A federal judge has dismissed a proposed class-action lawsuit claiming Google illegally profited from scams involving Google Play gift cards. The plaintiff, Judy May, alleged she lost $1,000 after a scammer posed as a government official, instructing her to purchase Google Play gift cards to claim grant money. She argued that Google should have warned consumers about such scams on the card packaging.
However, Judge Beth Labson Freeman ruled that Google was not responsible for May’s losses, as the tech giant neither caused her financial harm nor knowingly benefited from the stolen funds. Freeman also dismissed claims that Google’s 15% to 30% commission on purchases using the gift cards was linked to the initial fraud.
The Federal Trade Commission reported that Americans lost $217 million to gift card fraud in 2023, with Google Play cards implicated in roughly 20% of reported cases. Though May’s case was dismissed, the judge allowed her the option to refile.
The UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has indicated that a proposed merger between Vodafone and Three could proceed, contingent on the companies making commitments to protect consumer prices and enhance the nation’s 5G infrastructure. The regulator, initially concerned that combining the two networks could lead to higher costs and reduced competition, has now concluded that these issues could be mitigated if Vodafone and Three agree to specific remedies.
Vodafone has responded positively to the CMA’s findings, expressing optimism that the proposal offers a clear path to regulatory approval. The telecom giants have emphasised that the merger would benefit both consumers and businesses, with plans to bring advanced 5G access to schools, hospitals, and other vital sectors across the UK.
The CMA’s investigation, which began in January, is now focused on ensuring the merged entity honors price promises on certain data plans for at least three years. Additionally, the companies would be required to maintain existing deals with smaller Mobile Virtual Network Operators (MVNOs) like Sky Mobile, Lyca, and Lebara. Industry analysts see the CMA’s conditional support as a positive step, potentially leading to a stronger three-player market alongside existing competitors EE and O2.
With public feedback on the proposal open until 12 November, a final decision is expected from the CMA by 7 December.
Craig Wright, the Australian computer scientist who claims to be Bitcoin’s creator, now faces potential contempt of court charges in the UK. Wright recently filed a $1.2B lawsuit against Block, a payments firm founded by Jack Dorsey, despite an injunction barring him from bringing new claims based on his disputed identity as “Satoshi Nakamoto.” A UK court previously found “overwhelming evidence” against Wright’s authorship of Bitcoin’s founding document and accused him of fabricating evidence on a “grand scale.”
Wright was previously referred to UK prosecutors for potential perjury, following a court decision to block him from further lawsuits tied to his claim of creating Bitcoin. Jonathan Hough, a lawyer for the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA), argued that Wright’s lawsuit against Block violates the court’s injunction. Wright, appearing by videolink, denied being in contempt but stated he would amend his lawsuit if necessary.
The court will hold a hearing in December to determine if Wright is indeed in contempt. In the meantime, his $1.2B lawsuit against Block has been temporarily halted pending further legal review.
The US Commerce Department has fined GlobalFoundries $500,000 for exporting semiconductor chips to SJ Semiconductor, an affiliate of China’s blacklisted chipmaker SMIC, without proper authorisation. GlobalFoundries, based in New York and one of the world’s largest contract chipmakers, reportedly made 74 shipments valued at $17.1M to the Chinese firm without obtaining the required export license. SJ Semiconductor and its parent, SMIC, were placed on the US trade restriction list in 2020 due to SMIC’s alleged links to China’s military.
GlobalFoundries disclosed the unintentional violation, attributing the exports to a data-entry error that occurred before the Chinese firms were listed. The company emphasised its commitment to strict compliance practices, a sentiment echoed by Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement Matthew Axelrod, who urged American companies to be vigilant in transactions with Chinese entities.
This fine comes amid increased scrutiny of US export policy and enforcement, particularly as Washington works to prevent American technology from enhancing China’s military capabilities. GlobalFoundries is also in line to receive $1.5B in government support to expand semiconductor manufacturing in the United States, part of the Biden administration’s broader push to boost domestic chip production.
US tech companies have raised concerns over a proposed data protection law in Vietnam, warning it could restrict their ability to grow in one of Asia’s largest digital markets. The draft law, which is under discussion in Vietnam’s parliament, aims to tighten controls on data protection, limit data transfers abroad, and give authorities easier access to information. Major industry players, represented by the Information Technology Industry Council, argue that these restrictions could hinder companies like Meta, Google, and Equinix from effectively reaching their large Vietnamese user base and building new data centres.
Vietnam, home to 100 million people, is an attractive market for tech and social media companies and has ambitions to expand its data centre industry through foreign investments. However, the new law would require companies to obtain prior authorisation before transferring “core” or “important” data abroad—terms that critics say are vaguely defined. In addition, companies may be required to share data with the government in cases broadly categorised as being in the “public interest.”
The US tech sector has voiced opposition, citing an “undue expansion of government access” that could create significant compliance challenges. The American Chamber of Commerce in Hanoi has joined the call, urging lawmakers to reconsider the legislation’s quick adoption, which is scheduled for a vote on November 30. Industry analysts are watching closely, as the law could impact foreign investment plans, including Google’s potential new data centre in southern Vietnam.
Google has won a trademark lawsuit brought by Shorts International, a British company specialising in short films, over the use of the word ‘shorts’ in YouTube‘s short video platform, YouTube Shorts. London’s High Court found no risk of consumer confusion between Shorts International’s brand and YouTube’s platform, which launched in 2020 as a response to TikTok‘s popularity.
Shorts International, known for its short film television channel, argued that YouTube Shorts infringed on its established trademark. However, Google’s lawyer, Lindsay Lane, countered that it was clear the ‘Shorts’ platform belonged to YouTube, removing any chance of brand confusion.
Judge Michael Tappin ruled in favour of Google, stating that the use of ‘shorts’ by YouTube would not affect the distinctiveness or reputation of Shorts International’s trademark. The court’s decision brings the legal challenge to a close, dismissing all claims of infringement.
The Kremlin has called on Google to lift its restrictions on Russian broadcasters on YouTube, highlighting mounting legal claims against the tech giant as potential leverage. Google blocked more than a thousand Russian channels and over 5.5 million videos, including state-funded media, after halting ad services in Russia following its invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
Russia’s legal actions against Google, initiated by 17 Russian TV channels, have led to compound fines based on the company’s revenue in Russia, accumulating to a staggering figure reportedly in the “undecillions,” according to Russian media. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov described this enormous number as symbolic but urged Google to take these legal pressures seriously and reconsider its restrictions.
In response, Google has not commented on these demands. Russian officials argue that such restrictions infringe on the country’s broadcasters and hope the significant financial claims will compel Google to restore access to Russian media content on YouTube.
Seven families in France are suing TikTok, alleging that the platform’s algorithm exposed their teenage children to harmful content, leading to tragic consequences, including the suicides of two 15-year-olds. Filed at the Créteil judicial court, this grouped case seeks to hold TikTok accountable for what the families describe as dangerous content promoting self-harm, eating disorders, and suicide.
The families’ lawyer, Laure Boutron-Marmion, argues that TikTok, as a company offering its services to minors, must address its platform’s risks and shortcomings. She emphasised the need for TikTok’s legal liability to be recognised, especially given that its algorithm is often blamed for pushing disturbing content. TikTok, like Meta’s Facebook and Instagram, faces multiple lawsuits worldwide accusing these platforms of targeting minors in ways that harm their mental health.
TikTok has previously stated it is committed to protecting young users’ mental well-being and has invested in safety measures, according to CEO Shou Zi Chew’s remarks to US lawmakers earlier this year.
Aleksei Andriunin, the founder of cryptocurrency firm Gotbit, has been indicted in the US for alleged involvement in a conspiracy to manipulate cryptocurrency markets. The Justice Department claims that Andriunin and his firm provided market manipulation services to increase artificial trading volumes for various cryptocurrency companies from 2018 to 2024.
The superseding indictment also names Gotbit’s directors, Fedor Kedrov and Qawi Jalili, who were already charged earlier in October. Prosecutors allege that these actions aimed to distort the cryptocurrency markets, with several companies, including some in the United States, reportedly benefitting from these tactics.
If convicted, Andriunin faces significant penalties, with wire fraud charges carrying a potential 20-year prison sentence. He could also face an additional five years for conspiracy charges. The allegations form part of a larger crackdown on crypto market manipulation, which has already led to several arrests and asset seizures worth $25 million.
Recent moves by federal prosecutors highlight a more aggressive stance on crypto-related fraud. They have targeted multiple firms, including Gotbit, and several leaders have already agreed to plead guilty. The crackdown aims to strengthen transparency and curb malpractice in the cryptocurrency market.
A US federal appeals court has expressed doubts over the Federal Communications Commission’s authority to reinstate net neutrality rules. A three-judge panel of the 6th Circuit Court in Cincinnati heard arguments from the telecom industry, which claims the FCC exceeded its powers by reintroducing the rules. Initially implemented under the Obama administration, net neutrality was later repealed by the Trump administration before being revived under President Joe Biden.
Net neutrality regulations prevent internet service providers (ISPs) from blocking or slowing access to websites and prohibit paid prioritisation arrangements that favour some content over others. The FCC’s April decision to classify broadband as a telecommunications service has drawn significant opposition from major telecom firms, while receiving backing from tech giants like Amazon, Apple, and Google. However, the 6th Circuit has temporarily blocked the rules’ enforcement while the legal challenge proceeds.
Central to the case is whether Congress granted the FCC sufficient authority to make sweeping regulations on internet services. The telecom industry argues that the ‘major questions’ doctrine, a judicial principle requiring clear congressional authorisation for significant regulatory action, should apply. Industry lawyer Jeff Wall contends that Congress should decide the matter, not an agency acting independently.
The judges also debated the FCC’s evolving stance on broadband regulation over recent administrations. Judge Griffin questioned whether frequent policy shifts weakened the FCC’s case, while Judge Kethledge urged a focus on statutory text rather than broad doctrines. A ruling on the matter could significantly impact the regulatory landscape for ISPs and the future of net neutrality.
