The owner of TikTok, ByteDance, plans a significant $7 billion investment in AI hardware by 2025. The company is turning to Nvidia chips despite US-imposed restrictions on AI chip exports to China. ByteDance has devised methods to bypass these curbs by storing chips in data centres outside China, particularly in Southeast Asia, without breaching restrictions.
The United States introduced export restrictions in 2022, citing security concerns about Chinese companies accessing advanced AI hardware. ByteDance has denied any ties to the Chinese government, countering allegations raised by US lawmakers. Meanwhile, the restrictions have drawn warnings from Chinese industry bodies about over-reliance on US technology, a scenario that could also affect companies like Nvidia and AMD.
US President-elect Donald Trump is advocating for a delay in the January 19 TikTok ban deadline. He hopes for more time to pursue a political solution that avoids disruption to TikTok’s 170 million US users. Legal challenges filed by ByteDance against the ban, which it argues infringes free speech, have so far failed to yield results.
The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments on the matter on January 10, marking a final chance for ByteDance, TikTok, and US authorities to present their cases. Trump recently met TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew, describing the platform as holding a ‘warm spot’ in his heart. However, over 20 state attorneys general and the Justice Department have labelled the app a national security risk, urging the court to uphold the ban.
AI is revolutionising the legal field, offering solutions to improve fairness and reduce costs in the justice system. Tools powered by AI are being used to streamline tasks like analysing evidence, drafting contracts, and preparing cases. Organisations like the Westway Trust in London are adopting AI to assist clients with complex disputes, such as benefits appeals and housing issues. These tools save hours of work, enabling paralegals to focus on providing better support.
The technology has sparked excitement and debate among legal professionals. AI models are being developed to help barristers identify inconsistencies in real-time court transcripts and assist judges with evidence analysis. Advocates argue that AI could make justice more accessible, while reducing the burden on legal practitioners and cutting costs for clients. However, concerns about accuracy and bias persist, with experts emphasising the importance of human oversight.
Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls, underscores the need for AI to complement, not replace, human judges. Guidelines stress transparency in AI use and the responsibility of lawyers to verify outputs. While tools like ChatGPT can provide general advice, professionals caution against relying on non-specialised AI for legal matters. Experts believe that AI will play a crucial role in addressing the fairness gap in the justice system without compromising the rule of law.
Nvidia has completed its $700 million acquisition of Israeli AI software company Run:ai, following unconditional approval by the European Commission. The deal, initially announced in April, underwent antitrust scrutiny to evaluate potential market dominance in GPUs, critical for AI applications. Regulators concluded Run:ai’s minimal current revenues posed no competition concerns.
Established in 2018, Run:ai offers workload management and orchestration software tailored for AI infrastructure. Its platform supports enterprise customers in optimising compute resources across cloud, edge, and on-premises environments. With a focus on managing large-scale GPU clusters, Run:ai is instrumental in deploying AI workloads like generative AI and search engines.
Now integrated into Nvidia, Run:ai aims to expand its offerings and make its software open-source, broadening its compatibility beyond Nvidia GPUs. The move aligns with Nvidia’s broader strategy to enhance its robotics portfolio and strengthen its AI ecosystem.
Nvidia plans to continue its advancements in robotics, targeting the release of its next-generation Jetson Thor computer for humanoid robots by early 2025.
President-elect Donald Trump has called on the US Supreme Court to postpone implementing a law that would ban TikTok or force its sale, arguing for time to seek a political resolution after taking office. The court will hear arguments on the case on 10 January, ahead of a 19 January deadline for TikTok’s Chinese owner, ByteDance, to sell the app or face a US ban.
The move marks a stark shift for Trump, who previously sought to block TikTok in 2020 over national security concerns tied to its Chinese ownership. Trump’s legal team emphasised that his request does not take a stance on the law’s merits but seeks to allow his incoming administration to explore alternatives. Trump has expressed a newfound appreciation for TikTok, citing its role in boosting his campaign visibility.
TikTok, with over 170 million US users, continues to challenge the legislation, asserting that its data and operations affecting US users are fully managed within the country. However, national security concerns persist, with the Justice Department and a coalition of attorneys general urging the Supreme Court to uphold the divest-or-ban mandate. The case highlights the growing debate between free speech advocates and national security interests in regulating digital platforms.
Starting Saturday, all small- and medium-sized portable electronic devices sold in the EU must use USB-C ports for charging, a move aimed at reducing waste and increasing convenience for consumers. Devices like smartphones, tablets, cameras, and headphones will now share a standardised charger, eliminating the need for multiple charging cables.
The new rule follows a 2022 vote by the European Parliament and member states to phase out alternative charging methods. Consumers can also choose to opt out of receiving a charger with new devices, further cutting down on waste. Laptop manufacturers will be required to comply with similar standards starting April 28, 2026.
Anna Cavazzini, chair of the European Parliament’s Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, hailed the change as a victory for sustainability and cost savings. The measure is expected to save EU households €250 million annually and significantly reduce the waste generated by discarded chargers. The Parliament has pledged to closely monitor manufacturers as they implement the new rules.
Amazon and Universal Music Group (UMG) have expanded their collaboration to address issues surrounding AI in the music industry. The partnership aims to combat the unauthorised use of AI-generated content and protect artists from fraud and misattribution, while also focusing on innovations in audio, audiobooks, and livestreamed content.
The initiative comes as UMG, alongside Sony Music and Warner Music, has filed lawsuits against AI music startups, alleging unauthorised use of copyrighted material. The defendants argue their practices fall under ‘fair use,’ highlighting the ongoing debate over intellectual property and AI-generated works.
Legal experts underscore the need for clearer guidelines as businesses adopt AI tools for content creation. While AI offers opportunities for efficiency and creativity, its integration must balance innovation with copyright protection. Industry leaders like Adobe are already developing tools to ensure AI-generated content remains legally safe for commercial use.
Instacart has joined Uber in a legal challenge against a new Seattle ordinance regulating how app-based workers can be deactivated. The law, set to take effect in January, requires companies to provide gig workers with a 14-day notice of deactivation, base decisions on reasonable policies, and allow human review of all deactivations.
Seattle officials describe the legislation as a landmark move to ensure worker rights in the gig economy. Advocacy groups support the law, arguing that it addresses unfair deactivations and offers greater job security for app-based workers.
Instacart and Uber, however, claim the ordinance infringes on constitutional rights, federal laws, and operational safety. This lawsuit is part of broader disputes between tech companies and cities over labour regulations in the gig economy. Seattle has pledged to defend its policies, emphasising its commitment to protecting workers in modern app-driven industries.
The UK government is intensifying efforts to safeguard children online, with new measures requiring social media platforms to implement robust age verification and protect young users from harmful content. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle highlighted the importance of ‘watertight’ systems, warning that companies failing to comply could face significant fines or even prison terms for executives.
The measures, part of the Online Safety Act passed in 2023, will see platforms penalised for failing to address issues such as bullying, violent content, and risky stunts. Ofcom, the UK‘s communications regulator, is set to outline further obligations in January, including stricter ID verification for adult-only apps.
Debate continues over the balance between safety and accessibility. While some advocate for bans similar to Australia‘s under-16 restrictions, teenagers consulted by Kyle emphasised the positive aspects of social media, including learning opportunities and community connections. Research into the impact of screen time on mental health is ongoing, with new findings expected next year.
A German court has ordered Signify, the world’s largest lighting maker, to recall and destroy certain products sold since 2017, citing patent infringement claims made by Seoul Semiconductor, a South Korean firm. The Düsseldorf court also ruled that Signify could face fines of up to €250,000 ($259,925) for each violation of the order, according to a statement from Seoul Semiconductor.
Signify, headquartered in the Netherlands and spun off from Philips in 2016, has not yet responded to requests for comment. The court ruling adds to the challenges faced by the company, which has a global reputation in the lighting industry.
Seoul Semiconductor, a leader in light-emitting diode (LED) technology, invests heavily in innovation, allocating about 10% of its revenue to research and development. The company boasts a portfolio of over 18,000 patents and has pursued legal action against multinational corporations to protect its intellectual property rights.
Vietnam’s new internet law, known as ‘Decree 147,’ came into effect Wednesday, requiring platforms like Facebook and TikTok to verify user identities and share data with authorities upon request. Critics view the move as a crackdown on freedom of expression, with activists warning it will stifle dissent and blur the lines between legal and illegal online activity. Under the rules, tech companies must store verified information alongside users’ names and dates of birth and remove government-designated “illegal” content within 24 hours.
The decree also impacts the booming social commerce sector by allowing only verified accounts to livestream. Additionally, it imposes restrictions on gaming for minors, limiting sessions to one hour and a maximum of 180 minutes daily. Vietnam, with over 65 million Facebook users and a growing gaming population, may see significant disruptions in online behaviour and businesses.
Critics liken the law to China’s tight internet controls. Activists and content creators have expressed fear of persecution, citing recent examples like the 12-year prison sentence for a YouTuber critical of the government. Despite the sweeping measures, some local businesses and gamers remain sceptical about enforcement, suggesting a wait-and-see approach to the decree’s real-world impact.
