A US judge has ruled that Google must make significant changes to its Play Store, allowing Android users to access third-party app stores and payment methods for three years. The ruling comes after a jury sided with ‘Fortnite’ creator Epic Games, which accused Google of monopolising app access and in-app payments on Android devices.
The order, issued by Judge James Donato, prevents Google from blocking alternative payment options or pre-installing its app store through deals with device makers. The decision is set to take effect on 1 November 2024, giving Google time to comply. However, Google plans to appeal the ruling, arguing that it could harm consumers, developers, and device makers.
Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney called the decision “big news” and said it could lead to a more competitive Android ecosystem by 2025. Meanwhile, Google is also facing antitrust cases over its dominance in web search and ad technology.
Several rival web browsers, including Vivaldi, Waterfox, and Wavebox, along with a web development advocacy group, have called on the European Commission to impose stricter antitrust regulations on Microsoft’s Edge browser. In a letter dated 17 September, the group argued that Edge, pre-installed on all Windows devices, is given an unfair distribution advantage, limiting competition. This follows a recent lawsuit by Opera, a Norwegian browser company, which challenged the Commission’s decision to exempt Edge from the Digital Markets Act (DMA).
DMA aims to stop dominant online platforms from restricting consumer choices by setting guidelines for ‘gatekeeper’ services. Rival browsers argue that Microsoft’s practice of making Edge the default browser on Windows undermines the spirit of the law. They contend that Edge’s pre-installed presence gives it an unfair advantage, making it harder for independent browsers to compete, especially as many users rely on Edge to download alternatives.
Neither Microsoft nor the European Commission has commented on the issue, but critics have pointed out that Edge’s pop-up messages often misrepresent the features of rival browsers. Despite these allegations, Microsoft Edge holds only a small portion of the global browser market, with just over 5%, while Google Chrome dominates with 66%.
The United Kingdom‘s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has confirmed that Amazon’s $4 billion partnership with AI startup Anthropic will not be subject to a more in-depth investigation. The regulator determined that the deal did not raise competition concerns under Britain’s merger regulations.
Amazon expressed support for the CMA’s decision, noting that it acknowledged the regulator’s lack of jurisdiction over the collaboration. The CMA also cleared a similar partnership between Microsoft and Inflection AI, while a deal between Alphabet and Anthropic remains under review.
Anthropic, which was co-founded by siblings Dario and Daniela Amodei, former OpenAI executives, reiterated that its partnerships with major tech firms do not compromise its independence or governance. The startup has received billions in investments from several large companies.
Amid growing antitrust scrutiny of deals between startups and big tech firms, regulators are closely monitoring collaborations like those involving Anthropic and its partners.
Appario, a former top seller on Amazon India, has petitioned a court to dismiss an antitrust investigation that concluded Amazon and several sellers breached local competition laws. The Competition Commission of India (CCI) alleges that Amazon, Walmart’s Flipkart, and certain smartphone brands favoured select sellers and prioritised specific listings. These accusations were based on a 2021 Reuters investigation, which exposed Amazon’s internal practices. Despite the findings, Amazon continues to deny any misconduct.
Appario, which has ceased selling on Amazon, is contesting the CCI’s findings in the Karnataka High Court, asserting that the report implicating it should be “set aside.” This legal action marks the first challenge to the CCI’s ongoing investigation, initiated in 2020, and poses a significant obstacle for Amazon in India, one of its most important markets.
The CCI previously conducted raids on Appario and other sellers during its investigation. Court records indicate that Appario is also challenging a CCI order that requires it to submit financial statements following the investigation. Neither Amazon nor Appario has commented on the ongoing legal proceedings.
The European Commission’s Competition Directorate (DG COMP) and the Connectivity Directorate (DG CNECT) are at the centre of a critical debate over the future of the EU telecom regulations. That discussion highlights the struggle within the EU to balance regulatory harmonisation with market fragmentation.
DG CNECT advocates for increased consolidation in the telecom sector, arguing that the current fragmented landscape hampers competitiveness and investment compared to the more integrated markets of the US and China. In contrast, DG COMP warns that excessive national consolidation could lead to higher consumer prices and undermine the competition necessary for innovation.
As these discussions progress, DG COMP and DG CNECT are examining the implications of indirect deregulation in the telecom sector. Specifically, DG COMP has raised concerns that eliminating regulated sub-markets could increase the bureaucratic burden on national regulators, thereby reducing the effectiveness of oversight across the EU. That shift would transfer more responsibility to individual member states, potentially leading to inconsistencies hindering the EU’s telecom objectives. Meanwhile, while DG CNECT supports deregulation, it must consider the potential impacts on market dynamics and consumer protection.
DG COMP and DG CNECT are committed to fostering innovation within the telecommunications sector through strategic investments in future technologies. DG COMP emphasises the importance of competitive markets in driving advancements like edge computing and OpenRAN. At the same time, DG CNECT argues for regulatory frameworks and consolidation to facilitate these investments. Ultimately, their shared focus on innovation aims to enhance the EU’s telecommunications infrastructure and maintain its competitiveness in the global market.
The United States Commerce Department has announced a new rule that could streamline the process for sending AI chips to data centres in the Middle East. The rule will allow data centres to apply for Validated End User (VEU) status, enabling them to receive AI chips through a general authorisation, eliminating the need for individual licences for each shipment.
The move follows concerns in Washington that Middle Eastern countries could act as intermediaries for China to acquire US chips that are restricted from direct export to China. G42, an AI company based in the United Arab Emirates with historical connections to China, has been at the centre of these concerns, despite its efforts to distance itself from China and comply with US regulations.
The VEU program will involve rigorous screening to ensure safeguards are in place to prevent the misuse or diversion of US technology. The Commerce Department emphasised the importance of this review process to protect national security.
The Bureau of Industry and Security reiterated its commitment to facilitating international AI growth while mitigating risks to US and global security, aiming to balance technological development with safety concerns.
Meta Platforms has announced it will not immediately join the European Union‘s voluntary AI Pact, which is a temporary initiative ahead of the AI Act coming into force. The company is currently focusing on compliance with the forthcoming regulations set out in the act, but may sign the pact at a later stage.
The EU’s AI Act, agreed in May and adopted by the European Council, will introduce strict rules governing the development and use of artificial intelligence. Under these regulations, companies must provide detailed summaries of the data used to train their AI models. The majority of the law’s provisions will take effect from August 2026.
In the interim, the AI Pact encourages companies to voluntarily adopt some of the key requirements of the forthcoming act. Meta has expressed its support for harmonised EU regulations but is prioritising work on meeting the obligations of the AI Act.
The Israeli Communications Ministry is taking decisive steps to stimulate competition in the cellular infrastructure market by welcoming new entrants. That initiative aims to diversify a landscape dominated by a few major players, foster innovation, and attract investment in cellular services.
By opening the market to fresh competition, the ministry intends to accelerate the rollout of 5G networks nationwide, benefiting consumers with improved service quality and more choices. Ultimately, this effort is critical as Israel strives to bolster its technological infrastructure and meet the increasing demand for faster, more reliable communication services.
However, the Israeli Communications Ministry needs help balancing these changes with the concerns of existing industry stakeholders. The market currently comprises three primary cellular networks – Pelephone, Cellcom, and Partner (including Hot Mobile), each operating its infrastructure independently. Consequently, introducing new players may disrupt the established order, raising questions about potential impacts on service quality and competition.
Moreover, the ministry has encountered resistance from the workers’ union of Pelephone, which contends that the proposed changes could undermine competition and jeopardise national security. The union argues that this initiative prioritises financial interests over the integrity of communication services. In this context, they express concern that instead of addressing fundamental infrastructure issues, the ministry opts for a superficial solution that may lead to long-term negative consequences for the industry and consumers.
Italy‘s antitrust agency has launched an investigation into a Dublin-based company that runs Shein’s website and app over potentially deceptive environmental claims. The investigation targets Infinite Styles Services Co. Limited, accusing Shein of using unclear and misleading language to present its products as environmentally sustainable. It specifically questions claims related to Shein’s ‘evoluSHEIN’ collection, which may mislead consumers about the use of eco-friendly fabrics and the recyclability of its clothing.
Shein stated that it is prepared to cooperate with Italian authorities and provide necessary information fully. This investigation is part of a larger European push to combat ‘greenwashing,’ with the EU enforcing new rules that require companies to substantiate their environmental claims with clear evidence. Italy’s antitrust body also highlighted inconsistencies between Shein’s sustainability promises and the rise in greenhouse gas emissions the company reported in 2022 and 2023.
The case reflects a wider trend as European regulators intensify scrutiny of companies making environmental claims. Under Italy’s consumer protection laws, companies found guilty of misleading practices could face fines ranging from 5,000 to 10 million euros.
Google has filed a formal complaint with the European Commission over Microsoft’s cloud business practices. The tech giant argues that Microsoft uses its dominant position with Windows Server to stifle competition and lock customers into its Azure platform. Specifically, Google claims Microsoft enforces heavy mark-ups on users of rival cloud services and restricts access to essential security updates.
The dispute follows a recent settlement where Microsoft paid €20 million to resolve concerns raised by European cloud providers. However, the agreement excluded key rivals like Google and Amazon Web Services (AWS), fuelling further criticism. Google insists only regulatory action will halt what it sees as Microsoft’s monopolistic approach, urging the EU to step in and ensure fair competition.
Microsoft denies the accusations, stating they have settled similar issues amicably with other European providers. A Microsoft spokesperson expressed confidence that Google would fail to persuade the European Commission, as it had failed with EU businesses.
Google believes immediate intervention is necessary to prevent the cloud market from becoming increasingly restrictive. They warn that Microsoft’s influence over the European cloud sector, which is growing rapidly, could limit options for customers and hurt competitors.
