Competition regulation

Google seeks delay on Play Store competition ruling

Google is pushing back against a federal judge’s recent order that would force it to allow more competition in its Play Store. In a court filing, the tech giant requested that US District Judge James Donato’s injunction, set to take effect on 1 November, be paused. Google argues that the ruling could introduce significant security, privacy, and safety risks to the Android ecosystem and is seeking time to pursue an appeal.

The injunction stems from a lawsuit initiated by Epic Games, the creator of ‘Fortnite,’ which argued that Google monopolised app distribution and in-app payment processes on Android devices. A jury sided with Epic, and the judge’s order now requires Google to allow users to download apps from third-party platforms and use alternative payment methods for in-app purchases.

In addition, the ruling prevents Google from paying manufacturers to preinstall its Play Store on devices and from sharing revenue generated through the Play Store with other distributors. These measures aim to reduce Google’s control over the app marketplace, opening up more space for competitors.

If Judge Donato denies Google’s request to delay the order, the company can take its case to the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals, based in San Francisco. Google has already filed its notice of appeal and is preparing to challenge the injunction and the antitrust verdict that underpins it.

As the appeal process unfolds, the court will ultimately decide whether Google must comply with the ruling or if the tech giant can maintain its current app store policies while reviewing the case.

The legal battle has significant implications for app distribution on Android devices.

Temu faces deadline from EU over illegal product sales

The European Commission has set a deadline of October 21 for the Chinese online marketplace Temu to respond to inquiries regarding its compliance with the Digital Services Act (DSA). The Commission is seeking detailed information about Temu’s efforts to combat the sale of illegal products on its platform and the measures it has implemented to ensure consumer protection, public health, and user wellbeing.

Temu, founded in 2022 by PDD Holdings, was classified as a Very Large Online Platform due to its user base exceeding 45 million monthly average users in the EU. It was previously required to meet DSA standards by the end of September, including addressing systemic risks and preventing the sale of counterfeit goods. This latest inquiry marks the second time the Commission has sought clarification from Temu, following questions in June about its compliance with the “Notice and Action mechanism” for reporting illegal products.

The European Consumer Organisation (BEUC) has also raised concerns about Temu’s practices, filing complaints against the platform for failing to protect consumers and employing manipulative tactics. These complaints, supported by representatives from 17 EU member states, allege that Temu does not provide essential seller information, hindering consumers’ ability to verify product safety compliance. The DSA has been in effect since February, and the EU has initiated several investigations into other major platforms for similar compliance issues.

G7 ministers address urgent semiconductor industry challenges

Industry ministers from the G7 advanced democracies have agreed that non-market practices in the semiconductor industry pose an urgent challenge that requires collective action. This consensus was announced by the Italian presidency and is a response to growing concerns about China’s influence in the sector. During the G7 summit in June, leaders had previously pledged to address what they called unfair business practices by China, particularly as the country aggressively advances its semiconductor manufacturing capabilities.

The majority of global semiconductor production takes place in South Korea and Taiwan, with Taiwan’s closeness to mainland China heightening concerns about potential military conflicts that could disrupt global supply chains. Due to Taiwan’s leadership in advanced chip manufacturing, major economies such as the US and European nations have enacted legislation to enhance domestic semiconductor production. Initiatives like the US CHIPS Act and corresponding European measures have allocated substantial funding to incentivise companies to set up chip production facilities within their countries.

Alongside semiconductor issues, the newly established G7 task force will also focus on undersea cable connectivity, which has grown increasingly critical. Recent outages in major undersea cables have underscored the necessity for a stable and secure global internet infrastructure. This expansion of the G7’s agenda aims to address broader technological stability, moving beyond semiconductor concerns to encompass essential aspects of digital connectivity.

New competition rules for digital platforms in Brazil

Brazil‘s government has proposed a reform to its competition law that would empower the antitrust authority, CADE, to designate certain digital platforms as systemically relevant, imposing new obligations on them as needed. The Finance Ministry emphasises the importance of equipping local legislation with tools to tackle the challenges posed by large tech firms that inhibit competition due to their size and market influence. This reform targets practices like exclusivity agreements, ‘killer acquisitions,’ and self-preferencing in search results.

The proposed changes would require digital platforms to submit pre-merger notifications and follow transparency rules concerning service and product usage. They would also need to disclose any modifications to their terms of service. The government seeks to find a balance between the regulatory frameworks of the US and the EU while taking inspiration from practices in Japan, the UK, and Germany.

The next steps for the Brazilian government include deciding whether to present these recommendations as a new bill to Congress or to integrate them into existing legislative proposals. Economic Reforms Secretary Marcos Pinto highlighted that the goal of the proposal is to promote competition while avoiding hindrances to innovation or unnecessary bureaucracy, underscoring the need to maintain a competitive economic environment.

Meta agrees to data collection changes in Germany

German cartel authorities have closed their investigation into Meta’s data practices following extensive negotiations that led to the US tech giant agreeing to address regulatory concerns. Meta, the owner of Facebook and Instagram, has committed to implementing several measures to change how user data is collected and processed on its platforms, the officials announced on Thursday.

According to Andreas Mundt, the president of the German Federal Cartel Office, one of the most significant changes is that users of Facebook will no longer be required to consent to the unrestricted collection and association of data to their user accounts. This new approach ensures that data not generated through Facebook’s services cannot be automatically linked to a user’s account without specific consent. The decision marks a significant step in limiting the scope of Meta’s data collection and improving user privacy in Germany.

The investigation into Meta was part of a larger initiative by European regulators to closely examine and regulate the data practices of major tech firms. Meta’s cooperation with German authorities highlights its readiness to comply with regulatory standards and could set a precedent for similar cases across Europe. The agreed changes aim to enhance privacy protections for users and increase transparency in how tech platforms manage and utilise personal data.

Google faces potential breakup as DOJ targets search monopoly

The US Department of Justice has proposed remedies to dismantle Google‘s dominance in the search market, which analysts warn could undermine the company’s primary profit source and hinder its advancements in AI. The DOJ may seek to compel Google to divest parts of its business, including the Chrome browser and Android operating system, while also considering measures such as barring the collection of sensitive user data, requiring transparency in search results, and allowing websites to opt out of their content being used for AI training.

The proposed changes have already affected Alphabet’s stock, which fell by 1.5% after the announcement. Analysts indicate that if these remedies are put into action, they could diminish Google’s revenue while providing more opportunities for competitors like DuckDuckGo and Microsoft Bing, as well as AI companies such as Meta and Amazon. With Google’s share of the US search ad market expected to fall below 50% for the first time in over a decade by 2025, these remedies are viewed as essential for creating a more competitive landscape.

Despite the ambitious nature of the DOJ’s proposals, some experts are sceptical about their feasibility. Adam Kovacevich from the Chamber of Progress argues that these remedies could encounter legal challenges and may not withstand the appeals process. While investors appear doubtful that a forced breakup of Google will take place, the situation highlights the increasing scrutiny and pressure on the tech giant within a rapidly changing competitive landscape.

X exempt from gatekeeper obligations in EU’s Digital Markets Act

Elon Musk’s platform, X (formerly known as Twitter), will not be classified as a ‘gatekeeper’ under the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA), a landmark set of tech regulations that impose strict obligations on major digital players. According to sources familiar with the situation, the European Commission, which has been investigating X since May, is expected to confirm this decision in the coming week.

The DMA prevents dominant tech companies from abusing their market power, particularly in messaging apps and pre-installed software. Platforms designated as gatekeepers must comply with rules to promote competition, such as ensuring their messaging systems are interoperable with rival apps and allowing users to choose which apps to install by default on their devices.

Despite meeting the user-base threshold for a gatekeeper, X argued that it does not meet the additional criteria of being a key intermediary between businesses and consumers. This claim led the Commission to launch its investigation to clarify whether the platform should face the extra obligations imposed by the DMA.

While several major companies, including Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, TikTok’s parent company ByteDance, and Booking.com, have already been named as gatekeepers under the act, X has successfully avoided this designation, at least for now. If violations are found, this decision could spare X from stringent requirements and potential penalties, amounting to up to 10% of a company’s global revenue.

As the Commission’s ruling draws near, it highlights the ongoing scrutiny faced by tech giants under EU regulations to curb their influence over the digital economy. For Musk’s X, this is a significant reprieve amid growing regulatory pressure on Big Tech worldwide.

E-commerce in Europe sees rebound amid strong competition from Temu

Online shopping in Europe is making a comeback this year, with ecommerce turnover expected to reach €958 billion, up 8% from 2023, according to a report by Ecommerce Europe. While inflation has strained consumer spending power, recovering confidence is pushing more shoppers back online. However, the competitive market has intensified, particularly due to low-cost platforms like Temu, which is owned by PDD Holdings. These marketplaces, known for offering cheap products, are challenging local players across Europe.

In countries like Germany and Denmark, industry leaders have voiced concerns over the growing presence of Chinese platforms like Temu, which offer significantly lower-priced goods. These platforms are seen as creating an uneven playing field, as they are not always subject to the same regulations as European retailers. Despite these challenges, e-commerce in Europe is seeing its first real growth in years after adjusting for inflation, signaling a shift toward a “new normal” in consumer behavior.

US DoJ aims to break Google’s search engine monopoly

The US government is considering drastic measures to break up Google’s dominance in the online search industry, which could lead to the company divesting critical parts of its business, such as its Chrome browser and Android operating system. The potential legal move follows a judge’s August ruling that declared Google had illegally established a monopoly in online search. With the tech giant controlling about 90% of internet searches in the US, the Justice Department is pushing for remedies that could transform how Americans access information and shrink Google’s revenue while creating more opportunities for competitors.

One of the government’s proposals involves halting Google’s massive payments to ensure its search engine remains the default on new devices. In 2021 alone, Google paid $26.3 billion to companies like Apple to keep its search engine pre-installed on smartphones and browsers. The Justice Department argues that ending these agreements is necessary to prevent Google from maintaining its dominant position in search distribution today and in the future, particularly as the market expands into AI.

Prosecutors are also eyeing Google’s role in the growing AI sector. They propose opening up Google’s vast indexes, data, and models to its rivals to prevent the company from monopolising AI-driven search technologies. Additional suggestions include limiting Google’s ability to make deals, restricting competitors’ access to web content and allowing websites to opt out of having their data used for AI training. Google, however, has pushed back, arguing that such interventions could distort the rapidly developing AI industry and stifle innovation at a crucial moment.

The stakes are high for Google, which plans to appeal the proposed remedies, calling them ‘radical’ and far beyond the scope of the legal case. Google maintains that its search engine’s popularity is due to its superior quality and points to competition from companies like Amazon as proof of a competitive market. Meanwhile, the company faces mounting legal battles, including a separate ruling forcing it to open its Play app store to greater competition.

The Justice Department is expected to submit more detailed proposals by 20 November, with Google having until 20 December to respond with its suggestions.

Why does it matter?

The antitrust case is seen as a significant victory for regulators seeking to rein in the power of Big Tech, with similar lawsuits already filed against Meta, Amazon, and Apple. Smaller competitors, like Yelp and DuckDuckGo, have voiced support for breaking up Google’s assets, advocating for changes that could level the playing field in both search and AI.

Judge allows FTC antitrust case against Amazon to proceed

A US District judge has allowed the Federal Trade Commission’s antitrust case against Amazon to proceed, although some claims made by state attorneys general from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Oklahoma were dismissed. The FTC accuses Amazon of using anti-competitive tactics to dominate the online retail market, including an algorithm that allegedly inflated prices for US households by over $1 billion before it was discontinued in 2019.

Amazon had sought to dismiss the case, arguing that the FTC had not proven harm to consumers. However, the judge ruled that it’s too early to consider Amazon’s defense that its practices benefited competition. The case will continue, keeping the spotlight on Amazon’s business practices.