Saturday Closing Ceremony: Summit of the Future Action Days

Saturday Closing Ceremony: Summit of the Future Action Days

Session at a Glance

Summary

The closing ceremony of the Summit of the Future Action Days focused on shaping a peaceful, sustainable, and digital future for all. Rapporteurs summarized key discussions on achieving peace, sustainability, and digital inclusion globally. Speakers emphasized the importance of multilateralism, local government involvement, and financial reform to address global challenges.

The need for concrete action and financing to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals was a recurring theme. Speakers highlighted the importance of reforming the international financial architecture, addressing debt issues, and increasing funding for developing countries. The role of cities and local governments in implementing global initiatives was emphasized.

Youth engagement and intergenerational approaches were stressed as crucial for building a better future. Discussions covered topics such as climate change, digital technologies, and peace-building. Speakers called for solidarity, trust-building, and collective action to address global issues.

The UN Deputy Secretary-General emphasized the power of inclusive multilateralism and partnerships demonstrated during the summit. She urged continued engagement to implement commitments and hold leaders accountable. The President of Namibia highlighted the importance of civil society participation and youth leadership in shaping the future.

The Prime Minister of Barbados concluded by calling for coordinated action to address global inequities and create a more just world. She emphasized the need for widespread engagement and attitude changes to achieve meaningful progress on issues like climate change, artificial intelligence, and equitable development.

Keypoints

Major discussion points:

– The need for inclusive, multi-stakeholder collaboration and partnerships to address global challenges

– Reforming the international financial architecture to better support sustainable development and climate action

– The importance of youth engagement and intergenerational approaches in shaping the future

– Leveraging digital technologies and AI responsibly to advance the SDGs while managing risks

– Implementing concrete actions and commitments following the Summit of the Future

Overall purpose:

The discussion aimed to summarize the key outcomes and insights from the Summit of the Future Action Days, and look ahead to implementing the Pact for the Future and other commitments to be made at the upcoming Summit.

Tone:

The overall tone was one of urgency and call to action, while also being hopeful and inspiring. Speakers emphasized the critical challenges facing the world but expressed optimism that collaborative, inclusive efforts could drive meaningful change. The tone became more impassioned towards the end, with the final speakers making emotional appeals for unity and decisive action.

Speakers

Speakers:

– Folly Bah Thibault – Moderator/facilitator

– Nudhara Yusuf – Rapporteur for Peaceful Future for All sessions

– Betty Wainaina – Rapporteur for Sustainable Future for All sessions

– Rumman Chowdhury – Rapporteur for Digital Future for All sessions

– Anne Hidalgo – Mayor of Paris, member of UN Secretary General’s Advisory Group on Local and Regional Governments

– Axel van Trotsenburg – Senior Managing Director of the World Bank

– Amina J. Mohammed – UN Deputy Secretary General

– Nangolo Mbumba – President of Namibia

– Mia Mottley – Prime Minister of Barbados

Moderator:

– Folly Bah Thibault – Journalist and news anchor, moderating the discussion

Areas of expertise:

– Nudhara Yusuf – Peace and security

– Betty Wainaina – Sustainable development

– Rumman Chowdhury – Digital technology and AI

– Anne Hidalgo – Local government and urban issues

– Axel van Trotsenburg – International finance and development

– Amina J. Mohammed – International development and UN affairs

– Nangolo Mbumba – African politics and development

– Mia Mottley – Caribbean politics and climate change

Full session report

Revised Summary of the Summit of the Future Action Days Closing Ceremony

The closing ceremony of the Summit of the Future Action Days featured high-level speakers discussing the shaping of a peaceful, sustainable, and digital future for all. Moderated by journalist Folly Bah Thibault, the event included rapporteurs summarizing key outcomes and insights from the summit, followed by perspectives from global leaders on implementing the Pact for the Future and other commitments.

1. Rapporteurs’ Summaries

Nudhara Yusuf, rapporteur for the Peaceful Future for All sessions, highlighted:

– The importance of intergenerational dialogue and rebuilding trust

– Dismantling patriarchal power structures in peace processes

– Countering terrorism through solidarity and cooperation

– Protecting civilians from explosive weapons in populated areas

– Harnessing technology for peace while mitigating risks

Yusuf emphasized, “We stand as the last few generations who can do something about the challenges that we face, and the first few generations that have the opportunity to seize new potentials for impact.”

Betty Wainaina, rapporteur for the Sustainable Future for All sessions, focused on:

– Reforming the international financial architecture

– Strengthening international tax cooperation

– Addressing the debt crisis in developing countries

– Scaling up development and climate financing

Wainaina noted, “Debt servicing is crowding out SDG financing. Speakers stressed the need for global consensus to stem the rising debt crisis, including a systemic multilateral approach.”

Rumman Chowdhury, rapporteur for the Digital Future for All sessions, outlined:

– Reducing the digital divide and ensuring universal access

– Leveraging digital innovations to achieve SDGs

– Developing inclusive AI governance

– Fostering multi-stakeholder partnerships for digital inclusion

Chowdhury emphasized the need to address not only access to digital technology but also the skills and capacities required to use it meaningfully.

2. Global Leaders’ Perspectives

Anne Hidalgo, Mayor of Paris, stressed:

– Including local authorities in multilateral efforts

– Providing funding for cities to address climate change and development

– Fostering trust and peaceful coexistence through local initiatives

Hidalgo also highlighted the recent Paris Olympics as an opportunity to showcase sustainable practices and global unity.

Axel van Trotsenburg, Senior Managing Director of the World Bank, focused on:

– Reinvigorating multilateralism through increased funding

– Providing concessional financing for poorest countries

– Incentivizing private sector participation in developing countries

Van Trotsenburg emphasized, “Multilateralism is under threat… Yet many problems, and the mayor just mentioned climate change, you cannot solve alone. It will require international global collaboration if we want to succeed.”

Amina J. Mohammed, UN Deputy Secretary General, stressed:

– Implementing new global agreements through inclusive partnerships

– Strengthening intergenerational discourse at national and international levels

– Rebuilding trust in international institutions

Mohammed highlighted the extensive engagement of civil society and youth throughout the summit process and emphasized the power of inclusive multilateralism.

Nangolo Mbumba, President of Namibia, emphasized:

– Recognizing youth as key stakeholders in global decision-making

– Amplifying voices of marginalized groups through youth leadership

– Addressing climate change, human rights, and equitable development

Mbumba stated, “The true measure of our success will be in the effective implementation of the pact for the future, the Global Digital Compact, and the Declaration of Future Generations. These initiatives will be pivotal in advancing the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.”

Mia Mottley, Prime Minister of Barbados, called for:

– Reforming financial systems to match development needs

– Ensuring equitable access to new technologies like AI

– Prioritizing education and dialogue over conflict

– Providing basic necessities to all people globally

Mottley addressed current global challenges, including ongoing wars, environmental crises, and economic inequalities. She emphasized, “If we doubted the power of the people we only need to see where that power has made significant changes even in this year that we live in, but what matters now is that there be coordinated action and that we believe and that we sell and share with each other that there is a possibility for a win-win.”

In conclusion, the Summit of the Future Action Days closing ceremony highlighted the urgent need for concrete action and financing to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Speakers emphasized the importance of reforming the international financial architecture, addressing debt issues, and increasing funding for developing countries. The role of cities, local governments, and youth in implementing global initiatives was stressed throughout the discussion. The overall tone was one of urgency and call to action, while also expressing hope that collaborative, inclusive efforts could drive meaningful change in addressing global challenges.

Session Transcript

Folly Bah Thibault: Excellencies, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the closing ceremony of the Summit of the Future Action Days. I know it’s been an action-packed day for all of us, with thousands of stakeholders engaging in dozens of sessions and side events throughout the day with the primary goal of reimagining how we work together to address the most pressing opportunities and challenges of our time. As we reflect on today’s sessions, we have heard rich, impactful discussions on how we can collectively shape a more peaceful, sustainable and digital future for all. In this closing ceremony today, we will hear the main takeaways from the day’s events and will be joined by leaders who will reflect on the pact of the future and what lies ahead after this summit. The work begins today. But first, it’s my pleasure to introduce the rapporteurs for each of today’s core themes who will summarize the insights and outcomes of their respective sessions. To start us off, let’s hear from Nudhara Yusuf, the rapporteur for the Peaceful Future for All sessions. Nudhara.

Nudhara Yusuf : Thank you all so very much. When I last had the pleasure of meeting so many of you at the UN Civil Society Conference in Nairobi, we left the closing ceremony saying we would show people what civil society has to offer to a process, not just what we expect from a process. It’s been a long journey, both in these halls but also in the world outside, but it is moving to see that that energy has continued throughout. the year, so thank you for being here and for representing. The Action Day on Peaceful Futures for All drew on the core principles of trust, solidarity, and universality highlighted in A New Agenda for Peace, and it galvanized strong support for these principles. The first session of the day, the Intergenerational Dialogue for Peace, focused on the search for peace in the more complex and divided world of today. The elders, two former presidents, and two young peacebuilders reflected together on the courage and perseverance it takes to rebuild trust, engage in dialogue and diplomacy to build peace. They spoke to the difficult work of repairing communal wounds from the past and rebuilding trust while also protecting the planet. In a second session, we explored how patriarchal power structures affect the lives of people, how war amplifies and feeds on them. We discussed how to dismantle these oppressive structures and the role of women and men as leaders in this effort, and, get this, about how football can be a tool to achieve it. We were inspired by the poetry To Break the Old Patterns. I am sure many of you were moved to tears as I was. In the third session, a call to action for a future free from terrorism highlighted the need for solidarity, common understanding and cooperative approach to countering terrorism. It reinforced the commitment to universal norms in countering terrorism, acknowledging that the evolving threat requires consistent application of international law and established norms, not selective enforcement. Youth and diverse actors were recognized as vital to achieving a future free from terrorism through leadership, innovation and fostering global cooperation. Following this session, we walked for peace across the United Nations premises along a route that highlights the artwork that represents peace, solidarity and global solidarity. global unity. Inspired by the walk, we discussed protection of civilians impacted by the use of explosive weapons in urban settings. In a moving session, we heard stories of resilience, messages urging an end of multigenerational trauma, the calls for action to, one, implementation of the political declaration on the use of explosive weapons in populated areas, two, leave no one behind and address rights of persons with disabilities impacted by armed conflict, and three, commit political will and funding to eliminate these threats to civilians forever. The final session, Imagining Peace in a Digital World, explored scenarios for peace and security in 2045, defined by transformative factors like advancing technology, climate change, and the future of multilateralism. The session unpacked how technologies can be harnessed for good while mitigating risks for a peaceful digital future. A call to action was presented, too, to recommit to multilateralism through the United Nations, to resolve disputes peacefully, to develop governance frameworks that are fit for purpose in a changing world, to uphold disarmament commitments, to prevent conflict and reduce human suffering, to strengthen multi-stakeholder partnerships, to tackle future risks. We stand as the last few generations who can do something about the challenges that we face, and the first few generations that have the opportunity to seize new potentials for impact. So, we, the people of the United Nations, let’s do this. Thank you.

Folly Bah Thibault: Thank you, Nudhara. Thank you very much, Nudhara, for summarizing the discussions on how we can achieve a peaceful future for all. They were, indeed, very insightful discussions throughout the day here today. We’ll now hear from Betty Wainaina. the rapporteur for a sustainable future for all sessions, Betty.

Betty Wainaina: Thank you very much. Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, I am delighted to report on the session on a sustainable future for all. The message echoed by speakers throughout the day was clear, the SDGs are off track, the clock is ticking, and realising a sustainable future for all hinges on us achieving the SDGs. Financing remains a key bottleneck for the achievement of SDGs, but we have options. Swift action on reforming the international financial architecture, addressing debt and getting taxation right can set us on the right track. Let me highlight some of the concrete outcomes across the five thematic blocks of the day. In the first session on sustainable development in time of global transformation, in their dialogue, the most honourable Andrew Holness of Jamaica and Deputy Secretary General Amina Mohammed stressed that we must rebuild trust and peace and fair representation are prerequisites for developing countries’ voices to be heard. In the second session, we had a discussion on international tax cooperation. This session noted that tax is as close to a panacea as we can get. It can provide income, set incentives, and reduce inequality. Speakers stressed the need for global initiatives to strengthen international tax cooperation including the Framework Convention. on international tax cooperation. The third session delved into the question of debt. Debt servicing is crowding out SDG financing. Speakers stressed the need for global consensus to stem the rising debt crisis, including a systemic multilateral approach. Instruments, including climate resilient debt clauses and state contingent debt instruments must be rolled out at scale. Debt resolution mechanisms need to be delivered with a speed that matches the urgency of the moment. In the fourth session on scaling up development and climate financing, the speakers stressed that both scale and quality needs to be pursued ambitiously. Public development banks play a key role in this and the private sector will also need to step up to this challenge. The fifth session delved into the question of international financial architecture reform. The current architecture needs to keep pace with the realities of the 21st century and beyond. Only bold international financial architecture reform can save the sustainable development goals. Speakers called for bigger and better international financial institutions, more accessible and affordable financing for developing countries, and SDG impact as a guiding force. Speakers across all sessions were clear that action must be taken now to safeguard the SDGs and sustainable futures for all. There is no shortage of opportunities to achieve change, as many of the speakers emphasized. The fourth International Conference on Financing for Development that will be held in Spain in 2025 provides a unique moment and a platform to turn the ambitions of the world into reality. of the Pact for the Future into action to accelerate the SDGs through financing for the Sustainable Development Goals. Thank you very much.

Folly Bah Thibault: Thank you very much, Betty, for that comprehensive summary of your discussions and for highlighting the main points that were made today in that session, in those sessions I should say. And finally, we’ll hear from Rumman Chowdhury, the rapporteur for the Digital Future for All sessions.

Rumman Chowdhury: Excellencies, distinguished guests, colleagues, and friends, today we heard from powerful voices focused on a simple question. What is your vision of a digital future for all? We have heard how a digital future for everyone, everywhere means a universal, affordable, meaningful, inclusive, sustainable, and prosperous digital future. Many of our speakers today have highlighted the urgent need to reduce the digital divide, not just in terms of achieving universal connectivity, but also to ensure that everyone has access to affordable and safe digital technology and the skills and capacities to use it meaningfully to improve their lives. From healthcare to education, climate mitigation, poverty alleviation, and gender equality, we have seen a diverse range of groundbreaking digital innovations that are driving progress towards achieving the SDGs. To quote Bianca Johnson, a young paraplegic woman who has regained her mobility thanks to technology, what we saw is that the future is the present. We’ve also heard what an inclusive architecture for AI governance looks like, building on the AI advisory body’s report, Governing AI for Humanity, with announcements on implementing its recommendations. And last but not least, we’ve heard how stakeholders and governments can join hands to deliver on the vision of the global digital compact. None of this is possible without innovative, inclusive, and multi-stakeholder partnerships that focus on specific SDG goals and targets. The SDG digital event this morning saw the announcement of, get this, $1.05 billion in pledges to support various initiatives to advance digital inclusion via the Partner to Connect platform. The summit of the Future Action Day on digital today has shown us incredible examples of the inclusive and collaborative action being taken all over the world. Indeed, it has shown us the power of collective action. We are ready for the second half of this journey. Accelerate, innovate, collaborate, and lead. Thank you.

Folly Bah Thibault: Thank you very much, Rumman, for summarizing the sessions from the Digital Future for All sessions. And thanks to all the rapporteurs for the thoughtful and comprehensive summaries that they’ve provided. Now we’ll hear from a few respondents who will share their unique perspectives on the Pact for the Future. Ladies and gentlemen, it’s my honor to introduce Anne Hidalgo and Axel van Trotsenburg. Our first respondent, please join us on stage, Madame Hidalgo, Mr. van Trotsenburg. Thank you so much for joining us. So our first respondent is Madame Hidalgo, who’s a member of the Secretary General’s Advisory Group on Local and Regional Governments and the Mayor of Paris, of course. And she’ll share her reflections about the role governments play in implementing the Pact at the local level.

Anne Hidalgo: Thank you very much for being with us today. You’re going to speak to us about the role that governments will play in implementing this pact for the future at the local level. Thank you. And thank you for hosting us. First and foremost, I’d like to thank the Secretary General of the United Nations, Mr. Hidalgo, who’s opened up the door to multilateralism, including the various levels, including local authorities. What is now being proposed is that we follow up on what Martin Luther King said, that those who love peace need to know how to organize just as well as those that prefer war. And that’s what we’re talking about here. Multilateralism, what will that allow us to do? Well, it will enable us to act, because today, whether we’re talking about climate change or the social impact of climate change, the fight against poverty, whether we’re talking about democracy. We know that all of that can be evaluated in the lives of our citizens and within the level of cities because you have this phenomenon of people moving to the cities throughout the world for over 10 years now. Well, since the Paris Agreement on Climate Change, we’ve been meeting in different networks that have an exchange on good practices, particularly with regard to climate, the fight against poverty, this issue of housing and access to housing, and we’ve been meeting in these networks, French-speaking networks, the C40, for example, and for 10 years now, we’ve been working to try to get recognition for the place of local governments in global governance, not to work against states or try to usurp anyone’s authority. We want to join our forces together as part of a global coalition where actors need to be there, civil society, NGOs, national authorities, and of course, the private sector. What’s being proposed today is to be able to be present at the table of negotiations because we are essential players in the action that now needs to be carried out with regard to climate change, and in order to do that, and this is part of our agenda, we have to find funding that cities need, particularly cities in the South need. They need access to funding so that they can bring about this transformation, living better, housing, air pollution, taking the pollution out of rivers. I think now. at a crossroads in this summit for the future, where we’ve seen the facts, the work is before us. What we need now is willingness to bring all players together, particularly those that are on the front lines, particularly the mares, and I think of the Olympics and things like that and what we experienced in Paris and what we tried to share with the whole world, and namely it was this trust in humanism. I can assure you that living for more than a month, as if the world were all in Paris for a month, where we had people from all continents, all religions, all languages being brought together by sport, meeting in a peaceful environment where as mares, me as mayor, I was able to do everything I could to ensure that we had quality air, for example, so that the water of the Seine could have the pollution taken out of it, so that we could extend this universal welcome, peaceful welcome, and when you experience that, I can tell you, you want to cultivate that. We can’t extend those games or the Paraolympic Games, but what we can do is take that trust in humanity and the ability of those that prefer peace, take that so that we can build this peace together, and that is the path that is now open to us and it will be at the heart of the discussions on the Summit of the Future. Thank you very much.

Folly Bah Thibault: So, what you’re saying is that it’s important that local governments can and should play a big role in this Pact for the Future. Thank you. Thank you very much. And now we’re going to hear from Mr. Axel van Trotsenburg, the Senior Managing Director of the World Bank, who will share his reflections on how the Summit and the Pact for the Future can contribute to reform our global international financial architecture.

Axel van Trotsenburg: Well, thank you very much and good afternoon and a late Saturday afternoon. I hope that everybody stays focused. But first, a congratulation to the fantastic Olympic Games. I think that were fantastically done. I think the Summit of the Future is yet another reminder that we need to stay engaged on development. The SDGs are off track and we cannot forget that. And so, the Summit of the Future should not be limited to words. We need to encourage deeds and action. And the problem, what we are having is we need to have governments engaged, private sector engaged, and yes, multilaterals. Yet multilateralism is under threat. And many are questioning why you have multilateral organizations, be it the UN, be it multilateral development banks. Yet many problems, and the mayor just mentioned climate change, you cannot solve alone. It will require international global collaboration if we want to succeed. So that means that we actually need to put new life in multilateralism. And if you believe in that, you need to invest. You cannot limit the investment to words only. It will require significant amount. We don’t need to remind people and last year at the midterm review of the SDGs, we will need trillions of dollars. And that will have to come from all sources, from government, from private sector, from multilaterals. And that is, I think, the critical one where we need to focus. And some speakers talked about the financing. So I think one can always lecture to the other, but I think the multilaterals should start by themselves. So that is one of the areas where we actually, also at the bank, started the whole reform process. And also to see, can you actually do more with the existing resources? Because many governments, and that we have to admit, they are living on the fiscal stress. It’s not that there is unlimited resources available. And I think here we have done that, and that is a necessary condition. And more needs to be done. How can we get the private sector better involved? And particularly in developing country, and most importantly in the low-income countries. And there it is hard to attract private capital. So we need to think about de-risking mechanisms to incentivize the private sector also to participate. Why is this important? Because we need to keep behind the financing, there are people, there are jobs to create it, and they are not created. There are basically every year 1.2 million young people getting or trying to get in the market, and only a third will find a job. What is happening with the other 800 million? So I think we need to keep that in mind when we do this. Now what it requires for the poorest countries is that you need also concessional resources. Simply for two reasons. There are, they don’t have the fiscal resources to pay for high coupon debt. They will need long-term concessional financing or grants, and that will have to come also from governments. We have the largest fund available for the poorest countries called the International Development Association. It’s replenished every three years. The last round was $93 billion, and donors gave about $23.5 billion. I’m co-chairing the current round. Let me tell you, it is a struggle. It’s a big struggle. Not to agree, that’s on the policy framework. We can get good agreements. But to get more concessional resources from governments is going to be very difficult. And that is a first test. What I am saying is, we cannot only talk, we need to find these necessary resources, and that requires that we still need a mind change that multilateralism matters and ultimately will need to be reflected in policy action as well as money. And I think that is, in a way, where we need to keep this in mind, why this is important. And I just think we need to prioritize, in my mind, the poorest countries first, because their needs are the largest. But I think we are trying, for example, with the African Development Bank, to facilitate the access to energy or electricity for 300 million people in Africa. Six and a half million have no access. So we want to do that by 2030. So it’s very ambitious. But I think these are the type of things where you need to create the conditions. If you don’t have electricity, you cannot have digital. And very often, you can’t have jobs. So we will need to put the basic infrastructure in place so that people can succeed. And so what we need is a far stronger coalition of those that there is a need for internet. national solidarity, and it will need to go also through the purse. You will need to provide some money. Nobody is saying these are the exorbitant amounts in relation to the GDPs we’re having. We should be able to afford that. And that’s the plea what I would say for the summit of the future. We have to look also the summit of solidarity. We cannot forget that, and we need to act on it. Thank you.

Folly Bah Thibault: Solidarity is the key word here. Thank you very much, Mr. van Trotsenburg, Senior Managing Director of the World Bank. Thank you for sharing your reflections with us. Thank you both. Yes, you can return to your seats now. Thank you so much. And now, I’m very pleased to welcome the United Nations Deputy Secretary General to the stage, Amina Mohammed, who will offer her reflections of the conversations we’ve had the past two days here at the Summit of Future Action Days, rich conversations, insightful ones that gives a lot to think about. The DSG will also discuss what lies ahead, right? What happens next after the talking comes the action, right? All right.

Amina J. Mohammed: Thank you so much, Chair Foley, and thank you for being with us all the way through these action days. Your Excellency, the President of Namibia, Your Excellency, our sister and leader, Prime Minister Miyamoto Barbados, President of the General Assembly, Excellencies, colleagues, thank you all for your work and contributions, and very much enjoyed listening to the last session. These action days have showcased the power of inclusive and networked multilateralism, but they’ve also demonstrated the potential and the power of partnerships. They’ve reminded us of the immense potential of collaboration, of what we can achieve when we come together, united in purpose across sectors, generations, and continents. And your diverse contributions reflect the richness of what can be achieved when everyone is brought to the table in an inclusive dialogue. Yesterday, youth-led conversations forced us to face our collective responsibilities to deal with present challenges, and in doing so, take action also to secure a brighter future and for future generations. generations. They showed that meaningful youth engagement looks like in action and underscored the indispensable role that young people play in improving our world and bringing and informing concrete solutions. Today, we focus on the core issues to be resolved to allow financing to flow for sustainable development. Climate finance, taxes, debt. We also address the need to take profit of the potential of technology while managing its risks and to bring peace to a more complex and interconnected world. The discussions throughout the day have explored innovative tax corporation schemes, solutions to global debt, options for the expansion of climate financing, and for increased representation of developing countries in the global financial architecture. The relevance of intergenerational approaches, dismantling patriarchal power structures and putting young people at the forefront of discussions about the future featured strongly in the conversations under peace and security. You’ve also spoken about putting an end to terrorism, protecting civilians in armed conflict, and addressing new and emerging threats, including in the digital sphere. And you’ve insisted that a secure future depends on our ability to build trust, solidarity, and collective action. Finally, we just heard how cutting-edge technology solutions like satellite, internet, blockchain, artificial intelligence are advancing the SDGs. Yet, much work needs to be done to bridge the digital divide. Personal stories from the women and girls across Africa, the Caribbean, Latin America, all demonstrated what is possible by scaling up access and capacities around digital technologies. And all this is while bearing in mind our responsibilities. towards future generations, the 10 billion who will inhabit our planet by the end of this century. What I can promise you is that we will carry your insights and ideas forward into the summit of the future, starting from tomorrow, because your input here, and we’ve seen this throughout the two days, is central to building and shaping a better world. Excellencies and friends, four years ago we began the process for this wonderful summit of the future. The Secretary General called for a more inclusive and networked multilateral system to increase our collective effectiveness. This call was rooted in a recognition of how the world was changing, in the fact that power and the ideas to solve global problems lie in many different hands, and in the fact that our world is in desperate need of transformation. Changes that will allow us to accelerate action, to deliver the promises that have been made to the Sustainable Development Goals, to achieve the SDGs, countries will need to invest, and so we must wrestle with our financial architecture that is no longer fit for purpose. It has served its time, and it’s served it well, and so we need to take this opportunity to make that pivot and be as responsive as we can to the needs of financing the development agenda. Since this process began, the United Nations has provided a platform for the broadest possible engagement, inclusion, and collaboration, and you have responded, putting forward ideas, announcements, initiatives, coalitions, agreed to disagree. Countless civil society networks and groups, including the major groups and other stakeholders, and the impact coalitions from the UN Civil Society Conference, have all been mobilized, heard, and have shaped the outcome of the Summit of the Future. All of you and the constituencies you represent have participated every step of the process in different formats. You’ve pushed for ambition in the three new texts that we are hopeful member states will soon adopt, the Pact for the Future, the Global Digital Compact, and the Declaration on Future Generations. Over these past two days alone, over 8,000 individuals have come into the UN HQ. More than 60 events have taken place inside the UN, with an additional 100 more across New York, and a further 30 around the world. world. In short, the UN made a call for an inclusive multilateralism, and you have delivered in trying to shape that. And for that, we thank you sincerely. But we do ask you to keep it up, because the day after is where it counts in implementing those commitments that will be made tomorrow. We need your continued drive, your engagement, and pressure to implement the new texts and hold us to account. You’ve proven time and time again that you’re willing to work together with governments, the UN, and all other actors that are key to building a better world. It is essential that we continue and that we keep strengthening the dialogue between political decision makers and the whole of civil society within the multilateral system. But it is also important to the intergenerational discourse that must continue to be deepened and be strengthened at the national and international level. All of this will be vital to rebuilding trust and hope and restoring legitimacy in international institutions, ensuring that global decisions that we take truly reflect the concerns, the values, and the experiences of people worldwide, 8 billion on our world today. And above all, to demonstrating that multilateralism can deliver for everyone. It can deliver for them everywhere, and it can leave no one behind when we try to shape a better future. So let’s keep working together to make all of that a reality in everyone’s life. Thank you so much.

Folly Bah Thibault: Thank you. Thank you very much, DSG, for your inspiring remarks, and indeed, let’s keep working together for a better future for all of us. It now gives me great pleasure to introduce the President of the Republic of Namibia, His Excellency Nangolo Mbumba, who will be looking ahead to tomorrow’s Summit of the Future, the official start of the Summit of the Future on Monday, and how we take forward the implementation of the Pact. Please welcome His Excellency Nangolo Mbumba of the Republic of Namibia.

Nangolo Mbumba: Your Excellency Philémon Yang, the 79th President of the General Assembly. Your Excellency Mia Mottley, Prime Minister of Barbados. Your Excellency Amina Mohammed, UN Deputy Secretary General. Excellencies, distinguished delegates, esteemed members of the civil society. We find ourselves in a time of profound global change, where our collective future depends not only on the decisions we make, but on the values we embrace. The United Nations has always been a beacon of common aspirations, fostering cooperation among nations to tackle challenges of our time. As we look to the future, it is clear that the strength of our global community does not only depend on the actions of governments, but on the active participation of civil society in the spirit of the Charter of the United Nations that speaks of We the People. Ladies and gentlemen, as we reflect on the significant journey leading up to this moment, summit of the future, we are reminded of the unwavering commitment and active engagement of various stakeholders, including civil society. The voice of the youth and broader civil society are energizing the world with vitality and a spirit of innovation. Their contributions have been instrumental in shaping both the debates and new commitments outlined in the Pact for the Future. This is the essence of the march of multilateralism. The belief that nations, peoples and communities, by working together towards a shared future of peace, stability and prosperity, can collectively accomplish more than when apart. This collective effort reaffirms the profound relevance of the United Nations in the global community. The action days of the past two days have underscored dynamic youth leadership as we chart a course towards the future of our global community. The outcomes of your discussions on critical issues advancing intergenerational solidarity, promoting climate and environmental foresight, ensuring governance for human rights, peace and security have been nothing short of inspirational. This conversation offers a foundation upon which we can build as we move forward with the adoption of the Pact for the Future. Ladies and gentlemen, I must underscore that our future will not and cannot rest solely on the well-crafted documents. The true measure of our success will be in the effective implementation of the pact for the future, the Global Digital Compact, and the Declaration of Future Generations. These initiatives will be pivotal in advancing the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Namibia, as is the case for most African countries, has a younger population. This pact is not just for leaders of today. It is for you, the youth, who will inherit the wealth of today and tomorrow. It is a framework that seeks to secure your future by addressing the most critical issues that humanity faces. We therefore recognize and celebrate the active participation of the youth and the critical role they play as civil society in strengthening democracy. It is through the voices of community organizations, grassroots movements, and individuals, which are often led by young people, that we are reminded of the needs and aspirations of the people we are serving. The role is critical as active partners in shaping our international institutions. Since the release of our Common Agenda by the Secretary-General, his proposal for the Summit of the Future was always clear. This summit must have an outcome that is a bold step forward, charting a path for a more just, sustainable, and inclusive world. The Pact for the Future calls for urgent action on climate change. Namibia, like many other nations, is already feeling the effect of a warming planet. Our farmers suffer from severe droughts, our ecosystems are under threat, and our coastal communities are at risk from rising sea levels. The Pact recognizes the need for global peace and security. Peace is not just the absence of war. It is the presence of justice, equality, and human rights. The Pact for the Future highlights the transformative power of technology. In a world where technological innovation is advancing at an unprecedented rate, we must ensure that these advancements do not widen the gap between the rich and the poor, between those with access and those without. It is, therefore, incumbent upon us to amplify the voices of the marginalized and to push for ambitious action in the critical areas of climate change, human rights, and equitable development. Excellencies, delegates, esteemed youth delegates of civil society, we all are part of a global community. When we adopt the Pact of the Future tomorrow, let us hold hands and pull in the same direction to ensure that together we can build a world that truly leaves no one behind. And I thank you for your attention.

Folly Bah Thibault: Thank you very much, Your Excellency, the President of Namibia, Nangolo Mbumba, for his remarks and calling for action from all of us, as he said, not just governments, of course, but civil society and the different actors. Thank you very much, Mr. President. And it’s now my great pleasure to introduce the Prime Minister of Barbados, Her Excellency Mia Mottley, who will offer her perspective on the way forward.

Mia Mottley: Thank you very much, Madam Chair, President of Namibia, the Deputy Secretary General, my dear sister, President of the General Assembly, President Yang, brothers and sisters. We are here on a Saturday afternoon from so many different corners of the earth because we know that our time here and our commitment matters more than ever. As we speak, war rages in the Middle East, in Africa, in Europe, and in the Americas while there is no declared war, there is conflict that causes the loss of lives because of access to assault weapons and all of those other things that literally have undermined citizen security in our hemisphere. We are here in the season of superlatives from the dryas. to the wettest, to the strongest storms, every possible thing that we could imagine that can disrupt our way of life from the environment, and the range of biodiversity that is so essential to the balance of our earth, has already been affecting us. And we are here, generations after countries declared independence, with the intention of being able to deliver for their people the best life possible, but constrained of course by the absence of access to development opportunities, and most importantly of all, to the fuel, to the oxygen, to the financing that matches the needs of their people. I do not tire in saying that we cannot build schools and hospitals with 10 and 15 year money. We’re here because even though noises were made every decade for the last few decades, that things ought to change, they continued in the same direction, fueled by greed, fueled by inequity, fueled by marginalization, fueled by values reflected by human beings taking decisions, or as His Holiness would say to us, from literally the desensitization that comes that allows us to take comfort in ignoring what we see and what we hear. I take comfort this evening from the fact that we are here, but we being here will only be a record or a footnote in history. if our actions just end here. Yes, the conclusion of the pact for the future is the seminal treaty and theoretical point from which we want to take our action. But the truth is that that may become just simply another document in history if all that we have come to do is to secure a pact. We have now to ensure that we enlarge the people, the army, the believers, the doers, who are prepared to say that in the same way history can record successfully that slavery was wrong and needed to be abolished, in the same way that we can have history record successfully that women should have the right of agency over their vote and their body, in the same way that history can record successfully that the people who live in separate and apart systems in South Africa, or regrettably now as we see in the Middle East, that they should be freed from the bondages that allow others to determine what their destiny should be and to be able to secure it for themselves and the least capable among them. If you lived at those points in history, you might well have said that the battle was impossible. But we know enough to know, as President Mandela told us, it is not impossible if it can. be done, or it is impossible until it is done. This world can change, but it needs our energy, our commitment, and in the same way in electoral matters we go out and find other people to help us proselytize and canvas, we must now go out and find ordinary citizens who are prepared to say that they’re not wishing to be pawns anymore of others, and that the notion of two worlds, one for those who have and the rest for those who are relegated to not have it, one for those who see people and feel people and understand their obligation to help, and others who are insensitive and do not quite frankly care or see those around them. If we doubted the power of the people we only need to see where that power has made significant changes even in this year of that we live in, but what matters now is that there be coordinated action and that we believe and that we sell and share with each other that there is a possibility for a win-win, that there is a possibility for us to have a green transition that can mitigate the damages that would otherwise come from the climate crisis, that there is the possibility for ensuring greater equitable access to artificial intelligence and that the power of regulation can ensure that it be a force for good and not an instrument of oppression or recolonization of the earth, that it is possible for us to be able to take stances that recognize that investment in education will always trump conflict and war. and guns. But that there may be difficult decisions that we may have to make too. And the problem is, is that if we have a world that is dominated only by 60 second sound bites and four column inches, rather than allowing the spaces for discussion as we are doing in here, not just at the UN but in the villages, in the towns, in the communities, in the homes, in the households, that if we don’t get that discussion going, we’re not going to get the level of participation and we’re not going to build the momentum necessary that can move the inequity and that can remove the threats that this world has. I believe that it is possible for us to have a win-win. I believe that hope can be restored. But I do recognize that we are at that inflection point. And those who have power and want to maintain the status quo, even though they do not yet have a plan for allowing us to live on Mars, they are adamant on not creating the space or the policy flexibility or the access to the funding necessary for us to bring along others. It is unconscionable for us not to recognize that unless we can provide the basics of food, water, shelter, electricity to all people on this earth, we cannot talk about being a successful generation in human civilization. And we all know, we all know that there is sufficient to be able to share. What is needed is the change in attitude and values. I’m not going to reflect only on the fact that almost every religion carries us in the direction of caring for the most vulnerable, because people may want then to get into the schisms and isms of religious differences. But there is, in African civilization, the concept of Ubuntu. I am.

Folly Bah Thibault:

N

Nudhara Yusuf

Speech speed

0 words per minute

Speech length

0 words

Speech time

1 seconds

Intergenerational dialogue and rebuilding trust

Explanation

The session focused on the search for peace in today’s complex world. It emphasized the importance of rebuilding trust and engaging in dialogue across generations to build peace.

Evidence

The session included reflections from elders, former presidents, and young peacebuilders on rebuilding trust and engaging in dialogue.

Major Discussion Point

Achieving a Peaceful Future for All

Dismantling patriarchal power structures

Explanation

The session explored how patriarchal power structures affect people’s lives and how war amplifies these structures. It discussed ways to dismantle oppressive structures and the role of women and men as leaders in this effort.

Evidence

The session mentioned using football as a tool to achieve dismantling of patriarchal structures.

Major Discussion Point

Achieving a Peaceful Future for All

Countering terrorism through solidarity and cooperation

Explanation

The session highlighted the need for solidarity, common understanding, and a cooperative approach to countering terrorism. It reinforced the commitment to universal norms and consistent application of international law in countering terrorism.

Evidence

The session recognized youth and diverse actors as vital to achieving a future free from terrorism through leadership, innovation, and fostering global cooperation.

Major Discussion Point

Achieving a Peaceful Future for All

Protecting civilians from explosive weapons

Explanation

The session discussed the protection of civilians impacted by the use of explosive weapons in urban settings. It called for action to implement political declarations on the use of explosive weapons in populated areas and address the rights of persons with disabilities impacted by armed conflict.

Evidence

The session included stories of resilience and messages urging an end to multigenerational trauma.

Major Discussion Point

Achieving a Peaceful Future for All

Harnessing technology for peace while mitigating risks

Explanation

The session explored scenarios for peace and security in 2045, considering factors like advancing technology and climate change. It discussed how technologies can be harnessed for good while mitigating risks for a peaceful digital future.

Evidence

A call to action was presented to recommit to multilateralism, resolve disputes peacefully, and develop governance frameworks fit for a changing world.

Major Discussion Point

Achieving a Peaceful Future for All

B

Betty Wainaina

Speech speed

119 words per minute

Speech length

478 words

Speech time

240 seconds

Reforming international financial architecture

Explanation

The session emphasized the need for bold reform of the international financial architecture to keep pace with 21st-century realities. Speakers called for bigger and better international financial institutions and more accessible financing for developing countries.

Evidence

The upcoming fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Spain in 2025 was mentioned as a platform to turn ambitions into action.

Major Discussion Point

Creating a Sustainable Future for All

Agreed with

Axel van Trotsenburg

Mia Mottley

Agreed on

Need for reforming global financial systems

Strengthening international tax cooperation

Explanation

The session highlighted the importance of tax as a tool for providing income, setting incentives, and reducing inequality. Speakers stressed the need for global initiatives to strengthen international tax cooperation.

Evidence

The Framework Convention on international tax cooperation was mentioned as a potential initiative.

Major Discussion Point

Creating a Sustainable Future for All

Addressing the debt crisis in developing countries

Explanation

The session discussed how debt servicing is crowding out SDG financing. Speakers stressed the need for a global consensus to stem the rising debt crisis, including a systemic multilateral approach.

Evidence

Instruments such as climate resilient debt clauses and state contingent debt instruments were suggested to be rolled out at scale.

Major Discussion Point

Creating a Sustainable Future for All

Scaling up development and climate financing

Explanation

The session emphasized the need to pursue both scale and quality in development and climate financing. Public development banks were highlighted as playing a key role, with the private sector also needing to step up.

Major Discussion Point

Creating a Sustainable Future for All

R

Rumman Chowdhury

Speech speed

118 words per minute

Speech length

309 words

Speech time

156 seconds

Reducing the digital divide and ensuring universal access

Explanation

The session highlighted the urgent need to reduce the digital divide, not just in terms of connectivity, but also in ensuring access to affordable and safe digital technology. It emphasized the importance of providing skills and capacities for meaningful use of technology.

Major Discussion Point

Shaping a Digital Future for All

Leveraging digital innovations to achieve SDGs

Explanation

The session showcased a diverse range of groundbreaking digital innovations driving progress towards achieving the SDGs. These innovations span various sectors including healthcare, education, climate mitigation, poverty alleviation, and gender equality.

Evidence

A personal story was shared about Bianca Johnson, a young paraplegic woman who regained mobility thanks to technology.

Major Discussion Point

Shaping a Digital Future for All

Agreed with

Nangolo Mbumba

Amina J. Mohammed

Agreed on

Importance of youth engagement in shaping the future

Developing inclusive AI governance

Explanation

The session discussed what an inclusive architecture for AI governance looks like, building on the AI advisory body’s report ‘Governing AI for Humanity’. Announcements were made on implementing the report’s recommendations.

Major Discussion Point

Shaping a Digital Future for All

Fostering multi-stakeholder partnerships for digital inclusion

Explanation

The session emphasized the importance of innovative, inclusive, and multi-stakeholder partnerships focused on specific SDG goals and targets. It highlighted the power of collective action in advancing digital inclusion.

Evidence

The SDG digital event saw the announcement of $1.05 billion in pledges to support various initiatives to advance digital inclusion via the Partner to Connect platform.

Major Discussion Point

Shaping a Digital Future for All

A

Anne Hidalgo

Speech speed

131 words per minute

Speech length

645 words

Speech time

293 seconds

Including local authorities in multilateral efforts

Explanation

Hidalgo emphasized the importance of including local authorities in global governance and multilateral efforts. She argued for recognition of the place of local governments in addressing global challenges like climate change and poverty.

Evidence

Hidalgo mentioned networks like C40 where cities have been working together for 10 years to gain recognition in global governance.

Major Discussion Point

Role of Local Governments in Implementation

Agreed with

Amina J. Mohammed

Mia Mottley

Agreed on

Importance of inclusive multilateralism

Providing funding for cities to address climate change and development

Explanation

Hidalgo stressed the need for cities, particularly in the Global South, to have access to funding. This funding is crucial for transforming cities to address issues like climate change, housing, air pollution, and water pollution.

Major Discussion Point

Role of Local Governments in Implementation

Fostering trust and peaceful coexistence through local initiatives

Explanation

Hidalgo highlighted the role of cities in fostering trust and peaceful coexistence among diverse populations. She emphasized the importance of creating environments where people from all backgrounds can come together peacefully.

Evidence

Hidalgo shared her experience of hosting the Olympics in Paris, where people from all continents, religions, and languages came together in a peaceful environment.

Major Discussion Point

Role of Local Governments in Implementation

A

Axel van Trotsenburg

Speech speed

134 words per minute

Speech length

866 words

Speech time

385 seconds

Reinvigorating multilateralism through increased funding

Explanation

Van Trotsenburg emphasized the need to reinvigorate multilateralism through increased funding. He argued that addressing global challenges like climate change requires significant investment from all sources, including governments, private sector, and multilaterals.

Evidence

He mentioned that trillions of dollars will be needed to achieve the SDGs, as highlighted in the midterm review of the SDGs last year.

Major Discussion Point

Reforming Global Financial Architecture

Providing concessional financing for poorest countries

Explanation

Van Trotsenburg stressed the importance of providing concessional financing or grants for the poorest countries. He argued that these countries lack the fiscal resources to pay for high-coupon debt and need long-term concessional financing.

Evidence

He mentioned the International Development Association, which provides the largest fund for the poorest countries, with its last round raising $93 billion.

Major Discussion Point

Reforming Global Financial Architecture

Agreed with

Betty Wainaina

Mia Mottley

Agreed on

Need for reforming global financial systems

Incentivizing private sector participation in developing countries

Explanation

Van Trotsenburg highlighted the need to incentivize private sector participation in developing countries, particularly in low-income countries. He suggested developing de-risking mechanisms to encourage private capital investment in these areas.

Evidence

He mentioned that out of 1.2 million young people entering the job market annually, only a third find jobs, emphasizing the need for private sector involvement in job creation.

Major Discussion Point

Reforming Global Financial Architecture

A

Amina J. Mohammed

Speech speed

144 words per minute

Speech length

1046 words

Speech time

434 seconds

Implementing new global agreements through inclusive partnerships

Explanation

Mohammed emphasized the importance of implementing new global agreements through inclusive and networked multilateralism. She highlighted the power of partnerships and collaboration across sectors, generations, and continents.

Evidence

She mentioned that over 8,000 individuals came to the UN HQ, with more than 60 events taking place inside the UN and additional events across New York and around the world.

Major Discussion Point

Moving from Commitments to Action

Agreed with

Anne Hidalgo

Mia Mottley

Agreed on

Importance of inclusive multilateralism

Strengthening intergenerational discourse at national and international levels

Explanation

Mohammed stressed the importance of deepening and strengthening intergenerational discourse at both national and international levels. She argued that this is vital for rebuilding trust and hope in international institutions.

Major Discussion Point

Moving from Commitments to Action

Agreed with

Nangolo Mbumba

Rumman Chowdhury

Agreed on

Importance of youth engagement in shaping the future

Rebuilding trust in international institutions

Explanation

Mohammed emphasized the need to rebuild trust and restore legitimacy in international institutions. She argued that this is essential for ensuring that global decisions reflect the concerns, values, and experiences of people worldwide.

Major Discussion Point

Moving from Commitments to Action

N

Nangolo Mbumba

Speech speed

94 words per minute

Speech length

777 words

Speech time

490 seconds

Recognizing youth as key stakeholders in global decision-making

Explanation

Mbumba emphasized the importance of recognizing and celebrating the active participation of youth in global decision-making processes. He argued that the youth play a critical role in strengthening democracy and shaping international institutions.

Evidence

He mentioned that Namibia, like most African countries, has a younger population, and the Pact for the Future is for the youth who will inherit the world of today and tomorrow.

Major Discussion Point

Youth Engagement in Shaping the Future

Agreed with

Amina J. Mohammed

Rumman Chowdhury

Agreed on

Importance of youth engagement in shaping the future

Amplifying voices of marginalized groups through youth leadership

Explanation

Mbumba stressed the importance of amplifying the voices of marginalized groups through youth leadership. He called for pushing ambitious action in critical areas that affect these groups.

Major Discussion Point

Youth Engagement in Shaping the Future

Addressing climate change, human rights, and equitable development

Explanation

Mbumba highlighted the need for urgent action on climate change, ensuring global peace and security, and harnessing the transformative power of technology. He emphasized the importance of addressing these issues in an equitable manner.

Evidence

He mentioned Namibia’s experience with severe droughts, threatened ecosystems, and coastal communities at risk from rising sea levels as examples of climate change impacts.

Major Discussion Point

Youth Engagement in Shaping the Future

M

Mia Mottley

Speech speed

0 words per minute

Speech length

0 words

Speech time

1 seconds

Reforming financial systems to match development needs

Explanation

Mottley emphasized the need to reform financial systems to better match the development needs of countries. She argued that current financial structures constrain countries’ ability to deliver for their people and access development opportunities.

Evidence

She stated that countries cannot build schools and hospitals with 10 and 15 year money, highlighting the mismatch between financial structures and development needs.

Major Discussion Point

Transforming Global Systems for Equity

Agreed with

Betty Wainaina

Axel van Trotsenburg

Agreed on

Need for reforming global financial systems

Ensuring equitable access to new technologies like AI

Explanation

Mottley stressed the importance of ensuring equitable access to new technologies, particularly artificial intelligence. She argued for the need to regulate these technologies to ensure they are a force for good rather than instruments of oppression or recolonization.

Major Discussion Point

Transforming Global Systems for Equity

Agreed with

Anne Hidalgo

Amina J. Mohammed

Agreed on

Importance of inclusive multilateralism

Prioritizing education and dialogue over conflict

Explanation

Mottley emphasized the importance of prioritizing investment in education over conflict and war. She argued for creating spaces for discussion and dialogue at all levels of society to build momentum for change.

Major Discussion Point

Transforming Global Systems for Equity

Providing basic necessities to all people globally

Explanation

Mottley argued for the necessity of providing basic necessities like food, water, shelter, and electricity to all people on Earth. She stated that this is essential for considering our generation successful in human civilization.

Evidence

She pointed out that there are sufficient resources to share, but what is needed is a change in attitude and values.

Major Discussion Point

Transforming Global Systems for Equity

Agreements

Agreement Points

Importance of youth engagement in shaping the future

Nangolo Mbumba

Amina J. Mohammed

Rumman Chowdhury

Recognizing youth as key stakeholders in global decision-making

Strengthening intergenerational discourse at national and international levels

Leveraging digital innovations to achieve SDGs

These speakers emphasized the crucial role of youth in decision-making processes, intergenerational dialogue, and leveraging technology for sustainable development.

Need for reforming global financial systems

Betty Wainaina

Axel van Trotsenburg

Mia Mottley

Reforming international financial architecture

Providing concessional financing for poorest countries

Reforming financial systems to match development needs

These speakers agreed on the urgent need to reform global financial systems to better support developing countries and match their development needs.

Importance of inclusive multilateralism

Anne Hidalgo

Amina J. Mohammed

Mia Mottley

Including local authorities in multilateral efforts

Implementing new global agreements through inclusive partnerships

Ensuring equitable access to new technologies like AI

These speakers emphasized the importance of inclusive multilateralism, involving local authorities, diverse partnerships, and ensuring equitable access to new technologies.

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers stressed the importance of addressing the debt crisis in developing countries and providing concessional financing to support their development needs.

Betty Wainaina

Axel van Trotsenburg

Addressing the debt crisis in developing countries

Providing concessional financing for poorest countries

Both speakers emphasized the importance of addressing systemic inequalities and prioritizing peaceful approaches to conflict resolution.

Nudhara Yusuf

Mia Mottley

Dismantling patriarchal power structures

Prioritizing education and dialogue over conflict

Unexpected Consensus

Role of local governments in global governance

Anne Hidalgo

Nangolo Mbumba

Including local authorities in multilateral efforts

Recognizing youth as key stakeholders in global decision-making

While coming from different perspectives (local government and national leadership), both speakers emphasized the importance of including diverse voices in global governance structures.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of agreement included the importance of youth engagement, the need for financial system reform, and the value of inclusive multilateralism.

Consensus level

There was a moderate to high level of consensus among the speakers on these key issues, suggesting a shared understanding of the challenges facing global governance and development. This consensus implies a potential for collaborative action on these fronts in the implementation of the Pact for the Future.

Disagreements

Disagreement Points

Approach to financing development

Axel van Trotsenburg

Mia Mottley

Van Trotsenburg stressed the importance of providing concessional financing or grants for the poorest countries. He argued that these countries lack the fiscal resources to pay for high-coupon debt and need long-term concessional financing.

Mottley emphasized the need to reform financial systems to better match the development needs of countries. She argued that current financial structures constrain countries’ ability to deliver for their people and access development opportunities.

While both speakers agree on the need for better financing for developing countries, they differ in their approach. Van Trotsenburg focuses on concessional financing and grants, while Mottley argues for a more fundamental reform of the financial system.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of disagreement revolve around the specific approaches to financing development, the role of different stakeholders in global governance, and the prioritization of various issues within the broader context of sustainable development and global cooperation.

Disagreement level

The level of disagreement among the speakers appears to be relatively low. Most speakers seem to agree on the overall goals and the need for action, with differences mainly in the specific approaches or areas of focus. This level of disagreement is not likely to significantly impede progress on the topics at hand, but rather could lead to a more comprehensive and nuanced approach to addressing global challenges.

Partial Agreements

Partial Agreements

Both speakers agree on the need for more inclusive decision-making processes in global governance, but they focus on different groups: Hidalgo on local authorities and Mbumba on youth.

Anne Hidalgo

Nangolo Mbumba

Hidalgo emphasized the importance of including local authorities in global governance and multilateral efforts. She argued for recognition of the place of local governments in addressing global challenges like climate change and poverty.

Mbumba emphasized the importance of recognizing and celebrating the active participation of youth in global decision-making processes. He argued that the youth play a critical role in strengthening democracy and shaping international institutions.

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers stressed the importance of addressing the debt crisis in developing countries and providing concessional financing to support their development needs.

Betty Wainaina

Axel van Trotsenburg

Addressing the debt crisis in developing countries

Providing concessional financing for poorest countries

Both speakers emphasized the importance of addressing systemic inequalities and prioritizing peaceful approaches to conflict resolution.

Nudhara Yusuf

Mia Mottley

Dismantling patriarchal power structures

Prioritizing education and dialogue over conflict

Takeaways

Key Takeaways

The Summit of the Future Action Days highlighted the importance of inclusive, multi-stakeholder partnerships to address global challenges

Reforming the international financial architecture is crucial for achieving sustainable development and climate goals

Youth engagement and intergenerational approaches are essential for shaping a better future

Digital technologies and AI offer opportunities for advancing SDGs but require governance frameworks to manage risks

Local governments play a vital role in implementing global agreements and fostering peace

Rebuilding trust in multilateral institutions is necessary to address complex global issues

Resolutions and Action Items

Implement the Pact for the Future, Global Digital Compact, and Declaration on Future Generations

Scale up development and climate financing, particularly for poorest countries

Strengthen international tax cooperation, including through a Framework Convention

Develop inclusive AI governance frameworks

Increase funding and support for multilateral institutions

Enhance youth participation in global decision-making processes

Unresolved Issues

Specific mechanisms for reforming the international financial architecture

Concrete steps to address the debt crisis in developing countries

Detailed plans for bridging the digital divide globally

Precise methods for dismantling patriarchal power structures in peace processes

Exact strategies for protecting civilians from explosive weapons in urban settings

Suggested Compromises

Balancing the need for increased development financing with fiscal constraints of donor countries

Finding common ground between different stakeholders (governments, private sector, civil society) in shaping global policies

Reconciling rapid technological advancement with equitable access and ethical considerations

Harmonizing local government initiatives with national and international policy frameworks

Thought Provoking Comments

We stand as the last few generations who can do something about the challenges that we face, and the first few generations that have the opportunity to seize new potentials for impact.

Speaker

Nudhara Yusuf

Reason

This comment powerfully frames the current moment as both a critical responsibility and unique opportunity for action, emphasizing the urgency and potential of the present generation.

Impact

It set an inspiring and action-oriented tone for the discussion, emphasizing the need for concrete steps rather than just talk.

Debt servicing is crowding out SDG financing. Speakers stressed the need for global consensus to stem the rising debt crisis, including a systemic multilateral approach.

Speaker

Betty Wainaina

Reason

This highlights a critical obstacle to sustainable development and calls for a coordinated global response, demonstrating the interconnectedness of financial and development issues.

Impact

It shifted the conversation towards the practical financial challenges of implementing sustainable development goals, leading to discussion of specific policy proposals.

Multilateralism is under threat. And many are questioning why you have multilateral organizations, be it the UN, be it multilateral development banks. Yet many problems, and the mayor just mentioned climate change, you cannot solve alone. It will require international global collaboration if we want to succeed.

Speaker

Axel van Trotsenburg

Reason

This comment directly addresses a core challenge to global cooperation while asserting its necessity, particularly for issues like climate change.

Impact

It refocused the discussion on the importance of multilateral institutions and international cooperation, leading to further exploration of how to strengthen these systems.

The true measure of our success will be in the effective implementation of the pact for the future, the Global Digital Compact, and the Declaration of Future Generations. These initiatives will be pivotal in advancing the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

Speaker

Nangolo Mbumba

Reason

This comment shifts focus from agreement on principles to the critical importance of implementation, tying the discussion to concrete global development goals.

Impact

It moved the conversation from theoretical discussions to practical considerations of how to turn agreements into action, emphasizing accountability.

If we doubted the power of the people we only need to see where that power has made significant changes even in this year of that we live in, but what matters now is that there be coordinated action and that we believe and that we sell and share with each other that there is a possibility for a win-win

Speaker

Mia Mottley

Reason

This comment emphasizes the power of collective action while also stressing the need for coordination and shared vision, bridging grassroots energy with organized efforts.

Impact

It energized the discussion by highlighting recent successes and the potential for positive change, while also calling for strategic, coordinated efforts.

Overall Assessment

These key comments shaped the discussion by consistently emphasizing the need for concrete action, global cooperation, and effective implementation of agreed-upon goals. They moved the conversation beyond theoretical agreements to practical considerations of financing, institutional reform, and coordinated efforts. The speakers highlighted both the urgency of current challenges and the unique opportunities of the present moment, creating a sense of both responsibility and possibility. This framing encouraged a forward-looking, action-oriented discussion that tied high-level agreements to tangible impacts on sustainable development and global cooperation.

Follow-up Questions

How can we effectively implement the political declaration on the use of explosive weapons in populated areas?

Speaker

Nudhara Yusuf

Explanation

This was highlighted as a key action point to protect civilians in conflict zones

What specific governance frameworks are needed to address future risks in a changing world?

Speaker

Nudhara Yusuf

Explanation

This was mentioned as part of a call to action for peace in a digital world

How can we accelerate the implementation of climate resilient debt clauses and state contingent debt instruments at scale?

Speaker

Betty Wainaina

Explanation

These were identified as important tools to address the debt crisis in developing countries

What concrete steps can be taken to reform the international financial architecture to better support developing countries?

Speaker

Betty Wainaina

Explanation

This was emphasized as crucial for achieving the SDGs

How can we effectively bridge the digital divide, particularly in terms of skills and capacities to use digital technology meaningfully?

Speaker

Rumman Chowdhury

Explanation

This was highlighted as a key challenge in achieving a digital future for all

What specific mechanisms can be developed to de-risk investments and incentivize private sector participation in low-income countries?

Speaker

Axel van Trotsenburg

Explanation

This was identified as crucial for attracting private capital to developing countries

How can we strengthen the intergenerational discourse at national and international levels?

Speaker

Amina J. Mohammed

Explanation

This was emphasized as important for rebuilding trust and legitimacy in international institutions

What concrete actions can be taken to ensure the effective implementation of the Pact for the Future, the Global Digital Compact, and the Declaration of Future Generations?

Speaker

Nangolo Mbumba

Explanation

This was stressed as the true measure of success beyond the adoption of these documents

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed.

Runway partners with Lionsgate to revolutionise film-making

Runway, a generative AI startup, has announced a significant partnership with Lionsgate, the studio responsible for popular franchises such as John Wick and Twilight. This collaboration will enable Lionsgate’s creative teams, including filmmakers and directors, to utilise Runway’s AI video-generating models. These models have been trained on the studio’s film catalogue and will be used to enhance their creative work. Michael Burns, vice chair of Lionsgate, emphasised the potential for this partnership to support creative talent.

Runway is considering new opportunities, including licensing its AI models to individual creators, allowing them to create and train custom models. This partnership represents the first public collaboration between a generative AI startup and a major Hollywood studio. Although Disney and Paramount have reportedly been discussing similar partnerships with AI providers, no official agreements have been reached yet.

This deal comes at a time of increased attention on AI in the entertainment industry, due to California’s new laws that regulate the use of AI digital replicas in film and television. Runway is also currently dealing with legal challenges regarding the alleged use of copyrighted works to train its models without permission.

Towards 2030 and Beyond: Accelerating the SDGs through Access to Evidence on What Works

Towards 2030 and Beyond: Accelerating the SDGs through Access to Evidence on What Works

Session at a Glance

Summary

This discussion focused on accelerating progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through improved access to evidence and international collaboration. The event brought together representatives from governments, the UN, academia, and civil society to explore how evidence synthesis and new technologies like AI can support SDG achievement.

Speakers highlighted the urgent need to make better use of existing evidence to inform policymaking and accelerate SDG progress. They emphasized that while vast amounts of research exist, much of it remains underutilized or inaccessible to decision-makers. To address this, the Global SDG Synthesis Coalition was formed to unite UN agencies, governments, and other partners in synthesizing and disseminating actionable evidence on SDG implementation.

Major funding commitments were announced by the UK government and Wellcome Trust to support “living” evidence syntheses that are continuously updated using AI and other technologies. Speakers stressed the importance of making these efforts globally inclusive, ensuring evidence is accessible and relevant for decision-makers worldwide, especially in developing countries.

The discussion highlighted the transformative potential of AI and other digital technologies in accelerating evidence synthesis and use, while also cautioning that responsible innovation is crucial to avoid exacerbating inequalities. Speakers called for increased international collaboration and harmonization of evidence efforts globally.

Youth representatives emphasized the importance of including diverse voices, especially young people, in evidence production and decision-making processes. Overall, the event showcased a shared commitment to leveraging evidence more effectively to drive SDG progress through 2030 and beyond.

Keypoints

Major discussion points:

– The importance of evidence synthesis and making research findings more accessible to policymakers to accelerate progress on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

– Announcements of major funding commitments from the UK government and Wellcome Trust to support AI-driven evidence synthesis efforts

– The need for international collaboration and harmonized global efforts to make evidence more timely, relevant and equitable

– The role of artificial intelligence in transforming evidence synthesis, while ensuring responsible and ethical use

– Ensuring evidence reaches all countries and populations, including youth and vulnerable groups

Overall purpose:

The discussion aimed to highlight the critical role of evidence in accelerating progress on the SDGs and to announce new initiatives and funding to improve the synthesis and accessibility of evidence for policymakers globally.

Tone:

The tone was largely optimistic and forward-looking, with speakers expressing excitement about the potential for new technologies and collaborations to transform evidence use. There was also a sense of urgency given the short timeframe to achieve the SDGs by 2030. The tone became more reflective and aspirational when youth representatives spoke near the end, emphasizing the importance of including future generations in decision-making.

Speakers

Moderator/Facilitator:

– Andrea Cook – Executive Director of the UN Sustainable Development Group Systemwide Evaluation Office

Speakers:

– Bob Rae – President of the UN Economic and Social Council and Canada’s permanent representative to the UN

– Simplex Chitiola Banda – Malawi’s Minister of Finance and Economic Affairs

– Emran Mian – Director General for Digital Technologies and Telecoms at the UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology

– Lord Patrick Vallance (via video) – UK Minister of State for Science, Research, and Innovation

– Isabelle Mercier – Director of the Independent Evaluation Office at UNDP and Co-Chair of the Global SDG Synthesis Coalition

– John Lavis – Co-Lead of the Global Commission on Evidence to Address Societal Challenges

– John-Arne Røttingen – Chief Executive Officer of the Wellcome Trust

– Ana Jiménez de la Hoz – Ambassador from Spain

– Martin Kimani – Executive Director of NYU’s Center on International Cooperation and Kenya’s former permanent representative to the UN

– Justine Germo Nzweundji – Member of the chairing committee of INGSA in Africa

– Karla Soares-Weiser – Editor-in-Chief of Cochrane

– Will Moy – Chief Executive Officer of the Campbell Collaboration

– Krishna Kishore Pandalaneni – Master of Public Administration student at Columbia University

– Reuben Pohl – Medical student at Oxford University and Yale

– Kerry Albright – Principal Advisor and Deputy Director at the UNICEF Evaluation Office and Co-Chair of the Global SDG Synthesis Coalition

The speakers represent a diverse range of expertise including diplomacy, finance, science and technology policy, evidence synthesis, international development, healthcare, and youth perspectives.

Full session report

Accelerating Progress on the Sustainable Development Goals through Evidence Synthesis and International Collaboration

A high-level discussion brought together representatives from governments, the UN, academia, and civil society to explore how evidence synthesis and new technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) can support achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The event, moderated by Andrea Cook, the first Executive Director of the UN Sustainable Development Group Systemwide Evaluation Office, focused on improving access to evidence and fostering international collaboration to accelerate SDG progress.

Key Themes and Agreements

1. Importance of Evidence Synthesis for SDG Progress

There was strong consensus among speakers on the critical role of evidence synthesis in driving SDG achievement. Andrea Cook, Simplex Chitiola Banda, Bob Rae, Isabelle Mercier, and John-Arne Røttingen all emphasised how synthesising research findings can help identify effective interventions and policies. Banda noted that evidence synthesis can illuminate what works and what doesn’t, while Rae stressed the importance of international collaboration in these efforts.

However, speakers also highlighted significant challenges in accessing and using evidence for policymaking. Mercier pointed out that evidence is often scattered and underutilised, while Martin Kimani noted that policymakers face time constraints in accessing relevant information. Justine Germo Nzweundji raised the issue of language and cultural barriers affecting evidence accessibility, and Karla Soares-Weiser emphasised the need for evidence synthesis to be timely and relevant.

2. Role of Technology and AI in Enhancing Evidence Synthesis

Lord Patrick Vallance and John-Arne Røttingen discussed the potential of AI and technology to improve evidence synthesis capabilities. However, Bob Rae cautioned about existing inequalities in access to digital technologies and AI, highlighting the need to ensure that technological advancements benefit all countries and populations.

3. Major Initiatives and Investments

Several significant announcements were made during the discussion:

– Formation of the Global SDG Synthesis Coalition to unite UN agencies, governments, and other partners in synthesising and disseminating actionable evidence on SDG implementation (Isabelle Mercier). Specific synthesis reports include:

• Completed report on SDG 17 Partnership Pillar

• Ongoing synthesis on the Peace Pillar (SDG 16.1 and 16.4)

• Upcoming synthesis on the People Pillar (SDGs 1-5)

• Plans for synthesis on the Planet Pillar (SDGs 6, 12-15)

– UK government investment of £11.5 million in AI-driven evidence synthesis (Lord Vallance), with three main aims:

• Creating an AI-based approach for analyzing evidence

• Developing AI-supported evidence synthesis products

• Improving accessibility and dissemination of synthesized evidence

– Wellcome Trust commitment of £45 million over five years to support “living” evidence syntheses that are continuously updated using AI and other technologies (John-Arne Røttingen)

– Ongoing support from Cochrane and the Campbell Collaboration for global evidence synthesis efforts (Karla Soares-Weiser, Will Moy). Cochrane’s new scientific strategy focuses on SDG-related areas: maternal, newborn, and child health; infectious disease; climate health; and multiple chronic conditions.

– Spain’s efforts to champion localisation of SDGs and evidence use (Ana Jiménez de la Hoz)

4. Youth Involvement and Diverse Perspectives

Krishna Kishore Pandalaneni and Reuben Pohl, representing youth perspectives, emphasised the importance of involving young people in decision-making processes and ensuring that evidence serves those most affected by policies, particularly future generations. Pohl highlighted the potential of citizen science initiatives to bridge communities and researchers, while both speakers stressed the need for diversity in evidence production and sharing.

5. Strengthening the Science-Policy Interface

Justine Germo Nzweundji highlighted the role of INGSA (International Network for Governmental Science Advice) in strengthening the science-policy interface, emphasizing its importance in bridging the gap between evidence producers and policymakers.

Areas of Partial Agreement and Unresolved Issues

While there were no significant disagreements among speakers, some nuanced perspectives emerged:

– Bob Rae and Lord Vallance both acknowledged the importance of AI and technology in evidence synthesis, but Rae emphasised existing inequalities in access to these technologies, while Vallance focused more on their potential benefits.

– The discussion revealed unresolved questions about ensuring equitable access to AI and digital technologies across all countries, effectively integrating local context and knowledge into global evidence synthesis, and balancing the speed of AI-driven synthesis with the need for rigorous and ethical evidence production.

Thought-Provoking Comments and Future Directions

Several speakers made particularly impactful statements that shaped the discussion:

– John Lavis painted a vivid picture of the potential for comprehensive, easily accessible evidence on education interventions, demonstrating how synthesised evidence could be made actionable for decision-makers.

– Karla Soares-Weiser thoughtfully addressed both the opportunities and challenges presented by AI in evidence synthesis, emphasising the need for proper regulation, ethical use, and collaboration.

– Bob Rae powerfully framed the SDGs as fundamental human needs and highlighted the urgency of leveraging new technologies to address global inequalities.

– John-Arne Røttingen’s announcement of significant funding from the Wellcome Trust demonstrated concrete commitment to the ideas being discussed and shifted the conversation towards practical implementation.

These comments collectively moved the discussion from theoretical concepts to practical action, while maintaining focus on the ultimate goal of improving human lives through better use of evidence in pursuit of the SDGs.

Conclusion and Next Steps

The discussion showcased a shared commitment to leveraging evidence more effectively to drive SDG progress through 2030 and beyond. Key action items include the development of synthesis reports on various SDG topics by the Global SDG Synthesis Coalition, special meetings on AI and evidence use for SDGs called by the ECOSOC President, and ongoing support for global evidence synthesis efforts from organisations like Cochrane and the Campbell Collaboration.

Moving forward, stakeholders will need to address challenges such as ensuring equitable access to AI and digital technologies, integrating local context into global evidence synthesis, and sustainably funding and coordinating global evidence synthesis efforts beyond initial investments. The discussion highlighted the need for continued dialogue and diverse approaches to effectively harness evidence and technology in service of the SDGs.

The event concluded with an announcement by Kerry Albright about a closing reception at the UK Consulate for pre-registered attendees, providing an opportunity for further networking and discussion.

Session Transcript

Andrea Cook: Thank you. So good afternoon, everyone. His Excellency Honourable Simplex Chitiola Banda, Her Excellency Minister Zainab Chukan, His Excellency Ambassador Bob Rae, Director General Emran Mian, distinguished guests, esteemed colleagues, and passionate advocates for a better world. Good afternoon. I am Andrea Cook, appointed by the Secretary General one year ago as the first Executive Director of the United Nations Sustainable Development Group Systemwide Evaluation Office. On behalf of the organizing team from Malawi, the United Kingdom, INGSA, and the Global SDG Synthesis Coalition, I warmly welcome you all to this crucial event towards 2030 and beyond, accelerating the SDGs through access to evidence on what works. We are honored today to have such a distinguished group of leaders and experts gathered here and such a full and engaged room. It’s so exciting. So we’re here to explore the transformative power of science, digital technologies, artificial intelligence, and international collaboration to bridge the gap and bring evidence to the fore at global, regional, national, and local level to help drive us forwards to accelerate the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals. A special thanks to our esteemed ministers, Honourable Simplex Chitra Labanda from Malawi and Lord Patrick Vallance from the United Kingdom, and His Excellency Ambassador Bob Rae, the President of the Economic and Social Council, for their leadership and commitment and for their invaluable contributions to this crucial dialogue. I especially thank the distinguished presenters and panelists from Brazil, Cameroon, Canada, Germany, India, Norway, Spain, and the United Kingdom, who bring their commitment and the perspective of different and diverse organizations to our deliberations. This event aligns seamlessly with the spirit and the vision of the greatly anticipated impact for the future, emphasizing the critical role of knowledge and the science policy interface in looking at how to improve the access of policymakers and decision makers to better evidence to accelerate the achievement of the global goals. Today we will delve into the groundbreaking work of the Global SDG Synthesis Coalition, which is a testament to the power of partnership and collaboration. We will also hear from two major research funders and from the UK Research and Innovation and the Wellcome Trust about significant new funding commitments that will be used to bring together all the existing evidence on what works, including previously untapped evaluative evidence to make it more useful for decision makers across the world to help achieve the SDGs. This initiative is an incredible demonstration of the Secretary General’s vision of how artificial intelligence and science can boost the SDGs for all countries, and also his recognition of the immense value of partnerships between UN agencies, national governments, philanthropies and academia that go beyond mere financing to encompass technical resources and expertise. Today presents a significant opportunity to forge new collaborations across science, evidence and policy communities. As Soren Kierkegaard wisely said, life can only be… understood backwards but it must be lived forwards. As we look towards 2030 and beyond we have the potential to seize and share knowledge and insight rooted in more credible and reliable evidence to shape a better future in a more sustainable and equitable world. Up with that it’s now my honor to introduce Bob Ray the president of the UN Economic and Social Council and Canada’s permanent representative to the United Nations to open our side event. Ambassador Rae’s distinguished career spans law, public policy and diplomacy making him uniquely positioned to highlight the critical role of evidence in addressing global challenges. Over to you, thank you.

Bob Rae: Thank you very much Andrea it’s a great pleasure to be here and to be in such a illustrious company. I suspect that Soren Kierkegaard has not been quoted in this place since since Dag Hammarskjöld was the Secretary General and if anybody was any doubt about how serious this conversation is we have Kierkegaard looking over us to tell us what we’re doing right or wrong. It really is a pleasure to be here. When I was invited to do this many of my staff said why do you why do you want to do this one I mean not no offense but I get asked I get asked to do so many of these things now nothing to do with me it’s just to do with my title and I said because this happens to be one of the most important questions that we’re facing in the world today and that is that we know what needs to be done and we know how it can be done but gathering this information and this evidence and marshalling it and putting it into battle is really the challenge that we face. We go to a bewildering number of meetings during these action days and I one of my first ones this morning I think this is my eighth meeting was a really interesting discussion not that this isn’t going to be an interesting discussion but I was at a really interesting discussion between among the SDG advocates and my prime minister was there so I had to be at that one and the most I thought the most interesting presentation was by the president of Microsoft, because he pointed out that the invention of electricity took place 150 years ago. The first power plant was built in Manhattan well before the end of the 19th century. We still have hundreds of millions of people living in the world, particularly in the continent of Africa, who do not have access to electricity. So if you think of artificial intelligence, and my offhand view about artificial intelligence is better than no intelligence at all, but when you think about artificial intelligence, it requires enormous investments in hardware and in software in order to be able to have the impact that it has. There will be central places where this is done, and we’re at the same risk that we were at with the discovery of electricity, and that is that those who have the money and the financing to put it at the center of their economic activity will explode in terms of their ability to advance and take advantage of it, and those who do not have this access will be at risk of falling even further behind than they are today. And so we’re at a real inflection point in the life of the world. We have a new technology that’s coming available. We have a challenge before us with respect to the sustainable development goals, which, as I call them, are really just the common sense of humankind. What do we need to be able to do in order to live decent lives? That’s what the sustainable development goals are, nothing more and nothing less. But if we do not marshal all these resources, we will be even worse off, frankly, than we are today in terms of the fundamental challenge, which is not that we don’t have prosperity among us. We do. Not that we don’t have exciting technological discussion going on. We all do. The problem is we don’t have available to everyone, and many people are being left badly behind. So we are at an inflection point because I do think that this next round of technological innovation will either have the capacity to accelerate all of us or will have the ability to accelerate some of us and leave others even further behind than they are now. I had the honour when I first came here to co-chair the co-facilitation of the Doha Declaration, which is the declaration of the least developed countries in the world. At that time, we discovered, found and said and told other members of the UN that less than 15 per cent of LDCs had access to the technical and financial resources required to implement advanced digital technologies, extending their participation severely in global digital markets. Global investments in AI are projected to reach $500 billion by 2024. That’s a lot, $500 billion, when you consider that the global economy is $100 trillion. That’s a significant amount of money. Most of these investments were concentrated in high-income countries. So those in the least developed countries and even in middle-income countries have been left behind. We know that in some SIDs, less than 20% of the workforce had basic digital literacy. About 19% of the population in sub-Saharan Africa, prominently LDCs and LLDCs, about 200 million people, live outside of mobile broadband coverage without any access at all. And globally, women are 19% less likely than men to use the internet. And less than 25% of LDCs have comprehensive policies addressing digital inclusion for women and marginalized groups. The central challenge that we face is twofold. One is how do we mobilize our institutions to respond to this crisis? But the second one is how do we mobilize public opinion in all of our countries to care about whether this will or will not be done? At the same meeting this morning, as the Secretary General said, if we leave things on their own and don’t intervene successfully to change the pattern of development and to change the pace of development and the focus of development, inequality will only get worse. This is not some speculative comment. This is a reality. But the other half of the challenge that we face is that we will – things are going to get worse unless we’re able to combat the powerful sources of disinformation, misogyny, patriarchy, prejudice, hate, which are permeating our social media. yes permeating our politics and we have to respond to it with a very vigorous commitment not only to our values but to science and to information and to facts to not leave behind the heritage that we have accumulated that we know that all of these things are right and all that that it goes against it is actually wrong and the truth is a real thing not a made-up thing it’s a real thing people speak today of my truth and your truth no I mean David Hume would be rolling over in his grave some things are true and other things are not true and we have to keep on encountering this as the president this year of ECOSOC I have the chance to call a couple of special meetings and I’m going to be calling a special meeting on AI it’s not going to focus on AI governance it’s going to focus on this question access to the to the investments that are going to be required in every corner of the globe in order to ensure that we do not get swamped by another wave of inequality second the STI forum will be an opportunity for innovators and thinkers to come together on how to address inequalities and access to technologies and proposed solutions and we’re also going to be using the high-level political forum to get to get on to this question of how we can make sure that the science-based information that’s present is built into and baked into our policies and baked into what agencies and what the UN system itself does so I’m delighted to be here I’m delighted to be able to hear what people have to say and I’m delighted to be able to participate in these discussions I want to assure you that we we are going to be taking this cause up because we really I really do think that it’s a critical issue for the UN system as a whole but more importantly than just the UN system it’s more important for humankind for all of all of us it’s important for us to recognize this is a point at which choices have to be made decisions have to be made and for heaven’s sake let’s base those decisions on evidence on facts on knowledge on information and yes on truth thank you very much

Andrea Cook: Thank you, Ambassador Rae, for your insightful opening remarks and throwing down the challenge. We really appreciate your leadership in highlighting the priorities of yourself and the Economic and Social Council and to set the scene for the critical issues that relate to this important discussion today. From the perspective of the Republic of Malawi, from the front lines of policy implementation, we welcome His Excellency the Honourable Simplex Tjotiola Banda, Malawi’s Minister of Finance and Economic Affairs. His expertise in international trade and development economics highlights the crucial link between evidence and effective policymaking. Thank you. Over to you, Minister Banda.

Simplex Chitiola Banda: Thank you very much and good afternoon to all. As alluded to by the coordinator, I’m Simplex Chitiola Banda, Malawi’s Finance Minister. Your Excellencies, distinct delegates, partners and audience members, we’ve just heard from the previous speaker about the importance of decision makers having access to timely and reliable evidence. And we’ll hear more, I hope so, about how research and innovation can drive national growth, development and well-being, and how artificial intelligence, AI, can help speed up our important work. With a mere six years to go until 2030, it is imperative to speed up our work in all these areas to accelerate progress towards the SDGs. We need to employ the newest technology advances to fast-track our work wherever possible. We need to make better use of evidence for more effective policymaking and ensure that this evidence is available. to everybody. This requires, as alluded to by us all, to connect and work together more closely. Only through substantial international collaboration, by sharing the lessons we learn on our journey to solve our most pressing challenges, can we ensure that our efforts have the most impact and for the benefit of everybody. Malawi strongly believes in the transformative power of evidence, technology and cooperation. These, ladies and gentlemen, are vital to achieve the Malawi 2063 and ensure sustainable economic growth and development. We have worked closely with the United Nations system on our vision, which sets out a clear path to realizing the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. We are committed to achieving the aspirations of the Malawi 2063 and the 2030 Agenda on Sustainable Development. We are convinced that the joining forces with stakeholders from all sectors will be able to get back on track and accelerate progress towards the global goals in these crucial years until 2030. Ladies and gentlemen, Malawi is proud to demonstrate its commitment to the 2030 Agenda, evidence-based policymaking and meaningful international cooperation and partnership on many occasions. Just last year, we proudly co-sponsored the UN General Assembly Resolution on Strengthening Voluntary National Reviews through country-led evaluation, which encourages all member states to use the evidence from evaluations to their decision-making to achieve their global goals. This commitment is why Malawi has been a strong advocate for the Global SDG Synthesis Coalition and a member of the Steering Committee since its inception. One year ago, together with Panama and our coalition partners, we proudly sponsored an event at SDG Summit to launch the first evidence synthesis on SDG 17 Partnership Pillar. This report provided concrete evidence of how strong international collaboration, fair trade and meaningful partnerships can characterize growth and progress for the benefit of everybody. One year later, Malawi has again the pleasure of co-sponsoring an important event with the UK Government, the United Nations and International Network for Governmental Science Advice. But today, we come together as part of an even bigger and stronger coalition. Through our combined efforts, we are pleased to welcome new influential and committed partners, including global leaders in the realm of evidence, technology and innovation. I am, therefore, very much looking forward to hearing about their vision from our distinguished speakers today, your excellencies, distinguished representatives, partners, and colleagues. I hope this session will persuade and inspire you, persuade you of the key role that cutting-edge technology, accessible evidence, and meaningful collaboration can play in addressing the complex challenges we face today. I, therefore, urge you to become part of this global initiative, making available what you have learned from your efforts to achieve global goals. I advocate for the better use of evidence for policymaking and engage with partners from different sectors and disciplines. Together, we will find the new solutions needed to create a more just, equitable, and prosperous future. Thank you for your attention.

Andrea Cook: Thank you, Minister Banda, for sharing Malawi’s invaluable perspective on the importance of international collaboration and evidence-based policymaking for achievement of the SDGs. We’re privileged to move to the United Kingdom, our main other sponsoring partner, and we’re privileged to have a video message by His Excellency Lord Patrick Vallance, the United Kingdom Minister of State for Science, Research, and Innovation. With a background as both clinical academic and a leader in pharmaceutical research and development, Lord Vallance will share the UK government’s perspective on the transformative power of international scientific collaboration and evidence synthesis. We request Emran Mian, the Director General for Digital Technologies and Telecoms at the Department for Science. innovation and technology in the United Kingdom, to represent Lord Patrick Vallance, who unfortunately couldn’t be here with us in person today. And he’s very disappointed not to be here. Over to you.

Emran Mian: Thank you very much. And yes, he sends his apologies, though I think we will briefly hear from him on a video. So look, I’ve been sitting here feeling rather lazy because unlike my colleague next to me, I haven’t been to eight events today. I’ve done a mere four. But I think already from four events today, it’s feeling to me that there’s a consistent theme running through this summit, about the way in which research and innovation is going to underline our progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals. And it’s that theme I just want to talk a little bit about. The UK role in this, as well as being really happy to co-sponsor this event with Malawi, is expressed partly through our international science partnerships, which is over 300 million pounds of funding that we use to put research and innovation at the heart of our international relationships. We have also been collaborating with Canada and a set of African civil society organizations and universities to begin to create an AI for development program. And the aim of this is to create safe, inclusive, and responsible AI ecosystems in Africa. Through the UK Economic and Social Research Council, we’ve also been supporting the production of a new global evidence report, published just last week, which sets out a blueprint for better international collaboration on synthesizing and using evidence. And this, I feel, is a really important point, that as well as governments helping to support the production of science, we need to help to support the synthesizing of the evidence that science provides. And this is something that I think often we under-invest in collectively. And as a consequence, scientific… remains the preserve of those who create it doesn’t sufficiently get to policymakers and when it does get to policymakers perhaps disproportionately gets to policymakers in only in certain countries and not globally. There are exceptions to this. I think we’ve got a lot to learn from health sciences where a lot of this synthesis work already happens. The work of the the Cochrane organization, those collaborations I think are a real lodestar here in terms of how you can do this work. Inspired by that work last year the UK government and the Gates Foundation launched the Juno Evidence Alliance. This is the world’s first evidence synthesis network for agriculture and food systems and as people in this room know as climate change increasingly affects vulnerable farmers and rural communities these synthesis methods become all the more important to help policymakers to prioritize and apply research findings to drive the action that is needed. In fact Juno’s most recent report found that there was a 60% growth in research publications in agri-food overall but very low levels of research targeting the poorest, hungriest and most climate vulnerable countries. So the power of evidence synthesis is not only to show what evidence we have but also to show what evidence we don’t have and what are the gaps that we need to work together to fill. AI is also a tool by which we can do more to fill those gaps and I’m going to hand over to the video of Lord Velens to talk about what we want to do next in that space.

Lord Vallance: Hello and my apologies that I’ve not been able to join you in person today because this is a really exciting moment for the use of evidence synthesis for global food. Today it’s my pleasure to announce that the UK government in strategic partnership with the UN will be making an initial investment of £11.5 million in a new program to catalyze a step change in AI-driven evidence synthesis. This opportunity has been launched by UK Research and Innovation, led by the Economic and Social Research Council. Our vision is to transform government leaders’ access to accurate, up-to-date and accessible summaries of the existing evidence base in key policy areas. Specifically, we have three aims. The first, to work with the best developers to create a powerful, AI-based approach for analysing and interpreting the latest evidence. Second, to create a comprehensive suite of AI-supported evidence synthesis products centred on topics of international interest and, of course, importance. This includes evidence and gap maps that allow decision makers to visualise the quantity and quality of relative evidence, and living evidence reviews that provide up-to-date evidence synthesis that meets the needs of national decision makers and doesn’t become outdated. And the third, we want to improve the accessibility, presentation and dissemination of synthesised evidence, with a focus on collaborating with decision makers and undertaking user testing to ensure products are designed and distributed in formats primed for policymaking. And that’s really important, that primed for policymaking. Partnership and global coordination sit at the heart of our plans. We want to build on, not duplicate, existing efforts. It is why we have partnered with the UN-led SDG Synthesis Coalition, which I understand you’ll hear much more about today. The effort we fund will also need to collaborate with existing evidence infrastructure to achieve collective impact. That includes investments made by many of the organisations in this room, like the Wellcome Trust, who you will hear from, who have shown really significant leadership in this space. I hope that together we can achieve real progress in accelerating access to evidence on what works, and indeed on what doesn’t. doesn’t in achieving the SDGs.

Andrea Cook: Thank you Director-General Mian for representing Lord Vallance and for highlighting the United Kingdom Government’s commitment to advancing evidence-based solutions through international collaboration and AI-driven innovation. With that, once again, we extend our sincere thanks to our distinguished speakers from Canada, the United Kingdom and Malawi for their valuable contributions. Now let’s transition to the next segment of our programme and please join me in welcoming Isabelle Mercier, John Lavis and John Arnaud Rottingham. As we continue to explore the crucial role of evidence in accelerating progress towards the SDGs, our esteemed speakers will share unique perspectives and insights. Firstly, we have Isabel Mercier, the Director of the Independent Evaluation Office at UNDP and Co-Chair of the Global SDG Synthesis Coalition. Isabelle will provide an overview of the Coalition’s ambitious objectives and the impactful work it has accomplished to date. Then after Isabel, we will hear from John Lavis, the Co-Lead of the Global Commission on Evidence to Address Societal Challenges. John will outline the exciting opportunities ahead for the Coalition and how it can align with the collective vision of the Global Evidence Commission to accelerate progress. And then finally, we will hear from John-Arne Røttingen, the Chief Executive Officer of the Wellcome Trust, who will share the Wellcome Trust’s perspectives on critical needs for global collaboration and provide insights into their future priorities in this area. And in this connection, we’ll be very excited to hear about the commitments that are being made and announced today from the Wellcome Trust to support this vital work. So over to you, first of all, Isabel. Thank you.

Isabelle Mercier: Thank you, Andrea. Excellencies, colleagues, friends, good afternoon. It’s a real pleasure for me to be here today. and to address such a distinguished group. I’m going to share with you the story of the Global SDG Synthesis Coalition, how it came to be, the work we’re doing, and the transformative impact we believe it can have on the global efforts to achieve these sustainable development goals. The coalition was formed in 2022 during a time we all remember when COVID-19 pandemic forced a temporary halt in primary research across international development evaluation. In that pause, my community of evaluators found an opportunity for reflection. We realized there was an untapped wealth of insights buried in underused research. Research lost in the noise, scattered across platforms, and forgotten in databases. This wasn’t irrelevant research, it was valuable, but it was overlooked. So we’ve made something that looked impossible happen. We’ve united 45 UN agencies, plus governments, academic institutions, synthesis networks, multilateral banks, and private sector partners around a vision to turn this fragmented and underused information into structured, accessible, and actionable insights that can accelerate progress towards the SDGs and answer critical questions. What works, for whom, and where? And let me tell you, this collaboration is transforming how we approach the challenge of achieving the SDGs. What sets the coalition apart is not just the concept of an evidence ecosystem. This idea isn’t new. What’s new is the intensity, ambition, and scale at which we’re building it. We’re creating a global evidence framework for the SDGs, an enduring commitment also to work together to address the challenges of different systems and accountabilities. Two major factors have made this possible. Advancements in technology and artificial intelligence, and more importantly, people. People who are breaking silos and collaborating even when the incentives say otherwise. The members of the coalition don’t just generate evidence. They champion it, ensuring that this evidence is used to take decisions that are made in their countries, in their regions, in their cities. The goal is to ensure that quality evidence is not only noticed, but used to inform the decisions that shape our future. We know that you, our leaders, face complex, urgent challenges, and that you need the best evidence to make informed choices. The coalition is here to respond to that need. Our coalition knows who to talk to and how to promote a dialogue, which is a unique strength within the UN system. In the past year, we’ve pooled resources, we’ve standardized methodologies, and we’ve intensified our commitment to driving the use of synthesis through every accessible channel. And we’ve managed to build a very dynamic space where academic knowledge meets real world policy needs, where evidence from UN process evaluations and impact evaluations by academics are synthesized and discussed with government officials, bringing the best insights to the global stage. After our first report on SDG 17, I’m excited to share that the coalition is now developing its first synthesis under the Peace Pillar. The synthesis, which consolidates evidence from impact evaluations and UN assessments, will deliver valuable insights and strategies for reducing homicides and conflict-related deaths with a specific focus on SDG target 16.1, reducing all forms of violence, and 16.4, curbing illicit financial and arms flows. The synthesis report, which will be made available in November 2024, will show which interventions are most effective and, importantly, why they succeeded. This will help accelerate progress toward these targets. Thomas Duhoup, I don’t know where he is. I think he’s in this room somewhere. The synthesis team leader from the American Institutes for Research is present in the audience. He’s working on this. Please feel free. I hope you don’t mind I’m saying this, Thomas. Feel free to approach him with any questions you have. In the meantime, I encourage you to explore our protocol and interim brief, which are available on our website. are available on the SDG Synthesis Coalition website and offer a detailed update on the evidence gathered so far. We’ve also developed two interactive visual evidence map that showcase the breadth of evaluative evidence on these topics. And I think there’s a QR code, and I think if you click on it, it’ll bring you to that. As for the other reports, I’m pleased to share that we’ll soon begin working on a synthesis of people pillar encompassing SDGs one through five, which will examine the implementation and effectiveness of social protection interventions aimed at reaching those most in need. We’re also currently completing a scoping consultation process to identify key thematic priorities for future living syntheses under all pillars, including the planet pillar, which covers SDGs six and 12 through 15, which is crucial due to the interconnectedness of ecosystems, human health, and global stability with all other SDGs. These reports are going to deliver valuable messages. At the same time, we’ve also learned that one-off syntheses like these will unlikely be enough. Decision-making is ongoing, and new evidence is constantly emerging. So what excites me even more is something that my friend here, John Lavis, will talk about in just a minute, and which is the coalition’s vision of a global bank of living syntheses. Powered by technology and AI, the coalition will continually update and refine insights, offering a well-structured, high-quality resource to decision-makers at all levels. So I hope you’re as excited and thrilled about this work as I am. Together, I believe we can be the change-makers, the bridge-builders, and advocates for a future where no one’s left behind. So now, with your permission, Andrea, I’ll turn the floor over to John. Thank you.

John Lavis: That was super. Thanks very much, Isabel. Distinguished guests and colleagues, I’m absolutely thrilled to be here today, and I want to start by applauding the Global SDG Synthesis Coalition. As somebody who’s labored for 30 years to try to get evidence into the hands of decision-makers, to have 45 UN agencies, independent. evaluation offices stand up and say, we want to foreground evaluations and evidence synthesis in our work. We want to make sure they’re used and we want to work with countries to support their use is really a game changer. And we’re really grateful to see that leadership coming from the UN. For the last three and a half years, I’ve co-led something called the Global Evidence Commission. And we felt that during COVID with evidence, so many things went well, but so many things went poorly. And we desperately needed to learn the lessons from that experience going forward so we can better deal with things during normal times and be prepared to pivot during crises. And we wanted to talk about how we had radical improvements, radically more timely, radically more relevant, radically more affordable, living evidence synthesis, syntheses that are continuously updated. Most recently, we led a consensus building process, brought together the evidence leaders from across the globe, the majority of whom are in the global south, to agree on six features of the future that we think are absolutely essential if we’re going to use evidence to power change and to accelerate progress with the SDGs. If we pull up the slide, I’m going to show you those six features. We call them Show Me the Evidence. And regrettably, that is also the title of a book about the Obama administration’s use of evidence. So we are buried way, way down in a Google search. The feature most relevant today is harmonized efforts globally that make it easier to learn from others around the world. And this, again, we really think is a path-breaking opportunity. But what exactly does it mean to do this? How do we harmonize efforts globally? Well, one piece of it is the platform at the base of this simple structure. That’s the infrastructure. We need to work with users across the UN system, with policymakers in member states, with civil society groups to understand their questions. We need to build capacity to produce these living evidence syntheses and shift their production and leadership for their development to the global south. We need platforms for data sharing and reusing. During COVID, we often had hundreds of rapid reviews on the exact same topic. Over and over again, people extracted data from studies, did risk-bias assessments, no sharing. That has to stop. We also need responsible innovation in tools and methods. One of the hallmarks of the evidence synthesis community is doing things systematically and transparently. And as AI can be used safely and responsibly in workflows, this will be incorporated. But we don’t want to introduce it prematurely when it runs the risk of increasing discrimination or causing other problems. That’s the infrastructure. And you’ll soon be hearing from Jan-Arne about a breathtaking investment in that infrastructure that will power this work around the globe across all sectors. Then we have funders coming forward, and you’ve heard about UKRI coming forward with with a bold investment in living evidence syntheses about accelerating progress towards the SDGs. We anticipate that in future, welcome in its three solution areas of climate and health, mental health and infectious disease will also be commissioning living evidence syntheses. But we have in Stee and Westlake, the chief executive of ESRC and Jan-Arne Rottingen, who you’ll hear from shortly, a desire to bring many other funders to the table so we can eventually cover all of the big questions over time related to the SDGs. We also need people investing in ways of serving up these actionable insights for different sectors, for different types of decision makers, for different geographies. We are on the cusp of having every impact study in the world about education with all the data extracted, with all the risk of bias assessments done. And once that’s done, it can be served up in many different ways. It can be served up by best buys. It can be served up by broad approach like peer tutoring. It can be served up by branded programs. So if politicians are being lobbied, they can look to see what the evidence is. So really exciting. This is the total vision. Today you’ll hear about two investments, and we hope to see many more coming forward, all of which will help to accelerate progress towards the SDGs. But the magic happens when that global system is working well and we have people on the ground in every country who can pull together the many forms of needed evidence when political windows of opportunity open. I have a colleague, Laura Boera, in Brazil, colleague Rona Majumbi was in Uganda, now in Malawi, a colleague Kerry in Canada. They all run rapid evidence support shops for their respective governments. People can call them up and say in two business days, I need all the best evidence systematically pulled together on this topic. In five business days, I need all the evidence on this topic. They have to pull together many forms of local evidence. What this will allow them to do is learn from other countries around the world and introduce those actionable insights from other settings. And this is now going to be so much more efficient for them. If I give you just one example, in the last 15 months, my colleague Kerry in Canada has had nine requests related to climate. Because of the generosity of a team in Berlin who makes available all of the data for their living evidence syntheses, she could pull down the relevant studies, contextualize it to the Canadian context, and deliver it in that highly contextualized form on the exact question that was asked. This should become the new normal. It should not be a one-off opportunity. So that’s what we’re talking about. The Global SDG Synthesis Coalition hopes that a year out, we have living evidence syntheses on the highest priority SDG questions of our time. Three years out, we’re answering most of the big questions. Six years out, we’ve got the entire spectrum covered, and we’re ready for 2030 and beyond. So thank you to the Global SDG Synthesis Coalition for its leadership. Thank you to these two visionary funders for setting us on a bold path. I am really excited about the future, and I hope you’ll join me in making that future a reality. Thank you.

John-Arne Røttingen: Thank you, John. Excellencies, colleagues, it’s great to follow. And we are here really to focus on how to make progress on some of the most pressing challenges we face in the world, as we have heard from many of the speakers. And easy access to up-to-date scientific evidence is vital for global progress. But as we have heard, the process of synthesising that information to deliver rigorous up-to-date summaries of the state of our knowledge is slow and labour-intensive. That bottleneck is holding back development. This is in a context, and we have heard about it from Malawi, we have short time to 2030 and to deliver on our SDG commitments, and we are not on track. As the scientific journal Nature actually put earlier this week in an editorial, and we heard from Isabelle as well, there’s part of the problem is that tens of thousands of research papers and evaluations are gathering dust in institutional vaults. Not physical anymore, but digital. But still… that they are not used, and rather than being available to inform policy and practice around the world. Just an example, infectious disease interventions in, around the Zika outbreak in South America in 2015 was a big challenge. A systematic review begun in May 2016 and identified and synthesized more than 700 papers on the topic, but by the time the review came out in January 2017, a further 1,400 papers had been published and had not been integrated in that review, so it meant it was outdated at the day of publication. We also saw during the COVID-19 pandemic, as John just mentioned, that yes, there were a lot of important efforts around the world in synthesizing research evidence, but they were duplicative. There were some great efforts in doing it together, but most countries did it alone. And did it the same, so that is both inefficient and it’s costly. So Wellcome Trust, in collaboration with the UN, we really hope to improve these systems for better timeliness and resource use with a new evidence synthesis infrastructure collaborative. So today I am announcing that Wellcome’s intention is to provide around 45 million pounds, around $60 million over the coming five years to boost what we can call living evidence synthesis. And several inputs will emerge through this process. However, more of this funding will be sought out through Funding Extremes, which John had just described by the others. Our funding will address three priorities. First, user engagement and capacity building, both of which will be supported through existing knowledge brokers who have trusted relationships with policy makers and the stakeholders in their respective countries. Second, platforms for data sharing and reuse, can reuse these data many times over and be much more efficient. And third, responsible innovation in tools and methods, which will include supporting the use of AI tools in work. flows, where it can be done safely, transparently, and responsibly, and crucially, without worsening discrimination or perpetuating inequities. So a community of different organizations already undertake these living evidence synthesis. We heard about the coalition, but there’s little support for shared foundational work so that we can be more effective together. Partnership and global coordination sit at the heart of our plans. We want to build on, definitely not duplicate, existing efforts. So we warmly welcome Lord Patrick Wallen’s announcement just now on funding from the UK government. We want to work with UK Economic and Social Research Council to bring together other research funders in a more joined-up approach to supporting this important work internationally. These are global public goods. It doesn’t make sense if we cannot really collectively invest. So we are just two funders now today around the table. Others are funding other parts of this ecosystem, but we need to do it more joined up. We will work closely with all actors in the area of living evidence, such as the Cochrane and Campbell collaborations, and collaborate with the UN Global Synthesis Coalition. So this system-wide investment from our end will complement existing and future investments we already do on specific areas, like, as John said, climate and health, mental health, and infectious diseases. And we hope other funders will take other priority areas within health, but indeed across all of the SDGs. It’s crucial that evidence professionals can spend less time on the laborious elements of conducting reviews, and more on understanding problems, engaging with policymakers. We know that that’s the major gap in really bringing evidence to decisions and implementation. And then to create products that will be genuinely useful to drive change in that local context. Because putting the best and timely evidence in the hands of decision-makers who need it is how science can best help us solve the urgent challenges. to be faced. So thank you.

Andrea Cook: So thank you Isabelle, John and John-Arne for your insightful and inspiring presentations on what may be possible and some of the resources that can come together to help to deliver that. It’s truly inspiring. I hope everyone else is as inspired as I am sitting around this table today. So now we’re going to delve deeper into the perspectives of key stakeholders in this endeavor and first of all we will turn to Ambassador Ana Jiménez de la Hoz from Spain who is going to explain how this work is of interest to Spain to share insights on why and also Spain’s involvement in the global SDG synthesis coalition as a founder and how that connects with the the vision for global SDG achievement. Over to you Ana. Thank you.

Ana Jimenez: Thank you very much Andrea for for giving me the floor and for the invitation to this important meeting and also to the previous speakers for all the wisdom and all the experiences they have shared so far. So from my side as you mentioned I’m going to share the importance that this issue has for Spain and some of the implications that we see it can have for some of the streams of where we are involved in. First of all for us evaluation is not like an add-on. It’s really the backbone for the successful implementation of Agenda 2030. It’s only by having evidence by having an evaluation of what’s working what is not working that we can really make progress. So we take this issue very seriously nationally and also in the context of the UN system. Here in the previous presentations, of course, we are very impressed by the work that the Synthesis Coalition is doing. We think it’s a very good living example of what we member states want to see coming out of the United Nations. In this context is the United Nations development system coming together with these 40-plus entities, working, producing this evidence that we need to make decisions. And we think that the example of this collaboration can also be an inspiration maybe for other parts of the UN system to come together in other processes and to work and produce very concrete results. We think that it’s a great opportunity, the Synthesis Coalition, to see what’s working, what is not working, and how to escalate what is working. Because at the end of the day, the achievement of the SDGs is such a colossal undertaking that we also need to think very big when we find that there’s evidence that works, how we can make it widely shared and how we can make scaling up for the whole of the world. Also another issue that is very important for us in the context of the Synthesis Coalition is the information that can be given to decision makers, and that’s something that other speakers have also shared. And for us, there is a very, very direct connection between this work and what we member states, what we decision makers have to do to make progress in the achievement of Agenda 2030. We think that the Synthesis Coalition is a great example about synergies within the UN system, and there’s much more potential to build on these synergies and to do much more. Another issue that we are particularly interested in, in the implementation of the SDGs is localization. Any other success of the 2030 Agenda is going to be a local success. We can think very big, very widely, very globally, but at the end of the day, it’s only when the SDGs start making a difference in people’s lives that things will change. And in this respect, Spain has been a champion of localization. We host the Secretariat of the Local 2030 Coalition in Spain, and this is an issue in which we are investing a great deal of both financial and political capital. So in this very positive context, we also think there is room for reflection and improvement. And one of these reflections actually touches upon your own office, your own mandate, and how the Synthesis Coalition and the system-wide evaluation office can work better together. Is it possible to find areas of complementarity, synergies, taking into account the different mandates and the different work, the different scope of work? We also think that the coalition, the Synthesis Coalition conclusions and recommendations can play a very important role for the executive boards of the agencies, funds, and programs. We want to find more connection between the work that is being done by the Synthesis Coalition and the discussions that we have as member states when we meet in the executive boards, and we make recommendations to the UN system. So there has to be a very fluid, fluid two-way conversation, so we make sure that your findings, your recommendations, then find the way through us in the recommendation that we make for the UN system. And we also think that this exercise can also elicit a lot of partnership and collaboration. operations, which maybe are not there yet, but can open up the road for that. So that would be sort of in a nutshell some of the issues that I would like to put for discussion. And I thank you again very much for the opportunity of taking part of the conversation.

Andrea Cook: Thank you, Ambassador Jiménez de La hoz, and for grounding your comments in the actual experience that we’ve been living the past two years within the coalition. It’s very helpful. I will now move on to our next speaker. We’re very honored to have Ambassador Martin Kimani join us as the Executive Director of NYU’s Center on International Cooperation and Kenya’s former permanent representative to the United Nations. Ambassador Kimani brings a wealth of experience in diplomacy and conflict resolution, and a passion for evidence. Ambassador Kimani, we look forward to hearing your insights on how international institutions and academia can better contribute to the topic for our discussions today. Over to you today, over to you.

Martin Kimani: Thank you very much, Andrea, and good afternoon. I don’t have much time, otherwise I’d give you lots of stories about how being in government means events move faster than your knowledge. And so you act before you think it all the way through. And you act usually on the basis of who you trust. And so the evidence to the people who are trusted is very important. At CRAC, we have the conviction that SDG 16 is going to be key to accelerating the fulfillment of the SDGs by 2030. And so we… do a lot of work to generate evidence on what works in SDG 16 and how can we get what works in the hands of coalitions of action that bring together officials, civil society, UN organizations and try and bring that evidence to the policy process. We do that through the building of an inequality solutions portal which is a live resource of about a hundred policies from 36 countries that cover issues from social protection to housing reform, just transitions, etc. We have a justice action coalition that we are a part of and are an important driver of which is a multi-stakeholder alliance of countries and organizations working to achieve measurable progress in justice outcomes. And just earlier today we were at the New York launch of the halving global violence task force report which brings, which analyzes a role of interpersonal violence, the impact of interpersonal violence and what evidence there is of how to cut it in half. And this is work that is being done by coalitions on the ground. We heard from the mayor of a Colombian city who had used evidence to reduce violence in the community to a 17-year low. We also work through a gender equality network for small arms control which works to reduce the impact of arms, small arms in engendered violence. The reason I bring these up other than to advertise our work is that the evidence is needed in such complex and varying ways. And so it’s very important for us to have the evidence produced by think tanks, produced by synthesis, produced by the different efforts that are going on within the world of technology, but align groups that are oriented towards action because ultimately the evidence must be brought to the ground. And so these coalitions generate trust, they generate solidarity, and they generate the momentum, the political and policy momentum. I’ll finish here with something that Bob and Anna here know, which is even before we get to the successful implementation of the SDGs by 2030, delegations here are drowning in paper and ability for experts to get synthesized evidence just from the vast trove of reports and resolutions and statements that are made here at the UN is critically important because only a few missions, actually no mission is not drowning in the process, but there’s so many missions that have very few experts, there are missions that have just less than five people working in them, and it’s going to be very crucial to bring the kind of, this coalition on evidence synthesis, I would highly recommend that you bring your attention to the United Nations. And by equalizing delegations here at the UN, they’ll be better able to engage in the debates on SDGs, and I think that will go some ways to supporting their governments. Congratulations to the launch of this exciting, exciting tool and thank you very much for inviting me to the meeting. Thank you.

Andrea Cook: Thank you, Martin. I’ll now move to the other member of our organizing team for this event, which is the International Network of Government Science Advice, and we’re now going to hear from Dr. Justine Germo-Unswunji. I hope I said that well. Justine is a plant biotechnologist and science policy expert, and she’s going to share INGSA’s perspective on strengthening the science policy interface. Over to you, Justine. Thank you.

Justine Germo Nzweundji: Thank you, Andrea. I’m very happy to be part of this important panel. I’m a member of the chairing committee of INGSA in Africa. INGSA is the International Network for Governmental Science Advice. It’s an organization gathering about 6,000 members around the world at the interface of science and policy. Those members are from about more than 100 countries. So INGSA works with individuals and organizations or institutions in terms of reinforce their capacity on science advice and also enhance evidence-informed policymaking. So my personal experience, I’ve been active through INGSA since the creation of the African chapter, and it has been a very exciting experience. On the other hand, also we have now artificial intelligence, which is the topic. INGSA community is also excited to use artificial intelligent tools in terms of gathering information, more information, wider information, timely information. And INGSA and partners are really looking forward to see how they can use artificial intelligence evidence synthesis tools in their work every day. I would just want to point out a few points. The first is the question framing, when we talk about science advice. We should be able to have input from different perspective. If not, we will be responding to the wrong question. So, this need then to be done in an inclusive way with a lot of collaboration. Another point that I want to point out is the evidence synthesis. Need to choose the right evidence. Inclusion and the diverse perspective also is important. But what I will mention here is we can take that vision in terms of field of research, in terms of language. Because some evidence can be available from one language and not for another languages, yes. In terms also of origin of evidence, where does it come from? Is it enough available, yeah. And the third point that I want to mention is the context of implementation. I heard during the presentation of the coalition the context of implementation. So, how will evidence will be carried out in a specific area? What was successful at the global level will it be implemented in another area? What training and resources needs to be part of the policy prescribing so that the global solution are relevant and also manageable in a local context under a specific condition. So, we talk about the culture, the linguistic, the economic, also the infrastructure. So, those three element, I think with the new coalition inside is ready to work closely to have better results in their work. And then specific because when we talk about science policy, When we talk about science advice or advocacy, there are two main elements which is really important. Those elements are evidence gathering, evidence synthesis. So with the tools that the coalition is presenting today, I think INSA is really ready to work together to have the better solution in their work. Thank you so much.

Andrea Cook: Thank you, Justine. And thanks for Ana, Martin, and Justine for really starting to ground this in the practical realities of what this needs to respond to. I’m now going to turn to Dr. Karla Soares-Weiser, the Editor-in-Chief of Cochrane, and Will Moy, the Chief Executive Officer of the Campbell Collaboration, who will give their perspectives from the producers of this work. Just please be mindful of time. We have four more speakers, including the two of you to go. So just keep it nice and short. Thank you. Over to you, Karla.

Karla Soares-Weiser: Thank you. Excellencies, distinguished guests, and colleagues. Today, I speak as part of a global effort to transform how we produce and use evidence. Campbell, Cochrane, and JBI, along with many others, are committed to make evidence centers more timely, relevant, and equitable. We fully support the principles of Show Me the Evidence, particularly the harmonizing global efforts to ensure equity and balance. As AI reshapes the landscape, we are excited to harness its potential while ensuring proper regulation and ethical use. One thing is clear. None of us can achieve this alone. Global challenges are complex, and if we are to contribute to the sustainable development goals, we must work together. Cochrane’s new scientific strategy focuses on key SDGs related to maternal, newborn, and child health, infectious disease, climate health, and multiple chronic conditions. We are committed to produce evidence in an inclusive way so that those most affected by health challenges can lead, contribute, and participate fully in decision making. Our goal is simple, to make evidence timely, relevant, and accessible to all. This shared commitment united us here today. And we are deeply grateful to the Malawian UK government, ESRC, welcome, the Global SDG Coalition, and a special thanks to John Laves from the Global Evidence Commission for bringing us at this moment. Thanks to your leadership, we now have a real opportunity to make a difference together. Thank you.

Andrea Cook: Will.

Will Moy: I, of course, agree with everything Carla says, and she speaks, I think, for the whole global evidence synthesis production community. Billions of people could be better off if we only used the evidence we already have and the research budgets we already have more effectively, and that’s what evidence synthesis should do. Everybody who makes decisions about the hardest problems in the world should have access to everything the world needs, knows, to solve those problems in one convenient place, whether they are sitting in a government building like this, or whether they are a teacher, a clinician, or a law enforcement officer, anywhere in the world. That’s the promise that has been made possible by these visionary investments today, and we are extremely grateful to the funders who have made those choices, and to everybody who has brought us to this stage. As somebody who only joined the Campbell Collaboration a year ago, I recognize that decades of work have gone into proving this possibility and bringing us to this point, and the years ahead are now very exciting and hard-earned by many people. I am just delighted to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with my colleagues at Cochrane, with JBI, and so many other people in the synthesis community to deliver this, and we recognize the moral responsibility on us all to make the transformative changes we can make. over the next few years thanks to this investment and the opportunity these two leading funders have created for other funders to step in and get extraordinary value for money and ultimately achieve comprehensive evidence synthesis across the entire set of the Sustainable Development Goals. Thank you all very much.

Andrea Cook: So thank you Will and Karla. We now have a slight change of tack because we’re now turning to the bridge between these seasoned experts, ministers, policy leaders and we’re going to turn now to hear from the generation that will inherit the world which the SDGs will deliver, hopefully a better and more equitable world. So we’re now going to turn to two youth reporters. Firstly Krishna Kishore Pandalaneni from India who is a Master of Public Administration at Columbia University and Reuben Pohl, a medical student at Oxford University and at Yale from Germany and we look forward to hearing their insights on leveraging evidence for effective decision-making and achievement SDGs and really bringing in their hopes as young people working at the beginning of their career to help drive forward a better future for us all. Krishna.

Krishna Kishore Pandalaneni: Thank you Andrea and it’s not easy to speak after these many distinguished speakers. From my childhood and from yours we have seen poverty, we have seen hunger and now we are speaking about climate change. All these challenges persist despite having countless well-crafted policies and significant efforts in drafting and implementing greater policies. This often leaves me wondering, what’s missing? The answer lies in evidence and access to the evidence. Without solid evidence, we can’t determine what works well, what doesn’t work, which policies truly create change and which doesn’t. Thanks to technological advancements, we now have access to vast amounts of data. Emerging technologies like AI are helping us in harnessing this data to generate evidence. If we use it effectively and responsibly, we can unlock untapped potential to drive better policies. As we celebrate the progress made in utilizing evidence and also the investment supporting this, we must keep in mind, a chain is only as strong as its weakest link. To truly leave no one behind, we must ensure the power of evidence reaches all, regardless of its nation’s size, capacity or resources. It is often the most vulnerable populations, the youth and the small territories that face the most pressing challenges. Overlooking them puts the entire system at risk. Policy failures doesn’t have boundaries, as COVID has shown us. This calls for, and I reiterate what all the distinguished speakers have stressed, the need for international cooperation. And who is the most important in all of this? The youth. They are the immediate future, the ones most impacted by today’s policies. Even the Pact for Future calls for the increased investment in youth and their meaningful participation in the decision making. Thank you.

Reuben Pohl: Good afternoon, and thank you very much to the esteemed panel from whom we’ve heard today, and thank you to the organizers for bringing this incredible event together. When discussing the Pact of the Future, Antonio Guterres emphasized the need for youth to be involved in the decision making process. directly. To achieve this, we need to broaden the decision-making process to involve anyone affected regardless of age, background, or power within the existing systems. Throughout the talks today, we have heard about new initiatives to make evidence-based decision-making more accessible and inclusive, to rely more on evidence, and to get better at knowing which evidence is reliable, and finally, to harness AI responsibly to learn more from the data that we collect. Several developments have already contributed to advancing these goals and to make the local experience more familiar. Citizen science initiatives are forming bonds between communities and researchers. Community outreach and accountability programs ensure that the knowledge we develop serves those who are affected by it most. As we develop new tools and methodologies, it will be critical to share these broadly. On an international level, we need to ensure that everyone has access to our shared knowledge, but we also need to learn to listen more deeply. We need to make our knowledge base broader by diversifying who produces evidence, who shares evidence, and which systems we consider trustworthy. If we want our efforts to serve the whole world, then those efforts should originate from and be supported by the whole world. Fueled by advances in digital technologies, organizations represented here today have already made significant strides toward that direction. As we develop new technologies, we have ever more potential to break down the remaining barriers. With AI, this trend will become even more apparent, and it is on us to harness it responsibly and to create the future that we hope for. Thank you very much.

Andrea Cook: So thank you to Krishna and to Reuben. So now I’m very pleased to hand over to Kerry Albright, the Principal Advisor and Deputy Director at the UNICEF Evaluation Office and Co-Chair of the Global STG Synthesis Coalition, who will bring us to a close. Over to you, Kerry.

Kerry Albright: Thank you, Andrea. Your Excellencies, distinguished delegates, dear partners and audience members. My job today is relatively simple, I think. It’s just to give votes of thanks to everybody who was involved in organizing this event. So it’s my great pleasure to be able to draw the Summit of the Future Action Day side event to a conclusion today. I hope that when you leave today’s event, you’ll leave as I am doing, feeling really excited and stimulated about what you’ve heard. What you’ve heard in this room is both a collective commitment, but also a sense of responsibility to really do something radically different together, not in isolation, to accelerate delivery of the STGs, based both on insights from vastly underutilized sources of evidence, but also very practical actions and next steps. It’s time to capitalize upon that momentum and to really seize this unique moment, I think, for transformational change. Events like this don’t come together overnight. I’d like to acknowledge the hard work of senior officials and other colleagues from the organizing partners, including the Malawi mission to the UN, the UK mission to the UN, UK Research and Innovation, UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, the International Network for Government and Health Science Advice, the UN STG system-wide evaluation office, and the many, many UN agencies, member states, and civil society partners making up the Global STG Synthesis Coalition. On behalf of all of the organizing partners, I’d also like to thank all of our distinguished speakers for your time today. We’ve heard really groundbreaking and transformational announcements and statements of support from many people here, the governments of Canada, Malawi, United Kingdom, and Spain, as well as from the Wellcome Trust. We’ve heard from important civil society partners and leading thinkers in the evidence synthesis and science policy. So, thank you here to colleagues from the Global Commission on Evidence to Address Societal Challenges, New York University, Cochrane, Campbell Collaboration. Many thanks for your trust and for your collaborative mindsets and helping us really to think through how we shape a bigger, better, collective vision to accelerate use of evidence to drive forward delivery of the STGs. We’ve also heard from our two fantastic youth reporters, Krishna and Ruben. The Summit of the Future, as both of them said, really rightly places an emphasis on the voices and opinions of future leaders, and this will be at the heart of our conversations in coming days. The STGs lays out a blueprint for a better world for future generations, as Andrea said, and we all need to take that responsibility, nothing about us without us, listen to colleagues around the room, future generations very seriously. And finally, of course, I’d like to thank all of you. I mean, it’s such a packed room, far more than we’d anticipated here today, especially in the light of such a rich and stimulating program and choice of events. Please do join us, help us in delivering a more sustainable, equitable, and peaceful world that is transformed by multiple forms of evidence and multiple voices. Finally, practically, I’d like to invite those of you who pre-registered for the reception event at the UK Consulate to make your way over there now. Officials from the organizing team will be very happy to show you the way. For other attendees, thank you very much once again for your support, and I believe the closing ceremony, we’re not too far over, for the Summit of the Future Action Days is now taking place in the Yirkasak Council Chamber upstairs, should you like to attend. Thank you again, and the session is formally adjourned.

A

Andrea Cook

Speech speed

115 words per minute

Speech length

1703 words

Speech time

882 seconds

Evidence synthesis is crucial for accelerating SDG progress

Explanation

Andrea Cook emphasizes the importance of evidence synthesis in driving progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). She suggests that synthesizing evidence can help bridge gaps and bring evidence to the forefront at various levels of decision-making.

Evidence

Cook mentions the need to explore the transformative power of science, digital technologies, artificial intelligence, and international collaboration to accelerate the achievement of the SDGs.

Major Discussion Point

The importance of evidence synthesis for achieving the SDGs

Agreed with

Simplex Chitiola Banda

Bob Rae

Isabelle Mercier

John-Arne Røttingen

Agreed on

Evidence synthesis is crucial for accelerating SDG progress

J

John-Arne Røttingen

Speech speed

156 words per minute

Speech length

805 words

Speech time

309 seconds

Lack of access to evidence is holding back development

Explanation

John-Arne Røttingen argues that the difficulty in accessing up-to-date scientific evidence is impeding global progress. He points out that the process of synthesizing information to deliver rigorous summaries of current knowledge is slow and labor-intensive, creating a bottleneck in development.

Evidence

Røttingen cites the example of the Zika outbreak in 2015, where a systematic review begun in May 2016 was outdated by the time it was published in January 2017 due to the rapid publication of new research papers.

Major Discussion Point

Challenges in accessing and using evidence for policymaking

Agreed with

Lord Vallance

Bob Rae

Agreed on

The role of technology and AI in enhancing evidence synthesis

S

Simplex Chitiola Banda

Speech speed

107 words per minute

Speech length

632 words

Speech time

352 seconds

Evidence synthesis can help identify what works and what doesn’t

Explanation

Simplex Chitiola Banda emphasizes the importance of evidence synthesis in determining effective policies and practices. He suggests that synthesizing evidence can help policymakers understand which interventions are successful and which are not, leading to more informed decision-making.

Evidence

Banda mentions Malawi’s commitment to evidence-based policymaking and their involvement in the Global SDG Synthesis Coalition as examples of their dedication to this approach.

Major Discussion Point

The importance of evidence synthesis for achieving the SDGs

Agreed with

Andrea Cook

Bob Rae

Isabelle Mercier

John-Arne Røttingen

Agreed on

Evidence synthesis is crucial for accelerating SDG progress

L

Lord Vallance

Speech speed

118 words per minute

Speech length

359 words

Speech time

182 seconds

AI and technology can enhance evidence synthesis capabilities

Explanation

Lord Vallance highlights the potential of artificial intelligence and technology to improve evidence synthesis. He suggests that these tools can help analyze and interpret the latest evidence more efficiently and effectively.

Evidence

Lord Vallance announces the UK government’s investment of £11.5 million in a new program to catalyze AI-driven evidence synthesis, aiming to create comprehensive suites of AI-supported evidence synthesis products.

Major Discussion Point

Initiatives and investments to improve evidence synthesis and use

Agreed with

Bob Rae

John-Arne Røttingen

Agreed on

The role of technology and AI in enhancing evidence synthesis

B

Bob Rae

Speech speed

149 words per minute

Speech length

1401 words

Speech time

562 seconds

International collaboration is key for effective evidence synthesis

Explanation

Bob Rae emphasizes the importance of international cooperation in gathering and synthesizing evidence. He argues that collaboration is essential to address global challenges and ensure that evidence-based solutions are accessible to all countries.

Evidence

Rae mentions his role in co-chairing the co-facilitation of the Doha Declaration and highlights the disparities in access to technical and financial resources between developed and developing countries.

Major Discussion Point

The importance of evidence synthesis for achieving the SDGs

Agreed with

Andrea Cook

Simplex Chitiola Banda

Isabelle Mercier

John-Arne Røttingen

Agreed on

Evidence synthesis is crucial for accelerating SDG progress

Inequalities exist in access to digital technologies and AI

Explanation

Bob Rae points out the significant disparities in access to digital technologies and AI between developed and developing countries. He argues that this inequality could lead to further gaps in development and progress towards the SDGs.

Evidence

Rae cites statistics showing that less than 15% of LDCs have access to advanced digital technologies, and about 19% of the population in sub-Saharan Africa lives outside of mobile broadband coverage.

Major Discussion Point

Challenges in accessing and using evidence for policymaking

Agreed with

Lord Vallance

John-Arne Røttingen

Agreed on

The role of technology and AI in enhancing evidence synthesis

I

Isabelle Mercier

Speech speed

154 words per minute

Speech length

941 words

Speech time

366 seconds

Evidence is often scattered and underutilized

Explanation

Isabelle Mercier highlights the problem of valuable research being overlooked or underused. She argues that there is a wealth of insights buried in scattered and forgotten research that could be valuable for achieving the SDGs.

Evidence

Mercier mentions the formation of the Global SDG Synthesis Coalition, which unites 45 UN agencies and other partners to turn fragmented information into structured, accessible, and actionable insights.

Major Discussion Point

Challenges in accessing and using evidence for policymaking

Agreed with

Andrea Cook

Simplex Chitiola Banda

Bob Rae

John-Arne Røttingen

Agreed on

Evidence synthesis is crucial for accelerating SDG progress

M

Martin Kimani

Speech speed

127 words per minute

Speech length

591 words

Speech time

278 seconds

Policymakers face time constraints in accessing evidence

Explanation

Martin Kimani highlights the challenge policymakers face in accessing and using evidence due to time constraints. He argues that events often move faster than knowledge acquisition, leading to actions based on trust rather than comprehensive evidence.

Evidence

Kimani mentions the work of the Center on International Cooperation in generating evidence on SDG 16 and bringing it to policy processes through coalitions of action.

Major Discussion Point

Challenges in accessing and using evidence for policymaking

Agreed with

John-Arne Røttingen

Justine Germo Nzweundji

Karla Soares-Weiser

Will Moy

Agreed on

Challenges in accessing and using evidence for policymaking

J

Justine Germo Nzweundji

Speech speed

128 words per minute

Speech length

486 words

Speech time

227 seconds

Language and cultural barriers affect evidence accessibility

Explanation

Justine Germo Nzweundji points out that language and cultural differences can create barriers to accessing and using evidence. She argues that evidence synthesis needs to consider diverse perspectives and sources to be truly inclusive and effective.

Evidence

Nzweundji mentions the importance of considering evidence from different languages and origins to ensure a comprehensive synthesis.

Major Discussion Point

Challenges in accessing and using evidence for policymaking

Agreed with

John-Arne Røttingen

Martin Kimani

Karla Soares-Weiser

Will Moy

Agreed on

Challenges in accessing and using evidence for policymaking

K

Karla Soares-Weiser

Speech speed

111 words per minute

Speech length

233 words

Speech time

125 seconds

Evidence synthesis needs to be timely and relevant

Explanation

Karla Soares-Weiser emphasizes the need for evidence synthesis to be timely and relevant to decision-makers. She argues that evidence centers should focus on making their work more accessible and applicable to real-world policy needs.

Evidence

Soares-Weiser mentions Cochrane’s new scientific strategy focusing on key SDGs related to maternal, newborn, and child health, infectious disease, climate health, and multiple chronic conditions.

Major Discussion Point

Challenges in accessing and using evidence for policymaking

Agreed with

John-Arne Røttingen

Martin Kimani

Justine Germo Nzweundji

Will Moy

Agreed on

Challenges in accessing and using evidence for policymaking

W

Will Moy

Speech speed

160 words per minute

Speech length

279 words

Speech time

104 seconds

Evidence synthesis needs to be timely and relevant

Explanation

Will Moy emphasizes the importance of making evidence synthesis timely and relevant for decision-makers. He argues that everyone making decisions about complex global problems should have easy access to synthesized evidence from around the world.

Major Discussion Point

Challenges in accessing and using evidence for policymaking

Agreed with

John-Arne Røttingen

Martin Kimani

Justine Germo Nzweundji

Karla Soares-Weiser

Agreed on

Challenges in accessing and using evidence for policymaking

A

Ana Jiménez de la Hoz

Speech speed

0 words per minute

Speech length

0 words

Speech time

1 seconds

Spain championing localization of SDGs and evidence use

Explanation

Ana Jiménez de la Hoz highlights Spain’s commitment to localizing the SDGs and promoting evidence-based policymaking. She emphasizes the importance of making SDG implementation relevant at the local level and using evidence to inform decision-making.

Evidence

Jiménez de la Hoz mentions that Spain hosts the Secretariat of the Local 2030 Coalition and is investing both financial and political capital in localization efforts.

Major Discussion Point

Initiatives and investments to improve evidence synthesis and use

K

Krishna Kishore Pandalaneni

Speech speed

142 words per minute

Speech length

288 words

Speech time

121 seconds

Youth should be involved in decision-making processes

Explanation

Krishna Kishore Pandalaneni argues for the importance of involving youth in decision-making processes related to the SDGs. He emphasizes that young people are the immediate future and are most impacted by today’s policies.

Evidence

Pandalaneni references the Pact for Future, which calls for increased investment in youth and their meaningful participation in decision-making.

Major Discussion Point

The role of youth and future generations in evidence-based policymaking

Youth are the immediate future and most impacted by today’s policies

Explanation

Krishna Kishore Pandalaneni emphasizes that young people are the ones who will be most affected by current policy decisions. He argues that their involvement in decision-making processes is crucial for addressing future challenges effectively.

Major Discussion Point

The role of youth and future generations in evidence-based policymaking

R

Reuben Pohl

Speech speed

129 words per minute

Speech length

320 words

Speech time

148 seconds

Citizen science initiatives can bridge communities and researchers

Explanation

Reuben Pohl highlights the potential of citizen science initiatives to create connections between communities and researchers. He argues that these initiatives can help make local experiences more familiar and relevant in the research process.

Major Discussion Point

The role of youth and future generations in evidence-based policymaking

Evidence needs to serve those most affected by policies

Explanation

Reuben Pohl emphasizes the importance of ensuring that evidence and knowledge serve those who are most affected by policies. He argues for the need to make the decision-making process more inclusive and responsive to diverse perspectives.

Evidence

Pohl mentions community outreach and accountability programs as examples of efforts to ensure that knowledge serves those most affected by it.

Major Discussion Point

The role of youth and future generations in evidence-based policymaking

Diversity in evidence production and sharing is crucial

Explanation

Reuben Pohl argues for the importance of diversity in the production and sharing of evidence. He emphasizes the need to broaden the knowledge base by including diverse voices and perspectives in the evidence synthesis process.

Major Discussion Point

The role of youth and future generations in evidence-based policymaking

Agreements

Agreement Points

Evidence synthesis is crucial for accelerating SDG progress

Speakers

Andrea Cook

Simplex Chitiola Banda

Bob Rae

Isabelle Mercier

John-Arne Røttingen

Arguments

Evidence synthesis is crucial for accelerating SDG progress

Evidence synthesis can help identify what works and what doesn’t

International collaboration is key for effective evidence synthesis

Evidence is often scattered and underutilized

Lack of access to evidence is holding back development

Summary

Multiple speakers emphasized the importance of evidence synthesis in driving progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by identifying effective interventions and policies.

Challenges in accessing and using evidence for policymaking

Speakers

John-Arne Røttingen

Martin Kimani

Justine Germo Nzweundji

Karla Soares-Weiser

Will Moy

Arguments

Lack of access to evidence is holding back development

Policymakers face time constraints in accessing evidence

Language and cultural barriers affect evidence accessibility

Evidence synthesis needs to be timely and relevant

Summary

Several speakers highlighted various challenges in accessing and using evidence for policymaking, including time constraints, language barriers, and the need for timely and relevant synthesis.

The role of technology and AI in enhancing evidence synthesis

Speakers

Lord Vallance

Bob Rae

John-Arne Røttingen

Arguments

AI and technology can enhance evidence synthesis capabilities

Inequalities exist in access to digital technologies and AI

Lack of access to evidence is holding back development

Summary

Speakers discussed the potential of AI and technology to improve evidence synthesis while also acknowledging the inequalities in access to these technologies.

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers emphasized the importance of involving youth in decision-making processes and ensuring that evidence serves those most affected by policies, particularly future generations.

Speakers

Krishna Kishore Pandalaneni

Reuben Pohl

Arguments

Youth should be involved in decision-making processes

Youth are the immediate future and most impacted by today’s policies

Evidence needs to serve those most affected by policies

Diversity in evidence production and sharing is crucial

Unexpected Consensus

Localization of SDGs and evidence use

Speakers

Ana Jiménez de la Hoz

Reuben Pohl

Arguments

Spain championing localization of SDGs and evidence use

Citizen science initiatives can bridge communities and researchers

Explanation

Despite representing different perspectives (government and youth), both speakers emphasized the importance of localizing SDG implementation and involving communities in the research and evidence-gathering process.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of agreement included the importance of evidence synthesis for SDG progress, challenges in accessing and using evidence for policymaking, the role of technology and AI in enhancing evidence synthesis, and the need for inclusive and diverse approaches to evidence production and use.

Consensus level

There was a high level of consensus among speakers on the importance of evidence synthesis and the need for improved access to evidence. This consensus suggests a strong foundation for collaborative efforts to enhance evidence-based policymaking for SDG achievement. However, there were also nuanced perspectives on implementation challenges and the role of different stakeholders, indicating the need for continued dialogue and diverse approaches to address these issues.

Disagreements

Overall Assessment

Summary

There were no significant disagreements among the speakers. The discussion was largely characterized by agreement on the importance of evidence synthesis, the need for international collaboration, and the potential of AI and technology in advancing SDG progress.

Disagreement level

The level of disagreement among the speakers was minimal. This high level of agreement implies a strong consensus on the importance of evidence-based decision-making and the need for improved access to synthesized evidence for achieving the SDGs. However, it also suggests that the discussion may have lacked diverse perspectives or critical challenges to the proposed approaches.

Partial Agreements

Partial Agreements

Both speakers agree on the importance of AI and technology in evidence synthesis, but Bob Rae emphasizes the existing inequalities in access to these technologies, while Lord Vallance focuses on their potential benefits without addressing the access issue.

Speakers

Bob Rae

Lord Vallance

Arguments

Inequalities exist in access to digital technologies and AI

AI and technology can enhance evidence synthesis capabilities

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers emphasized the importance of involving youth in decision-making processes and ensuring that evidence serves those most affected by policies, particularly future generations.

Speakers

Krishna Kishore Pandalaneni

Reuben Pohl

Arguments

Youth should be involved in decision-making processes

Youth are the immediate future and most impacted by today’s policies

Evidence needs to serve those most affected by policies

Diversity in evidence production and sharing is crucial

Takeaways

Key Takeaways

Evidence synthesis is crucial for accelerating progress on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

There are significant challenges in accessing and using evidence for policymaking, including scattered information, time constraints, and inequalities in access to technology

Major initiatives and investments are being launched to improve evidence synthesis and use, including the Global SDG Synthesis Coalition and significant funding from the UK government and Wellcome Trust

Youth involvement and diverse perspectives are essential for effective evidence-based policymaking and SDG achievement

Resolutions and Action Items

UK government to invest £11.5 million in AI-driven evidence synthesis

Wellcome Trust to commit £45 million to living evidence synthesis over 5 years

Global SDG Synthesis Coalition to develop synthesis reports on various SDG topics, including peace and social protection

ECOSOC President to call special meetings on AI and evidence use for SDGs

Cochrane and Campbell Collaboration to support global evidence synthesis efforts

Unresolved Issues

How to ensure equitable access to AI and digital technologies across all countries

How to effectively integrate local context and knowledge into global evidence synthesis

How to balance the speed of AI-driven synthesis with the need for rigorous and ethical evidence production

How to sustainably fund and coordinate global evidence synthesis efforts beyond initial investments

Suggested Compromises

Balancing global evidence synthesis with localization of SDGs and evidence use

Combining AI-driven methods with human expertise and ethical considerations in evidence synthesis

Integrating multiple forms of evidence and voices, including youth perspectives, in policymaking processes

Thought Provoking Comments

We are on the cusp of having every impact study in the world about education with all the data extracted, with all the risk of bias assessments done. And once that’s done, it can be served up in many different ways. It can be served up by best buys. It can be served up by broad approach like peer tutoring. It can be served up by branded programs. So if politicians are being lobbied, they can look to see what the evidence is.

Speaker

John Lavis

Reason

This comment provides a concrete vision for how synthesized evidence could be made accessible and actionable for decision-makers in unprecedented ways.

Impact

It shifted the conversation from abstract concepts to tangible possibilities, inspiring excitement about the potential real-world applications of the evidence synthesis work being discussed.

As AI reshapes the landscape, we are excited to harness its potential while ensuring proper regulation and ethical use. One thing is clear. None of us can achieve this alone. Global challenges are complex, and if we are to contribute to the sustainable development goals, we must work together.

Speaker

Karla Soares-Weiser

Reason

This comment thoughtfully addresses both the opportunities and challenges presented by AI in evidence synthesis, while emphasizing the need for collaboration.

Impact

It helped frame AI as a tool to be carefully leveraged rather than an automatic solution, and reinforced the importance of partnership across organizations and sectors.

We are at a real inflection point in the life of the world. We have a new technology that’s coming available. We have a challenge before us with respect to the sustainable development goals, which, as I call them, are really just the common sense of humankind. What do we need to be able to do in order to live decent lives? That’s what the sustainable development goals are, nothing more and nothing less. But if we do not marshal all these resources, we will be even worse off, frankly, than we are today in terms of the fundamental challenge, which is not that we don’t have prosperity among us. We do. Not that we don’t have exciting technological discussion going on. We all do. The problem is we don’t have available to everyone, and many people are being left badly behind.

Speaker

Bob Rae

Reason

This comment powerfully frames the SDGs as fundamental human needs and highlights the urgency of leveraging new technologies to address global inequalities.

Impact

It set a tone of moral imperative for the discussion, emphasizing that the work being discussed is not just about efficiency but about fundamental human wellbeing and equity.

Today I am announcing that Wellcome’s intention is to provide around 45 million pounds, around $60 million over the coming five years to boost what we can call living evidence synthesis.

Speaker

John-Arne Røttingen

Reason

This announcement of significant funding demonstrates concrete commitment to the ideas being discussed.

Impact

It shifted the conversation from theoretical possibilities to practical implementation, giving weight and momentum to the initiatives being proposed.

Overall Assessment

These key comments shaped the discussion by grounding abstract concepts in concrete possibilities, emphasizing the moral imperative of the work, highlighting the need for careful and collaborative approaches to new technologies, and demonstrating tangible commitment through funding announcements. They collectively moved the conversation from theoretical discussion to practical action, while maintaining a focus on the ultimate goal of improving human lives through better use of evidence in pursuit of the SDGs.

Follow-up Questions

How can we ensure equitable access to AI and digital technologies across all countries, particularly in least developed countries?

Speaker

Bob Rae

Explanation

This is crucial to prevent widening inequality gaps as AI advances

How can we combat disinformation and misuse of social media that hinders progress on SDGs?

Speaker

Bob Rae

Explanation

Addressing this is essential for building public support for SDG efforts

How can the Synthesis Coalition and UN system-wide evaluation office work better together?

Speaker

Ana Jiménez de la Hoz

Explanation

Finding synergies between these efforts could improve overall effectiveness

How can the Synthesis Coalition’s work be better integrated into UN executive board discussions?

Speaker

Ana Jiménez de la Hoz

Explanation

This could help ensure findings inform UN system recommendations

How can evidence synthesis tools be applied to help UN delegations better process the large volume of reports and resolutions?

Speaker

Martin Kimani

Explanation

This could help smaller delegations engage more effectively in SDG debates

How can we ensure evidence synthesis includes diverse perspectives in terms of research fields, languages, and origins?

Speaker

Justine Germo Nzweundji

Explanation

This is important for creating truly comprehensive and inclusive evidence

How can we ensure global evidence and solutions are relevant and implementable in local contexts?

Speaker

Justine Germo Nzweundji

Explanation

This is crucial for effective implementation of SDG efforts globally

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed.

A Digital Future for All (afternoon sessions)

A Digital Future for All (afternoon sessions)

Session at a Glance

Summary

This discussion focused on the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in shaping a digital future that benefits humanity. The event brought together leaders from government, technology, civil society, and international organizations to explore how to harness digital technologies and AI for sustainable development while addressing potential risks.

Key themes included the importance of inclusivity, bridging the digital divide, and ensuring AI governance is rooted in human rights. Speakers emphasized the need for multi-stakeholder cooperation and global governance frameworks to guide AI development. The United Nations was highlighted as uniquely positioned to facilitate this process due to its global reach and legitimacy.

Participants discussed both the transformative potential of AI to accelerate progress on sustainable development goals and the need to mitigate risks like bias, privacy concerns, and potential misuse. The importance of building capacity, especially in developing countries, was stressed to prevent an “AI divide” from emerging.

Recommendations from the UN’s High-Level Advisory Body on AI were presented, including proposals for a global AI capacity network, an international scientific panel on AI, and mechanisms to foster inclusive AI development. Speakers noted the urgency of action, given AI’s rapid advancement.

The discussion concluded on an optimistic note, with participants expressing hope that early engagement on AI governance could help steer the technology towards benefiting humanity. However, they emphasized sustained effort and cooperation would be needed to realize this vision of an inclusive, sustainable digital future for all.

Keypoints

Major discussion points:

– The importance of developing AI and digital technologies in an inclusive, ethical way that benefits all of humanity

– The need for global cooperation and governance frameworks for AI, with the UN playing a key role

– Bridging the digital divide and ensuring developing countries can participate in and benefit from AI advancements

– Balancing the opportunities of AI with potential risks and challenges

– Implementing the Global Digital Compact and moving from principles to concrete actions

Overall purpose/goal:

The discussion aimed to highlight the transformative potential of AI and digital technologies while emphasizing the need for responsible development and governance to ensure these technologies benefit all of humanity. It sought to build momentum for global cooperation on AI governance through initiatives like the Global Digital Compact.

Tone:

The overall tone was optimistic and forward-looking, with speakers emphasizing the positive potential of AI while acknowledging challenges. There was a sense of urgency about the need to act quickly to shape AI’s development. The tone became more action-oriented towards the end, focusing on next steps and implementation.

Speakers

Moderators/Facilitators:

– Redi Thlabi – Journalist and TV Host Al Jazeera English

– Tumi Makgabo – In Africa World Wide Media

Speakers:

– Ian Bremmer – Political Scientist, President of Eurasia Group and GZERO Media

– Ebba Busch – Minister for Energy, Business and Industry and Deputy Prime Minister of Sweden

– Sundar Pichai – CEO, Google and Alphabet

– Felix Mutati – Minister of Technology and Science, Zambia

– Margrethe Vestager – Executive Vice President of the European Union

– Rebeca Grynspan – Secretary-General, United Nations Trade and Development (UNCTAD)

– Omar Al Olama – Minister of State for Artificial Intelligence, Digital Economy and Remote Work in the United Arab Emirates

– Josephine Teo – Minister for Digital Development and Information, Singapore

– Nnenna Nwakanma – Digital Policy, Advocacy and Cooperation Strategist

– Carme Artigas – Former Secretary of State for Digitalisation and AI of Spain and Co-Chair of the Secretary-General’s High-level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence

– James Manyika – Senior VP, Google-Alphabet and Co-Chair of the Secretary-General’s High-level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence

– Vilas Dhar – President and Trustee, Patrick J. McGovern Foundation

– Jian Wang – CTO and Founder, Alibaba Cloud

– Volker Türk, High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)

– Alondra Nelson – Harold F. Linder Professor, Institute for Advanced Study

– Mokgweetsi Masisi – President of Botswana

– Amandeep Singh Gill – UN Secretary-General’s Envoy on Technology

– Achim Steiner – Administrator of UNDP

– Doreen Bogdan-Martin – Secretary-General of the ITU

The speakers represent a diverse range of expertise including government leadership, technology industry executives, civil society representatives, academics, and leaders of international organizations. Their areas of focus include artificial intelligence, digital development, human rights, sustainable development, and global governance.

Full session report

The Global Digital Compact and AI Governance: Shaping a Digital Future for All

This high-level discussion brought together diverse leaders from government, technology, civil society, and international organizations to explore the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in shaping an inclusive digital future. The conversation centered on the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the need for responsible AI development and governance to benefit all of humanity.

Key Themes and Agreements

1. The Global Digital Compact as a Foundation for AI Governance

There was broad consensus on the importance of the Global Digital Compact as a starting point for global AI governance. Speakers like Carme Artigas and Omar Al Olama emphasized the unique position of the United Nations to lead this effort. James Manyika stressed the need for a multi-stakeholder approach, which was echoed by other participants. Volker Turk noted that the GDC builds on existing human rights frameworks, stating, “The Global Digital Compact is firmly anchored in human rights.”

2. AI’s Potential for Sustainable Development

Speakers agreed on AI’s transformative potential to accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goals. Felix Mutati highlighted AI’s ability to transform lives in rural areas, saying, “AI has the potential to leapfrog development.” However, many stressed the need to bridge the digital divide to prevent an AI divide, emphasizing the importance of building AI capacity in developing countries.

3. Balancing Innovation and Risk Mitigation

There was general agreement on the need for a balanced approach to AI governance that promotes innovation while mitigating risks. Margrethe Vestager emphasized the importance of enforceable AI regulation, while Carme Artigas highlighted the need to balance innovation and risk mitigation.

4. Human Rights and Community Engagement

Speakers like Volker Turk and Alondra Nelson emphasized the importance of grounding AI governance and development in existing human rights frameworks. Vilas Dhar highlighted the importance of community engagement in AI development, challenging the typical narrative of top-down control in governance.

5. Scientific Research and Understanding of AI

Multiple speakers, including James Manyika, Dr. Wang Jian, and Alondra Nelson, stressed the importance of scientific research to better understand AI systems and their impacts. Manyika proposed “a real-time scientific panel on AI developments,” while Nelson drew parallels to rapid scientific developments during the COVID-19 pandemic.

6. Role of the Private Sector

James Manyika and others discussed the crucial role of the private sector in AI governance. Manyika emphasized the need for collaboration, stating, “We need everybody at the table – governments, civil society, academia, and the private sector.”

7. Capacity Building and Infrastructure

Many speakers emphasized the importance of capacity building and infrastructure development for AI in developing countries. Nnenna Nwakanma’s statement, “Connect the schools. Connect the young people. Connect my children,” refocused the conversation on practical, human-centered outcomes of digital development.

Key Recommendations and Action Items

1. Recommendations from the UN High-Level Advisory Body on AI, as discussed by Ian Bremmer and panelists, including:

– Establishing a global fund for AI for sustainable development

– Creating an international scientific panel on AI

– Developing a global AI capacity-building program

2. Proposal to make an online platform available for public input on the Global Digital Compact after its adoption

3. Emphasis on building AI capacity and infrastructure in developing countries to prevent an AI divide

4. Focus on sustainable and ethical AI development practices, as highlighted by Alondra Nelson

5. Plan to potentially adopt the Global Digital Compact at the upcoming Summit of the Future

Thought-Provoking Insights

1. Vilas Dhar reframed governance as a collaborative process involving multiple stakeholders, not just governments and tech companies.

2. Mokgweetsi Masisi highlighted the interconnection between digital divides, global inequality, and gender disparities.

3. Alondra Nelson acknowledged the limitations of current knowledge about AI systems, emphasizing the need for ongoing research and understanding.

Unresolved Issues and Future Directions

Despite the productive discussion, several issues remain to be addressed:

1. Specific mechanisms for enforcing AI governance globally

2. Details on implementation of the proposed global fund on AI

3. How to effectively balance AI development with sustainability and climate concerns

4. Concrete steps to ensure AI benefits reach marginalized communities

In conclusion, the discussion demonstrated a high level of consensus on fundamental principles and goals for AI governance, providing a strong foundation for global cooperation. The conversation evolved from high-level policy talk to considering concrete actions and their impacts on diverse communities, particularly in the Global South. The Global Digital Compact emerges as a crucial starting point for global AI governance, with emphasis on multi-stakeholder involvement, scientific research, capacity building, and human rights-centered approaches. As Amandeep Singh Gill noted, “The Global Digital Compact is our chance to shape our digital future.” The stage is set for continued dialogue and action on shaping an inclusive, sustainable digital future for all.

Session Transcript

Redi Thlabi: I think the applause was loudest this side. You’re very generous. Thank you. Good afternoon. Honored delegates, ladies and gentlemen. My name is Redi Thlabi. I’m a broadcast journalist, a moderator, an MC from Johannesburg, South Africa, delighted to be a visitor in the United States. I noticed that when the lunch break was announced, many of you did not leave. That tells me that you were in this room this morning when the answer to why we are here was provided. In the morning, we saw the real impact of digital tools, of artificial intelligence enabling human flourishing. Who can forget Adit, a young lady who grew up in a refugee camp, but she was able to access learning. She was able to connect with other young people from other parts of the world because she had the technology to do so. Who can forget how we witnessed the ability to get mobility after an acute injury. The mobility that you and I take for granted, but when you lose it, you need technology, you need innovation to help you be a part of the global community. You were in this room when we saw how technological tools can be enabled to respond to the planetary crisis that we are all facing today. That’s what happened this morning. So what are we doing this afternoon? We are here to ensure that those case studies that we heard about in the morning are not just the exception, but they become the norm. We are here to renew our commitments, to find solutions to the crises that we face, to ensure that we create a global digital architecture, a compact that is human-centered, that is secure, that is efficient, that is accessible to all. Because if we don’t do this, we create other frontiers of inequality. I come from Africa, I’m a part of the Global South, and we see very much how often we feel as if the world is advancing without us, even though we have the expertise, the agency, the tools, the willingness. But without the investment, without being invited into the table as we find these digital solutions, then this inequality will deepen. And so we convene today at a very hopeful moment. In a few hours, the Global Digital Compact may just become a reality. You will hear a lot about it. It has several themes that resonate. It’s about collaboration, creating policy, bringing all the stakeholders together to ensure that the case studies that we heard about in the morning become a global norm so that we all become citizens of a world where technology and AI are accessible, they are free, they are secure, and they are rooted, they are rooted in human flourishing. That’s what today is all about. But to situate us in the moment, let’s watch this very short video about the Global Digital Compact just to get a sense of the process and how it unfolded.

Official Video: GDC has been a very optimistic and constructive process during the past 18 months with broad participation from multi-stakeholders. And with GDC, we see that every country and every member state of the United Nations will have better possibilities of implementing the SDG agenda. Co-facilitators of the Global Digital Compact are so excited that we’ve come to this moment where we can actually indulge the Global Digital Compact. We as co-facilitators have engaged with yourselves. over many many hours. Over hundreds, thousands of delegates have put in their work and now it’s time to really look at this document and adopt it. And so we’re very excited that we’ve really come to this point and welcome you to this event. Thank you very much. The Global Digital Compact provides an opportunity to close the digital divide. It also provides an opportunity for Africa to engage as well as civil society organizations to engage way better at the United Nations level. The Global Digital Compact should be implemented through a multi-stakeholder process so that everyone, everywhere, can thrive in the age of AI. Governments must protect and support the people who build and govern digital public goods, like Wikipedia, which is run by volunteers who share knowledge in over 300 languages. Thank you very much for this outstanding opportunity to share with all of you how private and public collaboration can help achieve the goals of the Global Digital Compact. We at TIGO, we build broadband networks across all the communities we operate in. We call them digital highways because they provide the highways that bring our communities to the digital economy and it takes the work of everyone involved, public, private sector, everyone, so that those digital highways get built for the betterment of our communities are for the inclusion of everyone in them into the digital economy of the 21st century. Let’s make it happen together. I’m delighted to welcome the Global Digital Compact and to see that children’s rights are at the heart of this declaration. Children’s charities across the world have collaborated closely with co-facilitators and the UN Tech Envoy for two years to shape this important compact. We welcome that it now underscores a unified commitment for children’s rights and safety. I hope all will live by its words and will move from words to action. States have made bold commitments. They must now translate them into concrete actions. Equally, tech companies must not be exempt and be held accountable for the services they deliver to children. The Global Digital Compact has been a crucial platform for diverse stakeholders like me to come together and shape the future of a digital world that benefits everyone. It has fostered a sense of shared responsibility and ownership. I believe that the GDC we contributed will play a vital role in shaping a digital world.

Redi Thlabi: Thank you very much. Thank you. You will have an opportunity to make your inputs to ensure that the Global Digital Compact becomes a reality. Once it’s been adopted by world leaders, the online platform will be available tomorrow and you can share your inputs. Ladies and gentlemen, please help me welcome the Deputy Prime Minister of Sweden, Ebba Busch.

Ebba Busch: Excellencies, distinguished colleagues, ladies and gentlemen. I was suggesting earlier here when we were waiting for things to start, soon someone has to get up on stage and start singing. I’m not gonna sing here today but we’re going to talk about the digital era that we have just entered fully on now. And we’re living in an era where digital and emerging technologies, where they’re really reshaping almost every single aspect of our lives. our lives. The digital transformation presents us with unprecedented opportunities to really accelerate our work towards the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals. To fulfil those opportunities, we need to cooperate across all levels, and certainly, of course, including the UN. Sweden has, together with Zambia, had the honour of facilitating the negotiations on the Global Digital Compact that we are soon going to adopt. The Compact outlines our collective commitment to a digital future that is inclusive, that is open, that is sustainable, fair, safe and secure. And it seeks to close those digital divides and accelerate progress across the Sustainable Development Goals. Sweden is my home country, and Sweden is also home to some of the most innovative companies in the world that are enabling and driving the global digital transition forward. To truly harness this power of digital technology for a better and more sustainable future, we need an approach that involves all stakeholders. It is only by bringing together the excellent researchers, innovative companies, efficient authorities and multilateral organisations that we can create a well-functioning innovation system that works for everyone. Artificial intelligence, AI, plays a central role in this context. It has the potential to revolutionise how we work, learn and connect with one another. Yet, we must also acknowledge the challenges and risks that come with it. Of course, like so many of the new emerging technologies, AI can be used for both good and for harm. This is why it is crucial that we work together to establish common norms and governance structures that guide the use of AI in such a way that it truly, truly benefits humanity. And at the same time, limit its proliferation into areas of use that may threaten our common security, development, and future. We need a global conversation to build a shared understanding of both the opportunities and the challenges of AI. And in this regards, I really like to emphasize the Compact’s initiative to launch a global dialogue on AI governance, which engages governments and stakeholders in developing standards that prioritizes human rights, that prioritizes safety and sustainability. Increased investment will be crucial to scale up AI capacity, building for sustainable development. Taking into account the recommendations of the High-Level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence, the GDC encourages the establishment of a global fund on AI that is complementary to relevant UN funding mechanisms. Additionally, an international scientific panel on AI could offer valuable guidance on the global community on AI development. Sweden has long championed an open, free, and secure internet. And we believe that digital technology should be used to strengthen human rights. We have a responsibility to turn our vision of a digital future future into concrete actions that make a real difference. This means we must collaborate across borders and sectors, and we must all take responsibility to ensure that the digital transformation benefits everyone. Sweden is committed to continuing its leadership in this global process, and we look forward to working with all of you to unlock the potential of digitalization and to ensure that we build a future where digital technology truly serves all of humanity. And with that, I’d like to end with somewhat of a more personal reflection and personal note as a citizen of the world, as a mother of two. My two children back home in Sweden, they’re named Elise and Birger, they’re seven and nine years old. I was this much pregnant when I got elected party leader for my party for 10 years ago. And I’m happy and I’m proud to be able to say to them, because they are now, I mean, they are the generation that are growing up not knowing what life was like before internet, you know? Can you imagine? And I’m proud to be able to say to them that we are now truly taking their rights in the digitalized era seriously, because I’ve said so many times that a childhood in freedom requires safety online. And thank you. And it really is so. We’ve said it so many times, but you can’t say it enough times. Children’s rights are human rights. Women’s rights are human rights. And we are now bringing human rights and the sustainable developmental goals online, finally. Thank you.

Redi Thlabi: Deputy Prime Minister, thank you for your energy and inspiring case studies that you shared. Without much ado, let us hear another keynote this afternoon from the CEO of Google, Sundar Pichai.

Sundar Pichai: Mr. Secretary General, President of the General Assembly, Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, it’s a privilege to join you today. I am energized by the Summit’s focus on the future. We have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to unlock human potential for everyone, everywhere. I believe that technology is a foundational enabler of progress. Just as the Internet and mobile devices expanded opportunities for people around the world, now AI is poised to accelerate progress at unprecedented scale. I’m here today to make the case for three things. Why I believe AI is so transformative. How it can be applied to benefit humanity and make progress on the UN Sustainable Development Goals. And where we can drive deeper partnerships to ensure that the technology benefits everyone. But first, let me share why this is so important to me personally and to Google as a company. Growing up in Chennai, India with my family, the arrival of each new technology improved our lives in meaningful ways. Our first rotary phone saved us hours of travel to the hospital to get test results. Our first refrigerator gave us more time to spend as a family rather than rushing to cook ingredients before they spoil. The technology that changed my life the most was the computer. I didn’t have much access to one growing up. When I came to graduate school in the U.S., there were labs full of machines I could use anytime I wanted. It was mind-blowing. Access to computing inspired me to pursue a career where I could bring technology to more people. And that path led me to Google 20 years ago. I was excited by its mission to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful. That mission has had incredible impact. Google Search democratized information access, opened up opportunities in education and entrepreneurship. Platforms like Chrome and Android helped bring 1 billion people online. Today, 15 of our products serve more than half a billion people and businesses each, and 6 of them each serve more than 2 billion. There is no cost to use them, and most of our users are in the developing world. Today we are working on the most transformative technology yet, AI. We’ve been investing in AI research, tools, and infrastructure for two decades because it’s the most profound way we can deliver on our mission and improve people’s lives. I want to talk today about four of the biggest opportunities we see, many of which align with the SDGs. One is helping people access the world’s knowledge in their own language. Using AI, in just the last year we have added 110 new languages to Google Translate, spoken by half a billion people around the world. That brings our total to 246 languages, and we are working towards 1,000 of the world’s most spoken languages. A second area is accelerating scientific discovery to benefit humanity. Our AlphaFold breakthrough is solving big challenges in predicting some of the building blocks of life, including proteins. and DNA. We have opened up AlphaFold to the scientific community free of charge and it has been accessed by more than 2 million researchers from over 190 countries. 30% are in the developing world. For example, over 25,000 researchers just in Brazil. Globally, AlphaFold is being used in research that could help make crops more resistant to disease, discover new drugs in areas like malaria vaccines and cancer treatments and much more. A third opportunity is helping people in the path of climate-related disaster, building on the UN’s initiative, Early Warnings for All. Our Flood Hub system provides early warnings up to seven days in advance, helping protect over 460 million people in over 80 countries. And for millions in the path of wildfires, our boundary tracking systems are already in 22 countries on Google Maps. We also just announced FireSat technology, which will use satellites to detect and track early-stage wildfires, with imagery updated every 20 minutes globally so firefighters can respond. AI gives a boost in accuracy, speed and scale. Fourth, we see the opportunity for AI to meaningfully contribute to economic progress. It’s already enabling entrepreneurs and small businesses, empowering governments to provide public services, and boosting productivity across sectors. Some studies show that AI could boost global labor productivity by 1.4 percentage points and increase global GDP by 7% within the next decade. For example, AI is helping improve operations and logistics in emerging markets, where connectivity, infrastructure and traffic congestion are big challenges. Freight startup Gary Logistics in Ethiopia is using AI to help move goods to market faster and bring more work opportunities to freelance drivers. These are just very early examples, and there are so many others across education, health, and sustainability. As technology improves, so will the benefits. As with any emerging technology, AI will have limitations, be it issues with accuracy, factuality, and bias, as well as the risks of misapplication and misuse, like the creation of deep fakes. It also presents new complexities. For example, the impact on the future of work. For all these reasons, we believe that AI must be developed, deployed, and used responsibly from the start. We are guided by our AI principles, which we published back in 2018. And we work with others across the industry, academia, the UN, and governments in efforts like the Frontier Model Forum, the OECD, and the G7 Hiroshima process. But I want to talk about another risk that I worry about. I think about where I grew up and how fortunate I was to have access to technology, even if it came slowly. Not everyone had that experience. And while good progress has been made by UN institutions like the ITU, gaps persist today in the form of a well-known digital divide. With AI, we have the chance to be inclusive from the start and to ensure that the digital divide doesn’t become an AI divide. This is a challenge that needs to be met by the private sector and public sector working together. We can focus on three key areas. First is digital infrastructure. Google has made big investments globally in subsea and terrestrial fiber optic cables. One connects Africa with Europe. And two others will be the first intercontinental fiber optic routes. that connect Asia-Pacific and South America, and Australia and Africa. These fiber optic routes stitch together our network of 40 cloud regions around the world that provide digital services to governments, entrepreneurs, SMBs, and companies across all sectors. In addition to compute access, we also open up our technology to others. We did this with Android, and now our Gemma AI models are open to developers and researchers, and we’ll continue to invest here. A second area is about investing in people. That starts with making sure people have the skills they need to seize new opportunities. Our Grow with Google program has already trained 100 million people around the world in digital skills. And today, I’m proud to announce our Global AI Opportunity Fund. This will invest $120 million to make AI education and training available in communities around the world. We are providing this in local languages, in partnerships with nonprofits and NGOs. We are also helping to support entrepreneurs for the AI revolution. In Brazil, we worked with thousands of women entrepreneurs to use Google AI to grow their businesses. In Asia, where fewer than 6% of startups are founded by women, we are providing many with mentorship, capital, and training. The third area is one where we especially need the help of member countries and leaders in this room, creating an enabling policy environment, one that addresses both the risks and worries around new technologies, and also encourages the kind of applications that improve lives at scale. This requires a few things. Government policymaking that supports investments in infrastructure, people. and innovation that benefits humanity. Country development strategies and frameworks like the Global Digital Compact that prioritize the adoption of AI solutions. And smart product regulation that mitigates harms and resists national protectionist impulses that could widen an AI divide and limit AI’s benefits. We are excited to be your partner and to work with you to make sure bold innovations are deployed responsibly so that AI is truly helpful for everyone. The opportunities are too great, the challenge is too urgent, and this technology too transformational to do anything less. Thank you.

Redi Thlabi: Thank you very much to the CEO of Google, Sundar Pichai, for that very holistic picture of the potential, the risks, and the opportunities. Thank you. Now let’s get to the conversation. Let’s put some meat to it, as we say in my language at home. Let’s just give some meaning to the Global Digital Compact. How do we position ourselves to move from aspiration to action and to take us through that very important conversation? Here is a sister, a moderator, and an international broadcaster, my homegirl, Tumi Makgabo.

Tumi Makgabo: Thank you. All right, we got there in the end. Good afternoon, everybody. Reedy, thank you so very much for that introduction. I feel like we flew a long way to get together in New York, but it’s always a pleasure to be in. in this incredible, exciting, stimulating city. But more importantly, I think it’s really incredible to have the opportunity to be in a room where people are thinking about what tomorrow’s going to look like. How do we create a tomorrow that works for everybody who’s involved in tomorrow? Well, you’ve heard a little bit about the GDC, and in this following conversation, we’re going to try to unpack how do we take the idea, how do we take the thought, how do we take the intent of what the GDC is trying to create and make it real, give it life, breathe it into existence. It isn’t easy, it certainly will be a challenge, but I think it’s a challenge not only that we’re up for, but it’s a challenge that is important to ensure that the society and the world looks exactly the way we hope and intend. Now, ordinarily, I could safely stand up here all by myself, but I don’t think that’s going to be the most exciting thing for you to watch. So please assist me in giving a very, very, very warm welcome to the following. Felix Mutati, who is the Minister of Technology and Science in Zambia. Margrethe Vestager, who is Executive Vice President of the European Union. Rebeca Grynspan, who is the Secretary General of UNCTAD. Omar Al Olama, the Minister of State for Artificial Intelligence, Digital Economy, and Remote Work Applications in the UAE. Josephine Teo, who is the Minister for Digital Development and Information in Singapore. And last, but most certainly not least, Nnenna Nwakanama, Civil Society Representative. To all of you, thank you so very much for joining us today. And it really is genuinely and truly an honor to have each of you joining me today. And I’m looking forward to having this conversation. I’m going to take a seat next to you. But not too close. I get a little bit nervous because I don’t know what they might do to me if I ask them a question they don’t like. The reason we really gathered here, and let’s talk for a moment about the digital compact. It’s about principles, it’s about commitments, it’s about inclusivity, not just in terms of who negotiated it, but in terms of who it’s supposed to apply to. The intention is to, and I’m going to read this so I don’t get it wrong, to support the achievement of an inclusive, open, sustainable, fair, safe, and secure digital future for all. Ambitious. In addition, there’s something that’s really important that the GDC does, and that is it recognizes the pervasive and existing digital divides, and we know, we can see what the impact of those divides are and have been in the past. And really, it responds to the need for more inclusive digital governance. So we all have an understanding of what it should do, what it shouldn’t do, and how do we deal. So the ambition is there. It’s in paper, in various iterations. How do we make that happen? Perhaps Mr. Minister, if I can begin with you. Developing countries in particular, Reedy mentioned it earlier, and I think the lived reality of most people who exist in the developing world will be able to tell you about some of the challenges that we face whenever we experience digital divides. I mean, the CEO of Google just gave us a perfect example in his remarks. How do you think the GDC will help in particular developing countries, but perhaps you can use your country as an example, to bridge that divide? It’s on. Let’s try again.

Felix Mutati: Thank you. Many thanks for having me. I’ll just tell you a short story in terms of bridging the digital divide, in terms of inclusivity, from a Zambian perspective. A young man called James in the rural part of Zambia, a farmer, farming using traditional methods because he was not included or connected, had a chance to secure a mobile phone, had a chance to get connected to internet. Using those tools, he transformed his farming methods because he had access to weather forecast, he had access to market prices, he had access to information. And our interpretation is that the Global Digital Compact is about a shared vision. Transforming life for that little boy in the rural part of Zambia. That is our simple understanding and that is why we’re here, changing lives.

Tumi Makgabo: Now there’s a particular balance that is always required because we see that sometimes when we change and transform lives, sometimes it can happen really rapidly, sometimes it takes a little bit longer. If I can come to the UAE as an example, what is the thinking about bridging and bringing together that process of rapid adoption of AI, along with making sure that it is a safe environment for all who are going to be involved in digital technology and how it changes their lives?

Omar Al Olama: Thank you very much. I’m very happy to be here and to be very honest, I think the UAE is a good example of what happens when you create a trajectory for digital development that is on steroids, as they say. we’ve experienced it. So we went from not having paved roads, not having university graduates, being a country that was maybe part of the underdeveloped world 50 years ago to being today one of the most advanced countries in the world. That advancement created a lot of opportunities, it made the UAE be able to explore frontiers like artificial intelligence, and I think it also shows that there is no excuse for us not to be able to do that for more countries. We need to move from, and I don’t mean to plagiarize President Obama here, but from yes we can to yes we will. We need to really definitely try to actually implement that vision that we have on digital development and take forward the recommendations that the panel is making towards the global south.

Tumi Makgabo: We need to also have the conversation about inclusivity. The reason we can have a conversation around developed versus developing countries is because growth has not been equitable. There are some parts of the world that have grown and done well economically, et cetera, and those that have clearly been left behind. If we can then talk for a moment, Secretary General, about how do we make sure that this compact is not just a document that is full of ambition, but it actually means that we see a manifestation of that inclusivity of growth when it comes to the digital era.

Rebeca Grynspan: Thank you. Thank you very much, and thank you for that question. First of all, let me say that we all know that we are lagging in the SDGs, yes? That only 70% of the SDGs are enrolled to be accomplished by 2030. So we have to start by thinking that we cannot have linear solutions because we need non-linear ones, pathways, to really get to the 2030 objectives. And I think that the digital revolution in AI can provide those. non-linear path towards DSDG. So it’s a great opportunity because obviously, you know, the digital technologies are transforming life in an exponential way. So that can be really a very important tool. But my second point, going to you, is that when you are in a society where things are changing so rapidly, we have to remember always that not everything changes at the same speed. So it creates tensions. It creates asymmetries. It creates imbalances that we need to deal with. So it’s not enough access. You need really a deliberate digital development strategy because you have to connect. You have to bring the stakeholders. But you have to do a lot of things. You have to create an ecosystem that is, you know, really will bring everybody to the speed, to the level that is necessary. But you start from a very uneven play field, yes? Not everybody is today in the same line to start this career. So you have to make an extra effort. And part of this extra effort is, first of all, for people, it’s not only access, but it’s affordability and quality of their access to the digital technologies. But it’s also not to relegate the developing countries to be users. We want to be producers. We want to bring the digital revolution, not only for our consumption, but we want to really use it for our diversification, for going up the ladder. in terms of the value chains in the world, to add more value, to create better employment, and to bring digital into the productive structure will really require an extra effort from the international community and also from governments to make it, as I said, a deliberate development strategy.

Tumi Makgabo: One thing that also is going to require deliberate efforts is the question of human rights. Margrethe, if I can come to you on that. How do you make sure that there is a respect and a consideration for human rights while at the same time one wants to promote fair competition and keep in mind that we’re coming from such different points of departure, there’s a lot of balancing. How is the EU thinking about that?

Margrethe Vestager: First and foremost, I think the Global Digital Compact is an amazing achievement. It is as if we have a new chance. We have it. There are so many things where we have not succeeded, and I think the Digital Compact shows that we can agree that we’re really going to engage in correcting the mistakes and show much increased effort because if we live up to what is in the Compact, well, then a lot of the things that are haunting us will be a thing of the past, and for us, we want to partner with as many countries as possible, and the fact that human rights are completely core of the Global Digital Compact makes our conversation shorter, focused because we know that we agree on the fundamentals when we digitalize. So, partnerships will be so much easier, and these are really important for us. And I think it also illustrates that there is a commitment to create trust in technology. Because that doesn’t come automatic. Technology can be terribly misused, both for crime and fraud, but also for surveillance and undermining democracy. And here we can focus on the use of technology. I think the example, the story was excellent. It’s such a good illustration of the agency that people get. Because I think that is the underlining ambition here. That all the things that we were not successful with, with trust, with focusing on the use cases and giving people agency, enabling them, then this digital compact will be, you know, a road to a future that is very different from all the bad scenarios that we actually do have ahead of us.

Tumi Makgabo: There is no question, I think, for anybody that this presents a particular opportunity. One through the GDC, but generally through technology and how we can better harness that to achieve all of these things that we wanted to do. The world of work, however, we all recognize is going to look quite different in five years’ time, let alone a decade or two down the road. In Singapore’s case, how are you ensuring that there is better preparedness for a more digitized work in the context of work? And how can we learn from what Singapore has done so that we’re not always having to go back to the beginning in order to ensure we’re better prepared for a world of work that looks so different?

Josephine Teo: Well, thank you very much for this opportunity to participate in this great conversation. My comments will build on what Margaret and the Secretary-General have said. And that is to recognize the fact that unevenness exists even for the workforce. And what it means… is that there will be some parts of the workforce that are closer to the technology frontier because their employers are already using technologies in innovative ways in their companies. And so that creates an environment for them to pick up the right skills to become even more proficient in the jobs and the requirements of the future. But there will be many other members of the workforce who, for example, may be employed by small and medium enterprises who tend to lag in terms of the technology adoption. Then there are also people who are marginalised. Sometimes it is because they have special needs. It could be because they have a disability. We have to be very creative in thinking about how all of the past barriers that put impediments in the path of these individuals to succeed. The way in which we are doing this is to enable every single one of the workers to acquire the skills to be relevant for the future. Part of it involves working with employers because they create the momentum and they create the strongest incentives. But we also need active labour market policies in the form of support for individual learning, putting resources in the hands of individual workers so that they don’t only depend on their employers to provide the training opportunities. Then in order to support this ecosystem, you need also to build up the training infrastructure so that there is a good ecosystem of training providers who not only can deliver training competently, but whose content meet the needs of the market. All of these have to come together and the more we can share with each other how these can be achieved in each of our contexts, I think the better we are going to be. So we are very grateful to the UN for putting together the GDC to create the opportunities for us to do exactly that.

Tumi Makgabo: Thank you very much, Minister Teo. Minister Al-Olama, I believe that we have to bid you farewell, so thank you very much for joining us. Do you want to, is there one more comment and thought that you want to leave us with before you go?

Omar Al Olama: I think the Global Digital Compact is a great starting point for the action to follow. The UAE, we believe that there’s a lot that needs to be done but we all need to work together on it. This technology is very pervasive, it crosses borders, and there needs to be cooperation. So we’re definitely part of this roadmap that the UN is putting forward and we’re definitely going to be a big supporter for it.

Tumi Makgabo: That’s terrific to hear. Thank you for joining us and we look forward to seeing you do that. If you can please just give him a thank you. Thank you. And no, I wasn’t waiting for him to leave, I just have to get closer to the panellists, so don’t think I’m being, I promise I’m not being weird. Nnenna, if I can come to you, from a civil society perspective. You know, the reality is that there sometimes can be a disconnect between what happens on the ground and what happens higher up between policy makers and those of us who have really good intentions. It doesn’t always manifest in the way that we hope. What does the implementation question and what does the monitoring question of the GDC look like in a civil society context from your point of view?

Nnenna Nwakanama: Sankofa, I’ll come back to that word. Fabrizio Hochschild is from Chile. Ninten Desai is from India. Lynn Sentamu is Canadian. Marcus Comer. is from Switzerland, Yanis Karklins from Lithuania, Dee Williams in St. Lucia, Adama Samaseko in Mali, and the journalist Brenda Zulu from Zambia. I’ve met these people over my 25 years of engagement in digital cooperation within the UN. These are people from all walks of life. And my first statement here today is sankofa, looking back from where we’re coming from so we know where we’re going to. The GDC is nothing revolutionary. The success is in the process, and that process is multi-stakeholder. I do believe that as we keep shaking hands between multilateralism and multi-stakeholderism, we can do much. Not just here in New York. I don’t need a visa to be able to implement GDC. I want to be at home and have the same principle of multi-stakeholderism play out in everything at national level.

Tumi Makgabo: I think we understand why you’ve been in this process for so long. We kind of get it. Thank you for that. Minister Mutati, if I can then come back to you. We can look at the broader picture, and I think the GDC is no doubt inspiring. Those who believe it or not, I did actually read it, and I think it is really inspiring, and I think it really is ambitious, and I think it genuinely is asking us to address some of the most fundamental and pressing issues that help us address the human rights challenges we face on the planet. planet. How, though, do we begin to implement that? From a Zambia perspective, what is the translation of that, from paper to reality, actually look like and involve?

Felix Mutati: Thank you very much. One of the pillars of the Global Digital Compact is strategic partnerships. And strategic partnership from a Zambia perspective, I’ll give you two examples. This year, Zambia has got challenges around climate change. Our economy, in terms of GDP, is going down. And we have difficulties and other problems. But earlier on, we had a strategic partnership to look at how we can collaborate among ourselves as Africans. And one of the countries in Africa, we went and lifted a tax innovation, collection innovation, which we started using this year. Now, the consequences of that partnership has been that, whereas the economy is going down, the tax revenue is going up. And for us, we think that is what is called strategic partnership, which is part of the Global Compact. It gives actual results. And this is actually happening. Second example, because of limited resource, to try to extend connectivity of our people, government on one side. Working with the private sector and other partners, providing the necessary incentives, they were able to plant significant infrastructure, digital infrastructure, which has enabled Internet to move from in the 50s to almost 70 percent. That is what we call strategic partnership. So Zambia, in a sense, was already implementing the global digital compact and the key pillar of partnership, and the results are there for us to see. Thank you.

Tumi Makgabo: That’s a really interesting example that you use, because it sounds to me like a lot of this has to do with ensuring that the solutions are specific to what your needs are, no doubt. But when we look more broadly, the challenge for a lot of developing countries is that they have to prioritize where they allocate those resources. So it’s easier for us to sit and say, well, you know, we have to think about ESG, or we have to think about greening, or we have to think about this safety and that health. But the resources that are required to do all of those things are quite limited. What do you think needs to happen to allow developing countries to better strike that balance, and how potentially can the GDC be supportive of that process? We know that within the document itself, it’s quite specific about a need for that to happen. But again, the reality versus what’s on paper.

Rebeca Grynspan: Yeah, it’s such a good question, because, you know, precisely today we were talking about the necessary changes in international financial architecture, really to support development. We were talking about restructuring the debt, because debt doesn’t allow many of these countries, to really have the strategies and the investments that need to be done. I gave today the number that 3.3 billion people live in countries that are paying more in service and debt than on health or education. So if you have that problem, how are you going really to have the investments that you need for making this happen? And the other part of this, I’m sorry to say, obviously, is the responsibility to think about the long-term. I always say we usually forget that the short and the long-term start at the same time. There is no long-term that is a succession of short-termism, yes? You don’t get there by short-term thinking. You need long-term thinking. But many of the systems don’t allow, don’t have the structures, don’t have the institutions like, for example, Singapore has, to really have this long-term view for a policy to stay and to persevere for the objectives. So let me just end saying, you need national responsibility, and the minister has talked about that. You need a government that really thinks about this, that does the right thing, that invests in education, that invests in the people that Nina was talking about, that brings society in an inclusive way with a voice to really harness development, but you need the international community. And that’s why the global digital compact is so important, as we have said. Because you need a framework. And the other thing, and I’m sorry to say this because we are talking about optimism, but this is a very concentrated market, yes? need to spread the opportunities because really concentration is very high. So you need international standards and international norms to really make these technologies to stay within the good and not to go to the bad, like Margrethe was saying.

Tumi Makgabo: So it’s interesting that you’re promoting the global view, which is crucial. We’ve heard from the minister the national view, but there’s that space in between, which is the regional question. Now we’ve seen what the EU has been doing. We understand the EU’s ambition generally to be a leader in many spaces, and this is not unique in that question. What can the world, or what should we be learning about broader cooperation and implementation of such policies when we look at what the EU is trying to do within its space of influence from a policy perspective? Because one size doesn’t fit all, so there needs to be some maneuverability in that regard, but there also needs to be an overview that allows everybody to understand what the rules of engagement are.

Margrethe Vestager: I think that is very well put. And the thing is that there is an asymmetry here, because the individual human being can take the most of the possibilities, but the individual cannot do away with the harm that technology can bring. That is not possible. So there is a societal, regional, global answer here to address things that are systemic in a systemic matter. And this is what we are trying to do. So we have passed legislation, the Digital Markets Act, to keep the market open so that people have choice, and so that the businesses who provide choice, that they are interested for investors. Because, if you depend on a gatekeeper to get to the market, why invest in you? We have the Digital Services Act making sure that digital services are safe to use. That they would not cause you mental health problems or undermine democracy or the integrity of our elections. And that what is legitimately decided in our democracy is also treated as such when online. We have privacy legislation and our AI Act is coming into force. All of that to create a systemic response to the things that people cannot influence themselves individually. And when you have a systemic response, and we enforce in full, because otherwise it’s worth nothing. Enforcement is everything. When we do that, then each and every one of us, alone and together, can grasp the opportunities. And that’s the important thing here, because otherwise nothing will happen. So I think one should be really careful to try to decentralize, to say, you go, you go figure out. No, no. We need that systemic response. We think that legislation is needed, because we see the harm that can be done. And I think that global digital compact is essential, especially when it comes to AI. Because AI is not just any new digital algorithm. It is so much more powerful when it comes to human agency. And that is why the use cases, the trust that we as societies will be responsible, is absolutely key for all these wonderful things that we’re talking about.

Tumi Makgabo: That brings me nicely. Okay, you want to… They keep wanting to clap for you and I keep interrupting them. So I think every now and again, I must remember to give you a chance to clap properly. That brings me nicely to the question of public-private partnerships. So, when we are looking at this process, everybody has to play their part. We need to make sure that the rules of engagement not only exist, but that they are followed and that they are implemented, and that there is consequence for transgression, right? Because it doesn’t help, and we know about, broadly speaking, the challenges of international law when it comes to the implementation and enforcement of consequence. What role, however, do you see, maybe you can give us an example in Singapore, where this public-private partnership can better foster the implementation and the oversight of what this GDC process may look like?

Josephine Teo: Well, since Margaret was talking about AI, that could be where the example arises. I think being a general-purpose technology, we all want to benefit from its transformative potential. And yet, at the level of public services, very often the expertise does not yet exist. And that’s where I think the private sector can be brought into the picture and encouraged to enable policymakers, as well as individuals, teams, organisations that make the rules to understand how this technology is implemented. And that’s exactly how we have done it in Singapore. We encouraged and we invited the private sector to contribute to the development of use cases, as well as our understanding of the guardrails that need to be put in place. But I would go one step further. I would say that the private sector can do a lot more in terms of helping to build capacity. And the capacity is so important because, particularly from the point of view of small states, on the one hand we see the opportunities, on the other hand we are told of the risks. The question is, will we… we’d be left behind as small states. Now, in this process of figuring out what to do, I think we were really appreciative that at the UN level, there was an advisory board at the high level that was constituted in a very inclusive way. And this has given us the motivation to contribute to this process by asking our own chief AI officer to be involved, and then subsequently inviting the whole high-level advisory board to meet in Singapore so that they can also engage with the forum of small states that was meeting there. Now, the result of a process like this is that we now have the ability to say, adopting the principles articulated in the GDC, how to help ourselves as nations, but equally importantly, how we can help each other. And in that regard, I’m very pleased to note that this process created an opportunity for another country that we admire greatly, which is Rwanda, to say, how about the both of us come together to create an AI playbook for small states? So that is something that we have done. And I hope that this will help all of us.

Tumi Makgabo: I just love my panel because everything they say, everybody wants to clap for them.

Margrethe Vestager: Can I add something? Because I would encourage everybody to look at the AI apprentice model that is implemented in Singapore, because that allows businesses to get to use AI while people in all walks of life can learn about how to do that. And you get experts who are embedded in the local community. So this idea of AI apprenticeships, I think the Singaporean model is really, really inspiring.

Tumi Makgabo: Thank you very much.

Josephine Teo: We’re happy to share more.

Tumi Makgabo: They’re happy to share. So everybody come, let’s share. Okay, Nnenna, if I can come to you because believe it or not, we’ve got like four minutes left. What measures do you think specifically we need to be mindful of? And I’m going to limit you in the sense that I’m going to ask you for two of the most important measures we need to make sure are in place to protect human rights as we embark on this journey.

Nnenna Nwakanama: Two measures, capacity to implement. It is okay to come to New York. It is okay to read European papers and all of that, but America and Europe do not make the world. I’m African. I’m Nigerian. I live in Cote d’Ivoire. I’m part of this world and I want that to be down here. So capacity to implement across the whole world, whether it be government, because I have spoken about multi-stakeholder, but multi-stakeholder capacity is needed, financial, human and technological. That is one. We need to balance that. The other one is connecting people. I see people talking about AI. I see, I’ve lived in the days of great technology, emerging technology, and all of the big grammar technology, but please, can we get people connected to me? And please, can we not disconnect the people who are already connected? Because some of you are here and then you go home and you disrupt internet connectivity. We have to talk about shutdown. In the GDC itself, that part has, they’ve been knowing at it. I don’t know what it’s going to be like tomorrow morning. Anyway, let me now, excellences, ladies and gentlemen, friends here and friends who are watching me online, boys and girls, cats and dogs, emojis and avatars, I myself, on behalf of my own self, I would like to endorse the GDC.

Tumi Makgabo: because I want my time back from all this clapping. Like really, I’ve lost like loads of time from the applause. Okay, we’ve literally got two and a half minutes, so I’m gonna do a rapid fire round. I’m going to ask you for two specific things that when we leave this stage and we leave this room, as individuals, we need to consider implementing. We’re not talking broad policy strokes here, we’re talking about things that you think we can do when we leave. Nnenna, you’ve given us a clue, but can you give us two different ones, and I’m gonna start with you and work my way across. We’ve got two minutes.

Nnenna Nwakanama: Connect the schools. Connect the young people. Connect my children. Thank you.

Tumi Makgabo: Okay, okay, okay, thank you. Thank you. Minister Teo.

Josephine Teo: We want to move beyond learning about digital to thriving with digital. And to do that, we can move alone, and we can go very fast that way, or we can go together, and I believe that will go even further.

Tumi Makgabo: Thank you. Even further. Secretary General, you.

Rebeca Grynspan: Embrace not only the global digital compact, talk to your governments for implementing, for supporting, but embrace the path for the future, because there are many things that we have to do for this to be possible. And in the path of the future, we have a lot that can help people to get connected.

Tumi Makgabo: Vice-President Vestager.

Margrethe Vestager: Obviously, first things first, connectivity is everything. If you’re not connected, well, what then? But as we connect, please make sure that we do not sacrifice our children. Their independence, their agency, that they do not get dependent, that they do not get sucked in, in social media that will not serve them well. We have a huge challenge in making. sure that our children, they’re not only safe, but developed, and that they can use digital for their own good and for the good of their community.

Tumi Makgabo: Minister?

Felix Mutati: Thank you. One of the biggest challenges, the skills and literacy, particularly in the rural part of our country, things we take for granted. Let us handhold our people. And let us show them how to press the numbers on the mobile phone. Thank you.

Tumi Makgabo: I don’t know if you can tell, but I thoroughly enjoyed that conversation. And it is because we had such a wonderful panel of speakers with us this afternoon. Can you please give them the appropriate round of applause? I can’t hear it. Thank you so very much. Thank you. And thank you. Thank you very much.

Redi Thlabi: OK, I see your panel doesn’t want to leave the stage to me. OK. Thank you. Thank you so very much to Dumi Mahabo for expertly leading that important conversation. We’re going to watch a very short video speaking to the themes of today about the futures that are possible for us and the kind of decisions we need to make. Let’s just watch this short video, and then I’ll introduce you to the next panel.

Official Video: One humanity, two futures. In one, we embrace AI’s potential for a world of inclusion and equity. In another, AI tools became the catalyst for division and exclusion. The choice between these paths did not lie in circuits, but in human hands. In October 2023, amid heated debates on artificial intelligence and its potential, there was excitement about the future, but also anxiety over its risks and uncertainties. The UN Secretary-General gathered 39 top AI experts to confront this challenge. The uniquely diverse group consulted intensively around the world and engaged with thousands of experts. This uniquely diverse group aligned on guiding principles to propose concrete actions for governing AI for humanity by building common scientific understanding on AI, its opportunities and its risks, by fostering common ground for effective AI policies and standards anchored in human rights, by sharing common benefits through building capacity, mobilizing resources and tackling data dilemmas, to close AI divides, and to support this global action, an AI office at the United Nations, for an equitable and inclusive future with AI. Let’s build this future together.

Redi Thlabi: Thank you very much. And I think the theme of that video links so well with the comments that came from the first panel. We all acknowledge we come from different worlds, but we are one humanity. So how do we create these digital tools, AI for humanity, make it serve humanity, make it accessible for all of humanity? I’m really looking forward. to this next panel discussion, which speaks exactly to that, AI for Humanity. And to moderate this panel discussion is Ian Bremmer, president of Eurasia Group. Ian?

Ian Bremmer: Thank you so much, and also thanks to me, who just crushed it for the last 45 minutes, absolutely, right? So now you’re stuck with me, and obviously I’m honored to be here at the Summit of the Future. We’re going to talk about artificial intelligence. I’m honored to be one of the 39 members of the high-level advisory panel on AI, and you’re going to meet a number of my peers on the panel today. It was back in 2017 that the Secretary General, António Guterres, I remember first told me that he thought that his two most important legacies in global governance would be on combating climate change and responding to the positive implications of disruptive technologies. You have seen the UN engage and lead the work on climate over the past many years, but today is a day we get to talk about and even celebrate a little some efforts in global governance on artificial intelligence. This past Thursday, I think you’ve seen it, we have released our final report, Governing AI for Humanity. It’s right here. It’s the first truly global approach to governance of artificial intelligence, and we’re going to talk today about some of the recommendations, why governance including nations from the global south is so important, and some practical reasons why this roadmap is needed. to ensure progress and greater equity, given the challenges that we face in our digital and physical future. So, with that, let me please introduce our distinguished panelists. Experts and leaders from many sectors required for a multi-stakeholder approach, five of us together on the UN High-Level Advisory Body, and two interlopers who are here anyway. As I mentioned, first of all, our co-chairs. We have Carme Artigas, who is co-chair of the body, along with James Manyka, senior vice president at Google Alphabet. We’ve got Vilas Dhar, also an HLAB member. He’s president of the Patrick J. McGovern Foundation. Dr. Wang Jian is chief technology officer at Alibaba. Volker Turk, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. And Alondra Nelson, also an HLAB member, is a professor at the Institute of Advanced Study. I welcome all of you. Please. So, let’s get right to it. Carme, the first question I want to ask, and I’m going to start with our two co-chairs, shockingly, bracketing this whole thing, is why the United Nations, right? There have been a lot of efforts at governance of AI. There’s been a lot of money going into AI. The UN doesn’t have a lot of money, doesn’t have a lot of power, right? But here we are. So, why? I mean, obviously, part of it is because it makes us sit uncomfortably close, and that facilitates cooperation. But leaving that aside, why was it critical for the United Nations to take this on?

Carme Artigas: Yes, so this was the first question we had to answer ourselves in the body. You were independent people, and we came to the conclusion that the UN is uniquely positioned to this effort, because it’s the only global organization that has the mandate, the reach, and the legitimacy to seat all nations and all stakeholders in the table. And it has the historical, I would say, success that has done it in the past, I mean, governing international topics such as climate change or on earth control. And because AI is such a pervasive and horizontal technology, and it’s absolutely cross borders, there is no single nation or region that can solve by itself the potential harm biases, discrimination, and lack of inclusiveness. And of course there are other frameworks that are very, very valuable, but they are limited. They usually leave behind many nations, especially on the global south. So we do not pretend that UN is the right place to regulate AI at a global level. We think it’s the right place to encourage collaboration, to foster inclusive business, and ensure that AI is developed, keeping the human rights in mind.

Ian Bremmer: Now, you’re a European, and the Europeans are known for having governance, even multi-stakeholder governance as a superpower. I mean, Lord knows it’s not building AI companies, right? So given that, how do you, former minister in this field, you know, how did you engage with what can the UN do, and what should the EU really be doing?

Carme Artigas: I would say that people sometimes mix ethics, regulation, and governance. There are three different things. Ethics is how do we should, how should we all behave well, companies, governments. Governance is how do we put in mechanisms, instruments, that ensure that everybody’s behaving ethically. And regulation is one of these mechanisms, and we have done it in Europe, the first international regulation, and nobody can argue against me that regulation is not against innovation. That’s another topic, but I am open to discuss it to anyone. I think regulation builds trust, because it orders a market and gives trust. confidence to the market, the consumers, and the citizens. But there are not only a way to govern through regulation. We can govern through transparency, through oversight, through involving everybody. So governance is beyond regulation itself. It’s one mechanism. We should find also the market incentives so that companies and governments behave ethically.

Ian Bremmer: Just a quick one, because I’m responding to that. Did you say, I mean, when the group first came together, you know, 39 members from all these different countries, different walks of life, that actually coming to agreement on common principles seemed to be one of the easiest things for our group to do? That was quick. Am I right about that?

Carme Artigas: Yeah, of course.

Ian Bremmer: Anyone else want to take that on? James?

James Manyika: No, you’re fundamentally right. I mean, one of the things that was extraordinary when we began our work was how quickly we got to agree on things like, this must be based on fundamental human rights. We all agreed. This must be based on international law. We all agreed. This must benefit everybody. We all agreed. I think the hard work was, how do we all come together to think through how we actually do and achieve those things? But I think getting to the principles was relatively quite straightforward. I’m looking at Alondra here, who was a big, you know, force in getting us to many of the right places we got to, especially on issues around fundamental human rights based on the extraordinary work that she had been doing for many, many years.

Ian Bremmer: Alondra, do you want to jump in?

Alondra Nelson: Yeah, I would just say, you know, to your question of why, why is that the UN provides us with a quite incredible foundation? I mean, the UN Charter, our international accords around human rights are quite powerful kind of cornerstones for thinking about this. And so we had a place to go. And I think, you know, the challenge that we face with technology is particularly powerful and fast moving ones like AI is things are moving around and where do we anchor ourselves? And I think the why of the UN is in part that the world’s countries had agreed. have agreed upon already these fundamental kind of true North values. The challenge becomes what does that mean in a digital world? What does that mean in an AI world in which, you know, society is being kind of re-transformed and reconfigured? But I think those fundamental things are true and that’s been a really core of our work on the committee.

Ian Bremmer: And I want our audience to appreciate this. I mean, getting the Singaporeans to champion rule of law is not exactly shocking, but I mean, we’re talking about the Americans, the Russians, the Chinese, the Europeans, the global South. I mean, all participants here, this was not the hard challenge in this group. Vilas?

Vilas Dhar: I think that’s right. I mean, Ian, I want to start from a fundamental observation. We too often equate governance with control. And it’s part of a conversation that’s much bigger. I think we have followed a narrative that technology companies innovate and governments regulate and somehow in that the rest of us go along. But that’s not the point of governance, right? Governance is to set a shared vision for humanity, is to think about all of the resources we can bring to bear to make shared decisions that put agency with communities, that allow voices to participate and to come forward. When we think about the work of the body, I think this underpins the idea. What we got from the Secretary General was a mandate to think beyond, beyond the forms and functions of the moment, to think about a world where a digital future actually works for all of us. It starts from the fundamental pieces that James and Alondra spoke to. But it requires us to also envision new functions and new forms for a future that’s grounded in the idea of governance for, by, and of the people. And I think AI gives us such an amazing aperture to go back to really fundamental questions about what participatory mechanics should look like.

Ian Bremmer: I’m glad you brought that up because when, you know, so much of the conversation on AI out there is about risks, existential risks, disinformation, all of that. This group, not in any way unconcerned with those risks. but fundamentally thinking about how to use AI for humanity. I mean, climate change in a sense is a much more difficult conversation because there’s so much zero-sumness. There’s so much, you know, like reparations need to be paid because you’ve done this to us. This has been an overwhelmingly positive sum, non-zero-sum conversation. James?

James Manyika: Yeah, it has been, but it also has highlighted something else, including beyond the UN itself, is how important this is for it to be a multi-stakeholder endeavor. That was fundamentally important. Let me tell you why I think that was fundamentally important. If you think about what’s at the heart of this technology, this conversation, and what we hope for it, you point to three things, I think. One are the extraordinary opportunities, the possibility to address so much of our challenges with the SDGs, climate change, there’s so much that we could potentially do that’s transformational, number one. There are complexities and risks. There are so many of them. We have to think about all the kinds of issues that we know could happen and go wrong with this technology. And then third, the idea that this has to benefit and include everybody. If you think about each of those three things, there’s no other way to get that done other than through a multi-stakeholder effort. The opportunities, companies are pursuing those, researchers are pursuing those, NGOs are pursuing those, governments are pursuing those. The risks and complexities, same thing. Governments are thinking about those, agencies are thinking about those, researchers are, civil society is. Get to the inclusion and the opportunities. How do you go after opportunities, especially in countries and places and communities where those are not commercial opportunities? You have to include everybody. So as you think about each of the three things that are at the heart of this, it has to be a multi-stakeholder effort. And that’s why I’ll say one final thing. It’s why I was so thrilled that our body actually represented that multi-stakeholder effort. take hold of you. We had researchers, we had academics, we had activists, we had civil society, we had everybody involved. We debated a lot, argued a lot, and we worked pretty well together, I think.

Ian Bremmer: And I would say that it wasn’t obvious during the conversations who necessarily was wearing each of those hats, because the body was collective, pretty global. But I’m going to ask you, because you do wear one of those hats in real life, when we talk about governance, and Vilas just talked about the way we should think about governance, what are the responsibilities that the core private sector corporations, and even some of them state-owned enterprises are linked, should have when we think about governance of AI?

James Manyika: Well, we have several. First of all, keep in mind that much of the research, fundamental research that’s advanced in this field, is led in the private sector, a lot of the research labs are in the private sector. So that places an incredible responsibility, one which is to make sure we’re developing this technology responsibly, we’re thinking about all the beneficial uses of it, not just the commercial uses of it, we have to think about all of that, and we also have a responsibility to engage with governments and others, who are not only going to govern these technologies, but also think about, because keep in mind that this technology, three things happen to it, it’s developed, it’s deployed, and it’s used. That whole chain involves lots of other actors, so we have a responsibility as a private sector to work with each and every one of those, hear their concerns, and see and work together to think about how we deploy and use this technology responsibly. We have an enormous responsibility. Part of it, I’ll say one last thing, we have a responsibility to be transparent, and to help build trust. If this technology is going to have the impact that we think it’s going to have, the public has to trust it, the public has to feel that we and everybody else who’s developing, deploying, and using it, is held accountable. So we have a profound responsibility.

Ian Bremmer: And an interesting point there here is a technology that frankly a lot of people in the global south are more excited about and trust more than a lot of people in the advanced world also an opportunity. Right a fundamental opportunity thing about governments, but Alondra you wanted to come in and then I’m turning to Dr. Wang

Alondra Nelson: I just I think one of the things that we were grappling with is that it’s a fundamental different moment for different moment for multilateralism Right because of exactly what James said not only because you have if we think about something about multilateral action around nuclear Right, those are often owned by states or utilities. And so you have a whole different ecosystem these are technologies that are often coming out of the private sector almost exclusively or a lot of the R&D is coming out of the private sector and then as James suggested you have this sort of series of Stakeholders along the sort of lifecycle of them and that’s a whole so part of what we were grappling with was not just you know How do you govern a dynamic iterative technology? But how do you do it in a way that also is at the same time trying to reimagine what multilateralism looks like when you have when you have to have a Multistakeholder system in a way that you did not when we were trying to think about how do we do nuclear nonproliferation? it’s a completely different set of Actors with different kinds of different sets of power and different kinds of asymmetry than we’ve had to deal with before.

Ian Bremmer: I mean there are US China arms control agreements on AI that will be required But but that’s not what we’re talking about right here. Now. Dr. Wang you you are a scientist and indeed when when you started out There weren’t that many with PhDs in your field in your company. You’re also in the private sector I’m wondering how you are navigating how you think about those tensions and how those tensions are changing as AI is Moving so much faster is becoming so much more transformative as we’re talking about what governance Multistakeholder governance should look like.

Jian Wang: Yeah, I think there’s a different way to look at it. The first thing, you know think about in the UN level Actually, I feel pretty good because you know of the good structure. Like we have the United Nations, we have UNESCO, we have the ITU, these are part of the global organization. And ITU could be a very critical role in terms of technology development. And UNESCO, dealing with the science, dealing with the education and the culture, I think for any new challenge, particularly from new technology, you have to work with a different party and solve the problem from different perspective. You really cannot just solve the problem just by, you know, involve the government. You have to involve the different level of things. That’s one thing. But the scientists, I think, is very important. Get scientists, get individual involved to solve this problem. So for me, the governing is not just, you know, the responsibility of the organization, of government. It’s actually responsible to every people. Just like in the last couple of years, I’m working with the scientists in UK and the scientists in the United States, working together on the geoscience problem. And the more interesting, you know, eventually, actually not eventually, later this year, we bring this new technology to Africa. So individual could make a great deal to help solve this problem. So for me, just like the conversation today, and technology is not just creating a problem. The technology is bringing the people together, even though today is a different way to bring people together. But eventually, you know, different people love this technology. They will work together and solve the challenge. So I’m pretty confident, you know, any problem, you know, created by the human could be solved by a human being.

Ian Bremmer: So this is the most inclusive, proactive conversation I’ve seen on big governance issues, frankly, in the UN in a long time. I’m gonna now shift to implementation and to someone who’s been tasked with some of the most challenging problems in the world on that. front, Volker, none of us envy your position. As you think about AI and how AI can be used, can be implemented by governments, by non-state actors to allow impunity or to facilitate transformation and effective governance, where do you think it’s going right now and what do you think needs to be implemented as a result of these recommendations?

Volker Turk: Well, first of all, congratulations that you got the report out. I think it’s a minor miracle that you have been able to do it and really congratulations to you. When you mentioned mandate, no, you mentioned legitimacy, reach and mandate. I would add normative framework and you have mentioned it. It’s about human rights. We do not have to reinvent the wheel. We have an existing framework that is dynamic, that evolves, that deals with also the future issues and human rights is at the core of it. Because if you are not aware of the impact that anything that happens in this world on freedoms, on fundamental freedoms or on individual rights, if that is not analysed, it’s going to be a problem. And the advantage is it’s a universal framework. So it’s not about global south, global north, west versus someone else. It is universal and that is still agreed at this point in time by everyone. We had a big event on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights last year. There was no detractor from that, no spoiler. So we have that framework. It’s intergenerational. It’s not just about now, it’s also about the past because in some instances you have to deal with the grievances. of the past, but it is primarily also about the future, so it has this intergenerational dimension and it brings us back to human agency and to human dignity, which is whenever anything happens in this world, including on the digital, on the AI front, you will have to take into account. And it is multi-stakeholder. A human rights framework is by nature multi-stakeholder. We cannot do anything on the human rights front if you didn’t, if it wasn’t nourished by social movements, by civil society, by the private sector, and by member states. And actually, so we have a role model when we look at the implementation of how we can bring this to bear on the norms that states themselves have accepted, that the private sector through the business and human rights guiding principles have accepted, and how we can actually go into the granular detail that is needed in order to analyze how we are going to work.

Ian Bremmer: James wants to come in, but a quick follow-up for you first, which is people outside this room, people in this room know this. People outside this room don’t necessarily appreciate that 194 countries around the world agree on a lot of things. They agree on fundamental human rights, even if they don’t implement them. They agree, but they know what they are. They agree on sustainable development goals and where one would want humanity to go, even if right now most of them are not on track to being fulfilled. And hopefully, they agree on a global digital compact and how one deploys artificial intelligence to help ensure that we can actually get some of this better. So when you think about that, if you had a crystal ball, right now, do you believe over the next two, three years that AI is potentially on track to help actually implement, execute more of the things that we agree on but aren’t doing?

Volker Turk: Look, we are obviously at a very difficult geopolitical moment, no doubt about that. But we hopefully will have the global digital compact and the pact for the future. It’s a good beginning. beginning, it’s not enough, it will require a lot of dedicated attention to it, it will require continued multi-stakeholder conversations, it will require a governance framework that becomes more and more effective. Of course we are divided, polarised, we are not at the best place when it comes at the societal level to bring coherence to things, but this is precisely where whatever we can hang on to that works, including the report that you brought out, it actually shows that it is possible and we need to grab on to that and run with it.

Ian Bremmer: James?

James Manyika: Well you know, as you know well Ian, a couple of things that were on our minds when we were doing the work, one is the need to move and act very quickly, for at least two reasons that were centred in our work, the SDGs, the world’s behind, we’re all behind if you recall, we centred the need to contribute to accelerate the SDGs, the ITU has just done some phenomenal work that highlights that of something like the 169 goals in the SDGs, something like 134 of them could benefit and be accelerated using AI, we have to move. The second thing that was on our minds was the issues around capacity, and this is where especially the Global South comes to mind, because I grew up in the Global South, unless we’re able to give people access to this technology, both to participate and benefit from it, the risk of the digital divide becoming the AI divide is too huge, so we have to act, we have to act, that’s why one of our recommendations is around either the capacity fund or capacity network, we have to bring together a multi-stakeholder group that moves quickly to bring capacity and access to especially the Global South.

Ian Bremmer: I mean climate change, we didn’t really have decades, but the reality was you kind of could kick the can for a while and just let other people pay for it, the kids. You don’t have that time on this issue, which is why I don’t think I’m not surprised that everything happened in a year because, I mean, you need light speed to make that work. Carme, you want to come in and then Vilas.

Carme Artigas: Yes, exactly. I think these recommendations are only as good as our capacity to implement them as soon as possible. So as you have mentioned, and no of these recommendations are built on vacuum. We’re building on existing frameworks that already work, like human rights, but also the excellent work that UN agencies are already doing in their own domains. And that they will keep on doing that, and probably they will have much more burden of work around all these topics on AI. But we need additional instruments because there is still a global governance deficit. And because this is so horizontal, it requires so much coordination. So this is why we did not recommend, as the first thing, an international agency. Because that takes a long time, it’s a big institution, and we will see if that comes.

Ian Bremmer: And the governments, they were not ready to approve that. If you’d announced it, it wouldn’t have happened.

Carme Artigas: I don’t know, but we are proposing things that are actionable, and that we believe that in less than 18 months’ time can be ready for work. Because that’s what we need. And I think that governance is far from an innovator, it’s a catalyzer, and it’s an enabler. And I think that’s what we should be focused on.

Ian Bremmer: An agenda setter?

Carme Artigas: Of course. But I think having this conversation, and these conversations, was not the public opinion one year ago. And I think we are starting a conversation now that I hope is followed beyond the Global Digital Compact, and the companies and the governments and all the institutions will support our recommendation.

Ian Bremmer: I mean, this is the sneaky thing about the UN, right? Which is that, you know, you actually put it together, you imagine it, you start actually having conversations that other people aren’t having, and they will, default, become what people are talking about.

Vilas Dhar: Here’s the power in it, Ian. I think you’re exactly right. There is a way to talk about this that is the law of big numbers. That AI is the story of billions of dollars of investment, millions of lines of code. The foundation models that have the most parameters. And you can almost turn it into a math problem. There were a number of experts on the body with me that were computer scientists. I think we probably would all say, I hated doing math homework as a kid. I certainly don’t want to do it now. It’s not the solution. Instead, what I think about is all of these things we are talking about aren’t really about put all the ingredients together, put them in a stew pot and get an answer. It’s think about the fact that almost all of this comes down to the experience of people on the ground. My brothers and sisters, my cousins, my uncles, my aunts in countries across the planet. And what we put forward in the report is a mechanism to think about real intervention that intersects with people where they are. We don’t think about capacity building as finding a few critical enablers and saying let’s invest in compute. Or let’s just make sure there are data sources. Instead, we think about a holistic network that says let’s actually look with communities at what their needs are and think about a mechanism by which we say there is massive resources across the system. There is those contextual pieces of a normative framework. There is that mandate and that integrity. But it doesn’t happen because any entity, the UN or otherwise, says we are now going to come in and build AI for the public good. Happens because we work with communities to say what do you need to build and want to build? The second recommendation in the report that’s relevant is this idea of a global fund. The idea that we actually need capital resources that sit apart from and outside of our political mechanisms that hold instead a moral responsibility to say we need to take the resources necessary for communities to define their digital agency and make sure that they have the economic resources that let them use that money in the way they need to to build what they do. Now, we haven’t defined the specific form of that fund for a very specific reason. This is something that needs to happen through a participatory mechanism. That through the global digital compact and the implementation that comes, we need to take rights, we need to take frameworks, we need to take capital and turn it into something that actually advances progress.

Ian Bremmer: Alondra, as someone who does public policy for a living, what do you take out of this? If you were in charge of global implementation, what would you, how would you think, not about priority. advertising, but how would you think about your agenda? What would you want to make sure that people are taking away from the next steps?

Alondra Nelson: Well, first I would go to process, because that’s what wonks do. But would it be, just to double click on what Vilash said, I mean, part of this process was a lot of consultation with lots of people from civil society, with the impacted communities. So if we really want to steer and shape these good outcomes, we need to figure out how to do that in part by engaging communities. So any implementation, exactly to Vilash’s point, has to include communities that are impacted, that are going to be impacted, need to have a seat at this table in this conversation, whether or not they have PhDs in computer science or can do math. That’s critically important. I think the other piece is that we don’t know enough. So I would also associate myself with Dr. Jian, and that we don’t know the science. I mean, if we think back about the high watermark of the COVID-19 pandemic, and there were lots of preprints and lots of papers, and I think in that context, perhaps it was okay to say, you know, we’re going to figure out the science as we’re, you know, we’re going to build a plane while we’re flying it. We actually don’t know enough about these systems and tools and models. A lot of what we do know, a few people know, a lot of people don’t know. So I think one of the sort of outcomes of the report is really a commitment to implementing a kind of common understanding. And we’re seeing across the, you know, sort of international ecosystem, different ways for doing that. We proposed in the report, creating an international panel for understanding AI, for the science of AI, that would complement work on AI safety, that would complement some of the other sort of multilateral and regional things that are happening. But even these have to be done in a way that is communicating that information to not only nation states, but sees the public as an audience for how these tools work, what they can do, what their limitations are, and how we can use that information to steer them to the good outcomes that I think many of us hope and want, but are not inevitable and are not unique inherently characteristics of the technology.

Ian Bremmer: And I’d like to believe that this panel right now is actually leading by example specifically on that. That’s what we’re trying to do on this stage right now, right? Volker, you wanted to go and then James.

Volker Turk: Just to, because I think it’s a very important discussion, because if you look at the future and what startups want to do these days, they will want to do something for the for the good, common good, public good, whatever you call it. But you need to fill it then with content. That’s where the human rights side comes in, because you want to do something that is of benefit to humanity. And we often hear that actually from those who are involved in this. That’s important. But there is also the risk side and we cannot avoid talking about the risks. And because risks, we can also look at it from like traffic regulations. I mean you’re going to hit another car if you don’t respect the traffic regulations. And it’s a little bit the same when it comes to innovation, to all kinds of creative work.

Ian Bremmer: I want to give James and Dr. Wang a chance to come in and then we’re going to turn to risks. And I’m going to go to you first, by the way, but go ahead James.

James Manyika: I want to just underscore something that Dr. Nelson just described, which is there’s so much more research still to do in this field. I mean I, in my day job, I oversee the research teams that are researching and building these systems. And the field is moving so quickly, the advance is coming so fast. There’s still a lot more that we still need to learn. Some of that is surprising as being incredibly beneficial. We have all these breakthroughs and landmark breakthroughs in science and other places. But some of them are risks that we’re still researching. So I think the research frontier, that’s why one of the key pieces in our recommendation was this idea of a scientific panel that tries to keep it. But it’s got to be one that works very, very differently than what say the IPCC does. It has to be real-time. IPCC does what, a report every seven years? We can’t do that here. So that’s why the ongoing research both to understand the benefits benefits, the potential, as well as the risks, is so fundamentally important. That’s why many of us are involved in a lot of these AI safety institutes and research to really work on the frontier of the risks.

Ian Bremmer: Dr. Wang, you want to come in?

Jian Wang: Yeah, I think that back to this research challenge, I think it’s something to bring up, you know, at this time. Just thinking about every year, we have more than 5 million paper published, probably some number even bigger than 5 million, that’s a lot of paper. And just like climate change, it’s a very, very complex system, and it takes time for people to really understand. And come to the AI, it’s even more complex than the climate change, okay. So I would say that really needs something new and a framework to bring the whole science community together. Again, I want to emphasize that, and with a UN framework, and otherwise, there’s no single science committee can solve this problem.

Ian Bremmer: And is it fair to say in this field that right now, especially when we look at the two countries that are leading the way in AI, U.S. and China, that the scientific community is actually getting further apart?

Jian Wang: And most of the time, I won’t look at this field based on the countries, okay. So if you look at the people who really pioneered this area, they are from Europe, okay, from Canada. So it is not just country by country, and you have to look at how the science community actually works, okay. So for me, actually, the reason that people are thinking about U.S. and China is just because they have good AI infrastructure, helped people do the research, okay. So I think for the UN, we have to make sure they have the global shared AI infrastructure so everybody could contribute, and everybody could contribute. to solve the problem, okay. This is actually how big tech companies should do as well. You know, it’s not just for your company, but it’s really on a shared infrastructure, particular technology infrastructure, I would say.

Ian Bremmer: For the rest of the people, yeah. Oh, okay. Who was first? No, to focus first. So, only because I want to shift towards, again, we can have a very upbeat conversation about where we want to get, but as you said very eloquently, the geopolitical environment right now, the trajectory is not towards more integration, more global cooperation. It’s actually towards more conflict, and the political and economic models that we thought we could kind of take for granted are themselves under siege. So, when you look at the AI initiatives that are now being put together against that geopolitical conflict, that context, where do you see the biggest challenges?

Volker Turk: Well, it is obviously, once the genie is out of the bottle, how do you control the genie? And I think- Once all sorts of actors have that technology. For instance, and this is a phenomenon that is not just in one part of the world. I mean, we get a lot of it. We actually get a lot of requests for advisory services from member states and startup companies all around the world who want to do the right thing. So, they’re asking us, what type of risk models do we use? How do we regulate? How do we get a multi-stakeholder system in place? And it’s incredibly important that we are very fast in making sure that these advisory services can be provided. We have done it with the big tech companies. I mean, I brought you one of the documents that came out of this, which looks at taxonomy of risks from a human rights perspective, which wants to really complement the existing risk frameworks and really say you need to look at obligations. when it impinges on individual freedoms and rights. And that work is incredibly important. It’s not about ethics anymore, it is about obligations that we have towards people.

Ian Bremmer: All right, please.

Carme Artigas: I just wanted to comment on all the discussions about risk. I don’t know if we all remember that we’re talking about machine learning and deep learning, the conversations were about fairness. All of a sudden, when generative AI came to scene, we forgot about the conversation of fairness, we focused the focus on risks, in most of them existential risk or risk for frontier AI models, and sometimes that is preventing us to look at the existing risks that we already have in the present, more on the sides of fundamental rights. And it’s very interesting, and I recommend everybody having access to the document, and an agenda we have included, which is a risk analysis, a risk survey, involving many countries in the world, different stakeholders, and how interesting it is to see the difference on perception of risks of global north, global south, men and women. And we’re talking about risk because we are not informed that we need this scientific panel on the real facts, sometimes we tend to be dramatic or probably overreacting, and we forget to talk about opportunities. And if we see how risk is perceived in the global south is less perceived, people are more concerned about the opportunities they can miss.

Ian Bremmer: But they’re being left out.

Carme Artigas: Absolutely. So let’s talk also about opportunities, let’s have scientific panel inform us, not only on the risk, more transparency from the private companies, of course, but also on the great opportunities. And I can mention the huge acceleration we can expect on achieving the sustainable development goals, and also how can we allow for education and public health and universality. And I think that is the discussion that we still need to have.

Ian Bremmer: So the principle global risk here is that the lack of resources, the lack of urgency, means the digital divide becomes an AI divide, and we end up splitting apart much farther, right? And humanity doesn’t look like humanity very much in that environment. right?

James Manyika: No, it doesn’t. I mean, I was going to interject very, very quickly. If you remember in our work, one of the fascinating observations for me is when we’re talking about the risks, we often talked about misapplication and misuse. Several members in our body said, please add missed uses. If you remember that word, it’s actually in there. Missed opportunities. And that was mostly some of the members in the Global South thinking about the missed opportunities when this technology could actually transform their lives, circumstances. But all of that hinged on this ability, having the capacity to be able to participate. And we spent a lot of time thinking about the enabling infrastructure, the enablers to enable participation that range everything from very basic things that are in the digital compact like broadband connectivity, even electricity, right? In addition to access to models and compute. So I think this question of access and capacity is so fundamental to the inclusivity part of this conversation.

Ian Bremmer: So addressing the missed opportunity isn’t like, oh, we’re paying you because we’re doing something wrong. It’s because you’re actually creating market opportunities. I mean, it should be additive.

Alondra Nelson: Can I jump in here and just have a slight push back a little bit? I mean, I do think, so we did hear quite a lot from people in the global majority that they didn’t want to be left out. But there were also concerns about climate and sustainability, about the mining of critical minerals, about the extraction of labor that has to be done to train data. So I want to be very clear about what we’re hearing on the sort of landscape of inequality when you think about the entire AI stack and not just the sort of deployed tool or system.

Ian Bremmer: It feels like a race, right? I mean, on the one hand, you need these tools to address the challenges, but making the tools is also going to strain the challenges. Yeah? Please.

Vilas Dhar: I mean, we assume that inertia is the problem, right? We assume that inertia is inevitability, that the ways that we develop are the only ways can do it. Today, in this building, we are showing an AI model in a collaboration with Rafik Anadol, who I know is friends with many of us, a model that’s trained on 100 million pieces of data, sourced ethically with community consent from across the planet, trained on a model that uses only renewable power, that goes slow rather than fast, that generates incredible pieces of aesthetic beauty, and can also be used to build a predictive climate model that lets us test interventions. AI doesn’t have to be an attack against our climate sustainability. What we have to change instead is the why behind our reasons for moving so fast, for what the commercial purposes are that are often putting us in conflict against things like political rights, economic rights, climate issues, and more. There are other ways. Risks are not deterministic. We talk about risks so we can come up with better paths to better futures.

Ian Bremmer: Do you buy that? I mean, I’m asking… Thank you.

Alondra Nelson: I do. I do. I mean, I think that we are, you know, we talk quite a lot about a few organizations, but we have other organizations that are creating different models or trying to think about the sustainability issue. And I think we should be, if we’re really serious about advancing on the SDGs, we should need to be really serious about the sustainability issues and about, I think, a growing conversation that says we just need more energy, full stop, and, you know, whatever happens, you know, so be it. And so we, I think particularly in a place, in a conversation at the UN, we’ve got to figure out a way to hold all those things together and put them in balance, even understanding that it’s going to be very hard to do. And I think this is, that’s innovation, right? I mean, I think that we have had other moments where we said, you know, you’ve got to, you’ve mentioned seatbelts, seatbelts in the cars, we put guardrails on the road that allow you to sort of go where you want to go, steer a little bit faster. I mean, there are other kinds of historical moments in which we have had to make choices about how we want to advance things. And I would, you know, I think one of the challenges that we want to offer to the world, particularly to the scientific community, is how do you build these models more sustainably? How do you build data centers that are cooler, that use less water? I mean, it is a, like, it’s a, it is, these are the scientific challenges. engineering challenges of our time. And I think for many scientists, they’re incredibly exciting to think about as puzzles and how do we incentivize that?

Ian Bremmer: So we have only three minutes left. And I wanna use that for our two co-chairs, if you don’t mind. And I wanna ask both of you, take a step back. Is this a historic moment? In 10 years time, do we go back? Is there a COP process for artificial intelligence? Are we thinking differently about global AI? Are we applying our models in ways that are more inclusive, more integrative because of what is being done right now? Do you believe that? I wanna ask both of you, what it means for you. James.

James Manyika: I think this is a very important moment. One of the things that gives me enormous confidence is the fact that we’re still so early in the development of this technology. The fact that we’re having these debates, these discussions, this early in the development of a technology that still is in its early stages gives me a lot of hope. The fact that we’re able to at least agree on fundamental principles that should guide the development of this technology, that gives me enormous hope. The fact that we can actually have a multi-stakeholder conversation about this and come together to think about, so how do we do this? It goes back to what you said, Ian. The fact that we very quickly got to agree on basic principles and that much of the debate and hard work all had to do with how do we do it, that gives me hope. So I’m actually quite optimistic about all of this. I think, but it’s only incumbent on everybody here and all of us in the room to make sure we progress this with humanity’s best interests at the center of what we do with this technology.

Ian Bremmer: Carme, you get a minute.

Carme Artigas: I’m absolutely confident that here, in changing times, we have managed to develop AI for the good of humanity with more inclusiveness, with more opportunity to all, not only relying to the goodwill of organizations and governments, but we have. created really the governance instruments to make it happen and that we would look back to today of today and say, we were proposing the right thing, but most important, the nations were brave enough to adopt them.

Ian Bremmer: So before we close, I want to thank you to the panel, but I know everybody here would be a little remiss if we didn’t ask our friend Amandeep to stand up, our special envoy who made this process work. Tireless, tireless efforts, incredibly balanced decency, moral guidance and integrity and reflects everything that we are hoping for on this panel would not be happening if he wasn’t there. And I just want to thank you for everybody here. Thanks so much for joining us. We’re out of time and we’ll see you soon.

Redi Thlabi: Thank you so much, Ian, for this marvelous moderating of that panel and to your panelists as well. So much love, respect and affection, I see, but we’ve got to move along to the next segment of the program. Thank you all so very much. Thank you. I’ll introduce our next guest once we’ve all settled down to prepare for the next speaker as we wind down to the final segment of our convening this afternoon. I’d like us to settle down so we can give the president his moment and an opportunity to address us as we take the final steps to our event today. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, again, please help me in starting this joint closing. Help me welcome, a warm welcome, he’s travelled a long way to be here. Western Africa is a long way from here. His Excellency, I’m not going to call him up until we’ve all settled. I think it is appropriate. I think it is appropriate to demonstrate our own commitment, our own respect, and a word that Ian used earlier, decency, in describing Amandeep Singh Gill, UN Secretary General’s envoy on technology. So I’d like us to afford the same warmth and decency to our next speaker. It is a pleasure to welcome on stage his Excellency, the President of Botswana, Mokgweetsi Masisi, for his closing comments.

Mokgweetsi Masisi: Mr. Secretary General, Excellencies, I wish to express my profound gratitude to the Secretary General of the United Nations, His Excellency Antonio Guterres, for the invitation to participate in the Action Days session ahead of the summit of the future that is scheduled for 22nd to the 23rd September 2024, particularly on the segment of the digital track. Recommendations go to all the speakers and presenters on the digital future for all for highlighting the significance of digital justice. Digital technology is pivotal in global transformation. The effects of its impact can either be positive or negative, depending on how we harness the opportunities and mitigate challenges. However, the scope of positive impact remains high if we can collectively work towards this end. It is critical to make a link between digital inclusion and digital cooperation to bridge the divide between nation-states and within nation-states. We need to recognize that the digital divide emanates from disparities between the developed and developing countries. Technology has the potential to advance the promotion and acceleration of closing the gap in opportunities between genders and, consequently, can lead to the attainment of gender parity goals. More importantly, digital space has the potential to advance the promotion of human rights, if unimpeded. Furthermore, issues of international peace and security leverage on the use of digital technologies to inform the world of the threats and challenges that need to be addressed. Botswana, therefore, commits to be part of the brigade that flags the criticality of the potential of digitalization and cautions of its threats. Thus, my Administration has prioritized digitalization as one of its priorities within its flagship strategy of the Reset and Reclaim Agenda. I assure you of the Republic of Botswana Government’s commitment to continue to be open and amplify our voice on issues of digitalization. It is also my fervent hope that the global aspirations outlined in the Global Digital Compact would close gaps, create inclusivity, and promote access. by once again extending my sincere appreciation to the Secretary-General and all other key stakeholders for a productive session as we all look towards the summit of the future tomorrow. Thank you.

Redi Thlabi: Thank you very much. And now, for the final segment of our closing, a pleasure to welcome Amdip Singh Jo, UN Secretary-General’s envoy in technology. If you could also join him on stage, please. We heard from you earlier this morning Achim Steiner, Administrator of UNDP. If you can also come with him at the same time, thank you. Thank you. Doreen Bogdan-Martin, Secretary-General of the ITU. If you could also kindly come on stage, please. I’ll pick on you first, Amandeep, to speak, okay? Thank you.

Amandeep Singh Gill: And thank you to all of you for being here with us at this moment, this very important moment. And I want to thank my partners in this endeavour, Doreen and Achim, and their teams for the incredible work that we’ve been able to do together. I have only three points to share with you as reflection from the day. First, the importance of connection. And as we heard in the video, it’s not about connecting the circuits, it’s about connecting the people. So it’s the connections across people, people from different geographies, different backgrounds, different sectors, different lived experiences. We can only get the digital future right. if we connect people. The other second point that I take away from the day is the importance of not retreating into silos. Everything is connected. We can’t deal with AI without dealing with data. We can’t deal with either without dealing with digital public infrastructure and connectivity and so on. So we need to take a holistic view. And the last point I want to share is the importance of humility. I think we need to listen more than we speak. All of us who are in the policy space need to be very, very humble about what their understanding of technology is, what its implications are. We need to work together. We need to constantly update ourselves and hang out with the right people so that we can bring their insights, their valuable insights, into our policy work and improve the quality of our policy responses. So thank you very much. It’s a very exciting moment. It’s a very sobering moment at the same time. There’s a lot of work ahead. But with you, we can get there. Thank you.

Redi Thlabi: Thank you so much. I think you can speak at the podium or on your microphone. It’s up to you.

Achim Steiner: I’ll just use the microphone. And thank you, I will not use the teleprompter because it’s really just two things that I want to say. One is a really big thank you. You and we and all of us in the UN today had a treat. We listened to presidents, to CEOs, to young entrepreneurs, to artists, to people who, together with science, engineering, technology, are able to walk again, at least, with the help of technology. We’ve had an extraordinary day. And I hope that what you can take away from this SDG Digital Day and also this prospect of AI that to all of us is still somewhat unknown, even though we know it is going to be central to our lives as we think into the future, is this age of possibility. There is so much in the world right now that makes… everyone feel like they live under a cloud and sometimes you lose perspective. I think today I hope you all got a sense of what an extraordinary age we live in and if we make the right choices what an extraordinary age it can be for the next generation and for everyone. In that spirit I want to thank Amandeep, I want to thank Doreen, our staff who’ve actually been working for weeks on all of this and everybody else who supported this day today by turning it into something that I hope the United Nations will always be known for. Even in the darkest days there is hope and it will be done and it will be led by people. Thank you so much.

Doreen Bogdan-Martin: Thank you, thank you Achim and thank you Amandeep and indeed it has been an extraordinary, extraordinary day. Sustainable, inclusive, responsible. Three concepts at the heart of our digital track during the summit of the future action days and I would like to add to that hope because nothing gives me more hope for our shared digital future than all of you. Our brilliant innovators, our partner to connect pledgers, our digital game changers, you showed us technology can be co-created with the people it’s built for involving them directly as decision makers in design. You showed us how to make digital work with the lived realities of people in developing countries and underserved and vulnerable populations. You showed us how emerging tech from augmented reality to AI can help boost our planet’s resilience while supporting climate action. You showed us how digital skill building can lead to decent work and economic prosperity. in the unlikeliest of places against all odds. You showed us what peace tech can do to rescue the SDGs. You even showed us how much it will take, literally, an investment to connect everyone everywhere by 2030 through the Connecting Humanity Action Blueprint mentioned by Saudi Arabia. And you showed us your commitment to do what it takes through new Partner to Connect pledges. And I thank you for those new pledges. Ladies and gentlemen, we are the SDG generation. A digital future full of hope, possibility, and ambition is in our hands. And I want to thank each and every one of you for giving us a glimpse today. You gave us a glimpse of what is possible. We may have come to the end of our first Digital Action Day, our second SDG Digital, but the action certainly does not stop here. It can’t. Because too much is at stake. Fired up by hope, let’s take everything that we’ve learned today, let’s go out there and let us build a more sustainable, inclusive, and responsible digital future for all. And let’s build it together. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, as we wrap up, and as Akeem already mentioned, I think it’s important to understand this really was a team effort here. And I also want to acknowledge all of the staff, and if I may, can I ask the staff to just stand up? Because this wouldn’t have happened without our amazing teams. I know it’s dark in the room. Thank you.

Redi Thlabi: Thank you very much. Now that’s leadership, because often we say we leave no one behind, but we forget the people who are doing the groundwork, who perhaps don’t have the opportunity to shine on the global stage. So I find that very inspirational indeed. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, let me thank you, all of you, for being here today. It’s been a long day. I’ve got nothing to add to all the challenging, inspiring messages that we’ve heard today as we journey together towards a digital future for all. For all. Now, the last thing I’m going to tell you is that that online forum or platform where you can make your inputs is going to be up tomorrow after world leaders have adopted the Global Digital Compact. Please speak honestly, share what you know, what you think, what you’ve experienced, and take the learnings from today as you make your input. We look forward to them. Thank you so very much for today. Goodbye.

C

Carme Artigas

Speech speed

172 words per minute

Speech length

963 words

Speech time

335 seconds

Unique UN position to lead global AI governance

Explanation

The UN is uniquely positioned to lead global AI governance due to its mandate, reach, and legitimacy. It can bring all nations and stakeholders to the table, building on its historical success in governing international issues.

Evidence

Examples of UN’s past success in governing climate change and arms control

Major Discussion Point

The importance and role of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

Agreed with

Omar Al Olama

James Manyika

Tumi Makgabo

Volker Turk

Agreed on

Importance of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

Balancing innovation and risk mitigation in AI governance

Explanation

AI governance should focus on both opportunities and risks, not just existential risks. There is a need to balance innovation with risk mitigation, considering the different perceptions of risks across global north and south.

Evidence

Risk analysis survey showing differences in risk perception between global north and south

Major Discussion Point

Governance and regulation of AI

Disagreed with

James Manyika

Disagreed on

Focus on risks vs opportunities in AI governance

O

Omar Al Olama

Speech speed

191 words per minute

Speech length

254 words

Speech time

79 seconds

GDC as starting point for future action on AI

Explanation

The Global Digital Compact is seen as a great starting point for future action on AI. It provides a framework for cooperation and action on AI governance.

Evidence

UAE’s commitment to be part of the roadmap put forward by the UN

Major Discussion Point

The importance and role of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

Agreed with

Carme Artigas

James Manyika

Tumi Makgabo

Volker Turk

Agreed on

Importance of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

J

James Manyika

Speech speed

181 words per minute

Speech length

1479 words

Speech time

489 seconds

Need for multi-stakeholder approach in AI governance

Explanation

AI governance requires a multi-stakeholder approach due to the diverse nature of opportunities, risks, and inclusivity challenges. This approach involves companies, researchers, NGOs, governments, and civil society.

Evidence

Composition of the UN advisory body representing diverse stakeholders

Major Discussion Point

The importance and role of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

Agreed with

Carme Artigas

Omar Al Olama

Tumi Makgabo

Volker Turk

Agreed on

Importance of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

Need to bridge digital divide to prevent AI divide

Explanation

There is an urgent need to bridge the digital divide to prevent it from becoming an AI divide. This requires providing access to AI technology and building capacity, especially in the Global South.

Evidence

Recommendation for a capacity fund or network to bring AI access to the Global South

Major Discussion Point

Opportunities and challenges of AI for development

Agreed with

Tumi Makgabo

Sundar Pichai

Agreed on

Addressing the digital divide to prevent an AI divide

Role of private sector in responsible AI development

Explanation

The private sector has a significant responsibility in AI development, including conducting fundamental research, developing technology responsibly, and engaging with governments and other stakeholders. They also have a duty to be transparent and build public trust.

Evidence

Examples of private sector research labs leading AI development

Major Discussion Point

Governance and regulation of AI

Need for real-time scientific panel on AI developments

Explanation

There is a need for a scientific panel that can provide real-time insights on AI developments, both in terms of benefits and risks. This panel should work differently from existing models like the IPCC, given the rapid pace of AI advancements.

Evidence

Comparison with IPCC’s seven-year reporting cycle, which is too slow for AI

Major Discussion Point

Governance and regulation of AI

Addressing both risks and missed opportunities of AI

Explanation

AI governance should address not only the risks but also the missed opportunities, especially for the Global South. There is a need to focus on enabling infrastructure and capacity building to ensure inclusive participation in AI development and benefits.

Evidence

Inclusion of ‘missed uses’ in the advisory body’s risk discussions

Major Discussion Point

Ensuring AI benefits humanity

Agreed with

Sundar Pichai

Felix Mutati

Agreed on

AI’s potential to accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goals

Disagreed with

Carme Artigas

Disagreed on

Focus on risks vs opportunities in AI governance

T

Tumi Makgabo

Speech speed

166 words per minute

Speech length

2102 words

Speech time

757 seconds

GDC addresses digital divides and inclusive governance

Explanation

The Global Digital Compact aims to address existing digital divides and promote more inclusive digital governance. It recognizes the need for a more equitable digital future.

Major Discussion Point

The importance and role of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

Agreed with

James Manyika

Sundar Pichai

Agreed on

Addressing the digital divide to prevent an AI divide

V

Volker Turk

Speech speed

162 words per minute

Speech length

854 words

Speech time

315 seconds

GDC builds on existing human rights frameworks

Explanation

The Global Digital Compact builds on existing human rights frameworks, which provide a universal and dynamic foundation for addressing AI governance. This approach ensures that human rights considerations are central to AI development and deployment.

Evidence

Reference to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and its continued relevance

Major Discussion Point

The importance and role of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

Agreed with

Carme Artigas

Omar Al Olama

James Manyika

Tumi Makgabo

Agreed on

Importance of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

Focusing on AI use cases that benefit humanity

Explanation

There is a need to focus on AI use cases that benefit humanity and contribute to the common good. This involves filling the concept of ‘public good’ with content that aligns with human rights principles.

Evidence

Mention of startups focusing on projects for the common good

Major Discussion Point

Ensuring AI benefits humanity

S

Sundar Pichai

Speech speed

136 words per minute

Speech length

1405 words

Speech time

618 seconds

AI can accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goals

Explanation

AI has the potential to accelerate progress on the UN Sustainable Development Goals. It can be applied to benefit humanity in various areas such as health, education, and climate action.

Evidence

Examples of AI applications in language translation, scientific discovery, and disaster prediction

Major Discussion Point

Opportunities and challenges of AI for development

Agreed with

James Manyika

Felix Mutati

Agreed on

AI’s potential to accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goals

AI enables economic progress and entrepreneurship

Explanation

AI is enabling economic progress and entrepreneurship, especially in emerging markets. It can boost productivity across sectors and create new opportunities for businesses.

Evidence

Example of Gary Logistics in Ethiopia using AI to improve operations and create job opportunities

Major Discussion Point

Opportunities and challenges of AI for development

Agreed with

James Manyika

Tumi Makgabo

Agreed on

Addressing the digital divide to prevent an AI divide

J

Josephine Teo

Speech speed

141 words per minute

Speech length

795 words

Speech time

338 seconds

Importance of building AI capacity in developing countries

Explanation

There is a need to build AI capacity in developing countries to ensure they can participate in and benefit from AI advancements. This involves working with employers, providing individual learning support, and building training infrastructure.

Evidence

Singapore’s approach to enabling workers to acquire relevant skills for the future

Major Discussion Point

Opportunities and challenges of AI for development

F

Felix Mutati

Speech speed

98 words per minute

Speech length

411 words

Speech time

251 seconds

Potential of AI to transform lives in rural areas

Explanation

AI and digital technologies have the potential to transform lives in rural areas by providing access to information and services. This can lead to improved farming methods and economic opportunities.

Evidence

Example of a young farmer in rural Zambia using a mobile phone and internet to access weather forecasts and market prices

Major Discussion Point

Opportunities and challenges of AI for development

Agreed with

Sundar Pichai

James Manyika

Agreed on

AI’s potential to accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goals

M

Margrethe Vestager

Speech speed

137 words per minute

Speech length

792 words

Speech time

345 seconds

Need for global cooperation on AI governance

Explanation

There is a need for global cooperation on AI governance to address challenges that individual countries cannot solve alone. The Global Digital Compact provides a framework for such cooperation.

Major Discussion Point

Governance and regulation of AI

Importance of enforceable AI regulation

Explanation

Enforceable AI regulation is crucial to create a systemic response to the challenges posed by AI. This includes legislation to keep markets open, ensure digital services are safe, and protect privacy.

Evidence

Examples of EU legislation like the Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act

Major Discussion Point

Governance and regulation of AI

A

Alondra Nelson

Speech speed

207 words per minute

Speech length

1177 words

Speech time

340 seconds

Centering human rights in AI development

Explanation

Human rights should be at the center of AI development and governance. This involves anchoring AI governance in fundamental human rights principles and international law.

Major Discussion Point

Ensuring AI benefits humanity

Need for sustainable and ethical AI development practices

Explanation

There is a need for more sustainable and ethical AI development practices. This includes addressing issues of climate sustainability, labor practices in data training, and the extraction of critical minerals.

Evidence

Mention of concerns about climate impact, labor exploitation, and resource extraction in AI development

Major Discussion Point

Ensuring AI benefits humanity

V

Vilas Dhar

Speech speed

217 words per minute

Speech length

859 words

Speech time

236 seconds

Importance of community engagement in AI development

Explanation

Community engagement is crucial in AI development to ensure that AI solutions meet the needs of the people they are intended to serve. This involves working with communities to understand their needs and involving them in decision-making processes.

Evidence

Proposal for a global fund to support community-defined digital agency

Major Discussion Point

Ensuring AI benefits humanity

Agreements

Agreement Points

Importance of the Global Digital Compact (GDC)

Carme Artigas

Omar Al Olama

James Manyika

Tumi Makgabo

Volker Turk

Unique UN position to lead global AI governance

GDC as starting point for future action on AI

Need for multi-stakeholder approach in AI governance

GDC addresses digital divides and inclusive governance

GDC builds on existing human rights frameworks

Speakers agreed on the critical role of the Global Digital Compact in addressing AI governance, digital divides, and promoting inclusive development while building on existing frameworks.

Addressing the digital divide to prevent an AI divide

James Manyika

Tumi Makgabo

Sundar Pichai

Need to bridge digital divide to prevent AI divide

GDC addresses digital divides and inclusive governance

AI enables economic progress and entrepreneurship

Speakers emphasized the importance of bridging the digital divide to ensure equitable access to AI technologies and prevent further inequalities.

AI’s potential to accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goals

Sundar Pichai

James Manyika

Felix Mutati

AI can accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goals

Addressing both risks and missed opportunities of AI

Potential of AI to transform lives in rural areas

Speakers highlighted AI’s potential to contribute to sustainable development and improve lives, particularly in developing regions.

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers emphasized the need for a balanced approach to AI governance that promotes innovation while mitigating risks through enforceable regulations.

Carme Artigas

Margrethe Vestager

Balancing innovation and risk mitigation in AI governance

Importance of enforceable AI regulation

Both speakers stressed the importance of grounding AI governance and development in existing human rights frameworks.

Volker Turk

Alondra Nelson

GDC builds on existing human rights frameworks

Centering human rights in AI development

Unexpected Consensus

Multi-stakeholder approach to AI governance

Carme Artigas

James Manyika

Vilas Dhar

Unique UN position to lead global AI governance

Need for multi-stakeholder approach in AI governance

Importance of community engagement in AI development

Despite representing different sectors (government, private sector, and civil society), these speakers unexpectedly agreed on the necessity of a multi-stakeholder approach to AI governance, emphasizing the importance of inclusive participation from various sectors and communities.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of agreement included the importance of the Global Digital Compact, the need to address digital divides, AI’s potential for sustainable development, the necessity of human rights-based approaches, and the importance of multi-stakeholder governance.

Consensus level

There was a high level of consensus among speakers on fundamental principles and goals for AI governance. This consensus suggests a strong foundation for global cooperation on AI development and regulation, which could facilitate more rapid progress in implementing the Global Digital Compact and related initiatives. However, the specific mechanisms for implementation and balancing various interests may still require further negotiation and refinement.

Disagreements

Disagreement Points

Focus on risks vs opportunities in AI governance

Carme Artigas

James Manyika

Balancing innovation and risk mitigation in AI governance

Addressing both risks and missed opportunities of AI

While both speakers acknowledge the need to address risks, Carme Artigas emphasizes the importance of not overlooking opportunities, especially for the global south, while James Manyika stresses the need to address both risks and missed opportunities equally.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of disagreement revolve around the balance between focusing on risks versus opportunities in AI governance, and the specific approaches to ensuring sustainable and ethical AI development.

Disagreement level

The level of disagreement among the speakers is relatively low. Most speakers agree on the fundamental principles and goals of AI governance, with differences mainly in emphasis and specific implementation strategies. This suggests a generally unified vision for the Global Digital Compact, which bodes well for its potential implementation and effectiveness.

Partial Agreements

Partial Agreements

Both speakers agree on the need for ongoing research and monitoring of AI developments, but James Manyika focuses on the speed and real-time nature of the panel, while Alondra Nelson emphasizes the importance of sustainability and ethical considerations in AI development.

James Manyika

Alondra Nelson

Need for real-time scientific panel on AI developments

Need for sustainable and ethical AI development practices

Both speakers recognize the potential of AI for development, but while Sundar Pichai focuses on the positive impacts, Alondra Nelson emphasizes the need to address sustainability and ethical concerns in AI development.

Sundar Pichai

Alondra Nelson

AI can accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goals

Need for sustainable and ethical AI development practices

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers emphasized the need for a balanced approach to AI governance that promotes innovation while mitigating risks through enforceable regulations.

Carme Artigas

Margrethe Vestager

Balancing innovation and risk mitigation in AI governance

Importance of enforceable AI regulation

Both speakers stressed the importance of grounding AI governance and development in existing human rights frameworks.

Volker Turk

Alondra Nelson

GDC builds on existing human rights frameworks

Centering human rights in AI development

Takeaways

Key Takeaways

The Global Digital Compact (GDC) is seen as a crucial starting point for global AI governance and cooperation

AI has significant potential to accelerate progress on Sustainable Development Goals and enable economic development

There is a need for inclusive, multi-stakeholder governance of AI that involves developing countries

Balancing innovation with risk mitigation is key in AI governance and regulation

Centering human rights and community engagement in AI development is essential

Building AI capacity and infrastructure in developing countries is critical to prevent an AI divide

Resolutions and Action Items

Launch of a Global AI Opportunity Fund by Google to invest $120 million in AI education and training globally

Proposal to establish a global fund on AI for sustainable development

Recommendation to create an international scientific panel on AI

Plan to make an online platform available for public input on the Global Digital Compact after its adoption

Unresolved Issues

Specific mechanisms for enforcing AI governance globally

Details on implementation of the proposed global fund on AI

How to effectively balance AI development with sustainability and climate concerns

Concrete steps to ensure AI benefits reach marginalized communities

Suggested Compromises

Using existing UN frameworks and agencies to implement AI governance rather than creating new institutions immediately

Focusing on both risks and opportunities of AI to address concerns of developed and developing nations

Balancing regulation with market incentives to encourage ethical AI development by companies

Thought Provoking Comments

We too often equate governance with control. And it’s part of a conversation that’s much bigger. I think we have followed a narrative that technology companies innovate and governments regulate and somehow in that the rest of us go along. But that’s not the point of governance, right? Governance is to set a shared vision for humanity, is to think about all of the resources we can bring to bear to make shared decisions that put agency with communities, that allow voices to participate and to come forward.

Speaker

Vilas Dhar

Reason

This comment reframes the concept of governance in a more inclusive and participatory way, challenging the typical narrative of top-down control.

Impact

It shifted the conversation towards considering governance as a collaborative process involving multiple stakeholders, not just governments and tech companies. This perspective was echoed by other panelists throughout the discussion.

We don’t think about capacity building as finding a few critical enablers and saying let’s invest in compute. Or let’s just make sure there are data sources. Instead, we think about a holistic network that says let’s actually look with communities at what their needs are and think about a mechanism by which we say there is massive resources across the system.

Speaker

Vilas Dhar

Reason

This comment provides a nuanced view of capacity building, emphasizing the importance of community needs and holistic approaches.

Impact

It deepened the discussion on implementation strategies, moving beyond technical solutions to consider social and community contexts.

We need to recognize that the digital divide emanates from disparities between the developed and developing countries. Technology has the potential to advance the promotion and acceleration of closing the gap in opportunities between genders and, consequently, can lead to the attainment of gender parity goals.

Speaker

Mokgweetsi Masisi

Reason

This comment highlights the interconnection between digital divides, global inequality, and gender disparities.

Impact

It broadened the scope of the discussion to include considerations of global equity and gender equality in digital development.

We don’t know enough. So I would also associate myself with Dr. Jian, and that we don’t know the science. I mean, if we think back about the high watermark of the COVID-19 pandemic, and there were lots of preprints and lots of papers, and I think in that context, perhaps it was okay to say, you know, we’re going to figure out the science as we’re, you know, we’re going to build a plane while we’re flying it. We actually don’t know enough about these systems and tools and models.

Speaker

Alondra Nelson

Reason

This comment acknowledges the limitations of current knowledge about AI systems and draws a parallel to the rapid scientific developments during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Impact

It introduced a note of caution and humility into the discussion, emphasizing the need for ongoing research and scientific understanding alongside policy development.

Connect the schools. Connect the young people. Connect my children.

Speaker

Nnenna Nwakanma

Reason

This simple yet powerful statement cuts through complex policy discussions to highlight a fundamental priority.

Impact

It refocused the conversation on the practical, human-centered outcomes of digital development, particularly for young people and education.

Overall Assessment

These key comments shaped the discussion by broadening its scope beyond technical and policy considerations to include community needs, global equity, scientific understanding, and practical human outcomes. They challenged conventional narratives about governance and implementation, emphasizing the importance of inclusive, participatory approaches and acknowledging the complexities and unknowns in the field of AI. The discussion evolved from high-level policy talk to considering concrete actions and their impacts on diverse communities, particularly in the Global South.

Follow-up Questions

How can we ensure AI benefits are distributed equitably and the digital divide does not become an AI divide?

Speaker

James Manyika

Explanation

This is critical to ensure AI does not exacerbate existing inequalities between developed and developing countries.

How can we build AI models and data centers more sustainably to address climate and environmental concerns?

Speaker

Alondra Nelson

Explanation

This is important to ensure AI development does not conflict with climate goals and sustainability efforts.

How can we create a real-time scientific panel to study and report on AI developments and impacts?

Speaker

James Manyika

Explanation

A rapid, ongoing research effort is needed to keep up with the fast pace of AI advancement and inform governance efforts.

How can we implement capacity building and create a global fund to support AI development in the Global South?

Speaker

James Manyika and Vilas Dhar

Explanation

This is crucial to enable developing countries to participate in and benefit from AI advancements.

How can we better involve impacted communities in shaping AI governance and development?

Speaker

Alondra Nelson

Explanation

Ensuring diverse voices are included is essential for creating AI systems that work for all of humanity.

How can we create a shared global AI infrastructure to enable more inclusive research and development?

Speaker

Jian Wang

Explanation

This could help democratize AI development and reduce concentration of power in a few countries or companies.

How can we balance discussions of AI risks with equal focus on opportunities, especially for the Global South?

Speaker

Carme Artigas

Explanation

A balanced approach is needed to fully realize AI’s potential while mitigating risks.

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed.

Intel moves photonics business to Data Centre division

As restructuring unfolds, Intel is making significant changes to its photonics business by moving its Integrated Photonics Solutions (IPS) into the Data Centre and Artificial Intelligence division (DCAI). The main goal is to better align its R&D efforts with core business priorities. This shift follows recent advancements in integrated photonics technology, including the first fully integrated optical compute interconnect (OCI) chipset, representing a major leap in high-bandwidth interconnect for AI and high-performance computing.

Intel’s Integrated Photonics Solutions (IPS) division specialises in light generation and optical signal modulation, which are key to addressing signal loss in high-density transistors. By utilising optical signals rather than electrical ones, silicon photonics technology facilitates faster data transmission and increased bandwidth. Since its 2016 launch, Intel’s silicon photonics platform has delivered millions of photonic integrated circuits and on-chip lasers, with widespread adoption among major cloud service providers.

Integrating IPS with DCAI underscores Intel’s dedication to advancing silicon photonics, a field also being quickly developed by rivals such as AMD and TSMC.

The Power of the Commons: Digital Public Goods for a More Secure, Inclusive and Resilient World

The Power of the Commons: Digital Public Goods for a More Secure, Inclusive and Resilient World

Session at a Glance

Summary

This event focused on the power of digital commons and digital public goods (DPGs) in creating a more secure, inclusive, and resilient world. Speakers from governments, international organizations, academia, and civil society discussed the transformative potential of DPGs and digital public infrastructure (DPI) in fostering sustainable development and advancing human rights globally.

Key themes included the importance of multi-stakeholder collaboration, the need to close digital divides, and the critical role of community-led initiatives in developing DPGs. Speakers highlighted successful examples like Wikipedia and emphasized how DPGs can democratize access to knowledge and technology. The discussion underscored the importance of embedding human rights and democratic values in the design of digital systems.

Participants stressed the need for robust governance frameworks and universal safeguards to ensure DPGs and DPIs respect privacy, promote inclusion, and protect against misuse. The role of governments in providing legal frameworks and supporting connectivity was discussed, alongside the importance of civil society participation in shaping digital governance.

Academia was highlighted as a key contributor to digital commons through knowledge creation, incubation of projects, and research on societal impacts. Speakers called for increased investment in digital skills and emphasized trust and safety as crucial for the continued development and use of DPGs.

The event concluded with calls to action for building a global ecosystem around DPGs, integrating them into various policy fields, and fostering international cooperation to leverage their potential in addressing global challenges and achieving sustainable development goals.

Keypoints

Major discussion points:

– The importance of digital public goods (DPGs) and digital public infrastructure (DPI) for inclusive development and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals

– The need for multi-stakeholder collaboration and community-led approaches in developing and governing DPGs

– The role of governments in supporting DPGs through policy frameworks, funding, and infrastructure

– The critical importance of embedding human rights and democratic values in the design of digital systems and DPGs

– The potential of DPGs to democratize access to knowledge and empower marginalized communities

Overall purpose:

The discussion aimed to highlight the transformative potential of digital public goods and digital public infrastructure in fostering sustainable, inclusive development worldwide. It sought to encourage multi-stakeholder partnerships to promote and protect DPGs that are truly universal and reflect diverse voices.

Tone:

The overall tone was optimistic and forward-looking, with speakers expressing enthusiasm about the potential of DPGs while also acknowledging challenges. There was a sense of urgency about the need to act now to shape the digital future in line with democratic values and human rights. The tone remained consistent throughout, emphasizing collaboration and shared responsibility among different stakeholders.

Speakers

Moderators/Facilitators:

– Costanza Sciubba Caniglia (Anti-Disinformation Strategy Lead at Wikimedia Foundation)

– Nicole Manger (Lead Global AI Governance and Digital Cooperation at Federal Foreign Office of Germany)

Speakers:

– Amandeep Gill (UN Secretary-General’s Envoy on Technology)

– Krzysztof Szczerski (Ambassador of Poland)

– Alicia Buenrostro Massieu (Deputy Permanent Representative of Mexico to the UN)

– Rebecca MacKinnon (Vice President Global Advocacy at Wikimedia Foundation)

– Ivan Sigal (Executive Director of Global Voices)

– Fabro Steibel (ITS Rio)

– Eileen Donahoe (Coordinator for Digital Freedom, US Department of State)

– Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi (Director General of NITDA Nigeria)

– Marianne Díaz Hernández (YID Campaigner at Access Now)

– Jimmy Wales (Co-founder of Wikipedia)

– Urs Gasser (Professor at Technical University of Munich)

– Emran Mian (Director General for Digital and Telecoms, UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology)

– Anna Christmann (Member of German Parliament, member of UN Secretary-General’s High-Level Advisory Body on AI)

Areas of expertise among speakers include digital governance, technology policy, digital rights, civil society engagement, digital public goods, artificial intelligence, and international relations.

Full session report

Digital Public Goods: Building a More Secure, Inclusive, and Resilient World

This high-level discussion brought together experts from governments, international organizations, academia, and civil society to explore the transformative potential of digital public goods (DPGs) and digital public infrastructure (DPI) in fostering sustainable development and advancing human rights globally.

Event Structure and Overview

Costanza Sciubba Caniglia opened the event, outlining its structure: opening remarks, success stories, and a panel discussion. The event aimed to highlight the importance of DPGs and DPI in promoting inclusive digital transformation and sustainable development.

Key Themes and Discussions

1. The Importance of Digital Public Goods and Infrastructure

Speakers unanimously agreed on the critical role of DPGs and DPI in promoting inclusive, sustainable digital transformation. Amandeep Gill, UN Secretary-General’s Envoy on Technology, set the tone by emphasising that “well-governed commons are the foundations of human civilization. Digital is no exception, and today more than ever digital commons are vital to our interconnected world.”

Fabro Steibel provided a thought-provoking perspective, noting that “DPIs emerge earlier and faster in the Global South than in the Global North. This is what research shows and most likely this is because out of necessity. In the Global South, we need better technologies to spread and equalise wealth and power.” This insight challenged common assumptions about technological innovation and highlighted the unique contributions of the Global South in developing digital public infrastructure.

Alicia Buenrostro Massieu, Deputy Permanent Representative of Mexico to the UN, stressed the importance of DPGs and DPI in closing the digital divide, while Eileen Donahoe, Coordinator for Digital Freedom at the US Department of State, emphasised the need for universal safeguards to protect human rights in the development and implementation of these technologies.

2. Multi-stakeholder Collaboration and Community-led Approaches

The discussion highlighted the crucial role of multi-stakeholder collaboration in developing and governing DPGs. Speakers agreed that involving diverse stakeholders, including civil society, academia, and community members, is essential for creating truly inclusive and effective digital public goods.

Marianne Díaz Hernández of Access Now emphasised the role of civil society in ensuring DPGs remain transparent, inclusive, and responsive to societal needs. Urs Gasser, Professor at Technical University of Munich, highlighted academia’s multifaceted contribution: “Academia can not only contribute in these different forms substantively to the formation of digital commons and digital public goods. It can also study and assess what we can learn about digital commons as we go forward, about the societal impact about the relevance, we can assess whether we pass the Wikipedia test when new policies are rolled out.”

Jimmy Wales, co-founder of Wikipedia, stressed the importance of community-driven governance, using Wikipedia as a prime example of a successful DPG. He suggested that when considering digital policies, one should ask, “If you’re about to pass some rule, think about, is this going to wreck Wikipedia? And if it is, it might not be a great rule.”

3. The Role of Governments and Policy Frameworks

While there was broad agreement on the importance of government support for DPGs, there were nuanced differences in how speakers viewed the government’s role. Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi, Director General of NITDA Nigeria, emphasised the need for governments to provide legal frameworks and connectivity for DPGs.

Emran Mian, Director General for Digital and Telecoms at the UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, focused on the importance of digital skills and trust and safety in the context of enjoying and creating DPGs. Anna Christmann, member of the UN Secretary-General’s High-Level Advisory Body on AI, called for bringing DPG discussions to other policy areas like climate change and COP negotiations.

4. Human Rights and Democratic Values in Digital Systems

A recurring theme throughout the discussion was the critical importance of embedding human rights and democratic values in the design of digital systems and DPGs. Marianne Díaz Hernández provided a thought-provoking comment on this issue: “When we focus on development above human rights, instead of understanding development as a tool to achieve human rights, we risk creating systems that have not been designed with human rights as a principle, but as an afterthought.”

Eileen Donahoe echoed this sentiment, advocating for universal safeguards to protect human rights in DPGs and DPI. This emphasis on human rights highlighted a key challenge: balancing rapid development of DPGs with ensuring robust protections for individual rights and freedoms.

5. Success Stories and Practical Applications

Ivan Sigal from Global Voices shared insights on the importance of multilingualism in DPGs, highlighting their work in creating tools for underrepresented languages. Fabro Steibel discussed successful DPI implementations in Brazil, emphasizing the role of open-source solutions in government services.

6. Global Digital Compact and Future Initiatives

Amandeep Gill highlighted the Global Digital Compact as a new foundation for international action on DPGs and DPI. He emphasized its role in addressing key digital issues and promoting cooperation. Gill also mentioned the upcoming OSPOS for Good Conference, focusing on open-source technologies for public good.

Anna Christmann called for new hands-on initiatives to co-design frontier open data and AI solutions as DPGs. The discussion also touched on the relevance of the upcoming Summit of the Future in shaping the global digital landscape.

7. Challenges and Future Directions

The discussion identified several challenges and areas for future focus in the development of DPGs:

– Balancing development goals with protecting human rights

– Establishing sustainable funding mechanisms for DPGs and open-source projects

– Improving data and AI literacy to enable wider participation in DPG development

– Addressing potential risks and misuse of DPGs and open data

– Ensuring multilingualism and local context in global DPGs

– Developing governance models that balance community-driven approaches with government support

– Integrating DPGs into broader policy discussions on climate change, education, and healthcare

Conclusion

The discussion underscored the transformative potential of digital public goods and digital public infrastructure in fostering sustainable, inclusive development worldwide. It emphasised the need for multi-stakeholder partnerships to promote and protect DPGs that are truly universal and reflect diverse voices. The overall tone was optimistic and forward-looking, with speakers expressing enthusiasm about the potential of DPGs while also acknowledging the challenges ahead.

As the world continues to grapple with digital transformation, the insights from this discussion provide a valuable framework for leveraging DPGs to create a more secure, inclusive, and resilient global digital ecosystem. The emphasis on human rights, community-driven approaches, and multi-stakeholder collaboration offers a path forward in harnessing the power of digital commons for the benefit of all.

Session Transcript

Costanza Sciubba Caniglia: Hello, good morning, welcome, Excellencies, colleagues, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you so much for joining us today for our event, The Power of the Commons, Digital Public Goods for a More Secure, Inclusive, and Resilient World. My name is Costanza Sciubba Caniglia, I am the Anti-Disinformation Strategy Lead at the Wikimedia Foundation, and I am honored today to co-moderate this event with my colleague, Nicole Mangier, Lead Global AI Governance and Digital Cooperation at the Federal Foreign Office of Germany. Before we start, I wanted to thank our co-organizers, the Office of the Tech Envoy, the Permanent Mission of Poland and Mexico, the Federal Foreign Office of Germany, TUM, the Network of Centers, and multiple Wikimedia affiliates, Wikimedia EU, Wikimedia Poland, Wikimedia Czech, and Wikimedia Deutschland. I’m going to leave the floor to Nicole in a moment, but just wanted to articulate the event is going to be divided in four parts. We’re going to have opening remarks, and then we’re going to have a section on success stories that will serve to ground the panel that will come afterwards, with a couple of examples of grassroots digital public good examples. And then we’re going to have a panel of experts, and then we’ll close with a couple of closing remarks. And with this, Nicole, to you.

Nicole Manger: Thank you so much, Amandeep. Thank you so much, Amandeep. So thanks a lot, Costanza. And I also very warmly welcome you to our side event, The Power of the Commons, the role of digital public goods for a more secure, inclusive, and resilient world. So this event, as Costanza said, is co-hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation and its affiliates by the governments of Mexico and Poland, and then by the UN Secretary General’s Envoy on Technology. So I want to step a little back. ask the question, like, why are we meeting here on this topic today? So, I guess we are all expecting to be, to see the pact for the future and especially the global digital compact to be adopted successfully tomorrow and adopted. Yeah, and so it’s going to be the first Compass truly global approach to an open, free, secure, and human-centered digital future for all and everywhere. And so for us today, we wanted to highlight especially the transformative potential of digital public goods for the values of the GDC, such as enabling access, inclusive access to digital technologies, and also enabling civil society to have a voice in how technology is designed and governed. Also to pool scarce resources like data and infrastructure to really increase resilience and sustainability and have a digital transformation that is also sustainable. So without further ado, I would like to introduce our esteemed speakers, opening speakers, and I first pass it on to His Excellency Under-Secretary-General Amandeep Gill, Secretary General’s Envoy on Technology.

Amandeep Gill: Thank you very much, Nicole, and I’d like to begin by welcoming all of you to the pre-summit of the Future Action Day. Thank you for being here at UN Headquarters with us. It means a lot. It means a lot to the Secretary General, to all of us. I want to also thank Mexico, Poland, and Wikimedia for organizing this event, this very important event, and I want to thank Germany for their consistent support to this constellation of important ideas. Ladies and gentlemen, well-governed commons are the foundations of human civilization. Digital is no exception, and today more than ever digital commons are vital to our interconnected world. When we speak about digital commons, we mean resources that are collectively owned and managed by a community and freely accessible to all members of our society, and on the technology front, open digital resources are key to the equitable advancement of digital digital technologies, particularly emerging technologies like AI. Nicole mentioned the Global Digital Compact. So after nearly two years of consultation and negotiations, the negotiations have concluded and there’s a text on the table as part of the pact for the future for a decision tomorrow. This document, the Global Digital Compact, embeds an international commitment to global digital commons through digital public goods and digital public infrastructure. So it is a new foundation for more meaningful, more impactful action in this area. This is very significant. The GDC can play a crucial role in democratizing access to knowledge and technological resources, ensuring that everyone everywhere, regardless of their socioeconomic status, has the opportunity to participate in benefit from the digital economy. This inclusivity is crucial for reducing inequalities and promoting social equity, aligning with the goal of leaving no one behind. Further, the collaborative nature of digital commons, including digital public goods and digital public infrastructure, fosters innovation and creativity. By enabling the free exchange of ideas and resources, by bringing data sets together, by bringing talent, coding talent in particular, together, digital commons help accelerate technological advancements and the development of new solutions to global challenges. At the same time, because you have many more eyes on the code, many more eyes on the data, you prevent misuse. You build a set of safeguards, a set of checks and balances that ensure that our digital commons work for everyone. This open and responsible innovation ecosystem can support economic growth, the creation of jobs, enhancement of productivity, contributing to overall economic prosperity and social well-being. At the UN, we know that the open nature of open source software, platforms, data, AI models are a key enabler of the Sustainable Development Goals. By leveraging the potential of Digital Commons, we believe we can accelerate progress towards the 2030 Agenda. As part of the Secretary General’s commitment to Digital Commons, my office, together with many partners, some of which are in the room today, organizes the yearly OSPOS for Good Conference. In July, we hosted this together with Germany and Kenya, the second edition of this conference. Through two days at the UN, over 600 participants from around the world gathered in New York with active engagement, high-quality discussions, and a collaborative spirit characteristic of the open-source community. I’d like to finish these remarks by inviting you all to join us in collaborating on the future of this conference in follow-up to the Global Digital Compact. In this spirit, I wish you an invigorating exchange today. Thank you.

Nicole Manger: Thank you so much, Under-Secretary General Gill. I pass on the word to His Excellency, Ambassador of Poland Krzysztof Szczerski. I am so sorry, possibly, for mispronouncing the name, but I hope I got it over to you.

Krzysztof Szczerski: Thank you very much, Excellencies, Mr. Special Envoy, ladies and gentlemen, I’m so excited to be here, being one of the, not only the daily reader of the Wikipedia, but also having my own profile on it. It’s good to be in the system, somehow. Okay, it’s my honor to be with you today, as we heard, in the dawn of the summit of the future, which we are all very excited about. First and foremost, let me congratulate the Wikimedia Foundation for gathering us and for working tirelessly to ensure the success of today’s discussions. Poland is, of course, happy to be the co-sponsor of this event. As a gentleman, digital cooperation is going to be heavily featured during the Summit of the Future and the entire High-Level Week. We expect, as we already heard, that already tomorrow the heads of states and governments will adopt the foundation for the global digital cooperation, the document which is named, as we heard, Global Digital Compact. This will mark the new era of recognition that we need to act swiftly, decisively and collectively to utilize and govern the ever-expanding digital sphere. I am more than happy to see involvement of many stakeholders from outside the governments like the lead organizer of this event, Wikimedia, in our discussions. It’s only with their active participation on equal footing that we can fully tap the potential of digital public goods and digital public infrastructure for realization of the Sustainable Development Goals. Colleagues, one of the aims of this meeting is to highlight the potential of digital commons, the role of which is inavailable in providing individuals and communities with free and easy access to information. And I just want to underline the word information because I think we get too much of the free and easy access to disinformation. And it’s crucially important since this device becomes now the best friend of many of ours. So therefore it’s very important to really guarantee that it’s free, easy, but also reliable. Therefore I would like to share with you just a couple of cases of how public open data is used by citizens in my country, Poland, to build interest in digital tools, to participate in public life, and to monitor the activity of public authorities. Take for example the portal dane.gov.pl. This is a universal access point to open data in Poland and has been enthusiastically embraced by various stakeholders. It’s a governmental portal, but open for everybody. Presidents interested in monitoring state activities use it as a tool for holding the government accountable. Companies leverage data to build innovative products and services. Another set of examples includes the fact-checking platforms run by civil society. There are various of them. Their adaptability to most recent events, such as fact-checking related to the upcoming elections, is one of their strengths. Our goal, however, in all these efforts, is not to simply implement open data policy, but to do more to construct a comprehensive, robust, citizen-friendly system that is fueled by the valuable data. And we have been recognized for our efforts by the major European and global open data rankings. Ladies and gentlemen, in conclusion, I am looking forward to learning about the concrete examples of how digital public goods and digital public infrastructure can contribute to a safe, resilient, and open digital world, which we strive to build in order to leave no one behind. And I wish you all the very enriching and exciting discussions, and I thank you. Thank you.

Nicole Manger: And next, I would pass on the word to Her Excellency Alicia Buenrostro Massieu, Deputy Permanent Representative of the Mexican United States to the United Nations in New York. The floor is yours.

Alicia Buenrostro Massieu: Thank you very much, and it’s also a pleasure to be here with all of you. In particular, it’s very good to share the floor with such a panel. And having the creator of Wikipedia, as my colleague from Poland has just mentioned, it’s just a real honor, and with them, a big deal as well. And for Mexico, a country that really has put a lot into the global digital compact. So it’s an honor, really, to be here today representing my country, Mexico. The Pact for the Future, and more specifically… the Global Digital Compact represents certainly an opportunity to consolidate a global digital governance framework that fosters inclusion, equity, and sustainability, as well as to emphasize the political relevance of this framework in the multilateral sphere. It’s the first time that we are working on this type of issue from a real compact, and that is a step forward and as the Ambassador of Poland has just mentioned, we really look forward to being able to witness that this has been passed tomorrow morning. So for my country, for Mexico, the promise of digital transformation lies in its ability to drive inclusive growth, reduce inequalities, and accelerate progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Technology must be a development catalyst and not a luxury for a few, and that is the position of my country. So this should be for everybody. Mexico’s priorities are very clear. First, we must close the digital divide and ensure that no one is left behind in the digital age. Second, to empower small and medium-sized enterprises. Technology can be a great equalizer by fostering innovation and supporting local economic activity. Third, Mexico is committed to ensuring that human rights are respected in all digital policies, and that is very important as well. As a country that enshrines the right to access information and communication technologies in our Constitution, we are dedicated to promoting meaningful digital inclusion, particularly for groups in vulnerable situations that have faced historical exclusions, such as women, indigenous peoples, and Afro-descendant communities. At the heart of our efforts is the concept of digital public goods as essential for building a digital commons that is transparent, equitable, and open to all. By investing in digital public infrastructure, we create pathways for marginalized communities to be able to fully participate in the global economy. It’s not just about providing access, but about empowering our people to innovate, to grow, and contribute to the development of their communities. Digital public goods align with Mexico’s goals of inclusive economic development and socio-economic equity. In this context, the Global Digital Compact gains relevance as a roadmap for building secure, inclusive, and rights- based digital ecosystems. Early last year, Mexico co-hosted the GDC consultation for the Americas in Mexico City, and Amandeep was there. That was along with Germany and the Office of the Secretary’s General Envoy, as I mentioned. This consultation brought together key actors from across the region to discuss the most pressing issues around digital governance and the role of digital public goods. Throughout the GDC negotiations, my country has pushed for the creation of open government initiatives, which focus on integrating digital tools into public administration to promote transparency and accountability. We are advocating for the development of inclusive and accessible digital tools, particularly tailored to small and medium enterprises and entrepreneurs. These tools must be affordable and adaptable to the needs of small businesses and local innovators, helping them leverage the power of technology for economic growth. Mexico is committed to investing in inclusive digital infrastructure, focusing on marginalized and underserved communities. By expanding access to the infrastructure in rural and in economically disadvantaged regions, we can help bridge the digital divide and ensure equitable opportunities for all. And to conclude, I would like to encourage all governments and stakeholders to ensure that digital transformation benefits all people everywhere, and that is a commitment that we almost assume. By investing in digital public goods and digital public infrastructure, and by collaborating and building on the principles, objectives, commitments, and actions outlined in the Global Digital Compact, we can consolidate the construction of a global digital environment that is inclusive, equitable, and sustainable. Thank you.

Nicole Manger: Thank you, and I would like to pass it on now to our civil society voice on this stage, Rebecca MacKinnon. She is Vice President Global Advocacy at Wikimedia Foundation and also founder of Global Voices. Rebecca, the floor is yours.

Rebecca MacKinnon: Thank you so much, Nicole. I’m here today representing the Wikimedia Foundation along with my colleague Costanza here and several other colleagues in the room. Someone was asking me just before we got seated what’s the difference between the Wikimedia Foundation and Wikipedia. We are the nonprofit organization that serves as the technical, legal, and fundraising host for Wikipedia and other volunteer-run projects that operate in over 300 languages. Wikipedia, of course, being created before the foundation existed by Jimmy Wales, who you’ll hear from later. We also have staff who support the global community of volunteers who build and maintain these projects around the world. And, of course, I’d like to thank all of our co-organizers shown on the screen today, in particular the governments of Poland, Mexico, and Germany and the Office of the UN Tech Envoy, without whose support we wouldn’t be here. And also grateful to the partnership of many others in the United Nations system, national governments, and civil society and academia who’ve helped organize this event and, more generally, in their commitment to support and protect digital public goods like Wikipedia. And we’ll take the next slide, please. So this is a group of just some of the people who maintain and create Wikipedia who traveled to Katowice in Poland just last month for an annual conference called Wikimania. It was organized, one of the key organizers actually sitting right there, the young man named Maciek. And thanks to our co-hosts and the gracious Polish people for welcoming us. We are very lucky to have him here today. Wikipedia is a digital native, but a lot of the people who build and govern this global resource of free knowledge actually find it very important to gather in person, as you see here, to brainstorm, learn from each other, and build human bonds that enable us to collaborate with empathy and understanding of each other’s lived experience. Next slide, please. New language communities are joining the Wikimedia family all the time. And this is an example, Wikimedia founder Jimmy Wales, sitting there, who you’ll hear from in a few minutes, gave the 2024 Newcomer of the Year Award at Wikimania to the people who’ve created a new version of Wikipedia in the Waiyu language. Next slide, please. And here is that new Waiyu language, Wikipedia. Waiyu is spoken by about 400,000 indigenous people in northwestern Venezuela and northeastern Colombia. It’s an example of a project that benefits an indigenous community that commercial internet companies have no financial incentive to care about. Top-down government services in a lot of countries also often fail to prioritize the needs of indigenous people whose ancient communities often span across several borders, which is why it’s so vital that governments must protect and support the people and the work behind such community-led bottom-up projects. Projects like Wikipedia, but many others, and we’ll hear some more examples later, serve the public interest by creating knowledge, infrastructure, and access to information built on a robust digital commons that we’ve heard about already, which includes open-source software, a range of open content and open data projects, and open licensing for content that enables projects to build upon one another in an interdependent ecosystem. Next slide, please. So here we have a photo of the Igbo language user group in Nigeria, jumping across. the Atlantic Ocean, and a community outreach activity that they carried out not too long ago. Wikipedia exists in several Nigerian languages, run by volunteers who all care passionately about preserving and strengthening their community’s linguistic and cultural heritage, while contributing also to a global body of knowledge about the people, places, issues, and ideas in their countries and communities. So then that knowledge also gets translated into other languages and ends up in English, et cetera. And in so doing, they’re also helping to advance technical capacity, economic opportunity, and cultural flourishing in their own communities. To put it another way, they’re directly contributing to the advancement of quite a number of SDGs. And there’s simply no way that a top-down approach to digital public infrastructure and digital public goods is going to be able to reach all of the underserved, vulnerable, and marginalized communities around the world, full of talented people who will take initiative in innovative ways if given half a chance, as we’ve been discovering throughout the Wikimedia communities. So we believe that the future of the internet should be one that promotes and protects these types of projects and these people, like those who we work with around the world. Wikipedia is one of the most famous examples, but there’s many others that have emerged over the past two decades, and we’re going to be hearing about a few of them in just a few minutes. Thank you.

Nicole Manger: Thank you, Rebecca, and thanks to all our distinguished speakers here on this stage. We are now transitioning to the second segment of hearing success stories of civil society grassroots organizations. because DPGs are really at its core about grassroots involvement and so that’s why we would like to highlight these success stories and also the perspectives of two organizations, one Global Voices and the second ITS Rio on how they are using the potential of DPGs and also possibly certain challenges what you know when it comes to governance structures, robust funding mechanisms and also creating robust data AI literacy to leverage DPGs successfully. So with that said I would like to call Fabro Steibel and Ivan Sigal on the stage with me. So we will start with one example of successful DPGs which is Global Voices. So this is really a multilingual community of writers, translators, academics and digital rights activists worldwide and I would like to give the floor to Ivan Seagal, Executive Director of Global Voices.

Ivan Sigal: Good morning. I’m Ivan Sigal as is just told. I’m now the actually outgoing Executive Director of Global Voices. This is my last public appearance in this role. We’re an organization that’s been for the past 20 years has been a forum for the perspectives and priorities of global majority writers and activists and explores how information technologies affect movements, politics, culture and information integrity. Some 8,000 writers, translators and researchers have participated from 160 countries and contributed to our to our work over the years. We’re dedicated to building understanding across cultures and languages and specifically we understand that the internet does not by itself bring around positive social change. Rather we need to invest in and build an internet based on a vision that reflects those values and we’re one of many communities and initiatives and organizations that exists as a digital public good that works in a much smaller level than a group like Wikipedia but is an example of what people can accomplish when the internet flourish functions as a flourishing and healthy information ecosystem rather than as a censored or surveilled information space or based on a small number of platforms that function as walled gardens or exists as a field of data to be extracted and monetized primarily for artificial intelligence. So my key message today is good internet regulation should support proactively support flourishing information ecosystems marked by a diversity of sources and languages and retaining the means of all people to be part of a network public’s participating in the creation sharing and consumption of information and knowledge. A key element of healthy information ecosystems is information integrity. By this I mean not just controlling or removing the most harmful elements of disinformation in online spaces, but proactively supporting the trustworthiness of information sources, ensuring that users have meaningful agency over information environments and control over their data, and working for more inclusive and diverse participation in online spaces. We work on these issues in numerous ways, such as our Civic Media Observatory, which is a research project to investigate and decode how people understand information and create knowledge in complex information ecosystems. We work with local researchers who have deep knowledge of local context and subtext of information and narrative to explain how information functions in their societies, rather than looking just at factuality or just at data flows. And the example we have there is the Unfreedom Monitor, which is a two-year, 20-country study in networked authoritarianism, which explores how states use both technology and regulation to restrict expression and augment those restrictions through information operations and propaganda. Another example of what this looks like, Global Voices for the last 15 years has run a project called Rising Voices, which is dedicated to supporting marginalized communities to participate and create online with networks of mutual support and learning. We focus on the ability of minority and indigenous language communities to create their own information spaces as they see fit. We work, for example, with Mayan language communities across the Americas to use the internet for language preservation and revitalization. These images come from our annual, this is from our 2024 Mayan Language Summit, which is now an annual event held in Mayan. Very unusual that an event is actually run in Mayan as opposed to being a secondary language to build networks of support for the use of Mayan in online contexts. Thank you.

Nicole Manger: Thank you so much, Ivan. And now, moving from a global organization, we are now zooming in on one regional use case. So, I am very glad to welcome Fabros Deibel here on stage for ITS Rio. So, ITS Rio, it’s the Institute of Technology Rio, that is really working to represent and strengthen Brazil’s and Latin America’s voice in global discussions and conversations on technology governance and digital rights. And it is also a member of the DPI Safeguards Initiative with Fabro himself also being in the Digital Public Goods Alliance. So, Fabro, the floor is yours.

Fabro Steibel: Nicole, thank you very much and thank you Wikimedia for the invitation. I start with a fact. DPIs emerge earlier and faster in the Global South than in the Global North. This is what research shows and most likely this is because out of necessity. In the Global South, we need better technologies to spread and equalize wealth and power. So, when you look at DPIs from the Global South, you ask them why they cannot be DPGs, why you cannot open the digital public infrastructures for good. And this is what we bring as a civil society member of Brazil, also as an academic, as a member of the network of centers, and as a member of the DPGA alliance. So, openness in Brazil is no coincidence. In the 90s, people from civil society and academia, they penetrate the government, they enter the government, and they start to foster open culture from inside the government. Outside the government, the culture keeps open and now we have a strong ecosystem. And we come from this ecosystem. So, what we are doing with DPGA and what do you think we can contribute to this debate today? Number one, we need very good green DPIs. We need open green DPIs. Brazil has CAR, C-A-R, which is a brilliant digital public infrastructure that can be even more brilliant if we bring the openness idea to it. It’s open data, but it’s not really a DPG yet. So, bringing this idea can have, as Wikimedia has a community around it that makes use of this data, make new… So, we have a lot of data, and we have a lot of data, and we can use it to do new surveillance of this data, and then we can fight deforestation or land rights. Number two, information integrity. We had Pegabot, Bot Catcher, that is an open algorithm that used to identify in Twitter the use of bots for this information. We collaborated with journalists and others having that. And we have a lot of data, and we have a lot of data, and we can use it to identify bots, and also, someone got our algorithm and made Atrapabot, a version of it using Mozilla language back to identify bots in Colombia. And lastly, the last case we have is on civic participation. So, we love to use technology to make new ways for people to enjoy deliberating together. So, we have a lot of data, and we have a lot of data, and we can use it to identify bots, and we can use it to make voting for people to deliberate in a more meaningful way other than a majority always wins. And the case studies we have shows that we have young football teams that are using Cucurdamos to select the coach. And we did this in partnership with Taiwan, who has a brilliant captain as well. And we tried it for the human aspect of the environment and it has to be, you know, you can now interact with it, and makes the environment better. You can now interact with it, and then becomes part of the more harmonious ecosystem. And we see now the perspective that can not only open technology, but open technology thinking about the human aspect as well.

Nicole Manger: I talked to leveraging DPGs, you know, across different themes and topics. And I will now pass it over to our expert panel with Costanza moderating, and they will pick up on these success stories, but also look more deeply into potential challenges like funding mechanisms, governing structures, and also data AI literacy. And also really be informed by other existing successful initiatives Amandeep mentioned before, the DPI safeguards initiative, the Digital Public Goods Alliance, and also the OSPO for Good conference that was just hosted here in New York in July. So with that, I hand it over to Costanza and our esteemed panelists. Thank you.

Costanza Sciubba Caniglia: Let’s give a moment to our speakers to get seated. There’s, yes, a very, a very exciting panel. So we’re now going to move to the panel section of our event. I am honored to introduce some of the world-leading experts on the topic of digital public goods and digital governance. This past month and the months in front of us, as we all know, are critical times for the future of digital, global digital governance. And the global digital compact process, the pact of the future, WISE’s review, the high-level advisory board on artificial intelligence are all elements that are going to shape the future of our digital and physical world. One thing before we start that I want to say is this event is in many ways a follow-up event to a conversation that we started with Access Now during the CSW this year and before. So I just wanted to mention this and it’s great to be with Marianne today and with Access Now. But going to the panel, we wanted to have a moment here in the action day to reflect in particular on the transformative potential of digital public goods such as Wikipedia and others and digital public infrastructure and fostering sustainable development worldwide. Digital public goods, especially when grounded in robust digital commons, are essential for inclusive open, sustainable, and digital world and so we want to really encourage this multi-stakeholder partnership. As you can see, this panel has a really wide multi-stakeholder perspective and so we want to encourage this to promote and protect TPGs that truly are universal and reflect on how to best enable civil society and communities globally to have a voice in how technology is developed. So without further ado, I’ll pass it on to our panelists. Dr. Donahoe, I would like to start with you. Dr. Donahoe is the coordinator for digital freedom in the US Department of State’s Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy. So Dr. Donahoe, digital public goods and DPIs have been such a central topic of discussion in the negotiations around the Global Digital Compact and more in general in the discussion about how to rethink global internet governance. I know you’ve been working about a model of right-respecting DPI which is achieved through universal safeguards. Can you tell us more about this and how multilateral and multi-stakeholder effort to protect TPGs and DPI should be shaped?

Eileen Donahoe: Great. First, let me congratulate the organizers here. This is a really remarkable event and it’s a very good reflection of where the DPG-DPI conversation is in the world and it’s very notable that this subject is at the top of the agenda at the high-level week at UNGA. I’m gonna make a comment that’s just based on observing what we’ve already heard. I think what we observed is that the multi-stakeholder community is way ahead and actually building digital public goods and global commons and that’s been going on for decades and you can use the case of Wikimedia, Wikipedia as an example. I think we’re here at UNGA which is a state-centric event. It’s a multilateral led body and I think it is really fair to say that states are generally behind and just catching on to these concepts and also that states are generally much more focused on DPIs and just trying to get ahead around that subject. So, But I will note that, so I’m gonna talk a little about what I see in the multilateral space that’s good and also what the U.S. is focused on and universal safeguards. Basically, here at the U.N. and in the Global Digital Compact, everybody’s really still focusing on definitions and concepts. And I think we’ve gravitated around several core features which include open interoperable standards and specifications that include delivery of public and private services at scale that are ideally and we will be fighting for rights respecting by design and protection of fundamental freedoms embedded in the design. But all of this is intended to drive toward inclusion, development, acceleration of the SDGs. And I just have to say it is really a giant change in the global conversation. This has been central to the G20 under the leadership of Brazil and India. It’s been part of the G7. It’s been in multiple agencies at the U.N. and that is brand new. That has never happened before. So this is really a new topic for states. What I will emphasize for the United States in particular, there are two key parts and it’s a combination of concern and excitement. The concern is that yes, DPGs and DPI hold tremendous promise to accelerate development. And obviously that is the core rationale that states are latching onto it. People are yearning to be part of the digital transformation. There is not equity around the world in that regard. And that is the driving motivation, animating energy here. But what we all have to be careful of is the risks that come with this digitization of infrastructure. And I’m sure we’re gonna be hearing. that from access, but we in the United States are also really focused on risk, and we have embraced the work of the Office of the Tech Envoy and UNDP on universal safeguards because we think that in every instance when DPIs, DPGs, digital commons are built, you have to be thinking about the impact on citizens’ rights. And the core of those concerns relates to privacy, and I will also say obviously equal protection, non-discrimination, and also the risk of exclusion from basic services if you do not build in safeguards and just embrace the technology itself. This is ultimately about bringing democratic values into the digital future around the world, and if we fail to bring safeguards with the actual access to the technology, we will be failing our citizens. The second part I want to mention that we’re really excited about, though, and this is what I do believe civil society has been onto for years, is that technology itself is now a vehicle for governance innovation. It is the way that the governing world can catch up to the pace of technological change, and I think it’s very exciting, this idea that the design, development, and deployment of the technology becomes the vehicle for spreading values and for governing in a way that protects citizens. And so, for me, that is why I’m really actually very excited about the opportunity of DPI, that it’s not just about inclusion in the digital transformation. It is about bringing values. by design in the technology. And last point I want to make is I really want to applaud the Universal Safeguards Initiative that last year at UNGA, OSET, Amandeep himself, Robert Opp from UNDP, they were on the stage launching the Universal Safeguards Initiative. That has been a year-long process. We have been part of it. Foundational principle number one is do no harm and it is about protecting human rights by design and we really applaud that. But the key idea here is no developing country and citizens in developing countries should never be asked to exchange their human rights. They do not trade off their human rights for inclusion in the digital ecosystem or for to be part of the digital transformation. That’s not okay. Development and human rights are not intention.

Costanza Sciubba Caniglia: They must go together so. Thank you, thank you Dr. Donahoe, such an important message. I love your conclusive message especially. Now I would like to move to Mr. Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi, Director General of NITDA Nigeria. So Mr. Abdullahi, digital public goods seem to be very important of course for social and economic development, also what we were just talking about, respectful of human rights. In your current position and as an expert on digital development, how do you see the role of government support for people to operate digital public goods and also to develop digital public goods? And before passing the floor to you, I just also want to mention Wikipedia has a very active community also of Wikimedians in Nigeria who work especially on multilingualism. So that’s also something that how do you think about those communities, not Wikipedia in particular, but in general communities that develop digital public goods in Nigeria?

Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi: Okay, thank you very much. First and foremost, I want to thank the organizers for inviting me and also for giving Africa opportunity to be part of this conversation. Because for me, digital technology is dramatically transforming our world, offering immense potential benefits for the well-being and advancement of humanity, our societies and our planets. And it also holds the promise of accelerating the achievement of sustainable development goals. This can only be achieved through international cooperation that close all digital gaps. Because we recognize those digital gaps are really posing challenge to countries, in particular developing countries who have so many challenges to solve but with limited resources. So I think we should focus on closing that gap because imagine a person sitting next to you never clicked a link, never sent an email and never experienced social media. So almost half of the world population are excluded from this digital transformation, especially in Africa. So we cannot be talking about digital public good without ensuring every person is included. Because if that person is excluded, the technology will not consider that person when making its decisions. So that’s why we are quite fascinated about this conversation on digital public good. And also, like it mentioned before, this DPI-DPG conversation started from the global south, where people are excluded. And we can see the passion about bringing everyone to be part of it. And in Nigeria also, the government is focused on achieving that. We are starting with the digital public infrastructure. We are laying the foundation. We are putting the legal framework in place and also ensuring that we have a robust digital identity, a robust payment system and data exchange platform. So we have two and we are lacking the data exchange platform. platform. Now the government is working on coming up with standard and ensuring that we have that data exchange platform. That will enable us to build the digital public goods when we have the strong DPI stack in place. But now we are having some in silos, like you mentioned about Wikipedia. Wikipedia is a very good example in Nigeria of DPI, where people, the communities around are creating the platform. And that ensure democratization of access to services as well as quality information, fact-checking. Because we should learn from social media, how it started, where it is controlled by few, and also it is for profit. That’s why you can see a lot of things are happening without the control of the countries. Like we came from a way whereby most of these big techs, they don’t even listen to developing countries. They do things based on developed countries’ laws and mission, vision, and so on. And also that is really affecting us in the developing countries. Because for them it is about profit, it’s about what they will make. Few people decide what you see, what you buy, and what you can even think, or who you can friend, what you can believe. But with DPG, it will be open for societies, communities, and societies to look at information, to ensure you have the right information in place, and ensure things are fact-checked before being in public. So in Nigeria we have other smaller ones apart from the Wikipedia, which they are open, but in a siloes form. We cannot call them like a big DPGs. Like for example, we have a platform called Budget, where people can go and check information about government budget, and also do a fact-check to provide information for people in communities to look at budget line item, where the project is supposed to be executed, and check to ensure if it is executed or not. So this also can help for good governance, and it will make things to be open and transparent. So I think it’s good to support this kind of initiatives as well. We also have the National Health Information System project, which is driven by government to make health record available for decision makers, for health service providers, and so on, so that they can have access to health record and citizens can easily get services. So for governments, when you talk about DPGs, government has critical role to play, because it is about democratizing access, and also it is it is about breaking all the experience we have with social media, where few people are controlling everything. So we need to break that unaccountable control over public digital infrastructure. So the DPG will provide that. So government needs to provide the legal framework, because everything you do, you need to have laws that will guide it. You need to have framework and governance in place. So government has the convening power to bring the civil society, the private organizations, and everyone on board to discuss on the governance framework, to discuss on inclusive connectivity and also to intervene to connect the unconnected. So we have so many initiatives we are doing on that. Like in Nigeria, almost about more than 40% of the citizens are excluded. So government is promoting connectivity. We launched the 9,000 kilometers fiber optics project where government want to connect the remote societies and underserved communities. In addition to that also, we have other initiatives around digital literacy. Because it is not just about connecting, but people need to be digitally literate to navigate around the digital platform as well. So we do a lot in training people in developing our digital fluency in the country. We are working with other partners like Ministry of Education. We are developing digital literacy and skills curriculum to infuse it into our formal education so that people will learn from schools. We are also having other projects that will build talent. Because also you need to build your proficiency in building these digital offerings. Because no country will rely on another for its digital offerings. We need people within the country that can build the communities and services. So these are things government is doing in addition to the legal framework like we are working on enacting a law on digital economy and e-governance in Nigeria which can help in promoting digital public infrastructure as well as digital public good. But also for me the most important is this kind of conversation so that developing countries and African countries should have voice on what we are doing globally. Thank you.

Costanza Sciubba Caniglia: Thank you so much. Thank you so much. Marianne, I would like to move on to you now to talk about especially how civil society is a critical stakeholder in global digital governance and for the development of digital public goods. Marianne Diaz-Hernandez is the YID campaigner at Access Now. She’s also a Venezuelan lawyer and digital rights activist and fiction writer. So as I mentioned earlier, this panel really is born as a second step of a conversation that we started together with Access Now a few months back. And so it’s great to continue this conversation and have so many more partners joining it as well. So I’m particularly interested to hear, how you think things have changed in them and what the role of civil society really should be as we move towards a new digital governance. You work extensively to make sure that all stakeholders have a perspective on digital public goods, including community development, digital public goods, and civil society agency. So what can you tell us about that?

Marianne Díaz Hernández: Thank you, Costanza. And thank you, everyone, for the privilege and the honor of your time and attention. Digital public goods, as well as the public infrastructure, which has also been mentioned a lot today on the upcoming days, I’m sure, have a profound need for community-led and community developed spaces where free speech and free assembly and civic life and dissent can thrive. And that requires the existence of spaces of total or partial anonymity and pseudonymity. And it is only possible to understand, design, and regulate these type of spaces through a multi-stakeholder lens, which is the only way that can ensure that the development and the governance of these digital commons remains transparent, inclusive, and responsive to a wide array of societal needs. DPGs are not only extremely important to society on their own standing, as the stories that were previously shared very clearly highlight, but also as the foundation for DPI, as Fabro was detailing, among others. Both of these assets need to be protected and nurtured to enable equitable access and to prevent monopolization or control by a select few. And this inclusivity ensures that the governance of digital spaces aligns with public interest and is the only way to protect them as open participatory environments that will encourage democratic engagement and free expression. And to go back to what Dr. Donahue was touching upon, when we focus on development above human rights, instead of understanding development as a tool to achieve human rights, we risk creating systems that have not been designed with human rights as a principle, but as an afterthought. We are then in need of a paradigm shift that allows us to understand that privacy, anonymity, free speech are not principles that are intentioned with the notion of development, but that have to be at the core of the design of the systems that are necessary to build the trust that the systems require in order to operate. There will be no development without these principles built into the systems that we create. So if we are to build and implement systems that are either created by the private sector, or by governments, or by any sort of hybrid model, the only way that we can make these systems accomplish what we want them to do, which is to support us in achieving the sustainable development goals, and ultimately achieving universal human rights, it is to build systems that are based in solid trust. And the construction of that trust cannot be taken by granted. It requires full and meaningful participation of society in a way that ensures and protects their agency in how to build, implement, and engage with technology. I believe then that civil society needs to work together and with other multi-stakeholders in articulating and putting forward the notion that what we require at this moment in time is a paradigm shift. We are not only speaking about enabling or defending human rights, or when these technologies are created, but about creating these technologies for a world that is built. with public in mind. Where public means built to benefit everyone by shared resources and managed by the community. And this does require a paradigm shift from a world view where resources are meant to be administered by specific actors in society. That model is not sustainable. It’s not participatory and it doesn’t help us in building strong democracies. Thank you.

Costanza Sciubba Caniglia: Thank you so much, Marianne. And now that we are talking about civil society participation, I would like to move on to you, Jimmy. Jimmy is, Jimmy Wales is the co-founder of Wikipedia, so it’s really an honor to introduce you. So you have the unique experience of having created one of the largest, most used digital public goods in the world, which is really a unique kind of experience. What have you learned about how people are able to come together and create and govern projects that serve the public interest? And what advice can you give to all stakeholders and why is it important to do it today?

Jimmy Wales: Great, thank you. And thank you to the organizers and everyone for making this happen. It’s a great event. Yeah, so I think one of the key elements in terms of advice and thinking about this has already been mentioned a couple of times today and that is values. The original vision for Wikipedia was for all of us to imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. And that’s what we’re doing at Wikipedia. And so every element of that is really, really important to us. When we say every single person on the planet, that means that we’re inherently global. We’re in many, many, many languages. And when I say the sum of all human knowledge, it means we care a lot about the quality of what we put out. It isn’t just sort of a giant random message. board we actually try to impart knowledge. This was 23 years ago when I started Wikipedia and it was just a handful of us typing away on the internet with very very limited software and very limited resources. But today Wikipedia is one of the top 10 most visited websites in the world. We have hundreds of millions of visitors every month from all around the world. We’re in over 300 languages, although of course some of those languages are quite small and just getting going. And for me that aspect of our work is one that I’m probably the most passionate about. I’m always very excited to think about the impact that we can have in bringing the ability for people to share knowledge in their own world, in their own community, in their own mother tongue. Some of the values that really carry us forward, we really care a lot about reliable sources. We have policies, for example, our well we have a lot of internal jargon. BLP policy, biography of living persons, which basically says if you see something negative in a biography it better have a source and if it doesn’t you should just remove it immediately and not just discuss what to do about it. Take it out and let’s discuss it then to say of course there’s going to be negative information. It needs to be really reliable and this can be contrasted with of course social media where people just write whatever they want and who knows maybe it’s fact-checked eventually or not. We try to be really really careful about that. One of our core community rules is no personal attacks. So obviously a lot of open spaces on the internet are just rife with personal attacks and that can be fine if it’s a political debate and discussion that often can be quite personal but it’s not right for us. We’re trying to write an encyclopedia. We’re a global movement in many many many different languages but everything in Wikipedia is locally written. Even as we move into an era of AI and I’m actually very excited about the really rapid increases that we’re seeing in the quality of machine translation and yet we have no concept or idea that we should just start wholesale translating Wikipedia into small languages because we know that it’s about that local cultural context. It’s about the local people. They will of course use these tools and it will… you know, finally accelerate that work so that we’re going to see really rapid growth in a lot of the languages that previously have been much more slower to grow. Really, Wikipedia, when we think about a digital public good, I think one of the paradigm cases that everyone should have in mind is Wikipedia. It’s a global resource used by almost everyone on the planet. We’re a non-profit organization. We’re community-built, community-driven. And when I see things in the Global Digital Compact that talk about protecting and supporting digital public goods, I’m very, very happy about this. Because too often, when policymakers are thinking about how to make decisions on public policy and the Internet, they’re really thinking about top-down social media platforms that I always say they run like feudal estates. All the people using it are like the serfs, but the master makes the rules from top down. Whereas we’re a community. We’re a bunch of people. All the rules of Wikipedia are made by the community. All of the decisions are made out in the community. The Wikimedia Foundation doesn’t engage in sort of constant moderation. Boy, the number of times people have complained to me, Wikipedia says this, Jimmy Wales is a communist. I’m like, well, first, I’m not a communist, and second, I didn’t write it. And there’s the sources, and there’s actually a debate, and you can get involved, and let’s have a discourse about human knowledge. So my call to action, really, for everyone is to, and to governments in particular, is let’s think about, as we’re doing public policy, let’s really begin to adopt what I would call the Wikipedia test. If you’re about to pass some rule, think about, is this going to wreck Wikipedia? And if it is, it might not be a great rule. And that might not be, you might want to step back and say, hold on a second, we do need to, oh, yes, clap, please, yes. We need to protect these open communities. So, thank you.

Costanza Sciubba Caniglia: Thank you so much. First one was for the Wikipedia test. Yes, thank you so much. And now I’d like to move to Professor Gasser, who is Professor of Public Policy Governance and Innovative Technology at the Technical University of Munich, TUM, who has been a great partner also in organizing this event, and also the Dean of the TUM School of Social Sciences. So, Professor Gasser, I’d like to move to you as an expert scholar representing academia and go back to the idea of digital commons as a necessary condition for the development of digital public goods. So, academia is also a big contributor to the digital commons. How do you see its role in this context and in improving shared access to knowledge and digital public goods in general?

Urs Gasser: Wonderful. Thank you so much for inviting also perspectives from academia. And, of course, it’s a great honor to be on this panel. And I would like to start right where Jimmy started as well with values. I think if you look at the values of academia, and Fabro set the stage beautifully, you see how this idea of public interest mission of academic organizations and the public interest-driven mindset of academics and academic community make academia a natural ally to the cause of digital public goods and the commons. So, I see a lot of resemblance and echoes to what you just described. I think Fabro already pointed out and alluded to the different functions that academic institutions and, more importantly, also the human beings in academia can play as we aim for more robust commons ecosystems. I just would like to maybe highlight three such roles. The first one is academia, academic networks and individuals as trusted creators of knowledge. If you look back over the past couple of decades, academics have been key contributors to building the digital commons by sharing data and knowledge about the world and doing so through open access publishing, among other things. The second role I would like to highlight is academia as an incubator and convener. Academic communities and values have been a key driver in incubating and launching digital public infrastructures. Just think back about the origins of the internet and the world wide web that were shaped by academic values and communities. But also as we’ve heard examples today, I hope I don’t reveal secrets, but global voices or creative commons and many more projects were closely linked to academic institutions and communities when they started. So you see the role of academia here again as we think about the creation of digital public infrastructures. And let me emphasize one point, what the beauty of it is, is that it’s happening in a distributed way, in a collaborative spirit, and that’s very powerful. The third role I would like to briefly highlight is that academia can not only contribute in these different forms substantively to the formation of digital commons and digital public goods. It can also study and assess what we can learn about digital commons as we go forward, about the society. societal impact about the relevance, we can assess whether we pass the Wikipedia test when new policies are rolled out. So academia can be a learning partner in our endeavors, can help to inform policymaking and good governance. So you see all together, and I just highlighted three rules, you see how academia should actually join the calls around this table and stakeholders for strong principles, policies, and practices that embrace the wealth of distributed academic networks so that together with the other stakeholders we can double down on our commitment to build strong and robust commons ecosystems for the future. Thank you very much.

Costanza Sciubba Caniglia: Thank you so much, and thank you to all of the panelists. I now I’m gonna move to the closing section of this event because we are already running a little over time, but thank you so much for for your participation. And now I would like to call back my co-moderator, Nicole. And for the closing remarks, Mr. Emran Mian, the Director General for Digital and Telecoms in the UK Department for Science, Innovation and Technology. Yes, please, Dr. Emran Mian, you have the floor.

Emran Mian: Thank you very much. Conscious of time, I’ll be very brief. Thank you very much for organizing this event. It’s been a real pleasure to listen to stakeholders across this community talk about DPGs and their contributions to them. There’s just two things I wanted to bring out as reflections. One is focusing on digital skills and the skills that people need both to create DPGs but also to enjoy DPGs. And this is a shared responsibility, I think, across the stakeholder community, businesses, civil society, and government. And the UK government, for our part, we’re very pleased of the way in which we’re able to work with partners in countries such as Indonesia, Kenya, and Nigeria to help people to acquire these digital skills. And there’s a lot more to do on that front. And then the second thing I just wanted to draw out was trust and safety. To continue to enjoy DPGs and for DPGs to continue to be created, people need to trust the digital technologies that they are using, and they need to be safe when they’re doing so. And again, for our part as a UK government, we’ve been really pleased to be part of a conversation on AI safety and to have initiated that at Bletchley Park with a UK-hosted safety summit last year. And it’s great to see the continuance of that in all kinds of ways, including a summit in Seoul earlier this year. And earlier this morning we were hearing from the French about their plans for an AI action summit early next year. And I know this is a real source of concern. sort of attention and action for the UN as well. I’ll stop there. Thank you.

Nicole Manger: Thank you so much. And I will now introduce Dr. Anna Christmann. She has multiple heads in innovation technology in the German ecosystem, as member of parliament, amongst others. I guess most people here in New York know her from her role in the Secretary General’s high-level advisory body on AI. Anna, the floor is yours.

Anna Christmann: Yeah, thank you so much. I’m very happy to be part of this panel. And just mentioning first that I’m very inspired by the panels that we just had. And I think it’s an important signal that this panel takes place today in the context of the Global Digital Compact. I think that is just a very important signal of the relevance of digital common goods for the society on a global scale and all the things that we heard about leaving no one behind, strengthening the multi-stakeholder approach, access for everyone and everywhere. I think these are just very important principles and it’s good that they are here in New York in the context of the summit of the future. And then maybe two very concrete points to the questions. What is the call to action that we heard for the future now, building on what we heard today. It was all the great examples also, of course, what we have already as common global digital comments. And I would say one is to really be active now in building this international ecosystem of the multi-stakeholder approach of all the people who are involved already in the open source community and everything around, but also bringing all the other stakeholders into this field. And we heard states might not be the leaders so far, but bringing them as very active actors into this ecosystem. So I would invite us all to really start new hands on initiatives and. projects to co-design frontier open data and also AI solutions and I think there are also links to the work that we did at the high-level advisory body and artificial intelligence at the UN and we have the report which is a lot about capacity building and openness and I think that really links a lot to what we heard today. And of course they are crucial is bringing the people together have the ecosystem have also the investments and the multi-stakeholder governance I think that would be important principles for that. And then maybe mentioning also one very concrete thing that we can do from here on is bringing as a question of DPGs across policy fields and there of course in the UN context as a question of climate policy is one obvious one so bringing this idea and discussions that we had today also to the context of the COP I think would be very valuable as well and I think if everyone is active like we are also in Germany just to mention this very short with with also different initiatives around digital sovereignty data institutes as we are just building if we get this ecosystem on the global scale I think there’s lots to win for all of us. Thank you.

Nicole Manger: Thank you so much and so I guess in light of the timing Constanze and I will just wrap up. So it was our intention here today to convene high-level speakers from UN member states the United Nations and especially academia and civil society really to discuss best practices and a common understanding and I guess just linking to what Dr. Anna Christmann has said we really invite all of you to join our conversations to kick-start projects to really enable this global solutions architects, ecosystem on developing DPGs together.

Costanza Sciubba Caniglia: Yes, yes, thank you. Thank you everyone, it was a fantastic conversation that I am sure will lead to many more conversations. So to be continued, thank you everyone for participating.

A

Amandeep Gill

Speech speed

116 words per minute

Speech length

579 words

Speech time

297 seconds

DPGs and DPI are essential for inclusive, sustainable digital transformation

Explanation

Amandeep Gill emphasizes that digital public goods (DPGs) and digital public infrastructure (DPI) are vital for an equitable and sustainable digital future. He argues that these resources are key to democratizing access to knowledge and technological resources.

Evidence

The Global Digital Compact embeds an international commitment to global digital commons through digital public goods and digital public infrastructure.

Major Discussion Point

The importance of digital public goods (DPGs) and digital public infrastructure (DPI) for global development

Agreed with

Fabro Steibel

Alicia Buenrostro Massieu

Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi

Agreed on

Importance of DPGs and DPI for inclusive development

The Global Digital Compact provides a new foundation for DPG/DPI action

Explanation

Gill highlights that the Global Digital Compact, as part of the Pact for the Future, establishes a new basis for more meaningful action in the area of digital public goods and infrastructure. This document represents a significant step forward in international commitment to these resources.

Evidence

The Global Digital Compact embeds an international commitment to global digital commons through digital public goods and digital public infrastructure.

Major Discussion Point

The future of DPGs and digital governance

F

Fabro Steibel

Speech speed

194 words per minute

Speech length

552 words

Speech time

170 seconds

DPGs emerge faster in the Global South out of necessity

Explanation

Fabro Steibel points out that digital public goods (DPGs) and digital public infrastructure (DPI) tend to develop more quickly in the Global South due to pressing needs. He suggests that this is because these technologies are essential for spreading and equalizing wealth and power in these regions.

Evidence

Examples of DPGs from Brazil, such as CAR (rural environmental registry) and Pegabot (bot detection tool).

Major Discussion Point

The importance of digital public goods (DPGs) and digital public infrastructure (DPI) for global development

Agreed with

Amandeep Gill

Alicia Buenrostro Massieu

Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi

Agreed on

Importance of DPGs and DPI for inclusive development

A

Alicia Buenrostro Massieu

Speech speed

127 words per minute

Speech length

704 words

Speech time

330 seconds

DPGs and DPI are critical for closing the digital divide

Explanation

Alicia Buenrostro Massieu emphasizes the importance of digital public goods and infrastructure in reducing inequalities and promoting digital inclusion. She argues that these resources are essential for ensuring that technology benefits all people, particularly marginalized communities.

Evidence

Mexico’s efforts to develop inclusive digital infrastructure and tools for small and medium enterprises.

Major Discussion Point

The importance of digital public goods (DPGs) and digital public infrastructure (DPI) for global development

Agreed with

Amandeep Gill

Fabro Steibel

Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi

Agreed on

Importance of DPGs and DPI for inclusive development

E

Eileen Donahoe

Speech speed

130 words per minute

Speech length

829 words

Speech time

382 seconds

DPGs and DPI need universal safeguards to protect human rights

Explanation

Eileen Donahoe argues for the importance of incorporating universal safeguards into digital public goods and infrastructure to protect human rights. She emphasizes that development and human rights should not be seen as conflicting goals, but rather as complementary.

Evidence

The Universal Safeguards Initiative launched by the Office of the Tech Envoy and UNDP.

Major Discussion Point

The importance of digital public goods (DPGs) and digital public infrastructure (DPI) for global development

Need to balance development goals with protecting human rights

Explanation

Donahoe stresses the importance of integrating human rights protections into the design and development of digital public goods and infrastructure. She argues that development should not come at the expense of human rights, but rather should be a tool to achieve them.

Evidence

The Universal Safeguards Initiative with its foundational principle of ‘do no harm’.

Major Discussion Point

Challenges and considerations in developing DPGs

K

Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi

Speech speed

112 words per minute

Speech length

1070 words

Speech time

572 seconds

Governments need to provide legal frameworks and connectivity for DPGs

Explanation

Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi emphasizes the critical role of governments in creating an enabling environment for digital public goods. He argues that governments must establish legal frameworks and ensure connectivity to support the development and use of DPGs.

Evidence

Nigeria’s initiatives to promote connectivity, including a 9,000 km fiber optics project and digital literacy programs.

Major Discussion Point

The role of different stakeholders in developing and governing DPGs

Agreed with

Amandeep Gill

Fabro Steibel

Alicia Buenrostro Massieu

Agreed on

Importance of DPGs and DPI for inclusive development

Disagreed with

Jimmy Wales

Disagreed on

Role of government in DPG development

M

Marianne Díaz Hernández

Speech speed

143 words per minute

Speech length

573 words

Speech time

239 seconds

Civil society ensures DPGs remain transparent, inclusive and responsive to societal needs

Explanation

Marianne Díaz Hernández argues that civil society plays a crucial role in ensuring that digital public goods serve the public interest. She emphasizes the importance of community-led spaces and multi-stakeholder governance in creating transparent and inclusive digital commons.

Major Discussion Point

The role of different stakeholders in developing and governing DPGs

Agreed with

Urs Gasser

Jimmy Wales

Agreed on

Multi-stakeholder approach in DPG development and governance

Need for a paradigm shift to build technologies with the public in mind

Explanation

Díaz Hernández calls for a fundamental change in how we approach technology development. She argues for creating technologies that are built with the public interest as a core principle, rather than as an afterthought.

Major Discussion Point

The future of DPGs and digital governance

U

Urs Gasser

Speech speed

126 words per minute

Speech length

490 words

Speech time

232 seconds

Academia serves as creators, incubators and assessors of DPGs

Explanation

Urs Gasser highlights the multifaceted role of academia in the development of digital public goods. He argues that academic institutions and individuals contribute as trusted creators of knowledge, incubators of new projects, and assessors of the societal impact of DPGs.

Evidence

Examples of academic contributions to the digital commons, such as open access publishing and the incubation of projects like Global Voices and Creative Commons.

Major Discussion Point

The role of different stakeholders in developing and governing DPGs

Agreed with

Marianne Díaz Hernández

Jimmy Wales

Agreed on

Multi-stakeholder approach in DPG development and governance

J

Jimmy Wales

Speech speed

166 words per minute

Speech length

911 words

Speech time

327 seconds

Community-driven governance is key for successful DPGs like Wikipedia

Explanation

Jimmy Wales emphasizes the importance of community-driven governance in the success of digital public goods like Wikipedia. He argues that allowing the community to make rules and decisions leads to a more robust and responsive platform.

Evidence

Wikipedia’s community-driven policies and decision-making processes.

Major Discussion Point

The role of different stakeholders in developing and governing DPGs

Agreed with

Marianne Díaz Hernández

Urs Gasser

Agreed on

Multi-stakeholder approach in DPG development and governance

Disagreed with

Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi

Disagreed on

Role of government in DPG development

E

Emran Mian

Speech speed

171 words per minute

Speech length

289 words

Speech time

101 seconds

Importance of digital skills and trust/safety for DPG adoption

Explanation

Emran Mian highlights the critical role of digital skills and trust in the adoption of digital public goods. He argues that people need both the skills to use DPGs and the confidence that these technologies are safe and trustworthy.

Evidence

UK government’s work with partners in countries like Indonesia, Kenya, and Nigeria to help people acquire digital skills.

Major Discussion Point

Challenges and considerations in developing DPGs

N

Nicole Manger

Speech speed

120 words per minute

Speech length

889 words

Speech time

442 seconds

DPGs require robust funding mechanisms and data/AI literacy

Explanation

Nicole Manger points out the need for strong funding mechanisms to support the development of digital public goods. She also emphasizes the importance of data and AI literacy in leveraging DPGs effectively.

Major Discussion Point

Challenges and considerations in developing DPGs

R

Rebecca MacKinnon

Speech speed

130 words per minute

Speech length

802 words

Speech time

368 seconds

Multilingualism and local context are crucial for global DPGs

Explanation

Rebecca MacKinnon emphasizes the importance of multilingualism and local context in the development of global digital public goods. She argues that DPGs should reflect the linguistic and cultural diversity of their users to be truly inclusive and effective.

Evidence

Examples of Wikipedia versions in various languages, including indigenous languages like Waiyu.

Major Discussion Point

Challenges and considerations in developing DPGs

A

Anna Christmann

Speech speed

148 words per minute

Speech length

465 words

Speech time

187 seconds

Importance of bringing DPG discussions to other policy areas like climate

Explanation

Anna Christmann suggests expanding the discussion of digital public goods to other policy areas, particularly climate policy. She argues that integrating DPG concepts into broader policy discussions can enhance their impact and relevance.

Major Discussion Point

The future of DPGs and digital governance

Call for new hands-on initiatives to co-design frontier open data and AI solutions

Explanation

Christmann calls for practical initiatives to collaboratively design cutting-edge open data and AI solutions. She emphasizes the importance of multi-stakeholder involvement in these efforts to ensure their effectiveness and inclusivity.

Major Discussion Point

The future of DPGs and digital governance

Agreements

Agreement Points

Importance of DPGs and DPI for inclusive development

Speakers

Amandeep Gill

Fabro Steibel

Alicia Buenrostro Massieu

Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi

Arguments

DPGs and DPI are essential for inclusive, sustainable digital transformation

DPGs emerge faster in the Global South out of necessity

DPGs and DPI are critical for closing the digital divide

Governments need to provide legal frameworks and connectivity for DPGs

Summary

Multiple speakers emphasized the crucial role of digital public goods (DPGs) and digital public infrastructure (DPI) in promoting inclusive development, particularly in the Global South.

Multi-stakeholder approach in DPG development and governance

Speakers

Marianne Díaz Hernández

Urs Gasser

Jimmy Wales

Arguments

Civil society ensures DPGs remain transparent, inclusive and responsive to societal needs

Academia serves as creators, incubators and assessors of DPGs

Community-driven governance is key for successful DPGs like Wikipedia

Summary

Speakers agreed on the importance of involving multiple stakeholders, including civil society, academia, and community members, in the development and governance of DPGs.

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers emphasized the need to prioritize human rights and public interest in the development of digital technologies and infrastructure.

Speakers

Eileen Donahoe

Marianne Díaz Hernández

Arguments

DPGs and DPI need universal safeguards to protect human rights

Need for a paradigm shift to build technologies with the public in mind

Unexpected Consensus

Global South leadership in DPG development

Speakers

Fabro Steibel

Alicia Buenrostro Massieu

Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi

Arguments

DPGs emerge faster in the Global South out of necessity

DPGs and DPI are critical for closing the digital divide

Governments need to provide legal frameworks and connectivity for DPGs

Explanation

There was an unexpected consensus on the Global South’s leadership and innovation in DPG development, challenging the common perception of technological advancement being primarily driven by the Global North.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of agreement included the importance of DPGs and DPI for inclusive development, the need for multi-stakeholder involvement in DPG development and governance, and the recognition of human rights and public interest in digital technologies.

Consensus level

There was a high level of consensus among speakers on the fundamental importance and potential of DPGs and DPI. This strong agreement suggests a solid foundation for future collaborative efforts in developing and implementing DPGs globally, particularly in addressing development challenges in the Global South.

Disagreements

Disagreement Points

Role of government in DPG development

Speakers

Kashifu Inuwa Abdullahi

Jimmy Wales

Arguments

Governments need to provide legal frameworks and connectivity for DPGs

Community-driven governance is key for successful DPGs like Wikipedia

Summary

While Abdullahi emphasizes the critical role of governments in creating an enabling environment for DPGs, Wales stresses the importance of community-driven governance. This represents a difference in perspective on the primary drivers of successful DPG development.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of disagreement revolve around the role of different stakeholders in DPG development and governance, as well as the approach to integrating human rights and public interest into DPG design.

Disagreement level

The level of disagreement among the speakers is relatively low. Most speakers agree on the importance of DPGs for global development and the need for inclusive, rights-respecting approaches. The differences mainly lie in the emphasis placed on various stakeholders’ roles and the specific strategies for implementation. These nuanced disagreements can actually be beneficial for developing a comprehensive approach to DPG development and governance, as they highlight different perspectives that need to be considered.

Partial Agreements

Partial Agreements

Both speakers agree on the importance of protecting human rights in the development of DPGs, but they differ in their approach. Donahoe advocates for universal safeguards, while Díaz Hernández calls for a more fundamental paradigm shift in how technologies are developed.

Speakers

Eileen Donahoe

Marianne Díaz Hernández

Arguments

DPGs and DPI need universal safeguards to protect human rights

Need for a paradigm shift to build technologies with the public in mind

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers emphasized the need to prioritize human rights and public interest in the development of digital technologies and infrastructure.

Speakers

Eileen Donahoe

Marianne Díaz Hernández

Arguments

DPGs and DPI need universal safeguards to protect human rights

Need for a paradigm shift to build technologies with the public in mind

Takeaways

Key Takeaways

Digital public goods (DPGs) and digital public infrastructure (DPI) are essential for inclusive, sustainable global digital transformation

DPGs and DPI require multi-stakeholder collaboration between governments, civil society, academia, and communities

Universal safeguards and human rights protections must be built into DPGs and DPI by design

Community-driven governance and local context are crucial for successful global DPGs like Wikipedia

The Global Digital Compact provides a new foundation for international action on DPGs and DPI

Resolutions and Action Items

Incorporate the ‘Wikipedia test’ when developing digital policies to ensure they don’t harm open community projects

Bring DPG discussions to other policy areas like climate change and COP negotiations

Start new hands-on initiatives to co-design frontier open data and AI solutions as DPGs

Build a global ecosystem and multi-stakeholder governance structures for DPGs

Unresolved Issues

How to balance rapid development of DPGs with ensuring robust human rights protections

Sustainable funding mechanisms for DPGs and open-source projects

How to improve data and AI literacy to enable wider participation in DPG development

Addressing potential risks and misuse of DPGs and open data

Suggested Compromises

Develop universal safeguards for DPIs that protect rights while enabling development

Use AI and machine translation to accelerate growth of smaller language Wikipedias while maintaining local community involvement

Thought Provoking Comments

Well-governed commons are the foundations of human civilization. Digital is no exception, and today more than ever digital commons are vital to our interconnected world.

Speaker

Amandeep Gill

Reason

This comment frames digital commons as a fundamental part of modern civilization, elevating their importance.

Impact

It set the tone for the discussion by emphasizing the critical nature of digital commons in our interconnected world, encouraging participants to consider their broad societal impact.

DPIs emerge earlier and faster in the Global South than in the Global North. This is what research shows and most likely this is because out of necessity. In the Global South, we need better technologies to spread and equalize wealth and power.

Speaker

Fabro Steibel

Reason

This insight challenges the common assumption that technological innovation primarily comes from the Global North.

Impact

It shifted the conversation to consider the unique needs and contributions of the Global South in developing digital public infrastructure, broadening the global perspective of the discussion.

When we focus on development above human rights, instead of understanding development as a tool to achieve human rights, we risk creating systems that have not been designed with human rights as a principle, but as an afterthought.

Speaker

Marianne Díaz Hernández

Reason

This comment highlights a crucial tension between development and human rights in the context of digital technologies.

Impact

It deepened the conversation by emphasizing the need to prioritize human rights in the design and implementation of digital systems, encouraging a more nuanced approach to development.

If you’re about to pass some rule, think about, is this going to wreck Wikipedia? And if it is, it might not be a great rule.

Speaker

Jimmy Wales

Reason

This ‘Wikipedia test’ provides a simple yet powerful heuristic for evaluating digital policies.

Impact

It introduced a practical framework for policymakers to consider the impact of regulations on open, community-driven digital public goods, potentially influencing future policy discussions.

Academia can not only contribute in these different forms substantively to the formation of digital commons and digital public goods. It can also study and assess what we can learn about digital commons as we go forward, about the societal impact about the relevance, we can assess whether we pass the Wikipedia test when new policies are rolled out.

Speaker

Urs Gasser

Reason

This comment highlights the multifaceted role of academia in both creating and studying digital commons.

Impact

It expanded the discussion to include the importance of ongoing research and assessment in the development and governance of digital public goods, emphasizing a learning-oriented approach.

Overall Assessment

These key comments shaped the discussion by broadening its scope from a primarily Western and government-centric view to a more global, multi-stakeholder perspective. They emphasized the critical importance of digital commons in modern society, highlighted the unique contributions of the Global South, stressed the need to prioritize human rights in technological development, introduced practical frameworks for policy evaluation, and underscored the role of academia in both creating and studying digital public goods. This resulted in a rich, nuanced conversation that considered the complex interplay between technology, policy, human rights, and global development in the context of digital public goods.

Follow-up Questions

How can we ensure digital public goods and infrastructure are designed with human rights as a core principle rather than an afterthought?

Speaker

Marianne Díaz Hernández

Explanation

This is important to ensure development of digital systems aligns with human rights and builds necessary trust.

How can we better enable civil society and communities globally to have a voice in how technology is developed?

Speaker

Costanza Sciubba Caniglia

Explanation

This is crucial for ensuring digital public goods reflect diverse needs and perspectives.

How can we apply the ‘Wikipedia test’ when developing new internet regulations and policies?

Speaker

Jimmy Wales

Explanation

This approach could help protect open communities and digital public goods when crafting new rules.

How can we strengthen the multi-stakeholder ecosystem for developing digital public goods?

Speaker

Anna Christmann

Explanation

Building a robust ecosystem with diverse stakeholders is key for advancing digital public goods.

How can we integrate digital public goods into climate policy discussions, such as at COP?

Speaker

Anna Christmann

Explanation

Bringing digital public goods into other policy areas could expand their impact and application.

How can we improve digital skills both for creating and using digital public goods?

Speaker

Emran Mian

Explanation

Enhancing digital skills is crucial for the development and adoption of digital public goods.

How can we ensure trust and safety in the creation and use of digital public goods?

Speaker

Emran Mian

Explanation

Trust and safety are fundamental for the continued creation and enjoyment of digital public goods.

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed.

Google revises plans for Chile data centre following court ruling

Google has announced it will redesign its plans for a $200 million data centre in Santiago, Chile, after concerns were raised about its environmental impact. The company will start the project from scratch following a ruling by a local environmental court, which partially reversed a 2020 permit and called for a reassessment in light of climate change.

Originally approved in 2020, the project faced backlash from residents and officials due to fears over its effects on Santiago’s drought-stricken aquifer. Data centres require significant amounts of water for cooling, an issue of concern given Chile’s ongoing drought for over a decade.

Google has informed Chile‘s environmental regulator that it will not proceed with its original plans for the Cerrillos neighbourhood. Instead, the tech giant plans to introduce a new proposal that incorporates air-cooling technology to mitigate environmental concerns.

The company is expected to submit a fresh application, addressing local concerns and aiming to reduce the project’s environmental footprint, as it continues to work on its data centre plans in Santiago.

A Digital Future for All (morning sessions)

A Digital Future for All (morning sessions)

Session at a Glance

Summary

This discussion focused on the importance of creating an inclusive and sustainable digital future for all. The event, hosted by ITU and UNDP, brought together leaders from government, industry, and civil society to explore how digital technologies can advance the Sustainable Development Goals.

Speakers highlighted the urgent need to bridge the digital divide, with 2.6 billion people still lacking internet access. They emphasized that connectivity alone is not enough – digital skills, affordable devices, and meaningful content are also crucial. Several initiatives were announced to expand connectivity and digital literacy, particularly in underserved communities.

The transformative potential of technologies like AI, blockchain, and satellite communications was showcased through various examples. These included using AI for flood prediction, blockchain for refugee assistance, and satellites for wildlife conservation. Speakers stressed the importance of ensuring these technologies benefit everyone, not just the privileged few.

Digital public infrastructure was presented as a key foundation for inclusive development. Examples from countries like Brazil, India and Estonia demonstrated how digital ID systems and other core platforms can improve service delivery and economic participation. However, speakers emphasized that proper safeguards for privacy and security are essential.

The discussion also explored how digital technologies can support environmental sustainability, from monitoring deforestation to enabling clean energy transitions. Youth representatives called for ensuring the digital future is equitable, secure and empowering for all.

Overall, the event highlighted both the immense opportunities and challenges of the digital revolution. Speakers agreed that realizing an inclusive digital future will require collaborative efforts across sectors and borders, with a focus on putting people and planet at the center of technological progress.

Keypoints

Major discussion points:

– The importance of universal and affordable digital connectivity, with a focus on connecting the 2.6 billion people who are still unconnected

– Leveraging digital technologies and AI to address global challenges like climate change, healthcare, education, and economic development

– Ensuring digital inclusion and bridging digital divides, especially for women, youth, and underserved communities

– The need for safeguards, regulations and ethical frameworks as AI and digital technologies advance

– Public-private partnerships and multi-stakeholder collaboration to drive digital transformation

Overall purpose:

The overall purpose of the discussion was to highlight the transformative potential of digital technologies and AI in achieving sustainable development goals, while emphasizing the need for inclusive and responsible approaches to ensure no one is left behind in the digital future.

Tone:

The overall tone was optimistic and forward-looking, with speakers expressing enthusiasm about technological possibilities while also acknowledging challenges. There was a sense of urgency in calls to action for bridging digital divides. The tone remained largely consistent throughout, balancing excitement about innovation with reminders of the importance of ethics and inclusion.

Speakers

Moderators/Facilitators:

– Sade Baderinwa – Eyewitness News Anchor, ABC News

Speakers:

– Achim Steiner – Administrator, UNDP

– Amandeep Singh Gill – UN Secretary General’s Envoy in Technology

– Doreen Bogdan-Martin – Secretary General , ITU

– Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub – CEO Vodacom Group and Vodafone Executive Committee Member

– Jessica Rosenworcel – Chairwoman, Federal Communications Commission, USA

– Juan Lavista Ferres – Corporate Vice President and Chief Data Scientist, Microsoft

– Emma Theophilus – Minister of Information and Communication Technology, Namibia

– Karan Bhatia – Vice President of Government Affairs and Public Policy, Google

– David Sapolsky – Senior Vice President, Global Public Policy & General Counsel, Amazon

– Ann Aerts – Head, Novartis Foundation

– Mats Granryd – Director General, GSMA

– Alexandre Reis Siqueira Freire – Commissioner, National Telecommunications Agency, Brazil

– Rabab Fatima – Under-Secretary-General and High Representative UNOHRLLS

– Bianca Faith Johnson – President, Board of Trustees, Push to Walk

– Kelly T. Clements – United Nations Deputy High Commissioner for Refugees

– Lady Mariéme Jamme – Founder and CEO, iamtheCODE

– Amr Talaat – Minister of Information and Communication Technology, Egypt

– Lisa Russell – Emmy-winning Filmmaker and Founder/CEO of Arts Envoy Lab/Create2030

– Lori Freeman – Global GM and Vice President, Salesforce for Nonprofits

– Tunde Wackman – Chief Development Officer, World Central Kitchen

– Abdullah Alswaha – Minister of Communications and Information Technology, Saudi Arabia

– Joan Joseph Moses – Educator, Roosevelt Douglas Primary School in Portsmouth, Dominica

– Tofara L. Chokera – CEO and Founder, Tofara Online

– Pamela Coke-Hamilton – Executive Director, International Trade Center

– Christopher Burns – Chief Digital Development Officer and Director, Technology Division, USAID

– Lazarus Chakwera – President of Malawi

– Esther Dweck – Minister for Management and Innovation and Public Services of Brazil

– Paul Foster – CEO, Global Esports Federation

– Brad Smith – Vice Chair and President, Microsoft

– Alan Davidson – Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information and Administrator, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, USA

– Rumman Chowdhury – CEO and co-Founder, Humane Intelligence, United States Science Envoy, Artificial Intelligence

– Harrison Lung – Group Chief Strategy Officer, e&

– Bosun Tijani – Minister of Communications, Innovation and Digital Economy, Nigeria

– Robert Muggah – Co-Founder, Igarapé Institute

– Valentino Valentini – Deputy Minister at the Ministry of Enterprise and Made in Italy

– Jakob Granit – Director-General, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency

– Zhiping Chen – Vice President, ZTE Corporation

– Fatou Haidara – Deputy Director General, UNIDO

– Daren Tang – Director General, WIPO

– Tawfik Jelassi – Assistant Director-General for Communication and Information, UNESCO

– Deemah AlYahya – Secretary General, Digital Cooperation Organization

– Nobu Okada – Founder and CEO, AstroScale

Youth Representatives:

– Sanjana Sanghi – UNDP India Youth Champion and Bollywood Actress

– Yuri Romashko – CEO, Institute of Analysis and Advocacy, UNDP Generation 17

– Daniella Esi Darlington – Co-Founder, Copianto AI and ITU Secretary-General’s Youth Advisory Board Member

Full session report

Expanded Summary of the Discussion on Creating an Inclusive Digital Future

Introduction

This discussion, part of the Summit of the Future Action Days, was hosted by ITU and UNDP. It brought together leaders from government, industry, civil society, and youth to explore how digital technologies can advance the Sustainable Development Goals and create an inclusive digital future for all. The event was moderated by Sade Baderinwa, a news anchor at WABC in New York, and featured a diverse array of speakers with expertise in technology, development, and policy.

Key Themes and Discussion Points

1. Universal Digital Connectivity

A central focus of the discussion was the urgent need to bridge the digital divide, with 2.6 billion people still lacking internet access. Speakers emphasised that connectivity alone is insufficient; digital skills, affordable devices, and meaningful content are also crucial for true digital inclusion.

Technological Solutions:

– Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub (Vodacom Group) stressed the importance of connecting the unconnected.

– Jessica Rosenworcel (FCC) highlighted satellite-to-cell phone communications as a potential game-changer for ending mobile dead zones.

– Juan Lavista Ferres (Microsoft) discussed using AI and satellite imagery to map population shifts for targeted connectivity efforts.

– David Sapolsky (Amazon) presented Project Kuiper for affordable global satellite broadband.

The Partner2Connect Digital Coalition was highlighted as a crucial initiative, with significant pledges announced during the event to support digital inclusion efforts globally.

2. Digital Inclusion and Skills Development

Speakers emphasised that true digital inclusion requires both infrastructure and skills development, particularly for underserved populations.

Key Points:

– Tofara L. Chokera (Tofara Online Trust) highlighted digital skills training for economic empowerment, especially for women and youth.

– Mats Granryd (GSMA) pointed out that affordable smartphones are key to bridging the digital divide.

– Lazarus Chakwera (President of Malawi) called for integrating digital literacy into national education curricula and presented the Digital Malawi Project.

– Christopher Burns (USAID) introduced the Responsible Computing Challenge to embed ethics in tech education.

3. AI for Sustainable Development

The transformative potential of AI in addressing global challenges was a recurring theme, balanced with calls for responsible and ethical development.

Applications and Initiatives:

– Karan Bhatia (Google) discussed AI for early flood warnings and disaster preparedness.

– Valentino Valentini (Ministry of Enterprise and Made in Italy) presented the AI Hub for Sustainable Development.

– Achim Steiner (UNDP) stressed the need for AI safeguards to prevent exclusion and protect rights.

– Rumman Chowdhury (Humane Intelligence) highlighted evaluating AI systems for cultural appropriateness.

– Brad Smith (Microsoft) emphasised ensuring AI benefits the Global South.

4. Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) and Digital Public Goods

DPI was presented as a key foundation for inclusive development, with speakers emphasizing its potential and the need for careful implementation.

Perspectives:

– Esther Dweck (Minister, Brazil) discussed DPI for efficient government services, financial inclusion, and environmental efforts.

– Achim Steiner highlighted that DPI requires commitment, capital, and capacity building.

– Several speakers emphasized the importance of digital public goods in fostering innovation and development.

5. Technology for Social Impact

The discussion showcased various examples of how digital technologies can create significant social impact across diverse fields.

Examples:

– Bianca Faith Johnson demonstrated exoskeleton technology that restores mobility for paralyzed individuals, highlighting the need to make such technologies widely accessible and affordable.

– Kelly T. Clements (UNHCR) discussed blockchain-based digital wallets for rapid financial aid to refugees.

– Ann Aerts (Novartis Foundation) highlighted AI and digital tools for improving healthcare outcomes and reducing inequalities.

– Zhiping Chen (ZTE Corporation) discussed digital technologies for protecting endangered species in remote areas.

6. Youth Perspectives and Initiatives

The event featured strong youth representation, highlighting their role in shaping the digital future.

Key Contributions:

– Sanjana Sanghi presented youth-led initiatives for digital inclusion and skills development.

– Yuri Romashko discussed the importance of involving young people in digital policy-making.

– Daniella Esi Darlington highlighted youth-led efforts to bridge the digital divide in Africa.

7. Space Sustainability and Innovation

Nobu Okada presented on the critical issue of space sustainability, discussing innovative technologies for space debris removal and the importance of maintaining a clean orbital environment for future space-based technologies.

8. Global Initiatives and Frameworks

Several speakers highlighted important global initiatives:

– Amandeep Singh Gill discussed the Global Digital Compact and its importance in shaping international digital cooperation.

– Deemah AlYahya presented the Digital Cooperation Organization’s Digital Economy Navigator (DEN).

– Paul Foster announced the Global Esports Federation’s pledge to support digital inclusion through gaming.

9. Creative Integration of Technology

Lisa Russell demonstrated the integration of AI in creative fields by presenting AI-generated artwork created during the event, sparking discussions on the future of human-AI collaboration in the arts.

Challenges and Unresolved Issues

1. Ensuring AI development benefits the Global South without exacerbating inequalities

2. Balancing rapid technological advancement with necessary regulatory frameworks and ethical considerations

3. Addressing potential job displacement due to AI and automation in developing countries

4. Ensuring data privacy and security in the implementation of digital public infrastructure

5. Making cutting-edge technologies widely accessible and affordable

6. Maintaining space sustainability while advancing space-based technologies

Conclusion

The discussion highlighted both the immense opportunities and challenges of the digital revolution. Speakers agreed that realising an inclusive digital future will require collaborative efforts across sectors, generations, and borders, with a focus on putting people and planet at the centre of technological progress. The overall tone was optimistic and forward-looking, balanced with a strong emphasis on ethical considerations, inclusion, and responsible development of digital technologies.

Session Transcript

Sade Baderinwa: If everyone could please take their seats, in the back, if you could please take your seats. Thank you so much. We’re going to begin. It is good to see everyone here this morning. Your Excellencies, esteemed speakers, and distinguished guests, I’m Sade Baderinwa, a news anchor at WABC in New York, and it is an absolute pleasure to be here today. Thank you. We’ve got some eyewitnesses viewers. Well, welcome to the summit of the future, Action Days, a digital future for all. We are living in an extraordinary era of technological transformation. Consider this. A cook in Thailand shares a family recipe through a short video online, and within hours, people around the globe are replicating it in their kitchens. In mere moments, that recipe transcends borders. We find ourselves at a pivotal crossroads. Technology is reshaping our lives at a speed we just couldn’t have imagined just a decade ago. It is revolutionizing industries, democratizing education, and connecting people across continents. In healthcare, artificial intelligence is diagnosing diseases with unprecedented accuracy and speed, delivering life-saving treatments to once inaccessible regions. Personalized medicine tailored to individual needs is no longer a far-off dream, but a reality on the horizon. Today, you will witness that transformation firsthand. A woman who is paralyzed will walk again through the use of technology. It truly is remarkable, and I think you all are going to be blown away. We’ll also explore how technology is being harnessed beyond the battlefield. Satellite-based networks are restoring communication in war-torn areas like Ukraine, where infrastructure is devastated. Consider the plight of refugees escaping war zones like Ukraine. They often arrive with only the clothes on their backs. No money. No legal documents and no answers for tomorrow. Technology, however, is changing that. Through blockchain technologies, refugees will be given digital wallets that offer instant access to financial aid and shelter. You’re going to hear today how this groundbreaking solution is enabling refugees to rebuild their lives in just mere minutes. Meanwhile, there are so many companies using the power of AI to predict floods, offering life-saving warnings up to a week in advance. And these forecasts are reaching dozens of countries, protecting millions of people in vulnerable areas. We’re going to talk with some of these companies today. Digital access is truly a game changer. For millions of people in isolated regions, farmers, women, and schools in rural areas, often overlooked for decades, are now part of a connected world, transforming their lives and economies simply by getting online. You’ll hear today how this is helping the previously forgotten thrive. And as we explore these advancements, we must also be vigilant with our proper safeguards, the same technologies that drive progress could deepen inequalities, threaten privacy, and marginalize the most vulnerable. Our digital future must be open, free, and secure for everyone, not just for the privileged few. So today, we will also discuss those crucial safeguards. There’s so much to cover, and it’s going to be an exciting day centered on harnessing the transformative power of technology. So, let’s get started. And first, I’d like to introduce Achim Steiner, Administrator, UNDP. Amandeep Singh Gill, UN Secretary General’s Envoy in Technology. And Doreen Bogdan-Martin, Secretary General of ITU.

Achim Steiner: Thank you. At the end, Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to this amazing room this morning. My name is Achim Steiner and I’m the head of the United Nations Development Programme, UNDP. I’m delighted to extend a very warm welcome to all of you joining us for the joint opening of the A Digital Future for All event, proudly co-hosted by UNDP, the International Telecommunication Union, and the Office of the UN Secretary General’s Envoy on Technology. We are convening on the eve of the Summit of the Future, when world leaders will come together in this building to commit to the bold new solutions that better reflect the realities of the 21st century, and can respond to both today’s and tomorrow’s challenges and, perhaps even more importantly, opportunities. Our event is part of the Summit’s Action Days, which focus on building multi-stakeholder partnerships and paving the way to a more inclusive and interconnected multinaturalism. Today, representatives from every corner of the globe and all sectors of society will showcase digital solutions and announce new commitments to realize that brighter digital future for everyone, everywhere. Our vision of a digital future for all. At UNDP, we believe that digital technologies will be the fundamental driver of development this century, reshaping economies and societies, and helping to radically reshape development – from driving down poverty and inequalities, to advancing gender equality, to powering decisive climate action. Working as part of the United Nations family, we are not only closing the digital connectivity divide, we are committed to helping to shape inclusive digital ecosystems in over 100 countries today to help digital innovation flourish everywhere. First in our partner countries, we are supporting the development of digital policies and strategies that guide country-level digital transformation. Second, we enable the planning and development of digital foundations that underpin inclusive digital transformations, particularly digital public infrastructure, which represent the roads and railway tracks, so to speak, of our new digital era. Third, we provide digital capacity-building support to ensure that governments and communities and citizens have the skills they need. Our work is only possible thanks to our partnership with governments, our UN partners, international organizations, the private sector, civil society, academia and well beyond. That is also the spirit of today’s event, to create strong collaborations that reach everyone, everywhere, and that ensure that people can shape their own digital future in this era. Thank you.

Amandeep Singh Gill: Good morning. How are we today? Welcome. The future calls, and here we are, united, determined to build it together. A peaceful, prosperous, sustainable and hopeful world, where technology empowers us all and disempowers none. Our future is digital, and we have been hard at work over the past two years to ensure that it is open, safe and secure, and that it leaves no one behind. A future that upholds our hard-won victories on human rights and sustainable development. UN member states, with critical contributions of stakeholders from civil society, the tech community and academia, and the private sector, have been negotiating a global digital compact. A uniquely diverse body of experts on artificial intelligence can mean by the Secretary General has worked at warp speed to produce a blueprint for the international governance of AI. And it all comes together tomorrow at the Summit of the Future. A pact for the future with two powerful annexes, a Global Digital Compact and a Declaration on Future Generations, will be on the table for leaders to decide and adopt. The Global Digital Compact puts digitalization at the center of multilateral cooperation and a fit-for-purpose United Nations. It sets out principles and actions to advance an open, safe and secure digital future for all. The GDC provides an ambitious agenda to harness digital technologies for development and benefit of all countries and communities. It provides us with a normative foundation, a moral compass, if you will, to benchmark our progress. It includes concrete commitments and actions, almost two decades after the World Summit on Information Society, to ensure that everyone, everywhere is connected to the internet and to close digital divides. It recognizes the challenges of safety and security online and seeks to mobilize political and financial resources to protect against risks and harms. The Compact is practical. It sets out actions to close digital divides and leverage technologies to accelerate development, expand opportunities for inclusion in the digital economy so that all stakeholders have more opportunities to generate value and be more than mere consumers of digital technologies. The GDC aims to protect and promote human rights online and make the digital space safe for all, especially children, women and girls. It aims to advance responsible, equitable and interoperable data governance, and importantly, it aims to govern AI for the public benefit and inclusively. At the core of the GDC is a commitment to inclusive, equitable governance of technology, in particular emerging technologies like AI. It makes digital governance a global public policy issue, one in which all stakeholders – the private sector, the tech community, civil society and academia – have a role to play. We are at the start of a new journey. We need your engagement to ensure that the commitments in the GDC bring meaningful digital futures to all. Thank you.

Doreen Bogdan-Martin: Generation that has never known a world without digital. It’s the SDG generation. Millions of young people who are stepping into their teenage years on the brink of adulthood. Their journey has been extraordinary. They have grown up in a decade that has seen part of the population using the internet nearly double, social media surrounding us, and artificial intelligence going mainstream. They’re too young to remember when the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Paris Agreement on Climate Change were adopted. They were just kids when a global pandemic turned their world upside down and shifted education online. Then, like all of us, they encountered generative AI. In a series of developments. have since been nothing short of extraordinary, digital runs through their veins. It’s the most connected generation of all, and the first to come of age in an era of unimaginable digital opportunities. What will they do with all this power? How will they live up to this responsibility, and what kind of future will they build? Let’s see this future through their eyes, and let’s give them a seat at the table. So we’re in 2030, a not-so-distant digital future where everyone can access the Internet anytime, anywhere. Where having the right device is a basic standard, not a privilege. Where digital skills are a fundamental part of education. Where men and women have a fair shot at opportunity and success. Where algorithms create equity, not bias. Where access to computing resources are distributed more evenly, and where human rights are the bedrock of our digital society. Where safety is the norm, and where digital and green transitions go hand-in-hand. In short, a sustainable, inclusive, and responsible digital future for all. Three fundamental truths that guide our digital track, here during the action days of the Summit of the Future. Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, the digital future is not yet written. It’s happening on our watch. We are all, all the SDG generation. So let’s forge the digital future with the audacity of youth, a future full of hope, possibility, and ambition. The best future we can dream of. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you, Doreen. Thank you so much. Where algorithms create equity and not bias. So important. Thank you for those words. Well, now I give you SDG Digital.

Official Video: Hi, it’s not what you’re thinking. We’re not experiencing technological difficulties here. This is what our digital world looked like less than 50 years ago. This is what it still looks like for 2.6 billion people. Unconnected, to cell phones, computers, global knowledge bases. That’s not the inspiring, positive, optimistic message you might be sitting there hoping for. So what would a digital future for all be like? The world is at my fingertips. Just a click away. Fingertips. Just a click away. Endless possibilities. What we do now will affect generations to come. No one has to choose between paying the bills and using the Internet. The digital world must give every woman a voice and a chance to lead. Learning with the Internet is like a super power. Starting a business has never been faster. The time starts now.

Doreen Bogdan-Martin: It all began with a simple question. What’s your vision of a digital future for all? We’ve just heard some powerful voices, all part of our campaign leading up to this moment. Now it’s time for Achim and I to share our vision. For me, it really comes down to three words. Universal, meaningful connectivity. It’s a driving force of the ITU as the UN agency for digital technologies, and it’s my number one priority. I want to be able to take my future grandchildren one day to the halls of the United Nations, and I want to be able to tell them the story of how we unlocked the power of digital and emerging technologies to everyone in this decade. No matter who they are, where they live. regardless of their gender, their age, their education, or the opportunities they’ve been given.

Achim Steiner: We live in a world in which the familiar is giving way to the unknown. We cannot predict where our new digital future will take us. We can hope for it. What we can do is help create an inclusive, sustainable, and prosperous digital future. That means setting the conditions so that everyone, everywhere, can reap the benefits of our digital world. Ensuring that everyone has the necessary skills, the capacities, and access so that no one is left behind. We must also harness digital technologies to protect and restore the environment and advance the decisive climate action we need so urgently to transform lives and livelihoods and drive progress across all, yes all, 17 Sustainable Development Goals. At UNDP, this is more than a vision. We are using digital to change lives today and ensure that the generations to come have the ability to determine their own futures.

Doreen Bogdan-Martin: This future that Achim and I have described is within reach. Fast forward to September 25, 2030, the SDG deadline. It’s our moment of truth. Formidable challenges that once seemed insurmountable have given way to a future filled with promises. Countries and companies have doubled down on cybersecurity. Putting security first, they’ve saved countless lives and protected the global economy from escalating threats. We’ve bridged the global digital gender gap with major breakthroughs in least-developed countries where women’s online participation has surged. Digital technologies have become a powerhouse. ally in tackling climate change and in keeping the 1.5 degree target alive. Countries have worked together to clean up millions of pieces of debris in the low-earth orbit, making space sustainability a reality. Our efforts to develop standards against deepfakes have stopped the spread of disinformation and rebuilt the public’s trust in technology. And today, developing countries are competing on equal footing in AI with the infrastructure and the talent to drive innovation that benefits us all.

Achim Steiner: The year 2030. Imagine a deadline that seemed so distant, yet our global community has achieved so much. A global community united by a clear blueprint for a better future. The Sustainable Development Goals. No one lives in extreme poverty any longer. We live in a world free from hunger. Nearly every child has a primary education. Everyone has access to clean water and sanitation. Renewable energy powers four-fifths of the world. And nearly every car sold worldwide is an electric vehicle. Where digital technologies are powering decisive climate action and the protection and restoration of our natural world. Truly monumental achievements. How did we get there? Investments in digital were pivotal. Ones that went beyond the next app or one-off digital solution. We need to invest in a digital ecosystem from which true innovation takes root and can flourish. For our global community actively shaped the AI revolution to improve lives. And now, as we stand at the threshold of a new era, we see a world where progress is not just a possibility. It is the reality we’ve built together. It is to the age of possibility we are looking at.

Doreen Bogdan-Martin: When Achim and I stood here for our first SDG Digital, we dared to think digital solutions could accelerate progress on 70% of the SDG targets. Now, in 2030, that vision has exceeded our expectations. Thanks to technologies like satellites, artificial intelligence, every school in the world is connected to the Internet. When the Giga Initiative helped connect Brianna’s school in Honduras, her first thought was for the unconnected children. As she put it, all children have the same rights. That’s true for countries, and that includes two-thirds of the small island developing states that lacked early warning systems. But the Early Warnings for All initiative changed that, uniting us through emerging technologies to ensure everyone is protected. These technologies marked a turning point in our efforts to rescue the SDGs and leave no one behind. I always remember Luis, a young ALS patient who joined us for our AI for Good Global Summit from his home in Lisbon. Luis had lost his ability to speak, but an AI device connected to his brain gave him back his voice.

Achim Steiner: As Doreen has so eloquently articulated, we see a world transforming ways we couldn’t have fully imagined even a few years ago. We’ve arrived at a point where digital transformation is not just about technology. It’s about lives, our lives, our children’s lives. Consider digital public infrastructure. Every person now has a secure digital identity. We are imagining the year 2030. This has unlocked services that were previously out of reach of so many. When the digital ID initiative reached a young mother, it didn’t just give her access to education and health care. For the first time, I feel seen, she said. Closing the digital skills gap has ushered in a new era of entrepreneurship. That includes a young graduate of 23 years of age. Thanks to a new digital bank account, he has now set up his own green transport business and employs seven people. Or look to technologies being harnessed to deliver for the planet. Governments and civil society are now using AI to track deforestation in real time, showing where to take action, combating forest fires. I’ll never forget a farmer that I met who used AI to help predict changing climate patterns and double her crop yield. Today, in 2030, we have a truly global AI ecosystem. And many of the world’s most impactful AI innovations come from regions like Africa, Latin America, the Caribbean, and Asia, to just mention a few examples.

Doreen Bogdan-Martin: This is the moment when we said no to digital inequalities and yes to digital opportunities. And ITU and UNDP showed true partnership. As the world unites behind the vision laid out in the pact for the future, the declaration on future generations, and the global digital compact. It’s a new beginning. It’s the start of a journey towards greater unity, peace, and innovation, a future where digital technology serves as a force for good, and for inclusion, and for sustainable development. A future worth living for.

Achim Steiner: This is a moment to redefine our digital destiny. You must turn skepticism into an appetite for the unknown, a catalyst for change, and a willingness to push new frontiers. The ITU and UNDP are working together to put this commitment into practice across the globe as part of the UN’s promise. That includes driving progress on digital public infrastructure, capacity building and financing, the means to an end. And this is not just an idle digital dream. We are bringing this vision to life, like fiber optic cables lighting up with new streams of data, understanding and growth, powering a year of transformative breakthroughs for the SDGs.

Doreen Bogdan-Martin: It all began with a simple question.

Achim Steiner: What is your vision of a digital future for all?

Doreen Bogdan-Martin: Today you will see how we can make this future a reality.

Achim Steiner: To rescue the SDGs.

Doreen Bogdan-Martin: To build, right now, at the summit of the future action days, an affordable, universal,

Achim Steiner: meaningful and inclusive, sustainable and peaceful, and prosperous digital future for all.

Sade Baderinwa: And thank you Doreen and thank you Achim and Amandeep. Well, excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, and now we give you, as we mentioned, SDD Digital. Thank you both for propelling us to the future and for sharing your vision. Now is the time to delve into the powerful words you mentioned. And this is act two, the hope of digital. And we’re going to showcase concrete examples of game changing solutions for a digital future for all. And some of the solutions that we will see on stage today came through a rigorous process established by the advisory group of SDD Digital. So, let’s dive right into it. Let’s take a look at this video. 2.6 billion people are unconnected. A digital future for all can only be possible if access to connectivity is universal and affordable. So, to get us started, I have the pleasure to call to the stage Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub, who is the Chief Executive Officer and Executive Director of Vodacon Group. And we also have Jessica Rosenworcel, Chairwoman, Federal Communications Commission, and Juan Lavista Ferres, Corporate Vice President and Chief Data Scientist of Microsoft. Thank you. Thank you all. So, let me go with Broadband Commissioner Shamil. I’m excited about what you guys have in store for us today, so the floor is yours.

Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub: Thank you, Doreen, and thank you, Achim, for the powerful vision for 2030. It’s ambitious, it’s exciting, but let’s bring ourselves back to reality for a moment. Today, in low-income countries, just 35% of the population have access to 4G. While Vodafone and others continue to invest heavily in expanding our networks, this problem is far too big to be fixed by traditional methods. The world needs new radical approaches. We need to boldly seize the opportunities in front of us. We must accelerate action and drive real global change. The convergence of the satellite and the mobile industries can help us with this opportunity. Something amazing happens when we are forced to act with urgency. When a crisis hits, we stop debating, we stop delaying, and we smash through barriers. I want to share two stories, real recent examples, that show just how bold we can be. First, when the Ukrainian town of Irpin was devastated by Russian attacks, Vodafone Ukraine used a satellite-based network to restore mobile communications fast. Second, after Hurricane Beryl tore through the Caribbean in July, we turned to low-orbit satellites with our instant network on Union Island. Both examples show that, in the middle of a crisis, urgent application of satellite and mobile technology can ensure that, even in chaos, people’s voices can still be heard. So here’s the question. Can we harness this technology beyond war zones and natural disasters? Can we finally close the digital divide? Let’s really think about that number. 2.6 billion people are still unconnected. 2.6 billion were left out of today’s digital economy.

Official Video: In areas of conflict and natural disasters, where terrestrial networks have been destroyed, low-orbit satellites have helped us provide an essential lifeline for millions of people. But in a digital world, still missing 2.6 billion people, we need to take the same urgent actions and find bold solutions, such as satellites, to solve the world’s coverage gaps, connecting people no matter who they are or where they live.

Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub: 2.6 billion people are excluded from opportunities and disconnected from basic services. But I believe we can change that. Together with our partner, AST Space Mobile, we are pushing the next technology frontier. We are working on a direct-to-mobile satellite network, one that doesn’t need dishes or special equipment. We are aiming to plug coverage gaps in low- and middle-income countries with this conversion of satellites and mobile in a safe, secure, and equitable way. Last week, five satellites were launched from Florida. They are currently 500 kilometers above us, preparing to test direct-to-mobile connectivity. This offers the real prospect of digital to millions of more people with just a regular 4G headset. With this technology, we can reach the last mile – the isolated communities, the farmers, the rural women, and the schools. Let me be clear. Connectivity is empowerment. It’s education. It’s economic inclusion. It’s health. But it’s not happening fast enough. So how can we be bolder and really make the change we need to see? I leave you with three ideas. First, investment. To achieve universal access, we need $428 billion. That’s significant, yes. But we need to think big, create a scalable investment strategy, and make it happen. Second, there is no point in creating satellite coverage if people don’t have a device to use it. We need to lower the cost of smartphones to under $20 in the least-developed countries, removing duties and surcharges on low-cost 4G devices, and promoting local production will help. Third, we need to ensure that we innovate in a way that truly benefits everyone. and without doing harm, respecting the frameworks that keep us safe online. By the way, to succeed, we must think differently. Incremental change isn’t good enough. We need something new, something bold. We can close the digital divide. But only if we are brave, innovative, and act today with true urgency. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you, Shameel. A lot of great points there. Jessica, now it’s your turn, so please tell us more about the importance of accessibility.

Jessica Rosenworcel: The big idea that I want to talk about today is going to change and save lives. I say that confidently because it already has. So let me explain with a story. It starts on Hawaii. And if you’ve ever been there, you know that Hawaii is a beautiful place with a landscape that is often green and lush. But the climate’s changing. And last year, dry, wind-fueled flames raced along the western edge of Maui, which is one of the eight major islands in Hawaii. It was the deadliest wildfire in the United States in over a century. The flames leveled the historic town of Lahaina, which is on Maui. And in the middle of this fire, when the flames were raging, we had five young people on the road on the outskirts of Lahaina. They were trapped in a white van. Skies were smoky. It was not clear where to go or what to do, so they decided to drive toward the ocean. But the roads to the water, they were blocked, and poor visibility quickly turned into no visibility. They were stuck in a sea of flames with nowhere to go. to go. Terrestrial wireless services were knocked out, so there was no way to call the emergency number 911 for help. The van was hot and it was getting hotter. The situation felt hopeless. But you see, this crew of five young people, they survived. They’re alive today thanks to a new technology. Their phone had a new feature, the ability to connect directly to emergency personnel by bypassing ground-based communications and instead using satellite signals delivered directly from space. At 6.14pm, their message asking for help reached first responders along with their location. And at 6.47pm, they sent a follow-up message to the dispatchers to say they had been rescued. Now put simply, satellite-to-cell phone communications is a game-changer. By combining space-based networks and terrestrial wireless networks, both can accomplish more together than either can do on its own. They can make our networks more resilient and more available whenever disaster strikes. And we saw that clearly in the United States in Hawaii. But you see, the combination of these services can do even more. They can end mobile dead zones. And that’s why in the United States, the Federal Communications Commission has set up a framework, the first of its kind in the world, to support supplemental coverage from space. That means we’re making it easier for wireless carriers to have all of our smartphones connected through satellites when there’s no signal on the ground. This is part of a broader effort at the Federal Communications Commission to seize the communications opportunities of the new space age. To adapt to this era when rocket launches are no longer rare. Constellations are no longer small, and satellites are no longer just big, bulky objects destined for decades in our skies. We created a new Space Bureau. And our Space Bureau has streamlined our regulatory process for licensing satellite services. It has updated our requirements to mitigate orbital debris. So new space actors are always good stewards of our skies. And it’s put forward a plan to support in-space servicing, assembly, and manufacturing. Now in the end, the goal of all of this is to build what I call the single network future. And what exactly is the single network future? It’s a future where we no longer limit ourselves to thinking about one communications technology at a time. It’s a future where fiber networks, licensed terrestrial systems, next-generation unlicensed wireless technology, and satellite broadband seamlessly interact in a way that is invisible to the user. It’s a future where we have the power to end mobile dead zones. It’s a future where it is possible to connect everyone, everywhere. So let’s make it happen. Let’s build this future together.

Sade Baderinwa: Great. Thank you, Jessica. Satellite to cell phone communication. No dead zones. Fantastic. Incredible. Well, now comes something very special. Juan, you are next.

Juan Lavista Ferres: Twenty years ago, a massive earthquake struck the Indian Ocean, causing devastating tsunamis that claimed the lives of over 230,000 people in Southeast Asia. The disaster was foreseeable hours before it struck the coastline. There were no warnings notification to people at risk. It was a turning point, one that underscored the urgent need for global early warning systems that can save lives in such critical moments. While early warning systems have their effectiveness to hinges the crucial factor, communications with people on the ground, no matter how sophisticated our technology is, if we cannot reach those in harm way, the warnings are useless. There is an illusion of accessibility and current data in today’s digital age. However, this is a misconception. The reality is that in many parts of the world, population data is outdated by decades or more. The foundational knowledge of any early warning system is understanding where people are located. That’s why Microsoft has partnered with planet labs, which image the earth daily in high resolution and the institute of health metrics and evaluation at the University of Washington to create the first high resolution maps that show population shifts over time. To understand not only where people are, but also which of those people have connectivity to receive an early warning, we are collaborating with Doreen and her team at ITU in support of the early warnings for all initiative. As you can see, here in Bonatou, we have harnessed the power of AI with planet satellite imagery and ITU data to identify communities that remain disconnected from communication channels. This information is essential for governments, companies, and international organizations to prioritize investment infrastructure that ensures that everyone is reachable in time of crisis. Everyone in this room can be part of the solution. Through cross-sector innovation, we can ensure that early warnings can reach the most vulnerable. This is about more than just warnings. It’s about giving every person, no matter where they live, the confidence of knowing that they are protected and supported in time of crisis. There are 2.6 billion people in the world that are not connected. In our smartphones today, we have more processing power than the one that was needed to put a person on the moon. There are very important problems out there that can and should be solved with data. We no longer have excuses. Thank you very much.

Sade Baderinwa: Great. Thank you, Juan, and thank you all to our speakers. And I invite you to go offstage and take your seat back in the audience. Thank you. And ladies and gentlemen, now I’d like to welcome to the stage Her Excellency Emma Theophilus, Minister of Information and Communication Technology, Namibia.

Emma Theophilus: Ladies and gentlemen, our world is now implored with the situation of climate change. And digital technologies, digital infrastructure could be the answer to our challenges. With quantum technology, an opportunity where citizens, countries, continents can overcome their challenges through quantum computing and the ability to adapt where other continents are unable to. As the world races toward the fourth industrial revolution, Africa must not be left behind. Quantum technology offers Africa a path to leapfrog traditional developmental models. And if we’re being honest, existing developmental models were not meant to develop Africa. And to ensure we accelerate the achievement of the sustainable developmental goals. Quantum technology holds tremendous potential to accelerate our developmental and directly support the achievement of these SDGs. We need to focus on creating an environment where the basics of technology are met so that quantum technologies can be used to benefit all. We need to strike the balance between laying the groundwork while ensuring we don’t miss out on opportunities to leapfrog. We need to recognize the adaptability as well as the agility of our local experiences navigating minimal resources for maximum impact in rural areas who can in fact contribute and advance quantum solutions. We need to do work to make quantum technology more inclusive and applications more compatible and that involves African countries and global south partners. We’re talking about an energy transition. In Namibia we’re talking about being the hub of the green hydrogen, ensuring energy efficiency and climate resilience directly impacting SDG 7 and SDG 13. We’re talking about enhancing healthcare outcomes, good health and well-being. Namibia continues to face healthcare challenges including disease management and limited access to advanced medical technologies, not to mention the rest of the continent. Agriculture and water management, where climate change continues to see cycles of flash floods and droughts. All the continents, all the countries, these innovations will ensure and enhance food production, supporting SDG 2 around zero hunger, and SDG 6 around clean water and sanitation. Other SDGs can easily be connected with quantum. Example, education through increasing quantum literacy, impacting SDG 4. Economic growth and technological innovation, directly impacting SDG 8 and 9. And quantum cryptography to enhance the security of communications and data around governance, security, and global partnerships around SDG 16 and SDG 17. Thank you very much.

Sade Baderinwa: And thank you very much, Your Excellency. Next we have Karan Bhatia, the Vice President of Government Affairs and Public Policy at Google. Karan, thank you. Please take the mic.

Karan Bhatia: Thank you very much. Good morning, everybody. A clear vision for 2030, 17 sustainable development goals. The clock is ticking, and we’re trailing. The time is now to get artificial intelligence into the game. Let’s journey to northern India, where my father was born. It’s a land often ravaged by floods, the most common natural disaster there for generations. Imagine floodwaters surging, engulfing homes, businesses, crippling infrastructure, endangering lives. It’s a story that has played out sadly year after year with growing intensity in recent years as the effects of climate change are increasingly evident. But what if we could foresee the floods? What if we could warn people days in advance and get them out of harm’s way, saving lives, saving livelihoods? For years, this was just a dream. Predicting when and how riverine flooding would occur was an impossibly complicated task. But it’s impossible no more. Today with Google’s Flood Hub, an AI-powered flood forecasting tool, we’re able to predict flood zones up to a week before they strike. It’s live in 80 countries, reaching more than 460 million people around the world, and we’re just getting started. We have been, we’re going to continue to work closely with governments, with the United Nations, with NGOs to implement and distribute flood forecasts to empower them to act and warn people, saving lives and livelihoods. And AI is just beginning to deliver for the SDGs in this kind of way. It’s helping farmers choose when to harvest their crops, doctors when to diagnose diseases earlier and how to, and educating people throughout the world in their native languages. It’s a tool to accelerate progress towards the SDGs. But as we’ve heard, with 2.6 billion people lacking basic Internet, we’ve got to ensure that AI doesn’t become a luxury. It needs to be universal, affordable, accessible to all. Digital inclusion requires action. We cannot allow the digital divide to now become the AI divide. Google is committed to bridging this gap. We’ve invested tens of billions of dollars annually in digital infrastructure globally, ranging from data centers to undersea cables, transforming Internet accessibility. This year alone, we’ve announced new high-capacity fiber optic links connecting Latin America to Africa, Africa to the Asia Pacific, Latin America to the Asia Pacific, and remote parts of the Pacific Ocean to America and the world. But infrastructure alone is not going to be enough. We are, and are going to continue to invest heavily in digital skilling, training across the globe, building off our track record of already having trained more than 100 million people globally with Grow with Google. And we’re now doubling down with a new focus on AI skilling to allow everyone access to this amazing technology. And we’re marrying this with world-class cloud computing and cybersecurity solutions that are critical to gain the benefit of AI. To close, at Google, we love to think big. And right now, with digital inclusion as our foundation, as our true north, AI as our superpower, and you all as our partners, we are about a future where no one is left behind, a future where the SDGs are not just aspirations, but they’re going to be achievements. Thank you very much.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you, Karan. Now, I think this is a great time to travel to space. Let’s take a look at this video, and it’s going to be followed by speaker David Sapolsky from Amazon. Let’s take a look.

Official Video: Status check, go Atlas, go Kuiper, three, two, one, and we have ignition, and liftoff. Copy that, Proto-1, we got contact with our satellites, huge milestone.

David Sapolsky: I want to thank the ITU Secretary-General, Doreen Bogdan-Martin, UNDP Administrator Achim Steiner, heads of state, and other distinguished guests, $2.6 billion. We’ve heard it before, we’re going to hear it again, but we can’t grow desensitized to this number. That’s because behind the numbers are families, frontline workers, small businesses, students, and many others who, according to the ITU, don’t have internet access at home. Progress is being made to close this gap, but we need more solutions and faster. So today I’m delighted to present Project Kuiper, Amazon’s satellite broadband initiative, as a digital solution that can deliver affordable, high-performance connectivity to unserved and underserved communities around the world and advance progress toward the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals. We started Project Kuiper to help bridge the digital divide for customers without access to reliable broadband. The goal of Project Kuiper is simple. With just one of these ultra-compact, affordable customer terminals and a view of the sky, customers will be able to access high-speed broadband from virtually anywhere in the world. Our network will have the capacity, flexibility, and performance to serve a wide range of customers, including schools, hospitals, businesses, government agencies, and others operating in places without reliable connectivity. The video you just saw included some footage from Kuiper’s launch of our satellite prototypes last year, which had a 100% success rate across key mission objectives. Kuiper will initially rely on a constellation of more than 3,200 low-Earth-orbit satellites. That means they operate at a lower orbit than traditional satellites. LEOs, as they’re called, provide sufficient speeds for many modern critical services, such as real-time video conferencing, telehealth, industrial applications, and live streaming. I’m also told you can shop online with it. Kuiper can also provide governments and communities with important tools for responding in moments of great need, such as humanitarian crises or hurricanes. or wildfires when other networks are incapacitated. While Kuiper remains acutely focused on advancing our shared mission to affordably connect the unconnected, our principles of space safety, sustainability, and mitigating space debris continue to influence every aspect of our satellite work. Over the coming years, companies will have to work hand in hand with governments and civil society groups to shape the global framework for sustainable global space operations. And you have an Amazon, a reliable, constructive partner, to do just that. As we’ve heard in today’s program, the magnitude of the divide is greater than any single entity can overcome. Through Project Kuiper, we are working to contribute to the solution by connecting people who lack reliable access to the internet affordably. But we’re not doing it alone. We’re proud to partner with governments and industry around the world, such as Vodafone and VRIO, on stage with us today. Congratulations to the ITU and the UNDP for hosting this wonderful event, and thank you for inviting Amazon to play a small part.

Sade Baderinwa: Great. Thank you, David. And thank you all. Please return to your seats. And now I’d like to talk about universal access to health and affordability of devices. Please welcome on stage Ann Aerts, head of Novartis Foundation, and Mats Granryd, director general of GSMA. And Ann.

Ann Aerts: Good morning, New York. A baby born in New York City today has a 12 years longer life expectancy than a baby born in another part of this city, maybe only a few blocks away. Why is that? Why do these children have to start with such a different prospect in life? Well, let’s wind our clocks back. If we look back at the past 30 to 50 years, we’ve seen tremendous breakthroughs in scientific innovations that have extended our life expectancy. by 15 to 20 years, and most of these gains were thanks to the progress in cardiovascular medicine. At the same time, these past 10 to 20 years, we see this convergence with technology innovations, technology that enabled us to radically re-imagine the way we deliver health and care. We can bring health services to people wherever and whenever they need it, even in their living rooms. That doesn’t sound too bad, does it? Still, cardiovascular disease is still the leading cause of death in the world, causing over 20 million people dying with heart disease every year. That is about 2,300 people per hour, equivalent to five jumbo jets falling out of the sky in an hour. And on top of that, cardiovascular disease is back on the rise, but not for everybody. In fact, it’s disproportionately rising in people that already face hardships, in disadvantaged populations. So it seems we are not having the full picture here. We’re missing a piece of the puzzle. That is because we don’t really understand what drives our health. We know that only 20% of our health is driven by the care we access. The other 80% is driven by the conditions in which we are born, we grow up, we live, and we age. Those social, economic, environmental conditions are not well understood. Yet, that is. Because today, we have an unprecedented opportunity to use the massive amounts of data we have in our hands, the computational power and data science capabilities around, to better understand that. We can bring data from the health system together with the data on all these underlying determinants. be it education, income, employment, housing, security, or access to healthy food, access to digital tools, you name it. All these data together can be brought into the machine, and advanced analytics can help us understand what truly is the leading determinants that drive our health and health inequities. Because only if we understand those can we address them, and can we address them at the root instead of patching symptoms. That is what we set out to do with AI for Healthy Cities, a Novartis Foundation partnership with the cities of New York, Singapore, Helsinki, and Basel, where we are deciphering the true drivers of health and health inequities. Only when we understand and address those can we offer two babies born on the same day, in the same city, or elsewhere, a similar chance on a long and healthy life. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Okay, thank you, Ann. Now we’re going to shift the conversation towards affordability. That’s, smartphones are a central part of our lives.

Mats Granryd: Absolutely.

Sade Baderinwa: But there’s a great barrier to entry, right?

Mats Granryd: Yeah.

Sade Baderinwa: If you don’t have the money, how can you get the smartphone?

Mats Granryd: Exactly.

Sade Baderinwa: How can you get accessibility?

Mats Granryd: That’s what I’m going to talk about.

Sade Baderinwa: Wonderful.

Mats Granryd: Super, thank you very much. Well, ladies and gentlemen, it is a great pleasure to be here, and I have a very serious message. My name is Mats Granryd, and I’m the Director General of GSMA. I think I will have another slide here. So, I’d like to introduce to you this family. It’s Fortinet and Paddy. Paddy being the father, and Fortinet the daughter. She’s a doctor, and they live in rural Uganda. She is the only doctor in Uganda. miles around, so her services were so sought after. The problem was that when light went out, when there’s no sun anymore, she could not perform her duties. Her father, though, realized that there is something called mobile internet, there is something on this handset that people are talking about. So he got a phone for her, and she can now continue to do her work and ask other doctors for help. But she can also deploy mobile-enabled solar power, which means that she has light almost as much as you want, and she can then perform her service day and night, which is a fantastic achievement. Now, she’s only one family. We know that there is more than, and we have heard this many times today, that it’s 2.6 billion people that are not as fortunate. They are not connected to internet, and predominantly to mobile internet. Now why is that? I mean, we know that people, these 2.6 billion people, the vast majority, 95 plus percent, live beneath a mobile broadband coverage. So we don’t need more stuff. We don’t need more base stations. We don’t need anything in the sky either. It is just there to use. But they can’t use it. Why? Well, it is all around affordability. And we have done a lot of research on this topic, and the biggest barrier is handset affordability. It is the cost of this device, this little device. So we need to bring down the cost of the device. We know roughly $20 is the sweet spot, and we’re not close to that. $20 might help some, but we still have issues. So the next step we need to do is to increase access to financing, to make sure that you can actually use the handset as a collateral and borrow money to buy your first hand. It’s sort of like you buy a car or a similar thing. And thirdly, is to reduce or even remove the sector-specific tax. The handset is not a luxury item. The handset is something that is a true necessity. So those are three things that we should do. And from GSMA, we have a handset affordability coalition that has been up and running now for a year. And we’re very happy to have Doreen and ITU on board, as well as the WEF Edison Alliance, and also the World Bank, helping us to reduce the handset cost and helping us to make sure that we can get good financing. So let’s get this done. Thank you very much.

Sade Baderinwa: Great. Thank you both. Please have a seat. And unfortunately, we’re running a little long, which means we have to shorten speeches. So this is going to be almost like the Oscars. You know, when the orchestra starts playing, it says your time is running up. Speakers, you’re going to hear a little ring. Where’s the person with the little bell? There you go. We’re going to hear that. And you actually have 20 seconds to wrap. So please bear with us so we can move this program along. Well, ladies and gentlemen, now comes a very exciting moment. Two years ago, ITU launched Partner to Connect, P2C, a digital coalition to advance universal and meaningful connectivity. To date, PTC’s online platform has received over 900 pledges worth an estimated value of $51 billion for connectivity projects globally. And today, five new pledges will be announced to the world. And to announce the first one, please welcome Alexandre Reis Siqueira Freire, Commissioner of National Telecommunications Agency, Anatel, Brazil. Thank you.

Alexandre Reis Siqueira Freire: Good morning, everyone. I want to share with you one of our most impactful initiatives, a project that holds the power to change the lives of an entire generation of children across Brazil. From the resources obtained by the Brazilian 5G radio frequency auction, I’m happy to announce an amount of US$549 million commitment to partner to connect digital coalition to connect public schools, particularly in underserved and remote regions like indigenous and African-Brazilian traditional communities, and urban outskirts in order to expand the access to information and communication technologies for academic purposes. Under the coordination of Commissioner of the National Telecommunication Agency, Vicente Aquino, we launched a three-year pilot project impacting 177 public schools and over 13,000 students. These schools received high-speed internet connections, Wi-Fi networks, computers for students and teachers, and solar energy systems if the premises lack electricity. The results have been transformative and strengthen our drive to continue to expand the project, which means to benefit about 40,000 schools in the year to come. The schools connectivity project led by Anatel is part of the program Accelerate Growth, launched by the federal government in 2023. It established that all 138,000 public schools will have connectivity by the end of 2020. And six, so we must secure long-term partnership to maintain the infrastructure and the connection service after 5G opt-in resources are over. We have a responsibility to make sure this progress is not temporary. If the power of the connectivity, we, countries from the global south, can face our specific challenges arise from inequalities, build more equal and promise a future for all. Thank you, everyone.

Sade Baderinwa: And thank you, Alexandre, for that generous pledge and for setting an example of the importance of investing in technology and education. So thank you so much. Ladies and gentlemen, to conclude this session, let me introduce a strong believer in P2C, Rabab Fatima, Undersecretary General and High Representative. Rabab, the floor is yours.

Rabab Fatima: Thank you very much. Again, apologies. As you can see, I’m not very digitally smart. I’m reading from paper notes because I represent a group of people. countries who are still not yet there. No? You can hear me now? Okay, okay, thank you very much. Again, very digitally challenged here for me. Yes, thank you. I’m using paper notes, not yet there, and using teleprompters. Doreen, Achim, excellencies, dear friends and colleagues, thank you very much for this opportunity to share a few words, but first of all, let me thank and congratulate ITU and UNDP for organizing another successful digital day. Another fascinating, inspiring event, and I would like to thank you for keeping the digital agenda high on our agenda. As we have heard, the internet has fundamentally transformed education, healthcare, commerce, and global connectivity, benefiting billions worldwide. Yet, a large portion of the global population remains disconnected. Yes, I’m talking about the least developed countries where only 36% of the population are online. The landlocked developing countries, the LLDCs, fare slightly better at 39%, while in small island developing states, SIDS, 67% are using the internet, and women and the rural communities in these countries are certainly the ones who are being left furthest behind. In contrast, advanced economies enjoy near universal internet access, exposing the stark inequality in opportunities, access to information, and pathways to a brighter future. Excellencies, my office supports these countries, these 92 most vulnerable countries, the 45 LDCs, the 32 LLDCs, and the 39 SIDS, home to 1.4 billion people. Nearly 60% of this population is under the age. of 25, representing a generation with immense potential for digital growth. However, the persistent digital divide continues to limit this potential. This gap is not just a technological issue, but a profound development challenge. Affordability remains a key barrier to digital connectivity. The United Nations Broadband Commission has set a target for 2025 that broadband services should cost less than 2% of monthly GNI per capita in low- and middle-income countries. Yet, as of 2023, only four LDCs have met this goal. On average, 75% of LDCs face mobile broadband costs exceeding 5% of GNI per capita. LLDCs and SIDs face similar high costs averaging above the 2% target. Even when connectivity is available, challenges persist as many are unable to utilize the Internet’s full potentials. In LDCs, LLDCs, and SIDs, a consumption gap exists, but data usage remains low despite Internet access. This gap underscores not only connectivity issues, but also lack of adequate digital skills and infrastructure. To bridge this digital divide, a comprehensive approach is required, one that integrates quality education, robust infrastructure, and affordability. And I would like to commend the Partner to Connect for making efforts to bridge this gap. Yes, I’m speaking for 92 countries, give me another minute. Looking ahead, we must focus on more of such actionable solutions. developing countries to be held in Havarone, Botswana, in December to continue this conversation. The conference will feature a dedicated connectivity track that my office will be organizing with ITU, and that will be focusing on practical digital initiatives aimed at enhancing meaningful collectivity for the LLDCs. As we look to the future, let us harness the power of digital connectivity to build a more inclusive, resilient, and sustainable future. And I look forward to continuing these important discussions with all of you at the conference in Botswana to make sure that no one is left behind in this digital leap forward, and no one is left disconnected. I thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you very much. That’s right. Take your minute. Now let’s move to session two. An inclusive and meaningful digital future is one where no one is left behind. Wondercraft, a robotics company developing a first-of-its-kind self-balancing personal exoskeleton is enabling people who cannot walk the opportunity to stand up and walk again in their everyday lives. And you actually may have already seen this during the Paris Olympics in 2024 with para-athlete Kevin Piette, who became the first person with paraplegia to work to walk the torch in the summer Olympics relay. And today, you’re going to see this very same prototype presented by Bianca Faith Johnson, JD. She is making her way there. You know what? We’re going to forget all the run-throughs because I just want to get right through you. Tell me, this is really a game-changer. Talk to me about what happened to you. I know that you became paralyzed. Tell me about that journey.

Bianca Faith Johnson: Seven years ago, I was in a near-fatal motorcycle accident, no fault of my own. And as a result of that, I sustained a T4, T6 spinal cord injury. So that’s the equivalent of me being paralyzed from about mid-chest down.

Sade Baderinwa: And that completely changed your life.

Bianca Faith Johnson: Absolutely.

Sade Baderinwa: Can you tell me just how difficult that moment was in the journey after that?

Bianca Faith Johnson: That moment was extremely difficult. Imagine waking up in the hospital and being probed by doctors asking, can you move your legs and not being able to. My entire world was literally shifted upside down. But I knew that even in that moment, I was still going to make it. And I needed to make sure that I prepared myself for what was to come, for technology such as this.

Sade Baderinwa: Wow. Well, I can see your sunshine just radiating, and I can tell that you are a fighter and you are strong. So shall we walk through this together?

Bianca Faith Johnson: Absolutely.

Sade Baderinwa: Okay. So tell me about this technology. All of a sudden you found out about it, but how did you find out about it?

Bianca Faith Johnson: So I’m actually the acting chair of an organization called Push to Walk, which is located in New Jersey. It’s a spinal cord injury gym. And we were fortunate enough to have the opportunity for Wondercraft, an amazing organization who is the creators of this exoskeleton, to come and do some demos. And I was a part of that demonstration, and from there the synergy was just perfect, and I’ve been working with them ever since.

Sade Baderinwa: Okay. So let’s show everyone, shall we? Wow. Wow. That’s incredible. Shall we walk forward a little bit? Absolutely. Okay. Wow. Wow. Incredible. Wow. Okay. That was fantastic. So this has changed everything because one thing I remember reading about you, you were saying like I was standing up talking to you and you were saying that before I had to look up, but now you’re able to look eye to eye. That means everything, right?

Bianca Faith Johnson: Everything.

Sade Baderinwa: Talk to me about that.

Bianca Faith Johnson: This is how our bodies were intended to be. So, and then, of course, I was injured, so I remember what it felt like standing upright, walking upright, and looking someone and having that type of connection eye to eye. So now, in this self-balancing prototype, this exoskeleton, I’m able to do so hands-free, and I can talk to you just like everyone else would.

Sade Baderinwa: And also, just having the freedom to go where you want to go. Did you ever imagine you would be here at the UN, walking and talking to this incredible crowd?

Bianca Faith Johnson: I did not imagine this exactly, but I knew it would be something like this.

Sade Baderinwa: Shall we walk a little bit more forward? Okay, so, as we do this, can you tell me about that first moment when you got in the exoskeleton and then being able to move like this?

Bianca Faith Johnson: It was literally everything, because imagine, for seven years, I’ve been in a seated position, unable to stand on my own or walk on my own. So the moment I was engulfed and put on this exoskeleton, it put me on, and I was able to embody the position that my body was used to doing. It is almost like a little muscle memory thing going on. It remembers where I came from, and it’s bringing me into where I need to be.

Sade Baderinwa: And it’s bringing your spirit to life again.

Bianca Faith Johnson: Yes, ma’am, yes, ma’am.

Sade Baderinwa: Was there anything else you wanted to share with everyone?

Bianca Faith Johnson: This technology is just absolutely amazing. And I just want everyone to acknowledge that what you are looking at is literally the future and the present. It has given back my, it has the potential to give me back my movement and, with it, my freedom. So I plan on just making sure that I’m maximizing on this opportunity. This should be supported. You should be spreading the word, sending it to your friends, and letting everyone know that Wondercraft, in particular, it’s an organization that is for the people. for people like me, so that we can get our lives back. And it may not change the world, but it certainly has the potential to change mine.

Sade Baderinwa: That’s what technology is all about. That’s what today is all about, giving access to people, changing their lives, right?

Bianca Faith Johnson: Yes, yes.

Sade Baderinwa: Is somebody here from Wondercraft? I wish they were.

Bianca Faith Johnson: I’m surrounded by them.

Sade Baderinwa: Okay, well, Wondercraft is here. Yes?

Bianca Faith Johnson: One right there.

Sade Baderinwa: Oh, right here. Oh, wait, wait, wait, wait. I thought you were just helping along.

Bianca Faith Johnson: Yes, yes.

Sade Baderinwa: Tell me just about what this means for you, working on this.

Physical Therapist: It is so inspiring. I’m a physical therapist by background, so being able to work with a company that puts patients first and allows people the ability to walk again is so meaningful, and that’s why Wondercraft does what it does.

Sade Baderinwa: And I’m sure you’ve seen so many patients, and you’ve seen that transformation. What is it like for you on the other side, giving people the ability to have freedom again?

Physical Therapist: It’s incredible. It’s stories like Bianca and Tony and all of the other patients in our lives that really, that we make an impact on a daily basis. So it’s just very meaningful, and we love what we do at Wondercraft.

Sade Baderinwa: And your colleague over here, I can’t leave him out.

Engineer: Yeah, so, yeah, I’m one of the engineers.

Sade Baderinwa: You’re one of the engineers.

Engineer: I don’t do-

Sade Baderinwa: So come forward, please. Everybody can see you.

Engineer: I don’t typically do a lot of PR, but- But that’s okay, that’s okay. Yeah, it’s great to be on another side of the company and be able to participate in this. And working with, not directly as a PT like Sarah, but with patients like Bianca is really a gem.

Sade Baderinwa: Well, this is the connectivity right here. The engineer, what you’re putting to paper, what you’re actually building, there you go, she could even lean in, is changing people’s lives. It’s changing her life. What does that mean to you personally?

Engineer: Oh. Oh. Yeah. That’s- I think-

Sade Baderinwa: We can feel that. We can feel that.

Engineer: It’s something that- maybe I’ll never have to experience firsthand, but we get to experience it through, like I said, great patients we get to work with, like Bianca, and be able to really talk to them face-to-face and see how their lives have changed.

Sade Baderinwa: Well, we appreciate your honesty, we appreciate your heart, because that’s what really all of this is about. We have your excellencies here, we have engineers like yourself, PT, we have somebody here who suffered from this through the hands of somebody else, but like all of these things, all of these companies, and Google, and all these other companies, Amazon, and so many others, like these things matter. And this is what we’re talking about, the digital future. What does it mean? Not leaving people behind, not leaving people behind like you. So thank you for everything that you’re doing, and we really appreciate it, and making the difference here, and for so many others. Thank you. Thank you. Wonderful. Shall we walk together? Okay, which way do you wanna go? We’re gonna turn? Okay, we’re gonna turn together. It’s truly incredible. Wow. And as an engineer, technology is only gonna get better, right?

Engineer: Yeah, of course. So, like Bianca mentioned, this is a prototype device, and we’re actively working on it every day, ensuring that we can incorporate more features to be able to give her more of her life back as she can continue to do more and more with it.

Sade Baderinwa: So things are gonna become more streamlined, it’s gonna just become easier, right?

Engineer: Certainly.

Sade Baderinwa: Okay, wonderful. Well, thank you all again. Please give them a round of applause. Woo! Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Well, as they make their way, pretty incredible, isn’t it? It really is. Now we welcome on stage United Nations Deputy High Commissioner for Refugees, Kelly T. Clements, who will talk to us about using blockchain for inclusive financial services anywhere, anytime, and on any device. Please welcome Kelly T. Clements, United Nations Deputy High Commissioner for Refugees, UNHCR. Thank you.

Kelly T. Clements: Thank you. Amazing, right? Yeah, incredible.

Sade Baderinwa: It’s wonderful. So you’re going to be able to talk about blockchain technology helping refugees. And not only is blockchain just changing how we do business, but it’s also helping victims of war-torn areas like in Ukraine or so many other places. Exactly. So you’re going to tell us more?

Kelly T. Clements: I will. I will. In fact, I’m going to tell you the story about Hannah. Hannah. Yes. I’m looking forward to it. So Hannah is a mother of two who had to flee from her hometown in Ukraine as the full-scale war broke out, caring for her elderly mother and her grandmother. When she arrived at a safe location, she had nowhere to sleep. After registering and engaging with our team on the ground, within 15 minutes, she tells us, the family received cash aid from UNHCR through a digital wallet on her phone. This support is part of a rental market program that we run in Ukraine to help families forced to flee find safe and dignified accommodation. Using cash to support displaced families settle into their new lives isn’t new. Cash, when conditions allow, provide a more dignified form of aid, giving people the choice to prioritize what they need. What was new for Hannah was the financial technology used to make and receive the transaction, a digital wallet powered by blockchain technology. Technology is reshaping every aspect of our lives, and the humanitarian sector is no exception. UNHCR alone manages a volume of over 2 million payment transactions every year. Handling transfers of $6 billion to partner organizations, vendors, and people like Hanna as part of our cash-based intervention. Until now, processing these payments had involved many banks, multiple payment technologies, complex processes, which vary among UN agencies and are costly and slow. Accessing financial services is a big challenge for many vulnerable communities that face difficulties opening a bank account, they lack identity documents, they live in remote areas with limited connectivity and services. There is a record 120 million people across the globe that do not have, many of them, the minimum ability to be able to access this cash. With minimal overhead costs, in a secure, transparent, and accountable way, we launched the UN Financial Gateway. It’s an initiative with Switzerland, the government. It standardizes and streamlines the payment infrastructure and processes the UN system uses for financial transactions. The Gateway seeks to leverage digital financial technologies to help us prepare, to deliver aid in a more agile and efficient way, while promoting financial inclusion. This is a collaboration across the UN, and with humanitarian partners, it could lead to efficiency gains of up to $60 million a year. Already in Ukraine, we’ve saved $12 million using the digital payment technology and reducing financial service fees. In Argentina, we saved 30% of our budget by mitigating local currency devaluation by using the digital wallet. This modality has assisted 2,500 households in Ukraine and Argentina alone. To scale up these solutions and reach those at risk of being excluded, we have to invest in global connectivity, digital infrastructure. digital and financial literacy. We need to bridge the gap between the financial ecosystem, available technical solutions, and the people that need them the most. We have to collaborate among many, many, many partners. So let’s go back to Hannah. We all have a role to play in this global challenge. Hannah was able to rent an apartment where she now lives with her two children, her elderly mother, and her grandmother. We support people like Hannah who have been forced to flee to restart their lives and find a new home. Thank you so much.

Sade Baderinwa: Great, thank you Kelly. I think this is so exciting. Let me, just come with me just quickly. Because people think about blockchain technology is just about exchanging money, but this is really where governments really help people in need, like you told us the story about Hannah. But it is also about reducing the costs for governments and for countries to be able to help them directly. Do you think that we’re gonna see a lot more advancements?

Kelly T. Clements: Absolutely. This is really just the tip of the iceberg in terms of both helping people like Hannah, but at a much reduced cost. You know, with with a number of people around the world that are forced to flee, we don’t have the resources to be able to assist them all. And governments were on the front lines with partners to be able to respond to people that are coming to entirely new locations with almost nothing. We need to do it much more economically, much more efficiently, and we need to use technology to show us the way.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you so much. Thank you. Thank you Kelly. Well, now I’d like to show you guys a very special story. Let’s take a look.

Official Video: My name is Adit Philip Maze. I’m a South Sudanese by nationality, schooling at our Ladies Girls Secondary School, and I’m also a member of the I Am The Code. For me, I Am The Code has helped me a lot because if I take back where I was, I was not that much confidence. I couldn’t be who I am now. But because of I Am The Court, I can now speak to the people, speak to the world, speak out what I have inside me. And thanks to that, I Am The Court also has made me a leader, not only of myself, but also to the whole school now. As the school head girl, I am capable now of helping my fellow students. I Am The Court also is helping our school with the morning breakfasts, because we usually have one, and it is after four lessons. Sometimes it is difficult to concentrate in class, but at least now we are able to be sustained due to the breakfast provided to us. And also, I Am The Court is helping us on coding, because here in school we just concentrate on books, but at least now we are exposed to the devices, and we are also exposed to the technology. We are now able to do codings, and at least now, when we go outside there, it will help us. For me, what I can tell to the world leaders is that they should include the refugee girls, and they should expose them, because where we come from, it is very difficult. We didn’t have all the things that we have now, because due to the culture and the society that we were living in. But now, as a refugee girl, I am being supported, I am exposed to the technology, I am now able to code, and also I am able to change my people back there, because they still have that mentality that we are being brought up of being neglected as a woman and as a girl. If now we are included by most people, and we are supported, the number of girls and women being neglected or discriminated, it will reduce. I would like to thank Lady Maryam, because she is my role model. Because since we started, I couldn’t make it up to where I am, because I did not know my rights. The only thing I do is just to listen to what society is telling me and do it. Thank you so much.

Sade Baderinwa: Technology really making a difference. And Lady Mariéme, please come to the stage. I’m so excited to hear your story. It’s an honor to meet you. Please come forward. I know you have things to share, but we’re talking about this technology and how it’s changing lives, even in remote areas. So for this woman, or young girl rather, and so many of the other young girls, you’re able to get them onto the future by coding. So they’re not just getting online, they’re able to meet the moment of the economy. So take it away.

Lady Mariéme Jamme: Thank you. Thank you so much for having me. I can’t start my speech without thanking Doreen. Thank you so much. And also Kelly Clements, who just spoke before me. And Ursula, the team behind ITU is just amazing. Thank you, Ursula. Thank you, everyone. Thank you. So I only have a few minutes. I timed myself, I promise you. Adit was supposed to be here, and she couldn’t make it. She was supposed to be on the stage, but she’s a refugee, and we tried very hard for her to be here with me today. So on behalf of the girls in Kakuma Refugee Camp in Kenya, thank you for giving us a few minutes to just share their stories. Thank you. So my name is Lady Mariéme Jamme. I am the founder of I Am the Code. In 2030, six years from now, Adit will be here on this stage sharing her story with you. She’ll be learning how to code. She’ll be an AI specialist. She’ll be understanding what Gen AI is. She’ll be understanding everything, because she lives in a place where it’s so hard for young women and girls. So hard. But thanks to UNHCR teams on the ground, Adit can now have an academy, the first ever academy Open, in the world, in a refugee camp and asylum seeker setting, where she’s sitting right now, she’s eating three meals a day, she’s coding, she’s developing the best coding languages in the world, from HTML to Python. When I started my work in Kakuma Refugee Camp in Kenya, I didn’t know who Adit was. She told me, today I’m a refugee, tomorrow I’m going to become a coder. And I think what is important, that as we build the future, we must include young women and girls, refugees. In Kakuma and Dadaab alone, we have over 900,000 people right now watching us. They’re refugees. And they must be part of the conversation. I stand here today before you because I didn’t go to school. I was born in Senegal. I was 50 years old yesterday, 50 years old. I know I look young. But the reason why I share this story is because young women do grow up. They grew up and they do have the sages like this and stand up and share their stories at the United Nations. So as we build the solutions for the future, we must include young women. We must include refugees. Being a refugee is just written, you know, it’s just a title. But the girls don’t feel refugees. They feel today they are coders. So as technologists, as we build the solution of tomorrow, we must do this. I’m very proud, as an African woman from Senegal, 50 years ago, I didn’t know I’d be standing here talking to you about refugees. And I have a duty, as an African woman, to make sure that I am making a contribution to my continent, but also we are making contribution to young women and girls across the world. So thank you, ITU, for including us. Thank you so much. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: And Mariéme, thank you for investing in girls and STEM, getting them involved. Thank you so much. Now let’s travel 1,800 miles up north from Kakuma. Let’s go to the cradle of civilization. Welcome on stage, Her Excellency, Amr Talaat, Minister of Information and Communication Technology of Egypt, to talk to us more about skills and the hope of digital. Thank you, His Excellency, thank you.

Amr Talaat: The hope of digital, or is it the fear of digital? Distinguished guests, this is a question that resonates with millions around the world, and perhaps more so in the global south where I come from, where technological advancements are widening the economic gaps among our nations, and the ambiguity about AI’s impact on jobs is leading many to wonder, will I find a job in the digital world? The echoes of skepticism about recent developments are looming large, but in Egypt, I also assure you that the sounds of hope are thunderous. While carrying out my public service duties, I travel all around Egypt to connect with people and gain first-hand insights into how the government can improve its digital services and empower our people with indispensable digital skills. From the shores of the Mediterranean, to the Nile Delta, to the temples of Aswan, all across the nation, I consistently witness a common theme. A mother who left her career to raise her children is now thriving as a remote digital marketing manager of an American company right here from Alexandria, thanks to the skills she gained through our free scholarships. A fresh graduate, once struggling to find employment, re-skilled in our data analytics programs and launched a startup, serving clients globally and creating jobs for more of his diligent peers. Another young engineer wanted to give back to her village. After attending our digital innovation workshops, she founded a successful e-commerce platform that not only supports local artisans, but also partners with development organizations to enhance their skills. and invest in their local capabilities. Ladies and gentlemen, the narratives of hope are imposing. They are invigorating and propel us to continue channeling public investments. To extend fiber optics in Egypt’s rural communities, benefiting over 58 million citizens, around 50% of our population. To expand our digital scaling scholarships to more than half a million beneficiaries across the nation. This year, multiplying the beneficiaries by 125 times over the past six years. And to continue digitalizing government services, while ensuring their accessibility through multiple channels, so that no one is left behind. The opportunities that our digital world is creating are glaring. Today, our world is open. Open beyond measure. Open beyond borders. Open beyond nationalities. And open beyond our differences. Today in Egypt, we embrace our commonalities. We accept the challenges of governing technology to create meaningful, inclusive impact. And we are embracing the hope of digital. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Lisa Russell on stage. She’s an Emmy Award winning filmmaker. And she’s going to talk about how AI is revolutionizing filmmaking. Lisa.

Lisa Russell: Good afternoon. Thank you. So, I just want to start off with a quick question. How many here believe that art can actually create a better world? Hands up. Hands up. Fantastic and I do as well and that is why I spent the last 20 years pushing for arts and storytelling in the UN space. My name is Lisa Russell. I’m an Emmy Award-winning filmmaker and the founder of Create 2030 and I’m a big advocate for artists to be working in the climate and sustainability sections because not only are we great entertainers, meaning we can help translate and amplify the great work being done in this space, we are also incredible creative thinkers and problem solvers and we deserve a seat at the table to help find solutions to our world’s greatest problems. Now behind me you are seeing images that have been generated using AI through my arts envoy lab and I’m on a mission to help sustainability and climate advocates learn how to become AI artists and that is because arts and storytelling is incredibly powerful, more powerful than we even realize. Did you know that there’s research that shows that a brainwave of a storyteller actually syncs up with the people who are listening to the story and people in a theater space, their heart rates synchronize with other people in the room. We have no idea the power of art and storytelling but I do believe that if we trained every climate and sustainability advocate how to use AI to amplify and translate their work we would have we would have a much wider reach. So I’m sorry Swifties, Taylor Swift should not be the voice of the world. Instead climate and sustainability advocates and creators can do so and we should be using AI to help democratize access for BIPOC and global south global majority advocates and creators to help amplify these important messages. So with that said Are you all ready to make some AI art with me? Yes Whoo. I’m gonna make you all AI artists today So behind me there’s going to be a QR code I believe it is coming soon. And this is a QR code for a survey about digital futures I want you all to take out your phones all of you and I want you to do the survey Because if you don’t do the survey you are not going to be part of this art Experience and I know you all want to be so go ahead Take the survey. I’m gonna disappear I’m gonna go do my art stuff and I’m gonna come back and I’m gonna share with you the art that we have made Together, how does that sound? Good. All right. Thank you very much. I’ll be back.

Sade Baderinwa: Hey, I Got my QR code. Okay, I gotta fill out the survey Are you guys gonna fill out the survey? Please do because she really has this extraordinary piece of art that she’s gonna put together So I’m looking forward to it So she’s gonna come back in session three to show us the product of all of our artwork. So, please Give them a survey at some point now We welcome now We welcome Lori Freeman global GM and vice president of Salesforce of nonprofits along with tunday Blackman chief development officer of world central kitchen. Lori Freeman.

Tunde Wackman: We’ve already seen so many incredible solutions here today

Official Video: There’s no place on earth that can’t be brought hope with WCK

Tunde Wackman: Like I said, we’ve already seen so many incredible solutions that help people predict disasters and provide community with critical early warning. But when that disaster strikes, World Central Kitchen is immediately on the ground, on the front lines, mobilizing volunteers and local partners to start cooking fresh, nutritious meals. Because we know that a hot meal that is locally prepared is so much more than just nutrition. It is comfort, it’s hope, and it’s dignity. Since 2010, we have provided more than 400 million meals to support climate, humanitarian, and community crises. We do it all with a commitment to inclusivity in our team and in our work, serving everyone everywhere, bringing in the local community as part of the solution. And we do it fast. As our founder, Jose Andres, likes to say, when people are hungry, send in chefs. Not tomorrow, not next week, today. Mobilizing the right resources at the right time requires the right digital solution. So I’d like to introduce Lori Freeman from Salesforce to show you how technology helps us move with the urgency of now. Lori.

Lori Freeman: As you’ve said, time is absolutely of the essence. World Central Kitchen is able to impact the work ahead within 48 hours. So let’s see how they make that happen. This work starts even before a disaster strikes. When those early alerts begin rolling in, they’re able to reach out to volunteers in the area and quickly put out the calls of support. Now the next step, preparing to feed those in need. World Central Kitchen partners with local suppliers and restaurants to serve meals that taste like home, but they’re also serving to help stimulate the local economy. And that means working with different partners all over. So they simply must rely upon activation dashboards that help them understand what’s happening in the area, tracking key information, like the number of meals served, the locations where they are, the recipients of those. Having that actionable data, it allows them to align with so many agencies like. at the UN, which helps inform the larger response. But of course, none of this would be possible without passionate humans who help support WCK through their financial gifts. So WCK manages their donor data and sends personalized journeys across each of these supporters. And they use these journeys to request critical funds to support their ongoing response efforts. As they engage their donors, they’re able to adapt in creative and meaningful ways. They even send handwritten thank you notes. I’ve received one of those. All of this engagement and donation support, it has to be rolled into fundraising dashboards to track everything. This is what helps them provide continuity, being data-driven.

Tunde Wackman: In a world where climate disasters are becoming more frequent and intense, we not only continue to innovate our disaster response through our partnership with Salesforce, but we also continue to fuel our fundraising efforts through our Climate Disaster Relief Fund. This gives the WCK relief team on the ground the ability to solely focus on what is most important, using the power of food to lift up communities across the globe. To meet the challenge of this moment, we need all hands on deck, including the collaboration of many in this room. Together, we can provide meaningful support to those in need anytime a disaster strikes. We hope you’ll join us. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you. Thank you, ladies. And now, we’re gonna talk about digital inclusion in Saudi Arabia. Please welcome His Excellency, Abdullah Alswaha, Minister of Communications and Information Technology, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, to share with us some of the advancements in digital inclusion in the kingdom. Your Excellency.

Abdullah Alswaha: Thank you. Thank you. The cost, the global cost, of gender inequality is close to $7 trillion. That’s almost 7% of the global economy and more than the joint combined output of six G20 nations. According to the UN, the world, us, we’re not on track to achieve the goal by 2030. As a matter of fact, in some of these targets, it will take us 286 years. Over the next three minutes, I’m going to share with you a story of how a nation has achieved its economic prosperity and diversification under the leadership of Prince Mohammed bin Salman by focusing on gender equality in digital. This story, and trust me when I say this, because I witnessed it firsthand, started when I was working for the Silicon Valley. That was the first time I met His Royal Highness, and he shared with us a vision, how he intends to empower people by focusing on women and youth, safeguard the planet, and shape new frontiers while diversifying our economy. Fast forward to today, we have a lot to celebrate. I was told that MISC are here. Can I hear from MISC? We started with MISC, with Saudi codes touching a million women and youth with coding with a game called Minecraft. And it’s no wonder that this story has only helped us achieve becoming the grandest and the boldest success story on planet Earth, but wait for this. it helped us achieve the highest success story in the most innovative platform known to humanity, sending the first Arab astronaut to the International Space Station, Riana Bernoulli. Riana, as a cancer researcher, she has devoted her life to fighting and predicting cancer. And as a matter of fact, in addition to Riana, the woman in the middle is actually my Chief of Staff, Noura Zaid, who has been the heartbeat and the executive force multiplier behind most of our successes in tech and digital space and STEM. And speaking of remarkable women, I have to talk about Deemah AlYahya, our General Secretary for the Digital Cooperation Organization, how we have pledged under the leadership of His Royal Highness, joining hands with 16 like-minded nations to make sure that we connect the unconnected, leave no one behind in three continents. And last but not least, I have to talk about Dr. Latifa Al-Abdulkarim, who sits on the UN Secretary General AI Advisory Board, helping humanity achieve the outcomes of the summit of the future with a human-centric AI, tackling the most pressing challenges in governance, ethics, and regulation. So it’s no wonder that as we achieved the boldest and the highest success story in women empowerment in tech, space, and STEM under the leadership of His Royal Highness, His Royal Highness Prince Mohammed bin Salman, year in, year out, we have celebrated becoming a top five nation by the UN, by ITU, by UNDP, by the World Economic Forum. And the team was kind enough to remind me today. that my time for my three minutes is over. But indeed, the time for all of us will be over when it comes to achieving the SDGs by 2030 if we do not start with empowering women in tech and digital. Thank you so much.

Sade Baderinwa: Your Excellency, can I speak with you? Can I speak with you? Please. Of course. I just wanted to take a few moments. Of course, being a woman, I am charged by seeing so many women lead these initiatives. Why was it important for Saudi Arabia to do this and have women just really be the cornerstone for all the movements going forward?

Abdullah Alswaha: It’s 50% of our productivity, prosperity, and future. So it’s only natural that as we move from 7% women empowered in tech, which was a position we did not want to be, to achieving 35%, surpassing the Silicon Valley average, the EU average, and even the G20 average, becoming the most successful story. And hear this, we have achieved our economic diversification by achieving 50% of our economy today becoming in an oil. And tell me briefly, what has this done for other women in the country, seeing women lead these initiatives? It’s got to be inspiring. I bet you’re going to hear it from Noura, Deemah, and the rest of the girls that we have here, how this has really not only transformed their lives, but have helped them contribute to a region on how we can tackle the most pressing issues. These women have led the study in collaboration with ITU on how we can connect the unconnected world, how we can deliver non-terrestrial networks to connect from satellite communication to devices. They have worked on a million empowering women and youth when it comes to the largest reskilling and upskilling activities with Saudi codes, starting up with Microsoft and Minecraft. And fast forward with AI, they are leading the work for the tech envoy today for the General Secretary on how we can tackle the most pressing issues in regulation, in standardization, and delivering a human-centric AI for the world.

Sade Baderinwa: Your Excellency, thank you very much.

Abdullah Alswaha: No, thank you. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: So, what is meaningful digital future for all? It is where everyone has the right to a safe, enriching, and productive online experience. And we heard earlier from Doreen’s TED Talk, if you’ll recall, she mentioned Giga, a UNICEF and ITU-led initiative to connect every school on the planet to the Internet by 2030. That’s only five years. I mean, it’s not far away. And exactly five years ago, Giga was born here at the heart of the United Nations. And today, we are celebrating Giga’s birthday, so let’s take a look at this video.

Official Video: At Giga, we are committed to connecting all the schools in the world to the Internet by 2030. By mapping schools using satellite imagery and AI, and by identifying cost-effective methods for delivering connectivity through infrastructure analysis, we provide governments with the tools to advance digital learning. Let’s take a look at Giga Maps. Red dots are schools that are offline. Green dots are schools connected to the Internet. In Dominica, Giga has helped turn red dots into green. Let’s meet a teacher from one of those schools.

Joan Moses: Good afternoon, everyone. My name is Joan Moses, and I’m a teacher at the Roosevelt Douglas Primary School in Potsmouth, Dominica. I stand before you in New York for the first time, filled with excitement and anticipation. This moment is a testament of how connectivity can change lives. When my school was connected to the Internet, everything changed. The internet has opened the door to a whole new world of digital resources, allowing me to bring innovative teaching methods into my classroom, creating a more stimulating and inclusive learning environment. My students are more engaged, more curious, and they’re achieving more than we have ever imagined. This May in Dominica, 835 students participated in national exams online simultaneously, thanks to the internet. Through Giga, schools in our region have also collaborated with each other and shared best practices, allowing us to learn from each other teachers and address common challenges. The internet has enriched our discussions around critical topics, such as climate change and social justice, encouraging our school community to reflect on our roles as global citizens. My students are learning about the importance of empathy, collaboration, and responsibility, qualities that are essential in today’s interconnected world. Let us work together to ensure that every child, regardless of their location, has the opportunity to connect, learn, and thrive in the digital world. Together we can bridge the gap and create a brighter future for all. But don’t just take it from me. Let’s hear from my students.

Official Video: Internet helps boost my learning, like when I have extra classes or extra activities and the teacher has like the flu or something. I still do Google stuff. It means that it is a modern day school, it’s a good school, and it also helps if your teacher needs to show you a slide show. Teachers can care for you, they can love you, and they can use the internet connection to help you learn. Diva is 5 years old now. Happy birthday, Diva!

Joan Moses: Help connect every school to the Internet, because with technology and great teachers, we can give our children access to information, opportunity and choice. Thank you.

Tofara L. Chokera: Ladies and gentlemen, I stand before you today as a living proof that embracing the digital world unlocks a future filled with endless opportunities. When I first encountered a computer at the age of 20, I had no idea how profoundly it will change my life. Today, as a founder of the Tofara Online Trust, I have witnessed firsthand how digital tools can transform not one life, but thousands. Through our flagship initiatives, the Digital Skills Development Program, we have empowered more than 12,000 women, youth and SMEs across Zimbabwe and Africa. We are empowering them with digital skills they need for international trade. We launched an initiative called the Talent for Startups in partnerships with Digital Africa, where we are equipping the youth with skills needed to secure meaningful employment in the digital economy. This year, 58% of our students were young women who are now website developers, graphics designers and digital marketing professionals. just to mention a few, giving them equal access to technology and digital skills. We stand at the crossroads of change, where the future of Africa is not just written by the hands of few, but by the collective efforts of many. It is a digital future for all, where women rise together as leaders, driving the digital era forward with their resilience, creativity and innovation. Winning the Equals in Tech Award as a leader in SME in 2022 was a milestone for us that uplifted thousands of women who looked up to us for inspiration. It shows us that our work and our voices matter. This recognition has fuelled our determination to work even harder, get opportunities to collaborate with women leaders across Africa, and also, as a board member of the Komesa Federation for Women in Business in Zimbabwe, I am advocating for a digital future where every woman is driving digital transformation for their businesses. My wish and my dream is to see every woman embrace technology, to see them learn, to see them innovate and to see them lead. The future belongs to those who dare to step in the digital space and claim it as theirs. Let’s build that future together. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you, Tofara. And please welcome to the stage Pamela Coke-Hamilton. She is the Executive Director of the International Trade Center. Pamela.

Pamela Coke-Hamilton: Thank you. I’m supposed to have a teleprompter up here, but clearly not. Thank you so much, Tofara. You represent actually for us one of the great success stories of ITC and of the International Trade Center process generally. You’ve done some powerful work and your insights are really incredible, especially what you’ve done in Zimbabwe. Your leadership and your mentorship, recognized by the Equals in Tech Awards, thank you, Doreen, has really empowered women to build digital skills and unlock economic opportunities. It’s a reminder of what is possible if we truly commit ourselves to closing the gender digital divide and of what we can achieve if we dare to do things differently. It’s why I’m so proud to be a supporter and a founding member of the Equals Initiative. Building a truly inclusive digital economy means creating access and actually enabling these same opportunities and tools that can ensure all women and all small businesses can have a digital future. I want you to imagine with me a world where every small business, no matter its size or location, can access the same data, insights as Global Jans. A world where a family-run bakery in Cambodia or a craft store in Kenya can reach international markets, identify the best opportunities, and connect with customers they never imagined possible. A world where we have finally democratized access to digital opportunities so no firm is left behind. Small businesses are the backbone of our global economy, but too often they’re unable to take full part in our digital age. Many don’t know where to start. Many don’t have the finance or the training to use the newest digital tools. Many don’t understand what the buyers in new markets want. But what if we could change that? The good news is we can, and we already know how. In Southeast Asia, over 1,000 small and medium-sized enterprises have transformed their prospects through the Digital Export Enablement Program. They have been able to access online resources. like Google Market Finder, Trademap, the Global Trade Helpdesk, and EcomConnect tools. They’ve learned what they needed to create their own strategies, thanks to online and hybrid sessions, and the support of a network of trainers. They’re using AI-powered insights and tailoring digital campaigns to connect with new audiences on a far deeper level. And they’re showing us how the future of business growth lies at the intersection of data, digital strategy, and innovation. After participating in the program, over 95% of the businesses reshaped their strategies and grew their global presence. This program was born out of a collaboration between the International Trade Center and Google, working alongside partners in the international space, like the ICC, and of course, my good friend from the World Intellectual Property Organization, Daren. Very good to see you, Daren, thanks. And this was just the beginning. Now it’s time to go global. When small businesses can access the same market insights, digital strategies, and online platforms as big corporations, the impact is clear. More growth, more jobs, and more inclusive economic development. The future belongs to those who can leverage the power of data. Together, I believe we can make that future possible. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you. Oh, wonderful. Thank you. Thank you. Pamela, thank you so much. And the importance of digital skills is essential for leveraging digital platforms and AI tools. Please welcome Christopher Burns from USAID. Christopher, please. Thank you.

Christopher Burns: Each year, more than 10 million students graduate from tech-related fields. These students are the future developers, engineers, and innovators who will shape the digital landscape, not just in their home countries, but globally because we know technology’s impacts go far beyond national borders. By integrating a responsible approach into their education, we can ensure that they enter the workforce, not just as technologists, but as architects of a digital future built on safety, inclusion, and justice. And the world needs such leaders. International development is replete with stories about the successes of digital technology, but not every instance has a happy ending. I heard a story a few years ago about a small business owner in East Africa who, in a moment of financial need, turned to a fintech lending app for a quick loan, as millions of people across the world do every year. The app’s design, its ease of access, its seamless integration with mobile money made borrowing almost too easy. But what seemed like a lifeline ended up being a trap, much like a predatory payday lender in the US. Needing to repay this initial loan very quickly to avoid a high interest rate, this business owner turned to a second lending app, and then a third, and then a fourth. As this business owner said, the apps give your money gently, and then they come for your neck. So, yes, the app did provide access to finance, but it did not solve financial inclusion, the true development challenge facing many countries. The story illustrates a theme we’ve heard many times, but seem to have not yet internalized. Technology can uplift humanity, but it can also deepen existing societal divides. Too often, the people designing these technologies are focused on innovation, without considering the full impacts of their products and services. And as AI technologies are becoming embedded in our everyday lives, we cannot afford to miss this moment. This concern is what the Responsible Computing Challenge aims to address. Designed and implemented by Mozilla Foundation, and sponsored by USAID, the challenge is an initiative that’s reshaping how we train the world’s future technologists, especially young women and girls, in an effort to close digital divides around the world. The challenge aims to embed responsibility into the core of technology and computer science curricula at universities, in the U.S., in Kenya and India, and with more to come in South Africa, Ghana, and elsewhere. Students in the Global South are aware of these issues and are eager to address them in their communities. As a student in Kenya reflecting on their experience with the challenge shared, as my classmates and I step into the workplace, we will carry this knowledge, empowered by a newfound sense of purpose, and we know the unique opportunity in our lives to ensure that when we enter the workplace, we are doing so with ethics, user-centered design, and responsibility as it means to the real world. The challenge we face is immense, and so is the opportunity. I invite you, policymakers, innovators, and leaders gathered here today to join us in this mission. The Responsible Computing Challenge is just the beginning. Your ideas, your expertise, and your commitment can help us build a future where technology truly empowers every individual. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Great, thank you so much. Okay, we are now approaching the end of the session, but we’re going to conclude with a bang. We’re going to focus on our youth, which is so important because it’s about laying out this future for them, a key pillar of this summit, future, and its action days. So, please, let me call to this day Sanjana Sanghi, Yuri Romashko, and Daniella Esi Darlington. Please, have a seat. So, Sanjana, let me start with you. You feel strongly about girls getting access to digital technology. Why? And tell me about this.

Sanjana Sanghi: Thank you for your question, and good afternoon, everyone. It’s an honor to be here. The reason why I feel so passionate about that is because I come from India, and I am youth champion for the UNDP in India, but I am also a girl who’s just grown up wanting access to education, wanting to build a life for herself. I have been fortunate to be able to get that access but in my journey of advocacy work, I have worked with girls in certain parts of our country that haven’t and I have my mother who’s actually seated in the audience here right now. Shout out to my mom who is a… Where is mom? Where is mom? Where is mom? Mom, can you raise your hand?

Sade Baderinwa: Oh, there she is.

Sanjana Sanghi: Okay. Who is a fifty-six-year-old Indian woman who wanted to make a difference and the only way she could do that is because digital technologies allowed her to connect with girls from very, very economically backward sections of society in India. Zainab and Pallavi are her name, their names and they belong to slums in India. Their parents do everyday jobs if at all. They don’t have any steady stream of income but they have somehow got themselves a smartphone. So their course modules they can see on their smartphone while my mom teaches them English which prepares them to be a part of the bigger world because they would never ever have gotten the opportunity to learn even just a basic language like English. So I have seen how women from two different generations and two different economic backgrounds with the tool of digital technology can come together and change each other’s lives. My mom feels invigorated by teaching them and Zainab and Pallavi are off to hopefully a better future.

Sade Baderinwa: Wow. Mom, you did an excellent job. Fantastic. Okay, Yuri, let’s talk about you. You attended this, this thing yesterday, right? For youth. What was your biggest takeaway?

Yurii Romashko: Well, I want to deliver two key takeaways. First, youth extremely accurately identify the main challenges of digital future based on digital today. And according to youth consultations, which was held in a Spark Blue platform, youth determined limited literacy. limited access to the internet, limited infrastructure as the key barriers which enable access to the digital technologies. So all this requires our common and global efforts. And second thing, the voice of youth is vibrant and game changer today. It ensures that policy makers and institutions should engage youth into the policy making, because of the reform agenda, because of the IA technologies, because of the digital solutions provide a lot of new opportunities. They reshape youth opportunities and therefore it’s extremely important to engage and involve youth people into the decision making process right now.

Sade Baderinwa: Well you’re a part of this decision making process right now yourself, because we have leaders here from different countries, so your voice matters. Daniella, let me get you in here. What were your takeaways from yesterday’s session?

Daniella Esi Darlington: Right, thank you so much for the question. So we realize that youth are more connected than ever before. However, there still exists a lot of digital divide in terms of internet connectivity and accessibility, especially in rural areas. And with ITU, our head of international youth day, we conducted a series of quizzes to gauge the level of awareness among youth in terms of internet usage and connectivity amongst others. And we realized that 66% of the youth were not really informed about where the biggest digital divide exists. So my key takeaway was that it’s not enough that we bridge the digital divide, we also have to bridge the awareness divide. Because you can only empower someone to do something, they can only do something if they have the knowledge about it. So we have to create more digital literacy programs for our youth, and we also have to create platforms where they apply those knowledge. especially where space technology is not so commonly known among the youth. We have to create opportunities where they can apply their knowledge in AI and space technologies to bridge and solve problems in their local communities. And my final words will be that we’ve connected our youth to the world and it’s important that we also connect them to its future. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you, thank you. So what, Sanjana, what does your vision for a digital future look like for all?

Sanjana Sanghi: Oh, it’s a daunting, you know, thought, but for me, there’s always this kind of like an invisible prefix to the digital future, which is an equitable and just a realistic digital future. By that, I mean that anything untamed can just spill in different directions, right? So what I mean by that is that when I see, say the youth being empowered with social media, when I see them getting untamed access, I see it having negative effects, negative effects on their mental health, negative effects on their attention spans, on the way they use it. So I feel like everything else in the world, even access to digital technologies needs to be guided and rooted. Like Daniela said that the ones who have it have too much and the ones who don’t have none at all. So firstly, that equitable distribution is really important because again, coming from India, I get to see it in a magnified way and who’s illiterate continues to remain digitally illiterate as well. So like many speakers here today have said that there are many developmental kind of barriers that we have to overcome for any kind of equitable digital future to be possible. So I’m waiting for that digital future where it’s more of a digital dividend and not a digital disaster.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you. And for you, Yuri, what does the digital future look like for you?

Yurii Romashko: My vision of the digital future is based on these three pillars. It is inclusivity and accessibility, digital literacy, and digital security. And my vision is very simple, to take action and transform challenges into opportunities in my community, city, country. I’m from Ukraine, where is the war. And because of the war, one of the biggest challenges is reconstruction. And there are thousands of projects simultaneously happening from all over the country. And to properly manage, control, organize, we create DREAM, Digital Restoration Ecosystem for Accountable Management. It’s an ecosystem as a single pipeline solution, where everyone sees everything that is connected with the reconstruction.

Sade Baderinwa: Great, thank you. And for you, Daniela, what does this future look like?

Daniella Esi Darlington: I’d also like to summarize that into three key words, universal, affordable, and also inclusive. For anybody to be able to leverage digital solutions, it needs to be available for them to be able to harness it. Also universality is also key to affordability. So then we have to make sure that building AI technologies and tools is, we do that with cost in mind. Because I am a tech founder, and I realized how building AI tools would not be able to, people in rural areas would not be able to leverage these tools if they don’t even have access to it in the first place. So we have to factor all these costs into digital solutions and innovations. And lastly, it has to be inclusive. We have to include people who are in the underrepresented parts of the world, those who are blind, people with disabilities. We have to bring them on board when we are developing technological tools so that it’s not just for us who are capable, but also those who lack the ability to afford these things or able to leverage these tools are also, they also have the opportunity to partake in the digital future. So that would be my future, that the digital world is inclusive, it’s universal, and also it’s affordable.

Sade Baderinwa: Good points there. Daniella, thank you. Sanjana and Yuri, this is our future. Let’s give them a round of applause. All so poised, poised and smart. Thank you all. Well now, Paul Foster is going to announce a pledge. He’s the CEO of Global Esports Federation. Please welcome him.

Paul J. Foster: Good afternoon. Your excellencies, distinguished guests, good afternoon. It’s a real pleasure to be with you today on behalf of our Global Esports Federation and our community of over 3.2 billion gamers around the world. Secretary General Doreen, Administrator Akim, thank you for the opportunity for our community to contribute to this important work. But gaming is more than a game. Our motto, World Connected, inspires us to do more. Just last month at the Paris 2024 Olympic Games as a sign of our progress, the International Olympic Committee declared that they would create next year in 2025 the very first Olympic esports games. And so today, on behalf of our global impact partners around the world, we pledge a multi-year, multi-million dollar series of global initiatives leveraging this transformation potential about our digital world and the youth of the world. Thank you very much.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you so much. And next, I’d like to welcome to the stage Brad Smith, who is the Vice Chair and President of Microsoft UNSDG. Thank you so much. Thank you.

Brad Smith: Well, I know the time is running out. Let me be brief, but let me say just a few words. First, of course, to thank Doreen and Akam and ITU and UNDP for not just today, but all the work every day. I want to say just a few words about one critical topic. When we look to the future and we think about artificial intelligence, how will we ensure that it reaches and serves the global South? That I think is one of the most important questions before the United Nations this week and this year. First, I would say we need to learn the lessons of the past. Artificial intelligence is what economists call a general-purpose technology. Think electricity. It changes every part of the economy. So first, let’s learn the lessons from the history of electricity. A hundred and forty-two years ago, the first power plant lit up lower Manhattan. And yet tonight, there are still 700 million people, 43 percent of the people who live in Africa, who do not have access to electricity. And what one sees over 15 decades is that every time electricity grew and people had access to it, economic development followed. But it has been extraordinarily uneven in many ways because of the economic structure of electricity. We all know that a power plant is very big and very expensive, as is an electric grid, even though an appliance may not cost much money at all. And the inability to overcome that economic challenge which is, in my opinion, a fundamental contributor, even cause, of one of history’s greatest technology tragedies. Because the electricity divide, I believe, is the fundamental cause in so many ways of the great north-south divide that shapes everything we are talking about here today. So now, let’s go to the future, and we have to ask ourselves, how do we ensure that this history does not repeat itself? First, we need to understand that the artificial intelligence economic structure looks a lot like electricity. At the infrastructure layer, data centers, they are big, they are expensive, they cost billions of dollars, even if it is very inexpensive to create an AI application. So what are we going to do? Well, first, we are going to have to do what was never done for electricity for the first 50 years after it was invented. Harness the power of capital and bring it to the world, and not just parts of it. And that means private companies like Microsoft, where we spent more than $50 billion last year, not just in the U.S., but in the developing world as well. But it means raising more capital, it means turning to long-term development financing, it means making this one of the great goals for the next decade to ensure that AI reaches everywhere. Second, we not only have to be thinking globally, we have to be focusing locally. And that’s what so many of you do. We need local language models so local voices can be heard. We need local data sets so that global and local problems can both be addressed. And in order to harness the power of AI at a local level, we need to recognize that just as important as the technology infrastructure. is the skilling infrastructure. It is investing to educate more data scientists, data analysts, computer scientists, and the many, many, many other fields that need to be grown so that a local economy can put AI to work. If and only if we do these things, we can ensure that AI is a leapfrog technology that helps close the gaps that divide the world in so many ways today. It will require all of us. It will require new types of partnerships. But I think it requires, among other things, a spirit of optimism that learns from the past and does our best to repeating the things that have gone wrong before. Thank you very much.

Sade Baderinwa: Brad, thank you so much. Just quickly, quickly, quickly. Okay, you’re giving us optimism. You talked about $50 billion Microsoft actually used around us, not here, but around the globe, and that we need to think locally, not just for language models, so you can hear those local voices. Because a lot of people are afraid of AI on a very granular level. Tell us just more about bridging that gap and how it can really transform the world.

Brad Smith: Well, I think bridging the gap probably requires a couple of things. One is it’s another one of the great lessons of electricity. You got to go meet people where they are, show them how they can use it, and show them how it can make their lives better. It’s an educational exercise that when you study electricity and how it moved around, it was key. And then the other thing that we also have to keep in mind and that I have to be, I think especially, it’s important for somebody like me to say, this technology and the companies that create it need to be subject to the rule of law. Local laws in countries, all the way to global governance. including at the United Nations. And that’s why the kind of multi-stakeholder activism that you see on a day like today is fundamental to ensuring that this technology truly serves the world.

Sade Baderinwa: And just really quickly, because I think this is an important point, talking about the skilled infrastructure, we also need to teach people about this new future and giving them the skills that they need.

Brad Smith: Yeah, and it’s so fascinating because I think that fundamentally you start by thinking, well, you gotta teach somebody how to do data analytics or how to use a large language model, how to write prompts. All of those things are true. I actually think the first step is to show people what they can do once they master those skills. One of my favorite things, like studying electricity, was here in the United States where it didn’t reach rural communities. There was a government initiative to just show people what it would mean to farmers, to women who were washing clothes or cooking food, to men who are harvesting crops. You have to help people see what it means for their own lives and not in just some abstract sense.

Sade Baderinwa: Wonderful. Brad Smith, thank you so much.

Brad Smith: Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you. Thank you. Okay, in this next session, we are going to see how we can harness digital technologies to protect the environment and planet. Now joining us is Nobu Okada, founder and CEO of AstroScale. Please welcome Nobu.

Nobu Okada: Hello, everybody. Take a look. This 10 millimeter metal ball could derail all the incredible digital progress we’ve been talking about today. This is a visualization of the space object reflecting millions of space debris ranging from smaller than this size to as large as a city bus size. that are traveling around the Earth at tremendous speed, 100 times faster than a bullet train. This is an urgent threat to the satellites which we rely on every day for digital technologies, from climate monitoring and traffic control to internet access and disaster response. We used to think space was big, treating rockets and satellites as disposable objects. But today, space is very congested and unsustainable. And just one collision with this metal ball could trigger a chain reaction collision that could prevent us from using space for generations. At Astroscale, our vision is to make space sustainable, and our satellites are designed to create a circular economy to remove, reuse, relocate the fuel, and in the future, repair and recycle spacecraft, leaving no waste in space. This requires advanced technology to approach and capture fast-moving, uncontrolled objects in space. And our satellites are equipped with sensors to locate objects, software for autonomous maneuvers, and robotic arms to grab an object and remove or service it. This year, our Astroscale team achieved a historic milestone, successfully locating and approaching a real piece of debris. This is the world’s first image of real space debris, an 11-meter-long rocket body weighing 3 tons, taken from just 15… meters away. And here is a time-lapse of a fly around. This debris is not sitting still. It’s moving at over seven kilometers per second. When I saw this image, I thought this is beautiful, although it’s just a garbage. And then our next mission is to remove this debris, but we should recycle this in future. Space sustainability is critical to safeguarding our future, and this matters to each and every one of you. So be an advocate for space sustainability. Together we have the responsibility and opportunity to ensure space as a resource that benefits humanity for the generation to come. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Okay, thank you so much. Now we’re actually going to turn to the Middle East, and earlier we heard from His Excellency Abdullah Alswaha about his appointment of women for his vision of the future. And joining us now is one of those appointments is Deemah AlYahya, Secretary General of Digital Cooperation Organization. Please come to the stage, Deemah.

Deemah AlYahya: Thank you so much. Thank you. Good afternoon, everyone. I would like first to thank Doreen and Achim for bringing us all together and giving us this platform to cooperate and partner together and bridge that gap, the digital divide and the digital gap. Now Ladies and gentlemen, excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, honored guests, it is 2024 and yet there are still regions in the world where a staggering 75% of the population remains disconnected from the Internet. While connecting them is a priority, we must ask ourselves, if we were to bring everyone online today, would it really solve the pressing issues of poverty, unemployment, the lack of digital skills? Is that enough? The answer is no, because it is no longer just about digital divide. It is about gender digital divide, AI divide, skill divide, and the disparity in the quality of connectivity across the borders. So how do we address this? The answer lies in three I’s, infrastructure, innovation, and inclusivity. First infrastructure, without robust infrastructure, true digital growth will remain a distant dream. Second is innovation, quantum computing, AI, blockchain, and the Internet of Things. These innovations are not just breakthroughs, they are engines for transformation that we must nourish. Third, inclusivity. Bridging the digital divide requires more than just connectivity. It depends and realize that we close the quality gap and provide equal opportunities for all to fully participate in the digital economy. So how do we ensure a bright digital future? Ladies and gentlemen, introducing the Digital Cooperation Organization’s answer, DEN, the digital economy navigator. Well, there was supposed to be a video playing, but okay, I’ll continue. So navigating tomorrow, that is our goal. And with DEN, we provide the solution with constructive insights for digital growth. DEN is not just an innovative tool. It is a game changer. It offers comprehensive, detailed view of digital economy performance across 50 countries. And it goes beyond measurement. DEN provides a clear framework with 102 indicators across 10 pillars, measuring digital economy maturity in three main dimensions, digital enablers, digital business, and digital society. This helps countries benchmark their progress and identify the steps needed to go from consumer into producers, innovators, and disruptors. Through DEN, the Digital Cooperation Organization is taking charge in providing a solution that connects fragmented efforts, offers clarity, and accelerates digital growth. I call and urge all of you to seize this opportunity, engage with us, and use DEN as a tool for all international organizations, countries, private sector. We connect the dots and connect source and connect the supply with the demand. Thank you so much. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Okay. Deemah, if you can just stay here for a moment. And sorry about the video. Unfortunately, we had technical difficulties. But you know, I spoke with His Excellency Abdullah Alswaha earlier. And he talked about the women who are being appointed these positions. And you are leading these efforts on a global scale right now. And you are giving the answers to the globe. Tell me about what this means to you personally.

Deemah AlYahya: Well, this is first, His Excellency surprised us today. And I appreciate that recognition. He and of course, Prince Mohammed bin Salman has been the force. behind enabling women and giving them the opportunity, really, to lead. What is really beautiful and what is provided now for women in Saudi Arabia is not just the opportunity, but also treated and these positions are looked at from a quality perspective and not just filling in a gap with gender equality. And this is, we’re blessed as women to be recognized and given this opportunity and now it’s our time to deliver and show that we are up to the task and we can.

Sade Baderinwa: So you’re telling me that this means something to you personally. What do you hope the other Saudi woman living at home who happens to see this streaming, what do you hope it inspires in her?

Deemah AlYahya: Well, not a Saudi woman, actually, all girls all over the world. That we can do it and opportunities are there. We have to seek for these opportunities and we have to make sure that we’re always learning and upskilling ourselves to make sure that we are up to always the task.

Sade Baderinwa: Well, you are up to the task and you are doing it. So thank you for inspiring all of the women, not just Saudi women. Thank you so much. Thank you. And I just want to remind the speakers, just for the sake of time, if we can condense the remarks because I know people are starting to get hungry in the room and we do want a break for lunch at some point. So please now allow me to welcome to the stage His Excellency Valentino Valentini, Deputy Minister at the Ministry of Enterprise and Made in Italy. Please welcome him. Thank you so much.

Valentino Valentini: Thank you so much. Thank you very much. Well, the digital revolution is reshaping our world at an unprecedented pace. The rapid advancement of technology offers immense opportunities, but it also brings with it the responsibility to ensure that these innovations support environmental sustainability. and equitable growth. To achieve a future where technology serves as a force for good, we must focus on integrating digital solutions with sustainable practices and fostering collaborations that bridge gaps and drive progress, ensuring that no one is left behind. Today, I am thrilled to share with you an initiative that embodies this vision – the AI Hub for Sustainable Development, co-designed by Italy’s G7 Presidency in partnership with the United Nations Development Programme. This initiative exemplifies our commitment to leveraging AI for sustainable development and global progress, with a focus on the African continent. It reflects our conviction that the path to the future must be inclusive and equitable, benefiting every corner of our world. Our journey in creating this AI Hub has been guided by collaboration, inclusivity, and a shared vision for the future of AI. We started by engaging with the African Union and securing the support of our G7 partners. We consulted with over 100 stakeholders, engaged with more than 300 AI startups across Africa, and initiated 80 partnerships focused on local language digitization. This collaborative effort ensures that the future of AI is shaped by diverse voices, perspectives, and innovative ideas. Our approach is centered around four critical pillars – data, computing power, talent, and enabling ecosystems. We are committed to deepening partnerships with our private sector and industry to strengthen the foundations and scale AI solutions that address the most pressing global challenges we heard today – whether it’s transforming energy, revolutionizing agriculture, improving health care, managing water resources, enhancing education and infrastructure – we’ve seen it all today, well presented here – AI holds the potential to tackle this issue. in ways we’ve only began to imagine. The AI Hub is also a cornerstone of Italy’s MATE plan, reinforcing our dedication to sustainable development and innovation in Africa. This initiative wants to go beyond technology transfer. It’s about co-creating, creating solutions together, learning from each other, and growing together. We believe that Africa must be a true partner in shaping the future of AI, and we’re committed to ensuring that this journey is one of mutual growth and shared benefits. As we stand at this pivotal moment of the Global Digital Compact, I invite you to join us in this transformative endeavor. Together, we can harness the power of AI to build a future where technology enhances our lives, protects our planet, and ensures prosperity for all. Thank you very much. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you. Who’s next? Jakob, Jakob. Thank you so much. And now I just wanted to take the moment to recognize the president, the presence of the president of Malawi, His Excellency Lazarus Chakwera. Thank you so much. We look forward to hearing from you a little bit later. And our next speaker is Jakob Granit. He’s the Director General, Swedish International Developed Corporation Agency. Please, let’s welcome Jakob. Jakob, thank you.

Jakob Granit: It’s my great privilege to address you on behalf of Sweden on a topic of hope, digital sustainability, and prosperity. The ongoing digital transformation presents mankind with plenty of hope for solutions to tackle poverty, build equitable societies, and find sustainable solutions in areas such as the green transition. At the same time, There are many risks related to digitalization, such as misinformation, and that vulnerable parts of society are left behind. To address these risks and opportunities, Sweden has worked with its co-facilitator Zambia, the Secretary General’s tech envoy, member states, and stakeholders in the intergovernmental process for a global digital compact. The compact has a key goal of an inclusive, open, sustainable, fair, safe, and secure digital future for all, and is planned to be agreed here at this summit. Now there is a strong link between the green transition and the digital transformation. Digital services often replace carbon-intensive services and transport, and the circular economy relies on digital infrastructure and services. Let me provide one example of how the Swedish International Development Co-operative Agency, SIDA, brings digital and green together. SIDA was part of establishing an investment in the GSMA Innovation Fund for Climate Resilience and Adaptation. The fund has supported start-ups across the section of green and digital. Some of the examples in the agriculture space range from a system to share tractors in Nigeria, to boosting fish farms in Kenya through iInternet of Things solutions, and to support farmers in Nepal to adapt to climate change through new techniques and access to information. These examples illustrate how the private sector can leverage the power of digital while ensuring the sustainability principles of the global digital compact. So in ending, the hope of digitalization in terms of contributing to prosperity and sustainability in support of a green transition is very large, and we hope the Global Digital Compact will provide a roadmap to unlock these opportunities. for the benefit of all of us. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you, Jakob. And our next speaker, Zhiping Chen. Thank you so much. She’s the vice president of ZTE Corporation, and she’s going to share how connectivity, entire species can be saved and preserved in one of the most remote places on earth. Zhiping.

Zhiping Chen: Thank you. Thank you for today to have a chance to be here. It’s my great honor. I’m Summer Chen, and today I want to share a wonderful story. Do you ever thinking about a place is ever in charge in time, and is rural, or in charge by the, this is Cocoshilli, one is the highest UNESCO hesitate site. In these places, park rangers, they are wirelessly protect Tibetan antelope for poachers. And we find the digital solutions to connect this remote areas. This vast isolated wilderness is a home to over 200 spices. When you step into Cocoshilli, it means leaving all behind the modern connectivities. Today I want to share a remarkable story of hope. Through these digital solutions, we protect these remote areas, caring for ecosystem in ways you never imagined. In these places, what the monthly without connection park rangers, what they are doing? Not just protect the only retirement entertainment, staring contest, to see who would blink first. Despite all these challenges, in collaboration with our partners, ZTE embarked on a mission We connected this and achieved three breakthroughs. First, successfully to build the first 5G base station. It allows for observation and in-depth animals and the live stream on the tablet, antelope migration and caring season. Nearly six, seven point millions of viewers tuned in worldwide. It’s greatly public wellness enhancement. Second, our 5G network will connect park rangers for their loved ones through a reliable railroad course. We witnessed the rangers were overwhelmed by the first call. Third, thanks for this 5G technicals, we caught on the carbon emission is another big win for environmental protection. And all our commitment is not just for Kokushile, we pushing the boundaries worldwide. For ZTE, our mission is quite clear, to making the connectivity and the trust everywhere. We believe this digital inclusion is a fundamental pillar of SDGs. It’s ensuring the digital future for all. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you. And now from the UN, let’s bring up Fatou Haidara, Daren Tang, and Tawfik Jelassi.

Fatou Haidara: Good afternoon, Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen. Every solution begins with a problem. In this particular case, we are dealing with an invasive species called Acacia bushes that invades the grassland of Namibia and takes up farmland. The farmers affected were simply burning the bushes to recover land, a dangerous process but also a source of harmful emissions. The New Dose Sustainable Bush Value Chain Project uses artificial intelligence, machine learning, satellite and drone imagery to analyze and map the growth of the bush across Namibia. It is a prime example of how digital technology can be used to tackle environmental degradation and resource depletion. Artificial intelligence and geographic information systems now identify where the Acacia is growing and estimate the total biomass. This provides a foundation for the responsible harvesting of this invasive species and as next step, the harvested Acacia is turned into marketable products like charcoal and cattle feed. Together with our partners, we transform a harmful environmental issue into an economic asset. for local communities. A challenge become an opportunity. Funded by Finland, our solution has received strong support from national authorities and local communities, attracted venture capital, and led to the establishment of a factory for biomass processing. A factory like this means local value addition, job creation, and income generation. Our initiative shows how AI technologies can benefit rural populations and foster sustainable in inclusive growth. It is our collective responsibility to ensure that developing countries have access to such technologies to bridge the digital divide. At UNIDO, we will continue to explore the potential of AI for advancing local communities, job creation, and environmental sustainability. We look forward to partnering with all of you in identifying and implementing similar concrete digital solutions. I thank you.

Daren Teng: Hi, I think I’m next as the DG of WIPO. Good afternoon, everyone. I’m Daren Teng, the Director General of the World Intellectual Property Organization, the UN Agency for Innovation, Creativity, and Intellectual Property. Innovation is a process by which an idea is turned into an invention, and an invention creates impact. One of the key work, key missions of WIPO is to develop a global network of technology and innovation support centers, or TIS. But what are TIS, and how did it really harness the power of digital to unlock innovation potential? Think of every innovation journey. as a planting an idea in fertile soy. But like any seed, these seeds need the right nutrients to grow, and one key nutrient is information. One of the unique features of the IP system is that when you apply for any type of IP, you have to disclose information behind this new technology, new brand, or new design. And with over 20 million intellectual property applications filed each year, this has become a huge database of information. Policymakers use it to understand technology trends, researchers use it to identify new areas of research and decide on research priorities, and entrepreneurs apply it to find potential partners for their businesses. But making information available is only part of the story. Advice is also needed for these researchers, inventors, and entrepreneurs, especially from developing countries to take their ideas from the lab to the market. By combining cutting-edge digital tools with expert guidance, WIPO’s Technology Innovation Support Centers, or TIS, help to transform information into insights and insights into impact. WIPO’s patent scope is one example of information provided through TIS. Powered by artificial intelligence, it mines over 100 million patent documents and close to five million scientific and technical materials to allow innovators to draw insights from all fields of human research. Another example is RD, or Access to Research and Development for Innovation Program. Through this single platform, inventors in developing countries can access hundreds of thousands of scientific and technical reference materials from over 100 publishers. TIS not only provide these digital tools, they guide innovators in how to make best use of them, turning knowledge into new discoveries that drive economies and societies forward. Let me quickly share the story of two amazing innovators, Luis Miguel Segovia and Maria Almanza, both from Colombia. As students, they developed a new solution for foot pain caused by high heels. Impressed, their professor encouraged them to turn their ideas into a business. which led Luis and Maria into a local TIS. Working with an IP expert, they confirmed that their idea was new, studied the market and worked on a patent application. But support didn’t just stop there. The TIS also helped them to apply for seed funding to launch a shoe line, Calzado & Mansa. Luis and Maria are two of the many innovators that we supported throughout 1,500 centres in 93 countries. TIS handled 2.2 million enquiries last year and close to 8 million enquiries in the past four years. We are proud of these numbers, but we are proud of still people like Luis and Maria who are changing the world with their ideas. So let us work together to support them and others to bring their ideas to the world and build a better future for all of us. Thank you very much.

Tawfik Jelassi: Excellencies, esteemed delegates, distinguished guests, my name is Tawfik Jelassi, I am Assistant Director General at UNESCO. I invite you to imagine a world without public services, without schools, without security forces to protect us, without care for the environment, without social security for all. These are not just conveniences, these are the backbone of our society. They uphold equality, inclusivity, human rights, democracy. And it is not a coincidence that SDG 16, which calls for strong institutions, emphasises this. To fully realise digital transformation in the public sector could unlock over $3.5 trillion annually, according to a study by McKinsey. Yet, despite significant investments, 70% of civil servants still lack digital capabilities, according to the World Economic Forum. The cost is not just financial, it’s about lost opportunities to better serve citizens, eroding trust in institutions and undermining democratic values. Obviously, we need to tackle this. What is UNESCO doing about this? Imagine equipping the world with better education, with digital skills, and obviously with full respect of human rights, dignity, equity, and inclusivity. We need to change not only the technology, we need to change the mindsets in order to change the behavior. And we do that through capacity infrastructure, in addition to what ITU has been doing, the meaningful digital infrastructure. One of the examples is our work on AI and the rule of law, training thousands of judges, prosecutors, on the new impact of AI and Gen AI on their work. And obviously, the educational transformation, also the greening of education. So these are just some examples that we are working on, in addition to with the African Union, with ITU, with UNDP, our work on data governance, and the capacity building for civil servants. So obviously, we need to move from just policy makers and tech innovators. We have also to empower educators, citizens, everybody has a role to play. So let’s invest in a digital transformation that serves both people and the planet. Let’s restore trust in our institutions, and let’s reinforce our democratic values. Thank you for your attention. I was supposed to play 30 seconds of the famous song, Imagine, but I was told I cannot do that because of intellectual property rights, especially in the presence of the Director General of WIPO. So you can imagine the music, here are the lyrics. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you all. Thank you so much. if you can please exit the stage. Now up next for a special announcement, we have Alan Davidson from NTIA and Harrison Lung from END.

Alan Davidson: Hi, I’m Alan Davidson, and I just wanna say a very quick shout out and thank you to Doreen Bogdan-Martin for your leadership here to ITU and UNDP and all of our hosts for this second Digital Action Day. Honestly, it’s been an inspiring day. And as a starting point, as we’ve said, the internet is now the essential tool for communications in our modern world. It’s essential for access to work, to education, access to healthcare, access to opportunity. And yet it is incredible that here we are in 2024 and that billions of people around the world still lack access to a high-speed internet connection or they lack the means and the skills to use it. That has to change. In the U.S., we’re doing our part through the Biden-Harris administration’s $90 billion Internet for All initiative to connect everyone, the president keeps saying everyone, everyone in America. And we are proud today to renew and expand our support for the Partner to Connect initiative to mobilize resources to connect the unconnected around the world. In 2022, the Commerce Department delivered our Partner to Connect pledge in Kigali at the ITU’s World Telecommunications Development Conference. And we pledged at that time to provide in-kind knowledge exchange and training opportunities focused on developing the next generation of leaders who will be improving broadband connections around the world. Since then, we’ve funded several efforts to grow global connectivity, but I wanted to highlight particularly the training sessions that have been so valuable and the work that we’ve done in partnership with USTTI in Washington and in Rwanda. Both have focused on African policy leaders and entrepreneurs interested in connectivity, in Internet governance, in space-based communications. I’ll say, I had the chance to meet with this cohort of extraordinary young leaders, and they should give us all hope for the future. They were truly inspiring. As the saying goes, the kids are all right. This brings me to our news today. I’m pleased to share that NTIA is renewing and expanding our pledge. We will partner again with USTTI to bring a new cohort of current and emerging African leaders, all women, to Washington, D.C. for training. We will also bring them – yes, thank you, it’s great, it’s a great group, it’s been a great group – and we’re going to bring them to Silicon Valley as well for some experience with American-style entrepreneurship. Our grant for the African Women Digital Leaders Training Program will promote best practices, demonstrate emerging technologies, grow the leadership skills of these participants, and really invest, again, in this next generation of leaders that we need around the world if we’re going to make this connectivity a reality. We plan to continue similar trainings focused on digital skills and connectivity in the years to come. We look forward to our continued partnership with the ITU on this important effort. I’ll just say, this is a historic moment. The pandemic reminded us that connectivity is not a luxury, it’s a necessity. And the coming AI revolution is only going to deepen that divide for those who don’t have internet access. So this is our chance to connect everyone in the world with the tools that they need to thrive in the modern digital economy. It’s going to take a lot of work, but together I know we can achieve that promise of greater digital access and community around the globe. Thank you.

Harrison Lung: Your Excellencies, distinguished guests, and esteemed speakers. Thank you for the opportunity to speak here today. I would like to use this stage to reaffirm our commitment to building a sustainable and inclusive future, as well as add an additional pledge here on this stage. EN, formerly known as Etisalat, started as a UAE-based telecom operator close to 50 years ago. Since then, we have grown to become a global technology company with operations in over 30 countries across Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia, and over 175 million subscribers. Thus far, we’ve made significant public commitments as part of our sustainability strategy across financial investments and population impacted in our operating footprint. Firstly, as part of the World Economic Forum’s Edison Alliance and its One Billion Lives Challenge, EN has pledged to contribute significantly to this mission by striving to improve the lives of 30 million individuals through enhanced network access, financial services, and technology education by 2025. In addition to connectivity, the digital services and applications, such as technology-supporting financial services, healthcare, and education, is critical to leveling the playing field. Secondly, as part of the UNDP, Digital for Sustainable Development Program, we will soon announce a strategic collaboration with focused initiatives across a number of areas, including AI, fintech, and education. Stay tuned for that. Thirdly, as part of our commitment to ITU’s Partner to Connect Digital Coalition, earlier this year at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, EN announced an investment of $6 billion between 2024 to 2026 in technological advancement, infrastructure, and innovative solutions to extend meaningful connectivity to everyone. This is particularly important as we aim to bridge the digital divide in our less developed markets, much of whom is operating in the Global South. Today, on this stage, I’m happy to announce a new pledge to Partner2Connect, a new multi-million dollar commitment to the promotion of digital economies by bridging the digital divide and building skills in underserved communities. This pledge will address many of the issues we heard of in previous segments, such as resilience in disaster-affected areas through early warning systems, capacity building and re-skilling to bring the next generation of workforce into the digital economy, and lastly, access to capital to women and small business entrepreneurs. We believe that the digital network and infrastructure is critical to uplifting the society in a digital age. Additionally, various digital services will provide access and capabilities to the general consumer and elevate enterprises to the global economy. EN is a proud partner with the ITU and the UNDP to contribute to a common vision of a sustainable, inclusive and prosperous digital future of all. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Okay, thank you all. Now, if Rumman Chowdhury can come to the stage, and His Excellency Bosun Tijani and Robert Muggah. Please, please, anywhere that’s comfortable. I’ll sit here on the edge. All right, His Excellency, let’s begin with you. I believe you have an important announcement. want to share about how Nigeria will encourage innovation in tech, but also while ensuring regulations around data privacy.

Bosun Tijani: Right. If I start with that, I think what we’re doing is a recognition that we have a unique opportunity now to rebuild trust between people and the government by ensuring that we can leverage technology to serve and provide opportunity for them during live events. So when you give birth to a child, you’re registering a business. You want to pay your tax. We think the most important thing is that we’re able to deliver this seamlessly and most comfortably to our people. So what we’ve committed to is ensuring that by 2027, that the lowest form of government is connected to quality internet. So we do have what we call the local government, which is the lowest form of interaction that our people get with our government. So the federal government is connecting all the 774 secretariat of our local government to ensure that the services that our people are seeking can be provided to them digitally.

Sade Baderinwa: Wonderful. Thank you. And let me get you in here, Rumman. What do we need to do to ensure a sustainable and inclusive development for AI?

Rumman Chowdhury: Wonderful question. With my nonprofit, Humane Intelligence, we focus on giving access to everybody in the world not to build artificial intelligence, but to evaluate artificial intelligence. We know that AI models are not fit for use around the world in different cultures, different languages. The images that they create can be stereotypical or even degrading. So what we’re trying to provide access to and what leads to a good, sustainable AI future is the ability for everyone to get their hands on AI and determine if it is good for them. Building that level of critical thinking and evaluation with AI systems is a key and often missing part of the AI development story. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: OK. Well, Robert, can you talk about, just in a condensed version, about the risk of AI in the global South?

Robert Muggah: There are multiple risks, some of which have been discussed over the last couple of hours. Some of these risks are already here. Advanced cybersecurity challenges, mass information pollution, the overabundant consumption of energy used by AI, which will be up to 3% to 4% of all energy use within the next five years. Some of them are on the horizon. AGI, artificial general intelligence outside of human control, a real concern. And some we don’t even know about. We set up a global task force last year with representatives from Africa, the Americas, Asia, including an esteemed member on the panel, to reflect a bit on what were the risks and what were the solutions for the global South. We identified four big ones, and I’ll only talk about two. The first is job displacement and inequality. Second is AI bias and discrimination. The third is surveillance and privacy violations. And the fourth is the concentration of power in a small number of AI companies. With respect to job displacement and automation, probably the most important, over 800 million jobs are at risk within the next five years from AI. In the global South, according to the ILO, 56% of all jobs in the global South are at high risk of displacement. Significant. Hugely significant. So what do we have to do? We have to do all of the stuff that’s been talked about in terms of multi-stakeholder engagement. But we also have to invest in job upgrading. We need digital literacy. We need job placement programs. We need to have employment schemes. We also need universal basic income, really socioeconomic responses to what is a digital challenge. And the good news is a lot’s happening. The AI for all in India, Connectus in Brazil, digital ambassadors in Rwanda, NGOs around the world are also investing in this area. And I think we’re also seeing UBI schemes from Namibia to India. So we see solutions, but we’ve got to scale those up.

Sade Baderinwa: I so wish I had more time to talk with you. I’ve got like 20 different questions in my mind about you already and what’s so important in terms of these guardrails and what it means for society, training workers about what is this new technology moving forward, so thank you all. Unfortunately, we’re running out of time. Really appreciate your words today. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. And now it is my great pleasure and honor to introduce his Excellency, President of Malawi, Lazarus Chakwera. Please, come to the stage. Thank you so much. Thank you.

Lazarus Chakwera: Well, I’m supposed to have my thing there, but bring me my iPad. Today, we stand at a pivotal moment in history, a moment where the digital landscape is not just a realm of technology, but a canvas upon which we can paint a brighter, more inclusive future for all. As we gather here, we must recognize that the digital revolution is not merely about advancements in technology, it is about the transformation of our societies, our economies, and ultimately our humanity. Malawi is therefore committed to bridging the digital divide because it is an economic and social issue. Our strategic plans for digital transformation include expanding digital infrastructure, enhancing digital literacy, and fostering an inclusive digital economy to ensure that no one is left behind in our digital journey. To accelerate digital adoption, Malawi has launched several initiatives with support from development partners. For instance, the Digital Malawi Project has been instrumental in expanding Internet connectivity to public institutions, institutions where the last mile rule of connectivity and inclusive digital transformation for Malawi, IDT4M projects, provide equitable access to digital technologies and foster digital literacy across all segments of society. Additionally, we have implemented a data exchange platform that leverages our national ID system as a single point of truth for identity verification. This platform is critical in assuring seamless access to services, improving efficiency across government, and reducing bureaucratic bottlenecks. Complementing this, we have also implemented an e-service platform which now serves as a single point of entry for all government digital services. These initiatives are premised on the acceptance that the digital age has brought forth unprecedented opportunities. It has connected us across continents, enabling us to share ideas, cultures, and innovations. It has empowered individuals, given them a voice and platform to advocate for change. However, while these initiatives ensure that our citizens can access essential services with greater ease, transparency, and security, with great power comes great responsibility. As we lay the foundations of a digital future, we must ensure that this future is equitable, inclusive, and peaceful. Digital literacy is essential for full participation in the digital economy. Therefore we are integrating digital literacy into our national education curricula and providing training opportunities for all age groups. Our technology hubs, which are training thousands of young people in coding, digital skills, and entrepreneurship, are playing a crucial role in fostering innovation. These hubs are not only incubating new ideas, but also creating jobs and driving the growth of Malawi’s digital economy. A truly inclusive digital future cannot be achieved in isolation. Today millions of people around the world remain disconnected, excluded from the benefits of the digital economy. Education and health care. This is not just unfortunate, it is wrong. And it is dangerous. As I said earlier, this divide is not merely a technological issue, it is a social justice issue. To build a peaceful future, we must ensure that everyone, regardless of their socioeconomic status, geographical location, or background, has access to digital tools and the internet. This requires collaboration between governments and multilevel partners, private sectors, and civil society to invest in infrastructure, education, and digital leaders. And we strive, as we strive to bridge the digital divide, we call upon the global community to not only provide financial and technical support, but also to share knowledge, innovations, and best practices. The journey toward a digital future must be a shared one, where no nation, no citizen, is left behind. In conclusion, laying the foundations of a digital future for all is a collective endeavor that requires our commitment, creativity, and compassion. As we embark on this journey, let us remember that technology is a tool, a tool that can either divide us or unite us. It is our collective responsibility to choose the path of inclusion, equity, and peace. Together, let us build a digital future that reflects our highest ideals, a future where everyone has the opportunity to thrive, where dialogue replaces discord, and where peace is not just a dream, but a reality for all. Malawi stands ready to embrace the future, a future where a digital transformation is not just an abstract concept, but a reality that improves the lives of every Malawian. The future is ours to shape, a future that benefits all humanity. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you so much, Your Excellency. Thank you so much. The President of Malawi, Lazarus Chakwera. Please give him another round of applause. Thank you. And joining us once again on the stage is Achim Steiner, he’s going to talk about the promise of digital public infrastructure, and then there will be a video and Akeem will give other remarks.

Official Video: Registry is helping to achieve the goal of the Paris Agreement by reforesting 12 million hectares and creating interoperability between stakeholders and infrastructure across natural resources. But it is not just Malawi, Finland and Brazil. The impact of DPI is growing, with more and more countries leveraging the transformative power of digital public infrastructure. To keep the promise of the Sustainable Development Goals, DPI represents a fundamental pivot that involves everyone, everywhere, and that includes you. Let’s work together to build a safe and inclusive digital future for all.

Achim Steiner: Isn’t it amazing? This is all happening already. And congratulations just to three more pioneers. In many ways, development is, as we have heard from a number of people today, an agenda of hope. This hope for a better future has historically driven development and humanities progress. If there was no hope, we wouldn’t be where we are now. This hope still matters. And hope in one’s own ability to change the course of history, influence people’s decisions and actions. This is why laying the foundations for a digital future is about hope and actions. I want to take you through the journey of building digital public infrastructure across countries today. In fact, it says with the video, but you have just seen it. So, you know, sometimes the script is a little bit behind. Can we go on to the next part? And as we stand at this juncture where our collective commitment to digital foundations can catalyze this brighter future for everyone, everywhere on our planet, I think you have already sensed that in the previous segment of this extraordinary day, we explored groundbreaking digital technologies and the profound impact they can have on sustainability and inclusivity. All the innovative solutions making connectivity universal and affordable, the digital tools enhancing inclusiveness. Their groundwork is laid both inspiring and formidable. Now as we transition to discussing the fundamental structures that support these innovations, we need to collectively shape the future by laying the foundations that are safe and inclusive and serve the public interest. We often talk about physical infrastructure, things like roads and power lines and water utilities that are fundamental to development. In fact, for many, they are already taken for granted. These are the building blocks that elevate the welfare of people and allow people to gain a livelihood. Let’s apply that same understanding for a moment to the digital world. Digital public infrastructure, or DPI, is an approach that goes beyond one-off solutions like apps or portals. It encompasses foundational systems, like digital identity systems we just saw, or payment platforms that allow people, businesses and governments to interact in a secure, inclusive and efficient way. This in turn enables everything from facilitating the access of vital health records online to enabling people more easily to start their own businesses. However, just as traditional infrastructure, like roads and railway tracks, have speed limits and guardrails, we also need to ensure that DPI has the principles, policies and institutions that keep the interests, safety and rights of people and protection of our planet at the very heart of these foundations. As we take equal access to physical infrastructure for granted, DPI must also ensure public value and provide safe, inclusive services at scale. While some governments are deploying DPI rapidly, others are just beginning their digital journeys. Both face risks like privacy concerns, data security and exclusion without proper safeguards. Conversely, embedding safety and inclusion can reduce inequalities and foster trust. This is why putting people and our planet at the centre of DPI is so critical. Digital public infrastructure plays a pivotal role in advancing all the interconnected sustainable development goals by employing digital technologies to address global challenges at scale. For example, foundational digital infrastructure, like digital identification platforms, have the potential to facilitate access to finance or access to healthcare. Again, we heard examples this morning already. Yet, to fully unlock the potential of DPI, we must put people and planet at the center. This requires building on three essential pillars, commitment, capital, capacity. First, commitment. Governments must commit to the importance of inclusive, safe, and equitable digital systems, not just the hardware, not just the fiber optic cable or the devices. Trust and equity are the cornerstones of a progressive society. Without these safeguards, we risk creating systems that exclude vulnerable populations or violate fundamental rights. Brazil, India, and Estonia are often cited as prominent examples for their digital ID systems, which have advanced development. These systems must be specifically designed with safeguards to prevent exclusion or data misuse. Second, capital. Financial investment is critical, not only for building digital public infrastructure, but more importantly for ensuring that robust safeguards are in place. No single entity can do this alone. It requires a collective effort from governments, the private sector, and global partners, civil society, scientists, academia, everyone. Together, actors have to work together and leverage their financial resources to support sustainable, secure, and inclusive DPI that serves everyone. Third and finally, capacity. Skilled teams, an empowered civil society, and expert technical support and beyond are crucial for the effective implementation and governance of DPI safeguards. Yet capacity must go beyond mere technical expertise. It’s about fostering an ecosystem – we’ve heard that word used quite frequently this morning – of collaboration and accountability, where actors share knowledge and resources to ensure that safeguards are implemented and continuously adapted to protect the rights of all users in a rapidly changing field. Our commitment to DPI extends beyond getting the technology right. It must include ensuring these systems are secure, trusted, and protect the rights of all users. Safeguards should not be optional. They are essential to the acceptance and success of digital public infrastructure globally. People need to be empowered and free to shape their own lives. That’s the fundamental basis for 21st century development. And together, we are not just updating systems, we are programming a future – a digital ecosystem that will enable every individual to thrive in this interconnected world that is already here. Thank you for giving me a couple of minutes to share these thoughts with you. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you so much. And now let’s welcome Esther Dweck, Her Excellency, Minister for Management and Innovation and Public Services of Brazil. Thank you, Esther. Thank you.

Esther Dweck: It’s an honor to participate in this session. In Brazil, we believe the future must be green and inclusive, driven by a fair digital revolution. The digital agenda is essential to development, addressing systemic inequality, including the technological ones. Brazil is committed to a triple transition – ecological, digital, and social – reducing inequalities both within and between countries. Brazil’s digital policies are aligned with the SDGs, and we are increasingly considering the environmental impact of digitalization. Under President Lula’s leadership, digital public infrastructures are key to Brazil’s digital transformation, ensuring sustainable, just, and inclusive development. We believe DPIs should be implemented with proper and universal safeguards, built through participatory processes to ensure that they are safe and inclusive and protect people’s rights. A prime example is our National Identity Card, linked to the gov.br platform, which provides access to over 4,000 public services for more than 160 million users. Other DPIs include PICS, our instant payment system that enhances financial inclusion, and the UNIFI Register for Social Policies, which improves social program management and access. The National Health Data Network ensures continuity of care through data sharing between public and private health care providers. The Rural Environmental Registry is a green DPI that supports environmental efforts such as reducing deforestation, restoring forests, implementing agriculture traceability, and fostering carbon markets. It plays a crucial role in a rural financial instrument such as credit and insurance, protecting biomes, increasing agriculture resilience, and will be a central at COP30 in Belém next year. Brazil is also advancing DPI for artificial intelligence, taking into account digital sovereignty. Achieving this requires a collaborative across government, especially those of the global south, civil society, the private sector, and multilateral organizations. Our National AI Plan includes developing an autonomous capacity in the field and launching a Portuguese-language LLM which respects intellectual property rights and cultural heritage, promoting AI in health care, education, and transportation. We emphasize open innovation, competition, and protection of human rights to prevent monopolies that stifle innovation. As we continue our presidency of G20 and prepare for COP30 and BRICS leadership, Brazil reaffirms its commitment to promote an inclusive DPI to foster a fair and equal digital future. Last year, we brought here a perspective on Brazil’s DPIs. After a year, we are here returning to collaborate with our global voices, seeking to promote digital inclusion, digital public infrastructure, digital public goods, and other strategies to foster an equitable planet. Together, we must act now for a sustainable, inclusive digital future. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Thank you so much, Your Excellency. Thank you very much. Okay. Remember that art piece we said we were going to work on? You’re supposed to do the survey? Well, now we’ve got it. We’ve got Lisa Russell back. Come on, Lisa.

Lisa Russell: All right. Thank you so much.

Sade Baderinwa: Okay. So, tell everyone what you did, how you did it, and take it away.

Lisa Russell: So, as you know, we collected information from the surveys, and we generated AI art using only a keyboard. There are no cameras, no microphones, no graphic pens. And this is the beauty of AI art in labeling people across the world to have access to creating artwork for people and for the planet. And so, I’m really excited to share with you the images that were generated using the data from the survey. Every answer, there are six answers, every answer corresponds with a different color of the SDG, and we synthesized the data, fed it some prompts, some creative prompts, and here are some of the images that we have generated using the Digital Futures Survey. So, if we can go ahead and show these images. And that is our official video. I believe there are three more images we’re going to show, I believe. So, this was all generated using, see all the colors in it? Those colors correspond to your answers in the digital survey. And this is the kind of artwork that we can create. And again, this is why we need an arts movement in the UN. We need artists to be able to help translate and amplify the incredible and important work being done in these spaces. This is just a small example. And I’m hoping, and I want to train every advocate for climate change, for sustainability, on how to translate their important work in art so that we can move audiences, move more general audiences. So I believe, are we showing the other images or? I think we are not showing the other images. So thank you so much.

Sade Baderinwa: Well, I’ll have to say, I think this is beautiful.

Lisa Russell: Yes, thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: This is beautiful. But, you know, it really is important. First of all, I love artists because it’s like you’re the soul of who we are and interpreting what that soul is. So if people are interested in learning more, certainly from all of these agencies, they can contact you?

Lisa Russell: Yes. Arts Envoy Lab is my program. I’m with Create 2030, and I am dying to teach young advocates on how to use creative AI. So definitely please get in touch with me. I’d appreciate it. ArtsEnvoyLab.com. Thank you.

Sade Baderinwa: Love it. Thank you, Lisa. And I’m going to contact you. Okay. Well, that wraps it up for our morning session. Thank you so much. And it was a pleasure being here with all of you today. So have some lunch, enjoy, network with different people here, and then the afternoon session will begin around 2.30. Thank you again, and I hope you enjoyed yourself.

M

Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub

Speech speed

131 words per minute

Speech length

583 words

Speech time

266 seconds

Connecting 2.6 billion unconnected people is crucial

Explanation

Joosub emphasizes the importance of connecting the 2.6 billion people who are currently unconnected to the internet. He argues that this is a critical step in bridging the digital divide and ensuring equal access to digital opportunities.

Evidence

Vodafone and partners are investing in expanding networks and exploring new technologies like satellite-based networks to reach unconnected populations.

Major Discussion Point

Universal Digital Connectivity

Agreed with

Jessica Rosenworcel

Juan Lavista Ferres

David Sapolsky

Agreed on

Universal digital connectivity is crucial for development

Disagreed with

Jessica Rosenworcel

David Sapolsky

Disagreed on

Approach to bridging the digital divide

J

Jessica Rosenworcel

Speech speed

134 words per minute

Speech length

644 words

Speech time

288 seconds

Satellite-to-cell phone communications can end mobile dead zones

Explanation

Rosenworcel argues that satellite-to-cell phone communications technology can eliminate mobile dead zones. This technology allows for connectivity in areas where traditional ground-based networks are unavailable or have been disrupted.

Evidence

She cites an example from Hawaii where satellite-to-cell phone technology helped save lives during a wildfire when terrestrial networks were knocked out.

Major Discussion Point

Universal Digital Connectivity

Agreed with

Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub

Juan Lavista Ferres

David Sapolsky

Agreed on

Universal digital connectivity is crucial for development

Disagreed with

Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub

David Sapolsky

Disagreed on

Approach to bridging the digital divide

J

Juan Lavista Ferres

Speech speed

136 words per minute

Speech length

402 words

Speech time

177 seconds

AI and satellite imagery can map population shifts to target connectivity efforts

Explanation

Ferres explains how AI and satellite imagery can be used to create high-resolution maps of population shifts over time. This technology helps identify communities that remain disconnected from communication channels, allowing for more targeted connectivity efforts.

Evidence

Microsoft is partnering with Planet Labs and the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation to create these maps, which can inform infrastructure investment decisions.

Major Discussion Point

Universal Digital Connectivity

Agreed with

Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub

Jessica Rosenworcel

David Sapolsky

Agreed on

Universal digital connectivity is crucial for development

D

David Sapolsky

Speech speed

150 words per minute

Speech length

482 words

Speech time

191 seconds

Project Kuiper aims to provide affordable global satellite broadband

Explanation

Sapolsky introduces Project Kuiper, Amazon’s satellite broadband initiative. The project aims to deliver affordable, high-performance connectivity to unserved and underserved communities worldwide using a constellation of low-Earth-orbit satellites.

Evidence

Project Kuiper plans to use over 3,200 low-Earth-orbit satellites to provide internet access with sufficient speeds for modern critical services like video conferencing and telehealth.

Major Discussion Point

Universal Digital Connectivity

Agreed with

Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub

Jessica Rosenworcel

Juan Lavista Ferres

Agreed on

Universal digital connectivity is crucial for development

Disagreed with

Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub

Jessica Rosenworcel

Disagreed on

Approach to bridging the digital divide

T

Tofara L. Chokera

Speech speed

122 words per minute

Speech length

363 words

Speech time

178 seconds

Digital skills training is essential for economic empowerment, especially for women and youth

Explanation

Chokera emphasizes the importance of digital skills training for economic empowerment, particularly for women and youth. She argues that providing digital skills enables individuals to participate in the digital economy and access new opportunities.

Evidence

Through the Digital Skills Development Program, Chokera’s organization has empowered over 12,000 women, youth, and SMEs across Zimbabwe and Africa with digital skills for international trade.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Inclusion and Skills

Agreed with

Lazarus Chakwera

Christopher Burns

Agreed on

Digital skills training is essential for economic empowerment

M

Mats Granryd

Speech speed

150 words per minute

Speech length

518 words

Speech time

206 seconds

Affordable smartphones are key to bridging the digital divide

Explanation

Granryd argues that the high cost of smartphones is a major barrier to digital inclusion. He emphasizes the need to bring down the cost of devices to around $20 to make them accessible to more people in developing countries.

Evidence

GSMA has established a handset affordability coalition to work on reducing handset costs and improving financing options for smartphone purchases.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Inclusion and Skills

L

Lazarus Chakwera

Speech speed

115 words per minute

Speech length

720 words

Speech time

372 seconds

Digital literacy must be integrated into national education curricula

Explanation

President Chakwera emphasizes the importance of integrating digital literacy into national education curricula. He argues that this is essential for full participation in the digital economy and for preparing the workforce of the future.

Evidence

Malawi is integrating digital literacy into its national education curricula and providing training opportunities for all age groups. The country has also established technology hubs that are training thousands of young people in coding, digital skills, and entrepreneurship.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Inclusion and Skills

Agreed with

Tofara L. Chokera

Christopher Burns

Agreed on

Digital skills training is essential for economic empowerment

C

Christopher Burns

Speech speed

173 words per minute

Speech length

551 words

Speech time

190 seconds

The Responsible Computing Challenge aims to embed ethics in tech education

Explanation

Burns introduces the Responsible Computing Challenge, an initiative to reshape how future technologists are trained. The challenge aims to embed responsibility and ethics into the core of technology and computer science curricula, especially for young women and girls.

Evidence

The challenge is being implemented in universities in the U.S., Kenya, and India, with plans to expand to South Africa and Ghana. It focuses on teaching students to consider the full impacts of their products and services.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Inclusion and Skills

Agreed with

Tofara L. Chokera

Lazarus Chakwera

Agreed on

Digital skills training is essential for economic empowerment

K

Karan Bhatia

Speech speed

145 words per minute

Speech length

538 words

Speech time

221 seconds

AI can be used for early flood warnings and disaster preparedness

Explanation

Bhatia highlights how AI can be used to predict and mitigate natural disasters. He specifically mentions Google’s Flood Hub, an AI-powered flood forecasting tool that can predict flood zones up to a week in advance.

Evidence

Google’s Flood Hub is live in 80 countries, reaching more than 460 million people around the world.

Major Discussion Point

AI for Sustainable Development

Agreed with

Valentino Valentini

Achim Steiner

Rumman Chowdhury

Agreed on

AI can be leveraged for sustainable development

V

Valentino Valentini

Speech speed

140 words per minute

Speech length

455 words

Speech time

194 seconds

AI Hub for Sustainable Development focuses on data, computing power, talent, and ecosystems

Explanation

Valentini introduces the AI Hub for Sustainable Development, an initiative co-designed by Italy’s G7 Presidency and UNDP. The hub aims to leverage AI for sustainable development, focusing on four critical pillars: data, computing power, talent, and enabling ecosystems.

Evidence

The initiative has engaged with over 100 stakeholders, 300 AI startups across Africa, and initiated 80 partnerships focused on local language digitization.

Major Discussion Point

AI for Sustainable Development

Agreed with

Karan Bhatia

Achim Steiner

Rumman Chowdhury

Agreed on

AI can be leveraged for sustainable development

A

Achim Steiner

Speech speed

148 words per minute

Speech length

2059 words

Speech time

832 seconds

AI must be developed with safeguards to prevent exclusion and protect rights

Explanation

Steiner emphasizes the need for safeguards in AI development to prevent exclusion and protect individual rights. He argues that these safeguards should be an essential part of digital public infrastructure, not an optional add-on.

Major Discussion Point

AI for Sustainable Development

Agreed with

Karan Bhatia

Valentino Valentini

Rumman Chowdhury

Agreed on

AI can be leveraged for sustainable development

DPI requires commitment, capital, and capacity building

Explanation

Steiner argues that successful implementation of Digital Public Infrastructure requires three essential pillars: commitment from governments, capital investment, and capacity building. He emphasizes that these elements are crucial for ensuring that DPI is inclusive, safe, and equitable.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI)

R

Rumman Chowdhury

Speech speed

174 words per minute

Speech length

117 words

Speech time

40 seconds

Evaluating AI systems for cultural appropriateness is crucial

Explanation

Chowdhury argues for the importance of evaluating AI systems for cultural appropriateness and potential biases. She emphasizes that AI models are often not fit for use across different cultures and languages, and can produce stereotypical or degrading content.

Evidence

Chowdhury’s nonprofit, Humane Intelligence, focuses on giving people worldwide the ability to evaluate AI systems, not just build them.

Major Discussion Point

AI for Sustainable Development

Agreed with

Karan Bhatia

Valentino Valentini

Achim Steiner

Agreed on

AI can be leveraged for sustainable development

E

Esther Dweck

Speech speed

128 words per minute

Speech length

420 words

Speech time

196 seconds

DPI enables efficient government services and financial inclusion

Explanation

Dweck highlights how Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) can improve government service delivery and promote financial inclusion. She argues that DPI is key to Brazil’s digital transformation strategy.

Evidence

Brazil’s National Identity Card, linked to the gov.br platform, provides access to over 4,000 public services for more than 160 million users. The PICS instant payment system enhances financial inclusion.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI)

DPI must be implemented with proper safeguards and participatory processes

Explanation

Dweck emphasizes the importance of implementing DPI with proper safeguards and through participatory processes. This approach ensures that DPI is safe, inclusive, and protects people’s rights.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI)

DPI can support environmental efforts like reducing deforestation

Explanation

Dweck explains how DPI can be used to support environmental initiatives. She highlights Brazil’s Rural Environmental Registry as an example of a ‘green DPI’ that aids in efforts to reduce deforestation and restore forests.

Evidence

The Rural Environmental Registry supports environmental efforts such as reducing deforestation, restoring forests, implementing agriculture traceability, and fostering carbon markets.

Major Discussion Point

Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI)

B

Bianca Faith Johnson

Speech speed

173 words per minute

Speech length

486 words

Speech time

167 seconds

Exoskeleton technology can restore mobility for paralyzed individuals

Explanation

Johnson demonstrates how exoskeleton technology can help paralyzed individuals regain mobility. She argues that this technology has the potential to significantly improve quality of life for people with spinal cord injuries.

Evidence

Johnson, who is paralyzed from mid-chest down, demonstrates walking using a self-balancing exoskeleton prototype developed by Wondercraft.

Major Discussion Point

Technology for Social Impact

K

Kelly T. Clements

Speech speed

148 words per minute

Speech length

665 words

Speech time

268 seconds

Blockchain-based digital wallets can provide rapid financial aid to refugees

Explanation

Clements explains how blockchain-based digital wallets can be used to provide quick financial assistance to refugees. This technology allows for faster, more efficient distribution of aid in crisis situations.

Evidence

She cites an example from Ukraine where a family received cash aid through a digital wallet within 15 minutes of registering with UNHCR.

Major Discussion Point

Technology for Social Impact

A

Ann Aerts

Speech speed

138 words per minute

Speech length

499 words

Speech time

216 seconds

AI and digital tools can improve healthcare outcomes and reduce inequalities

Explanation

Aerts argues that AI and digital tools have the potential to significantly improve healthcare outcomes and reduce health inequalities. She emphasizes the importance of understanding and addressing the social determinants of health through data analysis.

Evidence

The Novartis Foundation’s AI for Healthy Cities initiative uses data analytics to understand the true drivers of health and health inequities in cities like New York, Singapore, Helsinki, and Basel.

Major Discussion Point

Technology for Social Impact

Z

Zhiping Chen

Speech speed

89 words per minute

Speech length

323 words

Speech time

216 seconds

Digital technologies can protect endangered species in remote areas

Explanation

Chen discusses how digital technologies, particularly 5G networks, can be used to protect endangered species in remote areas. She argues that these technologies enable better monitoring and conservation efforts in previously inaccessible regions.

Evidence

ZTE built the first 5G base station in Cocoshilli, a remote UNESCO World Heritage site, allowing for real-time observation and live streaming of Tibetan antelope migration.

Major Discussion Point

Technology for Social Impact

Agreements

Agreement Points

Universal digital connectivity is crucial for development

Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub

Jessica Rosenworcel

Juan Lavista Ferres

David Sapolsky

Connecting 2.6 billion unconnected people is crucial

Satellite-to-cell phone communications can end mobile dead zones

AI and satellite imagery can map population shifts to target connectivity efforts

Project Kuiper aims to provide affordable global satellite broadband

These speakers agree on the importance of expanding digital connectivity to unconnected populations, emphasizing various technological solutions including satellite communications and AI-driven mapping.

Digital skills training is essential for economic empowerment

Tofara L. Chokera

Lazarus Chakwera

Christopher Burns

Digital skills training is essential for economic empowerment, especially for women and youth

Digital literacy must be integrated into national education curricula

The Responsible Computing Challenge aims to embed ethics in tech education

These speakers emphasize the importance of digital skills training and education, particularly for youth and underserved populations, to ensure participation in the digital economy and responsible use of technology.

AI can be leveraged for sustainable development

Karan Bhatia

Valentino Valentini

Achim Steiner

Rumman Chowdhury

AI can be used for early flood warnings and disaster preparedness

AI Hub for Sustainable Development focuses on data, computing power, talent, and ecosystems

AI must be developed with safeguards to prevent exclusion and protect rights

Evaluating AI systems for cultural appropriateness is crucial

These speakers agree on the potential of AI to address sustainable development challenges, while also emphasizing the need for responsible development and evaluation of AI systems.

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers emphasize the importance of Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) for development, while stressing the need for proper implementation with safeguards and capacity building.

Esther Dweck

Achim Steiner

DPI enables efficient government services and financial inclusion

DPI must be implemented with proper safeguards and participatory processes

DPI requires commitment, capital, and capacity building

Unexpected Consensus

Technology for social impact across diverse fields

Bianca Faith Johnson

Kelly T. Clements

Ann Aerts

Zhiping Chen

Exoskeleton technology can restore mobility for paralyzed individuals

Blockchain-based digital wallets can provide rapid financial aid to refugees

AI and digital tools can improve healthcare outcomes and reduce inequalities

Digital technologies can protect endangered species in remote areas

Despite coming from diverse fields (healthcare, refugee aid, conservation), these speakers unexpectedly converge on the potential of various technologies to create significant social impact in their respective areas.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of agreement include the importance of universal digital connectivity, the need for digital skills training, the potential of AI for sustainable development, and the role of Digital Public Infrastructure in development.

Consensus level

There is a high level of consensus among the speakers on the transformative potential of digital technologies for development and social impact. This consensus implies a strong foundation for collaborative efforts in leveraging technology for global development goals. However, speakers also consistently emphasize the need for responsible implementation, including safeguards and capacity building, suggesting a nuanced approach to technological adoption.

Disagreements

Disagreement Points

Approach to bridging the digital divide

Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub

Jessica Rosenworcel

David Sapolsky

Connecting 2.6 billion unconnected people is crucial

Satellite-to-cell phone communications can end mobile dead zones

Project Kuiper aims to provide affordable global satellite broadband

While all speakers agree on the importance of connecting the unconnected, they propose different technological solutions: expanding traditional networks, satellite-to-cell phone communications, and low-Earth-orbit satellite broadband.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of disagreement revolve around the specific technological approaches to achieve universal connectivity and digital inclusion.

Disagreement level

The level of disagreement among speakers is relatively low. Most speakers agree on the overall goals of digital inclusion and leveraging technology for sustainable development. The differences mainly lie in the specific approaches or focus areas each speaker emphasizes. This level of disagreement is not likely to hinder progress towards the shared goals, but rather encourages a diverse range of solutions to address the complex challenges of digital transformation.

Partial Agreements

Partial Agreements

Both speakers agree on the importance of digital inclusion, but Granryd focuses on hardware affordability while Burns emphasizes the need for ethical education in technology.

Mats Granryd

Christopher Burns

Affordable smartphones are key to bridging the digital divide

The Responsible Computing Challenge aims to embed ethics in tech education

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers emphasize the importance of Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) for development, while stressing the need for proper implementation with safeguards and capacity building.

Esther Dweck

Achim Steiner

DPI enables efficient government services and financial inclusion

DPI must be implemented with proper safeguards and participatory processes

DPI requires commitment, capital, and capacity building

Takeaways

Key Takeaways

Universal digital connectivity is crucial, with 2.6 billion people still unconnected

Digital inclusion requires both infrastructure and skills development, especially for underserved populations

AI and digital technologies have significant potential for sustainable development and social impact

Digital public infrastructure (DPI) is essential for efficient government services and financial inclusion, but must be implemented with proper safeguards

Emerging technologies like exoskeletons, blockchain, and AI can address critical social and environmental challenges

Resolutions and Action Items

Expand satellite-based internet connectivity to reach unconnected populations

Integrate digital literacy into national education curricula

Develop AI solutions for disaster preparedness and environmental protection

Implement digital public infrastructure with safeguards to protect rights and prevent exclusion

Increase investment in digital skills training, especially for women and youth

Create partnerships between governments, private sector, and civil society to advance digital inclusion

Unresolved Issues

How to ensure AI development benefits the Global South and doesn’t exacerbate existing inequalities

Balancing rapid technological advancement with necessary regulatory frameworks and ethical considerations

Addressing potential job displacement due to AI and automation in developing countries

Ensuring data privacy and security in the implementation of digital public infrastructure

How to make cutting-edge technologies like exoskeletons widely accessible and affordable

Suggested Compromises

Collaborate across sectors and countries to develop inclusive AI solutions that respect local contexts

Balance rapid digital transformation with careful implementation of safeguards and regulations

Invest in both digital infrastructure and skills development simultaneously to ensure meaningful connectivity

Develop open-source and affordable technologies to make digital solutions more accessible to developing countries

Thought Provoking Comments

Can we harness this technology beyond war zones and natural disasters? Can we finally close the digital divide?

Speaker

Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub

Reason

This rhetorical question challenges participants to think bigger about applying emergency connectivity solutions to everyday life.

Impact

It shifted the conversation from reactive emergency measures to proactive, widespread connectivity initiatives.

Satellite-to-cell phone communications is a game-changer. By combining space-based networks and terrestrial wireless networks, both can accomplish more together than either can do on its own.

Speaker

Jessica Rosenworcel

Reason

This insight highlights a innovative technological approach to bridging the digital divide.

Impact

It introduced a new dimension to the connectivity discussion, prompting consideration of hybrid terrestrial-satellite solutions.

We need to focus on creating an environment where the basics of technology are met so that quantum technologies can be used to benefit all.

Speaker

Emma Theophilus

Reason

This comment emphasizes the importance of foundational digital infrastructure before pursuing advanced technologies.

Impact

It grounded the discussion in practical realities while still maintaining a vision for future technological advancements.

To fully realise digital transformation in the public sector could unlock over $3.5 trillion annually, according to a study by McKinsey. Yet, despite significant investments, 70% of civil servants still lack digital capabilities.

Speaker

Tawfik Jelassi

Reason

This comment provides concrete data on both the potential benefits and current challenges of digital transformation in government.

Impact

It shifted the focus to the importance of digital skills training and capacity building in the public sector.

As we lay the foundations of a digital future, we must ensure that this future is equitable, inclusive, and peaceful.

Speaker

Lazarus Chakwera

Reason

This statement emphasizes the ethical imperatives alongside technological progress.

Impact

It broadened the discussion beyond technical solutions to include social and ethical considerations in digital development.

Overall Assessment

These key comments shaped the discussion by consistently emphasizing the dual challenges of expanding digital access and ensuring that access is equitable, inclusive, and beneficial to all. The speakers moved from identifying the scale of the problem to proposing innovative technological solutions, while also highlighting the need for policy frameworks, skills development, and ethical considerations. This created a comprehensive dialogue that addressed both the technical and human aspects of creating a digital future for all.

2.6 billion people are unconnected. a digital future for all can only be possible if access to connectivity is universal and affordable.

Speaker

Sade Baderinwa

Reason

This comment frames the central challenge and goal of the entire discussion, highlighting the massive scale of the digital divide.

Impact

It set the tone for the subsequent speakers to address how to overcome this divide through various technological and policy solutions.

Follow-up Questions

How can we ensure AI reaches and serves the global South?

Speaker

Brad Smith

Explanation

This is crucial to prevent the digital divide from becoming an AI divide and to ensure equitable access to AI’s benefits globally.

How can we create strong collaborations to reach everyone, everywhere with digital technologies?

Speaker

Achim Steiner

Explanation

Collaboration is essential to ensure universal access to digital technologies and their benefits.

How can we lower the cost of smartphones to under $20 in the least-developed countries?

Speaker

Mohamed Shameel Aziz Joosub

Explanation

Affordable devices are crucial for bridging the digital divide and enabling access to digital services.

How can we ensure proper safeguards are in place for digital public infrastructure?

Speaker

Achim Steiner

Explanation

Safeguards are essential to protect user rights, ensure inclusivity, and build trust in digital systems.

How can we integrate responsible computing into technology and computer science curricula globally?

Speaker

Christopher Burns

Explanation

This is important to ensure future technologists consider the full impacts of their products and services on society.

How can we address the potential job displacement and inequality caused by AI in the global South?

Speaker

Robert Muggah

Explanation

This is crucial to mitigate the negative impacts of AI on employment and economic inequality in developing countries.

How can we ensure everyone has the ability to evaluate AI systems for their specific contexts and needs?

Speaker

Rumman Chowdhury

Explanation

This is important to ensure AI systems are appropriate and beneficial for diverse global contexts and cultures.

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed.

Saturday Opening Ceremony: Summit of the Future Action Days

Saturday Opening Ceremony: Summit of the Future Action Days

Session at a Glance

Summary

This discussion focused on the Declaration on Future Generations, a key component of the upcoming Summit of the Future at the United Nations. The opening ceremony featured speeches from UN Secretary-General António Guterres and other leaders, emphasizing the importance of inclusive multilateralism and addressing global challenges like climate change, inequality, and conflict. A panel of experts then explored the potential impact of the Declaration and ways to implement its goals.

Key themes included the need to consider long-term consequences of current decisions, incorporate diverse perspectives (especially from youth and indigenous communities), and reform global financial and governance systems to better serve future generations. Panelists highlighted specific actions governments could take, such as focusing on competitive economic sectors, bridging local and global concerns, and fostering social connections across generations.

The discussion underscored the interconnectedness of past, present, and future in addressing global issues. Participants stressed the importance of civil society pressure on governments and the need for wealthier nations to support climate adaptation in vulnerable countries. The conversation also touched on innovative approaches, such as using legal systems to advance intergenerational equity and rethinking economic models to benefit future Africans.

Overall, the discussion emphasized the transformative potential of the Declaration on Future Generations, while acknowledging the challenges in translating its principles into concrete action. Participants called for continued engagement from diverse stakeholders to ensure the Declaration leads to meaningful change in global governance and decision-making.

Keypoints

Major discussion points:

– The Declaration on Future Generations and its potential to transform global decision-making to consider long-term impacts

– The need for concrete actions and implementation to give life to the declaration’s principles

– The importance of including diverse voices, especially from youth, indigenous communities, and developing countries

– Economic opportunities and challenges in building a sustainable future, particularly for Africa

– The role of civil society in pressuring governments and driving change

Overall purpose:

The discussion aimed to build momentum and gather diverse perspectives on how to effectively implement the Declaration on Future Generations, which will be adopted at the upcoming Summit of the Future. Speakers explored ways to translate the declaration’s principles into meaningful action across sectors and regions.

Tone:

The tone was largely optimistic and forward-looking, with speakers expressing hope about the potential for positive change. However, there were also notes of urgency and concern about the scale of challenges facing future generations. The tone became more action-oriented as speakers discussed specific steps needed to realize the declaration’s goals.

Speakers

Speakers:

– Folly Bah Thibault – Journalist and global champion for Education Cannot Wait, served as host/moderator

– António Guterres – UN Secretary-General

– Matthew Dominick – NASA astronaut

– Jeanette Epps – NASA astronaut

– Astronauts from China Space Station (unnamed)

– Carole Osero-Ageng’o – Co-chair of UN Civil Society Conference

– Oli Henman – Co-chair of Coordination Mechanism of Major Groups and other stakeholders

– Saumya Aggarwal – Co-founder of Youth for Peace International

– Andrew Holness – Prime Minister of Jamaica

– Evelyn Wever-Croes – Prime Minister of Aruba

Panel discussion participants:

– Thomas Hale (Moderator) – Professor of global public policy at University of Oxford

– Hina Jilani – Lawyer, human rights defender, member of the Elders

– Abdullahi Alim – CEO of Africa Future Fund

– Paolo Baca – Deputy Director of De Justicia

Areas of expertise:

– Folly Bah Thibault: Journalism, education advocacy

– António Guterres: International diplomacy, UN leadership

– Astronauts: Space exploration, international cooperation

– Carole Osero-Ageng’o & Oli Henman: Civil society engagement, stakeholder coordination

– Saumya Aggarwal: Youth advocacy, peacebuilding

– Andrew Holness & Evelyn Wever-Croes: Government leadership, international relations

– Thomas Hale: Global public policy, long-term governance challenges

– Hina Jilani: Human rights law, civil society advocacy

– Abdullahi Alim: African economic development, future-oriented investment

– Paolo Baca: Indigenous rights, environmental law

Full session report

Expanded Summary of Discussion on the Declaration on Future Generations

Introduction

This discussion focused on the Declaration on Future Generations, a key component of the upcoming Summit of the Future at the United Nations. The event featured an opening ceremony with speeches from UN Secretary-General António Guterres and other leaders, followed by a panel discussion moderated by Thomas Hale, exploring the potential impact of the Declaration and ways to implement its goals.

Opening Ceremony

UN Secretary-General António Guterres emphasized the need for intergenerational solidarity and responsibility in addressing global challenges. He called for more inclusive multilateralism, greater representation of developing countries, and reforms to international financial institutions.

Andrew Holness, Prime Minister of Jamaica, stressed the importance of embedding futures thinking in decision-making processes. He outlined key components of the Declaration, including its purpose to safeguard the interests of future generations and promote long-term thinking in governance.

Evelyn Wever-Croes, Prime Minister of Aruba, further elaborated on the Declaration’s aims to ensure that present actions do not compromise the well-being of future generations.

Panel Discussion

1. Youth Perspective – Saumya Aggarwal, Youth for Peace International

Aggarwal advocated for meaningful youth participation in policymaking and investing in youth-led solutions. She presented specific recommendations from the Youth Action Day, including:

– Establishing a UN Youth Office

– Creating a UN Special Envoy for Future Generations

– Implementing a Global Citizens’ Assembly

2. Indigenous and Global South Perspective – Paolo Baca, Deputy Director of De Justicia

Baca offered insights on time from Andean indigenous cultures, challenging Western assumptions about intergenerational relationships. He discussed a Colombian court case granting rights to future generations, highlighting its outcomes and implementation challenges.

3. African Perspective – Abdullahi Alim, CEO of Africa Future Fund

Alim provided context on demographic shifts in Africa, noting that “One billion Africans will be born in the next generation alone.” He outlined the Africa Future Fund’s goals, including:

– Restructuring debt measurement and management for African countries

– Focusing on competitive economic sectors to drive growth

– Leveraging Africa’s demographic dividend for sustainable development

4. Human Rights and Civil Society – Hina Jilani, Lawyer and Human Rights Defender

Jilani emphasized the disproportionate impact of climate change on vulnerable communities and the need to compensate developing countries. She stressed the importance of:

– Civil society pressure on governments to drive change

– Developing plans for socially connected communities

– Strengthening UN human rights mechanisms

She also referenced an intergenerational call to action issued by the Elders.

5. Civil Society Engagement – Carole Osero-Ageng’o, Co-chair of UN Civil Society Conference

Osero-Ageng’o stressed the importance of intergenerational dialogue and collaboration in addressing global challenges.

6. UN System Reform – Oli Henman, Co-chair of Major Groups Coordination Mechanism

Henman emphasized the need to strengthen UN human rights mechanisms and reform global governance structures to better serve future generations.

Key Themes and Outcomes

1. Intergenerational Solidarity and Long-term Thinking

2. Inclusive Multilateralism and Diverse Perspectives

3. Global Challenges and Opportunities, particularly climate change and demographic shifts

4. Reforming Global Financial and Governance Systems

5. Role of Civil Society and Community Building

Concrete Actions Proposed

– Appointing a UN Special Envoy for Future Generations

– Establishing a UN Youth Office

– Implementing a Global Citizens’ Assembly

– Developing plans for socially connected communities

– Restructuring debt measurement for African countries

– Providing compensation and resources to developing countries facing climate impacts

Conclusion and Next Steps

The discussion concluded with a sense of optimism about the potential for positive change, tempered by an acknowledgment of the urgent challenges facing future generations. An upcoming forum was announced to check on progress in implementing the Declaration. The Summit of the Future Action Days was mentioned as a platform for continued engagement and action.

A visual scribe created a summary of the session, capturing key points and themes graphically.

As the event concluded, it was clear that while the Declaration on Future Generations offers transformative potential, translating its principles into concrete action will require ongoing effort, collaboration, and innovative thinking across sectors and regions.

Session Transcript

Folly Bah Thibault: summit of the future action days. Yes! I love the energy already. Loving the energy. My name is Folly Bah Thibault, a journalist and global champion for Education Cannot Wait, the United Nations Education Fund for Emergencies and Protected Crises. I’m thrilled to be your host this morning as we gather here in New York to reimagine how we can all work together to address the opportunities and challenges of our time. Now on day one of the action days Friday, we saw what meaningful youth engagement looks like in practice in shaping our common future. We heard from youth leaders about the importance of cross-generational collaboration to create lasting solutions on crucial issues like climate change, gender equity, and women and girls empowerment. We’ll hear more about their recommendations from the youth rapporteur who will be joining us on stage in just a few moments. In today’s sessions, we are bringing together a broad and diverse set of global leaders and actors from all across sectors. They’ll share their ideas and experiences on how to advance on critical themes including digital and technology, peace and security, and sustainable development and financing. In addition to those themes, we’ll have a dedicated focus throughout the day on future generations. Throughout this opening ceremony, ladies and gentlemen, we’ll also have a visual scribe working in the background to create a visual summary of this session so you won’t miss anything at the end of the day. But first, to open this exciting day, it’s my pleasure and honor to welcome the United Nations Secretary-General, His Excellency António Guterres.

António Guterres: Excellencies, dear friends, all protocol observed. Welcome to the summit of the Future Action Days, which kicked off yesterday with a youth-led afternoon. A day full of ideas, energy, hope and expectation, and a perfect reminder of why we are here. Today promises to be just as dynamic. Looking out, I see world leaders, I see mayors and legislators, I see civil society, the private sector, academics, artists, activists and young people. You come from every corner of the world, every generation and every walk of life. Friends, this is what effective, inclusive, networked multilateralism must look like. Four years ago, we began the process that brings us here today. And because we saw a world in trouble, torn apart by conflict and inequalities, threatened by climate chaos and unregulated technologies, with the Sustainable Development Goals in peril, with many countries now mirrored in disastrous debt and the cost of living crisis. We saw our multilateral institutions ailing, unable to respond to contemporary challenges, let alone those of tomorrow. We saw faith in multilateral solutions eroding. And we saw trust in each other dissipating just when we needed it most. So we began a journey to reform, to renew the international system, so that it meets the moment and is fit for the future. We need multilateralism that is more inclusive, more effective and more networked, with stronger links between international institutions and with the people. That means greater representation in developing countries, and it means a stronger voice for all of you and what you represent. This ambition was rooted in some clear truth. The world belongs to us all. People want a say in the decisions that affect them. And while governments have primary responsibility that we do not deny, we will not solve today’s global problems without contributions from all of society, from civil society and young people, delivering change, promoting accountability, demanding better standing up for truth and justice, and using new technologies to organize for a better world. From business and finance, critical to combating the climate crisis and shaping our digital future for the benefit of all. From scientists, innovators and academics, pushing the boundaries of our knowledge and developing solutions to the great challenges that we face, from hunger and disease to online aid. Dear friends, over the past four years, the people in this room and your colleagues around the world participated in the most consultative process ever undertaken by the United Nations. We have seen a total of 1.5 million people, from every one of our member states, involved in discussions and consultations everywhere. Hundreds of civil society groups in putting into the Pact for the Future the Global Digital Compact and the Declaration on Future Generations and thousands of written contributions. Together, you have pushed for vision ambition and I thank you for that. We have now three milestone texts that are on the table which must open the door to changes our world in a way that it desperately needs. The pact for the future must lay the ground for reform. Reform of the outdated United Nations Security Council to make it more effective but also more representative of what the world is today. Reform of our international financial institutions so that they supercharge resources for sustainable development and for climate action. Reforms of the rules governing outer space currently a chaotic free-for-all and reform how we respond to complex global shocks and work together on peace and security. On the other hand the Global Digital Compact must be a blueprint for closing digital divides and the first universal agreement on artificial intelligence laying the foundations for a global platform centered at the UN that can bring all actors together. The Declaration on Future Generations must commit leaders to take tomorrow into account as they make decisions today and gender equality and human rights must weave through every aspect of those texts reflecting the fact that they are fundamental to every area of life. Excellences, friends, the issues at the heart of these texts justice, rights, peace and equality have animated my work for decades driving me forward. I know the same is true for many of you. I will not give up. and I know that you won’t either. The adoption of these texts will not be the end of the journey. It will simply be a new beginning. Our next task is to breathe life into these texts, to put words into action, and to use them to set humanity on a better course. Your continued engagement, commitment and pressure will be vital. That work starts with these Action Days. We look forward to hearing your ideas and solutions on what these new frameworks mean for you and how, together, you can help to make them a reality. A renewed multilateralism will not be built in a day or by governments alone. It will be fuelled and carried forward by all of you and the groups that you represent. We have fought for ambition. Now, let’s fight for action together. On behalf of the United Nations, thank you for joining us in this vital task.

Folly Bah Thibault: Thank you. Now, our next speakers exemplify the essence of international collaboration. There are currently multiple astronauts in space, and we have the privilege to hear from some of them. The crews on board the International Space Station and the Tianyong Space Station orbiting above us are quite literally showing us that global teamwork knows no bounds. Cosmonauts of the Russian Federation on the ISS are currently changing shifts, as you’ll appreciate their safety is of paramount importance. Ladies and gentlemen, let’s now take a giant leap, well, a virtual one at least, into space with this message from astronauts on the International Space Station and the Tianyong Space Station. Take a look.

Matthew Dominick: Greetings from the International Space Station. I’m NASA astronaut Matthew Dominick with my crewmate, Jeanette Epps. International cooperation and collaboration in space are just as critical to our work aboard this international research lab as it is back on Earth.

Jeanette Epps: On the ISS, we do research in microgravity that is not possible on Earth. From our unique vantage point in space, we can better understand our changing planet. NASA’s Earth Science Mission, many implemented with our partnerships around the world, are helping decision makers improve life on Earth, safeguard our future, and help us discover and innovate for the benefit of all.

Matthew Dominick: As you gather this week for the UN General Assembly, we encourage all nations to help assure peaceful, safe, and sustainable space exploration for the benefit of humankind.

China Space Station: We greet everyone from China’s space station. The peaceful use of outer space is a common goal for humanity. In a summit of the future, countries will jointly explore important issues such as multilateralism and international cooperation in the field of space under the framework of the UN, which will have significant impact on global governance of outer space. We feel honored to participate in it. China has always adhered to the peaceful use of outer space. The China Space Station, a landmark project of China’s space industry, officially entered a new stage of application and development in 2023 after two years of on-orbit assembly and construction. The China Space Station belongs not only to China but also to the world. As early as 2019, the Chinese Government opened the utilization resources of China’s Space Station to other countries to ensure that more countries could participate in manned space technology and application research, which was a strong support to the UN 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. We are willing to continue to conduct space exchange and cooperation with other countries and actually promote building a community with a shared future for mankind in the field of outer space based on equality, mutual benefit, peaceful use, and inclusive development. We wish the UN Summit of the Future a complete success. Thank you.

Folly Bah Thibault: Isn’t that just amazing? Amazing. Thank you to the incredible astronauts on board the ISS and the Tiangong Space Station for that out-of-this-world message, as you saw. Only at the UN can you see such great things, right? Their vantage point reminds us that while we may be separated by vast distances, our shared challenges and aspirations unite us all. So thank you once again to the astronauts. Now let’s bring our focus back on Earth. us and turn our attention to two remarkable leaders who are driving positive change within our communities. They have both been instrumental in organizing and facilitating consultations with civil society in the lead-up to the summit of the Future Action Days. First, we are going to hear from Ms. Carole Osero-Ageng’o, who was one of the co-chairs of the UN Civil Society Conference that took place in May in Nairobi. Please give a warm welcome to Carole.

Carole Osero-Ageng’o: Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, as we reflect on the 69th Civil Society Conference, the first in the Global South, and which was in support of the Summit of the Future, three points stand out – connection, convening, and collaboration in an intersectional and intergenerational world, before, during, and after the conference. Excellencies, the nine-week collaboration in planning the conference was a collaborative endeavor, a collaborative endeavor showing the strength and the diversity of civil society and the broad issues of interests of civil society, which we learned we must bring together at all possible junctures, because we do not engage with these issues, one to the exclusion of another. My co-chair, Nudhara Yusuf, and I, in framing the objectives of inclusion, impact, and innovation, asked ourselves, how do we drive impact? How do we catalyze change? Excellencies, in the run-up to the conference, unprecedented rains and resultant floods in Nairobi did not spare the United Nations campus where we were to hold the conference. but it united civil society in support of the victims of the floods in Nairobi, showing the spirit of collaboration and partnership that sits at the foundation of civil society. The outcome package of the conference is now available on the conference website, detailing two days of workshops and impact coalition engagements. The impact coalitions covered broad issues ranging from development, financing for development, AI governance, future generations. The impact coalitions bring together civil society, academia, think tanks, member states and other stakeholders for action-oriented inputs into the summit. The civil society continues to lean into the diversity that defines us, even as we seek to build common ground and move ahead to advance the ambitions of the millions of people around the world who benefit from our actions. We do not always agree, and that is fine. That is diversity. The coming days will see civil society input tap into the existing stakeholder collaboration platforms that work together to put the conference, including the major groups and other stakeholders, coalition for the UN. We need GNEC and Congo to engage in the key reform issues contained in the pact. We, however, seek and will continue to seek greater opportunity for civil society in the UN processes. Excellencies, it is also time to reframe the narrative on aging from a challenge to an opportunity, and we saw this in the intergenerational activities yesterday. Prospective aging of the youth of today calls for envisioning of young people here today as older people of the future, a future consisting also of other young people. The prospect shifts the definition of who is old as life expectancy increases to recognize the many older adults today who are engaged and productive and bring valuable contributions to society. We must recognize and protect their fundamental rights, but we can also harness the knowledge, experience, and innovation of this growing population segment as a resource for future generations. And we are also interconnected and interdependent in our families, communities, and societies, and globally, so we need to seek solutions that work for all of us. I thank you very much.

Folly Bah Thibault: Carole, thank you very much for your remarks. Thank you for your contributions to this summit of the future. Thank you. Next, we’ll hear from Mr. Oli Henman, who’s one of the co-chairs of the Coordination Mechanism of Major Groups and other stakeholders. Oli, welcome to the stage.

Oli Henman: Thank you very much. Excellencies, Secretary-General, ladies and gentlemen, colleagues, and friends. It’s a great honor to speak here today as we face the future together. My name is Oli Henman, and together with Rashima Quatra, I’m one of the co-chairs of the Major Groups and other Stakeholders Coordination Mechanism. This mechanism has been working together since the Rio Earth Summit in 1992 and is recognized under mandate by the General Assembly. Its 21 constituencies are thematic and regional in nature, and these constituencies represent millions of diverse people from around the world. We have engaged over many months in dialogue with the co-facilitators of the key documents of the Summit for the Future, And we are grateful for this regular engagement, including at the Nairobi CSO Conference. Over these Action Days, we are witnessing the energy and dynamism of civil society, the collaboration with a wide range of partners, and fresh ideas from so many diverse groups. We are glad to be here together during the Action Days, but our voice must also be heard at the Summit itself. We cannot be excluded from the opportunity to shape our common future and insist on meaningful inclusion in all UN processes. In terms of the pact for the future and what comes next, we have some key insights based on our shared positions, and I am glad that many other colleagues are here to share their views over these days as well. Firstly, the pact must demonstrate the UN’s values to champion a democratic and rights-based multilateral system, ensuring meaningful participation of all stakeholders. We appreciate the mention of ECOSOC-accredited NGOs and also the specific call for meaningful inclusion of relevant stakeholders. However, we are concerned at attempts to create additional barriers for accreditation. And while we called for greater collaboration with civil society, unfortunately we do not see that in the revised text. We welcome the continued dialogue with Member States, and we commit to engage with a wide range of delegations going forward to ensure a strong exchange of ideas. Secondly, on human rights, we are very glad to see a recommitment to shared principles on the universality of rights. Everyone’s rights must be guaranteed. While in recent years we have witnessed populism and inflammatory language from some political leaders which has led to an us-and-them culture, erosion of rights, and the rollback of hard-fought equalities, massive violations in situations of conflict. In order to guarantee these rights, the UN’s own structures for protection and enhancement of rights must be strengthened. We call for accelerating support for the human rights pillar of the UN and forging clearer links at the country level with resident coordinator teams. Thirdly, we are pleased to see renewed commitment for financing to deliver real change. It is essential that adequate financing is agreed to deliver the SDGs. And in particular, we are glad to see the reference to targeting programs to support those who are being left behind. We believe the pact provides one step along the way, and note that crucial discussions for financing will be taking place next year at the Financing for Development Forum. Fourthly, it is essential that this pact sets out a renewed vision that is built on equity, fairness and trust. We must step back from the brink of catastrophic wars and conflict, and instead direct our energy and resources to a reinvestment in social protection. We therefore look forward to the World Social Summit in 2025 as a key moment to reset priorities and ensure recommitment to people-centered development, accessible and affordable public services and social protection for all. Finally, the pact’s recognition of the need to protect wildlife and ecosystems is a positive step, but we must accelerate efforts to restore biodiversity for the health of our planet and future generations. Climate change imperils us all. We are therefore glad to see the commitment to accelerating action on climate change and scaling up finance for adaptation and prevention of loss and damage. However, these commitments are not compatible with new fossil fuel exploration, and we therefore urge all governments to halt any new oil, gas or coal exploration. The future is in all of our hands. We have it in our collective power to reshape the world for our children and their children. It is essential that we do not go home empty-handed. When I go back home and see my young boys and hear the optimism in their voices, I want to be able to say that yes, the world is listening and change is coming. We cannot contemplate failure. Thank you.

Folly Bah Thibault: Thank you very much, Ali, for that powerful message. The future is in all of our hands. Ali also talked about the energy in civil society, and I want to hear the energy in this room now. for a better future for all of us. Is there energy? Are we energized? Yes? Are we gonna do it all together? Yes. Thank you very much, Oli, for bringing us the civil society view there. We’re grateful for your contributions. Now, as I mentioned earlier, day one of the Summit of the Future Action Day brought together young people from all over the world to discuss how we can all work together for a better future. And here now to reflect on yesterday’s Youth-Led Action Day is Ms. Saumya Aggarwal, co-founder of the Youth for Peace International, which is an organization dedicated to fostering peace and understanding among youth globally. Saumya, the floor is yours.

Saumya Aggarwal: Excellencies, distinguished guests, and fellow youth. Collectively, the world is significantly behind on the achievements set out in the Sustainable Development Goals and many other global frameworks. Today, young people make over one-third of the world’s population, and youth are creating innovative and sustainable solutions to the problem we are currently facing. However, young people around the world are losing or have lost trust in our governance systems, and we must collectively decide to change our approach and reshape the path forward. We are so excited to start the Summit of the Future with the Youth Action Days. It’s the first time in history that we have dedicated a youth day, and multi-stakeholders have shown genuine interest to learn and listen to us. Young people have been rigorously preparing for the Summit of the Future, and it was refreshing to see that the processes were co-designed and coordinated between UN agencies, youth constituencies, youth-led and youth-focused organizations. Let’s see where we are, because these spaces are only meaningful. when we commit to make a shift and learn. Yesterday was nothing less than inspiring. Youth voices were very loud and clear that they are watching the leaders and the upcoming summit should not be just another international conference. Yesterday, young people alongside policy makers and civil society discussed key recommendations to ensure the implementation of the Pact for the future and beyond. Let me share with you key takeaways that have been highlighted by the young people clustered under the three themes of today’s Action Day. First, on inclusivity for peaceful futures, we need to collaborate with the national coalitions to advance the UNHCR 2250 on youth peace and security commitments and support the efforts of young people and youth-led organizations in the implementation. Allocate flexible, accessible, and sustainable financial support for adolescent-led, youth-led, youth-focused organizations and networks, including for humanitarian action. Strengthen partnerships and dialogue between the youth-led organizations, policy makers, and humanitarian and development actors to ensure youth-driven solutions are recognized, scaled, and sustainable. Address the prevalence of climate and eco-anxiety among youth, which is contributing to a global mental health crisis. Usually we have seen that mental health support is neglected. Recommit to peace, youth protection, and human rights as youth are urging an emergent and permanent ceasefire in all conflict zones. For a digital future, explore potential strategies to mitigate growing digital risk and leverage digital opportunities to build an inclusive, safe, and meaningful digital futures for all. We also need to advocate for youth inclusion in digital and AI policymaking spaces, discuss current and future implications of emerging digital technologies with the focus on the consequences for young people, and explore mechanisms that protect the youth from digital harm. And finally, if we want to ensure sustainable futures, we have to take immediate actions to mitigate security risks and threats to building a peaceful world and sustainable societies. Establish national youth consultative bodies like youth advisory councils to ensure that young people and adolescents inform foreign and national policies. Young people must be part of policymaking and decision-making processes and governance systems at various levels. Raise recognition and legitimization of youth efforts in traditional governance structures and facilitate a culture for meaningful youth participation. Young people also brought recommendations on gender yesterday, such as the need to revitalize the Commission on the Status of Women and the Commission on Population and Development in partnership with civil society and youth. Under the intergenerational equity and solidarity, youth and partners demand to create an intergenerational dialogue platform as well as to leverage science, data, statistics, and strategic foresight to ensure long-term thinking and planning in their governance structures. These are clear examples that young people need to be included across discussions, negotiations, and policies, because all matters are youth matters. He acknowledged that his generation prioritized profit in systems that ultimately failed us. This must be corrected. Our generation needs to be included in decision-making spaces and be meaningfully engaged in shaping those processes. The change needs to happen now and youth lead for a better future. Thank you everyone. Have a great day.

Folly Bah Thibault: Thank you, Saumya, for so eloquently summarizing your discussions and capturing the energy that we all felt yesterday on day one of the Summit of the Future Action Days. So this now concludes our first opening segment and we’ll now zero in on one of the summit’s major targeted outcomes and that is the Declaration on Future Generations, which will be a vital step forward in ensuring that the rights and interests of future generations are at the heart of global decision-making. To discuss this, I’m delighted to welcome to the stage His Excellency Andrew Holness, Prime Minister of Jamaica, to join us. Thank you.

Andrew Holness: Secretary General of the United Nations, His Excellency António Guterres, Excellencies and distinguished delegates, representatives of the United Nations, civil society, youth, major groups and other stakeholders, it is a distinct honor to join you this morning in building momentum towards the Summit of the Future. and to formally commence the discussions on future generations. Allow me to congratulate and commend all of you for your tremendous efforts over these past few years to ensure the success of the Summit. Jamaica is proud to have co-facilitated the intergovernmental process for the Declaration on Future Generations, and I take this opportunity to express my appreciation to our co-facilitator, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, for their excellent collaboration during this challenging process. I would also like to thank the Secretary General and his team for the support provided to our respective teams during the negotiations and consultations. The inclusivity of the Summit of the future and its preceding action days, as well as the proprietary processes leading up to this very critical moment, is truly symbolic of the approach that is required to preserve a robust and effective multilateral system with the United Nations at its core. It is clear that member states and the UN system cannot chart this path alone. We must leverage the knowledge, expertise and vigor of civil society, youth, academia, the private sector and other stakeholders to deliver a better future for this planet and for all its people. The Declaration on Future Generations has certainly benefited from this. coming together of great minds, and reflects the diverse perspectives and challenges across the world that must be taken into account as we lay the foundation for the next century and beyond. Indeed, with the adoption of this Declaration at the Summit tomorrow, we will be able to celebrate a universal realization that, even as we address the challenges of today, we have an obligation to protect the interests of future generations and ensure that they will inherit a planet in which they can thrive. We must now translate that enthusiasm into action by giving life to the Declaration. We are grateful that, during the consultations, all stakeholders recognized that it was important to not only manifest lofty intent to take account of the needs of future generations, but to agree to fundamental guiding principles, make far-reaching commitments, and prescribe concrete actions to propel us to achieve this end. Having completed the negotiations, it is now our responsibility to ensure effective implementation of the Pact for the Future, the Global Digital Compact, and the Declaration on Future Generations. For governments like mine, this effort will require a whole-of-society collaboration as we seek to embed futures thinking. in all our decision-making processes across national and local government. The role of civil society, academia, and the private sector in this endeavour will be critical in developing solutions, as well as building and maintaining momentum towards implementation. In Jamaica, my government has already begun to invest in anticipatory planning and future-proofing, recognising first and foremost that a solid macroeconomic foundation is the most basic requirement. We have lowered our debt-to-GDP ratio, increased our foreign exchange reserves, reduced our unemployment rate, and achieved single-digit inflation as well as financial sector stability. This has allowed us to increase investment in sustainable and smart infrastructure, building for the future while taking account of changing demographic trends. We are, however, well aware of the capacity limitations of developing states to deal with the multidimensional challenges we currently face. Climate change, debt sustainability, economic stability, access to financing for development, global shocks, among others. Technology and knowledge transfer must therefore be facilitated, including through mutually agreed arrangements. The international financial institutions must be reformed to provide the necessary access to financing as the means of implementation. The multilateral system, with the UN at its core, must be equipped to provide opportunities for developing and sharing best practices. In this regard, a follow-up mechanism will also be important, so that implementation of commitments we make over the next few days can be appropriately measured and monitored. Excellencies, with the adoption of the Pact and its annexes, we have charted a path and made the first bold steps. Let us now move forward with hope and determination to ensure that our collective legacy will be a peaceful, healthy and prosperous planet for all our peoples and a sustainable future for the generations to come. I thank you.

Folly Bah Thibault: Thank you.

Evelyn Wever-Croes: Mr. President, Excellencies, distinguished guests, I’m delighted to be here with you all today on this inspiring occasion to take part in the discussion and to listen to your valuable insights. The Kingdom of the Netherlands is proud to have co-facilitated the intergovernmental process for a declaration on future generations alongside Jamaica. I would like to express my deepest gratitude to the Most Honorable Andrew Holness, Prime Minister of Jamaica, for his unwavering commitment and collaboration throughout this process. The declaration represents a significant milestone, and it will be annexed to the Pact for the Future during the Summit of the Future, an event that provides a rare, once-in-a-generation opportunity to create lasting change. This summit is our chance to set things right, not only for the people of today, young and old, but for the generations yet to come. Our decisions and our actions sent ripple effects across time, shaping the future. By making thoughtful and responsible choices now, we ensure a positive intergenerational impact benefiting those who will inherit this world. The declaration has the potential to mark a pivotal moment in our multilateral efforts to address global crisis and to establish a robust framework for long-term sustainable development. By embracing strategic foresight and carefully considering the long-term effects of our decisions, we can pave the way for a more equitable and sustainable world for future generations. It is essential that we demonstrate intergenerational solidarity. Challenges such as inequality and discrimination, climate change, food insecurity, the digital divide and ongoing conflicts are human-made. They demand collective solutions. It is our collective responsibility to champion impactful and long-lasting solutions. Governments, policymakers and all stakeholders must work together to turn legal and policy decisions into a unified, intergenerational agenda that safeguards the interests of future generations. The Declaration promises to bring about a major shift in how we think, making sure that caring for future generations and sharing responsibility across generations are priorities in our decisions. This is especially important when it comes to climate change. Like many countries around the world, my country, Aruba, and indeed our entire kingdom, which spans two continents, is facing the consequences of global warming. Rising sea levels and more extreme weather events clearly show us how what we do or don’t do affects everyone, now and in the future. The devastating hurricanes and floods in our Caribbean region are a stark reminder of this reality. Yet, history teaches us that forward-thinking decisions can protect future generations. By learning from past mistakes and taking decisive action today, we will secure long-term benefits for ourselves and for those to come after us. And this is why I look to the future with what I call realistic optimism. But there is a catch. We need to act now, and we must act collectively. Civil society partners, research institutions, the private sector, and so many others gathered here today all have an essential role to play. By supporting governments, policymakers, and international organizations like the United Nations, we can steer decisions towards this common goal, a thriving legacy for future generations. Today is the International Day of Peace, which was designated by the General Assembly as a time of nonviolence and ceasefire. Unfortunately, today is not a day without conflict, as the violence in the Middle East, Sudan, and Ukraine shows. While solving these conflicts is beyond what we can expect to achieve today, that doesn’t mean we should stop working towards a better future. And that is why I’m honored to be here today with you. Your Excellencies, distinguished guests, I would like to extend my sincere thank you to the Secretary General of the United Nations for his forward-thinking vision in prioritizing future generations and entrusting us with the responsibility of advancing the Declaration. His leadership has helped make the concept of future generations more tangible. Additionally, I want to express my gratitude to all the stakeholders here today, civil society, academia, the private sector, and impact coalitions, for your active participation over the past two years. Your dedication has been critical in shaping this process. With the Declaration on Future Generations, we must thrive. good ancestors, to leave behind a world that offers a better quality of life for those who follow. I look forward to continuing this journey together, shaping a more inclusive and just future. Thank you.

Folly Bah Thibault: Thank you very much Madam Prime Minister and thank you as well to the Prime Minister of Jamaica for your efforts in ensuring the interests of future generations remains at the top of the global agenda. We’re getting things set up now for our panel discussion. We’ll be joined by a panel of experts working on the topic of future generations, moderated by Thomas Hale, who is a professor of global public policy in the Blavatnik School of Government at the University of Oxford. His work, Thomas’s work, has focused on precisely the issue of how we safeguard our future and address the subject of what he terms long problems. Professor Hale will be joined by three distinguished panelists. Our first panelist is Hina Jilani, a pioneering lawyer and human rights defender and a member of the Elders, an esteemed group of global leaders. Ms. Jelani will be joined by Abdullahi Alim, the CEO of the Africa Future Fund, which is a new financing mechanism to advance the rights and prosperity of future Africans. And to round out our panel, we have Paolo Baca, the Deputy Director of De Justicia. Dr. Baca’s work blends academic scholarship with public engagement and his extensive fieldwork has fostered collaborations with indigenous organizations. worldwide. So we’re honored to have these experts join us at the General Assembly today to provide their diverse perspectives on the Declaration of Future Generations. And I will turn it over now to Professor Hale and his panelists.

Thomas Hale: Thank you very much, Foley, for this kind introduction. Ladies and gentlemen, tomorrow, every member state of the United Nations will adopt a Declaration on Future Generations, thanks to the hard work of many people in this room and a few late hours last night. This is a potentially transformative document. But as we’ve just heard from these speakers, the potential of any document to transform our world depends entirely on what happens next, what action follows from the text. And we have a fantastic panel today to talk about the work they’re doing to advance the goals and the objectives that the Declaration speaks to. And I’m going to be asking them, what is the transformative potential of this document, and how do we unlock it? And those are important questions because we are facing a world, this document is arriving in a world that is fraught. We face war, we face debt, we face a climate crisis, we face the lingering effects of a global pandemic, we face many immediate challenges. And so why now? Why in September 2024 are we talking about future generations? And a document answers that critical question in two ways. First, it recognizes the fundamental connection between the immediate, urgent challenges we face and the long-term trends and drivers from which they grow. It understands that things like climate change, poverty, underdevelopment, lack of health, lack of justice are fundamental risk factors that create crises. And as we all saw in our own lives just a few years ago, when a crisis gets out of control, we can’t react our way out of it. We can’t respond only. We need to anticipate and act in advance, and that’s a fundamental shift consistent with the goals of the United Nations to advance sustainable development. Second, the document, and I think this is really striking and important, it recognizes a fundamental consensus across cultures, across religions, across philosophies, across value systems that we all have an interest and indeed a responsibility to think about the future, to think about leaving a better world for those that come after us. And in a world where consensus is sorely lacking, isn’t it helpful, isn’t it powerful to think about the powerful consensus that exists there? Now of course these kind of lofty words fall flat. They ring hollow without action to follow up. And so we’re going to hear from a panel thinking about what that action looks like. But of course we see already trends happening around the world that are driving forward action to support future generations. Just this week, the European Union appointed a commissioner with responsibility for intergenerational fairness. This month, the South Korean Constitutional Court ordered the government to enhance its climate targets to better serve future generations. This is actually happening on the ground everywhere. And so the real question for this declaration is how it can catalyze more such changes going forward. Abdullahi, I’d like to start with you. You’re the CEO of the Africa Future Fund, working to support leaders and transformative businesses. to solve the continent’s greatest challenges. You’ve also worked at the International Chamber of Commerce, so you know what the private sector thinks. And you’ve just done a survey of a number of private sector leaders across Africa, asking them, what do you think about future generations? What did they say?

Abdullahi Alim: So yes, my name is Abdullahi Alim, and I’m currently leading an outfit called the Africa Future Fund. I’m no longer with the International Chamber of Commerce, so just a quick mention to the technical team. One billion Africans will be born in the next generation alone, and I think by the close of this century, you can expect about three to four billion total more Africans to be born. When you think of the mega cities of the future, it’ll be cities like Lagos, cities like Dar es Salaam, cities like Mogadishu, where I was born. And for some context, Mogadishu alone, by the end of this century, will be more populous than the entire country of Spain. Just to give you some scope of where the world and where the trajectory of population growth is growing. So from my perspective, when I think future generations, to make it as specific as possible, from my vantage point, I’m talking about future Africans. If this rapid growth in population that we’re expecting over the next few decades isn’t also met with commensurate increases in industrialization, in living standards, of course, without clocking past ecological boundaries, then we will have yet another wasted generation. And it’s from this place that we created the Africa Future Fund. We’re trying to take big bets on our communities. We’re trying to channel big investments to seismically change the geopolitical economic might of the continent over the next few decades. What does that look like? It looks, for example, like backing a local African initiative that is studying, that is, most importantly, IP-ing active compounds that are found in plant life that are indigenous to the Congolese basin. These kind of active compounds will be critical to the modern genomic revolution and to some of the anti-cancer treatment. statements of the future. It’s about backing, for example, fellowships that bring together young Africans at the forefront of combating advanced disinformation warfare. There’s one particular form, if anybody’s interested in like the future of disinformation called adversarial AI, we wrote a piece for them, about them rather, for foreign policy. And so some of the foremost thinkers on this topic are actually from the continent. So unlike what you normally see where it’s European, US or advanced Asian economies leading the world on thought and sort of exporting it to sub-Saharan Africa, we want to get to a stage where we’re leading and setting the standard for global resilience in this case. And you know, to be also honest, it’s also about backing young progressive political voices on the continent, training them on what the future looks like so that they’re able to really rise to the occasion when they assume positions of influence, positions of power. As Thomas alluded to, we ran a massive consultation across the continent to figure out what does the future look like, what’s the significance of it to your work if you are, for example, the head of a sovereign wealth fund, if you are a former head of state, if you are a young entrepreneur, three main priorities that made it very, very practical for us. It’s about restructuring the way debt is measured on the continent. Unlike anywhere else in the world, the majority of the debt in Africa is actually owned by the private sector. And it’s four times more expensive to borrow debt on the continent than anywhere else in the world. Number one, reforming debt. The second one is around really advancing export-oriented industrial policy. It makes no sense that, for example, Cote d’Ivoire, the largest producer of cashew nuts, makes a very limited gain in the global supply chain relative to countries like Vietnam, relative to countries like India. And the third one is really about taking more potential out from our SMEs. And we have this concept known as search funds, which we’re also championing. Three key ideas that came when we spoke to CEOs, when we spoke to government leaders, young entrepreneurs, and I’ll go into a bit more detail.

Thomas Hale: Fantastic, thank you so much for highlighting the opportunity that thinking about the future can highlight. We often think about the risks and how we manage them, but actually we need to have a real laser focus on the opportunity side as well. Pablo, I’ll come to you next if I may. You work for Davis TCO, which is a fantastic group of researchers and advocates working across a range of issues. But many people here will have heard about a famous case that you won in which a group of youth and children successfully sued the government in Colombia’s highest court for action to prevent deforestation in the Amazon because of the impacts that that would have on climate change and the climate future generations will inherit. So how do you think about this question, future generations, in your own work, and is there more potential to unlock that kind of transformation going forward?

Paolo Baca: Thank you, Tom. I will start on the issue how future generations’ perspective have changed my mind, and later on I will talk about the justicious case. I have been working with indigenous peoples for over two decades, and I have learned from Andean communities from Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru that the issue on future generations have to be tackled from a temporality perspective. For Andean indigenous peoples, the time is not linear or chronological. It happens in Western cultures. For them, for example, the future is behind us, and the past is in front, and that is women carry on their kids, their children, on the back, because children are the future. And the past is in front because in front they find the wisdom of the elders. And the wisdom of the elders are the meanings that can drive the present of our daily lives. So in indigenous cosmologies, the future is not something that will come. It’s something that is linked with past and present, and it changes everything. Because for them, there is no separation between nature and culture. They think and they belong to the mountains, they belong to the lakes, and their ancestors belong to those sources of the land. And it changes the perspective about human rights and international law, for example. And using this kind of framework, the justicia sued the Colombian state because deforestation was increasing in the Amazon region. And we use the concept of future generations in order to stop deforestation. And the Supreme Court ordered an intergenerational pact to stop deforestation in the Amazon region. Nevertheless, after six years of this important ruling, the implementation, in a way, has been a failure, at least in terms of this intergenerational pact. On the one hand, because it is necessary to build a mechanism to drive inter-jurisdictional models between the Colombian states and the indigenous Amazonian peoples. And it has been difficult, so we need to work together to put forward the voice of indigenous peoples in their own terms to understand how future generation pacts should work. And on the other hand, the armed conflict, it is still an issue in Colombia. And unfortunately, the conflict is still going on in the Amazon region, and it has put some difficulties to implement the pact and to stop deforestation. So unfortunately, deforestation is increasing and we don’t have the intergenerational pact.

Thomas Hale: I think it’s a really important example for us to think about, a really innovative case of using law to take indigenous thinking into the heart of modern governance, and then the challenge, the ongoing challenge, of trying to deliver that requiring a deeper transformation of governance systems. So like for many of the things we’re thinking about around future generations, a step forward, but then many more steps to come and a long-term perspective needed to drive the fundamental transformation. Ms. Jelani, can I turn next to you? You are a pioneering lawyer. You founded the first all-woman law firm in Pakistan. You’ve represented the UN as a special representative for human rights defenders. You’re working currently with the elders. You’ve seen these issues change over time, but you’ve also been at the forefront of that change. And yesterday, you and the other elders issued an intergenerational call to action. So how does the future generations declaration, which we’re coming to tomorrow influence the work that you’re doing?

Hina Jilani: Thank you, Thomas, for that question. Let me say, first of all, that when we talk about a declaration on future generations, what springs to my mind immediately is Article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which essentially says that every human being is endowed with reason and conscience. If that belief is true, then I see no reason for hesitation on the implementation of any of the agreed principles and implementation strategies that the Declaration says. If there is hesitation on the part of those that are making decisions and policies that affect the lives of their own people and the global environment, I would regretfully have to say that this belief that all human beings are endowed with reason and a conscience is going to be confounded. I also believe that the transformation that we are talking about and our aspiration to bring about that transformation is really rooted in the respect for human rights, in the recognition that only a rule-based order can propel that change and be able to achieve what are the crisis and critical areas of concern to us today. You’ve spoken about climate change and its effect. I come from a country which is one of the top 10 countries to be affected by climate change. So the effects of climate change for people like me are not in the abstract. They are not just a technical issue for us to deal with or an academic, are not of academic concern. We see things happening to people where displacement, loss of livelihood, loss of life in many cases is so real and is affecting so many of the vulnerable communities. Paulo speaks of indigenous communities. I have seen people who have traditionally been inhabitants of land for centuries having to leave that land, having to leave that way of life because of climate change. We all know what the COVID pandemic did to us and how it has changed our lives. So I do believe that if there is reason, if there is a conscience, and if there is a will to preserve the environment in which we live and to develop the consensus to bring about an environment in the world where dialogue is possible, where it’s important to understand the values of diversity rather than that becoming the reason for division, where intolerance is totally rejected, where people not only talk about tolerating others but have a belief that tolerance will be replaced by accommodation of everyone’s belief, everyone’s culture, everyone’s needs. So these are some of the things that I look forward to. And I think the civil society has a very critical role to play, because these are the people who can not take on governments, but at least create a balance in the power of the state and the voices of the people. And one of my colleagues, one of the other elders, President Santos, from your country, said yesterday that governments understand pressure. The civil society can build that pressure.

Thomas Hale: An important source of action, not just in the world at all, but also for this declaration, which is, as I think the speakers before highlighted, benefited from some of that pressure and ideas. I love how you’ve connected, Mr. Lani, the declaration coming tomorrow to the long history and the fundamental human rights that sit at the center of the multilateral system, and how this is an extension and a deepening and a recognition of how that understanding must evolve as we face problems like climate change and other things that last generation to generation. I want to come back to the panel with a burning point, which is going back to this idea of, how do we unlock the transformation? How do we make this text come to life? How do we breathe life into it, as the Secretary General said? I’m curious what the one action you would like governments to take next. They’re going to sign this thing tomorrow, agree the thing. What should they do the day after? What should they make their top priority? I think there’s many, many ones. But what’s one you would like to see them take forward? I wonder, Abdullahi, if I can come back to you first.

Abdullahi Alim: So I think for me it’s, is it just one? Just your top one. I would say, focus on. For me, it’s always an economic conversation, to be honest. Because if your population is going to double, if it’s going to triple, you’re almost planning for a new country over the next few decades. So think about which sectors are your most competitive and hone in your entire government strategy based on that. That sounds very simple, but it’s actually somewhat difficult to do. Again, I’ll go back to the example of the cashew nut trade in West Africa. I spoke to a young entrepreneur who told me, you know, I export my raw cashew nuts, let’s say, I’m just going to give a hypothetical number, let’s say $1 a kilo. He then sells it to somebody based in another part of the world who has machinery that is able to roast, that is able to salt at scale these nuts, and then sell it for $10. So this person has already lost $9 because they just happen to be based in a part of the world that lacks industrial capacity. So for me, it’s a case where I think each government needs to come to terms with the fact that focus on two or three critical sectors where you think you have growth opportunities. Make sure your roads and transportation authority, your investment authority, your education, like everybody needs to be focused on that one competitive sector because ultimately to protect future generations, you’re going to need money. You’re going to need capital because it’s going to require a lot of infrastructure.

Thomas Hale: And I think your comment is particularly trenchant given the current debt burden that so many future majority countries hold. And so it’s not even about building for the future, it’s also about getting the legacy of the past righted in that sense.

Abdullahi Alim: If you were to give… Sorry, I’m going to be very cheeky. If you were to give a loan to any business anywhere in the world, can I tell you which region in the world you’ll most likely recover your loan is from? It’s sub-Saharan Africa at number one. More so than Europe, more so than Latin America, more so than South Asia. The number one region in the world for loan recovery when it comes to lending to the private sector is sub-Saharan Africa. But still very expensive for us.

Thomas Hale: Fantastic opportunity. The opportunity is really shining through in this Future Generations narrative. Paulo, what’s the one action you would like to see taken?

Paolo Baca: Well, I think that it is very important to make a bridge between the local and the global. I think that countries such as Pakistan or Colombia are suffering the consequences of the climate crisis, but we are not the ones who produce the crisis. So I think that it is important that the wealthier countries, the ones who are producing global warming, acknowledge that, and that acknowledgement is connected with the past of, for example, colonial history, racial and structural discrimination, and of course it is also connected with the generations to come to build a better future for everyone. So I think that we need to move forward from these global forums, which are very important, of course, and go also to the local communities and try to understand these kinds of discussions from their point of view. So it is very important to engage, for example, with peasants, with Afro-descendants, with indigenous peoples, with these sectors who have the knowledge to stop the climate crisis, because they have the biocultural knowledge, for example, in the Amazon, to make sustainable development for future generations and be more open. have been with us, because they have the skills to go, for example, to the course, to the United Nations.

Thomas Hale: Indeed. And your work shows exactly the potential of that. Your work shows how to do that, which I think is so important, because I think many people will say, OK, that’s a really good idea, but how do we do it? And you’ve given us a model in this case that is a work in progress, as you said very clearly, but is a good starting point. So this is a really, I think, practical way forward that you’re articulating. Ms. Jilani, your top wish to see after government sign the Declaration on Future Innovations?

Hina Jilani: Can I just, if you allow me, add to something that Paolo has just said? Look, as a human rights defender, I have always criticized government’s failure to take care of climate consequences and extreme emergencies that happen. But there are times when I pity our governments, because even where there is willingness, the ability to respond is not there. So I do think that globally, we, countries who have almost no carbon footprint, have to be compensated. We have to have enough resources for adaptation, for mitigation, and to respond to the people’s loss of livelihood and other issues that emerge. But coming to your question now, I think my top priority, apart from many others that compete with this one, is governments must ensure that they have a plan to develop communities that demonstrate the power of social connection. One thing I can say as an elder, we may be called the elders. But we don’t think that we are a repository of all wisdom. We have a plan and a policy and a commitment to seeking out the pockets of wisdom where they exist and learning from those. And one of the important things that the elders totally believe in and have a faith in is this intergenerational connection. I think this kind of social connection is critical to ending loneliness, to ending social isolation, bringing about people’s ability to reach out to each other, learn from each other, and in that context also to inform the global environment on what the essential needs are all the time. I’m not going to enumerate all the problems that we have today. But let me say, through this whole policy of social connection, ending isolation, ending loneliness, which is not just a public health issue. It’s an issue of governance, really. By doing that, we can fix it.

Thomas Hale: Well, I think your comments remind me very much of the philosopher Edmund Burke, who said, described society as a pact between the past, the present, and the future. And that is indeed what this declaration is recognizing. And what the fantastic work you each have described is aiming to give life to, to put meaning into those ideas and principles, whether it be economic issues, whether it be the incorporation of indigenous ideas to protect the environment, whether it be fundamental human rights protections. And of course, that’s a perfect framing for our discussions for the rest of today, where we’ll have numerous sessions looking at how we take forward the ideas in the pact overall and how the declaration on future generations can best be implemented. And I think as a final point to add to those discussions, you said it very well, Ms. Jilani. Governments don’t always have the capacities to deliver on these things. And so a key question for us today is what more do we want the multilateral system to be doing to support us, to support governments to deliver on the pact? For example, in the declaration text, there’s an upcoming forum to check in on progress as a report. There’s a noting of the Secretary General’s proposal to appoint a special envoy for future generations. What more support should the multilateral system provide to take forward these ideas is another key part of our discussions today. In conclusion, please join me in thanking our extraordinary panel. Thank you.

Folly Bah Thibault: Thank you all very much. Thank you, Professor Hale. Thank you. That was such a great discussion, great conversation. Thank you all very much for your time here today. A fascinating discussion moderated by Professor Hill. Thank you very much. It’s so inspiring to hear unique voices across sectors and generations who remind us that we all have a role to play in building this future together. With that, Excellencies and Ladies and Gentlemen, we end our opening ceremony. Before leaving, however, we want to show you a summary of the discussions this morning that our visual scribe has been working on diligently in the background, summing up, as you can see there, the main themes addressed this morning. Look at it. Isn’t it great? Please, a round of applause for our visual scribe. Now, as Professor Hill mentioned, our discussions will continue throughout the day and throughout the building, so please make your way now to the other sessions, the main sessions. In conference room four, the sessions on a sustainable future for all will focus on key action areas of sustainable development and financing for development that will deliver on the aspirations of the 2030 Agenda. In the trusteeship chamber, the peaceful future for all session, which will focus on intergenerational dialogue for peace. And in ECOSOC chamber, join us for a digital future for all sessions, which will bring forward looking commitments from all stakeholders to harness innovation, science, and data in a more inclusive, safe, and sustainable manner. And of course, don’t forget to join us for the closing ceremony, everyone, at 5.30 p.m. in ECOSOC as well, where we’ll share our learnings from the day’s interactive and thought-provoking sessions and look towards the next steps in creating our shared future. Thank you all very much. I’ll kindly ask you to please quickly leave the room, because we have another session in place. And, you know, continue your conversations outside and in the other rooms, ECOSOC chamber and the different sessions that we’re having this morning. Thank you all very much. I wish you an excellent day, and see you at 5.30 for our closing ceremony. Thank you very much.

A

António Guterres

Speech speed

119 words per minute

Speech length

858 words

Speech time

430 seconds

Intergenerational solidarity and responsibility

Explanation

Guterres emphasizes the importance of considering future generations in current decision-making. He calls for a shift in thinking to prioritize long-term impacts and shared responsibility across generations.

Evidence

Mention of the Declaration on Future Generations as a key outcome of the Summit of the Future

Major Discussion Point

Declaration on Future Generations

Agreed with

Carole Osero-Ageng’o

Hina Jilani

Agreed on

Importance of intergenerational dialogue and collaboration

Reforming international financial institutions

Explanation

Guterres advocates for reforming international financial institutions to better support sustainable development and climate action. He argues that current systems are inadequate to address contemporary global challenges.

Evidence

Mention of the need to ‘supercharge resources for sustainable development and for climate action’

Major Discussion Point

Reforming Global Systems

Agreed with

Abdullahi Alim

Agreed on

Need for reforming global financial systems

Inclusive and networked multilateralism

Explanation

Guterres calls for a more inclusive and networked form of multilateralism. He emphasizes the need for greater representation of developing countries and stronger links between international institutions and people.

Evidence

Statement: ‘We need multilateralism that is more inclusive, more effective and more networked, with stronger links between international institutions and with the people.’

Major Discussion Point

Reforming Global Systems

A

Andrew Holness

Speech speed

95 words per minute

Speech length

739 words

Speech time

462 seconds

Embedding futures thinking in decision-making

Explanation

Holness emphasizes the importance of incorporating long-term thinking into government decision-making processes. He argues for the need to consider the impacts of current decisions on future generations.

Evidence

Mention of Jamaica’s efforts to invest in anticipatory planning and future-proofing

Major Discussion Point

Declaration on Future Generations

P

Paolo Baca

Speech speed

0 words per minute

Speech length

0 words

Speech time

1 seconds

Bridging local and global perspectives

Explanation

Baca emphasizes the importance of connecting local and global perspectives in addressing climate change and future challenges. He argues for incorporating indigenous knowledge and perspectives into global decision-making processes.

Evidence

Example of the Colombian Supreme Court case involving indigenous communities and deforestation in the Amazon

Major Discussion Point

Declaration on Future Generations

Indigenous perspectives on time and nature

Explanation

Baca highlights how indigenous communities view time and nature differently from Western perspectives. He argues that these alternative worldviews can provide valuable insights for addressing long-term challenges.

Evidence

Description of Andean indigenous peoples’ non-linear concept of time and their relationship with nature

Major Discussion Point

Challenges and Opportunities for Future Generations

H

Hina Jilani

Speech speed

113 words per minute

Speech length

814 words

Speech time

428 seconds

Developing socially connected communities

Explanation

Jilani emphasizes the importance of fostering social connections and ending isolation within communities. She argues that this is crucial for addressing various societal challenges and informing global governance.

Evidence

Statement: ‘I think my top priority, apart from many others that compete with this one, is governments must ensure that they have a plan to develop communities that demonstrate the power of social connection.’

Major Discussion Point

Declaration on Future Generations

Agreed with

António Guterres

Carole Osero-Ageng’o

Agreed on

Importance of intergenerational dialogue and collaboration

Climate change impacts on vulnerable communities

Explanation

Jilani highlights the disproportionate impact of climate change on vulnerable communities, particularly in developing countries. She argues for the need to compensate and support these countries in addressing climate-related challenges.

Evidence

Personal experience from Pakistan, which is among the top 10 countries affected by climate change

Major Discussion Point

Challenges and Opportunities for Future Generations

A

Abdullahi Alim

Speech speed

181 words per minute

Speech length

1042 words

Speech time

344 seconds

Population growth and economic development in Africa

Explanation

Alim discusses the rapid population growth expected in Africa and the need for commensurate economic development. He argues for strategic investments in key competitive sectors to drive economic growth and improve living standards.

Evidence

Projection of 1 billion Africans to be born in the next generation, and 3-4 billion by the end of the century

Major Discussion Point

Challenges and Opportunities for Future Generations

Debt burdens and financing for developing countries

Explanation

Alim highlights the challenges of debt and financing for African countries. He argues for restructuring debt measurement and improving access to affordable financing for development.

Evidence

Statement that debt in Africa is four times more expensive than elsewhere in the world

Major Discussion Point

Challenges and Opportunities for Future Generations

Agreed with

António Guterres

Agreed on

Need for reforming global financial systems

Restructuring debt measurement for African countries

Explanation

Alim advocates for reforming how debt is measured and managed for African countries. He argues that current systems disadvantage African nations and hinder their economic development.

Evidence

Mention of debt restructuring as one of three main priorities identified in consultations with African leaders

Major Discussion Point

Reforming Global Systems

Agreed with

António Guterres

Agreed on

Need for reforming global financial systems

Supporting progressive young political voices

Explanation

Alim emphasizes the importance of supporting and training young, progressive political voices in Africa. He argues that this is crucial for preparing future leaders to address long-term challenges.

Evidence

Mention of backing and training young progressive political voices as part of the Africa Future Fund’s activities

Major Discussion Point

Youth Engagement and Empowerment

Agreed with

Saumya Aggarwal

Agreed on

Importance of youth participation in decision-making

S

Saumya Aggarwal

Speech speed

120 words per minute

Speech length

686 words

Speech time

342 seconds

Meaningful youth participation in policymaking

Explanation

Aggarwal advocates for the inclusion of youth in decision-making processes at various levels of governance. She argues that young people must be part of policymaking to ensure their perspectives are considered in shaping the future.

Evidence

Call for establishing national youth consultative bodies and including youth in foreign and national policy-making

Major Discussion Point

Youth Engagement and Empowerment

Agreed with

Abdullahi Alim

Agreed on

Importance of youth participation in decision-making

Investing in youth-led solutions and organizations

Explanation

Aggarwal calls for increased financial support and resources for youth-led organizations and initiatives. She argues that this is crucial for enabling young people to develop and implement innovative solutions to global challenges.

Evidence

Recommendation to allocate flexible, accessible, and sustainable financial support for adolescent-led and youth-led organizations

Major Discussion Point

Youth Engagement and Empowerment

C

Carole Osero-Ageng’o

Speech speed

126 words per minute

Speech length

518 words

Speech time

245 seconds

Intergenerational dialogue and collaboration

Explanation

Osero-Ageng’o emphasizes the importance of fostering dialogue and collaboration between different generations. She argues that this approach is crucial for addressing complex global issues and creating sustainable solutions.

Evidence

Reference to intergenerational activities at the conference and the need to reframe the narrative on aging

Major Discussion Point

Youth Engagement and Empowerment

Agreed with

António Guterres

Hina Jilani

Agreed on

Importance of intergenerational dialogue and collaboration

O

Oli Henman

Speech speed

168 words per minute

Speech length

768 words

Speech time

273 seconds

Strengthening UN human rights mechanisms

Explanation

Henman calls for strengthening the human rights pillar of the UN and improving its implementation at the country level. He argues that this is essential for protecting and enhancing rights globally.

Evidence

Call for ‘accelerating support for the human rights pillar of the UN and forging clearer links at the country level with resident coordinator teams’

Major Discussion Point

Reforming Global Systems

Agreements

Agreement Points

Importance of intergenerational dialogue and collaboration

Speakers

António Guterres

Carole Osero-Ageng’o

Hina Jilani

Arguments

Intergenerational solidarity and responsibility

Intergenerational dialogue and collaboration

Developing socially connected communities

Summary

These speakers emphasized the need for collaboration and dialogue across generations to address global challenges and create sustainable solutions.

Need for reforming global financial systems

Speakers

António Guterres

Abdullahi Alim

Arguments

Reforming international financial institutions

Debt burdens and financing for developing countries

Restructuring debt measurement for African countries

Summary

Both speakers highlighted the importance of reforming international financial institutions and debt structures to better support developing countries, particularly in Africa.

Importance of youth participation in decision-making

Speakers

Saumya Aggarwal

Abdullahi Alim

Arguments

Meaningful youth participation in policymaking

Supporting progressive young political voices

Summary

These speakers advocated for increased youth involvement in policy-making processes and leadership roles to shape the future.

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers emphasized the disproportionate impact of climate change on vulnerable communities and the need to incorporate local perspectives in global decision-making.

Speakers

Paolo Baca

Hina Jilani

Arguments

Bridging local and global perspectives

Climate change impacts on vulnerable communities

Unexpected Consensus

Importance of indigenous knowledge in addressing global challenges

Speakers

Paolo Baca

António Guterres

Arguments

Indigenous perspectives on time and nature

Inclusive and networked multilateralism

Explanation

While not explicitly stated by Guterres, his call for more inclusive multilateralism aligns with Baca’s emphasis on incorporating indigenous perspectives, suggesting an unexpected consensus on the value of diverse knowledge systems in global governance.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of agreement include the importance of intergenerational collaboration, the need for financial system reforms, increased youth participation in decision-making, and the recognition of diverse perspectives in addressing global challenges.

Consensus level

There is a moderate to high level of consensus among the speakers on these key issues. This suggests a shared understanding of the critical challenges facing future generations and the need for inclusive, collaborative approaches to address them. The implications of this consensus could lead to more coordinated efforts in implementing the Declaration on Future Generations and related initiatives.

Disagreements

Disagreement Points

Approach to addressing climate change impacts

Speakers

Hina Jilani

Paolo Baca

Arguments

Jilani highlights the disproportionate impact of climate change on vulnerable communities, particularly in developing countries. She argues for the need to compensate and support these countries in addressing climate-related challenges.

Baca emphasizes the importance of connecting local and global perspectives in addressing climate change and future challenges. He argues for incorporating indigenous knowledge and perspectives into global decision-making processes.

Summary

While both speakers acknowledge the importance of addressing climate change, they differ in their proposed approaches. Jilani focuses on compensation and support for vulnerable countries, while Baca emphasizes the incorporation of indigenous knowledge and local perspectives.

Overall Assessment

Summary

The main areas of disagreement among the speakers were primarily related to specific approaches and focus areas in addressing global challenges, rather than fundamental disagreements on core issues.

Disagreement level

The level of disagreement among the speakers was relatively low. Most speakers shared similar overarching goals related to sustainable development, addressing climate change, and improving global governance systems. The differences were mainly in the specific strategies or areas of emphasis each speaker prioritized based on their expertise and regional perspectives. This low level of disagreement suggests a general consensus on the importance of considering future generations and the need for systemic reforms, which could facilitate more unified action on these issues.

Partial Agreements

Partial Agreements

All three speakers agree on the need for reform in global financial and decision-making systems to better address future challenges. However, they differ in their specific focus areas: Guterres emphasizes reforming international financial institutions, Holness focuses on incorporating long-term thinking in government processes, and Alim specifically addresses debt measurement for African countries.

Speakers

António Guterres

Andrew Holness

Abdullahi Alim

Arguments

Guterres advocates for reforming international financial institutions to better support sustainable development and climate action. He argues that current systems are inadequate to address contemporary global challenges.

Holness emphasizes the importance of incorporating long-term thinking into government decision-making processes. He argues for the need to consider the impacts of current decisions on future generations.

Alim advocates for reforming how debt is measured and managed for African countries. He argues that current systems disadvantage African nations and hinder their economic development.

Similar Viewpoints

Both speakers emphasized the disproportionate impact of climate change on vulnerable communities and the need to incorporate local perspectives in global decision-making.

Speakers

Paolo Baca

Hina Jilani

Arguments

Bridging local and global perspectives

Climate change impacts on vulnerable communities

Takeaways

Key Takeaways

The Declaration on Future Generations aims to ensure the rights and interests of future generations are at the heart of global decision-making

There is a need for intergenerational solidarity and responsibility in addressing global challenges like climate change

Youth engagement and empowerment is critical for shaping a better future

Reforms are needed in global systems like the UN Security Council and international financial institutions to better serve future generations

Indigenous and local perspectives are valuable for sustainable development and addressing climate change

Economic development and industrialization in Africa presents both challenges and opportunities for future generations

Resolutions and Action Items

Governments should develop plans to foster socially connected communities

Countries should focus on developing their most competitive economic sectors to drive growth

Wealthier countries should provide compensation and resources to developing countries facing climate impacts

The UN should appoint a Special Envoy for Future Generations

An upcoming forum will be held to check on progress of implementing the Declaration

Unresolved Issues

How to effectively implement the intergenerational pact ordered by Colombia’s Supreme Court to stop deforestation

Specific mechanisms for reforming international financial institutions

How to balance rapid population growth in Africa with sustainable development

Concrete steps for meaningful youth inclusion in policymaking processes

Suggested Compromises

Balancing economic growth and industrialization with staying within ecological boundaries

Combining global frameworks with local and indigenous knowledge and practices

Integrating perspectives of both older and younger generations in decision-making

Thought Provoking Comments

We need multilateralism that is more inclusive, more effective and more networked, with stronger links between international institutions and with the people. That means greater representation in developing countries, and it means a stronger voice for all of you and what you represent.

Speaker

António Guterres

Reason

This comment highlights the need for a fundamental shift in how global governance operates, emphasizing inclusivity and stronger connections between institutions and people.

Impact

It set the tone for the subsequent discussions on reforming multilateral institutions and including diverse voices in decision-making processes.

One billion Africans will be born in the next generation alone, and I think by the close of this century, you can expect about three to four billion total more Africans to be born. When you think of the mega cities of the future, it’ll be cities like Lagos, cities like Dar es Salaam, cities like Mogadishu, where I was born.

Speaker

Abdullahi Alim

Reason

This comment provides a striking perspective on demographic shifts and urbanization in Africa, highlighting the continent’s growing importance in shaping the global future.

Impact

It shifted the conversation to focus more on the specific challenges and opportunities facing Africa, and the need for targeted strategies to support sustainable development in rapidly growing regions.

For Andean indigenous peoples, the time is not linear or chronological. It happens in Western cultures. For them, for example, the future is behind us, and the past is in front, and that is women carry on their kids, their children, on the back, because children are the future. And the past is in front because in front they find the wisdom of the elders.

Speaker

Paolo Baca

Reason

This comment introduces a fundamentally different cultural perspective on time and generations, challenging Western assumptions about the relationship between past, present, and future.

Impact

It broadened the discussion to include non-Western perspectives on intergenerational relationships and responsibility, encouraging participants to think beyond conventional frameworks.

I think my top priority, apart from many others that compete with this one, is governments must ensure that they have a plan to develop communities that demonstrate the power of social connection.

Speaker

Hina Jilani

Reason

This comment shifts the focus from abstract policy discussions to the importance of building strong, connected communities as a foundation for addressing future challenges.

Impact

It introduced a more human-centered perspective to the discussion, emphasizing the role of social cohesion in creating resilient societies capable of addressing long-term challenges.

Overall Assessment

These key comments shaped the discussion by broadening its scope beyond traditional policy frameworks. They introduced diverse cultural perspectives, highlighted the specific challenges facing regions like Africa, and emphasized the importance of social connection and community-building. This led to a more nuanced and inclusive conversation about how to address long-term global challenges, incorporating voices and viewpoints from various sectors and cultures. The discussion evolved from abstract policy talk to considering practical, human-centered approaches to building a sustainable and equitable future for all generations.

Follow-up Questions

How can we reform international financial institutions to provide better access to financing for developing countries?

Speaker

Andrew Holness

Explanation

This is important to address capacity limitations of developing states in dealing with multidimensional challenges like climate change and debt sustainability.

What mechanisms can be developed to drive inter-jurisdictional models between national governments and indigenous peoples?

Speaker

Paolo Baca

Explanation

This is crucial for implementing intergenerational pacts and stopping deforestation in regions like the Amazon.

How can we restructure the way debt is measured and managed in Africa?

Speaker

Abdullahi Alim

Explanation

This is important because debt in Africa is primarily owned by the private sector and is significantly more expensive than in other parts of the world.

What strategies can be employed to advance export-oriented industrial policies in African countries?

Speaker

Abdullahi Alim

Explanation

This is crucial for increasing African countries’ gains in global supply chains and fostering economic development.

How can we create an intergenerational dialogue platform to ensure long-term thinking and planning in governance structures?

Speaker

Saumya Aggarwal

Explanation

This is important for incorporating youth perspectives in policymaking and decision-making processes.

What concrete actions can be taken to embed futures thinking in decision-making processes across national and local governments?

Speaker

Andrew Holness

Explanation

This is crucial for effective implementation of the Declaration on Future Generations and other global frameworks.

How can we develop communities that demonstrate the power of social connection to address issues like loneliness and social isolation?

Speaker

Hina Jilani

Explanation

This is important for fostering intergenerational connections and informing global governance on essential needs.

Disclaimer: This is not an official record of the session. The DiploAI system automatically generates these resources from the audiovisual recording. Resources are presented in their original format, as provided by the AI (e.g. including any spelling mistakes). The accuracy of these resources cannot be guaranteed.

Eutelsat to use Mitsubishi’s H3 rockets for future satellite launches

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has secured a significant deal to provide H3 rocket launches for French satellite company Eutelsat from 2027. This agreement marks a major step forward for Japan’s H3 project, backed by a $1.5 billion investment, aiming to expand its presence internationally. Eutelsat, the world’s third-largest satellite operator by revenue, is the second foreign client to choose H3 rockets after Britain’s Inmarsat.

The H3 project, following its first successful flight earlier this year, aims to reduce launch costs to $33 million per mission and increase the number of annual launches to ten. Rising global demand for commercial rockets has made the competitive pricing of H3 appealing. Japan hopes to position H3 as a flagship rocket for its satellite and exploration missions.

After merging with OneWeb, Eutelsat now competes directly with SpaceX’s Starlink in the low-earth orbit communications market. The global satellite sector is intensifying, with other major players such as Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin, Boeing-Lockheed’s Vulcan, and Europe’s Ariane 6 also preparing for launches.

MHI’s strategy to make the H3 rocket more competitive reflects growing global interest in space exploration and communications. Japan’s ambitions with H3 align with the increasing number of companies seeking to expand satellite fleets, driven by surging demand for internet connectivity.