Democratic lawmakers are calling for an explanation from the Pentagon after reports surfaced about an order to pause offensive cyber operations against Russia during sensitive negotiations aimed at ending the war in Ukraine.
The decision to halt such operations, which disrupt rival computer networks, is not unusual in the context of diplomatic efforts but has raised concerns among lawmakers. The order was first reported by The Record and later confirmed by two anonymous sources familiar with the matter.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer criticised the move, calling it a ‘critical strategic mistake’ and arguing that ‘the best defence is always a strong offence’, especially in cybersecurity.
Representative Adam Smith, the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, also demanded that the Pentagon provide Congress with details regarding the scope of the pause and its potential impact on US allies. He further questioned whether a risk assessment was made before the decision.
The Pentagon declined to comment on the matter, citing operational security concerns. The pause in cyber operations comes amid rising tensions surrounding President Donald Trump’s recent dealings with Russia, including a public clash with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy.
Trump has shifted US policy by engaging in talks with Moscow and openly criticising Zelenskiy, suggesting that America could pull its support for Ukraine if the war does not end soon.
For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.
A court in India has ordered an Amazon unit to pay $39 million in damages for trademark infringement after unauthorised ‘Beverly Hills Polo Club’ garments were sold on its platform.
The ruling marks one of the highest damages awarded against a US company in an Indian trademark case. Lifestyle Equities, the owner of the Beverly Hills Polo Club brand, filed the lawsuit in 2020, alleging that Amazon’s Indian website was selling apparel with nearly identical branding at lower prices.
The Delhi High Court found that the infringing brand was owned by Amazon Technologies and sold directly on the platform. Judges noted that the logos were ‘hardly distinguishable’ and stated that Amazon was aware of the brand’s exclusive rights, citing previous legal disputes in the United Kingdom.
The ruling includes a permanent injunction, barring Amazon from selling counterfeit products with the Beverly Hills Polo Club branding. The company has denied wrongdoing, and its representatives have not commented on the decision.
Amazon has faced similar legal battles before, including a trademark dispute in London, where it lost an appeal last year. Critics have long accused the e-commerce giant of engaging in predatory practices, with a 2021 Reuters investigation alleging that Amazon manipulated search results to promote its own private brands in India.
The recent court decision has reignited calls for stricter enforcement of trademark laws and fair business practices in the country.
For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.
The University of Cambridge is set to open a new department, The Bennett School of Public Policy, later this year, dedicated to exploring how AI can improve both business and public sector operations.
However, this marks the university’s first major new academic department in the 21st century, with research priorities focused on harnessing AI to address pressing policy challenges.
Professors from a wide range of disciplines, including economics, social sciences, and medical fields, will collaborate to investigate the potential benefits and risks of AI adoption across sectors.
The school’s leadership aims to foster a generation of ‘tech-savvy’ policymakers who can effectively manage AI’s role in society while promoting sustainable and inclusive growth.
In addition to investigating AI’s economic impact, researchers will work closely with the Civil Service to develop AI workflows and help local government leaders address geographical inequality.
With a focus on cross-disciplinary expertise, the Bennett School plans to train policymakers who can tackle the complex issues of today’s world.
For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.
A US federal judge has dismissed a fraud lawsuit filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against Richard Heart, the founder of the cryptocurrency platform Hex.
The SEC accused Heart of raising over $1 billion through unregistered offerings and misappropriating investor funds for luxury purchases, including sports cars and a black diamond.
However, the judge ruled that the SEC’s claims lacked a direct link to the United States, as Heart’s activities were primarily directed at a global audience and occurred abroad.
The SEC had also alleged that Heart misled investors with exaggerated claims about potential returns from his Hex token and other crypto projects.
Despite these accusations, the court determined that the transactions, including fund misappropriations, took place outside of US jurisdiction, with no clear evidence of US-based investors being affected.
Heart’s legal team welcomed the ruling, describing it as a significant victory for the cryptocurrency industry. They argued that the decision highlighted the need for clearer regulations surrounding digital assets. The SEC has not yet commented on the ruling.
For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.
Intel has announced a significant delay in its planned $28 billion semiconductor manufacturing project in Ohio, pushing the completion of its first factory to 2030.
Operations are expected to begin between 2030 and 2031, extending the initial timeline by at least five years. The second factory is now scheduled for completion in 2031, with production starting in 2032.
The chipmaker is adjusting its plans in response to financial pressures following its costly push into contract chip manufacturing.
Naga Chandrasekaran, general manager of Intel Foundry Manufacturing, stated that the decision was made to align factory operations with market demand and ensure responsible capital management.
The company has also been cutting costs through workforce reductions, dividend suspensions, and a broader expense reduction strategy.
Intel’s financial restructuring follows a challenging period for the company, which has struggled to regain its position in the semiconductor industry.
The delay in Ohio’s factory construction reflects a cautious approach to investment, with the company aiming to keep operating expenses at approximately $17.5 billion for 2025.
For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.
The notice relates to the acquisition of two companies, Little Internet Private Limited and Nearbuy India Private Limited, covering the period from 2015 to 2019.
Paytm has stated that the alleged violations occurred before these companies became its subsidiaries. The company maintains that the notice has no impact on its services for consumers and merchants. No further details about the specific allegations have been disclosed.
The notice comes at a time of increased regulatory scrutiny of digital payment firms in India.
Paytm has previously faced challenges related to compliance and operations, making the latest development a significant issue for the company as it continues to navigate the country’s evolving financial regulations.
For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.
The founder of cryptocurrency financial services firm Gotbit has been extradited from Portugal to the United States to face charges of market manipulation and fraud.
Aleksei Andriunin, a 26-year-old Russian national, appeared in a Boston court, where he pleaded not guilty to wire fraud and conspiracy charges. Prosecutors allege his company engaged in sham trading to artificially inflate the value of digital tokens.
Authorities claim that between 2018 and 2024, Gotbit manipulated cryptocurrency trading volumes through a practice known as ‘wash trading’. The FBI’s ‘Operation Token Mirrors‘ played a key role in the investigation, reportedly using its own digital token to detect fraudulent activities.
Gotbit allegedly facilitated wash trades worth millions and profited tens of millions of dollars by boosting the market appeal of cryptocurrencies such as Saitama and Robo Inu.
Andriunin was arrested in Portugal in October when US authorities first announced charges against him and others. His company and two employees in Russia also face legal action, though they have not yet appeared in court.
The case is part of a broader crackdown on fraud in the cryptocurrency sector.
For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.
Chinese AI start-up DeepSeek has revealed that its theoretical profit margins could reach 545 percent, shedding light on the financial potential of its innovative approach to AI. The Hangzhou-based company said its V3 and R1 models’ cost-to-sales ratio during 24 hours in February highlighted the massive profitability of its AI services.
However, DeepSeek clarified that actual revenues are much lower, as many services remain free or discounted during off-peak hours, and the calculations exclude research and development costs. Despite the hypothetical nature of these margins, the disclosure comes as AI start-ups worldwide struggle to prove their business models can turn sustainable profits.
Giants like OpenAI and Anthropic experiment with various revenue streams — from subscriptions to licensing fees — while investors increasingly question how soon these companies can achieve lasting profitability. What makes DeepSeek stand out is its commitment to transparency and open-source innovation.
The company publicly shared insights into its infrastructure, explaining how it optimises server loads, reduces latency, and maximises data processing efficiency. This openness contrasts sharply with many US-based competitors’ secretive, proprietary strategies, signalling DeepSeek’s confidence in its long-term vision.
Why does it matter?
In an industry racing to build more powerful AI, DeepSeek’s willingness to share its methods and potential profitability sparks an important debate: Can a balance between innovation, openness, and sustainable revenue reshape the future of AI?
For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.
Samsung has unveiled its latest Galaxy A-series lineup, introducing the Galaxy A56, A36, and A26, packed with new AI-powered features. One of the standout additions is the ‘awesome intelligence’ suite, which brings advanced image editing capabilities.
Among these features is Best Face, allowing users to swap facial expressions in group photos — similar to Google Pixel’s Best Take. These tools, first seen in the Galaxy S25, aim to simplify capturing and editing moments.
The Galaxy A56 has performance upgrades, including an Exynos 1580 chip and a larger vapour chamber for better cooling. It features a 6.7-inch full HD Plus display with a 120Hz refresh rate, a 50MP primary camera, a 12MP ultrawide sensor, and a 5MP macro lens. Priced at $499, the A56 is set to launch in the US later this year, while the A36 and A26 will hit shelves in late March, costing $399 and $299, respectively.
Buyers in the UK can get their hands on the new devices starting 19 March, with prices beginning at €299 for the Galaxy A26. The series also promises long-term value, offering up to six years of Android OS and security updates, plus IP67 dust and water resistance on the A26, making these phones a compelling choice for budget-conscious consumers looking for modern features.
For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.
United States officials are reviewing whether the UK breached a bilateral agreement by reportedly pressuring Apple to create a ‘backdoor’ for government access to encrypted iCloud backups.
Apple recently withdrew an encrypted storage feature for UK users following reports that it had refused to comply with such demands, which could have affected users worldwide. The Washington Post reported that Apple rejected the UK government’s request.
The US director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, confirmed in a letter to lawmakers that a legal review is underway to determine if the UK violated the CLOUD Act.
Under the agreement, neither the US nor the United Kingdom can demand data access for citizens or residents of the other country. Initial legal assessments suggest the UK’s reported demands may have overstepped its authority under the agreement.
Apple has long defended its encryption policies, arguing that creating a backdoor for government access would weaken security and leave user data vulnerable to hackers. Cybersecurity experts warn that any such backdoor, once created, would inevitably be exploited.
The tech giant has clashed with regulators over encryption before, notably in 2016 when it resisted US government efforts to unlock a terrorism suspect’s iPhone.
For more information on these topics, visit diplomacy.edu.
