A recent report by the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) has revealed that Instagram failed to remove abusive comments directed at female politicians who may run in the 2024 US elections. The study examined over half a million comments on posts by prominent female figures from the Democratic and Republican parties, including Vice President Kamala Harris and Senator Marsha Blackburn.
Over 20,000 comments were flagged as ‘toxic,’ with a significant number containing sexist, racist abuse and even death and rape threats. Despite violating Instagram’s community standards, 93% of the harmful comments remained on the platform.
Meta, the parent company of Instagram, highlighted the tools available to users to filter out offensive content but acknowledged the need to review the CCDH report and promised to act on any content that breaches their policies. The report further emphasised that women of colour were particularly vulnerable to online abuse during the 2020 election and criticised social media algorithms for amplifying harmful content. Advocacy groups are increasingly calling on social media platforms to better enforce their safety guidelines to protect users from targeted abuse.
YouTube has shut down the video channel of the Portuguese ultranationalist group Grupo 1143 for violating its hate speech policies. The action came after the New York Times contacted the platform while investigating how online hate speech can incite real-world violence, using Portugal as a case study. YouTube stated that it prohibits content glorifying hateful supremacist propaganda and took down the channel linked to the group, which is led by neo-Nazi activist Mario Machado.
Machado, who has a criminal history including charges of assault and racial discrimination, criticised the shutdown on X, claiming it was an attempt by the ‘global Left’ to silence his nationalist organisation. Despite the YouTube ban, Grupo 1143’s accounts on X and Telegram remain active. The group, known for organising anti-immigration and anti-Islam protests, is currently under investigation by Portuguese authorities for its possible connection to violent attacks on migrants earlier this year, although it denies any involvement.
YouTube’s hate speech policy strictly bans content promoting violence or hatred based on attributes like immigration status, nationality, or religion. In the first quarter of 2024, YouTube removed over 157,000 videos worldwide for violating these policies.
Meta Platforms announced that access to Instagram in Turkey has been restored after a nine-day block. The social media giant expressed its satisfaction with the platform being operational again and confirmed ongoing discussions with Turkish authorities regarding content that violates its policies. Meta emphasised its commitment to removing content related to dangerous organisations and individuals while applying allowances for newsworthy content where appropriate.
The Turkish government had blocked Instagram on 2 August, citing the platform’s failure to comply with local laws. The ban was linked to allegations that Instagram had restricted posts expressing condolences over the assassination of Ismail Haniyeh, a leader of the Palestinian militant group Hamas. The block led to significant protests from users and businesses reliant on the platform. Meta clarified that it did not change its policies but agreed to reassess its actions concerning policy-violating content in Turkey.
Turkey, which ranks fifth globally in Instagram usage with over 57 million users, saw the platform reinstated after Meta’s assurances to cooperate with Turkish authorities. Despite the platform’s return, tensions remain, highlighted by the recent arrest of a woman who criticised the Instagram ban.
Companies from US and China are leading the race in AI research, with Alphabet, the parent company of Google, at the forefront. A recent study from Georgetown University revealed that Alphabet has published the most frequently cited AI academic papers over the past decade. Seven of the top ten positions are held by US companies, including Microsoft and Meta, reflecting their dominance in the field.
Chinese firms are not far behind, with Tencent, Alibaba, and Huawei securing spots within the top ten. These companies have shown remarkable growth, particularly in the number of papers accepted at major conferences. Huawei has outpaced its competitors with a 98.2% annual growth rate in this area, followed by Alibaba at 53.5%.
The competition extends beyond academic publications to patents. Baidu, a leading Chinese tech firm, topped the list of patent applications with over 10,000 submissions from 2013 to 2023. Baidu’s growth has been particularly striking, with a 228% increase in patent applications year-on-year in 2020. US companies hold three spots in the top ten for patents, with IBM making the list.
Samsung Electronics is the only Korean company to make the top 100, ranking No. 14 for highly cited AI articles and No. 4 for patents. However, Samsung’s growth in these areas has been slower compared to other global leaders, with modest increases in conference paper acceptances in recent years.
Bluesky, a social media platform, has reported a significant increase in signups in the United Kingdom recently as users look for alternatives to Elon Musk’s X. The increase follows Musk’s controversial remarks on ongoing riots in the UK, which have driven users, including several Members of Parliament, to explore other platforms. The company announced that it had experienced a 60% rise in activity from UK accounts.
Musk has faced criticism for inflaming tensions after riots in Britain were sparked by misinformation surrounding the murder of three girls in northern England. The Tesla CEO allegedly used X to disseminate misleading information to his vast audience, including a post claiming that civil war in Britain was ‘inevitable.’ The case has prompted Prime Minister Keir Starmer to respond and increased calls for the government to accelerate the implementation of online content regulations.
Bluesky highlighted that the UK had the most signups of any country for five of the last seven days. Once supported by Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey, the platform is among the many apps vying to replace Twitter after Musk’s turbulent takeover in late 2022.
As of July, Bluesky’s monthly active user base was approximately 688,568, which is small compared to X’s 76.9 million users, according to Similarweb, a digital market intelligence firm. Despite its smaller size, the recent surge in UK signups to Bluesky appears to be a growing interest in alternative social media platforms.
Elon Musk’s Starlink has been granted a licence to offer satellite broadband services in Sri Lanka. This development follows the country’s recent amendment to its telecommunications law, the first change in 28 years, which allowed Starlink Lanka to establish its presence.
Sri Lanka’s parliament passed the updated telecommunications bill last month, clearing the way for new players like Starlink to enter the market. The satellite service, a subsidiary of SpaceX, owns around 60% of the 7,500 satellites currently in orbit, solidifying its dominance in the satellite internet sector.
In March, Starlink proposed to set up operations in Sri Lanka, with officials confirming the company will need to pay a tariff for the licence. While Starlink has shown interest in expanding into South Asia, including India, no concrete plans have been revealed.
Starlink has not yet commented on the recent developments, leaving questions about its next steps in the region.
Polish billionaire Rafal Brzoska and his wife plan to take legal action against Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, due to fake advertisements circulating on these platforms. These ads falsely feature Brzoska’s image and spread misinformation about his wife. The couple has yet to decide where to file the lawsuit, which is part of a broader effort to hold Meta accountable for allowing such ads to persist even after being alerted to the issue.
Brzoska, known for founding the Polish parcel locker company InPost, stated that he first notified Meta about the problem in early July but has yet to see a resolution. He and his wife are considering various legal jurisdictions, including possibly filing a lawsuit in the United States if they don’t see action in Europe. They intend to demand that Meta cease profiting from misleading content that infringes on their rights and seek substantial compensation, which they plan to donate to charity.
The situation has prompted action from the President of the Personal Data Protection Office in Poland, who recently mandated that Meta Platforms Ireland Limited stop displaying false advertisements featuring the Brzoskas on Facebook and Instagram in Poland for three months.
A Meta spokesperson responded that the company removes false ads when discovered and collaborates with local authorities to combat scammers. They acknowledged the ongoing challenge of scammers who constantly adapt to evade detection, reaffirming their commitment to working with businesses, local governments, and law enforcement to address these issues.
As the US election draws near, the proliferation of deepfake content is raising serious concerns about its impact on undecided voters. Deepfakes—AI-generated images, videos, or audio clips—pose a significant threat to the democratic process by making it increasingly difficult for the public to distinguish between reality and fiction. This issue was recently highlighted when Donald Trump falsely claimed that a large crowd welcoming Vice President Kamala Harris in Detroit was an AI fabrication, despite evidence proving the event’s authenticity.
Trump’s unfounded allegations and the spread of misleading deepfake content by his supporters are not just problematic for those who are firmly in his camp, but for undecided voters. These voters, who are critical to the outcome of the election, may struggle to discern the truth amidst a flood of manipulated media. This erosion of trust in what is real and what is fabricated undermines a key pillar of democracy and creates fertile ground for anti-democratic forces to gain power.
The growing prevalence of deepfakes and other digital misinformation strategies is expected to intensify in the run-up to the election. Already, Trump supporters have circulated a clearly AI-generated image, falsely claiming it was promoted by the Harris campaign. Such tactics aim to blur the lines between truth and falsehood, turning the election discourse away from verifiable facts and towards a chaotic environment where nothing can be trusted.
Experts warn that unless decisive action is taken, deepfake content will continue to compromise the integrity of the democratic process. The European Union has expressed similar concerns about the role of deepfakes in elections, highlighting the global scale of the problem. In the US, the spread of political spam and digital misinformation has surged as the 2024 election approaches, further complicating the landscape for voters.
Türkiye restored access to Instagram after a nine-day ban, which had been imposed due to the platform’s failure to comply with local laws and sensitivities. The restriction was lifted after Instagram’s parent company, Meta, agreed to cooperate with Turkish authorities. The ban was initially triggered by Instagram’s blocking of condolence posts related to the assassination of Ismail Haniyeh, a leader of the Palestinian group Hamas. The action sparked significant protests from users and small businesses in Türkiye, which ranks fifth globally in Instagram usage with over 57 million users.
Transport and Infrastructure Minister Abdulkadir Uraloglu announced the end of the ban, citing successful negotiations with Instagram officials. These discussions resulted in Meta agreeing to remove posts and content that contain elements of certain crimes or terrorism propaganda, which is in line with Turkish law. Uraloglu emphasised that these measures would enhance digital security and legal compliance in Türkiye and protect user rights.
The ban was the longest imposed on a major social media platform in Türkiye in recent years. It drew significant attention from users and monitoring groups like NetBlocks, which reported the gradual restoration of Instagram across Türkiye’s main internet providers following the agreement.
Meta Platforms (META.O) has successfully defended against an appeal by Children’s Health Defense (CHD), an anti-vaccine group founded by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., challenging Meta’s censorship of Facebook posts containing vaccine misinformation. The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals in Pasadena, California, ruled that CHD did not prove Meta was influenced or coerced by federal officials to suppress anti-vaccine content, upholding a June 2021 decision by US District Judge Susan Illston.
CHD sued Meta in 2020, claiming its constitutional rights were violated when Meta flagged ‘vaccine misinformation’ as false and restricted the group’s advertising on Facebook. Meta argued its actions were part of efforts to curb the spread of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation, including prohibiting claims that the vaccines are ineffective and directing users to authoritative sources like the World Health Organisation for accurate information.
Circuit Judge Eric Miller, appointed by former President Donald Trump, emphasised that Meta, as a private company, has the right under the First Amendment to regulate content on its platform and promote its views on vaccine safety and efficacy, even if they align with the government’s stance. The court also dismissed claims against the Poynter Institute and Science Feedback, which help Meta evaluate content accuracy.
Children’s Health Defense expressed disappointment with the ruling and is considering further legal actions. Circuit Judge Daniel Collins dissented partially, suggesting that CHD could seek an injunction on free speech claims. However, he agreed other claims, such as those for monetary damages, should be dismissed. The decision underscores the ongoing debate around content moderation and free speech in the digital age.
