Digital business models

OpenAI faced questions after ChatGPT surfaced app prompts for paid users

ChatGPT users complained after the system surfaced an unexpected Peloton suggestion during an unrelated conversation. The prompt appeared for a Pro Plan subscriber and triggered questions about ad-like behaviour. Many asked why paid chats were showing promotional-style links.

OpenAI said the prompt was part of early app-discovery tests, not advertising. Staff acknowledged that the suggestion was irrelevant to the query. They said the system is still being adjusted to avoid confusing or misplaced prompts.

Users reported other recommendations, including music apps that contradicted their stated preferences. The lack of an option to turn off these suggestions fuelled irritation. Paid subscribers warned that such prompts undermine the service’s reliability.

OpenAI described the feature as a step toward integrating apps directly into conversations. The aim is to surface tools when genuinely helpful. Early trials, however, have demonstrated gaps between intended relevance and actual outcomes.

The tests remain limited to selected regions and are not active in parts of Europe. Critics argue intrusive prompts risk pushing users to competitors. OpenAI said refinements will continue to ensure suggestions feel helpful, not promotional.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Regulators question transparency after Mixpanel data leak

Mixpanel is facing criticism after disclosing a security incident with minimal detail, providing only a brief note before the US Thanksgiving weekend. Analysts say the timing and lack of clarity set a poor example for transparency in breach reporting.

OpenAI later confirmed its own exposure, stating that analytics data linked to developer activity had been obtained from Mixpanel’s systems. It stressed that ChatGPT users were not affected and that it had halted its use of the service following the incident.

OpenAI said the stolen information included names, email addresses, coarse location data and browser details, raising concerns about phishing risks. It noted that no advertising identifiers were involved, limiting broader cross-platform tracking.

Security experts say the breach highlights long-standing concerns about analytics companies that collect detailed behavioural and device data across thousands of apps. Mixpanel’s session-replay tools can be sensitive, as they can inadvertently capture private information.

Regulators argue the case shows why analytics providers have become prime targets for attackers. They say that more transparent disclosure from Mixpanel is needed to assess the scale of exposure and the potential impact on companies and end-users.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Irish regulator probes an investigation into TikTok and LinkedIn

Regulators in Ireland have opened investigations into TikTok and LinkedIn under the EU Digital Services Act.

Coimisiún na Meán’s Investigations Team believes there may be shortcomings in how both platforms handle reports of suspected illegal material. Concerns emerged during an exhaustive review of Article 16 compliance that began last year and focused on the availability of reporting tools.

The review highlighted the potential for interface designs that could confuse users, particularly when choosing between reporting illegal content and content that merely violates platform rules.

An investigation that will examine whether reporting tools are easy to access, user-friendly and capable of supporting anonymous reporting of suspected child sexual abuse material, as required under Article 16(2)(c).

It will also assess whether platform design may discourage users from reporting material as illegal under Article 25.

Coimisiún na Meán stated that several other providers made changes to their reporting systems following regulatory engagement. Those changes are being reviewed for effectiveness.

The regulator emphasised that platforms must avoid practices that could mislead users and must provide reliable reporting mechanisms instead of diverting people toward less protective options.

These investigations will proceed under the Broadcasting Act of Ireland. If either platform is found to be in breach of the DSA, the regulator can impose administrative penalties that may reach six percent of global turnover.

Coimisiún na Meán noted that cooperation remains essential and that further action may be necessary if additional concerns about DSA compliance arise.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

OpenAI expands investment in mental health safety research

Yesterday, OpenAI launched a new grant programme to support external research on the connection between AI and mental health.

An initiative that aims to expand independent inquiry into how people express distress, how AI interprets complex emotional signals and how different cultures shape the language used to discuss sensitive experiences.

OpenAI also hopes that broader participation will strengthen collective understanding, rather than keeping progress confined to internal studies.

The programme encourages interdisciplinary work that brings together technical specialists, mental health professionals and people with lived experience. OpenAI is seeking proposals that can offer clear outputs, such as datasets, evaluation methods, or practical insights, that improve safety and guidance.

Researchers may focus on patterns of distress in specific communities, the influence of slang and vernacular, or the challenges that appear when mental health symptoms manifest in ways that current systems fail to recognise.

The grants also aim to expand knowledge of how providers use AI within care settings, including where tools are practical, where limitations appear and where risks emerge for users.

Additional areas of interest include how young people respond to different tones or styles, how grief is expressed in language and how visual cues linked to body image concerns can be interpreted responsibly.

OpenAI emphasises that better evaluation frameworks, ethical datasets and annotated examples can support safer development across the field.

Applications are open until 19 December, with decisions expected by mid-January. The programme forms part of OpenAI’s broader effort to invest in well-being and safety research, offering financial support to independent teams working across diverse cultural and linguistic contexts.

The company argues that expanding evidence and perspectives will contribute to a more secure and supportive environment for future AI systems.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

AI growth threatens millions of jobs across Asia

UN economists warned millions of jobs in Asia could be at risk as AI widens the gap between digitally advanced nations and those lacking basic access and skills. The report compared the AI revolution to 19th-century industrialisation, which created a wealthy few and left many behind.

Women and young adults face the most significant threat from AI in the workplace, while the benefits in health, education, and income are unevenly distributed.

Countries such as China, Singapore, and South Korea have invested heavily in AI and reaped significant benefits. Still, entry-level workers in many South Asian nations remain highly vulnerable to automation and technological advancements.

The UN Development Programme urged governments to consider ethical deployment and inclusivity when implementing AI. Countries such as Cambodia, Papua New Guinea, and Vietnam are focusing on developing simple digital tools to help health workers and farmers who lack reliable internet access.

AI could generate nearly $1 trillion in economic gains across Asia over the next decade, boosting regional GDP growth by about two percentage points. Income disparities mean AI benefits remain concentrated in wealthy countries, leaving poorer nations at a disadvantage.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot! 

eSafety highlights risks in connected vehicle technology

Australia’s eSafety regulator is drawing attention to concerns about how connected car features can be misused within domestic and family violence situations.

Reports from frontline workers indicate that remote access tools, trip records and location tracking can be exploited instead of serving their intended purpose as safety and convenience features.

The Australian regulator stresses that increased connectivity across vehicles and devices is creating new challenges for those supporting victim-survivors.

Smart cars often store detailed travel information and allow remote commands through apps and online accounts. These functions can be accessed by someone with shared credentials or linked accounts, which can expose sensitive information.

eSafety notes that misuse of connected vehicles forms part of a broader pattern of technology-facilitated coercive control, where multiple smart devices such as watches, tablets, cameras and televisions can play a role.

The regulator has produced updated guidance to help people understand potential risks and take practical steps with the support of specialist services.

Officials highlight the importance of stronger safeguards from industry, including simpler methods for revoking access, clearer account transfer processes during separation and more transparent logs showing when remote commands are used.

Retailers and dealerships are encouraged to ensure devices and accounts are reset when ownership changes. eSafety argues that design improvements introduced early can reduce the likelihood of harm, rather than requiring complex responses later.

Agencies and community services continue to assist those affected by domestic and family violence, offering advice on account security, safe device use and available support services.

The guidance aims to help people take protective measures in a controlled and safe way, while emphasising the importance of accessing professional assistance.

eSafety encourages ongoing cooperation between industry, government and frontline workers to manage risks linked to emerging automotive and digital technologies.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Quantum money meets Bitcoin: Building unforgeable digital currency

Quantum money might sound like science fiction, yet it is rapidly emerging as one of the most compelling frontiers in modern digital finance. Initially a theoretical concept, it was far ahead of the technology of its time, making practical implementation impossible. Today, thanks to breakthroughs in quantum computing and quantum communication, scientists are reviving the idea, investigating how the principles of quantum physics could finally enable unforgeable quantum digital money. 

Comparisons between blockchain and quantum money are frequent and, on the surface, appear logical, yet can these two visions of new-generation cash genuinely be measured by the same yardstick? 

Origins of quantum money 

Quantum money was first proposed by physicist Stephen Wiesner in the late 1960s. Wiesner envisioned a system in which each banknote would carry quantum particles encoded in specific states, known only to the issuing bank, making the notes inherently secure. 

Due to the peculiarities of quantum mechanics, these quantum states could not be copied, offering a level of security fundamentally impossible with classical systems. At the time, however, quantum technologies were purely theoretical, and devices capable of creating, storing, and accurately measuring delicate quantum states simply did not exist. 

For decades, Wiesner’s idea remained a fascinating thought experiment. Today, the rise of functional quantum computers, advanced photonic systems, and reliable quantum communication networks is breathing new life into the concept, allowing researchers to explore practical applications of quantum money in ways that were once unimaginable.

A new battle for the digital throne is emerging as quantum money shifts from theory to possibility, challenging whether Bitcoin’s decentralised strength can hold its ground in a future shaped by quantum technology.

The no-cloning theorem: The physics that makes quantum money impossible to forge

At the heart of quantum money lies the no-cloning theorem, a cornerstone of quantum mechanics. The principle establishes that it is physically impossible to create an exact copy of an unknown quantum state. Any attempt to measure a quantum state inevitably alters it, meaning that copying or scanning a quantum banknote destroys the very information that ensures its authenticity. 

The unique property makes quantum money exceptionally secure: unlike blockchain, which relies on cryptographic algorithms and distributed consensus, quantum money derives its protection directly from the laws of physics. In theory, a quantum banknote cannot be counterfeited, even by an attacker with unlimited computing resources, which is why quantum money is considered one of the most promising approaches to unforgeable digital currency.

A new battle for the digital throne is emerging as quantum money shifts from theory to possibility, challenging whether Bitcoin’s decentralised strength can hold its ground in a future shaped by quantum technology.

How quantum money works in theory

Quantum money schemes are typically divided into two main types: private and public. 

In private quantum money systems, a central authority- such as a bank- creates quantum banknotes and remains the only entity capable of verifying them. Each note carries a classical serial number alongside a set of quantum states known solely to the issuer. The primary advantage of this approach is its absolute immunity to counterfeiting, as no one outside the issuing institution can replicate the banknote. However, such systems are fully centralised and rely entirely on the security and infrastructure of the issuing bank, which inherently limits scalability and accessibility.

Public quantum money, by contrast, pursues a more ambitious goal: allowing anyone to verify a quantum banknote without consulting a central authority. Developing this level of decentralisation has proven exceptionally difficult. Numerous proposed schemes have been broken by researchers who have managed to extract information without destroying the quantum states. Despite these challenges, public quantum money remains a major focus of quantum cryptography research, with scientists actively pursuing secure and scalable methods for open verification. 

Beyond theoretical appeal, quantum money faces substantial practical hurdles. Quantum states are inherently fragile and susceptible to decoherence, meaning they can lose their information when interacting with the surrounding environment. 

Maintaining stable quantum states demands highly specialised and costly equipment, including photonic processors, quantum memory modules, and sophisticated quantum error-correction systems. Any error or loss could render a quantum banknote completely worthless, and no reliable method currently exists to store these states over long periods. In essence, the concept of quantum money is groundbreaking, yet real-world implementation requires technological advances that are not yet mature enough for mass adoption. 

A new battle for the digital throne is emerging as quantum money shifts from theory to possibility, challenging whether Bitcoin’s decentralised strength can hold its ground in a future shaped by quantum technology.

Bitcoin solves the duplication problem differently

While quantum money relies on the laws of physics to prevent counterfeiting, Bitcoin tackles the duplication problem through cryptography and distributed consensus. Each transaction is verified across thousands of nodes, and SHA-256 hash functions secure the blockchain against double spending without the need for a central authority. 

Unlike elliptic curve cryptography, which could eventually be vulnerable to large-scale quantum attacks, SHA-256 has proven remarkably resilient; even quantum algorithms such as Grover’s offer only a marginal advantage, reducing the search space from 2256 to 2128– still far beyond any realistic brute-force attempt. 

Bitcoin’s security does not hinge on unbreakable mathematics alone but on a combination of decentralisation, network verification, and robust cryptographic design. Many experts therefore consider Bitcoin effectively quantum-proof, with most of the dramatic threats predicted from quantum computers likely to be impossible in practice. 

Software-based and globally accessible, Bitcoin operates independently of specialised hardware, allowing users to send, receive, and verify value anywhere in the world without the fragility and complexity inherent in quantum systems. Furthermore, the network can evolve to adopt post-quantum cryptographic algorithms, ensuring long-term resilience, making Bitcoin arguably the most battle-hardened digital financial instrument in existence. 

A new battle for the digital throne is emerging as quantum money shifts from theory to possibility, challenging whether Bitcoin’s decentralised strength can hold its ground in a future shaped by quantum technology.

Could quantum money be a threat to Bitcoin?

In reality, quantum money and Bitcoin address entirely different challenges, meaning the former is unlikely to replace the latter. Bitcoin operates as a global, decentralised monetary network with established economic rules and governance, while quantum money represents a technological approach to issuing physically unforgeable tokens. Bitcoin is not designed to be physically unclonable; its strength lies in verifiability, decentralisation, and network-wide trust.

However, SHA-256- the hashing algorithm that underpins Bitcoin mining and block creation- remains highly resistant to quantum threats. Quantum computers achieve only a quadratic speed-up through Grover’s algorithm, which is insufficient to break SHA-256 in practical terms. Bitcoin also retains the ability to adopt post-quantum cryptographic standards as they mature, whereas quantum money is limited by rigid physical constraints that are far harder to update.

Quantum money also remains too fragile, complex, and costly for widespread use. Its realistic applications are limited to state institutions, military networks, or highly secure financial environments rather than everyday payments. Bitcoin, by contrast, already benefits from extensive global infrastructure, strong market adoption, and deep liquidity, making it far more practical for daily transactions and long-term digital value transfer. 

A new battle for the digital throne is emerging as quantum money shifts from theory to possibility, challenging whether Bitcoin’s decentralised strength can hold its ground in a future shaped by quantum technology.

Where quantum money and blockchain could coexist

Although fundamentally different, quantum money and blockchain technologies have the potential to complement one another in meaningful ways. Quantum key distribution could strengthen the security of blockchain networks by protecting communication channels from advanced attacks, while quantum-generated randomness may enhance cryptographic protocols used in decentralised systems. 

Researchers have also explored the idea of using ‘quantum tokens’ to provide an additional privacy layer within specialised blockchain applications. Both technologies ultimately aim to deliver secure and verifiable forms of digital value. Their coexistence may offer the most resilient future framework for digital finance, combining the physics-based protection of quantum money with the decentralisation, transparency, and global reach of blockchain technology. 

A new battle for the digital throne is emerging as quantum money shifts from theory to possibility, challenging whether Bitcoin’s decentralised strength can hold its ground in a future shaped by quantum technology.

Quantum physics meets blockchain for the future of secure currency

Quantum money remains a remarkable concept, originally decades ahead of its time, and now revived by advances in quantum computing and quantum communication. Although it promises theoretically unforgeable digital currency, its fragility, technical complexity, and demanding infrastructure make it impractical for large-scale use. 

Bitcoin, by contrast, stands as the most resilient and widely adopted model of decentralised digital money, supported by a mature global network and robust cryptographic foundations. 

Quantum money and Bitcoin stand as twin engines of a new digital finance era, where quantum physics is reshaping value creation, powering blockchain innovation, and driving next-generation fintech solutions for secure and resilient digital currency. 

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot! 

Gemini Projects feature appears in Google app teardown

Google is preparing a Gemini feature called Projects, offering a small workspace for grouping chats by topic. Early clues show it works like a sandbox that keeps related conversations structured. It is still hidden and not active for anyone.

An Android Authority teardown of the Google app revealed the interface and onboarding prompts. These mention isolating chats, choosing a focus area and adding files for context. The feature remains dormant until Google enables it on the server.

When opening a project, users can name it and then view a simple dashboard. This includes options to set project goals that guide Gemini’s behaviour. The aim is to keep longer tasks organised in one place.

The teardown shows a limit of ten file uploads per project, with no clarity on whether paid tiers will receive more. This may affect complex tasks that require a larger context. Users will also be able to pin projects for quicker access.

Because all information comes from hidden code, Google has not confirmed any details. The design or limits may change before launch. Until the Gemini feature is announced, the findings should be treated as provisional.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Greek businesses urged to accelerate AI adoption

AI is becoming a central factor in business development, according to Google Cloud executives visiting Athens for Google Cloud Day.

Marianne Janik and Boris Georgiev explained that AI is entering daily life more quickly than many expected, creating an urgent need for companies to strengthen their capabilities. Their visit coincided with the international launch of Gemini 3, the latest version of the company’s AI model.

They argued that enterprises in Greece should accelerate their adoption of AI tools to remain competitive. A slow transition could limit their position in both domestic and international markets.

They also underlined the importance of employees developing new skills that support digital transformation, noting that risk-taking has become a necessary element of strategic progress.

The financial sector is advancing at a faster pace, aided by its long-standing familiarity with digital and analytical tools.

Banks are investing heavily in compliance functions and customer onboarding. Retail is also undergoing a similar transformation, driven by consumer expectations and operational pressures.

Google Cloud Day in Athens brought together a large number of participants, highlighting the sector’s growing interest in practical AI applications and the role of advanced models in shaping business processes.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU moves forward with Bulgaria payment review

The European Commission has given partial approval to Bulgaria’s request for €1.6 billion under the Recovery and Resilience Facility. The assessment followed the country’s submission in early October and confirmed that most reforms and investments linked to the payment were completed.

Progress spanned the green and digital transition, research, innovation, healthcare, social protection, sustainable transport and business modernisation.

Officials confirmed that 48 of 50 milestones were met, supporting Bulgaria’s efforts to strengthen economic growth and improve long-term competitiveness, rather than delaying structural change.

Measures covered a prohibition on new coal or lignite power installations, limits on emissions from existing plants, investment in renewable energy and steps to make healthcare careers more appealing.

The Commission noted that these areas formed core elements of Bulgaria’s recovery plan.

Two milestones were considered incomplete. The first relates to the establishment of an operational anti-corruption body; the second concerns aspects of legal acts linked to criminal proceedings and the accountability of the Prosecutor General.

Additionally, the Commission proposed a temporary deferral for the portion of funding connected to those elements, allowing Bulgaria to receive money for milestones already achieved instead of holding back the entire request.

The next stage involves a review by the Economic and Financial Committee within four weeks. Bulgaria will also have one month to respond to the Commission’s concerns. If issues remain unresolved, part of the payment will be withheld until the outstanding milestones are met.

Once corrective actions are completed, the remaining funds will be released in line with the standard procedure for the Recovery and Resilience Facility.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!