AI copyright clash stalls UK data bill

A bitter standoff over AI and copyright has returned to the House of Lords, as ministers and peers clash over how to protect creative workers while fostering technological innovation.

At the centre of the debate is the proposed Data (Use and Access) Bill, which was expected to pass smoothly but is now stuck in parliamentary limbo due to growing resistance.

The bill would allow AI firms to access copyrighted material unless rights holders opt out, a proposal that many artists and peers believe threatens the UK’s £124bn creative industry.

Nearly 300 Lords have called for AI developers to disclose what content they use and seek licences instead of relying on blanket access. Former film director Baroness Kidron described the policy as ‘state-sanctioned theft’ and warned it would sacrifice British talent to benefit large tech companies.

Supporters of the bill, like former Meta executive Sir Nick Clegg, argue that forcing AI firms to seek individual permissions would severely damage the UK’s AI sector. The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology insists it will only consider changes if they are proven to benefit creators.

If no resolution is found, the bill risks being shelved entirely. That would also scrap unrelated proposals bundled into it, such as new NHS data-sharing rules and plans for a nationwide underground map.

Despite the bill’s wide scope, the fight over copyright remains its most divisive and emotionally charged feature.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Gmail adds automatic AI summaries

Gmail on mobile now displays AI-generated summaries by default, marking a shift in how Google’s Gemini assistant operates within inboxes.

Instead of relying on users to request a summary, Gemini will now decide when it’s useful—typically for long email threads with multiple replies—and present a brief summary card at the top of the message.

These summaries update automatically as conversations evolve, aiming to save users from scrolling through lengthy discussions.

The feature is currently limited to mobile devices and available only to users with Google Workspace accounts, Gemini Education add-ons, or a Google One AI Premium subscription. For the moment, summaries are confined to emails written in English.

Google expects the rollout to take around two weeks, though it remains unclear when, or if, the tool will extend to standard Gmail accounts or desktop users.

Anyone wanting to opt out must disable Gmail’s smart features entirely—giving up tools like Smart Compose, Smart Reply, and package tracking in the process.

While some may welcome the convenience, others may feel uneasy about their emails being analysed by large language models, especially since this process could contribute to further training of Google’s AI systems.

The move reflects a wider trend across Google’s products, where AI is becoming central to everyday user experiences.

Additional user controls and privacy commitments

According to Google Workspace, users have some control over the summary cards. They can collapse a Gemini summary card, and it will remain collapsed for that specific email thread.

In the near future, Gmail will introduce enhancements, such as automatically collapsing future summary cards for users who consistently collapse them, until the user chooses to expand them again. For emails that don’t display automatic summaries, Gmail still offers manual options.

Users can tap the ‘summarise this email’ chip at the top of the message or use the Gemini side panel to trigger a summary manually. Google also reaffirms its commitment to data protection and user privacy. All AI features in Gmail adhere to its privacy principles, with more details available on the Privacy Hub.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Europe’s digital euro ambitions: A bid for global currency influence

At a recent speech in Berlin, European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde highlighted the potential of the euro to take on a greater international role amid growing uncertainty in the global monetary system. With the dominance of the US dollar increasingly under scrutiny and central banks turning to gold at levels unseen in decades, Lagarde outlined how a digital euro could be pivotal in shifting the balance of global finance.

Lagarde emphasised that the euro already accounts for around 20% of global foreign exchange reserves but still lags far behind the US dollar’s 58%. She argued that a more internationally accepted euro would shield Europe from exchange rate volatility, reduce borrowing costs, and help protect the EU from coercive economic measures.

One of the key steps in this direction is the ongoing development of a digital euro—an initiative the ECB is pursuing to modernise cross-border payments and reinforce the euro’s international utility. The ECB President noted that trade alone won’t be enough to elevate the euro to global reserve status.

Investors also need confidence in Europe’s geopolitical strength and legal institutions. She linked the US dollar’s global standing to its economy, military alliances, and legal predictability—areas where Europe must step up.

A digital euro, supported by robust capital markets and legal credibility, could become a cornerstone in this strategy. Lagarde concluded with a call for bold action.

The global economic landscape is shifting, and Europe must seize this ‘global euro moment.’ But success is not guaranteed, she warned.

For the euro to rise as a true rival to the dollar, the EU must act decisively, invest in unity, and deliver on reforms that inspire trust and stability, both politically and economically.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacyIf so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

AI takes over eCommerce tasks as Visa and Mastercard adapt

Visa and Mastercard have announced major AI initiatives that could reshape the future of e-commerce, marking a significant step in the evolution of retail technology.

The initiatives—Visa’s Intelligent Commerce and Mastercard’s Agent Pay—move beyond traditional recommendation engines to empower AI agents to make purchases directly on behalf of consumers.

Visa is partnering with leading tech firms, including Anthropic, IBM, Microsoft, OpenAI, and Stripe, to build a system where AI agents shop according to user preferences.

Meanwhile, Mastercard’s Agent Pay integrates payment functionality into AI-driven conversational platforms, blending commerce and conversation into a seamless user experience.

These announcements follow years of AI integration into retail, with adoption growing at 40% annually and the market projected to surpass $8 billion by 2024. Retailers initially used AI for backend optimisation, but nearly 87% now apply it in customer-facing roles.

The next phase, where AI doesn’t just suggest but acts, is rapidly taking shape—backed by consumer demand for hyper-personalisation and efficiency.

Research suggests 71% of consumers want generative AI embedded in their shopping journeys, with 58% already turning to AI tools over traditional search engines for recommendations. However, consumer trust remains a challenge.

Satisfaction with AI dropped slightly last year, highlighting concerns over privacy and implementation quality—especially critical for financial transactions.

Visa and Mastercard’s moves reflect both opportunity and necessity. With 75% of retailers viewing AI agents as essential within the next year, and AI expected to handle 20% of eCommerce tasks, the payment giants are positioning themselves as indispensable infrastructure in a fast-changing market.

Their broad alliances across AI, payments, and tech underline a shared goal: to stay central as shopping behaviours evolve in the AI era.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

DeepSeek claims its new AI rivals top global models

Chinese AI start-up DeepSeek has announced a major upgrade to its R1 model, stating that the new version, R1-0528, now matches the performance of top-tier models from global giants like OpenAI and Google.

Unveiled on Thursday, the upgraded model brings notable improvements in reasoning and creative writing, allowing it to generate argumentative essays, fiction, and prose with a style said to be close to human authors.

DeepSeek also reported enhanced coding capabilities, positioning the model as a more versatile tool for both technical and literary applications.

The original R1 model debuted in January. With the R1-0528 update, DeepSeek appears to be accelerating its efforts to compete with established Western AI developers in both domestic and international markets.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Gemini AI can now summarise videos in Google Drive

Google is expanding Gemini AI’s capabilities in Drive by enabling it to analyse video files and respond to user questions or generate concise summaries.

The new feature aims to save users time by providing quick insights from lengthy content such as meetings, classes or announcements, instead of requiring them to watch the entire video. Until now, Gemini could only summarise documents and PDFs stored in Drive.

According to a blog post published on 28 May 2025, the feature will support prompts like ‘Summarise the video’ or ‘List action items from the meeting.’ Users can access Gemini’s functionality either through Drive’s overlay previewer or a standalone viewer in a separate browser tab.

However, captions must be enabled within the user’s domain for the feature to work properly.

The update is being gradually rolled out and is expected to be available to all eligible users by 19 June. At the moment, it is limited to English and accessible only to users of Google Workspace and Google One AI Premium, or those with Gemini Business or Enterprise add-ons.

For administrators, smart features and personalisation settings must be activated to grant access.

To use the new function, users can double-click on a video file in Drive and select the ‘Ask Gemini’ option marked by a star icon in the top right corner. Google says the upgrade reflects a broader effort to integrate AI seamlessly into everyday workflows by making content easier to navigate and understand.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Meta faces backlash over open source AI claims

Meta is under renewed scrutiny for what critics describe as ‘open washing’ after sponsoring a Linux Foundation whitepaper on the benefits of open source AI.

The paper highlights how open models help reduce enterprise costs—claiming companies using proprietary AI tools spend over three times more. However, Meta’s involvement has raised questions, as its Llama AI models are presented as open source despite industry experts insisting otherwise.

Amanda Brock, head of OpenUK, argues that Llama does not meet accepted definitions of open source due to licensing terms that restrict commercial use.

She referenced the Open Source Initiative’s (OSI) standards, which Llama fails to meet, pointing to the presence of commercial limitations that contradict open source principles. Brock noted that open source should allow unrestricted use, which Llama’s license does not support.

Meta has long branded its Llama models as open source, but the OSI and other stakeholders have repeatedly pushed back, stating that the company’s licensing undermines the very foundation of open access.

While Brock acknowledged Meta’s contribution to the broader open source conversation, she also warned that such mislabelling could have serious consequences—especially as lawmakers and regulators increasingly reference open source in crafting AI legislation.

Other firms have faced similar allegations, including Databricks with its DBRX model in 2024, which was also criticised for failing to meet OSI standards. As the AI sector continues to evolve, the line between truly open and merely accessible models remains a point of growing tension.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Anthropic CEO warns of mass job losses from AI

Just one week after releasing its most advanced AI models to date — Opus 4 and Sonnet 4 — Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei warned in an interview with Axios that AI could soon reshape the job market in alarming ways.

AI, he said, may be responsible for eliminating up to half of all entry-level white-collar roles within the next one to five years, potentially driving unemployment as high as 10% to 20%.

Amodei’s goal in speaking publicly is to help workers prepare and to urge both AI companies and governments to be more transparent about coming changes. ‘Most of them [workers] are unaware that this is about to happen,’ he told Axios. ‘It sounds crazy, and people just don’t believe it.’

According to Amodei, the shift from AI augmenting jobs to fully automating them could begin as soon as two years from now. He highlighted how widespread displacement may threaten democratic stability and deepen inequality, as large groups of people lose the ability to generate economic value.

Despite these warnings, Amodei explained that competitive pressures prevent developers from slowing down. Regulatory caution in the US, he suggested, would only result in countries like China advancing more rapidly.

Still, not all implications are negative. Amodei pointed to major breakthroughs in other areas, such as healthcare, as part of the broader impact of AI.

‘Cancer is cured, the economy grows at 10% a year, the budget is balanced — and 20% of people don’t have jobs,’ he said.

To prepare society, Amodei called for increased public awareness, encouraging individuals to reconsider career paths and avoid the most automation-prone fields.

He referenced the Anthropic Economic Index, which monitors how AI affects different occupations. At its launch in February, the index showed that 57% of AI use cases still supported human tasks rather than replacing them.

However, during a press-only session at Code with Claude, Amodei noted that augmentation is likely to be a short-term strategy. He described a ‘rising waterline’ — the gradual shift from assistance to full replacement — which may soon outpace efforts to retain human roles.

‘When I think about how to make things more augmentative, that is a strategy for the short and the medium term — in the long term, we are all going to have to contend with the idea that everything humans do is eventually going to be done by AI systems. That is a constant. That will happen,’ he said.

His other recommendations included boosting AI literacy and equipping public officials with a deeper understanding of superintelligent systems, so they can begin forming policy for a radically transformed economy.

While Amodei’s outlook may sound daunting, it echoes a pattern seen throughout history: every major technological disruption brings workforce upheaval. Though some roles vanish, others emerge. Several studies suggest AI may even highlight the continued relevance of distinctively human skills.

Regardless of the outcome, one thing remains clear — learning to work with AI has never been more important.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

New York Times partners with Amazon on AI integration

The New York Times Company and Amazon have signed a multi-year licensing agreement that will allow Amazon to integrate editorial content from The New York Times, NYT Cooking, and The Athletic into a range of its AI-powered services, the companies announced Wednesday.

Under the deal, Amazon will use licensed content for real-time display in consumer-facing products such as Alexa, as well as for training its proprietary foundation models. The agreement marks an expansion of the firms’ existing partnership.

‘The agreement expands the companies’ existing relationship, and will deliver additional value to Amazon customers while bringing Times journalism to broader audiences,’ the companies said in a joint statement.

According to the announcement, the licensing terms include ‘real-time display of summaries and short excerpts of Times content within Amazon products and services’ alongside permission to use the content in AI model development. Amazon platforms will also feature direct links to full Times articles.

Both companies described the partnership as a reflection of a shared commitment to delivering global news and information across Amazon’s AI ecosystem. Financial details of the agreement were not made public.

The announcement comes amid growing industry debate about the role of journalistic material in training AI systems.

By entering a formal licensing arrangement, The New York Times positions itself as one of the first major media outlets to publicly align with a technology company for AI-related content use.

The companies have yet to name additional Amazon products that will feature Times content, and no timeline has been disclosed for the rollout of the new integrations.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU says US tech firms censor more

Far more online content is removed under US tech firms’ terms and conditions than under the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA), according to Tech Commissioner Henna Virkkunen.

Her comments respond to criticism from American tech leaders, including Elon Musk, who have labelled the DSA a threat to free speech.

In an interview with Euractiv, Virkkunen said recent data show that 99% of content removals in the EU between September 2023 and April 2024 were carried out by platforms like Meta and X based on their own rules, not due to EU regulation.

Only 1% of cases involved ‘trusted flaggers’ — vetted organisations that report illegal content to national authorities. Just 0.001% of those reports led to an actual takedown decision by authorities, she added.

The DSA’s transparency rules made those figures available. ‘Often in the US, platforms have more strict rules with content,’ Virkkunen noted.

She gave examples such as discussions about euthanasia and nude artworks, which are often removed under US platform policies but remain online under European guidelines.

Virkkunen recently met with US tech CEOs and lawmakers, including Republican Congressman Jim Jordan, a prominent critic of the DSA and the DMA.

She said the data helped clarify how EU rules actually work. ‘It is important always to underline that the DSA only applies in the European territory,’ she said.

While pushing back against American criticism, Virkkunen avoided direct attacks on individuals like Elon Musk or Mark Zuckerberg. She suggested platform resistance reflects business models and service design choices.

Asked about delays in final decisions under the DSA — including open cases against Meta and X — Virkkunen stressed the need for a strong legal basis before enforcement.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!