Alternative dispute resolution

AI tool improves accuracy in detecting heart disease

A team of researchers at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York has successfully calibrated an AI tool to more accurately assess the likelihood of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) in patients.

By assigning specific probability scores, the AI model now offers clearer guidance to clinicians and patients regarding disease risk.

HCM, a thickening of the heart muscle that affects around one in 200 people globally, can lead to serious complications such as heart failure or sudden cardiac death.

The Viz HCM algorithm, already approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, previously provided vague classifications like ‘suspected HCM.’ Thanks to model calibration, clinicians can now give patients more precise estimates—for instance, a 60% probability of having the condition.

Researchers ran the algorithm on nearly 71,000 patients who had undergone electrocardiograms between March 2023 and January 2024. Out of these, 1,522 were flagged by the AI, with further review of medical records and imaging confirming diagnoses.

The results validated that the newly calibrated probabilities closely reflected real-world outcomes, improving the tool’s accuracy and practical utility.

Experts say this advancement enhances clinical workflows by helping doctors prioritise patients based on their actual risk levels.

Beyond technological innovation, the study marks a step forward in integrating AI responsibly into everyday clinical practice—making healthcare more personalised, interpretable, and effective.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

US-India trade negotiations intensify over tariff disputes

India is prepared to lower tariffs on over half of US imports worth $23 billion in a bid to ease trade tensions and prevent harsh reciprocal tariffs from Washington.

With US President Donald Trump set to impose new worldwide tariffs from 2 April, Indian officials fear the move could impact 87% of the country’s exports to the United States, prompting urgent negotiations between the two nations.

Trade talks are scheduled to begin this week, led by US Assistant Trade Representative Brendan Lynch.

While India is willing to make significant tariff cuts on a wide range of goods, government sources indicate that the concessions will depend on securing relief from US duties.

Sensitive items such as meat, wheat, maize, and dairy products remain off the table, but reductions may be possible for almonds, pistachios, and certain grains. India is also pushing for a phased reduction of its automobile tariffs, which currently exceed 100%.

Despite efforts by Prime Minister Narendra Modi to strengthen ties with Washington, Trump has repeatedly criticised India’s tariff policies, labelling the country a ‘tariff abuser.’

The Modi administration is weighing broader tariff reforms but faces domestic political challenges in implementing sweeping reductions. Experts suggest that while external pressure from the US might drive some changes, major across-the-board cuts remain unlikely in the short term.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

Lawsuit claims Google favoured white and Asian employees in pay and promotions

Google has agreed to pay $28 million (€25.6 million) to settle a class action lawsuit alleging it favoured white and Asian employees by offering them higher pay and better career progression.

The case, which covered at least 6,632 employees in California between 2018 and 2024, won preliminary approval from a Santa Clara county judge last week.

The lawsuit was led by Ana Cantu, a former Google employee who claimed the company placed white and Asian workers in higher job levels while restricting promotions and pay increases for others.

Cantu, who worked in Google’s people operations and cloud departments for seven years, alleged she was denied career advancement despite performing well. She argued that Google’s practices violated the California Equal Pay Act.

A Google spokesperson confirmed the settlement but maintained that the company had not engaged in discriminatory treatment. A final hearing is scheduled for September, where the court will decide whether to grant full approval of the settlement.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

China says US curbs will harm global semiconductor industry

China has warned that the United States‘ efforts to pressure other nations into targeting its semiconductor industry will ultimately backfire.

During a regular press briefing, Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Lin Jian criticised Washington’s approach, arguing that it would disrupt the global semiconductor supply chain and hinder industry development worldwide.

The comments came in response to reports that the White House plans to tighten restrictions on China’s access to advanced chip technologies.

Lin Jian emphasised that such actions not only undermine fair competition but also threaten the stability of the global technology market.

Tensions between the US and China over semiconductor access have escalated in recent years, with Washington implementing export controls and encouraging its allies to adopt similar measures.

Beijing has consistently opposed these restrictions, calling them politically motivated attempts to curb China’s technological progress.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

Google settles tax dispute in Italy for 326 million euros

Milan prosecutors have announced plans to drop a case against Google’s European division after the company agreed to settle a tax dispute by paying 326 million euros (£277 million). The settlement covers the period from 2015 to 2019, including penalties, sanctions, and interest.

The tax dispute stemmed from allegations that Google had failed to file and pay taxes on revenue generated in Italy, based on the digital infrastructure it operates within the country. This comes after the company settled a previous tax case with Italian authorities in 2017 by paying 306 million euros, which acknowledged Google’s permanent presence in Italy.

In 2023, Italy had requested that Google pay 1 billion euros in unpaid taxes and penalties. However, with this latest settlement, the case against the tech giant appears to be resolved for now.

For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.

Motorola loses appeal over UK emergency services contract

Motorola has been denied permission to appeal against the UK competition regulator’s ruling that it was making excessive profits from its contract to provide communications for Britain’s emergency services. The Court of Appeal unanimously dismissed the company’s application, upholding the Competition and Markets Authority’s (CMA) decision to impose a price cap on Motorola’s Airwave network.

The CMA introduced the cap in July 2023, reducing the cost of the Airwave service to reflect a competitive market, cutting an estimated £200 million in annual charges. Motorola had previously challenged the regulator’s findings at a tribunal but was unsuccessful. CMA Executive Director George Lusty welcomed the court’s decision, stating it ensures fair pricing for emergency services and marks the end of the legal dispute.

A Motorola spokesperson defended the company’s role, emphasising that Airwave remains essential for UK public safety communications. Despite disagreeing with the CMA’s ruling, Motorola said it is focused on continuing to provide high-quality emergency communication services.

Irish regulator wants answers from DeepSeek on data practices

Ireland’s Data Protection Commission (DPC) has asked Chinese AI company DeepSeek to clarify how it processes the personal data of Irish users. The request comes as part of ongoing efforts to ensure compliance with European data protection laws.

Unlike major US tech firms that base their EU operations in Ireland, DeepSeek has not designated the country as its European headquarters. This means the company does not fall under the same oversight framework as other large technology firms, prompting the regulator to seek direct answers on its data handling practices.

The DPC’s inquiry highlights the increasing scrutiny of foreign tech companies operating in Europe, especially those dealing with sensitive user information. As concerns over privacy and data security continue to grow, regulators are expected to tighten enforcement to ensure adherence to strict EU data protection laws.

Apple denies misusing Siri data following $95 million settlement

Apple has clarified that it has never sold data collected by its Siri voice assistant or used it to create marketing profiles. The statement, issued Wednesday, follows a $95 million settlement last week to resolve a class action lawsuit alleging that Siri had inadvertently recorded private conversations and shared them with third parties, including advertisers. Apple denied the claims and admitted no wrongdoing as part of the settlement, which could result in payouts of up to $20 per Siri-enabled device for millions of affected customers.

The controversy stemmed from claims that Siri sometimes activated unintentionally, recording sensitive interactions. Apple emphasised in its statement that Siri data is used minimally and only for real-time server input when necessary, with no retention of audio recordings unless users explicitly opt-in. Even in such cases, the recordings are solely used to improve Siri’s functionality. Apple reaffirmed its commitment to privacy, stating, ‘Apple has never used Siri data to build marketing profiles, never made it available for advertising, and never sold it to anyone.’

This case has drawn attention alongside a similar lawsuit targeting Google’s Voice Assistant, currently pending in federal court in San Jose, California. Both lawsuits are spearheaded by the same legal teams, highlighting growing scrutiny over how tech companies handle voice assistant data.

Legal world embraces AI for access to justice

AI is revolutionising the legal field, offering solutions to improve fairness and reduce costs in the justice system. Tools powered by AI are being used to streamline tasks like analysing evidence, drafting contracts, and preparing cases. Organisations like the Westway Trust in London are adopting AI to assist clients with complex disputes, such as benefits appeals and housing issues. These tools save hours of work, enabling paralegals to focus on providing better support.

The technology has sparked excitement and debate among legal professionals. AI models are being developed to help barristers identify inconsistencies in real-time court transcripts and assist judges with evidence analysis. Advocates argue that AI could make justice more accessible, while reducing the burden on legal practitioners and cutting costs for clients. However, concerns about accuracy and bias persist, with experts emphasising the importance of human oversight.

Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls, underscores the need for AI to complement, not replace, human judges. Guidelines stress transparency in AI use and the responsibility of lawyers to verify outputs. While tools like ChatGPT can provide general advice, professionals caution against relying on non-specialised AI for legal matters. Experts believe that AI will play a crucial role in addressing the fairness gap in the justice system without compromising the rule of law.

Google counters US push to sell Chrome

Google has proposed a legal alternative to a United States Department of Justice recommendation to dismantle its Chrome browser. Instead, the company suggests barring itself from using app licensing agreements to secure default software positions.

The proposal follows a landmark ruling declaring Google a monopoly. The government seeks stronger measures, including a ban on exclusive deals ensuring Google’s dominance on smartphones and other devices.

Judge Amit Mehta’s decision on antitrust remedies is expected to influence the tech industry. Google plans to appeal any adverse ruling.