizes safety and sustainability. Increased investment will be crucial to scale up AI capacity, building for sustainable development. Taking into account the recommendations of the High-Level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence, the GDC encourages the establishment of a global fund on AI that is complementary to relevant UN funding mechanisms. Additionally, an international scientific panel on AI could offer valuable guidance on the global community on AI development. Sweden has long championed an open, free, and secure internet. And we believe that digital technology should be used to strengthen human rights. We have a responsibility to turn our vision of a digital future future into concrete actions that make a real difference. This means we must collaborate across borders and sectors, and we must all take responsibility to ensure that the digital transformation benefits everyone. Sweden is committed to continuing its leadership in this global process, and we look forward to working with all of you to unlock the potential of digitalization and to ensure that we build a future where digital technology truly serves all of humanity. And with that, I’d like to end with somewhat of a more personal reflection and personal note as a citizen of the world, as a mother of two. My two children back home in Sweden, they’re named Elise and Birger, they’re seven and nine years old. I was this much pregnant when I got elected party leader for my party for 10 years ago. And I’m happy and I’m proud to be able to say to them, because they are now, I mean, they are the generation that are growing up not knowing what life was like before internet, you know? Can you imagine? And I’m proud to be able to say to them that we are now truly taking their rights in the digitalized era seriously, because I’ve said so many times that a childhood in freedom requires safety online. And thank you. And it really is so. We’ve said it so many times, but you can’t say it enough times. Children’s rights are human rights. Women’s rights are human rights. And we are now bringing human rights and the sustainable developmental goals online, finally. Thank you.

Redi Thlabi: Deputy Prime Minister, thank you for your energy and inspiring case studies that you shared. Without much ado, let us hear another keynote this afternoon from the CEO of Google, Sundar Pichai.

Sundar Pichai: Mr. Secretary General, President of the General Assembly, Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, it’s a privilege to join you today. I am energized by the Summit’s focus on the future. We have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to unlock human potential for everyone, everywhere. I believe that technology is a foundational enabler of progress. Just as the Internet and mobile devices expanded opportunities for people around the world, now AI is poised to accelerate progress at unprecedented scale. I’m here today to make the case for three things. Why I believe AI is so transformative. How it can be applied to benefit humanity and make progress on the UN Sustainable Development Goals. And where we can drive deeper partnerships to ensure that the technology benefits everyone. But first, let me share why this is so important to me personally and to Google as a company. Growing up in Chennai, India with my family, the arrival of each new technology improved our lives in meaningful ways. Our first rotary phone saved us hours of travel to the hospital to get test results. Our first refrigerator gave us more time to spend as a family rather than rushing to cook ingredients before they spoil. The technology that changed my life the most was the computer. I didn’t have much access to one growing up. When I came to graduate school in the U.S., there were labs full of machines I could use anytime I wanted. It was mind-blowing. Access to computing inspired me to pursue a career where I could bring technology to more people. And that path led me to Google 20 years ago. I was excited by its mission to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful. That mission has had incredible impact. Google Search democratized information access, opened up opportunities in education and entrepreneurship. Platforms like Chrome and Android helped bring 1 billion people online. Today, 15 of our products serve more than half a billion people and businesses each, and 6 of them each serve more than 2 billion. There is no cost to use them, and most of our users are in the developing world. Today we are working on the most transformative technology yet, AI. We’ve been investing in AI research, tools, and infrastructure for two decades because it’s the most profound way we can deliver on our mission and improve people’s lives. I want to talk today about four of the biggest opportunities we see, many of which align with the SDGs. One is helping people access the world’s knowledge in their own language. Using AI, in just the last year we have added 110 new languages to Google Translate, spoken by half a billion people around the world. That brings our total to 246 languages, and we are working towards 1,000 of the world’s most spoken languages. A second area is accelerating scientific discovery to benefit humanity. Our AlphaFold breakthrough is solving big challenges in predicting some of the building blocks of life, including proteins. and DNA. We have opened up AlphaFold to the scientific community free of charge and it has been accessed by more than 2 million researchers from over 190 countries. 30% are in the developing world. For example, over 25,000 researchers just in Brazil. Globally, AlphaFold is being used in research that could help make crops more resistant to disease, discover new drugs in areas like malaria vaccines and cancer treatments and much more. A third opportunity is helping people in the path of climate-related disaster, building on the UN’s initiative, Early Warnings for All. Our Flood Hub system provides early warnings up to seven days in advance, helping protect over 460 million people in over 80 countries. And for millions in the path of wildfires, our boundary tracking systems are already in 22 countries on Google Maps. We also just announced FireSat technology, which will use satellites to detect and track early-stage wildfires, with imagery updated every 20 minutes globally so firefighters can respond. AI gives a boost in accuracy, speed and scale. Fourth, we see the opportunity for AI to meaningfully contribute to economic progress. It’s already enabling entrepreneurs and small businesses, empowering governments to provide public services, and boosting productivity across sectors. Some studies show that AI could boost global labor productivity by 1.4 percentage points and increase global GDP by 7% within the next decade. For example, AI is helping improve operations and logistics in emerging markets, where connectivity, infrastructure and traffic congestion are big challenges. Freight startup Gary Logistics in Ethiopia is using AI to help move goods to market faster and bring more work opportunities to freelance drivers. These are just very early examples, and there are so many others across education, health, and sustainability. As technology improves, so will the benefits. As with any emerging technology, AI will have limitations, be it issues with accuracy, factuality, and bias, as well as the risks of misapplication and misuse, like the creation of deep fakes. It also presents new complexities. For example, the impact on the future of work. For all these reasons, we believe that AI must be developed, deployed, and used responsibly from the start. We are guided by our AI principles, which we published back in 2018. And we work with others across the industry, academia, the UN, and governments in efforts like the Frontier Model Forum, the OECD, and the G7 Hiroshima process. But I want to talk about another risk that I worry about. I think about where I grew up and how fortunate I was to have access to technology, even if it came slowly. Not everyone had that experience. And while good progress has been made by UN institutions like the ITU, gaps persist today in the form of a well-known digital divide. With AI, we have the chance to be inclusive from the start and to ensure that the digital divide doesn’t become an AI divide. This is a challenge that needs to be met by the private sector and public sector working together. We can focus on three key areas. First is digital infrastructure. Google has made big investments globally in subsea and terrestrial fiber optic cables. One connects Africa with Europe. And two others will be the first intercontinental fiber optic routes. that connect Asia-Pacific and South America, and Australia and Africa. These fiber optic routes stitch together our network of 40 cloud regions around the world that provide digital services to governments, entrepreneurs, SMBs, and companies across all sectors. In addition to compute access, we also open up our technology to others. We did this with Android, and now our Gemma AI models are open to developers and researchers, and we’ll continue to invest here. A second area is about investing in people. That starts with making sure people have the skills they need to seize new opportunities. Our Grow with Google program has already trained 100 million people around the world in digital skills. And today, I’m proud to announce our Global AI Opportunity Fund. This will invest $120 million to make AI education and training available in communities around the world. We are providing this in local languages, in partnerships with nonprofits and NGOs. We are also helping to support entrepreneurs for the AI revolution. In Brazil, we worked with thousands of women entrepreneurs to use Google AI to grow their businesses. In Asia, where fewer than 6% of startups are founded by women, we are providing many with mentorship, capital, and training. The third area is one where we especially need the help of member countries and leaders in this room, creating an enabling policy environment, one that addresses both the risks and worries around new technologies, and also encourages the kind of applications that improve lives at scale. This requires a few things. Government policymaking that supports investments in infrastructure, people. and innovation that benefits humanity. Country development strategies and frameworks like the Global Digital Compact that prioritize the adoption of AI solutions. And smart product regulation that mitigates harms and resists national protectionist impulses that could widen an AI divide and limit AI’s benefits. We are excited to be your partner and to work with you to make sure bold innovations are deployed responsibly so that AI is truly helpful for everyone. The opportunities are too great, the challenge is too urgent, and this technology too transformational to do anything less. Thank you.

Redi Thlabi: Thank you very much to the CEO of Google, Sundar Pichai, for that very holistic picture of the potential, the risks, and the opportunities. Thank you. Now let’s get to the conversation. Let’s put some meat to it, as we say in my language at home. Let’s just give some meaning to the Global Digital Compact. How do we position ourselves to move from aspiration to action and to take us through that very important conversation? Here is a sister, a moderator, and an international broadcaster, my homegirl, Tumi Makgabo.

Tumi Makgabo: Thank you. All right, we got there in the end. Good afternoon, everybody. Reedy, thank you so very much for that introduction. I feel like we flew a long way to get together in New York, but it’s always a pleasure to be in. in this incredible, exciting, stimulating city. But more importantly, I think it’s really incredible to have the opportunity to be in a room where people are thinking about what tomorrow’s going to look like. How do we create a tomorrow that works for everybody who’s involved in tomorrow? Well, you’ve heard a little bit about the GDC, and in this following conversation, we’re going to try to unpack how do we take the idea, how do we take the thought, how do we take the intent of what the GDC is trying to create and make it real, give it life, breathe it into existence. It isn’t easy, it certainly will be a challenge, but I think it’s a challenge not only that we’re up for, but it’s a challenge that is important to ensure that the society and the world looks exactly the way we hope and intend. Now, ordinarily, I could safely stand up here all by myself, but I don’t think that’s going to be the most exciting thing for you to watch. So please assist me in giving a very, very, very warm welcome to the following. Felix Mutati, who is the Minister of Technology and Science in Zambia. Margrethe Vestager, who is Executive Vice President of the European Union. Rebeca Grynspan, who is the Secretary General of UNCTAD. Omar Al Olama, the Minister of State for Artificial Intelligence, Digital Economy, and Remote Work Applications in the UAE. Josephine Teo, who is the Minister for Digital Development and Information in Singapore. And last, but most certainly not least, Nnenna Nwakanama, Civil Society Representative. To all of you, thank you so very much for joining us today. And it really is genuinely and truly an honor to have each of you joining me today. And I’m looking forward to having this conversation. I’m going to take a seat next to you. But not too close. I get a little bit nervous because I don’t know what they might do to me if I ask them a question they don’t like. The reason we really gathered here, and let’s talk for a moment about the digital compact. It’s about principles, it’s about commitments, it’s about inclusivity, not just in terms of who negotiated it, but in terms of who it’s supposed to apply to. The intention is to, and I’m going to read this so I don’t get it wrong, to support the achievement of an inclusive, open, sustainable, fair, safe, and secure digital future for all. Ambitious. In addition, there’s something that’s really important that the GDC does, and that is it recognizes the pervasive and existing digital divides, and we know, we can see what the impact of those divides are and have been in the past. And really, it responds to the need for more inclusive digital governance. So we all have an understanding of what it should do, what it shouldn’t do, and how do we deal. So the ambition is there. It’s in paper, in various iterations. How do we make that happen? Perhaps Mr. Minister, if I can begin with you. Developing countries in particular, Reedy mentioned it earlier, and I think the lived reality of most people who exist in the developing world will be able to tell you about some of the challenges that we face whenever we experience digital divides. I mean, the CEO of Google just gave us a perfect example in his remarks. How do you think the GDC will help in particular developing countries, but perhaps you can use your country as an example, to bridge that divide? It’s on. Let’s try again.

Felix Mutati: Thank you. Many thanks for having me. I’ll just tell you a short story in terms of bridging the digital divide, in terms of inclusivity, from a Zambian perspective. A young man called James in the rural part of Zambia, a farmer, farming using traditional methods because he was not included or connected, had a chance to secure a mobile phone, had a chance to get connected to internet. Using those tools, he transformed his farming methods because he had access to weather forecast, he had access to market prices, he had access to information. And our interpretation is that the Global Digital Compact is about a shared vision. Transforming life for that little boy in the rural part of Zambia. That is our simple understanding and that is why we’re here, changing lives.

Tumi Makgabo: Now there’s a particular balance that is always required because we see that sometimes when we change and transform lives, sometimes it can happen really rapidly, sometimes it takes a little bit longer. If I can come to the UAE as an example, what is the thinking about bridging and bringing together that process of rapid adoption of AI, along with making sure that it is a safe environment for all who are going to be involved in digital technology and how it changes their lives?

Omar Al Olama: Thank you very much. I’m very happy to be here and to be very honest, I think the UAE is a good example of what happens when you create a trajectory for digital development that is on steroids, as they say. we’ve experienced it. So we went from not having paved roads, not having university graduates, being a country that was maybe part of the underdeveloped world 50 years ago to being today one of the most advanced countries in the world. That advancement created a lot of opportunities, it made the UAE be able to explore frontiers like artificial intelligence, and I think it also shows that there is no excuse for us not to be able to do that for more countries. We need to move from, and I don’t mean to plagiarize President Obama here, but from yes we can to yes we will. We need to really definitely try to actually implement that vision that we have on digital development and take forward the recommendations that the panel is making towards the global south.

Tumi Makgabo: We need to also have the conversation about inclusivity. The reason we can have a conversation around developed versus developing countries is because growth has not been equitable. There are some parts of the world that have grown and done well economically, et cetera, and those that have clearly been left behind. If we can then talk for a moment, Secretary General, about how do we make sure that this compact is not just a document that is full of ambition, but it actually means that we see a manifestation of that inclusivity of growth when it comes to the digital era.

Rebeca Grynspan: Thank you. Thank you very much, and thank you for that question. First of all, let me say that we all know that we are lagging in the SDGs, yes? That only 70% of the SDGs are enrolled to be accomplished by 2030. So we have to start by thinking that we cannot have linear solutions because we need non-linear ones, pathways, to really get to the 2030 objectives. And I think that the digital revolution in AI can provide those. non-linear path towards DSDG. So it’s a great opportunity because obviously, you know, the digital technologies are transforming life in an exponential way. So that can be really a very important tool. But my second point, going to you, is that when you are in a society where things are changing so rapidly, we have to remember always that not everything changes at the same speed. So it creates tensions. It creates asymmetries. It creates imbalances that we need to deal with. So it’s not enough access. You need really a deliberate digital development strategy because you have to connect. You have to bring the stakeholders. But you have to do a lot of things. You have to create an ecosystem that is, you know, really will bring everybody to the speed, to the level that is necessary. But you start from a very uneven play field, yes? Not everybody is today in the same line to start this career. So you have to make an extra effort. And part of this extra effort is, first of all, for people, it’s not only access, but it’s affordability and quality of their access to the digital technologies. But it’s also not to relegate the developing countries to be users. We want to be producers. We want to bring the digital revolution, not only for our consumption, but we want to really use it for our diversification, for going up the ladder. in terms of the value chains in the world, to add more value, to create better employment, and to bring digital into the productive structure will really require an extra effort from the international community and also from governments to make it, as I said, a deliberate development strategy.

Tumi Makgabo: One thing that also is going to require deliberate efforts is the question of human rights. Margrethe, if I can come to you on that. How do you make sure that there is a respect and a consideration for human rights while at the same time one wants to promote fair competition and keep in mind that we’re coming from such different points of departure, there’s a lot of balancing. How is the EU thinking about that?

Margrethe Vestager: First and foremost, I think the Global Digital Compact is an amazing achievement. It is as if we have a new chance. We have it. There are so many things where we have not succeeded, and I think the Digital Compact shows that we can agree that we’re really going to engage in correcting the mistakes and show much increased effort because if we live up to what is in the Compact, well, then a lot of the things that are haunting us will be a thing of the past, and for us, we want to partner with as many countries as possible, and the fact that human rights are completely core of the Global Digital Compact makes our conversation shorter, focused because we know that we agree on the fundamentals when we digitalize. So, partnerships will be so much easier, and these are really important for us. And I think it also illustrates that there is a commitment to create trust in technology. Because that doesn’t come automatic. Technology can be terribly misused, both for crime and fraud, but also for surveillance and undermining democracy. And here we can focus on the use of technology. I think the example, the story was excellent. It’s such a good illustration of the agency that people get. Because I think that is the underlining ambition here. That all the things that we were not successful with, with trust, with focusing on the use cases and giving people agency, enabling them, then this digital compact will be, you know, a road to a future that is very different from all the bad scenarios that we actually do have ahead of us.

Tumi Makgabo: There is no question, I think, for anybody that this presents a particular opportunity. One through the GDC, but generally through technology and how we can better harness that to achieve all of these things that we wanted to do. The world of work, however, we all recognize is going to look quite different in five years’ time, let alone a decade or two down the road. In Singapore’s case, how are you ensuring that there is better preparedness for a more digitized work in the context of work? And how can we learn from what Singapore has done so that we’re not always having to go back to the beginning in order to ensure we’re better prepared for a world of work that looks so different?

Josephine Teo: Well, thank you very much for this opportunity to participate in this great conversation. My comments will build on what Margaret and the Secretary-General have said. And that is to recognize the fact that unevenness exists even for the workforce. And what it means… is that there will be some parts of the workforce that are closer to the technology frontier because their employers are already using technologies in innovative ways in their companies. And so that creates an environment for them to pick up the right skills to become even more proficient in the jobs and the requirements of the future. But there will be many other members of the workforce who, for example, may be employed by small and medium enterprises who tend to lag in terms of the technology adoption. Then there are also people who are marginalised. Sometimes it is because they have special needs. It could be because they have a disability. We have to be very creative in thinking about how all of the past barriers that put impediments in the path of these individuals to succeed. The way in which we are doing this is to enable every single one of the workers to acquire the skills to be relevant for the future. Part of it involves working with employers because they create the momentum and they create the strongest incentives. But we also need active labour market policies in the form of support for individual learning, putting resources in the hands of individual workers so that they don’t only depend on their employers to provide the training opportunities. Then in order to support this ecosystem, you need also to build up the training infrastructure so that there is a good ecosystem of training providers who not only can deliver training competently, but whose content meet the needs of the market. All of these have to come together and the more we can share with each other how these can be achieved in each of our contexts, I think the better we are going to be. So we are very grateful to the UN for putting together the GDC to create the opportunities for us to do exactly that.

Tumi Makgabo: Thank you very much, Minister Teo. Minister Al-Olama, I believe that we have to bid you farewell, so thank you very much for joining us. Do you want to, is there one more comment and thought that you want to leave us with before you go?

Omar Al Olama: I think the Global Digital Compact is a great starting point for the action to follow. The UAE, we believe that there’s a lot that needs to be done but we all need to work together on it. This technology is very pervasive, it crosses borders, and there needs to be cooperation. So we’re definitely part of this roadmap that the UN is putting forward and we’re definitely going to be a big supporter for it.

Tumi Makgabo: That’s terrific to hear. Thank you for joining us and we look forward to seeing you do that. If you can please just give him a thank you. Thank you. And no, I wasn’t waiting for him to leave, I just have to get closer to the panellists, so don’t think I’m being, I promise I’m not being weird. Nnenna, if I can come to you, from a civil society perspective. You know, the reality is that there sometimes can be a disconnect between what happens on the ground and what happens higher up between policy makers and those of us who have really good intentions. It doesn’t always manifest in the way that we hope. What does the implementation question and what does the monitoring question of the GDC look like in a civil society context from your point of view?

Nnenna Nwakanama: Sankofa, I’ll come back to that word. Fabrizio Hochschild is from Chile. Ninten Desai is from India. Lynn Sentamu is Canadian. Marcus Comer. is from Switzerland, Yanis Karklins from Lithuania, Dee Williams in St. Lucia, Adama Samaseko in Mali, and the journalist Brenda Zulu from Zambia. I’ve met these people over my 25 years of engagement in digital cooperation within the UN. These are people from all walks of life. And my first statement here today is sankofa, looking back from where we’re coming from so we know where we’re going to. The GDC is nothing revolutionary. The success is in the process, and that process is multi-stakeholder. I do believe that as we keep shaking hands between multilateralism and multi-stakeholderism, we can do much. Not just here in New York. I don’t need a visa to be able to implement GDC. I want to be at home and have the same principle of multi-stakeholderism play out in everything at national level.

Tumi Makgabo: I think we understand why you’ve been in this process for so long. We kind of get it. Thank you for that. Minister Mutati, if I can then come back to you. We can look at the broader picture, and I think the GDC is no doubt inspiring. Those who believe it or not, I did actually read it, and I think it is really inspiring, and I think it really is ambitious, and I think it genuinely is asking us to address some of the most fundamental and pressing issues that help us address the human rights challenges we face on the planet. planet. How, though, do we begin to implement that? From a Zambia perspective, what is the translation of that, from paper to reality, actually look like and involve?

Felix Mutati: Thank you very much. One of the pillars of the Global Digital Compact is strategic partnerships. And strategic partnership from a Zambia perspective, I’ll give you two examples. This year, Zambia has got challenges around climate change. Our economy, in terms of GDP, is going down. And we have difficulties and other problems. But earlier on, we had a strategic partnership to look at how we can collaborate among ourselves as Africans. And one of the countries in Africa, we went and lifted a tax innovation, collection innovation, which we started using this year. Now, the consequences of that partnership has been that, whereas the economy is going down, the tax revenue is going up. And for us, we think that is what is called strategic partnership, which is part of the Global Compact. It gives actual results. And this is actually happening. Second example, because of limited resource, to try to extend connectivity of our people, government on one side. Working with the private sector and other partners, providing the necessary incentives, they were able to plant significant infrastructure, digital infrastructure, which has enabled Internet to move from in the 50s to almost 70 percent. That is what we call strategic partnership. So Zambia, in a sense, was already implementing the global digital compact and the key pillar of partnership, and the results are there for us to see. Thank you.

Tumi Makgabo: That’s a really interesting example that you use, because it sounds to me like a lot of this has to do with ensuring that the solutions are specific to what your needs are, no doubt. But when we look more broadly, the challenge for a lot of developing countries is that they have to prioritize where they allocate those resources. So it’s easier for us to sit and say, well, you know, we have to think about ESG, or we have to think about greening, or we have to think about this safety and that health. But the resources that are required to do all of those things are quite limited. What do you think needs to happen to allow developing countries to better strike that balance, and how potentially can the GDC be supportive of that process? We know that within the document itself, it’s quite specific about a need for that to happen. But again, the reality versus what’s on paper.

Rebeca Grynspan: Yeah, it’s such a good question, because, you know, precisely today we were talking about the necessary changes in international financial architecture, really to support development. We were talking about restructuring the debt, because debt doesn’t allow many of these countries, to really have the strategies and the investments that need to be done. I gave today the number that 3.3 billion people live in countries that are paying more in service and debt than on health or education. So if you have that problem, how are you going really to have the investments that you need for making this happen? And the other part of this, I’m sorry to say, obviously, is the responsibility to think about the long-term. I always say we usually forget that the short and the long-term start at the same time. There is no long-term that is a succession of short-termism, yes? You don’t get there by short-term thinking. You need long-term thinking. But many of the systems don’t allow, don’t have the structures, don’t have the institutions like, for example, Singapore has, to really have this long-term view for a policy to stay and to persevere for the objectives. So let me just end saying, you need national responsibility, and the minister has talked about that. You need a government that really thinks about this, that does the right thing, that invests in education, that invests in the people that Nina was talking about, that brings society in an inclusive way with a voice to really harness development, but you need the international community. And that’s why the global digital compact is so important, as we have said. Because you need a framework. And the other thing, and I’m sorry to say this because we are talking about optimism, but this is a very concentrated market, yes? need to spread the opportunities because really concentration is very high. So you need international standards and international norms to really make these technologies to stay within the good and not to go to the bad, like Margrethe was saying.

Tumi Makgabo: So it’s interesting that you’re promoting the global view, which is crucial. We’ve heard from the minister the national view, but there’s that space in between, which is the regional question. Now we’ve seen what the EU has been doing. We understand the EU’s ambition generally to be a leader in many spaces, and this is not unique in that question. What can the world, or what should we be learning about broader cooperation and implementation of such policies when we look at what the EU is trying to do within its space of influence from a policy perspective? Because one size doesn’t fit all, so there needs to be some maneuverability in that regard, but there also needs to be an overview that allows everybody to understand what the rules of engagement are.

Margrethe Vestager: I think that is very well put. And the thing is that there is an asymmetry here, because the individual human being can take the most of the possibilities, but the individual cannot do away with the harm that technology can bring. That is not possible. So there is a societal, regional, global answer here to address things that are systemic in a systemic matter. And this is what we are trying to do. So we have passed legislation, the Digital Markets Act, to keep the market open so that people have choice, and so that the businesses who provide choice, that they are interested for investors. Because, if you depend on a gatekeeper to get to the market, why invest in you? We have the Digital Services Act making sure that digital services are safe to use. That they would not cause you mental health problems or undermine democracy or the integrity of our elections. And that what is legitimately decided in our democracy is also treated as such when online. We have privacy legislation and our AI Act is coming into force. All of that to create a systemic response to the things that people cannot influence themselves individually. And when you have a systemic response, and we enforce in full, because otherwise it’s worth nothing. Enforcement is everything. When we do that, then each and every one of us, alone and together, can grasp the opportunities. And that’s the important thing here, because otherwise nothing will happen. So I think one should be really careful to try to decentralize, to say, you go, you go figure out. No, no. We need that systemic response. We think that legislation is needed, because we see the harm that can be done. And I think that global digital compact is essential, especially when it comes to AI. Because AI is not just any new digital algorithm. It is so much more powerful when it comes to human agency. And that is why the use cases, the trust that we as societies will be responsible, is absolutely key for all these wonderful things that we’re talking about.

Tumi Makgabo: That brings me nicely. Okay, you want to… They keep wanting to clap for you and I keep interrupting them. So I think every now and again, I must remember to give you a chance to clap properly. That brings me nicely to the question of public-private partnerships. So, when we are looking at this process, everybody has to play their part. We need to make sure that the rules of engagement not only exist, but that they are followed and that they are implemented, and that there is consequence for transgression, right? Because it doesn’t help, and we know about, broadly speaking, the challenges of international law when it comes to the implementation and enforcement of consequence. What role, however, do you see, maybe you can give us an example in Singapore, where this public-private partnership can better foster the implementation and the oversight of what this GDC process may look like?

Josephine Teo: Well, since Margaret was talking about AI, that could be where the example arises. I think being a general-purpose technology, we all want to benefit from its transformative potential. And yet, at the level of public services, very often the expertise does not yet exist. And that’s where I think the private sector can be brought into the picture and encouraged to enable policymakers, as well as individuals, teams, organisations that make the rules to understand how this technology is implemented. And that’s exactly how we have done it in Singapore. We encouraged and we invited the private sector to contribute to the development of use cases, as well as our understanding of the guardrails that need to be put in place. But I would go one step further. I would say that the private sector can do a lot more in terms of helping to build capacity. And the capacity is so important because, particularly from the point of view of small states, on the one hand we see the opportunities, on the other hand we are told of the risks. The question is, will we… we’d be left behind as small states. Now, in this process of figuring out what to do, I think we were really appreciative that at the UN level, there was an advisory board at the high level that was constituted in a very inclusive way. And this has given us the motivation to contribute to this process by asking our own chief AI officer to be involved, and then subsequently inviting the whole high-level advisory board to meet in Singapore so that they can also engage with the forum of small states that was meeting there. Now, the result of a process like this is that we now have the ability to say, adopting the principles articulated in the GDC, how to help ourselves as nations, but equally importantly, how we can help each other. And in that regard, I’m very pleased to note that this process created an opportunity for another country that we admire greatly, which is Rwanda, to say, how about the both of us come together to create an AI playbook for small states? So that is something that we have done. And I hope that this will help all of us.

Tumi Makgabo: I just love my panel because everything they say, everybody wants to clap for them.

Margrethe Vestager: Can I add something? Because I would encourage everybody to look at the AI apprentice model that is implemented in Singapore, because that allows businesses to get to use AI while people in all walks of life can learn about how to do that. And you get experts who are embedded in the local community. So this idea of AI apprenticeships, I think the Singaporean model is really, really inspiring.

Tumi Makgabo: Thank you very much.

Josephine Teo: We’re happy to share more.

Tumi Makgabo: They’re happy to share. So everybody come, let’s share. Okay, Nnenna, if I can come to you because believe it or not, we’ve got like four minutes left. What measures do you think specifically we need to be mindful of? And I’m going to limit you in the sense that I’m going to ask you for two of the most important measures we need to make sure are in place to protect human rights as we embark on this journey.

Nnenna Nwakanama: Two measures, capacity to implement. It is okay to come to New York. It is okay to read European papers and all of that, but America and Europe do not make the world. I’m African. I’m Nigerian. I live in Cote d’Ivoire. I’m part of this world and I want that to be down here. So capacity to implement across the whole world, whether it be government, because I have spoken about multi-stakeholder, but multi-stakeholder capacity is needed, financial, human and technological. That is one. We need to balance that. The other one is connecting people. I see people talking about AI. I see, I’ve lived in the days of great technology, emerging technology, and all of the big grammar technology, but please, can we get people connected to me? And please, can we not disconnect the people who are already connected? Because some of you are here and then you go home and you disrupt internet connectivity. We have to talk about shutdown. In the GDC itself, that part has, they’ve been knowing at it. I don’t know what it’s going to be like tomorrow morning. Anyway, let me now, excellences, ladies and gentlemen, friends here and friends who are watching me online, boys and girls, cats and dogs, emojis and avatars, I myself, on behalf of my own self, I would like to endorse the GDC.

Tumi Makgabo: because I want my time back from all this clapping. Like really, I’ve lost like loads of time from the applause. Okay, we’ve literally got two and a half minutes, so I’m gonna do a rapid fire round. I’m going to ask you for two specific things that when we leave this stage and we leave this room, as individuals, we need to consider implementing. We’re not talking broad policy strokes here, we’re talking about things that you think we can do when we leave. Nnenna, you’ve given us a clue, but can you give us two different ones, and I’m gonna start with you and work my way across. We’ve got two minutes.

Nnenna Nwakanama: Connect the schools. Connect the young people. Connect my children. Thank you.

Tumi Makgabo: Okay, okay, okay, thank you. Thank you. Minister Teo.

Josephine Teo: We want to move beyond learning about digital to thriving with digital. And to do that, we can move alone, and we can go very fast that way, or we can go together, and I believe that will go even further.

Tumi Makgabo: Thank you. Even further. Secretary General, you.

Rebeca Grynspan: Embrace not only the global digital compact, talk to your governments for implementing, for supporting, but embrace the path for the future, because there are many things that we have to do for this to be possible. And in the path of the future, we have a lot that can help people to get connected.

Tumi Makgabo: Vice-President Vestager.

Margrethe Vestager: Obviously, first things first, connectivity is everything. If you’re not connected, well, what then? But as we connect, please make sure that we do not sacrifice our children. Their independence, their agency, that they do not get dependent, that they do not get sucked in, in social media that will not serve them well. We have a huge challenge in making. sure that our children, they’re not only safe, but developed, and that they can use digital for their own good and for the good of their community.

Tumi Makgabo: Minister?

Felix Mutati: Thank you. One of the biggest challenges, the skills and literacy, particularly in the rural part of our country, things we take for granted. Let us handhold our people. And let us show them how to press the numbers on the mobile phone. Thank you.

Tumi Makgabo: I don’t know if you can tell, but I thoroughly enjoyed that conversation. And it is because we had such a wonderful panel of speakers with us this afternoon. Can you please give them the appropriate round of applause? I can’t hear it. Thank you so very much. Thank you. And thank you. Thank you very much.

Redi Thlabi: OK, I see your panel doesn’t want to leave the stage to me. OK. Thank you. Thank you so very much to Dumi Mahabo for expertly leading that important conversation. We’re going to watch a very short video speaking to the themes of today about the futures that are possible for us and the kind of decisions we need to make. Let’s just watch this short video, and then I’ll introduce you to the next panel.

Official Video: One humanity, two futures. In one, we embrace AI’s potential for a world of inclusion and equity. In another, AI tools became the catalyst for division and exclusion. The choice between these paths did not lie in circuits, but in human hands. In October 2023, amid heated debates on artificial intelligence and its potential, there was excitement about the future, but also anxiety over its risks and uncertainties. The UN Secretary-General gathered 39 top AI experts to confront this challenge. The uniquely diverse group consulted intensively around the world and engaged with thousands of experts. This uniquely diverse group aligned on guiding principles to propose concrete actions for governing AI for humanity by building common scientific understanding on AI, its opportunities and its risks, by fostering common ground for effective AI policies and standards anchored in human rights, by sharing common benefits through building capacity, mobilizing resources and tackling data dilemmas, to close AI divides, and to support this global action, an AI office at the United Nations, for an equitable and inclusive future with AI. Let’s build this future together.

Redi Thlabi: Thank you very much. And I think the theme of that video links so well with the comments that came from the first panel. We all acknowledge we come from different worlds, but we are one humanity. So how do we create these digital tools, AI for humanity, make it serve humanity, make it accessible for all of humanity? I’m really looking forward. to this next panel discussion, which speaks exactly to that, AI for Humanity. And to moderate this panel discussion is Ian Bremmer, president of Eurasia Group. Ian?

Ian Bremmer: Thank you so much, and also thanks to me, who just crushed it for the last 45 minutes, absolutely, right? So now you’re stuck with me, and obviously I’m honored to be here at the Summit of the Future. We’re going to talk about artificial intelligence. I’m honored to be one of the 39 members of the high-level advisory panel on AI, and you’re going to meet a number of my peers on the panel today. It was back in 2017 that the Secretary General, António Guterres, I remember first told me that he thought that his two most important legacies in global governance would be on combating climate change and responding to the positive implications of disruptive technologies. You have seen the UN engage and lead the work on climate over the past many years, but today is a day we get to talk about and even celebrate a little some efforts in global governance on artificial intelligence. This past Thursday, I think you’ve seen it, we have released our final report, Governing AI for Humanity. It’s right here. It’s the first truly global approach to governance of artificial intelligence, and we’re going to talk today about some of the recommendations, why governance including nations from the global south is so important, and some practical reasons why this roadmap is needed. to ensure progress and greater equity, given the challenges that we face in our digital and physical future. So, with that, let me please introduce our distinguished panelists. Experts and leaders from many sectors required for a multi-stakeholder approach, five of us together on the UN High-Level Advisory Body, and two interlopers who are here anyway. As I mentioned, first of all, our co-chairs. We have Carme Artigas, who is co-chair of the body, along with James Manyka, senior vice president at Google Alphabet. We’ve got Vilas Dhar, also an HLAB member. He’s president of the Patrick J. McGovern Foundation. Dr. Wang Jian is chief technology officer at Alibaba. Volker Turk, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. And Alondra Nelson, also an HLAB member, is a professor at the Institute of Advanced Study. I welcome all of you. Please. So, let’s get right to it. Carme, the first question I want to ask, and I’m going to start with our two co-chairs, shockingly, bracketing this whole thing, is why the United Nations, right? There have been a lot of efforts at governance of AI. There’s been a lot of money going into AI. The UN doesn’t have a lot of money, doesn’t have a lot of power, right? But here we are. So, why? I mean, obviously, part of it is because it makes us sit uncomfortably close, and that facilitates cooperation. But leaving that aside, why was it critical for the United Nations to take this on?

Carme Artigas: Yes, so this was the first question we had to answer ourselves in the body. You were independent people, and we came to the conclusion that the UN is uniquely positioned to this effort, because it’s the only global organization that has the mandate, the reach, and the legitimacy to seat all nations and all stakeholders in the table. And it has the historical, I would say, success that has done it in the past, I mean, governing international topics such as climate change or on earth control. And because AI is such a pervasive and horizontal technology, and it’s absolutely cross borders, there is no single nation or region that can solve by itself the potential harm biases, discrimination, and lack of inclusiveness. And of course there are other frameworks that are very, very valuable, but they are limited. They usually leave behind many nations, especially on the global south. So we do not pretend that UN is the right place to regulate AI at a global level. We think it’s the right place to encourage collaboration, to foster inclusive business, and ensure that AI is developed, keeping the human rights in mind.

Ian Bremmer: Now, you’re a European, and the Europeans are known for having governance, even multi-stakeholder governance as a superpower. I mean, Lord knows it’s not building AI companies, right? So given that, how do you, former minister in this field, you know, how did you engage with what can the UN do, and what should the EU really be doing?

Carme Artigas: I would say that people sometimes mix ethics, regulation, and governance. There are three different things. Ethics is how do we should, how should we all behave well, companies, governments. Governance is how do we put in mechanisms, instruments, that ensure that everybody’s behaving ethically. And regulation is one of these mechanisms, and we have done it in Europe, the first international regulation, and nobody can argue against me that regulation is not against innovation. That’s another topic, but I am open to discuss it to anyone. I think regulation builds trust, because it orders a market and gives trust. confidence to the market, the consumers, and the citizens. But there are not only a way to govern through regulation. We can govern through transparency, through oversight, through involving everybody. So governance is beyond regulation itself. It’s one mechanism. We should find also the market incentives so that companies and governments behave ethically.

Ian Bremmer: Just a quick one, because I’m responding to that. Did you say, I mean, when the group first came together, you know, 39 members from all these different countries, different walks of life, that actually coming to agreement on common principles seemed to be one of the easiest things for our group to do? That was quick. Am I right about that?

Carme Artigas: Yeah, of course.

Ian Bremmer: Anyone else want to take that on? James?

James Manyika: No, you’re fundamentally right. I mean, one of the things that was extraordinary when we began our work was how quickly we got to agree on things like, this must be based on fundamental human rights. We all agreed. This must be based on international law. We all agreed. This must benefit everybody. We all agreed. I think the hard work was, how do we all come together to think through how we actually do and achieve those things? But I think getting to the principles was relatively quite straightforward. I’m looking at Alondra here, who was a big, you know, force in getting us to many of the right places we got to, especially on issues around fundamental human rights based on the extraordinary work that she had been doing for many, many years.

Ian Bremmer: Alondra, do you want to jump in?

Alondra Nelson: Yeah, I would just say, you know, to your question of why, why is that the UN provides us with a quite incredible foundation? I mean, the UN Charter, our international accords around human rights are quite powerful kind of cornerstones for thinking about this. And so we had a place to go. And I think, you know, the challenge that we face with technology is particularly powerful and fast moving ones like AI is things are moving around and where do we anchor ourselves? And I think the why of the UN is in part that the world’s countries had agreed. have agreed upon already these fundamental kind of true North values. The challenge becomes what does that mean in a digital world? What does that mean in an AI world in which, you know, society is being kind of re-transformed and reconfigured? But I think those fundamental things are true and that’s been a really core of our work on the committee.

Ian Bremmer: And I want our audience to appreciate this. I mean, getting the Singaporeans to champion rule of law is not exactly shocking, but I mean, we’re talking about the Americans, the Russians, the Chinese, the Europeans, the global South. I mean, all participants here, this was not the hard challenge in this group. Vilas?

Vilas Dhar: I think that’s right. I mean, Ian, I want to start from a fundamental observation. We too often equate governance with control. And it’s part of a conversation that’s much bigger. I think we have followed a narrative that technology companies innovate and governments regulate and somehow in that the rest of us go along. But that’s not the point of governance, right? Governance is to set a shared vision for humanity, is to think about all of the resources we can bring to bear to make shared decisions that put agency with communities, that allow voices to participate and to come forward. When we think about the work of the body, I think this underpins the idea. What we got from the Secretary General was a mandate to think beyond, beyond the forms and functions of the moment, to think about a world where a digital future actually works for all of us. It starts from the fundamental pieces that James and Alondra spoke to. But it requires us to also envision new functions and new forms for a future that’s grounded in the idea of governance for, by, and of the people. And I think AI gives us such an amazing aperture to go back to really fundamental questions about what participatory mechanics should look like.

Ian Bremmer: I’m glad you brought that up because when, you know, so much of the conversation on AI out there is about risks, existential risks, disinformation, all of that. This group, not in any way unconcerned with those risks. but fundamentally thinking about how to use AI for humanity. I mean, climate change in a sense is a much more difficult conversation because there’s so much zero-sumness. There’s so much, you know, like reparations need to be paid because you’ve done this to us. This has been an overwhelmingly positive sum, non-zero-sum conversation. James?

James Manyika: Yeah, it has been, but it also has highlighted something else, including beyond the UN itself, is how important this is for it to be a multi-stakeholder endeavor. That was fundamentally important. Let me tell you why I think that was fundamentally important. If you think about what’s at the heart of this technology, this conversation, and what we hope for it, you point to three things, I think. One are the extraordinary opportunities, the possibility to address so much of our challenges with the SDGs, climate change, there’s so much that we could potentially do that’s transformational, number one. There are complexities and risks. There are so many of them. We have to think about all the kinds of issues that we know could happen and go wrong with this technology. And then third, the idea that this has to benefit and include everybody. If you think about each of those three things, there’s no other way to get that done other than through a multi-stakeholder effort. The opportunities, companies are pursuing those, researchers are pursuing those, NGOs are pursuing those, governments are pursuing those. The risks and complexities, same thing. Governments are thinking about those, agencies are thinking about those, researchers are, civil society is. Get to the inclusion and the opportunities. How do you go after opportunities, especially in countries and places and communities where those are not commercial opportunities? You have to include everybody. So as you think about each of the three things that are at the heart of this, it has to be a multi-stakeholder effort. And that’s why I’ll say one final thing. It’s why I was so thrilled that our body actually represented that multi-stakeholder effort. take hold of you. We had researchers, we had academics, we had activists, we had civil society, we had everybody involved. We debated a lot, argued a lot, and we worked pretty well together, I think.

Ian Bremmer: And I would say that it wasn’t obvious during the conversations who necessarily was wearing each of those hats, because the body was collective, pretty global. But I’m going to ask you, because you do wear one of those hats in real life, when we talk about governance, and Vilas just talked about the way we should think about governance, what are the responsibilities that the core private sector corporations, and even some of them state-owned enterprises are linked, should have when we think about governance of AI?

James Manyika: Well, we have several. First of all, keep in mind that much of the research, fundamental research that’s advanced in this field, is led in the private sector, a lot of the research labs are in the private sector. So that places an incredible responsibility, one which is to make sure we’re developing this technology responsibly, we’re thinking about all the beneficial uses of it, not just the commercial uses of it, we have to think about all of that, and we also have a responsibility to engage with governments and others, who are not only going to govern these technologies, but also think about, because keep in mind that this technology, three things happen to it, it’s developed, it’s deployed, and it’s used. That whole chain involves lots of other actors, so we have a responsibility as a private sector to work with each and every one of those, hear their concerns, and see and work together to think about how we deploy and use this technology responsibly. We have an enormous responsibility. Part of it, I’ll say one last thing, we have a responsibility to be transparent, and to help build trust. If this technology is going to have the impact that we think it’s going to have, the public has to trust it, the public has to feel that we and everybody else who’s developing, deploying, and using it, is held accountable. So we have a profound responsibility.

Ian Bremmer: And an interesting point there here is a technology that frankly a lot of people in the global south are more excited about and trust more than a lot of people in the advanced world also an opportunity. Right a fundamental opportunity thing about governments, but Alondra you wanted to come in and then I’m turning to Dr. Wang

Alondra Nelson: I just I think one of the things that we were grappling with is that it’s a fundamental different moment for different moment for multilateralism Right because of exactly what James said not only because you have if we think about something about multilateral action around nuclear Right, those are often owned by states or utilities. And so you have a whole different ecosystem these are technologies that are often coming out of the private sector almost exclusively or a lot of the R&D is coming out of the private sector and then as James suggested you have this sort of series of Stakeholders along the sort of lifecycle of them and that’s a whole so part of what we were grappling with was not just you know How do you govern a dynamic iterative technology? But how do you do it in a way that also is at the same time trying to reimagine what multilateralism looks like when you have when you have to have a Multistakeholder system in a way that you did not when we were trying to think about how do we do nuclear nonproliferation? it’s a completely different set of Actors with different kinds of different sets of power and different kinds of asymmetry than we’ve had to deal with before.

Ian Bremmer: I mean there are US China arms control agreements on AI that will be required But but that’s not what we’re talking about right here. Now. Dr. Wang you you are a scientist and indeed when when you started out There weren’t that many with PhDs in your field in your company. You’re also in the private sector I’m wondering how you are navigating how you think about those tensions and how those tensions are changing as AI is Moving so much faster is becoming so much more transformative as we’re talking about what governance Multistakeholder governance should look like.

Jian Wang: Yeah, I think there’s a different way to look at it. The first thing, you know think about in the UN level Actually, I feel pretty good because you know of the good structure. Like we have the United Nations, we have UNESCO, we have the ITU, these are part of the global organization. And ITU could be a very critical role in terms of technology development. And UNESCO, dealing with the science, dealing with the education and the culture, I think for any new challenge, particularly from new technology, you have to work with a different party and solve the problem from different perspective. You really cannot just solve the problem just by, you know, involve the government. You have to involve the different level of things. That’s one thing. But the scientists, I think, is very important. Get scientists, get individual involved to solve this problem. So for me, the governing is not just, you know, the responsibility of the organization, of government. It’s actually responsible to every people. Just like in the last couple of years, I’m working with the scientists in UK and the scientists in the United States, working together on the geoscience problem. And the more interesting, you know, eventually, actually not eventually, later this year, we bring this new technology to Africa. So individual could make a great deal to help solve this problem. So for me, just like the conversation today, and technology is not just creating a problem. The technology is bringing the people together, even though today is a different way to bring people together. But eventually, you know, different people love this technology. They will work together and solve the challenge. So I’m pretty confident, you know, any problem, you know, created by the human could be solved by a human being.

Ian Bremmer: So this is the most inclusive, proactive conversation I’ve seen on big governance issues, frankly, in the UN in a long time. I’m gonna now shift to implementation and to someone who’s been tasked with some of the most challenging problems in the world on that. front, Volker, none of us envy your position. As you think about AI and how AI can be used, can be implemented by governments, by non-state actors to allow impunity or to facilitate transformation and effective governance, where do you think it’s going right now and what do you think needs to be implemented as a result of these recommendations?

Volker Turk: Well, first of all, congratulations that you got the report out. I think it’s a minor miracle that you have been able to do it and really congratulations to you. When you mentioned mandate, no, you mentioned legitimacy, reach and mandate. I would add normative framework and you have mentioned it. It’s about human rights. We do not have to reinvent the wheel. We have an existing framework that is dynamic, that evolves, that deals with also the future issues and human rights is at the core of it. Because if you are not aware of the impact that anything that happens in this world on freedoms, on fundamental freedoms or on individual rights, if that is not analysed, it’s going to be a problem. And the advantage is it’s a universal framework. So it’s not about global south, global north, west versus someone else. It is universal and that is still agreed at this point in time by everyone. We had a big event on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights last year. There was no detractor from that, no spoiler. So we have that framework. It’s intergenerational. It’s not just about now, it’s also about the past because in some instances you have to deal with the grievances. of the past, but it is primarily also about the future, so it has this intergenerational dimension and it brings us back to human agency and to human dignity, which is whenever anything happens in this world, including on the digital, on the AI front, you will have to take into account. And it is multi-stakeholder. A human rights framework is by nature multi-stakeholder. We cannot do anything on the human rights front if you didn’t, if it wasn’t nourished by social movements, by civil society, by the private sector, and by member states. And actually, so we have a role model when we look at the implementation of how we can bring this to bear on the norms that states themselves have accepted, that the private sector through the business and human rights guiding principles have accepted, and how we can actually go into the granular detail that is needed in order to analyze how we are going to work.

Ian Bremmer: James wants to come in, but a quick follow-up for you first, which is people outside this room, people in this room know this. People outside this room don’t necessarily appreciate that 194 countries around the world agree on a lot of things. They agree on fundamental human rights, even if they don’t implement them. They agree, but they know what they are. They agree on sustainable development goals and where one would want humanity to go, even if right now most of them are not on track to being fulfilled. And hopefully, they agree on a global digital compact and how one deploys artificial intelligence to help ensure that we can actually get some of this better. So when you think about that, if you had a crystal ball, right now, do you believe over the next two, three years that AI is potentially on track to help actually implement, execute more of the things that we agree on but aren’t doing?

Volker Turk: Look, we are obviously at a very difficult geopolitical moment, no doubt about that. But we hopefully will have the global digital compact and the pact for the future. It’s a good beginning. beginning, it’s not enough, it will require a lot of dedicated attention to it, it will require continued multi-stakeholder conversations, it will require a governance framework that becomes more and more effective. Of course we are divided, polarised, we are not at the best place when it comes at the societal level to bring coherence to things, but this is precisely where whatever we can hang on to that works, including the report that you brought out, it actually shows that it is possible and we need to grab on to that and run with it.

Ian Bremmer: James?

James Manyika: Well you know, as you know well Ian, a couple of things that were on our minds when we were doing the work, one is the need to move and act very quickly, for at least two reasons that were centred in our work, the SDGs, the world’s behind, we’re all behind if you recall, we centred the need to contribute to accelerate the SDGs, the ITU has just done some phenomenal work that highlights that of something like the 169 goals in the SDGs, something like 134 of them could benefit and be accelerated using AI, we have to move. The second thing that was on our minds was the issues around capacity, and this is where especially the Global South comes to mind, because I grew up in the Global South, unless we’re able to give people access to this technology, both to participate and benefit from it, the risk of the digital divide becoming the AI divide is too huge, so we have to act, we have to act, that’s why one of our recommendations is around either the capacity fund or capacity network, we have to bring together a multi-stakeholder group that moves quickly to bring capacity and access to especially the Global South.

Ian Bremmer: I mean climate change, we didn’t really have decades, but the reality was you kind of could kick the can for a while and just let other people pay for it, the kids. You don’t have that time on this issue, which is why I don’t think I’m not surprised that everything happened in a year because, I mean, you need light speed to make that work. Carme, you want to come in and then Vilas.

Carme Artigas: Yes, exactly. I think these recommendations are only as good as our capacity to implement them as soon as possible. So as you have mentioned, and no of these recommendations are built on vacuum. We’re building on existing frameworks that already work, like human rights, but also the excellent work that UN agencies are already doing in their own domains. And that they will keep on doing that, and probably they will have much more burden of work around all these topics on AI. But we need additional instruments because there is still a global governance deficit. And because this is so horizontal, it requires so much coordination. So this is why we did not recommend, as the first thing, an international agency. Because that takes a long time, it’s a big institution, and we will see if that comes.

Ian Bremmer: And the governments, they were not ready to approve that. If you’d announced it, it wouldn’t have happened.

Carme Artigas: I don’t know, but we are proposing things that are actionable, and that we believe that in less than 18 months’ time can be ready for work. Because that’s what we need. And I think that governance is far from an innovator, it’s a catalyzer, and it’s an enabler. And I think that’s what we should be focused on.

Ian Bremmer: An agenda setter?

Carme Artigas: Of course. But I think having this conversation, and these conversations, was not the public opinion one year ago. And I think we are starting a conversation now that I hope is followed beyond the Global Digital Compact, and the companies and the governments and all the institutions will support our recommendation.

Ian Bremmer: I mean, this is the sneaky thing about the UN, right? Which is that, you know, you actually put it together, you imagine it, you start actually having conversations that other people aren’t having, and they will, default, become what people are talking about.

Vilas Dhar: Here’s the power in it, Ian. I think you’re exactly right. There is a way to talk about this that is the law of big numbers. That AI is the story of billions of dollars of investment, millions of lines of code. The foundation models that have the most parameters. And you can almost turn it into a math problem. There were a number of experts on the body with me that were computer scientists. I think we probably would all say, I hated doing math homework as a kid. I certainly don’t want to do it now. It’s not the solution. Instead, what I think about is all of these things we are talking about aren’t really about put all the ingredients together, put them in a stew pot and get an answer. It’s think about the fact that almost all of this comes down to the experience of people on the ground. My brothers and sisters, my cousins, my uncles, my aunts in countries across the planet. And what we put forward in the report is a mechanism to think about real intervention that intersects with people where they are. We don’t think about capacity building as finding a few critical enablers and saying let’s invest in compute. Or let’s just make sure there are data sources. Instead, we think about a holistic network that says let’s actually look with communities at what their needs are and think about a mechanism by which we say there is massive resources across the system. There is those contextual pieces of a normative framework. There is that mandate and that integrity. But it doesn’t happen because any entity, the UN or otherwise, says we are now going to come in and build AI for the public good. Happens because we work with communities to say what do you need to build and want to build? The second recommendation in the report that’s relevant is this idea of a global fund. The idea that we actually need capital resources that sit apart from and outside of our political mechanisms that hold instead a moral responsibility to say we need to take the resources necessary for communities to define their digital agency and make sure that they have the economic resources that let them use that money in the way they need to to build what they do. Now, we haven’t defined the specific form of that fund for a very specific reason. This is something that needs to happen through a participatory mechanism. That through the global digital compact and the implementation that comes, we need to take rights, we need to take frameworks, we need to take capital and turn it into something that actually advances progress.

Ian Bremmer: Alondra, as someone who does public policy for a living, what do you take out of this? If you were in charge of global implementation, what would you, how would you think, not about priority. advertising, but how would you think about your agenda? What would you want to make sure that people are taking away from the next steps?

Alondra Nelson: Well, first I would go to process, because that’s what wonks do. But would it be, just to double click on what Vilash said, I mean, part of this process was a lot of consultation with lots of people from civil society, with the impacted communities. So if we really want to steer and shape these good outcomes, we need to figure out how to do that in part by engaging communities. So any implementation, exactly to Vilash’s point, has to include communities that are impacted, that are going to be impacted, need to have a seat at this table in this conversation, whether or not they have PhDs in computer science or can do math. That’s critically important. I think the other piece is that we don’t know enough. So I would also associate myself with Dr. Jian, and that we don’t know the science. I mean, if we think back about the high watermark of the COVID-19 pandemic, and there were lots of preprints and lots of papers, and I think in that context, perhaps it was okay to say, you know, we’re going to figure out the science as we’re, you know, we’re going to build a plane while we’re flying it. We actually don’t know enough about these systems and tools and models. A lot of what we do know, a few people know, a lot of people don’t know. So I think one of the sort of outcomes of the report is really a commitment to implementing a kind of common understanding. And we’re seeing across the, you know, sort of international ecosystem, different ways for doing that. We proposed in the report, creating an international panel for understanding AI, for the science of AI, that would complement work on AI safety, that would complement some of the other sort of multilateral and regional things that are happening. But even these have to be done in a way that is communicating that information to not only nation states, but sees the public as an audience for how these tools work, what they can do, what their limitations are, and how we can use that information to steer them to the good outcomes that I think many of us hope and want, but are not inevitable and are not unique inherently characteristics of the technology.

Ian Bremmer: And I’d like to believe that this panel right now is actually leading by example specifically on that. That’s what we’re trying to do on this stage right now, right? Volker, you wanted to go and then James.

Volker Turk: Just to, because I think it’s a very important discussion, because if you look at the future and what startups want to do these days, they will want to do something for the for the good, common good, public good, whatever you call it. But you need to fill it then with content. That’s where the human rights side comes in, because you want to do something that is of benefit to humanity. And we often hear that actually from those who are involved in this. That’s important. But there is also the risk side and we cannot avoid talking about the risks. And because risks, we can also look at it from like traffic regulations. I mean you’re going to hit another car if you don’t respect the traffic regulations. And it’s a little bit the same when it comes to innovation, to all kinds of creative work.

Ian Bremmer: I want to give James and Dr. Wang a chance to come in and then we’re going to turn to risks. And I’m going to go to you first, by the way, but go ahead James.

James Manyika: I want to just underscore something that Dr. Nelson just described, which is there’s so much more research still to do in this field. I mean I, in my day job, I oversee the research teams that are researching and building these systems. And the field is moving so quickly, the advance is coming so fast. There’s still a lot more that we still need to learn. Some of that is surprising as being incredibly beneficial. We have all these breakthroughs and landmark breakthroughs in science and other places. But some of them are risks that we’re still researching. So I think the research frontier, that’s why one of the key pieces in our recommendation was this idea of a scientific panel that tries to keep it. But it’s got to be one that works very, very differently than what say the IPCC does. It has to be real-time. IPCC does what, a report every seven years? We can’t do that here. So that’s why the ongoing research both to understand the benefits benefits, the potential, as well as the risks, is so fundamentally important. That’s why many of us are involved in a lot of these AI safety institutes and research to really work on the frontier of the risks.

Ian Bremmer: Dr. Wang, you want to come in?

Jian Wang: Yeah, I think that back to this research challenge, I think it’s something to bring up, you know, at this time. Just thinking about every year, we have more than 5 million paper published, probably some number even bigger than 5 million, that’s a lot of paper. And just like climate change, it’s a very, very complex system, and it takes time for people to really understand. And come to the AI, it’s even more complex than the climate change, okay. So I would say that really needs something new and a framework to bring the whole science community together. Again, I want to emphasize that, and with a UN framework, and otherwise, there’s no single science committee can solve this problem.

Ian Bremmer: And is it fair to say in this field that right now, especially when we look at the two countries that are leading the way in AI, U.S. and China, that the scientific community is actually getting further apart?

Jian Wang: And most of the time, I won’t look at this field based on the countries, okay. So if you look at the people who really pioneered this area, they are from Europe, okay, from Canada. So it is not just country by country, and you have to look at how the science community actually works, okay. So for me, actually, the reason that people are thinking about U.S. and China is just because they have good AI infrastructure, helped people do the research, okay. So I think for the UN, we have to make sure they have the global shared AI infrastructure so everybody could contribute, and everybody could contribute. to solve the problem, okay. This is actually how big tech companies should do as well. You know, it’s not just for your company, but it’s really on a shared infrastructure, particular technology infrastructure, I would say.

Ian Bremmer: For the rest of the people, yeah. Oh, okay. Who was first? No, to focus first. So, only because I want to shift towards, again, we can have a very upbeat conversation about where we want to get, but as you said very eloquently, the geopolitical environment right now, the trajectory is not towards more integration, more global cooperation. It’s actually towards more conflict, and the political and economic models that we thought we could kind of take for granted are themselves under siege. So, when you look at the AI initiatives that are now being put together against that geopolitical conflict, that context, where do you see the biggest challenges?

Volker Turk: Well, it is obviously, once the genie is out of the bottle, how do you control the genie? And I think- Once all sorts of actors have that technology. For instance, and this is a phenomenon that is not just in one part of the world. I mean, we get a lot of it. We actually get a lot of requests for advisory services from member states and startup companies all around the world who want to do the right thing. So, they’re asking us, what type of risk models do we use? How do we regulate? How do we get a multi-stakeholder system in place? And it’s incredibly important that we are very fast in making sure that these advisory services can be provided. We have done it with the big tech companies. I mean, I brought you one of the documents that came out of this, which looks at taxonomy of risks from a human rights perspective, which wants to really complement the existing risk frameworks and really say you need to look at obligations. when it impinges on individual freedoms and rights. And that work is incredibly important. It’s not about ethics anymore, it is about obligations that we have towards people.

Ian Bremmer: All right, please.

Carme Artigas: I just wanted to comment on all the discussions about risk. I don’t know if we all remember that we’re talking about machine learning and deep learning, the conversations were about fairness. All of a sudden, when generative AI came to scene, we forgot about the conversation of fairness, we focused the focus on risks, in most of them existential risk or risk for frontier AI models, and sometimes that is preventing us to look at the existing risks that we already have in the present, more on the sides of fundamental rights. And it’s very interesting, and I recommend everybody having access to the document, and an agenda we have included, which is a risk analysis, a risk survey, involving many countries in the world, different stakeholders, and how interesting it is to see the difference on perception of risks of global north, global south, men and women. And we’re talking about risk because we are not informed that we need this scientific panel on the real facts, sometimes we tend to be dramatic or probably overreacting, and we forget to talk about opportunities. And if we see how risk is perceived in the global south is less perceived, people are more concerned about the opportunities they can miss.

Ian Bremmer: But they’re being left out.

Carme Artigas: Absolutely. So let’s talk also about opportunities, let’s have scientific panel inform us, not only on the risk, more transparency from the private companies, of course, but also on the great opportunities. And I can mention the huge acceleration we can expect on achieving the sustainable development goals, and also how can we allow for education and public health and universality. And I think that is the discussion that we still need to have.

Ian Bremmer: So the principle global risk here is that the lack of resources, the lack of urgency, means the digital divide becomes an AI divide, and we end up splitting apart much farther, right? And humanity doesn’t look like humanity very much in that environment. right?

James Manyika: No, it doesn’t. I mean, I was going to interject very, very quickly. If you remember in our work, one of the fascinating observations for me is when we’re talking about the risks, we often talked about misapplication and misuse. Several members in our body said, please add missed uses. If you remember that word, it’s actually in there. Missed opportunities. And that was mostly some of the members in the Global South thinking about the missed opportunities when this technology could actually transform their lives, circumstances. But all of that hinged on this ability, having the capacity to be able to participate. And we spent a lot of time thinking about the enabling infrastructure, the enablers to enable participation that range everything from very basic things that are in the digital compact like broadband connectivity, even electricity, right? In addition to access to models and compute. So I think this question of access and capacity is so fundamental to the inclusivity part of this conversation.

Ian Bremmer: So addressing the missed opportunity isn’t like, oh, we’re paying you because we’re doing something wrong. It’s because you’re actually creating market opportunities. I mean, it should be additive.

Alondra Nelson: Can I jump in here and just have a slight push back a little bit? I mean, I do think, so we did hear quite a lot from people in the global majority that they didn’t want to be left out. But there were also concerns about climate and sustainability, about the mining of critical minerals, about the extraction of labor that has to be done to train data. So I want to be very clear about what we’re hearing on the sort of landscape of inequality when you think about the entire AI stack and not just the sort of deployed tool or system.

Ian Bremmer: It feels like a race, right? I mean, on the one hand, you need these tools to address the challenges, but making the tools is also going to strain the challenges. Yeah? Please.

Vilas Dhar: I mean, we assume that inertia is the problem, right? We assume that inertia is inevitability, that the ways that we develop are the only ways can do it. Today, in this building, we are showing an AI model in a collaboration with Rafik Anadol, who I know is friends with many of us, a model that’s trained on 100 million pieces of data, sourced ethically with community consent from across the planet, trained on a model that uses only renewable power, that goes slow rather than fast, that generates incredible pieces of aesthetic beauty, and can also be used to build a predictive climate model that lets us test interventions. AI doesn’t have to be an attack against our climate sustainability. What we have to change instead is the why behind our reasons for moving so fast, for what the commercial purposes are that are often putting us in conflict against things like political rights, economic rights, climate issues, and more. There are other ways. Risks are not deterministic. We talk about risks so we can come up with better paths to better futures.

Ian Bremmer: Do you buy that? I mean, I’m asking… Thank you.

Alondra Nelson: I do. I do. I mean, I think that we are, you know, we talk quite a lot about a few organizations, but we have other organizations that are creating different models or trying to think about the sustainability issue. And I think we should be, if we’re really serious about advancing on the SDGs, we should need to be really serious about the sustainability issues and about, I think, a growing conversation that says we just need more energy, full stop, and, you know, whatever happens, you know, so be it. And so we, I think particularly in a place, in a conversation at the UN, we’ve got to figure out a way to hold all those things together and put them in balance, even understanding that it’s going to be very hard to do. And I think this is, that’s innovation, right? I mean, I think that we have had other moments where we said, you know, you’ve got to, you’ve mentioned seatbelts, seatbelts in the cars, we put guardrails on the road that allow you to sort of go where you want to go, steer a little bit faster. I mean, there are other kinds of historical moments in which we have had to make choices about how we want to advance things. And I would, you know, I think one of the challenges that we want to offer to the world, particularly to the scientific community, is how do you build these models more sustainably? How do you build data centers that are cooler, that use less water? I mean, it is a, like, it’s a, it is, these are the scientific challenges. engineering challenges of our time. And I think for many scientists, they’re incredibly exciting to think about as puzzles and how do we incentivize that?

Ian Bremmer: So we have only three minutes left. And I wanna use that for our two co-chairs, if you don’t mind. And I wanna ask both of you, take a step back. Is this a historic moment? In 10 years time, do we go back? Is there a COP process for artificial intelligence? Are we thinking differently about global AI? Are we applying our models in ways that are more inclusive, more integrative because of what is being done right now? Do you believe that? I wanna ask both of you, what it means for you. James.

James Manyika: I think this is a very important moment. One of the things that gives me enormous confidence is the fact that we’re still so early in the development of this technology. The fact that we’re having these debates, these discussions, this early in the development of a technology that still is in its early stages gives me a lot of hope. The fact that we’re able to at least agree on fundamental principles that should guide the development of this technology, that gives me enormous hope. The fact that we can actually have a multi-stakeholder conversation about this and come together to think about, so how do we do this? It goes back to what you said, Ian. The fact that we very quickly got to agree on basic principles and that much of the debate and hard work all had to do with how do we do it, that gives me hope. So I’m actually quite optimistic about all of this. I think, but it’s only incumbent on everybody here and all of us in the room to make sure we progress this with humanity’s best interests at the center of what we do with this technology.

Ian Bremmer: Carme, you get a minute.

Carme Artigas: I’m absolutely confident that here, in changing times, we have managed to develop AI for the good of humanity with more inclusiveness, with more opportunity to all, not only relying to the goodwill of organizations and governments, but we have. created really the governance instruments to make it happen and that we would look back to today of today and say, we were proposing the right thing, but most important, the nations were brave enough to adopt them.

Ian Bremmer: So before we close, I want to thank you to the panel, but I know everybody here would be a little remiss if we didn’t ask our friend Amandeep to stand up, our special envoy who made this process work. Tireless, tireless efforts, incredibly balanced decency, moral guidance and integrity and reflects everything that we are hoping for on this panel would not be happening if he wasn’t there. And I just want to thank you for everybody here. Thanks so much for joining us. We’re out of time and we’ll see you soon.

Redi Thlabi: Thank you so much, Ian, for this marvelous moderating of that panel and to your panelists as well. So much love, respect and affection, I see, but we’ve got to move along to the next segment of the program. Thank you all so very much. Thank you. I’ll introduce our next guest once we’ve all settled down to prepare for the next speaker as we wind down to the final segment of our convening this afternoon. I’d like us to settle down so we can give the president his moment and an opportunity to address us as we take the final steps to our event today. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, again, please help me in starting this joint closing. Help me welcome, a warm welcome, he’s travelled a long way to be here. Western Africa is a long way from here. His Excellency, I’m not going to call him up until we’ve all settled. I think it is appropriate. I think it is appropriate to demonstrate our own commitment, our own respect, and a word that Ian used earlier, decency, in describing Amandeep Singh Gill, UN Secretary General’s envoy on technology. So I’d like us to afford the same warmth and decency to our next speaker. It is a pleasure to welcome on stage his Excellency, the President of Botswana, Mokgweetsi Masisi, for his closing comments.

Mokgweetsi Masisi: Mr. Secretary General, Excellencies, I wish to express my profound gratitude to the Secretary General of the United Nations, His Excellency Antonio Guterres, for the invitation to participate in the Action Days session ahead of the summit of the future that is scheduled for 22nd to the 23rd September 2024, particularly on the segment of the digital track. Recommendations go to all the speakers and presenters on the digital future for all for highlighting the significance of digital justice. Digital technology is pivotal in global transformation. The effects of its impact can either be positive or negative, depending on how we harness the opportunities and mitigate challenges. However, the scope of positive impact remains high if we can collectively work towards this end. It is critical to make a link between digital inclusion and digital cooperation to bridge the divide between nation-states and within nation-states. We need to recognize that the digital divide emanates from disparities between the developed and developing countries. Technology has the potential to advance the promotion and acceleration of closing the gap in opportunities between genders and, consequently, can lead to the attainment of gender parity goals. More importantly, digital space has the potential to advance the promotion of human rights, if unimpeded. Furthermore, issues of international peace and security leverage on the use of digital technologies to inform the world of the threats and challenges that need to be addressed. Botswana, therefore, commits to be part of the brigade that flags the criticality of the potential of digitalization and cautions of its threats. Thus, my Administration has prioritized digitalization as one of its priorities within its flagship strategy of the Reset and Reclaim Agenda. I assure you of the Republic of Botswana Government’s commitment to continue to be open and amplify our voice on issues of digitalization. It is also my fervent hope that the global aspirations outlined in the Global Digital Compact would close gaps, create inclusivity, and promote access. by once again extending my sincere appreciation to the Secretary-General and all other key stakeholders for a productive session as we all look towards the summit of the future tomorrow. Thank you.

Redi Thlabi: Thank you very much. And now, for the final segment of our closing, a pleasure to welcome Amdip Singh Jo, UN Secretary-General’s envoy in technology. If you could also join him on stage, please. We heard from you earlier this morning Achim Steiner, Administrator of UNDP. If you can also come with him at the same time, thank you. Thank you. Doreen Bogdan-Martin, Secretary-General of the ITU. If you could also kindly come on stage, please. I’ll pick on you first, Amandeep, to speak, okay? Thank you.

Amandeep Singh Gill: And thank you to all of you for being here with us at this moment, this very important moment. And I want to thank my partners in this endeavour, Doreen and Achim, and their teams for the incredible work that we’ve been able to do together. I have only three points to share with you as reflection from the day. First, the importance of connection. And as we heard in the video, it’s not about connecting the circuits, it’s about connecting the people. So it’s the connections across people, people from different geographies, different backgrounds, different sectors, different lived experiences. We can only get the digital future right. if we connect people. The other second point that I take away from the day is the importance of not retreating into silos. Everything is connected. We can’t deal with AI without dealing with data. We can’t deal with either without dealing with digital public infrastructure and connectivity and so on. So we need to take a holistic view. And the last point I want to share is the importance of humility. I think we need to listen more than we speak. All of us who are in the policy space need to be very, very humble about what their understanding of technology is, what its implications are. We need to work together. We need to constantly update ourselves and hang out with the right people so that we can bring their insights, their valuable insights, into our policy work and improve the quality of our policy responses. So thank you very much. It’s a very exciting moment. It’s a very sobering moment at the same time. There’s a lot of work ahead. But with you, we can get there. Thank you.

Redi Thlabi: Thank you so much. I think you can speak at the podium or on your microphone. It’s up to you.

Achim Steiner: I’ll just use the microphone. And thank you, I will not use the teleprompter because it’s really just two things that I want to say. One is a really big thank you. You and we and all of us in the UN today had a treat. We listened to presidents, to CEOs, to young entrepreneurs, to artists, to people who, together with science, engineering, technology, are able to walk again, at least, with the help of technology. We’ve had an extraordinary day. And I hope that what you can take away from this SDG Digital Day and also this prospect of AI that to all of us is still somewhat unknown, even though we know it is going to be central to our lives as we think into the future, is this age of possibility. There is so much in the world right now that makes… everyone feel like they live under a cloud and sometimes you lose perspective. I think today I hope you all got a sense of what an extraordinary age we live in and if we make the right choices what an extraordinary age it can be for the next generation and for everyone. In that spirit I want to thank Amandeep, I want to thank Doreen, our staff who’ve actually been working for weeks on all of this and everybody else who supported this day today by turning it into something that I hope the United Nations will always be known for. Even in the darkest days there is hope and it will be done and it will be led by people. Thank you so much.

Doreen Bogdan-Martin: Thank you, thank you Achim and thank you Amandeep and indeed it has been an extraordinary, extraordinary day. Sustainable, inclusive, responsible. Three concepts at the heart of our digital track during the summit of the future action days and I would like to add to that hope because nothing gives me more hope for our shared digital future than all of you. Our brilliant innovators, our partner to connect pledgers, our digital game changers, you showed us technology can be co-created with the people it’s built for involving them directly as decision makers in design. You showed us how to make digital work with the lived realities of people in developing countries and underserved and vulnerable populations. You showed us how emerging tech from augmented reality to AI can help boost our planet’s resilience while supporting climate action. You showed us how digital skill building can lead to decent work and economic prosperity. in the unlikeliest of places against all odds. You showed us what peace tech can do to rescue the SDGs. You even showed us how much it will take, literally, an investment to connect everyone everywhere by 2030 through the Connecting Humanity Action Blueprint mentioned by Saudi Arabia. And you showed us your commitment to do what it takes through new Partner to Connect pledges. And I thank you for those new pledges. Ladies and gentlemen, we are the SDG generation. A digital future full of hope, possibility, and ambition is in our hands. And I want to thank each and every one of you for giving us a glimpse today. You gave us a glimpse of what is possible. We may have come to the end of our first Digital Action Day, our second SDG Digital, but the action certainly does not stop here. It can’t. Because too much is at stake. Fired up by hope, let’s take everything that we’ve learned today, let’s go out there and let us build a more sustainable, inclusive, and responsible digital future for all. And let’s build it together. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, as we wrap up, and as Akeem already mentioned, I think it’s important to understand this really was a team effort here. And I also want to acknowledge all of the staff, and if I may, can I ask the staff to just stand up? Because this wouldn’t have happened without our amazing teams. I know it’s dark in the room. Thank you.

Redi Thlabi: Thank you very much. Now that’s leadership, because often we say we leave no one behind, but we forget the people who are doing the groundwork, who perhaps don’t have the opportunity to shine on the global stage. So I find that very inspirational indeed. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, let me thank you, all of you, for being here today. It’s been a long day. I’ve got nothing to add to all the challenging, inspiring messages that we’ve heard today as we journey together towards a digital future for all. For all. Now, the last thing I’m going to tell you is that that online forum or platform where you can make your inputs is going to be up tomorrow after world leaders have adopted the Global Digital Compact. Please speak honestly, share what you know, what you think, what you’ve experienced, and take the learnings from today as you make your input. We look forward to them. Thank you so very much for today. Goodbye.

C

Carme Artigas

Speech speed

172 words per minute

Speech length

963 words

Speech time

335 seconds

Unique UN position to lead global AI governance

Explanation

The UN is uniquely positioned to lead global AI governance due to its mandate, reach, and legitimacy. It can bring all nations and stakeholders to the table, building on its historical success in governing international issues.

Evidence

Examples of UN’s past success in governing climate change and arms control

Major Discussion Point

The importance and role of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

Agreed with

Omar Al Olama

James Manyika

Tumi Makgabo

Volker Turk

Agreed on

Importance of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

Balancing innovation and risk mitigation in AI governance

Explanation

AI governance should focus on both opportunities and risks, not just existential risks. There is a need to balance innovation with risk mitigation, considering the different perceptions of risks across global north and south.

Evidence

Risk analysis survey showing differences in risk perception between global north and south

Major Discussion Point

Governance and regulation of AI

Disagreed with

James Manyika

Disagreed on

Focus on risks vs opportunities in AI governance

O

Omar Al Olama

Speech speed

191 words per minute

Speech length

254 words

Speech time

79 seconds

GDC as starting point for future action on AI

Explanation

The Global Digital Compact is seen as a great starting point for future action on AI. It provides a framework for cooperation and action on AI governance.

Evidence

UAE’s commitment to be part of the roadmap put forward by the UN

Major Discussion Point

The importance and role of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

Agreed with

Carme Artigas

James Manyika

Tumi Makgabo

Volker Turk

Agreed on

Importance of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

J

James Manyika

Speech speed

181 words per minute

Speech length

1479 words

Speech time

489 seconds

Need for multi-stakeholder approach in AI governance

Explanation

AI governance requires a multi-stakeholder approach due to the diverse nature of opportunities, risks, and inclusivity challenges. This approach involves companies, researchers, NGOs, governments, and civil society.

Evidence

Composition of the UN advisory body representing diverse stakeholders

Major Discussion Point

The importance and role of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

Agreed with

Carme Artigas

Omar Al Olama

Tumi Makgabo

Volker Turk

Agreed on

Importance of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

Need to bridge digital divide to prevent AI divide

Explanation

There is an urgent need to bridge the digital divide to prevent it from becoming an AI divide. This requires providing access to AI technology and building capacity, especially in the Global South.

Evidence

Recommendation for a capacity fund or network to bring AI access to the Global South

Major Discussion Point

Opportunities and challenges of AI for development

Agreed with

Tumi Makgabo

Sundar Pichai

Agreed on

Addressing the digital divide to prevent an AI divide

Role of private sector in responsible AI development

Explanation

The private sector has a significant responsibility in AI development, including conducting fundamental research, developing technology responsibly, and engaging with governments and other stakeholders. They also have a duty to be transparent and build public trust.

Evidence

Examples of private sector research labs leading AI development

Major Discussion Point

Governance and regulation of AI

Need for real-time scientific panel on AI developments

Explanation

There is a need for a scientific panel that can provide real-time insights on AI developments, both in terms of benefits and risks. This panel should work differently from existing models like the IPCC, given the rapid pace of AI advancements.

Evidence

Comparison with IPCC’s seven-year reporting cycle, which is too slow for AI

Major Discussion Point

Governance and regulation of AI

Addressing both risks and missed opportunities of AI

Explanation

AI governance should address not only the risks but also the missed opportunities, especially for the Global South. There is a need to focus on enabling infrastructure and capacity building to ensure inclusive participation in AI development and benefits.

Evidence

Inclusion of ‘missed uses’ in the advisory body’s risk discussions

Major Discussion Point

Ensuring AI benefits humanity

Agreed with

Sundar Pichai

Felix Mutati

Agreed on

AI’s potential to accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goals

Disagreed with

Carme Artigas

Disagreed on

Focus on risks vs opportunities in AI governance

T

Tumi Makgabo

Speech speed

166 words per minute

Speech length

2102 words

Speech time

757 seconds

GDC addresses digital divides and inclusive governance

Explanation

The Global Digital Compact aims to address existing digital divides and promote more inclusive digital governance. It recognizes the need for a more equitable digital future.

Major Discussion Point

The importance and role of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

Agreed with

James Manyika

Sundar Pichai

Agreed on

Addressing the digital divide to prevent an AI divide

V

Volker Turk

Speech speed

162 words per minute

Speech length

854 words

Speech time

315 seconds

GDC builds on existing human rights frameworks

Explanation

The Global Digital Compact builds on existing human rights frameworks, which provide a universal and dynamic foundation for addressing AI governance. This approach ensures that human rights considerations are central to AI development and deployment.

Evidence

Reference to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and its continued relevance

Major Discussion Point

The importance and role of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

Agreed with

Carme Artigas

Omar Al Olama

James Manyika

Tumi Makgabo

Agreed on

Importance of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

Focusing on AI use cases that benefit humanity

Explanation

There is a need to focus on AI use cases that benefit humanity and contribute to the common good. This involves filling the concept of ‘public good’ with content that aligns with human rights principles.

Evidence

Mention of startups focusing on projects for the common good

Major Discussion Point

Ensuring AI benefits humanity

S

Sundar Pichai

Speech speed

136 words per minute

Speech length

1405 words

Speech time

618 seconds

AI can accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goals

Explanation

AI has the potential to accelerate progress on the UN Sustainable Development Goals. It can be applied to benefit humanity in various areas such as health, education, and climate action.

Evidence

Examples of AI applications in language translation, scientific discovery, and disaster prediction

Major Discussion Point

Opportunities and challenges of AI for development

Agreed with

James Manyika

Felix Mutati

Agreed on

AI’s potential to accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goals

AI enables economic progress and entrepreneurship

Explanation

AI is enabling economic progress and entrepreneurship, especially in emerging markets. It can boost productivity across sectors and create new opportunities for businesses.

Evidence

Example of Gary Logistics in Ethiopia using AI to improve operations and create job opportunities

Major Discussion Point

Opportunities and challenges of AI for development

Agreed with

James Manyika

Tumi Makgabo

Agreed on

Addressing the digital divide to prevent an AI divide

J

Josephine Teo

Speech speed

141 words per minute

Speech length

795 words

Speech time

338 seconds

Importance of building AI capacity in developing countries

Explanation

There is a need to build AI capacity in developing countries to ensure they can participate in and benefit from AI advancements. This involves working with employers, providing individual learning support, and building training infrastructure.

Evidence

Singapore’s approach to enabling workers to acquire relevant skills for the future

Major Discussion Point

Opportunities and challenges of AI for development

F

Felix Mutati

Speech speed

98 words per minute

Speech length

411 words

Speech time

251 seconds

Potential of AI to transform lives in rural areas

Explanation

AI and digital technologies have the potential to transform lives in rural areas by providing access to information and services. This can lead to improved farming methods and economic opportunities.

Evidence

Example of a young farmer in rural Zambia using a mobile phone and internet to access weather forecasts and market prices

Major Discussion Point

Opportunities and challenges of AI for development

Agreed with

Sundar Pichai

James Manyika

Agreed on

AI’s potential to accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goals

M

Margrethe Vestager

Speech speed

137 words per minute

Speech length

792 words

Speech time

345 seconds

Need for global cooperation on AI governance

Explanation

There is a need for global cooperation on AI governance to address challenges that individual countries cannot solve alone. The Global Digital Compact provides a framework for such cooperation.

Major Discussion Point

Governance and regulation of AI

Importance of enforceable AI regulation

Explanation

Enforceable AI regulation is crucial to create a systemic response to the challenges posed by AI. This includes legislation to keep markets open, ensure digital services are safe, and protect privacy.

Evidence

Examples of EU legislation like the Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act

Major Discussion Point

Governance and regulation of AI

A

Alondra Nelson

Speech speed

207 words per minute

Speech length

1177 words

Speech time

340 seconds

Centering human rights in AI development

Explanation

Human rights should be at the center of AI development and governance. This involves anchoring AI governance in fundamental human rights principles and international law.

Major Discussion Point

Ensuring AI benefits humanity

Need for sustainable and ethical AI development practices

Explanation

There is a need for more sustainable and ethical AI development practices. This includes addressing issues of climate sustainability, labor practices in data training, and the extraction of critical minerals.

Evidence

Mention of concerns about climate impact, labor exploitation, and resource extraction in AI development

Major Discussion Point

Ensuring AI benefits humanity

V

Vilas Dhar

Speech speed

217 words per minute

Speech length

859 words

Speech time

236 seconds

Importance of community engagement in AI development

Explanation

Community engagement is crucial in AI development to ensure that AI solutions meet the needs of the people they are intended to serve. This involves working with communities to understand their needs and involving them in decision-making processes.

Evidence

Proposal for a global fund to support community-defined digital agency

Major Discussion Point

Ensuring AI benefits humanity

Agreements

Agreement Points

Importance of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

Carme Artigas

Omar Al Olama

James Manyika

Tumi Makgabo

Volker Turk

Unique UN position to lead global AI governance

GDC as starting point for future action on AI

Need for multi-stakeholder approach in AI governance

GDC addresses digital divides and inclusive governance

GDC builds on existing human rights frameworks

Speakers agreed on the critical role of the Global Digital Compact in addressing AI governance, digital divides, and promoting inclusive development while building on existing frameworks.

Addressing the digital divide to prevent an AI divide

James Manyika

Tumi Makgabo

Sundar Pichai

Need to bridge digital divide to prevent AI divide

GDC addresses digital divides and inclusive governance

AI enables economic progress and entrepreneurship

Speakers emphasized the importance of bridging the digital divide to ensure equitable access to AI technologies and prevent further inequalities.

AI’s potential to accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goals

Sundar Pichai

James Manyika

Felix Mutati

AI can accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goals

Addressing both risks and missed opportunities of AI

Potential of AI to transform lives in rural areas

Speakers highlighted AI’s potential to contribute to sustainable development and improve lives, particularly in developing regions.

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers emphasized the need for a balanced approach to AI governance that promotes innovation while mitigating risks through enforceable regulations.

Carme Artigas

Margrethe Vestager

Balancing innovation and risk mitigation in AI governance

Importance of enforceable AI regulation

Both speakers stressed the importance of grounding AI governance and development in existing human rights frameworks.

Volker Turk

Alondra Nelson

GDC builds on existing human rights frameworks

Centering human rights in AI development

Unexpected Consensus

Multi-stakeholder approach to AI governance

Carme Artigas

James Manyika

Vilas Dhar

Unique UN position to lead global AI governance

Need for multi-stakeholder approach in AI governance

Importance of community engagement in AI development

Despite representing different sectors (government, private sector, and civil society), these speakers unexpectedly agreed on the necessity of a multi-stakeholder approach to AI governance, emphasizing the importance of inclusive participation from various sectors and communities.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of agreement included the importance of the Global Digital Compact, the need to address digital divides, AI’s potential for sustainable development, the necessity of human rights-based approaches, and the importance of multi-stakeholder governance.

Consensus level

There was a high level of consensus among speakers on fundamental principles and goals for AI governance. This consensus suggests a strong foundation for global cooperation on AI development and regulation, which could facilitate more rapid progress in implementing the Global Digital Compact and related initiatives. However, the specific mechanisms for implementation and balancing various interests may still require further negotiation and refinement.

Disagreements

Disagreement Points

Focus on risks vs opportunities in AI governance

Carme Artigas

James Manyika

Balancing innovation and risk mitigation in AI governance

Addressing both risks and missed opportunities of AI

While both speakers acknowledge the need to address risks, Carme Artigas emphasizes the importance of not overlooking opportunities, especially for the global south, while James Manyika stresses the need to address both risks and missed opportunities equally.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of disagreement revolve around the balance between focusing on risks versus opportunities in AI governance, and the specific approaches to ensuring sustainable and ethical AI development.

Disagreement level

The level of disagreement among the speakers is relatively low. Most speakers agree on the fundamental principles and goals of AI governance, with differences mainly in emphasis and specific implementation strategies. This suggests a generally unified vision for the Global Digital Compact, which bodes well for its potential implementation and effectiveness.

Partial Agreements

Partial Agreements

Both speakers agree on the need for ongoing research and monitoring of AI developments, but James Manyika focuses on the speed and real-time nature of the panel, while Alondra Nelson emphasizes the importance of sustainability and ethical considerations in AI development.

James Manyika

Alondra Nelson

Need for real-time scientific panel on AI developments

Need for sustainable and ethical AI development practices

Both speakers recognize the potential of AI for development, but while Sundar Pichai focuses on the positive impacts, Alondra Nelson emphasizes the need to address sustainability and ethical concerns in AI development.

Sundar Pichai

Alondra Nelson

AI can accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goals

Need for sustainable and ethical AI development practices

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers emphasized the need for a balanced approach to AI governance that promotes innovation while mitigating risks through enforceable regulations.

Carme Artigas

Margrethe Vestager

Balancing innovation and risk mitigation in AI governance

Importance of enforceable AI regulation

Both speakers stressed the importance of grounding AI governance and development in existing human rights frameworks.

Volker Turk

Alondra Nelson

GDC builds on existing human rights frameworks

Centering human rights in AI development

Takeaways

Key Takeaways

The Global Digital Compact (GDC) is seen as a crucial starting point for global AI governance and cooperation

AI has significant potential to accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goals and enable economic development

There is a need for inclusive, multi-stakeholder governance of AI that involves developing countries

Balancing innovation with risk mitigation is key in AI governance and regulation

Centering human rights and community engagement in AI development is essential

Building AI capacity and infrastructure in developing countries is critical to prevent an AI divide

Resolutions and Action Items

Launch of a Global AI Opportunity Fund by Google to invest $120 million in AI education and training globally

Proposal to establish a global fund on AI for sustainable development

Recommendation to create an international scientific panel on AI

Plan to make an online platform available for public input on the Global Digital Compact after its adoption

Unresolved Issues

Specific mechanisms for enforcing AI governance globally

Details on implementation of the proposed global fund on AI

How to effectively balance AI development with sustainability and climate concerns

Concrete steps to ensure AI benefits reach marginalized communities

Suggested Compromises

Using existing UN frameworks and agencies to implement AI governance rather than creating new institutions immediately

Focusing on both risks and opportunities of AI to address concerns of developed and developing nations

Balancing regulation with market incentives to encourage ethical AI development by companies

Thought Provoking Comments

We too often equate governance with control. And it’s part of a conversation that’s much bigger. I think we have followed a narrative that technology companies innovate and governments regulate and somehow in that the rest of us go along. But that’s not the point of governance, right? Governance is to set a shared vision for humanity, is to think about all of the resources we can bring to bear to make shared decisions that put agency with communities, that allow voices to participate and to come forward.

Speaker

Vilas Dhar

Reason

This comment reframes the concept of governance in a more inclusive and participatory way, challenging the typical narrative of top-down control.

Impact

It shifted the conversation towards considering governance as a collaborative process involving multiple stakeholders, not just governments and tech companies. This perspective was echoed by other panelists throughout the discussion.

We don’t think about capacity building as finding a few critical enablers and saying let’s invest in compute. Or let’s just make sure there are data sources. Instead, we think about a holistic network that says let’s actually look with communities at what their needs are and think about a mechanism by which we say there is massive resources across the system.

Speaker

Vilas Dhar

Reason

This comment provides a nuanced view of capacity building, emphasizing the importance of community needs and holistic approaches.

Impact

It deepened the discussion on implementation strategies, moving beyond technical solutions to consider social and community contexts.

We need to recognize that the digital divide emanates from disparities between the developed and developing countries. Technology has the potential to advance the promotion and acceleration of closing the gap in opportunities between genders and, consequently, can lead to the attainment of gender parity goals.

Speaker

Mokgweetsi Masisi

Reason

This comment highlights the interconnection between digital divides, global inequality, and gender disparities.

Impact

It broadened the scope of the discussion to include considerations of global equity and gender equality in digital development.

We don’t know enough. So I would also associate myself with Dr. Jian, and that we don’t know the science. I mean, if we think back about the high watermark of the COVID-19 pandemic, and there were lots of preprints and lots of papers, and I think in that context, perhaps it was okay to say, you know, we’re going to figure out the science as we’re, you know, we’re going to build a plane while we’re flying it. We actually don’t know enough about these systems and tools and models.

Speaker

Alondra Nelson

Reason

This comment acknowledges the limitations of current knowledge about AI systems and draws a parallel to the rapid scientific developments during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Impact

It introduced a note of caution and humility into the discussion, emphasizing the need for ongoing research and scientific understanding alongside policy development.

Connect the schools. Connect the young people. Connect my children.

Speaker

Nnenna Nwakanma

Reason

This simple yet powerful statement cuts through complex policy discussions to highlight a fundamental priority.

Impact

It refocused the conversation on the practical, human-centered outcomes of digital development, particularly for young people and education.

Overall Assessment

These key comments shaped the discussion by broadening its scope beyond technical and policy considerations to include community needs, global equity, scientific understanding, and practical human outcomes. They challenged conventional narratives about governance and implementation, emphasizing the importance of inclusive, participatory approaches and acknowledging the complexities and unknowns in the field of AI. The discussion evolved from high-level policy talk to considering concrete actions and their impacts on diverse communities, particularly in the Global South.

Follow-up Questions

How can we ensure AI benefits are distributed equitably and the digital divide does not become an AI divide?

Speaker

James Manyika

Explanation

This is critical to ensure AI does not exacerbate existing inequalities between developed and developing countries.

How can we build AI models and data centers more sustainably to address climate and environmental concerns?

Speaker

Alondra Nelson

Explanation

This is important to ensure AI development does not conflict with climate goals and sustainability efforts.

How can we create a real-time scientific panel to study and report on AI developments and impacts?

Speaker

James Manyika

Explanation

A rapid, ongoing research effort is needed to keep up with the fast pace of AI advancement and inform governance efforts.

How can we implement capacity building and create a global fund to support AI development in the Global South?

Speaker

James Manyika and Vilas Dhar

Explanation

This is crucial to enable developing countries to participate in and benefit from AI advancements.

How can we better involve impacted communities in shaping AI governance and development?

Speaker

Alondra Nelson

Explanation

Ensuring diverse voices are included is essential for creating AI systems that work for all of humanity.

How can we create a shared global AI infrastructure to enable more inclusive research and development?

Speaker

Jian Wang

Explanation

This could help democratize AI development and reduce concentration of power in a few countries or companies.

How can we balance discussions of AI risks with equal focus on opportunities, especially for the Global South?

Speaker

Carme Artigas

Explanation

A balanced approach is needed to fully realize AI’s potential while mitigating risks.

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed.

Vietnam faces US-China rivalry over undersea cable expansion

The United States is pushing Vietnam to avoid using Chinese firm HMN Technologies in its plan to build 10 new undersea cables by 2030, amid concerns over national security and sabotage. Vietnam’s current cables, essential for global internet connectivity, have suffered repeated failures, prompting the government to prioritise new projects.

Washington is lobbying Hanoi to select more experienced and trusted suppliers for the cables, citing concerns about espionage and security threats linked to HMN Technologies, which the US views as associated with Chinese tech giant Huawei. The US has also raised concerns about possible sabotage of Vietnam’s current subsea cables.

Vietnamese authorities have remained open to working with Chinese firms, but United States officials have stressed that choosing HMN Tech could discourage American companies from investing in Vietnam. Meanwhile, Vietnam’s top telecoms company, Viettel, is already planning a cable with Singapore, bypassing disputed waters in the South China Sea.

The US and China are vying for influence in Vietnam as the Southeast Asian nation looks to expand its undersea cable infrastructure. Both countries are heavily invested in Vietnam, with subsea cables becoming a critical element in the broader US-China technology rivalry.

The Power of the Commons: Digital Public Goods for a More Secure, Inclusive and Resilient World

The Power of the Commons: Digital Public Goods for a More Secure, Inclusive and Resilient World

Session at a Glance

Summary

This event focused on the power of digital commons and digital public goods (DPGs) in creating a more secure, inclusive, and resilient world. Speakers from governments, international organizations, academia, and civil society discussed the transformative potential of DPGs and digital public infrastructure (DPI) in fostering sustainable development and advancing human rights globally.

Key themes included the importance of multi-stakeholder collaboration, the need to close digital divides, and the critical role of community-led initiatives in developing DPGs. Speakers highlighted successful examples like Wikipedia and emphasized how DPGs can democratize access to knowledge and technology. The discussion underscored the importance of embedding human rights and democratic values in the design of digital systems.

Participants stressed the need for robust governance frameworks and universal safeguards to ensure DPGs and DPIs respect privacy, promote inclusion, and protect against misuse. The role of governments in providing legal frameworks and supporting connectivity was discussed, alongside the importance of civil society participation in shaping digital governance.

Academia was highlighted as a key contributor to digital commons through knowledge creation, incubation of projects, and research on societal impacts. Speakers called for increased investment in digital skills and emphasized trust and safety as crucial for the continued development and use of DPGs.

The event concluded with calls to action for building a global ecosystem around DPGs, integrating them into various policy fields, and fostering international cooperation to leverage their potential in addressing global challenges and achieving sustainable development goals.

Keypoints

Major discussion points:

– The importance of digital public goods (DPGs) and digital public infrastructure (DPI) for inclusive development and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals

– The need for multi-stakeholder collaboration and community-led approaches in developing and governing DPGs

– The role of governments in supporting DPGs through policy frameworks, funding, and infrastructure

– The critical importance of embedding human rights and democratic values in the design of digital systems and DPGs

– The potential of DPGs to democratize access to knowledge and empower marginalized communities

Overall purpose:

The discussion aimed to highlight the transformative potential of digital public goods and digital public infrastructure in fostering sustainable, inclusive development worldwide. It sought to encourage multi-stakeholder partnerships to promote and protect DPGs that are truly universal and reflect diverse voices.

Tone:

The overall tone was optimistic and forward-looking, with speakers expressing enthusiasm about the potential of DPGs while also acknowledging challenges. There was a sense of urgency about the need to act now to shape the digital future in line with democratic values and human rights. The tone remained consistent throughout, emphasizing collaboration and shared responsibility among different stakeholders.

Speakers

Moderators/Facilitators:

– Costanza Sciubba Caniglia (Anti-Disinformation Strategy Lead at Wikimedia Foundation)

– Nicole Manger (Lead Global AI Governance and Digital Cooperation at Federal Foreign Office of Germany)

Speakers:

– Amandeep Gill (UN Secretary-General’s Envoy on Technology)

– Krzysztof Szczerski (Ambassador of Poland)

– Alicia Buenrostro Massieu (Deputy Permanent Representative of Mexico to the UN)

– Rebecca MacKinnon (Vice President Global Advocacy at Wikimedia Foundation)

– Ivan Sigal (Executive Director of Global Voices)

– Fabro Steibel (ITS Rio)

– Eileen Donahoe (Coordinator for Digital Freedom, US Department of State)

– Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi (Director General of NITDA Nigeria)

– Marianne Díaz Hernández (YID Campaigner at Access Now)

– Jimmy Wales (Co-founder of Wikipedia)

– Urs Gasser (Professor at Technical University of Munich)

– Emran Mian (Director General for Digital and Telecoms, UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology)

– Anna Christmann (Member of German Parliament, member of UN Secretary-General’s High-Level Advisory Body on AI)

Areas of expertise among speakers include digital governance, technology policy, digital rights, civil society engagement, digital public goods, artificial intelligence, and international relations.

Full session report

Digital Public Goods: Building a More Secure, Inclusive, and Resilient World

This high-level discussion brought together experts from governments, international organizations, academia, and civil society to explore the transformative potential of digital public goods (DPGs) and digital public infrastructure (DPI) in fostering sustainable development and advancing human rights globally.

Event Structure and Overview

Costanza Sciubba Caniglia opened the event, outlining its structure: opening remarks, success stories, and a panel discussion. The event aimed to highlight the importance of DPGs and DPI in promoting inclusive digital transformation and sustainable development.

Key Themes and Discussions

1. The Importance of Digital Public Goods and Infrastructure

Speakers unanimously agreed on the critical role of DPGs and DPI in promoting inclusive, sustainable digital transformation. Amandeep Gill, UN Secretary-General’s Envoy on Technology, set the tone by emphasising that “well-governed commons are the foundations of human civilization. Digital is no exception, and today more than ever digital commons are vital to our interconnected world.”

Fabro Steibel provided a thought-provoking perspective, noting that “DPIs emerge earlier and faster in the Global South than in the Global North. This is what research shows and most likely this is because out of necessity. In the Global South, we need better technologies to spread and equalise wealth and power.” This insight challenged common assumptions about technological innovation and highlighted the unique contributions of the Global South in developing digital public infrastructure.

Alicia Buenrostro Massieu, Deputy Permanent Representative of Mexico to the UN, stressed the importance of DPGs and DPI in closing the digital divide, while Eileen Donahoe, Coordinator for Digital Freedom at the US Department of State, emphasised the need for universal safeguards to protect human rights in the development and implementation of these technologies.

2. Multi-stakeholder Collaboration and Community-led Approaches

The discussion highlighted the crucial role of multi-stakeholder collaboration in developing and governing DPGs. Speakers agreed that involving diverse stakeholders, including civil society, academia, and community members, is essential for creating truly inclusive and effective digital public goods.

Marianne Díaz Hernández of Access Now emphasised the role of civil society in ensuring DPGs remain transparent, inclusive, and responsive to societal needs. Urs Gasser, Professor at Technical University of Munich, highlighted academia’s multifaceted contribution: “Academia can not only contribute in these different forms substantively to the formation of digital commons and digital public goods. It can also study and assess what we can learn about digital commons as we go forward, about the societal impact about the relevance, we can assess whether we pass the Wikipedia test when new policies are rolled out.”

Jimmy Wales, co-founder of Wikipedia, stressed the importance of community-driven governance, using Wikipedia as a prime example of a successful DPG. He suggested that when considering digital policies, one should ask, “If you’re about to pass some rule, think about, is this going to wreck Wikipedia? And if it is, it might not be a great rule.”

3. The Role of Governments and Policy Frameworks

While there was broad agreement on the importance of government support for DPGs, there were nuanced differences in how speakers viewed the government’s role. Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi, Director General of NITDA Nigeria, emphasised the need for governments to provide legal frameworks and connectivity for DPGs.

Emran Mian, Director General for Digital and Telecoms at the UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, focused on the importance of digital skills and trust and safety in the context of enjoying and creating DPGs. Anna Christmann, member of the UN Secretary-General’s High-Level Advisory Body on AI, called for bringing DPG discussions to other policy areas like climate change and COP negotiations.

4. Human Rights and Democratic Values in Digital Systems

A recurring theme throughout the discussion was the critical importance of embedding human rights and democratic values in the design of digital systems and DPGs. Marianne Díaz Hernández provided a thought-provoking comment on this issue: “When we focus on development above human rights, instead of understanding development as a tool to achieve human rights, we risk creating systems that have not been designed with human rights as a principle, but as an afterthought.”

Eileen Donahoe echoed this sentiment, advocating for universal safeguards to protect human rights in DPGs and DPI. This emphasis on human rights highlighted a key challenge: balancing rapid development of DPGs with ensuring robust protections for individual rights and freedoms.

5. Success Stories and Practical Applications

Ivan Sigal from Global Voices shared insights on the importance of multilingualism in DPGs, highlighting their work in creating tools for underrepresented languages. Fabro Steibel discussed successful DPI implementations in Brazil, emphasizing the role of open-source solutions in government services.

6. Global Digital Compact and Future Initiatives

Amandeep Gill highlighted the Global Digital Compact as a new foundation for international action on DPGs and DPI. He emphasized its role in addressing key digital issues and promoting cooperation. Gill also mentioned the upcoming OSPOS for Good Conference, focusing on open-source technologies for public good.

Anna Christmann called for new hands-on initiatives to co-design frontier open data and AI solutions as DPGs. The discussion also touched on the relevance of the upcoming Summit of the Future in shaping the global digital landscape.

7. Challenges and Future Directions

The discussion identified several challenges and areas for future focus in the development of DPGs:

– Balancing development goals with protecting human rights

– Establishing sustainable funding mechanisms for DPGs and open-source projects

– Improving data and AI literacy to enable wider participation in DPG development

– Addressing potential risks and misuse of DPGs and open data

– Ensuring multilingualism and local context in global DPGs

– Developing governance models that balance community-driven approaches with government support

– Integrating DPGs into broader policy discussions on climate change, education, and healthcare

Conclusion

The discussion underscored the transformative potential of digital public goods and digital public infrastructure in fostering sustainable, inclusive development worldwide. It emphasised the need for multi-stakeholder partnerships to promote and protect DPGs that are truly universal and reflect diverse voices. The overall tone was optimistic and forward-looking, with speakers expressing enthusiasm about the potential of DPGs while also acknowledging the challenges ahead.

As the world continues to grapple with digital transformation, the insights from this discussion provide a valuable framework for leveraging DPGs to create a more secure, inclusive, and resilient global digital ecosystem. The emphasis on human rights, community-driven approaches, and multi-stakeholder collaboration offers a path forward in harnessing the power of digital commons for the benefit of all.

Session Transcript

Costanza Sciubba Caniglia: Hello, good morning, welcome, Excellencies, colleagues, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you so much for joining us today for our event, The Power of the Commons, Digital Public Goods for a More Secure, Inclusive, and Resilient World. My name is Costanza Sciubba Caniglia, I am the Anti-Disinformation Strategy Lead at the Wikimedia Foundation, and I am honored today to co-moderate this event with my colleague, Nicole Mangier, Lead Global AI Governance and Digital Cooperation at the Federal Foreign Office of Germany. Before we start, I wanted to thank our co-organizers, the Office of the Tech Envoy, the Permanent Mission of Poland and Mexico, the Federal Foreign Office of Germany, TUM, the Network of Centers, and multiple Wikimedia affiliates, Wikimedia EU, Wikimedia Poland, Wikimedia Czech, and Wikimedia Deutschland. I’m going to leave the floor to Nicole in a moment, but just wanted to articulate the event is going to be divided in four parts. We’re going to have opening remarks, and then we’re going to have a section on success stories that will serve to ground the panel that will come afterwards, with a couple of examples of grassroots digital public good examples. And then we’re going to have a panel of experts, and then we’ll close with a couple of closing remarks. And with this, Nicole, to you.

Nicole Manger: Thank you so much, Amandeep. Thank you so much, Amandeep. So thanks a lot, Costanza. And I also very warmly welcome you to our side event, The Power of the Commons, the role of digital public goods for a more secure, inclusive, and resilient world. So this event, as Costanza said, is co-hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation and its affiliates by the governments of Mexico and Poland, and then by the UN Secretary General’s Envoy on Technology. So I want to step a little back. ask the question, like, why are we meeting here on this topic today? So, I guess we are all expecting to be, to see the pact for the future and especially the global digital compact to be adopted successfully tomorrow and adopted. Yeah, and so it’s going to be the first Compass truly global approach to an open, free, secure, and human-centered digital future for all and everywhere. And so for us today, we wanted to highlight especially the transformative potential of digital public goods for the values of the GDC, such as enabling access, inclusive access to digital technologies, and also enabling civil society to have a voice in how technology is designed and governed. Also to pool scarce resources like data and infrastructure to really increase resilience and sustainability and have a digital transformation that is also sustainable. So without further ado, I would like to introduce our esteemed speakers, opening speakers, and I first pass it on to His Excellency Under-Secretary-General Amandeep Gill, Secretary General’s Envoy on Technology.

Amandeep Gill: Thank you very much, Nicole, and I’d like to begin by welcoming all of you to the pre-summit of the Future Action Day. Thank you for being here at UN Headquarters with us. It means a lot. It means a lot to the Secretary General, to all of us. I want to also thank Mexico, Poland, and Wikimedia for organizing this event, this very important event, and I want to thank Germany for their consistent support to this constellation of important ideas. Ladies and gentlemen, well-governed commons are the foundations of human civilization. Digital is no exception, and today more than ever digital commons are vital to our interconnected world. When we speak about digital commons, we mean resources that are collectively owned and managed by a community and freely accessible to all members of our society, and on the technology front, open digital resources are key to the equitable advancement of digital digital technologies, particularly emerging technologies like AI. Nicole mentioned the Global Digital Compact. So after nearly two years of consultation and negotiations, the negotiations have concluded and there’s a text on the table as part of the pact for the future for a decision tomorrow. This document, the Global Digital Compact, embeds an international commitment to global digital commons through digital public goods and digital public infrastructure. So it is a new foundation for more meaningful, more impactful action in this area. This is very significant. The GDC can play a crucial role in democratizing access to knowledge and technological resources, ensuring that everyone everywhere, regardless of their socioeconomic status, has the opportunity to participate in benefit from the digital economy. This inclusivity is crucial for reducing inequalities and promoting social equity, aligning with the goal of leaving no one behind. Further, the collaborative nature of digital commons, including digital public goods and digital public infrastructure, fosters innovation and creativity. By enabling the free exchange of ideas and resources, by bringing data sets together, by bringing talent, coding talent in particular, together, digital commons help accelerate technological advancements and the development of new solutions to global challenges. At the same time, because you have many more eyes on the code, many more eyes on the data, you prevent misuse. You build a set of safeguards, a set of checks and balances that ensure that our digital commons work for everyone. This open and responsible innovation ecosystem can support economic growth, the creation of jobs, enhancement of productivity, contributing to overall economic prosperity and social well-being. At the UN, we know that the open nature of open source software, platforms, data, AI models are a key enabler of the Sustainable Development Goals. By leveraging the potential of Digital Commons, we believe we can accelerate progress towards the 2030 Agenda. As part of the Secretary General’s commitment to Digital Commons, my office, together with many partners, some of which are in the room today, organizes the yearly OSPOS for Good Conference. In July, we hosted this together with Germany and Kenya, the second edition of this conference. Through two days at the UN, over 600 participants from around the world gathered in New York with active engagement, high-quality discussions, and a collaborative spirit characteristic of the open-source community. I’d like to finish these remarks by inviting you all to join us in collaborating on the future of this conference in follow-up to the Global Digital Compact. In this spirit, I wish you an invigorating exchange today. Thank you.

Nicole Manger: Thank you so much, Under-Secretary General Gill. I pass on the word to His Excellency, Ambassador of Poland Krzysztof Szczerski. I am so sorry, possibly, for mispronouncing the name, but I hope I got it over to you.

Krzysztof Szczerski: Thank you very much, Excellencies, Mr. Special Envoy, ladies and gentlemen, I’m so excited to be here, being one of the, not only the daily reader of the Wikipedia, but also having my own profile on it. It’s good to be in the system, somehow. Okay, it’s my honor to be with you today, as we heard, in the dawn of the summit of the future, which we are all very excited about. First and foremost, let me congratulate the Wikimedia Foundation for gathering us and for working tirelessly to ensure the success of today’s discussions. Poland is, of course, happy to be the co-sponsor of this event. As a gentleman, digital cooperation is going to be heavily featured during the Summit of the Future and the entire High-Level Week. We expect, as we already heard, that already tomorrow the heads of states and governments will adopt the foundation for the global digital cooperation, the document which is named, as we heard, Global Digital Compact. This will mark the new era of recognition that we need to act swiftly, decisively and collectively to utilize and govern the ever-expanding digital sphere. I am more than happy to see involvement of many stakeholders from outside the governments like the lead organizer of this event, Wikimedia, in our discussions. It’s only with their active participation on equal footing that we can fully tap the potential of digital public goods and digital public infrastructure for realization of the Sustainable Development Goals. Colleagues, one of the aims of this meeting is to highlight the potential of digital commons, the role of which is inavailable in providing individuals and communities with free and easy access to information. And I just want to underline the word information because I think we get too much of the free and easy access to disinformation. And it’s crucially important since this device becomes now the best friend of many of ours. So therefore it’s very important to really guarantee that it’s free, easy, but also reliable. Therefore I would like to share with you just a couple of cases of how public open data is used by citizens in my country, Poland, to build interest in digital tools, to participate in public life, and to monitor the activity of public authorities. Take for example the portal dane.gov.pl. This is a universal access point to open data in Poland and has been enthusiastically embraced by various stakeholders. It’s a governmental portal, but open for everybody. Presidents interested in monitoring state activities use it as a tool for holding the government accountable. Companies leverage data to build innovative products and services. Another set of examples includes the fact-checking platforms run by civil society. There are various of them. Their adaptability to most recent events, such as fact-checking related to the upcoming elections, is one of their strengths. Our goal, however, in all these efforts, is not to simply implement open data policy, but to do more to construct a comprehensive, robust, citizen-friendly system that is fueled by the valuable data. And we have been recognized for our efforts by the major European and global open data rankings. Ladies and gentlemen, in conclusion, I am looking forward to learning about the concrete examples of how digital public goods and digital public infrastructure can contribute to a safe, resilient, and open digital world, which we strive to build in order to leave no one behind. And I wish you all the very enriching and exciting discussions, and I thank you. Thank you.

Nicole Manger: And next, I would pass on the word to Her Excellency Alicia Buenrostro Massieu, Deputy Permanent Representative of the Mexican United States to the United Nations in New York. The floor is yours.

Alicia Buenrostro Massieu: Thank you very much, and it’s also a pleasure to be here with all of you. In particular, it’s very good to share the floor with such a panel. And having the creator of Wikipedia, as my colleague from Poland has just mentioned, it’s just a real honor, and with them, a big deal as well. And for Mexico, a country that really has put a lot into the global digital compact. So it’s an honor, really, to be here today representing my country, Mexico. The Pact for the Future, and more specifically… the Global Digital Compact represents certainly an opportunity to consolidate a global digital governance framework that fosters inclusion, equity, and sustainability, as well as to emphasize the political relevance of this framework in the multilateral sphere. It’s the first time that we are working on this type of issue from a real compact, and that is a step forward and as the Ambassador of Poland has just mentioned, we really look forward to being able to witness that this has been passed tomorrow morning. So for my country, for Mexico, the promise of digital transformation lies in its ability to drive inclusive growth, reduce inequalities, and accelerate progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Technology must be a development catalyst and not a luxury for a few, and that is the position of my country. So this should be for everybody. Mexico’s priorities are very clear. First, we must close the digital divide and ensure that no one is left behind in the digital age. Second, to empower small and medium-sized enterprises. Technology can be a great equalizer by fostering innovation and supporting local economic activity. Third, Mexico is committed to ensuring that human rights are respected in all digital policies, and that is very important as well. As a country that enshrines the right to access information and communication technologies in our Constitution, we are dedicated to promoting meaningful digital inclusion, particularly for groups in vulnerable situations that have faced historical exclusions, such as women, indigenous peoples, and Afro-descendant communities. At the heart of our efforts is the concept of digital public goods as essential for building a digital commons that is transparent, equitable, and open to all. By investing in digital public infrastructure, we create pathways for marginalized communities to be able to fully participate in the global economy. It’s not just about providing access, but about empowering our people to innovate, to grow, and contribute to the development of their communities. Digital public goods align with Mexico’s goals of inclusive economic development and socio-economic equity. In this context, the Global Digital Compact gains relevance as a roadmap for building secure, inclusive, and rights- based digital ecosystems. Early last year, Mexico co-hosted the GDC consultation for the Americas in Mexico City, and Amandeep was there. That was along with Germany and the Office of the Secretary’s General Envoy, as I mentioned. This consultation brought together key actors from across the region to discuss the most pressing issues around digital governance and the role of digital public goods. Throughout the GDC negotiations, my country has pushed for the creation of open government initiatives, which focus on integrating digital tools into public administration to promote transparency and accountability. We are advocating for the development of inclusive and accessible digital tools, particularly tailored to small and medium enterprises and entrepreneurs. These tools must be affordable and adaptable to the needs of small businesses and local innovators, helping them leverage the power of technology for economic growth. Mexico is committed to investing in inclusive digital infrastructure, focusing on marginalized and underserved communities. By expanding access to the infrastructure in rural and in economically disadvantaged regions, we can help bridge the digital divide and ensure equitable opportunities for all. And to conclude, I would like to encourage all governments and stakeholders to ensure that digital transformation benefits all people everywhere, and that is a commitment that we almost assume. By investing in digital public goods and digital public infrastructure, and by collaborating and building on the principles, objectives, commitments, and actions outlined in the Global Digital Compact, we can consolidate the construction of a global digital environment that is inclusive, equitable, and sustainable. Thank you.

Nicole Manger: Thank you, and I would like to pass it on now to our civil society voice on this stage, Rebecca MacKinnon. She is Vice President Global Advocacy at Wikimedia Foundation and also founder of Global Voices. Rebecca, the floor is yours.

Rebecca MacKinnon: Thank you so much, Nicole. I’m here today representing the Wikimedia Foundation along with my colleague Costanza here and several other colleagues in the room. Someone was asking me just before we got seated what’s the difference between the Wikimedia Foundation and Wikipedia. We are the nonprofit organization that serves as the technical, legal, and fundraising host for Wikipedia and other volunteer-run projects that operate in over 300 languages. Wikipedia, of course, being created before the foundation existed by Jimmy Wales, who you’ll hear from later. We also have staff who support the global community of volunteers who build and maintain these projects around the world. And, of course, I’d like to thank all of our co-organizers shown on the screen today, in particular the governments of Poland, Mexico, and Germany and the Office of the UN Tech Envoy, without whose support we wouldn’t be here. And also grateful to the partnership of many others in the United Nations system, national governments, and civil society and academia who’ve helped organize this event and, more generally, in their commitment to support and protect digital public goods like Wikipedia. And we’ll take the next slide, please. So this is a group of just some of the people who maintain and create Wikipedia who traveled to Katowice in Poland just last month for an annual conference called Wikimania. It was organized, one of the key organizers actually sitting right there, the young man named Maciek. And thanks to our co-hosts and the gracious Polish people for welcoming us. We are very lucky to have him here today. Wikipedia is a digital native, but a lot of the people who build and govern this global resource of free knowledge actually find it very important to gather in person, as you see here, to brainstorm, learn from each other, and build human bonds that enable us to collaborate with empathy and understanding of each other’s lived experience. Next slide, please. New language communities are joining the Wikimedia family all the time. And this is an example, Wikimedia founder Jimmy Wales, sitting there, who you’ll hear from in a few minutes, gave the 2024 Newcomer of the Year Award at Wikimania to the people who’ve created a new version of Wikipedia in the Waiyu language. Next slide, please. And here is that new Waiyu language, Wikipedia. Waiyu is spoken by about 400,000 indigenous people in northwestern Venezuela and northeastern Colombia. It’s an example of a project that benefits an indigenous community that commercial internet companies have no financial incentive to care about. Top-down government services in a lot of countries also often fail to prioritize the needs of indigenous people whose ancient communities often span across several borders, which is why it’s so vital that governments must protect and support the people and the work behind such community-led bottom-up projects. Projects like Wikipedia, but many others, and we’ll hear some more examples later, serve the public interest by creating knowledge, infrastructure, and access to information built on a robust digital commons that we’ve heard about already, which includes open-source software, a range of open content and open data projects, and open licensing for content that enables projects to build upon one another in an interdependent ecosystem. Next slide, please. So here we have a photo of the Igbo language user group in Nigeria, jumping across. the Atlantic Ocean, and a community outreach activity that they carried out not too long ago. Wikipedia exists in several Nigerian languages, run by volunteers who all care passionately about preserving and strengthening their community’s linguistic and cultural heritage, while contributing also to a global body of knowledge about the people, places, issues, and ideas in their countries and communities. So then that knowledge also gets translated into other languages and ends up in English, et cetera. And in so doing, they’re also helping to advance technical capacity, economic opportunity, and cultural flourishing in their own communities. To put it another way, they’re directly contributing to the advancement of quite a number of SDGs. And there’s simply no way that a top-down approach to digital public infrastructure and digital public goods is going to be able to reach all of the underserved, vulnerable, and marginalized communities around the world, full of talented people who will take initiative in innovative ways if given half a chance, as we’ve been discovering throughout the Wikimedia communities. So we believe that the future of the internet should be one that promotes and protects these types of projects and these people, like those who we work with around the world. Wikipedia is one of the most famous examples, but there’s many others that have emerged over the past two decades, and we’re going to be hearing about a few of them in just a few minutes. Thank you.

Nicole Manger: Thank you, Rebecca, and thanks to all our distinguished speakers here on this stage. We are now transitioning to the second segment of hearing success stories of civil society grassroots organizations. because DPGs are really at its core about grassroots involvement and so that’s why we would like to highlight these success stories and also the perspectives of two organizations, one Global Voices and the second ITS Rio on how they are using the potential of DPGs and also possibly certain challenges what you know when it comes to governance structures, robust funding mechanisms and also creating robust data AI literacy to leverage DPGs successfully. So with that said I would like to call Fabro Steibel and Ivan Sigal on the stage with me. So we will start with one example of successful DPGs which is Global Voices. So this is really a multilingual community of writers, translators, academics and digital rights activists worldwide and I would like to give the floor to Ivan Seagal, Executive Director of Global Voices.

Ivan Sigal: Good morning. I’m Ivan Sigal as is just told. I’m now the actually outgoing Executive Director of Global Voices. This is my last public appearance in this role. We’re an organization that’s been for the past 20 years has been a forum for the perspectives and priorities of global majority writers and activists and explores how information technologies affect movements, politics, culture and information integrity. Some 8,000 writers, translators and researchers have participated from 160 countries and contributed to our to our work over the years. We’re dedicated to building understanding across cultures and languages and specifically we understand that the internet does not by itself bring around positive social change. Rather we need to invest in and build an internet based on a vision that reflects those values and we’re one of many communities and initiatives and organizations that exists as a digital public good that works in a much smaller level than a group like Wikipedia but is an example of what people can accomplish when the internet flourish functions as a flourishing and healthy information ecosystem rather than as a censored or surveilled information space or based on a small number of platforms that function as walled gardens or exists as a field of data to be extracted and monetized primarily for artificial intelligence. So my key message today is good internet regulation should support proactively support flourishing information ecosystems marked by a diversity of sources and languages and retaining the means of all people to be part of a network public’s participating in the creation sharing and consumption of information and knowledge. A key element of healthy information ecosystems is information integrity. By this I mean not just controlling or removing the most harmful elements of disinformation in online spaces, but proactively supporting the trustworthiness of information sources, ensuring that users have meaningful agency over information environments and control over their data, and working for more inclusive and diverse participation in online spaces. We work on these issues in numerous ways, such as our Civic Media Observatory, which is a research project to investigate and decode how people understand information and create knowledge in complex information ecosystems. We work with local researchers who have deep knowledge of local context and subtext of information and narrative to explain how information functions in their societies, rather than looking just at factuality or just at data flows. And the example we have there is the Unfreedom Monitor, which is a two-year, 20-country study in networked authoritarianism, which explores how states use both technology and regulation to restrict expression and augment those restrictions through information operations and propaganda. Another example of what this looks like, Global Voices for the last 15 years has run a project called Rising Voices, which is dedicated to supporting marginalized communities to participate and create online with networks of mutual support and learning. We focus on the ability of minority and indigenous language communities to create their own information spaces as they see fit. We work, for example, with Mayan language communities across the Americas to use the internet for language preservation and revitalization. These images come from our annual, this is from our 2024 Mayan Language Summit, which is now an annual event held in Mayan. Very unusual that an event is actually run in Mayan as opposed to being a secondary language to build networks of support for the use of Mayan in online contexts. Thank you.

Nicole Manger: Thank you so much, Ivan. And now, moving from a global organization, we are now zooming in on one regional use case. So, I am very glad to welcome Fabros Deibel here on stage for ITS Rio. So, ITS Rio, it’s the Institute of Technology Rio, that is really working to represent and strengthen Brazil’s and Latin America’s voice in global discussions and conversations on technology governance and digital rights. And it is also a member of the DPI Safeguards Initiative with Fabro himself also being in the Digital Public Goods Alliance. So, Fabro, the floor is yours.

Fabro Steibel: Nicole, thank you very much and thank you Wikimedia for the invitation. I start with a fact. DPIs emerge earlier and faster in the Global South than in the Global North. This is what research shows and most likely this is because out of necessity. In the Global South, we need better technologies to spread and equalize wealth and power. So, when you look at DPIs from the Global South, you ask them why they cannot be DPGs, why you cannot open the digital public infrastructures for good. And this is what we bring as a civil society member of Brazil, also as an academic, as a member of the network of centers, and as a member of the DPGA alliance. So, openness in Brazil is no coincidence. In the 90s, people from civil society and academia, they penetrate the government, they enter the government, and they start to foster open culture from inside the government. Outside the government, the culture keeps open and now we have a strong ecosystem. And we come from this ecosystem. So, what we are doing with DPGA and what do you think we can contribute to this debate today? Number one, we need very good green DPIs. We need open green DPIs. Brazil has CAR, C-A-R, which is a brilliant digital public infrastructure that can be even more brilliant if we bring the openness idea to it. It’s open data, but it’s not really a DPG yet. So, bringing this idea can have, as Wikimedia has a community around it that makes use of this data, make new… So, we have a lot of data, and we have a lot of data, and we can use it to do new surveillance of this data, and then we can fight deforestation or land rights. Number two, information integrity. We had Pegabot, Bot Catcher, that is an open algorithm that used to identify in Twitter the use of bots for this information. We collaborated with journalists and others having that. And we have a lot of data, and we have a lot of data, and we can use it to identify bots, and also, someone got our algorithm and made Atrapabot, a version of it using Mozilla language back to identify bots in Colombia. And lastly, the last case we have is on civic participation. So, we love to use technology to make new ways for people to enjoy deliberating together. So, we have a lot of data, and we have a lot of data, and we can use it to identify bots, and we can use it to make voting for people to deliberate in a more meaningful way other than a majority always wins. And the case studies we have shows that we have young football teams that are using Cucurdamos to select the coach. And we did this in partnership with Taiwan, who has a brilliant captain as well. And we tried it for the human aspect of the environment and it has to be, you know, you can now interact with it, and makes the environment better. You can now interact with it, and then becomes part of the more harmonious ecosystem. And we see now the perspective that can not only open technology, but open technology thinking about the human aspect as well.

Nicole Manger: I talked to leveraging DPGs, you know, across different themes and topics. And I will now pass it over to our expert panel with Costanza moderating, and they will pick up on these success stories, but also look more deeply into potential challenges like funding mechanisms, governing structures, and also data AI literacy. And also really be informed by other existing successful initiatives Amandeep mentioned before, the DPI safeguards initiative, the Digital Public Goods Alliance, and also the OSPO for Good conference that was just hosted here in New York in July. So with that, I hand it over to Costanza and our esteemed panelists. Thank you.

Costanza Sciubba Caniglia: Let’s give a moment to our speakers to get seated. There’s, yes, a very, a very exciting panel. So we’re now going to move to the panel section of our event. I am honored to introduce some of the world-leading experts on the topic of digital public goods and digital governance. This past month and the months in front of us, as we all know, are critical times for the future of digital, global digital governance. And the global digital compact process, the pact of the future, WISE’s review, the high-level advisory board on artificial intelligence are all elements that are going to shape the future of our digital and physical world. One thing before we start that I want to say is this event is in many ways a follow-up event to a conversation that we started with Access Now during the CSW this year and before. So I just wanted to mention this and it’s great to be with Marianne today and with Access Now. But going to the panel, we wanted to have a moment here in the action day to reflect in particular on the transformative potential of digital public goods such as Wikipedia and others and digital public infrastructure and fostering sustainable development worldwide. Digital public goods, especially when grounded in robust digital commons, are essential for inclusive open, sustainable, and digital world and so we want to really encourage this multi-stakeholder partnership. As you can see, this panel has a really wide multi-stakeholder perspective and so we want to encourage this to promote and protect TPGs that truly are universal and reflect on how to best enable civil society and communities globally to have a voice in how technology is developed. So without further ado, I’ll pass it on to our panelists. Dr. Donahoe, I would like to start with you. Dr. Donahoe is the coordinator for digital freedom in the US Department of State’s Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy. So Dr. Donahoe, digital public goods and DPIs have been such a central topic of discussion in the negotiations around the Global Digital Compact and more in general in the discussion about how to rethink global internet governance. I know you’ve been working about a model of right-respecting DPI which is achieved through universal safeguards. Can you tell us more about this and how multilateral and multi-stakeholder effort to protect TPGs and DPI should be shaped?

Eileen Donahoe: Great. First, let me congratulate the organizers here. This is a really remarkable event and it’s a very good reflection of where the DPG-DPI conversation is in the world and it’s very notable that this subject is at the top of the agenda at the high-level week at UNGA. I’m gonna make a comment that’s just based on observing what we’ve already heard. I think what we observed is that the multi-stakeholder community is way ahead and actually building digital public goods and global commons and that’s been going on for decades and you can use the case of Wikimedia, Wikipedia as an example. I think we’re here at UNGA which is a state-centric event. It’s a multilateral led body and I think it is really fair to say that states are generally behind and just catching on to these concepts and also that states are generally much more focused on DPIs and just trying to get ahead around that subject. So, But I will note that, so I’m gonna talk a little about what I see in the multilateral space that’s good and also what the U.S. is focused on and universal safeguards. Basically, here at the U.N. and in the Global Digital Compact, everybody’s really still focusing on definitions and concepts. And I think we’ve gravitated around several core features which include open interoperable standards and specifications that include delivery of public and private services at scale that are ideally and we will be fighting for rights respecting by design and protection of fundamental freedoms embedded in the design. But all of this is intended to drive toward inclusion, development, acceleration of the SDGs. And I just have to say it is really a giant change in the global conversation. This has been central to the G20 under the leadership of Brazil and India. It’s been part of the G7. It’s been in multiple agencies at the U.N. and that is brand new. That has never happened before. So this is really a new topic for states. What I will emphasize for the United States in particular, there are two key parts and it’s a combination of concern and excitement. The concern is that yes, DPGs and DPI hold tremendous promise to accelerate development. And obviously that is the core rationale that states are latching onto it. People are yearning to be part of the digital transformation. There is not equity around the world in that regard. And that is the driving motivation, animating energy here. But what we all have to be careful of is the risks that come with this digitization of infrastructure. And I’m sure we’re gonna be hearing. that from access, but we in the United States are also really focused on risk, and we have embraced the work of the Office of the Tech Envoy and UNDP on universal safeguards because we think that in every instance when DPIs, DPGs, digital commons are built, you have to be thinking about the impact on citizens’ rights. And the core of those concerns relates to privacy, and I will also say obviously equal protection, non-discrimination, and also the risk of exclusion from basic services if you do not build in safeguards and just embrace the technology itself. This is ultimately about bringing democratic values into the digital future around the world, and if we fail to bring safeguards with the actual access to the technology, we will be failing our citizens. The second part I want to mention that we’re really excited about, though, and this is what I do believe civil society has been onto for years, is that technology itself is now a vehicle for governance innovation. It is the way that the governing world can catch up to the pace of technological change, and I think it’s very exciting, this idea that the design, development, and deployment of the technology becomes the vehicle for spreading values and for governing in a way that protects citizens. And so, for me, that is why I’m really actually very excited about the opportunity of DPI, that it’s not just about inclusion in the digital transformation. It is about bringing values. by design in the technology. And last point I want to make is I really want to applaud the Universal Safeguards Initiative that last year at UNGA, OSET, Amandeep himself, Robert Opp from UNDP, they were on the stage launching the Universal Safeguards Initiative. That has been a year-long process. We have been part of it. Foundational principle number one is do no harm and it is about protecting human rights by design and we really applaud that. But the key idea here is no developing country and citizens in developing countries should never be asked to exchange their human rights. They do not trade off their human rights for inclusion in the digital ecosystem or for to be part of the digital transformation. That’s not okay. Development and human rights are not intention.

Costanza Sciubba Caniglia: They must go together so. Thank you, thank you Dr. Donahoe, such an important message. I love your conclusive message especially. Now I would like to move to Mr. Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi, Director General of NITDA Nigeria. So Mr. Abdullahi, digital public goods seem to be very important of course for social and economic development, also what we were just talking about, respectful of human rights. In your current position and as an expert on digital development, how do you see the role of government support for people to operate digital public goods and also to develop digital public goods? And before passing the floor to you, I just also want to mention Wikipedia has a very active community also of Wikimedians in Nigeria who work especially on multilingualism. So that’s also something that how do you think about those communities, not Wikipedia in particular, but in general communities that develop digital public goods in Nigeria?

Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi: Okay, thank you very much. First and foremost, I want to thank the organizers for inviting me and also for giving Africa opportunity to be part of this conversation. Because for me, digital technology is dramatically transforming our world, offering immense potential benefits for the well-being and advancement of humanity, our societies and our planets. And it also holds the promise of accelerating the achievement of sustainable development goals. This can only be achieved through international cooperation that close all digital gaps. Because we recognize those digital gaps are really posing challenge to countries, in particular developing countries who have so many challenges to solve but with limited resources. So I think we should focus on closing that gap because imagine a person sitting next to you never clicked a link, never sent an email and never experienced social media. So almost half of the world population are excluded from this digital transformation, especially in Africa. So we cannot be talking about digital public good without ensuring every person is included. Because if that person is excluded, the technology will not consider that person when making its decisions. So that’s why we are quite fascinated about this conversation on digital public good. And also, like it mentioned before, this DPI-DPG conversation started from the global south, where people are excluded. And we can see the passion about bringing everyone to be part of it. And in Nigeria also, the government is focused on achieving that. We are starting with the digital public infrastructure. We are laying the foundation. We are putting the legal framework in place and also ensuring that we have a robust digital identity, a robust payment system and data exchange platform. So we have two and we are lacking the data exchange platform. platform. Now the government is working on coming up with standard and ensuring that we have that data exchange platform. That will enable us to build the digital public goods when we have the strong DPI stack in place. But now we are having some in silos, like you mentioned about Wikipedia. Wikipedia is a very good example in Nigeria of DPI, where people, the communities around are creating the platform. And that ensure democratization of access to services as well as quality information, fact-checking. Because we should learn from social media, how it started, where it is controlled by few, and also it is for profit. That’s why you can see a lot of things are happening without the control of the countries. Like we came from a way whereby most of these big techs, they don’t even listen to developing countries. They do things based on developed countries’ laws and mission, vision, and so on. And also that is really affecting us in the developing countries. Because for them it is about profit, it’s about what they will make. Few people decide what you see, what you buy, and what you can even think, or who you can friend, what you can believe. But with DPG, it will be open for societies, communities, and societies to look at information, to ensure you have the right information in place, and ensure things are fact-checked before being in public. So in Nigeria we have other smaller ones apart from the Wikipedia, which they are open, but in a siloes form. We cannot call them like a big DPGs. Like for example, we have a platform called Budget, where people can go and check information about government budget, and also do a fact-check to provide information for people in communities to look at budget line item, where the project is supposed to be executed, and check to ensure if it is executed or not. So this also can help for good governance, and it will make things to be open and transparent. So I think it’s good to support this kind of initiatives as well. We also have the National Health Information System project, which is driven by government to make health record available for decision makers, for health service providers, and so on, so that they can have access to health record and citizens can easily get services. So for governments, when you talk about DPGs, government has critical role to play, because it is about democratizing access, and also it is it is about breaking all the experience we have with social media, where few people are controlling everything. So we need to break that unaccountable control over public digital infrastructure. So the DPG will provide that. So government needs to provide the legal framework, because everything you do, you need to have laws that will guide it. You need to have framework and governance in place. So government has the convening power to bring the civil society, the private organizations, and everyone on board to discuss on the governance framework, to discuss on inclusive connectivity and also to intervene to connect the unconnected. So we have so many initiatives we are doing on that. Like in Nigeria, almost about more than 40% of the citizens are excluded. So government is promoting connectivity. We launched the 9,000 kilometers fiber optics project where government want to connect the remote societies and underserved communities. In addition to that also, we have other initiatives around digital literacy. Because it is not just about connecting, but people need to be digitally literate to navigate around the digital platform as well. So we do a lot in training people in developing our digital fluency in the country. We are working with other partners like Ministry of Education. We are developing digital literacy and skills curriculum to infuse it into our formal education so that people will learn from schools. We are also having other projects that will build talent. Because also you need to build your proficiency in building these digital offerings. Because no country will rely on another for its digital offerings. We need people within the country that can build the communities and services. So these are things government is doing in addition to the legal framework like we are working on enacting a law on digital economy and e-governance in Nigeria which can help in promoting digital public infrastructure as well as digital public good. But also for me the most important is this kind of conversation so that developing countries and African countries should have voice on what we are doing globally. Thank you.

Costanza Sciubba Caniglia: Thank you so much. Thank you so much. Marianne, I would like to move on to you now to talk about especially how civil society is a critical stakeholder in global digital governance and for the development of digital public goods. Marianne Diaz-Hernandez is the YID campaigner at Access Now. She’s also a Venezuelan lawyer and digital rights activist and fiction writer. So as I mentioned earlier, this panel really is born as a second step of a conversation that we started together with Access Now a few months back. And so it’s great to continue this conversation and have so many more partners joining it as well. So I’m particularly interested to hear, how you think things have changed in them and what the role of civil society really should be as we move towards a new digital governance. You work extensively to make sure that all stakeholders have a perspective on digital public goods, including community development, digital public goods, and civil society agency. So what can you tell us about that?

Marianne Díaz Hernández: Thank you, Costanza. And thank you, everyone, for the privilege and the honor of your time and attention. Digital public goods, as well as the public infrastructure, which has also been mentioned a lot today on the upcoming days, I’m sure, have a profound need for community-led and community developed spaces where free speech and free assembly and civic life and dissent can thrive. And that requires the existence of spaces of total or partial anonymity and pseudonymity. And it is only possible to understand, design, and regulate these type of spaces through a multi-stakeholder lens, which is the only way that can ensure that the development and the governance of these digital commons remains transparent, inclusive, and responsive to a wide array of societal needs. DPGs are not only extremely important to society on their own standing, as the stories that were previously shared very clearly highlight, but also as the foundation for DPI, as Fabro was detailing, among others. Both of these assets need to be protected and nurtured to enable equitable access and to prevent monopolization or control by a select few. And this inclusivity ensures that the governance of digital spaces aligns with public interest and is the only way to protect them as open participatory environments that will encourage democratic engagement and free expression. And to go back to what Dr. Donahue was touching upon, when we focus on development above human rights, instead of understanding development as a tool to achieve human rights, we risk creating systems that have not been designed with human rights as a principle, but as an afterthought. We are then in need of a paradigm shift that allows us to understand that privacy, anonymity, free speech are not principles that are intentioned with the notion of development, but that have to be at the core of the design of the systems that are necessary to build the trust that the systems require in order to operate. There will be no development without these principles built into the systems that we create. So if we are to build and implement systems that are either created by the private sector, or by governments, or by any sort of hybrid model, the only way that we can make these systems accomplish what we want them to do, which is to support us in achieving the sustainable development goals, and ultimately achieving universal human rights, it is to build systems that are based in solid trust. And the construction of that trust cannot be taken by granted. It requires full and meaningful participation of society in a way that ensures and protects their agency in how to build, implement, and engage with technology. I believe then that civil society needs to work together and with other multi-stakeholders in articulating and putting forward the notion that what we require at this moment in time is a paradigm shift. We are not only speaking about enabling or defending human rights, or when these technologies are created, but about creating these technologies for a world that is built. with public in mind. Where public means built to benefit everyone by shared resources and managed by the community. And this does require a paradigm shift from a world view where resources are meant to be administered by specific actors in society. That model is not sustainable. It’s not participatory and it doesn’t help us in building strong democracies. Thank you.

Costanza Sciubba Caniglia: Thank you so much, Marianne. And now that we are talking about civil society participation, I would like to move on to you, Jimmy. Jimmy is, Jimmy Wales is the co-founder of Wikipedia, so it’s really an honor to introduce you. So you have the unique experience of having created one of the largest, most used digital public goods in the world, which is really a unique kind of experience. What have you learned about how people are able to come together and create and govern projects that serve the public interest? And what advice can you give to all stakeholders and why is it important to do it today?

Jimmy Wales: Great, thank you. And thank you to the organizers and everyone for making this happen. It’s a great event. Yeah, so I think one of the key elements in terms of advice and thinking about this has already been mentioned a couple of times today and that is values. The original vision for Wikipedia was for all of us to imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. And that’s what we’re doing at Wikipedia. And so every element of that is really, really important to us. When we say every single person on the planet, that means that we’re inherently global. We’re in many, many, many languages. And when I say the sum of all human knowledge, it means we care a lot about the quality of what we put out. It isn’t just sort of a giant random message. board we actually try to impart knowledge. This was 23 years ago when I started Wikipedia and it was just a handful of us typing away on the internet with very very limited software and very limited resources. But today Wikipedia is one of the top 10 most visited websites in the world. We have hundreds of millions of visitors every month from all around the world. We’re in over 300 languages, although of course some of those languages are quite small and just getting going. And for me that aspect of our work is one that I’m probably the most passionate about. I’m always very excited to think about the impact that we can have in bringing the ability for people to share knowledge in their own world, in their own community, in their own mother tongue. Some of the values that really carry us forward, we really care a lot about reliable sources. We have policies, for example, our well we have a lot of internal jargon. BLP policy, biography of living persons, which basically says if you see something negative in a biography it better have a source and if it doesn’t you should just remove it immediately and not just discuss what to do about it. Take it out and let’s discuss it then to say of course there’s going to be negative information. It needs to be really reliable and this can be contrasted with of course social media where people just write whatever they want and who knows maybe it’s fact-checked eventually or not. We try to be really really careful about that. One of our core community rules is no personal attacks. So obviously a lot of open spaces on the internet are just rife with personal attacks and that can be fine if it’s a political debate and discussion that often can be quite personal but it’s not right for us. We’re trying to write an encyclopedia. We’re a global movement in many many many different languages but everything in Wikipedia is locally written. Even as we move into an era of AI and I’m actually very excited about the really rapid increases that we’re seeing in the quality of machine translation and yet we have no concept or idea that we should just start wholesale translating Wikipedia into small languages because we know that it’s about that local cultural context. It’s about the local people. They will of course use these tools and it will… you know, finally accelerate that work so that we’re going to see really rapid growth in a lot of the languages that previously have been much more slower to grow. Really, Wikipedia, when we think about a digital public good, I think one of the paradigm cases that everyone should have in mind is Wikipedia. It’s a global resource used by almost everyone on the planet. We’re a non-profit organization. We’re community-built, community-driven. And when I see things in the Global Digital Compact that talk about protecting and supporting digital public goods, I’m very, very happy about this. Because too often, when policymakers are thinking about how to make decisions on public policy and the Internet, they’re really thinking about top-down social media platforms that I always say they run like feudal estates. All the people using it are like the serfs, but the master makes the rules from top down. Whereas we’re a community. We’re a bunch of people. All the rules of Wikipedia are made by the community. All of the decisions are made out in the community. The Wikimedia Foundation doesn’t engage in sort of constant moderation. Boy, the number of times people have complained to me, Wikipedia says this, Jimmy Wales is a communist. I’m like, well, first, I’m not a communist, and second, I didn’t write it. And there’s the sources, and there’s actually a debate, and you can get involved, and let’s have a discourse about human knowledge. So my call to action, really, for everyone is to, and to governments in particular, is let’s think about, as we’re doing public policy, let’s really begin to adopt what I would call the Wikipedia test. If you’re about to pass some rule, think about, is this going to wreck Wikipedia? And if it is, it might not be a great rule. And that might not be, you might want to step back and say, hold on a second, we do need to, oh, yes, clap, please, yes. We need to protect these open communities. So, thank you.

Costanza Sciubba Caniglia: Thank you so much. First one was for the Wikipedia test. Yes, thank you so much. And now I’d like to move to Professor Gasser, who is Professor of Public Policy Governance and Innovative Technology at the Technical University of Munich, TUM, who has been a great partner also in organizing this event, and also the Dean of the TUM School of Social Sciences. So, Professor Gasser, I’d like to move to you as an expert scholar representing academia and go back to the idea of digital commons as a necessary condition for the development of digital public goods. So, academia is also a big contributor to the digital commons. How do you see its role in this context and in improving shared access to knowledge and digital public goods in general?

Urs Gasser: Wonderful. Thank you so much for inviting also perspectives from academia. And, of course, it’s a great honor to be on this panel. And I would like to start right where Jimmy started as well with values. I think if you look at the values of academia, and Fabro set the stage beautifully, you see how this idea of public interest mission of academic organizations and the public interest-driven mindset of academics and academic community make academia a natural ally to the cause of digital public goods and the commons. So, I see a lot of resemblance and echoes to what you just described. I think Fabro already pointed out and alluded to the different functions that academic institutions and, more importantly, also the human beings in academia can play as we aim for more robust commons ecosystems. I just would like to maybe highlight three such roles. The first one is academia, academic networks and individuals as trusted creators of knowledge. If you look back over the past couple of decades, academics have been key contributors to building the digital commons by sharing data and knowledge about the world and doing so through open access publishing, among other things. The second role I would like to highlight is academia as an incubator and convener. Academic communities and values have been a key driver in incubating and launching digital public infrastructures. Just think back about the origins of the internet and the world wide web that were shaped by academic values and communities. But also as we’ve heard examples today, I hope I don’t reveal secrets, but global voices or creative commons and many more projects were closely linked to academic institutions and communities when they started. So you see the role of academia here again as we think about the creation of digital public infrastructures. And let me emphasize one point, what the beauty of it is, is that it’s happening in a distributed way, in a collaborative spirit, and that’s very powerful. The third role I would like to briefly highlight is that academia can not only contribute in these different forms substantively to the formation of digital commons and digital public goods. It can also study and assess what we can learn about digital commons as we go forward, about the society. societal impact about the relevance, we can assess whether we pass the Wikipedia test when new policies are rolled out. So academia can be a learning partner in our endeavors, can help to inform policymaking and good governance. So you see all together, and I just highlighted three rules, you see how academia should actually join the calls around this table and stakeholders for strong principles, policies, and practices that embrace the wealth of distributed academic networks so that together with the other stakeholders we can double down on our commitment to build strong and robust commons ecosystems for the future. Thank you very much.

Costanza Sciubba Caniglia: Thank you so much, and thank you to all of the panelists. I now I’m gonna move to the closing section of this event because we are already running a little over time, but thank you so much for for your participation. And now I would like to call back my co-moderator, Nicole. And for the closing remarks, Mr. Emran Mian, the Director General for Digital and Telecoms in the UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology. Yes, please, Dr. Emran Mian, you have the floor.

Emran Mian: Thank you very much. Conscious of time, I’ll be very brief. Thank you very much for organizing this event. It’s been a real pleasure to listen to stakeholders across this community talk about DPGs and their contributions to them. There’s just two things I wanted to bring out as reflections. One is focusing on digital skills and the skills that people need both to create DPGs but also to enjoy DPGs. And this is a shared responsibility, I think, across the stakeholder community, businesses, civil society, and government. And the UK government, for our part, we’re very pleased of the way in which we’re able to work with partners in countries such as Indonesia, Kenya, and Nigeria to help people to acquire these digital skills. And there’s a lot more to do on that front. And then the second thing I just wanted to draw out was trust and safety. To continue to enjoy DPGs and for DPGs to continue to be created, people need to trust the digital technologies that they are using, and they need to be safe when they’re doing so. And again, for our part as a UK government, we’ve been really pleased to be part of a conversation on AI safety and to have initiated that at Bletchley Park with a UK-hosted safety summit last year. And it’s great to see the continuance of that in all kinds of ways, including a summit in Seoul earlier this year. And earlier this morning we were hearing from the French about their plans for an AI action summit early next year. And I know this is a real source of concern. sort of attention and action for the UN as well. I’ll stop there. Thank you.

Nicole Manger: Thank you so much. And I will now introduce Dr. Anna Christmann. She has multiple heads in innovation technology in the German ecosystem, as member of parliament, amongst others. I guess most people here in New York know her from her role in the Secretary General’s high-level advisory body on AI. Anna, the floor is yours.

Anna Christmann: Yeah, thank you so much. I’m very happy to be part of this panel. And just mentioning first that I’m very inspired by the panels that we just had. And I think it’s an important signal that this panel takes place today in the context of the Global Digital Compact. I think that is just a very important signal of the relevance of digital common goods for the society on a global scale and all the things that we heard about leaving no one behind, strengthening the multi-stakeholder approach, access for everyone and everywhere. I think these are just very important principles and it’s good that they are here in New York in the context of the summit of the future. And then maybe two very concrete points to the questions. What is the call to action that we heard for the future now, building on what we heard today. It was all the great examples also, of course, what we have already as common global digital comments. And I would say one is to really be active now in building this international ecosystem of the multi-stakeholder approach of all the people who are involved already in the open source community and everything around, but also bringing all the other stakeholders into this field. And we heard states might not be the leaders so far, but bringing them as very active actors into this ecosystem. So I would invite us all to really start new hands on initiatives and. projects to co-design frontier open data and also AI solutions and I think there are also links to the work that we did at the high-level advisory body and artificial intelligence at the UN and we have the report which is a lot about capacity building and openness and I think that really links a lot to what we heard today. And of course they are crucial is bringing the people together have the ecosystem have also the investments and the multi-stakeholder governance I think that would be important principles for that. And then maybe mentioning also one very concrete thing that we can do from here on is bringing as a question of DPGs across policy fields and there of course in the UN context as a question of climate policy is one obvious one so bringing this idea and discussions that we had today also to the context of the COP I think would be very valuable as well and I think if everyone is active like we are also in Germany just to mention this very short with with also different initiatives around digital sovereignty data institutes as we are just building if we get this ecosystem on the global scale I think there’s lots to win for all of us. Thank you.

Nicole Manger: Thank you so much and so I guess in light of the timing Constanze and I will just wrap up. So it was our intention here today to convene high-level speakers from UN member states the United Nations and especially academia and civil society really to discuss best practices and a common understanding and I guess just linking to what Dr. Anna Christmann has said we really invite all of you to join our conversations to kick-start projects to really enable this global solutions architects, ecosystem on developing DPGs together.

Costanza Sciubba Caniglia: Yes, yes, thank you. Thank you everyone, it was a fantastic conversation that I am sure will lead to many more conversations. So to be continued, thank you everyone for participating.

A

Amandeep Gill

Speech speed

116 words per minute

Speech length

579 words

Speech time

297 seconds

DPGs and DPI are essential for inclusive, sustainable digital transformation

Explanation

Amandeep Gill emphasizes that digital public goods (DPGs) and digital public infrastructure (DPI) are vital for an equitable and sustainable digital future. He argues that these resources are key to democratizing access to knowledge and technological resources.

Evidence

The Global Digital Compact embeds an international commitment to global digital commons through digital public goods and digital public infrastructure.

Major Discussion Point

The importance of digital public goods (DPGs) and digital public infrastructure (DPI) for global development

Agreed with

Fabro Steibel

Alicia Buenrostro Massieu

Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi

Agreed on

Importance of DPGs and DPI for inclusive development

The Global Digital Compact provides a new foundation for DPG/DPI action

Explanation

Gill highlights that the Global Digital Compact, as part of the Pact for the Future, establishes a new basis for more meaningful action in the area of digital public goods and infrastructure. This document represents a significant step forward in international commitment to these resources.

Evidence

The Global Digital Compact embeds an international commitment to global digital commons through digital public goods and digital public infrastructure.

Major Discussion Point

The future of DPGs and digital governance

F

Fabro Steibel

Speech speed

194 words per minute

Speech length

552 words

Speech time

170 seconds

DPGs emerge faster in the Global South out of necessity

Explanation

Fabro Steibel points out that digital public goods (DPGs) and digital public infrastructure (DPI) tend to develop more quickly in the Global South due to pressing needs. He suggests that this is because these technologies are essential for spreading and equalizing wealth and power in these regions.

Evidence

Examples of DPGs from Brazil, such as CAR (rural environmental registry) and Pegabot (bot detection tool).

Major Discussion Point

The importance of digital public goods (DPGs) and digital public infrastructure (DPI) for global development

Agreed with

Amandeep Gill

Alicia Buenrostro Massieu

Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi

Agreed on

Importance of DPGs and DPI for inclusive development

A

Alicia Buenrostro Massieu

Speech speed

127 words per minute

Speech length

704 words

Speech time

330 seconds

DPGs and DPI are critical for closing the digital divide

Explanation

Alicia Buenrostro Massieu emphasizes the importance of digital public goods and infrastructure in reducing inequalities and promoting digital inclusion. She argues that these resources are essential for ensuring that technology benefits all people, particularly marginalized communities.

Evidence

Mexico’s efforts to develop inclusive digital infrastructure and tools for small and medium enterprises.

Major Discussion Point

The importance of digital public goods (DPGs) and digital public infrastructure (DPI) for global development

Agreed with

Amandeep Gill

Fabro Steibel

Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi

Agreed on

Importance of DPGs and DPI for inclusive development

E

Eileen Donahoe

Speech speed

130 words per minute

Speech length

829 words

Speech time

382 seconds

DPGs and DPI need universal safeguards to protect human rights

Explanation

Eileen Donahoe argues for the importance of incorporating universal safeguards into digital public goods and infrastructure to protect human rights. She emphasizes that development and human rights should not be seen as conflicting goals, but rather as complementary.

Evidence

The Universal Safeguards Initiative launched by the Office of the Tech Envoy and UNDP.

Major Discussion Point

The importance of digital public goods (DPGs) and digital public infrastructure (DPI) for global development

Need to balance development goals with protecting human rights

Explanation

Donahoe stresses the importance of integrating human rights protections into the design and development of digital public goods and infrastructure. She argues that development should not come at the expense of human rights, but rather should be a tool to achieve them.

Evidence

The Universal Safeguards Initiative with its foundational principle of ‘do no harm’.

Major Discussion Point

Challenges and considerations in developing DPGs

K

Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi

Speech speed

112 words per minute

Speech length

1070 words

Speech time

572 seconds

Governments need to provide legal frameworks and connectivity for DPGs

Explanation

Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi emphasizes the critical role of governments in creating an enabling environment for digital public goods. He argues that governments must establish legal frameworks and ensure connectivity to support the development and use of DPGs.

Evidence

Nigeria’s initiatives to promote connectivity, including a 9,000 km fiber optics project and digital literacy programs.

Major Discussion Point

The role of different stakeholders in developing and governing DPGs

Agreed with

Amandeep Gill

Fabro Steibel

Alicia Buenrostro Massieu

Agreed on

Importance of DPGs and DPI for inclusive development

Disagreed with

Jimmy Wales

Disagreed on

Role of government in DPG development

M

Marianne Díaz Hernández

Speech speed

143 words per minute

Speech length

573 words

Speech time

239 seconds

Civil society ensures DPGs remain transparent, inclusive and responsive to societal needs

Explanation

Marianne Díaz Hernández argues that civil society plays a crucial role in ensuring that digital public goods serve the public interest. She emphasizes the importance of community-led spaces and multi-stakeholder governance in creating transparent and inclusive digital commons.

Major Discussion Point

The role of different stakeholders in developing and governing DPGs

Agreed with

Urs Gasser

Jimmy Wales

Agreed on

Multi-stakeholder approach in DPG development and governance

Need for a paradigm shift to build technologies with the public in mind

Explanation

Díaz Hernández calls for a fundamental change in how we approach technology development. She argues for creating technologies that are built with the public interest as a core principle, rather than as an afterthought.

Major Discussion Point

The future of DPGs and digital governance

U

Urs Gasser

Speech speed

126 words per minute

Speech length

490 words

Speech time

232 seconds

Academia serves as creators, incubators and assessors of DPGs

Explanation

Urs Gasser highlights the multifaceted role of academia in the development of digital public goods. He argues that academic institutions and individuals contribute as trusted creators of knowledge, incubators of new projects, and assessors of the societal impact of DPGs.

Evidence

Examples of academic contributions to the digital commons, such as open access publishing and the incubation of projects like Global Voices and Creative Commons.

Major Discussion Point

The role of different stakeholders in developing and governing DPGs

Agreed with

Marianne Díaz Hernández

Jimmy Wales

Agreed on

Multi-stakeholder approach in DPG development and governance

J

Jimmy Wales

Speech speed

166 words per minute

Speech length

911 words

Speech time

327 seconds

Community-driven governance is key for successful DPGs like Wikipedia

Explanation

Jimmy Wales emphasizes the importance of community-driven governance in the success of digital public goods like Wikipedia. He argues that allowing the community to make rules and decisions leads to a more robust and responsive platform.

Evidence

Wikipedia’s community-driven policies and decision-making processes.

Major Discussion Point

The role of different stakeholders in developing and governing DPGs

Agreed with

Marianne Díaz Hernández

Urs Gasser

Agreed on

Multi-stakeholder approach in DPG development and governance

Disagreed with

Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi

Disagreed on

Role of government in DPG development

E

Emran Mian

Speech speed

171 words per minute

Speech length

289 words

Speech time

101 seconds

Importance of digital skills and trust/safety for DPG adoption

Explanation

Emran Mian highlights the critical role of digital skills and trust in the adoption of digital public goods. He argues that people need both the skills to use DPGs and the confidence that these technologies are safe and trustworthy.

Evidence

UK government’s work with partners in countries like Indonesia, Kenya, and Nigeria to help people acquire digital skills.

Major Discussion Point

Challenges and considerations in developing DPGs

N

Nicole Manger

Speech speed

120 words per minute

Speech length

889 words

Speech time

442 seconds

DPGs require robust funding mechanisms and data/AI literacy

Explanation

Nicole Manger points out the need for strong funding mechanisms to support the development of digital public goods. She also emphasizes the importance of data and AI literacy in leveraging DPGs effectively.

Major Discussion Point

Challenges and considerations in developing DPGs

R

Rebecca MacKinnon

Speech speed

130 words per minute

Speech length

802 words

Speech time

368 seconds

Multilingualism and local context are crucial for global DPGs

Explanation

Rebecca MacKinnon emphasizes the importance of multilingualism and local context in the development of global digital public goods. She argues that DPGs should reflect the linguistic and cultural diversity of their users to be truly inclusive and effective.

Evidence

Examples of Wikipedia versions in various languages, including indigenous languages like Waiyu.

Major Discussion Point

Challenges and considerations in developing DPGs

A

Anna Christmann

Speech speed

148 words per minute

Speech length

465 words

Speech time

187 seconds

Importance of bringing DPG discussions to other policy areas like climate

Explanation

Anna Christmann suggests expanding the discussion of digital public goods to other policy areas, particularly climate policy. She argues that integrating DPG concepts into broader policy discussions can enhance their impact and relevance.

Major Discussion Point

The future of DPGs and digital governance

Call for new hands-on initiatives to co-design frontier open data and AI solutions

Explanation

Christmann calls for practical initiatives to collaboratively design cutting-edge open data and AI solutions. She emphasizes the importance of multi-stakeholder involvement in these efforts to ensure their effectiveness and inclusivity.

Major Discussion Point

The future of DPGs and digital governance

Agreements

Agreement Points

Importance of DPGs and DPI for inclusive development

Speakers

Amandeep Gill

Fabro Steibel

Alicia Buenrostro Massieu

Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi

Arguments

DPGs and DPI are essential for inclusive, sustainable digital transformation

DPGs emerge faster in the Global South out of necessity

DPGs and DPI are critical for closing the digital divide

Governments need to provide legal frameworks and connectivity for DPGs

Summary

Multiple speakers emphasized the crucial role of digital public goods (DPGs) and digital public infrastructure (DPI) in promoting inclusive development, particularly in the Global South.

Multi-stakeholder approach in DPG development and governance

Speakers

Marianne Díaz Hernández

Urs Gasser

Jimmy Wales

Arguments

Civil society ensures DPGs remain transparent, inclusive and responsive to societal needs

Academia serves as creators, incubators and assessors of DPGs

Community-driven governance is key for successful DPGs like Wikipedia

Summary

Speakers agreed on the importance of involving multiple stakeholders, including civil society, academia, and community members, in the development and governance of DPGs.

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers emphasized the need to prioritize human rights and public interest in the development of digital technologies and infrastructure.

Speakers

Eileen Donahoe

Marianne Díaz Hernández

Arguments

DPGs and DPI need universal safeguards to protect human rights

Need for a paradigm shift to build technologies with the public in mind

Unexpected Consensus

Global South leadership in DPG development

Speakers

Fabro Steibel

Alicia Buenrostro Massieu

Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi

Arguments

DPGs emerge faster in the Global South out of necessity

DPGs and DPI are critical for closing the digital divide

Governments need to provide legal frameworks and connectivity for DPGs

Explanation

There was an unexpected consensus on the Global South’s leadership and innovation in DPG development, challenging the common perception of technological advancement being primarily driven by the Global North.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of agreement included the importance of DPGs and DPI for inclusive development, the need for multi-stakeholder involvement in DPG development and governance, and the recognition of human rights and public interest in digital technologies.

Consensus level

There was a high level of consensus among speakers on the fundamental importance and potential of DPGs and DPI. This strong agreement suggests a solid foundation for future collaborative efforts in developing and implementing DPGs globally, particularly in addressing development challenges in the Global South.

Disagreements

Disagreement Points

Role of government in DPG development

Speakers

Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi

Jimmy Wales

Arguments

Governments need to provide legal frameworks and connectivity for DPGs

Community-driven governance is key for successful DPGs like Wikipedia

Summary

While Abdullahi emphasizes the critical role of governments in creating an enabling environment for DPGs, Wales stresses the importance of community-driven governance. This represents a difference in perspective on the primary drivers of successful DPG development.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of disagreement revolve around the role of different stakeholders in DPG development and governance, as well as the approach to integrating human rights and public interest into DPG design.

Disagreement level

The level of disagreement among the speakers is relatively low. Most speakers agree on the importance of DPGs for global development and the need for inclusive, rights-respecting approaches. The differences mainly lie in the emphasis placed on various stakeholders’ roles and the specific strategies for implementation. These nuanced disagreements can actually be beneficial for developing a comprehensive approach to DPG development and governance, as they highlight different perspectives that need to be considered.

Partial Agreements

Partial Agreements

Both speakers agree on the importance of protecting human rights in the development of DPGs, but they differ in their approach. Donahoe advocates for universal safeguards, while Díaz Hernández calls for a more fundamental paradigm shift in how technologies are developed.

Speakers

Eileen Donahoe

Marianne Díaz Hernández

Arguments

DPGs and DPI need universal safeguards to protect human rights

Need for a paradigm shift to build technologies with the public in mind

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers emphasized the need to prioritize human rights and public interest in the development of digital technologies and infrastructure.

Speakers

Eileen Donahoe

Marianne Díaz Hernández

Arguments

DPGs and DPI need universal safeguards to protect human rights

Need for a paradigm shift to build technologies with the public in mind

Takeaways

Key Takeaways

Digital public goods (DPGs) and digital public infrastructure (DPI) are essential for inclusive, sustainable global digital transformation

DPGs and DPI require multi-stakeholder collaboration between governments, civil society, academia, and communities

Universal safeguards and human rights protections must be built into DPGs and DPI by design

Community-driven governance and local context are crucial for successful global DPGs like Wikipedia

The Global Digital Compact provides a new foundation for international action on DPGs and DPI

Resolutions and Action Items

Incorporate the ‘Wikipedia test’ when developing digital policies to ensure they don’t harm open community projects

Bring DPG discussions to other policy areas like climate change and COP negotiations

Start new hands-on initiatives to co-design frontier open data and AI solutions as DPGs

Build a global ecosystem and multi-stakeholder governance structures for DPGs

Unresolved Issues

How to balance rapid development of DPGs with ensuring robust human rights protections

Sustainable funding mechanisms for DPGs and open-source projects

How to improve data and AI literacy to enable wider participation in DPG development

Addressing potential risks and misuse of DPGs and open data

Suggested Compromises

Develop universal safeguards for DPIs that protect rights while enabling development

Use AI and machine translation to accelerate growth of smaller language Wikipedias while maintaining local community involvement

Thought Provoking Comments

Well-governed commons are the foundations of human civilization. Digital is no exception, and today more than ever digital commons are vital to our interconnected world.

Speaker

Amandeep Gill

Reason

This comment frames digital commons as a fundamental part of modern civilization, elevating their importance.

Impact

It set the tone for the discussion by emphasizing the critical nature of digital commons in our interconnected world, encouraging participants to consider their broad societal impact.

DPIs emerge earlier and faster in the Global South than in the Global North. This is what research shows and most likely this is because out of necessity. In the Global South, we need better technologies to spread and equalize wealth and power.

Speaker

Fabro Steibel

Reason

This insight challenges the common assumption that technological innovation primarily comes from the Global North.

Impact

It shifted the conversation to consider the unique needs and contributions of the Global South in developing digital public infrastructure, broadening the global perspective of the discussion.

When we focus on development above human rights, instead of understanding development as a tool to achieve human rights, we risk creating systems that have not been designed with human rights as a principle, but as an afterthought.

Speaker

Marianne Díaz Hernández

Reason

This comment highlights a crucial tension between development and human rights in the context of digital technologies.

Impact

It deepened the conversation by emphasizing the need to prioritize human rights in the design and implementation of digital systems, encouraging a more nuanced approach to development.

If you’re about to pass some rule, think about, is this going to wreck Wikipedia? And if it is, it might not be a great rule.

Speaker

Jimmy Wales

Reason

This ‘Wikipedia test’ provides a simple yet powerful heuristic for evaluating digital policies.

Impact

It introduced a practical framework for policymakers to consider the impact of regulations on open, community-driven digital public goods, potentially influencing future policy discussions.

Academia can not only contribute in these different forms substantively to the formation of digital commons and digital public goods. It can also study and assess what we can learn about digital commons as we go forward, about the societal impact about the relevance, we can assess whether we pass the Wikipedia test when new policies are rolled out.

Speaker

Urs Gasser

Reason

This comment highlights the multifaceted role of academia in both creating and studying digital commons.

Impact

It expanded the discussion to include the importance of ongoing research and assessment in the development and governance of digital public goods, emphasizing a learning-oriented approach.

Overall Assessment

These key comments shaped the discussion by broadening its scope from a primarily Western and government-centric view to a more global, multi-stakeholder perspective. They emphasized the critical importance of digital commons in modern society, highlighted the unique contributions of the Global South, stressed the need to prioritize human rights in technological development, introduced practical frameworks for policy evaluation, and underscored the role of academia in both creating and studying digital public goods. This resulted in a rich, nuanced conversation that considered the complex interplay between technology, policy, human rights, and global development in the context of digital public goods.

Follow-up Questions

How can we ensure digital public goods and infrastructure are designed with human rights as a core principle rather than an afterthought?

Speaker

Marianne Díaz Hernández

Explanation

This is important to ensure development of digital systems aligns with human rights and builds necessary trust.

How can we better enable civil society and communities globally to have a voice in how technology is developed?

Speaker

Costanza Sciubba Caniglia

Explanation

This is crucial for ensuring digital public goods reflect diverse needs and perspectives.

How can we apply the ‘Wikipedia test’ when developing new internet regulations and policies?

Speaker

Jimmy Wales

Explanation

This approach could help protect open communities and digital public goods when crafting new rules.

How can we strengthen the multi-stakeholder ecosystem for developing digital public goods?

Speaker

Anna Christmann

Explanation

Building a robust ecosystem with diverse stakeholders is key for advancing digital public goods.

How can we integrate digital public goods into climate policy discussions, such as at COP?

Speaker

Anna Christmann

Explanation

Bringing digital public goods into other policy areas could expand their impact and application.

How can we improve digital skills both for creating and using digital public goods?

Speaker

Emran Mian

Explanation

Enhancing digital skills is crucial for the development and adoption of digital public goods.

How can we ensure trust and safety in the creation and use of digital public goods?

Speaker

Emran Mian

Explanation

Trust and safety are fundamental for the continued creation and enjoyment of digital public goods.

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed.

Multistakeholder Dialogue on National Digital Health Transformation

Multistakeholder Dialogue on National Digital Health Transformation

Session at a Glance

Summary

This discussion focused on the importance of digital public infrastructure (DPI) in transforming health systems and achieving universal health coverage. Experts from various countries and organizations shared insights on the challenges and opportunities in implementing digital health solutions.

The conversation emphasized three key pillars for successful digital health transformation: governance, architecture, and financing. Speakers highlighted the need for country-led digital strategies, strong regulatory frameworks, and sustainable funding models. The importance of interoperability, data sharing, and user-centered design was stressed throughout the discussion.

Examples from countries like Estonia, Kenya, and India demonstrated how digital solutions can improve healthcare access and efficiency. These included digital identity systems, health information exchanges, and streamlined registration processes. The potential of digital technologies to enhance assistive technology access was also explored, with Ireland’s initiatives serving as a case study.

Participants addressed challenges such as fragmentation in digital health systems, data privacy concerns, and the need for better tracking of digital health investments. The importance of involving communities and end-users in the design and implementation of digital health solutions was emphasized.

The discussion concluded with a call for global collaboration and knowledge sharing to accelerate digital health transformation. Speakers urged for increased investment in digital public infrastructure and emphasized the potential of digital solutions to reduce health inequities and improve healthcare access for all.

Keypoints

Major discussion points:

– The importance of digital public infrastructure and architecture for transforming health systems

– The need for governance, financing, and coordination to enable digital health transformation

– Assistive technology as a use case for digital health infrastructure

– The importance of putting people and communities at the center of digital health efforts

– Examples of digital health initiatives from countries like Estonia, Kenya, Rwanda and India

The overall purpose of the discussion was to explore how investing in digital public infrastructure can accelerate progress toward universal health coverage and equitable health systems, with a focus on assistive technology as a key use case.

The tone of the discussion was largely optimistic and forward-looking, with speakers emphasizing the potential of digital technologies to transform health systems and improve access to care. There was also a sense of urgency about the need to coordinate efforts and invest strategically in digital infrastructure. The tone became more practical and example-focused toward the end when discussing specific country initiatives.

Speakers

Speakers:

– Leah Ekbladh (Moderator) – Executive Director at Digital Square

– Nele Leosk – Ambassador-at-Large for Digital Affairs, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Estonia

– Shane Stevens – First Secretary, Permanent Mission of Ireland to the United Nations

– Alain Labrique – Digital Health Director and Innovation Director, Science Division, World Health Organization

– Lisa Lewis-Person – Deputy Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy, Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT, United States

– Hani Eskandar – Head of Digital Service Division, ITU

– Sean Blaschke – Senior Health Specialist for Digital Health and Information Systems Unit, UNICEF

– Mathilde Forslund – Executive Director, TransformHealth

– Kylie Shae – Team Lead for Access to Assistive Technology, WHO

– Malcolm MacLachlan – Co-director Assistant Living and Learning Institute, Maynooth University

– Vikram Pagaria – Director of IT, National Health Authority of India

Moderator:

– Leah Ekbladh – Executive Director at Digital Square

Areas of expertise:

– Digital health

– Digital public infrastructure

– Health policy

– Assistive technology

– Global health

– Digital transformation

– Health systems

– Digital governance

Full session report

Digital Public Infrastructure for Health Systems Transformation

This comprehensive discussion brought together experts from various countries and organizations to explore the critical role of digital public infrastructure (DPI) in transforming health systems and achieving universal health coverage. The conversation, moderated by Leah Ekbladh of Digital Square, focused on three key pillars for successful digital health transformation: governance, architecture, and financing.

Infrastructure and Architecture

Hani Eskandar from ITU emphasized the importance of digital public infrastructure, stating that DPI enables interoperability, reusability, and trust in digital health systems. This perspective was echoed by other speakers, who provided concrete examples of successful DPI implementation.

Nele Leosk, Ambassador-at-Large for Digital Affairs at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs from Estonia, highlighted her country’s approach to digital identity and data sharing. Estonia’s success in solving interoperability issues through XRoute, addressing trust with digital ID, and creating reusable platforms was presented as a model for other nations to consider. Leosk also discussed Estonia’s national digital registration system and digitalized medical records, showcasing the country’s advanced digital health initiatives.

Vikram Pagaria from India’s National Health Authority shared the success of India’s Unified Payments Interface (UPI) as an example of effective DPI. He also stressed the importance of standards like HL7 FHIR for ensuring interoperability across different health systems. Pagaria highlighted India’s digital health initiatives, including a QR code system for hospital registration and a project to establish 100 model facilities demonstrating the use of digital health technologies.

These examples underscored a key agreement among speakers: the crucial role of digital public infrastructure in enabling efficient, secure, and interoperable digital health systems.

Governance and Legal Frameworks

The discussion highlighted the need for strong governance mechanisms and legal frameworks to guide digital health transformation and protect data privacy. Nele Leosk emphasized the importance of these frameworks in the Estonian context, while Sean Blaschke pointed to Kenya’s Digital Health Act as an example of progressive legislation in this area. Blaschke also cited Rwanda’s e-government approach with embedded ICT teams as an example of effective country-led digital transformation.

Lisa Lewis-Person from the US Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT stressed the need for country leadership and ownership in digital health initiatives. She also discussed the Global Digital Health Partnership (GDHP) and its focus areas, as well as the International Patient Summary project, which aims to standardize health information exchange across borders.

Financing Digital Health Transformation

Mathilde Forslund, Executive Director of TransformHealth, raised concerns about the current state of digital health funding, describing it as insufficient and fragmented. She emphasized the need to track and measure digital health investments more effectively and called for costed national digital health plans. Forslund also highlighted TransformHealth’s role in representing civil society and end-users in digital health discussions.

Vikram Pagaria provided a contrasting perspective, highlighting India’s significant investment of $20 million in its National Digital Health Mission. He also mentioned India’s issuance of 1.9 billion COVID certificates digitally, demonstrating the country’s capacity for large-scale digital health initiatives. This juxtaposition of views underscored the varying approaches to financing digital health transformation across different countries.

Assistive Technology as a Use Case

The discussion highlighted the potential of digital technologies to enhance access to assistive technology. Kylie Shae from WHO highlighted the large unmet need for assistive technology globally, while Malcolm MacLachlan from Maynooth University emphasized how digital solutions can help scale up access.

MacLachlan presented Ireland’s assistive technology passport as an innovative digital solution in this area. He also discussed the SHAPES project, which aims to create an integrated care platform for healthy aging. Shane Stevens provided additional information about Ireland’s investment in assistive technology, highlighting the country’s commitment to this area of digital health.

Global Initiatives and Collaboration

The discussion touched on several global initiatives aimed at promoting digital health transformation. Vikram Pagaria mentioned the Global Initiative on Digital Health (GIDH) launched by India during its G20 presidency, which aims to foster international cooperation in digital health. Lisa Lewis-Person discussed the Global Digital Health Partnership (GDHP), emphasizing its role in facilitating knowledge sharing and collaboration among countries.

Challenges and Concerns

Despite the overall optimistic tone, speakers addressed several challenges in implementing digital health solutions. These included:

1. Fragmentation in digital health systems

2. Data privacy concerns

3. The need for better tracking of digital health investments

4. Ensuring that digital health initiatives do not exacerbate existing inequities in access to care

Community Involvement and User-Centered Design

A recurring theme throughout the discussion was the importance of involving communities and end-users in the design and implementation of digital health solutions. This point was raised in response to an audience question and resonated with many speakers, who agreed that user involvement is critical for the adoption and effectiveness of digital health systems.

Conclusion

The discussion concluded with a call for global collaboration and knowledge sharing to accelerate digital health transformation. Speakers urged for increased investment in digital public infrastructure and emphasized the potential of digital solutions to reduce health inequities and improve healthcare access for all.

Overall, the discussion highlighted the complex, multifaceted nature of digital health transformation, emphasizing the need for coordinated efforts across governance, infrastructure, and financing to realize the full potential of digital technologies in improving global health outcomes. The diverse examples from countries like Estonia, India, Kenya, Rwanda, and Ireland demonstrated the varied approaches to digital health implementation and the importance of tailoring solutions to local contexts while learning from global best practices.

Session Transcript

Leah Ekbladh: My name is Leah Ekbladh. I’m the executive director at Digital Square. It’s an initiative out of an international NGO called PATH. I’m joined here today with many esteemed colleagues that have a lot of rich information to share with us. So I’m gonna get us started. We all set? Okay. So welcome to a multi-stakeholder dialogue on investing in digital public infrastructure for equitable future health systems with assistive technology as a use case. This is part of the Summit for the Future Action Day Two. And this has been hosted by the Permanent Mission of Estonia to the United Nations, the Permanent Mission of Ireland to the United Nations, the World Health Organization, the International Telecommunications Union, the Global Disability Innovation Hub, and finally Transform Health. We’re gonna start our session off with actually a recorded message from the Nele Leosk, the Ambassador-at-Large for Digital Affairs at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs from Estonia.

Nele Leosk: Good morning, everybody, and thank you for joining us. And it’s my real pleasure to kick off the digital discussion of the digital day also from Estonian side. And kick off, I would say, a week full of different discussions on different topics of digitalization. And I would really like to thank our co-organizers, World Health Organization, the Government of Ireland, ITU, Transformative Health, and many others who have actually today brought together two important topics. So I would say that we have two flies at once, bringing together digital health and digital public infrastructure. So as you know, Estonia is often referred to as a digital nation. And indeed, I immensely enjoy everything I can do online. Digital Signature has allowed me to participate in my city municipality council meeting. It has allowed me to vote. It has allowed me to rent my apartment, everything while being away from my own country. And some of these services, indeed, getting married, you can also do online. But let’s face it, how many times do we actually need these services? Some people get married once, maybe some get more, some never do. So actually, there are not so many times. We have a chance to use these services or these benefits that actually the government provides us, but it’s very different when it comes to health. Because every single person needs digital health care and health care services at every stage in their life. And I think this is also one of the reasons why health care has been Estonia’s priority area and will be also in the future. So we have invested heavily in making sure that every person in Estonia, no matter where they live, because it’s actually a very scarcely populated country. We have municipalities with some hundreds of people living there. And the task to bring health care services to all of them is an immense one. So we have in Estonia a national one digital registration system that would support us to see the availability of doctors all over the country. And I do have to admit, I had to use this service two weeks ago when I needed to find very quickly a surgeon to my kid. And I didn’t find availability in my own city. I had actually to drive 40 minutes to a neighboring city to visit a specialist quicker than I could in my own town. We have, and many maybe have also heard, a fully digitalized medical record. So the medical data about a person all comes together from different hospitals, different clinics. I can see my dental records, all my pictures taken, of course, given that I have given a permit to share my data. And we have also, for 10% of our patients, we have a medical record. population, a fully sequent genome. And that has really allowed us to step on the personal medicine so that our GPs don’t have to screen every patient for cancer, for example, but really those that have higher risk to be imposed to that kind of a disease or any other. But what has made all that possible is actually the second side of our topic today, and it’s digital public infrastructure. It is a rather newly coined term. It’s a good key, so it has many names. But what it really means to us is that the government has laid down, I would say, a basic foundation for digital development for everybody, not just government, but also every other partner. Is it the private sector? Is it a health care establishment? Is it even a private individual? And I would maybe bring out two reasons why we did that. So around 30 years ago, we realized in Estonia that actually the needs of our public sector for digitalization, but also private sector, are quite similar. We all needed to start to digitally authenticate ourselves. We had to give digital signature. We had to share data. And we realized that we cannot afford simply every municipality, every organization, every private sector, or even private health clinics, develop their own systems. First of all, we didn’t have resources for that. We did not have human or financial resources. But second of all, it was a matter of security. It was clear that a local municipality or a dental practice cannot simply develop systems secure enough. So this security by design principle has really helped us through to make sure that our data is protected and it is not misused. And this actually comes or takes me to the end of my opening remarks, I’m very much looking forward to hearing from the others, is that actually when we look at ourselves coming from very different countries here in this room, actually we are quite similar too. Despite our differences, we are quite similar. So since 2016, some of the systems that we are using in Estonia, for example our data sharing system, we are not developing alone. No country can do it alone, maybe with the exception of a few, but most of us cannot do it alone. So we coupled up with our closest friends, Finland, in 2016 and some of the solutions that we are using also for secure data exchange, including in healthcare sector, we are developing together with Finland. So we are saving our resources and they are saving theirs, and we make these tools also available for everybody else. We have also some international collaboration. I see Honey here from ITU. We have an initiative called GovStack that follows the same principle, that there are some solutions, for example consent service, that we all need in healthcare sector and we don’t have to reinvent it every time we need it. So I end with a call for collaboration between all of us. I encourage not only to share, but also to reuse. So thank you from my side.

Leah Ekbladh: Thank you. It’s a treat that you’re here in person. That was a wonderful surprise. So hearing a little bit about data protection, data use, and data being in our lives, and digital being in our lives, from registering your marriage to seeking health care, I think is a great way for us to start. I’m going to pass it over now to Mr. Shane Stevens. He’s the first Secretary for the Permanent Mission of Ireland to the United Nations to share his remarks.

Shane Stevens: Leah, thank you very much and thanks also to the World Health Organization for giving us this opportunity to partner with you again. It was great to hear from… Ambassador Liask there. And once again, to be reminded of what an important force Estonia is in this world of digital technology and the e-government. We have a lot to learn. It’s great. I just want to say that personally, that we consider it a great privilege to be able to contribute to this progressive and equity-based agenda. We’re all here today, of course, to explore how best digital infrastructure can accelerate progress on the achievement of universal health coverage, and more broadly, SDG 3, health and well-being for all. Ireland’s international development policy puts global health center stage, and Ireland’s partnership with the WHO is a core component of that approach. We continue to strengthen our partnership with the WHO in recognition of the leadership role it plays at the heart of the global health architecture. As we’re all aware, one of the focus areas of this action day, too, is digital futures. And in a few days, during a high-level week, our Tornista, Miho Martin, our Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs, will engage in a high-level interactive dialogue towards a digital future. So this is an important theme for us on an ongoing basis. I look forward to hearing today about the potential and opportunities of digital health infrastructure during this morning’s event. In the second session of this morning’s event, we will be exploring an important aspect of digital health infrastructure that related to digital and assistive technologies. Ireland is focused on promoting the full inclusion of people with disabilities in our society and progressing the implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. We also recognize the importance of investing in digital health infrastructure to ensure that every person, including persons with disabilities, has access to the same health services as every other person throughout their life course. We are committed to taking action to improve health equality. Ireland ratified the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in 2018 and highlighted the importance placed on access, production, and research into assistive technologies for persons with disabilities. We also recognize the recommendations of the Global Report on Assistive Technology and the role of assistive technology in ensuring improved health incomes, inclusion, and participation for about one third of the population. Ireland was present at the launch of the Global Report in 2022, and our Taoiseach, Prime Minister, gave the keynote address on that occasion. Our engagement in this area and our support culminated in the recent announcement of the Global LEAD Agreement between the WHO and Ireland in May this year. Through our Department of Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth, Ireland is investing $12.5 million in partnership with the WHO over the next five years for its Digital Assistive Technology Initiative. This partnership will help strengthen affordable and equitable access to assistive technology globally, and will focus on innovation in people-centered rights-based service delivery models with the aim of harnessing the potential of digital assistive technology to strengthen the interconnected pillars of people, policy, products, provision and personnel. Through the leadership of the WHO and the engagement of other member states, Ireland strongly believes that collective action to support improvements in health infrastructure will result in driving positive change. I look forward to the rest of today’s discussions. Thank you.

Leah Ekbladh: Thank you, First Secretary Stevens. It’s very important for us to keep equity in mind as we go forward to make sure that the digital enhancements we’re talking about in the health system don’t create further divides in access to care. To follow up on that, I’m going to introduce Dr. Alain Labrique. He’s the Digital Health Director and Innovation Director at the Science Division at the World Health Organization. He’ll be telling us a bit more about fostering digital health transformation and the lessons learned from the World Summit of Information Society C7 Action, and also update us on the WHO Guide Initiative.

Alain Labrique: Fantastic. Thank you, Leah. I really appreciate everyone’s partnership. and engagement this morning, what an outstanding show of solidarity we have. I know it was a competitive process to get people into this room, but it’s a packed room, and it’s a pleasure to have you here. Thank you especially to our colleagues from the governments of Ireland, Estonia, and the U.S., the Global Disability Hub, ITU, UNICEF, and Transform Health. Distinguished colleagues and fellow digital health champions, good morning, and it’s really an exciting program with experts that you’re going to be hearing from from around the world, and let me start by setting the scene with a few focused slides. The role of digital in creating resilient health systems became increasingly clear during the pandemic. Over the last two years, WHO and partners have been working to meet the demands from countries to help shift the conversation of a decade of, let me just say very plainly, playing with digital solutions as piecemeal band-aids to vertical challenges towards now what we’re talking about, carefully planned and executed digital health systems. Digital public infrastructure is the underlying fabric, as we’ve heard from our two speakers this morning, on which other systems, whether it’s banking, education, and of course health, are built. More than 120 member states have articulated a digital health strategy, but we have struggled to convert these visions and ideals into action. A proliferation of solutions exists as a result of donor-driven investments, while the foundational elements that we’ve heard about this morning from our colleagues in Estonia that are needed for systematic digital transformation remain neglected. Who are the custodians of a national digital transformation? What is the budget to build and maintain what we call the commons or infrastructure? What are the standards on which the entrepreneurs developing digital solutions build to ensure interoperability? Together, we need to develop the architecture and and guidance, which is what we’re doing right now with WHO and ITU and UNICEF, under the guide initiative, as well as to mobilize the resources to move into this upper right quadrant of what we call strong enabling environments. We see there to be at least three foundational pillars or legs of the stool necessary for achieving sustainable and inclusive digital health transformation. These are governance, architecture, and financing. Following our moderated discussion around these three pillars today, we will zoom in on one of the many areas that could be enabled by these functions, by these critical foundations. Assistive technologies, for example, enhanced by digital, and access to assistive technologies strengthened by strong, robust digital systems. Assistive technology is an underserved area in most health systems with significant global inequities in access to coverage. We cannot keep talking about health for all and universal health coverage without, as our distinguished colleague from Ireland just said, inclusivity and equity baked into the DNA of what we do in digital. Effective financing, governance, and the foundational architecture that support digital health interventions can be powerful enablers to assistive technology, as well as many, many other domains of health. National transformation has to be guided by clear priorities with the curation of multiple stakeholders, funders, and constituents entrusted to one or more public agencies. It’s another thing that I think Estonia and several other governments have begun to do, demonstrating the leadership of the public sector in sustaining and creating that commons. The public agencies entrusted with this responsibility are responsible for building, managing, and maintaining these digital commons, public goods, and resources. Across income lines, we see countries following this approach, defining national digital transformation as agencies to curate the shift from what I called e-chaos to… e-coordination, where we have, as exemplars, the U.S., Indonesia, Kenya, and so many others, which have defined this core pillar of the stool. The World Summit on Information Society, also known as WISIS, as well as the new Global Initiative on Digital Health, you see the shameless banners on either side of me here, are platforms. These are multilateral platforms to promote country leaderships, putting countries at the center of their digital transformation. The second leg of the stool, National Digital Public Infrastructure, or DPIs, creates the environments in which entrepreneurships thrive. Core elements such as digital identity, payments, and shared services remove the burden on entrepreneurs to have to recreate these foundational pieces every time a new system is built. But also the lack of standards and interoperability exacerbates already fragmented care and creates poor user-centered experiences. Let me move to one of our sister agencies, UNDP, in their recent DPI report that came out of the India G20 process, where I know the graphic may be a little small, but it explains very nicely how there are some core DPI functions. These foundations, such as strategic leadership, strong policy frameworks, are essential to that enabling environment to ensure that DPIs are implemented successfully. Second, we have what we call foundational or core DPIs, and these are the digital commons. They are reusable infrastructural assets that strengthen digital transformation across sectors, banking, education, health, you name it. These are the things, as our colleague from Estonia said earlier, you may or may not use every day or every month, but they also are so embedded in our daily transactions that are now digital that we often don’t even realize how essential they are to smooth functioning. There’s nothing as frustrating as turning on the tap and not having water come out, or plugging in your device to charge it and realize there’s no electricity coming through the port. These are things that, in much of the world, you assume to be part of the infrastructure of societies, but in sad truth, they are not equitably distributed around the globe, and the same is now true for digital. Second, we also see on top of these core foundational infrastructure that are digital identity, digital payments, interoperability, and so forth, we also see that every sector has digital public infrastructure dedicated to that sector. In health, these are, for example, canonical registries, so lists that are definitive of the health workforce, of patients, persistent health records that allow for continuity of care across vertical service deliveries. And even as WHO recently took on the burden of hosting, last year, digital public infrastructure that allows the verifiability of health certificates as we as citizens travel across national borders and within countries that our own health records can be verified as we move around. So together, these three pieces represent public goods, which if not addressed specifically, suffer from what we call the tragedy of the commons. If they’re not financed, if they’re not governed, and if they’re not clearly architected, these are the 21st century roads, highways, and electrical infrastructure that were fundamentally responsible for unlocking industrialization and drastically improving health outcomes almost a century ago. Last but not least, let me end with the third leg of the stool, and that is financing. And to achieve sustainable and inclusive digital health transformation, we need a vast improvement in the availability and alignment of resources. We started speaking earlier about, you know, we’re playing around in digital for the last 10 years. Now is the time to get serious. And with moving from experimentation to serious infrastructure also means an accompanying serious financing commitment. And I think that’s what countries are asking us to look at. According to OECD, 0.4% of $350 billion of development assistance were dedicated to digital initiatives. That is insufficient to drive the transformation that we’re talking about today. How much of this investment is supporting the digital commons? Not the shiny objects, but the commons. How much of this is creating disease-specific shiny objects? So let’s support governments in doing more with the resources that we have and in helping to align the resources that are being put into this field. And let’s shepherd digital transformations that truly enable health for all. Thank you.

Leah Ekbladh: Thank you. We’re going to continue our discussion around these three pillars, the three legs of the stool, with a bit of a panel discussion here. We’re going to be talking about the challenges and the opportunities moving from a fragmented digital transformation to a country-led digital transformation of health systems. And we’ll be pulling on those three pillars of financing, governance, and architecture in our panel to give you a flavor of some of those challenges and opportunities. And then we’ll move on to the case study. So our first speaker, again, will be virtual for us. It’s Ambassador Alexandre Ghisleni, the head of special office for international affairs at the Ministry of Health of Brazil.

Alexandre Ghisleni: I’d like to commend the WHO for holding this timely event. on national digital health transformation. It converges with our priorities at the G20 and the work that have been doing in G20. Minister Nisa Trindade, Brazil’s Minister of Health, has chosen as the main overarching theme for the Brazilian presidency of the health track the theme of building resilient health systems, which is a multifaceted task. We have been approaching it from many different angles. We have been talking about AMR, climate change. We have been talking about health workforce, pandemic preparedness, including local production of vaccines, medicines, and diagnostic tools for neglected diseases and neglected populations. All of these tasks must converge to the same objective. And one element that is key to all of them, which helps connect them, is digital health. Digital health makes our health systems be more efficient, makes it reach underserved areas, makes it provide services that were not available before, which is why, during our presidencies, we have been discussing artificial intelligence. We have been discussing telehealth, including telemedicine, and also the implementation of a guide of the global initiative on digital health, which was launched by the WHO. We’re fully supportive of implementing this global initiative to the fullest, of making it serve the interests of developing countries, and especially people that are in the most vulnerable situations. Bringing it to the United Nations and helping the discussion move forward in the global arena is an objective that we share and we support. We’d like to wish you all a great event and lots of success. Thank you very much.

Leah Ekbladh: Thank you. My first question is to Lisa Lewis-Person. She’s the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy, the Deputy National Coordinator for Operations, the Chief Operating Officer, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT for the United States. Ms. Person, my first question is around the fragmented digital health systems and how they frequently stem from a long history of investment from fragmented vertical health areas. So, funding for maternal and child health, funding for HIV. What suggestions do you have for us for fostering alignment and coordination between the different owners of existing systems to ensure effective integration and data sharing across these health verticals?

Lisa Lewis-Person: Thank you for the question, Emil. Hello. Thank you all so much for having me and thank you to my esteemed colleagues and to the WHO for the Global Initiative on Digital Health and for hosting this very important conversation. I’m a believer that information is the great equalizer and our digital health systems is the way to bring equality to healthcare. So thank you all for the work that you are doing. I would say I know I chose the right field because I would rather not be doing anything than this on a Saturday morning. So although countries have different healthcare systems, we speak different languages, we have different populations that we serve, we have many commonalities. And as you’ve heard this morning, how we use our digital health systems is one of those commonalities. We also have the opportunity to move in the same direction as we advance the use of digital health to be able to address the fragmentation of systems and improve health outcomes, which is the ultimate goal. I believe the strongest way to overcome this type of fragmentation is for all of us to work collaboratively through key digital health leadership organizations that advance alignment of digital health efforts and systems. We cannot solve the global digital health fragmentation problem alone. We must work in concert with other countries and global digital health groups, such as this forum, the WHO’s Global Initiative on Digital Health. The guide is focusing on how to help countries at all levels of digital health overcome obstacles in a variety of areas, and this is critical work. We also have the Global Digital Health Partnership, or GDHP, which is a collaboration of 40 country governments and the WHO, which was formed to support the executive implementation of worldwide digital health services. The GDHP’s members include digital health leaders who focus on advancing global digital health in clinical and human engagement, in cybersecurity, which we heard is critical to all of us, evidence and evaluation, interoperability, and policy environments. The Office of the Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy within the U.S. co-chairs the Cybersecurity and the interoperability work streams, and we are the immediate past chairs of the GDHP. I want to thank every country that participates either in GUIDE or the GDHP. Thank you for your membership and your partnership. I want to thank Elise Anthony for being the senior executive who is responsible for our global digital health efforts and Aisha Hassan for leading our global digital health portfolio. There are many examples of the types of projects that are the result of collaborative engagements through groups like GDHP and GUIDE, such as progressing and implementing the International Patient Summary, which allows individuals to access their patient data whenever and wherever they need to do so. That puts the care of the patient back at the center of what we are doing and puts it in their own hands. It’s important that they receive this information in a seamless, safe, and secure manner, and so we work to do that through patient-mediated and provider-mediated exchanges within countries, between countries, and across the world, such as the 2024 Hajj pilgrimage, where Indonesia, Malaysia, Oman, and Saudi Arabia were able to exchange patient data. This example demonstrates that if we work together as leaders, we can avoid digital health transformation happening in silos. The digital world knows no borders. We serve our citizens best when we work together collaboratively to improve health outcomes by addressing compelling issues in digital health, such as the fragmentation of digital health systems. Thank you so much.

Leah Ekbladh: Thank you. I’m going to turn my next question to Hani Eskandar. He’s the head of the Digital Service Division at the ITU, and hoping we can talk a little bit about ways that we can use architecture to defragment some of those health silos and making sure that we can exchange safely those digital health streams. Last December, WHO led the publication of an article in the Oxford Open Digital Health featuring the full-stack approach. This approach highlights the importance of open standards, technology, architecture, and content to adjust the challenges of fragmentation. At the Global Initiative on Digital Health Multistakeholder Dialogue in May this year, both WHO and the ITU kicked off the work on a reference architecture for digital transformation of health systems. Can you tell us more about that guidance and who the intended users are? And then, if there is time, what’s next on that agenda?

Hani Eskandar: Thank you very much, Leah, and good morning, good afternoon, everyone. Maybe just I would like to acknowledge that maybe we are not all aware we are in a juncture historical moment in the digital health history, and I am not exaggerating. For those who are involved in digital health since a long, long time ago, we’ve been always saying the same thing, the digital health fragmentation, experimentation, duplication, etc. And I would like to acknowledge in UNGA 2024, the first time architecture is the focus of the discussion. And this is, for me, is a strategic and radical shift in the mindset of the people who are involved in digital health. Let me maybe explain this in really one minute, just to try to explain why architecture is so important. We’ve been very much dominated by what you can call a solution mindset. Basically, I have a problem, I develop an application to solve my solution. There is a huge difference, and this is what we have learned after so many years, even at our agencies. We have discovered that building a solution is not the same as transforming a sector or digitizing a sector. Those are completely two different things, and the approaches are different, and investments are different. Why? Because if you are talking about digitally transform the health sector, you need to develop and deploy decentralized systems, meaning that you need to have your solution pull data and share data across the whole system and even outside of the boundaries of the health sector. And you cannot do that without doing three things. Enabling interoperability, solving the issue of reusability, and create trust. And by the way, this is not related only to health. All the countries and sectors who managed to transform using digital, they managed to solve those three things first. Estonia is a great example. What did Estonia do? They solved interoperability through XRoute, they solved the issue of trust by ID, and they solved the issue of reusability by creating those kind of shared and reusable platforms. If you don’t have those things, you cannot share data in a trusted manner. And if you are not able to share data across the system and beyond the system, you cannot talk about digital transformation. So the way to do that is the missing thing that we have never given enough focus to is the magic word is architecture. Architecture. If you, there is one thing you need to get out of this session is the word, there is a new thing called architecture. DPI, what’s DPI? Digital Public Infrastructure. Digital Public Infrastructure is basically the implementation of an architecture. The DPI has a component that can enable all those three things, reusability, interoperability, and trust. So this is not a trivial, this is not just a new buzzword, this is not just a nice thing that international agencies are excited about and brings conferences, etc. This is the core of the problem of investments in health, digital health, because everyone is doing, concerned with their own problem, but no one is looking at the overall system. So to solve this issue, what we are going to do, and actually we started to do this, we are going to create something that, long name, DPI Based Reference Architecture for Digital Health Transformation. So basically developing an architecture for digital health is not an easy task. It requires a lot of, and actually the most rare skill is the architect. I think for those who are involved in digital, they know a good architect is like a blessing. So, what we’re going to do, we’re going to do the homework for countries is to give them a blueprint, like an example, a model of an architecture. But more importantly is that this architecture is not only, is not considering that health is a silo. No. Health is part of the overall digital transformation. We need now to, not to talk about digital health transformation, we need to talk health in digital transformation. Health should be part of the overall digital transformation of a government. And that’s why developing an architecture that takes this into consideration is key. How we are going to do it? Very practically in 30 seconds. We have a call, which is still open by the way, calling for countries, experts, individuals, organizations who have any experience in developing similar architectures. There are, the good news is that there are a lot of things that have been done. We have very good examples from Estonia, from India, from so many other countries. We have initiatives, open HIE, so there are a lot. Our role as international organizations is to try to compile this and do the homework for the countries to say, let’s try to give you an example of an architecture. And by the way, this work will be driven by an excellent piece of work that WHO did, which is the SMART guidelines. The SMART guidelines, if you really understand them, it’s a reference use case. It’s an example of saying how you design care, how you deliver care in the digital era. What is missing from the SMART guidelines, and that was my comment to WHO, if you give the SMART guidelines to countries, they will end up having duplication of application. If you don’t have architecture in the middle, so this is the next step that we are going to do. We are going to pull a group, a working group, and you are all invited, if you have the expertise of course, to join this group because it’s difficult, right? So we really need to make sure that we do the hard work to give this kind of reference specification, but in doing so, we’re going to involve people from the digital government and I think Nelly mentioned the GovStack initiative and many other initiatives that are looking at the DPI in general, so we try to bring this so that health doesn’t become a silo sector. No, health needs to be part of the digital transformation. So you are all invited, it’s a call for all you to, if you have the time and expertise and the will, and by the way, this session is so important that people came on a Saturday and even being in ITU, there is a very exciting event that is happening, which is SDG Day and decided to leave it and come to this session because of the architecture.

Leah Ekbladh: Well, we know that countries themselves need to both govern and invest in this architecture. And my next question is for Sean Blaschke, he’s the Senior Health Specialist for Digital Health and Information Systems Unit at UNICEF. And we’re going to stay on that topic of architecture. And Sean, many of us have experienced the shift in political commitment to interventions with a change in government. How can a complex and expansive journey of digital transformation survive and transcend electoral and political shifts in the countries where we work and live?

Sean Blaschke: Thanks, Leah. I’m going to try to apply the same architecture framework to legislation, policy, compliance, building block, and talk a bit about a couple of countries that I think have demonstrated how they’ve done this successfully. So first, I’d like to talk a bit about Kenya. Kenya has been working for a while in terms of both devolving healthcare delivery, but also providing a roadmap, a superhighway for digital transformation. But the Kenya government had been challenged under the previous administration. The Digital Health Act had been stuck in draft for, I believe, five or six years. Technology was changing. The needs of the government was changing. But the Ministry of Health, they were constrained quite significantly without having a national vision codified into law to help guide the country. When the current president, President Ruto, was campaigning, this was something that his advisors were asking, well, you know, how do we get the interest of the youth, the young people, entrepreneurs? And he pledged during his campaign. campaign to prioritize digital transformation, technology, digital health, and as soon as he was elected, his staff and his constituents held him to task. And in almost record time, I think six, seven months, they were able to take an act that had been stagnated for many years and quickly turned that into legislation and policy. I’d note a few things that the Digital Health Act in Kenya also included linked to architecture and has helped, I think, accelerate work over the last few months. You know, one is that it’s heavily grounded in the Health Information Exchange architecture and standards, but without being prescriptive. Prescriptive around architecture and standards, not prescriptive around solutions. Kenya is a devolved country and the Ministry of Health did not want to dictate every last solution to the counties. What they did want and need to dictate were the rules of the game. What needs to be shared, how it needs to be shared, and with whom. And so I think this has been something that has really contributed to Kenya capitalizing on a lot of the opportunities that they had that were nascent without that national act in place. The second country quickly to talk about is Rwanda. And Rwanda, I want to talk about the governance side of this. Rwanda has been investing for many years in a e-gov approach where they have the Ministry of Health and then they have an authority under the Ministry of Health which is responsible for operationalizing the national laws and policies. Key to this is that they’ve embedded teams within each of the sectoral line ministries. There are people from the ICT authorities sitting within the Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Water. These are senior architects and business analysts. These aren’t software engineers, but people who can see the big picture, can connect the dots. and can identify and corral a lot of very different divergent interests towards, again, a common set of public goods. The one thing I would note, or the example I’d note that has, I think, accelerated health sector work in Rwanda was investment in digital identity. Birth registration in Rwanda in 2017 was 56%. As of today, it’s over 93%. This is a huge increase in a handful of years. This was done in part due to business process optimization, cutting unnecessary extra steps. It was done through policy reform that mandated the health sector to issue birth certificates, IDs, at the point of birth. So a one-stop shop where the mother did not need to take their child to a separate location, and digitization. And we’ve seen, during the COVID response, for example, how Rwanda was able to identify and monitor the delivery of every last dose and report on it. And again, this would not have been possible without years’ worth of investments in terms of that overall governance architecture, the multi-sectoral governance architecture, and investments in key DPI as a result of it, including digital identity. So I think echoing many other speakers here, there’s really a need for development partners, funders, donors, to rethink how we are supporting member states to invest in digitally transforming the health sector, not in a piecemeal, program-by-program, vertical fashion, but at minimum contributing to a larger architecture and strengthening the legislation, the policies, the infrastructure, the human resources required for it to be successful. Thanks.

Leah Ekbladh: It’s great to have a story to put behind it. I think that’s really helpful to kind of ground us in where we are and to think about how even a change in government can enhance a lot of the work that we’ve been doing. Something else that can enhance the work we’re doing is on the financial side. And I’m going to invite Mathilde Forslund from TransformHealth, she’s the executive director of TransformHealth, to talk about one of the key challenges to digital health transformation and that being the lack of information about what is funded and then what resources still remain to be funded. And that can lead to not only fragmenting how we implement digital transformation, but fragmentation among donors who are helping on that journey. What would you like to see from governments, from the multilateral agencies, including one sitting to your left and right, and other donors in the room, prioritize in the light of the global digital compact and the summit of the future to advance better tracking and optimization of funding toward universal health coverage?

Mathilde Forslund: Thank you. That’s a big question. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for the opportunity to speak here today. So as Lea said, I’m the executive director of TransformHealth. And for those of you that don’t know TransformHealth, we’re a global coalition of more than two hundred organizations working to harness the potential of digital transformation to achieve universal health coverage by 2030. So as we all gathered here at the UNGA in New York, at the sidelines of the summit of the future, and as I think the only representative of society on this panel, we must recognize that we are at a pivotal moment for bold, coordinated action to close the digital divide and drive progress towards universal health coverage. We need to ensure that digital transformation and the use of AI is built on equity and rights-based principles that truly serve everyone, everywhere. We need to invest in strong legislative and regulatory environments to guide digital transformation of health, including stronger health data governance regulation to govern the collection and use of data and spur responsible innovation. So as Alan said also earlier in his presentation, we also need to ensure that investment in digital transformation is coordinated and aligned, which is why our call as Transform Health, a key call to action over the last few years, has been to call on governments, donors, and private sector leaders to come together and align resources and efforts. And this is in response to a common focus on tech solutions and isolated pilot projects that have emerged in the absence of national digital health strategies and tracking of resources. Interventions may address a vertical disease area rather than the wider ecosystem, and this leads to an expensive and fragmented approach to the digitalization of health services. So as we move forward from solutions-focused digital health initiatives to holistic national digital health transformation of health systems, having clear and costed plans in place will ensure that stakeholders prioritize areas most in need of funding and most available to deliver health impact for all. So in 2022, Transform Health published a conceptual framework titled Closing the Digital Divide, More and Better Funding for the Digital Transformation of Health Systems. To better understand the sustainable digital transformation of health systems, and our engagement around the G20 India, G20 Brazil, and the Global Initiative on Digital Health have centered around the key recommendations from this report. We know that digital transformation is critical investment areas in health, and yet investment in digital health are falling short of the estimated 12.5 billion that is needed for digital transformation of health in low and middle income countries. So beyond the funding shortfall, another challenge is that digital health investment is not measured or tracked routinely or in a standardized way. This information is often across different data sources and categories, and this makes it challenging to quantify the funding needed, make the case for resources, coordinate funding, and to hold different stakeholders accountable. So, at this week’s UNGA, the Global Digital Compact also calls for increased investment for the development of digital public goods and digital public infrastructure, especially in developing countries. The compact highlights that digital transformation should be integrated to development assistance. But ultimately, we cannot increase what we cannot measure. As long as investment in digital health continues to be wrapped into vertical silos and programming, governments will struggle to identify and strengthen digital public infrastructure for health. So, if we instead integrate the tracking of digital health investment as part of the routine process for health systems planning and budgeting, we will give leaders better data to make funding decisions in the face of budget tradeoffs, ensure that digital health investment reinforces the UHC agenda, and support advocates, civil society, and health workforce in holding governments accountable so that funds reach the priorities and those most in need. It will be really important that we build the evidence base on what the digital health ecosystem can learn from other successful efforts to track financing for other complex investment areas such as climate, gender equity, PHC, HIV and AIDS, and nutrition. We also need to leverage existing tracking mechanisms such as the OECDAC reporting and the national health accounts. Ultimately, driving investment to DPI, DPI health, and digital health, equipped with a clear framework to measure and quantify the need while ensuring resources are directed to the greatest priorities, is critical to advancing the digital transformation of health systems and achieving universal health coverage. Thank you.

Leah Ekbladh: Thank you, Mathilde. We heard a lot from our panel around those three pillars that Elan mentioned. had spoken about at the beginning of our session around the financing of the investment case, the country-led investment that needs to be involved, around the government’s needs, what are those national needs, and what partners and local capacity strengthening need to happen in order to realize the governance that needs to happen around digital transformation, and then, again, three cheers for architecture, and talking about that digital public infrastructure, and then the quality assurance and making sure that the data is that equalizer. What I’d like to do now is have everyone hold questions around that digital transformation. We are going to have some Q&A, but before we do that, we are going to talk about that use case and talk about assistive technology as that use case. So I’m going to introduce Kylie Shae. She’s the team lead for access to assistive technology at WHO.

Kylie Shae: Thank you very much, Leah, and yes, I’m now bringing you to the cold face, you know, why are we doing all of this with just one example, and the montage of photographs on the screen is there to remind us all that assistive technology encompasses a very broad and diverse range of assistive products, including those that support people in the functional domains of cognition, communication, hearing, mobility, daily self-care, and also vision, and on the slide, you will see people of all ages in different settings using assistive products such as wheelchairs, walking aids, glasses, hearing aids, and memory devices, and these are just a few common examples of assistive products. However, there are many more, and the successful provision and use of these devices requires systems and policies that ensure people can access affordable, quality, safe products appropriately fitted and maintained with the support of trained personnel. So, WHO estimates as many as 2.5 billion people need at least one assistive product, so that is one in three of us, and the ratio increases as people age with as many as two to three of us needing assistive technology after the age of 65, but despite the need and all the benefits to individuals, communities, and society as a whole, there is a stark inequity of access, with as few as 3 to 10 percent of people in low-income countries having the assistive technology they need, compared to 90 percent having access in high-income countries. Many barriers exist, including a lack of awareness and understanding of the need, and indeed the potential savings for health care delivery. when people have timely access. And of course, critical challenges in terms of services and workforce capacity and the reach to deliver assistive technology, which extends to the ability of countries to respond to the surge in need during humanitarian crisis. WHO recognizes access to assistive technology as an integral component of universal health coverage. And we are working with countries, with UN partners and others to support integration of assistive technology throughout the health system, addressing areas including better data, supply chain issues, policy and provision systems and workforce. Our work includes looking to the future to see how we can ensure that assistive technology is seen as a priority use case for the application of digital health initiatives. And most importantly, is factored into the design and the implementation of digital public infrastructure for health so we become part of this integrated collaborative solution. We are particularly proud of our partnership with the government of Ireland and the opportunity of the global award that the first secretary mentioned earlier, which is intended to help address that global inequity of access to assistive technology with a deliberate focus on digital technologies addressing the most problematic of those access barriers. And we very much look forward to sharing our progress at future digital health forums. And with that, I would like to hand over to Professor Malcolm MacLachlan, who is the co-director Assistant Living and Learning Institute from Maynooth University and an advisor to the Irish health system, who although he could not be with us in person is gonna share just a few perspectives and examples of work in Ireland in this area. So thank you.

Malcolm MacLachlan: Good morning, everyone. And thank you, Kylie. And so I want to talk to you about. how much digital can add to the impact of assistive technologies. If we consider the WHO Global Initiative on Digital Health, it’s focused very much around universal health coverage and the health-related sustainable development goals. So in other words, coverage for all and leaving nobody behind. And surely these two central ideas are going to be key indicators of our success with digital health. So I believe assistive technology is a really compelling use case for digital public infrastructure. And especially so to be discussed at this summit of the future. I think it’s important for you all to have some idea of the scale of need for assistive technology. Kylie has already touched on this. But who does need assistive technology? So people with disabilities clearly need assistive technology. And the WHO 22 report on global health equity for persons with disability has highlighted that this group has the worst health outcome of any particular group. Really important to understand these poor health outcomes are not because of an intrinsic disability, but rather they’re because of barriers that people face in accessing health services. Also the ageing population, obviously with more ageing people, there will be more functional difficulties. And assistive technology can help alleviate and allow people to operate with these conditions. Also more people living with chronic illnesses. So here we’re often talking about habilitation rather than rehabilitation. People living well. with a difficulty and enjoying a better quality of life. And of course, then there’s people with acquired injuries. Just think of the thousands of people at present injured through current conflicts. Many of them in the short term will need assistive technologies, but many will also need them well into the longer term. So I believe that digital technologies offer huge opportunities to remove barriers. For instance, if we look at the sort of five pillars around promoting inclusive assistive technology, digital can help us promote a person-centered approach. It can help us enhance a supportive policy framework, and it can help with the supply of appropriate assistive products. This also relates to the effective provision system, and this must be integrated throughout health and welfare systems at the different levels. And digital has a huge role in supporting an appropriately trained workforce. Some practical examples of work in Ireland we’re exploring with WHO through our global collaboration with them on digital and assistive technology. And these are about, for instance, analyzing population data regarding the need for assistive technology, so that that can inform policy and crucially financing decisions, including assistive products in existing stock management systems. Using digital tools to streamline assessment and referral processes around assistive technology, and developing online platforms and digital communication. to train and support rural workforces. In Ireland, we’re actively working to explore the full potential of digital technologies and to reduce waiting times and enhance services for children and adults and to increase, I guess, their sense of control and involvement in their own service provision. Just a couple of quick examples. One, a project called SHAPES, which stands for Smart and Healthy Aging through people working through empowered systems. Sorry about that. So I had the pleasure of being the PI on that project, and it worked across 14 different countries within Europe. And what we did essentially was we brought together a huge range of assistive and digital technologies through an open digital platform. So the platform is the enabler for the rollout of assistive technology, particularly to those most marginalized groups, and crucially within the community. So rather than going into hospitals, effective digital infrastructure facilitates the provision of these sorts of services in the community. A second example from Ireland, then, is the assistive technology passport. Again, a digitally mediated platform. And this was supported through a project through the Irish Health Service called CREATE. And interestingly, I think in our context here, is CREATE sought to support digital initiatives that, one, made a difference to individuals, but two, made a difference to the system’s ability to supply quality assistive products. So the assistive technology passport really enhances a person’s access to all types of assistive technology and their associated supports. So it’s in its pilot phase still, but it really represents a digital solution that places the user at the center of their own assistive technology journey, including self-assessment, potential self-referral, access to information, advice, and ongoing support and training and technical support for them and their associated helpers. This project is led by Enable Ireland and Freedom Tech, crucially co-designed with assistive technology users and collaborating with Microsoft and Maynooth University. But in essence, the assistive technology passport embodies how digital can better support access to and use of assistive technology. So in Ireland and throughout the world, assistive technology is a compelling use case for achieving more equitable health systems with greater coverage, further reach, and leaving nobody behind for promoting universal health care and achieving the health-related Sustainable Development Goals. But, and there’s always a but, assistive technology services and systems can only scale these barriers, can only achieve the coverage that we all seek for it and make the impact that it’s potentially capable of making if it is digitally supported by the necessary public digital infrastructure. We ask you to join us in contributing to making that a reality. Thank you very much.

Leah Ekbladh: It’s good to bring it back to people, especially people who can really benefit from these enhanced technologies. So thank you for that. I’m going to open it up to the floor for unfortunately only about five minutes so that we have plenty of time for our closing remarks from our colleague from India. But if there is one or two questions from the floor, oh, I see two hands over there. Perfect. Ladies first, if that’s okay.

Questions: I appreciate that. Hi, everybody. I’m Nancy Munchen. I’m the founder of the AI group. I’m in the studio to announce the position that we have. So first of all, thank you for all your sharing and kudos for the work. We have been discussing a lot about the macroscopic level and about the technology to solve these problems. But as everybody knows here, healthcare is huge about the human. And sometimes that is the most challenging part. So I have one unified question regarding the human engagement. First of all, is the end user engagement. Right now, how we’re kind of marrying or evaluating the end users adoption by market adoption of the digital technology. And the second, because I know we already have a multilayered world, you know, like efforts on encouraging the countries to share the data and have the technology, the platform to communicate that data. But healthcare data is so sensitive that it concerns many, many countries like national security. So how can we, especially, you know, these days with the geopolitical tensions and all this wreck of the nationalism, how are we going to encourage or incentivize all these countries on an individual basis to contribute their data to integrity and slightly more transparency? Thank you.

Leah Ekbladh: Thanks, and I’ll just summarize. I hear two in there. One is around how do we evaluate end user engagement, and then how can we encourage countries to share data across systems. for global learning. Is that, did I get it right? Yes. Super. Okay, who wants it? All right, Alain, please.

Alain Labrique: The first one, which is, I think, easier, because for us, digital is the opportunity to put people at the center. When the health experience today, for most people, is extremely fragmented, is extremely discoordinated, and the opportunity, why we’re talking about infrastructure, why we’re talking about interoperability, because we see this as the key to unlock the continuity of care that we’ve talked about for so many years, but without those shared services, without the common language, where the patient is at the center, as the custodian of their own health record, to be able to have them go through that patient journey in a way that’s person-centered, not hospital-centered, or at the convenience of the clinician, but at the convenience of the patient. We look at what the financial sector has done, and nobody has the patience or time to stand in a five-hour queue to access their bank balance. They want banking at their fingertips. The same we’re now seeing post-pandemic is what people expect from health, and that’s what this public infrastructure, interoperability is going to help us achieve. So people are absolutely at the center. It’s the value proposition that drives this forward. It’s not the financial benefits, but it’s the people at the center. So thank you for emphasizing that.

Leah Ekbladh: It was an excellent question. The gentleman in the back corner there.

Questions: Thank you very much. I’m a new physician, and I’ve been for a long time in Africa, and I’m excited to be back in Europe. I was excited to have this initiative, and I’m thinking also, looking at the types of multi-stakeholder, I was trying to figure out where communities would be manufactured, one, because at the end of the day, communities are the end users of these products, and two, we also very much need to kind of of be aware of the sustainability issue, because one, at the end users, then we can also upgrade, modify this digital health tools we’re talking about. And also making sure that success at community level means that success is achieved everywhere. So to what extent are we considering communities when we talk about multi-stakeholders? Thank you.

Leah Ekbladh: Thank you. Yes, we talked a lot about architecture and financing and governance. Where does the community fit in those three pillars? Mathilde, please.

Mathilde Forslund: Yeah, yeah. Great question. Thank you for that. I think that’s actually why we established TransformHealth, because we felt that the end user wasn’t really represented in these conversations. And so TransformHealth is actually an organization of 200 civil society based organizations to bring these communities and the representatives of these communities, whether it’s people living with HIV and AIDS, whether the data and the privacy of the data is being affected, or as we design these systems for the future, their needs and perspectives are heard in that design and architecture. So I concur with you completely. It’s really important. And we do a lot of stakeholder consultations to bring in the end users perspectives in the different dialogues, as we design these systems and architectures and financial mechanisms that we need in order to enable better digital transformation. Thank you.

Nele Leosk: I actually wanted to just comment on some of the questions that had been asked, and maybe also follow up a bit on what Hani was saying, because Hani was giving this picture that you need these three things to have a successful digital society. And I wish it was so simple. But actually, it is not, because we are increasingly seeing misuses. technology and there was a question around the privacy and and all the other issues that come especially with health data that is a sensitive data and and I would actually like to add here actually the importance of a legal framework and and I would say the entire governance mechanism and I think this is a global issue that has also gathered us all here today to discuss global digital compact and I can tell also from Estonian size that despite the facts that we had our privacy regulation we have a since 90s in in place that would also take into account I would say this virtual world we had a very clear data governance mechanism we would know exactly who is responsible for the collection of which data how it can be used how it needs to be shared and so forth but I would say that it was still not enough we really had to show people that their data is used properly so we actually gave the right for every person in Estonia to see what kind of data is being collected by them and how these data was being used of course I don’t see who exactly has seen my data but I but I but I have a log so I can track down if my data has been used so for example if I’m stopped by police I should have a log there that that somebody has checked whether I have the right to drive so this is a very important question actually that was raised considering the world we are currently living.

Leah Ekbladh: Thank you I recognize your hand I’m afraid I’m gonna have to move on but if you want to hold it you see all of our faces I encourage you to find us afterwards I do want to give our last five minutes to mr. Vikram Pagaria he’s the director of IT for the National Health Authority of India.

Vikram Pagaria: Distinguished delegates colleagues and friends it’s an honor to be here today I would like to extend my heartful appreciation to the organizers for putting out this session so well and I also compliment all the speakers who have given us their insights. I’m sure that this session has made us more knowledgeable than we were before this session, at least for me, the talk on architecture. As you may be aware, India had the privilege of launching the global initiative on digital health on August 19, 2023, during its recently concluded G20 presidency. This initiative represents a pivotal step in democratizing digital health technologies, particularly for the global south, and ensuring equitable access to health services through robust digital public infrastructure. India is deeply committed to building equitable digital health systems, placing people at the heart of our efforts. I would like to share one example of our digital public infrastructure, which is the UPI, Unified Payments Interface, which has really revolutionized payments across the country by making it very simple to make payments. Today, Indians no longer need to carry their cards or wallets when they go outside to buy something. With just a smartphone and low data costs, they can transact seamlessly not just in India, but also in other countries like Singapore, France, UAE, Sri Lanka, Mauritius, Bhutan, and Nepal. To date, UPI facilitates over 10 billion transactions per month with 600 banks, which are live on this platform. In health, about 1.9 billion COVID certificates have been issued digitally by India. And I think the The discussion about foundational infrastructure to enable these transactions is very important. In the realm of healthcare, the commitment to use technology to make easy the life of the citizen is the same. India has started early. This is exemplified through the National Digital Health Mission, which was launched in 2021 with an initial outlay of $20 million. This initiative is aimed at enabling creation of digital health records and promoting interoperability. This mission keeps the individual at the center. By being consent-based, it empowers citizens to take charge of their health data. It also has taken into aspects of data privacy by being built on a federated data architecture. That is, the records are stored at the health facilities where they are created, and our architecture only enables the transfer of those records from one health facility to another, when the user, when the patient gives their consent. The ABDM, the ABDM, that is the Digital Mission Framework, aligns closely with GIDH’s mission, further strengthening our commitment to fostering equitable health access. India has pledged $10 million to GIDH to support countries interested in adopting our DPIs. To ensure that India’s digital health journey aligns with global efforts, the adoption of HL7 FHIR standards have been inbuilt within our ecosystem. We are also strongly recommending SNOMED City standards adherence for the various digital health software which are being used in the country. Accessibility. and augmented care coordination is at the heart of our digital health intervention. I would like to give an example of a use case, Ireland’s assistive technology use case was given, but what in our country we have provided to our citizens is that there is a lot of crowding at our public hospitals. So what happens is that the patients are waiting in the registration area, and they have to go to a registration counter, and they have to share what their name is, what their address is, what their mobile number is, and they have to say that, oh, I want to visit a orthopedic. And what happens is that the register counter, they enter all their details, and they give them a slip. What we have done through the QR codes, which are very, very common in our country, is that through any app, there are about 12 apps which are there where the citizen can go, and when they are there near the registration area, they can scan the QR code, and all their demographic details are given to the registered counter, and they get a token, say 42. And when the 42 number token comes, the citizen can go, and they can just say that, oh, I want to go to the orthopedic, or I have a dental ailment, and all the other details that are not required to be collected. So from about the waiting time of about 40 to 50 minutes, we have been able to reduce it to four to five minutes, and about 300,000 people daily use this technology and get quick OBD registrations. Through innovative financing models, we are ensuring that the investments in digital health align with national priorities and contribute to a sustainable country-led transformation. In our country, the level of digitization in health is still. So what we are trying to do is we are working on 100 model facilities project, wherein we are trying to understand the complexities of digitization, and we are focusing on making 100 facilities across the country as end-to-end digitized, so that we learn on this process, and then we will try to use those learnings to digitize the entire health ecosystem. I thank you for your time, for your patience, and I hope it was a good session. Thank you so much.

Leah Ekbladh: I want to thank all of our panelists and our participants, particularly those who offered questions to bring us back to the community. That’s always a great way to end as well. We are only five minutes over, so I’m very proud of myself, but we do have to clear the room for the next session, but I think many of us will be around in the lobby if there’s other questions. Thanks so much.

H

Hani Eskandar

Speech speed

158 words per minute

Speech length

1089 words

Speech time

412 seconds

Importance of architecture – DPI enables interoperability, reusability, and trust

Explanation

Hani Eskandar emphasizes that digital public infrastructure (DPI) is crucial for enabling interoperability, reusability, and trust in digital health systems. He argues that these elements are essential for transforming the health sector digitally.

Evidence

Eskandar mentions that DPI components can enable reusability, interoperability, and trust, which are necessary for digital transformation.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Public Infrastructure for Health Systems

Agreed with

Nele Leosk

Vikram Pagaria

Agreed on

Importance of digital public infrastructure (DPI) for health systems

Disagreed with

Mathilde Forslund

Disagreed on

Approach to digital health transformation

N

Nele Leosk

Speech speed

146 words per minute

Speech length

1324 words

Speech time

542 seconds

Estonia’s example of digital identity and data sharing

Explanation

Nele Leosk highlights Estonia’s successful implementation of digital identity and data sharing systems. She argues that these systems have enabled efficient and secure digital services for citizens.

Evidence

Estonia’s digital signature system allowing citizens to participate in municipal council meetings, vote, and rent apartments remotely.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Public Infrastructure for Health Systems

Agreed with

Hani Eskandar

Vikram Pagaria

Agreed on

Importance of digital public infrastructure (DPI) for health systems

Need for governance and legal frameworks to protect data privacy

Explanation

Leosk emphasizes the importance of having strong governance mechanisms and legal frameworks to protect data privacy. She argues that these are necessary to ensure proper use of sensitive data, especially in healthcare.

Evidence

Estonia’s implementation of a system allowing citizens to see what data is collected about them and how it is used.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Public Infrastructure for Health Systems

Agreed with

Sean Blaschke

Agreed on

Need for proper governance and legal frameworks

V

Vikram Pagaria

Speech speed

129 words per minute

Speech length

885 words

Speech time

409 seconds

India’s Unified Payments Interface as successful DPI example

Explanation

Vikram Pagaria presents India’s Unified Payments Interface (UPI) as a successful example of digital public infrastructure. He argues that UPI has revolutionized digital payments in India, making transactions simple and accessible.

Evidence

UPI facilitates over 10 billion transactions per month with 600 banks live on the platform.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Public Infrastructure for Health Systems

Agreed with

Hani Eskandar

Nele Leosk

Agreed on

Importance of digital public infrastructure (DPI) for health systems

Importance of standards like HL7 FHIR for interoperability

Explanation

Pagaria emphasizes the importance of adopting international standards like HL7 FHIR for ensuring interoperability in digital health systems. He argues that these standards are crucial for aligning India’s digital health journey with global efforts.

Evidence

India’s adoption of HL7 FHIR standards within their ecosystem and recommendation of SNOMED CT standards for digital health software.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Public Infrastructure for Health Systems

India’s $20 million investment in National Digital Health Mission

Explanation

Pagaria highlights India’s significant investment in the National Digital Health Mission. He argues that this initiative aims to create digital health records and promote interoperability in the healthcare system.

Evidence

India’s launch of the National Digital Health Mission in 2021 with an initial outlay of $20 million.

Major Discussion Point

Financing Digital Health Transformation

M

Mathilde Forslund

Speech speed

145 words per minute

Speech length

896 words

Speech time

369 seconds

Current funding for digital health insufficient and fragmented

Explanation

Mathilde Forslund argues that the current funding for digital health is insufficient and fragmented. She emphasizes that this leads to an expensive and disjointed approach to digitalizing health services.

Evidence

Reference to isolated pilot projects and vertical disease-focused interventions in the absence of national digital health strategies.

Major Discussion Point

Financing Digital Health Transformation

Disagreed with

Hani Eskandar

Disagreed on

Approach to digital health transformation

Need to track and measure digital health investments

Explanation

Forslund stresses the importance of tracking and measuring digital health investments. She argues that this information is crucial for quantifying funding needs, making cases for resources, and holding stakeholders accountable.

Evidence

Mention of the challenge in measuring digital health investments due to data being spread across different sources and categories.

Major Discussion Point

Financing Digital Health Transformation

Importance of costed national digital health plans

Explanation

Forslund emphasizes the need for clear and costed national digital health plans. She argues that these plans will ensure stakeholders prioritize areas most in need of funding and most likely to deliver health impact.

Evidence

Reference to Transform Health’s conceptual framework ‘Closing the Digital Divide’ which highlights the importance of costed plans.

Major Discussion Point

Financing Digital Health Transformation

L

Lisa Lewis-Person

Speech speed

145 words per minute

Speech length

603 words

Speech time

249 seconds

Need for country leadership and ownership

Explanation

Lisa Lewis-Person emphasizes the importance of country leadership and ownership in digital health transformation. She argues that countries need to take the lead in developing and implementing their digital health strategies.

Major Discussion Point

Governance of Digital Health Systems

Importance of multi-stakeholder collaboration

Explanation

Lewis-Person stresses the significance of multi-stakeholder collaboration in advancing digital health. She argues that working together through key digital health leadership organizations is crucial for overcoming fragmentation.

Evidence

Mention of collaborative efforts through the Global Initiative on Digital Health and the Global Digital Health Partnership.

Major Discussion Point

Governance of Digital Health Systems

S

Sean Blaschke

Speech speed

138 words per minute

Speech length

737 words

Speech time

318 seconds

Role of legislation like Kenya’s Digital Health Act

Explanation

Sean Blaschke highlights the importance of legislation in digital health transformation. He argues that laws like Kenya’s Digital Health Act provide a national vision and guide for digital health implementation.

Evidence

Kenya’s Digital Health Act, which was passed after being stuck in draft for 5-6 years, now provides a roadmap for digital health transformation.

Major Discussion Point

Governance of Digital Health Systems

Agreed with

Nele Leosk

Agreed on

Need for proper governance and legal frameworks

Rwanda’s e-gov approach with embedded ICT teams

Explanation

Blaschke presents Rwanda’s e-government approach as an effective governance model. He argues that embedding ICT teams within different ministries helps connect the dots and identify common public goods across sectors.

Evidence

Rwanda’s placement of senior architects and business analysts from ICT authorities within various ministries, including health.

Major Discussion Point

Governance of Digital Health Systems

K

Kylie Shae

Speech speed

150 words per minute

Speech length

547 words

Speech time

218 seconds

Large unmet need for assistive technology globally

Explanation

Kylie Shae highlights the significant global need for assistive technology. She argues that despite the high demand, there is a stark inequity in access to these technologies, especially in low-income countries.

Evidence

WHO estimates that 2.5 billion people need at least one assistive product, with only 3-10% of people in low-income countries having access compared to 90% in high-income countries.

Major Discussion Point

Assistive Technology as Use Case for Digital Health

M

Malcolm MacLachlan

Speech speed

118 words per minute

Speech length

912 words

Speech time

461 seconds

Digital can help scale up access to assistive technology

Explanation

Malcolm MacLachlan argues that digital technologies offer significant opportunities to improve access to assistive technology. He suggests that digital can help remove barriers and enhance various aspects of assistive technology provision.

Evidence

Examples of digital tools streamlining assessment and referral processes, and developing online platforms to train and support rural workforces.

Major Discussion Point

Assistive Technology as Use Case for Digital Health

Ireland’s assistive technology passport as digital solution

Explanation

MacLachlan presents Ireland’s assistive technology passport as an innovative digital solution. He argues that this digitally mediated platform enhances a person’s access to all types of assistive technology and associated supports.

Evidence

Description of the assistive technology passport project, which includes features for self-assessment, potential self-referral, access to information, advice, and ongoing support.

Major Discussion Point

Assistive Technology as Use Case for Digital Health

U

Unknown speaker

Speech speed

0 words per minute

Speech length

0 words

Speech time

1 seconds

Need to involve end users and communities in design

Explanation

This argument emphasizes the importance of involving end users and communities in the design of digital health systems. It suggests that community engagement is crucial for ensuring the sustainability and effectiveness of digital health tools.

Major Discussion Point

Assistive Technology as Use Case for Digital Health

Agreements

Agreement Points

Importance of digital public infrastructure (DPI) for health systems

Hani Eskandar

Nele Leosk

Vikram Pagaria

Importance of architecture – DPI enables interoperability, reusability, and trust

Estonia’s example of digital identity and data sharing

India’s Unified Payments Interface as successful DPI example

Speakers agree on the crucial role of digital public infrastructure in enabling efficient, secure, and interoperable digital health systems.

Need for proper governance and legal frameworks

Nele Leosk

Sean Blaschke

Need for governance and legal frameworks to protect data privacy

Role of legislation like Kenya’s Digital Health Act

Speakers emphasize the importance of strong governance mechanisms and legal frameworks to guide digital health transformation and protect data privacy.

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers highlight the need for significant and coordinated investment in digital health infrastructure and transformation.

Mathilde Forslund

Vikram Pagaria

Current funding for digital health insufficient and fragmented

India’s $20 million investment in National Digital Health Mission

Both speakers emphasize the importance of country-led approaches and embedding digital expertise within government structures for effective digital health transformation.

Lisa Lewis-Person

Sean Blaschke

Need for country leadership and ownership

Rwanda’s e-gov approach with embedded ICT teams

Unexpected Consensus

Importance of assistive technology in digital health

Kylie Shae

Malcolm MacLachlan

Unknown speaker

Large unmet need for assistive technology globally

Digital can help scale up access to assistive technology

Need to involve end users and communities in design

There was an unexpected focus on assistive technology as a key use case for digital health, with multiple speakers highlighting its importance and potential for digital enhancement.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of agreement include the importance of digital public infrastructure, the need for proper governance and legal frameworks, the significance of country-led approaches, and the potential of digital technologies in enhancing assistive technology access.

Consensus level

There is a high level of consensus among speakers on the fundamental aspects of digital health transformation. This consensus suggests a shared understanding of key priorities and challenges, which could facilitate more coordinated and effective efforts in advancing digital health globally.

Disagreements

Disagreement Points

Approach to digital health transformation

Hani Eskandar

Mathilde Forslund

Importance of architecture – DPI enables interoperability, reusability, and trust

Current funding for digital health insufficient and fragmented

While Eskandar emphasizes the importance of architecture and DPI for digital health transformation, Forslund focuses on the need for better funding and tracking of investments. This suggests a difference in prioritization of technical infrastructure versus financial resources.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of disagreement revolve around prioritization of different aspects of digital health transformation, such as technical infrastructure, funding, and governance.

Disagreement level

The level of disagreement among the speakers appears to be relatively low. Most speakers present complementary perspectives on digital health transformation rather than conflicting views. This suggests a general consensus on the importance of digital health transformation, with differences mainly in emphasis and approach. These differences could potentially lead to more comprehensive strategies if integrated effectively.

Partial Agreements

Partial Agreements

Both speakers agree on the importance of digital public infrastructure, but they present different national approaches and focus areas. Leosk emphasizes digital identity and data sharing in Estonia, while Pagaria highlights India’s success with digital payments.

Nele Leosk

Vikram Pagaria

Estonia’s example of digital identity and data sharing

India’s Unified Payments Interface as successful DPI example

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers highlight the need for significant and coordinated investment in digital health infrastructure and transformation.

Mathilde Forslund

Vikram Pagaria

Current funding for digital health insufficient and fragmented

India’s $20 million investment in National Digital Health Mission

Both speakers emphasize the importance of country-led approaches and embedding digital expertise within government structures for effective digital health transformation.

Lisa Lewis-Person

Sean Blaschke

Need for country leadership and ownership

Rwanda’s e-gov approach with embedded ICT teams

Takeaways

Key Takeaways

Digital public infrastructure (DPI) is crucial for enabling interoperable, reusable, and trustworthy digital health systems

Financing for digital health transformation is currently insufficient and fragmented, requiring better tracking and alignment of investments

Strong governance frameworks and country leadership are essential for successful digital health implementation

Assistive technology represents an important use case that can benefit greatly from digital health infrastructure

Involving end users and communities in the design of digital health systems is critical for adoption and effectiveness

Resolutions and Action Items

WHO and ITU to develop guidance on reference architecture for digital transformation of health systems

Countries invited to join working group on developing reference architecture for digital health

India pledged $10 million to support countries interested in adopting their digital public infrastructure models

Unresolved Issues

How to encourage countries to share sensitive health data across systems for global learning while addressing privacy and security concerns

How to ensure digital health initiatives do not exacerbate existing inequities in access to care

Specific mechanisms for involving communities and end users in digital health system design and implementation

Suggested Compromises

Balancing country-specific digital health solutions with adoption of global standards and interoperable systems

Using existing tracking mechanisms like OECD reporting to measure digital health investments rather than creating new systems

Thought Provoking Comments

We’ve been very much dominated by what you can call a solution mindset. Basically, I have a problem, I develop an application to solve my solution. There is a huge difference, and this is what we have learned after so many years, even at our agencies. We have discovered that building a solution is not the same as transforming a sector or digitizing a sector.

Speaker

Hani Eskandar

Reason

This comment challenges the prevailing approach to digital health and introduces a more holistic perspective on digital transformation.

Impact

It shifted the discussion from focusing on individual solutions to considering systemic transformation and architecture. This led to further exploration of the importance of digital public infrastructure and interoperability.

Estonia is a great example. What did Estonia do? They solved interoperability through XRoute, they solved the issue of trust by ID, and they solved the issue of reusability by creating those kind of shared and reusable platforms.

Speaker

Hani Eskandar

Reason

This comment provides a concrete example of successful digital transformation, illustrating key principles in action.

Impact

It grounded the abstract discussion in a real-world case study, prompting other participants to consider how these principles could be applied in their own contexts.

We cannot increase what we cannot measure. As long as investment in digital health continues to be wrapped into vertical silos and programming, governments will struggle to identify and strengthen digital public infrastructure for health.

Speaker

Mathilde Forslund

Reason

This comment highlights a critical challenge in digital health transformation and links it to the need for better measurement and tracking of investments.

Impact

It introduced the importance of financial tracking and accountability into the discussion, leading to consideration of how to better align and optimize funding for digital health initiatives.

I believe assistive technology is a really compelling use case for digital public infrastructure. And especially so to be discussed at this summit of the future.

Speaker

Malcolm MacLachlan

Reason

This comment connects the broader discussion of digital infrastructure to a specific and impactful use case, demonstrating the practical implications of the concepts being discussed.

Impact

It shifted the conversation to consider concrete applications of digital health infrastructure, particularly in addressing health equity and access issues.

Overall Assessment

These key comments shaped the discussion by moving it from abstract concepts to practical considerations of digital health transformation. They challenged participants to think beyond individual solutions to systemic change, highlighted the importance of measurement and accountability in funding, and provided concrete examples of successful implementation and impactful use cases. This progression deepened the conversation, making it more nuanced and action-oriented, while consistently emphasizing the need for holistic, interoperable, and equitable approaches to digital health infrastructure.

Follow-up Questions

How can we evaluate end user engagement and adoption of digital health technologies?

Speaker

Nancy Munchen

Explanation

Understanding user adoption is crucial for the success and impact of digital health initiatives.

How can we encourage or incentivize countries to share health data across systems for global learning, especially given concerns about national security and geopolitical tensions?

Speaker

Nancy Munchen

Explanation

Data sharing is essential for global health improvements, but sensitive health data raises concerns that need to be addressed.

To what extent are we considering communities when we talk about multi-stakeholders in digital health initiatives?

Speaker

Unnamed physician

Explanation

Ensuring community involvement is crucial for the sustainability and effectiveness of digital health tools.

How can we strengthen legal frameworks and governance mechanisms to protect privacy and prevent misuse of health data?

Speaker

Nele Leosk

Explanation

Robust legal and governance structures are necessary to build trust and ensure proper use of sensitive health data in digital systems.

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed.

A Digital Future for All (morning sessions)

A Digital Future for All (morning sessions)

Session at a Glance

Summary

This discussion focused on the importance of creating an inclusive and sustainable digital future for all. The event, hosted by ITU and UNDP, brought together leaders from government, industry, and civil society to explore how digital technologies can advance the Sustainable Development Goals.

Speakers highlighted the urgent need to bridge the digital divide, with 2.6 billion people still lacking internet access. They emphasized that connectivity alone is not enough – digital skills, affordable devices, and meaningful content are also crucial. Several initiatives were announced to expand connectivity and digital literacy, particularly in underserved communities.

The transformative potential of technologies like AI, blockchain, and satellite communications was showcased through various examples. These included using AI for flood prediction, blockchain for refugee assistance, and satellites for wildlife conservation. Speakers stressed the importance of ensuring these technologies benefit everyone, not just the privileged few.

Digital public infrastructure was presented as a key foundation for inclusive development. Examples from countries like Brazil, India and Estonia demonstrated how digital ID systems and other core platforms can improve service delivery and economic participation. However, speakers emphasized that proper safeguards for privacy and security are essential.

The discussion also explored how digital technologies can support environmental sustainability, from monitoring deforestation to enabling clean energy transitions. Youth representatives called for ensuring the digital future is equitable, secure and empowering for all.

Overall, the event highlighted both the immense opportunities and challenges of the digital revolution. Speakers agreed that realizing an inclusive digital future will require collaborative efforts across sectors and borders, with a focus on putting people and planet at the center of technological progress.

Keypoints

Major discussion points:

– The importance of universal and affordable digital connectivity, with a focus on connecting the 2.6 billion people who are still unconnected

– Leveraging digital technologies and AI to address global challenges like climate change, healthcare, education, and economic development

– Ensuring digital inclusion and bridging digital divides, especially for women, youth, and underserved communities

– The need for safeguards, regulations and ethical frameworks as AI and digital technologies advance

– Public-private partnerships and multi-stakeholder collaboration to drive digital transformation

Overall purpose:

The overall purpose of the discussion was to highlight the transformative potential of digital technologies and AI in achieving sustainable development goals, while emphasizing the need for inclusive and responsible approaches to ensure no one is left behind in the digital future.

Tone:

The overall tone was optimistic and forward-looking, with speakers expressing enthusiasm about technological possibilities while also acknowledging challenges. There was a sense of urgency in calls to action for bridging digital divides. The tone remained largely consistent throughout, balancing excitement about innovation with reminders of the importance of ethics and inclusion.

Speakers

Moderators/Facilitators:

– Sade Baderinwa – Eyewitness News Anchor, ABC News

Speakers:

– Achim Steiner – Administrator, UNDP

– Amandeep Singh Gill – UN Secretary General’s Envoy in Technology

– Doreen Bogdan-Martin – Secretary General , ITU

– Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub – CEO Vodacom Group and Vodafone Executive Committee Member

– Jessica Rosenworcel – Chairwoman, Federal Communications Commission, USA

– Juan Lavista Ferres – Corporate Vice President and Chief Data Scientist, Microsoft

– Emma Theophilus – Minister of Information and Communication Technology, Namibia

– Karan Bhatia – Vice President of Government Affairs and Public Policy, Google

– David Sapolsky – Senior Vice President, Global Public Policy & General Counsel, Amazon

– Ann Aerts – Head, Novartis Foundation

– Mats Granryd – Director General, GSMA

– Alexandre Reis Siqueira Freire – Commissioner, National Telecommunications Agency, Brazil

– Rabab Fatima – Under-Secretary-General and High Representative UNOHRLLS

– Bianca Faith Johnson – President, Board of Trustees, Push to Walk

– Kelly T. Clements – United Nations Deputy High Commissioner for Refugees

– Lady Mariéme Jamme – Founder and CEO, iamtheCODE

– Amr Talaat – Minister of Information and Communication Technology, Egypt

– Lisa Russell – Emmy-winning Filmmaker and Founder/CEO of Arts Envoy Lab/Create2030

– Lori Freeman – Global GM and Vice President, Salesforce for Nonprofits

– Tunde Wackman – Chief Development Officer, World Central Kitchen

– Abdullah Alswaha – Minister of Communications and Information Technology, Saudi Arabia

– Joan Joseph Moses – Educator, Roosevelt Douglas Primary School in Portsmouth, Dominica

– Tofara L. Chokera – CEO and Founder, Tofara Online

– Pamela Coke-Hamilton – Executive Director, International Trade Center

– Christopher Burns – Chief Digital Development Officer and Director, Technology Division, USAID

– Lazarus Chakwera – President of Malawi

– Esther Dweck – Minister for Management and Innovation and Public Services of Brazil

– Paul Foster – CEO, Global Esports Federation

– Brad Smith – Vice Chair and President, Microsoft

– Alan Davidson – Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information and Administrator, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, USA

– Rumman Chowdhury – CEO and co-Founder, Humane Intelligence, United States Science Envoy, Artificial Intelligence

– Harrison Lung – Group Chief Strategy Officer, e&

– Bosun Tijani – Minister of Communications, Innovation and Digital Economy, Nigeria

– Robert Muggah – Co-Founder, Igarapé Institute

– Valentino Valentini – Deputy Minister at the Ministry of Enterprise and Made in Italy

– Jakob Granit – Director-General, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency

– Zhiping Chen – Vice President, ZTE Corporation

– Fatou Haidara – Deputy Director General, UNIDO

– Daren Tang – Director General, WIPO

– Tawfik Jelassi – Assistant Director-General for Communication and Information, UNESCO

– Deemah AlYahya – Secretary General, Digital Cooperation Organization

– Nobu Okada – Founder and CEO, AstroScale

Youth Representatives:

– Sanjana Sanghi – UNDP India Youth Champion and Bollywood Actress

– Yuri Romashko – CEO, Institute of Analysis and Advocacy, UNDP Generation 17

– Daniella Esi Darlington – Co-Founder, Copianto AI and ITU Secretary-General’s Youth Advisory Board Member

Full session report

Expanded Summary of the Discussion on Creating an Inclusive Digital Future

Introduction

This discussion, part of the Summit of the Future Action Days, was hosted by ITU and UNDP. It brought together leaders from government, industry, civil society, and youth to explore how digital technologies can advance the Sustainable Development Goals and create an inclusive digital future for all. The event was moderated by Sade Baderinwa, a news anchor at WABC in New York, and featured a diverse array of speakers with expertise in technology, development, and policy.

Key Themes and Discussion Points

1. Universal Digital Connectivity

A central focus of the discussion was the urgent need to bridge the digital divide, with 2.6 billion people still lacking internet access. Speakers emphasised that connectivity alone is insufficient; digital skills, affordable devices, and meaningful content are also crucial for true digital inclusion.

Technological Solutions:

– Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub (Vodacom Group) stressed the importance of connecting the unconnected.

– Jessica Rosenworcel (FCC) highlighted satellite-to-cell phone communications as a potential game-changer for ending mobile dead zones.

– Juan Lavista Ferres (Microsoft) discussed using AI and satellite imagery to map population shifts for targeted connectivity efforts.

– David Sapolsky (Amazon) presented Project Kuiper for affordable global satellite broadband.

The Partner2Connect Digital Coalition was highlighted as a crucial initiative, with significant pledges announced during the event to support digital inclusion efforts globally.

2. Digital Inclusion and Skills Development

Speakers emphasised that true digital inclusion requires both infrastructure and skills development, particularly for underserved populations.

Key Points:

– Tofara L. Chokera (Tofara Online Trust) highlighted digital skills training for economic empowerment, especially for women and youth.

– Mats Granryd (GSMA) pointed out that affordable smartphones are key to bridging the digital divide.

– Lazarus Chakwera (President of Malawi) called for integrating digital literacy into national education curricula and presented the Digital Malawi Project.

– Christopher Burns (USAID) introduced the Responsible Computing Challenge to embed ethics in tech education.

3. AI for Sustainable Development

The transformative potential of AI in addressing global challenges was a recurring theme, balanced with calls for responsible and ethical development.

Applications and Initiatives:

– Karan Bhatia (Google) discussed AI for early flood warnings and disaster preparedness.

– Valentino Valentini (Ministry of Enterprise and Made in Italy) presented the AI Hub for Sustainable Development.

– Achim Steiner (UNDP) stressed the need for AI safeguards to prevent exclusion and protect rights.

– Rumman Chowdhury (Humane Intelligence) highlighted evaluating AI systems for cultural appropriateness.

– Brad Smith (Microsoft) emphasised ensuring AI benefits the Global South.

4. Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) and Digital Public Goods

DPI was presented as a key foundation for inclusive development, with speakers emphasizing its potential and the need for careful implementation.

Perspectives:

– Esther Dweck (Minister, Brazil) discussed DPI for efficient government services, financial inclusion, and environmental efforts.

– Achim Steiner highlighted that DPI requires commitment, capital, and capacity building.

– Several speakers emphasized the importance of digital public goods in fostering innovation and development.

5. Technology for Social Impact

The discussion showcased various examples of how digital technologies can create significant social impact across diverse fields.

Examples:

– Bianca Faith Johnson demonstrated exoskeleton technology that restores mobility for paralyzed individuals, highlighting the need to make such technologies widely accessible and affordable.

– Kelly T. Clements (UNHCR) discussed blockchain-based digital wallets for rapid financial aid to refugees.

– Ann Aerts (Novartis Foundation) highlighted AI and digital tools for improving healthcare outcomes and reducing inequalities.

– Zhiping Chen (ZTE Corporation) discussed digital technologies for protecting endangered species in remote areas.

6. Youth Perspectives and Initiatives

The event featured strong youth representation, highlighting their role in shaping the digital future.

Key Contributions:

– Sanjana Sanghi presented youth-led initiatives for digital inclusion and skills development.

– Yuri Romashko discussed the importance of involving young people in digital policy-making.

– Daniella Esi Darlington highlighted youth-led efforts to bridge the digital divide in Africa.

7. Space Sustainability and Innovation

Nobu Okada presented on the critical issue of space sustainability, discussing innovative technologies for space debris removal and the importance of maintaining a clean orbital environment for future space-based technologies.

8. Global Initiatives and Frameworks

Several speakers highlighted important global initiatives:

– Amandeep Singh Gill discussed the Global Digital Compact and its importance in shaping international digital cooperation.

– Deemah AlYahya presented the Digital Cooperation Organization’s Digital Economy Navigator (DEN).

– Paul Foster announced the Global Esports Federation’s pledge to support digital inclusion through gaming.

9. Creative Integration of Technology

Lisa Russell demonstrated the integration of AI in creative fields by presenting AI-generated artwork created during the event, sparking discussions on the future of human-AI collaboration in the arts.

Challenges and Unresolved Issues

1. Ensuring AI development benefits the Global South without exacerbating inequalities

2. Balancing rapid technological advancement with necessary regulatory frameworks and ethical considerations

3. Addressing potential job displacement due to AI and automation in developing countries

4. Ensuring data privacy and security in the implementation of digital public infrastructure

5. Making cutting-edge technologies widely accessible and affordable

6. Maintaining space sustainability while advancing space-based technologies

Conclusion

The discussion highlighted both the immense opportunities and challenges of the digital revolution. Speakers agreed that realising an inclusive digital future will require collaborative efforts across sectors, generations, and borders, with a focus on putting people and planet at the centre of technological progress. The overall tone was optimistic and forward-looking, balanced with a strong emphasis on ethical considerations, inclusion, and responsible development of digital technologies.

Session Transcript

Sade Baderinwa: If everyone could please take their seats, in the back, if you could please take your seats. Thank you so much. We’re going to begin. It is good to see everyone here this morning. Your Excellencies, esteemed speakers, and distinguished guests, I’m Sade Baderinwa, a news anchor at WABC in New York, and it is an absolute pleasure to be here today. Thank you. We’ve got some eyewitnesses viewers. Well, welcome to the summit of the future, Action Days, a digital future for all. We are living in an extraordinary era of technological transformation. Consider this. A cook in Thailand shares a family recipe through a short video online, and within hours, people around the globe are replicating it in their kitchens. In mere moments, that recipe transcends borders. We find ourselves at a pivotal crossroads. Technology is reshaping our lives at a speed we just couldn’t have imagined just a decade ago. It is revolutionizing industries, democratizing education, and connecting people across continents. In healthcare, artificial intelligence is diagnosing diseases with unprecedented accuracy and speed, delivering life-saving treatments to once inaccessible regions. Personalized medicine tailored to individual needs is no longer a far-off dream, but a reality on the horizon. Today, you will witness that transformation firsthand. A woman who is paralyzed will walk again through the use of technology. It truly is remarkable, and I think you all are going to be blown away. We’ll also explore how technology is being harnessed beyond the battlefield. Satellite-based networks are restoring communication in war-torn areas like Ukraine, where infrastructure is devastated. Consider the plight of refugees escaping war zones like Ukraine. They often arrive with only the clothes on their backs. No money. No legal documents and no answers for tomorrow. Technology, however, is changing that. Through blockchain technologies, refugees will be given digital wallets that offer instant access to financial aid and shelter. You’re going to hear today how this groundbreaking solution is enabling refugees to rebuild their lives in just mere minutes. Meanwhile, there are so many companies using the power of AI to predict floods, offering life-saving warnings up to a week in advance. And these forecasts are reaching dozens of countries, protecting millions of people in vulnerable areas. We’re going to talk with some of these companies today. Digital access is truly a game changer. For millions of people in isolated regions, farmers, women, and schools in rural areas, often overlooked for decades, are now part of a connected world, transforming their lives and economies simply by getting online. You’ll hear today how this is helping the previously forgotten thrive. And as we explore these advancements, we must also be vigilant with our proper safeguards, the same technologies that drive progress could deepen inequalities, threaten privacy, and marginalize the most vulnerable. Our digital future must be open, free, and secure for everyone, not just for the privileged few. So today, we will also discuss those crucial safeguards. There’s so much to cover, and it’s going to be an exciting day centered on harnessing the transformative power of technology. So, let’s get started. And first, I’d like to introduce Achim Steiner, Administrator, UNDP. Amandeep Singh Gill, UN Secretary General’s Envoy in Technology. And Doreen Bogdan-Martin, Secretary General of ITU.

Achim Steiner: Thank you. At the end, Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to this amazing room this morning. My name is Achim Steiner and I’m the head of the United Nations Development Programme, UNDP. I’m delighted to extend a very warm welcome to all of you joining us for the joint opening of the A Digital Future for All event, proudly co-hosted by UNDP, the International Telecommunication Union, and the Office of the UN Secretary General’s Envoy on Technology. We are convening on the eve of the Summit of the Future, when world leaders will come together in this building to commit to the bold new solutions that better reflect the realities of the 21st century, and can respond to both today’s and tomorrow’s challenges and, perhaps even more importantly, opportunities. Our event is part of the Summit’s Action Days, which focus on building multi-stakeholder partnerships and paving the way to a more inclusive and interconnected multinaturalism. Today, representatives from every corner of the globe and all sectors of society will showcase digital solutions and announce new commitments to realize that brighter digital future for everyone, everywhere. Our vision of a digital future for all. At UNDP, we believe that digital technologies will be the fundamental driver of development this century, reshaping economies and societies, and helping to radically reshape development – from driving down poverty and inequalities, to advancing gender equality, to powering decisive climate action. Working as part of the United Nations family, we are not only closing the digital connectivity divide, we are committed to helping to shape inclusive digital ecosystems in over 100 countries today to help digital innovation flourish everywhere. First in our partner countries, we are supporting the development of digital policies and strategies that guide country-level digital transformation. Second, we enable the planning and development of digital foundations that underpin inclusive digital transformations, particularly digital public infrastructure, which represent the roads and railway tracks, so to speak, of our new digital era. Third, we provide digital capacity-building support to ensure that governments and communities and citizens have the skills they need. Our work is only possible thanks to our partnership with governments, our UN partners, international organizations, the private sector, civil society, academia and well beyond. That is also the spirit of today’s event, to create strong collaborations that reach everyone, everywhere, and that ensure that people can shape their own digital future in this era. Thank you.

Amandeep Singh Gill: Good morning. How are we today? Welcome. The future calls, and here we are, united, determined to build it together. A peaceful, prosperous, sustainable and hopeful world, where technology empowers us all and disempowers none. Our future is digital, and we have been hard at work over the past two years to ensure that it is open, safe and secure, and that it leaves no one behind. A future that upholds our hard-won victories on human rights and sustainable development. UN member states, with critical contributions of stakeholders from civil society, the tech community and academia, and the private sector, have been negotiating a global digital compact. A uniquely diverse body of experts on artificial intelligence can mean by the Secretary General has worked at warp speed to produce a blueprint for the international governance of AI. And it all comes together tomorrow at the Summit of the Future. A pact for the future with two powerful annexes, a Global Digital Compact and a Declaration on Future Generations, will be on the table for leaders to decide and adopt. The Global Digital Compact puts digitalization at the center of multilateral cooperation and a fit-for-purpose United Nations. It sets out principles and actions to advance an open, safe and secure digital future for all. The GDC provides an ambitious agenda to harness digital technologies for development and benefit of all countries and communities. It provides us with a normative foundation, a moral compass, if you will, to benchmark our progress. It includes concrete commitments and actions, almost two decades after the World Summit on Information Society, to ensure that everyone, everywhere is connected to the internet and to close digital divides. It recognizes the challenges of safety and security online and seeks to mobilize political and financial resources to protect against risks and harms. The Compact is practical. It sets out actions to close digital divides and leverage technologies to accelerate development, expand opportunities for inclusion in the digital economy so that all stakeholders have more opportunities to generate value and be more than mere consumers of digital technologies. The GDC aims to protect and promote human rights online and make the digital space safe for all, especially children, women and girls. It aims to advance responsible, equitable and interoperable data governance, and importantly, it aims to govern AI for the public benefit and inclusively. At the core of the GDC is a commitment to inclusive, equitable governance of technology, in particular emerging technologies like AI. It makes digital governance a global public policy issue, one in which all stakeholders – the private sector, the tech community, civil society and academia – have a role to play. We are at the start of a new journey. We need your engagement to ensure that the commitments in the GDC bring meaningful digital futures to all. Thank you.

Doreen Bogdan-Martin: Generation that has never known a world without digital. It’s the SDG generation. Millions of young people who are stepping into their teenage years on the brink of adulthood. Their journey has been extraordinary. They have grown up in a decade that has seen part of the population using the internet nearly double, social media surrounding us, and artificial intelligence going mainstream. They’re too young to remember when the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Paris Agreement on Climate Change were adopted. They were just kids when a global pandemic turned their world upside down and shifted education online. Then, like all of us, they encountered generative AI. In a series of developments. have since been nothing short of extraordinary, digital runs through their veins. It’s the most connected generation of all, and the first to come of age in an era of unimaginable digital opportunities. What will they do with all this power? How will they live up to this responsibility, and what kind of future will they build? Let’s see this future through their eyes, and let’s give them a seat at the table. So we’re in 2030, a not-so-distant digital future where everyone can access the Internet anytime, anywhere. Where having the right device is a basic standard, not a privilege. Where digital skills are a fundamental part of education. Where men and women have a fair shot at opportunity and success. Where algorithms create equity, not bias. Where access to computing resources are distributed more evenly, and where human rights are the bedrock of our digital society. Where safety is the norm, and where digital and green transitions go hand-in-hand. In short, a sustainable, inclusive, and responsible digital future for all. Three fundamental truths that guide our digital track, here during the action days of the Summit of the Future. Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, the digital future is not yet written. It’s happening on our watch. We are all, all the SDG generation. So let’s forge the digital future with the audacity of youth, a future full of hope, possibility, and ambition. The best future we can dream of. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you, Doreen. Thank you so much. Where algorithms create equity and not bias. So important. Thank you for those words. Well, now I give you SDG Digital.

Official Video: Hi, it’s not what you’re thinking. We’re not experiencing technological difficulties here. This is what our digital world looked like less than 50 years ago. This is what it still looks like for 2.6 billion people. Unconnected, to cell phones, computers, global knowledge bases. That’s not the inspiring, positive, optimistic message you might be sitting there hoping for. So what would a digital future for all be like? The world is at my fingertips. Just a click away. Fingertips. Just a click away. Endless possibilities. What we do now will affect generations to come. No one has to choose between paying the bills and using the Internet. The digital world must give every woman a voice and a chance to lead. Learning with the Internet is like a super power. Starting a business has never been faster. The time starts now.

Doreen Bogdan-Martin: It all began with a simple question. What’s your vision of a digital future for all? We’ve just heard some powerful voices, all part of our campaign leading up to this moment. Now it’s time for Achim and I to share our vision. For me, it really comes down to three words. Universal, meaningful connectivity. It’s a driving force of the ITU as the UN agency for digital technologies, and it’s my number one priority. I want to be able to take my future grandchildren one day to the halls of the United Nations, and I want to be able to tell them the story of how we unlocked the power of digital and emerging technologies to everyone in this decade. No matter who they are, where they live. regardless of their gender, their age, their education, or the opportunities they’ve been given.

Achim Steiner: We live in a world in which the familiar is giving way to the unknown. We cannot predict where our new digital future will take us. We can hope for it. What we can do is help create an inclusive, sustainable, and prosperous digital future. That means setting the conditions so that everyone, everywhere, can reap the benefits of our digital world. Ensuring that everyone has the necessary skills, the capacities, and access so that no one is left behind. We must also harness digital technologies to protect and restore the environment and advance the decisive climate action we need so urgently to transform lives and livelihoods and drive progress across all, yes all, 17 Sustainable Development Goals. At UNDP, this is more than a vision. We are using digital to change lives today and ensure that the generations to come have the ability to determine their own futures.

Doreen Bogdan-Martin: This future that Achim and I have described is within reach. Fast forward to September 25, 2030, the SDG deadline. It’s our moment of truth. Formidable challenges that once seemed insurmountable have given way to a future filled with promises. Countries and companies have doubled down on cybersecurity. Putting security first, they’ve saved countless lives and protected the global economy from escalating threats. We’ve bridged the global digital gender gap with major breakthroughs in least-developed countries where women’s online participation has surged. Digital technologies have become a powerhouse. ally in tackling climate change and in keeping the 1.5 degree target alive. Countries have worked together to clean up millions of pieces of debris in the low-earth orbit, making space sustainability a reality. Our efforts to develop standards against deepfakes have stopped the spread of disinformation and rebuilt the public’s trust in technology. And today, developing countries are competing on equal footing in AI with the infrastructure and the talent to drive innovation that benefits us all.

Achim Steiner: The year 2030. Imagine a deadline that seemed so distant, yet our global community has achieved so much. A global community united by a clear blueprint for a better future. The Sustainable Development Goals. No one lives in extreme poverty any longer. We live in a world free from hunger. Nearly every child has a primary education. Everyone has access to clean water and sanitation. Renewable energy powers four-fifths of the world. And nearly every car sold worldwide is an electric vehicle. Where digital technologies are powering decisive climate action and the protection and restoration of our natural world. Truly monumental achievements. How did we get there? Investments in digital were pivotal. Ones that went beyond the next app or one-off digital solution. We need to invest in a digital ecosystem from which true innovation takes root and can flourish. For our global community actively shaped the AI revolution to improve lives. And now, as we stand at the threshold of a new era, we see a world where progress is not just a possibility. It is the reality we’ve built together. It is to the age of possibility we are looking at.

Doreen Bogdan-Martin: When Achim and I stood here for our first SDG Digital, we dared to think digital solutions could accelerate progress on 70% of the SDG targets. Now, in 2030, that vision has exceeded our expectations. Thanks to technologies like satellites, artificial intelligence, every school in the world is connected to the Internet. When the Giga Initiative helped connect Brianna’s school in Honduras, her first thought was for the unconnected children. As she put it, all children have the same rights. That’s true for countries, and that includes two-thirds of the small island developing states that lacked early warning systems. But the Early Warnings for All initiative changed that, uniting us through emerging technologies to ensure everyone is protected. These technologies marked a turning point in our efforts to rescue the SDGs and leave no one behind. I always remember Luis, a young ALS patient who joined us for our AI for Good Global Summit from his home in Lisbon. Luis had lost his ability to speak, but an AI device connected to his brain gave him back his voice.

Achim Steiner: As Doreen has so eloquently articulated, we see a world transforming ways we couldn’t have fully imagined even a few years ago. We’ve arrived at a point where digital transformation is not just about technology. It’s about lives, our lives, our children’s lives. Consider digital public infrastructure. Every person now has a secure digital identity. We are imagining the year 2030. This has unlocked services that were previously out of reach of so many. When the digital ID initiative reached a young mother, it didn’t just give her access to education and health care. For the first time, I feel seen, she said. Closing the digital skills gap has ushered in a new era of entrepreneurship. That includes a young graduate of 23 years of age. Thanks to a new digital bank account, he has now set up his own green transport business and employs seven people. Or look to technologies being harnessed to deliver for the planet. Governments and civil society are now using AI to track deforestation in real time, showing where to take action, combating forest fires. I’ll never forget a farmer that I met who used AI to help predict changing climate patterns and double her crop yield. Today, in 2030, we have a truly global AI ecosystem. And many of the world’s most impactful AI innovations come from regions like Africa, Latin America, the Caribbean, and Asia, to just mention a few examples.

Doreen Bogdan-Martin: This is the moment when we said no to digital inequalities and yes to digital opportunities. And ITU and UNDP showed true partnership. As the world unites behind the vision laid out in the pact for the future, the declaration on future generations, and the global digital compact. It’s a new beginning. It’s the start of a journey towards greater unity, peace, and innovation, a future where digital technology serves as a force for good, and for inclusion, and for sustainable development. A future worth living for.

Achim Steiner: This is a moment to redefine our digital destiny. You must turn skepticism into an appetite for the unknown, a catalyst for change, and a willingness to push new frontiers. The ITU and UNDP are working together to put this commitment into practice across the globe as part of the UN’s promise. That includes driving progress on digital public infrastructure, capacity building and financing, the means to an end. And this is not just an idle digital dream. We are bringing this vision to life, like fiber optic cables lighting up with new streams of data, understanding and growth, powering a year of transformative breakthroughs for the SDGs.

Doreen Bogdan-Martin: It all began with a simple question.

Achim Steiner: What is your vision of a digital future for all?

Doreen Bogdan-Martin: Today you will see how we can make this future a reality.

Achim Steiner: To rescue the SDGs.

Doreen Bogdan-Martin: To build, right now, at the summit of the future action days, an affordable, universal,

Achim Steiner: meaningful and inclusive, sustainable and peaceful, and prosperous digital future for all.

Sade Baderinwa: And thank you Doreen and thank you Achim and Amandeep. Well, excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, and now we give you, as we mentioned, SDD Digital. Thank you both for propelling us to the future and for sharing your vision. Now is the time to delve into the powerful words you mentioned. And this is act two, the hope of digital. And we’re going to showcase concrete examples of game changing solutions for a digital future for all. And some of the solutions that we will see on stage today came through a rigorous process established by the advisory group of SDD Digital. So, let’s dive right into it. Let’s take a look at this video. 2.6 billion people are unconnected. A digital future for all can only be possible if access to connectivity is universal and affordable. So, to get us started, I have the pleasure to call to the stage Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub, who is the Chief Executive Officer and Executive Director of Vodacon Group. And we also have Jessica Rosenworcel, Chairwoman, Federal Communications Commission, and Juan Lavista Ferres, Corporate Vice President and Chief Data Scientist of Microsoft. Thank you. Thank you all. So, let me go with Broadband Commissioner Shamil. I’m excited about what you guys have in store for us today, so the floor is yours.

Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub: Thank you, Doreen, and thank you, Achim, for the powerful vision for 2030. It’s ambitious, it’s exciting, but let’s bring ourselves back to reality for a moment. Today, in low-income countries, just 35% of the population have access to 4G. While Vodafone and others continue to invest heavily in expanding our networks, this problem is far too big to be fixed by traditional methods. The world needs new radical approaches. We need to boldly seize the opportunities in front of us. We must accelerate action and drive real global change. The convergence of the satellite and the mobile industries can help us with this opportunity. Something amazing happens when we are forced to act with urgency. When a crisis hits, we stop debating, we stop delaying, and we smash through barriers. I want to share two stories, real recent examples, that show just how bold we can be. First, when the Ukrainian town of Irpin was devastated by Russian attacks, Vodafone Ukraine used a satellite-based network to restore mobile communications fast. Second, after Hurricane Beryl tore through the Caribbean in July, we turned to low-orbit satellites with our instant network on Union Island. Both examples show that, in the middle of a crisis, urgent application of satellite and mobile technology can ensure that, even in chaos, people’s voices can still be heard. So here’s the question. Can we harness this technology beyond war zones and natural disasters? Can we finally close the digital divide? Let’s really think about that number. 2.6 billion people are still unconnected. 2.6 billion were left out of today’s digital economy.

Official Video: In areas of conflict and natural disasters, where terrestrial networks have been destroyed, low-orbit satellites have helped us provide an essential lifeline for millions of people. But in a digital world, still missing 2.6 billion people, we need to take the same urgent actions and find bold solutions, such as satellites, to solve the world’s coverage gaps, connecting people no matter who they are or where they live.

Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub: 2.6 billion people are excluded from opportunities and disconnected from basic services. But I believe we can change that. Together with our partner, AST Space Mobile, we are pushing the next technology frontier. We are working on a direct-to-mobile satellite network, one that doesn’t need dishes or special equipment. We are aiming to plug coverage gaps in low- and middle-income countries with this conversion of satellites and mobile in a safe, secure, and equitable way. Last week, five satellites were launched from Florida. They are currently 500 kilometers above us, preparing to test direct-to-mobile connectivity. This offers the real prospect of digital to millions of more people with just a regular 4G headset. With this technology, we can reach the last mile – the isolated communities, the farmers, the rural women, and the schools. Let me be clear. Connectivity is empowerment. It’s education. It’s economic inclusion. It’s health. But it’s not happening fast enough. So how can we be bolder and really make the change we need to see? I leave you with three ideas. First, investment. To achieve universal access, we need $428 billion. That’s significant, yes. But we need to think big, create a scalable investment strategy, and make it happen. Second, there is no point in creating satellite coverage if people don’t have a device to use it. We need to lower the cost of smartphones to under $20 in the least-developed countries, removing duties and surcharges on low-cost 4G devices, and promoting local production will help. Third, we need to ensure that we innovate in a way that truly benefits everyone. and without doing harm, respecting the frameworks that keep us safe online. By the way, to succeed, we must think differently. Incremental change isn’t good enough. We need something new, something bold. We can close the digital divide. But only if we are brave, innovative, and act today with true urgency. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you, Shameel. A lot of great points there. Jessica, now it’s your turn, so please tell us more about the importance of accessibility.

Jessica Rosenworcel: The big idea that I want to talk about today is going to change and save lives. I say that confidently because it already has. So let me explain with a story. It starts on Hawaii. And if you’ve ever been there, you know that Hawaii is a beautiful place with a landscape that is often green and lush. But the climate’s changing. And last year, dry, wind-fueled flames raced along the western edge of Maui, which is one of the eight major islands in Hawaii. It was the deadliest wildfire in the United States in over a century. The flames leveled the historic town of Lahaina, which is on Maui. And in the middle of this fire, when the flames were raging, we had five young people on the road on the outskirts of Lahaina. They were trapped in a white van. Skies were smoky. It was not clear where to go or what to do, so they decided to drive toward the ocean. But the roads to the water, they were blocked, and poor visibility quickly turned into no visibility. They were stuck in a sea of flames with nowhere to go. to go. Terrestrial wireless services were knocked out, so there was no way to call the emergency number 911 for help. The van was hot and it was getting hotter. The situation felt hopeless. But you see, this crew of five young people, they survived. They’re alive today thanks to a new technology. Their phone had a new feature, the ability to connect directly to emergency personnel by bypassing ground-based communications and instead using satellite signals delivered directly from space. At 6.14pm, their message asking for help reached first responders along with their location. And at 6.47pm, they sent a follow-up message to the dispatchers to say they had been rescued. Now put simply, satellite-to-cell phone communications is a game-changer. By combining space-based networks and terrestrial wireless networks, both can accomplish more together than either can do on its own. They can make our networks more resilient and more available whenever disaster strikes. And we saw that clearly in the United States in Hawaii. But you see, the combination of these services can do even more. They can end mobile dead zones. And that’s why in the United States, the Federal Communications Commission has set up a framework, the first of its kind in the world, to support supplemental coverage from space. That means we’re making it easier for wireless carriers to have all of our smartphones connected through satellites when there’s no signal on the ground. This is part of a broader effort at the Federal Communications Commission to seize the communications opportunities of the new space age. To adapt to this era when rocket launches are no longer rare. Constellations are no longer small, and satellites are no longer just big, bulky objects destined for decades in our skies. We created a new Space Bureau. And our Space Bureau has streamlined our regulatory process for licensing satellite services. It has updated our requirements to mitigate orbital debris. So new space actors are always good stewards of our skies. And it’s put forward a plan to support in-space servicing, assembly, and manufacturing. Now in the end, the goal of all of this is to build what I call the single network future. And what exactly is the single network future? It’s a future where we no longer limit ourselves to thinking about one communications technology at a time. It’s a future where fiber networks, licensed terrestrial systems, next-generation unlicensed wireless technology, and satellite broadband seamlessly interact in a way that is invisible to the user. It’s a future where we have the power to end mobile dead zones. It’s a future where it is possible to connect everyone, everywhere. So let’s make it happen. Let’s build this future together.

Sade Baderinwa: Great. Thank you, Jessica. Satellite to cell phone communication. No dead zones. Fantastic. Incredible. Well, now comes something very special. Juan, you are next.

Juan Lavista Ferres: Twenty years ago, a massive earthquake struck the Indian Ocean, causing devastating tsunamis that claimed the lives of over 230,000 people in Southeast Asia. The disaster was foreseeable hours before it struck the coastline. There were no warnings notification to people at risk. It was a turning point, one that underscored the urgent need for global early warning systems that can save lives in such critical moments. While early warning systems have their effectiveness to hinges the crucial factor, communications with people on the ground, no matter how sophisticated our technology is, if we cannot reach those in harm way, the warnings are useless. There is an illusion of accessibility and current data in today’s digital age. However, this is a misconception. The reality is that in many parts of the world, population data is outdated by decades or more. The foundational knowledge of any early warning system is understanding where people are located. That’s why Microsoft has partnered with planet labs, which image the earth daily in high resolution and the institute of health metrics and evaluation at the University of Washington to create the first high resolution maps that show population shifts over time. To understand not only where people are, but also which of those people have connectivity to receive an early warning, we are collaborating with Doreen and her team at ITU in support of the early warnings for all initiative. As you can see, here in Bonatou, we have harnessed the power of AI with planet satellite imagery and ITU data to identify communities that remain disconnected from communication channels. This information is essential for governments, companies, and international organizations to prioritize investment infrastructure that ensures that everyone is reachable in time of crisis. Everyone in this room can be part of the solution. Through cross-sector innovation, we can ensure that early warnings can reach the most vulnerable. This is about more than just warnings. It’s about giving every person, no matter where they live, the confidence of knowing that they are protected and supported in time of crisis. There are 2.6 billion people in the world that are not connected. In our smartphones today, we have more processing power than the one that was needed to put a person on the moon. There are very important problems out there that can and should be solved with data. We no longer have excuses. Thank you very much.

Sade Baderinwa: Great. Thank you, Juan, and thank you all to our speakers. And I invite you to go offstage and take your seat back in the audience. Thank you. And ladies and gentlemen, now I’d like to welcome to the stage Her Excellency Emma Theophilus, Minister of Information and Communication Technology, Namibia.

Emma Theophilus: Ladies and gentlemen, our world is now implored with the situation of climate change. And digital technologies, digital infrastructure could be the answer to our challenges. With quantum technology, an opportunity where citizens, countries, continents can overcome their challenges through quantum computing and the ability to adapt where other continents are unable to. As the world races toward the fourth industrial revolution, Africa must not be left behind. Quantum technology offers Africa a path to leapfrog traditional developmental models. And if we’re being honest, existing developmental models were not meant to develop Africa. And to ensure we accelerate the achievement of the sustainable developmental goals. Quantum technology holds tremendous potential to accelerate our developmental and directly support the achievement of these SDGs. We need to focus on creating an environment where the basics of technology are met so that quantum technologies can be used to benefit all. We need to strike the balance between laying the groundwork while ensuring we don’t miss out on opportunities to leapfrog. We need to recognize the adaptability as well as the agility of our local experiences navigating minimal resources for maximum impact in rural areas who can in fact contribute and advance quantum solutions. We need to do work to make quantum technology more inclusive and applications more compatible and that involves African countries and global south partners. We’re talking about an energy transition. In Namibia we’re talking about being the hub of the green hydrogen, ensuring energy efficiency and climate resilience directly impacting SDG 7 and SDG 13. We’re talking about enhancing healthcare outcomes, good health and well-being. Namibia continues to face healthcare challenges including disease management and limited access to advanced medical technologies, not to mention the rest of the continent. Agriculture and water management, where climate change continues to see cycles of flash floods and droughts. All the continents, all the countries, these innovations will ensure and enhance food production, supporting SDG 2 around zero hunger, and SDG 6 around clean water and sanitation. Other SDGs can easily be connected with quantum. Example, education through increasing quantum literacy, impacting SDG 4. Economic growth and technological innovation, directly impacting SDG 8 and 9. And quantum cryptography to enhance the security of communications and data around governance, security, and global partnerships around SDG 16 and SDG 17. Thank you very much.

Sade Baderinwa: And thank you very much, Your Excellency. Next we have Karan Bhatia, the Vice President of Government Affairs and Public Policy at Google. Karan, thank you. Please take the mic.

Karan Bhatia: Thank you very much. Good morning, everybody. A clear vision for 2030, 17 sustainable development goals. The clock is ticking, and we’re trailing. The time is now to get artificial intelligence into the game. Let’s journey to northern India, where my father was born. It’s a land often ravaged by floods, the most common natural disaster there for generations. Imagine floodwaters surging, engulfing homes, businesses, crippling infrastructure, endangering lives. It’s a story that has played out sadly year after year with growing intensity in recent years as the effects of climate change are increasingly evident. But what if we could foresee the floods? What if we could warn people days in advance and get them out of harm’s way, saving lives, saving livelihoods? For years, this was just a dream. Predicting when and how riverine flooding would occur was an impossibly complicated task. But it’s impossible no more. Today with Google’s Flood Hub, an AI-powered flood forecasting tool, we’re able to predict flood zones up to a week before they strike. It’s live in 80 countries, reaching more than 460 million people around the world, and we’re just getting started. We have been, we’re going to continue to work closely with governments, with the United Nations, with NGOs to implement and distribute flood forecasts to empower them to act and warn people, saving lives and livelihoods. And AI is just beginning to deliver for the SDGs in this kind of way. It’s helping farmers choose when to harvest their crops, doctors when to diagnose diseases earlier and how to, and educating people throughout the world in their native languages. It’s a tool to accelerate progress towards the SDGs. But as we’ve heard, with 2.6 billion people lacking basic Internet, we’ve got to ensure that AI doesn’t become a luxury. It needs to be universal, affordable, accessible to all. Digital inclusion requires action. We cannot allow the digital divide to now become the AI divide. Google is committed to bridging this gap. We’ve invested tens of billions of dollars annually in digital infrastructure globally, ranging from data centers to undersea cables, transforming Internet accessibility. This year alone, we’ve announced new high-capacity fiber optic links connecting Latin America to Africa, Africa to the Asia Pacific, Latin America to the Asia Pacific, and remote parts of the Pacific Ocean to America and the world. But infrastructure alone is not going to be enough. We are, and are going to continue to invest heavily in digital skilling, training across the globe, building off our track record of already having trained more than 100 million people globally with Grow with Google. And we’re now doubling down with a new focus on AI skilling to allow everyone access to this amazing technology. And we’re marrying this with world-class cloud computing and cybersecurity solutions that are critical to gain the benefit of AI. To close, at Google, we love to think big. And right now, with digital inclusion as our foundation, as our true north, AI as our superpower, and you all as our partners, we are about a future where no one is left behind, a future where the SDGs are not just aspirations, but they’re going to be achievements. Thank you very much.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you, Karan. Now, I think this is a great time to travel to space. Let’s take a look at this video, and it’s going to be followed by speaker David Sapolsky from Amazon. Let’s take a look.

Official Video: Status check, go Atlas, go Kuiper, three, two, one, and we have ignition, and liftoff. Copy that, Proto-1, we got contact with our satellites, huge milestone.

David Sapolsky: I want to thank the ITU Secretary-General, Doreen Bogdan-Martin, UNDP Administrator Achim Steiner, heads of state, and other distinguished guests, $2.6 billion. We’ve heard it before, we’re going to hear it again, but we can’t grow desensitized to this number. That’s because behind the numbers are families, frontline workers, small businesses, students, and many others who, according to the ITU, don’t have internet access at home. Progress is being made to close this gap, but we need more solutions and faster. So today I’m delighted to present Project Kuiper, Amazon’s satellite broadband initiative, as a digital solution that can deliver affordable, high-performance connectivity to unserved and underserved communities around the world and advance progress toward the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals. We started Project Kuiper to help bridge the digital divide for customers without access to reliable broadband. The goal of Project Kuiper is simple. With just one of these ultra-compact, affordable customer terminals and a view of the sky, customers will be able to access high-speed broadband from virtually anywhere in the world. Our network will have the capacity, flexibility, and performance to serve a wide range of customers, including schools, hospitals, businesses, government agencies, and others operating in places without reliable connectivity. The video you just saw included some footage from Kuiper’s launch of our satellite prototypes last year, which had a 100% success rate across key mission objectives. Kuiper will initially rely on a constellation of more than 3,200 low-Earth-orbit satellites. That means they operate at a lower orbit than traditional satellites. LEOs, as they’re called, provide sufficient speeds for many modern critical services, such as real-time video conferencing, telehealth, industrial applications, and live streaming. I’m also told you can shop online with it. Kuiper can also provide governments and communities with important tools for responding in moments of great need, such as humanitarian crises or hurricanes. or wildfires when other networks are incapacitated. While Kuiper remains acutely focused on advancing our shared mission to affordably connect the unconnected, our principles of space safety, sustainability, and mitigating space debris continue to influence every aspect of our satellite work. Over the coming years, companies will have to work hand in hand with governments and civil society groups to shape the global framework for sustainable global space operations. And you have an Amazon, a reliable, constructive partner, to do just that. As we’ve heard in today’s program, the magnitude of the divide is greater than any single entity can overcome. Through Project Kuiper, we are working to contribute to the solution by connecting people who lack reliable access to the internet affordably. But we’re not doing it alone. We’re proud to partner with governments and industry around the world, such as Vodafone and VRIO, on stage with us today. Congratulations to the ITU and the UNDP for hosting this wonderful event, and thank you for inviting Amazon to play a small part.

Sade Baderinwa: Great. Thank you, David. And thank you all. Please return to your seats. And now I’d like to talk about universal access to health and affordability of devices. Please welcome on stage Ann Aerts, head of Novartis Foundation, and Mats Granryd, director general of GSMA. And Ann.

Ann Aerts: Good morning, New York. A baby born in New York City today has a 12 years longer life expectancy than a baby born in another part of this city, maybe only a few blocks away. Why is that? Why do these children have to start with such a different prospect in life? Well, let’s wind our clocks back. If we look back at the past 30 to 50 years, we’ve seen tremendous breakthroughs in scientific innovations that have extended our life expectancy. by 15 to 20 years, and most of these gains were thanks to the progress in cardiovascular medicine. At the same time, these past 10 to 20 years, we see this convergence with technology innovations, technology that enabled us to radically re-imagine the way we deliver health and care. We can bring health services to people wherever and whenever they need it, even in their living rooms. That doesn’t sound too bad, does it? Still, cardiovascular disease is still the leading cause of death in the world, causing over 20 million people dying with heart disease every year. That is about 2,300 people per hour, equivalent to five jumbo jets falling out of the sky in an hour. And on top of that, cardiovascular disease is back on the rise, but not for everybody. In fact, it’s disproportionately rising in people that already face hardships, in disadvantaged populations. So it seems we are not having the full picture here. We’re missing a piece of the puzzle. That is because we don’t really understand what drives our health. We know that only 20% of our health is driven by the care we access. The other 80% is driven by the conditions in which we are born, we grow up, we live, and we age. Those social, economic, environmental conditions are not well understood. Yet, that is. Because today, we have an unprecedented opportunity to use the massive amounts of data we have in our hands, the computational power and data science capabilities around, to better understand that. We can bring data from the health system together with the data on all these underlying determinants. be it education, income, employment, housing, security, or access to healthy food, access to digital tools, you name it. All these data together can be brought into the machine, and advanced analytics can help us understand what truly is the leading determinants that drive our health and health inequities. Because only if we understand those can we address them, and can we address them at the root instead of patching symptoms. That is what we set out to do with AI for Healthy Cities, a Novartis Foundation partnership with the cities of New York, Singapore, Helsinki, and Basel, where we are deciphering the true drivers of health and health inequities. Only when we understand and address those can we offer two babies born on the same day, in the same city, or elsewhere, a similar chance on a long and healthy life. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Okay, thank you, Ann. Now we’re going to shift the conversation towards affordability. That’s, smartphones are a central part of our lives.

Mats Granryd: Absolutely.

Sade Baderinwa: But there’s a great barrier to entry, right?

Mats Granryd: Yeah.

Sade Baderinwa: If you don’t have the money, how can you get the smartphone?

Mats Granryd: Exactly.

Sade Baderinwa: How can you get accessibility?

Mats Granryd: That’s what I’m going to talk about.

Sade Baderinwa: Wonderful.

Mats Granryd: Super, thank you very much. Well, ladies and gentlemen, it is a great pleasure to be here, and I have a very serious message. My name is Mats Granryd, and I’m the Director General of GSMA. I think I will have another slide here. So, I’d like to introduce to you this family. It’s Fortinet and Paddy. Paddy being the father, and Fortinet the daughter. She’s a doctor, and they live in rural Uganda. She is the only doctor in Uganda. miles around, so her services were so sought after. The problem was that when light went out, when there’s no sun anymore, she could not perform her duties. Her father, though, realized that there is something called mobile internet, there is something on this handset that people are talking about. So he got a phone for her, and she can now continue to do her work and ask other doctors for help. But she can also deploy mobile-enabled solar power, which means that she has light almost as much as you want, and she can then perform her service day and night, which is a fantastic achievement. Now, she’s only one family. We know that there is more than, and we have heard this many times today, that it’s 2.6 billion people that are not as fortunate. They are not connected to internet, and predominantly to mobile internet. Now why is that? I mean, we know that people, these 2.6 billion people, the vast majority, 95 plus percent, live beneath a mobile broadband coverage. So we don’t need more stuff. We don’t need more base stations. We don’t need anything in the sky either. It is just there to use. But they can’t use it. Why? Well, it is all around affordability. And we have done a lot of research on this topic, and the biggest barrier is handset affordability. It is the cost of this device, this little device. So we need to bring down the cost of the device. We know roughly $20 is the sweet spot, and we’re not close to that. $20 might help some, but we still have issues. So the next step we need to do is to increase access to financing, to make sure that you can actually use the handset as a collateral and borrow money to buy your first hand. It’s sort of like you buy a car or a similar thing. And thirdly, is to reduce or even remove the sector-specific tax. The handset is not a luxury item. The handset is something that is a true necessity. So those are three things that we should do. And from GSMA, we have a handset affordability coalition that has been up and running now for a year. And we’re very happy to have Doreen and ITU on board, as well as the WEF Edison Alliance, and also the World Bank, helping us to reduce the handset cost and helping us to make sure that we can get good financing. So let’s get this done. Thank you very much.

Sade Baderinwa: Great. Thank you both. Please have a seat. And unfortunately, we’re running a little long, which means we have to shorten speeches. So this is going to be almost like the Oscars. You know, when the orchestra starts playing, it says your time is running up. Speakers, you’re going to hear a little ring. Where’s the person with the little bell? There you go. We’re going to hear that. And you actually have 20 seconds to wrap. So please bear with us so we can move this program along. Well, ladies and gentlemen, now comes a very exciting moment. Two years ago, ITU launched Partner to Connect, P2C, a digital coalition to advance universal and meaningful connectivity. To date, PTC’s online platform has received over 900 pledges worth an estimated value of $51 billion for connectivity projects globally. And today, five new pledges will be announced to the world. And to announce the first one, please welcome Alexandre Reis Siqueira Freire, Commissioner of National Telecommunications Agency, Anatel, Brazil. Thank you.

Alexandre Reis Siqueira Freire: Good morning, everyone. I want to share with you one of our most impactful initiatives, a project that holds the power to change the lives of an entire generation of children across Brazil. From the resources obtained by the Brazilian 5G radio frequency auction, I’m happy to announce an amount of US$549 million commitment to partner to connect digital coalition to connect public schools, particularly in underserved and remote regions like indigenous and African-Brazilian traditional communities, and urban outskirts in order to expand the access to information and communication technologies for academic purposes. Under the coordination of Commissioner of the National Telecommunication Agency, Vicente Aquino, we launched a three-year pilot project impacting 177 public schools and over 13,000 students. These schools received high-speed internet connections, Wi-Fi networks, computers for students and teachers, and solar energy systems if the premises lack electricity. The results have been transformative and strengthen our drive to continue to expand the project, which means to benefit about 40,000 schools in the year to come. The schools connectivity project led by Anatel is part of the program Accelerate Growth, launched by the federal government in 2023. It established that all 138,000 public schools will have connectivity by the end of 2020. And six, so we must secure long-term partnership to maintain the infrastructure and the connection service after 5G opt-in resources are over. We have a responsibility to make sure this progress is not temporary. If the power of the connectivity, we, countries from the global south, can face our specific challenges arise from inequalities, build more equal and promise a future for all. Thank you, everyone.

Sade Baderinwa: And thank you, Alexandre, for that generous pledge and for setting an example of the importance of investing in technology and education. So thank you so much. Ladies and gentlemen, to conclude this session, let me introduce a strong believer in P2C, Rabab Fatima, Undersecretary General and High Representative. Rabab, the floor is yours.

Rabab Fatima: Thank you very much. Again, apologies. As you can see, I’m not very digitally smart. I’m reading from paper notes because I represent a group of people. countries who are still not yet there. No? You can hear me now? Okay, okay, thank you very much. Again, very digitally challenged here for me. Yes, thank you. I’m using paper notes, not yet there, and using teleprompters. Doreen, Achim, excellencies, dear friends and colleagues, thank you very much for this opportunity to share a few words, but first of all, let me thank and congratulate ITU and UNDP for organizing another successful digital day. Another fascinating, inspiring event, and I would like to thank you for keeping the digital agenda high on our agenda. As we have heard, the internet has fundamentally transformed education, healthcare, commerce, and global connectivity, benefiting billions worldwide. Yet, a large portion of the global population remains disconnected. Yes, I’m talking about the least developed countries where only 36% of the population are online. The landlocked developing countries, the LLDCs, fare slightly better at 39%, while in small island developing states, SIDS, 67% are using the internet, and women and the rural communities in these countries are certainly the ones who are being left furthest behind. In contrast, advanced economies enjoy near universal internet access, exposing the stark inequality in opportunities, access to information, and pathways to a brighter future. Excellencies, my office supports these countries, these 92 most vulnerable countries, the 45 LDCs, the 32 LLDCs, and the 39 SIDS, home to 1.4 billion people. Nearly 60% of this population is under the age. of 25, representing a generation with immense potential for digital growth. However, the persistent digital divide continues to limit this potential. This gap is not just a technological issue, but a profound development challenge. Affordability remains a key barrier to digital connectivity. The United Nations Broadband Commission has set a target for 2025 that broadband services should cost less than 2% of monthly GNI per capita in low- and middle-income countries. Yet, as of 2023, only four LDCs have met this goal. On average, 75% of LDCs face mobile broadband costs exceeding 5% of GNI per capita. LLDCs and SIDs face similar high costs averaging above the 2% target. Even when connectivity is available, challenges persist as many are unable to utilize the Internet’s full potentials. In LDCs, LLDCs, and SIDs, a consumption gap exists, but data usage remains low despite Internet access. This gap underscores not only connectivity issues, but also lack of adequate digital skills and infrastructure. To bridge this digital divide, a comprehensive approach is required, one that integrates quality education, robust infrastructure, and affordability. And I would like to commend the Partner to Connect for making efforts to bridge this gap. Yes, I’m speaking for 92 countries, give me another minute. Looking ahead, we must focus on more of such actionable solutions. developing countries to be held in Havarone, Botswana, in December to continue this conversation. The conference will feature a dedicated connectivity track that my office will be organizing with ITU, and that will be focusing on practical digital initiatives aimed at enhancing meaningful collectivity for the LLDCs. As we look to the future, let us harness the power of digital connectivity to build a more inclusive, resilient, and sustainable future. And I look forward to continuing these important discussions with all of you at the conference in Botswana to make sure that no one is left behind in this digital leap forward, and no one is left disconnected. I thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you very much. That’s right. Take your minute. Now let’s move to session two. An inclusive and meaningful digital future is one where no one is left behind. Wondercraft, a robotics company developing a first-of-its-kind self-balancing personal exoskeleton is enabling people who cannot walk the opportunity to stand up and walk again in their everyday lives. And you actually may have already seen this during the Paris Olympics in 2024 with para-athlete Kevin Piette, who became the first person with paraplegia to work to walk the torch in the summer Olympics relay. And today, you’re going to see this very same prototype presented by Bianca Faith Johnson, JD. She is making her way there. You know what? We’re going to forget all the run-throughs because I just want to get right through you. Tell me, this is really a game-changer. Talk to me about what happened to you. I know that you became paralyzed. Tell me about that journey.

Bianca Faith Johnson: Seven years ago, I was in a near-fatal motorcycle accident, no fault of my own. And as a result of that, I sustained a T4, T6 spinal cord injury. So that’s the equivalent of me being paralyzed from about mid-chest down.

Sade Baderinwa: And that completely changed your life.

Bianca Faith Johnson: Absolutely.

Sade Baderinwa: Can you tell me just how difficult that moment was in the journey after that?

Bianca Faith Johnson: That moment was extremely difficult. Imagine waking up in the hospital and being probed by doctors asking, can you move your legs and not being able to. My entire world was literally shifted upside down. But I knew that even in that moment, I was still going to make it. And I needed to make sure that I prepared myself for what was to come, for technology such as this.

Sade Baderinwa: Wow. Well, I can see your sunshine just radiating, and I can tell that you are a fighter and you are strong. So shall we walk through this together?

Bianca Faith Johnson: Absolutely.

Sade Baderinwa: Okay. So tell me about this technology. All of a sudden you found out about it, but how did you find out about it?

Bianca Faith Johnson: So I’m actually the acting chair of an organization called Push to Walk, which is located in New Jersey. It’s a spinal cord injury gym. And we were fortunate enough to have the opportunity for Wondercraft, an amazing organization who is the creators of this exoskeleton, to come and do some demos. And I was a part of that demonstration, and from there the synergy was just perfect, and I’ve been working with them ever since.

Sade Baderinwa: Okay. So let’s show everyone, shall we? Wow. Wow. That’s incredible. Shall we walk forward a little bit? Absolutely. Okay. Wow. Wow. Incredible. Wow. Okay. That was fantastic. So this has changed everything because one thing I remember reading about you, you were saying like I was standing up talking to you and you were saying that before I had to look up, but now you’re able to look eye to eye. That means everything, right?

Bianca Faith Johnson: Everything.

Sade Baderinwa: Talk to me about that.

Bianca Faith Johnson: This is how our bodies were intended to be. So, and then, of course, I was injured, so I remember what it felt like standing upright, walking upright, and looking someone and having that type of connection eye to eye. So now, in this self-balancing prototype, this exoskeleton, I’m able to do so hands-free, and I can talk to you just like everyone else would.

Sade Baderinwa: And also, just having the freedom to go where you want to go. Did you ever imagine you would be here at the UN, walking and talking to this incredible crowd?

Bianca Faith Johnson: I did not imagine this exactly, but I knew it would be something like this.

Sade Baderinwa: Shall we walk a little bit more forward? Okay, so, as we do this, can you tell me about that first moment when you got in the exoskeleton and then being able to move like this?

Bianca Faith Johnson: It was literally everything, because imagine, for seven years, I’ve been in a seated position, unable to stand on my own or walk on my own. So the moment I was engulfed and put on this exoskeleton, it put me on, and I was able to embody the position that my body was used to doing. It is almost like a little muscle memory thing going on. It remembers where I came from, and it’s bringing me into where I need to be.

Sade Baderinwa: And it’s bringing your spirit to life again.

Bianca Faith Johnson: Yes, ma’am, yes, ma’am.

Sade Baderinwa: Was there anything else you wanted to share with everyone?

Bianca Faith Johnson: This technology is just absolutely amazing. And I just want everyone to acknowledge that what you are looking at is literally the future and the present. It has given back my, it has the potential to give me back my movement and, with it, my freedom. So I plan on just making sure that I’m maximizing on this opportunity. This should be supported. You should be spreading the word, sending it to your friends, and letting everyone know that Wondercraft, in particular, it’s an organization that is for the people. for people like me, so that we can get our lives back. And it may not change the world, but it certainly has the potential to change mine.

Sade Baderinwa: That’s what technology is all about. That’s what today is all about, giving access to people, changing their lives, right?

Bianca Faith Johnson: Yes, yes.

Sade Baderinwa: Is somebody here from Wondercraft? I wish they were.

Bianca Faith Johnson: I’m surrounded by them.

Sade Baderinwa: Okay, well, Wondercraft is here. Yes?

Bianca Faith Johnson: One right there.

Sade Baderinwa: Oh, right here. Oh, wait, wait, wait, wait. I thought you were just helping along.

Bianca Faith Johnson: Yes, yes.

Sade Baderinwa: Tell me just about what this means for you, working on this.

Physical Therapist: It is so inspiring. I’m a physical therapist by background, so being able to work with a company that puts patients first and allows people the ability to walk again is so meaningful, and that’s why Wondercraft does what it does.

Sade Baderinwa: And I’m sure you’ve seen so many patients, and you’ve seen that transformation. What is it like for you on the other side, giving people the ability to have freedom again?

Physical Therapist: It’s incredible. It’s stories like Bianca and Tony and all of the other patients in our lives that really, that we make an impact on a daily basis. So it’s just very meaningful, and we love what we do at Wondercraft.

Sade Baderinwa: And your colleague over here, I can’t leave him out.

Engineer: Yeah, so, yeah, I’m one of the engineers.

Sade Baderinwa: You’re one of the engineers.

Engineer: I don’t do-

Sade Baderinwa: So come forward, please. Everybody can see you.

Engineer: I don’t typically do a lot of PR, but- But that’s okay, that’s okay. Yeah, it’s great to be on another side of the company and be able to participate in this. And working with, not directly as a PT like Sarah, but with patients like Bianca is really a gem.

Sade Baderinwa: Well, this is the connectivity right here. The engineer, what you’re putting to paper, what you’re actually building, there you go, she could even lean in, is changing people’s lives. It’s changing her life. What does that mean to you personally?

Engineer: Oh. Oh. Yeah. That’s- I think-

Sade Baderinwa: We can feel that. We can feel that.

Engineer: It’s something that- maybe I’ll never have to experience firsthand, but we get to experience it through, like I said, great patients we get to work with, like Bianca, and be able to really talk to them face-to-face and see how their lives have changed.

Sade Baderinwa: Well, we appreciate your honesty, we appreciate your heart, because that’s what really all of this is about. We have your excellencies here, we have engineers like yourself, PT, we have somebody here who suffered from this through the hands of somebody else, but like all of these things, all of these companies, and Google, and all these other companies, Amazon, and so many others, like these things matter. And this is what we’re talking about, the digital future. What does it mean? Not leaving people behind, not leaving people behind like you. So thank you for everything that you’re doing, and we really appreciate it, and making the difference here, and for so many others. Thank you. Thank you. Wonderful. Shall we walk together? Okay, which way do you wanna go? We’re gonna turn? Okay, we’re gonna turn together. It’s truly incredible. Wow. And as an engineer, technology is only gonna get better, right?

Engineer: Yeah, of course. So, like Bianca mentioned, this is a prototype device, and we’re actively working on it every day, ensuring that we can incorporate more features to be able to give her more of her life back as she can continue to do more and more with it.

Sade Baderinwa: So things are gonna become more streamlined, it’s gonna just become easier, right?

Engineer: Certainly.

Sade Baderinwa: Okay, wonderful. Well, thank you all again. Please give them a round of applause. Woo! Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Well, as they make their way, pretty incredible, isn’t it? It really is. Now we welcome on stage United Nations Deputy High Commissioner for Refugees, Kelly T. Clements, who will talk to us about using blockchain for inclusive financial services anywhere, anytime, and on any device. Please welcome Kelly T. Clements, United Nations Deputy High Commissioner for Refugees, UNHCR. Thank you.

Kelly T. Clements: Thank you. Amazing, right? Yeah, incredible.

Sade Baderinwa: It’s wonderful. So you’re going to be able to talk about blockchain technology helping refugees. And not only is blockchain just changing how we do business, but it’s also helping victims of war-torn areas like in Ukraine or so many other places. Exactly. So you’re going to tell us more?

Kelly T. Clements: I will. I will. In fact, I’m going to tell you the story about Hannah. Hannah. Yes. I’m looking forward to it. So Hannah is a mother of two who had to flee from her hometown in Ukraine as the full-scale war broke out, caring for her elderly mother and her grandmother. When she arrived at a safe location, she had nowhere to sleep. After registering and engaging with our team on the ground, within 15 minutes, she tells us, the family received cash aid from UNHCR through a digital wallet on her phone. This support is part of a rental market program that we run in Ukraine to help families forced to flee find safe and dignified accommodation. Using cash to support displaced families settle into their new lives isn’t new. Cash, when conditions allow, provide a more dignified form of aid, giving people the choice to prioritize what they need. What was new for Hannah was the financial technology used to make and receive the transaction, a digital wallet powered by blockchain technology. Technology is reshaping every aspect of our lives, and the humanitarian sector is no exception. UNHCR alone manages a volume of over 2 million payment transactions every year. Handling transfers of $6 billion to partner organizations, vendors, and people like Hanna as part of our cash-based intervention. Until now, processing these payments had involved many banks, multiple payment technologies, complex processes, which vary among UN agencies and are costly and slow. Accessing financial services is a big challenge for many vulnerable communities that face difficulties opening a bank account, they lack identity documents, they live in remote areas with limited connectivity and services. There is a record 120 million people across the globe that do not have, many of them, the minimum ability to be able to access this cash. With minimal overhead costs, in a secure, transparent, and accountable way, we launched the UN Financial Gateway. It’s an initiative with Switzerland, the government. It standardizes and streamlines the payment infrastructure and processes the UN system uses for financial transactions. The Gateway seeks to leverage digital financial technologies to help us prepare, to deliver aid in a more agile and efficient way, while promoting financial inclusion. This is a collaboration across the UN, and with humanitarian partners, it could lead to efficiency gains of up to $60 million a year. Already in Ukraine, we’ve saved $12 million using the digital payment technology and reducing financial service fees. In Argentina, we saved 30% of our budget by mitigating local currency devaluation by using the digital wallet. This modality has assisted 2,500 households in Ukraine and Argentina alone. To scale up these solutions and reach those at risk of being excluded, we have to invest in global connectivity, digital infrastructure. digital and financial literacy. We need to bridge the gap between the financial ecosystem, available technical solutions, and the people that need them the most. We have to collaborate among many, many, many partners. So let’s go back to Hannah. We all have a role to play in this global challenge. Hannah was able to rent an apartment where she now lives with her two children, her elderly mother, and her grandmother. We support people like Hannah who have been forced to flee to restart their lives and find a new home. Thank you so much.

Sade Baderinwa: Great, thank you Kelly. I think this is so exciting. Let me, just come with me just quickly. Because people think about blockchain technology is just about exchanging money, but this is really where governments really help people in need, like you told us the story about Hannah. But it is also about reducing the costs for governments and for countries to be able to help them directly. Do you think that we’re gonna see a lot more advancements?

Kelly T. Clements: Absolutely. This is really just the tip of the iceberg in terms of both helping people like Hannah, but at a much reduced cost. You know, with with a number of people around the world that are forced to flee, we don’t have the resources to be able to assist them all. And governments were on the front lines with partners to be able to respond to people that are coming to entirely new locations with almost nothing. We need to do it much more economically, much more efficiently, and we need to use technology to show us the way.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you so much. Thank you. Thank you Kelly. Well, now I’d like to show you guys a very special story. Let’s take a look.

Official Video: My name is Adit Philip Maze. I’m a South Sudanese by nationality, schooling at our Ladies Girls Secondary School, and I’m also a member of the I Am The Code. For me, I Am The Code has helped me a lot because if I take back where I was, I was not that much confidence. I couldn’t be who I am now. But because of I Am The Court, I can now speak to the people, speak to the world, speak out what I have inside me. And thanks to that, I Am The Court also has made me a leader, not only of myself, but also to the whole school now. As the school head girl, I am capable now of helping my fellow students. I Am The Court also is helping our school with the morning breakfasts, because we usually have one, and it is after four lessons. Sometimes it is difficult to concentrate in class, but at least now we are able to be sustained due to the breakfast provided to us. And also, I Am The Court is helping us on coding, because here in school we just concentrate on books, but at least now we are exposed to the devices, and we are also exposed to the technology. We are now able to do codings, and at least now, when we go outside there, it will help us. For me, what I can tell to the world leaders is that they should include the refugee girls, and they should expose them, because where we come from, it is very difficult. We didn’t have all the things that we have now, because due to the culture and the society that we were living in. But now, as a refugee girl, I am being supported, I am exposed to the technology, I am now able to code, and also I am able to change my people back there, because they still have that mentality that we are being brought up of being neglected as a woman and as a girl. If now we are included by most people, and we are supported, the number of girls and women being neglected or discriminated, it will reduce. I would like to thank Lady Maryam, because she is my role model. Because since we started, I couldn’t make it up to where I am, because I did not know my rights. The only thing I do is just to listen to what society is telling me and do it. Thank you so much.

Sade Baderinwa: Technology really making a difference. And Lady Mariéme, please come to the stage. I’m so excited to hear your story. It’s an honor to meet you. Please come forward. I know you have things to share, but we’re talking about this technology and how it’s changing lives, even in remote areas. So for this woman, or young girl rather, and so many of the other young girls, you’re able to get them onto the future by coding. So they’re not just getting online, they’re able to meet the moment of the economy. So take it away.

Lady Mariéme Jamme: Thank you. Thank you so much for having me. I can’t start my speech without thanking Doreen. Thank you so much. And also Kelly Clements, who just spoke before me. And Ursula, the team behind ITU is just amazing. Thank you, Ursula. Thank you, everyone. Thank you. So I only have a few minutes. I timed myself, I promise you. Adit was supposed to be here, and she couldn’t make it. She was supposed to be on the stage, but she’s a refugee, and we tried very hard for her to be here with me today. So on behalf of the girls in Kakuma Refugee Camp in Kenya, thank you for giving us a few minutes to just share their stories. Thank you. So my name is Lady Mariéme Jamme. I am the founder of I Am the Code. In 2030, six years from now, Adit will be here on this stage sharing her story with you. She’ll be learning how to code. She’ll be an AI specialist. She’ll be understanding what Gen AI is. She’ll be understanding everything, because she lives in a place where it’s so hard for young women and girls. So hard. But thanks to UNHCR teams on the ground, Adit can now have an academy, the first ever academy Open, in the world, in a refugee camp and asylum seeker setting, where she’s sitting right now, she’s eating three meals a day, she’s coding, she’s developing the best coding languages in the world, from HTML to Python. When I started my work in Kakuma Refugee Camp in Kenya, I didn’t know who Adit was. She told me, today I’m a refugee, tomorrow I’m going to become a coder. And I think what is important, that as we build the future, we must include young women and girls, refugees. In Kakuma and Dadaab alone, we have over 900,000 people right now watching us. They’re refugees. And they must be part of the conversation. I stand here today before you because I didn’t go to school. I was born in Senegal. I was 50 years old yesterday, 50 years old. I know I look young. But the reason why I share this story is because young women do grow up. They grew up and they do have the sages like this and stand up and share their stories at the United Nations. So as we build the solutions for the future, we must include young women. We must include refugees. Being a refugee is just written, you know, it’s just a title. But the girls don’t feel refugees. They feel today they are coders. So as technologists, as we build the solution of tomorrow, we must do this. I’m very proud, as an African woman from Senegal, 50 years ago, I didn’t know I’d be standing here talking to you about refugees. And I have a duty, as an African woman, to make sure that I am making a contribution to my continent, but also we are making contribution to young women and girls across the world. So thank you, ITU, for including us. Thank you so much. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: And Mariéme, thank you for investing in girls and STEM, getting them involved. Thank you so much. Now let’s travel 1,800 miles up north from Kakuma. Let’s go to the cradle of civilization. Welcome on stage, Her Excellency, Amr Talaat, Minister of Information and Communication Technology of Egypt, to talk to us more about skills and the hope of digital. Thank you, His Excellency, thank you.

Amr Talaat: The hope of digital, or is it the fear of digital? Distinguished guests, this is a question that resonates with millions around the world, and perhaps more so in the global south where I come from, where technological advancements are widening the economic gaps among our nations, and the ambiguity about AI’s impact on jobs is leading many to wonder, will I find a job in the digital world? The echoes of skepticism about recent developments are looming large, but in Egypt, I also assure you that the sounds of hope are thunderous. While carrying out my public service duties, I travel all around Egypt to connect with people and gain first-hand insights into how the government can improve its digital services and empower our people with indispensable digital skills. From the shores of the Mediterranean, to the Nile Delta, to the temples of Aswan, all across the nation, I consistently witness a common theme. A mother who left her career to raise her children is now thriving as a remote digital marketing manager of an American company right here from Alexandria, thanks to the skills she gained through our free scholarships. A fresh graduate, once struggling to find employment, re-skilled in our data analytics programs and launched a startup, serving clients globally and creating jobs for more of his diligent peers. Another young engineer wanted to give back to her village. After attending our digital innovation workshops, she founded a successful e-commerce platform that not only supports local artisans, but also partners with development organizations to enhance their skills. and invest in their local capabilities. Ladies and gentlemen, the narratives of hope are imposing. They are invigorating and propel us to continue channeling public investments. To extend fiber optics in Egypt’s rural communities, benefiting over 58 million citizens, around 50% of our population. To expand our digital scaling scholarships to more than half a million beneficiaries across the nation. This year, multiplying the beneficiaries by 125 times over the past six years. And to continue digitalizing government services, while ensuring their accessibility through multiple channels, so that no one is left behind. The opportunities that our digital world is creating are glaring. Today, our world is open. Open beyond measure. Open beyond borders. Open beyond nationalities. And open beyond our differences. Today in Egypt, we embrace our commonalities. We accept the challenges of governing technology to create meaningful, inclusive impact. And we are embracing the hope of digital. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Lisa Russell on stage. She’s an Emmy Award winning filmmaker. And she’s going to talk about how AI is revolutionizing filmmaking. Lisa.

Lisa Russell: Good afternoon. Thank you. So, I just want to start off with a quick question. How many here believe that art can actually create a better world? Hands up. Hands up. Fantastic and I do as well and that is why I spent the last 20 years pushing for arts and storytelling in the UN space. My name is Lisa Russell. I’m an Emmy Award-winning filmmaker and the founder of Create 2030 and I’m a big advocate for artists to be working in the climate and sustainability sections because not only are we great entertainers, meaning we can help translate and amplify the great work being done in this space, we are also incredible creative thinkers and problem solvers and we deserve a seat at the table to help find solutions to our world’s greatest problems. Now behind me you are seeing images that have been generated using AI through my arts envoy lab and I’m on a mission to help sustainability and climate advocates learn how to become AI artists and that is because arts and storytelling is incredibly powerful, more powerful than we even realize. Did you know that there’s research that shows that a brainwave of a storyteller actually syncs up with the people who are listening to the story and people in a theater space, their heart rates synchronize with other people in the room. We have no idea the power of art and storytelling but I do believe that if we trained every climate and sustainability advocate how to use AI to amplify and translate their work we would have we would have a much wider reach. So I’m sorry Swifties, Taylor Swift should not be the voice of the world. Instead climate and sustainability advocates and creators can do so and we should be using AI to help democratize access for BIPOC and global south global majority advocates and creators to help amplify these important messages. So with that said Are you all ready to make some AI art with me? Yes Whoo. I’m gonna make you all AI artists today So behind me there’s going to be a QR code I believe it is coming soon. And this is a QR code for a survey about digital futures I want you all to take out your phones all of you and I want you to do the survey Because if you don’t do the survey you are not going to be part of this art Experience and I know you all want to be so go ahead Take the survey. I’m gonna disappear I’m gonna go do my art stuff and I’m gonna come back and I’m gonna share with you the art that we have made Together, how does that sound? Good. All right. Thank you very much. I’ll be back.

Sade Baderinwa: Hey, I Got my QR code. Okay, I gotta fill out the survey Are you guys gonna fill out the survey? Please do because she really has this extraordinary piece of art that she’s gonna put together So I’m looking forward to it So she’s gonna come back in session three to show us the product of all of our artwork. So, please Give them a survey at some point now We welcome now We welcome Lori Freeman global GM and vice president of Salesforce of nonprofits along with tunday Blackman chief development officer of world central kitchen. Lori Freeman.

Tunde Wackman: We’ve already seen so many incredible solutions here today

Official Video: There’s no place on earth that can’t be brought hope with WCK

Tunde Wackman: Like I said, we’ve already seen so many incredible solutions that help people predict disasters and provide community with critical early warning. But when that disaster strikes, World Central Kitchen is immediately on the ground, on the front lines, mobilizing volunteers and local partners to start cooking fresh, nutritious meals. Because we know that a hot meal that is locally prepared is so much more than just nutrition. It is comfort, it’s hope, and it’s dignity. Since 2010, we have provided more than 400 million meals to support climate, humanitarian, and community crises. We do it all with a commitment to inclusivity in our team and in our work, serving everyone everywhere, bringing in the local community as part of the solution. And we do it fast. As our founder, Jose Andres, likes to say, when people are hungry, send in chefs. Not tomorrow, not next week, today. Mobilizing the right resources at the right time requires the right digital solution. So I’d like to introduce Lori Freeman from Salesforce to show you how technology helps us move with the urgency of now. Lori.

Lori Freeman: As you’ve said, time is absolutely of the essence. World Central Kitchen is able to impact the work ahead within 48 hours. So let’s see how they make that happen. This work starts even before a disaster strikes. When those early alerts begin rolling in, they’re able to reach out to volunteers in the area and quickly put out the calls of support. Now the next step, preparing to feed those in need. World Central Kitchen partners with local suppliers and restaurants to serve meals that taste like home, but they’re also serving to help stimulate the local economy. And that means working with different partners all over. So they simply must rely upon activation dashboards that help them understand what’s happening in the area, tracking key information, like the number of meals served, the locations where they are, the recipients of those. Having that actionable data, it allows them to align with so many agencies like. at the UN, which helps inform the larger response. But of course, none of this would be possible without passionate humans who help support WCK through their financial gifts. So WCK manages their donor data and sends personalized journeys across each of these supporters. And they use these journeys to request critical funds to support their ongoing response efforts. As they engage their donors, they’re able to adapt in creative and meaningful ways. They even send handwritten thank you notes. I’ve received one of those. All of this engagement and donation support, it has to be rolled into fundraising dashboards to track everything. This is what helps them provide continuity, being data-driven.

Tunde Wackman: In a world where climate disasters are becoming more frequent and intense, we not only continue to innovate our disaster response through our partnership with Salesforce, but we also continue to fuel our fundraising efforts through our Climate Disaster Relief Fund. This gives the WCK relief team on the ground the ability to solely focus on what is most important, using the power of food to lift up communities across the globe. To meet the challenge of this moment, we need all hands on deck, including the collaboration of many in this room. Together, we can provide meaningful support to those in need anytime a disaster strikes. We hope you’ll join us. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you. Thank you, ladies. And now, we’re gonna talk about digital inclusion in Saudi Arabia. Please welcome His Excellency, Abdullah Alswaha, Minister of Communications and Information Technology, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, to share with us some of the advancements in digital inclusion in the kingdom. Your Excellency.

Abdullah Alswaha: Thank you. Thank you. The cost, the global cost, of gender inequality is close to $7 trillion. That’s almost 7% of the global economy and more than the joint combined output of six G20 nations. According to the UN, the world, us, we’re not on track to achieve the goal by 2030. As a matter of fact, in some of these targets, it will take us 286 years. Over the next three minutes, I’m going to share with you a story of how a nation has achieved its economic prosperity and diversification under the leadership of Prince Mohammed bin Salman by focusing on gender equality in digital. This story, and trust me when I say this, because I witnessed it firsthand, started when I was working for the Silicon Valley. That was the first time I met His Royal Highness, and he shared with us a vision, how he intends to empower people by focusing on women and youth, safeguard the planet, and shape new frontiers while diversifying our economy. Fast forward to today, we have a lot to celebrate. I was told that MISC are here. Can I hear from MISC? We started with MISC, with Saudi codes touching a million women and youth with coding with a game called Minecraft. And it’s no wonder that this story has only helped us achieve becoming the grandest and the boldest success story on planet Earth, but wait for this. it helped us achieve the highest success story in the most innovative platform known to humanity, sending the first Arab astronaut to the International Space Station, Riana Bernoulli. Riana, as a cancer researcher, she has devoted her life to fighting and predicting cancer. And as a matter of fact, in addition to Riana, the woman in the middle is actually my Chief of Staff, Noura Zaid, who has been the heartbeat and the executive force multiplier behind most of our successes in tech and digital space and STEM. And speaking of remarkable women, I have to talk about Deemah AlYahya, our General Secretary for the Digital Cooperation Organization, how we have pledged under the leadership of His Royal Highness, joining hands with 16 like-minded nations to make sure that we connect the unconnected, leave no one behind in three continents. And last but not least, I have to talk about Dr. Latifa Al-Abdulkarim, who sits on the UN Secretary General AI Advisory Board, helping humanity achieve the outcomes of the summit of the future with a human-centric AI, tackling the most pressing challenges in governance, ethics, and regulation. So it’s no wonder that as we achieved the boldest and the highest success story in women empowerment in tech, space, and STEM under the leadership of His Royal Highness, His Royal Highness Prince Mohammed bin Salman, year in, year out, we have celebrated becoming a top five nation by the UN, by ITU, by UNDP, by the World Economic Forum. And the team was kind enough to remind me today. that my time for my three minutes is over. But indeed, the time for all of us will be over when it comes to achieving the SDGs by 2030 if we do not start with empowering women in tech and digital. Thank you so much.

Sade Baderinwa: Your Excellency, can I speak with you? Can I speak with you? Please. Of course. I just wanted to take a few moments. Of course, being a woman, I am charged by seeing so many women lead these initiatives. Why was it important for Saudi Arabia to do this and have women just really be the cornerstone for all the movements going forward?

Abdullah Alswaha: It’s 50% of our productivity, prosperity, and future. So it’s only natural that as we move from 7% women empowered in tech, which was a position we did not want to be, to achieving 35%, surpassing the Silicon Valley average, the EU average, and even the G20 average, becoming the most successful story. And hear this, we have achieved our economic diversification by achieving 50% of our economy today becoming in an oil. And tell me briefly, what has this done for other women in the country, seeing women lead these initiatives? It’s got to be inspiring. I bet you’re going to hear it from Noura, Deemah, and the rest of the girls that we have here, how this has really not only transformed their lives, but have helped them contribute to a region on how we can tackle the most pressing issues. These women have led the study in collaboration with ITU on how we can connect the unconnected world, how we can deliver non-terrestrial networks to connect from satellite communication to devices. They have worked on a million empowering women and youth when it comes to the largest reskilling and upskilling activities with Saudi codes, starting up with Microsoft and Minecraft. And fast forward with AI, they are leading the work for the tech envoy today for the General Secretary on how we can tackle the most pressing issues in regulation, in standardization, and delivering a human-centric AI for the world.

Sade Baderinwa: Your Excellency, thank you very much.

Abdullah Alswaha: No, thank you. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: So, what is meaningful digital future for all? It is where everyone has the right to a safe, enriching, and productive online experience. And we heard earlier from Doreen’s TED Talk, if you’ll recall, she mentioned Giga, a UNICEF and ITU-led initiative to connect every school on the planet to the Internet by 2030. That’s only five years. I mean, it’s not far away. And exactly five years ago, Giga was born here at the heart of the United Nations. And today, we are celebrating Giga’s birthday, so let’s take a look at this video.

Official Video: At Giga, we are committed to connecting all the schools in the world to the Internet by 2030. By mapping schools using satellite imagery and AI, and by identifying cost-effective methods for delivering connectivity through infrastructure analysis, we provide governments with the tools to advance digital learning. Let’s take a look at Giga Maps. Red dots are schools that are offline. Green dots are schools connected to the Internet. In Dominica, Giga has helped turn red dots into green. Let’s meet a teacher from one of those schools.

Joan Moses: Good afternoon, everyone. My name is Joan Moses, and I’m a teacher at the Roosevelt Douglas Primary School in Potsmouth, Dominica. I stand before you in New York for the first time, filled with excitement and anticipation. This moment is a testament of how connectivity can change lives. When my school was connected to the Internet, everything changed. The internet has opened the door to a whole new world of digital resources, allowing me to bring innovative teaching methods into my classroom, creating a more stimulating and inclusive learning environment. My students are more engaged, more curious, and they’re achieving more than we have ever imagined. This May in Dominica, 835 students participated in national exams online simultaneously, thanks to the internet. Through Giga, schools in our region have also collaborated with each other and shared best practices, allowing us to learn from each other teachers and address common challenges. The internet has enriched our discussions around critical topics, such as climate change and social justice, encouraging our school community to reflect on our roles as global citizens. My students are learning about the importance of empathy, collaboration, and responsibility, qualities that are essential in today’s interconnected world. Let us work together to ensure that every child, regardless of their location, has the opportunity to connect, learn, and thrive in the digital world. Together we can bridge the gap and create a brighter future for all. But don’t just take it from me. Let’s hear from my students.

Official Video: Internet helps boost my learning, like when I have extra classes or extra activities and the teacher has like the flu or something. I still do Google stuff. It means that it is a modern day school, it’s a good school, and it also helps if your teacher needs to show you a slide show. Teachers can care for you, they can love you, and they can use the internet connection to help you learn. Diva is 5 years old now. Happy birthday, Diva!

Joan Moses: Help connect every school to the Internet, because with technology and great teachers, we can give our children access to information, opportunity and choice. Thank you.

Tofara L. Chokera: Ladies and gentlemen, I stand before you today as a living proof that embracing the digital world unlocks a future filled with endless opportunities. When I first encountered a computer at the age of 20, I had no idea how profoundly it will change my life. Today, as a founder of the Tofara Online Trust, I have witnessed firsthand how digital tools can transform not one life, but thousands. Through our flagship initiatives, the Digital Skills Development Program, we have empowered more than 12,000 women, youth and SMEs across Zimbabwe and Africa. We are empowering them with digital skills they need for international trade. We launched an initiative called the Talent for Startups in partnerships with Digital Africa, where we are equipping the youth with skills needed to secure meaningful employment in the digital economy. This year, 58% of our students were young women who are now website developers, graphics designers and digital marketing professionals. just to mention a few, giving them equal access to technology and digital skills. We stand at the crossroads of change, where the future of Africa is not just written by the hands of few, but by the collective efforts of many. It is a digital future for all, where women rise together as leaders, driving the digital era forward with their resilience, creativity and innovation. Winning the Equals in Tech Award as a leader in SME in 2022 was a milestone for us that uplifted thousands of women who looked up to us for inspiration. It shows us that our work and our voices matter. This recognition has fuelled our determination to work even harder, get opportunities to collaborate with women leaders across Africa, and also, as a board member of the Komesa Federation for Women in Business in Zimbabwe, I am advocating for a digital future where every woman is driving digital transformation for their businesses. My wish and my dream is to see every woman embrace technology, to see them learn, to see them innovate and to see them lead. The future belongs to those who dare to step in the digital space and claim it as theirs. Let’s build that future together. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you, Tofara. And please welcome to the stage Pamela Coke-Hamilton. She is the Executive Director of the International Trade Center. Pamela.

Pamela Coke-Hamilton: Thank you. I’m supposed to have a teleprompter up here, but clearly not. Thank you so much, Tofara. You represent actually for us one of the great success stories of ITC and of the International Trade Center process generally. You’ve done some powerful work and your insights are really incredible, especially what you’ve done in Zimbabwe. Your leadership and your mentorship, recognized by the Equals in Tech Awards, thank you, Doreen, has really empowered women to build digital skills and unlock economic opportunities. It’s a reminder of what is possible if we truly commit ourselves to closing the gender digital divide and of what we can achieve if we dare to do things differently. It’s why I’m so proud to be a supporter and a founding member of the Equals Initiative. Building a truly inclusive digital economy means creating access and actually enabling these same opportunities and tools that can ensure all women and all small businesses can have a digital future. I want you to imagine with me a world where every small business, no matter its size or location, can access the same data, insights as Global Jans. A world where a family-run bakery in Cambodia or a craft store in Kenya can reach international markets, identify the best opportunities, and connect with customers they never imagined possible. A world where we have finally democratized access to digital opportunities so no firm is left behind. Small businesses are the backbone of our global economy, but too often they’re unable to take full part in our digital age. Many don’t know where to start. Many don’t have the finance or the training to use the newest digital tools. Many don’t understand what the buyers in new markets want. But what if we could change that? The good news is we can, and we already know how. In Southeast Asia, over 1,000 small and medium-sized enterprises have transformed their prospects through the Digital Export Enablement Program. They have been able to access online resources. like Google Market Finder, Trademap, the Global Trade Helpdesk, and EcomConnect tools. They’ve learned what they needed to create their own strategies, thanks to online and hybrid sessions, and the support of a network of trainers. They’re using AI-powered insights and tailoring digital campaigns to connect with new audiences on a far deeper level. And they’re showing us how the future of business growth lies at the intersection of data, digital strategy, and innovation. After participating in the program, over 95% of the businesses reshaped their strategies and grew their global presence. This program was born out of a collaboration between the International Trade Center and Google, working alongside partners in the international space, like the ICC, and of course, my good friend from the World Intellectual Property Organization, Daren. Very good to see you, Daren, thanks. And this was just the beginning. Now it’s time to go global. When small businesses can access the same market insights, digital strategies, and online platforms as big corporations, the impact is clear. More growth, more jobs, and more inclusive economic development. The future belongs to those who can leverage the power of data. Together, I believe we can make that future possible. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you. Oh, wonderful. Thank you. Thank you. Pamela, thank you so much. And the importance of digital skills is essential for leveraging digital platforms and AI tools. Please welcome Christopher Burns from USAID. Christopher, please. Thank you.

Christopher Burns: Each year, more than 10 million students graduate from tech-related fields. These students are the future developers, engineers, and innovators who will shape the digital landscape, not just in their home countries, but globally because we know technology’s impacts go far beyond national borders. By integrating a responsible approach into their education, we can ensure that they enter the workforce, not just as technologists, but as architects of a digital future built on safety, inclusion, and justice. And the world needs such leaders. International development is replete with stories about the successes of digital technology, but not every instance has a happy ending. I heard a story a few years ago about a small business owner in East Africa who, in a moment of financial need, turned to a fintech lending app for a quick loan, as millions of people across the world do every year. The app’s design, its ease of access, its seamless integration with mobile money made borrowing almost too easy. But what seemed like a lifeline ended up being a trap, much like a predatory payday lender in the US. Needing to repay this initial loan very quickly to avoid a high interest rate, this business owner turned to a second lending app, and then a third, and then a fourth. As this business owner said, the apps give your money gently, and then they come for your neck. So, yes, the app did provide access to finance, but it did not solve financial inclusion, the true development challenge facing many countries. The story illustrates a theme we’ve heard many times, but seem to have not yet internalized. Technology can uplift humanity, but it can also deepen existing societal divides. Too often, the people designing these technologies are focused on innovation, without considering the full impacts of their products and services. And as AI technologies are becoming embedded in our everyday lives, we cannot afford to miss this moment. This concern is what the Responsible Computing Challenge aims to address. Designed and implemented by Mozilla Foundation, and sponsored by USAID, the challenge is an initiative that’s reshaping how we train the world’s future technologists, especially young women and girls, in an effort to close digital divides around the world. The challenge aims to embed responsibility into the core of technology and computer science curricula at universities, in the U.S., in Kenya and India, and with more to come in South Africa, Ghana, and elsewhere. Students in the Global South are aware of these issues and are eager to address them in their communities. As a student in Kenya reflecting on their experience with the challenge shared, as my classmates and I step into the workplace, we will carry this knowledge, empowered by a newfound sense of purpose, and we know the unique opportunity in our lives to ensure that when we enter the workplace, we are doing so with ethics, user-centered design, and responsibility as it means to the real world. The challenge we face is immense, and so is the opportunity. I invite you, policymakers, innovators, and leaders gathered here today to join us in this mission. The Responsible Computing Challenge is just the beginning. Your ideas, your expertise, and your commitment can help us build a future where technology truly empowers every individual. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Great, thank you so much. Okay, we are now approaching the end of the session, but we’re going to conclude with a bang. We’re going to focus on our youth, which is so important because it’s about laying out this future for them, a key pillar of this summit, future, and its action days. So, please, let me call to this day Sanjana Sanghi, Yuri Romashko, and Daniella Esi Darlington. Please, have a seat. So, Sanjana, let me start with you. You feel strongly about girls getting access to digital technology. Why? And tell me about this.

Sanjana Sanghi: Thank you for your question, and good afternoon, everyone. It’s an honor to be here. The reason why I feel so passionate about that is because I come from India, and I am youth champion for the UNDP in India, but I am also a girl who’s just grown up wanting access to education, wanting to build a life for herself. I have been fortunate to be able to get that access but in my journey of advocacy work, I have worked with girls in certain parts of our country that haven’t and I have my mother who’s actually seated in the audience here right now. Shout out to my mom who is a… Where is mom? Where is mom? Where is mom? Mom, can you raise your hand?

Sade Baderinwa: Oh, there she is.

Sanjana Sanghi: Okay. Who is a fifty-six-year-old Indian woman who wanted to make a difference and the only way she could do that is because digital technologies allowed her to connect with girls from very, very economically backward sections of society in India. Zainab and Pallavi are her name, their names and they belong to slums in India. Their parents do everyday jobs if at all. They don’t have any steady stream of income but they have somehow got themselves a smartphone. So their course modules they can see on their smartphone while my mom teaches them English which prepares them to be a part of the bigger world because they would never ever have gotten the opportunity to learn even just a basic language like English. So I have seen how women from two different generations and two different economic backgrounds with the tool of digital technology can come together and change each other’s lives. My mom feels invigorated by teaching them and Zainab and Pallavi are off to hopefully a better future.

Sade Baderinwa: Wow. Mom, you did an excellent job. Fantastic. Okay, Yuri, let’s talk about you. You attended this, this thing yesterday, right? For youth. What was your biggest takeaway?

Yurii Romashko: Well, I want to deliver two key takeaways. First, youth extremely accurately identify the main challenges of digital future based on digital today. And according to youth consultations, which was held in a Spark Blue platform, youth determined limited literacy. limited access to the internet, limited infrastructure as the key barriers which enable access to the digital technologies. So all this requires our common and global efforts. And second thing, the voice of youth is vibrant and game changer today. It ensures that policy makers and institutions should engage youth into the policy making, because of the reform agenda, because of the IA technologies, because of the digital solutions provide a lot of new opportunities. They reshape youth opportunities and therefore it’s extremely important to engage and involve youth people into the decision making process right now.

Sade Baderinwa: Well you’re a part of this decision making process right now yourself, because we have leaders here from different countries, so your voice matters. Daniella, let me get you in here. What were your takeaways from yesterday’s session?

Daniella Esi Darlington: Right, thank you so much for the question. So we realize that youth are more connected than ever before. However, there still exists a lot of digital divide in terms of internet connectivity and accessibility, especially in rural areas. And with ITU, our head of international youth day, we conducted a series of quizzes to gauge the level of awareness among youth in terms of internet usage and connectivity amongst others. And we realized that 66% of the youth were not really informed about where the biggest digital divide exists. So my key takeaway was that it’s not enough that we bridge the digital divide, we also have to bridge the awareness divide. Because you can only empower someone to do something, they can only do something if they have the knowledge about it. So we have to create more digital literacy programs for our youth, and we also have to create platforms where they apply those knowledge. especially where space technology is not so commonly known among the youth. We have to create opportunities where they can apply their knowledge in AI and space technologies to bridge and solve problems in their local communities. And my final words will be that we’ve connected our youth to the world and it’s important that we also connect them to its future. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you, thank you. So what, Sanjana, what does your vision for a digital future look like for all?

Sanjana Sanghi: Oh, it’s a daunting, you know, thought, but for me, there’s always this kind of like an invisible prefix to the digital future, which is an equitable and just a realistic digital future. By that, I mean that anything untamed can just spill in different directions, right? So what I mean by that is that when I see, say the youth being empowered with social media, when I see them getting untamed access, I see it having negative effects, negative effects on their mental health, negative effects on their attention spans, on the way they use it. So I feel like everything else in the world, even access to digital technologies needs to be guided and rooted. Like Daniela said that the ones who have it have too much and the ones who don’t have none at all. So firstly, that equitable distribution is really important because again, coming from India, I get to see it in a magnified way and who’s illiterate continues to remain digitally illiterate as well. So like many speakers here today have said that there are many developmental kind of barriers that we have to overcome for any kind of equitable digital future to be possible. So I’m waiting for that digital future where it’s more of a digital dividend and not a digital disaster.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you. And for you, Yuri, what does the digital future look like for you?

Yurii Romashko: My vision of the digital future is based on these three pillars. It is inclusivity and accessibility, digital literacy, and digital security. And my vision is very simple, to take action and transform challenges into opportunities in my community, city, country. I’m from Ukraine, where is the war. And because of the war, one of the biggest challenges is reconstruction. And there are thousands of projects simultaneously happening from all over the country. And to properly manage, control, organize, we create DREAM, Digital Restoration Ecosystem for Accountable Management. It’s an ecosystem as a single pipeline solution, where everyone sees everything that is connected with the reconstruction.

Sade Baderinwa: Great, thank you. And for you, Daniela, what does this future look like?

Daniella Esi Darlington: I’d also like to summarize that into three key words, universal, affordable, and also inclusive. For anybody to be able to leverage digital solutions, it needs to be available for them to be able to harness it. Also universality is also key to affordability. So then we have to make sure that building AI technologies and tools is, we do that with cost in mind. Because I am a tech founder, and I realized how building AI tools would not be able to, people in rural areas would not be able to leverage these tools if they don’t even have access to it in the first place. So we have to factor all these costs into digital solutions and innovations. And lastly, it has to be inclusive. We have to include people who are in the underrepresented parts of the world, those who are blind, people with disabilities. We have to bring them on board when we are developing technological tools so that it’s not just for us who are capable, but also those who lack the ability to afford these things or able to leverage these tools are also, they also have the opportunity to partake in the digital future. So that would be my future, that the digital world is inclusive, it’s universal, and also it’s affordable.

Sade Baderinwa: Good points there. Daniella, thank you. Sanjana and Yuri, this is our future. Let’s give them a round of applause. All so poised, poised and smart. Thank you all. Well now, Paul Foster is going to announce a pledge. He’s the CEO of Global Esports Federation. Please welcome him.

Paul J. Foster: Good afternoon. Your excellencies, distinguished guests, good afternoon. It’s a real pleasure to be with you today on behalf of our Global Esports Federation and our community of over 3.2 billion gamers around the world. Secretary General Doreen, Administrator Akim, thank you for the opportunity for our community to contribute to this important work. But gaming is more than a game. Our motto, World Connected, inspires us to do more. Just last month at the Paris 2024 Olympic Games as a sign of our progress, the International Olympic Committee declared that they would create next year in 2025 the very first Olympic esports games. And so today, on behalf of our global impact partners around the world, we pledge a multi-year, multi-million dollar series of global initiatives leveraging this transformation potential about our digital world and the youth of the world. Thank you very much.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you so much. And next, I’d like to welcome to the stage Brad Smith, who is the Vice Chair and President of Microsoft UNSDG. Thank you so much. Thank you.

Brad Smith: Well, I know the time is running out. Let me be brief, but let me say just a few words. First, of course, to thank Doreen and Akam and ITU and UNDP for not just today, but all the work every day. I want to say just a few words about one critical topic. When we look to the future and we think about artificial intelligence, how will we ensure that it reaches and serves the global South? That I think is one of the most important questions before the United Nations this week and this year. First, I would say we need to learn the lessons of the past. Artificial intelligence is what economists call a general-purpose technology. Think electricity. It changes every part of the economy. So first, let’s learn the lessons from the history of electricity. A hundred and forty-two years ago, the first power plant lit up lower Manhattan. And yet tonight, there are still 700 million people, 43 percent of the people who live in Africa, who do not have access to electricity. And what one sees over 15 decades is that every time electricity grew and people had access to it, economic development followed. But it has been extraordinarily uneven in many ways because of the economic structure of electricity. We all know that a power plant is very big and very expensive, as is an electric grid, even though an appliance may not cost much money at all. And the inability to overcome that economic challenge which is, in my opinion, a fundamental contributor, even cause, of one of history’s greatest technology tragedies. Because the electricity divide, I believe, is the fundamental cause in so many ways of the great north-south divide that shapes everything we are talking about here today. So now, let’s go to the future, and we have to ask ourselves, how do we ensure that this history does not repeat itself? First, we need to understand that the artificial intelligence economic structure looks a lot like electricity. At the infrastructure layer, data centers, they are big, they are expensive, they cost billions of dollars, even if it is very inexpensive to create an AI application. So what are we going to do? Well, first, we are going to have to do what was never done for electricity for the first 50 years after it was invented. Harness the power of capital and bring it to the world, and not just parts of it. And that means private companies like Microsoft, where we spent more than $50 billion last year, not just in the U.S., but in the developing world as well. But it means raising more capital, it means turning to long-term development financing, it means making this one of the great goals for the next decade to ensure that AI reaches everywhere. Second, we not only have to be thinking globally, we have to be focusing locally. And that’s what so many of you do. We need local language models so local voices can be heard. We need local data sets so that global and local problems can both be addressed. And in order to harness the power of AI at a local level, we need to recognize that just as important as the technology infrastructure. is the skilling infrastructure. It is investing to educate more data scientists, data analysts, computer scientists, and the many, many, many other fields that need to be grown so that a local economy can put AI to work. If and only if we do these things, we can ensure that AI is a leapfrog technology that helps close the gaps that divide the world in so many ways today. It will require all of us. It will require new types of partnerships. But I think it requires, among other things, a spirit of optimism that learns from the past and does our best to repeating the things that have gone wrong before. Thank you very much.

Sade Baderinwa: Brad, thank you so much. Just quickly, quickly, quickly. Okay, you’re giving us optimism. You talked about $50 billion Microsoft actually used around us, not here, but around the globe, and that we need to think locally, not just for language models, so you can hear those local voices. Because a lot of people are afraid of AI on a very granular level. Tell us just more about bridging that gap and how it can really transform the world.

Brad Smith: Well, I think bridging the gap probably requires a couple of things. One is it’s another one of the great lessons of electricity. You got to go meet people where they are, show them how they can use it, and show them how it can make their lives better. It’s an educational exercise that when you study electricity and how it moved around, it was key. And then the other thing that we also have to keep in mind and that I have to be, I think especially, it’s important for somebody like me to say, this technology and the companies that create it need to be subject to the rule of law. Local laws in countries, all the way to global governance. including at the United Nations. And that’s why the kind of multi-stakeholder activism that you see on a day like today is fundamental to ensuring that this technology truly serves the world.

Sade Baderinwa: And just really quickly, because I think this is an important point, talking about the skilled infrastructure, we also need to teach people about this new future and giving them the skills that they need.

Brad Smith: Yeah, and it’s so fascinating because I think that fundamentally you start by thinking, well, you gotta teach somebody how to do data analytics or how to use a large language model, how to write prompts. All of those things are true. I actually think the first step is to show people what they can do once they master those skills. One of my favorite things, like studying electricity, was here in the United States where it didn’t reach rural communities. There was a government initiative to just show people what it would mean to farmers, to women who were washing clothes or cooking food, to men who are harvesting crops. You have to help people see what it means for their own lives and not in just some abstract sense.

Sade Baderinwa: Wonderful. Brad Smith, thank you so much.

Brad Smith: Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you. Thank you. Okay, in this next session, we are going to see how we can harness digital technologies to protect the environment and planet. Now joining us is Nobu Okada, founder and CEO of AstroScale. Please welcome Nobu.

Nobu Okada: Hello, everybody. Take a look. This 10 millimeter metal ball could derail all the incredible digital progress we’ve been talking about today. This is a visualization of the space object reflecting millions of space debris ranging from smaller than this size to as large as a city bus size. that are traveling around the Earth at tremendous speed, 100 times faster than a bullet train. This is an urgent threat to the satellites which we rely on every day for digital technologies, from climate monitoring and traffic control to internet access and disaster response. We used to think space was big, treating rockets and satellites as disposable objects. But today, space is very congested and unsustainable. And just one collision with this metal ball could trigger a chain reaction collision that could prevent us from using space for generations. At Astroscale, our vision is to make space sustainable, and our satellites are designed to create a circular economy to remove, reuse, relocate the fuel, and in the future, repair and recycle spacecraft, leaving no waste in space. This requires advanced technology to approach and capture fast-moving, uncontrolled objects in space. And our satellites are equipped with sensors to locate objects, software for autonomous maneuvers, and robotic arms to grab an object and remove or service it. This year, our Astroscale team achieved a historic milestone, successfully locating and approaching a real piece of debris. This is the world’s first image of real space debris, an 11-meter-long rocket body weighing 3 tons, taken from just 15… meters away. And here is a time-lapse of a fly around. This debris is not sitting still. It’s moving at over seven kilometers per second. When I saw this image, I thought this is beautiful, although it’s just a garbage. And then our next mission is to remove this debris, but we should recycle this in future. Space sustainability is critical to safeguarding our future, and this matters to each and every one of you. So be an advocate for space sustainability. Together we have the responsibility and opportunity to ensure space as a resource that benefits humanity for the generation to come. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Okay, thank you so much. Now we’re actually going to turn to the Middle East, and earlier we heard from His Excellency Abdullah Alswaha about his appointment of women for his vision of the future. And joining us now is one of those appointments is Deemah AlYahya, Secretary General of Digital Cooperation Organization. Please come to the stage, Deemah.

Deemah AlYahya: Thank you so much. Thank you. Good afternoon, everyone. I would like first to thank Doreen and Achim for bringing us all together and giving us this platform to cooperate and partner together and bridge that gap, the digital divide and the digital gap. Now Ladies and gentlemen, excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, honored guests, it is 2024 and yet there are still regions in the world where a staggering 75% of the population remains disconnected from the Internet. While connecting them is a priority, we must ask ourselves, if we were to bring everyone online today, would it really solve the pressing issues of poverty, unemployment, the lack of digital skills? Is that enough? The answer is no, because it is no longer just about digital divide. It is about gender digital divide, AI divide, skill divide, and the disparity in the quality of connectivity across the borders. So how do we address this? The answer lies in three I’s, infrastructure, innovation, and inclusivity. First infrastructure, without robust infrastructure, true digital growth will remain a distant dream. Second is innovation, quantum computing, AI, blockchain, and the Internet of Things. These innovations are not just breakthroughs, they are engines for transformation that we must nourish. Third, inclusivity. Bridging the digital divide requires more than just connectivity. It depends and realize that we close the quality gap and provide equal opportunities for all to fully participate in the digital economy. So how do we ensure a bright digital future? Ladies and gentlemen, introducing the Digital Cooperation Organization’s answer, DEN, the digital economy navigator. Well, there was supposed to be a video playing, but okay, I’ll continue. So navigating tomorrow, that is our goal. And with DEN, we provide the solution with constructive insights for digital growth. DEN is not just an innovative tool. It is a game changer. It offers comprehensive, detailed view of digital economy performance across 50 countries. And it goes beyond measurement. DEN provides a clear framework with 102 indicators across 10 pillars, measuring digital economy maturity in three main dimensions, digital enablers, digital business, and digital society. This helps countries benchmark their progress and identify the steps needed to go from consumer into producers, innovators, and disruptors. Through DEN, the Digital Cooperation Organization is taking charge in providing a solution that connects fragmented efforts, offers clarity, and accelerates digital growth. I call and urge all of you to seize this opportunity, engage with us, and use DEN as a tool for all international organizations, countries, private sector. We connect the dots and connect source and connect the supply with the demand. Thank you so much. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Okay. Deemah, if you can just stay here for a moment. And sorry about the video. Unfortunately, we had technical difficulties. But you know, I spoke with His Excellency Abdullah Alswaha earlier. And he talked about the women who are being appointed these positions. And you are leading these efforts on a global scale right now. And you are giving the answers to the globe. Tell me about what this means to you personally.

Deemah AlYahya: Well, this is first, His Excellency surprised us today. And I appreciate that recognition. He and of course, Prince Mohammed bin Salman has been the force. behind enabling women and giving them the opportunity, really, to lead. What is really beautiful and what is provided now for women in Saudi Arabia is not just the opportunity, but also treated and these positions are looked at from a quality perspective and not just filling in a gap with gender equality. And this is, we’re blessed as women to be recognized and given this opportunity and now it’s our time to deliver and show that we are up to the task and we can.

Sade Baderinwa: So you’re telling me that this means something to you personally. What do you hope the other Saudi woman living at home who happens to see this streaming, what do you hope it inspires in her?

Deemah AlYahya: Well, not a Saudi woman, actually, all girls all over the world. That we can do it and opportunities are there. We have to seek for these opportunities and we have to make sure that we’re always learning and upskilling ourselves to make sure that we are up to always the task.

Sade Baderinwa: Well, you are up to the task and you are doing it. So thank you for inspiring all of the women, not just Saudi women. Thank you so much. Thank you. And I just want to remind the speakers, just for the sake of time, if we can condense the remarks because I know people are starting to get hungry in the room and we do want a break for lunch at some point. So please now allow me to welcome to the stage His Excellency Valentino Valentini, Deputy Minister at the Ministry of Enterprise and Made in Italy. Please welcome him. Thank you so much.

Valentino Valentini: Thank you so much. Thank you very much. Well, the digital revolution is reshaping our world at an unprecedented pace. The rapid advancement of technology offers immense opportunities, but it also brings with it the responsibility to ensure that these innovations support environmental sustainability. and equitable growth. To achieve a future where technology serves as a force for good, we must focus on integrating digital solutions with sustainable practices and fostering collaborations that bridge gaps and drive progress, ensuring that no one is left behind. Today, I am thrilled to share with you an initiative that embodies this vision – the AI Hub for Sustainable Development, co-designed by Italy’s G7 Presidency in partnership with the United Nations Development Programme. This initiative exemplifies our commitment to leveraging AI for sustainable development and global progress, with a focus on the African continent. It reflects our conviction that the path to the future must be inclusive and equitable, benefiting every corner of our world. Our journey in creating this AI Hub has been guided by collaboration, inclusivity, and a shared vision for the future of AI. We started by engaging with the African Union and securing the support of our G7 partners. We consulted with over 100 stakeholders, engaged with more than 300 AI startups across Africa, and initiated 80 partnerships focused on local language digitization. This collaborative effort ensures that the future of AI is shaped by diverse voices, perspectives, and innovative ideas. Our approach is centered around four critical pillars – data, computing power, talent, and enabling ecosystems. We are committed to deepening partnerships with our private sector and industry to strengthen the foundations and scale AI solutions that address the most pressing global challenges we heard today – whether it’s transforming energy, revolutionizing agriculture, improving health care, managing water resources, enhancing education and infrastructure – we’ve seen it all today, well presented here – AI holds the potential to tackle this issue. in ways we’ve only began to imagine. The AI Hub is also a cornerstone of Italy’s MATE plan, reinforcing our dedication to sustainable development and innovation in Africa. This initiative wants to go beyond technology transfer. It’s about co-creating, creating solutions together, learning from each other, and growing together. We believe that Africa must be a true partner in shaping the future of AI, and we’re committed to ensuring that this journey is one of mutual growth and shared benefits. As we stand at this pivotal moment of the Global Digital Compact, I invite you to join us in this transformative endeavor. Together, we can harness the power of AI to build a future where technology enhances our lives, protects our planet, and ensures prosperity for all. Thank you very much. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you. Who’s next? Jakob, Jakob. Thank you so much. And now I just wanted to take the moment to recognize the president, the presence of the president of Malawi, His Excellency Lazarus Chakwera. Thank you so much. We look forward to hearing from you a little bit later. And our next speaker is Jakob Granit. He’s the Director General, Swedish International Developed Corporation Agency. Please, let’s welcome Jakob. Jakob, thank you.

Jakob Granit: It’s my great privilege to address you on behalf of Sweden on a topic of hope, digital sustainability, and prosperity. The ongoing digital transformation presents mankind with plenty of hope for solutions to tackle poverty, build equitable societies, and find sustainable solutions in areas such as the green transition. At the same time, There are many risks related to digitalization, such as misinformation, and that vulnerable parts of society are left behind. To address these risks and opportunities, Sweden has worked with its co-facilitator Zambia, the Secretary General’s tech envoy, member states, and stakeholders in the intergovernmental process for a global digital compact. The compact has a key goal of an inclusive, open, sustainable, fair, safe, and secure digital future for all, and is planned to be agreed here at this summit. Now there is a strong link between the green transition and the digital transformation. Digital services often replace carbon-intensive services and transport, and the circular economy relies on digital infrastructure and services. Let me provide one example of how the Swedish International Development Co-operative Agency, SIDA, brings digital and green together. SIDA was part of establishing an investment in the GSMA Innovation Fund for Climate Resilience and Adaptation. The fund has supported start-ups across the section of green and digital. Some of the examples in the agriculture space range from a system to share tractors in Nigeria, to boosting fish farms in Kenya through iInternet of Things solutions, and to support farmers in Nepal to adapt to climate change through new techniques and access to information. These examples illustrate how the private sector can leverage the power of digital while ensuring the sustainability principles of the global digital compact. So in ending, the hope of digitalization in terms of contributing to prosperity and sustainability in support of a green transition is very large, and we hope the Global Digital Compact will provide a roadmap to unlock these opportunities. for the benefit of all of us. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you, Jakob. And our next speaker, Zhiping Chen. Thank you so much. She’s the vice president of ZTE Corporation, and she’s going to share how connectivity, entire species can be saved and preserved in one of the most remote places on earth. Zhiping.

Zhiping Chen: Thank you. Thank you for today to have a chance to be here. It’s my great honor. I’m Summer Chen, and today I want to share a wonderful story. Do you ever thinking about a place is ever in charge in time, and is rural, or in charge by the, this is Cocoshilli, one is the highest UNESCO hesitate site. In these places, park rangers, they are wirelessly protect Tibetan antelope for poachers. And we find the digital solutions to connect this remote areas. This vast isolated wilderness is a home to over 200 spices. When you step into Cocoshilli, it means leaving all behind the modern connectivities. Today I want to share a remarkable story of hope. Through these digital solutions, we protect these remote areas, caring for ecosystem in ways you never imagined. In these places, what the monthly without connection park rangers, what they are doing? Not just protect the only retirement entertainment, staring contest, to see who would blink first. Despite all these challenges, in collaboration with our partners, ZTE embarked on a mission We connected this and achieved three breakthroughs. First, successfully to build the first 5G base station. It allows for observation and in-depth animals and the live stream on the tablet, antelope migration and caring season. Nearly six, seven point millions of viewers tuned in worldwide. It’s greatly public wellness enhancement. Second, our 5G network will connect park rangers for their loved ones through a reliable railroad course. We witnessed the rangers were overwhelmed by the first call. Third, thanks for this 5G technicals, we caught on the carbon emission is another big win for environmental protection. And all our commitment is not just for Kokushile, we pushing the boundaries worldwide. For ZTE, our mission is quite clear, to making the connectivity and the trust everywhere. We believe this digital inclusion is a fundamental pillar of SDGs. It’s ensuring the digital future for all. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you. And now from the UN, let’s bring up Fatou Haidara, Daren Tang, and Tawfik Jelassi.

Fatou Haidara: Good afternoon, Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen. Every solution begins with a problem. In this particular case, we are dealing with an invasive species called Acacia bushes that invades the grassland of Namibia and takes up farmland. The farmers affected were simply burning the bushes to recover land, a dangerous process but also a source of harmful emissions. The New Dose Sustainable Bush Value Chain Project uses artificial intelligence, machine learning, satellite and drone imagery to analyze and map the growth of the bush across Namibia. It is a prime example of how digital technology can be used to tackle environmental degradation and resource depletion. Artificial intelligence and geographic information systems now identify where the Acacia is growing and estimate the total biomass. This provides a foundation for the responsible harvesting of this invasive species and as next step, the harvested Acacia is turned into marketable products like charcoal and cattle feed. Together with our partners, we transform a harmful environmental issue into an economic asset. for local communities. A challenge become an opportunity. Funded by Finland, our solution has received strong support from national authorities and local communities, attracted venture capital, and led to the establishment of a factory for biomass processing. A factory like this means local value addition, job creation, and income generation. Our initiative shows how AI technologies can benefit rural populations and foster sustainable in inclusive growth. It is our collective responsibility to ensure that developing countries have access to such technologies to bridge the digital divide. At UNIDO, we will continue to explore the potential of AI for advancing local communities, job creation, and environmental sustainability. We look forward to partnering with all of you in identifying and implementing similar concrete digital solutions. I thank you.

Daren Teng: Hi, I think I’m next as the DG of WIPO. Good afternoon, everyone. I’m Daren Teng, the Director General of the World Intellectual Property Organization, the UN Agency for Innovation, Creativity, and Intellectual Property. Innovation is a process by which an idea is turned into an invention, and an invention creates impact. One of the key work, key missions of WIPO is to develop a global network of technology and innovation support centers, or TIS. But what are TIS, and how did it really harness the power of digital to unlock innovation potential? Think of every innovation journey. as a planting an idea in fertile soy. But like any seed, these seeds need the right nutrients to grow, and one key nutrient is information. One of the unique features of the IP system is that when you apply for any type of IP, you have to disclose information behind this new technology, new brand, or new design. And with over 20 million intellectual property applications filed each year, this has become a huge database of information. Policymakers use it to understand technology trends, researchers use it to identify new areas of research and decide on research priorities, and entrepreneurs apply it to find potential partners for their businesses. But making information available is only part of the story. Advice is also needed for these researchers, inventors, and entrepreneurs, especially from developing countries to take their ideas from the lab to the market. By combining cutting-edge digital tools with expert guidance, WIPO’s Technology Innovation Support Centers, or TIS, help to transform information into insights and insights into impact. WIPO’s patent scope is one example of information provided through TIS. Powered by artificial intelligence, it mines over 100 million patent documents and close to five million scientific and technical materials to allow innovators to draw insights from all fields of human research. Another example is RD, or Access to Research and Development for Innovation Program. Through this single platform, inventors in developing countries can access hundreds of thousands of scientific and technical reference materials from over 100 publishers. TIS not only provide these digital tools, they guide innovators in how to make best use of them, turning knowledge into new discoveries that drive economies and societies forward. Let me quickly share the story of two amazing innovators, Luis Miguel Segovia and Maria Almanza, both from Colombia. As students, they developed a new solution for foot pain caused by high heels. Impressed, their professor encouraged them to turn their ideas into a business. which led Luis and Maria into a local TIS. Working with an IP expert, they confirmed that their idea was new, studied the market and worked on a patent application. But support didn’t just stop there. The TIS also helped them to apply for seed funding to launch a shoe line, Calzado & Mansa. Luis and Maria are two of the many innovators that we supported throughout 1,500 centres in 93 countries. TIS handled 2.2 million enquiries last year and close to 8 million enquiries in the past four years. We are proud of these numbers, but we are proud of still people like Luis and Maria who are changing the world with their ideas. So let us work together to support them and others to bring their ideas to the world and build a better future for all of us. Thank you very much.

Tawfik Jelassi: Excellencies, esteemed delegates, distinguished guests, my name is Tawfik Jelassi, I am Assistant Director General at UNESCO. I invite you to imagine a world without public services, without schools, without security forces to protect us, without care for the environment, without social security for all. These are not just conveniences, these are the backbone of our society. They uphold equality, inclusivity, human rights, democracy. And it is not a coincidence that SDG 16, which calls for strong institutions, emphasises this. To fully realise digital transformation in the public sector could unlock over $3.5 trillion annually, according to a study by McKinsey. Yet, despite significant investments, 70% of civil servants still lack digital capabilities, according to the World Economic Forum. The cost is not just financial, it’s about lost opportunities to better serve citizens, eroding trust in institutions and undermining democratic values. Obviously, we need to tackle this. What is UNESCO doing about this? Imagine equipping the world with better education, with digital skills, and obviously with full respect of human rights, dignity, equity, and inclusivity. We need to change not only the technology, we need to change the mindsets in order to change the behavior. And we do that through capacity infrastructure, in addition to what ITU has been doing, the meaningful digital infrastructure. One of the examples is our work on AI and the rule of law, training thousands of judges, prosecutors, on the new impact of AI and Gen AI on their work. And obviously, the educational transformation, also the greening of education. So these are just some examples that we are working on, in addition to with the African Union, with ITU, with UNDP, our work on data governance, and the capacity building for civil servants. So obviously, we need to move from just policy makers and tech innovators. We have also to empower educators, citizens, everybody has a role to play. So let’s invest in a digital transformation that serves both people and the planet. Let’s restore trust in our institutions, and let’s reinforce our democratic values. Thank you for your attention. I was supposed to play 30 seconds of the famous song, Imagine, but I was told I cannot do that because of intellectual property rights, especially in the presence of the Director General of WIPO. So you can imagine the music, here are the lyrics. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you all. Thank you so much. if you can please exit the stage. Now up next for a special announcement, we have Alan Davidson from NTIA and Harrison Lung from END.

Alan Davidson: Hi, I’m Alan Davidson, and I just wanna say a very quick shout out and thank you to Doreen Bogdan-Martin for your leadership here to ITU and UNDP and all of our hosts for this second Digital Action Day. Honestly, it’s been an inspiring day. And as a starting point, as we’ve said, the internet is now the essential tool for communications in our modern world. It’s essential for access to work, to education, access to healthcare, access to opportunity. And yet it is incredible that here we are in 2024 and that billions of people around the world still lack access to a high-speed internet connection or they lack the means and the skills to use it. That has to change. In the U.S., we’re doing our part through the Biden-Harris administration’s $90 billion Internet for All initiative to connect everyone, the president keeps saying everyone, everyone in America. And we are proud today to renew and expand our support for the Partner to Connect initiative to mobilize resources to connect the unconnected around the world. In 2022, the Commerce Department delivered our Partner to Connect pledge in Kigali at the ITU’s World Telecommunications Development Conference. And we pledged at that time to provide in-kind knowledge exchange and training opportunities focused on developing the next generation of leaders who will be improving broadband connections around the world. Since then, we’ve funded several efforts to grow global connectivity, but I wanted to highlight particularly the training sessions that have been so valuable and the work that we’ve done in partnership with USTTI in Washington and in Rwanda. Both have focused on African policy leaders and entrepreneurs interested in connectivity, in Internet governance, in space-based communications. I’ll say, I had the chance to meet with this cohort of extraordinary young leaders, and they should give us all hope for the future. They were truly inspiring. As the saying goes, the kids are all right. This brings me to our news today. I’m pleased to share that NTIA is renewing and expanding our pledge. We will partner again with USTTI to bring a new cohort of current and emerging African leaders, all women, to Washington, D.C. for training. We will also bring them – yes, thank you, it’s great, it’s a great group, it’s been a great group – and we’re going to bring them to Silicon Valley as well for some experience with American-style entrepreneurship. Our grant for the African Women Digital Leaders Training Program will promote best practices, demonstrate emerging technologies, grow the leadership skills of these participants, and really invest, again, in this next generation of leaders that we need around the world if we’re going to make this connectivity a reality. We plan to continue similar trainings focused on digital skills and connectivity in the years to come. We look forward to our continued partnership with the ITU on this important effort. I’ll just say, this is a historic moment. The pandemic reminded us that connectivity is not a luxury, it’s a necessity. And the coming AI revolution is only going to deepen that divide for those who don’t have internet access. So this is our chance to connect everyone in the world with the tools that they need to thrive in the modern digital economy. It’s going to take a lot of work, but together I know we can achieve that promise of greater digital access and community around the globe. Thank you.

Harrison Lung: Your Excellencies, distinguished guests, and esteemed speakers. Thank you for the opportunity to speak here today. I would like to use this stage to reaffirm our commitment to building a sustainable and inclusive future, as well as add an additional pledge here on this stage. EN, formerly known as Etisalat, started as a UAE-based telecom operator close to 50 years ago. Since then, we have grown to become a global technology company with operations in over 30 countries across Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia, and over 175 million subscribers. Thus far, we’ve made significant public commitments as part of our sustainability strategy across financial investments and population impacted in our operating footprint. Firstly, as part of the World Economic Forum’s Edison Alliance and its One Billion Lives Challenge, EN has pledged to contribute significantly to this mission by striving to improve the lives of 30 million individuals through enhanced network access, financial services, and technology education by 2025. In addition to connectivity, the digital services and applications, such as technology-supporting financial services, healthcare, and education, is critical to leveling the playing field. Secondly, as part of the UNDP, Digital for Sustainable Development Program, we will soon announce a strategic collaboration with focused initiatives across a number of areas, including AI, fintech, and education. Stay tuned for that. Thirdly, as part of our commitment to ITU’s Partner to Connect Digital Coalition, earlier this year at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, EN announced an investment of $6 billion between 2024 to 2026 in technological advancement, infrastructure, and innovative solutions to extend meaningful connectivity to everyone. This is particularly important as we aim to bridge the digital divide in our less developed markets, much of whom is operating in the Global South. Today, on this stage, I’m happy to announce a new pledge to Partner2Connect, a new multi-million dollar commitment to the promotion of digital economies by bridging the digital divide and building skills in underserved communities. This pledge will address many of the issues we heard of in previous segments, such as resilience in disaster-affected areas through early warning systems, capacity building and re-skilling to bring the next generation of workforce into the digital economy, and lastly, access to capital to women and small business entrepreneurs. We believe that the digital network and infrastructure is critical to uplifting the society in a digital age. Additionally, various digital services will provide access and capabilities to the general consumer and elevate enterprises to the global economy. EN is a proud partner with the ITU and the UNDP to contribute to a common vision of a sustainable, inclusive and prosperous digital future of all. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Okay, thank you all. Now, if Rumman Chowdhury can come to the stage, and His Excellency Bosun Tijani and Robert Muggah. Please, please, anywhere that’s comfortable. I’ll sit here on the edge. All right, His Excellency, let’s begin with you. I believe you have an important announcement. want to share about how Nigeria will encourage innovation in tech, but also while ensuring regulations around data privacy.

Bosun Tijani: Right. If I start with that, I think what we’re doing is a recognition that we have a unique opportunity now to rebuild trust between people and the government by ensuring that we can leverage technology to serve and provide opportunity for them during live events. So when you give birth to a child, you’re registering a business. You want to pay your tax. We think the most important thing is that we’re able to deliver this seamlessly and most comfortably to our people. So what we’ve committed to is ensuring that by 2027, that the lowest form of government is connected to quality internet. So we do have what we call the local government, which is the lowest form of interaction that our people get with our government. So the federal government is connecting all the 774 secretariat of our local government to ensure that the services that our people are seeking can be provided to them digitally.

Sade Baderinwa: Wonderful. Thank you. And let me get you in here, Rumman. What do we need to do to ensure a sustainable and inclusive development for AI?

Rumman Chowdhury: Wonderful question. With my nonprofit, Humane Intelligence, we focus on giving access to everybody in the world not to build artificial intelligence, but to evaluate artificial intelligence. We know that AI models are not fit for use around the world in different cultures, different languages. The images that they create can be stereotypical or even degrading. So what we’re trying to provide access to and what leads to a good, sustainable AI future is the ability for everyone to get their hands on AI and determine if it is good for them. Building that level of critical thinking and evaluation with AI systems is a key and often missing part of the AI development story. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: OK. Well, Robert, can you talk about, just in a condensed version, about the risk of AI in the global South?

Robert Muggah: There are multiple risks, some of which have been discussed over the last couple of hours. Some of these risks are already here. Advanced cybersecurity challenges, mass information pollution, the overabundant consumption of energy used by AI, which will be up to 3% to 4% of all energy use within the next five years. Some of them are on the horizon. AGI, artificial general intelligence outside of human control, a real concern. And some we don’t even know about. We set up a global task force last year with representatives from Africa, the Americas, Asia, including an esteemed member on the panel, to reflect a bit on what were the risks and what were the solutions for the global South. We identified four big ones, and I’ll only talk about two. The first is job displacement and inequality. Second is AI bias and discrimination. The third is surveillance and privacy violations. And the fourth is the concentration of power in a small number of AI companies. With respect to job displacement and automation, probably the most important, over 800 million jobs are at risk within the next five years from AI. In the global South, according to the ILO, 56% of all jobs in the global South are at high risk of displacement. Significant. Hugely significant. So what do we have to do? We have to do all of the stuff that’s been talked about in terms of multi-stakeholder engagement. But we also have to invest in job upgrading. We need digital literacy. We need job placement programs. We need to have employment schemes. We also need universal basic income, really socioeconomic responses to what is a digital challenge. And the good news is a lot’s happening. The AI for all in India, Connectus in Brazil, digital ambassadors in Rwanda, NGOs around the world are also investing in this area. And I think we’re also seeing UBI schemes from Namibia to India. So we see solutions, but we’ve got to scale those up.

Sade Baderinwa: I so wish I had more time to talk with you. I’ve got like 20 different questions in my mind about you already and what’s so important in terms of these guardrails and what it means for society, training workers about what is this new technology moving forward, so thank you all. Unfortunately, we’re running out of time. Really appreciate your words today. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. And now it is my great pleasure and honor to introduce his Excellency, President of Malawi, Lazarus Chakwera. Please, come to the stage. Thank you so much. Thank you.

Lazarus Chakwera: Well, I’m supposed to have my thing there, but bring me my iPad. Today, we stand at a pivotal moment in history, a moment where the digital landscape is not just a realm of technology, but a canvas upon which we can paint a brighter, more inclusive future for all. As we gather here, we must recognize that the digital revolution is not merely about advancements in technology, it is about the transformation of our societies, our economies, and ultimately our humanity. Malawi is therefore committed to bridging the digital divide because it is an economic and social issue. Our strategic plans for digital transformation include expanding digital infrastructure, enhancing digital literacy, and fostering an inclusive digital economy to ensure that no one is left behind in our digital journey. To accelerate digital adoption, Malawi has launched several initiatives with support from development partners. For instance, the Digital Malawi Project has been instrumental in expanding Internet connectivity to public institutions, institutions where the last mile rule of connectivity and inclusive digital transformation for Malawi, IDT4M projects, provide equitable access to digital technologies and foster digital literacy across all segments of society. Additionally, we have implemented a data exchange platform that leverages our national ID system as a single point of truth for identity verification. This platform is critical in assuring seamless access to services, improving efficiency across government, and reducing bureaucratic bottlenecks. Complementing this, we have also implemented an e-service platform which now serves as a single point of entry for all government digital services. These initiatives are premised on the acceptance that the digital age has brought forth unprecedented opportunities. It has connected us across continents, enabling us to share ideas, cultures, and innovations. It has empowered individuals, given them a voice and platform to advocate for change. However, while these initiatives ensure that our citizens can access essential services with greater ease, transparency, and security, with great power comes great responsibility. As we lay the foundations of a digital future, we must ensure that this future is equitable, inclusive, and peaceful. Digital literacy is essential for full participation in the digital economy. Therefore we are integrating digital literacy into our national education curricula and providing training opportunities for all age groups. Our technology hubs, which are training thousands of young people in coding, digital skills, and entrepreneurship, are playing a crucial role in fostering innovation. These hubs are not only incubating new ideas, but also creating jobs and driving the growth of Malawi’s digital economy. A truly inclusive digital future cannot be achieved in isolation. Today millions of people around the world remain disconnected, excluded from the benefits of the digital economy. Education and health care. This is not just unfortunate, it is wrong. And it is dangerous. As I said earlier, this divide is not merely a technological issue, it is a social justice issue. To build a peaceful future, we must ensure that everyone, regardless of their socioeconomic status, geographical location, or background, has access to digital tools and the internet. This requires collaboration between governments and multilevel partners, private sectors, and civil society to invest in infrastructure, education, and digital leaders. And we strive, as we strive to bridge the digital divide, we call upon the global community to not only provide financial and technical support, but also to share knowledge, innovations, and best practices. The journey toward a digital future must be a shared one, where no nation, no citizen, is left behind. In conclusion, laying the foundations of a digital future for all is a collective endeavor that requires our commitment, creativity, and compassion. As we embark on this journey, let us remember that technology is a tool, a tool that can either divide us or unite us. It is our collective responsibility to choose the path of inclusion, equity, and peace. Together, let us build a digital future that reflects our highest ideals, a future where everyone has the opportunity to thrive, where dialogue replaces discord, and where peace is not just a dream, but a reality for all. Malawi stands ready to embrace the future, a future where a digital transformation is not just an abstract concept, but a reality that improves the lives of every Malawian. The future is ours to shape, a future that benefits all humanity. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you so much, Your Excellency. Thank you so much. The President of Malawi, Lazarus Chakwera. Please give him another round of applause. Thank you. And joining us once again on the stage is Achim Steiner, he’s going to talk about the promise of digital public infrastructure, and then there will be a video and Akeem will give other remarks.

Official Video: Registry is helping to achieve the goal of the Paris Agreement by reforesting 12 million hectares and creating interoperability between stakeholders and infrastructure across natural resources. But it is not just Malawi, Finland and Brazil. The impact of DPI is growing, with more and more countries leveraging the transformative power of digital public infrastructure. To keep the promise of the Sustainable Development Goals, DPI represents a fundamental pivot that involves everyone, everywhere, and that includes you. Let’s work together to build a safe and inclusive digital future for all.

Achim Steiner: Isn’t it amazing? This is all happening already. And congratulations just to three more pioneers. In many ways, development is, as we have heard from a number of people today, an agenda of hope. This hope for a better future has historically driven development and humanities progress. If there was no hope, we wouldn’t be where we are now. This hope still matters. And hope in one’s own ability to change the course of history, influence people’s decisions and actions. This is why laying the foundations for a digital future is about hope and actions. I want to take you through the journey of building digital public infrastructure across countries today. In fact, it says with the video, but you have just seen it. So, you know, sometimes the script is a little bit behind. Can we go on to the next part? And as we stand at this juncture where our collective commitment to digital foundations can catalyze this brighter future for everyone, everywhere on our planet, I think you have already sensed that in the previous segment of this extraordinary day, we explored groundbreaking digital technologies and the profound impact they can have on sustainability and inclusivity. All the innovative solutions making connectivity universal and affordable, the digital tools enhancing inclusiveness. Their groundwork is laid both inspiring and formidable. Now as we transition to discussing the fundamental structures that support these innovations, we need to collectively shape the future by laying the foundations that are safe and inclusive and serve the public interest. We often talk about physical infrastructure, things like roads and power lines and water utilities that are fundamental to development. In fact, for many, they are already taken for granted. These are the building blocks that elevate the welfare of people and allow people to gain a livelihood. Let’s apply that same understanding for a moment to the digital world. Digital public infrastructure, or DPI, is an approach that goes beyond one-off solutions like apps or portals. It encompasses foundational systems, like digital identity systems we just saw, or payment platforms that allow people, businesses and governments to interact in a secure, inclusive and efficient way. This in turn enables everything from facilitating the access of vital health records online to enabling people more easily to start their own businesses. However, just as traditional infrastructure, like roads and railway tracks, have speed limits and guardrails, we also need to ensure that DPI has the principles, policies and institutions that keep the interests, safety and rights of people and protection of our planet at the very heart of these foundations. As we take equal access to physical infrastructure for granted, DPI must also ensure public value and provide safe, inclusive services at scale. While some governments are deploying DPI rapidly, others are just beginning their digital journeys. Both face risks like privacy concerns, data security and exclusion without proper safeguards. Conversely, embedding safety and inclusion can reduce inequalities and foster trust. This is why putting people and our planet at the centre of DPI is so critical. Digital public infrastructure plays a pivotal role in advancing all the interconnected sustainable development goals by employing digital technologies to address global challenges at scale. For example, foundational digital infrastructure, like digital identification platforms, have the potential to facilitate access to finance or access to healthcare. Again, we heard examples this morning already. Yet, to fully unlock the potential of DPI, we must put people and planet at the center. This requires building on three essential pillars, commitment, capital, capacity. First, commitment. Governments must commit to the importance of inclusive, safe, and equitable digital systems, not just the hardware, not just the fiber optic cable or the devices. Trust and equity are the cornerstones of a progressive society. Without these safeguards, we risk creating systems that exclude vulnerable populations or violate fundamental rights. Brazil, India, and Estonia are often cited as prominent examples for their digital ID systems, which have advanced development. These systems must be specifically designed with safeguards to prevent exclusion or data misuse. Second, capital. Financial investment is critical, not only for building digital public infrastructure, but more importantly for ensuring that robust safeguards are in place. No single entity can do this alone. It requires a collective effort from governments, the private sector, and global partners, civil society, scientists, academia, everyone. Together, actors have to work together and leverage their financial resources to support sustainable, secure, and inclusive DPI that serves everyone. Third and finally, capacity. Skilled teams, an empowered civil society, and expert technical support and beyond are crucial for the effective implementation and governance of DPI safeguards. Yet capacity must go beyond mere technical expertise. It’s about fostering an ecosystem – we’ve heard that word used quite frequently this morning – of collaboration and accountability, where actors share knowledge and resources to ensure that safeguards are implemented and continuously adapted to protect the rights of all users in a rapidly changing field. Our commitment to DPI extends beyond getting the technology right. It must include ensuring these systems are secure, trusted, and protect the rights of all users. Safeguards should not be optional. They are essential to the acceptance and success of digital public infrastructure globally. People need to be empowered and free to shape their own lives. That’s the fundamental basis for 21st century development. And together, we are not just updating systems, we are programming a future – a digital ecosystem that will enable every individual to thrive in this interconnected world that is already here. Thank you for giving me a couple of minutes to share these thoughts with you. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you so much. And now let’s welcome Esther Dweck, Her Excellency, Minister for Management and Innovation and Public Services of Brazil. Thank you, Esther. Thank you.

Esther Dweck: It’s an honor to participate in this session. In Brazil, we believe the future must be green and inclusive, driven by a fair digital revolution. The digital agenda is essential to development, addressing systemic inequality, including the technological ones. Brazil is committed to a triple transition – ecological, digital, and social – reducing inequalities both within and between countries. Brazil’s digital policies are aligned with the SDGs, and we are increasingly considering the environmental impact of digitalization. Under President Lula’s leadership, digital public infrastructures are key to Brazil’s digital transformation, ensuring sustainable, just, and inclusive development. We believe DPIs should be implemented with proper and universal safeguards, built through participatory processes to ensure that they are safe and inclusive and protect people’s rights. A prime example is our National Identity Card, linked to the gov.br platform, which provides access to over 4,000 public services for more than 160 million users. Other DPIs include PICS, our instant payment system that enhances financial inclusion, and the UNIFI Register for Social Policies, which improves social program management and access. The National Health Data Network ensures continuity of care through data sharing between public and private health care providers. The Rural Environmental Registry is a green DPI that supports environmental efforts such as reducing deforestation, restoring forests, implementing agriculture traceability, and fostering carbon markets. It plays a crucial role in a rural financial instrument such as credit and insurance, protecting biomes, increasing agriculture resilience, and will be a central at COP30 in Belém next year. Brazil is also advancing DPI for artificial intelligence, taking into account digital sovereignty. Achieving this requires a collaborative across government, especially those of the global south, civil society, the private sector, and multilateral organizations. Our National AI Plan includes developing an autonomous capacity in the field and launching a Portuguese-language LLM which respects intellectual property rights and cultural heritage, promoting AI in health care, education, and transportation. We emphasize open innovation, competition, and protection of human rights to prevent monopolies that stifle innovation. As we continue our presidency of G20 and prepare for COP30 and BRICS leadership, Brazil reaffirms its commitment to promote an inclusive DPI to foster a fair and equal digital future. Last year, we brought here a perspective on Brazil’s DPIs. After a year, we are here returning to collaborate with our global voices, seeking to promote digital inclusion, digital public infrastructure, digital public goods, and other strategies to foster an equitable planet. Together, we must act now for a sustainable, inclusive digital future. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you so much, Your Excellency. Thank you very much. Okay. Remember that art piece we said we were going to work on? You’re supposed to do the survey? Well, now we’ve got it. We’ve got Lisa Russell back. Come on, Lisa.

Lisa Russell: All right. Thank you so much.

Sade Baderinwa: Okay. So, tell everyone what you did, how you did it, and take it away.

Lisa Russell: So, as you know, we collected information from the surveys, and we generated AI art using only a keyboard. There are no cameras, no microphones, no graphic pens. And this is the beauty of AI art in labeling people across the world to have access to creating artwork for people and for the planet. And so, I’m really excited to share with you the images that were generated using the data from the survey. Every answer, there are six answers, every answer corresponds with a different color of the SDG, and we synthesized the data, fed it some prompts, some creative prompts, and here are some of the images that we have generated using the Digital Futures Survey. So, if we can go ahead and show these images. And that is our official video. I believe there are three more images we’re going to show, I believe. So, this was all generated using, see all the colors in it? Those colors correspond to your answers in the digital survey. And this is the kind of artwork that we can create. And again, this is why we need an arts movement in the UN. We need artists to be able to help translate and amplify the incredible and important work being done in these spaces. This is just a small example. And I’m hoping, and I want to train every advocate for climate change, for sustainability, on how to translate their important work in art so that we can move audiences, move more general audiences. So I believe, are we showing the other images or? I think we are not showing the other images. So thank you so much.

Sade Baderinwa: Well, I’ll have to say, I think this is beautiful.

Lisa Russell: Yes, thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: This is beautiful. But, you know, it really is important. First of all, I love artists because it’s like you’re the soul of who we are and interpreting what that soul is. So if people are interested in learning more, certainly from all of these agencies, they can contact you?

Lisa Russell: Yes. Arts Envoy Lab is my program. I’m with Create 2030, and I am dying to teach young advocates on how to use creative AI. So definitely please get in touch with me. I’d appreciate it. ArtsEnvoyLab.com. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Love it. Thank you, Lisa. And I’m going to contact you. Okay. Well, that wraps it up for our morning session. Thank you so much. And it was a pleasure being here with all of you today. So have some lunch, enjoy, network with different people here, and then the afternoon session will begin around 2.30. Thank you again, and I hope you enjoyed yourself.

M

Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub

Speech speed

131 words per minute

Speech length

583 words

Speech time

266 seconds

Connecting 2.6 billion unconnected people is crucial

Explanation

Joosub emphasizes the importance of connecting the 2.6 billion people who are currently unconnected to the internet. He argues that this is a critical step in bridging the digital divide and ensuring equal access to digital opportunities.

Evidence

Vodafone and partners are investing in expanding networks and exploring new technologies like satellite-based networks to reach unconnected populations.

Major Discussion Point

Universal Digital Connectivity

Agreed with

Jessica Rosenworcel

Juan Lavista Ferres

David Sapolsky

Agreed on

Universal digital connectivity is crucial for development

Disagreed with

Jessica Rosenworcel

David Sapolsky

Disagreed on

Approach to bridging the digital divide

J

Jessica Rosenworcel

Speech speed

134 words per minute

Speech length

644 words

Speech time

288 seconds

Satellite-to-cell phone communications can end mobile dead zones

Explanation

Rosenworcel argues that satellite-to-cell phone communications technology can eliminate mobile dead zones. This technology allows for connectivity in areas where traditional ground-based networks are unavailable or have been disrupted.

Evidence

She cites an example from Hawaii where satellite-to-cell phone technology helped save lives during a wildfire when terrestrial networks were knocked out.

Major Discussion Point

Universal Digital Connectivity

Agreed with

Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub

Juan Lavista Ferres

David Sapolsky

Agreed on

Universal digital connectivity is crucial for development

Disagreed with

Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub

David Sapolsky

Disagreed on

Approach to bridging the digital divide

J

Juan Lavista Ferres

Speech speed

136 words per minute

Speech length

402 words

Speech time

177 seconds

AI and satellite imagery can map population shifts to target connectivity efforts

Explanation

Ferres explains how AI and satellite imagery can be used to create high-resolution maps of population shifts over time. This technology helps identify communities that remain disconnected from communication channels, allowing for more targeted connectivity efforts.

Evidence

Microsoft is partnering with Planet Labs and the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation to create these maps, which can inform infrastructure investment decisions.

Major Discussion Point

Universal Digital Connectivity

Agreed with

Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub

Jessica Rosenworcel

David Sapolsky

Agreed on

Universal digital connectivity is crucial for development

D

David Sapolsky

Speech speed

150 words per minute

Speech length

482 words

Speech time

191 seconds

Project Kuiper aims to provide affordable global satellite broadband

Explanation

Sapolsky introduces Project Kuiper, Amazon’s satellite broadband initiative. The project aims to deliver affordable, high-performance connectivity to unserved and underserved communities worldwide using a constellation of low-Earth-orbit satellites.

Evidence

Project Kuiper plans to use over 3,200 low-Earth-orbit satellites to provide internet access with sufficient speeds for modern critical services like video conferencing and telehealth.

Major Discussion Point

Universal Digital Connectivity

Agreed with

Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub

Jessica Rosenworcel

Juan Lavista Ferres

Agreed on

Universal digital connectivity is crucial for development

Disagreed with

Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub

Jessica Rosenworcel

Disagreed on

Approach to bridging the digital divide

T

Tofara L. Chokera

Speech speed

122 words per minute

Speech length

363 words

Speech time

178 seconds

Digital skills training is essential for economic empowerment, especially for women and youth

Explanation

Chokera emphasizes the importance of digital skills training for economic empowerment, particularly for women and youth. She argues that providing digital skills enables individuals to participate in the digital economy and access new opportunities.

Evidence

Through the Digital Skills Development Program, Chokera’s organization has empowered over 12,000 women, youth, and SMEs across Zimbabwe and Africa with digital skills for international trade.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Inclusion and Skills

Agreed with

Lazarus Chakwera

Christopher Burns

Agreed on

Digital skills training is essential for economic empowerment

M

Mats Granryd

Speech speed

150 words per minute

Speech length

518 words

Speech time

206 seconds

Affordable smartphones are key to bridging the digital divide

Explanation

Granryd argues that the high cost of smartphones is a major barrier to digital inclusion. He emphasizes the need to bring down the cost of devices to around $20 to make them accessible to more people in developing countries.

Evidence

GSMA has established a handset affordability coalition to work on reducing handset costs and improving financing options for smartphone purchases.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Inclusion and Skills

L

Lazarus Chakwera

Speech speed

115 words per minute

Speech length

720 words

Speech time

372 seconds

Digital literacy must be integrated into national education curricula

Explanation

President Chakwera emphasizes the importance of integrating digital literacy into national education curricula. He argues that this is essential for full participation in the digital economy and for preparing the workforce of the future.

Evidence

Malawi is integrating digital literacy into its national education curricula and providing training opportunities for all age groups. The country has also established technology hubs that are training thousands of young people in coding, digital skills, and entrepreneurship.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Inclusion and Skills

Agreed with

Tofara L. Chokera

Christopher Burns

Agreed on

Digital skills training is essential for economic empowerment

C

Christopher Burns

Speech speed

173 words per minute

Speech length

551 words

Speech time

190 seconds

The Responsible Computing Challenge aims to embed ethics in tech education

Explanation

Burns introduces the Responsible Computing Challenge, an initiative to reshape how future technologists are trained. The challenge aims to embed responsibility and ethics into the core of technology and computer science curricula, especially for young women and girls.

Evidence

The challenge is being implemented in universities in the U.S., Kenya, and India, with plans to expand to South Africa and Ghana. It focuses on teaching students to consider the full impacts of their products and services.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Inclusion and Skills

Agreed with

Tofara L. Chokera

Lazarus Chakwera

Agreed on

Digital skills training is essential for economic empowerment

K

Karan Bhatia

Speech speed

145 words per minute

Speech length

538 words

Speech time

221 seconds

AI can be used for early flood warnings and disaster preparedness

Explanation

Bhatia highlights how AI can be used to predict and mitigate natural disasters. He specifically mentions Google’s Flood Hub, an AI-powered flood forecasting tool that can predict flood zones up to a week in advance.

Evidence

Google’s Flood Hub is live in 80 countries, reaching more than 460 million people around the world.

Major Discussion Point

AI for Sustainable Development

Agreed with

Valentino Valentini

Achim Steiner

Rumman Chowdhury

Agreed on

AI can be leveraged for sustainable development

V

Valentino Valentini

Speech speed

140 words per minute

Speech length

455 words

Speech time

194 seconds

AI Hub for Sustainable Development focuses on data, computing power, talent, and ecosystems

Explanation

Valentini introduces the AI Hub for Sustainable Development, an initiative co-designed by Italy’s G7 Presidency and UNDP. The hub aims to leverage AI for sustainable development, focusing on four critical pillars: data, computing power, talent, and enabling ecosystems.

Evidence

The initiative has engaged with over 100 stakeholders, 300 AI startups across Africa, and initiated 80 partnerships focused on local language digitization.

Major Discussion Point

AI for Sustainable Development

Agreed with

Karan Bhatia

Achim Steiner

Rumman Chowdhury

Agreed on

AI can be leveraged for sustainable development

A

Achim Steiner

Speech speed

148 words per minute

Speech length

2059 words

Speech time

832 seconds

AI must be developed with safeguards to prevent exclusion and protect rights

Explanation

Steiner emphasizes the need for safeguards in AI development to prevent exclusion and protect individual rights. He argues that these safeguards should be an essential part of digital public infrastructure, not an optional add-on.

Major Discussion Point

AI for Sustainable Development

Agreed with

Karan Bhatia

Valentino Valentini

Rumman Chowdhury

Agreed on

AI can be leveraged for sustainable development

DPI requires commitment, capital, and capacity building

Explanation

Steiner argues that successful implementation of Digital Public Infrastructure requires three essential pillars: commitment from governments, capital investment, and capacity building. He emphasizes that these elements are crucial for ensuring that DPI is inclusive, safe, and equitable.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI)

R

Rumman Chowdhury

Speech speed

174 words per minute

Speech length

117 words

Speech time

40 seconds

Evaluating AI systems for cultural appropriateness is crucial

Explanation

Chowdhury argues for the importance of evaluating AI systems for cultural appropriateness and potential biases. She emphasizes that AI models are often not fit for use across different cultures and languages, and can produce stereotypical or degrading content.

Evidence

Chowdhury’s nonprofit, Humane Intelligence, focuses on giving people worldwide the ability to evaluate AI systems, not just build them.

Major Discussion Point

AI for Sustainable Development

Agreed with

Karan Bhatia

Valentino Valentini

Achim Steiner

Agreed on

AI can be leveraged for sustainable development

E

Esther Dweck

Speech speed

128 words per minute

Speech length

420 words

Speech time

196 seconds

DPI enables efficient government services and financial inclusion

Explanation

Dweck highlights how Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) can improve government service delivery and promote financial inclusion. She argues that DPI is key to Brazil’s digital transformation strategy.

Evidence

Brazil’s National Identity Card, linked to the gov.br platform, provides access to over 4,000 public services for more than 160 million users. The PICS instant payment system enhances financial inclusion.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI)

DPI must be implemented with proper safeguards and participatory processes

Explanation

Dweck emphasizes the importance of implementing DPI with proper safeguards and through participatory processes. This approach ensures that DPI is safe, inclusive, and protects people’s rights.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI)

DPI can support environmental efforts like reducing deforestation

Explanation

Dweck explains how DPI can be used to support environmental initiatives. She highlights Brazil’s Rural Environmental Registry as an example of a ‘green DPI’ that aids in efforts to reduce deforestation and restore forests.

Evidence

The Rural Environmental Registry supports environmental efforts such as reducing deforestation, restoring forests, implementing agriculture traceability, and fostering carbon markets.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI)

B

Bianca Faith Johnson

Speech speed

173 words per minute

Speech length

486 words

Speech time

167 seconds

Exoskeleton technology can restore mobility for paralyzed individuals

Explanation

Johnson demonstrates how exoskeleton technology can help paralyzed individuals regain mobility. She argues that this technology has the potential to significantly improve quality of life for people with spinal cord injuries.

Evidence

Johnson, who is paralyzed from mid-chest down, demonstrates walking using a self-balancing exoskeleton prototype developed by Wondercraft.

Major Discussion Point

Technology for Social Impact

K

Kelly T. Clements

Speech speed

148 words per minute

Speech length

665 words

Speech time

268 seconds

Blockchain-based digital wallets can provide rapid financial aid to refugees

Explanation

Clements explains how blockchain-based digital wallets can be used to provide quick financial assistance to refugees. This technology allows for faster, more efficient distribution of aid in crisis situations.

Evidence

She cites an example from Ukraine where a family received cash aid through a digital wallet within 15 minutes of registering with UNHCR.

Major Discussion Point

Technology for Social Impact

A

Ann Aerts

Speech speed

138 words per minute

Speech length

499 words

Speech time

216 seconds

AI and digital tools can improve healthcare outcomes and reduce inequalities

Explanation

Aerts argues that AI and digital tools have the potential to significantly improve healthcare outcomes and reduce health inequalities. She emphasizes the importance of understanding and addressing the social determinants of health through data analysis.

Evidence

The Novartis Foundation’s AI for Healthy Cities initiative uses data analytics to understand the true drivers of health and health inequities in cities like New York, Singapore, Helsinki, and Basel.

Major Discussion Point

Technology for Social Impact

Z

Zhiping Chen

Speech speed

89 words per minute

Speech length

323 words

Speech time

216 seconds

Digital technologies can protect endangered species in remote areas

Explanation

Chen discusses how digital technologies, particularly 5G networks, can be used to protect endangered species in remote areas. She argues that these technologies enable better monitoring and conservation efforts in previously inaccessible regions.

Evidence

ZTE built the first 5G base station in Cocoshilli, a remote UNESCO World Heritage site, allowing for real-time observation and live streaming of Tibetan antelope migration.

Major Discussion Point

Technology for Social Impact

Agreements

Agreement Points

Universal digital connectivity is crucial for development

Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub

Jessica Rosenworcel

Juan Lavista Ferres

David Sapolsky

Connecting 2.6 billion unconnected people is crucial

Satellite-to-cell phone communications can end mobile dead zones

AI and satellite imagery can map population shifts to target connectivity efforts

Project Kuiper aims to provide affordable global satellite broadband

These speakers agree on the importance of expanding digital connectivity to unconnected populations, emphasizing various technological solutions including satellite communications and AI-driven mapping.

Digital skills training is essential for economic empowerment

Tofara L. Chokera

Lazarus Chakwera

Christopher Burns

Digital skills training is essential for economic empowerment, especially for women and youth

Digital literacy must be integrated into national education curricula

The Responsible Computing Challenge aims to embed ethics in tech education

These speakers emphasize the importance of digital skills training and education, particularly for youth and underserved populations, to ensure participation in the digital economy and responsible use of technology.

AI can be leveraged for sustainable development

Karan Bhatia

Valentino Valentini

Achim Steiner

Rumman Chowdhury

AI can be used for early flood warnings and disaster preparedness

AI Hub for Sustainable Development focuses on data, computing power, talent, and ecosystems

AI must be developed with safeguards to prevent exclusion and protect rights

Evaluating AI systems for cultural appropriateness is crucial

These speakers agree on the potential of AI to address sustainable development challenges, while also emphasizing the need for responsible development and evaluation of AI systems.

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers emphasize the importance of Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) for development, while stressing the need for proper implementation with safeguards and capacity building.

Esther Dweck

Achim Steiner

DPI enables efficient government services and financial inclusion

DPI must be implemented with proper safeguards and participatory processes

DPI requires commitment, capital, and capacity building

Unexpected Consensus

Technology for social impact across diverse fields

Bianca Faith Johnson

Kelly T. Clements

Ann Aerts

Zhiping Chen

Exoskeleton technology can restore mobility for paralyzed individuals

Blockchain-based digital wallets can provide rapid financial aid to refugees

AI and digital tools can improve healthcare outcomes and reduce inequalities

Digital technologies can protect endangered species in remote areas

Despite coming from diverse fields (healthcare, refugee aid, conservation), these speakers unexpectedly converge on the potential of various technologies to create significant social impact in their respective areas.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of agreement include the importance of universal digital connectivity, the need for digital skills training, the potential of AI for sustainable development, and the role of Digital Public Infrastructure in development.

Consensus level

There is a high level of consensus among the speakers on the transformative potential of digital technologies for development and social impact. This consensus implies a strong foundation for collaborative efforts in leveraging technology for global development goals. However, speakers also consistently emphasize the need for responsible implementation, including safeguards and capacity building, suggesting a nuanced approach to technological adoption.

Disagreements

Disagreement Points

Approach to bridging the digital divide

Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub

Jessica Rosenworcel

David Sapolsky

Connecting 2.6 billion unconnected people is crucial

Satellite-to-cell phone communications can end mobile dead zones

Project Kuiper aims to provide affordable global satellite broadband

While all speakers agree on the importance of connecting the unconnected, they propose different technological solutions: expanding traditional networks, satellite-to-cell phone communications, and low-Earth-orbit satellite broadband.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of disagreement revolve around the specific technological approaches to achieve universal connectivity and digital inclusion.

Disagreement level

The level of disagreement among speakers is relatively low. Most speakers agree on the overall goals of digital inclusion and leveraging technology for sustainable development. The differences mainly lie in the specific approaches or focus areas each speaker emphasizes. This level of disagreement is not likely to hinder progress towards the shared goals, but rather encourages a diverse range of solutions to address the complex challenges of digital transformation.

Partial Agreements

Partial Agreements

Both speakers agree on the importance of digital inclusion, but Granryd focuses on hardware affordability while Burns emphasizes the need for ethical education in technology.

Mats Granryd

Christopher Burns

Affordable smartphones are key to bridging the digital divide

The Responsible Computing Challenge aims to embed ethics in tech education

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers emphasize the importance of Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) for development, while stressing the need for proper implementation with safeguards and capacity building.

Esther Dweck

Achim Steiner

DPI enables efficient government services and financial inclusion

DPI must be implemented with proper safeguards and participatory processes

DPI requires commitment, capital, and capacity building

Takeaways

Key Takeaways

Universal digital connectivity is crucial, with 2.6 billion people still unconnected

Digital inclusion requires both infrastructure and skills development, especially for underserved populations

AI and digital technologies have significant potential for sustainable development and social impact

Digital public infrastructure (DPI) is essential for efficient government services and financial inclusion, but must be implemented with proper safeguards

Emerging technologies like exoskeletons, blockchain, and AI can address critical social and environmental challenges

Resolutions and Action Items

Expand satellite-based internet connectivity to reach unconnected populations

Integrate digital literacy into national education curricula

Develop AI solutions for disaster preparedness and environmental protection

Implement digital public infrastructure with safeguards to protect rights and prevent exclusion

Increase investment in digital skills training, especially for women and youth

Create partnerships between governments, private sector, and civil society to advance digital inclusion

Unresolved Issues

How to ensure AI development benefits the Global South and doesn’t exacerbate existing inequalities

Balancing rapid technological advancement with necessary regulatory frameworks and ethical considerations

Addressing potential job displacement due to AI and automation in developing countries

Ensuring data privacy and security in the implementation of digital public infrastructure

How to make cutting-edge technologies like exoskeletons widely accessible and affordable

Suggested Compromises

Collaborate across sectors and countries to develop inclusive AI solutions that respect local contexts

Balance rapid digital transformation with careful implementation of safeguards and regulations

Invest in both digital infrastructure and skills development simultaneously to ensure meaningful connectivity

Develop open-source and affordable technologies to make digital solutions more accessible to developing countries

Thought Provoking Comments

Can we harness this technology beyond war zones and natural disasters? Can we finally close the digital divide?

Speaker

Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub

Reason

This rhetorical question challenges participants to think bigger about applying emergency connectivity solutions to everyday life.

Impact

It shifted the conversation from reactive emergency measures to proactive, widespread connectivity initiatives.

Satellite-to-cell phone communications is a game-changer. By combining space-based networks and terrestrial wireless networks, both can accomplish more together than either can do on its own.

Speaker

Jessica Rosenworcel

Reason

This insight highlights a innovative technological approach to bridging the digital divide.

Impact

It introduced a new dimension to the connectivity discussion, prompting consideration of hybrid terrestrial-satellite solutions.

We need to focus on creating an environment where the basics of technology are met so that quantum technologies can be used to benefit all.

Speaker

Emma Theophilus

Reason

This comment emphasizes the importance of foundational digital infrastructure before pursuing advanced technologies.

Impact

It grounded the discussion in practical realities while still maintaining a vision for future technological advancements.

To fully realise digital transformation in the public sector could unlock over $3.5 trillion annually, according to a study by McKinsey. Yet, despite significant investments, 70% of civil servants still lack digital capabilities.

Speaker

Tawfik Jelassi

Reason

This comment provides concrete data on both the potential benefits and current challenges of digital transformation in government.

Impact

It shifted the focus to the importance of digital skills training and capacity building in the public sector.

As we lay the foundations of a digital future, we must ensure that this future is equitable, inclusive, and peaceful.

Speaker

Lazarus Chakwera

Reason

This statement emphasizes the ethical imperatives alongside technological progress.

Impact

It broadened the discussion beyond technical solutions to include social and ethical considerations in digital development.

Overall Assessment

These key comments shaped the discussion by consistently emphasizing the dual challenges of expanding digital access and ensuring that access is equitable, inclusive, and beneficial to all. The speakers moved from identifying the scale of the problem to proposing innovative technological solutions, while also highlighting the need for policy frameworks, skills development, and ethical considerations. This created a comprehensive dialogue that addressed both the technical and human aspects of creating a digital future for all.

2.6 billion people are unconnected. a digital future for all can only be possible if access to connectivity is universal and affordable.

Speaker

Sade Baderinwa

Reason

This comment frames the central challenge and goal of the entire discussion, highlighting the massive scale of the digital divide.

Impact

It set the tone for the subsequent speakers to address how to overcome this divide through various technological and policy solutions.

Follow-up Questions

How can we ensure AI reaches and serves the global South?

Speaker

Brad Smith

Explanation

This is crucial to prevent the digital divide from becoming an AI divide and to ensure equitable access to AI’s benefits globally.

How can we create strong collaborations to reach everyone, everywhere with digital technologies?

Speaker

Achim Steiner

Explanation

Collaboration is essential to ensure universal access to digital technologies and their benefits.

How can we lower the cost of smartphones to under $20 in the least-developed countries?

Speaker

Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub

Explanation

Affordable devices are crucial for bridging the digital divide and enabling access to digital services.

How can we ensure proper safeguards are in place for digital public infrastructure?

Speaker

Achim Steiner

Explanation

Safeguards are essential to protect user rights, ensure inclusivity, and build trust in digital systems.

How can we integrate responsible computing into technology and computer science curricula globally?

Speaker

Christopher Burns

Explanation

This is important to ensure future technologists consider the full impacts of their products and services on society.

How can we address the potential job displacement and inequality caused by AI in the global South?

Speaker

Robert Muggah

Explanation

This is crucial to mitigate the negative impacts of AI on employment and economic inequality in developing countries.

How can we ensure everyone has the ability to evaluate AI systems for their specific contexts and needs?

Speaker

Rumman Chowdhury

Explanation

This is important to ensure AI systems are appropriate and beneficial for diverse global contexts and cultures.

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed.

YouthLead: Inclusive digital future for all

YouthLead: Inclusive digital future for all

Session at a Glance

Summary

This discussion focused on creating an inclusive digital future, addressing the digital divide, and empowering youth through technology. Speakers emphasized the importance of bridging digital gaps, particularly for marginalized communities and developing countries. They highlighted the need for universal internet access, digital literacy, and affordable devices to ensure equal opportunities in the digital age.

The conversation touched on the potential of AI and emerging technologies to drive innovation and sustainable development, while also acknowledging associated risks such as bias and privacy concerns. Speakers stressed the importance of responsible AI development that reflects diverse cultures and languages.

Government representatives shared initiatives to engage youth in digital policymaking and foster innovation. The importance of intergenerational cooperation and mentorship was emphasized to nurture young leaders in the tech sector. Speakers also discussed the role of space technology in expanding connectivity and the need for policies that support innovative solutions.

The discussion highlighted the critical role of education in closing the digital divide, with examples of peer learning platforms and initiatives to improve digital skills. Intellectual property rights were addressed as a means to empower youth innovation and entrepreneurship.

Throughout the session, there was a strong emphasis on youth leadership and inclusion in shaping digital policies and technologies. Speakers called for greater representation of young voices in decision-making processes and the development of digital solutions that address local needs. The discussion concluded with a reminder of the challenges faced by youth in conflict zones and a call for inclusive thinking in technological development.

Keypoints

Major discussion points:

– The need to bridge the digital divide and ensure inclusive access to technology, especially for youth in underserved areas

– The importance of engaging and empowering youth in digital policymaking and governance

– Leveraging AI and emerging technologies responsibly to advance sustainable development goals

– Promoting digital skills, literacy and innovation among young people

– Addressing ethical challenges like AI bias and online safety

Overall purpose:

The discussion aimed to explore how to create an inclusive, equitable and youth-led digital future that harnesses technology to achieve sustainable development while addressing challenges like the digital divide.

Tone:

The tone was largely optimistic and forward-looking, with speakers emphasizing the potential for youth to drive positive change through technology. There was also a sense of urgency about the need to act quickly to shape an inclusive digital future. The tone became more somber at the very end when conflicts and hardships faced by youth in some regions were highlighted.

Speakers

Moderators/Facilitators:

– Moderator: Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla, Major Group of Children and Youth, Science Policy, Tech Focal Point

Speakers:

Sara Sabry – First Female African Astronaut; Executive Director of Deep Space Initiative

Melissa Michelle Munoz Suro – ITU Secretary General’s Youth Advisory Board, GDirector of Innovation at the Government Office of Information and Communication Technologies of the Dominican Republic

Zubair Junjunia – Social Entrepreneur and founder of ZNotes and UNDP & Samsung Generation17 Young Leader 

Mohamed Orman Bangura – Minister of Youth Affairs, Sierra Leone

Eylul Ercin – Global Teen Advisor, Girl Up, United Nations Foundation

Hamza Hameed – ITU SG Youth Advisory board member; Senior Practice Manager for Space & Connectivity, Access Partnership Singapore

Emra Mian – Director General for Digital Technologies and Telecom, UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology

Yurii Romashko – CEO of the think tank Institute of Analytics and Advocacy

Daniella Darlington – ITU Secretary General’s Youth Advisory Board member

Anatola Araba – Artist, futurist, and award-winning filmmaker

Doreen Bogdan-Martin – ITU Secretary General

Nchimunuya Munyama – CEO at Netagrow Technologies

Marcos Athias Neto – Assistant Administrator and Director, for Bureau for Policy and Programme Support (BPPS) UNDP

Clara Brown – Observer Constituency Representative, UNFCCC

Edward Kwakwa – Assistant Director General, Global Challenges and Partnerships Sector, WIPO

Priscilla Efe Johnson – Founder of XariAfrica Academy and UNDP & Samsung Generation17 Young Leader 

Tayma Abdalhadi – Innovator of User-centric, Digital Solutions

Areas of expertise cover digital inclusion, AI, space technology, youth empowerment, sustainable development, innovation, and intellectual property rights.

Full session report

Expanded Summary of Discussion on Creating an Inclusive Digital Future

Introduction

This discussion brought together a diverse group of speakers, including youth leaders, government officials, and representatives from international organisations, to explore the creation of an inclusive digital future. The conversation centred on addressing the digital divide, empowering youth through technology, and leveraging emerging technologies for sustainable development. Throughout the session, there was a strong emphasis on youth leadership and inclusion in shaping digital policies and technologies, with the audience repeatedly affirming their desire for a “youth-led” digital future.

Key Themes and Discussion Points

1. Bridging the Digital Divide

A primary focus of the discussion was the persistent digital divide and its disproportionate impact on youth and marginalised communities. Speakers highlighted various aspects of this divide:

– Infrastructure gaps: Emra Mian emphasised the limited connectivity and access to devices in underserved areas.

– Digital skills gap: The need to improve digital literacy and skills, especially for youth, was stressed.

– Gender gap: Doreen Bogdan-Martin pointed out the disproportionate impact on women and girls.

– Rural-urban divide: Clara Brown highlighted the lack of access in rural and remote areas.

– Economic barriers: Yurii Romashko discussed the high costs of devices and internet access.

While there was consensus on the existence and importance of the digital divide, speakers differed in their emphasis on specific aspects. This suggests a need for multifaceted approaches to address the issue comprehensively.

2. Youth Empowerment in Digital Policymaking

The discussion strongly advocated for increased youth representation and empowerment in digital policymaking:

– Youth representation: Mohamed Bangura stressed the need for youth voices in digital policymaking.

– Mentorship: Doreen Bogdan-Martin highlighted the importance of intergenerational cooperation and guidance through initiatives like ITU’s Generation Connect movement.

– Youth innovation: Marcos Athias Neto emphasised supporting youth-led digital solutions and entrepreneurship, mentioning UNDP’s Youth CoLab program.

– Youth engagement: Creating opportunities for youth participation in governance was discussed, including the importance of voting as mentioned by ASG Marcos Neto.

– Youth advisory boards: The involvement of youth in shaping digital strategies was proposed.

3. Space Technology and Innovation

A significant portion of the discussion focused on the role of space technology in creating an inclusive digital future:

– Satellite connectivity: Hamza Hameed discussed using lower earth orbit satellites to bridge digital divides in remote areas.

– Global perspective: Sara Sabry, the first Egyptian astronaut, shared her unique viewpoint on global interconnectedness from space, noting that “From space there are no lines separating countries, no divisions between people.”

– Innovation potential: Speakers explored how space technology could drive innovation and contribute to sustainable development goals.

4. Digital Innovation for Sustainable Development

The potential of digital innovation to drive sustainable development was a key theme:

– AI for social good: Clara Brown explored leveraging AI to address global challenges.

– Digital entrepreneurship: Supporting youth-led digital businesses was emphasised.

– Localised solutions: Priscilla Efe Johnson stressed customising digital innovations for specific community needs.

– Intellectual property: Edward Kwakwa discussed WIPO’s initiatives to make IP rights more accessible to young innovators.

5. Mentorship and Tools for Innovation

Rather than focusing solely on formal education, the discussion emphasized the importance of mentorship and providing tools for innovation:

– Peer learning: Examples of peer learning platforms were shared.

– Innovation tools: Nchimunuya Munyama emphasized the need to provide tools for innovation to young people in underserved areas.

– Customised approaches: The need for tailored digital skills programmes was discussed.

6. Artistic Representation of the Digital Future

Anatola Araba’s performance provided an artistic perspective on the digital future, emphasizing themes of connectivity, innovation, and youth empowerment. This creative element added depth to the discussion and highlighted the importance of diverse forms of expression in envisioning the future.

Conclusion and Future Directions

The discussion concluded with Priscilla Efe Johnson and Tayma Abdalhadi emphasizing the need for inclusive thinking and remembering youth in conflict zones. Key takeaways included:

1. The need for multifaceted approaches to address the digital divide.

2. The importance of youth empowerment and inclusion in digital policymaking.

3. The potential of space technology and digital innovation to contribute to sustainable development goals.

4. The necessity of localised and customised digital solutions.

5. The value of mentorship and providing tools for innovation.

Suggested action items included implementing the ITU’s IP Youth Empowerment Strategy, scaling up promising youth-led digital solutions, and developing modern tech policies to accelerate innovative technologies like lower earth orbit satellites for connectivity.

The discussion also touched on the Global Digital Compact, highlighting its importance in shaping the future of digital governance. The overall tone was optimistic and forward-looking, with a sense of urgency about the need to act quickly to shape an inclusive digital future. The diverse perspectives shared by the speakers, informed by a consultation process described by Yurii Romashko, highlighted the complexity of the challenges ahead, but also the wealth of innovative ideas and commitment to creating a more equitable digital world.

Session Transcript

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator): So, thank you so much for being here. That was an excellent, excellent session. Thank you so much to the gender session for setting the context. We request and invite everyone in the room to please take a seat. We will get started with our digital session. We will focus on a lot of interesting things and we have an amazing panel of experts and speakers lined up for the session. Again, maybe start to move and center yourself and find a spot to sit down and we’ll get the show started. Thank you.

Official Summit Video: In our accelerating digital age, incredible opportunities exist. But many young people continue to face major barriers. Poor connectivity, a lack of digital skills and limited access to devices are just some of the challenges that deepen the digital divide and prevent young people from sharing their voices. From participating in the digital economy and from accessing vital resources. As technologies evolve, new digital risks emerge, including online safety, security and privacy, misinformation, deep fakes, tech-facilitated gender-based violence and the mental health toll of social media. So, what kind of digital future do we want? How can we minimize these risks while harnessing the power of digital technology to build an inclusive, safe and equitable digital world for all? Young people are navigating these questions and shaping the digital future today.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator):  Awesome, nothing like an AI-generated video to kick off the digital session. Thank you so much again for being here today. We appreciate your presence. And again, it was a real. important question. How many of you paid attention to the video? Raise your hand because there were a lot of people moving around. What kind of digital future do we want? And the goal is youth led. I know we’re halfway through the session for today. I’m gonna scream what kind of digital future do we want and I want to hear back youth led. What kind of digital future do we want? That was pretty good. I thought I would have to do a second time. Thank you so much again. Again, as the video has shared, the digital revolution is an unprecedented opportunity for global development and connectivity. But it also highlights a lot of inequalities. The previous session did touch upon them and we will explore them much more deeply in the context of digital divide. Furthermore, exclusion from digital technology policymaking sidelines youth voices and documents and policies and frameworks that define the future of digital cooperation on various levels often miss that youth engagement component. The Global Digital Compact, which we will hopefully agree on in the next 48 hours, is an agreement that aims to establish a framework for a secure, free, and open digital future. There are six main objectives for the Global Digital Compact and I know many of you are really aware and well-versed in the document, but for those who are joining us for the first time, the objectives are closing all digital divides and accelerating progress across the sustainable development goals. Expand inclusion in and benefits for the digital economy for all. Foster an inclusive, open, safe, and secure digital space that respects, protects, and promotes human rights. Advance responsible, equitable, and interoperable data governance approaches. Enhance international governance of artificial intelligence for the benefit of all. And then there’s a lot of follow-up and mechanisms and reviews that we will also explore more. But when we talk about digital and AI, something that a lot of people do not think about is how digital is enabling space. And how many of you wanted to be an astronaut when you were growing up? Raise your hand. No? I had dreams of being an astronaut till I found out I had glasses in my seventh grade. But here we have today someone who is inspiring and who has done it. She thought about it and done it, did it. We have the first female African astronaut. Her ability to discuss the themes of future space and sustainability will set the agenda for today and how we can explore more on the topics of digital and AI divide and what the future can potentially look like. I would like to invite onto the stage the CEO of Deep Space Initiative and the first Egyptian astronaut, Sara Sabry.

Sara Sabry: Distinguished guests, esteemed leaders, and fellow citizens of the world. My name is Sara Sabry. I am proud to stand before you today as the first Egyptian astronaut and the first Arab woman and the first woman from the African continent to go to space. I’ve had the rare privilege of seeing our planet from a perspective that few experience. A vantage point that transcends borders, cultures, and divisions. From space there are no lines separating countries, no divisions between people. They’re just one earth, our shared home. And it is more interconnected, more united, and more hopeful than we often realize. But here on the ground I’ve seen something very different. As a woman from Africa and the Middle East, I have witnessed firsthand the devastating impact of oppression and injustice. From gender inequality, to suppression of free speech, to the denial of basic human rights. These are challenges that people in my region and around the world confront every single day. Too often it is the most vulnerable, especially women and children, who bear the brunt of these struggles. But there is hope. Because we, the people of this world, have the power to change these realities. But hope is not a passive emotion, it is an act of choice. It is the belief that the future is in our hands and that the problems we face, no matter how overwhelming, are solvable. As an engineer, I always approach problems by breaking them down into manageable parts. It’s how I design solutions, step-by-step, piece-by-piece. And this is how we must approach our biggest challenges facing humanity today. Whether it’s protecting human rights or confronting climate change, we can and we must solve these issues one step at a time. Let me tell you about the view from space. From up there, you see Earth as it truly is. A single living organism covered by a thin blue line, the atmosphere, that protects us all. It’s so fragile, yet incredibly powerful. Just like our own role on this planet. Fragile, but capable of immense impact. Climate change is a direct threat to that thin blue line, to the very system that sustains life on Earth. And though the problem seems enormous, the solution is within our grasp. But it starts with us, with the choices we make every day, and the actions we demand from our leaders. I stand here as part of a generation that refuses to accept a broken world. Young people today are not just calling for change, we are leading it. We are pushing for justice, for equality, for the rights of every person to be respected. We are fighting for this Earth, knowing that it is not just a fight for nature, but a fight for humanity’s future. We understand that these issues, human rights, environmental protection, equality, are not separate struggles. They are all part of the same mission, to build a future where every person can thrive. Each of us has a role to play. No matter where you come from, no matter what position you hold, or the resources you have, we have a responsibility to act. And if we work together, we can address these problems step by step. It starts with breaking them down and focusing on solutions. We have the ability to dismantle oppression, protect human rights, and reverse the tide of climate change, but only if we choose to act now. As the first Egyptian, the first Arab woman, and the first African woman to travel to space, I am living proof that barriers can be broken. Change is possible. Our world is more interconnected than we think, and our actions ripple across borders. The challenges we face may be great, but so is our capacity for innovation, resilience, and hope. We can choose hope. We can choose action. We can create the future we deserve, one where human rights are upheld, one where the Earth is protected, and where no one is left behind. Let us take responsibility for this planet. Let us protect the thin blue line that shields us. And let us unite in our shared mission to safeguard the rights and future of all people. Thank you.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator): Thank you so much, Sara. I think it’s truly important for us to recognize that the digital divide is not a phenomenon that is an isolated event. It exists because of the broken systems and structures that exist within our society. And it’s also really important to understand the role of government’s policy and education in bridging this digital divide. Our next two speakers are going to be talking about government perspectives on digital and AI divide, and how education and skills can be a key to bridging the digital divide. I want to invite onto the stage Ms. Melissa Michelle Munoz-Suro, who is on the ITU Secretary General’s Youth Advisory Board, and is also on the Government Office for ICT in the Dominican Republic. And also Zubair Junjunia, who is the founder of Z-Notes, and also a Generation 17 youth leader. Melissa and Zubair, the stage is yours.

Melissa Michelle Munoz Suro: When I was 25, I found myself standing in a room full of policymakers, developers, designers tasked with a monumental responsibility, leading the development of the Dominican Republic national AI strategy. The first one in Latin America, Central America, and the Caribbean. And I knew this was much bigger than me. It wasn’t just about policy or technology, it was about the future of millions of Dominicans who were left behind in the digital age. You see, 2.6 billion people around the world are still not connected. While we’re here talking about the latest AI breakthroughs, the vast part of the world is just struggling to lock on. I was 19 when I first entered the public sector, and I saw right in front of me all the challenges our community faced. Rural areas without internet, studying without access to digital education, or even electricity. And it was clear to me that this digital and AI divide was not just a technical issue, but a social one. I believe that digital transformation wasn’t just for Silicon Valley or Beijing, it has to be for everyone, from my home country to the most remote communities on the planet. And how do we bridge this divide? One powerful answer is you. In my work, I have seen how my team of 33 young people bring creativity, passion, and perspective into policymaking. That’s why, for example, we launched initiatives like Semillero Digital, where we’re turning 100 young people who were neither studying or working into skilled developers ready to shape the future of AI in the Dominican Republic. We have the opportunities to use AI to enhance education, drive economic growth, and solve the environmental challenges, but AI will only be as good as the data we fit into it. If the training data, the languages, and the perspective behind AI are biased or incomplete, we risk developing an AI system that… and amplify these biases. The DRAI strategy is a bold commitment to regional integration in Latin America with a clear message. AI will be regional or it will not be. Everything we develop will be in and on Spanish with our scientists, ensuring that AI reflects all culture. To build responsible AI, we must focus on inclusion, not just in theory, but in real concrete ways. The UN has unique capacity to champion what I call AI inclusion. And this means including our data, our problems, our language in the development of AI. The AI for Good Summit show AI’s potential to face the global challenges. But for success, we need standards and interoperability. At the UN’s AI Governance Day, the work set the foundation for responsible AI. AI need of creating guidelines, UN values, and support for developing skills in developing countries. In AI governance, we are still focused on regulation, but the world is starting to ask what now? It’s not enough to regulate, we need to implement AI that truly benefits everyone. My message is clear. Young leaders, make me sure this future isn’t just driven by technology, it’s driven by people. Thank you.

Zubair Junjunia: 10 years ago, I chose not to accept the status quo, the uneven playing of education. Everyone has a right to access quality education. And at the age of 16, in my own small way, I wanted to make a difference. And I started a website, ZNotes, to share my own study notes. Today, ZNotes is the world’s largest peer learning community that has reached over five and a half million students in 190 countries. And it is thanks to thousands of young people who have joined this as a global movement. Our community powered learning platform has proven to improve students’ self-efficacy, their sense of global citizenship, and their willingness to contribute towards social development. And it leverages three of our greatest assets in our fight against educational inequality. Number one, the power of youth. Young people are not just passive beneficiaries, and we need to flip the script. Empower them to be agents of change, to be creators of education, to be proponents of education, and you can see the difference that happens. The power of community. Many of you will remember learning from each other after break, after school, in coffee shops. Peer learning is proven to be an incredible way of improving academic learning outcomes. And the third one, the power of technology. We have the opportunity to learn from the best teachers, from accessing cutting-edge research, and connect with others across the globe. Emerging technologies like AI are now having the opportunity to personalize learning, empower educators, and enable inclusive learning assessments. And so, it is more important than ever before in our fight against educational inequality that we think about the barrier of the digital divide. To our heads of states convening next week, an inclusive digital world is integral to an inclusive global society. Thank you.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator):  Thank you, Melissa and Zubair. And I think I want to touch upon something that they both mentioned, is that we live in a world that has significantly changed over the last two decades. There are many things that are the same. We’re still fighting against those same things, but the context has changed. And with the change in the context, we need new leaders. AI policy, digital policy, cannot have young people as participants. We need youth leaders in digital and AI governance and policy plans. With that, it is my pleasure to invite… on our first panelists who are expert speakers and representatives from government. I would like to invite Minister Mohamed Orman Bangura from the Minister of Youth from Sierra Leone. Eylul Ercin, who is a youth leader, AI developer, and global teen advisor at GirlUp. Hamza Hameed, lawyer, Access Partnership, and a member of the ITU Secretary General’s Youth Advisory Board. And Dr. Emra Mian, who is the Director General for Digital Technologies and Telecom, Department for Science, Innovation, and Technology UK. Please, a round of applause for our panelists. Thank you so much again for joining us today, and we appreciate the different perspectives you bring. My first question is for His Excellency Mohamed Bangura. Can you share any examples of how Sierra Leone is empowering young people through digital inclusion policies and initiatives? What role do you believe governments, particularly in low-income countries, should play in closing that digital divide?

Mohamed Bangura: Yeah, thank you very much. As a government, I was blessed to serve under the presidency of retired Brigadier General Smotherbill six, seven years ago. And one thing we believe governments everywhere, especially in low-income countries, should do is that the presidency has to believe in young people. I happened to serve in a government that he was head of state at 28, and he left, he came back after 20 years, happens to be a president. And the first time of his service, which I served before, I was appointed as minister at 32. He, our flagship program happens to be human capital that says you feed the brain, you feed the tummy, try to be very healthy. And the presidency has to be deliberate in digital investment and believe in young people. That’s because of the youth bulge, government leadership has to be deliberative in bringing young people at the table. one of the youngest cabinets, you have a Minister of Foreign Affairs, 33, you have a Minister of Communication and Innovation, 27, Chief Minister, Dr. David Sengeh, happens to be around 36, 37, and it’s deliberate that government has to believe in young people, and by so doing, for you to enable young people to reach their potential, you bring them on the table. Innovation technology, the Presidency also believes that our current challenges, our current problems can only be solved by innovation and technology. As a result of that, he appointed a Chief Minister, a Chief Innovation Officer from MIT, Dr. Sengeh, who happens to be a Minister of Basic Education, and now he’s the Chief Minister. The Chief Minister is like the Prime Minister of a country. And deliberately, he also created a space, Directorate of Science and Technology, under his Presidency, that he supervised directly. And that notwithstanding, he created a Ministry of Communication and Innovation, appointed a young lady at the age of 27, to ensure that she leads that area. So, from the area of government, what we believe is that young people, I mean, they’re not asking for favor, they’re in the majority. I remember creating the space for every young individual from achievement level, district level, national level, they should be at the center of every stage. And when you’re serving in cabinets, you should ensure that you don’t see young people as coming for your job. It’s like you’re just creating the space to ensure that they have access to the Presidency. It’s as a result of that, every year we have what we call the Tech Summit. You bring innovators, you bring young people, you bring the Presidency, you bring entrepreneurs, you bring potential investors in the youth space, in the digital space, to meet and discuss the challenges, solutions, and how do they want it to be. So what we believe as a government is that women, especially female youth, should not just be at the back end, they should also reach at the cabinet area. So the only way we believe that things will change, having more young people in cabinet, especially more women, we’ll have the GIBI Act that says every position, parliament, appointment, should be 30 percent. The last cabinet before this, we have the Safe Abortion Bill, which was presented by the Minister of Health, Deputy Minister of Health, Dr. Angelika, to possibly just 28 years. So we still believe that young people should be at the center, young people should be role model, and they should be given the space by the presidency, and every facet, they should be the key decision-making table.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator): I appreciate that message a lot. And everybody here has heard it. You need to run for parliament. And taking the insights from you, you shared, young women also need to be a leader, leadership positions, and kind of share their message. And we have a young female leader on our panel. Elul, can you share a little bit about how AI both promises solutions and presents risks for the marginalized communities? And what do you think are some of the most pressing ethical, technical challenges facing young people in digital age? And don’t on the hat of if you were the parliamentarian, and you could wave a magic wand.

Eylul Ercin: Thank you for this question. That’s really great and really current. I think we’ve been seeing more and more on the news about legislation regarding AI, and it’s gaining momentum, especially discussions around privacy concerns or ownership of intellectual property. Something that I want to emphasize, an issue that I think goes relatively unnoticed is biased data sets that lead to biased algorithms. I’m going to try to demonstrate with an example. So there is a case where Amazon actually stopped using a discontinued hiring algorithm because they discovered after a while that the algorithm was favoring certain words on resumes that were used more commonly, overwhelmingly more commonly by men, like executed. Certain algorithms that feed on data sets can lead to the amplification of existing inequalities. But that is not to say that we want to kind of, you know, stop with what we’re doing with AI because actually there is so much more potential to it. So it’s a blank canvas, basically. It’s not evil inherently. It’s just what we teach it. So if we use AI the way we want it to be, if we feed data sets to it that are inclusive and diverse, then AI holds so much potential for the future.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator): Thank you so much. And I think it’s really important to understand who is the creators, who are the creators and who is influencing the creators. And I think I was talking to Dr. Emra a little bit about AI and everything, and something that he brought up was it’s important to focus on emerging technologies, but many in the world also lack access. We need to simultaneously talk about how do we get more research in emerging technologies, but also focus on bridging the digital divide simultaneously because this is a once in a lifetime movement and point for us to change the course. Dr. Emra, and given this context, what are some of the most persistent digital divides for you that you’ve observed from the government perspective? Can you share some impactful initiatives that the UK government has supported to engage young people in digital policymaking?

Emra Mian: Sure, thanks very much. I mean, first of all, just to say that I think a lot of what’s been said in the last few minutes about AI and data, I think there’s a lot there to reflect on and a lot there for us to act on in concert. Just three other things that I wanted to pull out very quickly. I think first is the point that you’ve just introduced about digital infrastructure. An inclusive digital future for all will be hampered if people don’t have equal access to high quality digital infrastructure. And in the UK, this manifests itself with young people who grow up in rural or remote areas not having that access. But even sometimes in urban areas where you might only be a few streets away from very high quality digital infrastructure, but where you live, perhaps because people may have lower incomes, you don’t have that same access. This is something that we’re acting on within the UK, but I think this is clearly something we need to act on in lots of other places and in concert as well. The second thing I just wanted to very quickly pull out was the way in which we also need to improve digital skills, and that’s such an important part of inclusivity. And again, this is something that government, business, and civil society can act together on. In fact, some of the very effective ways in which people learn digital skills online is when they’re trying to do things that a commercial provider is doing. So a lot of people’s knowledge about and confidence of doing things online comes from, for example, making or receiving payments. And so financial institutions have got a responsibility here alongside governments and civil society. And then the third thing I just wanted very quickly to mention is online safety. I think we face a real risk that people who are not safe online will retreat from these digital spaces, and for that reason, we will fail to have an inclusive digital future. Government clearly has a role here in terms of regulation. Civil society has a role here in terms of showing where people are not safe and helping to bring transparency to that. And clearly businesses, including technology companies, have a responsibility here to ensure that their spaces are as safe as possible.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator): Thank you so much. And again, it’s so interesting you share that message because for many in the room who are young people, they’ve had pictures taken of them from the moment they started walking. And there’s albums and albums of pictures, and all of that is data. And what happens when the digital space that you are born into doesn’t feel like you belong there, where do you go? And a lot of you mentioned a lot of those themes. Hamza, as a lawyer, I’m gonna ask on you to kind of tie the knots on the different themes we’ve heard here. From your perspective, how can innovative technologies bridge the digital divide with support from policy, but also ensure that perspectives from underserved communities are represented?

Hamza Hameed: Thanks a lot for that question, and a big thank you to all the facilitators of the Action Days for organizing this fantastic occasion and dialogue. Look, imagine a young mind brimming with ideas and thoughts and not being able to express them or share them with anyone simply because of a lack of internet. Now, this is reality for approximately 2.6 billion people all around the world, more than 50% of whom are young people. So 1.3 billion young people around the world don’t have access to good internet or internet at all to be able to really share their voices online. I think bridging the digital divide isn’t just about access to technology, it’s really about empowering young people to come online, share their voices, and shape their futures, whether that be through access to education, whether that be access to healthcare, or whether that be the ability to set up a business. I think a lot of my work revolves around promoting space technology and connectivity through space, and I think innovative technologies like that present a fantastic opportunity to bridge the digital divide and contribute to connecting more and more people to the internet. Organizations like the ITU play a critical role here by setting standards and facilitating multilateral dialogue to really get these people on the internet and to enable policymakers to put in place policies and regulations that are conducive to innovation and facilitate growth and connectivity for all. I think new technologies, for example, the rise of lower earth orbit satellites that provide internet where terrestrial networks have to. traditionally not been able to provide it, have already illustrated and connected people in the most remote parts of the world. And it’s really important for policymakers to develop modern tech policies that can accelerate the development and implementation of these innovative technologies. Space technologies like this not only help with connectivity but also promote remote sensing and disaster management, whether that be precision farming or other innovative activities that allow young people to grow their livelihoods and be more expressive online. I think bridging that digital divide will be a concerted effort. And for that, I encourage all policymakers, especially those that are here in this room today, to really think about the progressive and innovative policies that they need to put in place to bring these technologies to the people who need them the most so that we can promote and shape a more inclusive, equitable, and sustainable digital future for all. Thanks.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator): Thank you so much, Hamza. And a round of applause for our expert panelists. Thank you so much for your messages. We appreciate it. And you’ve seen it here first. Member states and youth are on the same page. And hopefully we’ll see more of that as the pad continues. Thank you so much for joining us. And as a part of the consultation for today’s session, I know many of you are watching live on the UN Web TV. As a part of the consultation planning and design of this session, we organized a consultation with various UN entities supported by the UN Youth Office, the ITU, UNDP, UNFPA, WIPO, and the Major Group for Children and Youth. And I would like to invite Yurii Romashko, who is a Generation 17 leader and the CEO of the Institute of Analytics and Advocacy to present a summary of the consultations and to represent you all watching live.

Yurii Romashko: Today, there are thousands of young leaders from all of the world here. Not everybody was able to join the summit in person. To ensure that voices of young people are heard, a global informal consultations on youth lead and inclusive digital future was open from the 3rd to 9th of September. A total of 100 global contributors joined the consultations from around the world and shared their experience. So I have the special and honorable mission to be the voice of youth and present the key takeaways from the consultations which you can see on the screen. Youth accurately identify the main barriers in accessing digital technologies among which limited infrastructure, limited digital literacy, high cost of devices and internet access. Therefore global effort and collective action are needed for universal use digital connectivity. This connectivity must provide inclusive technologies that ensure fair access for all young people to use them in a fair way. This is important because IA and technologies are essential to make a real chance to advance global goals. In this global context policy actors must engage in accessible dialogue with young people and amplify youth voices in decision-making. This requires implementation of decision-making structures at all levels for greater involvement of young people. To accelerate progress it’s necessary to focus policies on closing the digital divide and integrate digital literacy into education systems. All of this can provide extraordinary opportunities for youth driven digital innovations and sustainable development in communities. And last but not least to build just safe and inclusive artificial intelligence systems requires youth inclusion, access, transparency and governance leadership. Thank you.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator): Thank You Yuri. And, again, as we’ve all heard, space does not necessarily mean the only way you get engaged with space is to be an astronaut, and we wanted to hear what you all think about what space is and technologies are and AI is. I would like to invite Daniella Darlington, who is a responsible AI leader and also a member of the ITU Secretary General, to share some perspectives about young people that she’s heard about space and AI.

Daniella Esi Darlington: Distinguished guests, fellow advocates for youth empowerment, and digital innovators. So ahead of International Youth Day, ITU, UNDISA, IGF, and UN Habitats conducted a series of quizzes with input from the Youth Advisory Board and other youth groups on space, technology, AI, and sustainable development. Now, let me invite you into the minds of the 270 young people surveyed. While questions on AI, digital divide, among others, garnered significant interest, space technology received lower interest. So according to our survey, while 95% of youth actually felt that they are more connected than ever before, only 66% could identify where the biggest digital gaps exist. Imagine a young person in a hyper-connected urban center, unaware that their fellow peers lack access to basic internet. In fact, 77% of our responders correctly understood this gap. Now consider in Africa, only 53% of youth aged between 15 and 24 are connected online, compared to a staggering 98% in Europe. This stark contrast is even more pronounced when looking at the overall population. We found a high level of awareness. among youth regarding AI and its ethical implications. An impressive 100% of the responders recognized key ethical principles in AI development among others. However, it appears that young people are unaware of how space technologies can contribute to combating hunger, with only 62% making the connection in the survey. It appears that the full potential of space data and in combating hunger among others is not known. This lack of awareness is a missed opportunity for innovation, so what do we do with this information? Our call to action is simple. Let’s bridge not just the digital divide, but the awareness divide. Let’s empower our youth, not just with the technology, but with the digital skills to solve global problems. The next breakthrough in climate action, the next breakthrough in sustainable development or agriculture, the next innovation in disaster resilience is not in a satellite or service. It’s in the minds of our youth, ready to be unlocked. Distinguished leaders, we’ve connected our youth to the world, now it’s time to connect them to its future. Thank you.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator): Thank you so much, Daniela. I feel like time is just disappearing as we hear to all these amazing expert speakers. It’s like tiny pills of knowledge that are being sent your way. It’s really important when we’re talking about digital AI, technology, infrastructure, to also recognize that all of these technologies are the end of the day human experience. And what else, if nothing, art that talks about the human experience most. And I’m privileged to invite an amazing filmmaker, futurist, Anatola Araba, who has collaborated with me. collaborated with another amazing cinematographer and advocate Malik Malik Afegbua on a performance that you’re about to experience now, and I will say it this will be a treat for your eyes and ears Anatola

Anatola Araba: Hello Thank you for joining me for a brief creative interlude this poem is about the UN’s sustainable development goals and whether we will reach them by 2030 and The importance of each voice in shaping the future. It was written by me Anatola Araba with visuals by Malik Afegbua, so please enjoy Please Keep your arms and legs inside the vehicle because we are about to embark on a journey where no one has gone before Where you may ask to the future, of course My name is Anatola and I’ll be your conductor on this enchanting voyage Thank you for choosing the quantum Express the only train that travels through space and time to visit our possible shared futures Sound like science fiction Allow me to explain You see the one thing about the future is that it’s not a physical place rather the future exists as a spectrum of possibilities And every action that we take sends a ripple effect into that spectrum, shaping the timelines of tomorrow. Anyways, seatbelts on. The train is leaving the station. Chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga. Gaze out of the window. Time starts to speed up. We flash past 2025, then 2027, 2030, then 2034, until we grind to a halt in the spring of 2035. We arrive in New York City, five years after the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals were first slated to be achieved. This used to be the city that never slept, but now it barely treads water. The Empire State Building has been destroyed by recent hurricanes. There have been more and more of these devastating storms due to the effects of climate change. Oh, and Lower Manhattan is about 11 inches underwater. What happened here, you ask, horrified? We were supposed to have sustainable cities by 2030. Well, in this future, it appears that that was just another dream deferred. But have no fear. The future is full of possibilities, and this here was just one. Let’s head to the next stop on our voyage, one where technology and innovation were embraced to enable humans to thrive. I sure hope it’s better than this, you say. All aboard! The train is leaving this station. Chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga. We flash across time like lightning through a cloud. We fly past 2035, then 2050, 2065. Until we crash. Welcome to the Nile, Egypt. Only in this future, the water that once nourished entire civilizations is almost entirely dried up. It appears that everyone was surprised when artificial superintelligence declared that the best way to protect humanity was by destroying all of nature. But by then, it was too late to stop it. This is outrageous, you cry. New technology was supposed to help bridge the digital divide, not turn our greatest nations into a wasteland. Hang your head, defeated. What are we all fighting for then, if the future is doomed to be this way? May I ask, if you would not like the world to be this way then, what is the world you imagine? The one you’d like to see if there was no limitation. Perhaps this vision could help lead us to a more hopeful destination. It doesn’t matter, you say. It’s already too late. Remember, the future is not a physical place. It exists as a spectrum of possibilities. Every action you take sends a ripple effect into that spectrum, shaping the timelines of tomorrow. But I’m not a world leader or a tech billionaire, you argue. My actions are like a tiny drop in the ocean that is tomorrow. But that’s where you’re wrong. You only need a tiny drop of food coloring. to turn the worlds of green into green. So, I will ask you once more. What needs the world to imagine if there is no limitation? Let me begin with what if. What if. What if we actually did develop sustainable cities by 2030 and communities could gather in safe, green, public spaces and gardens grew food in abundance on lawns and rooftops? What if our algorithms were guided by a north star of diversity and innovation? What if technology worked entirely with nature and AI was designed for everyone, not just the select few? What if historically marginalized voices were heard and valued and the imagination of black, indigenous, and people of color were allowed to blossom to their fullest potential? What if this were the beginning of a new era? A blinding flash washes over the parts of its friends. The light of a new possibility can be seen far in the distance. What more shines brighter than the others? A new future. One that will outboard make noise with seas to boast. What are we waiting for? Now, let’s go! All aboard! The train is approaching a new timeline. Chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga-chugga. Hey, keep your arms and legs inside the vehicle because we are about to embark on a journey we’re known for. Where, you may ask? To the future! Reimagined.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator): I feel like I simultaneously saw the Marvel Avengers endgame scenario and the Stephen King movie at the same time. How many of you felt goosebumps? Raise your hand. Yes, that’s the power of art and for the future that you saw and the future that we want to avoid, it’s not going to be enough to take a group of people of this size room. It’s going to take everybody out there on the planet. It’s going to take multiple generations and I am so honored to invite a panel of experts who are going to show how multiple generations are going to work together and solve this problem and steer us on the right direction. I would like to invite on to the stage our ITU Secretary General, Ms. Doreen Bogdan-Martin. Youth Activist, Nchimunuya Munyama. The ASG for UNDP, Mr. Marcos Neto. Science Policy Interface Focal Point, Ms. Clara Brown. And the Assistant Secretary General for WIPO, Mr. Edward Kwakwa. I would want to call this the star panel of the session. I want to jump in super quick since I know we value your time and your presence here. Ms. Doreen, we’ve heard from multiple members of your advisory panel. Thank you so much for that initiative. A round of applause. You’ve done a lot for empowering youth at ITU. Could you please elaborate more about your vision for bridging the digital divide, making technology and AI more accessible to young people, but also centering the feminist movement and the experiences of girls and young people from rural and remote areas. And I’ve heard you are the songbird of hope in the digital world, so I hope you can inject some of that is into us today.

Doreen Bogdan-Martin: Thank you so much Yash and it’s slightly intimidating I think to be in this crowd because when you’re surrounded by smart young people you know much more than than we do and congratulations to Anatole that was just amazing. Thank you. I think it’s important for young people to remember that you are the most connected demographic in history but I think it’s also important to remember that you shouldn’t or we shouldn’t take that for granted and so I thought I’d kind of pick up a little bit from what Anatola just just showed amazingly with with that screen and ask you I know it’s late but close your eyes for a second everybody open your eyes and don’t fall asleep okay it’s 2013 not 2030 2013 the UN has just done and this is actually true the world that we want consultation it was amazing because at the time a million people answer answered that survey from around the world and we thought that’s incredible but what we at the ITU found kind of shocking that in the million people that were surveyed and asked about their priorities for the future internet access to the internet to connectivity was at the bottom of the list why because every single person that answered it had access to the internet now I know time is bracing but close your eyes again open okay it’s 2030 so what does 2030 look like I think Anatola said it well in the second part 2030 and this depends on you you said we need young people to lead if you lead if you help us lead in 2030 we can have an inclusive just safe fair, sustainable future for all. That’s where we need to focus. That’s where I’m focused at the ITU with my amazing youth advisory board, with my young professionals program, with our Generation Connect movement, with all the work that we’re specifically targeting for girls, for women and girls to close that digital gender gap. We have lots of skilling programs. I’ve heard that mentioned as well before. We’re also very focused on participation. We need you. We need you at AI for Good. We need you at the WSIS Forum. We need you at our Space Sustainability Forum where we did have a number of our space youth there. So we need you at the table. Because with you, we can shape a digital future that meets your needs and that is inclusive and makes the world a better place and helps us to achieve those SDGs that are way off track. Thank you.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator): Thank you so much. And I know you didn’t say the word, but a key part of the formula is mentorship. And that’s what you’re doing, I think, even though we’re not using the word. And even in the previous panel, we’re not just gonna have young parliamentarians show up in a week. They require a lot of mentorship and it requires every generation to work together. And Nchimunuya, you’ve had an impressive journey as an innovator in sustainable technology. And you’ve heard the different ways in which young people can stay engaged and engage in policy. What do you think is the role of digital inclusion in fostering innovation in those who do not have access to fill out that survey, the people who are underserved?

Nchimunuya Munyama: Okay, thank you so much. Once again, it’s a privilege to be here, to be among the powerful panel. Thank you so much. I will start by speaking about my experience, having been coming from the underserved area of those that do not have access to technology itself. I grew up in a farm where I had to learn how to create my own tools and how to actually grow. my own tomatoes. So I can, I think all I had was just creativity but I never had the tools itself, I mean like the tool itself to actually build what I wanted to do. So bringing it to this session, I think my main focus, as she has mentioned mentorship, but my main focus is also what if we could create a system that every young person out there can be given the tools to innovate. If it be, let’s say if it’s the tech itself, it can be the tool itself to help them create what they want to create. Just like my parents taught me morals, etiquette, safety, discipline, what if we could do that to the young generations, those who are upcoming in this sector itself. So I think for me mentorship has played a key role in my upbringing in this tech industry and also like how I was involved in the space of actually getting to know about these tools and my journey actually has been inspired by that experience and I am here because I have a team of young people in my country that believe in me and also I have supported people that actually want to follow my path. So to me I see myself as a beacon of hope for others and I believe that if we create the necessary tools for the young people to create what they want to create, definitely we will have an inclusive community. And lastly I would say that we also need to be creators, we need to be creators of our own technology and not passive consumers. I believe that every young person has the knowledge and the how to create their own tools to actually thrive in that area itself. Thank you.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator): Thank you so much and you make growing tomatoes super easy, it was not. I tried in COVID, I got like three tomatoes of like a big plant that was the size of like six foot. Thank you so much. I appreciate it. And I remember the first time I was in the UN at a science event was at the SDG Digital last year. It was a full day of sessions. People were committing and ITU and UNDP are pivotal for that initiative. ASG Neto, in your experience with UNDP, how critical is digital inclusion in achieving sustainable development goals, particularly for young people in least developed countries? And how are you supporting young people get more engaged in the processes? And we see such a good work you’re doing. How are you empowering them more?

Marcos Athias Neto: Thank you. And it’s a pleasure to be here. It’s great. You know, I want the Quantum Express, but just the last stop. I do not want to see the first two stops of the Quantum Express. But it can happen. There is no reason why it should happen. If we do what Doreen said, if we do it while we’re talking here, we will have the last stop. Now, two thirds of youth under 25 years old do not have internet at home. They can’t connect it to the Z nodes that we saw the colleague talk about earlier and get an increased education or open a business. One of the things we are doing, for example, in the Asia-Pacific region, we have a program partnership with Citibank Foundation called Youth CoLab. And we’ve actually supported 19,000 young people over 28 countries to actually improve or create 2,600 business, entrepreneurship. That is the innovation that needs to come in. The technology is essential to make those innovations go forward faster than we need to do right now. We have in our Africa Bureau at UNDP, we have a program of bringing young African women. We get about 20, 40, I don’t remember how many, every year and bring to New York, put work in my office for one year, all trying to build the best capabilities in those SKUs. The important point about closing the digital divide, and we fundamentally believe, is that young people must have a voice in closing the digital divide. Right, so being on our, we are dealing with a super election year, right? We as UNDP together with other members of the UN system are huge in doing election. Almost every day we are involved in an election around the world. One of the things that are very clear for us is to make sure that young people have a voice, and engage in those elections. And that I say, are actually competing, are actually running for office, and are being elected. So for us, those are a few of the things that matters. Across from entrepreneurship, to mentorship, to governance, and good citizenship in elections. Across the gamut, the future belongs to the young, belongs to you. Please, join in. Don’t sit on the side, don’t hope that my generation is going to fix it. It’s your time. Thank you.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator): Thank you so much. And the key message to everybody viewing this live, is go vote, wherever you are. That’s how you show your priorities and share feedback to policymakers. Thank you so much, ASG Marcos. Clara, as a young leader in this space, being a representative for adolescent girls, what challenges do you see for youth in accessing and utilizing digital tools to make an impact?

Clara Brown: Thank you so much. So, I’d first like to start by saying that my motivation to become a voice for youth in technology started with one line of code. And then it expanded from there to become eight coding languages and quantum computing. Some of the challenges that I foresee is a lack of intergenerational cooperation moving forward. And I think that’s something that this really showcases well that we are addressing this these challenges. I had the honor of helping to select some incredible youth innovators as nominees for the innovation showcase of the STI forum and these inspiring youth led initiatives are harnessing the power of technology for sustainable and inclusive development for vulnerable communities. In other areas I have helped fund youth led local solutions to bridge the digital divide that disproportionately affects youth and again the digital divide a crucial piece of the puzzle that we are still trying to solve. So the digital divide it disproportionately affects youth particularly young women in rural communities and it is crucial that we continue to sustainably fund and support work towards gender and socio-economic digital equity for youth and a safe equitable future for all people and our planet. As an observer constituency representative to the technology executive committee of the UNFCCC I have witnessed the power of innovation such as AI for climate action and AI for good to stimulate youth led innovation for climate action and social change. It’s time to scale up promising youth solutions. We need more international cooperation connecting young leaders in the tech and innovation space to each other as well. Raising awareness of opportunities and improving digital access democratizing the development and deployment of technology and AI to advance the SDGs globally.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator): Thank you I apologize for cutting you Clara but I also know we’re running out of time and actually that’s a great segue into I saved the last question for you because a big part of scaling up is going to be policy and is intellectual property rights, whether it be AI, data, even the compact, it’s a core component that many member states are discussing and debating. ASG, Kwakwa, can you just share a little bit about what steps is WIPO taking to make intellectual property rights more accessible to young people who are driving to change through digital innovation, entrepreneurship, and are trying to take these solutions and scale them up?

Edward Kwakwa: Thank you very much, Yash. So great question. I mean, I could take up 10 minutes of your time, but I know you are in a hurry, so I’ll be very quick. At WIPO, what we’ve tried to do, first thing, this year we launched what we call an IPS strategy. It’s IP Youth Empowerment Strategy. And that strategy aims to explain to the young people how best they can incorporate themselves in the intellectual property ecosystem. So we try and instill passion in them, we try and instill action in them, and we provide support to the young people so they use their intellectual property assets. Let me give you an example. We do things like, we call it IP in a box, in countries such as Zambia or Uganda. And what we do there is we try and use the intellectual property system and show the youth how it can be a fun thing to do, in addition to owning the intellectual property. So I know not everyone here is a football enthusiast, but let me give an example. Kylian Mbappe, what he’s done is he has trademarked his celebratory iconic stance. So this is with the European Patent Office to ensure no one uses it without his authorization. This is an important intellectual property asset. And when you have a celebrity such as. as Kylian Mbappe, exposing the benefits of the intellectual property system, you get the majority of the youth in the world also interested in the IP system. So WIPO, we are doing everything we can to make sure the youth, the most important constituents we have. And Clara, I could explain to you how this year, last year, our World IP Day theme was on IP and women. And the year before, it was on IP and the youth. So clearly all these two years, we spent the time explaining to the international community why intellectual property is important and how effective and important the role of women as well as youth is in the intellectual property ecosystem.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator):  Thank you so much. That’s important. Again, I think we started with a gender session and we see that key message running throughout every session. And a big round of applause to our star panelists. We appreciate your time. Thank you so much. Thank you so much again. And I’m going to make our ITUSG proud by saying that our closing is going to be about how the digital future is going to be woman-led. And I have two amazing speakers to share the closing remarks. I have Priscilla Efe Johnson, who is a Generation 17 leader, and Tayma Abdalhadi, who is a technologist and a digital rights advocate from Palestine. The stage is yours.

Priscilla Efe Johnson: Thank you so much everyone for your time and for being here with us. Thank you to all our panellists and to all our speakers for sharing their insights. Just to give a brief summary, we’ve heard from our panellists, we’ve heard from our youth activists and I think I would like to emphasise that technology can be leveraged as a tool to accelerate holistic development but we must emphasise the need for inclusion in bridging the digital divide. When talking about leveraging technology, especially for marginalised communities, we must understand that creating impactful digital solutions is not just about introducing fancy new tech, AI models or platforms. If we truly want to ensure that leaving no one behind is not just a catchphrase, then we must push for basic computer literacy for primary school girls in rural Nigeria as much as we push for new AI models. I pose this as an urge to leaders, innovators and activists that as we embrace innovation, we must ensure the customisation and localisation of innovation to the specific needs of underserved communities by ensuring inclusion of language, gender identities and the unique context of each individual to bridge the digital and development divide, leaving no girl, no woman and no one behind. Thank you.

Tayma Abdalhadi: Thank you so much, Efe. With this, we close today but as representatives of our youth, it would not be right not to put on the forefront and remember our heroes, our people under conflicts, under rockets, our youth who are fighting every day in Gaza, Palestine, Sudan, Syria, Lebanon, every day to make this future happen while we discuss it here safely in this room. We would also want to invite you all to put this mindset, this inclusive mindset that you are one accident, one gene, one born in a geographical area away from being in the position of those youth under rockets, under hunger, under censorship. So, this is an invitation from me and all the youth that spoke today to think before we speak, to think before we develop the technology, to think before we make any resolution, whether it was the president of the country or the youngest student in the education. Every person can make a difference and every person can convey this message of inclusivity, justice and support. Thank you, everyone. This is Tayma from Palestine and see you tomorrow.

Sri Yeswanth (Yash) Tadimalla (Moderator):  Thank you so much, everyone. going to end it the way we started. I’m going to ask, what kind of digital future do you want? What kind of digital future do you want? Thank you.

E

Emra Mian

Speech speed

183 words per minute

Speech length

396 words

Speech time

129 seconds

Infrastructure gaps – Limited connectivity and access to devices in underserved areas

Explanation

Emra Mian highlights that an inclusive digital future is hindered by unequal access to high-quality digital infrastructure. This manifests in both rural areas and some urban areas where people may have lower incomes.

Evidence

In the UK, young people in rural or remote areas often lack access to digital infrastructure. Even in urban areas, some neighborhoods may have limited access despite being close to high-quality infrastructure.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Divide and Inclusion

Agreed with

Doreen Bogdan-Martin

Clara Brown

Yurii Romashko

Agreed on

Digital divide disproportionately affects youth and marginalized communities

Disagreed with

Clara Brown

Yurii Romashko

Disagreed on

Approach to bridging the digital divide

Digital skills gap – Need to improve digital literacy and skills, especially for youth

Explanation

Mian emphasizes the importance of improving digital skills as a crucial part of digital inclusivity. He suggests that this requires collaborative efforts from government, business, and civil society.

Evidence

Many people gain digital skills and confidence through everyday online activities, such as making or receiving payments through financial institutions.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Divide and Inclusion

D

Doreen Bogdan-Martin

Speech speed

148 words per minute

Speech length

437 words

Speech time

176 seconds

Gender gap in digital access – Disproportionate impact on women and girls

Explanation

Bogdan-Martin highlights the need to focus on closing the digital gender gap. She emphasizes the importance of targeting programs specifically for girls and women to ensure their inclusion in the digital world.

Evidence

ITU has implemented various programs targeting women and girls, including skilling programs and initiatives to close the digital gender gap.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Divide and Inclusion

Agreed with

Emra Mian

Clara Brown

Yurii Romashko

Agreed on

Digital divide disproportionately affects youth and marginalized communities

C

Clara Brown

Speech speed

122 words per minute

Speech length

291 words

Speech time

142 seconds

Rural-urban divide – Lack of access in rural and remote areas

Explanation

Clara Brown points out that the digital divide disproportionately affects youth in rural communities. She emphasizes the need for sustainable funding and support to work towards digital equity for youth in these areas.

Evidence

As an observer constituency representative to the Technology Executive Committee of the UNFCCC, Brown has witnessed the power of innovation such as AI for climate action and social change.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Divide and Inclusion

Agreed with

Emra Mian

Doreen Bogdan-Martin

Yurii Romashko

Agreed on

Digital divide disproportionately affects youth and marginalized communities

Disagreed with

Emra Mian

Yurii Romashko

Disagreed on

Approach to bridging the digital divide

Y

Yurii Romashko

Speech speed

134 words per minute

Speech length

270 words

Speech time

120 seconds

Economic barriers – High costs of devices and internet access

Explanation

Romashko identifies high costs of devices and internet access as major barriers to digital inclusion. This economic factor prevents many young people from accessing digital technologies and participating fully in the digital world.

Evidence

This insight was derived from global informal consultations on youth-led and inclusive digital future, which gathered input from 100 global contributors.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Divide and Inclusion

Agreed with

Emra Mian

Doreen Bogdan-Martin

Clara Brown

Agreed on

Digital divide disproportionately affects youth and marginalized communities

Disagreed with

Emra Mian

Clara Brown

Disagreed on

Approach to bridging the digital divide

M

Mohamed Bangura

Speech speed

153 words per minute

Speech length

601 words

Speech time

234 seconds

Youth representation – Need for youth voices in digital policymaking

Explanation

Bangura emphasizes the importance of including young people in key decision-making positions, particularly in government. He argues that governments should be deliberate in bringing young people to the table, especially in areas of innovation and technology.

Evidence

In Sierra Leone, the government has appointed young people to key positions, including a 27-year-old Minister of Communication and Innovation, and a 33-year-old Minister of Foreign Affairs.

Major Discussion Point

Youth Empowerment in Digital Policymaking

Agreed with

Marcos Athias Neto

Agreed on

Need for youth representation and empowerment in digital policymaking

M

Marcos Athias Neto

Speech speed

147 words per minute

Speech length

397 words

Speech time

161 seconds

Youth innovation – Supporting youth-led digital solutions and entrepreneurship

Explanation

Neto highlights UNDP’s efforts to support young people in creating and improving businesses through digital entrepreneurship. He emphasizes the importance of technology in accelerating these innovations.

Evidence

UNDP’s Youth CoLab program in the Asia-Pacific region has supported 19,000 young people over 28 countries to create or improve 2,600 businesses.

Major Discussion Point

Youth Empowerment in Digital Policymaking

Agreed with

Mohamed Bangura

Agreed on

Need for youth representation and empowerment in digital policymaking

Youth engagement – Creating opportunities for youth participation in governance

Explanation

Neto stresses the importance of ensuring young people have a voice in governance, particularly in elections. He emphasizes the need for young people to not only engage in elections but also to run for office and be elected.

Evidence

UNDP is involved in elections around the world and focuses on ensuring young people have a voice and engage in these elections.

Major Discussion Point

Youth Empowerment in Digital Policymaking

Agreed with

Mohamed Bangura

Agreed on

Need for youth representation and empowerment in digital policymaking

E

Eylül Erçin

Speech speed

99 words per minute

Speech length

208 words

Speech time

125 seconds

Algorithmic bias – Risk of AI amplifying existing inequalities

Explanation

Eylül highlights the risk of biased datasets leading to biased algorithms, which can amplify existing inequalities. She emphasizes that AI is not inherently problematic, but rather reflects the data it’s trained on.

Evidence

Eylül cites an example of Amazon discontinuing a hiring algorithm that favored words commonly used by men, such as ‘executed’, leading to gender bias in hiring.

Major Discussion Point

Ethical Considerations in AI and Technology

Data inclusivity – Need for diverse and representative datasets

Explanation

Eylül stresses the importance of using inclusive and diverse datasets when training AI. She argues that by feeding AI diverse and inclusive data, we can harness its potential for a better future.

Major Discussion Point

Ethical Considerations in AI and Technology

S

Sara Sabry

Speech speed

163 words per minute

Speech length

704 words

Speech time

259 seconds

Humanity’s interconnectedness and responsibility – Joint action to address climate change, rights violations, and inequality

Explanation

Sabry highlights humanity’s shared responsibility in tackling climate change, inequality, and human rights violations, using her space perspective to emphasize global unity. She argues that problems, though complex, can be solved with hope and collective action. Hope is an active choice that requires responsibility from everyone.

Major Discussion Point

Joint action for a better future for all

M

Melissa Michelle Muñoz Suro

Speech speed

165 words per minute

Speech length

516 words

Speech time

187 seconds

AI governance – Developing frameworks for ethical AI use

Explanation

Munoz Suro discusses the importance of developing governance frameworks for responsible AI use. She emphasizes the need for regional integration in AI development to ensure it reflects diverse cultures and languages.

Evidence

Munoz Suro contributed to development of the Dominican Republic’s national AI strategy, the first in Latin America, Central America, and the Caribbean. The strategy emphasizes regional integration and development of AI in Spanish.

Major Discussion Point

Ethical Considerations in AI and Technology

H

Hamza Hameed

Speech speed

166 words per minute

Speech length

421 words

Speech time

151 seconds

Space technology – Using satellite connectivity to bridge digital divides

Explanation

Hameed highlights the potential of space technology, particularly lower earth orbit satellites, to provide internet connectivity in remote areas where terrestrial networks are not feasible. He emphasizes the need for policymakers to develop modern tech policies to accelerate the implementation of these innovative technologies.

Evidence

Hameed mentions that lower earth orbit satellites have already connected people in the most remote parts of the world.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Innovation for Sustainable Development

P

Priscilla Efe Johnson

Speech speed

149 words per minute

Speech length

212 words

Speech time

85 seconds

Localized solutions – Customizing digital innovations for specific community needs

Explanation

Johnson emphasizes the need to customize and localize digital solutions to the specific needs of underserved communities. She argues that truly inclusive innovation must consider language, gender identities, and the unique context of each individual.

Evidence

Johnson gives an example of pushing for basic computer literacy for primary school girls in rural Nigeria as much as pushing for new AI models.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Innovation for Sustainable Development

E

Edward Kwakwa

Speech speed

152 words per minute

Speech length

344 words

Speech time

135 seconds

Intellectual property – Making IP rights accessible to young innovators

Explanation

Kwakwa discusses WIPO’s efforts to make intellectual property rights more accessible to young people. He emphasizes the importance of educating youth about how to incorporate themselves into the intellectual property ecosystem.

Evidence

WIPO launched an IP Youth Empowerment Strategy to explain to young people how to best incorporate themselves in the intellectual property ecosystem. They also run programs like ‘IP in a box’ in countries such as Zambia and Uganda.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Innovation for Sustainable Development

Agreements

Agreement Points

Digital divide disproportionately affects youth and marginalized communities

Emra Mian

Doreen Bogdan-Martin

Clara Brown

Yurii Romashko

Infrastructure gaps – Limited connectivity and access to devices in underserved areas

Gender gap in digital access – Disproportionate impact on women and girls

Rural-urban divide – Lack of access in rural and remote areas

Economic barriers – High costs of devices and internet access

Multiple speakers highlighted various aspects of the digital divide, emphasizing its disproportionate impact on youth, women, rural communities, and those facing economic barriers.

Need for youth representation and empowerment in digital policymaking

Mohamed Bangura

Marcos Athias Neto

Youth representation – Need for youth voices in digital policymaking

Youth innovation – Supporting youth-led digital solutions and entrepreneurship

Youth engagement – Creating opportunities for youth participation in governance

Both speakers emphasized the importance of including young people in decision-making processes, particularly in government and digital policymaking, as well as supporting youth-led innovations and entrepreneurship.

Similar Viewpoints

These speakers all emphasized the importance of ethical considerations in AI development, including the need for diverse datasets, responsible development practices, and governance frameworks to ensure AI aligns with human rights and ethics.

Eylul Ercin

Melissa Michelle Munoz Suro

Algorithmic bias – Risk of AI amplifying existing inequalities

Data inclusivity – Need for diverse and representative datasets

Responsible AI development – Aligning AI with human rights and ethics

AI governance – Developing frameworks for ethical AI use

Unexpected Consensus

Space technology for digital inclusion

Hamza Hameed

Sara Sabry

Space technology – Using satellite connectivity to bridge digital divides

While coming from different perspectives (technology and astronautics), both speakers highlighted the potential of space technology to address global challenges, including digital inclusion. This unexpected connection between space exploration and digital rights showcases a novel approach to bridging the digital divide.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of agreement centered around addressing the digital divide, empowering youth in digital policymaking, ensuring ethical AI development, and leveraging innovative technologies (including space technology) for digital inclusion.

Consensus level

There was a high level of consensus among speakers on the importance of addressing the digital divide and involving youth in digital policymaking. This strong agreement suggests a unified direction for future efforts in digital inclusion and youth empowerment. However, the specific approaches and focus areas varied among speakers, indicating a need for diverse strategies to address these complex issues.

Disagreements

Disagreement Points

Approach to bridging the digital divide

Emra Mian

Clara Brown

Yurii Romashko

Infrastructure gaps – Limited connectivity and access to devices in underserved areas

Rural-urban divide – Lack of access in rural and remote areas

Economic barriers – High costs of devices and internet access

While all speakers agree on the existence of a digital divide, they emphasize different aspects as the primary barrier: Mian focuses on infrastructure gaps, Brown highlights the rural-urban divide, and Romashko emphasizes economic barriers.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of disagreement revolve around prioritizing different aspects of the digital divide and approaches to ethical AI development.

Disagreement level

The level of disagreement among the speakers is relatively low. Most speakers agree on the overall goals but differ in their emphasis on specific aspects or approaches. This suggests a general consensus on the importance of addressing the digital divide and ensuring ethical AI development, which is positive for advancing these issues. However, the different emphases may lead to challenges in prioritizing specific actions or allocating resources.

Partial Agreements

Partial Agreements

All speakers agree on the need for ethical AI development, but they propose different approaches: Ercin focuses on addressing algorithmic bias through diverse datasets, and Munoz Suro advocates for developing governance frameworks.

Eylul Ercin

Melissa Michelle Munoz Suro

Algorithmic bias – Risk of AI amplifying existing inequalities

Responsible AI development – Aligning AI with human rights and ethics

AI governance – Developing frameworks for ethical AI use

Similar Viewpoints

These speakers all emphasized the importance of ethical considerations in AI development, including the need for diverse datasets, responsible development practices, and governance frameworks to ensure AI aligns with human rights and ethics.

Eylul Ercin

Melissa Michelle Munoz Suro

Algorithmic bias – Risk of AI amplifying existing inequalities

Data inclusivity – Need for diverse and representative datasets

Responsible AI development – Aligning AI with human rights and ethics

AI governance – Developing frameworks for ethical AI use

Takeaways

Key Takeaways

The digital divide remains a significant challenge, with infrastructure gaps, skills gaps, and economic barriers limiting access for many, especially in underserved areas.

Youth empowerment and inclusion in digital policymaking is crucial for shaping an inclusive digital future.

Ethical considerations in AI and technology development, including addressing algorithmic bias and ensuring online safety, are critical.

Digital innovation, including space technology and AI, has significant potential to contribute to sustainable development goals.

Localized and customized digital solutions are needed to address the specific needs of different communities.

Intergenerational cooperation and mentorship are important for bridging the digital divide and fostering youth innovation.

Resolutions and Action Items

Implement the ITU’s IP Youth Empowerment Strategy to engage young people in the intellectual property ecosystem

Scale up promising youth-led digital solutions and innovations

Integrate digital literacy into education systems

Increase youth participation in digital policymaking and governance

Develop modern tech policies to accelerate innovative technologies like lower earth orbit satellites for connectivity

Unresolved Issues

Specific strategies for addressing the digital gender gap in different regions

Detailed plans for ensuring AI governance frameworks are implemented globally

Methods for balancing rapid technological advancement with ethical considerations and human rights protection

Concrete steps for making intellectual property rights more accessible to young innovators in developing countries

Suggested Compromises

Balancing the focus on advanced technologies like AI with efforts to provide basic digital access and literacy in underserved areas

Combining top-down policy approaches with bottom-up youth-led initiatives to address the digital divide

Integrating both global standards and localized solutions in digital development efforts

Thought Provoking Comments

From space there are no lines separating countries, no divisions between people. They’re just one earth, our shared home. And it is more interconnected, more united, and more hopeful than we often realize.

Speaker

Sara Sabry

Reason

This comment provides a unique perspective from someone who has seen Earth from space, challenging typical views of national borders and divisions.

Impact

It set a tone of unity and interconnectedness for the discussion, encouraging participants to think globally rather than locally about digital issues.

Young people are not just passive beneficiaries, and we need to flip the script. Empower them to be agents of change, to be creators of education, to be proponents of education, and you can see the difference that happens.

Speaker

Zubair Junjunia

Reason

This comment challenges the traditional view of youth as recipients of education and policy, instead positioning them as active creators and change agents.

Impact

It shifted the conversation towards discussing ways to actively involve youth in shaping digital policies and educational initiatives.

Something that I want to emphasize, an issue that I think goes relatively unnoticed is biased data sets that lead to biased algorithms.

Speaker

Eylul Ercin

Reason

This comment highlights a critical but often overlooked issue in AI development, bringing attention to the ethical implications of data bias.

Impact

It deepened the discussion on AI ethics and prompted consideration of the need for diverse and inclusive data sets in AI development.

I think bridging the digital divide isn’t just about access to technology, it’s really about empowering young people to come online, share their voices, and shape their futures, whether that be through access to education, whether that be access to healthcare, or whether that be the ability to set up a business.

Speaker

Hamza Hameed

Reason

This comment reframes the digital divide issue from mere access to technology to a broader concept of empowerment and opportunity.

Impact

It expanded the conversation beyond technical solutions to consider the broader societal impacts of digital inclusion.

If we truly want to ensure that leaving no one behind is not just a catchphrase, then we must push for basic computer literacy for primary school girls in rural Nigeria as much as we push for new AI models.

Speaker

Priscilla Efe Johnson

Reason

This comment provides a concrete example of how to balance cutting-edge technology with basic digital literacy, emphasizing true inclusivity.

Impact

It grounded the discussion in practical realities and highlighted the importance of addressing foundational digital skills alongside advanced technologies.

Overall Assessment

These key comments shaped the discussion by consistently emphasizing themes of inclusivity, youth empowerment, and the need for a holistic approach to digital development. They challenged participants to think beyond technological solutions and consider the broader societal implications of digital policies. The comments also highlighted the importance of diverse perspectives in shaping the digital future, from the view from space to the needs of rural schoolgirls. This led to a rich, multifaceted discussion that balanced aspirational goals with practical considerations for achieving true digital inclusion.

Follow-up Questions

How can we ensure AI and technology development includes diverse data sets and perspectives to avoid bias?

Speaker

Eylul Ercin

Explanation

Important to prevent AI from amplifying existing inequalities and ensure inclusive development

What policies and initiatives can improve digital infrastructure access in both rural and urban low-income areas?

Speaker

Emra Mian

Explanation

Critical for addressing persistent digital divides and ensuring equal access

How can governments, businesses, and civil society work together to improve digital skills, especially for underserved populations?

Speaker

Emra Mian

Explanation

Necessary for true digital inclusion and empowerment

What steps can be taken to enhance online safety and prevent marginalized groups from retreating from digital spaces?

Speaker

Emra Mian

Explanation

Essential for creating an inclusive digital future where all feel safe to participate

How can innovative space technologies be leveraged to bridge the digital divide in remote areas?

Speaker

Hamza Hameed

Explanation

Offers potential solutions for connecting underserved populations globally

What policies are needed to accelerate the development and implementation of innovative connectivity technologies?

Speaker

Hamza Hameed

Explanation

Crucial for enabling widespread access to digital tools and opportunities

How can we create systems to provide young people, especially in underserved areas, with the tools and resources to innovate?

Speaker

Nchimunuya Munyama

Explanation

Important for fostering innovation and empowering youth in all communities

What strategies can increase youth participation in governance and policymaking, particularly around digital issues?

Speaker

Marcos Athias Neto

Explanation

Critical for ensuring young people’s voices shape the digital future

How can we improve international cooperation to connect young leaders in tech and innovation globally?

Speaker

Clara Brown

Explanation

Necessary for scaling up promising youth-led solutions to global challenges

What steps can be taken to make intellectual property rights more accessible and understandable to young innovators?

Speaker

Edward Kwakwa

Explanation

Important for empowering youth to protect and benefit from their innovations

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed.

High Level Dialogue with the Secretary-General

High Level Dialogue with the Secretary-General

Session at a Glance

Summary

This discussion focused on youth participation in global decision-making, particularly within the United Nations system. The conversation involved UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and several youth representatives, exploring challenges and potential solutions for meaningful youth engagement.

The discussion began with a poll revealing that many perceive current youth participation as tokenistic. Youth representatives emphasized the need for systemic change, moving beyond mere consultation to active involvement in decision-making processes. They called for decentralization of youth offices, removal of barriers to UN employment, and protection for young activists.

Secretary-General Guterres acknowledged past failures of his generation in addressing global challenges and stressed the importance of involving youth in shaping a better future. He committed to reforms aimed at increasing youth participation in UN bodies and reversing the aging trend in UN staff.

Participants highlighted the importance of including marginalized youth voices, such as indigenous youth and young refugees. They also discussed innovative approaches young people are using to tackle global issues, emphasizing the need for empowerment, trust, and funding.

The conversation concluded with a visioning exercise, contrasting two potential futures: one where youth remain excluded from decision-making, and another with transformative change enabling youth participation. Participants overwhelmingly favored the latter, with Guterres emphasizing the need to actively build this preferred future to address critical challenges like climate change and technological disparities.

Keypoints

Major discussion points:

– The current state of youth participation in the UN and global decision-making is largely tokenistic and needs to shift to more meaningful engagement

– There is a need for concrete reforms and actions to give young people real power and influence, not just consultation

– Intergenerational collaboration and accountability is necessary to address global challenges created by past generations

– Innovation and empowerment of youth, especially marginalized groups, is critical for solving global issues

– Two potential futures were envisioned – one of continued challenges vs. one of transformative change led by youth

Overall purpose/goal:

The discussion aimed to have an honest, frank conversation about the state of youth engagement in global governance, particularly at the UN, and explore ways to make youth participation more meaningful and impactful going forward.

Tone:

The tone was largely serious and earnest, with participants speaking candidly about shortcomings in current youth engagement practices. However, there were also moments of inspiration and hope, particularly when discussing potential positive futures and youth-led innovations. The Secretary-General’s frank acknowledgment of past failures added gravity to the conversation. Overall, the tone balanced critical analysis with forward-looking optimism.

Speakers

Based on the transcript, there were 6 main speakers participating in the discussion:

– Moderator: Hajer Sharief, Co-founder, Together We Build It

– Antonio Guterres: United Nations Secretary-General

– Caleb Brathwaite: President of the Barbados Youth Development Council

– Daphne Frias: Youth activist, Organizer, Story-teller

– Josefa Tauli: Policy Co-ordinator of the Global Youth Biodiversity Network

– Amani Joel Mafigi: Co-founder of Unleashed (Potentials in Motion)

The speakers represented various youth perspectives and organizations focused on issues like climate change, indigenous rights, disability inclusion, and youth empowerment.

Full session report

Youth Participation in Global Decision-Making: A Critical Dialogue

This comprehensive discussion brought together UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and youth representatives to explore the challenges and potential solutions for meaningful youth engagement in global decision-making, particularly within the United Nations system. The session began with a visual scribe exercise, setting the stage for an interactive and dynamic conversation.

Current State of Youth Participation

A Mentimeter poll revealed that many perceive current youth engagement as largely tokenistic, with this option ranking highest among participants. This sentiment was echoed by several speakers. Daphne Frias, a disability and climate justice organiser, emphasised that youth voices are often heard but not acted upon, highlighting the prevalence of tokenism in current practices. Caleb Brathwaite, President of the Barbados Youth Development Council, argued that the system needs updating to better impact young people, suggesting that current structures are outdated and ineffective.

Secretary-General Guterres acknowledged that his generation had “messed up in relation to the world today”, setting a tone of accountability and urgency for change. He stated that the UN is in transition from merely listening to youth to including them in decision-making processes, but recognized the need for significant improvements.

Barriers to Meaningful Participation

Speakers identified several obstacles to meaningful youth engagement. Frias highlighted educational and language barriers that prevent many young people from working within the UN system. She also emphasized the extreme risks faced by young activists, particularly in Latin America and the Global South, where some youth are “giving up our lives” to defend the planet. Josefa Tauli, Indigenous youth policy coordinator of the Global Youth Biodiversity Network, shared personal experiences, mentioning her father’s criminalization as an environmental defender.

Proposed Reforms and Solutions

The conversation shifted to concrete reforms and actions needed to give young people real power and influence. Brathwaite proposed decentralising UN youth offices globally to better implement youth engagement initiatives. Secretary-General Guterres committed to integrating youth systematically into UN decision-making processes and increasing the number of young people working within the organisation to reverse the trend of an ageing staff.

Tauli emphasised the need to shift power dynamics to be led by marginalised youth voices, including indigenous youth, youth with disabilities, and young refugees. She argued that unless institutions and processes are being led by these groups, efforts at inclusion would be failing.

Youth Innovation and Empowerment

Amani Joel Mafigi, Co-founder of Unleashed Potentials in Motion, highlighted the innovative approaches young people are using to tackle global issues. He called for support for youth-led initiatives solving global challenges and proposed creating a Youth Empowerment Fund for climate action, social justice, and innovation.

Secretary-General Guterres echoed this sentiment, stressing the importance of unleashing the potential of young people to lead and contribute to society. He made a provocative statement that “Power is never given. Power is taken”, challenging young people to actively claim their place in decision-making processes rather than waiting for it to be granted.

Envisioning the Future

The conversation concluded with a visioning exercise contrasting two potential futures. Tauli envisioned a world where children are not afraid of the future and environmental defenders are protected. Secretary-General Guterres framed the choice as between a world of climate crisis and inequality versus one of sustainability and fairness.

Participants overwhelmingly favoured a future with transformative change enabling youth participation. Guterres emphasised the need to actively build this preferred future to address critical challenges like climate change and technological disparities. He also highlighted the importance of preserving truth, referencing the book “The Death of Truth” and stressing the need to ensure truth survives in our society.

Personal Reflections and Challenges

Throughout the discussion, speakers shared personal insights. Frias expressed the weight of responsibility felt by young activists, stating that sometimes she just wants to be 26 years old without the burden of fixing global problems. This sentiment highlighted the complex emotions and pressures faced by youth engaged in global issues.

Conclusion

This frank and earnest discussion highlighted the urgent need for systemic change in how the UN and global institutions engage with youth. It balanced critical analysis of current shortcomings with forward-looking strategies for youth-led solutions to global challenges. The conversation underscored the importance of moving beyond tokenism to meaningful engagement, empowering marginalised youth voices, and actively building a more sustainable and equitable future through intergenerational collaboration and accountability.

The moderator closed the session by thanking the participants and announcing three upcoming sessions focused on inclusion, equity, and trust, indicating an ongoing commitment to these crucial themes in youth engagement and global decision-making.

Session Transcript

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): Thank you very much for being here today. Everyone in the room, thank you for coming. And for those who are joining us online as well, thank you so much for joining. And for those who planned on being here and couldn’t come, thank you so much also. So I must say I had the privilege to facilitate many discussions in the previous years, but this one feels a little bit different, especially given the current state of the world. I mean, we’re seeing armed conflicts, we’re seeing wars, we’re seeing record high of displacements, record high of temperatures, heat waves across the world, climate crisis, natural crisis, lots of crises. But then I must also say sometimes it seems that the consequences of what we’re seeing in terms of challenges are not felt equally around the world, if I must say. To use a metaphor, sometimes it feels that there are parts of the world where people are relatively having a comfortable, safe lives, and other parts of the world where people are struggling. And maybe a more explicit metaphor, personally for me, sometimes I wake up in the morning and I look at the world and I feel like some parts of the world really feels like a barbie house, while other parts of the world feels like the real Hunger Games. And then we have the UN, right, our primary global organization, global leader, that seems a little bit stuck, maybe, maybe not. There is many young people around the world who maybe think that the UN is not fit for purpose, after all it was established in 1945. But there are also many people around the world who support the UN, believe in the mission of unity. And many of these people are here today, are joining us online as well. So all of this is to say, and I personally do believe that the UN have an important role to play as a global leader in this world, in tackling challenges and finding solutions and in leading all of us to really come together. So to do that, I would really want us to have an honest and frank conversation. I know the title of this session is dialogue, but what a dialogue really means is a conversation among equals, right? A conversation among people who believes and have shared values and have a shared vision. So I would ask everyone, us here on stage, but also everyone in the room, everyone online, to for an hour or two, a day or two, or for the rest of our lives, to put our titles a little bit aside, our affiliations a little bit aside, and let’s come together and have a conversation as individuals and as we, the people. Because you know what I really find fascinating? This is the charter of the United Nations, right? And in the permeable of the charter, I find it fascinating that it says, we, the peoples of the United Nations. And I think this says it all. We, the people of the United Nations have determined, and today the people also are coming together to determine. So if you all agree that this is gonna be a honest, frank conversation, again, not only among us, but with everyone in the room and a conversation that should continues, then I would want to hear a yes. So do we agree on that? Honest, frank conversation. Yes. Yes. What about you? Okay, everyone is excited. And to kick off this honest and frank conversation, we have an incredible group of people here. We have Daphne, who is a disability and a climate justice organizer. Thank you so much for joining us. We have the United Nations Secretary General. Thank you so much for joining us. And we have Caleb, President of the Barbados Youth Development Council. Thank you for joining us. So, a few things. We have an exercise going on, which is a visual scribe. I don’t know if we have some of the photos up here. Okay, that’s cool. We started. We started. And then we’re going to come back to this later on at the end of the session. But, again, since this is a conversation between everyone, we will start with an interactive poll. So, basically, what we want to do is we want you to answer a question. And this is based on the Heart’s Ladder of Participation, which ranks youth engagement from non-participation to participation. And it has different levels. So the first thing I would want everyone to do is to pick up your phone. Everyone pick up their phones. And go to menti.com. And that’s how you’re going to log into the question, which, as you see up here, in your opinion. What is the current stage of youth participation? So again, go to menti.com and then you have to enter a code, which is, I don’t know if you can see it on the screen, it’s all the way up there, but it’s 99409443. So again, for those who can’t see it on the screen, it’s 99409443. And we are already getting answers. Oh wow, that’s many answers, that’s great. So we have different levels, as you see on the screen. We have tokenism, we have youth-informed, we have youth-consulted, we have shared decision with youth, we have youth and adult-initiated, and we have youth-initiated and directed. Okay, so maybe while the answers are coming in, Caleb, maybe I can start with you. What do you think of the results? Are you surprised?

Caleb Brathwaite: Well, first and foremost, thank you very much for inviting me to speak briefly and to be in the presence of Changemakers of the World. Looking at the results, I see in terms of tokenism, tokenism is coming in rather high, and following that is youth-informed. Closest is youth-consulted, but what we should have been seeing is that of youth-initiated and directed. And it paints a bigger picture of how young people view youth engagement with United Nations. As the Secretary General rightfully said in one of his speeches, in relation to that, this system here was built by our grandparents, and how therefore can it really better impact us as young people and that of our grandchildren. And what really needs to happen is that there needs to be, the system needs to be updated, and the system needs to be able to better care for us now in 2024 as young people and beyond.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): Yeah. So the system needs to be updated. And then for you, what does the pact of the summit of the future means to you? The pact of the future and the summit of the future, what does it mean for you?

Caleb Brathwaite: The pact for the future, which essentially brings us here, all of us here, for the summit of the future. What it means for me is that of a mere agreement, and agreements on top of agreements we have seen come out of these hallowed walls, agreements on top of agreements, but what we need now is action. How can we achieve action? And I’d like to commend the work of His Excellency, the Secretary General, in establishing the youth affairs and having that of the Assistant Secretary General, because it is forward thinking, and I believe that we have to give a round of applause. You have been doing excellent work. But we need to go further. How can we go further? There’s already established the UN youth office, and what needs to happen is that it needs to be decentralized. Establishing UN youth offices around the world and already established multi-country offices so that the UN can play a better role in terms of ensuring what the part of the future in Chapter 4, which looks at youth engagement, can be really achieved, and so that there can be a better life for young people around the world. We must hold our governments accountable, we must keep our governments feet to the fair to ensure that that part of the future in relation to Chapter 4 is really actualized and realized for young people around the world. That is how we will turn this mere agreement, Chapter 4 and the path for the future, into action.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): Into action. That’s the key word today and moving forward, right? Thank you so much, Caleb. Daphne, we’ve seen a lot of developments when it comes to youth engagements. We’ve seen more mechanisms, more processes for youth engagement within the UN system or also, generally speaking. But do you think there are still obstacles when it comes to meaningful and equal youth engagement and participation?

Daphne Frias: Definitely. And again, as Caleb mentioned, I am so excited and grateful to be part of this conversation. But I don’t think the question is necessarily if there are obstacles, it’s more what are the obstacles and how can we remove them? So much so that as we saw in the Mentimeter poll, the highest ranking selection was tokenism. And the most sort of insidious thing about tokenism is that our stories got to be shared with others, but they don’t actually inform action going forward. Our voices occupy rooms, but then they fall on silent ears. And truly, it’s time for the people who do so much of the talking to do less of the talking. And for the people who don’t get to do as much of that talking to take center stage and to have the voices of my generation, the generation that has fueled the Summit of the Future, that has fueled the UN Youth Office to lead. I think we have to also talk about the fact that not only is the UN an entity that many young people don’t feel connected to, but when trying to achieve positions, employment or positions of engagement within the UN, there are so many barriers in terms of educational obstacles, language obstacles, and things of that nature. When it comes to the criteria for what is required for UN employees and getting young people into the forum of the UN, it is so few and far between. I also didn’t want to take a second to say some words in Spanish. I am a climate organizer and the background of my work is really highlighting the injustices that marginalized communities face, especially in the global south and especially as a visibly disabled Latina woman. Young people in countries of Latin America and the global south have always been fighting, but we are, some of us, giving up our lives in order to do this and this should not be the case. Fighting for our planet should not be something that is prohibited. It should be something that we do happily together with our community. What I said a little bit, so many young people, especially in the global south, are losing their lives trying to defend our planet, trying to fight for a better future, and simply it should not be controversial to defend and fight for our planet. We need, thank you, we need to expand the enforcement of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. We need to make sure that young people’s voices are protected in that declaration. And, unless that changes, what you see reflected in that poll is going to stay exactly the same. Tokenism is going to continue to be at the top, and youth engagement is not going to be fully realized.

Moderator: Yeah. And, yeah, she deserves a round of applause, for sure. And then, Daphne, in your opinion, have you seen gaps in the lead-up to the summit of the future when it comes to youth engagement?

Daphne Frias: I think that in creating Chapter 4, in creating our guidelines and conventions, it was more youth-influenced and less youth-led, in terms of we’ve compiled things from the major group for youth and children, we’ve compiled things from member states and the young people from member states, but it was less allowing youth to really build, brick by brick, what Chapter 4 should look like. And I think that we really need to push the boundaries of our ideas of reverse mentorship, where it’s not adults only teaching young people, but having adults understand that they can learn from us, as well. And how can we open those pathways so that it isn’t a hierarchical relationship, but it is a symbiotic relationship where we can continuously share our ideas with one another. And as we gather here today for the first summit of the future, I want there to be many summits of the future, but also work that happens outside of these summits, in UN offices, in member states, in places of community, because that’s really where the power happens.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): 100% agreed. So, Mr. Secretary General, if I would refer again to… to the UN Charter, where it says, we the peoples of the United Nations. And I must say, I’m fascinated by this sentence, although it’s been there since the establishment of the UN. And I’m fascinated by it because I find it very interesting that it says, we the peoples of the United Nations. It doesn’t necessarily say, we the governments of the world. This doesn’t say, we the people representing the other people. It really says, we the people. So for me, it sounds that it really centers us as a collective of individuals. And when it comes to youth participation and youth engagement, we’ve seen the results. We’ve heard from Caleb. We’ve heard from Daphne. In your opinion, what are the concrete steps and reforms that the UN should undertake to really ensure that we are centering the sentence, we the peoples, which include we the young people of the world?

Antonio Guterres: Well, thank you very much for your question. I think one needs to look into the history. In the beginning, when I was quite young, the attitudes of political leaders, but also of organizations like the UN in relation to the youth was grow up. There was no interest at all to have a discussion with young people. Then there was this idea that, I mean, young people is relevant. So we better try to make sure that young people does what we would like them to do. Let’s not forget that facing this attitude of rejection, young people revolted. May 68, remember, I’m talking about my young people’s time. And so. people started at these organizations to talk to young people, to try to communicate things to young people, not to listen to young people, but to tell things to young people, to try to convince young people to do this or to do that. Then we discovered that that wouldn’t lead anywhere. Young people became more and more assertive and so the third stage in which we are now is a stage in which there is a growing interest and the creation of some mechanisms to listen to young people. And there is a lot yet to be done. I think what this demonstrated is that we are somewhere, somewhere in the development of this phase, listening to young people, not listening systematically, not listening in an organized way always, but starting to listen. But what we need is the fourth phase and the fourth phase is to have young people participating in decision-making processes. And that is what requires a number of reforms and let’s be clear, that is something that is not easy in an organization like the UN that is still, even if it is with the peoples, an intergovernmental organization. And so a central aspect of the summit of the future and the central aspect of the reforms you talk about is how can we guarantee that the civil society, how can we guarantee that cities and the local authorities and especially how can we guarantee that young people participate in the different processes of decision of the UN. Now this is the task that our office now has to engage very strongly. which means looking into all the bodies of the UN work, General Assembly, how does the Economic and Social Council work. Security Council will be more difficult. We need to find ways in which, with the office totally committed to that, to make sure that in the decision-making processes of these bodies, there are moments in which there is an active intervention of young people. Not only that there is a consultation of young people, but moments of active intervention of young people. As we need to have moments of active intervention of the civil society, and as we need to have in some aspects moments of active intervention of the regional and local authorities that know better than governments at national level what’s really happening with we the people on the ground. Now, these are the reforms that we intend to accelerate now, and it means discussing with the leaders of the different bodies how to make sure that in the work of each of the bodies, there are moments in the different processes in which the young people have a systemic participation and not one like those that are there in that picture. And we are totally committed to do it. But there is another thing that is essential, is to have more young people working inside the organization. Unfortunately, many organizations in the world, and the UN is one of them, for different reasons, but especially for budgetary constraints, tend to have an aging population. is to reverse that trend. We need to have much more young people working daily. There where the dossiers are prepared, there where the decisions are studied, there where the ideas are born, to make sure that the kind of product that comes from the different areas and departments of the organization is much more adapted to the needs and to the interests of young people than what it is the case today. So, two main objectives. Organize the processes of the bodies of the UN to give young people a clear, interfering voice in decisive moments when things are being decided, not when things have already happened. And second, make a huge effort with all the budgetary difficulties that we have, a huge effort to reverse the trend of the aging nature of the UN staff.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): And in the spirit that this is an honest conversation and a frank conversation, do you think this would be enough to move and change this from moments to lasting moments?

Antonio Guterres: We need to persevere. We will face many resistances. So, if we want to have a lasting moment, we must be determined to overcome the obstacle. The obstacles will appear, but we must be determined to overcome these obstacles. And there is a fundamental reason for that. I mean, look at the world today. We have to recognize that my generation messed up in relation to the world today. There was a critical moment. I was at the time in government, in the 90s. We had the end of the Cold War, we had globalization that appeared to be the solution of all problems and there was a sense that the world was moving in the right direction and the generation that was in charge did nothing to correct the negative aspects that were going to appear. And then we saw that the globalization indeed produced richness but it produced inequality. And then we saw that the end of the Cold War meant a multiplication of hot wars and we see them now everywhere in the world. And then we discovered that the economic model that was in place had forgotten that there is nature, had forgotten that there is planet and started to use resources that were limited and started to have an impact of destruction of the planet itself. So this is the product of the model that my generation put in place. Taking profit of the end of the Cold War and of the globalization and its enormous potential, instead of transforming it in a world of peace and in a world of prosperity for everybody and in a world with peace with nature, developed a world of multiplication of warm conflicts, a world in which we have war with nature and a world in which we have an enormous increase of inequality that of course makes the situation of the use in large parts of the world absolutely dramatic. Now, if my generation recognizes that we failed, and that we need to revert things, and that we need a new model that takes place of the enormous potential of new technologies, that takes place of the enormous energy that has been generated in the world, makes peace with nature, creates true mechanisms of participation and equality at global level, and overcomes the contradictions that lead to the conflicts of today, for that we need a new generation, a digital generation, I’m still an analogic, a digital generation, that is able to understand that we are leading to a disaster, and that is able to revert things, and take profit of the enormous potential that exists in the world, to build something in which the next generation will feel comfortable. And we cannot do that if your generation is not part of the decision-making process that is still controlled by my generation, that messed up in the way it has happened. You said you wanted a frank conversation.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): Yes, did I expect that? No. But thank you so much, because I know you’ll have to deal with this. Daphne, I saw you nodding your head a lot. What were you thinking?

Daphne Frias: It’s very rare where the generation before ours takes responsibility for the harms that have been caused, and I’m 26 years old. Sometimes I just want to be 26 years old. I don’t want to have to fix the climate crisis. I don’t want to have to stop wars. I just want to watch Netflix.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): We all do.

Daphne Frias: I just want to pet my dog and eat some cookies and live my life. But unfortunately, that is not our reality, but it can be. It can be if we not necessarily push for intergenerational collaboration, but make that the standard where it isn’t one young person representing millions of young people. I cannot possibly speak for a young person in Kenya, speak for a young person going through genocide in Palestine, speak for speak for a young person. Thank you. In Australia, I can only speak for me and I can only share my story. But the more of us that we have and the more of our stories that get shared, that is where the true change happens. So I hope that more of the older generation can follow the SG’s example and take responsibility and say, okay, we understand and we’re ready to do the hard work because it’s gonna take a lot.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): Thank you, Daphne, for this. Caleb, just in a sentence, what were your thoughts?

Caleb Brathwaite: My initial thoughts are, whoa, and as Daphne said, take someone from the generation past taking responsibility for how this generation is now is incredible. I also laid hope, as Daphne also said, that he also lays solutions. I’m coming from a small developing state that reaches on the brink of the climate crisis, hurricanes that you’ve never seen before. You know, as a small developing state, we are not the world’s largest emitters, but we face the greatest threats, and that for the SG taking responsibility for what would have transpired years ago is incredible. We know what lies ahead. We know what the mission, and it’s for all of us in this room to collectively work to achieve that mission, and it’s prosperity for all young people.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): Amazing. For all of us in this room, thank you so much, Caleb. Thank you so much, Daphne. We will continue the conversation with another two amazing young people, Amani and Josefa. So Caleb and Daphne, thank you so much for joining us, and please keep the conversation going. That was very honest, Mr. Secretary General. That was very honest. Thank you for sharing that.

Antonio Guterres: That is simply the truth.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): That is simply the truth. Yeah, that deserves a round of applause. That is simply the truth.

Antonio Guterres: You know, there is a book that was published called The Death of Truth, and we see a lot of things being done in misinformation, especially social media, to kill the truth. You must make sure that the truth survives.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): And is heard.

Antonio Guterres: The truth wins.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator) Thank you so much. Josefa, thank you so much for joining us. You are an indigenous youth policy coordinator of the Global Youth Biodiversity Network. Amani, thank you so much for joining us, the co-founder of Unleashed Potentials in Motion. So Josefa, if I would start with you. In your opinion, what are the strategies that can be used and deployed today to ensure a meaningful youth participation in the decision-making processes, also taking into account what DSG has shared?

Josefa Tauli: Thank you so much, and I absolutely agree. Because among the young people, I just really, really want to emphasize that there are among them indigenous youth, youth with disabilities, young refugees, who are marginalized. And I think that unless our systems, our institutions, our decision-making processes, unless those work for them, and unless they listen to them and are led by them, that I think we would not only be failing at leaving no one behind, we would also be failing at listening to the voices and values and lived experiences that are very, very central to really healing the world that we live in. And I really say this also as an indigenous young woman who is constantly being shaped and molded by the young people, the indigenous people that I interact with every day at home and in the work that I do, these are people who really continue to be caring, caring for each other, caring for the land, caring for nature, and remain compassionate and kind, you know, even as they fight a system that is harming them and oppressing them and even killing them. So unless our institutions and processes are being led by them, then we would be failing at what we need to do, really. Just to add, I think what we need then is a shift, really, the shift in who holds power and space to speak and to lead, a shift in who gets resources, a shift in whose expertise we are listening to and whose values are guiding decision-making. For me, this needs to happen for transformation to really happen if we are sincere about really shifting and changing the system.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): That’s That’s very well put, especially if we are sincere and I hope everyone here is sincere about making that shift. Amani, what are some of the examples of innovative approaches that youth utilize in tackling the global challenges?

Amani Joel Mafigi: Thank you so much for the question and for the opportunity to speak. First of all, we have mentioned a lot of challenges and I know the world is currently facing a lot of them. You mentioned about innovation. Innovation is one way that we can assure a better future, but this innovation should be innovation for good. There are a lot of challenges and all these challenges can be really solved if we are to change the way we are doing things for better. I will share briefly about my story. I am a displaced person for the last 16 years. I’ve been living in Uganda as a firstly displaced person from the Democratic Republic of Congo. My life has been with a lot of adversities, but also great choices to make the world a better place. In 2018, I co-founded a youth-led organization called Unleashed Potentials in Motion, where we empower young people in leadership, potential discovery, business development, and social entrepreneurship. We have seen how this innovation can support young people to realize their future goals, because for anyone who has experienced a displacement, you know how it comes with traumas, having left your home behind. having left your story behind, some of your family members. So, and right now we have over 120 displaced people, 20 million displaced people. And it is such a huge, it’s such a huge opportunity that we have to tap in their talents, their skills, without leaving anyone behind. One of the youth that we trained called Basia Baraka. Let me finalize with this little story. Basia left his home in 2016. He tried to join school, but failed because of language barrier and lack of scholarship opportunities. He learned that Unleashed had opened up its doors, he applied quickly, and then he gained a scholarship at the organization. He started there through mentorship, he made research and realized that in the settlement, malaria was killing quite a big number of young people. So, he thought, which innovation could I create to reduce on the risk of this problem? He realized that he could use organic materials found in the settlement, in the community, to make a mosquito repellent jelly. Basia made the mosquito repellent jelly that is currently solving big challenges. And he’s supporting quite a number of young people to get jobs through his innovation. Now, this is one of the many innovations that young people are making. Like in this room, there are quite a lot of bright minds that are having a lot of innovations that they are creating to solve the challenge that face our world today. When youth are empowered, trusted, and funded, major breakthroughs that will shape our world to solve the challenges of today and the challenges of tomorrow is a guarantee. Thank you.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): Thank you so much, Caleb. Mr. Secretary General, we. We heard Josefa, she talked about the shift and the need for a genuine shift, right? A genuine shift, a genuine interest in making the shift for meaningful and equal youth participation. And Amani shared with us his story and also made a very incredible remark about the need to have youth empowered, trusted and funded. What are your thoughts on this?

Antonio Guterres: I believe that one of the things that is essential at country level, as in international organizations, is to unleash the potential of young people. I mean, things are organized in a way in which to a certain extent young people has no opportunity to develop their own capacities and to be able to have an active engagement and contribution to the society as a whole. So one of the key reforms that needs to be done, that needs to be implemented at all levels is to free the young people, to let young people strive, to let the potential of young people be multiplied. And what we see today, if one thinks about how technology is evolving, this is a need even for the future economy. The future economy requires a level of youth in the capacity to understand the new technologies and to use the new technologies. That it’s absolutely essential to create the space, create the environment in which young people can assume leadership in their lives, in their activities. and more and more in the lives and activities of the community. This is, I think, the main objective of my generation, is to let the next generation be able to take the power that we are still misusing.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): Wow. Is that a commitment?

Antonio Guterres: Yes, it is. But I mean, let’s be clear, power is never given. Power is taken. Which means young people need to have an exigent approach to their participation in countries, in organizations, in the life of our planet. So, I encourage young people not to be afraid to fight for their rights.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): Power is never given, it’s taken. That’s quite a statement of inspiration for young people to continue the determination. There’s two words that you said that sparked a thought for me. Unleash and free. And in the spirit that this is a conversation among all of us, as I said, not only the four of us here on stage with the other two young colleagues, but this is a conversation among all of us, I would want us to try to unleash our creativity and our imagination and free our minds a bit. discussions, we’ve been discussing challenges here, we’ve been discussing strategies, gaps and so on. But we also want to have a moment to think, to reflect and to imagine a little bit. So the first thing I’ll ask everyone is to make sure that you’re sitting comfortably in your chairs, you know, just sit comfortably and think a little bit about the future, about the world we want to live in. Maybe take a deep breath, maybe another deep breath. And if you feel comfortable, close your eyes. If you don’t, just try to think and connect with yourself a little bit. And while we do that, I want you to think and imagine two different worlds. One world where nothing changes, no reforms are done to ensure youth meaningful participation, a world where everyone goes business as usual, and a world where the status quo right now, where young people do not have the power to influence or to participate. That’s the first world. Now, I want you to imagine a second world where we adopt transformative change, where young people are able to unleash. unleash their power, unleash their potential, where young people can be free to participate and able to influence the decision-making processes. So maybe just take another deep breath and think about these two different worlds. Just for a second, imagine how they look like. And then now we have created two different worlds. And my question to you, Josefa, if I can start with you. Which world would you want to live in? Which one would you want your future? The future generation to live in, and what stood out for you about that world?

Josefa Tauli: So of course, it’s the one where transformation really happens. And I’ll share two aspects that are really personal to me. First is in this future, children and young people are not afraid of the future that’s facing them and don’t have to fight as hard as we’re fighting now. Even as we speak, there is a big climate march going on outside these halls who are calling to stop funding extractivism and the climate crisis. So one where children and young people are not afraid of the future. And the second aspect is thinking of my family at home in the Philippines, because my father is an environmental defender and he’s facing a difficult situation with criminalization. So in this world that I envision in the future, I really hope that environmental defenders are safe and fully protected.

Moderator: Thank you so much. And Amani, what about you and what action do we need to take for that world or maybe not take?

Amani Joel Mafigi: More than ever, young people are more than committed to create change in their communities. We want to bring our energy, our talents, and our skills. One action that could be taken to achieve a world where we are able to solve challenges that we face at this moment and for the future to come, we could create a Youth Empowerment Fund that supports initiatives that are solving challenges in climatic action, social justice, and innovation because this way we can indeed be able to project the future and see a light, to project the future and want to be there, not a world where we don’t want to be. And I was talking to someone yesterday who mentioned that at times when they look into the future, they feel like they do not want to be into that future. And it is us. It is one by one to take action. Like the Secretary General mentioned, the seat is not given, it is taken. So it is for every individual to take their actions in whichever way possible that they can to create that change and to have that world. Thank you.

Moderator: Thank you so much, Caleb. Now, I have the same question to the audience. So raise your hand if you want to be in World 1. There is one hand over there. There is another hand. Was that a third hand? No? Okay. And raise your hand if you want to be in World 2. That’s many hands, more than what I can count. Mr. Secretary General, which world would you want to be in?

Antonio Guterres: It’s not a matter of wanting to be, it’s a matter of building it. We need to build Number 2. What is Number 1? Number 1 means the temperature will rise to 2.5 to 3 degrees. It means that we will have devastating impacts caused by high-level sea rise, by storms, drought, by all kinds of natural phenomena. There will be no more glaciers. There will be no more corals. Biodiversity will be largely eliminated. Is this the world where we want to live? Of course, a few people will live well in this world. There will be a group of privileged people, because inequalities will grow, that will live in a kind of air-conditioning igloo and go on enjoying the good things of life. But the overwhelming majority of the population of the world will be in big trouble. And then it will be the world in which the enormous potential of the technologies that we are developing, especially artificial intelligence, will be in the hands of a small group of great companies, and the capacity… of transforming this world in a world in which human agency will be less and less relevant, in which we will be controlled by a system that we don’t even understand, where we will not even be able to know what is true and what is false. This is the world that will be world number one. But world number two is possible. We can fight climate change now. We can reduce the emissions drastically in this decade, and we can guarantee that we stick to the 1.5 degrees, and that the peace with nature is reestablished in the world and biodiversity is preserved, and the experience of indigenous communities demonstrates that it is possible. And on the other hand, we can use artificial intelligence to make it a fantastic instrument of development in a way that is much more fair, with much less inequality in the world, because it’s something that, with adequate investment in literacy, with adequate investment in the youth, the youth will be able to use it everywhere. So, I mean, the world number two is a world that will respond to the dramatic challenges that the world number one is creating. Destruction of nature with climate change reversed by a world in which we all can live normally.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): Indeed.

Antonio Guterres: Technology to divide, technology to unite. And then, one thing that is very important that was said, we see more and more young people today with a lot of anxiety about the future. We have a serious mental health problem developing in the world today because of this perception. that we are going in the wrong direction and that the world is becoming more and more difficult and more and more dangerous. That is why it is absolutely essential to go to model number two.

Hajer Sharief (Moderator): Model number two, world number two is possible and I really like how you challenged me on my question that it’s not the world we want to live in but which one we can build and that’s something that we will continue discussing today, especially in the sessions. Now, after this session, we’re going to have a half an hour break and then there are three sessions that are focused on inclusion, equity and trust which I think are essential to build world number two. Before we close, in the beginning, we saw the visual that was shown on the screen and maybe now we can take a look at it. That’s such an amazing visual, I must say, and it captures very well this honest and frank conversation. Thank you, everyone, for joining us. Thank you, Josefa. Thank you, Secretary General. Thank you, Amani. And I hope this is a conversation that will continue. Thank you so much, everyone.

D

Daphne Frias

Speech speed

140 words per minute

Speech length

863 words

Speech time

368 seconds

Tokenism is prevalent – youth voices heard but not acted upon

Explanation

Daphne Frias argues that tokenism is a significant issue in youth engagement with the UN. While young people’s stories are shared, they don’t actually inform action, and their voices fall on silent ears.

Evidence

The Mentimeter poll showed tokenism as the highest-ranking selection for youth participation.

Major Discussion Point

Current State of Youth Participation in the UN

Agreed with

Caleb Brathwaite

Antonio Guterres

Josefa Tauli

Amani Joel Mafigi

Agreed on

Need for meaningful youth participation in UN decision-making

Disagreed with

Caleb Brathwaite

Antonio Guterres

Disagreed on

Current state of youth participation in the UN

Obstacles remain in meaningful youth engagement, including educational and language barriers

Explanation

Frias points out that there are significant barriers for young people trying to engage with or work for the UN. These include educational requirements and language obstacles that limit access and participation.

Evidence

She mentions criteria for UN employees and the difficulty for young people to get into UN forums.

Major Discussion Point

Current State of Youth Participation in the UN

C

Caleb Brathwaite

Speech speed

157 words per minute

Speech length

543 words

Speech time

207 seconds

System needs updating to better impact young people

Explanation

Caleb Brathwaite argues that the UN system, built by previous generations, needs to be updated to better serve and impact young people today and in the future. He emphasizes the need for the system to adapt to the current needs of youth in 2024 and beyond.

Evidence

He references a speech by the Secretary General about the system being built by grandparents.

Major Discussion Point

Current State of Youth Participation in the UN

Agreed with

Daphne Frias

Antonio Guterres

Josefa Tauli

Amani Joel Mafigi

Agreed on

Need for meaningful youth participation in UN decision-making

Disagreed with

Daphne Frias

Antonio Guterres

Disagreed on

Current state of youth participation in the UN

Decentralize UN youth offices globally

Explanation

Brathwaite proposes decentralizing UN youth offices around the world. He suggests establishing these offices in already existing multi-country offices to improve the UN’s role in youth engagement.

Evidence

He mentions the existing UN youth office and the need to expand it globally.

Major Discussion Point

Reforms Needed for Meaningful Youth Participation

Agreed with

Antonio Guterres

Agreed on

Necessity for systemic changes in UN structures

A

António Guterres

Speech speed

126 words per minute

Speech length

2043 words

Speech time

968 seconds

UN is in transition from just listening to youth to including them in decision-making

Explanation

Antonio Guterres describes the evolution of youth engagement at the UN, from initially ignoring young people to now listening to them. He argues that the next phase should be youth participation in decision-making processes.

Evidence

He outlines the historical stages of youth engagement, from rejection to communication to listening, and now moving towards participation.

Major Discussion Point

Current State of Youth Participation in the UN

Agreed with

Daphne Frias

Caleb Brathwaite

Josefa Tauli

Amani Joel Mafigi

Agreed on

Need for meaningful youth participation in UN decision-making

Disagreed with

Daphne Frias

Caleb Brathwaite

Disagreed on

Current state of youth participation in the UN

Integrate youth into UN decision-making processes systematically

Explanation

Guterres proposes reforming UN bodies to systematically include youth in decision-making processes. He emphasizes the need for active intervention of young people at decisive moments in various UN bodies.

Evidence

He mentions looking into all UN bodies’ work, including the General Assembly and Economic and Social Council, to find ways for active youth intervention.

Major Discussion Point

Reforms Needed for Meaningful Youth Participation

Agreed with

Caleb Brathwaite

Agreed on

Necessity for systemic changes in UN structures

Increase number of young people working within the UN

Explanation

Guterres argues for increasing the number of young people working inside the UN organization. He sees this as essential to reverse the trend of an aging UN staff and to ensure that the organization’s output is more adapted to the needs and interests of young people.

Evidence

He mentions the current aging nature of UN staff and the need to have more young people working where decisions are prepared and ideas are born.

Major Discussion Point

Reforms Needed for Meaningful Youth Participation

Agreed with

Caleb Brathwaite

Agreed on

Necessity for systemic changes in UN structures

Unleash potential of young people to lead and contribute to society

Explanation

Guterres emphasizes the need to unleash the potential of young people at all levels. He argues that current systems often limit young people’s opportunities to develop their capacities and actively engage in society.

Evidence

He mentions the importance of youth potential for the future economy, especially in understanding and using new technologies.

Major Discussion Point

Youth Innovation and Empowerment

Empower youth to take power and fight for their rights

Explanation

Guterres encourages young people to actively fight for their rights and take power, rather than waiting for it to be given. He emphasizes the need for an exigent approach from youth in their participation in various spheres of life.

Evidence

He states, “Power is never given. Power is taken.”

Major Discussion Point

Youth Innovation and Empowerment

Choice between a world of climate crisis and inequality vs. one of sustainability and fairness

Explanation

Guterres presents two possible future worlds: one with devastating climate impacts and increased inequality, and another where climate change is mitigated and technology is used for fair development. He argues for the necessity of building the second, more sustainable and equitable world.

Evidence

He describes potential consequences of inaction, such as temperature rise, sea level rise, loss of biodiversity, and technological control by a small group of companies.

Major Discussion Point

Envisioning the Future

Need to build a world with climate action and equitable use of technology

Explanation

Guterres emphasizes the possibility and necessity of building a world that addresses climate change and uses technology for fair development. He argues that this future is achievable with adequate investment in youth and literacy.

Evidence

He mentions the potential of artificial intelligence as a tool for development if used equitably.

Major Discussion Point

Envisioning the Future

J

Josefa Tauli

Speech speed

147 words per minute

Speech length

421 words

Speech time

171 seconds

Shift power dynamics to be led by marginalized youth voices

Explanation

Josefa Tauli argues for a fundamental shift in power dynamics within institutions and decision-making processes. She emphasizes the need for marginalized youth, including indigenous youth and those with disabilities, to lead and guide these processes.

Evidence

She mentions the importance of listening to the voices and values of those who continue to care for each other and the land, even while fighting oppressive systems.

Major Discussion Point

Reforms Needed for Meaningful Youth Participation

Agreed with

Daphne Frias

Caleb Brathwaite

Antonio Guterres

Amani Joel Mafigi

Agreed on

Need for meaningful youth participation in UN decision-making

A world where children are not afraid of the future

Explanation

Tauli envisions a future where children and young people are not afraid of what’s facing them and don’t have to fight as hard as current generations. This represents a world where the challenges of climate change and social injustice have been addressed.

Evidence

She mentions the ongoing climate march outside the UN halls calling to stop funding extractivism and the climate crisis.

Major Discussion Point

Envisioning the Future

A future where environmental defenders are protected

Explanation

Tauli hopes for a future where environmental defenders are safe and fully protected. This reflects her personal connection to the issue and highlights the current dangers faced by those working to protect the environment.

Evidence

She mentions her father, an environmental defender facing criminalization in the Philippines.

Major Discussion Point

Envisioning the Future

A

Amani Joel Mafigi

Speech speed

136 words per minute

Speech length

664 words

Speech time

292 seconds

Support youth-led initiatives solving global challenges

Explanation

Amani Joel Mafigi argues for supporting youth-led initiatives that are working to solve global challenges. He emphasizes the commitment of young people to create change in their communities and their readiness to bring their energy, talents, and skills to address global issues.

Evidence

He shares his personal story of co-founding a youth-led organization called Unleashed Potentials in Motion, which empowers young people in leadership, potential discovery, business development, and social entrepreneurship.

Major Discussion Point

Youth Innovation and Empowerment

Agreed with

Daphne Frias

Caleb Brathwaite

Antonio Guterres

Josefa Tauli

Agreed on

Need for meaningful youth participation in UN decision-making

Create a Youth Empowerment Fund for climate action, social justice, and innovation

Explanation

Mafigi proposes the creation of a Youth Empowerment Fund to support initiatives addressing climate action, social justice, and innovation. He sees this as a concrete action to achieve a world where young people can solve current and future challenges.

Major Discussion Point

Youth Innovation and Empowerment

Agreements

Agreement Points

Need for meaningful youth participation in UN decision-making

Daphne Frias

Caleb Brathwaite

Antonio Guterres

Josefa Tauli

Amani Joel Mafigi

Tokenism is prevalent – youth voices heard but not acted upon

System needs updating to better impact young people

UN is in transition from just listening to youth to including them in decision-making

Shift power dynamics to be led by marginalized youth voices

Support youth-led initiatives solving global challenges

All speakers emphasized the importance of moving beyond tokenism to meaningful youth participation in UN decision-making processes.

Necessity for systemic changes in UN structures

Caleb Brathwaite

Antonio Guterres

Decentralize UN youth offices globally

Integrate youth into UN decision-making processes systematically

Increase number of young people working within the UN

Both speakers argued for structural changes within the UN to better incorporate youth perspectives and participation.

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers emphasized the importance of empowering youth to take leadership roles and contribute to solving global challenges.

Antonio Guterres

Amani Joel Mafigi

Unleash potential of young people to lead and contribute to society

Support youth-led initiatives solving global challenges

Both speakers envisioned a future where current global challenges, particularly climate change, are addressed to create a more sustainable and equitable world for future generations.

Josefa Tauli

Antonio Guterres

A world where children are not afraid of the future

Choice between a world of climate crisis and inequality vs. one of sustainability and fairness

Unexpected Consensus

Acknowledgment of past failures and need for youth leadership

Antonio Guterres

Daphne Frias

Empower youth to take power and fight for their rights

It’s very rare where the generation before ours takes responsibility for the harms that have been caused

The UN Secretary-General’s frank admission of his generation’s failures and encouragement for youth to take power was unexpectedly aligned with the youth representative’s call for accountability from older generations.

Overall Assessment

Summary

There was broad agreement on the need for meaningful youth participation in UN decision-making, structural changes within the UN to facilitate this, and the importance of empowering youth to address global challenges. Speakers also shared a vision for a more sustainable and equitable future.

Consensus level

High level of consensus among all speakers on the core issues of youth participation and empowerment. This strong agreement implies a shared recognition of the urgency for change in how the UN engages with youth, which could potentially lead to more concrete actions and reforms in the near future.

Disagreements

Disagreement Points

Current state of youth participation in the UN

Daphne Frias

Caleb Brathwaite

Antonio Guterres

Tokenism is prevalent – youth voices heard but not acted upon

System needs updating to better impact young people

UN is in transition from just listening to youth to including them in decision-making

While all speakers agree that youth participation needs improvement, they differ in their assessment of the current state. Frias emphasizes tokenism, Brathwaite focuses on systemic outdatedness, and Guterres presents a more optimistic view of transition towards inclusion.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of disagreement revolve around the current state of youth participation in the UN and the specific approaches to improve it. While there is a general consensus on the need for change, speakers differ in their assessment of the current situation and the most effective strategies for improvement.

Disagreement level

The level of disagreement among the speakers is moderate. While there are differing perspectives on the current state and specific strategies, there is a strong underlying agreement on the need for increased and meaningful youth participation. This level of disagreement is constructive as it provides diverse viewpoints and approaches to addressing the issue, which can lead to more comprehensive and effective solutions.

Partial Agreements

Partial Agreements

Both Brathwaite and Guterres agree on the need for structural changes to increase youth participation, but they propose different approaches. Brathwaite suggests decentralizing UN youth offices, while Guterres focuses on integrating youth into existing decision-making processes and increasing youth employment within the UN.

Caleb Brathwaite

Antonio Guterres

Decentralize UN youth offices globally

Integrate youth into UN decision-making processes systematically

Increase number of young people working within the UN

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers emphasized the importance of empowering youth to take leadership roles and contribute to solving global challenges.

Antonio Guterres

Amani Joel Mafigi

Unleash potential of young people to lead and contribute to society

Support youth-led initiatives solving global challenges

Both speakers envisioned a future where current global challenges, particularly climate change, are addressed to create a more sustainable and equitable world for future generations.

Josefa Tauli

Antonio Guterres

A world where children are not afraid of the future

Choice between a world of climate crisis and inequality vs. one of sustainability and fairness

Takeaways

Key Takeaways

Youth participation in UN processes is currently at the level of tokenism and consultation, not true decision-making power

Meaningful youth engagement requires systemic reforms to UN structures and processes

Young people are innovating solutions to global challenges but need more support and resources

A transformative shift in power dynamics is needed to center marginalized youth voices

Two potential futures were envisioned – one of climate crisis and inequality vs. one of sustainability and equity

Resolutions and Action Items

Integrate youth systematically into UN decision-making processes

Increase number of young people working within the UN

Decentralize UN youth offices globally

Create a Youth Empowerment Fund for youth-led initiatives

Unresolved Issues

Specific mechanisms for integrating youth into UN decision-making bodies

How to overcome budgetary constraints to hire more young UN staff

Ways to protect environmental defenders and activists

How to address youth mental health and anxiety about the future

Suggested Compromises

Implement reverse mentorship programs where adults learn from youth

Balance between consultation and direct youth participation in decision-making

Thought Provoking Comments

We the peoples of the United Nations have determined, and today the people also are coming together to determine.

Speaker

Hajer Sharief (Moderator)

Reason

This comment set the tone for the entire discussion by emphasizing the importance of collective action and participation from all people, not just governments or representatives.

Impact

It framed the subsequent conversation around the need for greater youth engagement and participation in UN processes.

The system needs to be updated, and the system needs to be able to better care for us now in 2024 as young people and beyond.

Speaker

Caleb Brathwaite

Reason

This comment directly challenged the current UN system and called for significant reforms to better serve young people.

Impact

It sparked a discussion about concrete steps and reforms needed to ensure meaningful youth participation in UN decision-making processes.

Young people in countries of Latin America and the global south have always been fighting, but we are, some of us, giving up our lives in order to do this and this should not be the case.

Speaker

Daphne Frias

Reason

This powerful statement highlighted the extreme risks faced by young activists in certain parts of the world, bringing attention to global inequalities in youth engagement.

Impact

It deepened the conversation by introducing the critical issue of safety for young activists and the need for global protection of youth voices.

We have to recognize that my generation messed up in relation to the world today.

Speaker

Antonio Guterres

Reason

This candid admission from the UN Secretary-General was strikingly honest and set a tone of accountability for past failures.

Impact

It shifted the conversation towards a more frank discussion of intergenerational responsibility and the need for systemic change led by younger generations.

Unless our institutions and processes are being led by them, then we would be failing at what we need to do, really.

Speaker

Josefa Tauli

Reason

This comment emphasized the need for not just inclusion, but leadership from marginalized youth groups in decision-making processes.

Impact

It pushed the discussion towards considering more radical changes in power structures within global institutions.

Power is never given. Power is taken. Which means young people need to have an exigent approach to their participation in countries, in organizations, in the life of our planet.

Speaker

Antonio Guterres

Reason

This provocative statement challenged young people to actively claim their place in decision-making processes rather than waiting for it to be granted.

Impact

It energized the discussion and shifted the focus towards actionable steps young people can take to increase their influence and participation.

Overall Assessment

These key comments shaped the discussion by progressively deepening the analysis of youth participation in global decision-making. The conversation evolved from identifying problems to proposing solutions, and ultimately to challenging young people to take an active role in claiming their power. The frank admissions from the Secretary-General added gravity to the discussion and opened space for more radical proposals for change. Overall, the comments pushed the dialogue beyond surface-level considerations of youth inclusion towards a more nuanced examination of power structures, global inequalities, and the need for fundamental systemic changes.

Follow-up Questions

How can the UN youth office be decentralized to better engage young people globally?

Speaker

Caleb Brathwaite

Explanation

Caleb suggested establishing UN youth offices around the world in multi-country offices to better implement youth engagement initiatives

How can barriers to youth employment and engagement within the UN system be reduced?

Speaker

Daphne Frias

Explanation

Daphne highlighted obstacles like educational and language requirements that prevent many young people from working at the UN

How can the Universal Declaration of Human Rights be expanded to better protect young people’s voices?

Speaker

Daphne Frias

Explanation

Daphne suggested this as a way to address issues of tokenism and improve meaningful youth participation

What concrete reforms are needed to ensure youth participation in UN decision-making processes?

Speaker

Moderator

Explanation

The moderator asked this of the Secretary-General to understand specific steps for improvement

How can the UN reverse the trend of an aging staff and incorporate more young people?

Speaker

Antonio Guterres

Explanation

The Secretary-General identified this as a key area to address to improve youth representation within the organization

What strategies can ensure meaningful participation of marginalized youth groups in decision-making?

Speaker

Josefa Tauli

Explanation

Josefa emphasized the need to include indigenous youth, youth with disabilities, and young refugees in processes

How can resources and power be shifted to amplify youth voices and leadership?

Speaker

Josefa Tauli

Explanation

Josefa suggested this was necessary for true transformation of systems and institutions

What innovative approaches are youth using to tackle global challenges?

Speaker

Moderator

Explanation

The moderator asked this to highlight youth-led solutions and initiatives

How can a Youth Empowerment Fund be created to support youth initiatives in climate action, social justice, and innovation?

Speaker

Amani Joel Mafigi

Explanation

Amani proposed this as a concrete action to empower youth to solve global challenges

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed.

Friday Opening Ceremony: Summit of the Future Action Days

Friday Opening Ceremony: Summit of the Future Action Days

Session at a Glance

Summary

This transcript covers the opening ceremony of Youth Action Day at the United Nations Headquarters, part of the Summit of the Future. The event focused on empowering youth voices and engaging young people in shaping global governance and policy. Speakers included UN officials, world leaders, and youth advocates who emphasized the importance of youth participation in addressing global challenges.

Key themes included the need for youth representation in decision-making processes, the impact of conflicts and crises on young people, and the potential for youth to drive positive change. Speakers highlighted the establishment of the UN Youth Office as a significant step towards youth inclusion. They also stressed the urgency of addressing issues like climate change, economic inequality, and peace-building with youth at the forefront.

The discussion showcased diverse perspectives, from the President of Cabo Verde emphasizing youth empowerment in small island developing states, to young advocates calling for action on children’s rights and political representation. Artistic expressions, including a video message from Hello Kitty, were used to inspire hope and creativity among youth.

The event culminated with anticipation for a dialogue between young people and the UN Secretary-General, emphasizing the Summit of the Future as a crucial opportunity for youth to influence global policy. Overall, the discussion underscored the critical role of youth in shaping a more inclusive, sustainable, and peaceful future for all.

Keypoints

Major discussion points:

– The importance of youth engagement and empowerment in shaping the future

– The need for greater youth representation in decision-making processes and leadership roles

– Addressing global challenges like climate change, inequality, and conflict that disproportionately affect youth

– The role of the UN and the upcoming Summit of the Future in advancing youth priorities

– Using art, technology and innovation to amplify youth voices and drive positive change

Overall purpose:

The purpose of this discussion was to kick off the Youth Action Days ahead of the UN Summit of the Future, highlighting the critical role of youth in shaping global policy and calling for greater youth inclusion in decision-making processes.

Tone:

The overall tone was inspirational, hopeful and energetic. Speakers aimed to motivate and empower youth attendees while also conveying the urgency of youth action on global issues. There was an emphasis on optimism about youth potential balanced with realism about the challenges ahead. The tone remained consistently upbeat and forward-looking throughout the various speeches and segments.

Speakers

Moderators/Facilitators:

– Florence Ifeoluwa Otetola (DJ Cuppy) – DJ, philanthropist, and moderator

Speakers:

– Keisha De Freece Lawrence – Indigenous education specialist and founding director of Sovereign Science

– Felipe Paullier – Assistant Secretary General for Youth Affairs at the UN

– José Maria Pereira Neves – President of Cabo Verde

– Terry Otieno – Youth advocate from Kenya

– Areej – Children’s rights advocate from Yemen

– Dan Carden – UK Member of Parliament and President of the Board of the Forum of Young Parliamentarians

– Hello Kitty – Animated character promoting SDGs

– Sanjana Sanghi – UNDP India youth champion and advocate

Areas of expertise:

– Florence Ifeoluwa Otetola: Entertainment, philanthropy, youth engagement

– Keisha De Freece Lawrence: Indigenous rights, traditional ecological knowledge

– Felipe Paullier: Youth affairs, UN leadership

– José Maria Pereira Neves: Governance, leadership, youth empowerment

– Terry Otieno: Youth advocacy, global youth leadership

– Areej: Children’s rights, conflict zone advocacy

– Dan Carden: Politics, youth representation in government

– Hello Kitty: SDG awareness, youth engagement

– Sanjana Sanghi: Youth development, advocacy for underprivileged children

Full session report

Revised Summary of Youth Action Day Opening Ceremony

The opening ceremony of Youth Action Day at the United Nations Headquarters, part of the Summit of the Future, brought together a diverse group of speakers to discuss the critical role of youth in shaping global governance and policy. The event, moderated by DJ and philanthropist Florence Ifeoluwa Otetola (DJ Cuppy), featured UN officials, world leaders, and youth advocates from various backgrounds, emphasizing the global nature of youth engagement.

Key Themes and Presentations

1. Indigenous Recognition and Land Acknowledgment

Keshia De Freece Lawrence, an indigenous education specialist, opened the ceremony with a powerful land acknowledgment. She recognized the 400th anniversary of the Dutch invasion of Lenapehoking territory, highlighting the importance of acknowledging indigenous peoples’ connection to the land and their ongoing presence.

2. Youth Empowerment and Engagement in Global Decision-Making

Felipe Paullier, Assistant Secretary General for Youth Affairs at the UN, emphasized the establishment of the UN Youth Office as a significant milestone for youth representation. He acknowledged the barriers young people face in participating in UN events, such as visa restrictions, language barriers, and financial constraints. Paullier called for concrete commitments at the upcoming Summit of the Future to address these challenges.

Dan Carden, UK Member of Parliament and President of the Board of the Forum of Young Parliamentarians, shared a striking statistic: despite more than half the world’s population being under 30, only 2.8% of Members of Parliament are under 30. He stressed the need for increased youth participation in political processes.

Youth advocates Sanjana Sanghi and Terry Otieno emphasized the importance of youth voices in shaping the future. Sanghi made a passionate plea for youth inclusion, stating, “All we ask is for a seat at the tables of change… All we ask is for our voices to be heard because we matter and our voice matters.”

3. Addressing Global Challenges

Speakers highlighted pressing global issues that disproportionately affect youth, including climate change, economic inequality, and conflict. José Maria Pereira Neves, President of Cabo Verde, stressed the importance of accelerating progress on the Sustainable Development Goals.

Areej, a children’s rights advocate from Yemen, brought attention to the critical need to protect children’s rights and futures in conflict zones, emphasizing the urgent need for peace, security, and development initiatives that prioritize youth welfare.

4. Summit of the Future and Pact for the Future

The upcoming Summit of the Future was positioned as a crucial opportunity for youth to influence global policy. Felipe Paullier described it as a “once-in-a-generation opportunity to reshape multilateralism,” emphasizing the importance of youth involvement in the preparatory process and advocacy.

5. Diversity, Inclusion, and Representation

Hello Kitty delivered a video message emphasizing the importance of respecting differences while finding common ground. The message also highlighted the connection between Hello Kitty’s values and the Sustainable Development Goals.

6. Art and Youth Engagement

The ceremony featured the presentation of the “Hope in Action” art project, showcasing youth creativity and expression in addressing global challenges.

7. Social Media Engagement

DJ Cuppy encouraged audience participation throughout the event, promoting the use of social media hashtags to engage online participants and extend the reach of the discussion.

Conclusion

The Youth Action Day opening ceremony set a tone of optimism and urgency regarding youth involvement in shaping global policy. By bringing together diverse voices and perspectives, the event highlighted the critical role of youth in addressing global challenges and building a more inclusive, sustainable, and peaceful future. As the world looks towards the Summit of the Future, the message was clear: youth must be at the forefront of decision-making processes to create meaningful and lasting change.

The ceremony concluded with an announcement of an upcoming conversation with the UN Secretary-General, further emphasizing the commitment to youth engagement at the highest levels of the United Nations.

Session Transcript

Florence Ifeoluwa Otetola – DJ Cuppy: Yes, thank you so much for the energy, thank you, it’s going to be a fantastic day. Welcome to the United Nations Headquarters for Youth Action Day, make some noise! We have so many, so many incredible young people joining us today and online as well from so many countries. I want to give a big shout out to our UN Web TV family. My name is Florence Ifeoluwa Otetola, but you can call me Cuppie. I’m repping a country called Nigeria, in case you’ve heard of it. Now I’m a DJ, philanthropist, but also your moderator, but it feels like I’m more your co-host because today is all about you. It’s all about the youth, and I am so, so honoured to be taking you on this journey today. And as they say in my language Yoruba, welcome everyone, energy! Now someone once told me, it’s not about your what, but it’s about your why. So why are we here? We believe that youth need to be able to take action. We believe in leadership that brings everyone to the table, and that’s why I’m just so proud to be here. My favourite SDG is definitely four, opportunity for everyone to get quality education. And at my foundation, the Cuppie Foundation, I’m so proud because we provide hardship funds for African students. So throughout today, this opening ceremony, I’d love you to get involved in the conversation, especially youth. What’s your favourite SDG? What do you have to say? What do you believe in? So make sure you use hashtag, of course, youth… lead and also hashtag our common future and don’t forget to get involved because everything here has been specially curated for the youth at UN Youth Affairs and don’t forget to make sure you have your say. So today is going to be amazing it’s going to be full of energy and like I said I’m a DJ so I like crowd involvement so I do something called a copy crowd check so when I say youth I want you to say action should we give it a go youth youth yes we got it right yes give it up for yourselves so without further ado I am so ecstatic to be taking you on this journey of course with the UN Youth Affairs office and its partners we are going to kick off with a special guest I’m so excited to welcome Keisha Talking Waters DeVries she’s going to kick off this day with a traditional land acknowledgement. Keisha is the founding director of Sovereign Science an indigenous-led community think-tank and she’s all about promoting a deep connection with nature and pushing for indigenous rights. Now over to you Keshia.

Keshia De Freece Lawrence: Wuluwapan, Kulamasi, good morning my name is Keshia De Freece Lawrence I’m Rampalinape deer and wolf clan I’m the indigenous education specialist at Harvard Forest I’m one of the inaugural tribal research fellows at the John Carter Brown University Library and I’m the founding director of the indigenous political theory and traditional ecological knowledge think-tank Sovereign Science. Alongside me today is my mother chemist educator and twice awarded indigenous Fulbright scholar Dr. Maria Lawrence who I’m eternally grateful for. My speech today is to address the eastern woodlands of Turtle Island and the many through lines of interconnection that exists for the legacy of indigeneity globally and the infamy of colonization and imperialism internationally. The eastern woodlands is the vast land and waterscapes east of the Great Plains and below the mighty Arctic and is the intricate cradleboard of the Haudenosaunee, the Nanticoke Lenni Lenape, the Wabanaki, the Micmac, the Wampanoag, the Nipmuc, the Massachusetts, the Nahagansett, the Pequot, the Mohegan, the Munsee, the Paugussett, the Skadikot, the Ramapo, the Shinnecock, the Montaukut, the Lumbee, the Shawnee, the Rappahannock, the Cherokee, the Seminole, the now six nations of the Grand River, the Anishinaabe, the Piscataway, and many other communities that call the land and waters of the first sunrise their home of origin, including our many Caribbean relatives. Although plagued by diasporic mechanisms, pervasive racism, and intrusively predatory colonial tactics, we remain abundant in timeless remedies prescribed by the Creator, filled by our kinship to Mother Earth, and taken in collective community strides, uniting us from past to present and into future generations unknown. 2024 marks 400 years since the Dutch invasion of the Lenapehoking territory. Traditional Umami, Munsee, and Algonquin dialects of lands, commonly referred to as New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Delaware, Pennsylvania, and pockets of others such as Massachusetts and Ohio. As Eastern Woodlands Indigenous Peoples, we have codified our Akwenee, our peace, since time immemorial because it has always been dependent on Aki, the earth. The digital compact does not include enough vernacular around indigeneity, thus appearing to erase future protections and innovations of indigenous communities and the larger pathways of a sustainable future, while also limiting indigenous peoples from a future associated with digital advancements. To appreciate the magnitude of this oversight, one must understand the quantum infinity that is indigenous ingenuity, from genetics to culinary, governance to forestry. traditional carbon sequestration to pragmatic geology, there is no rubric for the psyche of Indigenous peoples, places, or our relatives. Understanding that some of the antecedents to this reasoning are the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the most recent report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, there is a spectra to the multifaceted work of restoration and preservation ahead of all of us. It is truly remarkable that at the 79th United Nations General Assembly, there is retroactively progressive changes in protocols and content happening. I pray this good medicine is continuously planted and nurtured in every version of the future we are all setting off to caretake. I would be remissed if I didn’t take this opportunity to publicly thank the many elders here and gone that have led bravely in these spaces. Thank you to all those involved for organizing this week, including those who invited me, the Honorable Secretary General, the Undersecretary General for Policy, the Major Group for Children and Youth, and all of your phenomenal colleagues. Anushik Katabatash, Seygo Niawe, Wanishi Kishkulamankwe, Wacomanitou. Thank you, creator.

Florence Ifeoluwa Otetola – DJ Cuppy: Wow, wow, thank you so much, Keshia, for that profound start, respect and recognition. And you know, earlier on, I mentioned, it’s not just about our what, it’s about our why. So it’s only right that we watch through the official video for the summit of the future so that we actually understand what is at stake here and understand why youth action is so important. After the epic video, I’m so excited, we have an epic guest. After that, we’ll be on stage. Our guest, who is the youngest ever senior appointment in the history of the United Nations and the head of the newly established United Nations Youth Office. Alongside the summit of the future video, please welcome to the stage, our first ever Assistant Secretary General for Youth Affairs, Felipe Paullier.

Official Summit Video: Change. It defines our world. Adapting. Renewing. Redefining. And transforming. But today, the escalating pace of change is pushing our interconnected world to its limits. We cannot keep up with the challenges of today, or harness the opportunities of tomorrow with systems built for yesterday. We are at a pivotal moment in history. The choices we make today will have an exponential impact on current and future generations. This is our once-in-a-generation opportunity. To come together as one world. To make tough choices. Overcome conflict and chaos. And create a future worth striving for. A future worth living for. When countries work together, we can pave the way for global peace and prosperity. Restore our planet. Promote digital transformation. And protect human rights. But we must act now, as one world, to pave the way for our common future. For the benefit of all.

Felipe Paullier: Good afternoon. How are you doing? That’s good, that’s what we expect from this day and from the audience. So dear colleagues, delegates, fellow youth, I am so excited to join you today and to officially celebrate the opening of the Action Days of the Summit of the Future. Today I carry with an immense privilege and a deep sense of responsibility as I deliver a message of hope, of recognition, and a call to action as the first United Nations Assistant Secretary General for Youth Affairs. More than 1,600 young people registered for the Action Days, and thousands more are joining us remotely. So this is exceptional, you know? But at the same time, I want to recognize the barriers that many young people constantly face when trying to participate in these spaces. Visa barriers, language barriers, financial barriers. So to all of them, we hear you, we see you, and we recognize you today also in this conference room. I stand here filled with pride, with satisfaction, and a duty to acknowledge the path that brought us here. Allow me to take a moment to recognize those who have planted the seeds along the way. First and foremost, the young people who tirelessly have been advocating and striving for a world that is more just, more diverse. and equal. I also wish to extend my heartfelt gratitude to the former Secretary General’s envoy on youth, Ahmad Anjay Adma, who both took essential steps shedding light on youth issues and had long before issues that were invisible and relegated. And let me also recognize the support and the conviction of our leadership. Thank you, Secretary General Antonio Guterres, and thank you, Deputy Secretary General Amina Mohammed, who is in the room with us now, for being big champions of this agenda and being part of the Youth Action Days as true allies. The establishment of the United Nations Youth Office as a specialized mechanism for youth affairs in the United Nations Secretariat is the biggest testament of this journey. Backed by strong political support from member states, it is a significant shift in our commitment on youth issues. And today, we are here at the UN General Assembly, just a few hours before the starting point of a critical intergovernmental process for the future of global governance. The Summit of the Future is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to reshape multilateral system and to put young people at the center of multilateral system. Over the past year, our office has worked closely with young people around the world to advocate for concrete commitments at this summit, hoping to make meaningful youth engagement the norm. Esteemed young people and colleagues, ten years ago, a day like today would have been unimaginable. A day on the official program of the UN Security Council. the United Nations dedicated to youth, a day when young people are truly at the forefront of discussions of thinking and proposals. A day when this House recognises that any agenda, whether it’s gender, climate, peace and security, sustainable development or human rights, has the youth agenda as a cross-cultivating element of it. But despite this progress, our world is at a critical juncture. We are witnessing the highest number of conflicts since the Second World War, and these conflicts disproportionately affect young people all over the world. From Gaza to Ukraine, through Sudan to Myanmar, conflict-related deaths have reached a 28-year high. With one in four young people globally living in conflict-affected countries, these tensions directly impact their lives and their livelihoods. At the same time, mistrust between young people and institutions continues to worsen, and this is leading to exacerbating inequalities and increasing instability. As a global system and community, we have failed to build that world that we promised so many times. Excuses for failing to end climate tragedy, wars, forced displacements and ultimately for lost generations are running in short supply. The fact that we are gathered here today, young people from all over the world, representatives, heads of state, representatives of civil society, academia, public and private sectors, we are precisely here so that we can break from this trend and take action. On Sunday, the summit of the future opens, and I am hopeful and confident that these action days will bring about the positive transformation we need. That is the intent behind these two days that we inaugurate today. Colleagues, the Pact for the Future with member states, with governments, concrete commitments, it offers an opportunity to build the future we want. It is our joint responsibility to put these actions into practice. Although young people remain the generation with the most confidence in the multilateral system, we run the risk of losing them as partners if we don’t make this pact a reality. So I truly hope that these action days will spark actions and commitments and foster a renewed sense of solidarity, of collaboration, of trust, and of community. Thank you. Muchísimas gracias.

Florence Ifeoluwa Otetola – DJ Cuppy: Thank you. Thank you. Thank you so much to our Assistant Secretary General for Youth Affairs. And what he said was so true. We have come a long way, but we have to make sure we still go the further distance required. As we are now warmed up, I think we are ready for some speakers, and youth voices require good listeners to hear them out. So it is time to hear from some pretty good listeners. I am so honored to introduce our first speaker, who is no stranger to empowering youth. The president of Cabo Verde is not only dedicated to leadership, but is also an author. Outside of serving his country, His Excellency José María Neves has authored several books, including A Future to Build. As an African, personally, I am so inspired when I see innovative leadership styles. So please join me in welcoming the president of Cabo Verde to stage, His Excellency Jose Maria Neves.

José Maria Pereira Neves: Madam Deputy Secretary General, Assistant Secretary General for Youth Affairs, representatives of member states, civil society, private sector, academia, local and regional authorities, youth representatives, their youth. Ladies and gentlemen, my first words are to say that I’m truly honored to be here to address the youth of the world and the geocultural diversity and aspirations they represent. It is the satisfaction of someone who represents a previous generation and who today holds government responsibilities and is communicating with the young people of today while also thinking about future generations. We are gathered here over the next few years for the summit of the future and I want to commend the UN Thank you, Secretary General, for proposing this vital initiative under our common agenda to seal in a pact for the future a shared vision as well as urgent and decisive actions necessary to tackle the pressing current and emerging challenges impacting the world globally, especially those living in vulnerable situations, many of whom are youth. That is why the youth are at the forefront of our objectives and, as such, must be an integral part of the solutions we pursue as driving forces for leadership, change and action. Empowering the youth becomes not just a priority, it is an urgent necessity for all actors, both state and non-state actors. Here are four critical areas we view as essential. First, accelerating the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals in an inclusive manner, ensuring no youth is left behind in the fight against poverty and climate change, in access to health care, quality education, training and employment, alongside measures to alleviate the pressures to forced migration. In short, in the economic, technological and social empowerment of the youth. Second, promoting peace and security by placing youth at the center of development efforts in opposition to wars, conflicts. and social instability, which robbed them of opportunities for their spiritual and material growth and extinguished their hope and destroyed their futures. Third, science, technology, and innovation and digital cooperation are areas where youth can thrive by excellence. Thus, we must work at both international and national levels to ensure young people have access to these critical resources, using them as levers for transformation and for their progress and well-being. Fourth, it is essential to enhance young people’s participation in global and national governance toward their empowerment. International organizations must open their doors wider for the statutory recruitment of youth and encourage their involvement in various volunteer opportunities. At the national level, engaging youth in political, cultural, and social spheres is crucial for nurturing, learning, and exercising leadership. My country, Cabo Verde, is a small island developing state. Above all, Cabo Verde is a nation with over 500 years of history and a country that will celebrate 50 years of independence in 2025. It is a representative democracy committed to upholding human rights, particularly those of young people who make up the majority of our resident population. Through government initiatives and collaboration with civil society organizations, young people are active contributors to the solutions we advocate for in sustainable development, economic and social inclusion, peace and stability, both locally and globally. This summit is unique and will be remembered as the Youth Summit, focused on the youth, by the youth and for the youth, and it will open a new and more inclusive chapter in multilateralism. I wish you all fruitful Action Days and an excellent journey towards the future. Thank you very much for your attention.

Florence Ifeoluwa Otetola – DJ Cuppy: Wow, thank you so much, Your Excellency Jose Maria Neves Brigada, for being such an example in highlighting the importance and meaningfulness of youth engagement. As we know, it is Youth Action Day, so I want to do another copy crowd check. Are you with me? More energy, come on. It’s not every day. So when I say youth, you say action. Youth. Action. Youth. Action. Yes. So we are ready for not even one, but two incredible speakers. Terry is all about creating a world of justice, peace and good governance, and Areej has been fighting for children’s rights in Yemen. So, welcome, Terry. State governments should be respecting the civil rights and peaceful right moving electorates in Yemen, especially the access to education, talk about some serious goals. Terry and Areej, the stage is yours. Give it up for them.

Terry Otieno: Ujana Nimoshi, a Swahili saying that speaks to the undeniable truth, that we are all, once adolescents, transitioned into young adults and will ultimately take the journey to full adulthood. This progression happens so swiftly that it often feels like blinking, missing one face for the other, yet every stage leaves a significant mark on the next, shaping who and what becomes of us. My journey as a youth advocate started 10 years ago in Kenya, where I was born and raised. And being here today is proof that the UN is open and accessible to young people. I have experienced this openness firsthand without needing any special connections. I have grown from a grassroots youth advocate to a global youth leader and now a youth engagement facilitator. I am grateful to Kenya for the world-class education and the provision of information and communication technology, ICT, to her citizens, which has empowered an ordinary girl from rural central Kenya to actualize her youthful vision. Looking back, we see this same dynamic mirrored in the journey of youth advocacy in the United Nations. From the formation of the major groups of children and youth in 1992, to the appointment of the UN Youth Envoy, and now the establishment of the UN Youth Office, each step in this journey has been a chain reaction where the rhythm of youth involvement only intensifies as we move forward. Today, as the Action Days for Summit of the Future commence, we are standing on the threshold of future, filled with the hope, and as we eagerly await to witness another historic moment through the paths of the future. Youth at the UN have been instrumental in shaping the landscape during the preparatory process for Summit of the Future. The persistent advocacy efforts youth have successfully pushed for vital reforms in the language and the structure of the key outcomes policy framework, the Pact of the Future, the Global Digital Compact, and the Declaration on Future Generations. Capacity building has been a core pillar on youth-led and focused entities at the UN, with the efforts aimed at empowering young people with the skills and knowledge necessary to advocate for their future. From 2022 to 2024, young people have engaged in numerous consultations that have empowered us to raise concerns over the challenges of implementing these ideas at the grassroots level. These consultations were complemented by training sessions that we call the Youth Blast, designed to equip youth with the necessary tools to influence decision-making and policy processes. The youth-led and focused entities at the UN have also produced numerous position papers and reports that have provided invaluable insights into the needs and aspirations of young people. The Youth Voices report, produced at the 2024 Eco-Youth Forum, consolidated youth perspectives that were further disseminated in Nairobi during the 2024 UN Civil Society Conference, where the major groups for children and youth Partners supported the registration and participation of 500 plus youths, where we also had the opportunity to present our recommendations to the co-facilitators of the pact and the two annexes. By constantly engaging in outreach and ensuring that young people are aware of opportunities to participate, thousands of youths have been able to contribute to the global agenda and shape our future. Now, we are writing the next chapter.

Areej: I once saw a photo of a child from Yemen, small, fragile and innocent, standing amid the ruins of what used to be his home. His eyes were empty and hollow, not because he lacked food or shelter, but because he lost that one thing every child needs, hope. This photo, taken during the ongoing conflict in my home country, Yemen, is something I cannot forget. Today, I stand before you not just as a voice for youth and children in Yemen, but as a voice for every child in the world whose future rests in our hands. In the next 30 years, 4.2 children will be born into a world shaped by the choices we make today. What we do now will shape their world, whether that world is defined by conflict, poverty and fear, or by hope, security and opportunity. We must ask ourselves, are we ready to take action so that every child can flourish? Today’s children deserve more than survival. They deserve to thrive in a life filled with joy, curiosity and dreams, free from violence and discrimination. When we look into their eyes, we see the future. But that future depends on us, on what we do today. It’s often said that this generation will determine whether the next inherits a world filled with challenges or solutions. And I believe this generation can and will be the reason for the happiness of the next. But that future needs our unwavering dedication, our resources, and our collective will to act now. Imagine a world where the faces of children, like those we see in Yemen, are not marked by fear, but by joy. I urge you to help make that world a reality. Together, we can ensure that when we look back, the images of these children will be filled with happiness, safety, and opportunity. Let’s make sure it’s a future every child can believe in. My hopes and dreams for children are that they live in a world where they don’t just survive, but thrive. Where their dreams are nurtured, and their futures are full of possibility. So I have a question to the audience here. Will we let another generation slip through the cracks, or will we take decisive action? What about you, Terry? What are your dreams for children and youth around the world?

Terry Otieno: My hopes and dreams is that children and youth are empowered with the knowledge, resources, and opportunities to actively shape just, equitable, and sustainable planet for themselves and for the future generations.

Areej: We are the present. We are the future. The moment to act is now.

Florence Ifeoluwa Otetola – DJ Cuppy: Wow, wow. Thank you so much. Terry and Areej came with so much energy. That was really heartfelt. And keeping things fresh, the next speaker is a political young leader himself. So he understands firsthand the impact and importance of empowering young people. more young people to participate in political affairs. Dan Carden from the UK United Kingdom has been a Labour MP for Liverpool Walton since 2017. He is also the President of the Board of the Forum of Young Parliamentarians of the Inter-Parliamentary Union. It’s quite a mouthful. Please give a Youth Action warm welcome to Dan Carden.

Dan Carden: Dear colleagues, young delegates, it is truly a privilege to stand here before you, not just as a Member of Parliament in the United Kingdom for the great city of Liverpool, and not just as the President of Young Parliamentarians at the IPU, but as part of a generation confronting a world that feels more fragile and unstable than it has for decades. As old uncertainties wither and decay, we must face up to unprecedented global crises. Climate change threatens a future in which vast swathes of our planet may become uninhabitable. Economic models have concentrated power and wealth in the hands of a few. And the instruments of war are far outpacing the instruments of peace. These crises didn’t materialise out of thin air. Decisions we have made, actions we have taken, and cold political calculations that we have indulged have saddled us with this heavy burden. But if these problems stem… from human action, so too must their solutions. Because it is not providence that bends the arc of history towards justice, but the force of our collective resolve that must drag it in the right direction. And as a simple matter of chronological necessity, it is young people who will have to take on this task. And it is for this reason that the IPU has endeavoured to ensure that young people are given a seat at the table. And we saw these efforts just last week, as our global conference of young parliamentarians, where young MPs from around the world came together to make a positive case for the future. Here we coordinated actions to ensure that no matter the crisis or the setting, young people are still provided with quality education and decent employment. At the conference, we united in the belief that we cannot allow the challenges we face to drown our hopes for a better future. And this summit of the future is a critical opportunity to rise up to these challenges together. This is not simply a gathering of leaders, but an opportunity to envision a different world. And there are two essential points I would like to share with you today. The first is that parliaments are allies in translating this summit’s aspirations into actions. Whether it is writing the laws that will guide them, or holding governments to account, parliaments are needed. And the second point is that parliaments need to continually evolve to meet the pace of today’s challenges. And the strongest motors for this rejuvenation are young MPs, so we need more of us in positions of power. And we still have a lot of work to do, because despite more than half the world’s population being under the age of 30, only 2.8% of Members of Parliament are under 30. And that’s why young MPs are championing things like youth quotas, lowering the age of eligibility to run for office, having more youth committees and caucuses in parliaments, and empowering young parliamentarians into leadership positions and mentoring young aspirants. Ladies and gentlemen, the summit of the future is more than just a meeting. It is an anchor point for our aspirations and our efforts. And on this journey, you can count on the engagement of parliaments and especially of young MPs. Good luck. Thank you.

Florence Ifeoluwa Otetola – DJ Cuppy: Thank you. Thank you so much for those words. We definitely need more instruments of peace. And also, thank you for reminding us, Dan, that anything is truly possible. Maybe I could be the first female president of Nigeria. Who knows? But you know, sometimes all we need is a bit of hope. And I feel so much hope is in this room. And actually, I know someone that has plenty of hope, a friend of mine, and I think you all might know her. And she is so, so full of it. She’s one of the most kawaii, well-known characters in the world. She’s from Japan. And she has been working so hard to raise awareness on all the sustainable development goals, not just in Japan, but around the world. And I’ve told her to help us out today. So let’s see if I can reach her. I’ve been trying to find her. I’m not sure. Oh, she’s here. Hello Kitty, give it up for her!

Official Summit Video 2: Thanks so much everyone! Once again, I’m Hello Kitty! I’m really happy to have the chance to speak with you all today. But to be honest, I’m a little nervous too. Yet, when I hear all of your voices supporting me like this, it gives me the confidence that I can do my best. Your voices inspire me. But it’s not just me. I believe they can change the world for the better. What kind of world would you like to live in? For me, it’s a world where everyone gets along and lives in harmony. That’s why I want to hear your voices. The voices of today’s generation, who remind us that a better world is possible. Where you were born, your gender or age, we’re all different. And that means what we see, what we don’t see, and what we feel are probably different too. Does that mean we can’t understand each other? Not at all! I believe that by respecting each other’s differences and having heart-to-heart discussions, we can create a better future together. What really matters is that each one of us keeps pushing for change in our everyday lives. You’ve got your own unique way of tackling the challenges in front of you. And together we can find the best way to overcome them! Even a tiny idea that seems small to you might be innovative and new to someone else! When all those ideas come together, they can build something big! And by bringing all of your creative ideas and solutions together, this will surely contribute to achieving the global goals! So, you know what? Let’s hear more and more from everyone! I believe that if we all come together across generations and take action for the future, we can create a world that is better for everyone! I hope today is only one of many chances for all your ideas to turn into action! I look forward to seeing you again in a world where all of you are leading the way to an even better future! See you!

Florence Ifeoluwa Otetola – DJ Cuppy: Thank you so much for that wonderful presentation of how we can all get together and make change. And I love the fact that since 2019, Hello Kitty, alongside the United Nations and Sanrio, have been working so hard on Hello Global Goals! Talking about getting together, I have the personal pleasure of presenting a very special segment. This year, to celebrate International Youth Day, the United Nations Youth Office partnered with the SDG Action Campaign and H.U.G., which is a global community… global community for artists and a way for artists to communicate. The opportunity was to invite young people to submit some artwork so they could reimagine the world and today I have the pleasure to present to you the winning pieces. Art has been so important and always been a way to express oneself when words aren’t enough. So today we are celebrating these pieces of art as a force for young people to get together and all these pieces we’re about to see are not just dreams. They are bold statements. They are not just about hope, but they are making moves. So without further ado, I give you Hope in Action. Hope in Action Thank you and congratulations We would love love to thank all the artists behind Hope in Action and of course a big thank you to the UNSDG action campaign and hug for bringing us hope. And I hope you are all feeling as hopeful as I’m feeling now. And hope has certainly arrived. It’s a great time. And talking about arriving, arriving all the way from India, we have an amazing youth champion here with us today to wrap things up. UNDP’s India youth champion, Sanjana Sanghi, started her journey of giving back to underprivileged children in India. Through her work and hard advocate youth-led development, she’s here to drop some serious, serious inspiration. Give it up for Sanjana Sanghi.

Sanjana Sanghi: Thank you. Esteemed guests and distinguished leaders, I first will just take a moment to pinch myself because this moment feels every bit surreal. But I, Sanjana Sanghi, youth champion for the UNDP, stand here before you immersed in profound gratitude as it is one of my life’s greatest honors to have been entrusted by the United Nations to represent the voice of the youth. As a young girl growing up in India, I remember that it was moments like these that used to leave me overwhelmed with both awe and inspiration as I would see my idols and role models do their earnest best in guiding the way our future should unfold. They would look us in the eye, whether it was through television screens or other media, and remind us that we are the future, that our decisions, actions, opinions, and in general everything we feel, will be pivotal in shaping the way the future unfolds. It is important that we grow up to be conscious citizens of the world, hopeful yet realistic, passionate yet rooted, vulnerable yet resolute. That is a tall order to live up to. In our world today, where death and disease are spreading every day, where we find ourselves in the midst of a climate emergency, where armed conflict is waging havoc in different parts of the world, we, the youth, are trying to do our very best to keep our feet and ears rooted firmly to the ground, while our vision and hope soars for the stars. We are doing our best to not let any kind of cynicism, negativity or inaction overtake us. That is a tall order to live up to. As I stand here before you today, opening the Summit of the Future Action Days, I stand here representing young people from different parts of the world and sharing our collective hopes and aspirations. I stand here on behalf of the biggest youth generation in the history of time. While 50% of the world is under 30 years of age, less than 3% of national parliamentarians belong to that age group. That is something to think about, because if we are not involved in the decisions that will shape both our present and our future, then we aren’t setting ourselves up for too much success. If we are not the architects of our own future and the mere inheritors of it, we are not setting ourselves up for success. While the gap between the rich and the poor continues to widen, the challenges that surround us continue to deepen. And as young people, while we are facing our own challenges of the right to a quality education, gainful employment and maintaining our own personal, mental and physical well-being, I know that we are also willing to fight the bigger fights. I know that we don’t want to sit on the sidelines of the decisions that will guide the future that we dream of for ourselves and for our children and let that remain a pipe dream. And that is why it is organizations like the United Nations that carry out this formidable task of bringing member nations together to work towards solutions to resolve humanity’s biggest challenges. And that is why our trust in its various arms, like the United Nations Development Programme where I serve as youth champion in India, is critical because the solutions that we all work towards together today are going to have a positive and lasting impact on both our today and our tomorrow. As Mahatma Gandhi famously said, be the change that you wish to see in this world. All we ask is for a seat at the tables of change. All we ask is to be given genuine opportunities of engagement, whether it is in the private sector, in the government, at the United Nations or in academia. All we ask is for our voices to be heard because we matter and our voice matters. All we ask is to be given the opportunity to be the change that we wish to see in this world. Thank you.

Florence Ifeoluwa Otetola – DJ Cuppy: Thank you so much, Sanjana, for that. It has been such an amazing journey today. All the speakers have taken us and given us so much to think about. You know, I feel so inspired and it feels like Youth Action Day is now in full swing. So, there’s so much for us to do today as we get into all the conversations. I have not forgotten about my UN Web TV family locked in who are joining the conversation. Don’t forget, we want to hear what you have to say. So, make sure you use hashtag Youth Lead and our common future. And don’t forget to add the UN Youth Affairs. It’s been so exciting and we have so much more to come. We are getting ready. It’s going to be fun. And I want to make sure that my crowd are still with me. Do you remember the Copy Crowd Check? Yes? So, when I say youth, you say? Youth. Youth. Yes, you are still with me, which is great. We have a super, super exciting segment coming up. Our very own United Nations Secretary General is going to join us for some real talk, a real conversation with young people as we approach, of course, the summit of the future. And he’s here to listen to the priorities for the pact, for the future negotiations, and hear what young people want to get out of the coming summit ahead. It has been such a pleasure to be with you all. And I really hope everyone joins in on the conversation. And there will be, indeed, a Youth Action Day closing ceremony where I will be DJing. That is something to look forward to as well. And I feel like this is really going to be a great day for all of us. It has been already quite profound. The speakers have really given up so much. So soon I will hand it over to our next moderator. who will take us on a journey and we are going to engage even more with young people. So again, please join the conversation online using hashtag youth leads and hashtag our common future. It has been such a pleasure. As they say in my language Yoruba, odabo. Thank you so much and get ready for the next segment.

F

Felipe Paullier

Speech speed

121 words per minute

Speech length

832 words

Speech time

409 seconds

Establishment of UN Youth Office – milestone for youth representation

Explanation

The creation of the UN Youth Office marks a significant shift in the commitment to youth issues within the UN Secretariat. It represents a major step in recognizing and addressing youth concerns at the highest levels of global governance.

Evidence

Paullier is the first United Nations Assistant Secretary General for Youth Affairs, heading the newly established United Nations Youth Office.

Major Discussion Point

Youth Empowerment and Engagement in Global Decision-Making

Agreed with

Dan Carden

Sanjana Sanghi

Terry Otieno

Agreed on

Youth empowerment and engagement in global decision-making

Summit of the Future as once-in-a-generation opportunity to reshape multilateralism

Explanation

The Summit of the Future is presented as a crucial opportunity to reform the multilateral system and prioritize youth involvement. It aims to make meaningful youth engagement a standard practice in global governance.

Evidence

The UN Youth Office has worked with young people worldwide to advocate for concrete commitments at the summit.

Major Discussion Point

Summit of the Future and Pact for the Future

Agreed with

Dan Carden

Sanjana Sanghi

Terry Otieno

Agreed on

Summit of the Future as a crucial opportunity

Overcoming barriers to youth participation

Explanation

Paullier acknowledges the various obstacles that prevent many young people from participating in global forums. He emphasizes the need to address these barriers to ensure more inclusive youth representation.

Evidence

He specifically mentions visa barriers, language barriers, and financial barriers as examples of obstacles faced by youth.

Major Discussion Point

Diversity, Inclusion and Representation

D

Dan Carden

Speech speed

126 words per minute

Speech length

548 words

Speech time

260 seconds

Need for increased youth participation in political processes

Explanation

Carden emphasizes the importance of having more young people in positions of power within political systems. He points out the significant underrepresentation of youth in parliaments globally.

Evidence

Despite more than half the world’s population being under 30, only 2.8% of Members of Parliament are under 30.

Major Discussion Point

Youth Empowerment and Engagement in Global Decision-Making

Agreed with

Felipe Paullier

Sanjana Sanghi

Terry Otieno

Agreed on

Youth empowerment and engagement in global decision-making

Tackling climate change, economic inequality, and conflict

Explanation

Carden highlights these as major global crises that need to be addressed. He emphasizes that these problems stem from human actions and thus require human solutions.

Evidence

He mentions climate change threatening to make vast areas uninhabitable, economic models concentrating wealth, and instruments of war outpacing instruments of peace.

Major Discussion Point

Addressing Global Challenges

Importance of translating summit aspirations into concrete actions

Explanation

Carden stresses the role of parliaments in turning the summit’s goals into reality. He emphasizes that parliaments are crucial for writing laws and holding governments accountable.

Evidence

He mentions the recent global conference of young parliamentarians where actions were coordinated to ensure youth access to quality education and decent employment.

Major Discussion Point

Summit of the Future and Pact for the Future

Agreed with

Felipe Paullier

Sanjana Sanghi

Terry Otieno

Agreed on

Summit of the Future as a crucial opportunity

S

Sanjana Sanghi

Speech speed

144 words per minute

Speech length

686 words

Speech time

285 seconds

Importance of youth voices in shaping the future

Explanation

Sanghi emphasizes the critical role of youth in decision-making processes that affect their present and future. She argues for genuine opportunities for youth engagement across various sectors.

Evidence

She cites the statistic that while 50% of the world is under 30 years of age, less than 3% of national parliamentarians belong to that age group.

Major Discussion Point

Youth Empowerment and Engagement in Global Decision-Making

Agreed with

Felipe Paullier

Dan Carden

Terry Otieno

Agreed on

Youth empowerment and engagement in global decision-making

Need for youth to be architects of their own future

Explanation

Sanghi stresses the importance of youth being actively involved in shaping their future rather than just inheriting it. She calls for youth to be given opportunities to engage in decision-making processes.

Evidence

She quotes Mahatma Gandhi: ‘Be the change that you wish to see in this world’ to emphasize youth’s desire for active participation.

Major Discussion Point

Summit of the Future and Pact for the Future

Agreed with

Felipe Paullier

Dan Carden

Terry Otieno

Agreed on

Summit of the Future as a crucial opportunity

T

Terry Otieno

Speech speed

124 words per minute

Speech length

585 words

Speech time

282 seconds

Youth as drivers of change and action

Explanation

Otieno presents youth as key actors in shaping global agendas and driving positive change. He highlights the progress made in youth advocacy within the UN system over the years.

Evidence

He mentions his personal journey from a grassroots youth advocate to a global youth leader and youth engagement facilitator.

Major Discussion Point

Youth Empowerment and Engagement in Global Decision-Making

Agreed with

Felipe Paullier

Dan Carden

Sanjana Sanghi

Agreed on

Youth empowerment and engagement in global decision-making

Youth involvement in preparatory process and advocacy

Explanation

Otieno describes how youth have been actively involved in shaping the Summit of the Future. He highlights their efforts in influencing key outcome documents and policy frameworks.

Evidence

He mentions youth-led consultations, training sessions (Youth Blast), and the production of position papers and reports like the Youth Voices report.

Major Discussion Point

Summit of the Future and Pact for the Future

Agreed with

Felipe Paullier

Dan Carden

Sanjana Sanghi

Agreed on

Summit of the Future as a crucial opportunity

J

José Maria Pereira Neves

Speech speed

92 words per minute

Speech length

584 words

Speech time

378 seconds

Accelerating progress on Sustainable Development Goals

Explanation

Neves emphasizes the need to speed up the achievement of SDGs in an inclusive manner. He stresses the importance of ensuring no youth is left behind in various developmental aspects.

Evidence

He mentions specific areas such as fighting poverty and climate change, access to healthcare, quality education, training and employment.

Major Discussion Point

Addressing Global Challenges

Promoting peace, security and development for youth

Explanation

Neves highlights the importance of placing youth at the center of development efforts to counter wars, conflicts, and social instability. He emphasizes the need to provide opportunities for youth’s spiritual and material growth.

Major Discussion Point

Addressing Global Challenges

A

Areej

Speech speed

150 words per minute

Speech length

405 words

Speech time

162 seconds

Protecting children’s rights and futures in conflict zones

Explanation

Areej emphasizes the urgent need to safeguard children’s rights and futures, particularly in conflict-affected areas. She stresses that children deserve more than just survival; they should be able to thrive and have their dreams nurtured.

Evidence

She shares a personal anecdote about a photo of a child from Yemen standing amid ruins, symbolizing the loss of hope among children in conflict zones.

Major Discussion Point

Addressing Global Challenges

K

Keshia De Freece Lawrence

Speech speed

160 words per minute

Speech length

581 words

Speech time

217 seconds

Recognizing indigenous peoples and lands

Explanation

Lawrence emphasizes the importance of acknowledging and respecting indigenous peoples and their ancestral lands. She highlights the interconnectedness of indigenous communities globally and the impact of colonization on these communities.

Evidence

She provides a detailed acknowledgment of various indigenous communities in the eastern woodlands of Turtle Island.

Major Discussion Point

Diversity, Inclusion and Representation

H

Hello Kitty

Speech speed

0 words per minute

Speech length

0 words

Speech time

1 seconds

Respecting differences while finding common ground

Explanation

Hello Kitty emphasizes the importance of respecting individual differences while working together towards common goals. She encourages open dialogue and collaboration to create a better future.

Evidence

She states: ‘I believe that by respecting each other’s differences and having heart-to-heart discussions, we can create a better future together.’

Major Discussion Point

Diversity, Inclusion and Representation

Agreements

Agreement Points

Youth empowerment and engagement in global decision-making

Speakers

Felipe Paullier

Dan Carden

Sanjana Sanghi

Terry Otieno

Arguments

Establishment of UN Youth Office – milestone for youth representation

Need for increased youth participation in political processes

Importance of youth voices in shaping the future

Youth as drivers of change and action

Summary

All speakers emphasized the critical importance of involving youth in global decision-making processes and empowering them to shape their own future.

Summit of the Future as a crucial opportunity

Speakers

Felipe Paullier

Dan Carden

Sanjana Sanghi

Terry Otieno

Arguments

Summit of the Future as once-in-a-generation opportunity to reshape multilateralism

Importance of translating summit aspirations into concrete actions

Need for youth to be architects of their own future

Youth involvement in preparatory process and advocacy

Summary

Speakers agreed on the significance of the Summit of the Future as a key opportunity to reshape global governance and ensure youth participation.

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers emphasized the need to prioritize the well-being and development of children and youth, particularly in challenging environments such as conflict zones.

Speakers

José Maria Pereira Neves

Areej

Arguments

Accelerating progress on Sustainable Development Goals

Promoting peace, security and development for youth

Protecting children’s rights and futures in conflict zones

Unexpected Consensus

Diversity and inclusion in global representation

Speakers

Keshia De Freece Lawrence

Felipe Paullier

Hello Kitty

Arguments

Recognizing indigenous peoples and lands

Overcoming barriers to youth participation

Respecting differences while finding common ground

Explanation

Despite their diverse backgrounds and roles, these speakers all emphasized the importance of inclusivity and respecting differences in global representation, which was an unexpected area of consensus.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of agreement centered around youth empowerment, the importance of the Summit of the Future, addressing global challenges, and promoting diversity and inclusion in global representation.

Consensus level

There was a high level of consensus among the speakers on the importance of youth involvement in global decision-making processes. This strong agreement implies a unified push towards reforming global governance structures to be more inclusive of youth perspectives, which could potentially lead to more youth-focused policies and initiatives in the future.

Disagreements

Overall Assessment

Summary

The speakers generally presented aligned views on youth empowerment and engagement in global decision-making, with slight variations in focus and approach.

Disagreement level

The level of disagreement among the speakers was minimal. The slight differences in emphasis and approach do not significantly impact the overall message of youth empowerment and engagement. This alignment suggests a strong consensus on the importance of youth participation in shaping the future, which could facilitate more effective implementation of youth-focused initiatives.

Partial Agreements

Partial Agreements

Both speakers emphasize the importance of the Summit of the Future, but Paullier focuses on reshaping multilateralism and youth involvement, while Carden stresses the role of parliaments in implementing the summit’s goals.

Speakers

Felipe Paullier

Dan Carden

Arguments

Summit of the Future as once-in-a-generation opportunity to reshape multilateralism

Importance of translating summit aspirations into concrete actions

Both speakers advocate for increased youth participation in decision-making, but Carden specifically focuses on parliamentary representation, while Sanghi emphasizes broader engagement across various sectors.

Speakers

Dan Carden

Sanjana Sanghi

Arguments

Need for increased youth participation in political processes

Importance of youth voices in shaping the future

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers emphasized the need to prioritize the well-being and development of children and youth, particularly in challenging environments such as conflict zones.

Speakers

José Maria Pereira Neves

Areej

Arguments

Accelerating progress on Sustainable Development Goals

Promoting peace, security and development for youth

Protecting children’s rights and futures in conflict zones

Takeaways

Key Takeaways

The establishment of the UN Youth Office marks a significant milestone for youth representation in global decision-making

There is a critical need to increase youth participation in political processes and global governance

The Summit of the Future and Pact for the Future present a unique opportunity to reshape multilateralism with youth at the center

Addressing global challenges like climate change, inequality, and conflict requires meaningful youth engagement

Diversity, inclusion and representation of different youth voices (including indigenous youth) is crucial

Resolutions and Action Items

Engage youth in the preparatory process and advocacy for the Summit of the Future

Increase youth representation in parliaments through measures like youth quotas

Provide youth with opportunities for engagement in private sector, government, UN and academia

Use hashtags #YouthLead and #OurCommonFuture to join online conversations about youth action

Unresolved Issues

Specific mechanisms to overcome barriers to youth participation in global forums

Details on how to translate summit aspirations into concrete policy actions

Ways to address the widening gap between rich and poor that impacts youth

Concrete steps to protect children’s rights and futures in ongoing conflict zones

Suggested Compromises

Balance between respecting differences and finding common ground among diverse youth voices

Combining hopeful vision for the future with realistic assessment of current challenges

Thought Provoking Comments

The establishment of the United Nations Youth Office as a specialized mechanism for youth affairs in the United Nations Secretariat is the biggest testament of this journey. Backed by strong political support from member states, it is a significant shift in our commitment on youth issues.

Speaker

Felipe Paullier

Reason

This statement highlights a major institutional change in how the UN engages with youth, signaling a new era of youth involvement in global governance.

Impact

It framed the subsequent discussion around the increased role and responsibility of youth in shaping global policy and action.

Despite more than half the world’s population being under the age of 30, only 2.8% of Members of Parliament are under 30.

Speaker

Dan Carden

Reason

This statistic starkly illustrates the underrepresentation of youth in political leadership, challenging assumptions about youth participation.

Impact

It sparked discussion about the need for more youth representation in decision-making bodies and concrete actions to achieve this.

All we ask is for a seat at the tables of change. All we ask is to be given genuine opportunities of engagement, whether it is in the private sector, in the government, at the United Nations or in academia. All we ask is for our voices to be heard because we matter and our voice matters.

Speaker

Sanjana Sanghi

Reason

This passionate plea encapsulates the core demand of youth for meaningful inclusion and representation across all sectors.

Impact

It served as a powerful closing statement, reinforcing the central theme of youth empowerment and setting the stage for future action and engagement.

Overall Assessment

These key comments shaped the discussion by progressively building a case for increased youth involvement in global decision-making. Starting with acknowledgment of historical context and indigenous rights, the conversation moved through institutional changes at the UN, stark realities of current youth underrepresentation, and culminated in a call for meaningful inclusion. This progression created a narrative arc that emphasized the urgency and importance of youth action and representation in addressing global challenges.

2024 marks 400 years since the dutch invasion of the lenapehoking territory. traditional umami, munsee, and algonquin dialects of lands, commonly referred to as new york, new jersey, connecticut, delaware, pennsylvania, and pockets of others such as massachusetts and ohio. as eastern woodlands indigenous peoples, we have codified our akwenee, our peace, since time immemorial because it has always been dependent on aki, the earth.

Speaker

Keshia De Freece Lawrence

Reason

This comment provides important historical context and highlights the deep connection between indigenous peoples and the land, challenging listeners to consider a longer historical perspective.

Impact

It set a tone of acknowledging indigenous history and rights, which influenced subsequent speakers to consider inclusivity and representation.

Follow-up Questions

How can we address the barriers (visa, language, financial) that many young people face when trying to participate in UN spaces?

Speaker

Felipe Paullier

Explanation

Addressing these barriers is crucial for ensuring more inclusive and diverse youth participation in global decision-making processes.

How can we implement the ideas discussed at the UN level at the grassroots level?

Speaker

Terry Otieno

Explanation

Bridging the gap between high-level discussions and local implementation is essential for creating real-world impact.

How can we increase youth representation in parliaments, given that only 2.8% of Members of Parliament are under 30?

Speaker

Dan Carden

Explanation

Increasing youth representation in formal political structures is crucial for ensuring young people’s voices are heard in decision-making processes.

How can we ensure that young people are not just inheritors of the future but active architects of it?

Speaker

Sanjana Sanghi

Explanation

Empowering youth to actively shape their future is essential for addressing global challenges effectively.

How can we create more opportunities for genuine youth engagement in private sector, government, UN, and academia?

Speaker

Sanjana Sanghi

Explanation

Providing meaningful opportunities for youth engagement across various sectors is crucial for harnessing their potential and perspectives.

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed.

Major banks collaborate on new digital currency platform

Forty of the world’s top commercial banks have joined a new digital currency pilot known as the Agora project in collaboration with the New York Federal Reserve and several central banks from Europe, Korea, and Japan. The initiative aims to explore the use of tokenised bank deposits and central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) to improve cross-border payment systems. Specifically, it focuses on ‘wholesale’ CBDCs, which are used between banks.

The project will address the complexities of cross-border transactions, such as time zone differences, legal frameworks, and varying regulatory and technical systems. Major banks participating include JPMorgan, HSBC, UBS, and Japan’s MUFG.

Led by the Bank for International Settlements and the Institute of International Finance, Agora differs from another CBDC project called mBridge. It involves central banks from China, Hong Kong, Thailand, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia.

Bureau Veritas drives maritime digital innovation with Smart Maritime Network membership

Bureau Veritas seeks to drive digital innovation within the maritime sector through its recent Smart Maritime Network (SMN) membership. The partnership is designed to enhance integration, standardisation, and data sharing among industry stakeholders, positioning Bureau Veritas as a leader in digital advancement.

The strategic focus of the company headquartered in France encompasses digital efficiency, applications, classification, and digitalised assets (Maritime 4.0), all aimed at facilitating the sector’s digital transformation. By addressing evolving industry needs and improving safety, efficiency, and sustainability in maritime operations, Bureau Veritas is dedicated to developing solutions that enhance industry practices and foster progress.

Bureau Veritas is also committed to advancing the industry through strategic partnerships and innovative initiatives. Their collaboration with OrbitMI highlights their dedication to leveraging data-driven insights to minimise the carbon footprint of maritime operations.

Furthermore, the launch of ‘MOVE by Bureau Veritas,’ a smart hub integrating various maritime digital applications, marks a significant step forward in streamlining operations. This hub simplifies asset compliance and performance management, enabling faster, more informed decision-making and driving further progress within the maritime sector.