Australia begins trial of teen social media ban

Australia‘s government is conducting a world-first trial to enforce its national social media ban for children under 16, focusing on age-checking technology. The trial, set to begin in January and run through March, will involve around 1,200 randomly selected Australians. It will help guide the development of effective age verification methods, as platforms like Meta, X (formerly Twitter), TikTok, and Snapchat must prove they are taking ‘reasonable steps’ to keep minors off their services or face fines of up to A$49.5 million ($32 million).

The trial is overseen by the Age Check Certification Scheme and will test several age-checking techniques, such as video selfies, document uploads for verification, and email cross-checking. Although platforms like YouTube are exempt, the trial is seen as a crucial step for setting a global precedent for online age restrictions, which many countries are now considering due to concerns about youth mental health and privacy.

The trial’s outcomes could influence how other nations approach enforcing age restrictions, despite concerns from some lawmakers and tech companies about privacy violations and free speech. The government has responded by ensuring that no personal data will be required without alternatives. The age-check process could significantly shape global efforts to regulate social media access for children in the coming years.

Transparency issues plague UK mobile games

A recent investigation revealed that most top-selling mobile games in the UK fail to disclose the presence of loot boxes in their advertisements, despite regulations mandating transparency. Loot boxes, which provide randomised in-game items often obtained through payments, have drawn criticism for fostering addictive behaviors and targeting vulnerable groups, including children. Of the top 45 highest-grossing games analysed on Google Play, only two clearly mentioned loot boxes in their advertisements.

The UK Advertising Standards Authority, which oversees compliance, acknowledges the issue and promises further action but has faced criticism for its slow and limited enforcement. Critics argue that lax self-regulation within the gaming industry enables companies to prioritise profits over player well-being, particularly as loot boxes reportedly generate $15B annually.

Advocacy groups and researchers have voiced alarm over these findings, warning of long-term consequences. Zoë Osmond of GambleAware emphasised the risks of exposing children to gambling-like features in games, which could lead to harmful habits later in life. The gaming industry has so far resisted stricter government intervention, despite mounting evidence of non-compliance and harm.

Australian social media ban sparked by politician’s wife’s call to action

Australia has passed a landmark law banning children under 16 from using social media, following a fast-moving push led by South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas. The law, which takes effect in November 2025, aims to protect young people from the harmful effects of social media, including mental health issues linked to cyberbullying and body image problems. The bill has widespread support, with a government survey showing 77% of Australians backing the measure. However, it has sparked significant opposition from tech companies and privacy advocates, who argue that the law is rushed and could push young users to more dangerous parts of the internet.

The push for the national ban gained momentum after Malinauskas’s state-level initiative to restrict social media access for children under 14 in September. This led to a broader federal response, with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s government introducing a nationwide version of the policy. The legislation eliminates parental discretion, meaning no child under 16 will be able to use social media without facing fines for platforms that fail to enforce the rules. This move contrasts with policies in countries like France and Florida, where minors can access social media with parental permission.

While the law has garnered support from most of Australia’s political leaders, it has faced strong criticism from social media companies like Meta and TikTok. These platforms warn that the law could drive teens to hidden corners of the internet and that the rushed process leaves many questions unanswered. Despite the backlash, the law passed with bipartisan support, and a trial of age-verification technology will begin in January to prepare for its full implementation.

The debate over the law highlights growing concerns worldwide about the impact of social media on young people. Although some critics argue that the law is an overreach, others believe it is a necessary step to protect children from online harm. With the law now in place, Australia has set a precedent that could inspire other countries grappling with similar issues.

Australia’s new social media ban faces backlash from Big Tech

Australia’s new law banning children under 16 from using social media has sparked strong criticism from major tech companies. The law, passed late on Thursday, targets platforms like Meta’s Instagram and Facebook, as well as TikTok, imposing fines of up to A$49.5 million for allowing minors to log in. Tech giants, including TikTok and Meta, argue that the legislation was rushed through parliament without adequate consultation and could have harmful unintended consequences, such as driving young users to less visible, more dangerous parts of the internet.

The law was introduced after a parliamentary inquiry into the harmful effects of social media on young people, with testimony from parents of children who had been bullied online. While the Australian government had warned tech companies about the impending legislation for months, the bill was fast-tracked in a chaotic final session of parliament. Critics, including Meta, have raised concerns about the lack of clear evidence linking social media to mental health issues and question the rushed process.

Despite the backlash, the law has strong political backing, and the government is set to begin a trial of enforcement methods in January, with the full ban expected to take effect by November 2025. Australia’s long-standing tensions with major US-based tech companies, including previous legislation requiring platforms to pay for news content, are also fueling the controversy. As the law moves forward, both industry representatives and lawmakers face challenges in determining how it will be practically implemented.

Microsoft and Atom Computing announce quantum breakthrough

Microsoft and Atom Computing have announced a significant breakthrough in quantum computing that could revolutionise blockchain mining. The two companies developed a quantum system with 24 entangled logical qubits using just 80 physical qubits, setting a new record in quantum efficiency. This achievement could eventually lead to a transformation in the world of proof-of-work (PoW) blockchain mining, as quantum systems become capable of outperforming traditional mining methods.

The advancement is especially notable for its potential to impact the security of blockchain networks like Bitcoin, which rely on SHA-256 encryption. Quantum computers, by applying Grover’s Algorithm, could significantly speed up the process of solving the PoW puzzle, threatening the security measures that have safeguarded blockchain technology. While Grover’s Algorithm has shown promise in small-scale experiments, it has yet to be proven on the large scale required for cracking SHA-256 encryption.

Though the timeline for practical quantum mining remains uncertain, with experts predicting it could take 10 to 50 years, Atom Computing and Microsoft aim to bring a 1,000-qubit quantum computer to market as early as 2025. This breakthrough could drastically shorten the path to quantum systems capable of rivaling traditional mining rigs.

Pocket FM taps AI tools to expand content library and boost quality

India-based audio platform Pocket FM is leveraging AI to enrich its content offerings and scale its production capabilities. Despite hosting over 200,000 hours of content, CEO Rohan Nayak emphasised the need for deeper genre coverage and original content. The company has partnered with ElevenLabs to convert written stories into audio series, achieving faster production and significant cost savings. AI models are also being used to adapt stories for diverse regions by handling cultural nuances, ensuring broader appeal across geographies.

Pocket FM is testing AI tools to enhance its creative process. These include a writing assistant that provides alternative plot ideas and insights based on platform data, aiming to empower solo writers with a ‘writer’s room’ experience. A ‘blockbuster engine’ is under development to analyse trends and identify potential hit shows, underscoring the platform’s focus on producing popular content. AI has already contributed to more than 40,000 series on the platform, generating $3 million in revenue.

Despite the benefits, Pocket FM acknowledges challenges in maintaining quality while accelerating production. Industry experts caution that reliance on AI might undermine creativity, with artists needing to ensure authenticity in their work. Nayak affirmed that AI tools are intended to complement rather than replace human creativity. Pocket FM, backed by $197 million in funding, competes with platforms such as Audible and Kuku FM while striving to strike a balance between innovation and content excellence.

Mixed reactions as Australia bans social media for minors

Australia’s recent approval of a social media ban for children under 16 has sparked mixed reactions nationwide. While the government argues that the law sets a global benchmark for protecting youth from harmful online content, critics, including tech giants like TikTok, warn that it could push minors to darker corners of the internet. The law, which will fine platforms like Meta’s Facebook, Instagram and TikTok up to A$49.5 million if they fail to enforce it, takes effect one year after a trial period begins in January.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese emphasised the importance of protecting children’s physical and mental health, citing the harmful impact of social media on body image and misogynistic content. Despite widespread support—77% of Australians back the measure—many are divided. Some, like Sydney resident Francesca Sambas, approve of the ban, citing concerns over inappropriate content, while others, like Shon Klose, view it as an overreach that undermines democracy. Young people, however, expressed their intent to bypass the restrictions, with 11-year-old Emma Wakefield saying she would find ways to access social media secretly.

This ban positions Australia as the first country to impose such a strict regulation, ahead of other countries like France and several US states that have restrictions based on parental consent. The swift passage of the law, which was fast-tracked through parliament, has drawn criticism from social media companies, which argue the law was rushed and lacked proper scrutiny. TikTok, in particular, warned that the law could worsen risks to children rather than protect them.

The move has also raised concerns about Australia’s relationship with the United States, as figures like Elon Musk have criticised the law as a potential overreach. However, Albanese defended the law, drawing parallels to age-based restrictions on alcohol, and reassured parents that while enforcement may not be perfect, it’s a necessary step to protect children online.

Starlink operations halted in Namibia for lacking licence

Namibia’s communications regulator has ordered Starlink, operated by SpaceX, to cease its operations in the country. The Communications Regulatory Authority of Namibia (CRAN) stated that the company was running a telecommunications network without the required licence.

A cease-and-desist order was issued on 26 November, demanding that Starlink immediately halt all activities. CRAN has also advised the public against purchasing or subscribing to Starlink services, warning that these actions are illegal under Namibian law.

Investigators have already confiscated unlicensed terminals from consumers and have opened criminal cases with the police. The regulator emphasised its commitment to enforcing compliance with national telecommunications regulations.

Earlier this year, Cameroon faced a similar situation, seizing equipment at ports due to licence violations. SpaceX has yet to comment on the developments in Namibia.

Microsoft rejects AI training allegations

Microsoft has refuted allegations that it uses data from its Microsoft 365 applications, including Word and Excel, to train AI models. These claims surfaced online, with users pointing to the need to opt out of the ‘connected experiences’ feature as a possible loophole for data usage.

A Microsoft spokesperson stated categorically that customer data from both consumer and commercial Microsoft 365 applications is not utilised to train large language models. The spokesperson clarified in an email to Reuters that such suggestions were ‘untrue.’

The company explained that the ‘connected experiences’ feature is designed to support functionalities like co-authoring and cloud storage, rather than contributing to AI training. These assurances aim to address user concerns over potential misuse of their data.

Ongoing discussions on social media underscore persistent public worries about privacy and data security in AI development. Questions about data usage policies continue to highlight the need for transparency from technology companies.

Australia enacts groundbreaking law banning under-16s from social media

Australia has approved a groundbreaking law banning children under 16 from accessing social media, following a contentious debate. The new regulation targets major tech companies like Meta, TikTok, and Snapchat, which will face fines of up to A$49.5 million if they allow minors to log in. Starting with a trial period in January, the law is set to take full effect in 2025. The move comes amid growing global concerns about the mental health impact of social media on young people, with several countries considering similar restrictions.

The law, which marks a significant political win for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, has received widespread public support, with 77% of Australians backing the ban. However, it has faced opposition from privacy advocates, child rights groups, and social media companies, which argue the law was rushed through without adequate consultation. Critics also warn that it could inadvertently harm vulnerable groups, such as LGBTQIA or migrant teens, by cutting them off from supportive online communities.

Despite the backlash, many parents and mental health advocates support the ban, citing concerns about social media’s role in exacerbating youth mental health issues. High-profile campaigns and testimonies from parents of children affected by cyberbullying have helped drive public sentiment in favour of the law. However, some experts warn the ban could have unintended consequences, pushing young people toward more dangerous corners of the internet where they can avoid detection.

The law also has the potential to strain relations between Australia and the United States, as tech companies with major US ties, including Meta and X, have voiced concerns about its implications for internet freedom. While these companies have pledged to comply, there remain significant questions about how the law will be enforced and whether it can achieve its intended goals without infringing on privacy or digital rights.