Meta, the parent company of Facebook, has been fined nearly €800M by the European Union for anti-competitive practices related to its Marketplace feature. The European Commission accused the tech giant of abusing its dominant position by tying Marketplace to Facebook’s social network, forcing exposure to the service and disadvantaging competitors.
This marks the first time the EU has penalised Meta for breaching competition laws, though the company has faced previous fines for privacy violations. The investigation found that Meta unfairly used data from competitors advertising on Facebook and Instagram to benefit its own Marketplace, giving it an edge that rivals couldn’t match.
Meta rejected the claims, arguing that the decision lacks evidence of harm to competition or consumers. While the company pledged to comply with the EU’s order to cease the conduct, it plans to appeal the ruling. The case highlights ongoing EU scrutiny of Big Tech, with Meta facing additional investigations on issues like privacy, child safety, and election integrity.
Which? is taking legal action against Apple, alleging the company breached competition law by pressuring customers to use its iCloud service. Which? argues that Apple encouraged users to store their data on iCloud, making it challenging to switch to other providers, and then charged users when they exceeded the free 5GB limit. This practice, they claim, led to overcharges, costing consumers up to £13.36 ($16.98) this year in subscription fees.
Apple denies any wrongdoing, stating customers are not required to use iCloud and often choose third-party alternatives. However, if Which? succeeds, around 40 million Apple customers in the UK who have used iCloud over the last nine years could be entitled to compensation.
Which? CEO Anabel Hoult emphasised that the action aims to secure refunds for consumers, prevent future anti-competitive behaviour, and promote a fairer market. The group plans to file the claim with the Competition Appeal Tribunal.
Swisscom has moved a step closer to finalising its €8 billion acquisition of Vodafone Italia after receiving approval from Italy’s communications regulator, AGCOM. The deal, announced in March, aims to merge Vodafone Italia with Swisscom’s Fastweb subsidiary, potentially granting Swisscom a 30% share of Italy’s fixed broadband market. However, the transaction still faces scrutiny from Italy‘s antitrust authority, AGCM, which is conducting a detailed review to assess its impact on competition.
AGCM has expressed concerns that the merger could reduce competition in Italy’s already concentrated broadband market, potentially disadvantaging residential customers. In response, Swisscom has proposed several concessions, including access to Fastweb’s fiber network for competitors and protections for existing wholesale contracts.
Competitors were invited to provide feedback on these concessions by early November, and the AGCM is expected to conclude its review by mid-December. If approved, Swisscom aims to complete the acquisition by early 2025.
The European Union has issued a directive for Apple to cease geo-blocking content on several of its platforms, including the App Store, Apple Arcade, Music, iTunes Store, Books, and Podcasts. Geo-blocking, the practice of limiting access to content based on a user’s location, is considered discriminatory by the EU, as it creates barriers for consumers depending on where they live or are based. The European Commission has expressed its concerns, warning that if Apple does not address these issues within the next month, national regulators across EU member states could step in with enforcement actions.
European Commissioner Margrethe Vestager underscored the EU’s commitment to ensuring fair access to digital services, stating that no company, regardless of its size, should be allowed to unfairly limit customers’ access to services based on nationality, place of residence, or other factors unrelated to the services provided. Apple now has one month to submit a detailed plan that addresses these concerns and outlines how the company will eliminate geo-blocking practices from its platforms. Failure to meet this deadline could result in penalties or legal consequences as the EU continues to prioritise consumer rights and digital market fairness across Europe.
The incoming European Commissioner for Tech Sovereignty, Security, and Democracy, Henna Virkkunen, expressed dissatisfaction with the limited action taken by EU member states to exclude high-risk telecom suppliers, such as China’s Huawei and ZTE, from critical infrastructure. During her confirmation hearing in the European Parliament, Virkkunen noted that although the European Commission adopted 5G security measures in 2020, fewer than half of the EU member states have implemented restrictions on these suppliers. She indicated that this issue will be addressed in the planned revision of the Cyber Security Act next year and stressed the need for more serious action from national governments.
Virkkunen also pointed out that while the EU had adopted the 5G Cybersecurity Toolbox to protect telecom networks, only 11 of the 27 member states have fully implemented measures, including bans and restrictions on high-risk vendors. In addition to her efforts to strengthen cybersecurity, Virkkunen plans to propose a Digital Networks Act in 2025 to overhaul telecom regulations and boost investment and connectivity. On the topic of US Big Tech compliance with EU rules, she reaffirmed the importance of cooperation but emphasised that all companies must adhere to EU regulations, including those set out in the Digital Services Act.
Huawei Technologies has called on a US judge to dismiss most of the federal charges accusing the company of conspiring to steal technology secrets from American firms and misleading banks about its business dealings in Iran. In a court filing in Brooklyn, Huawei described the accusations as part of the Department of Justice’s ‘ill-founded’ China Initiative, aimed at prosecuting Chinese entities. The company argued there is no substantial evidence of a conspiracy and that several charges relate to actions outside the United States.
The telecommunications giant contended that the bank fraud allegations rely on a ‘right to control’ theory of fraud, which the US Supreme Court invalidated in a separate case last year. Huawei, which operates globally from its base in Shenzhen with around 207,000 employees, has pleaded not guilty. A trial is set for January 2026. A spokesperson for the US Attorney’s office declined to comment, and Huawei’s legal team did not respond to requests for remarks.
The case dates back to 2018 and led to the high-profile detention in Canada of Huawei’s Chief Financial Officer Meng Wanzhou. Although charges against her were dropped in 2022, the controversy remains a significant chapter in US-China tensions. The China Initiative, under which Huawei was prosecuted, was initiated during Donald Trump’s presidency to curb alleged intellectual property theft by Beijing but was terminated by the Biden administration in 2022 following criticism of racial profiling and the negative impact on research.
India’s financial crime agency is intensifying its probe into Flipkart and Amazon over alleged violations of foreign investment laws, with plans to summon executives from both companies after recent raids on their sellers. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) seized documents in last week’s raids, which a senior government source claims substantiate violations of India’s foreign investment laws. Under these laws, foreign e-commerce companies are restricted to operating as marketplaces without holding inventory, though the ED alleges that both Amazon and Flipkart have been exerting control over certain sellers.
This investigation adds to the growing regulatory scrutiny faced by the two e-commerce giants, which hold significant market shares in India’s $70 billion e-commerce sector. Previous findings from India’s antitrust authority suggested that both companies favour select sellers, allowing them to bypass marketplace-only regulations. One prominent Amazon seller, Appario, was reportedly raided and found to receive exclusive support from Amazon, including reduced fees and advanced retail tools.
The ED’s latest actions follow a pattern of increased regulatory focus on large e-commerce and delivery platforms, with recent antitrust findings indicating similar preferential treatment by food delivery services Zomato and Swiggy. As India’s retail landscape continues to expand, regulatory bodies are pushing for stricter compliance to ensure fair competition and protect smaller businesses.
Vietnam has warned Chinese online retailers Shein and Temu to register with the government by the end of November or face potential blocks on their websites and apps. The move follows concerns from Vietnam’s government and local businesses about the impact of foreign e-commerce platforms on local markets, especially regarding deep discounts and counterfeit goods. Deputy Trade Minister Nguyen Hoang Long stated that if Shein and Temu do not comply, technical measures will be taken to restrict access to their platforms.
Shein has been active in Vietnam for two years, while Temu only recently launched in the country. Shein expressed its commitment to adhering to Vietnam’s regulations, but Temu has yet to respond. This registration requirement comes amid broader scrutiny of ultra-low-cost foreign retailers in Southeast Asia, as governments like Indonesia’s have asked app stores to block Temu to support small businesses.
Vietnam’s e-commerce market, the third largest in Southeast Asia at $22 billion, is rapidly growing. Alongside Shein and Temu, the market features popular platforms like Shopee, Lazada, and local players Tiki and Sendo.
India’s antitrust regulator, the Competition Commission of India (CCI), has found that food delivery giants Zomato and Swiggy violated competition laws by favouring select restaurants on their platforms. According to the CCI’s investigation, Zomato used ‘exclusivity contracts’ to offer lower commissions to certain partners, while Swiggy promised growth to restaurants that listed exclusively with them. These practices, the report states, hinder market competition, as they prevent smaller players from gaining a fair foothold.
The investigation, which began in 2022 following a complaint by the National Restaurant Association of India, also highlights restrictive pricing practices on both platforms. Zomato imposed conditions to maintain price and discount parity across online platforms, even threatening penalties for non-compliance. Swiggy, on the other hand, pressured some partners by suggesting their ranking on the app would drop if they failed to match prices elsewhere. Swiggy later claimed that it discontinued its exclusivity program in 2023 but has plans to launch similar initiatives in smaller cities.
The probe has potential implications for Swiggy’s $1.4 billion IPO and lists the CCI investigation as an “internal risk” in its prospectus. Both companies have faced additional scrutiny recently, as India’s largest retail distributors have urged the CCI to investigate alleged predatory pricing in their quick-commerce grocery services. The CCI’s final decision on penalties or required changes to Zomato’s and Swiggy’s business practices is expected in the coming weeks, though the companies may challenge the findings.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has charged Sitejabber, an online review platform, for violating its new rules on fake reviews. This marks one of the agency’s first enforcement actions under updated regulations designed to curb deceptive practices. The FTC alleges that Sitejabber misled consumers by using point-of-sale reviews—feedback collected before customers had received any products or services—to falsely inflate businesses’ review scores.
The company allowed its clients to publish these premature reviews, giving a false impression that they reflected actual customer experiences. The FTC has now ordered Sitejabber to stop this practice and prohibited it from assisting other businesses in misrepresenting reviews. The new rules, which took effect last month, aim to tackle deceptive online review practices, including those involving AI-generated reviews and fake review websites masquerading as independent.
The FTC’s crackdown is part of a broader effort to address the rising problem of fake reviews on e-commerce platforms like Amazon. With the new regulations in place, the agency intends to prevent misleading online content that could deceive consumers into making purchasing decisions based on false information.
