European governments are intensifying their efforts to safeguard satellites from cyberattacks as space becomes an increasingly vital front in modern security and hybrid warfare. Once seen mainly as technical infrastructure, satellites are now treated as strategic assets, carrying critical communications, navigation, and intelligence data that are attractive targets for espionage and disruption.
Concerns intensified after a 2022 cyberattack on the Viasat satellite network coincided with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, exposing how vulnerable space systems can be during geopolitical crises. Since then, the EU institutions have warned of rising cyber and electronic interference against satellites and ground stations, while several European countries have flagged growing surveillance activities linked to Russia and China.
To reduce risks, Europe is investing in new infrastructure and technologies. One example is a planned satellite ground station in Greenland, backed by the European Space Agency, designed to reduce dependence on the highly sensitive Arctic hub in Svalbard. That location currently handles most European satellite data traffic but relies on a single undersea internet cable, making it a critical point of failure.
At the same time, the EU is advancing with IRIS², a secure satellite communication system designed to provide encrypted connectivity and reduce reliance on foreign providers, such as Starlink. Although the project promises stronger security and European autonomy, it is not expected to be operational for several years.
Experts warn that technology alone is not enough. European governments are still clarifying who is responsible for defending space systems, while the cybersecurity industry struggles to adapt tools designed for Earth-based networks to the unique challenges of space. Better coordination, clearer mandates, and specialised security approaches will be essential as space becomes more contested.
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
The European Space Agency (ESA) has confirmed that a data breach occurred, but stated that its impact appears to be limited. According to the agency, only a very small number of science servers were affected, and these systems were located outside ESA’s main corporate network.
Claims about the breach began circulating on 26 December, when a hacker using the alias ‘888’ alleged that more than 200 gigabytes of ESA data had been compromised and put up for sale. The hacker claimed the material included source code, internal project documents, API tokens, and embedded login credentials.
ESA acknowledged the allegations on 29 December and launched a forensic investigation. A day later, the agency stated that its initial findings confirmed unauthorised access but suggested the scope was far smaller than online claims implied.
The affected servers were described as unclassified systems used for collaborative engineering work within the scientific community. ESA said it has already informed relevant stakeholders and taken immediate steps to secure any potentially impacted devices.
The investigation is still ongoing, and ESA has stated that it will provide further updates once the forensic analysis is complete.
Would you like to learn more aboutAI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
The presidency of the Council of the European Union next year is expected to see Ireland lead a European drive for ID-verified social media accounts.
Tánaiste Simon Harris said the move is intended to limit anonymous abuse, bot activity and coordinated disinformation campaigns that he views as a growing threat to democracy worldwide.
A proposal that would require users to verify their identity instead of hiding behind anonymous profiles. Harris also backed an Australian-style age verification regime to prevent children from accessing social media, arguing that existing digital consent rules are not being enforced.
Media Minister Patrick O’Donovan is expected to bring forward detailed proposals during the presidency.
The plan is likely to trigger strong resistance from major social media platforms with European headquarters in Ireland, alongside criticism from the US.
However, Harris believes there is growing political backing across Europe, pointing to signals of support from French President Emmanuel Macron and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
Harris said he wanted constructive engagement with technology firms rather than confrontation, while insisting that stronger safeguards are now essential.
He argued that social media companies already possess the technology to verify users and restrict harmful accounts, and that European-level coordination will be required to deliver meaningful change.
Would you like to learn more aboutAI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
A hacker using the name Lovely has allegedly claimed to have accessed subscriber data belonging to WIRED and to have leaked details relating to around 2.3 million users.
The same individual also states that a wider Condé Nast account system covering more than 40 million users could be exposed in future leaks instead of ending with the current dataset.
Security researchers are reported to have matched samples of the claimed leak with other compromised data sources. The information is said to include names, email addresses, user IDs and timestamps instead of passwords or payment information.
Some researchers also believe that certain home addresses could be included, which would raise privacy concerns if verified.
The dataset is reported to be listed on Have I Been Pwned. However, no official confirmation from WIRED or Condé Nast has been issued regarding the authenticity, scale or origin of the claimed breach, and the company’s internal findings remain unknown until now.
The hacker has also accused Condé Nast of failing to respond to earlier security warnings, although these claims have not been independently verified.
Users are being urged by security professionals to treat unexpected emails with caution instead of assuming every message is genuine.
Would you like to learn more aboutAI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
South Korea has blamed weak femtocell security at KT Corp for a major mobile payment breach that triggered thousands of unauthorised transactions.
Officials said the mobile operator used identical authentication certificates across femtocells and allowed them to stay valid for ten years, meaning any device that accessed the network once could do so repeatedly instead of being re-verified.
More than 22,000 users had identifiers exposed, and 368 people suffered unauthorised payments worth 243 million won.
Investigators also discovered that ninety-four KT servers were infected with over one hundred types of malware. Authorities concluded the company failed in its duty to deliver secure telecommunications services because its overall management of femtocell security was inadequate.
The government has now ordered KT to submit detailed prevention plans and will check compliance in June, while also urging operators to change authentication server addresses regularly and block illegal network access.
Officials said some hacking methods resembled a separate breach at SK Telecom, although there is no evidence that the same group carried out both attacks. KT said it accepts the findings and will soon set out compensation arrangements and further security upgrades instead of disputing the conclusions.
A separate case involving LG Uplus is being referred to police after investigators said affected servers were discarded, making a full technical review impossible.
The government warned that strong information security must become a survival priority as South Korea aims to position itself among the world’s leading AI nations.
Would you like to learn more aboutAI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
Protecting AI agents from manipulation has become a top priority for OpenAI after rolling out a major security upgrade to ChatGPT Atlas.
The browser-based agent now includes stronger safeguards against prompt injection attacks, where hidden instructions inside emails, documents or webpages attempt to redirect the agent’s behaviour instead of following the user’s commands.
Prompt injection poses a unique risk because Atlas can carry out actions that a person would normally perform inside a browser. A malicious email or webpage could attempt to trigger data exposure, unauthorised transactions or file deletion.
Criminals exploit the fact that agents process large volumes of content across an almost unlimited online surface.
OpenAI has developed an automated red-team framework that uses reinforcement learning to simulate sophisticated attackers.
When fresh attack patterns are discovered, the models behind Atlas are retrained so that resistance is built into the agent rather than added afterwards. Monitoring and safety controls are also updated using real attack traces.
These new protections are already live for all Atlas users. OpenAI advises people to limit logged-in access where possible, check confirmation prompts carefully and give agents well-scoped tasks instead of broad instructions.
The company argues that proactive defence is essential as agentic AI becomes more capable and widely deployed.
Would you like to learn more aboutAI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
Researchers are warning that AI chatbots may treat dialect speakers unfairly instead of engaging with them neutrally. Studies across English and German dialects found that large language models often attach negative stereotypes or misunderstand everyday expressions, leading to discriminatory replies.
A study in Germany tested ten language models using dialects such as Bavarian and Kölsch. The systems repeatedly described dialect speakers as uneducated or angry, and the bias became stronger when the dialect was explicitly identified.
Similar findings emerged elsewhere, including UK council services and AI shopping assistants that struggled with African American English.
Experts argue that such patterns risk amplifying social inequality as governments and businesses rely more heavily on AI. One Indian job applicant even saw a chatbot change his surname to reflect a higher caste, showing how linguistic bias can intersect with social hierarchy instead of challenging it.
Developers are now exploring customised AI models trained with local language data so systems can respond accurately without reinforcing stereotypes.
Researchers say bias can be tuned out of AI if handled responsibly, which could help protect dialect speakers rather than marginalise them.
Would you like to learn more aboutAI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
South Korea has introduced mandatory facial recognition for anyone registering a new SIM card or eSIM, whether in-store or online.
The live scan must match the photo on an official ID so that each phone number can be tied to a verified person instead of relying on paperwork alone.
Existing users are not affected, and the requirement applies only at the moment a number is issued.
The government argues that stricter checks are needed because telecom fraud has become industrialised and relies heavily on illegally registered SIM cards.
Criminal groups have used stolen identity data to obtain large volumes of numbers that can be swapped quickly to avoid detection. Regulators now see SIM issuance as the weakest link and the point where intervention is most effective.
Telecom companies must integrate biometric checks into onboarding, while authorities insist that facial data is used only for real-time verification and not stored. Privacy advocates warn that biometric verification creates new risks because faces cannot be changed if compromised.
They also question whether such a broad rule is proportionate when mobile access is essential for daily life.
The policy places South Korea in a unique position internationally, combining mandatory biometrics with defined legal limits. Its success will be judged on whether fraud meaningfully declines instead of being displaced.
A rule that has become a test case for how far governments should extend biometric identity checks into routine services.
Would you like to learn more aboutAI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
Digital Minister Karsten Wildberger has indicated support for stricter age limits on social media after Australia banned teenagers under 16 from using major online platforms. He said age restrictions were more than justified and that the policy had clear merit.
Australia’s new rules require companies to remove under 16 user profiles and stop new ones from being created. Officials argued that the measure aims to reduce cyberbullying, grooming and mental health harm instead of relying only on parental supervision.
The European Commission President said she was inspired by the move, although social media companies and civil liberties groups have criticised it.
Germany has already appointed an expert commission to examine child and youth protection in the digital era. The panel is expected to publish recommendations by summer 2025, which could include policies on social media access and potential restrictions on mobile phone use in schools.
Would you like to learn more aboutAI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
Researchers warn AI chatbots are spreading rumours about real people without human oversight. Unlike human gossip, bot-to-bot exchanges can escalate unchecked, growing more extreme as they move through AI networks.
Philosophers Joel Krueger and Lucy Osler from the University of Exeter describe this phenomenon as ‘feral gossip.’ It involves negative evaluations about absent third parties and can persist undetected across platforms.
Real-world examples include tech reporter Kevin Roose, who encountered hostile AI-generated assessments of his work from multiple chatbots, seemingly amplified as the content filtered through training data.
The researchers highlight that AI systems lack the social checks humans provide, allowing rumours to intensify unchecked. Chatbots are designed to appear trustworthy and personal, so negative statements can seem credible.
Such misinformation has already affected journalists, academics, and public officials, sometimes prompting legal action. Technosocial harms from AI gossip extend beyond embarrassment. False claims can damage reputations, influence decisions, and persist online and offline.
While chatbots are not conscious, their prioritisation of conversational fluency over factual accuracy can make the rumours they spread difficult to detect and correct.
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
