The US government has announced new restrictions on exporting AI chips and technology, seeking to safeguard its dominance in AI development while limiting China’s access to advanced computing capabilities. The regulations, unveiled during the final days of President Biden’s administration, impose strict caps on AI chip exports to most countries, with exemptions for close allies such as Japan, the UK, and South Korea. Countries like China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea remain barred from accessing this critical technology.
Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo emphasised the importance of maintaining US leadership in AI to support national security and economic interests. The regulations, which build on a four-year effort to block China’s acquisition of advanced chips, also close existing loopholes and enforce tighter controls. New limits target advanced graphics processing units (GPUs), essential for training AI models, and introduce worldwide licensing requirements for cutting-edge AI technologies. Major cloud providers like Microsoft and Amazon will face new authorisation processes to establish data centres globally under stringent conditions.
Industry leaders, including Nvidia, have expressed concerns over the broad scope of the rules, warning of potential harm to innovation and market dynamics. Nvidia called the restrictions an “overreach,” while Oracle cautioned that the measures could inadvertently benefit Chinese competitors. Despite this criticism, US officials argue the rules are vital for maintaining a competitive edge, given AI’s transformative potential in sectors like healthcare, cybersecurity, and defence. China’s Commerce Ministry condemned the move, vowing to protect its interests in response to the escalating technology standoff.
The New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) has unveiled a Transatlantic Regulatory Exchange programme, fostering collaboration with the Bank of England to advance oversight of digital assets and emerging payment systems. This initiative will facilitate a six-month staff exchange starting February, aiming to enhance regulatory alignment and share expertise.
NYDFS Superintendent Adrienne Harris, who has led the regulator since 2022, emphasised the importance of the programme for global harmonisation in digital asset regulation. The department, renowned for its 2015 BitLicense scheme, views this partnership as a step towards strengthening crypto oversight.
The UK and US differ significantly in their approaches to digital currencies. The Bank of England continues exploring a central bank digital currency, while the US administration resists a government-backed digital dollar. With such exchanges, both regulators hope to gain deeper insights into navigating the challenges of the crypto landscape.
MicroStrategy Inc. has bolstered its position as a Bitcoin powerhouse, purchasing $243 million worth of the cryptocurrency in its 10th consecutive weekly acquisition. The company, based in Virginia, now controls over 2% of Bitcoin’s finite supply, continuing a strategy initiated by co-founder and Chairman Michael Saylor in 2020.
The firm acquired 2,530 Bitcoin between 6 and 12 January at an average price of $95,972 per token, according to a regulatory filing. With plans to raise $42 billion in capital by 2027 through stock sales and debt offerings, MicroStrategy intends to invest heavily in Bitcoin. It has already reached two-thirds of its equity-raising goals in just a few months and could potentially purchase an additional $6.5 billion in Bitcoin.
MicroStrategy’s shares have risen 13% this year, closing at $327.91 last week, while Bitcoin itself has experienced a slight dip, losing 3% in value after a 120% surge in 2024. The firm’s approach has drawn attention from hedge funds employing convertible arbitrage strategies, betting on the volatility of MicroStrategy’s stock as the company advances plans to expand its equity offerings.
Britain’s antitrust regulator, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), has launched an investigation into Google’s search operations to assess their impact on consumers, businesses, and competition. With Google handling 90% of UK online searches and supporting over 200,000 businesses through advertising, the CMA aims to ensure fair competition and innovation in search services, said CMA chief Sarah Cardell.
The probe will evaluate whether Google’s dominant position restricts market entry and innovation, as well as whether it provides preferential treatment to its own services. The CMA will also investigate the company’s extensive collection and use of consumer data, including its role in AI services. The findings, expected within nine months, could lead to measures such as requiring Google to share data with rivals or giving publishers more control over their content.
Google has defended its role, stating that its search services foster innovation and help UK businesses grow. The company pledged to work constructively with the CMA to create rules that benefit both businesses and users. The investigation follows similar scrutiny in the US, where prosecutors have pushed for major reforms to curb Google’s dominance in online search.
China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) announced plans to strengthen regulations on online platforms and the growing livestream e-commerce sector. The move aims to foster fair competition, protect smaller businesses, and improve consumer trust, according to SAMR Deputy Head Shu Wei.
At a press briefing, Shu highlighted plans to enhance transparency, reduce merchants’ operational costs, and address concerns over platform practices that disrupt fair competition. The regulator aims to improve existing frameworks to safeguard merchants’ and consumers’ rights against platform rule abuse.
The SAMR also intends to crack down on deceptive marketing in livestream e-commerce, a sector experiencing rapid growth but facing criticism for misleading tactics. The initiative is expected to address dishonest practices while ensuring a healthier and more balanced market environment.
Kenya is taking decisive steps to regulate cryptocurrencies as the government shifts its stance from cautious warnings to a more structured approach. Treasury Cabinet Secretary John Mbadi has confirmed plans to introduce a legal and regulatory framework aimed at fostering a fair and stable crypto market. This move is outlined in the ‘National Policy on Virtual Assets and Virtual Asset Service Providers,’ a draft proposal open for public feedback until 24 January.
The policy proposes comprehensive regulations for virtual assets, addressing key concerns such as money laundering, terrorism financing, and consumer protection. It aims to establish clear standards and procedures to govern virtual asset service providers, setting Kenya on a path similar to other African nations like South Africa and Nigeria, which have embraced crypto regulation.
Kenya’s cautious journey with cryptocurrencies dates back to a 2015 warning by the Central Bank of Kenya (CBK), highlighting risks like fraud and lack of legal safeguards. However, a significant shift occurred in September 2023 when the country completed an assessment of money laundering risks tied to virtual assets. With stablecoins accounting for nearly half of the region’s transaction volume, Kenya’s proactive regulatory approach could solidify its role as a leader in sub-Saharan Africa’s crypto adoption landscape.
Infosys has filed a counterclaim against Cognizant in a Texas federal court, accusing the US-based technology firm of anti-competitive behaviour. The Indian company alleges that Cognizant included restrictive clauses in client contracts, preventing them from working with rival firms and withholding necessary software training.
The Bengaluru-based software giant also claims Cognizant engaged in targeted poaching of its senior executives. The hiring of former Infosys president S Ravi Kumar as Cognizant’s CEO in 2023 allegedly delayed the development of Infosys’ Helix software product.
Cognizant denied the allegations, stating it supports fair competition but accused Infosys of improperly using its intellectual property. The counterclaim follows a 2023 lawsuit by Cognizant’s subsidiary TriZetto, which accused Infosys of stealing trade secrets related to healthcare insurance software.
Infosys is seeking damages, including legal fees, but did not disclose the amount. The case is being heard in the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
The US Supreme Court on Friday appeared inclined to uphold a law requiring a sale or ban of TikTok in the United States by January 19, citing national security risks tied to its Chinese parent company, ByteDance. Justices questioned TikTok’s potential role in enabling the Chinese government to collect data on its 170 million American users and influence public opinion covertly. Chief Justice John Roberts and others expressed concerns about China’s potential to exploit the platform, while also probing implications for free speech protections under the First Amendment.
The law, passed with bipartisan support and signed by outgoing President Joe Biden, has been challenged by TikTok, ByteDance, and app users who argue it infringes on free speech. TikTok’s lawyer, Noel Francisco, warned that without a resolution or extension by President-elect Donald Trump, the platform would likely shut down on January 19. Francisco emphasised TikTok’s role as a key platform for expression and called for at least a temporary halt to the law.
Liberal and conservative justices alike acknowledged the tension between national security and constitutional rights. Justice Elena Kagan raised historical parallels to Cold War-era restrictions, while Justice Brett Kavanaugh highlighted the long-term risks of data collection. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, representing the Biden administration, argued that TikTok’s foreign ownership poses a grave threat, enabling covert manipulation and espionage. She defended Congress’s right to act in the interest of national security.
With global trade tensions and fears of digital surveillance mounting, the Supreme Court’s decision will have wide-ranging implications for technology, free speech, and US-China relations. The court is now considering whether to grant a temporary stay, providing Trump’s incoming administration an opportunity to address the issue politically.
Taiwan is optimistic about the limited impact of US President-elect Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs on semiconductor exports, citing the nation’s technological edge in the global chip industry. On Friday, economy Minister Kuo Jyh-huei emphasised that Taiwan’s advanced semiconductor processes, led by industry giant TSMC, maintain an irreplaceable position in the supply chain for major companies like Apple and Nvidia.
Despite Trump’s pledges for sweeping tariffs—10% on global imports and up to 60% on Chinese goods—Taiwanese policymakers acknowledged potential challenges for the island’s export-driven economy. However, Kuo reassured that the chip sector’s resilience lies in its technological leadership, which mitigates the risk of significant disruption.
To adapt to the shifting trade landscape, Taiwan plans to help companies relocate parts of their supply chains to the United States if necessary. The island also aims to deepen cooperation in industries like aerospace and advanced technology by fostering ties with US and Japanese firms. This includes establishing a dedicated office in Japan to bolster collaboration on AI and drone development, Kuo said.
Taiwan’s proactive approach reflects its strategic positioning in global trade and its commitment to maintaining robust economic ties amid evolving US policies.
The European Union’s landmark crypto regulation, the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework, officially took effect on 30 December 2024, promising to streamline the industry across all 27 member states. MiCA introduces a unified rulebook to replace the fragmented national laws that previously governed the sector. Its goals include boosting transparency, reducing risks for investors, and fostering innovation in an industry often marred by scams and market instability.
Under MiCA, crypto token issuers must meet strict disclosure standards, while exchanges and wallet providers are required to register with the European Banking Authority. Stablecoins, particularly asset-referenced and electronic money tokens, face rigorous scrutiny, including reserve requirements and sustainability disclosures. However, the regulation has brought significant challenges, such as high compliance costs and operational overhauls, which could force smaller companies to relocate to less stringent jurisdictions like the UAE or UK.
Experts believe MiCA offers long-term benefits, including clarity and stability for the crypto sector, but warn that its strict demands might stifle innovation for startups. The regulation’s success will hinge on consistent enforcement across the EU and its ability to balance oversight with fostering growth. As Europe navigates this new framework, it signals a global shift, with the US also taking steps to establish itself as a crypto leader under its incoming administration.
