(Interactive Dialogue 1) Summit of the Future – General Assembly, 79th session

(Interactive Dialogue 1) Summit of the Future – General Assembly, 79th session

Session at a Glance

Summary

This interactive dialogue focused on transforming global governance and accelerating the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Participants emphasized the urgent need to reform the international financial architecture to better support developing countries in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Many speakers highlighted the challenges faced by developing nations, including high debt burdens, limited access to affordable financing, and the impacts of climate change.

Key themes included calls for increased representation of developing countries in global financial institutions, debt relief initiatives, and more equitable access to concessional financing. Speakers stressed the importance of mobilizing additional resources for development, including through innovative financing mechanisms and fulfilling official development assistance commitments. The need to address climate change and support a just transition to sustainable economies was also emphasized.

Representatives from international financial institutions outlined ongoing reform efforts, including initiatives to increase lending capacity and improve support for vulnerable countries. Civil society speakers called for greater inclusion of local communities and marginalized groups in development processes and financing decisions. Many participants highlighted the interconnected nature of global challenges and the need for collaborative, multilateral solutions.

The discussion underscored the critical importance of reforming global governance structures to create a more equitable and sustainable world. While acknowledging progress in some areas, speakers emphasized that much more ambitious action is needed to achieve the SDGs by 2030 and address the pressing challenges facing humanity and the planet.

Keypoints

Major discussion points:

– Reforming the international financial architecture to better support developing countries

– Increasing representation of developing countries in global financial institutions

– Addressing debt burdens and improving access to financing for developing countries

– Strengthening multilateralism and global cooperation to achieve the SDGs

– Leveraging technology and innovation to accelerate sustainable development

Overall purpose/goal:

The purpose of this dialogue was to discuss ways to transform global governance structures and accelerate implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Participants aimed to identify reforms and actions needed to create a more equitable global financial system that can better support developing countries in achieving the SDGs.

Tone:

The overall tone was one of urgency and calls for action, with many speakers emphasizing the need for immediate reforms to the global financial architecture. There was a sense of frustration from developing countries about current inequities, balanced with cautious optimism about potential reforms. The tone became more collaborative and solution-oriented as the discussion progressed, with various stakeholders offering ideas and commitments for change.

Speakers

Moderators/Facilitators:

– Chair (unnamed, likely a UN official moderating the session)

Speakers:

– Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Director General of the World Trade Organization

– Ajay Banga, President of the World Bank

– Kristalina Georgieva, Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund

– William Samoei Ruto, President of Kenya

– Robinah Nabbanja, Prime Minister of Uganda (speaking for G77 and China)

– Luc Frieden, Prime Minister of Luxembourg

– Nangolo Mbumba, President of Namibia

– Panapasi Nelesoni, Deputy Prime Minister of Tuvalu

– Minister of Foreign Affairs of Cuba

– Minister for Foreign Affairs of Liberia

– Lazarus McCarthy Chakwera, President of Malawi

– Minister of Heritage, State Portfolio and Public Enterprises of Côte d’Ivoire

– Minister of Foreign Affairs of Malaysia

– Minister of Finance, National Planning and Trade of Seychelles

– Minister of National Planning and Development Coordination of Solomon Islands

– Minister for Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of Zambia

– Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of Mali

– Minister of Foreign and CARICOM Affairs of Trinidad and Tobago

– Minister of Foreign Affairs, Migration and Tunisians Abroad of Tunisia

– Minister of Finance and Developmental Planning of Lesotho

– Minister for Foreign Affairs of Georgia

– State Minister for Environment and Sustainable Development of Democratic Republic of Congo

– Minister for Foreign Affairs, Immigration and Egyptian Expatriates of Egypt

– Commissioner for International Partnership of the European Union

– Minister of Pre-University Education and Literacy of Guinea

– Undersecretary of State of Poland (speaking for Group of Friends of UN Habitat)

– Lord Collins of Highbury of the United Kingdom

– President of the National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico

– Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka

– Permanent Representative of Morocco

– Permanent Representative of Pakistan

– Representatives from various UN agencies, international organizations, and civil society groups

In total, there were over 40 speakers representing a wide range of countries, international organizations, and civil society groups. Their areas of expertise covered topics like international trade, finance, development, foreign affairs, education, statistics, and various aspects of sustainable development.

Full session report

Expanded Summary of Interactive Dialogue on Transforming Global Governance and Accelerating SDG Implementation

Introduction

This interactive dialogue, part of the Summit of the Future, brought together over 40 speakers representing a wide range of countries, international organizations, and civil society groups to discuss transforming global governance and accelerating the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The discussion focused on urgent reforms needed in the international financial architecture to better support developing countries in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Key Themes and Discussion Points

1. The Pact for the Future

Several speakers highlighted the importance of the Pact for the Future, which was adopted on the day of the dialogue. This pact commits to transforming global governance and accelerating SDG implementation. As stated by Csaba Kőrösi, President of the UN General Assembly, “The Pact for the Future will be our roadmap to transform the global financial architecture and accelerate SDG implementation.”

2. Reforming the International Financial Architecture

There was broad consensus on the need to reform global financial institutions to create a more equitable and inclusive system. Speakers from developing countries called for increased representation and voting power in international financial institutions (IFIs) and multilateral development banks (MDBs).

Specific proposals included:

– Restructuring sovereign debt and providing debt relief (Kenya)

– Improving access to concessional financing for developing countries (Solomon Islands)

– Reforming credit rating systems that disadvantage developing countries (Zambia)

– Establishing a UN framework for international tax cooperation (Pakistan)

– Reallocating Special Drawing Rights to developing countries (Egypt)

The President of Kenya, William Samoei Ruto, emphasized, “The current global financial architecture is dysfunctional and unfair to developing countries. We need a system that reflects the realities of today’s world.”

3. Addressing Climate Change and Sustainable Development

Climate change emerged as a critical concern, with many speakers highlighting the disproportionate impact on developing countries and the need for increased support. Ajay Banga, President of the World Bank, stated, “The World Bank is committed to deploying 45% of its funds towards climate by 2025, half for mitigation and half for adaptation.”

Other key points included:

– Increasing climate financing, especially for adaptation

– Reforming harmful subsidies to free up funds for SDGs (World Trade Organization)

– Developing a global carbon pricing approach (WTO)

– Investing in clean energy and green infrastructure (European Union)

– Supporting a just transition to a green economy (UN Women)

4. Enhancing Representation of Developing Countries

A recurring theme was the need to increase the voice and influence of developing countries in global governance structures. Proposals included:

– Reforming the UN Security Council to include more developing countries (Kenya)

– Increasing the voice of developing countries in IFIs and MDBs (Uganda)

– Ensuring equitable representation in global tax governance (UN Economic Commission for Africa)

5. Mobilising Finance for Development

Speakers emphasized the urgent need to bridge the SDG financing gap and mobilize additional resources for development. Kristalina Georgieva, Managing Director of the IMF, warned of the risk of falling into a “low-growth, high-debt trap”, particularly for low-income countries.

Different priorities in this area included:

– Fulfilling official development assistance (ODA) commitments (Kenya)

– Leveraging private finance for SDGs (Luxembourg)

– Developing innovative financing mechanisms (Trinidad and Tobago)

– Improving domestic resource mobilization (Zambia)

6. Harnessing Technology and Innovation

Several speakers highlighted the potential of technology and innovation to accelerate sustainable development, while also emphasizing the need to address digital divides. Kenya called for closing the digital divide and transferring new technologies to developing countries, while Malawi emphasized developing policy frameworks for emerging technologies like AI.

7. Country-Specific Concerns and Proposals

Individual countries raised specific concerns and proposals:

– Seychelles called for integrating country-specific risk into development financing and implementing the Multidimensional Vulnerability Index.

– Solomon Islands emphasized the need for improved access to concessional financing for small island developing states.

– Zambia stressed the importance of reforming credit rating systems that disadvantage developing countries.

8. Perspectives from International Organizations

Representatives from major international organizations provided key insights:

– Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, WTO Director-General, emphasized the role of trade in poverty reduction and called for more inclusive trade practices.

– Ajay Banga, World Bank President, outlined specific goals including bringing electricity to 300 million Africans by 2030.

– Kristalina Georgieva, IMF Managing Director, highlighted the risks of a low-growth, high-debt trap for developing countries.

9. Civil Society Perspectives

Civil society representatives emphasized the importance of inclusive governance and grassroots participation in development processes. The Global Network of Civil Society Organizations for Disaster Reduction stressed the need for strengthening resilience against climate impacts at the community level.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Rebecca Grynspan, Secretary-General of UNCTAD, provided closing remarks that summarized many of the key points raised during the dialogue. She emphasized the urgent need for reform in the global financial architecture, increased climate financing, and more inclusive governance structures to achieve the SDGs.

Key action items identified include:

– Implementing the Pact for the Future to guide reforms and accelerate SDG implementation

– Convening the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in 2025

– Establishing a UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation

– Reforming multilateral development banks to increase lending capacity

– Developing a global approach to carbon pricing and taxation

The dialogue laid the groundwork for further negotiations and collaborations to address these complex global challenges and transform the international system to better support sustainable development for all.

Session Transcript

Chair: Head of State and Government, Excellencies, Distinguished Delegates, Distinguished Participants, I call to order Interactive Dialogue 1 of the Summit of the Future, our Common Agenda. I am delighted and honoured to share this interactive dialogue and I warmly welcome all of you participating in the dialogue this morning. In accordance with the concept note circulated through the website of the President of the General Assembly and the E-Delegate platform on 14 August, this interactive dialogue will focus on the theme, Transforming Global Governance and Turbocharging the Implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The dialogue brings together Member States and other relevant stakeholders to discuss the theme in keeping with the terms of Assembly Resolution 76-307 on the Modalities for the Summit of the Future and Decision 77-568 on the Scope of the Summit. I am pleased to welcome three special invitees present on the podium. Ms. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Director General of the World Trade. Organization, Mr. Ajay Banga, President of the World Bank, and Ms. Kristina Georgieva, Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund. I thank them for their availability to join us today. Excellencies, distinguished delegates and participants, allow me to this point to make a few national remarks on the theme of this dialogue. Honorable Ministers, Excellencies, distinguished delegates, I feel honored to share this highly relevant interactive dialogue session. We all are aware that we are meeting at a critical juncture in history. Despite much wealth having been created, poverty, hunger, and inequalities are on the rise. It is certainly disheartening that only 17 percent of the SDG targets are on track, which are deemed achievable in 2015. The global financial system designed decades ago fails to address contemporary issues such as poverty, climate change, and inequality. International support measures are stagnant or dwindling. Delegates, we gather here to seize a once-in-a-generation opportunity to enhance cooperation through multilateralism, putting the United Nations at the centre. In this regard, allow me to put forward my following thoughts. First, we must bridge the huge financing gap for development. LDCs face an annual spending gap of 40% of GDP to achieve the SDGs. I call upon all development partners to fulfil their ODA commitment. Second, it is imperative to reform the governance structures of IFIs to ensure they are more inclusive, transparent and accountable. Developing countries should have a stronger voice and representation in the decision-making process. Third, comprehensive debt relief initiatives, tailored to the unique circumstances of developing countries, including least-developed countries, should be implemented. Fourth, closing the digital divide is urgent in recovering progress in SDGs. New technologies should be transferred to the developing world to enable them. Fifth, to tackle climate change, adequate and predictable climate financing should be made available, particularly to poor countries. vulnerable countries and communities. In conclusion, effective implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development is critical to building a peaceful, prosperous and sustainable world for all, leaving no one behind. Let’s work closely together for the well-being of people and the planet. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, before I open the floor, I would like to inform all speakers that the time limit for statements is three minutes. Due to the limited time available, this will be strictly implemented through the use of automatic microphone cut-off when the speaker’s allotted time elapses. The red light on the speaker’s microphone will start to blink 30 seconds before the end of their allotted speaking time of three minutes, when their microphone will be automatically shut down. I thank all speakers in advance for their cooperation. To ensure time management, delegations with long statements are advised to deliver summarized versions of their statements and to submit the full text to establishments at un.org. To be posted in the Statements section of the UN Journal, as part of the record of our proceedings. Statements by special invitees now. I now have the pleasure to invite our distinguished special invitees to make some sense-setting remarks before we proceed to the list of speakers for this dialogue. I kindly remind them of the time limit of three minutes per statement. I first give the floor to Ms. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Director General of the World Trade Organization.

Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala: Thank you, Ms., thank you, Chair, Excellencies, ladies, and gentlemen. Whether in our lifetimes with the 2030 Agenda or in our grandchildren’s lifetimes, we cannot build the future we want without trade. That is why we call on all nations to eschew protectionism and unilateral measures that may have negative spillover effects on others, and to support the rules-based multilateral trading system with the WTO at its core. Eradicating poverty and ensuring food security, delivering the low-carbon transition, and all the challenges the world faces cannot be achieved without open global trade in goods and services. We welcome the draft pact for the future’s recognition that the multilateral trading system and the WTO have been and must continue to be engines for sustainable development. Without the boost to economic growth from deeper global trade ties over the past 30 years, the world could not have lifted 1.5 billion people out of extreme poverty. To lift the 700 million people who still subsist on less than $2.15 a day, we will need more trade, not less trade, but we need better trade, trade that includes more people, especially those left behind. We need to reimagine. globalization to bring in developing countries and poor communities in rich countries who have been left on the margins of global economic integration. At the WTO, we call this re-globalization. But I want you to know that despite the challenges to the multilateral trading system, trade has been resilient, and much of the WTO is still working well. Our core rules continue to underpin over 75% of global goods trade. The WTO is one of the few organizations in the world where all our members, big, small, developed, and developing, have an equal voice and an equal veto. This feature might make decision-making slow and frustrating, but it is also something to be proud of. In our world of complex and changing global governance, all have an equal voice at the WTO. But like the rest of the international economic architecture, we need to reform to meet today’s 21st century challenges. I will never cease pointing out that a critical reform that can release billions of dollars in financing for the sustainable development goals involves reforming trade-distorting, inequitable, and environmentally damaging subsidies. At the WTO, we can help in this regard. Our 2022 agreement on carbon-harmful fishery subsidies shows the way. It will release 22 billion once it becomes effective in public resources that were damaging our oceans and threatening food and livelihood security. Furthermore, by reforming agricultural subsidies, we can release $630 billion in annual farm subsidies to finance the SDGs. Fossil fuel subsidy reform could unlock up to $1.2 trillion in funds, and $300 billion in environmentally damaging water subsidies can also be reformed. We could also generate additional financing for the SDGs by developing and deploying a global approach to carbon pricing and taxation that channels resources to those who need it most. for a just transition. My colleagues on the table, the IMF, the World Bank, UNFCCC, UNCTAD, and OECD, we are all working together on such an approach. We are also reforming our dispute settlement system, and we are laying foundations for the exciting new opportunities in trade in digital, in green trade, and we are looking for the ballot to deliver a predictable, stable, and open rules-based trading system. Please join us to do this. Thank you.

Chair: Thank you very much, Director General of the World Trade Organization. I now give the floor to Mr. Ajay Banga, President of the World Bank. Please.

Ajay Banga: Thank you, Chair. A year ago, we wrote a new playbook, one that is fit for purpose, aimed at confronting today’s intertwined challenges while preparing for the uncertainties of tomorrow. Informed by the G20 expert group, we are advancing a set of reforms at the fastest pace we can. We expanded our mission and vision, create a world free of poverty and a livable planet, shortened our project approval process. By three months, we are going to work on this further. Integrated operations across all parts of the bank, IBRD, IFC, IDA, Amiga, and 20 pilot countries to simplify how we serve clients, stretched our existing balance sheet, leading to $120 billion of additional lending over the next 10 years, widened and deepened partnerships with other MDBs and other multilateral institutions. Overall, our knowledge bank structure, we are focusing on creating bankable projects and implementing them, providing capacity to client governments when needed. And we’ve worked to rebuild a focused corporate scorecard, 150 items down to 22, driving the institution towards impact. As a direct result of these, we are on a path to deliver greater scale and greater impact. Let me give you a few examples. Working with partners to bring electricity to 300 million Africans by 2030. Committed to deploy 45% of our funds. towards climate by 2025, half for mitigation, half for adaptation. Climate resilient debt pause clauses. And we set a target to provide quality, affordable healthcare to 1.5 billion people by 2030. So this is exciting for us, but we are very clear eyed about the scale of our challenges. First, there is the funding gap that the chair spoke to. Meanwhile, 1.2 billion young people in emerging markets will become working age adults over the next 10 to 12 years. Forecasts are that 420 million jobs await them, leaving nearly 800 million people without a clear path to prosperity and dignity. Forecasts are not destiny. And closing the financing and jobs gap will be helped by a significant replenishment of the International Development Association and its ability to multiply every donor dollar up to four times. But even with a bigger, better, more effective World Bank, even with all development institutions and philanthropy pushing together, we’re gonna need the private sector, we’re gonna need a specific focus on jobs, and we will need creative solutions for debt and liquidity challenges. So what are we trying to do? To ease the debt burden for four countries in the common framework, we’ve committed close to $16 billion from IDA of about half of which was pure grants, the rest concessional. Same period, same countries, net positive flows from the bank over 9 billion. For small businesses, 90% of all firms, 70% of employment, we’re exploring solutions to help banks lend against cash flow instead of relying on assets. This could usher in genuine growth if successful at scale. We’re pursuing a comprehensive work plan to aid private sector investing in emerging markets helped by a private sector investment lab and our work to become faster and simpler and the publication of our proprietary default and recovery data that is very useful to investors. And just last month, we announced a dedicated initiative aimed at generating jobs led by President Tharman of Singapore. Singapore, and President Michel Bachelet of Chile. The progress we aspire to achieve and will focus on this whole week demands more from us all. It requires that we do not succumb to the tyranny of small things. Most importantly, it requires this constellation of willing partners to work together as collaborators. That is what urgency and the moment demands from all of us. Thank you.

Chair: I would like to thank the President of the World Bank. We will now hear from Ms. Giorgieva, Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund.

Kristalina Georgieva: Thank you, Chair. A very good morning to all. When we strive to look into the future, it is important to first recognize where we are today. On the positive side, the world economy has proven to be remarkably resilient to the multiple shocks of the last years. Inflation generated by these shocks and by the response to them is finally receding, and we are avoiding the recession we feared may come. But prospects for growth are at their lowest levels in decades, and low growth means fewer jobs, lower incomes. We expect global growth of around 3% over the next five years. This is almost a percentage point less than in the decades before COVID. And this is most dramatic for low-income countries. Low-income countries are still 7.5%. sent below their growth trajectory before COVID. With elevated debt pressures in many countries, the world is at risk of falling into a low-growth, high-debt trap. The political economy environment is also becoming very complex. In many countries, inequality is up. The result is feelings of unfairness are eroding trust and striking social unrest. And as we heard from Ngozi, global fragmentation is rising. Yet, so what is in the future? We do stand at the cusp of a remarkable transformation fueled by technological change and the green innovation. We can harness higher green growth and jobs if we all concentrate on reshaping our economies. And artificial intelligence, if we deploy it properly, can add up to 0.8% to global growth. In other words, address the problem of slow growth I started from. And it is, as we heard from the chair, this decade, what we do in this decade would be absolutely critical. What do we see at the Fund? Three main objectives. Keep what works well, and it is strong policies, strong institutions. Second, remove the barriers to growth, domestically and internationally. And third, resist excessive protectionism so together we can do better. For us at the Fund, this translates in four priorities. First, work with our members on macro policies and sound performance. Second, leverage our financial strength to direct more to low-income countries, more to countries in need. And I am pleased to say that we lend 370. billion over the last years, and we are generating more funding for low-income countries through the Poverty Reduction and Growth Trust and the Sustainable and Resilience and Sustainability Trust. Three, it is important for us to help countries address the debt conundrum. We work with the bank. We created a new Global Sovereign Debt Roundtable to reshape how we address debt, and we changed our policies to be faster in our action. Last but not least, be more representative. We have created a new chair on our Board of Directors for Sub-Saharan Africa, so African members are more visible at the IMF, and we are working hard with our membership towards a new formula for quota distribution, so next year we can take on that journey effectively. I want to finish with the following. I am a very happy Managing Director today. Why? Because a small country, Liechtenstein, had a referendum on whether they should join the IMF, and they said, yes, so now we have grown to 191 members as a result, and it says the following, together we are stronger. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Chair: I thank the Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund. Thank you. Now, Excellencies, Distinguished Delegates, I now open the floor for statements by delegations inscribed on the list of speakers for this dialogue, and I kindly remind all speakers once again of the time limit of three minutes for all statements. This will be strictly implemented through the use of automatic microphone cut-off. In accordance with Resolution No. 72 of Article 313, the whole protocol observed principle is recommended, whereby participants are encouraged to refrain from the listing of standard protocol expressions during their statements. I give the floor to His Excellency William Samoei Ruto, President of the Republic of Kenya. Excellency.

Kenya: The global economy is facing multiple shocks that threaten to undo the progress made towards the Sustainable Development Goals. While no country is immune, many, where most humanity live, are more vulnerable than others. The gravity of the situation has been unlighted by the 2024 Inter-Agency Task Force on Financing Development, which has sounded the alarm bell on a looming sustainable development crisis driven by financing challenges that jeopardize both the SDGs and climate action. In the circumstances, the upcoming Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development may be our last opportunity to make the radical changes needed to realize and realign our development priorities to meet the SDGs by 2030. We must urgently close financing gaps, bridge international divides, and restore trust in multilateralism. However, the current multilateral system is clearly struggling to address these immense complex and dynamic challenges effectively. As a member of the SDG Stimulus Programme, I am committed to working with the SDGs to leaders group, which coordinates the mobilization of financial resources needed to accelerate global progress towards 2030 agenda. And as we do our best to achieve this goal, we also must recognize that the prevailing multilateral institutional architecture is dysfunctional, or at least highly ineffective, and cannot be relied upon to provide the solutions for the world that we all urgently need. This is why countries are increasingly turning to innovative, homegrown approaches to solve their most pressing problems. To achieve the SDGs, we must address the structural and financial issues hampering multilateral institutions, particularly their negative impact on developing countries. These challenges include limited fiscal ability, rising debt, unfair credit rating frameworks, and uneven interest rate regime. In the face of deteriorating global economic conditions, worsened by relentless climate crisis, these weaknesses limit the opportunities, especially in low-income countries. Today, one in three developing countries is at risk of defaulting on their debt obligations. The role of unfair and unjust global financial system is compounding economic crisis and deepening inequalities. Development financing is not keeping pace with the economic realities and urgent needs of developing world. Consequently, the gap between developing world and developing nations continue to grow, creating a form of development appetite. The Addis Ababa action agenda designed to address these challenges has lost momentum, with only 15% SDGs on track. Thank you. Thank you.

Chair: Thank you, Excellency President. I would like to thank you very much, the President of the Republic of Kenya. And now, I would like to hand over the floor to Her Excellency Robinah Nabbanja, Prime Minister of the Republic of Uganda.

Uganda: Thank you so much. Your Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, I have the honor to deliver this statement on behalf of the Group of 77 and China. The Group highly appreciates the tremendous effort that has been made by the Republic of Namibia and the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Zambia, the Kingdom of Sweden, as well as the Kingdom of Netherlands and the Republic of Jamaica, who for over the last 18 months have carefully co-facilitated the intergovernmental negotiation process of the Summit of the Future, the Global Digital Compact, the Declaration of the Future Generations, respectively, leading to the formulation of the Pact for the Future and its two annexes. The world today has changed dramatically since the adoption of the 23rd Agenda for Sustainable Development, and progress at halfway point of the agenda is increasingly fragile. The gap between developed and developing countries has widened with little recourse for developing countries due to structural asymmetries in global governance. We, the Group of 77 and China, therefore, call for action to strengthen and reinvigorate multilateralism, and deepen international cooperation. We call for a multilateral system with the United Nations at its center, reflecting the realities of today’s world by ensuring the voice and representation of developing countries in the global decision making. We emphasize that the UN remains the most inclusive and legitimate forum for advancing the Sustainable Development Goals. We call for strengthening the leadership role of the United Nations in the global economic governance and the reform of the international financial architecture. We welcome the initiative to convene a biannual summit at the level of heads of state and government to strengthen existing links and coordination between the United Nations and the international financial institutions. We call for undertaking governance reforms at the international financial institutions and multilateral development banks, and we underscore the need for enhancing representation and a voice of developing countries in decision making in the international financial architecture, especially the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank to deliver more effective, credible, accountable, and legitimate institutions. In addition to changes to quotas and voting power, we welcome other steps taken to improve the voice and representation of developing countries.

Chair: Thank you very much, Madam Prime Minister of the Republic of Uganda, who was speaking on behalf of the Group of 77 in China. Thank you very much. Thank you. Now, I would like to give the floor to His Excellency, Luc Frieden. Minister of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.

Luxembourg: Thank you, Chair. Luxembourg is fully committed to the implementation of the Pact for the Future and I am very satisfied that it has been adopted this morning. The Pact contains a number of actions that, if implemented in good faith, will help us make good on existing commitments and deliver on new commitments to address emerging challenges. Among those commitments is the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development with its 17 Sustainable Development Goals. And today, many of these goals seem far from reach, including those that are so important for humanity and poverty in all its forms, and hunger, achieve gender equality. What do we need to do? I think we need to do better at the national level. We need to transform global governance, including the international financial architecture, to better reflect the changing global economic landscapes and the geopolitical realities of our century. My country, Luxembourg, is committed to doing what it takes. We are one of the handful of UN Member States surpassing the goal of dedicating 0.7% of gross national income to official development assistance. Today, we are at 1%. And a significant part of it goes to least developed countries and former such countries, who continue to face particular vulnerabilities, like Cabo Verde, for example. Beyond ODA, it is crucial that we support our developing partners in improving governance and attracting investments. We also deliver on our commitments on climate finance, which in our case is additional to our ODA, and it should be. be for other Member States as well. We support the efforts of the World Bank, the IMF, and multilateral development banks, including the European Investment Bank, to increase the resources available for financing both development and climate action. The Luxembourg Stock Exchange, for instance, is a world leader in the listing of green bonds. We help leverage private finance for the SGGs and it is crucial to have this public-private partnership to achieve our goals. The reform of the international financial architecture is an important step towards strengthening the global economic governance, and Luxembourg welcomes the efforts underway at the IMF and the World Bank. They deserve all our support. Thank you.

Chair: Thank you, Prime Minister of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. Now, I give the floor to His Excellency Nangolo Mbumba, President of the Republic of Namibia.

Namibia: Thank you. At this pivotal moment in history, we stand united with unwavering commitment to our shared future. To respond effectively to our challenges, institutions of global governance must prioritise the voice of all nations, regardless of size or economic standing. This includes reforming the United Nations, international financial institutions and multilateral bodies. To turbocharge the global goals, we must act with agency, in several areas. One, eradicating poverty and inequality. Two, we must be able to create decent jobs for our people. Three, we must provide good education to our people in order to provide them also with health facilities. Four, we must act to combat climate change because this is the thing that is creating problem for all of us. We have drought, we have floods, we have all kind of problems because of that. We must transit to renewable energy. We must protect our ecosystem and implement the Paris Agreement in full. We must empower our youth and women. The empowerment of women and youth is central to the achievement of the SDGs. We must dismantle systemic barriers to their full participation in society, creating environments where they can thrive and lead. We must embrace positive aspect of technology and innovation. Namibia support the commitment to address global shocks through innovative proposal for enhanced international response. The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the need for the United Nations to be equipped with a robust mechanism, ensuring we are always prepared for future challenges. Lastly, we must act now. The stakes are too high, and the cost of inaction is far too great. Let us rise to this historic challenge, transform global governance, and accelerate our progress toward sustainable development goals. Together, we can build a future that is equitable, sustainable, and filled with hope.

Chair: Thank you, President of the Republic of Namibia. Now I give the floor to His Excellency Panapasi Nelesoni , Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance and Economic Development of Tuvalu.

Tuvalu: The adoption of the 2030 Agenda signalled the start of a new era of multilateralism. It was, and could still be, our plan of action to eradicate poverty, protect the planet, and ensure peace and prosperity. With five years remaining to meet the 2030 Agenda, we must re-evaluate where we stand on the pledge that no one will be left behind. As we face more frequent and more extreme climate disasters each year, Tuvalu faces the reality that we will either drown in debt or be drowned by the sea. At this time, my country is concerned that without urgent action and commitment from the multilateral system, vulnerable countries like mine will not only be left behind, but abandoned. The ocean is vital for regulating the Earth’s climate, supporting states’ economies and maintaining biodiversity. SDG 14 recognises the need for ocean protection and creating opportunities for sustainable economic activity. Despite this, we are concerned that SDG 14 remains unfunded, and four out of eight targets have lapsed. The Pacific has long established our role as stewards of the ocean and its resources, but despite our best efforts, ocean health continues to decline in the face of acidification, pollution, ANOVA exploitation, and IUU fishing. We need international cooperation to establish global governance frameworks that generate meaningful ocean protection. The recently concluded BBNJ Treaty is an important example of what we can achieve when we work together and to work on all member states to commit to ambitious and effective obligations in the ongoing negotiations for a legally binding instrument to address plastic pollution, including in the maritime and marine environment. Excellencies, each year Tuvalu faces cyclones, droughts, and king tides, which increase in frequency and intensity. Each disaster forces us into debt for disaster relief, and with few natural resources to generate GDP, we must choose loan servicing over development activities, locking us into the disaster debt under investment cycle. Development partners continue to double count official development assistance, ODA, as climate finance, and continue to prioritize adaptation over mitigation, despite the clear calls from SIDS that both must go hand in hand. Despite our calls for reform, the global financial architecture continues to press through lending practices of multilateral development banks and partners which contain restrictive procurement conditions.

Chair: I give the floor to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Cuba.

Cuba: Excellencies, Fulfillment of the 2030 Agenda and the supreme goal of the eradication of poverty cannot be achieved unless we honestly address the structural and moral failings of the current international order. A truly transformative agenda towards this must clearly indicate the guidelines for reform of the international financial architecture in terms of governance, representation and access to financing by developing countries. Making progress towards a multilateral mechanism for the renegotiation of sovereign debt with fair treatment that is focused on development. Guaranteeing swift and considerable recapitalization of the multilateral development banks in order to improve the loan conditions. Making progress in establishing measures and indicators beyond GDP in order to define access for developing countries to financing under favorable conditions. Rejecting the implementation of unilateral coercive measures that are incompatible with international law. Cuba has suffered the effects of this. After 70 years of a blockade and most recently following its inclusion in the spurious and unilateral list of supposedly terror-sponsoring states. This is defined unilaterally by the government of the United States. This agenda must drive cooperation in the area of science, technology and innovation. The aim must be to move towards a development model that is more sustainable and equitable. The summit of G77 in China in Havana in 2023 made significant contributions to this. India must also ensure reform of international value chains that will allow developing countries to industrialize their products. And I am pleased to leave you with the remaining 11 seconds. Thank you.

Chair: Thank you Minister for Foreign Affairs of Cuba. Now I give the floor to Minister for Foreign Affairs of Liberia.

Liberia: Excellencies, I appreciate the opportunity to speak today and we start out firstly by saying transformation is an imperative. But if we do not agree on what transformation means for each country, we can never move towards it equitably. Liberia believes that at the heart of this transformation lies a re-energized commitment to the Sustainable Development Goals. We believe that a shared roadmap for a future where prosperity, equality and environmental sustainability are achieved for all, that will be the transformation that we desire. Reforms are needed. Reforms that look at the overall UN system, global governance and global institutions. The Security Council, a council that should have two permanent seats for Africa, a council that should have more that will change than remain the same. We believe that we need a reflection on the historical circumstances that gave birth to the Bretton Woods institutions, asking why poverty has plummeted using their framework of operation. We need to reform the approach to defence. Military spending continues to increase at the expense of… education, health, justice, peace, and human dignity. If we spend more on those areas, we will have to spend less on the military. We need to reform our universal mindset. We need to work together as one globe, working together with equity, with fairness, with justice. Liberia is bidding for a non-permanent seat at the Security Council, representing the continent of Africa. We’re going to that with the view that the reforms of the UN Security Council are necessary, and they are necessary now. And we believe that for there to be a better world with less crises, the Security Council must be a council that remains relevant, fair, and objective in its operations. We believe that a more representative and effective Security Council will enhance global peace and security, which is a foundation for sustainable peace and sustainable development. Excellences, we call for a renewed focus on public-private partnerships that can drive innovation and progress. This includes empowering young people, giving our children the opportunity to dream and to drive towards development from their perspective of what the future looks like for them. We need to support women-led businesses and create inclusive economic opportunities that leave no one behind. Climate change, climate justice, in the midst of climate change is what we call for. We believe that climate justice will do justice for those who have caused the crisis and those who are bearing the brunt. We recognize that the 2030 Agenda is still at hand. There’s an opportunity, but without reforming Bretton Woods institutions and reforming global governance, it will not be a reality for all. Everyone needs a fighting chance at the Sustainable Development Goals, and the reforms are the only way. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

Chair: Thank you. Thank you, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Liberia. Now. I give the floor to Senior Minister of Planning and Development of Benin.

Benin: Merci beaucoup. Thank you very much. Excellencies, distinguished delegates, ladies and gentlemen, Benin has many reasons to congratulate themselves in terms of implementing the SDGs. We have put forward economic measures, significant ones, and therefore my country has started a structural transformation of our economy. And also, social work has enabled us to reduce poverty by more than four points. Ladies and gentlemen, these results could have been better if the global governance system had not imposed limitations, crises having to do with health, finance, security, reduces the margin of maneuver in our world today. We came out of it more or less all right, but not all countries had the same opportunity. Many situations worsened. We realize now that less than 20 percent of SDGs will be attained, and that means that we need to pay special attention to that. This morning, we adopted the pact. We now need to work thereupon for Benin. The response here is to the multilateral approach. This is to lead us to commit all of us to preserving global goods, in particular climate, economic stability, and international security. Especially we need to be paying attention to a sustainable development system. If we want to have a sustainably developed world, we need to have a global governance system which goes beyond the current paradigms and places humankind at the core of its concerns. Global governance which recognizes that every life is precious, that every culture is of great value, that each nation… and small or large has a role to play. The paradox today is that we live during the time when technological advancements and the wealth are great. And my country, as many others, are forward-looking. We have very clear expectations of the future when it comes to the renewal of the global system, for example. We want to make sure that it’s based on the values of solidarity, on financing for development. For us, solidarity is not just a philosophic ideal, but a vital need. And it’s not to be limited by the immediate interest or opportunities, but it is to be a sincere commitment for the well-being of every individual in every country. I thank you.

Chair: Thank you. Thank you, Senior Minister of Planning and Development of Benin. Now I give the floor to His Excellency Lazarus McCarthy Chakwera ,President of the Republic of Malawi.

Malawi: Thank you very much, Excellencies, heads of state and government, and leaders of delegations. Ladies and gentlemen, between the dawn and the dusk of human history, each generation has a unique assignment to contribute to the progress of the human race and its stewardship of the Earth, and our generation’s assignment to that journey is the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals, SDGs, to create decent living conditions and equal opportunities for every person alive. This is an assignment we simply cannot afford to fail. However, in order to pass, we must first accept that at this midterm point in this semester, we are in fact failing and it is time to catch up and catching up means speeding up. But developing countries like Malawi and other LDCs cannot speed up while their hands and legs are being tied by the punitive lending terms of global financial institutions, the exclusionary governance structures of multilateral organizations, the monopolization of access to technologies by developing developed countries, and the international community’s weak mechanism for enforcing commitments on both remedial climate financing from the economies that cause climate change and territorial compliance for those that cause armed conflicts. The truth is that our response to these four shackles leaves a lot to be desired and demands a radical resolve from all of us to supercharge the advancement of SDGs. And toward that end, Malawi strongly advocates for establishing a dedicated global green fund to exclusively finance clean energy projects in developing nations, doing so by offering concessional loans, grants, and guarantees to mitigate the financial risks associated with green energy investments effectively. Secondly, Malawi advocates for the incorporation of peace and security assessments into the lending criteria of international financial institutions, thus ensuring that those that wage wars on other nations or refuse to silence their guns are not rewarded with funding at the expense of those that live in peace. Thirdly, Malawi strongly advocates for digital inclusion through digital skills training and digital infrastructure development as well as the development of a global policy and regulatory framework for the safe utilization of emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence.

Chair: I thank the President of the Republic of Malawi. And now I give the floor to the Minister of Heritage, Estate, Portfolio and Public Enterprises of Côte d’Ivoire.

Côte d’Ivoire: Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we hail the United Nations for everything they have made available to us and the warm welcome and encouraging states to achieve the SDGs. In order to do this, the government of Côte d’Ivoire has adapted these two realities in the country with a plan for full implementation. We have three key axes for this implementation. Firstly, the important and favorable changes in reduction of poverty, access to health, reducing inequalities, access to drinking water, sanitation and access to sustainable solutions. The fight against inequality and the fight against climate change and access to marine resources are also important. I’ll also mention strengthening of our efforts in order to ensure equal access, the empowerment of women and girls and full productive employment and the creation of decent jobs for all. We can see that the level of poverty has been cut by half between 2011 and 2021. The rate of primary schooling has also almost doubled between 2014 and 2020, and access to drinking water has increased by 25 percentage points between 2011 and 2023, and the level of access to electricity has also increased significantly, achieving 86% in the country. Between 30 to 60 percent of the SDG targets have been met, and so we need considerable further efforts to achieve the remaining ones. For the last category of these, we have significant structures in place, but we would welcome further support. We have initiated social programs to improve living conditions in households in the area of health, education, drinking water, and access to electricity, and also to support young people and women in order to improve access to employment. This is the situation in Côte d’Ivoire, ladies and gentlemen, in terms of implementation of the SDGs, and we need further support for solidarity and multilateral mechanisms in order to facilitate achievement of the SDGs for the most vulnerable countries. I thank you.

Chair: Thank you, Minister for Heritage, State Portfolio and Public Enterprises of Côte d’Ivoire. Now I give the floor to Minister of Foreign Affairs of Malaysia.

Malaysia: Mr. Chairman, Excellencies, Distinguished Delegates, The multifaceted challenges that we face today, from climate change and economic inequality to geopolitical tensions and humanitarian crisis, requires more than a one-size-fits-all solution. Rising temperatures, extreme weather events, and sea level rise significantly challenge our global resilience. Concurrently, economic inequalities persist, particularly in developing nations that struggle to access affordable finance. The widening gap between developed and developing countries undermines social reforms and obstructs progress towards sustainable development. Geopolitical tensions exacerbate these issues leading to migration, displacement, and further humanitarian challenges. Addressing these interconnected problems demands a coordinated and multidimensional approach fostering comprehensive solutions. At the heart of our response must be the reform of international finance architecture to better support and aspiration of all nations, especially those in the developing world. Excellencies, we must collectively rethink the criteria for assessing international finance, ensuring they reflect the diverse realities of all countries and create pathways for meaningful developments. Malaysia calls for financial systems that prioritises inclusivity and sustainability, providing enhanced support for regional development banks and the adoption of new financial instruments tailored to the needs of the developing and least developed countries. Enhancing for sustainable development, financing for sustainable development, particularly in critical areas such as climate action, healthcare, and green infrastructure must be prioritised to achieve the 2030 Agenda and Sustainable Development Goals. Transparency and inclusivity in the governance of international financial institutions are essential. Malaysia advocates for broader civil society involvement and capacity building initiatives to strengthen monitoring and evaluation mechanisms, ensuring efficient use of funds, accurate outcome measurements and the application of lessons learned to future projects. Excellencies, Malaysia reaffirms its commitment to multilateralism as the cornerstone of our collective efforts to build a better future. We stand ready to work with all nations to reform the international financial system to ensure that it serves as a catalyst for sustainable, inclusive, and equitable development. Mr President, I thank you.

Chair: Thank you very much, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Malaysia. Now, I give the floor to Minister for Finance, National Planning and Trade of Seychelles.

Seychelles: Ladies and gentlemen, I am honored to speak today on an important matter of addressing the urgent need for transforming global governance and accelerating the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. We are at a critical juncture. Progress on the sustainable development goals is faltering, with many countries particularly the most vulnerable at risk of being left behind. One of the central obstacles is the inequitable and outdated international financial architecture, which exacerbates existing vulnerabilities and perpetuates inequality. The 2024 Sustainable Development Report reminds us that we are currently off track to achieve the sustainable development goals by 2030. Small island developing states in particular face significant disadvantages due to the extreme exposure to external shocks such as climate change, pandemics, and geopolitical tensions. The SEADS4 conference earlier this year highlighted the need to evolve the international financial architecture to fully address the unique development circumstances of SEADS. This includes making concessional finance more accessible to reduce fiscal constraints and the risk of indebtedness. Reforming the current system is crucial to create fiscal space for investment in economic and physical resilience, which can serve as a buffer against any future shocks. In our case, despite being classified as a high-income country, SEADS has a limited scope to mobilize funding and high borrowing costs further restricts our capacity. to raise funds. For 2024, an expected 36% of government’s revenue is being channeled towards debt repayment, which could otherwise be invested in critical infrastructure and social progress. This underscores the need for a more effective financial system that supports its development. It is only through accessing, access to affordable and reliable financing that the implementation of the SDGs can be accelerated. Therefore, we continue to advocate for the integration of country-specific risk into developing financing. The Multidimensional Vulnerability Index is a crucial tool in this regard, offering a more accurate measure of a country’s ability to manage external shocks. The reform also requires the adoption of a holistic approach, ensuring that the Antigua and Barbuda Agenda for Seeds is integrated into all support and policy pathways for our islands. All the progress is being made. More innovative mechanisms similar to the Resilience and Sustainability Fund are essential to support climate action and resilient development in seeds. In conclusion, transforming global governance and the international financial system is key to turbocharging the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. We must ensure that all countries, especially those facing the greatest challenges,

Chair: Thank you, Minister of Finance, National Planning and Trade of Seychelles. Now I give the floor to Minister of National Planning and Development Coordination of Solomon Islands.

Solomon Islands: Thank you, Chair, Excellency. The international financial architecture has several vulnerability and inequality that can be undermine financial stability and equitable economic growth, including financial imbalance between countries with large current account and those. like my own country with persistent deficit. Debt vulnerability of developing countries and inadequate integration of climate change into global financial system, this among other factors point to the need to reform the international financial architecture. Debt relief and restructure is pertinent and urgent. Countries need to extend and improve initiative like debt servicing suspension initiative and the common framework for debt treatment to provide more comprehensive debt relief. Bringing forward innovative debt relief solutions such as debt for sustainable development goals show up. Current financial flow insufficient to meet the estimated annual 4 trillion funding gap to achieve sustainable development goals. There is need to strengthen sustainable development goals linked to financial instrument. Global institutions like the World Bank and IFM should be intensive in incentivize sustainable development goals related investment through highly concessional financing and risk mitigation mechanism. The need to enhance the voice and representative of developing countries within the international financial institution and focus more dialogue between the UN agencies and system with the financial institution to enhance financial flow to sustainable development implementation. I thank you Mr. Chair and Excellency. Thank you.

Chair: I thank Minister of National Planning and Development, Coordination of Solomon Islands. I give the floor to the next speaker, Minister for Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of Zambia.

Zambia: Thank you. Thank you very much. Your Excellencies, distinguished delegates, ladies and gentlemen, Zambia is fully committed to our shared vision of a just, equitable, and sustainable world. However, with the slow pace of progress in the attainment of SDGs, reforms to the global financial architecture to make it more responsive to current global challenges, such as endemic poverty, inequality, as well as health and climate crises, this cannot be overemphasized, that it cannot be overemphasized, beg pardon, that there is need to bring equity in the manner in which these crucial aspects of the global financial architecture are dealt with. It is clear that to achieve the ambitions of the 2030 Agenda, we must not only commit ourselves to these noble goals, but also transform the structures that govern our international cooperation, including the global financial architecture. However, the global financial architecture in its present form is laden with structural flaws that impede its capacity to mobilize adequate long-term financing to support the implementation of the SDGs. Developing countries are unable to adequately leverage international financial markets on account of unreasonably high-risk perceptions that invariably factor into the high cost of borrowing. This is further worsened by the fact that the international financial institutions and the multilateral development banks that offer more concessionary financing lack sufficient scale to provide adequate financing to development needs of LDCs. There is therefore need to scale up international mechanisms for de-risking private investment in order to. promote FDI and other capital flows into developing countries. Your excellencies, furthermore, there’s need for enhanced international support in strengthening domestic resource mobilization among developing countries. This could be done through institutional capacity building to enable tax administrations combat illicit financial flows, tax evasion and profit shifting, as well as the speedy implementation of the UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation Initiative. Chairperson, noting that current levels of ODA are inadequate to achieve the SDGs, especially in Africa, we call on developed countries to fulfill their existing commitments of contributing 0.7% of GDP. Thank you.

Chair: I thank Minister for Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of Zambia. Now I give the floor to Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of Mali.

Mali: Merci. Thank you, Chairman. Mali would like to reaffirm its commitment to multilateralism, which is embodied by our organization, the United Nations, but also to the respect of the principles we have in Article 2 of the Charter, namely sovereign equality of all states and non-interference in the domestic affairs of states, and also the non-use of geopolitical considerations when it comes to populations. We have moved on to specific actions. So as truly transform global governance and undertake major reforms, which our people have been asking for a long time, in particular within the Security Council and the multilateral institutions, the United Nations have to stop continuously perpetuating the old order and the hegemony of certain groups over the world, and stop with the remnants of neocolonialism. The world needs collective leadership which can work together so as to forge a consensus which we need so as to tackle the challenges and do this in solidarity and equity. And this is a way we will be promoting the world of peace and justice and leave no one behind. one behind such reforms will help us promote sustainable development in our countries, all the while contributing towards ending crying inequalities in our countries. Now, given the scope of SDGs, we plan that absolute priority be given to creating a robust mechanism for innovative funding. So as to truly implement Agenda 2023, we call for strengthened partnerships between South-South, private-public partnership, or even investment in our countries of funding by diaspora. And especially, we call for growing mobilization of domestic resources. It’s important to accelerate them so as to implement our 2030 Agenda. To conclude, I would like to say that Mali sees that our challenges as something that we can tackle, provided we show courage and imagination. And we can collectively show true will for global governance, which serves all the peoples. I thank you.

Chair: Thank you. Thank you, Minister for Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of Mali. Now, I give the floor to Minister of Foreign Affairs Foreign and Caricom Affairs of Trinidad and Tobago.

Trinidad and Tobago: Excellencies, Trinidad and Tobago is grateful for the opportunity to discuss the imperative transformation of global governance. This is not merely a call to action. It is a pivotal moment in our shared journey toward the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. The challenges we face demand innovative approaches and collaborative solutions that reflect the diverse voices and aspirations of all nations. In an increasingly complex world marked by geopolitical tension, climate emergencies, and socio-economic disparities, we must rethink our governance approaches at both national and international levels. Our vision for sustainable development cannot thrive in isolation. It needs a collaborative framework that transcends borders and fosters trust among nations. The 2030 Agenda calls for bold commitments to eradicate poverty, protect our planet, and promote peace and prosperity for all, but we must acknowledge the gaps that persist. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted existing inequalities disproportionately affecting the most vulnerable. To turbocharge the implementation of the 2030 Agenda, we must prioritize the reforming of global governance structures. We need inclusive platforms that amplify the voices of small island developing states and marginalized nations. Trinidad and Tobago advocates for a governance model that embodies transparency, accountability, and the active participation of all stakeholders, governments, civil society, and the private sector. Furthermore, investment in technology and innovation is crucial. We must leverage digital solutions to enhance data sharing, collaboration, and monitoring of the SDGs. Knowledge exchange should be central to our efforts, ensuring that best practices and lessons learned are accessible to all. Let us recommit to a future where governance is the key. global governance is more equitable and responsive. None must be left behind. The time for action is now. Together we can transform our aspirations into reality, ensuring that we embark on this journey together toward sustainable development.

Chair: Thank you Minister for Foreign and Curriculum Affairs of Trinidad and Tobago. Now I give the floor to Minister of Foreign Affairs, Migration and Tunisians Abroad of Tunisia.

Tunisia: Mr. Chairman, an objective review of the current shape of our organization stresses the need of a deep reform, since it has been unable to shoulder its main responsibility, specifically providing a financial safety net for states in need. Accessing sufficient and long-term financing to help developing countries in their recovery and in achieving sustainable development has been bound by a purely profit logic based on short-term gains, which usually give preference to rich states’ interests. This is specifically what the Secretary General meant when he stressed that the system is morally bankrupt. At a time when developing states go through a severe financial crisis and need liquidity more than ever, after their resources were depleted, by the COVID-19 pandemic, they find themselves compelled to either succumb to the IMF’s conditions, even at the expense of their peace and social stability, or borrow from financial markets at exorbitant interest rates, sometimes double the rates given to developed states, especially in light of the excessive reliance on the ratings of credit rating agencies. These agencies give access to concessional financing based on the ability to pay and not based on the state and its priorities, without any supervision. As a result, to pay their debt, developing countries have to spend more than what they spend on basic services and human development, such as education, health, and social protection. Sometimes they even have to borrow to pay their debt. Hence, the urgent need for structural reforms leading to a just and transparent financial system that takes into account the needs and priorities of developing states based on the principles of global good governance. Mr. Chairman, ladies and gentlemen, the socio-economic conditions caused by this outdated system and its successive crises require new and urgent measures that bring back trust into international institutions based on the pillars of multilateral work.

Chair: Foreign affairs, migration, and Tunisians abroad of Tunisia. Now, I gave the floor to Minister of Finance and Developmental Planning of Lesotho.

Lesotho: Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The summit. the future provides us all with an opportunity to forge a new global consensus. This consensus aims not only to accelerate the achievement of the SDGs, but also to shape the kind of international system that we desire, and that will suit the current and future circumstances benefiting both the current and future generations. The world has significantly advanced in leveraging technology and innovation to enhance the socio-economic landscape. Digital pathways have revolutionized access to information and technology. The rapid and widespread use of technology and artificial intelligence is transforming societies and nations at an unprecedented pace. While these developments are positive, they also highlight the stark disparities in technological levels between the global south and the global north, as well as the digital divide within our countries. Bridging this gap can unlock economies and fully harness the global digital economy. As the Pact for the Future correctly notes, advance in knowledge, science, technology and innovation could deliver a breakthrough to a better and more sustainable future for all. In reviewing the SDG progress, many countries have recognized that financing for development is not only crucial, but also a key determinant to SDG attainment. Global economic shocks from the COVID-19 pandemic, climate change and ongoing geopolitical tensions and conflicts have impacted financing as initially envisioned. A new approach to financing for development is therefore necessary. The upcoming Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Spain in 2025 and the Pact for the Future from the Summit of the Future are positive steps towards a solution in this regard. However, governments must continue to implement strategies to enhance domestic resource mobilization. We acknowledge the potential of the youth as a catalyst for future growth, enhancing youth participation in governance, entrepreneurship, and decision-making is a necessity. By fostering innovation, securing sustainable financing, promoting peace, and empowering youth, we can address global challenges in a better way. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Excellencies.

Georgia: The vision put forth by the UN Secretary-General for this Summit emphasized the importance of forging multilateral solutions that could lead us towards a more promising future. I am honored to participate on behalf of the Delegation of Georgia and this exceptional opportunity at such a critical juncture. It is my sincere hope that this Summit will give an impetus to a renewed effort to implement evolving changes for peace, stability, and sustainable development. Ladies and gentlemen, we are witnessing a number of transformations to reimagine the global financial architecture, enabling it to more effectively tackle the urgent contemporary challenges. These challenges encompass still lingering impacts of the pandemic, persistent conflicts and wars, including Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, escalating socioeconomic inequalities, humanitarian emergencies, food insecurity, and the pressing issue of climate change, all of which impede the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. In this regard, approaches taken by the international financial institutions are extremely crucial. Countries that have struggled, and many that continue to struggle, with high debt-to-GDP ratio need to benefit from the instruments provided by the IFC. These instruments need to be more flexible and adaptable to individual needs. For many countries, including Georgia, fiscal parameters were breached during the pandemic. Debt-to-GDP ratio reached up to 61%, and fiscal deficit 9.3% of GDP. Since then, Georgia has experienced a very strong recovery, resulting in double-digit economic growth expected to range between 7% and 9% in 2023-2024. We are pleased to note that a sustainable and strong public finance management system was achieved as a result of deep and comprehensive reforms supported by IFIS. Looking ahead, we believe that Georgia is poised to sustain its economic growth by developing transformative infrastructure across key sectors, such as transportation, energy, and developing human capital. We trust that IFIS and MDBs will continue to innovate and unlock new financing instruments to further strengthen our partnerships. As we continue our efforts to reverse the key drivers of backsliding on economic and development progress, let me reiterate Georgia’s commitment to renewed impetus and accelerated actions to achieve the SDGs and foster financial stability and economic growth. Together, we have to find tangible ways to trigger transformative actions and deliver on the promises of this Summit. I thank you.

Chair: Thank you, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Georgia. Now, next speaker is State Minister for Environment and Sustainable Development of the Democratic Republic of Congo. I give the floor.

Congo: Merci. Thank you very much, Chairman, for giving me the floor. The Democratic Republic of the Congo welcomes this dialogue and appreciates the concerns that were presented in the form of questions with a view to discussing and ensuring reform of the international financial architecture. At the time of their creation, the World Bank and the IMF, the situation has evolved. since then, and the situation now. At the time of their creation, certain countries were colonies, but today they are sovereign states, and these countries must see their own priorities reflected. This has been recognized by the Secretary General. Our countries cannot develop when we are saddled with debt. We must focus on achievement of goal number 17 in a way that is beneficial to all. Our priorities and our potential must be taken into account. We are poor countries, and we have suffered from climate change, but we also represent the solutions for saving humanity thanks to our forest resources. They absorb the pollution that we are not responsible for. We also have water resources that can produce energy for the world, energy that is clean in order to support the energy transition. We also have biodiversity and strategic minerals that can help the planet move towards this energy transition. In order to make this a reality, the DRC has taken the option not only of using our local resources but transforming them to allow us also within the Congo Basin to have access to this energy transition. Ladies and gentlemen, the reform of international financial architecture is currently a priority. It must allow the countries of the world to develop on an equal footing. And this is why we must leave behind ODA in order to move towards true partnership and cooperation. carbon credits that we are hoping will help to finance our own projects and achieving the SDGs for ourselves. Thank you.

Chair: Thank you, State Minister for Environment and Sustainable Development of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Now I give the floor to Minister for Foreign Affairs, Immigration and Egyptian Expatriates of Egypt.

Egypt: Thank you so much, Chairman. Even before the current cascading crisis, developing countries have been facing enormous challenges in the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. Following the devastating impacts of COVID-19, the repercussions of geopolitical tension and the adverse effects of climate change, the current global context could not be more pressing. Current crises have rolled back many years of the hard-won progress in developing countries. An urgent reform of the international financial architecture is required to enable the developing countries to better respond to the multiple overlapping global crises and build resilience for the future. We need to boast the voice of representation of developing countries on the boards of the international financial institutions. The UN should play a leading role in this reform. It is of paramount importance to establish a new impactful financial mechanism and to enhance the efficiency of the existing ones. A reform of the global debt architecture is needed to make it fit for purpose, to promote the economic recovery, to create the opportunity for the development of the future, and to ensure the stability of the region. The UN should play a leading role in the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. It is of paramount importance to establish a new impactful financial mechanism and to enhance the efficiency of the existing ones. more inclusive growth through establishing comprehensive and efficient mechanisms to manage debt crisis in both low-income and medium-income countries in a suitable, predictable, and timely manner. It is also vital to improve debt sustainability analysis and credit rating methodologies. It is also important to reform the multilateral development banks and international financial institutions in order to increase lending capacities to help developing countries. Due consideration should be given also to reallocating special drawing rights to developing countries to enhancing global liquidity. In addition to exploring ways to expedite and automate SDR issues, especially in response to shocks, promoting inclusive and effective international tax cooperation remains a critical prerequisite to the achievement of the SDGs. Mr. Chairman, we look forward to the establishment of a Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation, and I thank you.

Chair: Thank you, Minister for Foreign Affairs, Immigration and Egyptian Expatriates of Egypt. Now I give the floor to Commissioner for International Partnership of the European Union.

European Union: Honourable Chair, Your Excellencies, A series of crises have dealt a serious blow to our collective efforts to reach the Sustainable Development Goals. To get us back on track, we need to mobilise a wide range of partners and partners, including range of financial resources. Throughout the crisis, the European Union and its member states have remained the world’s largest provider of official development assistance. The EU’s Global Gateway Investment Strategy is helping to achieve these duties by investing in clean energy, transport and digital infrastructure, as well as in human and social development. But we need collectively to do more. The international finance system must deliver much more financing to help developing and emerging economies fight poverty and tackle global challenges to avoid deepening inequalities. This is a priority for us, but also for many of our partners, and I am pleased that we could deliver together on this with high ambitions in the Pact of the Future adopted today. We have already made some progress. In the G20, we are supporting multilateral development banks to unlock up to 357 billion US dollars in additional lending in the coming decade. This is inspiration for further steps towards more effective NDBs. Another priority is to enable investments into sustainable activities. Private capital needs to be mobilised at scale, and here green bonds are part of the solution. We know that emerging economies can face hurdles to access capital markets, but we can change that, and this is why the EU established the Global Green Bond Initiative. Europe has the biggest and most advanced green bond market in the world, and we are ready to share our expertise on how to develop our own green bond markets. Let me highlight the European Green Bond Standard. This is the new voluntary standard that will apply… from December 2024 is designed to be a gold standard for green bonds and our sustainable finance framework is not just for companies that are already green, it also supports those on their journey there. To achieve progress, dear friends, we need a global recommitment to the 2030 agenda and its SDGs. And I can tell you that the European Union is ready to play its part. So let’s do it.

Chair: Thank you Commissioner for international partnerships of the European Union. Now I give the floor to Minister of Pre-University Education and Literacy of Guinea.

Guinea: Mesdames et messieurs, ladies and gentlemen, my delegation has aligned itself with a statement made by Uganda on behalf of G77 in China and we would like to make the following statement in our national capacity. The Republic of Guinea sees the growing inequality be developing in developed countries. This situation is an obstacle towards the effective implementation of the 2030 agenda and the sustainable development goals. It is therefore more than necessary now to restore the confidence between states and other actors international community the UN and the international financial institutions if we want to move the SDGs forward. However, my delegation is convinced that the United Nations are the ideal place for international cooperation for nations to come together and face challenges together such as poverty, food insecurity, international peace and security and the imbalance in global governance. Attaining sustainable development goals is being severely tested. Developing countries are facing a growing lack of funding. nations are amassing funding, and this impacts our educational system and our health system, peace and security negatively. This deficit makes it very difficult to implement SDGs by 2030, and we need to be thinking about how we can cover this gap. My country will continue pooling its efforts with others in the international community to make sure that the sustainable development goals are attained. We will continue investing increasingly in health, children’s education, in the most inclusive way possible. I thank you.

Chair: Thank you, Minister of University Education and Literacy of Guinea. Now, I give the floor to Undersecretary of State and the Chancellery of the President of Poland is speaking on behalf of the Group of Friends of UN Habitat Sustainable Urbanization and the New Urban Agenda.

Poland: Thank you. Mr. Chair, Your Excellencies, I have the honor to deliver this statement on behalf of the Group of Friends of UN Habitat Sustainable Urbanization and the New Urban Agenda, a group of 50 member states representing all regions. We would like to draw your attention to two pivotal aspects where the implementation of the 2030 agenda can be accelerated. Ladies and gentlemen, firstly, the future is undeniably urban. Statistics show that more than half of the world’s population already lives in urban areas and by 2050 is set to rise to nearly 70 percent. This trend underscores a fundamental truth. The Sustainable Development Goals, the SDGs, can only be achieved if our cities… become just, safe, healthy, accessible, resilient, and sustainable. Our group is pleased that the Just Adopted Pact for the Future commits the international community to act towards urban transformation. This commitment must now translate into measurable actions on climate, infrastructure, and inclusive social policies. Urban transformation is impossible without partnerships and the mobilization of sufficient development finance. Similarly, the goal of building just and resilient cities is unattainable without ensuring universal access to adequate, safe, and affordable housing, which the pact recognizes. Adequate housing is a direct, practical pathway to reducing poverty and inequality in the society. Excellencies, secondly, the localization of the SDGs is one of the most effective strategies for their successful implementation. Localization brings the goals into the heart of communities, embedding them in the delivery of essential public services that reflect the real needs and aspirations of citizens, thus achieving social equity and stability. In this context, cooperation with local and regional governments can be instrumental in the process of shaping the UN agenda by member states. We urge all member states to actively empower local governments to participate more meaningfully in intergovernmental decision-making processes. Ladies and gentlemen, in conclusion, the Group of Friends looks to the future with the hope that by strengthening our cities and prioritizing the localization of the SDGs, we will not only transform urban environments, but also, through this, ensure that no one is left behind in the journey toward a more sustainable and inclusive future. I thank you.

Chair: Lord Collins of Highbury of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

United Kingdom: Thank you Mr Chair and Excellencies. The challenge we face and we cannot be met without collaboration and partnership and the United Kingdom is dedicated to helping the UN’s mission not only because its founding principles are right and just but because it’s vital in meeting the challenges facing our world and it is precisely because the United Nations is so important that we need it to be more effective. A reinvigorated and dynamic United Nations is needed to tackle the world’s complex challenges. So allow me to highlight what we can do together to keep us on track to achieve the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. First as this session highlights we must strengthen the global financial system. While it has provided stability and growth over decades it needs to adapt to today’s world and be more responsive to developing country needs. That means developing countries need to be better represented and decisions need to be driven by their priorities. Secondly we must promote deeper trade and cooperation through the WTO including through an effective dispute settlement system. This will ensure stability for our businesses and consumers. Finally we must strengthen leadership in areas that serve as barriers to achieving the SDGs such as conflicts. That means more investment in the UN Peacebuilding Fund and a sustainable resident coordinator system improving coordination and delivery within countries. That’s why we must be ambitious when renewing the four-year mandate of the United Nations Development System later this autumn. Finally we need more permanent seats on the Security Council for African countries and for India, Germany, Japan, and Brazil, as well as an expansion of non-permanent membership. By working together and building consensus, these changes can strengthen the system to resolve rising conflicts, get the SDGs back on track, and create a world free from poverty on a livable planet. Thank you, Chair.

Chair: Thank you, Representative of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Now I give the floor to President of the National Institute of Statistics and Geography of Mexico.

Mexico: Thank you, Chair. Greetings on behalf of the INEGE, the National Institute for Statistics and Geography. And I am grateful for this excellent opportunity to address you at this summit of the future. In order for processes and initiatives that are agreed here to be viable and relevant and ambitious and transformative, the aspirations must be backed by reality. The focus of our collective efforts and necessary solutions and possibilities, the when, where, how, is important. This is why our proposal is first to measure together. Experience shows us that complex issues can be resolved through dialogue. First, we recognize their dimension and scale. The opportunity to find solutions to real situations through diplomacy, cooperation, and capacity building is real. This is what happened in October last year with the resolution. on statistics facilitated by Mexico and supported by the Trump-Hite organization of the ILO. Together with systems to assess nature and the contributions of ecosystems to biodiversity and other economies. There’s one example, there are other examples from the Statistics Commission. In order to understand through data the reality of LGBT plus communities and gender equality, just to get a picture of the information, our call is therefore to ensure that all efforts under this new multilateral pact for the future include at each stage measurement and evidence-based measurement as the baseline. Let us measure together. This is why we support action 56 of the pact for the future that captures the essence of measuring first and measuring together in order to decide together so that our decisions are better and to guarantee the viability of any new drive. We also feel it’s important to learn from experience with clear and decisive routes for their implementation. We support effective implementation of the United Nations systems and multilateral mechanisms so that through cooperation, capacity building and mobilization of resources, member states can achieve the ideals of well-being and sustainable development. I thank you.

Chair: Thank you, representative of Mexico. Now I give the floor to the permanent representative of Sri Lanka.

Sri Lanka: Thank you, Mr. Chair and excellencies. The multiple crises that we face today and our responses to them will largely hinder on the nature of global governance and how united, responsive, accountable and transparent it is both in policy and in implementation. Therefore today’s theme requires a multifaceted approach that addresses systemic challenges while fostering collaboration among stakeholders. This theme is deeply important to the Sri Lankan delegation as it also reflects the challenges we have faced in post-pandemic era. Mr. Chairman, the world is truly at crossroads in consequence of a convergence of significant challenges. and opportunities that can shape its future trajectory. We are grappling with multiple conflicts, heightened geopolitical tensions, rising inequality and mistrust, stalled progress on the SDGs, death interests, and the triple-pandemic crisis of climate change, biodiversity, loss and pollution, economic disparities, technological disruptions, public health crises, social movement and activism, migration and displacement, and the dynamics of a changing working environment due to technology and shifting economic models straddling through the tapestry of governance. We are surely at crossroads when choices made today will have profound implications for future generations. Mr. Chair, in response to these myriad challenges, member states agreed to an action-oriented outcome document titled A Pact for the Future, which is the culmination of the action envisaged by the GA resolution. This is a pivotal moment, Mr. Chairman. We believe that this document is a critical guide that will help shape the future of our planet and our people, which seeks to address the strengthening of multilateralism, promote inclusive participation, encourage innovative financing, improve data collection and analysis to track progress towards SDGs, support capacity building, promote the integration of the international and local development plans, utilize technology and innovation to progress in areas such as education, health, environmental sustainability, build partnerships amongst governments, businesses, and society, focus on building resilience against global challenges, and raise, I say, the importance of sustainable development through education and outreach initiatives. Mr. Chairman, the need for reform of the global financial architecture is more than urgent than ever. It is said there’s only one way to learn. It is through action. Everything you need to know, you have learned through this journey. So while remaining positive and hopeful about the outcome of the document, I must say that the success of multilateral agreements is dependent upon the intention of its members and states to implement the undertakings in both letter and spirit. The choice before us is whether we continue along the current path or whether we are genuine in charting a new path. Let us walk away from these deliberations with the will to make that difference.

Chair: Thank you, representative of Sri Lanka. Now I give the floor to permanent representative of Morocco.

Morocco: Merci, Monsieur le Président. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Your Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, this interactive dialogue is essential, and not just for us to exchange ideas, our visions that we may have of the world that will live for future generations, but also when it comes to the prospects for states, for us to work out a common future based on the principles of justice, equity, and solidarity, and to do this in the light of the pact of the future that we have just adopted this morning. The implementation of Agenda 2030 demands a renewed political will, but it also depends on putting together a imparting new dynamism to global governance in line with the actual realities and so as to meet the numerous challenges we’re facing. Therefore, more inclusive, representative, and more effective global governance working for sustainable development will be built on the basis of the three following pillars. The first pillar has to do with putting together a renewed and inclusive multilateralism and to do it through the reform of global governance institutions. We need to make sure that global governance bodies, in particular the U.N., and especially the Security Council, are not limited to simply managing the crises which happened but that they prevent conflicts, that they anticipate shocks, and that protect human rights, promote cooperation internationally, help with the coexistence of religions and cultures, and build bridges between states and nations. The second pillar has to do with the reform of international financial architecture. This architecture, whose initial foundations were laid in the wake of the Second World War, requires an in-depth overhaul. And this is not a luxury, but this is needed to become truly inclusive, equitable, and representative. It is imperative to make sure that it meets of the most vulnerable countries who are frequently most affected by the economic and environmental crises in the world, and do this through a financial system which guarantees access to funding for everyone, including concessional financing. And the third pillar has to do with transforming the framework for measuring development and progress. It is obvious that we can only progress with the SDGs, sustainability of the planet, or the well-being of everyone in the long term, only if there is a fund. fundamental change in the way we measure progress economically and the development of countries. We therefore need to work out measures which are complementary to the GDP criteria. We support the development of a conceptual framework which would allow us to give accurate value to things which count for people, for the planet, and for the future. Similarly, for special attention.

Chair: Thank you, Representative of Morocco. Now I give the floor to the representative of the Inter-Parliamentary Union.

Inter Parliamentary Union: Thank you so much, Mr. President. Turbocharging the Sustainable Development Goals requires a much stronger commitment to implementation through laws and budgets, which is where parliaments come in. With 180 member parliaments, the IPU is fully supportive of the reforms of the global financial architecture that are mentioned in the pact for the future. In this brief intervention, I want to add my own spin to what is a complex wave of interconnected issues. With global GDP of over $100 trillion, our problem is not so much about the total volume of resources for development, but of their distribution. While we need to help developing countries grow their economies so that they can provide for themselves, we must also put greater emphasis on redistributing resources that are being concentrated in fewer and fewer hands, both globally and nationally. First and foremost, we need to improve tax collection so that it is more progressive, taking more from those who can afford to pay more. In this regard, I am pleased that a deep reform of international tax system is beginning here at the United Nations with the start of the negotiations on a tax convention. A key priority of that convention must be to put pressure on international corporations that keep finding creative ways to pay little to no taxes. Bringing in more revenue in developing countries will free up more capital for multilateral financial institutions for badly needed debt relief and for more aid to help Global South and the SDGs in general. Cutting harmful fossil fuel subsidies will by itself free up hundreds of billions of dollars each year. It will also lead to trillions of dollars in indirect savings by reducing the cost of healthcare and environmental remediation linked to pollution. In developing countries, revenue collection has improved in recent years, but there is still some way to go to combat tax aversion, corruption, and illicit flows. Aid in all its forms must be made way more effective. We must stop the practice of diverting aid from social spending and infrastructure to climate projects or humanitarian support for which additional resources need to be found. Scaling up aid to the commitment of 1.7% of GDP will double current flows and make a significant difference all by itself. Last but not least, exploding military budgets need to be brought into line. The expenditure of over $2 trillion in the war machine is not just disproportionate to our security needs, but a clear signal that we have our priorities wrong. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Chair: Thank you, representative of the Inter-Parliamentary Union. Now I give the floor to Minister of International Relations and Cooperation of South Africa.

South Africa: Thank you very much. Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, advancing the 2030 Agenda for sustainable. development, including the Sustainable Development Goals and the Addis Ababa Agenda, and fundamental for the future of humanity is quite important. The Sustainable Development Goals align with South Africa’s National Development Plan and are the blueprint to achieve a better and more sustainable future for all. They address the global challenges we face, including those related to poverty, inequality, climate, environmental degradation, and promote global prosperity, peace, and justice. As African and other developing countries take difficult decisions on the development pathways and grapple with the multitude of issues, such as the overarching priority of poverty, eradication, and food and energy security, we realize the value of human solidarity. We believe in working together on shared opportunities and challenges, leaving no one and no place behind. The sense of human solidarity is needed now more than ever, at a time of great tension between the major powers, conflict situations, and unconstitutional changes to government in some countries, including in Africa. We need transformational change. South Africa has a leadership role in the global conversation on the agent need to transform the global political and security structures, including the United Nations. We need African and other developing countries to take their rightful place in global governance and respect for the UN Charter and its principles of non-interference in internal affairs of countries and respect for the sovereignty and territorial dignity of all nations. South Africa is also leading the call for a fundamental transformation of the global financial architecture to make it fit for purpose in supporting the Sustainable Development Goals. There is also a need to realize dedicated financial resources to implement international agreements inter alia the multilateral environment. agreements and the Climate Change Convention and its Paris agreement, which includes how the just transition pathways selected by countries based on their national circumstances are supported to mitigate the negative impact, and it could have a developing country’s economies. It could help the developing countries’ economies. Furthermore, the need is dire to scale up and accelerate concrete, innovative, transformative, accessible, and ambitious financing resources and the means of implementation, including the fulfillment of the ODA and climate finance commitment, as well as support for the transfer of technology and capacity building. Your Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, in conclusion, South Africa supports the construct of more concise, frequent, and policy-relevant work on sustainable development, especially given that the world has passed.

Chair: Thank you, Minister of International Relations and Cooperation of South Africa. Now I give the floor to South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation.

SAARC: In the context of South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation, CERC, comprises of the countries Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, the accelerating of implementation of 2030 agenda for sustainable development has been a regional priority. Achieving the post 2015 development agenda, including all sustainable development goals, in the remaining period of 2030 timeline will require an ambitious, comprehensive, holistic, and transformative approach with respect to the means of implementation and synergizing different means of implementation. It will require enhanced and revitalized global partnership in addressing the shared resources and investment gap. Our development partners must meet the of 0.7% of GNI and official development assistance, and while doing that, must avoid double counting of the resources as both climate and development financing. In the meantime, there is a strong need to recognize the importance of addressing the diverse need and challenges faced by the countries in special situation, in particular, the least developed countries and the countries in transition to middle income. These group of countries are the most vulnerable and resource-constrained group of countries, need enhanced global support to overcome the structural challenges they face in achieving the sustainable development goals. Such support should be provided on multiple fronts in a synergic manner, including the development assistance, market access, technology transfer, technology transfer FDI, and debt relief. CERC today persuades that the vision of South Asian Economic Union is a phased and planned manner to the creating of the free trade area, a customs union, a common market, and a common economic and monetary union. A consensus has been reached to develop the shared vision to undertake the joint initiative for implementing the post-25 education development agenda. To this end, CERC action plan for the implementation of the new daily declaration on education has been adopted, which is aimed at ensuring the education for all, which is also aligned with the SDG target for the quality education. CERC attaches the high importance in fighting the climate changes, and to this end, the Thimphu Statement of Climate Change adopted at the 16th CERC Summit in Thimphu 2010 is also currently under implementation. In the improved connectivity is also a center stone for the successful realization of 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Recognizing the pivotal role of the connectivity in South Asia, the member state have been working to improve the regional connectivity through the agreements of the motor vehicles, railway, and air services. By investing the connectivity infrastructure and roads, railway, and ports digital networks, member countries can achieve the progress on sustainable development. goals related to the economic growth. Industrial innovation and infrastructure, enhanced regional connectivity, also support environmental sustainability by optimizing the transport routes, promoting the efficient energy uses. In conclusion… Got you? Okay. Thank you.

Chair: Thank you, South ASEAN Association for Regional Cooperation, representative, Secretary General. And now I give the floor to international level organization.

ILO: Thank you so much, Mr. President, ladies and gentlemen. The ILO welcomes all efforts thus far deployed by multilateral and bilateral systems in responding to the challenges faced by the world as regard to the global governance coupled with the absolutely need to step up efforts in attaining SDGs. The ILO particularly wishes to acknowledge the significant positive steps that have been taken in recent years on reforming the international financial system, including the various initiatives presented earlier by the Director General of the World Trade Organization, the President of the World Bank, and the Executive Director of the IMF. The ILO wishes to reiterate that clearly more needed to be done in global governance and the financial architecture for an enhanced social justice. In this regard, keeping jobs, I meant decent jobs and protection at the center of our collective and individual effort in reshaping global governance and addressing the international financial architecture challenges remain a must. Finally, the ILO wishes to encourage an increased involvement of social partners, including workers and employers organizations in reshaping the global governance for better inclusivity. Thank you.

Chair: Thank you, Representative of the International Labour Organization. Now I give the floor to Representative of the United Nations Office for Project Services.

UNOPS: Thank you, Mr. President, Excellencies. To deliver on the 2030 Agenda, we clearly need reformed global financial structures that can support developing countries as they deliver for their populations in the face of rising crises. Difficulties in accessing adequate finance are clearly a barrier to speeding up climate action and sustainable development. But to deliver on the promise of leaving no one behind, we also need reforms to our broader development governance structures. And this goes beyond finance. To quote the Secretary General, we can’t create a future fit for our grandchildren with systems built for our grandparents. We all have a responsibility to make our systems more inclusive, accountable and transparent, to increase representation and decision-making at all levels from developing countries, to decentralize and to shift the focus away from a donor-recipient focus to true partnerships. We need to collaborate better to strengthen our global public goods. Our focus on finance and policy gaps, addressing the implementation of the climate goals and SDGs is important. But let’s make no mistake, there is also an implementation gap that requires strong commitment to turn development and climate ambitions into actions that improve the lives of millions. We need to redouble our efforts to provide technical assistance and to support on implementation. The development landscape has changed significantly in the last two decades. New sources of finance, new actors, new strategies, new frameworks, new norms and new measurement tools. Now it’s time for a change. the time to mobilize more resources and to align them with the SEGs and climate goals, but also to find new institutional arrangements that overcome fragmentation and inconsistency and can simultaneously bring together all sources of finance, ODA, South-South, triangular, remittances, foreign direct investment, domestic resource mobilization, blended finance, impact investing, philanthropic finance, debt, and all public, private, and civil society actors, and address in a holistic manner all key elements of the development cooperation architecture, from decision-making and rule-setting to accountability, enforcement, and learning. I commend the colleagues here in the panel for the efforts already made to drive these reforms, but we need to do more. UNOPS is committed to supporting these efforts, particularly through our focus on implementation and operations. Thank you.

Chair: Thank you, representative of the United Nations Office for Project Services. Now I give the floor to representative of St. Louis University, Madrid.

Civil Society 1 St. Louis University Madrid: Your excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, all protocols observed, good morning. We live in a time when it is not an option to do business as usual. The world is facing severe sustainability challenges that must be addressed urgently, such as climate change, population growth, and inequality, dwindling clean energy supplies and fresh water availability, among others. There is a need for cooperation between governments, businesses, and the financial sector in order to reach the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Almost two-thirds of historic carbon dioxide and methane emissions from 1854 to 2010 are attributed to fossil fuels and cement producers. Businesses are very responsible for the actual situation of environmental degradation that attains to our planet, but can be also part of the solution by offering innovative solutions for the decarbonization of our world. Adopting a holistic stakeholder theory is necessary to integrate among the goals of the businesses, not only the maximization of the profit, but a shared value approach. To this end, multi-stakeholder engagement is essential. A recent example are the impact coalitions created alongside the 2024 United Nations Civil Society Conference that took place in Nairobi last May, and which were created to foster collaboration across sectors to successfully implement the recommendations of the Pact of the Future. It is necessary a call for the development of regulations that will require corporations to report not only their financial statements, but also the environmental impacts. The European Union has taken the lead on this respect with a corporate sustainability reporting directive that drives accountability and transparency, promotes sustainable practices and investments, enhances decision making, and supports the transition to a sustainable economy. Not only European Union corporations should be mandated to disclose this information, but the global community for transparency. To achieve this, a unified global framework for environmental reporting should be implemented. This framework should be overseen by an international body like the United Nations Environment Program and the IFRS Foundation. To ensure transparency, accountability, and the prevention of greenwashing, sustainability reporting should be mandatory for businesses and subject to oversight by independent, third-party auditing organizations that are part of a robust international governance system. Thank you very much.

Chair: Thank you, Representative of Sri Lanka. Louis University, Madrid. Now I give the floor to representative of the Egyptian Food Bank.

Civil Society 2 Egyptian Food Bank: Your Excellencies, distinguished delegates, and of course the fellow changemakers, it was deep respect and sense of urgency that I stand before you today, not just as a representative of the Egyptian Food Bank and the 2.4 million beneficiaries that we serve every year, but also as a voice of millions of youth, families, and communities across Egypt and the global south. These are voices of hope, resilience, and determination, voices that demand a future that’s fair, sustainable, and inclusive. In a world where inequalities are widening and economic shocks are felt the most acutely by developmental nations, we cannot continue with business as usual. The time has come to reform global governance in a way that truly empowers the vulnerable and tapes into the energy, innovation, and resilience of youth. At the Egyptian Food Bank, we have seen firsthand how youth can lead impact-driven initiatives that go beyond the food distribution and create lasting solutions for poverty, elevation, social protection, economic development, and climate resilience through programs that integrate sustainable agriculture, digital innovation, malnutrition prevention, and entrepreneurship. Young people in Egypt are not just feeding their communities, they are shaping the future of food systems. These efforts, however, can only be scaled and sustainable if we rethink how the global financial system operates. The current global financial architecture is failing out youth, stagnant development countries’ growth, and that put the burden by debt and limited our abilities to invest in critical areas like food security, health, education, and climate action. If we are serious about turbocharging the 2030 agenda, we must move beyond the traditional approaches to financing. We need innovative solutions, debt relief initiatives, youth-focused funding mechanisms, and global partnerships that directly support local solutions and youth-led enterprises. Imagine a world where every young person, regardless of their geography, can access the resources, education, health care settings, and financial banking they need to create a change in their communities. In Egypt, the Egyptian Food Bank has launched youth-driven programs that empower young leaders to develop local food systems, reduce waste, put pressure on humanitarian aid intervention, and implement climate-smart agriculture. But to achieve the scale we envision, we need a global system that’s truly inclusive.

Chair: Thank you, representative of Egyptian Food Bank. Now I give the floor to representative of the Global Fund to fight AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria.

Global Fund to fight AIDS tuberculosis and malaria: Thank you, Mr. Chair, distinguished delegates. As a worldwide partnership to defeat HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria, the Global Fund welcomes the Pact for the Future that shines a spotlight on the urgency of increasing efforts to achieve the 2030 agenda and to accelerate progress towards better health for all. We applaud the leadership of Namibia and Germany in co-facilitating the pact. including engaging with civil society and communities. Only a pact that champions multilateralism and empowers communities and civil society to be meaningfully involved in global governance can we safeguard our collective future. In a world where about 4.5 billion people are not fully covered by essential health services, we know that health is fundamental to eradicate poverty, achieve gender equality, economic growth, and to ensure peaceful societies. Now is not the time to shy away from our commitments, but to take advantage of every opportunity to bolster progress towards universal health coverage. Now more than ever, we need to ensure that global health stays at the center of the international agenda. We hope that the pact can help elevate our common aspirations for better health and well-being of present and future generations. Mr. Chair, we applaud the pact’s focus on climate change, which poses the biggest global health challenges of our time. The phenomena is destabilizing the foundations of human health, deepening inequalities, threat to peace and security, and leading to the emergence and spread of infectious diseases. Therefore, we need to ramp up our collective responses as an urgent imperative in today’s challenging context. The Global Fund is an example of the transformative power of communities and civil society. It’s a partnership powered by equity, and as we come together to… To upload the pack for the future, we call on the international community to ensure that this leadership is recognized and upheld. As a global community, we need to find a new cause, one that can broaden and deepen multilateralism to create a more healthy, fair, just, and peaceful world for today and for all future generations. I thank you.

Chair: Thank you, representative of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria. Now I give the floor to Permanent Representative of Pakistan.

Pakistan: Thank you. Thank you, Prime Minister. And I thank all the panelists. We have all heard the aspirations of the developing countries in this interactive dialogue. The pact we have adopted is not perfect. There are many provisions in which we have stepped back from the commitments which were made in the SDG political declaration and even in Agenda 2030. But the transformation which we seek will be achieved through implementation. We have to implement the financial architectural agenda, implement the SDG stimulus, rechannel 50% of the 2021 SDG allocations to developing countries, increase the voice and representation of developing countries and financial institutions, improve access to concessional lending, review the sovereign debt architecture. adopt an equitable U.N. framework convention on international tax cooperation. On trade, the provisions of the Pact remain unsatisfactory. Trade must become, once again, an engine of growth and development. We must resist the new environmental protectionism, expand preferential treatment for developing countries, and pursue a robust revival of the WTO dispute settlement system. Lastly, on technology, the digital divide, bridging the digital divide, is the key to future development. We must avoid the north-south fragmentation as well as an east-west fragmentation. We must improve data governance. We must capture the power of artificial intelligence, including through a scientific panel, governance, as well as funding through a fund. Finally, the key will be the computing power for developing countries. To achieve computing power, we need to access the latest technologies and designs, and to invest in achieving these goals. I thank you, Mr. Prime Minister.

Chair: Okay. Thank you, representative of Pakistan. Now, I give the floor to representative of the Indian Development Cooperation.

CAF: Very good afternoon to you all. Excellencies, distinguished colleagues. I am honored to be here representing the Latin American and Caribbean Development Bank at this crucial time in the history of humanity. We are an institution that was created 56 years ago by Andean countries, and that today has 26 members in Latin America, also Spain. and Portugal. Just a few moments ago, the President of Brazil said in the General Assembly that the SDGs had been amongst the greatest diplomatic successes in our era. But if we don’t make significant progress swiftly, it could become our greatest failure. He also said that very often it’s very difficult to agree on questions of the past, but this is not the case for the present and for the future. Today, the countries of the world have affirmed that we have the intention to agree on the future of humanity at a time when, clearly, we must choose between two paths. Either we can continue with the same patterns of consumption, failing to look after the planet and failing to secure the future for generations to come, or, as Pope Francis has said, we can look after our common home in the certitude that on this path no one can save themselves because we are all in the same boat. It is clear that we, as international organizations, must reform our institutions in order to make them true tools for the change that our peoples need. Secondly, we must work to coordinate action and efforts from all international institutions so that we do not duplicate our efforts and to ensure that the impact is real. We are standing before a historic opportunity, and we are grasping this opportunity, making progress in the projects and programs that we develop and that we finance in Latin America and the Caribbean, and we are standing up to this challenge of the future, ensuring that our actions look to future generations. We want to be. be a responsible generation. It is down to us to make this change. We heard from the youth of Qatar and Namibia who are addressing the leaders of the world, and they will find our organization on this path in order to fulfill the pact for the future. And we believe that a better world is possible, and it is down to us to take action, collective action. Here we are playing our part. Thank you very much.

Chair: Thank you, Representative of the Indian Development Cooperation. Now I give the floor to the representative of the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa.

UNECA: Thank you very much, Prime Minister. Excellencies, today I address a pressing challenge, the urgent need to reform global governance to meet the financing needs of African nations as we pursue the Sustainable Development Goals. Africa’s public debt has surged beyond 60% of GDP, putting us in a precarious position. While stabilization is projected for 2024, interest payments now exceed 10% of government revenues in over 20 African countries, undermining our ability to invest in vital development initiatives. Moreover, multilateral financing remains inadequate. The current international tax system allows multinational companies to shift profits to tax havens, depriving developing nations of essential resources. This injustice complicates our efforts to fund development. As emphasized by the Secretary General, the global financial architecture has failed Africa. We lack the necessary funds for the SDGs and the structural transformation our continent requires. Therefore, a new global deal is imperative, one that overhauls the financial framework to create a fairer, more equitable system. African nations and the global south advocate for reforms in three critical areas. One, the rules of governance of international financial institutions were established before many African countries gained independence, leading to misaligned decisions. We must increase representation of developing countries on FI boards, enhance transparency, and update IMF quota formulas. Strengthening regional multilateral development banks is also essential for localized support. The dominance of developed nations in global tax governance must be addressed. A fairer distribution of tax revenue from multilateral corporations to Africa could significantly boost our domestic resource mobilization. The recent U.N. resolution aimed at creating an inclusive international tax cooperation framework is a vital step forward, but we need partnerships that promote stability, inclusivity, and equity. Three, we must reform the global debt architecture, and in particular, address the high cost of sovereign borrowing that contribute to debt distress in Africa. A well-governed IFI system can facilitate access to long-term affordable financing for SDGs and climate actions. We need to enhance the G20 common framework for debt treatments and tackle the biased global credit rating system that limits our access to capital markets. In conclusion, the time for action is now. By advocating for these essential reforms, we can reshape the financial landscape to better serve Africa and the global south. Together, let us work towards a more equitable and sustainable future for all. I thank you.

Chair: Thank you very much, Representative of the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa. Now I give the floor to the Representative of the United Nations, Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women.

UN Women: Thank you, Excellency Chair. The challenges we face today, debt crisis, climate crisis, and rising inequality, demand a system that works for everyone, especially women and girls. The data in UN Women’s latest SDG 5 snapshot report tell us that extreme poverty rates for women and girls are finally reducing, but yet, across the world, poverty continues to have a woman’s face. The current system is deeply inequitable and significantly costly. The cycle of debt and crisis forces regressive taxation and cuts to essential services like health care and education, which women and girls rely on most. Let us rethink the international financial architecture with social justice in mind, addressing pervasive inequalities and rebalancing economies towards the rights and needs of the majority. I would like to share three key areas of reform. First, easing the debt burdens on developing countries can free up public budgets to invest in essential services that directly benefit women. Countries should have fiscal space to prioritize jobs and care. Almost 300 million jobs can be created by 2035 through investments in care services, including childcare and elderly care. But debt service payments claim high shares of public revenue in a growing number of developing countries. Second, international financial institutions and government budgets and tax policies should be informed by gender analysis. Currently, one in four countries has financial systems that track allocations for gender equality. Stronger investments in systems, capacities, and data are urgently needed to avoid deepening inequalities. Third, mobilizing innovative sources of financing is essential to close the 360 billion annual global financing gap for gender equality. Instruments like thematic bonds and swaps can be effective for countries with sustainable debt burdens. We can transform economies if our professed commitments to equality are matched by our budgets as they should be. More importantly, these reforms should take into account the importance of gendered, just transition to blue and green economies. We know what is needed to reform the governance of finance across the world. It’s a matter of choosing to do it. I thank you.

Chair: Thank you very much, representative of the United Nations. for gender equality and empowerment of women. Now I give the floor to representative of Morningstar Sustainalistics.

Civil Society 3 Morningstar Sustainalytics: Excellencies, private sector and CSOs sitting behind me, and these United Nations, I think it’s important for everybody to just have an idea who Morningstar is. If you’re not aware, most of you know the Financial Times. If you open up the Financial Times and you look at the last several pages, at the very end you’ll find all of the financial data that you need. All of that is provided by Morningstar. We provide financial data, we provide financial intelligence, and we also provide stewardship, and that’s why we’re here. We’re here to be a steward between public institutions and also more private institutions and investors. To have a firm like ours here today is truly a testament to the progress of the United Nations and also to this summit. We’ve been looking at the pact of the future, and that’s something that we support. And we consider that there’s three areas of expertise that could further support it. The first is ESG or is data and data integrity. And then this is an issue of language, and I think this is appropriate speaking here at the United Nations. It’s an issue of language not between English and French or Russian and Arabic, but this is between ESG and SDGs. Many, many governments right now are still struggling through the UN SDCF in order to meet the SDGs, to fulfill all of the indicators that are in there, or to even report on them. And I can assure you that from investors in the company’s side, they don’t necessarily know how to navigate the SDGs, so they’re using ESG. And even then, ESG is quite challenging. So it’s as though there’s two different languages that are at play here, and that bridge is very important to overcome. One way is through beyond GDP. And then also, as many of your countries are already looking at ESG regulations, and you’re quite progressive on that, so there are some entry points there. A second thing that we think is important of the capacity is bringing the investor perspective and investor engagement. Investors do want to be more involved through FFD4, engaging with the MDBs. perspective of companies, especially those from emerging markets and the Global South. There is an active sustainable bond market already at play, which we should be playing more into. And then from companies of the Global South, these emerging markets, there’s a lot of innovations that are happening, which need to be presented here as well. Now, to summarize, we are here with data, investor voices, and stewardship to support the PAC’s commitment to financial reform for more social inclusiveness. And in the words of Kofi Annan, whom I met on my birthday, 21 years ago, before a Habs game, knowledge is power and information…

Chair: Thank you. Thank you, Representative of Morningstar, Sustainalistic. Now I give the floor to representative of the Global Network of Civil Society Organized… …

Civil Society 4 GNRD: Investing in disaster risk saves lives and money in the long term. But too little financing goes to disaster risk reduction. Furthermore, local actors understand their needs best and know how to build inclusive resilience. But too little finance is accessible to the local communities that are on the front lines of disasters and climate change. As we look to the Financing for Development Conference next year, and to close the finance gap, and to the much-needed reform of the international financial architecture, we need to make sure that our investments are future-proofed, that they drive risk-informed development, and that they are accessible to local communities and marginalized groups, including to people of all genders, to indigenous peoples, and to people with disabilities. Investing in risk-informed development requires analyzing the complex threats that people face, and understanding vulnerabilities and capacities. And this needs to be understood also from the perspective of local communities. In addition, development funds need to be made accessible to the marginalized groups within, and to be earmarked for local actors through direct access windows, and funding application processes also need to be streamlined. Communities and local organizations need to be trusted and enabled to lead their own development. This is a matter of justice, but is also a matter of effectiveness and impact. This applies to development finance, but also to climate finance, where we are seeing a devastating gap between what is needed and what is available. As we look to COP29, we so urgently need a step change in the negotiations. We need to stop what we are doing, and to remember our humanity. We all know that if we do not deliver the financing for a just transition now, we will dig an irreversible grave for ourselves and for our children. Achieving the 2030 Agenda and enabling localization requires more than words, or even political intention. It requires action. It requires finance. And this finance needs to flow to women-led groups, indigenous peoples, people with disabilities, and other key groups. Only then will development and climate funding truly work for all and build resilience. I thank you.

UN HABITAT: Dear Chair, at UNHCR, we are deeply encouraged by the adoption of the Pact for the Future. which includes a commitment by Member States to ensure access for all to adequate, safe and affordable housing and support developing countries to plan and implement just, safe, healthy, accessible, resilient and sustainable cities, PARA25. We believe that the recommendations sought from the Secretary General on engagement of local and regional governments to advance the 2030 Agenda can help strengthen policy coherence and multi-level governance, sectorial integration and multi-stakeholder partnerships towards the achievement of the SDGs. We also welcome the decisions related to reform of the international financial architecture and encourage that the subject of subnational or local financing be given due consideration in future deliberations. The Local 2030 Coalition and its Member UN Entities are committed to localizing the Pact for the Future and making it real for the local communities. The themes of the Summit’s Action Days are deeply interconnected with the future of our cities, communities and local economies. Cities will house 70% of the urban population in 2050. They offer significant opportunities for integrated, transformative investments that can accelerate SDGs. Adequate housing is the roof of the SDGs. Urban planning, the connection between cities, communities and local communities, is the key. for sustainable investments. We have a crucial opportunity before us today at the Summit of the Future, as well as in the fourth Financing for Development Conference and the second World Summit on Social Development via a road that passes through the 12th session of the World Urban Forum, COP 29 and COP 30, to reaffirm and reinvigorate our global commitment to sustainable urban development, transform the current development paradigm and push for towards a new multilateral system that is inclusive, just and responsive to the needs of the most vulnerable and the most marginalized. UN Habitat is ready to support stakeholders locally and globally so that finance lands well. Thank you.

Chair: Thank you representative of UN Habitat. Now I give the floor to representative of the Millennials Movement.

Civil Society 5 Millennials Movement : Thank you chair. I will deliver my speech in Spanish. Muchas gracias. Thank you very much excellencies. The Pact for the Future is a turning point for the global community to set up a tangible plan to secure present and future generations that will allow us to thrive and enjoy our human rights without any type of distinction. This is a time that can ensure that the global community can keep its promise made in Agenda 2030 for sustainable development, which is to leave no one behind. The future requires a solid foundation in implementation of Agenda 2030 for sustainable development. This is the solution that includes historically marginalized group. This should be a priority for laying the foundations for the future that we need. Last year during the SDG summit, we learned from the global report on sustainable development that we had only made progress towards 15% of the total SDGs. Today we join the call to secure our rights. to development and the right to the future and working on innovative transformations to ensure that there are real actions so that the pledges made in Chapter 1 are realized and thus make progress with Agenda 2030 with an intercultural and intergenerational approach to make it accessible for all. From the Millennials Movement and from Latin America, we call on you to fulfill your commitments and to mobilize the resources to ensure that the next six years really take us to a sustainable, peaceful, accessible and inclusive world that is prosperous and inclusive amongst all regions. We must have a follow-up mechanism for this on implementation of the Pact for the Future at all levels. We must also work collaboratively with the regional economic commissions of the United Nations. The future of the region of Latin America and the Caribbean must be free of corruption and organized crime, must be free of any type of discrimination, racial or otherwise, must be a future where all people, especially the youth, can define their own future and thrive. Ten years ago, when I was younger and I joined the efforts to try and define the SDGs, through the 2015 survey, I remember this promise that you made for a better world in 2030. And…

Chair: Thank you, representative of Millennials Movement. Now I give the floor to representative of the Confederation of NGOs of Rural India.

Civil Society 6 Rural India: Thank you very much, Excellency. A big pranam from India. I represent Confederation of NGOs of Rural India, which is 7,000 NGOs network in India. And I appeal to create an interdisciplinary and multi-sectoral approach which can reorient the global governance policies, especially the global financial architecture, which can be administratively implementable, producer-centric, environmentally sustainable, and economically viable. The collectives, this could be politically acceptable either. In fact, the kind of civil society structure which we are having globally is not farmer-centric, is not democratic. And the Bretton Woods Institution, even after the creation of, say, 80th year, we are going to be, it’s not for the cooperative, it’s not for the collectives. And therefore, I propose to create a network of commodity exchanges globally in the nation and states in a different part of the world, especially the southern part of the globe, which could be in the cooperative economic framework. We require more cooperative economic zone to dismantle the regional inequality. And in the 170 countries, commodities are being traded. But I don’t know where the money is going. So the financial sector, especially the academic and other international and regional organization must reorient and think about these things, that what kind of conducive and agile regulatory framework is required to create such kind of framework where everybody will have realized the SDG goals by 2030. So to enable that environment, I propose to create a cooperative economic framework, which we already have created in India, that’s World Cooperation Economic Forum, and to digitize and innovate with the kind of all stakeholders and all civil society members. This is a time also for the, where the globe is having the real trust deficit, where people are not having faith over each other, forget the countries and nations. So in this geoeconomic order to reorient the things, the cooperative economic framework is much, much necessary. And that’s why in the next year, when the United Nations is going to celebrate the International Year of Cooperation. we need to rethink that how equality can be addressed. Because the biggest challenge that the globe is facing is the regional inequality and the poverty. And that’s how, after five years down the lane, how we will achieve all SDG target in this way. So I have another proposal that we come from the nation where never expansionism has taken place. So the Buddha’s teaching which the globe can learn to emphasize the compassion, understanding, and nonviolence and it’s essential for the cooperative sector and to make the globe happy. That’s why this cooperative economic framework which I am proposing here as a part of the pact of the future can recreate and read on the things and revitalize the humanity and keep the world happy. Thank you very much, His Excellency.

Chair: Thank you, representative of the Confederation of NGOs of rural India. Now, the speakers from the floor is, the list is over. Excellencies, distinguished delegates, we have heard the last speaker in the list of speakers. I now give the floor to Ms Rebecca Grynspan, Secretary General of the United Nations, Trade and Development to deliver closing remarks.

Rebecca Grynspan: Thank you very much, Mr. Prime Minister, Excellencies. I won’t pretend to summarize this very rich discussion, but really we have heard today the legitimate aspirations of the countries of the South to be able to realize the 2030 agenda, fight poverty and inequality, universal access to basic services, health and education. investment in infrastructure, creation of decent jobs for the young, and economic transformation and opportunities for women through the economic transformation, taking advantage of the new technologies and the energy transition. But what we also have heard is that the enablers to do that are not there. First, finance. The call for the international financial architecture to provide critical resources, the very costly cost of finance for the developing countries, interest rates were mentioned widely. The RCAs were mentioned also in the discussion. The debt burdens that are creating a development crisis with too many countries facing impossible choices between servicing the debt or servicing their people. The issue of technology transfer that is weak and the digital AI and data divides where technology transfer can play such an important role. Trade opportunities for more inclusive development and the worries for rising protectionism, the devastating impact of climate change on the most vulnerable, and the need for a universal global safety net to protect countries from the systemic shocks. What we heard is a call for a better debt restructuring mechanism for more long-term and affordable development financing that will crowd in private investment and the risk for indirect investment, the recapitalization of the MDBs, the tax convention at the UN that will fight evasion and illicit financial flows, a more intensive use of the SDRs, the removal of surcharges, an innovative development finance for mitigation and adaptation, and a wide call and demand for more representation. We also heard a strong call from the Global North in their commitment to change and partnerships and solidarity. We heard the Bretton Woods institutions and the efforts being made for the World Bank in their road to be better and bigger, the climate financing, especially including adaptation, for trade to be more inclusive and the WTO reform that we heard from our sister Ngozi, the scale up of the financing for the PRGTs and RSTs in the IMF, and the new chair for the Sub-Saharan Africa in the board. All these are very welcome and a result of intense dialogue, so we heard also a call for more dialogue, more intense dialogue between the Bretton Woods institutions and the UN institutions, and a multi-stakeholder dialogue going forward. But as was also said, growth is weak because trade and investment and financial flows are weak. Actually, in 2023, financial flows were negative for the developing countries, not positive, negative. So, and despite the decrease on interest rates by the Federal Reserve last week, the developing countries face in 2024 probably the worst worst year in terms of debt payments. They are facing a debt wall and a very damaging debt burden. So given this panorama, no invisible hand will be able to fix it. We need you. We need a deliberate political will to scale up the efforts to embrace the pact of the future. We need all member states to strengthen multilateral solutions, to avoid fragmentation, and to rebuild trust. The world is in need of this transformation. This session and the pact of the future at large is about making the right choices, about defending multilateralism in the new age, but a renewed form of multilateralism with greater representation in governance, with fairer rules in trade and the environment, with much less inequity in how and under what conditions and interest rates international finance is allocated. Today we have chosen reform. Today we have chosen transformation. Today we have chosen renewal, renewal in acceleration and sustainable development. And that is something worth celebrating. I thank you.

Chair: I thank the Secretary General of the United Nations, Trade and Development, Excellencies, Distinguished Delegates. We have come to the end of Interactive Dialogue One of the Summit of the Future. I sincerely thank all the speakers and special invitees for their active participation and insightful contributions to our discussion of the thought-provoking theme of this dialogue. Before we adjourn, done, I would also like to inform participants that Interactive Dialogue 2 of the Summit of the Future will begin in this chamber at 3 p.m. this afternoon. Interactive Dialogue 1 on the theme, Transforming Global Governance and Turbocharging the Implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development is now concluded. The meeting is adjourned.

C

Chair

Speech speed

88 words per minute

Speech length

2107 words

Speech time

1430 seconds

Need for more inclusive and equitable global financial system

Explanation

The Chair emphasized the importance of reforming the global financial system to be more inclusive and equitable. This is seen as necessary to address current challenges and support sustainable development.

Major Discussion Point

Reforming the International Financial Architecture

Bridge SDG financing gap

Explanation

The Chair highlighted the need to address the significant financing gap for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. This was presented as a critical challenge that needs to be overcome.

Evidence

LDCs face an annual spending gap of 40% of GDP to achieve the SDGs.

Major Discussion Point

Mobilizing Finance for Development

L

Liberia

Speech speed

148 words per minute

Speech length

463 words

Speech time

186 seconds

Reform IFIs to give developing countries stronger voice

Explanation

Liberia called for reforms to international financial institutions to increase the representation and influence of developing countries. This is seen as necessary to ensure these institutions better serve the needs of all nations.

Major Discussion Point

Reforming the International Financial Architecture

Agreed with

Chair

Kenya

Solomon Islands

Zambia

Uganda

UNECA

Agreed on

Reform international financial institutions

K

Kenya

Speech speed

116 words per minute

Speech length

386 words

Speech time

199 seconds

Restructure sovereign debt and provide debt relief

Explanation

Kenya advocated for comprehensive debt relief initiatives tailored to the unique circumstances of developing countries. This is seen as crucial for freeing up resources for development and avoiding a debt crisis.

Major Discussion Point

Reforming the International Financial Architecture

Agreed with

Zambia

Egypt

Agreed on

Address debt burdens of developing countries

Fulfill ODA commitments

Explanation

Kenya called on development partners to fulfill their Official Development Assistance (ODA) commitments. This is seen as essential for providing necessary resources to support development in low-income countries.

Major Discussion Point

Mobilizing Finance for Development

Disagreed with

Luxembourg

WTO

Disagreed on

Priorities for mobilizing development finance

Close the digital divide

Explanation

Kenya emphasized the urgent need to close the digital divide to recover progress in SDGs. This is seen as crucial for ensuring equitable access to technology and its benefits across all countries.

Major Discussion Point

Harnessing Technology and Innovation

Transfer new technologies to developing countries

Explanation

Kenya called for the transfer of new technologies to the developing world. This is seen as necessary to enable developing countries to leverage technological advancements for their development.

Major Discussion Point

Harnessing Technology and Innovation

S

Solomon Islands

Speech speed

105 words per minute

Speech length

221 words

Speech time

126 seconds

Improve access to concessional financing for developing countries

Explanation

Solomon Islands emphasized the need for enhanced access to concessional financing for developing countries. This is seen as crucial for supporting development initiatives and addressing financial constraints.

Major Discussion Point

Reforming the International Financial Architecture

Agreed with

Chair

Liberia

Kenya

Zambia

Uganda

UNECA

Agreed on

Reform international financial institutions

Z

Zambia

Speech speed

117 words per minute

Speech length

339 words

Speech time

173 seconds

Reform credit rating systems that disadvantage developing countries

Explanation

Zambia called for reforms to global credit rating systems that currently disadvantage developing countries. This is seen as necessary to improve access to affordable financing for these nations.

Major Discussion Point

Reforming the International Financial Architecture

Agreed with

Chair

Liberia

Kenya

Solomon Islands

Uganda

UNECA

Agreed on

Reform international financial institutions

Improve domestic resource mobilization

Explanation

Zambia emphasized the need for enhanced international support in strengthening domestic resource mobilization among developing countries. This is seen as crucial for increasing self-reliance and reducing dependence on external financing.

Evidence

This could be done through institutional capacity building to enable tax administrations combat illicit financial flows, tax evasion and profit shifting.

Major Discussion Point

Mobilizing Finance for Development

P

Pakistan

Speech speed

97 words per minute

Speech length

259 words

Speech time

158 seconds

Establish UN framework for international tax cooperation

Explanation

Pakistan advocated for the adoption of an equitable UN framework convention on international tax cooperation. This is seen as necessary to address global tax challenges and ensure fair distribution of tax revenues.

Major Discussion Point

Reforming the International Financial Architecture

E

Egypt

Speech speed

99 words per minute

Speech length

353 words

Speech time

213 seconds

Reallocate Special Drawing Rights to developing countries

Explanation

Egypt called for the reallocation of Special Drawing Rights to developing countries. This is seen as a way to enhance global liquidity and provide additional financial resources to developing nations.

Major Discussion Point

Reforming the International Financial Architecture

Agreed with

Kenya

Zambia

Agreed on

Address debt burdens of developing countries

W

World Bank

Speech speed

0 words per minute

Speech length

0 words

Speech time

1 seconds

Increase climate financing, especially for adaptation

Explanation

The World Bank emphasized the need to increase climate financing, with a particular focus on adaptation. This is seen as crucial for addressing the impacts of climate change, especially in vulnerable countries.

Evidence

Committed to deploy 45% of our funds towards climate by 2025, half for mitigation, half for adaptation.

Major Discussion Point

Addressing Climate Change and Sustainable Development

Agreed with

WTO

European Union

UN Women

Global Network of Civil Society

Agreed on

Increase climate financing

Disagreed with

Uganda

UNECA

Disagreed on

Approach to reforming international financial institutions

W

WTO

Speech speed

0 words per minute

Speech length

0 words

Speech time

1 seconds

Reform harmful subsidies to free up funds for SDGs

Explanation

The WTO called for reforming trade-distorting, inequitable, and environmentally damaging subsidies. This is seen as a way to release significant funds that could be redirected towards achieving the SDGs.

Evidence

Reforming agricultural subsidies could release $630 billion in annual farm subsidies to finance the SDGs. Fossil fuel subsidy reform could unlock up to $1.2 trillion in funds.

Major Discussion Point

Addressing Climate Change and Sustainable Development

Agreed with

World Bank

European Union

UN Women

Global Network of Civil Society

Agreed on

Increase climate financing

Disagreed with

Kenya

Luxembourg

Disagreed on

Priorities for mobilizing development finance

Develop global carbon pricing approach

Explanation

The WTO proposed developing a global approach to carbon pricing and taxation. This is seen as a way to generate additional financing for the SDGs while addressing climate change.

Major Discussion Point

Addressing Climate Change and Sustainable Development

Agreed with

World Bank

European Union

UN Women

Global Network of Civil Society

Agreed on

Increase climate financing

E

European Union

Speech speed

119 words per minute

Speech length

374 words

Speech time

188 seconds

Invest in clean energy and green infrastructure

Explanation

The European Union emphasized the importance of investing in clean energy, transport, and digital infrastructure. This is seen as crucial for achieving sustainable development and addressing climate change.

Evidence

The EU’s Global Gateway Investment Strategy is helping to achieve these duties by investing in clean energy, transport and digital infrastructure, as well as in human and social development.

Major Discussion Point

Addressing Climate Change and Sustainable Development

Agreed with

World Bank

WTO

UN Women

Global Network of Civil Society

Agreed on

Increase climate financing

Promote digital inclusion and skills development

Explanation

The European Union emphasized the importance of digital inclusion and skills development. This is seen as necessary for leveraging digital technologies for sustainable development.

Major Discussion Point

Harnessing Technology and Innovation

U

UN Women

Speech speed

116 words per minute

Speech length

343 words

Speech time

177 seconds

Support just transition to green economy

Explanation

UN Women emphasized the importance of a gendered, just transition to blue and green economies. This is seen as crucial for ensuring that the shift to sustainable economies benefits all, particularly women and girls.

Major Discussion Point

Addressing Climate Change and Sustainable Development

Agreed with

World Bank

WTO

European Union

Global Network of Civil Society

Agreed on

Increase climate financing

G

Global Network of Civil Society

Speech speed

0 words per minute

Speech length

0 words

Speech time

1 seconds

Strengthen resilience against climate impacts

Explanation

The Global Network of Civil Society emphasized the need to strengthen resilience against climate impacts, particularly at the local level. This is seen as crucial for protecting vulnerable communities from the effects of climate change.

Major Discussion Point

Addressing Climate Change and Sustainable Development

Agreed with

World Bank

WTO

European Union

UN Women

Agreed on

Increase climate financing

U

Uganda

Speech speed

120 words per minute

Speech length

368 words

Speech time

183 seconds

Increase voice of developing countries in IFIs and MDBs

Explanation

Uganda, speaking on behalf of the G77 and China, called for enhancing the representation and voice of developing countries in decision-making in international financial institutions. This is seen as necessary for creating more effective, credible, and legitimate institutions.

Major Discussion Point

Enhancing Representation of Developing Countries

Agreed with

Chair

Liberia

Kenya

Solomon Islands

Zambia

UNECA

Agreed on

Reform international financial institutions

Disagreed with

UNECA

World Bank

Disagreed on

Approach to reforming international financial institutions

U

UNECA

Speech speed

128 words per minute

Speech length

390 words

Speech time

182 seconds

Ensure equitable representation in global tax governance

Explanation

UNECA emphasized the need to address the dominance of developed nations in global tax governance. This is seen as necessary for ensuring a fairer distribution of tax revenue from multinational corporations to Africa.

Major Discussion Point

Enhancing Representation of Developing Countries

Strengthen regional development banks

Explanation

UNECA called for strengthening regional multilateral development banks. This is seen as essential for providing more localized and responsive support to developing countries.

Major Discussion Point

Enhancing Representation of Developing Countries

Disagreed with

Uganda

World Bank

Disagreed on

Approach to reforming international financial institutions

U

UN Habitat

Speech speed

0 words per minute

Speech length

0 words

Speech time

1 seconds

Empower local and regional governments in global governance

Explanation

UN Habitat emphasized the importance of empowering local and regional governments in global governance processes. This is seen as crucial for ensuring that urban and local perspectives are incorporated into global decision-making.

Major Discussion Point

Enhancing Representation of Developing Countries

L

Luxembourg

Speech speed

130 words per minute

Speech length

362 words

Speech time

166 seconds

Leverage private finance for SDGs

Explanation

Luxembourg emphasized the importance of leveraging private finance for achieving the SDGs. This is seen as crucial for bridging the financing gap and complementing public resources.

Evidence

The Luxembourg Stock Exchange is a world leader in the listing of green bonds.

Major Discussion Point

Mobilizing Finance for Development

Disagreed with

Kenya

WTO

Disagreed on

Priorities for mobilizing development finance

T

Trinidad and Tobago

Speech speed

104 words per minute

Speech length

298 words

Speech time

171 seconds

Develop innovative financing mechanisms

Explanation

Trinidad and Tobago called for the development of innovative financing mechanisms to support sustainable development. This is seen as necessary to address the financing gaps for achieving the SDGs.

Major Discussion Point

Mobilizing Finance for Development

Leverage digital solutions to enhance SDG monitoring

Explanation

Trinidad and Tobago emphasized the need to leverage digital solutions for enhancing data sharing, collaboration, and monitoring of the SDGs. This is seen as crucial for improving the implementation and tracking of sustainable development efforts.

Major Discussion Point

Harnessing Technology and Innovation

G

Global Fund

Speech speed

0 words per minute

Speech length

0 words

Speech time

1 seconds

Increase long-term affordable financing for SDGs

Explanation

The Global Fund emphasized the need for increased long-term, affordable financing to achieve the SDGs and climate goals. This is seen as crucial for supporting sustainable development efforts, particularly in developing countries.

Major Discussion Point

Mobilizing Finance for Development

M

Malawi

Speech speed

114 words per minute

Speech length

355 words

Speech time

185 seconds

Develop policy framework for emerging technologies like AI

Explanation

Malawi called for the development of a global policy and regulatory framework for the safe utilization of emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence. This is seen as necessary to ensure that these technologies contribute positively to sustainable development.

Major Discussion Point

Harnessing Technology and Innovation

Agreements

Agreement Points

Reform international financial institutions

Speakers

Chair

Liberia

Kenya

Solomon Islands

Zambia

Uganda

UNECA

Arguments

Reform IFIs to give developing countries stronger voice

Improve access to concessional financing for developing countries

Reform credit rating systems that disadvantage developing countries

Increase voice of developing countries in IFIs and MDBs

Summary

Multiple speakers emphasized the need to reform international financial institutions to increase representation and influence of developing countries, improve access to concessional financing, and address unfair credit rating systems.

Address debt burdens of developing countries

Speakers

Kenya

Zambia

Egypt

Arguments

Restructure sovereign debt and provide debt relief

Reallocate Special Drawing Rights to developing countries

Summary

Several speakers called for measures to alleviate the debt burdens of developing countries, including debt restructuring, relief initiatives, and reallocation of Special Drawing Rights.

Increase climate financing

Speakers

World Bank

WTO

European Union

UN Women

Global Network of Civil Society

Arguments

Increase climate financing, especially for adaptation

Reform harmful subsidies to free up funds for SDGs

Develop global carbon pricing approach

Invest in clean energy and green infrastructure

Support just transition to green economy

Strengthen resilience against climate impacts

Summary

Multiple speakers emphasized the need for increased climate financing, particularly for adaptation, and proposed various measures to generate and allocate funds for climate action and sustainable development.

Similar Viewpoints

Both Kenya and the European Union emphasized the importance of bridging the digital divide and promoting digital inclusion through technology transfer and skills development.

Speakers

Kenya

European Union

Arguments

Close the digital divide

Transfer new technologies to developing countries

Promote digital inclusion and skills development

Zambia and Pakistan both advocated for measures to improve domestic resource mobilization and international tax cooperation, with a focus on combating illicit financial flows and ensuring fair distribution of tax revenues.

Speakers

Zambia

Pakistan

Arguments

Improve domestic resource mobilization

Establish UN framework for international tax cooperation

Unexpected Consensus

Empowering local and regional governments in global governance

Speakers

UN Habitat

UNECA

Arguments

Empower local and regional governments in global governance

Strengthen regional development banks

Explanation

There was an unexpected consensus between UN Habitat and UNECA on the importance of empowering local and regional entities in global governance structures. This consensus highlights a growing recognition of the role of subnational actors in addressing global challenges.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of agreement centered around reforming international financial institutions, addressing debt burdens of developing countries, increasing climate financing, bridging the digital divide, and improving domestic resource mobilization and international tax cooperation.

Consensus level

There was a moderate to high level of consensus among speakers on the need for significant reforms in global financial architecture and governance to better support developing countries and address climate change. This consensus suggests a growing momentum for transformative changes in international systems to achieve sustainable development goals.

Disagreements

Disagreement Points

Approach to reforming international financial institutions

Speakers

Uganda

UNECA

World Bank

Arguments

Increase voice of developing countries in IFIs and MDBs

Strengthen regional development banks

Increase climate financing, especially for adaptation

Summary

While Uganda and UNECA emphasized increasing representation of developing countries and strengthening regional banks, the World Bank focused more on increasing climate financing without directly addressing governance reforms.

Priorities for mobilizing development finance

Speakers

Kenya

Luxembourg

WTO

Arguments

Fulfill ODA commitments

Leverage private finance for SDGs

Reform harmful subsidies to free up funds for SDGs

Summary

Kenya emphasized fulfilling ODA commitments, Luxembourg focused on leveraging private finance, while the WTO proposed reforming harmful subsidies to free up funds for SDGs, showing different priorities for mobilizing development finance.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of disagreement centered around the specific approaches to reforming international financial institutions, priorities for mobilizing development finance, and the focus of technological initiatives for development.

Disagreement level

The level of disagreement was moderate. While there was broad consensus on the need for reform and increased support for developing countries, speakers differed on the specific mechanisms and priorities. These disagreements reflect the complex nature of global economic governance and the diverse needs of different countries and regions. The implications of these disagreements suggest that achieving a unified approach to reforming global governance and implementing the 2030 Agenda may require further negotiation and compromise among various stakeholders.

Partial Agreements

Partial Agreements

These speakers agreed on the need to address debt burdens and improve financial access for developing countries, but proposed different specific mechanisms to achieve this goal.

Speakers

Kenya

Zambia

Egypt

Arguments

Restructure sovereign debt and provide debt relief

Reform credit rating systems that disadvantage developing countries

Reallocate Special Drawing Rights to developing countries

These speakers agreed on the importance of leveraging technology for development, but focused on different aspects: closing the digital divide, enhancing SDG monitoring, and developing policy frameworks for emerging technologies.

Speakers

Kenya

Trinidad and Tobago

Malawi

Arguments

Close the digital divide

Leverage digital solutions to enhance SDG monitoring

Develop policy framework for emerging technologies like AI

Similar Viewpoints

Both Kenya and the European Union emphasized the importance of bridging the digital divide and promoting digital inclusion through technology transfer and skills development.

Speakers

Kenya

European Union

Arguments

Close the digital divide

Transfer new technologies to developing countries

Promote digital inclusion and skills development

Zambia and Pakistan both advocated for measures to improve domestic resource mobilization and international tax cooperation, with a focus on combating illicit financial flows and ensuring fair distribution of tax revenues.

Speakers

Zambia

Pakistan

Arguments

Improve domestic resource mobilization

Establish UN framework for international tax cooperation

Takeaways

Key Takeaways

There is an urgent need to reform the international financial architecture to better support developing countries

Addressing climate change and achieving sustainable development requires increased financing and support for developing nations

Enhancing representation of developing countries in global governance institutions is crucial

Mobilizing additional finance for development from various sources is necessary to achieve the SDGs

Harnessing technology and innovation, while bridging digital divides, is important for development

Resolutions and Action Items

Adopt the Pact for the Future to guide reforms and accelerate SDG implementation

Convene the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in 2025

Establish a UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation

Reform multilateral development banks to increase lending capacity

Develop a global approach to carbon pricing and taxation

Create more inclusive mechanisms for developing country participation in global economic governance

Unresolved Issues

Specific mechanisms for debt relief and restructuring for developing countries

Details of reforms to voting power and representation at IFIs and MDBs

Concrete commitments on climate finance amounts and allocation

Pathways to bridge technology and digital divides between developed and developing nations

Measures to address rising inequality within and between countries

Suggested Compromises

Reallocate a portion of Special Drawing Rights from developed to developing countries

Blend concessional and non-concessional financing to expand resources for developing countries

Balance climate mitigation and adaptation financing

Combine ODA with innovative financing mechanisms to increase overall development resources

Pursue both UN-led and Bretton Woods institution reforms in parallel

Thought Provoking Comments

Without the boost to economic growth from deeper global trade ties over the past 30 years, the world could not have lifted 1.5 billion people out of extreme poverty. To lift the 700 million people who still subsist on less than $2.15 a day, we will need more trade, not less trade, but we need better trade, trade that includes more people, especially those left behind.

Speaker

Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Director General of the World Trade Organization

Reason

This comment provides a powerful perspective on the role of trade in poverty reduction, while also acknowledging the need for more inclusive trade practices.

Impact

It shifted the conversation to focus on how to make trade more inclusive and beneficial for developing countries, rather than simply increasing trade volume.

We are on a path to deliver greater scale and greater impact. Let me give you a few examples. Working with partners to bring electricity to 300 million Africans by 2030. Committed to deploy 45% of our funds towards climate by 2025, half for mitigation, half for adaptation.

Speaker

Ajay Banga, President of the World Bank

Reason

This comment outlines specific, ambitious goals that demonstrate a commitment to addressing key development challenges.

Impact

It set a tone of action and concrete commitments, encouraging other participants to discuss specific plans and targets rather than just general principles.

We expect global growth of around 3% over the next five years. This is almost a percentage point less than in the decades before COVID. And this is most dramatic for low-income countries. Low-income countries are still 7.5% sent below their growth trajectory before COVID. With elevated debt pressures in many countries, the world is at risk of falling into a low-growth, high-debt trap.

Speaker

Kristalina Georgieva, Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund

Reason

This comment provides a sobering assessment of the global economic outlook, highlighting the particular challenges faced by low-income countries.

Impact

It focused the discussion on the urgent need for debt relief and financial support for developing countries, leading to more detailed discussions of financial architecture reform.

To respond effectively to our challenges, institutions of global governance must prioritise the voice of all nations, regardless of size or economic standing. This includes reforming the United Nations, international financial institutions and multilateral bodies.

Speaker

Nangolo Mbumba, President of the Republic of Namibia

Reason

This comment directly addresses the need for reform in global governance structures to ensure more equitable representation.

Impact

It sparked further discussion on specific reforms needed in international institutions, particularly to increase the voice of developing countries.

The current global financial architecture is dysfunctional, or at least highly ineffective, and cannot be relied upon to provide the solutions for the world that we all urgently need. This is why countries are increasingly turning to innovative, homegrown approaches to solve their most pressing problems.

Speaker

William Samoei Ruto, President of the Republic of Kenya

Reason

This comment provides a critical perspective on the current financial system and highlights the need for alternative approaches.

Impact

It encouraged discussion of innovative financial solutions and the need for systemic reform, rather than just incremental changes to existing structures.

Overall Assessment

These key comments shaped the discussion by focusing it on several critical themes: the need for more inclusive trade practices, the importance of concrete commitments and targets, the urgent challenges facing developing countries (particularly around debt and economic growth), the need for reform in global governance structures to increase representation of developing countries, and the inadequacy of the current global financial architecture. The discussion moved from general principles to more specific proposals for reform and action, with a particular emphasis on the needs and perspectives of developing countries.

Follow-up Questions

How can we reform the governance structures of international financial institutions to ensure more inclusive, transparent and accountable decision-making?

Speaker

Chair (summarizing multiple speakers)

Explanation

This is crucial for ensuring developing countries have a stronger voice in global financial decisions that affect them.

What specific measures can be implemented to provide comprehensive debt relief for developing countries, particularly least-developed countries?

Speaker

Chair (summarizing multiple speakers)

Explanation

Addressing the debt burden is essential for freeing up resources for sustainable development in these countries.

How can we develop and implement a global approach to carbon pricing and taxation that channels resources to those who need it most for a just transition?

Speaker

Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala

Explanation

This could generate significant additional financing for the SDGs while addressing climate change.

What strategies can be employed to generate jobs for the nearly 800 million young people in emerging markets who are projected to lack clear paths to prosperity and dignity?

Speaker

Ajay Banga

Explanation

Addressing youth unemployment is critical for economic development and social stability in emerging markets.

How can we improve debt sustainability analysis and credit rating methodologies to better reflect the realities of developing countries?

Speaker

Minister for Foreign Affairs, Immigration and Egyptian Expatriates of Egypt

Explanation

This is important for ensuring fairer access to finance for developing countries.

What mechanisms can be developed to ensure more equitable distribution of tax revenue from multinational corporations to African countries?

Speaker

Representative of the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa

Explanation

This could significantly boost domestic resource mobilization in African countries.

How can we create a robust mechanism for innovative funding to implement the 2030 Agenda?

Speaker

Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of Mali

Explanation

This is crucial for accelerating progress towards the SDGs, especially in developing countries.

What steps can be taken to bridge the gap between ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) metrics used by investors and the SDG indicators used by governments?

Speaker

Representative of Morningstar Sustainalistics

Explanation

Aligning these frameworks could help channel more private investment towards sustainable development goals.

How can we ensure that disaster risk reduction financing is more accessible to local communities and marginalized groups?

Speaker

Representative of the Global Network of Civil Society Organizations

Explanation

This is crucial for building resilience at the local level and ensuring no one is left behind in disaster preparedness.

What mechanisms can be established to follow up on the implementation of the Pact for the Future at all levels?

Speaker

Representative of the Millennials Movement

Explanation

Effective follow-up is essential to ensure that commitments made in the Pact are translated into concrete actions.

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed.

Runway partners with Lionsgate to revolutionise film-making

Runway, a generative AI startup, has announced a significant partnership with Lionsgate, the studio responsible for popular franchises such as John Wick and Twilight. This collaboration will enable Lionsgate’s creative teams, including filmmakers and directors, to utilise Runway’s AI video-generating models. These models have been trained on the studio’s film catalogue and will be used to enhance their creative work. Michael Burns, vice chair of Lionsgate, emphasised the potential for this partnership to support creative talent.

Runway is considering new opportunities, including licensing its AI models to individual creators, allowing them to create and train custom models. This partnership represents the first public collaboration between a generative AI startup and a major Hollywood studio. Although Disney and Paramount have reportedly been discussing similar partnerships with AI providers, no official agreements have been reached yet.

This deal comes at a time of increased attention on AI in the entertainment industry, due to California’s new laws that regulate the use of AI digital replicas in film and television. Runway is also currently dealing with legal challenges regarding the alleged use of copyrighted works to train its models without permission.

A Digital Future for All (afternoon sessions)

A Digital Future for All (afternoon sessions)

Session at a Glance

Summary

This discussion focused on the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in shaping a digital future that benefits humanity. The event brought together leaders from government, technology, civil society, and international organizations to explore how to harness digital technologies and AI for sustainable development while addressing potential risks.

Key themes included the importance of inclusivity, bridging the digital divide, and ensuring AI governance is rooted in human rights. Speakers emphasized the need for multi-stakeholder cooperation and global governance frameworks to guide AI development. The United Nations was highlighted as uniquely positioned to facilitate this process due to its global reach and legitimacy.

Participants discussed both the transformative potential of AI to accelerate progress on sustainable development goals and the need to mitigate risks like bias, privacy concerns, and potential misuse. The importance of building capacity, especially in developing countries, was stressed to prevent an “AI divide” from emerging.

Recommendations from the UN’s High-Level Advisory Body on AI were presented, including proposals for a global AI capacity network, an international scientific panel on AI, and mechanisms to foster inclusive AI development. Speakers noted the urgency of action, given AI’s rapid advancement.

The discussion concluded on an optimistic note, with participants expressing hope that early engagement on AI governance could help steer the technology towards benefiting humanity. However, they emphasized sustained effort and cooperation would be needed to realize this vision of an inclusive, sustainable digital future for all.

Keypoints

Major discussion points:

– The importance of developing AI and digital technologies in an inclusive, ethical way that benefits all of humanity

– The need for global cooperation and governance frameworks for AI, with the UN playing a key role

– Bridging the digital divide and ensuring developing countries can participate in and benefit from AI advancements

– Balancing the opportunities of AI with potential risks and challenges

– Implementing the Global Digital Compact and moving from principles to concrete actions

Overall purpose/goal:

The discussion aimed to highlight the transformative potential of AI and digital technologies while emphasizing the need for responsible development and governance to ensure these technologies benefit all of humanity. It sought to build momentum for global cooperation on AI governance through initiatives like the Global Digital Compact.

Tone:

The overall tone was optimistic and forward-looking, with speakers emphasizing the positive potential of AI while acknowledging challenges. There was a sense of urgency about the need to act quickly to shape AI’s development. The tone became more action-oriented towards the end, focusing on next steps and implementation.

Speakers

Moderators/Facilitators:

– Redi Thlabi – Journalist and TV Host Al Jazeera English

– Tumi Makgabo – In Africa World Wide Media

Speakers:

– Ian Bremmer – Political Scientist, President of Eurasia Group and GZERO Media

– Ebba Busch – Minister for Energy, Business and Industry and Deputy Prime Minister of Sweden

– Sundar Pichai – CEO, Google and Alphabet

– Felix Mutati – Minister of Technology and Science, Zambia

– Margrethe Vestager – Executive Vice President of the European Union

– Rebeca Grynspan – Secretary-General, United Nations Trade and Development (UNCTAD)

– Omar Al Olama – Minister of State for Artificial Intelligence, Digital Economy and Remote Work in the United Arab Emirates

– Josephine Teo – Minister for Digital Development and Information, Singapore

– Nnenna Nwakanma – Digital Policy, Advocacy and Cooperation Strategist

– Carme Artigas – Former Secretary of State for Digitalisation and AI of Spain and Co-Chair of the Secretary-General’s High-level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence

– James Manyika – Senior VP, Google-Alphabet and Co-Chair of the Secretary-General’s High-level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence

– Vilas Dhar – President and Trustee, Patrick J. McGovern Foundation

– Jian Wang – CTO and Founder, Alibaba Cloud

– Volker Türk, High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)

– Alondra Nelson – Harold F. Linder Professor, Institute for Advanced Study

– Mokgweetsi Masisi – President of Botswana

– Amandeep Singh Gill – UN Secretary-General’s Envoy on Technology

– Achim Steiner – Administrator of UNDP

– Doreen Bogdan-Martin – Secretary-General of the ITU

The speakers represent a diverse range of expertise including government leadership, technology industry executives, civil society representatives, academics, and leaders of international organizations. Their areas of focus include artificial intelligence, digital development, human rights, sustainable development, and global governance.

Full session report

The Global Digital Compact and AI Governance: Shaping a Digital Future for All

This high-level discussion brought together diverse leaders from government, technology, civil society, and international organizations to explore the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in shaping an inclusive digital future. The conversation centered on the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the need for responsible AI development and governance to benefit all of humanity.

Key Themes and Agreements

1. The Global Digital Compact as a Foundation for AI Governance

There was broad consensus on the importance of the Global Digital Compact as a starting point for global AI governance. Speakers like Carme Artigas and Omar Al Olama emphasized the unique position of the United Nations to lead this effort. James Manyika stressed the need for a multi-stakeholder approach, which was echoed by other participants. Volker Turk noted that the GDC builds on existing human rights frameworks, stating, “The Global Digital Compact is firmly anchored in human rights.”

2. AI’s Potential for Sustainable Development

Speakers agreed on AI’s transformative potential to accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goals. Felix Mutati highlighted AI’s ability to transform lives in rural areas, saying, “AI has the potential to leapfrog development.” However, many stressed the need to bridge the digital divide to prevent an AI divide, emphasizing the importance of building AI capacity in developing countries.

3. Balancing Innovation and Risk Mitigation

There was general agreement on the need for a balanced approach to AI governance that promotes innovation while mitigating risks. Margrethe Vestager emphasized the importance of enforceable AI regulation, while Carme Artigas highlighted the need to balance innovation and risk mitigation.

4. Human Rights and Community Engagement

Speakers like Volker Turk and Alondra Nelson emphasized the importance of grounding AI governance and development in existing human rights frameworks. Vilas Dhar highlighted the importance of community engagement in AI development, challenging the typical narrative of top-down control in governance.

5. Scientific Research and Understanding of AI

Multiple speakers, including James Manyika, Dr. Wang Jian, and Alondra Nelson, stressed the importance of scientific research to better understand AI systems and their impacts. Manyika proposed “a real-time scientific panel on AI developments,” while Nelson drew parallels to rapid scientific developments during the COVID-19 pandemic.

6. Role of the Private Sector

James Manyika and others discussed the crucial role of the private sector in AI governance. Manyika emphasized the need for collaboration, stating, “We need everybody at the table – governments, civil society, academia, and the private sector.”

7. Capacity Building and Infrastructure

Many speakers emphasized the importance of capacity building and infrastructure development for AI in developing countries. Nnenna Nwakanma’s statement, “Connect the schools. Connect the young people. Connect my children,” refocused the conversation on practical, human-centered outcomes of digital development.

Key Recommendations and Action Items

1. Recommendations from the UN High-Level Advisory Body on AI, as discussed by Ian Bremmer and panelists, including:

– Establishing a global fund for AI for sustainable development

– Creating an international scientific panel on AI

– Developing a global AI capacity-building program

2. Proposal to make an online platform available for public input on the Global Digital Compact after its adoption

3. Emphasis on building AI capacity and infrastructure in developing countries to prevent an AI divide

4. Focus on sustainable and ethical AI development practices, as highlighted by Alondra Nelson

5. Plan to potentially adopt the Global Digital Compact at the upcoming Summit of the Future

Thought-Provoking Insights

1. Vilas Dhar reframed governance as a collaborative process involving multiple stakeholders, not just governments and tech companies.

2. Mokgweetsi Masisi highlighted the interconnection between digital divides, global inequality, and gender disparities.

3. Alondra Nelson acknowledged the limitations of current knowledge about AI systems, emphasizing the need for ongoing research and understanding.

Unresolved Issues and Future Directions

Despite the productive discussion, several issues remain to be addressed:

1. Specific mechanisms for enforcing AI governance globally

2. Details on implementation of the proposed global fund on AI

3. How to effectively balance AI development with sustainability and climate concerns

4. Concrete steps to ensure AI benefits reach marginalized communities

In conclusion, the discussion demonstrated a high level of consensus on fundamental principles and goals for AI governance, providing a strong foundation for global cooperation. The conversation evolved from high-level policy talk to considering concrete actions and their impacts on diverse communities, particularly in the Global South. The Global Digital Compact emerges as a crucial starting point for global AI governance, with emphasis on multi-stakeholder involvement, scientific research, capacity building, and human rights-centered approaches. As Amandeep Singh Gill noted, “The Global Digital Compact is our chance to shape our digital future.” The stage is set for continued dialogue and action on shaping an inclusive, sustainable digital future for all.

Session Transcript

Redi Thlabi: I think the applause was loudest this side. You’re very generous. Thank you. Good afternoon. Honored delegates, ladies and gentlemen. My name is Redi Thlabi. I’m a broadcast journalist, a moderator, an MC from Johannesburg, South Africa, delighted to be a visitor in the United States. I noticed that when the lunch break was announced, many of you did not leave. That tells me that you were in this room this morning when the answer to why we are here was provided. In the morning, we saw the real impact of digital tools, of artificial intelligence enabling human flourishing. Who can forget Adit, a young lady who grew up in a refugee camp, but she was able to access learning. She was able to connect with other young people from other parts of the world because she had the technology to do so. Who can forget how we witnessed the ability to get mobility after an acute injury. The mobility that you and I take for granted, but when you lose it, you need technology, you need innovation to help you be a part of the global community. You were in this room when we saw how technological tools can be enabled to respond to the planetary crisis that we are all facing today. That’s what happened this morning. So what are we doing this afternoon? We are here to ensure that those case studies that we heard about in the morning are not just the exception, but they become the norm. We are here to renew our commitments, to find solutions to the crises that we face, to ensure that we create a global digital architecture, a compact that is human-centered, that is secure, that is efficient, that is accessible to all. Because if we don’t do this, we create other frontiers of inequality. I come from Africa, I’m a part of the Global South, and we see very much how often we feel as if the world is advancing without us, even though we have the expertise, the agency, the tools, the willingness. But without the investment, without being invited into the table as we find these digital solutions, then this inequality will deepen. And so we convene today at a very hopeful moment. In a few hours, the Global Digital Compact may just become a reality. You will hear a lot about it. It has several themes that resonate. It’s about collaboration, creating policy, bringing all the stakeholders together to ensure that the case studies that we heard about in the morning become a global norm so that we all become citizens of a world where technology and AI are accessible, they are free, they are secure, and they are rooted, they are rooted in human flourishing. That’s what today is all about. But to situate us in the moment, let’s watch this very short video about the Global Digital Compact just to get a sense of the process and how it unfolded.

Official Video: GDC has been a very optimistic and constructive process during the past 18 months with broad participation from multi-stakeholders. And with GDC, we see that every country and every member state of the United Nations will have better possibilities of implementing the SDG agenda. Co-facilitators of the Global Digital Compact are so excited that we’ve come to this moment where we can actually indulge the Global Digital Compact. We as co-facilitators have engaged with yourselves. over many many hours. Over hundreds, thousands of delegates have put in their work and now it’s time to really look at this document and adopt it. And so we’re very excited that we’ve really come to this point and welcome you to this event. Thank you very much. The Global Digital Compact provides an opportunity to close the digital divide. It also provides an opportunity for Africa to engage as well as civil society organizations to engage way better at the United Nations level. The Global Digital Compact should be implemented through a multi-stakeholder process so that everyone, everywhere, can thrive in the age of AI. Governments must protect and support the people who build and govern digital public goods, like Wikipedia, which is run by volunteers who share knowledge in over 300 languages. Thank you very much for this outstanding opportunity to share with all of you how private and public collaboration can help achieve the goals of the Global Digital Compact. We at TIGO, we build broadband networks across all the communities we operate in. We call them digital highways because they provide the highways that bring our communities to the digital economy and it takes the work of everyone involved, public, private sector, everyone, so that those digital highways get built for the betterment of our communities are for the inclusion of everyone in them into the digital economy of the 21st century. Let’s make it happen together. I’m delighted to welcome the Global Digital Compact and to see that children’s rights are at the heart of this declaration. Children’s charities across the world have collaborated closely with co-facilitators and the UN Tech Envoy for two years to shape this important compact. We welcome that it now underscores a unified commitment for children’s rights and safety. I hope all will live by its words and will move from words to action. States have made bold commitments. They must now translate them into concrete actions. Equally, tech companies must not be exempt and be held accountable for the services they deliver to children. The Global Digital Compact has been a crucial platform for diverse stakeholders like me to come together and shape the future of a digital world that benefits everyone. It has fostered a sense of shared responsibility and ownership. I believe that the GDC we contributed will play a vital role in shaping a digital world.

Redi Thlabi: Thank you very much. Thank you. You will have an opportunity to make your inputs to ensure that the Global Digital Compact becomes a reality. Once it’s been adopted by world leaders, the online platform will be available tomorrow and you can share your inputs. Ladies and gentlemen, please help me welcome the Deputy Prime Minister of Sweden, Ebba Busch.

Ebba Busch: Excellencies, distinguished colleagues, ladies and gentlemen. I was suggesting earlier here when we were waiting for things to start, soon someone has to get up on stage and start singing. I’m not gonna sing here today but we’re going to talk about the digital era that we have just entered fully on now. And we’re living in an era where digital and emerging technologies, where they’re really reshaping almost every single aspect of our lives. our lives. The digital transformation presents us with unprecedented opportunities to really accelerate our work towards the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals. To fulfil those opportunities, we need to cooperate across all levels, and certainly, of course, including the UN. Sweden has, together with Zambia, had the honour of facilitating the negotiations on the Global Digital Compact that we are soon going to adopt. The Compact outlines our collective commitment to a digital future that is inclusive, that is open, that is sustainable, fair, safe and secure. And it seeks to close those digital divides and accelerate progress across the Sustainable Development Goals. Sweden is my home country, and Sweden is also home to some of the most innovative companies in the world that are enabling and driving the global digital transition forward. To truly harness this power of digital technology for a better and more sustainable future, we need an approach that involves all stakeholders. It is only by bringing together the excellent researchers, innovative companies, efficient authorities and multilateral organisations that we can create a well-functioning innovation system that works for everyone. Artificial intelligence, AI, plays a central role in this context. It has the potential to revolutionise how we work, learn and connect with one another. Yet, we must also acknowledge the challenges and risks that come with it. Of course, like so many of the new emerging technologies, AI can be used for both good and for harm. This is why it is crucial that we work together to establish common norms and governance structures that guide the use of AI in such a way that it truly, truly benefits humanity. And at the same time, limit its proliferation into areas of use that may threaten our common security, development, and future. We need a global conversation to build a shared understanding of both the opportunities and the challenges of AI. And in this regards, I really like to emphasize the Compact’s initiative to launch a global dialogue on AI governance, which engages governments and stakeholders in developing standards that prioritizes human rights, that prioritizes safety and sustainability. Increased investment will be crucial to scale up AI capacity, building for sustainable development. Taking into account the recommendations of the High-Level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence, the GDC encourages the establishment of a global fund on AI that is complementary to relevant UN funding mechanisms. Additionally, an international scientific panel on AI could offer valuable guidance on the global community on AI development. Sweden has long championed an open, free, and secure internet. And we believe that digital technology should be used to strengthen human rights. We have a responsibility to turn our vision of a digital future future into concrete actions that make a real difference. This means we must collaborate across borders and sectors, and we must all take responsibility to ensure that the digital transformation benefits everyone. Sweden is committed to continuing its leadership in this global process, and we look forward to working with all of you to unlock the potential of digitalization and to ensure that we build a future where digital technology truly serves all of humanity. And with that, I’d like to end with somewhat of a more personal reflection and personal note as a citizen of the world, as a mother of two. My two children back home in Sweden, they’re named Elise and Birger, they’re seven and nine years old. I was this much pregnant when I got elected party leader for my party for 10 years ago. And I’m happy and I’m proud to be able to say to them, because they are now, I mean, they are the generation that are growing up not knowing what life was like before internet, you know? Can you imagine? And I’m proud to be able to say to them that we are now truly taking their rights in the digitalized era seriously, because I’ve said so many times that a childhood in freedom requires safety online. And thank you. And it really is so. We’ve said it so many times, but you can’t say it enough times. Children’s rights are human rights. Women’s rights are human rights. And we are now bringing human rights and the sustainable developmental goals online, finally. Thank you.

Redi Thlabi: Deputy Prime Minister, thank you for your energy and inspiring case studies that you shared. Without much ado, let us hear another keynote this afternoon from the CEO of Google, Sundar Pichai.

Sundar Pichai: Mr. Secretary General, President of the General Assembly, Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, it’s a privilege to join you today. I am energized by the Summit’s focus on the future. We have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to unlock human potential for everyone, everywhere. I believe that technology is a foundational enabler of progress. Just as the Internet and mobile devices expanded opportunities for people around the world, now AI is poised to accelerate progress at unprecedented scale. I’m here today to make the case for three things. Why I believe AI is so transformative. How it can be applied to benefit humanity and make progress on the UN Sustainable Development Goals. And where we can drive deeper partnerships to ensure that the technology benefits everyone. But first, let me share why this is so important to me personally and to Google as a company. Growing up in Chennai, India with my family, the arrival of each new technology improved our lives in meaningful ways. Our first rotary phone saved us hours of travel to the hospital to get test results. Our first refrigerator gave us more time to spend as a family rather than rushing to cook ingredients before they spoil. The technology that changed my life the most was the computer. I didn’t have much access to one growing up. When I came to graduate school in the U.S., there were labs full of machines I could use anytime I wanted. It was mind-blowing. Access to computing inspired me to pursue a career where I could bring technology to more people. And that path led me to Google 20 years ago. I was excited by its mission to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful. That mission has had incredible impact. Google Search democratized information access, opened up opportunities in education and entrepreneurship. Platforms like Chrome and Android helped bring 1 billion people online. Today, 15 of our products serve more than half a billion people and businesses each, and 6 of them each serve more than 2 billion. There is no cost to use them, and most of our users are in the developing world. Today we are working on the most transformative technology yet, AI. We’ve been investing in AI research, tools, and infrastructure for two decades because it’s the most profound way we can deliver on our mission and improve people’s lives. I want to talk today about four of the biggest opportunities we see, many of which align with the SDGs. One is helping people access the world’s knowledge in their own language. Using AI, in just the last year we have added 110 new languages to Google Translate, spoken by half a billion people around the world. That brings our total to 246 languages, and we are working towards 1,000 of the world’s most spoken languages. A second area is accelerating scientific discovery to benefit humanity. Our AlphaFold breakthrough is solving big challenges in predicting some of the building blocks of life, including proteins. and DNA. We have opened up AlphaFold to the scientific community free of charge and it has been accessed by more than 2 million researchers from over 190 countries. 30% are in the developing world. For example, over 25,000 researchers just in Brazil. Globally, AlphaFold is being used in research that could help make crops more resistant to disease, discover new drugs in areas like malaria vaccines and cancer treatments and much more. A third opportunity is helping people in the path of climate-related disaster, building on the UN’s initiative, Early Warnings for All. Our Flood Hub system provides early warnings up to seven days in advance, helping protect over 460 million people in over 80 countries. And for millions in the path of wildfires, our boundary tracking systems are already in 22 countries on Google Maps. We also just announced FireSat technology, which will use satellites to detect and track early-stage wildfires, with imagery updated every 20 minutes globally so firefighters can respond. AI gives a boost in accuracy, speed and scale. Fourth, we see the opportunity for AI to meaningfully contribute to economic progress. It’s already enabling entrepreneurs and small businesses, empowering governments to provide public services, and boosting productivity across sectors. Some studies show that AI could boost global labor productivity by 1.4 percentage points and increase global GDP by 7% within the next decade. For example, AI is helping improve operations and logistics in emerging markets, where connectivity, infrastructure and traffic congestion are big challenges. Freight startup Gary Logistics in Ethiopia is using AI to help move goods to market faster and bring more work opportunities to freelance drivers. These are just very early examples, and there are so many others across education, health, and sustainability. As technology improves, so will the benefits. As with any emerging technology, AI will have limitations, be it issues with accuracy, factuality, and bias, as well as the risks of misapplication and misuse, like the creation of deep fakes. It also presents new complexities. For example, the impact on the future of work. For all these reasons, we believe that AI must be developed, deployed, and used responsibly from the start. We are guided by our AI principles, which we published back in 2018. And we work with others across the industry, academia, the UN, and governments in efforts like the Frontier Model Forum, the OECD, and the G7 Hiroshima process. But I want to talk about another risk that I worry about. I think about where I grew up and how fortunate I was to have access to technology, even if it came slowly. Not everyone had that experience. And while good progress has been made by UN institutions like the ITU, gaps persist today in the form of a well-known digital divide. With AI, we have the chance to be inclusive from the start and to ensure that the digital divide doesn’t become an AI divide. This is a challenge that needs to be met by the private sector and public sector working together. We can focus on three key areas. First is digital infrastructure. Google has made big investments globally in subsea and terrestrial fiber optic cables. One connects Africa with Europe. And two others will be the first intercontinental fiber optic routes. that connect Asia-Pacific and South America, and Australia and Africa. These fiber optic routes stitch together our network of 40 cloud regions around the world that provide digital services to governments, entrepreneurs, SMBs, and companies across all sectors. In addition to compute access, we also open up our technology to others. We did this with Android, and now our Gemma AI models are open to developers and researchers, and we’ll continue to invest here. A second area is about investing in people. That starts with making sure people have the skills they need to seize new opportunities. Our Grow with Google program has already trained 100 million people around the world in digital skills. And today, I’m proud to announce our Global AI Opportunity Fund. This will invest $120 million to make AI education and training available in communities around the world. We are providing this in local languages, in partnerships with nonprofits and NGOs. We are also helping to support entrepreneurs for the AI revolution. In Brazil, we worked with thousands of women entrepreneurs to use Google AI to grow their businesses. In Asia, where fewer than 6% of startups are founded by women, we are providing many with mentorship, capital, and training. The third area is one where we especially need the help of member countries and leaders in this room, creating an enabling policy environment, one that addresses both the risks and worries around new technologies, and also encourages the kind of applications that improve lives at scale. This requires a few things. Government policymaking that supports investments in infrastructure, people. and innovation that benefits humanity. Country development strategies and frameworks like the Global Digital Compact that prioritize the adoption of AI solutions. And smart product regulation that mitigates harms and resists national protectionist impulses that could widen an AI divide and limit AI’s benefits. We are excited to be your partner and to work with you to make sure bold innovations are deployed responsibly so that AI is truly helpful for everyone. The opportunities are too great, the challenge is too urgent, and this technology too transformational to do anything less. Thank you.

Redi Thlabi: Thank you very much to the CEO of Google, Sundar Pichai, for that very holistic picture of the potential, the risks, and the opportunities. Thank you. Now let’s get to the conversation. Let’s put some meat to it, as we say in my language at home. Let’s just give some meaning to the Global Digital Compact. How do we position ourselves to move from aspiration to action and to take us through that very important conversation? Here is a sister, a moderator, and an international broadcaster, my homegirl, Tumi Makgabo.

Tumi Makgabo: Thank you. All right, we got there in the end. Good afternoon, everybody. Reedy, thank you so very much for that introduction. I feel like we flew a long way to get together in New York, but it’s always a pleasure to be in. in this incredible, exciting, stimulating city. But more importantly, I think it’s really incredible to have the opportunity to be in a room where people are thinking about what tomorrow’s going to look like. How do we create a tomorrow that works for everybody who’s involved in tomorrow? Well, you’ve heard a little bit about the GDC, and in this following conversation, we’re going to try to unpack how do we take the idea, how do we take the thought, how do we take the intent of what the GDC is trying to create and make it real, give it life, breathe it into existence. It isn’t easy, it certainly will be a challenge, but I think it’s a challenge not only that we’re up for, but it’s a challenge that is important to ensure that the society and the world looks exactly the way we hope and intend. Now, ordinarily, I could safely stand up here all by myself, but I don’t think that’s going to be the most exciting thing for you to watch. So please assist me in giving a very, very, very warm welcome to the following. Felix Mutati, who is the Minister of Technology and Science in Zambia. Margrethe Vestager, who is Executive Vice President of the European Union. Rebeca Grynspan, who is the Secretary General of UNCTAD. Omar Al Olama, the Minister of State for Artificial Intelligence, Digital Economy, and Remote Work Applications in the UAE. Josephine Teo, who is the Minister for Digital Development and Information in Singapore. And last, but most certainly not least, Nnenna Nwakanama, Civil Society Representative. To all of you, thank you so very much for joining us today. And it really is genuinely and truly an honor to have each of you joining me today. And I’m looking forward to having this conversation. I’m going to take a seat next to you. But not too close. I get a little bit nervous because I don’t know what they might do to me if I ask them a question they don’t like. The reason we really gathered here, and let’s talk for a moment about the digital compact. It’s about principles, it’s about commitments, it’s about inclusivity, not just in terms of who negotiated it, but in terms of who it’s supposed to apply to. The intention is to, and I’m going to read this so I don’t get it wrong, to support the achievement of an inclusive, open, sustainable, fair, safe, and secure digital future for all. Ambitious. In addition, there’s something that’s really important that the GDC does, and that is it recognizes the pervasive and existing digital divides, and we know, we can see what the impact of those divides are and have been in the past. And really, it responds to the need for more inclusive digital governance. So we all have an understanding of what it should do, what it shouldn’t do, and how do we deal. So the ambition is there. It’s in paper, in various iterations. How do we make that happen? Perhaps Mr. Minister, if I can begin with you. Developing countries in particular, Reedy mentioned it earlier, and I think the lived reality of most people who exist in the developing world will be able to tell you about some of the challenges that we face whenever we experience digital divides. I mean, the CEO of Google just gave us a perfect example in his remarks. How do you think the GDC will help in particular developing countries, but perhaps you can use your country as an example, to bridge that divide? It’s on. Let’s try again.

Felix Mutati: Thank you. Many thanks for having me. I’ll just tell you a short story in terms of bridging the digital divide, in terms of inclusivity, from a Zambian perspective. A young man called James in the rural part of Zambia, a farmer, farming using traditional methods because he was not included or connected, had a chance to secure a mobile phone, had a chance to get connected to internet. Using those tools, he transformed his farming methods because he had access to weather forecast, he had access to market prices, he had access to information. And our interpretation is that the Global Digital Compact is about a shared vision. Transforming life for that little boy in the rural part of Zambia. That is our simple understanding and that is why we’re here, changing lives.

Tumi Makgabo: Now there’s a particular balance that is always required because we see that sometimes when we change and transform lives, sometimes it can happen really rapidly, sometimes it takes a little bit longer. If I can come to the UAE as an example, what is the thinking about bridging and bringing together that process of rapid adoption of AI, along with making sure that it is a safe environment for all who are going to be involved in digital technology and how it changes their lives?

Omar Al Olama: Thank you very much. I’m very happy to be here and to be very honest, I think the UAE is a good example of what happens when you create a trajectory for digital development that is on steroids, as they say. we’ve experienced it. So we went from not having paved roads, not having university graduates, being a country that was maybe part of the underdeveloped world 50 years ago to being today one of the most advanced countries in the world. That advancement created a lot of opportunities, it made the UAE be able to explore frontiers like artificial intelligence, and I think it also shows that there is no excuse for us not to be able to do that for more countries. We need to move from, and I don’t mean to plagiarize President Obama here, but from yes we can to yes we will. We need to really definitely try to actually implement that vision that we have on digital development and take forward the recommendations that the panel is making towards the global south.

Tumi Makgabo: We need to also have the conversation about inclusivity. The reason we can have a conversation around developed versus developing countries is because growth has not been equitable. There are some parts of the world that have grown and done well economically, et cetera, and those that have clearly been left behind. If we can then talk for a moment, Secretary General, about how do we make sure that this compact is not just a document that is full of ambition, but it actually means that we see a manifestation of that inclusivity of growth when it comes to the digital era.

Rebeca Grynspan: Thank you. Thank you very much, and thank you for that question. First of all, let me say that we all know that we are lagging in the SDGs, yes? That only 70% of the SDGs are enrolled to be accomplished by 2030. So we have to start by thinking that we cannot have linear solutions because we need non-linear ones, pathways, to really get to the 2030 objectives. And I think that the digital revolution in AI can provide those. non-linear path towards DSDG. So it’s a great opportunity because obviously, you know, the digital technologies are transforming life in an exponential way. So that can be really a very important tool. But my second point, going to you, is that when you are in a society where things are changing so rapidly, we have to remember always that not everything changes at the same speed. So it creates tensions. It creates asymmetries. It creates imbalances that we need to deal with. So it’s not enough access. You need really a deliberate digital development strategy because you have to connect. You have to bring the stakeholders. But you have to do a lot of things. You have to create an ecosystem that is, you know, really will bring everybody to the speed, to the level that is necessary. But you start from a very uneven play field, yes? Not everybody is today in the same line to start this career. So you have to make an extra effort. And part of this extra effort is, first of all, for people, it’s not only access, but it’s affordability and quality of their access to the digital technologies. But it’s also not to relegate the developing countries to be users. We want to be producers. We want to bring the digital revolution, not only for our consumption, but we want to really use it for our diversification, for going up the ladder. in terms of the value chains in the world, to add more value, to create better employment, and to bring digital into the productive structure will really require an extra effort from the international community and also from governments to make it, as I said, a deliberate development strategy.

Tumi Makgabo: One thing that also is going to require deliberate efforts is the question of human rights. Margrethe, if I can come to you on that. How do you make sure that there is a respect and a consideration for human rights while at the same time one wants to promote fair competition and keep in mind that we’re coming from such different points of departure, there’s a lot of balancing. How is the EU thinking about that?

Margrethe Vestager: First and foremost, I think the Global Digital Compact is an amazing achievement. It is as if we have a new chance. We have it. There are so many things where we have not succeeded, and I think the Digital Compact shows that we can agree that we’re really going to engage in correcting the mistakes and show much increased effort because if we live up to what is in the Compact, well, then a lot of the things that are haunting us will be a thing of the past, and for us, we want to partner with as many countries as possible, and the fact that human rights are completely core of the Global Digital Compact makes our conversation shorter, focused because we know that we agree on the fundamentals when we digitalize. So, partnerships will be so much easier, and these are really important for us. And I think it also illustrates that there is a commitment to create trust in technology. Because that doesn’t come automatic. Technology can be terribly misused, both for crime and fraud, but also for surveillance and undermining democracy. And here we can focus on the use of technology. I think the example, the story was excellent. It’s such a good illustration of the agency that people get. Because I think that is the underlining ambition here. That all the things that we were not successful with, with trust, with focusing on the use cases and giving people agency, enabling them, then this digital compact will be, you know, a road to a future that is very different from all the bad scenarios that we actually do have ahead of us.

Tumi Makgabo: There is no question, I think, for anybody that this presents a particular opportunity. One through the GDC, but generally through technology and how we can better harness that to achieve all of these things that we wanted to do. The world of work, however, we all recognize is going to look quite different in five years’ time, let alone a decade or two down the road. In Singapore’s case, how are you ensuring that there is better preparedness for a more digitized work in the context of work? And how can we learn from what Singapore has done so that we’re not always having to go back to the beginning in order to ensure we’re better prepared for a world of work that looks so different?

Josephine Teo: Well, thank you very much for this opportunity to participate in this great conversation. My comments will build on what Margaret and the Secretary-General have said. And that is to recognize the fact that unevenness exists even for the workforce. And what it means… is that there will be some parts of the workforce that are closer to the technology frontier because their employers are already using technologies in innovative ways in their companies. And so that creates an environment for them to pick up the right skills to become even more proficient in the jobs and the requirements of the future. But there will be many other members of the workforce who, for example, may be employed by small and medium enterprises who tend to lag in terms of the technology adoption. Then there are also people who are marginalised. Sometimes it is because they have special needs. It could be because they have a disability. We have to be very creative in thinking about how all of the past barriers that put impediments in the path of these individuals to succeed. The way in which we are doing this is to enable every single one of the workers to acquire the skills to be relevant for the future. Part of it involves working with employers because they create the momentum and they create the strongest incentives. But we also need active labour market policies in the form of support for individual learning, putting resources in the hands of individual workers so that they don’t only depend on their employers to provide the training opportunities. Then in order to support this ecosystem, you need also to build up the training infrastructure so that there is a good ecosystem of training providers who not only can deliver training competently, but whose content meet the needs of the market. All of these have to come together and the more we can share with each other how these can be achieved in each of our contexts, I think the better we are going to be. So we are very grateful to the UN for putting together the GDC to create the opportunities for us to do exactly that.

Tumi Makgabo: Thank you very much, Minister Teo. Minister Al-Olama, I believe that we have to bid you farewell, so thank you very much for joining us. Do you want to, is there one more comment and thought that you want to leave us with before you go?

Omar Al Olama: I think the Global Digital Compact is a great starting point for the action to follow. The UAE, we believe that there’s a lot that needs to be done but we all need to work together on it. This technology is very pervasive, it crosses borders, and there needs to be cooperation. So we’re definitely part of this roadmap that the UN is putting forward and we’re definitely going to be a big supporter for it.

Tumi Makgabo: That’s terrific to hear. Thank you for joining us and we look forward to seeing you do that. If you can please just give him a thank you. Thank you. And no, I wasn’t waiting for him to leave, I just have to get closer to the panellists, so don’t think I’m being, I promise I’m not being weird. Nnenna, if I can come to you, from a civil society perspective. You know, the reality is that there sometimes can be a disconnect between what happens on the ground and what happens higher up between policy makers and those of us who have really good intentions. It doesn’t always manifest in the way that we hope. What does the implementation question and what does the monitoring question of the GDC look like in a civil society context from your point of view?

Nnenna Nwakanama: Sankofa, I’ll come back to that word. Fabrizio Hochschild is from Chile. Ninten Desai is from India. Lynn Sentamu is Canadian. Marcus Comer. is from Switzerland, Yanis Karklins from Lithuania, Dee Williams in St. Lucia, Adama Samaseko in Mali, and the journalist Brenda Zulu from Zambia. I’ve met these people over my 25 years of engagement in digital cooperation within the UN. These are people from all walks of life. And my first statement here today is sankofa, looking back from where we’re coming from so we know where we’re going to. The GDC is nothing revolutionary. The success is in the process, and that process is multi-stakeholder. I do believe that as we keep shaking hands between multilateralism and multi-stakeholderism, we can do much. Not just here in New York. I don’t need a visa to be able to implement GDC. I want to be at home and have the same principle of multi-stakeholderism play out in everything at national level.

Tumi Makgabo: I think we understand why you’ve been in this process for so long. We kind of get it. Thank you for that. Minister Mutati, if I can then come back to you. We can look at the broader picture, and I think the GDC is no doubt inspiring. Those who believe it or not, I did actually read it, and I think it is really inspiring, and I think it really is ambitious, and I think it genuinely is asking us to address some of the most fundamental and pressing issues that help us address the human rights challenges we face on the planet. planet. How, though, do we begin to implement that? From a Zambia perspective, what is the translation of that, from paper to reality, actually look like and involve?

Felix Mutati: Thank you very much. One of the pillars of the Global Digital Compact is strategic partnerships. And strategic partnership from a Zambia perspective, I’ll give you two examples. This year, Zambia has got challenges around climate change. Our economy, in terms of GDP, is going down. And we have difficulties and other problems. But earlier on, we had a strategic partnership to look at how we can collaborate among ourselves as Africans. And one of the countries in Africa, we went and lifted a tax innovation, collection innovation, which we started using this year. Now, the consequences of that partnership has been that, whereas the economy is going down, the tax revenue is going up. And for us, we think that is what is called strategic partnership, which is part of the Global Compact. It gives actual results. And this is actually happening. Second example, because of limited resource, to try to extend connectivity of our people, government on one side. Working with the private sector and other partners, providing the necessary incentives, they were able to plant significant infrastructure, digital infrastructure, which has enabled Internet to move from in the 50s to almost 70 percent. That is what we call strategic partnership. So Zambia, in a sense, was already implementing the global digital compact and the key pillar of partnership, and the results are there for us to see. Thank you.

Tumi Makgabo: That’s a really interesting example that you use, because it sounds to me like a lot of this has to do with ensuring that the solutions are specific to what your needs are, no doubt. But when we look more broadly, the challenge for a lot of developing countries is that they have to prioritize where they allocate those resources. So it’s easier for us to sit and say, well, you know, we have to think about ESG, or we have to think about greening, or we have to think about this safety and that health. But the resources that are required to do all of those things are quite limited. What do you think needs to happen to allow developing countries to better strike that balance, and how potentially can the GDC be supportive of that process? We know that within the document itself, it’s quite specific about a need for that to happen. But again, the reality versus what’s on paper.

Rebeca Grynspan: Yeah, it’s such a good question, because, you know, precisely today we were talking about the necessary changes in international financial architecture, really to support development. We were talking about restructuring the debt, because debt doesn’t allow many of these countries, to really have the strategies and the investments that need to be done. I gave today the number that 3.3 billion people live in countries that are paying more in service and debt than on health or education. So if you have that problem, how are you going really to have the investments that you need for making this happen? And the other part of this, I’m sorry to say, obviously, is the responsibility to think about the long-term. I always say we usually forget that the short and the long-term start at the same time. There is no long-term that is a succession of short-termism, yes? You don’t get there by short-term thinking. You need long-term thinking. But many of the systems don’t allow, don’t have the structures, don’t have the institutions like, for example, Singapore has, to really have this long-term view for a policy to stay and to persevere for the objectives. So let me just end saying, you need national responsibility, and the minister has talked about that. You need a government that really thinks about this, that does the right thing, that invests in education, that invests in the people that Nina was talking about, that brings society in an inclusive way with a voice to really harness development, but you need the international community. And that’s why the global digital compact is so important, as we have said. Because you need a framework. And the other thing, and I’m sorry to say this because we are talking about optimism, but this is a very concentrated market, yes? need to spread the opportunities because really concentration is very high. So you need international standards and international norms to really make these technologies to stay within the good and not to go to the bad, like Margrethe was saying.

Tumi Makgabo: So it’s interesting that you’re promoting the global view, which is crucial. We’ve heard from the minister the national view, but there’s that space in between, which is the regional question. Now we’ve seen what the EU has been doing. We understand the EU’s ambition generally to be a leader in many spaces, and this is not unique in that question. What can the world, or what should we be learning about broader cooperation and implementation of such policies when we look at what the EU is trying to do within its space of influence from a policy perspective? Because one size doesn’t fit all, so there needs to be some maneuverability in that regard, but there also needs to be an overview that allows everybody to understand what the rules of engagement are.

Margrethe Vestager: I think that is very well put. And the thing is that there is an asymmetry here, because the individual human being can take the most of the possibilities, but the individual cannot do away with the harm that technology can bring. That is not possible. So there is a societal, regional, global answer here to address things that are systemic in a systemic matter. And this is what we are trying to do. So we have passed legislation, the Digital Markets Act, to keep the market open so that people have choice, and so that the businesses who provide choice, that they are interested for investors. Because, if you depend on a gatekeeper to get to the market, why invest in you? We have the Digital Services Act making sure that digital services are safe to use. That they would not cause you mental health problems or undermine democracy or the integrity of our elections. And that what is legitimately decided in our democracy is also treated as such when online. We have privacy legislation and our AI Act is coming into force. All of that to create a systemic response to the things that people cannot influence themselves individually. And when you have a systemic response, and we enforce in full, because otherwise it’s worth nothing. Enforcement is everything. When we do that, then each and every one of us, alone and together, can grasp the opportunities. And that’s the important thing here, because otherwise nothing will happen. So I think one should be really careful to try to decentralize, to say, you go, you go figure out. No, no. We need that systemic response. We think that legislation is needed, because we see the harm that can be done. And I think that global digital compact is essential, especially when it comes to AI. Because AI is not just any new digital algorithm. It is so much more powerful when it comes to human agency. And that is why the use cases, the trust that we as societies will be responsible, is absolutely key for all these wonderful things that we’re talking about.

Tumi Makgabo: That brings me nicely. Okay, you want to… They keep wanting to clap for you and I keep interrupting them. So I think every now and again, I must remember to give you a chance to clap properly. That brings me nicely to the question of public-private partnerships. So, when we are looking at this process, everybody has to play their part. We need to make sure that the rules of engagement not only exist, but that they are followed and that they are implemented, and that there is consequence for transgression, right? Because it doesn’t help, and we know about, broadly speaking, the challenges of international law when it comes to the implementation and enforcement of consequence. What role, however, do you see, maybe you can give us an example in Singapore, where this public-private partnership can better foster the implementation and the oversight of what this GDC process may look like?

Josephine Teo: Well, since Margaret was talking about AI, that could be where the example arises. I think being a general-purpose technology, we all want to benefit from its transformative potential. And yet, at the level of public services, very often the expertise does not yet exist. And that’s where I think the private sector can be brought into the picture and encouraged to enable policymakers, as well as individuals, teams, organisations that make the rules to understand how this technology is implemented. And that’s exactly how we have done it in Singapore. We encouraged and we invited the private sector to contribute to the development of use cases, as well as our understanding of the guardrails that need to be put in place. But I would go one step further. I would say that the private sector can do a lot more in terms of helping to build capacity. And the capacity is so important because, particularly from the point of view of small states, on the one hand we see the opportunities, on the other hand we are told of the risks. The question is, will we… we’d be left behind as small states. Now, in this process of figuring out what to do, I think we were really appreciative that at the UN level, there was an advisory board at the high level that was constituted in a very inclusive way. And this has given us the motivation to contribute to this process by asking our own chief AI officer to be involved, and then subsequently inviting the whole high-level advisory board to meet in Singapore so that they can also engage with the forum of small states that was meeting there. Now, the result of a process like this is that we now have the ability to say, adopting the principles articulated in the GDC, how to help ourselves as nations, but equally importantly, how we can help each other. And in that regard, I’m very pleased to note that this process created an opportunity for another country that we admire greatly, which is Rwanda, to say, how about the both of us come together to create an AI playbook for small states? So that is something that we have done. And I hope that this will help all of us.

Tumi Makgabo: I just love my panel because everything they say, everybody wants to clap for them.

Margrethe Vestager: Can I add something? Because I would encourage everybody to look at the AI apprentice model that is implemented in Singapore, because that allows businesses to get to use AI while people in all walks of life can learn about how to do that. And you get experts who are embedded in the local community. So this idea of AI apprenticeships, I think the Singaporean model is really, really inspiring.

Tumi Makgabo: Thank you very much.

Josephine Teo: We’re happy to share more.

Tumi Makgabo: They’re happy to share. So everybody come, let’s share. Okay, Nnenna, if I can come to you because believe it or not, we’ve got like four minutes left. What measures do you think specifically we need to be mindful of? And I’m going to limit you in the sense that I’m going to ask you for two of the most important measures we need to make sure are in place to protect human rights as we embark on this journey.

Nnenna Nwakanama: Two measures, capacity to implement. It is okay to come to New York. It is okay to read European papers and all of that, but America and Europe do not make the world. I’m African. I’m Nigerian. I live in Cote d’Ivoire. I’m part of this world and I want that to be down here. So capacity to implement across the whole world, whether it be government, because I have spoken about multi-stakeholder, but multi-stakeholder capacity is needed, financial, human and technological. That is one. We need to balance that. The other one is connecting people. I see people talking about AI. I see, I’ve lived in the days of great technology, emerging technology, and all of the big grammar technology, but please, can we get people connected to me? And please, can we not disconnect the people who are already connected? Because some of you are here and then you go home and you disrupt internet connectivity. We have to talk about shutdown. In the GDC itself, that part has, they’ve been knowing at it. I don’t know what it’s going to be like tomorrow morning. Anyway, let me now, excellences, ladies and gentlemen, friends here and friends who are watching me online, boys and girls, cats and dogs, emojis and avatars, I myself, on behalf of my own self, I would like to endorse the GDC.

Tumi Makgabo: because I want my time back from all this clapping. Like really, I’ve lost like loads of time from the applause. Okay, we’ve literally got two and a half minutes, so I’m gonna do a rapid fire round. I’m going to ask you for two specific things that when we leave this stage and we leave this room, as individuals, we need to consider implementing. We’re not talking broad policy strokes here, we’re talking about things that you think we can do when we leave. Nnenna, you’ve given us a clue, but can you give us two different ones, and I’m gonna start with you and work my way across. We’ve got two minutes.

Nnenna Nwakanama: Connect the schools. Connect the young people. Connect my children. Thank you.

Tumi Makgabo: Okay, okay, okay, thank you. Thank you. Minister Teo.

Josephine Teo: We want to move beyond learning about digital to thriving with digital. And to do that, we can move alone, and we can go very fast that way, or we can go together, and I believe that will go even further.

Tumi Makgabo: Thank you. Even further. Secretary General, you.

Rebeca Grynspan: Embrace not only the global digital compact, talk to your governments for implementing, for supporting, but embrace the path for the future, because there are many things that we have to do for this to be possible. And in the path of the future, we have a lot that can help people to get connected.

Tumi Makgabo: Vice-President Vestager.

Margrethe Vestager: Obviously, first things first, connectivity is everything. If you’re not connected, well, what then? But as we connect, please make sure that we do not sacrifice our children. Their independence, their agency, that they do not get dependent, that they do not get sucked in, in social media that will not serve them well. We have a huge challenge in making. sure that our children, they’re not only safe, but developed, and that they can use digital for their own good and for the good of their community.

Tumi Makgabo: Minister?

Felix Mutati: Thank you. One of the biggest challenges, the skills and literacy, particularly in the rural part of our country, things we take for granted. Let us handhold our people. And let us show them how to press the numbers on the mobile phone. Thank you.

Tumi Makgabo: I don’t know if you can tell, but I thoroughly enjoyed that conversation. And it is because we had such a wonderful panel of speakers with us this afternoon. Can you please give them the appropriate round of applause? I can’t hear it. Thank you so very much. Thank you. And thank you. Thank you very much.

Redi Thlabi: OK, I see your panel doesn’t want to leave the stage to me. OK. Thank you. Thank you so very much to Dumi Mahabo for expertly leading that important conversation. We’re going to watch a very short video speaking to the themes of today about the futures that are possible for us and the kind of decisions we need to make. Let’s just watch this short video, and then I’ll introduce you to the next panel.

Official Video: One humanity, two futures. In one, we embrace AI’s potential for a world of inclusion and equity. In another, AI tools became the catalyst for division and exclusion. The choice between these paths did not lie in circuits, but in human hands. In October 2023, amid heated debates on artificial intelligence and its potential, there was excitement about the future, but also anxiety over its risks and uncertainties. The UN Secretary-General gathered 39 top AI experts to confront this challenge. The uniquely diverse group consulted intensively around the world and engaged with thousands of experts. This uniquely diverse group aligned on guiding principles to propose concrete actions for governing AI for humanity by building common scientific understanding on AI, its opportunities and its risks, by fostering common ground for effective AI policies and standards anchored in human rights, by sharing common benefits through building capacity, mobilizing resources and tackling data dilemmas, to close AI divides, and to support this global action, an AI office at the United Nations, for an equitable and inclusive future with AI. Let’s build this future together.

Redi Thlabi: Thank you very much. And I think the theme of that video links so well with the comments that came from the first panel. We all acknowledge we come from different worlds, but we are one humanity. So how do we create these digital tools, AI for humanity, make it serve humanity, make it accessible for all of humanity? I’m really looking forward. to this next panel discussion, which speaks exactly to that, AI for Humanity. And to moderate this panel discussion is Ian Bremmer, president of Eurasia Group. Ian?

Ian Bremmer: Thank you so much, and also thanks to me, who just crushed it for the last 45 minutes, absolutely, right? So now you’re stuck with me, and obviously I’m honored to be here at the Summit of the Future. We’re going to talk about artificial intelligence. I’m honored to be one of the 39 members of the high-level advisory panel on AI, and you’re going to meet a number of my peers on the panel today. It was back in 2017 that the Secretary General, António Guterres, I remember first told me that he thought that his two most important legacies in global governance would be on combating climate change and responding to the positive implications of disruptive technologies. You have seen the UN engage and lead the work on climate over the past many years, but today is a day we get to talk about and even celebrate a little some efforts in global governance on artificial intelligence. This past Thursday, I think you’ve seen it, we have released our final report, Governing AI for Humanity. It’s right here. It’s the first truly global approach to governance of artificial intelligence, and we’re going to talk today about some of the recommendations, why governance including nations from the global south is so important, and some practical reasons why this roadmap is needed. to ensure progress and greater equity, given the challenges that we face in our digital and physical future. So, with that, let me please introduce our distinguished panelists. Experts and leaders from many sectors required for a multi-stakeholder approach, five of us together on the UN High-Level Advisory Body, and two interlopers who are here anyway. As I mentioned, first of all, our co-chairs. We have Carme Artigas, who is co-chair of the body, along with James Manyka, senior vice president at Google Alphabet. We’ve got Vilas Dhar, also an HLAB member. He’s president of the Patrick J. McGovern Foundation. Dr. Wang Jian is chief technology officer at Alibaba. Volker Turk, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. And Alondra Nelson, also an HLAB member, is a professor at the Institute of Advanced Study. I welcome all of you. Please. So, let’s get right to it. Carme, the first question I want to ask, and I’m going to start with our two co-chairs, shockingly, bracketing this whole thing, is why the United Nations, right? There have been a lot of efforts at governance of AI. There’s been a lot of money going into AI. The UN doesn’t have a lot of money, doesn’t have a lot of power, right? But here we are. So, why? I mean, obviously, part of it is because it makes us sit uncomfortably close, and that facilitates cooperation. But leaving that aside, why was it critical for the United Nations to take this on?

Carme Artigas: Yes, so this was the first question we had to answer ourselves in the body. You were independent people, and we came to the conclusion that the UN is uniquely positioned to this effort, because it’s the only global organization that has the mandate, the reach, and the legitimacy to seat all nations and all stakeholders in the table. And it has the historical, I would say, success that has done it in the past, I mean, governing international topics such as climate change or on earth control. And because AI is such a pervasive and horizontal technology, and it’s absolutely cross borders, there is no single nation or region that can solve by itself the potential harm biases, discrimination, and lack of inclusiveness. And of course there are other frameworks that are very, very valuable, but they are limited. They usually leave behind many nations, especially on the global south. So we do not pretend that UN is the right place to regulate AI at a global level. We think it’s the right place to encourage collaboration, to foster inclusive business, and ensure that AI is developed, keeping the human rights in mind.

Ian Bremmer: Now, you’re a European, and the Europeans are known for having governance, even multi-stakeholder governance as a superpower. I mean, Lord knows it’s not building AI companies, right? So given that, how do you, former minister in this field, you know, how did you engage with what can the UN do, and what should the EU really be doing?

Carme Artigas: I would say that people sometimes mix ethics, regulation, and governance. There are three different things. Ethics is how do we should, how should we all behave well, companies, governments. Governance is how do we put in mechanisms, instruments, that ensure that everybody’s behaving ethically. And regulation is one of these mechanisms, and we have done it in Europe, the first international regulation, and nobody can argue against me that regulation is not against innovation. That’s another topic, but I am open to discuss it to anyone. I think regulation builds trust, because it orders a market and gives trust. confidence to the market, the consumers, and the citizens. But there are not only a way to govern through regulation. We can govern through transparency, through oversight, through involving everybody. So governance is beyond regulation itself. It’s one mechanism. We should find also the market incentives so that companies and governments behave ethically.

Ian Bremmer: Just a quick one, because I’m responding to that. Did you say, I mean, when the group first came together, you know, 39 members from all these different countries, different walks of life, that actually coming to agreement on common principles seemed to be one of the easiest things for our group to do? That was quick. Am I right about that?

Carme Artigas: Yeah, of course.

Ian Bremmer: Anyone else want to take that on? James?

James Manyika: No, you’re fundamentally right. I mean, one of the things that was extraordinary when we began our work was how quickly we got to agree on things like, this must be based on fundamental human rights. We all agreed. This must be based on international law. We all agreed. This must benefit everybody. We all agreed. I think the hard work was, how do we all come together to think through how we actually do and achieve those things? But I think getting to the principles was relatively quite straightforward. I’m looking at Alondra here, who was a big, you know, force in getting us to many of the right places we got to, especially on issues around fundamental human rights based on the extraordinary work that she had been doing for many, many years.

Ian Bremmer: Alondra, do you want to jump in?

Alondra Nelson: Yeah, I would just say, you know, to your question of why, why is that the UN provides us with a quite incredible foundation? I mean, the UN Charter, our international accords around human rights are quite powerful kind of cornerstones for thinking about this. And so we had a place to go. And I think, you know, the challenge that we face with technology is particularly powerful and fast moving ones like AI is things are moving around and where do we anchor ourselves? And I think the why of the UN is in part that the world’s countries had agreed. have agreed upon already these fundamental kind of true North values. The challenge becomes what does that mean in a digital world? What does that mean in an AI world in which, you know, society is being kind of re-transformed and reconfigured? But I think those fundamental things are true and that’s been a really core of our work on the committee.

Ian Bremmer: And I want our audience to appreciate this. I mean, getting the Singaporeans to champion rule of law is not exactly shocking, but I mean, we’re talking about the Americans, the Russians, the Chinese, the Europeans, the global South. I mean, all participants here, this was not the hard challenge in this group. Vilas?

Vilas Dhar: I think that’s right. I mean, Ian, I want to start from a fundamental observation. We too often equate governance with control. And it’s part of a conversation that’s much bigger. I think we have followed a narrative that technology companies innovate and governments regulate and somehow in that the rest of us go along. But that’s not the point of governance, right? Governance is to set a shared vision for humanity, is to think about all of the resources we can bring to bear to make shared decisions that put agency with communities, that allow voices to participate and to come forward. When we think about the work of the body, I think this underpins the idea. What we got from the Secretary General was a mandate to think beyond, beyond the forms and functions of the moment, to think about a world where a digital future actually works for all of us. It starts from the fundamental pieces that James and Alondra spoke to. But it requires us to also envision new functions and new forms for a future that’s grounded in the idea of governance for, by, and of the people. And I think AI gives us such an amazing aperture to go back to really fundamental questions about what participatory mechanics should look like.

Ian Bremmer: I’m glad you brought that up because when, you know, so much of the conversation on AI out there is about risks, existential risks, disinformation, all of that. This group, not in any way unconcerned with those risks. but fundamentally thinking about how to use AI for humanity. I mean, climate change in a sense is a much more difficult conversation because there’s so much zero-sumness. There’s so much, you know, like reparations need to be paid because you’ve done this to us. This has been an overwhelmingly positive sum, non-zero-sum conversation. James?

James Manyika: Yeah, it has been, but it also has highlighted something else, including beyond the UN itself, is how important this is for it to be a multi-stakeholder endeavor. That was fundamentally important. Let me tell you why I think that was fundamentally important. If you think about what’s at the heart of this technology, this conversation, and what we hope for it, you point to three things, I think. One are the extraordinary opportunities, the possibility to address so much of our challenges with the SDGs, climate change, there’s so much that we could potentially do that’s transformational, number one. There are complexities and risks. There are so many of them. We have to think about all the kinds of issues that we know could happen and go wrong with this technology. And then third, the idea that this has to benefit and include everybody. If you think about each of those three things, there’s no other way to get that done other than through a multi-stakeholder effort. The opportunities, companies are pursuing those, researchers are pursuing those, NGOs are pursuing those, governments are pursuing those. The risks and complexities, same thing. Governments are thinking about those, agencies are thinking about those, researchers are, civil society is. Get to the inclusion and the opportunities. How do you go after opportunities, especially in countries and places and communities where those are not commercial opportunities? You have to include everybody. So as you think about each of the three things that are at the heart of this, it has to be a multi-stakeholder effort. And that’s why I’ll say one final thing. It’s why I was so thrilled that our body actually represented that multi-stakeholder effort. take hold of you. We had researchers, we had academics, we had activists, we had civil society, we had everybody involved. We debated a lot, argued a lot, and we worked pretty well together, I think.

Ian Bremmer: And I would say that it wasn’t obvious during the conversations who necessarily was wearing each of those hats, because the body was collective, pretty global. But I’m going to ask you, because you do wear one of those hats in real life, when we talk about governance, and Vilas just talked about the way we should think about governance, what are the responsibilities that the core private sector corporations, and even some of them state-owned enterprises are linked, should have when we think about governance of AI?

James Manyika: Well, we have several. First of all, keep in mind that much of the research, fundamental research that’s advanced in this field, is led in the private sector, a lot of the research labs are in the private sector. So that places an incredible responsibility, one which is to make sure we’re developing this technology responsibly, we’re thinking about all the beneficial uses of it, not just the commercial uses of it, we have to think about all of that, and we also have a responsibility to engage with governments and others, who are not only going to govern these technologies, but also think about, because keep in mind that this technology, three things happen to it, it’s developed, it’s deployed, and it’s used. That whole chain involves lots of other actors, so we have a responsibility as a private sector to work with each and every one of those, hear their concerns, and see and work together to think about how we deploy and use this technology responsibly. We have an enormous responsibility. Part of it, I’ll say one last thing, we have a responsibility to be transparent, and to help build trust. If this technology is going to have the impact that we think it’s going to have, the public has to trust it, the public has to feel that we and everybody else who’s developing, deploying, and using it, is held accountable. So we have a profound responsibility.

Ian Bremmer: And an interesting point there here is a technology that frankly a lot of people in the global south are more excited about and trust more than a lot of people in the advanced world also an opportunity. Right a fundamental opportunity thing about governments, but Alondra you wanted to come in and then I’m turning to Dr. Wang

Alondra Nelson: I just I think one of the things that we were grappling with is that it’s a fundamental different moment for different moment for multilateralism Right because of exactly what James said not only because you have if we think about something about multilateral action around nuclear Right, those are often owned by states or utilities. And so you have a whole different ecosystem these are technologies that are often coming out of the private sector almost exclusively or a lot of the R&D is coming out of the private sector and then as James suggested you have this sort of series of Stakeholders along the sort of lifecycle of them and that’s a whole so part of what we were grappling with was not just you know How do you govern a dynamic iterative technology? But how do you do it in a way that also is at the same time trying to reimagine what multilateralism looks like when you have when you have to have a Multistakeholder system in a way that you did not when we were trying to think about how do we do nuclear nonproliferation? it’s a completely different set of Actors with different kinds of different sets of power and different kinds of asymmetry than we’ve had to deal with before.

Ian Bremmer: I mean there are US China arms control agreements on AI that will be required But but that’s not what we’re talking about right here. Now. Dr. Wang you you are a scientist and indeed when when you started out There weren’t that many with PhDs in your field in your company. You’re also in the private sector I’m wondering how you are navigating how you think about those tensions and how those tensions are changing as AI is Moving so much faster is becoming so much more transformative as we’re talking about what governance Multistakeholder governance should look like.

Jian Wang: Yeah, I think there’s a different way to look at it. The first thing, you know think about in the UN level Actually, I feel pretty good because you know of the good structure. Like we have the United Nations, we have UNESCO, we have the ITU, these are part of the global organization. And ITU could be a very critical role in terms of technology development. And UNESCO, dealing with the science, dealing with the education and the culture, I think for any new challenge, particularly from new technology, you have to work with a different party and solve the problem from different perspective. You really cannot just solve the problem just by, you know, involve the government. You have to involve the different level of things. That’s one thing. But the scientists, I think, is very important. Get scientists, get individual involved to solve this problem. So for me, the governing is not just, you know, the responsibility of the organization, of government. It’s actually responsible to every people. Just like in the last couple of years, I’m working with the scientists in UK and the scientists in the United States, working together on the geoscience problem. And the more interesting, you know, eventually, actually not eventually, later this year, we bring this new technology to Africa. So individual could make a great deal to help solve this problem. So for me, just like the conversation today, and technology is not just creating a problem. The technology is bringing the people together, even though today is a different way to bring people together. But eventually, you know, different people love this technology. They will work together and solve the challenge. So I’m pretty confident, you know, any problem, you know, created by the human could be solved by a human being.

Ian Bremmer: So this is the most inclusive, proactive conversation I’ve seen on big governance issues, frankly, in the UN in a long time. I’m gonna now shift to implementation and to someone who’s been tasked with some of the most challenging problems in the world on that. front, Volker, none of us envy your position. As you think about AI and how AI can be used, can be implemented by governments, by non-state actors to allow impunity or to facilitate transformation and effective governance, where do you think it’s going right now and what do you think needs to be implemented as a result of these recommendations?

Volker Turk: Well, first of all, congratulations that you got the report out. I think it’s a minor miracle that you have been able to do it and really congratulations to you. When you mentioned mandate, no, you mentioned legitimacy, reach and mandate. I would add normative framework and you have mentioned it. It’s about human rights. We do not have to reinvent the wheel. We have an existing framework that is dynamic, that evolves, that deals with also the future issues and human rights is at the core of it. Because if you are not aware of the impact that anything that happens in this world on freedoms, on fundamental freedoms or on individual rights, if that is not analysed, it’s going to be a problem. And the advantage is it’s a universal framework. So it’s not about global south, global north, west versus someone else. It is universal and that is still agreed at this point in time by everyone. We had a big event on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights last year. There was no detractor from that, no spoiler. So we have that framework. It’s intergenerational. It’s not just about now, it’s also about the past because in some instances you have to deal with the grievances. of the past, but it is primarily also about the future, so it has this intergenerational dimension and it brings us back to human agency and to human dignity, which is whenever anything happens in this world, including on the digital, on the AI front, you will have to take into account. And it is multi-stakeholder. A human rights framework is by nature multi-stakeholder. We cannot do anything on the human rights front if you didn’t, if it wasn’t nourished by social movements, by civil society, by the private sector, and by member states. And actually, so we have a role model when we look at the implementation of how we can bring this to bear on the norms that states themselves have accepted, that the private sector through the business and human rights guiding principles have accepted, and how we can actually go into the granular detail that is needed in order to analyze how we are going to work.

Ian Bremmer: James wants to come in, but a quick follow-up for you first, which is people outside this room, people in this room know this. People outside this room don’t necessarily appreciate that 194 countries around the world agree on a lot of things. They agree on fundamental human rights, even if they don’t implement them. They agree, but they know what they are. They agree on sustainable development goals and where one would want humanity to go, even if right now most of them are not on track to being fulfilled. And hopefully, they agree on a global digital compact and how one deploys artificial intelligence to help ensure that we can actually get some of this better. So when you think about that, if you had a crystal ball, right now, do you believe over the next two, three years that AI is potentially on track to help actually implement, execute more of the things that we agree on but aren’t doing?

Volker Turk: Look, we are obviously at a very difficult geopolitical moment, no doubt about that. But we hopefully will have the global digital compact and the pact for the future. It’s a good beginning. beginning, it’s not enough, it will require a lot of dedicated attention to it, it will require continued multi-stakeholder conversations, it will require a governance framework that becomes more and more effective. Of course we are divided, polarised, we are not at the best place when it comes at the societal level to bring coherence to things, but this is precisely where whatever we can hang on to that works, including the report that you brought out, it actually shows that it is possible and we need to grab on to that and run with it.

Ian Bremmer: James?

James Manyika: Well you know, as you know well Ian, a couple of things that were on our minds when we were doing the work, one is the need to move and act very quickly, for at least two reasons that were centred in our work, the SDGs, the world’s behind, we’re all behind if you recall, we centred the need to contribute to accelerate the SDGs, the ITU has just done some phenomenal work that highlights that of something like the 169 goals in the SDGs, something like 134 of them could benefit and be accelerated using AI, we have to move. The second thing that was on our minds was the issues around capacity, and this is where especially the Global South comes to mind, because I grew up in the Global South, unless we’re able to give people access to this technology, both to participate and benefit from it, the risk of the digital divide becoming the AI divide is too huge, so we have to act, we have to act, that’s why one of our recommendations is around either the capacity fund or capacity network, we have to bring together a multi-stakeholder group that moves quickly to bring capacity and access to especially the Global South.

Ian Bremmer: I mean climate change, we didn’t really have decades, but the reality was you kind of could kick the can for a while and just let other people pay for it, the kids. You don’t have that time on this issue, which is why I don’t think I’m not surprised that everything happened in a year because, I mean, you need light speed to make that work. Carme, you want to come in and then Vilas.

Carme Artigas: Yes, exactly. I think these recommendations are only as good as our capacity to implement them as soon as possible. So as you have mentioned, and no of these recommendations are built on vacuum. We’re building on existing frameworks that already work, like human rights, but also the excellent work that UN agencies are already doing in their own domains. And that they will keep on doing that, and probably they will have much more burden of work around all these topics on AI. But we need additional instruments because there is still a global governance deficit. And because this is so horizontal, it requires so much coordination. So this is why we did not recommend, as the first thing, an international agency. Because that takes a long time, it’s a big institution, and we will see if that comes.

Ian Bremmer: And the governments, they were not ready to approve that. If you’d announced it, it wouldn’t have happened.

Carme Artigas: I don’t know, but we are proposing things that are actionable, and that we believe that in less than 18 months’ time can be ready for work. Because that’s what we need. And I think that governance is far from an innovator, it’s a catalyzer, and it’s an enabler. And I think that’s what we should be focused on.

Ian Bremmer: An agenda setter?

Carme Artigas: Of course. But I think having this conversation, and these conversations, was not the public opinion one year ago. And I think we are starting a conversation now that I hope is followed beyond the Global Digital Compact, and the companies and the governments and all the institutions will support our recommendation.

Ian Bremmer: I mean, this is the sneaky thing about the UN, right? Which is that, you know, you actually put it together, you imagine it, you start actually having conversations that other people aren’t having, and they will, default, become what people are talking about.

Vilas Dhar: Here’s the power in it, Ian. I think you’re exactly right. There is a way to talk about this that is the law of big numbers. That AI is the story of billions of dollars of investment, millions of lines of code. The foundation models that have the most parameters. And you can almost turn it into a math problem. There were a number of experts on the body with me that were computer scientists. I think we probably would all say, I hated doing math homework as a kid. I certainly don’t want to do it now. It’s not the solution. Instead, what I think about is all of these things we are talking about aren’t really about put all the ingredients together, put them in a stew pot and get an answer. It’s think about the fact that almost all of this comes down to the experience of people on the ground. My brothers and sisters, my cousins, my uncles, my aunts in countries across the planet. And what we put forward in the report is a mechanism to think about real intervention that intersects with people where they are. We don’t think about capacity building as finding a few critical enablers and saying let’s invest in compute. Or let’s just make sure there are data sources. Instead, we think about a holistic network that says let’s actually look with communities at what their needs are and think about a mechanism by which we say there is massive resources across the system. There is those contextual pieces of a normative framework. There is that mandate and that integrity. But it doesn’t happen because any entity, the UN or otherwise, says we are now going to come in and build AI for the public good. Happens because we work with communities to say what do you need to build and want to build? The second recommendation in the report that’s relevant is this idea of a global fund. The idea that we actually need capital resources that sit apart from and outside of our political mechanisms that hold instead a moral responsibility to say we need to take the resources necessary for communities to define their digital agency and make sure that they have the economic resources that let them use that money in the way they need to to build what they do. Now, we haven’t defined the specific form of that fund for a very specific reason. This is something that needs to happen through a participatory mechanism. That through the global digital compact and the implementation that comes, we need to take rights, we need to take frameworks, we need to take capital and turn it into something that actually advances progress.

Ian Bremmer: Alondra, as someone who does public policy for a living, what do you take out of this? If you were in charge of global implementation, what would you, how would you think, not about priority. advertising, but how would you think about your agenda? What would you want to make sure that people are taking away from the next steps?

Alondra Nelson: Well, first I would go to process, because that’s what wonks do. But would it be, just to double click on what Vilash said, I mean, part of this process was a lot of consultation with lots of people from civil society, with the impacted communities. So if we really want to steer and shape these good outcomes, we need to figure out how to do that in part by engaging communities. So any implementation, exactly to Vilash’s point, has to include communities that are impacted, that are going to be impacted, need to have a seat at this table in this conversation, whether or not they have PhDs in computer science or can do math. That’s critically important. I think the other piece is that we don’t know enough. So I would also associate myself with Dr. Jian, and that we don’t know the science. I mean, if we think back about the high watermark of the COVID-19 pandemic, and there were lots of preprints and lots of papers, and I think in that context, perhaps it was okay to say, you know, we’re going to figure out the science as we’re, you know, we’re going to build a plane while we’re flying it. We actually don’t know enough about these systems and tools and models. A lot of what we do know, a few people know, a lot of people don’t know. So I think one of the sort of outcomes of the report is really a commitment to implementing a kind of common understanding. And we’re seeing across the, you know, sort of international ecosystem, different ways for doing that. We proposed in the report, creating an international panel for understanding AI, for the science of AI, that would complement work on AI safety, that would complement some of the other sort of multilateral and regional things that are happening. But even these have to be done in a way that is communicating that information to not only nation states, but sees the public as an audience for how these tools work, what they can do, what their limitations are, and how we can use that information to steer them to the good outcomes that I think many of us hope and want, but are not inevitable and are not unique inherently characteristics of the technology.

Ian Bremmer: And I’d like to believe that this panel right now is actually leading by example specifically on that. That’s what we’re trying to do on this stage right now, right? Volker, you wanted to go and then James.

Volker Turk: Just to, because I think it’s a very important discussion, because if you look at the future and what startups want to do these days, they will want to do something for the for the good, common good, public good, whatever you call it. But you need to fill it then with content. That’s where the human rights side comes in, because you want to do something that is of benefit to humanity. And we often hear that actually from those who are involved in this. That’s important. But there is also the risk side and we cannot avoid talking about the risks. And because risks, we can also look at it from like traffic regulations. I mean you’re going to hit another car if you don’t respect the traffic regulations. And it’s a little bit the same when it comes to innovation, to all kinds of creative work.

Ian Bremmer: I want to give James and Dr. Wang a chance to come in and then we’re going to turn to risks. And I’m going to go to you first, by the way, but go ahead James.

James Manyika: I want to just underscore something that Dr. Nelson just described, which is there’s so much more research still to do in this field. I mean I, in my day job, I oversee the research teams that are researching and building these systems. And the field is moving so quickly, the advance is coming so fast. There’s still a lot more that we still need to learn. Some of that is surprising as being incredibly beneficial. We have all these breakthroughs and landmark breakthroughs in science and other places. But some of them are risks that we’re still researching. So I think the research frontier, that’s why one of the key pieces in our recommendation was this idea of a scientific panel that tries to keep it. But it’s got to be one that works very, very differently than what say the IPCC does. It has to be real-time. IPCC does what, a report every seven years? We can’t do that here. So that’s why the ongoing research both to understand the benefits benefits, the potential, as well as the risks, is so fundamentally important. That’s why many of us are involved in a lot of these AI safety institutes and research to really work on the frontier of the risks.

Ian Bremmer: Dr. Wang, you want to come in?

Jian Wang: Yeah, I think that back to this research challenge, I think it’s something to bring up, you know, at this time. Just thinking about every year, we have more than 5 million paper published, probably some number even bigger than 5 million, that’s a lot of paper. And just like climate change, it’s a very, very complex system, and it takes time for people to really understand. And come to the AI, it’s even more complex than the climate change, okay. So I would say that really needs something new and a framework to bring the whole science community together. Again, I want to emphasize that, and with a UN framework, and otherwise, there’s no single science committee can solve this problem.

Ian Bremmer: And is it fair to say in this field that right now, especially when we look at the two countries that are leading the way in AI, U.S. and China, that the scientific community is actually getting further apart?

Jian Wang: And most of the time, I won’t look at this field based on the countries, okay. So if you look at the people who really pioneered this area, they are from Europe, okay, from Canada. So it is not just country by country, and you have to look at how the science community actually works, okay. So for me, actually, the reason that people are thinking about U.S. and China is just because they have good AI infrastructure, helped people do the research, okay. So I think for the UN, we have to make sure they have the global shared AI infrastructure so everybody could contribute, and everybody could contribute. to solve the problem, okay. This is actually how big tech companies should do as well. You know, it’s not just for your company, but it’s really on a shared infrastructure, particular technology infrastructure, I would say.

Ian Bremmer: For the rest of the people, yeah. Oh, okay. Who was first? No, to focus first. So, only because I want to shift towards, again, we can have a very upbeat conversation about where we want to get, but as you said very eloquently, the geopolitical environment right now, the trajectory is not towards more integration, more global cooperation. It’s actually towards more conflict, and the political and economic models that we thought we could kind of take for granted are themselves under siege. So, when you look at the AI initiatives that are now being put together against that geopolitical conflict, that context, where do you see the biggest challenges?

Volker Turk: Well, it is obviously, once the genie is out of the bottle, how do you control the genie? And I think- Once all sorts of actors have that technology. For instance, and this is a phenomenon that is not just in one part of the world. I mean, we get a lot of it. We actually get a lot of requests for advisory services from member states and startup companies all around the world who want to do the right thing. So, they’re asking us, what type of risk models do we use? How do we regulate? How do we get a multi-stakeholder system in place? And it’s incredibly important that we are very fast in making sure that these advisory services can be provided. We have done it with the big tech companies. I mean, I brought you one of the documents that came out of this, which looks at taxonomy of risks from a human rights perspective, which wants to really complement the existing risk frameworks and really say you need to look at obligations. when it impinges on individual freedoms and rights. And that work is incredibly important. It’s not about ethics anymore, it is about obligations that we have towards people.

Ian Bremmer: All right, please.

Carme Artigas: I just wanted to comment on all the discussions about risk. I don’t know if we all remember that we’re talking about machine learning and deep learning, the conversations were about fairness. All of a sudden, when generative AI came to scene, we forgot about the conversation of fairness, we focused the focus on risks, in most of them existential risk or risk for frontier AI models, and sometimes that is preventing us to look at the existing risks that we already have in the present, more on the sides of fundamental rights. And it’s very interesting, and I recommend everybody having access to the document, and an agenda we have included, which is a risk analysis, a risk survey, involving many countries in the world, different stakeholders, and how interesting it is to see the difference on perception of risks of global north, global south, men and women. And we’re talking about risk because we are not informed that we need this scientific panel on the real facts, sometimes we tend to be dramatic or probably overreacting, and we forget to talk about opportunities. And if we see how risk is perceived in the global south is less perceived, people are more concerned about the opportunities they can miss.

Ian Bremmer: But they’re being left out.

Carme Artigas: Absolutely. So let’s talk also about opportunities, let’s have scientific panel inform us, not only on the risk, more transparency from the private companies, of course, but also on the great opportunities. And I can mention the huge acceleration we can expect on achieving the sustainable development goals, and also how can we allow for education and public health and universality. And I think that is the discussion that we still need to have.

Ian Bremmer: So the principle global risk here is that the lack of resources, the lack of urgency, means the digital divide becomes an AI divide, and we end up splitting apart much farther, right? And humanity doesn’t look like humanity very much in that environment. right?

James Manyika: No, it doesn’t. I mean, I was going to interject very, very quickly. If you remember in our work, one of the fascinating observations for me is when we’re talking about the risks, we often talked about misapplication and misuse. Several members in our body said, please add missed uses. If you remember that word, it’s actually in there. Missed opportunities. And that was mostly some of the members in the Global South thinking about the missed opportunities when this technology could actually transform their lives, circumstances. But all of that hinged on this ability, having the capacity to be able to participate. And we spent a lot of time thinking about the enabling infrastructure, the enablers to enable participation that range everything from very basic things that are in the digital compact like broadband connectivity, even electricity, right? In addition to access to models and compute. So I think this question of access and capacity is so fundamental to the inclusivity part of this conversation.

Ian Bremmer: So addressing the missed opportunity isn’t like, oh, we’re paying you because we’re doing something wrong. It’s because you’re actually creating market opportunities. I mean, it should be additive.

Alondra Nelson: Can I jump in here and just have a slight push back a little bit? I mean, I do think, so we did hear quite a lot from people in the global majority that they didn’t want to be left out. But there were also concerns about climate and sustainability, about the mining of critical minerals, about the extraction of labor that has to be done to train data. So I want to be very clear about what we’re hearing on the sort of landscape of inequality when you think about the entire AI stack and not just the sort of deployed tool or system.

Ian Bremmer: It feels like a race, right? I mean, on the one hand, you need these tools to address the challenges, but making the tools is also going to strain the challenges. Yeah? Please.

Vilas Dhar: I mean, we assume that inertia is the problem, right? We assume that inertia is inevitability, that the ways that we develop are the only ways can do it. Today, in this building, we are showing an AI model in a collaboration with Rafik Anadol, who I know is friends with many of us, a model that’s trained on 100 million pieces of data, sourced ethically with community consent from across the planet, trained on a model that uses only renewable power, that goes slow rather than fast, that generates incredible pieces of aesthetic beauty, and can also be used to build a predictive climate model that lets us test interventions. AI doesn’t have to be an attack against our climate sustainability. What we have to change instead is the why behind our reasons for moving so fast, for what the commercial purposes are that are often putting us in conflict against things like political rights, economic rights, climate issues, and more. There are other ways. Risks are not deterministic. We talk about risks so we can come up with better paths to better futures.

Ian Bremmer: Do you buy that? I mean, I’m asking… Thank you.

Alondra Nelson: I do. I do. I mean, I think that we are, you know, we talk quite a lot about a few organizations, but we have other organizations that are creating different models or trying to think about the sustainability issue. And I think we should be, if we’re really serious about advancing on the SDGs, we should need to be really serious about the sustainability issues and about, I think, a growing conversation that says we just need more energy, full stop, and, you know, whatever happens, you know, so be it. And so we, I think particularly in a place, in a conversation at the UN, we’ve got to figure out a way to hold all those things together and put them in balance, even understanding that it’s going to be very hard to do. And I think this is, that’s innovation, right? I mean, I think that we have had other moments where we said, you know, you’ve got to, you’ve mentioned seatbelts, seatbelts in the cars, we put guardrails on the road that allow you to sort of go where you want to go, steer a little bit faster. I mean, there are other kinds of historical moments in which we have had to make choices about how we want to advance things. And I would, you know, I think one of the challenges that we want to offer to the world, particularly to the scientific community, is how do you build these models more sustainably? How do you build data centers that are cooler, that use less water? I mean, it is a, like, it’s a, it is, these are the scientific challenges. engineering challenges of our time. And I think for many scientists, they’re incredibly exciting to think about as puzzles and how do we incentivize that?

Ian Bremmer: So we have only three minutes left. And I wanna use that for our two co-chairs, if you don’t mind. And I wanna ask both of you, take a step back. Is this a historic moment? In 10 years time, do we go back? Is there a COP process for artificial intelligence? Are we thinking differently about global AI? Are we applying our models in ways that are more inclusive, more integrative because of what is being done right now? Do you believe that? I wanna ask both of you, what it means for you. James.

James Manyika: I think this is a very important moment. One of the things that gives me enormous confidence is the fact that we’re still so early in the development of this technology. The fact that we’re having these debates, these discussions, this early in the development of a technology that still is in its early stages gives me a lot of hope. The fact that we’re able to at least agree on fundamental principles that should guide the development of this technology, that gives me enormous hope. The fact that we can actually have a multi-stakeholder conversation about this and come together to think about, so how do we do this? It goes back to what you said, Ian. The fact that we very quickly got to agree on basic principles and that much of the debate and hard work all had to do with how do we do it, that gives me hope. So I’m actually quite optimistic about all of this. I think, but it’s only incumbent on everybody here and all of us in the room to make sure we progress this with humanity’s best interests at the center of what we do with this technology.

Ian Bremmer: Carme, you get a minute.

Carme Artigas: I’m absolutely confident that here, in changing times, we have managed to develop AI for the good of humanity with more inclusiveness, with more opportunity to all, not only relying to the goodwill of organizations and governments, but we have. created really the governance instruments to make it happen and that we would look back to today of today and say, we were proposing the right thing, but most important, the nations were brave enough to adopt them.

Ian Bremmer: So before we close, I want to thank you to the panel, but I know everybody here would be a little remiss if we didn’t ask our friend Amandeep to stand up, our special envoy who made this process work. Tireless, tireless efforts, incredibly balanced decency, moral guidance and integrity and reflects everything that we are hoping for on this panel would not be happening if he wasn’t there. And I just want to thank you for everybody here. Thanks so much for joining us. We’re out of time and we’ll see you soon.

Redi Thlabi: Thank you so much, Ian, for this marvelous moderating of that panel and to your panelists as well. So much love, respect and affection, I see, but we’ve got to move along to the next segment of the program. Thank you all so very much. Thank you. I’ll introduce our next guest once we’ve all settled down to prepare for the next speaker as we wind down to the final segment of our convening this afternoon. I’d like us to settle down so we can give the president his moment and an opportunity to address us as we take the final steps to our event today. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, again, please help me in starting this joint closing. Help me welcome, a warm welcome, he’s travelled a long way to be here. Western Africa is a long way from here. His Excellency, I’m not going to call him up until we’ve all settled. I think it is appropriate. I think it is appropriate to demonstrate our own commitment, our own respect, and a word that Ian used earlier, decency, in describing Amandeep Singh Gill, UN Secretary General’s envoy on technology. So I’d like us to afford the same warmth and decency to our next speaker. It is a pleasure to welcome on stage his Excellency, the President of Botswana, Mokgweetsi Masisi, for his closing comments.

Mokgweetsi Masisi: Mr. Secretary General, Excellencies, I wish to express my profound gratitude to the Secretary General of the United Nations, His Excellency Antonio Guterres, for the invitation to participate in the Action Days session ahead of the summit of the future that is scheduled for 22nd to the 23rd September 2024, particularly on the segment of the digital track. Recommendations go to all the speakers and presenters on the digital future for all for highlighting the significance of digital justice. Digital technology is pivotal in global transformation. The effects of its impact can either be positive or negative, depending on how we harness the opportunities and mitigate challenges. However, the scope of positive impact remains high if we can collectively work towards this end. It is critical to make a link between digital inclusion and digital cooperation to bridge the divide between nation-states and within nation-states. We need to recognize that the digital divide emanates from disparities between the developed and developing countries. Technology has the potential to advance the promotion and acceleration of closing the gap in opportunities between genders and, consequently, can lead to the attainment of gender parity goals. More importantly, digital space has the potential to advance the promotion of human rights, if unimpeded. Furthermore, issues of international peace and security leverage on the use of digital technologies to inform the world of the threats and challenges that need to be addressed. Botswana, therefore, commits to be part of the brigade that flags the criticality of the potential of digitalization and cautions of its threats. Thus, my Administration has prioritized digitalization as one of its priorities within its flagship strategy of the Reset and Reclaim Agenda. I assure you of the Republic of Botswana Government’s commitment to continue to be open and amplify our voice on issues of digitalization. It is also my fervent hope that the global aspirations outlined in the Global Digital Compact would close gaps, create inclusivity, and promote access. by once again extending my sincere appreciation to the Secretary-General and all other key stakeholders for a productive session as we all look towards the summit of the future tomorrow. Thank you.

Redi Thlabi: Thank you very much. And now, for the final segment of our closing, a pleasure to welcome Amdip Singh Jo, UN Secretary-General’s envoy in technology. If you could also join him on stage, please. We heard from you earlier this morning Achim Steiner, Administrator of UNDP. If you can also come with him at the same time, thank you. Thank you. Doreen Bogdan-Martin, Secretary-General of the ITU. If you could also kindly come on stage, please. I’ll pick on you first, Amandeep, to speak, okay? Thank you.

Amandeep Singh Gill: And thank you to all of you for being here with us at this moment, this very important moment. And I want to thank my partners in this endeavour, Doreen and Achim, and their teams for the incredible work that we’ve been able to do together. I have only three points to share with you as reflection from the day. First, the importance of connection. And as we heard in the video, it’s not about connecting the circuits, it’s about connecting the people. So it’s the connections across people, people from different geographies, different backgrounds, different sectors, different lived experiences. We can only get the digital future right. if we connect people. The other second point that I take away from the day is the importance of not retreating into silos. Everything is connected. We can’t deal with AI without dealing with data. We can’t deal with either without dealing with digital public infrastructure and connectivity and so on. So we need to take a holistic view. And the last point I want to share is the importance of humility. I think we need to listen more than we speak. All of us who are in the policy space need to be very, very humble about what their understanding of technology is, what its implications are. We need to work together. We need to constantly update ourselves and hang out with the right people so that we can bring their insights, their valuable insights, into our policy work and improve the quality of our policy responses. So thank you very much. It’s a very exciting moment. It’s a very sobering moment at the same time. There’s a lot of work ahead. But with you, we can get there. Thank you.

Redi Thlabi: Thank you so much. I think you can speak at the podium or on your microphone. It’s up to you.

Achim Steiner: I’ll just use the microphone. And thank you, I will not use the teleprompter because it’s really just two things that I want to say. One is a really big thank you. You and we and all of us in the UN today had a treat. We listened to presidents, to CEOs, to young entrepreneurs, to artists, to people who, together with science, engineering, technology, are able to walk again, at least, with the help of technology. We’ve had an extraordinary day. And I hope that what you can take away from this SDG Digital Day and also this prospect of AI that to all of us is still somewhat unknown, even though we know it is going to be central to our lives as we think into the future, is this age of possibility. There is so much in the world right now that makes… everyone feel like they live under a cloud and sometimes you lose perspective. I think today I hope you all got a sense of what an extraordinary age we live in and if we make the right choices what an extraordinary age it can be for the next generation and for everyone. In that spirit I want to thank Amandeep, I want to thank Doreen, our staff who’ve actually been working for weeks on all of this and everybody else who supported this day today by turning it into something that I hope the United Nations will always be known for. Even in the darkest days there is hope and it will be done and it will be led by people. Thank you so much.

Doreen Bogdan-Martin: Thank you, thank you Achim and thank you Amandeep and indeed it has been an extraordinary, extraordinary day. Sustainable, inclusive, responsible. Three concepts at the heart of our digital track during the summit of the future action days and I would like to add to that hope because nothing gives me more hope for our shared digital future than all of you. Our brilliant innovators, our partner to connect pledgers, our digital game changers, you showed us technology can be co-created with the people it’s built for involving them directly as decision makers in design. You showed us how to make digital work with the lived realities of people in developing countries and underserved and vulnerable populations. You showed us how emerging tech from augmented reality to AI can help boost our planet’s resilience while supporting climate action. You showed us how digital skill building can lead to decent work and economic prosperity. in the unlikeliest of places against all odds. You showed us what peace tech can do to rescue the SDGs. You even showed us how much it will take, literally, an investment to connect everyone everywhere by 2030 through the Connecting Humanity Action Blueprint mentioned by Saudi Arabia. And you showed us your commitment to do what it takes through new Partner to Connect pledges. And I thank you for those new pledges. Ladies and gentlemen, we are the SDG generation. A digital future full of hope, possibility, and ambition is in our hands. And I want to thank each and every one of you for giving us a glimpse today. You gave us a glimpse of what is possible. We may have come to the end of our first Digital Action Day, our second SDG Digital, but the action certainly does not stop here. It can’t. Because too much is at stake. Fired up by hope, let’s take everything that we’ve learned today, let’s go out there and let us build a more sustainable, inclusive, and responsible digital future for all. And let’s build it together. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, as we wrap up, and as Akeem already mentioned, I think it’s important to understand this really was a team effort here. And I also want to acknowledge all of the staff, and if I may, can I ask the staff to just stand up? Because this wouldn’t have happened without our amazing teams. I know it’s dark in the room. Thank you.

Redi Thlabi: Thank you very much. Now that’s leadership, because often we say we leave no one behind, but we forget the people who are doing the groundwork, who perhaps don’t have the opportunity to shine on the global stage. So I find that very inspirational indeed. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, let me thank you, all of you, for being here today. It’s been a long day. I’ve got nothing to add to all the challenging, inspiring messages that we’ve heard today as we journey together towards a digital future for all. For all. Now, the last thing I’m going to tell you is that that online forum or platform where you can make your inputs is going to be up tomorrow after world leaders have adopted the Global Digital Compact. Please speak honestly, share what you know, what you think, what you’ve experienced, and take the learnings from today as you make your input. We look forward to them. Thank you so very much for today. Goodbye.

C

Carme Artigas

Speech speed

172 words per minute

Speech length

963 words

Speech time

335 seconds

Unique UN position to lead global AI governance

Explanation

The UN is uniquely positioned to lead global AI governance due to its mandate, reach, and legitimacy. It can bring all nations and stakeholders to the table, building on its historical success in governing international issues.

Evidence

Examples of UN’s past success in governing climate change and arms control

Major Discussion Point

The importance and role of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

Agreed with

Omar Al Olama

James Manyika

Tumi Makgabo

Volker Turk

Agreed on

Importance of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

Balancing innovation and risk mitigation in AI governance

Explanation

AI governance should focus on both opportunities and risks, not just existential risks. There is a need to balance innovation with risk mitigation, considering the different perceptions of risks across global north and south.

Evidence

Risk analysis survey showing differences in risk perception between global north and south

Major Discussion Point

Governance and regulation of AI

Disagreed with

James Manyika

Disagreed on

Focus on risks vs opportunities in AI governance

O

Omar Al Olama

Speech speed

191 words per minute

Speech length

254 words

Speech time

79 seconds

GDC as starting point for future action on AI

Explanation

The Global Digital Compact is seen as a great starting point for future action on AI. It provides a framework for cooperation and action on AI governance.

Evidence

UAE’s commitment to be part of the roadmap put forward by the UN

Major Discussion Point

The importance and role of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

Agreed with

Carme Artigas

James Manyika

Tumi Makgabo

Volker Turk

Agreed on

Importance of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

J

James Manyika

Speech speed

181 words per minute

Speech length

1479 words

Speech time

489 seconds

Need for multi-stakeholder approach in AI governance

Explanation

AI governance requires a multi-stakeholder approach due to the diverse nature of opportunities, risks, and inclusivity challenges. This approach involves companies, researchers, NGOs, governments, and civil society.

Evidence

Composition of the UN advisory body representing diverse stakeholders

Major Discussion Point

The importance and role of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

Agreed with

Carme Artigas

Omar Al Olama

Tumi Makgabo

Volker Turk

Agreed on

Importance of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

Need to bridge digital divide to prevent AI divide

Explanation

There is an urgent need to bridge the digital divide to prevent it from becoming an AI divide. This requires providing access to AI technology and building capacity, especially in the Global South.

Evidence

Recommendation for a capacity fund or network to bring AI access to the Global South

Major Discussion Point

Opportunities and challenges of AI for development

Agreed with

Tumi Makgabo

Sundar Pichai

Agreed on

Addressing the digital divide to prevent an AI divide

Role of private sector in responsible AI development

Explanation

The private sector has a significant responsibility in AI development, including conducting fundamental research, developing technology responsibly, and engaging with governments and other stakeholders. They also have a duty to be transparent and build public trust.

Evidence

Examples of private sector research labs leading AI development

Major Discussion Point

Governance and regulation of AI

Need for real-time scientific panel on AI developments

Explanation

There is a need for a scientific panel that can provide real-time insights on AI developments, both in terms of benefits and risks. This panel should work differently from existing models like the IPCC, given the rapid pace of AI advancements.

Evidence

Comparison with IPCC’s seven-year reporting cycle, which is too slow for AI

Major Discussion Point

Governance and regulation of AI

Addressing both risks and missed opportunities of AI

Explanation

AI governance should address not only the risks but also the missed opportunities, especially for the Global South. There is a need to focus on enabling infrastructure and capacity building to ensure inclusive participation in AI development and benefits.

Evidence

Inclusion of ‘missed uses’ in the advisory body’s risk discussions

Major Discussion Point

Ensuring AI benefits humanity

Agreed with

Sundar Pichai

Felix Mutati

Agreed on

AI’s potential to accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goals

Disagreed with

Carme Artigas

Disagreed on

Focus on risks vs opportunities in AI governance

T

Tumi Makgabo

Speech speed

166 words per minute

Speech length

2102 words

Speech time

757 seconds

GDC addresses digital divides and inclusive governance

Explanation

The Global Digital Compact aims to address existing digital divides and promote more inclusive digital governance. It recognizes the need for a more equitable digital future.

Major Discussion Point

The importance and role of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

Agreed with

James Manyika

Sundar Pichai

Agreed on

Addressing the digital divide to prevent an AI divide

V

Volker Turk

Speech speed

162 words per minute

Speech length

854 words

Speech time

315 seconds

GDC builds on existing human rights frameworks

Explanation

The Global Digital Compact builds on existing human rights frameworks, which provide a universal and dynamic foundation for addressing AI governance. This approach ensures that human rights considerations are central to AI development and deployment.

Evidence

Reference to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and its continued relevance

Major Discussion Point

The importance and role of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

Agreed with

Carme Artigas

Omar Al Olama

James Manyika

Tumi Makgabo

Agreed on

Importance of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

Focusing on AI use cases that benefit humanity

Explanation

There is a need to focus on AI use cases that benefit humanity and contribute to the common good. This involves filling the concept of ‘public good’ with content that aligns with human rights principles.

Evidence

Mention of startups focusing on projects for the common good

Major Discussion Point

Ensuring AI benefits humanity

S

Sundar Pichai

Speech speed

136 words per minute

Speech length

1405 words

Speech time

618 seconds

AI can accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goals

Explanation

AI has the potential to accelerate progress on the UN Sustainable Development Goals. It can be applied to benefit humanity in various areas such as health, education, and climate action.

Evidence

Examples of AI applications in language translation, scientific discovery, and disaster prediction

Major Discussion Point

Opportunities and challenges of AI for development

Agreed with

James Manyika

Felix Mutati

Agreed on

AI’s potential to accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goals

AI enables economic progress and entrepreneurship

Explanation

AI is enabling economic progress and entrepreneurship, especially in emerging markets. It can boost productivity across sectors and create new opportunities for businesses.

Evidence

Example of Gary Logistics in Ethiopia using AI to improve operations and create job opportunities

Major Discussion Point

Opportunities and challenges of AI for development

Agreed with

James Manyika

Tumi Makgabo

Agreed on

Addressing the digital divide to prevent an AI divide

J

Josephine Teo

Speech speed

141 words per minute

Speech length

795 words

Speech time

338 seconds

Importance of building AI capacity in developing countries

Explanation

There is a need to build AI capacity in developing countries to ensure they can participate in and benefit from AI advancements. This involves working with employers, providing individual learning support, and building training infrastructure.

Evidence

Singapore’s approach to enabling workers to acquire relevant skills for the future

Major Discussion Point

Opportunities and challenges of AI for development

F

Felix Mutati

Speech speed

98 words per minute

Speech length

411 words

Speech time

251 seconds

Potential of AI to transform lives in rural areas

Explanation

AI and digital technologies have the potential to transform lives in rural areas by providing access to information and services. This can lead to improved farming methods and economic opportunities.

Evidence

Example of a young farmer in rural Zambia using a mobile phone and internet to access weather forecasts and market prices

Major Discussion Point

Opportunities and challenges of AI for development

Agreed with

Sundar Pichai

James Manyika

Agreed on

AI’s potential to accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goals

M

Margrethe Vestager

Speech speed

137 words per minute

Speech length

792 words

Speech time

345 seconds

Need for global cooperation on AI governance

Explanation

There is a need for global cooperation on AI governance to address challenges that individual countries cannot solve alone. The Global Digital Compact provides a framework for such cooperation.

Major Discussion Point

Governance and regulation of AI

Importance of enforceable AI regulation

Explanation

Enforceable AI regulation is crucial to create a systemic response to the challenges posed by AI. This includes legislation to keep markets open, ensure digital services are safe, and protect privacy.

Evidence

Examples of EU legislation like the Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act

Major Discussion Point

Governance and regulation of AI

A

Alondra Nelson

Speech speed

207 words per minute

Speech length

1177 words

Speech time

340 seconds

Centering human rights in AI development

Explanation

Human rights should be at the center of AI development and governance. This involves anchoring AI governance in fundamental human rights principles and international law.

Major Discussion Point

Ensuring AI benefits humanity

Need for sustainable and ethical AI development practices

Explanation

There is a need for more sustainable and ethical AI development practices. This includes addressing issues of climate sustainability, labor practices in data training, and the extraction of critical minerals.

Evidence

Mention of concerns about climate impact, labor exploitation, and resource extraction in AI development

Major Discussion Point

Ensuring AI benefits humanity

V

Vilas Dhar

Speech speed

217 words per minute

Speech length

859 words

Speech time

236 seconds

Importance of community engagement in AI development

Explanation

Community engagement is crucial in AI development to ensure that AI solutions meet the needs of the people they are intended to serve. This involves working with communities to understand their needs and involving them in decision-making processes.

Evidence

Proposal for a global fund to support community-defined digital agency

Major Discussion Point

Ensuring AI benefits humanity

Agreements

Agreement Points

Importance of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

Carme Artigas

Omar Al Olama

James Manyika

Tumi Makgabo

Volker Turk

Unique UN position to lead global AI governance

GDC as starting point for future action on AI

Need for multi-stakeholder approach in AI governance

GDC addresses digital divides and inclusive governance

GDC builds on existing human rights frameworks

Speakers agreed on the critical role of the Global Digital Compact in addressing AI governance, digital divides, and promoting inclusive development while building on existing frameworks.

Addressing the digital divide to prevent an AI divide

James Manyika

Tumi Makgabo

Sundar Pichai

Need to bridge digital divide to prevent AI divide

GDC addresses digital divides and inclusive governance

AI enables economic progress and entrepreneurship

Speakers emphasized the importance of bridging the digital divide to ensure equitable access to AI technologies and prevent further inequalities.

AI’s potential to accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goals

Sundar Pichai

James Manyika

Felix Mutati

AI can accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goals

Addressing both risks and missed opportunities of AI

Potential of AI to transform lives in rural areas

Speakers highlighted AI’s potential to contribute to sustainable development and improve lives, particularly in developing regions.

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers emphasized the need for a balanced approach to AI governance that promotes innovation while mitigating risks through enforceable regulations.

Carme Artigas

Margrethe Vestager

Balancing innovation and risk mitigation in AI governance

Importance of enforceable AI regulation

Both speakers stressed the importance of grounding AI governance and development in existing human rights frameworks.

Volker Turk

Alondra Nelson

GDC builds on existing human rights frameworks

Centering human rights in AI development

Unexpected Consensus

Multi-stakeholder approach to AI governance

Carme Artigas

James Manyika

Vilas Dhar

Unique UN position to lead global AI governance

Need for multi-stakeholder approach in AI governance

Importance of community engagement in AI development

Despite representing different sectors (government, private sector, and civil society), these speakers unexpectedly agreed on the necessity of a multi-stakeholder approach to AI governance, emphasizing the importance of inclusive participation from various sectors and communities.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of agreement included the importance of the Global Digital Compact, the need to address digital divides, AI’s potential for sustainable development, the necessity of human rights-based approaches, and the importance of multi-stakeholder governance.

Consensus level

There was a high level of consensus among speakers on fundamental principles and goals for AI governance. This consensus suggests a strong foundation for global cooperation on AI development and regulation, which could facilitate more rapid progress in implementing the Global Digital Compact and related initiatives. However, the specific mechanisms for implementation and balancing various interests may still require further negotiation and refinement.

Disagreements

Disagreement Points

Focus on risks vs opportunities in AI governance

Carme Artigas

James Manyika

Balancing innovation and risk mitigation in AI governance

Addressing both risks and missed opportunities of AI

While both speakers acknowledge the need to address risks, Carme Artigas emphasizes the importance of not overlooking opportunities, especially for the global south, while James Manyika stresses the need to address both risks and missed opportunities equally.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of disagreement revolve around the balance between focusing on risks versus opportunities in AI governance, and the specific approaches to ensuring sustainable and ethical AI development.

Disagreement level

The level of disagreement among the speakers is relatively low. Most speakers agree on the fundamental principles and goals of AI governance, with differences mainly in emphasis and specific implementation strategies. This suggests a generally unified vision for the Global Digital Compact, which bodes well for its potential implementation and effectiveness.

Partial Agreements

Partial Agreements

Both speakers agree on the need for ongoing research and monitoring of AI developments, but James Manyika focuses on the speed and real-time nature of the panel, while Alondra Nelson emphasizes the importance of sustainability and ethical considerations in AI development.

James Manyika

Alondra Nelson

Need for real-time scientific panel on AI developments

Need for sustainable and ethical AI development practices

Both speakers recognize the potential of AI for development, but while Sundar Pichai focuses on the positive impacts, Alondra Nelson emphasizes the need to address sustainability and ethical concerns in AI development.

Sundar Pichai

Alondra Nelson

AI can accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goals

Need for sustainable and ethical AI development practices

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers emphasized the need for a balanced approach to AI governance that promotes innovation while mitigating risks through enforceable regulations.

Carme Artigas

Margrethe Vestager

Balancing innovation and risk mitigation in AI governance

Importance of enforceable AI regulation

Both speakers stressed the importance of grounding AI governance and development in existing human rights frameworks.

Volker Turk

Alondra Nelson

GDC builds on existing human rights frameworks

Centering human rights in AI development

Takeaways

Key Takeaways

The Global Digital Compact (GDC) is seen as a crucial starting point for global AI governance and cooperation

AI has significant potential to accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goals and enable economic development

There is a need for inclusive, multi-stakeholder governance of AI that involves developing countries

Balancing innovation with risk mitigation is key in AI governance and regulation

Centering human rights and community engagement in AI development is essential

Building AI capacity and infrastructure in developing countries is critical to prevent an AI divide

Resolutions and Action Items

Launch of a Global AI Opportunity Fund by Google to invest $120 million in AI education and training globally

Proposal to establish a global fund on AI for sustainable development

Recommendation to create an international scientific panel on AI

Plan to make an online platform available for public input on the Global Digital Compact after its adoption

Unresolved Issues

Specific mechanisms for enforcing AI governance globally

Details on implementation of the proposed global fund on AI

How to effectively balance AI development with sustainability and climate concerns

Concrete steps to ensure AI benefits reach marginalized communities

Suggested Compromises

Using existing UN frameworks and agencies to implement AI governance rather than creating new institutions immediately

Focusing on both risks and opportunities of AI to address concerns of developed and developing nations

Balancing regulation with market incentives to encourage ethical AI development by companies

Thought Provoking Comments

We too often equate governance with control. And it’s part of a conversation that’s much bigger. I think we have followed a narrative that technology companies innovate and governments regulate and somehow in that the rest of us go along. But that’s not the point of governance, right? Governance is to set a shared vision for humanity, is to think about all of the resources we can bring to bear to make shared decisions that put agency with communities, that allow voices to participate and to come forward.

Speaker

Vilas Dhar

Reason

This comment reframes the concept of governance in a more inclusive and participatory way, challenging the typical narrative of top-down control.

Impact

It shifted the conversation towards considering governance as a collaborative process involving multiple stakeholders, not just governments and tech companies. This perspective was echoed by other panelists throughout the discussion.

We don’t think about capacity building as finding a few critical enablers and saying let’s invest in compute. Or let’s just make sure there are data sources. Instead, we think about a holistic network that says let’s actually look with communities at what their needs are and think about a mechanism by which we say there is massive resources across the system.

Speaker

Vilas Dhar

Reason

This comment provides a nuanced view of capacity building, emphasizing the importance of community needs and holistic approaches.

Impact

It deepened the discussion on implementation strategies, moving beyond technical solutions to consider social and community contexts.

We need to recognize that the digital divide emanates from disparities between the developed and developing countries. Technology has the potential to advance the promotion and acceleration of closing the gap in opportunities between genders and, consequently, can lead to the attainment of gender parity goals.

Speaker

Mokgweetsi Masisi

Reason

This comment highlights the interconnection between digital divides, global inequality, and gender disparities.

Impact

It broadened the scope of the discussion to include considerations of global equity and gender equality in digital development.

We don’t know enough. So I would also associate myself with Dr. Jian, and that we don’t know the science. I mean, if we think back about the high watermark of the COVID-19 pandemic, and there were lots of preprints and lots of papers, and I think in that context, perhaps it was okay to say, you know, we’re going to figure out the science as we’re, you know, we’re going to build a plane while we’re flying it. We actually don’t know enough about these systems and tools and models.

Speaker

Alondra Nelson

Reason

This comment acknowledges the limitations of current knowledge about AI systems and draws a parallel to the rapid scientific developments during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Impact

It introduced a note of caution and humility into the discussion, emphasizing the need for ongoing research and scientific understanding alongside policy development.

Connect the schools. Connect the young people. Connect my children.

Speaker

Nnenna Nwakanma

Reason

This simple yet powerful statement cuts through complex policy discussions to highlight a fundamental priority.

Impact

It refocused the conversation on the practical, human-centered outcomes of digital development, particularly for young people and education.

Overall Assessment

These key comments shaped the discussion by broadening its scope beyond technical and policy considerations to include community needs, global equity, scientific understanding, and practical human outcomes. They challenged conventional narratives about governance and implementation, emphasizing the importance of inclusive, participatory approaches and acknowledging the complexities and unknowns in the field of AI. The discussion evolved from high-level policy talk to considering concrete actions and their impacts on diverse communities, particularly in the Global South.

Follow-up Questions

How can we ensure AI benefits are distributed equitably and the digital divide does not become an AI divide?

Speaker

James Manyika

Explanation

This is critical to ensure AI does not exacerbate existing inequalities between developed and developing countries.

How can we build AI models and data centers more sustainably to address climate and environmental concerns?

Speaker

Alondra Nelson

Explanation

This is important to ensure AI development does not conflict with climate goals and sustainability efforts.

How can we create a real-time scientific panel to study and report on AI developments and impacts?

Speaker

James Manyika

Explanation

A rapid, ongoing research effort is needed to keep up with the fast pace of AI advancement and inform governance efforts.

How can we implement capacity building and create a global fund to support AI development in the Global South?

Speaker

James Manyika and Vilas Dhar

Explanation

This is crucial to enable developing countries to participate in and benefit from AI advancements.

How can we better involve impacted communities in shaping AI governance and development?

Speaker

Alondra Nelson

Explanation

Ensuring diverse voices are included is essential for creating AI systems that work for all of humanity.

How can we create a shared global AI infrastructure to enable more inclusive research and development?

Speaker

Jian Wang

Explanation

This could help democratize AI development and reduce concentration of power in a few countries or companies.

How can we balance discussions of AI risks with equal focus on opportunities, especially for the Global South?

Speaker

Carme Artigas

Explanation

A balanced approach is needed to fully realize AI’s potential while mitigating risks.

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed.

Intel moves photonics business to Data Centre division

As restructuring unfolds, Intel is making significant changes to its photonics business by moving its Integrated Photonics Solutions (IPS) into the Data Centre and Artificial Intelligence division (DCAI). The main goal is to better align its R&D efforts with core business priorities. This shift follows recent advancements in integrated photonics technology, including the first fully integrated optical compute interconnect (OCI) chipset, representing a major leap in high-bandwidth interconnect for AI and high-performance computing.

Intel’s Integrated Photonics Solutions (IPS) division specialises in light generation and optical signal modulation, which are key to addressing signal loss in high-density transistors. By utilising optical signals rather than electrical ones, silicon photonics technology facilitates faster data transmission and increased bandwidth. Since its 2016 launch, Intel’s silicon photonics platform has delivered millions of photonic integrated circuits and on-chip lasers, with widespread adoption among major cloud service providers.

Integrating IPS with DCAI underscores Intel’s dedication to advancing silicon photonics, a field also being quickly developed by rivals such as AMD and TSMC.

Fireblocks and Chainlink Labs join forces for stablecoin solutions

Fireblocks and Chainlink Labs have announced a new partnership aimed at helping banks issue and manage regulated stablecoins. The collaboration, revealed in a press release on 17 September, will provide a comprehensive solution for stablecoin issuers, covering everything from minting and custody to distribution. The strategic alliance enhances tokenisation capabilities and offers a real-time view of stablecoin reserves, market value, and total supply across various blockchains.

Angie Walker, Chainlink Labs’ global head of banking and capital markets, highlighted that this partnership will not only improve transparency for stablecoin users but also enhance the stablecoin’s role as a secure payment method and trading tool in digital asset markets. Although the specific banks involved in issuing stablecoins have not yet been disclosed, both companies previously supported Wenia, a division of Colombia’s largest bank, Bancolombia, in launching its COPW stablecoin.

The collaboration comes amid growing interest in stablecoins, which settled $3.7 trillion in transactions in 2023 and are projected to reach $5.28 trillion by 2024. According to a recent survey by Castle Island Ventures and Brevan Howard Digital, stablecoins are increasingly being used as a general-purpose digital dollar rather than just trading collateral.

Dogecoin’s rising transaction volume fuels market optimism

Last week, Dogecoin saw a significant increase in activity, processing 1.93 million transactions, the highest weekly total since early July. Although this figure is still below February’s peak, the rise suggests renewed interest in DOGE and potential future developments as more users engage with the network.

Data from CoinGlass shows a 1.37% rise in open interest for Dogecoin, reaching $463.16 million. This increase in outstanding derivative contracts points to heightened speculative activity, with investors anticipating significant price movements for DOGE shortly. Veteran investor Ted has expressed optimism on Twitter, noting that past Dogecoin rallies have often led to broader altcoin surges. He identifies a fractal pattern in DOGE’s current performance similar to one seen in 2021, which could signal another major alt season.

Ted’s views align with those of crypto analyst Crypto Anbu, who has noted that Dogecoin’s current technical indicators suggest a potential altcoin surge. These insights from prominent analysts support the idea that Dogecoin’s recent performance might be a precursor to significant movements in the broader cryptocurrency market.

Dogecoin is currently trading at approximately $0.1007, showing a slight 0.08% increase over the past 24 hours. The coin appears to be stabilising, which often occurs before substantial price changes.

Circle expands stablecoin reach into Brazil and Mexico

Stablecoin operator Circle has expanded its services into Latin America, allowing users in Brazil and Mexico to settle payments using its USDC token. The new feature enables the direct conversion between USDC and the Brazilian real or Mexican peso, removing the need for users to first convert their local currencies into US dollars before acquiring the stablecoin. Circle aims to streamline cross-border transactions for businesses and individuals, reducing both time and cost.

The company is now integrated with Brazil’s PIX and Mexico’s SPEI, the respective real-time payment systems, allowing local bank transfers to convert into USDC within minutes, rather than the typical days required for international wire transfers. That development is expected to free up capital and make stablecoin use more efficient in these growing markets.

Circle’s expansion into Brazil and Mexico follows its decision to relocate its global headquarters from Ireland to New York City. Now based in One World Trade Center, the company is positioning itself closer to Wall Street, and there are reports it may be preparing for an initial public offering (IPO), potentially becoming the first stablecoin operator to go public.

Global interest in central bank digital currencies surges with 134 countries exploring the technology

A new report reveals that 134 countries, representing nearly the entire global economy, are now exploring central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). This marks a significant rise from just 35 nations investigating the technology in 2020. According to the US-based Atlantic Council, over 65 countries, including major economies like India, Australia, and Brazil, are in advanced stages, either developing, piloting, or preparing to launch their CBDCs.

The G20 nations are particularly active, with 19 countries pushing ahead in their exploration of digital currencies. However, only three countries – The Bahamas, Jamaica, and Nigeria – have fully launched CBDCs, and each is working to expand the reach of these currencies within their borders. The report highlights the geopolitical dimensions of this digital push, especially among BRICS nations, which are piloting CBDCs as an alternative to the US dollar in international payments.

Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the subsequent G7 sanctions, the number of cross-border CBDC projects has more than doubled. Several of these initiatives aim to connect banking systems across countries like China, Thailand, and the UAE, further driving global interest in digital currency solutions.

UN issues final report with key recommendations on AI governance

In a world where AI is rapidly reshaping industries, societies, and geopolitics, the UN advisory body has stepped forward with its final report – ‘Governing AI for Humanity,’ presenting seven strategic recommendations for responsible AI governance. The report highlights the urgent need for global coordination in managing AI’s opportunities and risks, especially in light of the swift expansion of AI technologies like ChatGPT and the varied international regulatory approaches, such as the EU’s comprehensive AI Act and the contrasting regulatory policies of the US and China.

One of the primary suggestions is the establishment of an International Scientific Panel on AI. The body, modelled after the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, would bring together leading experts to provide timely, unbiased assessments of AI’s capabilities, risks, and uncertainties. The International Scientific Panel on AI would ensure that policymakers and civil society have access to the latest scientific understanding, helping to cut through the hype and misinformation that can surround new technological advances.

The AI Standards Exchange implementation would form a standard exchange bringing together global stakeholders, including national and international organizations, to debate and develop AI standards. It would ensure AI systems are aligned with global values like fairness and transparency.

AI Capacity Development Network is also one of the seven key points that would address disparities. The UN here proposes building an AI capacity network that would link centres of excellence globally, provide training and resources, and foster collaboration to empower countries that lack AI infrastructure.

Another key proposal is the creation of a Global AI Data Framework, which would provide a standardised approach to the governance of AI training data. Given that data is the lifeblood of AI systems, this framework would ensure the equitable sharing of data resources, promote transparency, and help balance the power dynamics between big AI companies and smaller emerging economies. The framework could also spur innovation by making AI development more accessible across different regions of the world.

The report further recommends forming a Global Fund for AI to bridge the AI divide between nations. The fund would provide financial and technical resources to countries lacking the infrastructure or expertise to develop AI technologies. The goal is to ensure that AI’s benefits are distributed equitably and not just concentrated in a few technologically advanced nations.

In tandem with these recommendations, the report advocates for a Policy Dialogue on AI Governance, emphasising the need for international cooperation to create harmonised regulations and avoid regulatory gaps. With AI systems impacting multiple sectors across borders, coherent global policies are necessary to prevent a ‘race to the bottom’ in safety standards and human rights protections.

Lastly, the UN calls for establishing an AI Office within the Secretariat, which would serve as a central hub for coordinating AI governance efforts across the UN and with other global stakeholders. This office would ensure that the recommendations are implemented effectively and that AI governance remains agile in rapid technological change.

Through these initiatives, the UN seeks to foster a world where AI can flourish while safeguarding human rights and promoting global equity. The report implies that the stakes are high, and only through coordinated global action can we harness AI’s potential while mitigating its risks.

Australia prioritises wholesale CBDC over retail version

Australia’s central bank, the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA), has shifted its focus towards developing a wholesale central bank digital currency (CBDC), citing fewer challenges and greater benefits compared to a retail CBDC. Assistant Governor Brad Jones, in a speech on 18 September, emphasised that a wholesale CBDC would serve as an evolutionary upgrade to existing financial systems rather than a revolutionary change. This type of CBDC is expected to enhance Australia’s financial infrastructure by leveraging new technologies such as programmability and atomic settlement.

The RBA is launching a three-year research initiative to explore the potential of wholesale CBDC and tokenised commercial bank deposits. Jones highlighted the central bank’s collaboration with industry leaders to assess the viability of these innovations and their ability to streamline the nation’s financial markets. Meanwhile, the benefits of a retail CBDC remain uncertain, with Jones stating that such a shift could introduce significant challenges to the current financial landscape.

Although the RBA remains open to considering a retail CBDC in the future, any decision would require legislative changes and government approval. As Jones pointed out, the Australian Government would ultimately be responsible for determining whether to introduce a retail CBDC, in line with international practices.