Kering has confirmed a data breach affecting several of its luxury brands, including Gucci, Balenciaga, Brioni, and Alexander McQueen, after unauthorised access to its Salesforce systems compromised millions of customer records.
Hacking group ShinyHunters has claimed responsibility, alleging it exfiltrated 43.5 million records from Gucci and nearly 13 million from the other brands. The stolen data includes names, email addresses, dates of birth, sales histories, and home addresses.
Kering stated that the incident occurred in June 2025 and did not compromise bank or credit card details or national identifiers. The company has reported the breach to the relevant regulators and is notifying the affected customers.
Evidence shared by ShinyHunters suggests Balenciaga made an initial ransom payment of €500,000 before negotiations broke down. The group released sample data and chat logs to support its claims.
ShinyHunters has exploited Salesforce weaknesses in previous attacks targeting luxury, travel, and financial firms. Questions remain about the total number of affected customers and the potential exposure of other Kering brands.
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
The rise of quantum computing is sparking fresh concerns over the long-term security of Bitcoin. Unlike classical systems, quantum machines could eventually break the cryptography protecting digital assets.
Experts warn that Shor’s algorithm, once run on a sufficiently powerful quantum computer, could recover private keys from public ones in hours, leaving exposed funds vulnerable. Analysts see the mid-to-late 2030s as the key period for cryptographically relevant breakthroughs.
ChatGPT-5’s probability model indicates less than a 5% chance of Bitcoin being cracked before 2030, but risk rises to 45–60% between 2035 and 2039, and nearly certainty by 2050. Sudden progress in large-scale, fault-tolerant qubits or government directives could accelerate the timeline.
Mitigation strategies include avoiding key reuse, auditing exposed addresses, and gradually shifting to post-quantum or hybrid cryptographic solutions. Experts suggest that critical migrations should be completed by the mid-2030s to secure the Bitcoin network against future quantum threats.
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
The European Union’s NIS2 directive has officially come into force, imposing stricter cybersecurity duties on thousands of organisations.
Adopted in 2022 and implemented into national law by late 2024, the rules extend beyond critical infrastructure to cover more industries. Energy, healthcare, transport, ICT, and even waste management firms now face mandatory compliance.
Measures include multifactor authentication, encryption, backup systems, and stronger supply chain security. Senior executives are held directly responsible for failures, with penalties ranging from heavy fines to operational restrictions.
Companies must also report major incidents promptly to national authorities. Unlike ISO certifications, NIS2 requires organisations to prove compliance through internal processes or independent audits, depending on national enforcement.
Analysts warn that firms still reliant on legacy systems face a difficult transition. Yet experts agree the directive signals a decisive shift: cybersecurity is now a legal duty, not simply best practice.
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
The UK’s National Cyber Security Centre has released version 4.0 of its Cyber Assessment Framework to help organisations protect essential services from rising cyber threats.
An updated CAF that provides a structured approach for assessing and improving cybersecurity and resilience across critical sectors.
Version 4.0 introduces a deeper focus on attacker methods and motivations to inform risk decisions, ensures software in essential services is developed and maintained securely, and strengthens guidance on threat detection through security monitoring and threat hunting.
AI-related cyber risks are also now covered more thoroughly throughout the framework.
The CAF primarily supports energy, healthcare, transport, digital infrastructure, and government organisations, helping them meet regulatory obligations such as the NIS Regulations.
Developed in consultation with UK cyber regulators, the framework provides clear benchmarks for assessing security outcomes relative to threat levels.
Authorities encourage system owners to adopt CAF 4.0 alongside complementary tools such as Cyber Essentials, the Cyber Resilience Audit, and Cyber Adversary Simulation services. These combined measures enhance confidence and resilience across the nation’s critical infrastructure.
Would you like to learn more aboutAI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
Marks & Spencer’s technology chief, Rachel Higham, has stepped down less than 18 months after joining the retailer from BT.
Her departure comes months after a cyberattack in April by Scattered Spider disrupted systems and cost the company around £300 million. Online operations, including click-and-collect, were temporarily halted before being gradually restored.
In a memo to staff, the company described Higham as a steady hand during a turbulent period and wished her well. M&S has said it does not intend to replace her role, leaving questions over succession directly.
The retailer expects part of the financial hit to be offset by insurance. It has declined to comment further on whether Higham will receive a payoff.
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) has confirmed that data was affected in a cyberattack that has kept its UK factories idle for more than a week. The company stated that it is contacting anyone whose data was involved, although it did not clarify whether the breach affected customers, suppliers, or internal systems.
JLR reported the incident to the Information Commissioner’s Office and immediately shut down IT systems to limit damage. Production at Midlands and Merseyside sites has been halted until at least Thursday, with staff instructed not to return before next week.
The disruption has also hit suppliers and retailers, with garages struggling to order spare parts and dealers facing delays registering vehicles. JLR said it is working around the clock to restore operations in a safe and controlled way, though the process is complex.
Responsibility for the hack has been claimed by Scattered Lapsus$ Hunters, a group linked to previous attacks on Marks & Spencer, the Co-op, and Las Vegas casinos in the UK and the US. The hackers posted alleged screenshots from JLR’s internal systems on Telegram last week.
Cybersecurity experts say the group’s claim that ransomware was deployed raises questions, as it appears to have severed ties with Russian ransomware gangs. Analysts suggest the hackers may have only stolen data or are building their own ransomware infrastructure.
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
Researchers at NYU’s Tandon School of Engineering have demonstrated how large language models can be utilised to execute ransomware campaigns autonomously. Their prototype, dubbed Ransomware 3.0, simulated every stage of an attack, from intrusion to the generation of a ransom note.
The system briefly raised an alarm after cybersecurity firm ESET discovered its files on VirusTotal, mistakenly identifying them as live malware. The proof-of-concept was designed only for controlled laboratory use and posed no risk outside testing environments.
Instead of pre-written code, the prototype embedded text instructions that triggered AI models to generate tailored attack scripts. Each execution created unique code, evading traditional detection methods and running across Windows, Linux, and Raspberry Pi systems.
The researchers found that the system identified up to 96% of sensitive files and could generate personalised extortion notes, raising psychological pressure on victims. With costs as low as $0.70 per attack using commercial AI services, such methods could lower barriers for criminals.
The team stressed that the work was conducted ethically and aims to help defenders prepare countermeasures. They recommend monitoring file access patterns, limiting outbound AI connections, and developing defences against AI-generated attack behaviours.
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
The EU’s digital transformation and the rise of trusted digital identities
The EU, like the rest of the world, is experiencing a significant digital transformation driven by emerging technologies, with citizens, businesses, and governments increasingly relying on online services.
At the centre of the shift lies digital identity, which enables secure, verifiable, and seamless online interactions.
Digital identity has also become a cornerstone of the EU’s transition toward a secure and competitive digital economy. As societies, businesses, and governments increasingly rely on online platforms, the ability for citizens to prove who they are in a reliable, secure, and user-friendly way has gained central importance.
Without trusted digital identities, essential services ranging from healthcare and education to banking and e-commerce risk fragmentation, fraud, and inefficiency.
However, it quickly became clear that further steps were necessary to improve adoption, interoperability, and user trust.
In May 2024, the updated framework, eIDAS 2 (Regulation (EU) 2024/1183), came into force.
At its heart lies the European Digital Identity Wallet, or EDIW, a tool designed to empower EU citizens with a secure, voluntary, and interoperable way to authenticate themselves and store personal credentials.
By doing so, eIDAS 2 aims to strengthen trust, security, and cross-border services, ensuring Europe builds digital sovereignty while safeguarding fundamental rights.
Lessons from eIDAS 1 and the need for a stronger digital identity framework
Back in 2014, when the first eIDAS Regulation was adopted, its purpose was to enable the mutual recognition of electronic identification and trust services across member states.
The idea was simple (and logical) yet ambitious: a citizen of one EU country should be able to use their national digital ID to access services in another, whether it is to enrol in a university abroad or open a bank account.
The original regulation created legal certainty for electronic signatures, seals, timestamps, and website authentication, helping digital transactions gain recognition equal to their paper counterparts.
For businesses and governments, it reduced bureaucracy and built trust in digital processes, both essential for sustainable development.
Despite the achievements, significant limitations emerged. Adoption rates varied widely across member states, with only a handful, such as Estonia and Denmark, achieving robust national digital ID systems.
Others lagged due to technical, political, or budgetary issues. Interoperability across borders was inconsistent, often forcing citizens and businesses to rely on paper processes.
Stakeholders and industry associations also expressed concerns about the complexity of implementation and the absence of user-friendly solutions.
The gaps highlighted the need for a new approach. As Commission President Ursula von der Leyen emphasised in 2020, ‘every time an app or website asks us to create a new digital identity or to easily log on via a big platform, we have no idea what happens to our data in reality.’
Concerns about reliance on non-European technology providers, combined with the growing importance of secure online transactions, paved the way for eIDAS 2.
The eIDAS 2 framework and the path to interoperable digital services
Regulation (EU) 2024/1183, adopted in the spring of 2024, updates the original eIDAS to reflect new technological and social realities.
Its guiding principle is technological neutrality, ensuring that no single vendor or technology dominates and allowing member states to adopt diverse solutions provided they remain interoperable.
Among its key innovations is the expansion of qualified trust services. While the original eIDAS mainly covered signatures and seals, the new regulation broadens the scope to include services such as qualified electronic archiving, ledgers, and remote signature creation devices.
The broader approach ensures that the regulation keeps pace with emerging technologies such as distributed ledgers and cloud-based security solutions.
eIDAS 2 also strengthens compliance mechanisms. Providers of trust services and digital wallets must adhere to rigorous security and operational standards, undergo audits, and demonstrate resilience against cyber threats.
In this way, the regulation not only fosters a common European market for digital identity but also reinforces Europe’s commitment to digital sovereignty and trust.
The European Digital Identity Wallet in action
The EDIW represents the most visible and user-facing element of eIDAS 2.
Available voluntarily to all EU citizens, residents, and businesses, the wallet is designed to act as a secure application on mobile devices where users can link their national ID documents, certificates, and credentials.
For citizens, the benefits are tangible. Rather than managing numerous passwords or carrying a collection of physical documents, individuals can rely on the wallet as a single, secure tool.
It allows them to prove their identity when travelling or accessing services in another country, while offering a reliable space to store and share essential credentials such as diplomas, driving licences, or health insurance cards.
In addition, it enables signing contracts with qualified electronic signatures directly from personal devices, reducing the need for paper-based processes and making everyday interactions considerably more efficient.
For businesses, the wallet promises smoother cross-border operations. For example, banks can streamline customer onboarding through secure, interoperable identification. Professional services can verify qualifications instantly.
E-commerce platforms can reduce fraud and improve compliance with ‘Know Your Customer’ requirements.
By reducing bureaucracy and offering convenience, the wallet embodies Europe’s ambition to create a truly single digital market.
Cybersecurity and privacy in the EDIW
Cybersecurity and privacy are central to the success of the wallet. On the positive side, the system enhances security through encryption, multi-factor authentication, and controlled data sharing.
Instead of exposing unnecessary information, users can share only the attributes required, for example, confirming age without disclosing a birth date.
Yet risks remain. The most pressing concern is risk aggregation. By consolidating multiple credentials in a single wallet, the consequences of a breach could be severe, leading to fraud, identity theft, or large-scale data exposure. The system, therefore, becomes an attractive target for attackers.
To address such risks, eIDAS 2 mandates safeguards. Article 45k requires providers to maintain data integrity and chronological order in electronic ledgers, while regular audits and compliance checks ensure adherence to strict standards.
Furthermore, the regulation mandates open-source software for the wallet components, enhancing transparency and trust.
The challenge is to balance security, usability, and confidence. If the wallet is overly restrictive, citizens may resist adoption. If it is too permissive, privacy could be undermined.
The European approach aims to strike the delicate balance between trust and efficiency.
Practical implications across sectors with the EDIW
The European Digital Identity Wallet has the potential to reshape multiple sectors across the EU, and its relevance is already visible in national pilot projects as well as in existing electronic identification systems.
Public services stand to benefit most immediately. Citizens will be able to submit tax declarations, apply for social benefits, or enrol in universities abroad without needing paper-based procedures.
Healthcare is another area where digital identity is of great importance, since medical records can be transferred securely across borders.
Businesses are also likely to experience greater efficiency. Banks and financial institutions will be able to streamline compliance with the ‘Know Your Customer’ and anti-money laundering rules.
In the field of e-commerce, platforms can provide seamless authentication, which will reduce fraud and enhance customer trust.
Citizens will also enjoy greater convenience in their daily lives when signing rental contracts, proving identity while travelling, or accessing utilities and other services.
National approaches to digital identity across the EU
National experiences illustrate both diversity and progress. Let’s review some examples.
Estonia has been recognised as a pioneer, having built a robust e-Identity system over two decades. Its citizens already use secure digital ID cards, mobile ID, and smart ID applications to access almost all government services online, meaning that integration with the EDIW will be relatively smooth.
Denmark has also made significant progress with its MitID solution, which replaced NemID and is now used by millions of citizens to access both public and private services with high security standards, including biometric authentication.
Germany has introduced BundID, a central portal for accessing public administration services, and has invested in enabling the use of national ID cards via NFC-based smartphones, although adoption is still limited compared to Scandinavian countries.
Italy has taken a different route by rolling out SPID, the Public Digital Identity System, which is now used by more than thirty-five million citizens to access thousands of services. The country also supports the Electronic Identity Card, known as CIE, and both solutions are being aligned with wallet requirements.
Spain has launched Cl@ve, a platform that combines permanent passwords and electronic certificates, and has joined several wallet pilot projects funded by the European Commission to test cross-border use.
France is developing its France Identité application, which allows the use of the electronic ID card for online authentication, and the project is at the centre of the national effort to meet European standards.
The Netherlands relies on DigiD, which provides access to healthcare, taxation, and education services. Although adoption is high, the system will require enhanced security features to meet the new regulations.
Greece has made significant strides in digital identity with the introduction of the Gov.gr Wallet. The mobile application allows citizens to store digital versions of their national identity card and driving licence on smartphones, giving them the same legal validity as physical documents in the country.
These varied examples reveal a mixed landscape. Countries such as Estonia and Denmark have developed advanced and widely used systems that will integrate readily with the European framework.
Others are still building broader adoption and enhancing their infrastructure. The wallet, therefore, offers an opportunity to harmonise national approaches, bridge existing gaps, and create a coherent European ecosystem.
By building on what already exists, member states can speed up adoption and deliver benefits to citizens and businesses in a consistent and trusted way.
Risks and limitations of the EDIW
Despite the promises, the rollout of the wallet faces significant challenges, several of which have already been highlighted in our analysis.
First, data privacy remains a concern. Citizens must trust that wallet providers and national authorities will not misuse or over-collect their data, especially given existing concerns about data breaches and increased surveillance across the Union. Any breach of that trust could significantly undermine adoption.
Second, Europe’s digital infrastructure remains uneven. Countries such as Estonia and Denmark (as mentioned earlier) already operate sophisticated e-ID systems, while others fall behind. Bridging the gap requires financial and technical support, as well as political will.
Third, balancing innovation with harmonisation is not easy. While technological neutrality allows for flexibility, too much divergence risks interoperability problems. The EU must carefully monitor implementation to avoid fragmentation.
Finally, there are long-term risks of over-centralisation. By placing so much reliance on a single tool, the EU may inadvertently create systemic vulnerabilities. Ensuring redundancy and diversity in digital identity solutions will be key to resilience.
Opportunities and responsibilities in the EU’s digital identity strategy
Looking forward, the success of eIDAS 2 and the wallet will depend on careful implementation and strong governance.
Opportunities abound. Scaling the wallet across sectors, from healthcare and education to transport and finance, could solidify Europe’s position as a global leader in digital identity. By extending adoption to the private sector, the EU can create a thriving ecosystem of secure, trusted services.
Yet the initiative requires continuous oversight. Cyber threats evolve rapidly, and regulatory frameworks must adapt. Ongoing audits, updates, and refinements will be necessary to keep pace. Member states will need to share best practices and coordinate closely to ensure consistent standards.
At a broader level, the wallet represents a step toward digital sovereignty. By reducing reliance on non-European identity providers and platforms, the EU strengthens its control over the digital infrastructure underpinning its economy. In doing so, it enhances both competitiveness and resilience.
The EU’s leap toward a digitally sovereign future
In conclusion, we firmly believe that the adoption of eIDAS 2 and the rollout of the European Digital Identity Wallet mark a decisive step in Europe’s digital transformation.
By providing a secure, interoperable, and user-friendly framework, the EU has created the conditions for greater trust, efficiency, and cross-border collaboration.
The benefits are clear. Citizens gain convenience and control, businesses enjoy streamlined operations, and governments enhance security and transparency.
But we have to keep in mind that challenges remain, from uneven national infrastructures to concerns over data privacy and cybersecurity.
Ultimately, eIDAS 2 is both a legal milestone and a technological experiment. Its success will depend on building and maintaining trust, ensuring inclusivity, and adapting to emerging risks.
If the EU can meet the challenges, the European Digital Identity Wallet will not only transform the daily lives of millions of its citizens but also serve as a model for digital governance worldwide.
Would you like to learn more aboutAI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
President Trump has signed an Executive Order to promote American leadership in AI exports, marking a significant policy shift. The move creates new global opportunities for US businesses but also introduces stricter compliance responsibilities.
The order establishes the American AI Exports Program, overseen by the Department of Commerce, to develop and deploy ‘full-stack’ AI export packages.
These packages cover everything from chips and cloud infrastructure to AI models and cybersecurity safeguards. Industry consortia will be invited to submit proposals, outlining hardware origins, export targets, business models, and federal support requests.
A central element of the initiative is ensuring compliance with US export control regimes. Companies must align with the Export Control Reform Act and the Export Administration Regulations, with special attention to restrictions on advanced computing chips.
New guidance warns against potential violations linked to hardware and highlights red flags for illegal diversion of sensitive technology.
Commerce stresses that participation requires robust export compliance plans and rigorous end user screening.
Legal teams are urged to review policies on AI exports, as regulators focus on preventing misuse of advanced computing systems in military or weapons programmes abroad.
Would you like to learn more aboutAI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
A Ukrainian cybercrime suspect has been added to the EU’s Most Wanted list for his role in the 2019 LockerGoga ransomware attack against a major Norwegian aluminium company and other global incidents.
The fugitive is considered a high-value target and is wanted by multiple countries. The US Department of Justice has offered up to USD 10 million for information leading to the arrest.
Europol stated that the identification of the suspect followed a lengthy, multinational investigation supported by Eurojust, with damages from the network estimated to be in the billions. Several members of the group have already been detained in Ukraine.
Investigators have mapped the network’s operations, tracing its hierarchy from malware developers and intrusion experts to money launderers who processed illicit proceeds. The wanted man is accused of directly deploying LockerGoga ransomware.
Europol has urged the public to visit the EU Most Wanted website and share information that could assist in locating the fugitive. The suspect’s profile is now live on the platform.
Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!
