A recent study from the University of Washington has exposed troubling biases in using AI for job application processes. The research identifies explicitly that OpenAI’s chatbot, ChatGPT, showed significant biases against disabled job applicants when used to screen CVs.
The research underscores concerns about existing AI tools perpetuating biases rather than mitigating them despite being designed to reduce human bias in hiring processes. Many companies rely on AI to streamline and expedite candidate screening, aiming to enhance recruitment efficiency.
Lead author Kate Glazko pointed out that ChatGPT’s biases can adversely affect how disabled jobseekers’ qualifications are perceived. Descriptions generated by ChatGPT tended to overshadow entire resumes based on disability-related content, potentially undermining the comprehensive evaluation of candidates.
Shari Trewin, Program Director of the IBM Accessibility Team, noted that AI systems, which typically rely on established norms, may inherently disadvantage individuals with disabilities. Addressing these biases requires implementing specific rules within AI systems to ensure fair treatment, as suggested by Glazko’s study advocating for AI to adopt principles aligned with Disability Justice values.
Why does it matter?
The study also calls for further efforts to mitigate AI biases and promote a more inclusive approach to technology development. It highlights the need for greater awareness and vigilance in using AI for sensitive real-world tasks like job recruitment, where fairness and equity are paramount concerns.
U.S. president Joe Biden said in his speech at the Arab summit in Saudi Arabia that the United States will keep its close partnership with the Middle East while urging leaders who attended the summit to advance human rights as a powerful source of economic and social changes. With that being said, freedom of the press and democratic rights are highlighted. He urged the necessity of releasing journalists.
Biden sent a message to the leaders saying: ‘Accountable, accountable institutions that are free from corruption and act transparently and respect the rule of law are the best way to deliver growth, respond to people’s needs, and I believe ensure justice.’
Relatives of Al Jazeera reporter Shireen Abu Akleh, who was killed while covering an Israeli raid in the occupied West Bank in May, showed their deep disappointment in President Joe Biden in a letter released over his administration’s response to her death.
The family accused the U.S. of trying to deny Israel’s responsibility for her death, saying in an official statement that Israeli fire most likely killed her but that the shooting in the West Bank town of Jenin was an accident. They sent a request to Biden for meeting with them when he visits the region, which The White House declined to comment on, alongside with the matters of the letter.
Palestinian eyewitnesses who claimed they saw she was shot by Israeli forces gained support from a reconstruction made by The Associated Press, investigations by CNN, New York Times, and The Washington Post as well as monitoring by the U.N. human rights office.
A Turkish court has jailed 16 Kurdish journalists for “belonging to a terrorist organisation” and their close cooperation with the pro-Kurdish Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP) in Diyarbarkir. They were also accused of spreading terrorist propaganda and since 2016 several hundred HDP members have already been detained.
Nazim Bilgin, the president of the Journalists’ Association of Turkey warns that: “We are living in the darkest days of our country as far as press freedom is concerned.” It is also alarming that Turkey has jailed more reporters than most other countries in the previous decade, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists.
Forty-five international organisations signed a communication to the Bangladesh Telecommunication Regulatory Commission (BTRC) urging them to withdraw or reconsider proposed regulations for digital media, social media, and over-the-top (OTT) platforms. The draft is dated October 2021 but was published on 6 February 2022. Stating that ‘The Draft Regulations seek to implement a content governance framework devoid of adequate judicial oversight, clarity and predictability, and integration of human rights and due process,’ the letter details eleven initial key concerns that require discussion.
