The EU’s Tech Sovereignty Package and the future of European digital power

On 3 June 2026, the European Commission presented the European Technological Sovereignty Package, a set of measures to strengthen Europe’s capacity in semiconductors, AI, cloud computing and open source software. The package comprises two legislative proposals, the Chips Act 2.0 and the Cloud and AI Development Act (CADA), alongside the new EU Open Source Strategy and the Strategic Roadmap for Digitalisation and AI in Energy.

The Commission framed the initiative as a fundamental shift in the EU’s approach to technology, underpinned by the recognition that digital dependence is no longer a market inefficiency to be tolerated, but a strategic vulnerability to be corrected through legislation.

Commission President Ursula von der Leyen stated that Europe cannot afford to depend on others for the technologies that keep its hospitals running, its energy grids stable, and its services secure, calling on the EU to convert its research excellence, industrial base and single market into technological sovereignty.

The package is designed to broaden choice in core technologies for EU businesses, citizens and public administrations, and to position Europe to capture a larger share of a global semiconductor market projected to reach EUR 1.37 trillion by 2030, with AI-related components accounting for roughly 70% of that growth.

The timing reflects a specific convergence of pressures. The rapid spread of AI applications is driving a sharp increase in demand for data centre and cloud capacity that EU infrastructure cannot currently meet at scale. At the same time, longstanding dependence on non-EU suppliers for advanced semiconductor manufacturing, chip design and cloud services has become increasingly difficult to ignore as geopolitical tensions have demonstrated the economic risk of concentrated supply chains.

The 2022 US CHIPS and Science Act, generous subsidy regimes in Asia and tightening export controls on advanced semiconductor equipment have accelerated the global race for technological self-sufficiency, prompting Europe to adopt a more active industrial policy response. 

Chips Act 2.0

 Electronics, Hardware, Printed Circuit Board, Mace Club, Weapon

The Chips Act 2.0 revises and expands the 2023 European Chips Act, which has mobilised more than EUR 52 billion in public and private investment, created an estimated 46,000 direct and indirect jobs and strengthened Europe’s research and innovation capacity in semiconductors. Despite this progress, the EU remains dependent on third countries for advanced chip manufacturing and semiconductor design.

The revised regulation is designed to accelerate Europe’s position across the entire semiconductor value chain, from raw materials and design to manufacturing and packaging, and to ensure that Europe captures a greater share of the growth in AI-related chip demand.

The proposal is structured around four objectives. On investment and competitiveness, the Act would cap permitting approvals at 12 months, introduce ‘Grand Challenges’ to support the development of strategically important chip types such as AI processors, and formalise Strategic Partnerships on Semiconductors with international allies.

To stimulate demand, it establishes Demand Accelerators to align new products with industry needs, expands innovation procurement, notably for European start-ups and scale-ups, and creates structural synergies with CADA to benefit from the data centre and AI Gigafactory buildout planned under that regulation.

On the supply side, the Act enables state aid for ‘First-of-a-Kind’ facilities not yet present in the Union, covering the full semiconductor value chain, designates strategic projects to unlock EU and member state co-investment, and creates a ‘Semiconductor Regions of Excellence’ label to attract investment at the regional level. To strengthen resilience, it establishes a business-to-business semiconductor supply chain platform and provides sector-specific guidance on risk assessment and mitigation.

The explicit linkage between Chips Act 2.0 and CADA reflects a deliberate industrial logic: European-made chips powering European cloud infrastructure, with demand from that infrastructure in turn supporting European chipmakers.

Cloud and AI Development Act

 Architecture, Building, Person, Security

The Cloud and AI Development Act (CADA) forms a central part of the Commission’s AI Continent Action Plan and simultaneously addresses two structural problems: insufficient EU cloud and data centre capacity to meet AI-driven demand, and strategic dependence on a small number of non-EU cloud providers.

The Act is designed to facilitate and accelerate the deployment of sustainable cloud and data centre infrastructure, while ensuring the EU accelerates the rollout of cloud and AI in critical sectors and retains meaningful control over the infrastructure on which that rollout depends.

The Act focuses on three main areas. On research, development and innovation, it supports next-generation cloud and AI technologies, including frontier AI, industrial AI, and physical AI, introduces grand challenges to drive R&D efforts, and promotes adoption in strategic sectors through national cloud and AI strategies and new Experience and Acceleration Centres for AI in member states.

On capacity, it targets at least a tripling of EU data centre capacity within five to seven years, simplifies and accelerates permitting, and improves access to energy, land, water and financing. On sovereignty and autonomy, it establishes a single EU-wide sovereignty classification framework, promotes open source solutions as a tool for resilience, and introduces a common EU-level procurement framework for public administrations.

The sovereignty classification system merits particular attention. It introduces four assurance levels for cloud and AI services, to be applied by public sector bodies based on their own risk assessments. Level 1 requires data to be processed and stored within the EU. Level 2 requires providers to demonstrate independence from third countries and transparency over their software supply chain.

Level 3 requires providers to be owned and controlled from within the EU and to meet additional criteria including personnel citizenship, although the Commission retains the ability to recognise third-country providers at this level. Level 4 requires full transparency and control over the software supply chain with no third-country interference.

Cloud service providers seeking recognition under this framework must undergo an independent audit conducted by member state authorities. The framework is significant because it creates, for the first time, a legally grounded and progressive definition of what it means for a cloud service to be sovereign, moving the concept from political rhetoric to a procurement-relevant standard.

EU Open Source Strategy

 Astronomy, Earth, Globe, Outer Space, Planet, Plate

The EU Open Source Strategy is the non-legislative pillar of the package most directly aimed at reducing dependence on proprietary, non-EU software. It places open source at the centre of the EU’s technological sovereignty approach, arguing that open ecosystems reduce supplier lock-in, increase transparency and give European developers and public administrations greater control over their digital infrastructure.

The strategy addresses a persistent structural weakness: the economic value generated by open source projects has historically been captured outside Europe, limiting the ability of European developers and companies to benefit fully from their own contributions.

The strategy is organised around four objectives. The first, Open Source for Tech Sovereignty, focuses on scaling the Open Internet Stack, a Commission-curated catalogue of EU-aligned open source solutions, and promoting alternatives to dominant proprietary products in areas such as cloud platforms, workplace tools, secure e-mail and decentralised social media.

The work will be carried out in cooperation with member states through the European Digital Infrastructure Consortium for Digital Commons. The second objective, Vibrant Open Source Ecosystem, targets start-up support through accelerators and procurement access, alongside a stewardship toolkit for critical open source assets and investment in digital skills across schools, universities, and civil services.

The third objective, Open Source in Public Administration, sets out procurement guidelines that favour open standards, reinforces the Commission’s Open Source Programme Office (OSPO) and the EU Public Sector OSPO Network, and seeks to embed openness and sovereignty-by-design in digital investment decisions across EU institutions and member states.

The fourth objective, Reinforced Standards and International Outreach, promotes EU open source developers and solutions internationally through the EU Tech Business Offer, supports uptake in partner countries and integrates open source communities into standardisation processes, including through a forthcoming revision of the EU Standardisation Regulation.

The strategy also intersects directly with the other package components. On semiconductors, it targets open hardware development through the Chips Joint Undertaking’s RISC-V programme. On AI, it supports the GenAI4EU initiative and promotes open source tooling for public sector AI adoption through the Apply AI Strategy.

On digital identity, it prioritises open source implementation of the European Digital Identity Wallet (EUDI Wallet) and the European Business Wallet. The strategy also interacts with the recently enacted Cyber Resilience Act (CRA), which imposes new security obligations on open source projects that have generated concern in the developer community. The Open Source Maintenance Instrument and critical dependency mapping exercises set out in the strategy are designed in part to address those obligations, though reconciling the CRA’s security requirements with the growth objectives of the strategy will be a key implementation challenge.

Strategic Roadmap for Digitalisation and AI in Energy

 Computer, Electronics, Hardware, Architecture, Building, Warehouse, Server, Factory

The Strategic Roadmap for Digitalisation and AI in Energy is the least legally binding element of the package but arguably the one that determines whether its ambitions are physically realisable. The targets set by CADA, particularly the goal of at least tripling EU data centre capacity within five to seven years, cannot be achieved without a corresponding expansion in reliable, affordable power supply.

Data centres are energy-intensive by nature, and the AI workloads they are increasingly required to process are even more demanding. The roadmap addresses this constraint by setting out how AI and digital technologies can improve the efficiency and flexibility of Europe’s energy systems while also enabling the energy infrastructure that these systems need.

The roadmap connects the package’s digital ambitions to the EU’s energy transition objectives, creating a mutually reinforcing relationship: cleaner, smarter energy systems create more viable conditions for data centre expansion, while AI-enabled demand management and grid optimisation tools reduce the cost and environmental impact of that expansion. The roadmap is also relevant as a governance document, since the deployment of AI in critical energy infrastructure raises its own questions about cybersecurity, data sovereignty and the concentration of control over systems on which entire economies depend.

Governance and policy implications

 Adult, Male, Man, Person, Text, Pen, Formal Wear, Clothing, Suit, Document, Computer, Electronics, Laptop, Pc

The Tech Sovereignty Package raises several governance issues that extend beyond its immediate legislative content. The most significant concerns the model it establishes for EU industrial policy. The package marks a clear departure from the long-standing assumption in EU competition policy that market mechanisms and trade openness are the primary tools for achieving efficient and innovative technology markets.

The explicit use of state aid for strategic semiconductor projects, the joint procurement frameworks in CADA and the deliberate promotion of EU-origin suppliers both in public procurement and sovereign cloud classification illustrate a greater role for public intervention in the technology sector. Whether the EU’s trading partners, particularly the United States and major Asian semiconductor producers, will treat these provisions as proportionate industrial policy or as market-distorting intervention is likely to become a significant diplomatic issue.

The package also has important implications for the governance of AI in Europe. It operates in parallel to the EU AI Act and the work of the EU AI Office, but addresses a different layer of the AI ecosystem. While the AI Act focuses on the risk profile and compliance obligations of AI systems once deployed, the Tech Sovereignty Package governs the infrastructure and supply chains that enable AI development in the first place.

The relationship between the two frameworks matters as decisions taken at the infrastructure layer, such as the cloud sovereignty level applied to a given public sector AI deployment, can have downstream consequences for compliance with AI Act requirements. The relationship between these frameworks will be an important area to monitor as implementation progresses.

A further coordination challenge arises internally. The package spans multiple policy domains and directorates-general within the Commission, including DG CONNECT for semiconductors, cloud and open source, and DG ENERGY for the energy roadmap.

It also interacts with DG COMP on State aid approvals and with DG TRADE on the trade implications of sovereignty-oriented procurement rules. Ensuring coherence across these areas during the legislative process, and subsequently during implementation, will require stronger-than-usual inter-institutional coordination.

Legislative process and upcoming milestones

 Scoreboard

The two legislative proposals, the Chips Act 2.0 and CADA, need to enter the ordinary legislative procedure, meaning they will be negotiated separately by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union before trilogue negotiations between the two institutions and the Commission can begin.

Given the political and economic stakes involved, and the number of member states with competing interests in semiconductor investment locations and cloud market access, the negotiations are likely to be protracted. The original European Chips Act took approximately two years from proposal to final adoption, and CADA, which touches on the politically sensitive question of digital sovereignty vis-à-vis key trading partners, may encounter comparable friction.

Several near-term milestones are already in view. The Commission is expected to launch a call for AI Gigafactories in July 2026, following the European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking (EuroHPC JU) Governing Board’s agreement in principle on 1 June 2026. AI Gigafactories are large-scale, purpose-built AI training facilities and represent one of the most concrete and immediately actionable elements of the broader AI infrastructure agenda.

Their deployment is intended to provide European researchers, start-ups and industry with access to the kind of computing capacity currently concentrated in the United States, and the July call will be an early test of the Commission’s ability to move from legislative ambition to operational delivery.

The Commission will also launch a consultation with member states, the European Investment Bank Group and other key stakeholders to design a European equity capacity at scale for financing tech sovereignty ambitions. This implies that the Commission does not believe grant funding and state aid alone will be sufficient to mobilise the investment required, and that a blended finance model, combining public equity with private capital, will be needed.

The EIB Group’s involvement points towards the kind of risk-sharing instruments it has used in other strategic sectors, although the specific structures and governance arrangements have yet to be designed through the consultation process.

Broader context

The package does not emerge in isolation. It sits within a cluster of interconnected EU strategic frameworks that have, over the past two to three years, progressively shifted the EU’s economic policy stance from market liberalisation towards what the Commission calls ‘open strategic autonomy’: the maintenance of trade openness where possible, combined with targeted interventionism to reduce strategic dependencies where necessary.

The Competitiveness Compass, adopted earlier in 2025 and drawing heavily on the 2024 Draghi report on European competitiveness, identifies reducing strategic dependencies as one of three pillars for restoring European economic dynamism. The Tech Sovereignty Package is the most operationally specific expression of that pillar to date.

The Economic Security Strategy, adopted in 2023, provided the risk-assessment framework within which the package sits, identifying advanced semiconductors, AI, quantum computing and biotechnology as the technological areas posing the most significant dual-use and strategic dependency risks for the EU. The Tech Sovereignty Package translates that risk assessment into concrete legislative and policy instruments, with semiconductors and AI infrastructure receiving the most direct regulatory attention.

The Commission’s AI Continent Action Plan, which positions Europe to become a global AI leader by focusing on computing infrastructure, data, skills, and adoption, provides the most direct policy antecedent for CADA in particular. The Tech Sovereignty Package fast-tracks the infrastructure ambitions of the Action Plan and adds the supply chain governance dimension that the Action Plan did not fully address.

Taken together, these documents represent a sustained and internally consistent shift in EU digital and industrial policy, one in which technological leadership is treated not merely as an economic aspiration but as a precondition for political and regulatory autonomy in an increasingly contested global technological order.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Google highlights rising online scam threats

Google has warned that online scams remain a major global challenge, citing estimates that fraud losses could reach nearly $580 billion in 2025.

In its latest fraud and scams advisory, the company said phishing attacks are becoming more sophisticated, with criminals using adversary-in-the-middle techniques and QR code phishing, also known as quishing, to steal credentials and bypass security measures.

The advisory also highlighted risks linked to cryptocurrency investment scams, malicious finance applications and police impersonation schemes. According to Google, scammers are using AI, social engineering and trusted digital services to deceive users, obtain money and collect sensitive information.

Google said its Trust & Safety teams are using AI tools, predictive analytics and policy enforcement to detect and disrupt fraudulent activity across its services. The company also pointed to measures such as stronger protections for session cookies, enforcement against deceptive crypto ads, monitoring of post-installation app behaviour and developer identity verification for apps installed on certified Android devices.

The company urged users to be cautious of unsolicited communications, unrealistic investment promises, unexpected QR codes and requests for personal or financial information.

Why does it matter?

The advisory shows how online fraud is becoming a cross-platform governance problem rather than a narrow cybersecurity issue. Scams now rely on trusted cloud services, mobile apps, messaging platforms, crypto infrastructure and impersonation of public authorities. That creates pressure on major technology companies to strengthen detection, app accountability and policy enforcement, while raising broader questions about consumer protection, platform responsibility and digital trust.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

EY Malta expands AI in audit services

EY Malta has introduced enterprise-scale agentic AI across its Assurance services, integrating the technology into EY Canvas, the firm’s global audit platform.

The rollout forms part of EY’s wider global strategy to embed AI into audit workflows and support audit quality, risk assessment, and client insights.

EY said the AI-enabled framework helps auditors analyse large volumes of data, assess risks, and access updated auditing and accounting guidance in real time. The firm said the technology is designed to support, not replace, auditors, with professional judgement and human oversight remaining central to the audit process.

The system is integrated with Microsoft Azure, Microsoft Foundry, and Microsoft Fabric, reflecting EY’s broader global partnership with Microsoft on the secure and scalable deployment of AI.

EY said the rollout follows global testing and is part of its long-term investment in audit quality, technology, and workforce development. The firm added that further AI enhancements are planned over the coming years as audit teams use the tools across more stages of the audit process.

EY Malta also highlighted related assurance and advisory services linked to AI readiness, governance, and risk management. The firm said the technology would allow teams in Malta to focus more on risk and audit quality while reducing administrative work.

Why does it matter?

The rollout shows how agentic AI is moving into regulated professional services, including audit, where accuracy, accountability, and human judgement remain central. AI could help auditors analyse larger datasets and focus on higher-risk areas. Still, it also raises questions about oversight, explainability, skills, liability, and how regulators assess AI-supported audit work.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

UK launches £200 million initiative to accelerate AI adoption across the economy

The UK government has unveiled a nationwide initiative to accelerate AI adoption, announcing more than £200 million in funding to help businesses deploy AI technologies while strengthening workforce skills.

The announcement was made at the inaugural AI Adoption Summit, which brought together technology companies, trade unions and industry leaders to discuss the practical deployment of AI across the economy.

The programme includes a £100 million expansion of the Bridge AI scheme to connect businesses with AI solutions and expertise, alongside £53 million for new AI innovation and adoption initiatives. Additional funding will support AI Growth Zones, scholarships, workforce training and sector-specific programmes aimed at helping organisations adopt AI responsibly and effectively.

A key element of the initiative is the creation of the AI Economics Institute, chaired by Nobel Prize-winning economist Simon Johnson. The institute will examine how AI affects employment, productivity and economic growth.

More than 30 companies have also committed to sharing data and experiences related to workplace AI adoption to help inform future policy development.

The UK government said the strategy seeks to increase AI adoption across businesses while ensuring workers gain the skills needed to benefit from technological change. Alongside public investment, several technology companies announced additional commitments focused on training, workforce development, research and business support.

Why does it matter?

Governments are increasingly shifting their focus from supporting AI research alone to encouraging widespread adoption across businesses and public services. Many policymakers see AI deployment as a key driver of productivity, competitiveness and economic growth, provided organisations and workers have the skills needed to use the technology effectively.

The UK’s initiative reflects this broader trend by combining investment in AI adoption with workforce development and evidence-based policymaking. The creation of the AI Economics Institute also signals growing interest in understanding how AI will affect jobs, productivity and economic performance as adoption accelerates.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Belgium outperforms EU average in business AI use

Belgium ranks among Europe’s top five countries for business use of AI, with more than a third of companies now using at least one AI technology.

In 2025, 34.54% of Belgian companies reported using AI, up from 24.71% in 2024. The figure is well above the European average of 19.95%, according to the latest Belgian Digital Economy Overview.

Adoption varies strongly by company size. More than 76% of large enterprises already use AI technologies, compared with just over 28% of small businesses.

The most common business applications include text analysis, content production (written or spoken), machine learning, and workflow automation. Companies mainly use AI for administrative and management processes, accounting and finance, and marketing and sales.

AI use is also rising among individuals. In 2025, 33.53% of Belgians used generative AI tools for personal use, compared with the European average of 25.09%.

Digitalisation Minister Vanessa Matz said Belgium should build on the momentum with a coherent strategy that strengthens expertise, supports talent, improves access to European technological capabilities, and builds trust.

She also stressed that AI development should take place within a clear, protective, and inclusive framework that respects privacy, prevents bias, and avoids widening inequalities.

Why does it matter?

Belgium’s AI uptake shows that business adoption is no longer limited to experimentation, especially among large companies. The gap between large enterprises and small businesses also matters, because uneven adoption could widen productivity differences inside the economy. The policy challenge is to support broader AI use while building safeguards around privacy, bias, skills, and inclusion.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

Starlink enters European ultra-low-cost flights through Wizz Air

Wizz Air has announced plans to roll out Starlink connectivity across its fleet from 2027, bringing low-Earth-orbit satellite internet to the European ultra-low-cost airline market.

The airline said it would become the first European ultra-low-cost carrier to offer Starlink’s in-flight internet technology to passengers. The service is expected to provide high-speed, low-latency connectivity during flights.

The move is significant because high-quality in-flight internet has often been treated as a premium service or a paid add-on, rather than a standard feature for low-cost travel. Wizz Air said passengers should not have to choose between affordable fares and reliable onboard connectivity.

The rollout would place Wizz Air among a growing group of airlines using Starlink to upgrade in-flight internet. Several full-service and hybrid carriers have already announced or begun Starlink deployments, but low-cost airlines have been more cautious because of installation, operating, weight and fuel-cost concerns.

Wizz Air’s decision suggests that satellite-based connectivity is moving beyond premium cabins and long-haul carriers into mass-market aviation. If implemented across the fleet, the service could change passenger expectations for affordable short- and medium-haul travel.

Ian Malin, Wizz Air’s Chief Commercial Officer, said ultra-low-cost travel has been about making opportunities accessible to more people and that the airline now wants to extend that approach to connectivity.

Starlink, operated by SpaceX, uses low-Earth orbit satellites to provide broadband connectivity with lower latency than traditional satellite internet systems. Its growing use in aviation reflects the wider expansion of satellite internet into transport, consumer connectivity and digital infrastructure markets.

Why does it matter?

The story matters because Starlink is helping shift in-flight connectivity from a premium airline feature towards a broader digital access expectation. If ultra-low-cost carriers can offer reliable satellite internet without undermining their fare model, connected air travel could become more common across short- and medium-haul routes. The move also shows how low-Earth-orbit satellite networks are expanding into mainstream transport infrastructure, not just for rural broadband or emergency connectivity.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

India targets dark patterns with fines for PhysicsWallah and McAfee

India’s Central Consumer Protection Authority has fined PhysicsWallah and McAfee Software India for using dark patterns that the regulator said misled consumers and influenced their choices on digital platforms.

PhysicsWallah was fined ₹5 lakh, while McAfee was fined ₹1 lakh. Both companies were directed to remove the practices from their platforms and ensure that users can make informed choices without pressure or manipulation.

The action was taken under the Consumer Protection Act 2019, the Consumer Protection (E-Commerce) Rules 2020, and the Guidelines for Prevention and Regulation of Dark Patterns 2023.

In the PhysicsWallah case, the regulator found that a ₹10 donation to the PW Foundation was automatically selected during checkout and added to the total payable amount without the consumer’s explicit consent. Users were also shown emotional messages related to children’s education, healthcare, and marriages that encouraged them to keep the donation selected.

The CCPA also found that courses advertised as free could only be accessed after users shared personal information such as a mobile number and email address. The regulator said the content remained the same across user accounts, indicating that mandatory data collection was not necessary to access the courses.

The authority identified basket sneaking, confirm shaming, and forced action in the PhysicsWallah case. It also said the practices raised serious consumer protection concerns because many users on the platform are students, including minors.

In the McAfee case, the CCPA found that users deciding whether to renew subscriptions were shown options such as ‘Renew Now’ and ‘Accept Risk’. The authority said the wording portrayed non-renewal as a risky decision and created pressure on consumers to continue their subscriptions.

The regulator identified confirmation shaming, interface interference, trick questions, and forced action in McAfee’s renewal process, saying consumers should be able to make subscription decisions freely and without fear-based messaging or misleading design.

The CCPA said the orders form part of its continued action against dark patterns in digital marketplaces. It reiterated that consumer consent must be explicit, informed, and free from manipulative design practices.

Why does it matter?

The penalties show that dark pattern rules in India are moving from guidance to enforcement. By targeting pre-selected donations, emotionally loaded opt-out messages, forced data sharing, and fear-based subscription renewal design, the CCPA is signalling that manipulative interface design can be treated as a consumer protection violation, not just a poor user experience.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

China widens access to value-added telecom services for foreign companies

China’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) has approved 166 foreign-invested enterprises to participate in pilot programmes for value-added telecommunications services since the first approvals were issued in February 2025, according to Xinhua.

The approved companies are authorised to provide services across China, including internet data centre operations, internet access services and information services. The move forms part of broader efforts to expand access to the country’s telecommunications market.

The ministry said the reforms align with international trade and investment rules while building on existing policy frameworks, including China’s commitments under the World Trade Organization and regulations governing free-trade zones. Under the pilot measures, foreign ownership restrictions have been lifted for selected categories of value-added telecommunications services.

More than 3,100 foreign-invested telecommunications enterprises are currently operating in China, and authorities said additional measures are planned to encourage further participation in the sector. Pilot reforms are currently being implemented in Beijing, Shanghai, Hainan and Shenzhen.

Why does it matter?

China’s telecommunications sector has historically maintained restrictions on foreign participation, particularly in value-added services. Expanding pilot programmes and easing ownership limits could increase opportunities for international companies seeking access to one of the world’s largest digital markets.

The reforms also signal China’s broader efforts to attract foreign investment and align aspects of its telecommunications framework with international trade commitments, while testing market-opening measures in selected regions before potential wider implementation.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot

Canada launches AI for All national strategy to accelerate adoption and digital sovereignty

Canada has launched AI for All, a new national AI strategy aimed at accelerating AI adoption, strengthening digital sovereignty, and positioning the country as a leading AI economy.

Announced by Prime Minister Mark Carney, the strategy combines proposed legislation, investments, and programmes intended to ensure AI is adopted responsibly and benefits businesses, workers, students, and communities across Canada.

The strategy targets an additional C$200 billion in economic growth, 250,000 new AI-related jobs over the next five years, and an increase in AI adoption from just over 12% today to 60% by 2034. The government also plans to provide up to 90,000 AI-related jobs and work placement opportunities for young Canadians.

The strategy is built around three principles: building trust, creating opportunities, and reinforcing Canadian sovereignty. To build trust, the government plans to modernise digital legislation, strengthen protections for personal information, address harms such as deepfakes and surveillance pricing, introduce an online safety regime, and expand the capabilities of the Canadian AI Safety Institute.

To create opportunities, the government will establish a National AI Literacy Initiative, provide access to trusted AI agents for post-secondary students, help small and medium-sized businesses adopt AI, support worker training, and launch an AI Missions Program with a flagship health mission focused on diagnostics, patient care, and system efficiency.

To reinforce sovereignty, Canada plans to build domestic AI foundations, including compute, cloud, connectivity, data, and talent. Measures include a world-leading public AI supercomputer, investments in sovereign compute and cloud infrastructure, better access to growth capital for Canadian AI companies, strategic public procurement, and expanded support for AI talent.

The government said the strategy is intended to ensure more AI value is created in Canada while strengthening privacy, data protection, public services, productivity, and economic security.

Why does it matter?

Canada’s AI for All strategy links AI adoption directly to economic growth, workforce development, public trust, and technological sovereignty. The strategy reflects a wider shift among governments: AI policy is no longer focused only on research excellence, but also on compute infrastructure, cloud sovereignty, data governance, safety institutions, business adoption, public procurement, and skills. Its success will depend on whether Canada can turn ambitious targets into measurable adoption across businesses, public services, and workers.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

France fines Shein over consumer protection breaches

France’s consumer watchdog has imposed two administrative fines on companies linked to Shein after finding consumer protection and environmental disclosure breaches on the retailer’s French website.

The Directorate General for Competition, Consumer Affairs and Fraud Control said an investigation carried out in 2025 on fr.shein.com found failures linked to the right of withdrawal, environmental product information, and order confirmation requirements.

Infinite Styles Ecommerce Co Limited, the seller of Shein-branded products on the French site, was fined €5.76 million. The investigation found that consumers were unable to cancel purchases under the legally required withdrawal procedures. It also found missing information on product traceability and the presence of plastic microfibres in certain textile products.

The watchdog said consumers must be informed when textiles containing more than 50% synthetic fibres release plastic microfibres into the environment during washing.

A second company, Infinite Styles Services Co Limited, which operates fr.shein.com, was fined €16.73 million for non-compliant order confirmations. The DGCCRF said confirmations sent to consumers were missing mandatory information, including the price of goods, delivery dates or deadlines, seller identity and contact details, legal guarantees, mediation options, and withdrawal forms and rights.

French authorities said the missing information weakened consumer protection by making it harder for customers to exercise rights such as cancelling purchases or seeking refunds.

Why does it matter?

The penalties show how consumer protection enforcement is increasingly targeting cross-border e-commerce platforms over both purchasing rights and environmental transparency. For fast-fashion platforms, compliance is no longer only about prices and delivery terms, but also about product traceability, withdrawal rights, order documentation, and disclosures on environmental impact.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!