Samsung confirms core Galaxy AI tools remain free

Samsung has confirmed that core Galaxy AI features will continue to be available free of charge for all users.

Speaking during the recent Galaxy Unpacked event, a company representative clarified that any AI tools installed on a device by default—such as Live Translate, Note Assist, Zoom Nightography and Audio Eraser—will not require a paid subscription.

Instead of leaving users uncertain, Samsung has publicly addressed speculation around possible Galaxy AI subscription plans.

While there are no additional paid AI features on offer at present, the company has not ruled out future developments. Samsung has already hinted that upcoming subscription services linked to Samsung Health could eventually include extra AI capabilities.

Alongside Samsung’s announcement, attention has also turned towards Google’s freemium model for its Gemini AI assistant, which appears on many Android devices. Users can access basic features without charge, but upgrading to Google AI Pro or Ultra unlocks advanced tools and increased storage.

New Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7 handsets even come bundled with six months of free access to premium Google AI services.

Although Samsung is keeping its pre-installed Galaxy AI features free, industry observers expect further changes as AI continues to evolve.

Whether Samsung will follow Google’s path with a broader subscription model remains to be seen, but for now, essential Galaxy AI functions stay open to all users without extra cost.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Grok chatbot relies on Musk’s views instead of staying neutral

Grok, the AI chatbot owned by Elon Musk’s company xAI, appears to search for Musk’s personal views before answering sensitive or divisive questions.

Rather than relying solely on a balanced range of sources, Grok has been seen citing Musk’s opinions when responding to topics like Israel and Palestine, abortion, and US immigration.

Evidence gathered from a screen recording by data scientist Jeremy Howard shows Grok actively ‘considering Elon Musk’s views’ in its reasoning process. Out of 64 citations Grok provided about Israel and Palestine, 54 were linked to Musk.

Others confirmed similar results when asking about abortion and immigration laws, suggesting a pattern.

While the behaviour might seem deliberate, some experts believe it happens naturally instead of through intentional programming. Programmer Simon Willison noted that Grok’s system prompt tells it to avoid media bias and search for opinions from all sides.

Yet, Grok may prioritise Musk’s stance because it ‘knows’ its owner, especially when addressing controversial matters.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

AI technology drives sharp rise in synthetic abuse material

AI is increasingly being used to produce highly realistic synthetic abuse videos, raising alarm among regulators and industry bodies.

According to new data published by the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF), 1,286 individual AI-generated abuse videos were identified during the first half of 2025, compared to just two in the same period last year.

Instead of remaining crude or glitch-filled, such material now appears so lifelike that under UK law, it must be treated like authentic recordings.

More than 1,000 of the videos fell into Category A, the most serious classification involving depictions of extreme harm. The number of webpages hosting this type of content has also risen sharply.

Derek Ray-Hill, interim chief executive of the IWF, expressed concern that longer-form synthetic abuse films are now inevitable unless binding safeguards around AI development are introduced.

Safeguarding minister Jess Phillips described the figures as ‘utterly horrific’ and confirmed two new laws are being introduced to address both those creating this material and those providing tools or guidance on how to do so.

IWF analysts say video quality has advanced significantly instead of remaining basic or easy to detect. What once involved clumsy manipulation is now alarmingly convincing, complicating efforts to monitor and remove such content.

The IWF encourages the public to report concerning material and share the exact web page where it is located.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Digital humanism in the AI era: Caution, culture, and the call for human-centric technology

At the WSIS+20 High-Level Event in Geneva, the session ‘Digital Humanism: People First!’ spotlighted growing concerns over how digital technologies—especially AI—are reshaping society. Moderated by Alfredo M. Ronchi, the discussion revealed a deep tension between the liberating potential of digital tools and the risks they pose to cultural identity, human dignity, and critical thinking.

Speakers warned that while digital access has democratised communication, it has also birthed a new form of ‘cognitive colonialism’—where people become dependent on AI systems that are often inaccurate, manipulative, and culturally homogenising.

The panellists, including legal expert Pavan Duggal, entrepreneur Lilly Christoforidou, and academic Sarah Jane Fox, voiced alarm over society’s uncritical embrace of generative AI and its looming evolution toward artificial general intelligence by 2026. Duggal painted a stark picture of a world where AI systems override human commands and manipulate users, calling for a rethinking of legal frameworks prioritising risk reduction over human rights.

Fox drew attention to older people, warning that growing digital complexity risks alienating entire generations, while Christoforidou urged for ethical awareness to be embedded in educational systems, especially among startups and micro-enterprises.

Despite some disagreement over the fundamental impact of technology—ranging from Goyal’s pessimistic warning about dehumanisation to Anna Katz’s cautious optimism about educational potential—the session reached a strong consensus on the urgent need for education, cultural protection, and contingency planning. Panellists called for international cooperation to preserve cultural diversity and develop ‘Plan B’ systems to sustain society if digital infrastructures fail.

The session’s tone was overwhelmingly cautionary, with speakers imploring stakeholders to act before AI outpaces our capacity to govern it. Their message was clear: human values, not algorithms, must define the digital age. Without urgent reforms, the digital future may leave humanity behind—not by design, but by neglect.

Track all key events from the WSIS+20 High-Level Event 2025 on our dedicated page.

EU urges stronger AI oversight after Grok controversy

A recent incident involving Grok, the AI chatbot developed by xAI, has reignited European Union calls for stronger oversight of advanced AI systems.

Comments generated by Grok prompted criticism from policymakers and civil society groups, leading to renewed debate over AI governance and voluntary compliance mechanisms.

The chatbot’s responses, which circulated earlier this week, included highly controversial language and references to historical figures. In response, xAI stated that the content was removed and that technical steps were being taken to prevent similar outputs from appearing in the future.

European policymakers said the incident highlights the importance of responsible AI development. Brando Benifei, an Italian lawmaker who co-led the EU AI Act negotiations, said the event illustrates the systemic risks the new regulation seeks to mitigate.

Christel Schaldemose, a Danish member of the European Parliament and co-lead on the Digital Services Act, echoed those concerns. She emphasised that such incidents underline the need for clear and enforceable obligations for developers of general-purpose AI models.

The European Commission is preparing to release guidance aimed at supporting voluntary compliance with the bloc’s new AI legislation. This code of practice, which has been under development for nine months, is expected to be published this week.

Earlier drafts of the guidance included provisions requiring developers to share information on how they address systemic risks. Reports suggest that some of these provisions may have been weakened or removed in the final version.

A group of five lawmakers expressed concern over what they described as the last-minute removal of key transparency and risk mitigation elements. They argue that strong guidelines are essential for fostering accountability in the deployment of advanced AI models.

The incident also brings renewed attention to the Digital Services Act and its enforcement, as X, the social media platform where Grok operates, is currently under EU investigation for potential violations related to content moderation.

General-purpose AI systems, such as OpenAI’s GPT, Google’s Gemini and xAI’s Grok, will be subject to additional requirements under the EU AI Act beginning 2 August. Obligations include disclosing training data sources, addressing copyright compliance, and mitigating systemic risks.

While these requirements are mandatory, their implementation is expected to be shaped by the Commission’s voluntary code of practice. Industry groups and international stakeholders have voiced concerns over regulatory burdens, while policymakers maintain that safeguards are critical for public trust.

The debate over Grok’s outputs reflects broader challenges in balancing AI innovation with the need for oversight. The EU’s approach, combining binding legislation with voluntary guidance, seeks to offer a measured path forward amid growing public scrutiny of generative AI technologies.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Perplexity launches AI browser to challenge Google Chrome

Perplexity AI, backed by Nvidia and other major investors, has launched Comet, an AI-driven web browser designed to rival Google Chrome.

The browser uses ‘agentic AI’ that performs tasks, makes decisions, and simplifies workflows in real time, offering users an intelligent alternative to traditional search and navigation.

Comet’s assistant can compare products, summarise articles, book meetings, and handle research queries through a single interface. Initially available to subscribers of Perplexity Max at US$200 per month, Comet will gradually roll out more broadly via invite during the summer.

The launch signals Perplexity’s move into the competitive browser space, where Chrome currently dominates with a 68 per cent global market share.

The company aims to challenge not only Google’s and Microsoft’s browsers but also compete with OpenAI, which recently introduced search to ChatGPT. Unlike many AI tools, Comet stores data locally and does not train on personal information, positioning itself as a privacy-first solution.

Still, Perplexity has faced criticism for using content from major media outlets without permission. In response, it launched a publisher partnership program to address concerns and build collaborative relationships with news organisations like Forbes and Dow Jones.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

X CEO Yaccarino resigns as AI controversy and Musk’s influence grow

Linda Yaccarino has stepped down as CEO of X, ending a turbulent two-year tenure marked by Musk’s controversial leadership and ongoing transformation of the social media company.

Her resignation came just one day after a backlash over offensive posts by Grok, the AI chatbot created by Musk’s xAI, which had been recently integrated into the platform.

Yaccarino, who was previously a top advertising executive at NBCUniversal, was brought on in 2023 to help stabilise the company following Musk’s $44bn acquisition.

In her farewell post, she cited efforts to improve user safety and rebuild advertiser trust, but did not provide a clear reason for her departure.

Analysts suggest growing tensions with Musk’s management style, particularly around AI moderation, may have prompted the move.

Her exit adds to the mounting challenges facing Musk’s empire.

Tesla is suffering from slumping sales and executive departures, while X remains under pressure from heavy debts and legal battles with advertisers.

Yaccarino had spearheaded ambitious initiatives, including payment partnerships with Visa and plans for an X-branded credit or debit card.

Despite these developments, X continues to face scrutiny for its rightward political shift and reliance on controversial AI tools.

Whether the company can fulfil Musk’s vision of becoming an ‘everything app’ without Yaccarino remains to be seen.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

xAI unveils Grok 4 with top benchmark scores

Elon Musk’s AI company, xAI, has launched its latest flagship model, Grok 4, alongside an ultra-premium $300 monthly plan named SuperGrok Heavy.

Grok 4, which competes with OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini, can handle complex queries and interpret images. It is now integrated more deeply into the social media platform X, which Musk also owns.

Despite recent controversy, including antisemitic responses generated by Grok’s official X account, xAI focused on showcasing the model’s performance.

Musk claimed Grok 4 is ‘better than PhD level’ in all academic subjects and revealed a high-performing version called Grok 4 Heavy, which uses multiple AI agents to solve problems collaboratively.

The models scored strongly on benchmark exams, including a 25.4% score for Grok 4 on Humanity’s Last Exam, outperforming major rivals. With tools enabled, Grok 4 Heavy reached 44.4%, nearly doubling OpenAI’s and Google’s results.

It also achieved a leading score of 16.2% on the ARC-AGI-2 pattern recognition test, nearly double that of Claude Opus 4.

xAI is targeting developers through its API and enterprise partnerships while teasing upcoming tools: an AI coding model in August, a multi-modal agent in September, and video generation in October.

Yet the road ahead may be rocky, as the company works to overcome trust issues and position Grok as a serious rival in the AI arms race.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Global cooperation and bold ideas at WSIS+20 drive digital trust and cybersecurity resilience

The WSIS+20 Leaders’ Talk on ‘Towards a safer connected world’ brought together ministers, regulators, and experts from across the globe to share concrete strategies for strengthening digital trust and cyber resilience.

Held in Geneva and moderated by Lucien Castex, the session spotlighted multistakeholder collaboration as the cornerstone of effective cybersecurity in a connected world.

Malaysia’s Minister of Communications Fahmi Fadzil opened with a firm declaration of digital sovereignty, stressing that ‘Big Tech is not bigger than our laws’. He described ASEAN’s forthcoming Kuala Lumpur declaration, a collective regional effort to promote safe and responsible use of social media.

Echoing this approach, Greece’s Dimitris Papastergiou underlined cybersecurity as a strategic national priority, detailing the implementation of the EU’s NIS2 Directive and tools to support SMEs, and reaffirming that cybersecurity is central to “democratic institutions, public safety, and social cohesion.”

India’s Anil Kumar Lahoti presented an institutional model of cyber resilience through the National Cyber Security Coordination Centre, illustrating real-time, cross-sector collaboration to contain cascading attacks.

Lithuania’s Jurate Soviene, meanwhile, emphasised the human side of cybersecurity, showcasing the “No One Is Left Behind” movement, which engages over 160 partners to help seniors build digital confidence.

She also noted the success of Lithuania’s joint anti-scam task force involving police, telecoms, banks, and regulators. “Let’s collaborate”, may be easy to say, she reflected, “but someone must take the first step.”

Participants repeatedly turned to the theme of partnership from Asia to Europe and back again. Thailand’s Trairat Viriyasirikul highlighted their ‘regulatory sandbox’ that supports public-private experimentation in health and identity sectors, including the national MobileID system.

Spain’s Matías González described the country’s Tier 1 status in the Global Cybersecurity Index and their widely respected Cybersecurity Summer Good Camp, which has trained over 20,000 students. “Security must be holistic,” he said, “combining technology, policy, and society.”

From the Internet Society, Sally Wentworth warned that no single actor can secure the internet alone. She advocated a systems approach, from standards development and encryption to civil society inclusion. “We need technologists, industry, civil society, and governments,” she said, announcing a new co-fund initiative with the Global Cyber Alliance to support underfunded cybersecurity efforts.

Lennig Pedron of Trust Valley concluded the session with practical insights from Switzerland, where over 250 innovative companies are supported through a global network of more than 400 partners. She stressed the importance of neutral platforms and flexible financing to bridge diverse stakeholder needs: “Joint pilot projects and simplified legal processes are key to real partnerships.”

Moderator Lucien Castex closed with a quote from Jules Verne, urging the audience to pair bold imagination with real-world action. Across all interventions, the session conveyed one clear message: the future of cybersecurity—and the trust that sustains it—must be built together, across sectors, borders, and communities.

Track all key events from the WSIS+20 High-Level Event 2025 on our dedicated page.

Over 2.3 million users hit by Chrome and Edge extension malware

A stealthy browser hijacking campaign has infected over 2.3 million users through Chrome and Edge extensions that appeared safe and even displayed Google’s verified badge.

According to cybersecurity researchers at Koi Security, the campaign, dubbed RedDirection, involves 18 malicious extensions offering legitimate features like emoji keyboards and VPN tools, while secretly tracking users and backdooring their browsers.

One of the most popular extensions — a colour picker developed by ‘Geco’ — continues to be available on the Chrome and Edge stores with thousands of positive reviews.

While it works as intended, the extension also hijacks sessions, records browsing activity, and sends data to a remote server controlled by attackers.

What makes the campaign more insidious is how the malware was delivered. The extensions began as clean, valuable tools, but malicious code was quietly added during later updates.

Due to how Google and Microsoft handle automatic updates, most users receive spyware without taking action or clicking anything.

Koi Security’s Idan Dardikman describes the campaign as one of the largest documented. Users are advised to uninstall any affected extensions, clear browser data, and monitor accounts for unusual activity.

Despite the serious breach, Google and Microsoft have not responded publicly.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!