Digital standards Archives | Page 2 of 388

European Commission marks .eu anniversary with internet governance focus

The European Commission has marked the 20th anniversary of the .eu top-level domain, presenting it as a symbol of European identity online and an element of Europe’s technological sovereignty agenda.

The milestone was celebrated during the 2026 European Internet Governance Dialogue in Brussels, where policymakers, technical experts, businesses, civil society representatives, and other stakeholders discussed the future of global internet governance.

According to the Commission, .eu has grown into the fourth-largest country-code top-level domain in Europe, with 3.8 million registrations since its launch in April 2006. The EU officials described the domain as a symbol of European identity online and an example of resilient European digital infrastructure, noting that it has operated without a single outage for two decades.

The discussions also focused on Europe’s broader approach to internet governance, digital autonomy, and the reduction of strategic technological dependencies. Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen said Europe is at a pivotal moment where digital autonomy, reduced dependencies, and global leadership in internet governance must go hand in hand.

The Commission linked the anniversary to future EU initiatives, including the upcoming Technological Sovereignty Package, which it said would further support Europe’s vision for a decentralised and open internet where users, businesses, and governments have real alternatives and control over their digital future.

Officials also stressed the importance of ensuring that European values, including human rights, inclusivity, and competition, continue to shape the next decade of global internet governance.

Why does it matter?

The anniversary shows how domain governance and internet infrastructure are increasingly being linked to digital sovereignty and technological dependence. By framing .eu as part of Europe’s identity, resilience, and internet governance agenda, the Commission is connecting a long-standing country-code top-level domain to broader debates on autonomy, infrastructure, trust, and Europe’s role in shaping the future of the open internet.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Vietnam introduces mandatory labels for AI-generated content

Vietnam will require disclosure labels for certain AI-generated and AI-edited content from May under a new government decree aimed at improving online transparency.

Under Decree 142/2026/ND-CP, organisations and individuals using AI systems must disclose when content has been created or altered by AI in ways that could affect perceptions of authenticity.

The rules apply to AI-generated or AI-edited audio, image, and video content, particularly material imitating real people or realistic events. Particularly, it applies to content that imitates the appearance or voice of real people or recreates real-life events in a convincing manner. According to the decree, disclosures must be clear, visible, and recognisable before or during user access to the content.

The decree states that disclosures designed to obscure the AI-generated nature of content will not satisfy the requirements. Anyways, several exemptions are included. Several exemptions are included, such as technical quality improvements that do not materially alter content.

The framework also excludes certain AI-assisted editing functions, including spelling correction, translation, summarisation, and grammar editing, where original meaning is preserved. Additional exemptions apply to internal organisational use and controlled research or testing environments not intended for public release. At the end, content produced during research, development or testing activities in controlled environments and not released to the public is also an exemption.

Authorities said disclosures may take different forms depending on content type, including labels, captions, interface notices, or audio announcements. Labels may appear directly on content, in titles, captions and descriptions, through platform interfaces or even as audio announcements. Films and artistic productions may include disclosures in opening sections, end credits or supporting materials.

Responsibility for compliance will apply both to parties generating AI content and those distributing it publicly. Parties generating or editing AI content must provide the information needed for labelling, while those publishing the material to the public must ensure disclosure rules are followed.

Vietnam’s Ministry of Science and Technology is expected to publish additional technical guidance related to the implementation of the disclosure framework. Officials said the guidance would not create additional administrative procedures or business conditions or obligations beyond those already outlined in the decree.

Why does it matter?

The decree reflects broader international efforts to improve transparency around AI-generated media as synthetic content becomes more realistic and widely accessible. Disclosure requirements are increasingly being explored by governments as a way to address misinformation risks, impersonation concerns, and public trust in digital content.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

European Commission delays tech sovereignty package again

The European Commission has postponed the presentation of its tech sovereignty package until 3 June, following several earlier delays. The publication had previously been scheduled for 25 March, 15 April and 27 May.

According to Euractiv, the package is expected to include the proposed Cloud and AI Development Act and Chips Act 2. The initiatives are intended to support digital infrastructure development and strengthen Europe’s semiconductor sector. The measures are also expected to encourage data centre investment and semiconductor manufacturing within the EU.

The latest postponement follows comments from the US ambassador to the EU concerning potential trade implications of European digital regulation. Euractiv additionally reported uncertainty regarding a proposed EU open-source strategy previously linked to the package.

The European Commission did not comment publicly on the latest delay.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

EU consultation closes on AI energy measurement

The European Commission has moved forward with work on measuring the energy consumption and emissions of AI models and systems, as part of preparations for a possible AI energy measurement framework under the EU AI Act.

The targeted consultation forms part of a Commission-procured study on measuring and promoting energy-efficient and low-emission AI in the European Union. Responses will help refine the study, contribute to a measurement framework for the AI Act’s energy-related objectives and support the design of a potential AI energy and emissions label.

The process focuses on how to measure energy use across the AI lifecycle, including development and training, as well as operational use and inference. The Commission says a comprehensive picture of AI’s energy efficiency and carbon footprint requires data on computational resources, electricity consumption and hardware details.

Under Annex XI of the AI Act, providers of general-purpose AI models must document known or estimated energy consumption as part of their technical documentation obligations. The consultation, therefore, targets developers and deployers of general-purpose AI models and AI systems, as well as component and service suppliers.

Stakeholders were asked about the accessibility of data needed to assess AI energy consumption and emissions, as well as the suitability of different AI performance indicators. The Commission said the aim is to develop a robust and practical industry-informed framework for measuring AI energy consumption and efficiency.

The AI Office will publish a summary of the consultation results based on aggregated data, with respondents not directly quoted.

Why does it matter?

AI’s growing energy demand is becoming a regulatory and environmental policy concern, especially as general-purpose AI models require substantial computing resources for training and inference. A common EU framework for measuring AI energy use and emissions could make environmental impacts more visible, support future transparency obligations and help compare systems more consistently. A possible AI energy and emissions label would also push sustainability into AI governance alongside safety, transparency and accountability.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

European Union reviews platform power in third annual Digital Markets Act report

The European Commission has published its first formal review of the Digital Markets Act, assessing how the regulation is affecting large online platforms and digital market competition across the European Union.

The review says the DMA has already produced visible changes in some areas, including greater user choice through third-party app stores and prompts allowing users to select browsers or search engines. However, it also points to continuing challenges in implementation and enforcement.

Enforcement has become a central part of the assessment. In April 2025, Apple was fined €500 million for blocking developers from directing users to cheaper purchasing options, while Meta was fined €200 million over its ‘consent or pay’ model. Both companies are appealing the decisions.

The Commission also highlighted ongoing compliance and procedural difficulties. According to the review, investigations are taking around twice as long as the 12-month target, while legal procedures are being used to slow compliance.

The assessment raises broader questions about whether the DMA should eventually cover fast-growing areas such as AI tools and cloud platforms. The review presents the regulation as an evolving framework whose long-term impact will depend on consistent enforcement and adaptation to new market realities.

Why does it matter?

The review indicates that the Digital Markets Act is transitioning from establishing rules to a more challenging phase of enforcement. Initial changes suggest that the law is starting to influence the behaviour of platforms. However, delays, appeals, and uncertainties regarding AI and cloud services demonstrate that the European Union’s digital competition framework will need to continuously adapt as the power of platforms shifts into new areas of the digital economy.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

European Commission advances AI transparency code under EU AI Act

The European Commission’s AI Office has convened a new round of working group meetings and workshops on the forthcoming Code of Practice on Marking and Labelling of AI-Generated Content.

The discussions brought together providers of generative AI systems and models, technology companies, industry representatives, civil society organisations and academic experts. Feedback from the meetings will inform the third and final draft of the code, expected in early June.

The code is intended to support transparency obligations under the AI Act, including requirements linked to marking, labelling, disclosure and detectability of AI-generated content. It covers issues such as synthetic media, deepfakes and certain AI-generated text.

Working Group 1 focused on marking and detection obligations for providers, including a revised multi-layered approach, technical feasibility, benchmarking, compliance frameworks and possible third-party assessments. Industry participants raised concerns over compliance burdens, innovation and feasibility, while civil society and academic experts called for stronger safeguards in the public interest.

Working Group 2 examined disclosure obligations for deployers of generative AI systems, particularly deepfakes and certain AI-generated text. Discussions covered origin disclosure, user-facing labels, proportionality, governance measures, editorial control and the possible development of a uniform EU label.

Additional workshops explored how machine-readable marks, provenance data, visible labels, watermarking systems and an EU-wide icon could work together across the AI value chain. Participants also discussed coordination with other EU rules, including the Digital Services Act, while stressing the need to balance transparency, legal clarity, accessibility and innovation.

Why does it matter?

The code of practice will help determine how AI-generated content is marked, labelled and disclosed across the EU. Its development highlights the practical difficulty of turning transparency obligations into workable rules, particularly when regulators, companies and civil society disagree over technical feasibility, compliance costs, user experience and safeguards against deceptive synthetic media.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

UK expands regulatory and infrastructure plans for digital finance

The Bank of England plans to publish draft rules for systemic stablecoins in June, as part of the UK’s broader digital asset regulatory framework.

Deputy Governor Sarah Breeden outlined the plans during the City Week conference in London.

According to officials, regulators are reviewing earlier proposals following industry feedback related to compliance and market impact. The proposals may include limits on overall stablecoin issuance and requirements for banks issuing stablecoins through separate legal entities.

Authorities are also considering branding requirements intended to distinguish stablecoins from insured bank deposits.

Breeden also referred to growing institutional interest in tokenised financial markets and distributed ledger-based settlement systems.

Several financial institutions, including HSBC, Euroclear, and London Stock Exchange Group, are expected to participate in the UK’s digital securities sandbox later this year.

Alongside private-sector initiatives, the Bank of England is also upgrading its Real-Time Gross Settlement infrastructure and exploring pilot projects involving tokenised government debt instruments. Authorities additionally aim to extend settlement operating hours toward near-continuous availability by the early 2030s.

Why does it matter?

The UK’s push to regulate stablecoins and support tokenized finance highlights how major economies are increasingly competing to become leading hubs for digital financial innovation.

Decisions taken by the Bank of England could influence how traditional banking, payments, and capital markets evolve globally as governments and institutions move toward blockchain-based financial infrastructure.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our chatbot!

UK authorities issue guidance on frontier AI cyber risks in finance

The Bank of England, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), and HM Treasury published a joint statement on cybersecurity and operational resilience risks linked to frontier AI models.

According to the statement, current frontier AI models can perform certain cyber-related tasks at high speed and scale, potentially increasing operational and security risks if misused.

UK authorities said regulated firms should strengthen governance, vulnerability management, third-party risk oversight, and recovery capabilities. The statement also referred to the use of automated and AI-supported defensive measures in cybersecurity operations.

The guidance highlighted risks associated with third-party services, open-source software, and legacy systems. According to the statement, boards and senior management should maintain awareness of frontier AI-related operational and cyber risks.

The authorities said they will continue monitoring frontier AI developments and engage with industry through the Cross Market Operational Resilience Group (CMORG). The statement also references guidance published by the UK National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) on vulnerability management and AI-related cyber risks.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech, and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

Global experts gather for CPDP 2026

The CPDP Conference 2026 has released its detailed programme, outlining a multi-day agenda of panels, workshops and cultural sessions focused on AI, data protection and digital governance. The conference will run from 19 to 22 May 2026, bringing together global experts across policy, academia and industry.

Across the programme, a wide range of panels and debates will explore key themes including AI regulation, digital governance, workplace data rights and platform power. Alongside panels and discussions, there will also be short movies and workshops offering conference topics in different formats.

Workshops are scheduled throughout each day, with structured breaks including coffee sessions and lunch intervals offering networking moments for participants. Topics range from AI in healthcare and advertising to digital conflict, governance under pressure and privacy-preserving technologies.

The programme also includes specialised tracks and cultural sessions, such as film screenings and artistic discussions on algorithmic systems, alongside academic panels and policy debates. The event will conclude after a final series of workshops and sessions on 22 May in Brussels, Belgium.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!

UK proposes stronger streaming rules under new Ofcom standards

Ofcom has proposed new content and accessibility standards for major streaming platforms operating in the UK, expanding regulatory oversight across the rapidly growing on-demand media sector. The draft framework follows powers introduced through the Media Act and would align streaming services more closely with traditional broadcast television standards.

The proposed rules would apply to major platforms including Netflix, Amazon and Disney. Ofcom said audiences increasingly expect consistent protections regardless of whether content is viewed through conventional television or streaming services.

The draft Code includes requirements covering harmful or offensive material, fairness and privacy protections, and due impartiality and accuracy for news content. Additional safeguards for minors would also apply, alongside stronger expectations around contextual warnings and viewer information.

Ofcom also proposed new accessibility obligations for streaming providers. Under the draft rules, platforms would need to subtitle 80% of catalogue content, provide audio description for 10%, and provide signing for 5%. The regulator said that more than 18 million people with hearing or sight conditions could benefit from improved accessibility standards across streaming platforms.

Why does it matter?

The proposals signal a major shift in how digital media platforms are regulated in the UK, extending broadcast-style obligations into streaming ecosystems for the first time. The measures could influence global debates around platform accountability, online safety, accessibility standards, and regulatory convergence between traditional media and digital services.

Would you like to learn more about AI, tech and digital diplomacy? If so, ask our Diplo chatbot!